Flowering plant

"Flowering Plants" redirects here. For the book by G. Ledyard Stebbins, see Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level.

Flowering plants are plants that bear flowers and fruits, and form the clade Angiospermae (/ˌændʒiəˈspərmiː/),^[5][6] commonly called angiosperms. The term "angiosperm" is derived from the Greek words ἀγγεῖον /angeion ('container, vessel') and σπέρμα / sperma ('seed'), and refers to those plants that produce their seeds enclosed within a fruit. They are by far the most diverse group of land plants with 64 orders, 416 families, approximately 13,000 known genera and 300,000 known species.^[7] Angiosperms were formerly called Magnoliophyta (/mæɡˌnoʊliˈɒfətə, -əˈfaɪtə/).^[8]

Flowering plant Temporal range: Cretaceous (Late Valanginian) – present, 134–0 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Diversity of angiosperms
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Plantae
Clade:	Tracheophytes
Clade:	Spermatophytes
Clade:	Angiosperms
Groups (APG IV)^[1]
Basal angiosperms Amborellales Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales Core angiosperms Clades Magnoliids Monocots Eudicots Orders Chloranthales Ceratophyllales
Synonyms
Anthophyta Cronquist^[2] Angiospermae Lindl. Magnoliophyta Cronquist, Takht. & W.Zimm.^[3] Magnolicae Takht.^[4]

Like gymnosperms, angiosperms are seed-producing plants. They are distinguished from gymnosperms by characteristics including flowers, endosperm within their seeds, and the production of fruits that contain the seeds.

The ancestors of flowering plants diverged from the common ancestor of all living gymnosperms before the end of the Carboniferous, over 300 million years ago. The origin and closest fossil relatives of flowering plants are uncertain and contentious. The earliest angiosperm fossils are in the form of pollen around 134 million years ago during the Early Cretaceous. Over the course of the Cretaceous, angiosperms diversified explosively, becoming the dominant group of plants across the planet by the end of the period, corresponding with the decline and extinction of previously widespread gymnosperm groups.

Description

 

Chamaenerion angustifolium, also known as fireweed or rosebay willowherb, is a flowering plant in the willowherb family Onagraceae.

Angiosperm derived characteristics

Angiosperms differ from other seed plants in several ways, described in the table below. These distinguishing characteristics taken together have made the angiosperms the most diverse and numerous land plants, and the most commercially important group to humans.^[a]

Distinctive features of angiosperms

Feature	Description
Flowering organs	Flowers, the reproductive organs of flowering plants, are the most remarkable feature distinguishing them from the other seed plants. Flowers provided angiosperms with the means to have a more species-specific breeding system, and hence a way to evolve more readily into different species without the risk of crossing back with related species. Faster speciation enabled the angiosperms to adapt to a wider range of ecological niches. This has allowed flowering plants to largely dominate terrestrial ecosystems, comprising about 90 percent of all plant species.^[9]
Stamens with two pairs of pollen sacs	Stamens are much lighter than the corresponding organs of gymnosperms and have contributed to the diversification of angiosperms through time with adaptations to specialised pollination syndromes, such as particular pollinators. Stamens have also become modified through time to prevent self-fertilization in many plants, which has permitted further diversification, allowing angiosperms eventually to fill more niches.
Reduced male gametophyte, three cells	The male gametophyte in angiosperms, is reduced in size compared to those of gymnosperms.^[10] The gametophyte, called pollen, produces the male gametes.^[11] The smaller size of the pollen reduces the amount of time between pollination (the pollen grain reaching the female plant) and fertilization. In gymnosperms, fertilization can occur up to a year after pollination, whereas in angiosperms, fertilization begins very soon after pollination.^[12] The shorter amount of time between pollination and fertilization allows angiosperms to produce seeds earlier after pollination than gymnosperms, providing angiosperms a distinct evolutionary advantage.
Closed carpel enclosing the ovules (carpel or carpels and accessory parts may become the fruit)	The closed carpel of angiosperms also allows adaptations to specialised pollination syndromes and controls. This helps to prevent self-fertilization, thereby maintaining increased diversity. Once the ovary is fertilised, the carpel and some surrounding tissues develop into a fruit. This fruit often serves as an attractant to seed-dispersing animals. The resulting cooperative relationship presents another advantage to angiosperms in the process of dispersal.
Reduced female gametophyte, seven cells with eight nuclei	The reduced female gametophyte, like the reduced male gametophyte, may be an adaptation allowing for more rapid seed set,^[citation needed] eventually leading to such flowering plant adaptations as annual herbaceous life-cycles, allowing the flowering plants to fill even more niches.
Endosperm	In general, endosperm formation begins after fertilization and before the first division of the zygote. Endosperm is a highly nutritive tissue that can provide food for the developing embryo, the cotyledons, and sometimes the seedling when it first appears.

Vascular anatomy

 

Cross-section of a stem of the angiosperm flax:
1. pith, 2. protoxylem, 3. xylem, 4. phloem, 5. sclerenchyma (bast fibre), 6. cortex, 7. epidermis

Angiosperm stems are made up of seven layers as shown on the right. The amount and complexity of tissue-formation in flowering plants exceeds that of gymnosperms.

In the dicotyledons, the vascular bundles of the stem are arranged such that the xylem and phloem form concentric rings.^[13] The bundles in the very young stem are arranged in an open ring, separating a central pith from an outer cortex. In each bundle, separating the xylem and phloem, is a layer of meristem or active formative tissue known as cambium. By the formation of a layer of cambium between the bundles (interfascicular cambium), a complete ring is formed, and a regular periodical increase in thickness results from the development of xylem on the inside and phloem on the outside. The soft phloem becomes crushed, but the hard wood persists and forms the bulk of the stem and branches of the woody perennial. Owing to differences in the character of the elements produced at the beginning and end of the season, the wood is marked out in transverse section into concentric rings, one for each season of growth, called annual rings.^[14]

Among the monocotyledons, the bundles are more numerous in the young stem and are scattered through the ground tissue. They contain no cambium and once formed the stem increases in diameter only in exceptional cases.^[14]

Reproductive anatomy

Main articles: Flower and Plant reproductive morphology

 

A collection of flowers forming an inflorescence.

The characteristic feature of angiosperms is the flower. Flowers show remarkable variation in form and elaboration, and provide the most trustworthy external characteristics for establishing relationships among angiosperm species. The function of the flower is to ensure fertilization of the ovule and development of fruit containing seeds.^[15] The floral apparatus may arise terminally on a shoot or from the axil of a leaf (where the petiole attaches to the stem).^{[citation needed]} Occasionally, as in violets, a flower arises singly in the axil of an ordinary foliage-leaf. More typically, the flower-bearing portion of the plant is sharply distinguished from the foliage-bearing or vegetative portion, and forms a more or less elaborate branch-system called an inflorescence.^[14]

There are two kinds of reproductive cells produced by flowers. Microspores, which will divide to become pollen grains, are the "male" cells and are borne in the stamens (or microsporophylls).^[16] The "female" cells called megaspores, which will divide to become the egg cell (megagametogenesis), are contained in the ovule and enclosed in the carpel (or megasporophyll).^[16]

The flower may consist only of these parts, as in willow, where each flower comprises only a few stamens or two carpels.^[14] Usually, other structures are present and serve to protect the sporophylls and to form an envelope attractive to pollinators. The individual members of these surrounding structures are known as sepals and petals (or tepals in flowers such as Magnolia where sepals and petals are not distinguishable from each other). The outer series (calyx of sepals) is usually green and leaf-like, and functions to protect the rest of the flower, especially the bud. The inner series (corolla of petals) is, in general, white or brightly colored, and is more delicate in structure. It functions to attract insect or bird pollinators. Attraction is effected by color, scent, and nectar, which may be secreted in some part of the flower. The characteristics that attract pollinators account for the popularity of flowers and flowering plants among humans.^{[citation needed]}

While the majority of flowers are perfect or hermaphrodite (having both pollen and ovule producing parts in the same flower structure), flowering plants have developed numerous morphological and physiological mechanisms to reduce or prevent self-fertilization. Heteromorphic flowers have short carpels and long stamens, or vice versa, so animal pollinators cannot easily transfer pollen to the pistil (receptive part of the carpel). Homomorphic flowers may employ a biochemical (physiological) mechanism called self-incompatibility to discriminate between self and non-self pollen grains. Alternatively, in dioecious species, the male and female parts are morphologically separated, developing on different individual flowers.^[17]

Taxonomy

History of classification

 

From 1736, an illustration of Linnaean classification

The botanical term "angiosperm", from Greek words angeíon (ἀγγεῖον 'bottle, vessel') and spérma (σπέρμα 'seed'), was coined in the form "Angiospermae" by Paul Hermann in 1690 but he used this term to refer to a group of plants which form only a subset of what today are known as angiosperms. Hermannn's Angiospermae including only flowering plants possessing seeds enclosed in capsules, distinguished from his Gymnospermae, which were flowering plants with achenial or schizo-carpic fruits, the whole fruit or each of its pieces being here regarded as a seed and naked. The terms Angiospermae and Gymnospermae were used by Carl Linnaeus with the same sense, but with restricted application, in the names of the orders of his class Didynamia.^[18]

The terms angiosperms and gymnosperm fundamentally changed in meaning in 1827 when Robert Brown established the existence of truly naked ovules in the Cycadeae and Coniferae.^[19] The term gymnosperm was from then on applied to seed plants with naked ovules, and the term angiosperm to seed plants with enclosed ovules. However, for many years after Brown's discovery, the primary division of the seed plants was seen as between monocots and dicots, with gymnosperms as a small subset of the dicots.^[20]

 

An auxanometer, a device for measuring increase or rate of growth in plants

In 1851, Hofmeister discovered the changes occurring in the embryo-sac of flowering plants, and determined the correct relationships of these to the Cryptogamia. This fixed the position of Gymnosperms as a class distinct from Dicotyledons, and the term Angiosperm then gradually came to be accepted as the suitable designation for the whole of the flowering plants other than Gymnosperms, including the classes of Dicotyledons and Monocotyledons.^[20] This is the sense in which the term is used today.^[14]

In most taxonomies, the flowering plants are treated as a coherent group. The most popular descriptive name has been Angiospermae, with Anthophyta (lit. 'flower-plants') a second choice (both unranked). The Wettstein system and Engler system treated them as a subdivision (Angiospermae). The Reveal system also treated them as a subdivision (Magnoliophytina),^[21] but later split it to Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida, and Rosopsida. The Takhtajan system and Cronquist system treat them as a division (Magnoliophyta).^{[citation needed]} The Dahlgren system and Thorne system (1992) treat them as a class (Magnoliopsida). The APG system of 1998, and the later 2003^[22] and 2009^[23] revisions, treat the flowering plants as an unranked clade without a formal Latin name (angiosperms). A formal classification was published alongside the 2009 revision in which the flowering plants rank as a subclass (Magnoliidae).^[24]

The internal classification of this group has undergone considerable revision. The Cronquist system, proposed by Arthur Cronquist in 1968 and published in its full form in 1981, is still widely used but is no longer believed to accurately reflect phylogeny. A consensus about how the flowering plants should be arranged has recently begun to emerge through the work of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG), which published an influential reclassification of the angiosperms in 1998. Updates incorporating more recent research were published as the APG II system in 2003,^[22] the APG III system in 2009,^[23][25] and the APG IV system in 2016.

Traditionally, the flowering plants are divided into two groups,

• Dicotyledoneae or Magnoliopsida
• Monocotyledoneae or Liliopsida

to which the Cronquist system ascribes the classes Magnoliopsida (from "Magnoliaceae") and Liliopsida (from "Liliaceae"). Other descriptive names allowed by Article 16 of the ICBN include Dicotyledones or Dicotyledoneae, and Monocotyledones or Monocotyledoneae, which have a long history of use. In plain English, their members may be called "dicotyledons" ("dicots") and "monocotyledons" ("monocots"). The Latin behind these names refers the observation that the dicots most often have two cotyledons, or embryonic leaves, within each seed. The monocots usually have only one, but the rule is not absolute either way. From a broad diagnostic point of view, the number of cotyledons is neither a particularly handy, nor a reliable character.^{[citation needed]}

Recent studies, as by the APG, show that the monocots form a monophyletic group (a clade) but that the dicots are paraphyletic. Nevertheless, the majority of dicot species fall into a clade, the eudicots or tricolpates, and most of the remaining fall into another major clade, the magnoliids, containing about 9,000 species. The rest include a paraphyletic grouping of early branching taxa known collectively as the basal angiosperms, plus the families Ceratophyllaceae and Chloranthaceae.^{[citation needed]}

Modern classification

 

Monocot (left) and dicot seedlings

There are eight groups of living angiosperms:

• Basal angiosperms (ANA: Amborella, Nymphaeales, Austrobaileyales)
  • Amborella, a single species of shrub from New Caledonia;
  • Nymphaeales, about 80 species,^[26] water lilies and Hydatellaceae;
  • Austrobaileyales, about 100 species^[26] of woody plants from various parts of the world
• Core angiosperms (Mesangiospermae)^[24]
  • Chloranthales, 77 known species^[27] of aromatic plants with toothed leaves;
  • Magnoliids, about 10,000 species,^[26] characterised by trimerous flowers, pollen with one pore, and usually branching-veined leaves—for example magnolias, bay laurel, and black pepper;
  • Monocots, about 70,000 species,^[28] characterised by trimerous flowers, a single cotyledon, pollen with one pore, and usually parallel-veined leaves—for example grasses, orchids, and palms;
  • Ceratophyllum, about 6 species^[26] of aquatic plants, perhaps most familiar as aquarium plants;
  • Eudicots, about 175,000 species,^[26] characterised by 4- or 5-merous flowers, pollen with three pores, and usually branching-veined leaves—for example sunflowers, petunia, buttercup, apples, and oaks.

The exact relationships among these eight groups is not yet clear, although there is agreement that the first three groups to diverge from the ancestral angiosperm were Amborellales, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyales (basal angiosperms)^[29] Of the remaining five groups (core angiosperms), the relationships among the three broadest groups remains unclear (magnoliids, monocots, and eudicots). Zeng and colleagues (Fig. 1) describe four competing schemes.^{[30][clarification needed]}The eudicots and monocots are the largest and most diversified, with ~ 75% and 20% of angiosperm species, respectively. Some analyses make the magnoliids the first to diverge, others the monocots.^[31] Ceratophyllum seems to group with the eudicots rather than with the monocots. The APG IV retained the overall higher order relationship described in APG III.^[23]

1. Phylogeny of the flowering plants, as of APG III (2009).^[23]

angiosperms Amborella Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales magnoliids Chloranthales monocots Ceratophyllum eudicots

2. Example of alternative phylogeny (2010)^[31]

angiosperms Amborella Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales monocots Chloranthales magnoliids Ceratophyllum eudicots

3. APG IV (2016)^[1]

angiosperms Amborellales Nymphaeales Austrobaileyales magnoliids Chloranthales monocots Ceratophyllales  eudicots basal angiosperms    (ANA group) core angiosperms

Detailed Cladogram of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) IV classification.^[1]

Angiosperms Amborellales Melikyan, Bobrov & Zaytzeva 1999 Nymphaeales Salisbury ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Austrobaileyales Takhtajan ex Reveal 1992 Mesangiosperms Chloranthales Mart. 1835 Magnoliids Canellales Cronquist 1957 Piperales von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Magnoliales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Laurales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Monocots Acorales Link 1835 Alismatales Brown ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Petrosaviales Takhtajan 1997 Dioscoreales Brown 1835 Pandanales Brown ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Liliales Perleb 1826 Asparagales Link 1829 Commelinids Arecales Bromhead 1840 Poales Small 1903 Zingiberales Grisebach 1854 Commelinales de Mirbel ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Ceratophyllales Link 1829 Eudicots Ranunculales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Proteales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Trochodendrales Takhtajan ex Cronquist 1981 Buxales Takhtajan ex Reveal 1996 Core eudicots Gunnerales Takhtajan ex Reveal 1992 Dilleniales de Candolle ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Superrosids Saxifragales von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Rosids Vitales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Fabids Zygophyllales Link 1829 Celastrales Link 1829 Oxalidales von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Malpighiales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Fabales Bromhead 1838 Rosales von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Cucurbitales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Fagales Engler 1892 (eurosids I) Malvids Geraniales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Myrtales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Crossosomatales Takhtajan ex Reveal 1993 Picramniales Doweld 2001 Sapindales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Huerteales Doweld 2001 Malvales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Brassicales Bromhead 1838 (eurosids II) Superasterids Berberidopsidales Doweld 2001 Santalales Brown ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Caryophyllales Asterids Cornales Link 1829 Ericales von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Lamiids Icacinales Van Tieghem 1900 Metteniusales Takhtajan 1997 Garryales Mart. 1835 Gentianales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Solanales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Boraginales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 Vahliales Doweld 2001 Lamiales Bromhead 1838 (euasterids I) Campanulids Aquifoliales Senft 1856 Escalloniales Mart. 1835 Asterales Link 1829 Bruniales Dumortier 1829 Apiales Nakai 1930 Paracryphiales Takhtajan ex Reveal 1992 Dipsacales de Jussieu ex von Berchtold & Presl 1820 (euasterids II)

Evolutionary history

Further information: Evolutionary history of plants § Flowers

Paleozoic

Fossilised spores suggest that land plants (embryophytes) have existed for at least 475 million years.^[32] Early land plants reproduced sexually with flagellated, swimming sperm, like the green algae from which they evolved.^{[citation needed]} An adaptation to terrestrial life was the development of upright sporangia for dispersal by spores to new habitats.^{[citation needed]} This feature is lacking in the descendants of their nearest algal relatives, the Charophycean green algae. A later terrestrial adaptation took place with retention of the delicate, avascular sexual stage, the gametophyte, within the tissues of the vascular sporophyte.^{[citation needed]} This occurred by spore germination within sporangia rather than spore release, as in non-seed plants. A current example of how this might have happened can be seen in the precocious spore germination in Selaginella, the spike-moss. The result for the ancestors of angiosperms and gymnosperms was enclosing the female gamete in a case, the seed. The first seed-bearing plants were gymnosperms, like the ginkgo, and conifers (such as pines and firs). These did not produce flowers. The pollen grains (male gametophytes) of Ginkgo and cycads produce a pair of flagellated, mobile sperm cells that "swim" down the developing pollen tube to the female and her eggs.

Angiosperms appear suddenly and in great diversity in the fossil record in the Early Cretaceous.^[33] This poses such a problem for the theory of gradual evolution that Charles Darwin called it an "abominable mystery".^[34] Several groups of extinct gymnosperms, in particular seed ferns, have been proposed as the ancestors of flowering plants, but there is no continuous fossil evidence showing how flowers evolved, and botanists still regard the issue as unsolved.^[35]

Several claims of pre-Cretaceous angiosperm fossils have been made, such as the upper Triassic Sanmiguelia lewisi, but none of these are widely accepted by paleobotanists.^[36] Oleanane, a secondary metabolite produced by many flowering plants, has been found in Permian deposits of that age together with fossils of gigantopterids.^[37][38] Gigantopterids are a group of extinct seed plants that share many morphological traits with flowering plants, although they are not known to have been flowering plants themselves.^[39] Molecular evidence suggests that the ancestors of angiosperms diverged from the gymnosperms during the late Devonian, about 365 million years ago, despite only appearing in the fossil record during the Early Cretaceous, almost two hundred million years later.^[40]

Triassic and Jurassic

Based on fossil evidence, some have proposed that the ancestors of the angiosperms diverged from an unknown group of gymnosperms in the Triassic period (245–202 million years ago). Fossil angiosperm-like pollen from the Middle Triassic (247.2–242.0 Ma) suggests an older date for their origin, which is further supported by genetic evidence of the ancestors of angiosperms diverging during the Devonian.^[40][41] A close relationship between angiosperms and gnetophytes, proposed on the basis of morphological evidence, has more recently been disputed on the basis of molecular evidence that suggest gnetophytes are instead more closely related to conifers and other gymnosperms.^[42][43]

The fossil plant species Nanjinganthus dendrostyla from Early Jurassic China seems to share many exclusively angiosperm features, such as a thickened receptacle with ovules, and thus might represent a crown-group or a stem-group angiosperm.^[44] However, these have been disputed by other researchers, who contend that the structures are misinterpreted decomposed conifer cones.^[45][46]

The evolution of seed plants and later angiosperms appears to be the result of two distinct rounds of whole genome duplication events.^[47] These occurred at 319 million years ago and 192 million years ago. Another possible whole genome duplication event at 160 million years ago perhaps created the ancestral line that led to all modern flowering plants.^[48] That event was studied by sequencing the genome of an ancient flowering plant, Amborella trichopoda.^[49]

One study has suggested that the early-middle Jurassic plant Schmeissneria, traditionally considered a type of ginkgo, may be the earliest known angiosperm, or at least a close relative.^[50] This, along with all other pre-Cretaceous angiosperm fossil claims, is strongly disputed by many paleobotanists.^[33][36]

Many paleobotanists consider the Caytoniales, a group of "seed ferns" that first appeared during the Triassic and went extinct in the Cretaceous, to be amongst the best candidates for a close relative of angiosperms.^[51]

Cretaceous

Whereas the earth had previously been dominated by ferns and conifers, angiosperms quickly spread during the Cretaceous. They now comprise about 90% of all plant species including most food crops.^[52] It has been proposed that the swift rise of angiosperms to dominance was facilitated by a reduction in their genome size. During the early Cretaceous period, only angiosperms underwent rapid genome downsizing, while genome sizes of ferns and gymnosperms remained unchanged. Smaller genomes—and smaller nuclei—allow for faster rates of cell division and smaller cells. Thus, species with smaller genomes can pack more, smaller cells—in particular veins and stomata^[53]—into a given leaf volume. Genome downsizing therefore facilitated higher rates of leaf gas exchange (transpiration and photosynthesis) and faster rates of growth. This would have countered some of the negative physiological effects of genome duplications, facilitated increased uptake of carbon dioxide despite concurrent declines in atmospheric CO₂ concentrations, and allowed the flowering plants to outcompete other land plants.^[54]

The oldest known fossils definitively attributable to angiosperms are reticulated monosulcate pollen from the late Valanginian (Early or Lower Cretaceous - 140 to 133 million years ago) of Italy and Israel, likely representative of the basal angiosperm grade.^[45]

The earliest known macrofossil confidently identified as an angiosperm, Archaefructus liaoningensis, is dated to about 125 million years BP (the Cretaceous period),^[55] whereas pollen considered to be of angiosperm origin takes the fossil record back to about 130 million years BP,^[33] with Montsechia representing the earliest flower at that time.^[56]

 

Adaptive radiation in the Cretaceous created many flowering plants, such as Sagaria in the Ranunculaceae.

In 2013 flowers encased in amber were found and dated 100 million years before present. The amber had frozen the act of sexual reproduction in the process of taking place. Microscopic images showed tubes growing out of pollen and penetrating the flower's stigma. The pollen was sticky, suggesting it was carried by insects.^[57] In August 2017, scientists presented a detailed description and 3D model image of what the first flower possibly looked like, and presented the hypothesis that it may have lived about 140 million years ago.^[58][59] A Bayesian analysis of 52 angiosperm taxa suggested that the crown group of angiosperms evolved between 178 million years ago and 198 million years ago.^[60]

Recent DNA analysis based on molecular systematics^[61][62] showed that Amborella trichopoda, found on the Pacific island of New Caledonia, belongs to a sister group of the other flowering plants, and morphological studies^[63] suggest that it has features that may have been characteristic of the earliest flowering plants. The orders Amborellales, Nymphaeales, and Austrobaileyales diverged as separate lineages from the remaining angiosperm clade at a very early stage in flowering plant evolution.^[64]

The great angiosperm radiation, when a great diversity of angiosperms appears in the fossil record, occurred in the mid-Cretaceous (approximately 100 million years ago). However, a study in 2007^[65] estimated that the division of the five most recent of the eight main groups occurred around 140 million years ago. (the genus Ceratophyllum, the family Chloranthaceae, the eudicots, the magnoliids, and the monocots) .

It is generally assumed that the function of flowers, from the start, was to involve mobile animals in their reproduction processes. That is, pollen can be scattered even if the flower is not brightly colored or oddly shaped in a way that attracts animals; however, by expending the energy required to create such traits, angiosperms can enlist the aid of animals and, thus, reproduce more efficiently.

Island genetics provides one proposed explanation for the sudden, fully developed appearance of flowering plants. Island genetics is believed to be a common source of speciation in general, especially when it comes to radical adaptations that seem to have required inferior transitional forms. Flowering plants may have evolved in an isolated setting like an island or island chain, where the plants bearing them were able to develop a highly specialised relationship with some specific animal (a wasp, for example). Such a relationship, with a hypothetical wasp carrying pollen from one plant to another much the way fig wasps do today, could result in the development of a high degree of specialisation in both the plant(s) and their partners. Note that the wasp example is not incidental; bees, which, it is postulated, evolved specifically due to mutualistic plant relationships, are descended from wasps.^[66]

Animals are also involved in the distribution of seeds. Fruit, which is formed by the enlargement of flower parts, is frequently a seed-dispersal tool that attracts animals to eat or otherwise disturb it, incidentally scattering the seeds it contains (see frugivory). Although many such mutualistic relationships remain too fragile to survive competition and to spread widely, flowering proved to be an unusually effective means of reproduction, spreading (whatever its origin) to become the dominant form of land plant life.^{[citation needed]}

Flower ontogeny uses a combination of genes normally responsible for forming new shoots.^[67] The most primitive flowers probably had a variable number of flower parts, often separate from (but in contact with) each other. The flowers tended to grow in a spiral pattern, to be bisexual (in plants, this means both male and female parts on the same flower), and to be dominated by the ovary (female part). As flowers evolved, some variations developed parts fused together, with a much more specific number and design, and with either specific sexes per flower or plant or at least "ovary-inferior". Flower evolution continues to the present day; modern flowers have been so profoundly influenced by humans that some of them cannot be pollinated in nature. Many modern domesticated flower species were formerly simple weeds, which sprouted only when the ground was disturbed. Some of them tended to grow with human crops, perhaps already having symbiotic companion plant relationships with them, and the prettiest did not get plucked because of their beauty, developing a dependence upon and special adaptation to human affection.^[68]

A few paleontologists have also proposed that flowering plants, or angiosperms, might have evolved due to interactions with dinosaurs. One of the idea's strongest proponents is Robert T. Bakker. He proposes that herbivorous dinosaurs, with their eating habits, provided a selective pressure on plants, for which adaptations either succeeded in deterring or coping with predation by herbivores.^[69]

By the late Cretaceous, angiosperms appear to have dominated environments formerly occupied by ferns and cycadophytes, but large canopy-forming trees replaced conifers as the dominant trees only close to the end of the Cretaceous 66 million years ago or even later, at the beginning of the Paleogene.^[70] The radiation of herbaceous angiosperms occurred much later.^[71] Yet, many fossil plants recognisable as belonging to modern families (including beech, oak, maple, and magnolia) had already appeared by the late Cretaceous. Flowering plants appeared in Australia about 126 million years ago. This also pushed the age of ancient Australian vertebrates, in what was then a south polar continent, to 126–110 million years old.^[56]

Gallery

•  

  A poster of twelve different species of flowers of the family Asteraceae

•  

  Lupinus pilosus

•  

  Bud of a pink rose

Diversity

The number of species of flowering plants is estimated to be in the range of 250,000 to 400,000.^[72][73][74] This compares to around 12,000 species of moss^[75] and 11,000 species of pteridophytes,^[76] showing that flowering plants are much more diverse. The number of families in APG (1998) was 462. In APG II^[22] (2003) it is not settled; at maximum it is 457, but within this number there are 55 optional segregates, so that the minimum number of families in this system is 402. In APG III (2009) there are 415 families.^[23][77] Compared to the APG III system, the APG IV system recognizes five new orders (Boraginales, Dilleniales, Icacinales, Metteniusales and Vahliales), along with some new families, making a total of 64 angiosperm orders and 416 families.^[1] The diversity of flowering plants is not evenly distributed. Nearly all species belong to the eudicot (75%), monocot (23%), and magnoliid (2%) clades. The remaining five clades contain a little over 250 species in total; i.e. less than 0.1% of flowering plant diversity, divided among nine families. The 43 most diverse of 443 families of flowering plants by species,^[78] in their APG circumscriptions, are

1. Asteraceae or Compositae (daisy family): 22,750 species;
2. Orchidaceae (orchid family): 21,950;
3. Fabaceae or Leguminosae (bean family): 19,400;
4. Rubiaceae (madder family): 13,150;^[79]
5. Poaceae or Gramineae (grass family): 10,035;
6. Lamiaceae or Labiatae (mint family): 7,175;
7. Euphorbiaceae (spurge family): 5,735;
8. Melastomataceae or Melastomaceae (melastome family): 5,005;
9. Myrtaceae (myrtle family): 4,625;
10. Apocynaceae (dogbane family): 4,555;
11. Cyperaceae (sedge family): 4,350;
12. Malvaceae (mallow family): 4,225;
13. Araceae (arum family): 4,025;
14. Ericaceae (heath family): 3,995;
15. Gesneriaceae (gesneriad family): 3,870;
16. Apiaceae or Umbelliferae (parsley family): 3,780;
17. Brassicaceae or Cruciferae (cabbage family): 3,710:
18. Piperaceae (pepper family): 3,600;
19. Bromeliaceae (bromeliad family): 3,540;
20. Acanthaceae (acanthus family): 3,500;
21. Rosaceae (rose family): 2,830;
22. Boraginaceae (borage family): 2,740;
23. Urticaceae (nettle family): 2,625;
24. Ranunculaceae (buttercup family): 2,525;
25. Lauraceae (laurel family): 2,500;
26. Solanaceae (nightshade family): 2,460;
27. Campanulaceae (bellflower family): 2,380;
28. Arecaceae (palm family): 2,361;
29. Annonaceae (custard apple family): 2,220;
30. Caryophyllaceae (pink family): 2,200;
31. Orobanchaceae (broomrape family): 2,060;
32. Amaranthaceae (amaranth family): 2,050;
33. Iridaceae (iris family): 2,025;
34. Aizoaceae or Ficoidaceae (ice plant family): 2,020;
35. Rutaceae (rue family): 1,815;
36. Phyllanthaceae (phyllanthus family): 1,745;
37. Scrophulariaceae (figwort family): 1,700;
38. Gentianaceae (gentian family): 1,650;
39. Convolvulaceae (bindweed family): 1,600;
40. Proteaceae (protea family): 1,600;
41. Sapindaceae (soapberry family): 1,580;
42. Cactaceae (cactus family): 1,500;
43. Araliaceae (Aralia or ivy family): 1,450.

Of these, the Orchidaceae, Poaceae, Cyperaceae, Araceae, Bromeliaceae, Arecaceae, and Iridaceae are monocot families; Piperaceae, Lauraceae, and Annonaceae are magnoliid dicots; the rest of the families are eudicots.

Reproduction

Fertilisation and embryogenesis

Main articles: Fertilization and Plant embryogenesis

 

Angiosperm life cycle

Double fertilization requires two sperm cells to fertilise cells in the ovule. This process begins when a pollen grain adheres to the stigma of the pistil (female reproductive structure), germinates, and grows a long pollen tube. While this pollen tube is growing, a haploid generative cell travels down the tube behind the tube nucleus. The generative cell divides by mitosis to produce two haploid (n) sperm cells. As the pollen tube grows, it makes its way from the stigma, down the style and into the ovary. Here the pollen tube reaches the micropyle of the ovule and digests its way into one of the synergids, releasing its contents (which include the sperm cells). The synergid that the cells were released into degenerates and one sperm makes its way to fertilise the egg cell, producing a diploid (2n) zygote. The second sperm cell fuses with both central cell nuclei, producing a triploid (3n) cell. As the zygote develops into an embryo, the triploid cell develops into the endosperm, which serves as the embryo's food supply. The ovary will now develop into a fruit and the ovule will develop into a seed.^[80]

Fruit and seed

Main articles: Fruit and Seed

 

The fruit of Aesculus hippocastanum, the horse chestnut tree

As the development of the embryo and endosperm proceeds within the embryo sac, the sac wall enlarges and combines with the nucellus (which is likewise enlarging) and the integument to form the seed coat. The ovary wall develops to form the fruit or pericarp, whose form is closely associated with type of seed dispersal system.^[81]

Frequently, the influence of fertilisation is felt beyond the ovary, and other parts of the flower take part in the formation of the fruit, e.g., the floral receptacle in the apple, strawberry, and others.^{[citation needed]}

The character of the seed coat bears a definite relation to that of the fruit. They protect the embryo and aid in dissemination; they may also directly promote germination. Among plants with indehiscent fruits, in general, the fruit provides protection for the embryo and secures dissemination. In this case, the seed coat is only slightly developed. If the fruit is dehiscent and the seed is exposed, in general, the seed-coat is well developed and must discharge the functions otherwise executed by the fruit.^{[citation needed]}

In some cases, like in the Asteraceae family, species have evolved to exhibit heterocarpy, or the production of different fruit morphs.^[82] These fruit morphs, produced from one plant, are different in size and shape, which influence dispersal range and germination rate.^[82] These fruit morphs are adapted to different environments, increasing chances for survival.^[82]

Meiosis

Like all diploid multicellular organisms that use sexual reproduction, flowering plants generate gametes using a specialised type of cell division called meiosis. Meiosis takes place in the ovule—a structure within the ovary that is located within the pistil at the centre of the flower (see diagram labeled "Angiosperm lifecycle"). A diploid cell (megaspore mother cell) in the ovule undergoes meiosis (involving two successive cell divisions) to produce four cells (megaspores) with haploid nuclei.^[83] It is thought that the basal chromosome number in angiosperms is n=7.^[84] One of these four cells (megaspore) then undergoes three successive mitotic divisions to produce an immature embryo sac (megagametophyte) with eight haploid nuclei. Next, these nuclei are segregated into separate cells by cytokinesis to produce three antipodal cells, two synergid cells and an egg cell. Two polar nuclei are left in the central cell of the embryo sac.^{[citation needed]}

Pollen is also produced by meiosis in the male anther (microsporangium). During meiosis, a diploid microspore mother cell undergoes two successive meiotic divisions to produce four haploid cells (microspores or male gametes). Each of these microspores, after further mitoses, becomes a pollen grain (microgametophyte) containing two haploid generative (sperm) cells and a tube nucleus. When a pollen grain makes contact with the female stigma, the pollen grain forms a pollen tube that grows down the style into the ovary. In the act of fertilisation, a male sperm nucleus fuses with the female egg nucleus to form a diploid zygote that can then develop into an embryo within the newly forming seed. Upon germination of the seed, a new plant can grow and mature.^{[citation needed]}

The adaptive function of meiosis is currently a matter of debate. A key event during meiosis in a diploid cell is the pairing of homologous chromosomes and homologous recombination (the exchange of genetic information) between homologous chromosomes. This process promotes the production of increased genetic diversity among progeny and the recombinational repair of damages in the DNA to be passed on to progeny. To explain the adaptive function of meiosis in flowering plants, some authors emphasise diversity^[85] and others emphasise DNA repair.^[86]

Apomixis

Apomixis (reproduction via asexually formed seeds) is found naturally in about 2.2% of angiosperm genera.^[87] One type of apomixis, gametophytic apomixis found in a dandelion species^[88] involves formation of an unreduced embryo sac due to incomplete meiosis (apomeiosis) and development of an embryo from the unreduced egg inside the embryo sac, without fertilisation (parthenogenesis).^{[citation needed]}

Some angiosperms, including many citrus varieties, are able to produce fruits through a type of apomixis called nucellar embryony.^[89]

Uses

Agriculture is almost entirely dependent on angiosperms, which provide virtually all plant-based food, and also provide a significant amount of livestock feed. Of all the families of plants, the Poaceae, or grass family (providing grains), is by far the most important, providing the bulk of all feedstocks (rice, maize, wheat, barley, rye, oats, pearl millet, sugar cane, sorghum). The Fabaceae, or legume family, comes in second place. Also of high importance are the Solanaceae, or nightshade family (potatoes, tomatoes, and peppers, among others); the Cucurbitaceae, or gourd family (including pumpkins and melons); the Brassicaceae, or mustard plant family (including rapeseed and the innumerable varieties of the cabbage species Brassica oleracea); and the Apiaceae, or parsley family. Many of our fruits come from the Rutaceae, or rue family (including oranges, lemons, grapefruits, etc.), and the Rosaceae, or rose family (including apples, pears, cherries, apricots, plums, etc.).^[90][91]

In some parts of the world, certain single species assume paramount importance because of their variety of uses, for example the coconut (Cocos nucifera) on Pacific atolls, and the olive (Olea europaea) in the Mediterranean region.^[92]

Flowering plants also provide economic resources in the form of wood, paper, fiber (cotton, flax, and hemp, among others), medicines (digitalis, camphor), decorative and landscaping plants, and many other uses. Coffee and cocoa are the common beverages obtained from the flowering plants. The main area in which they are surpassed by other plants—namely, coniferous trees (Pinales), which are non-flowering (gymnosperms)—is timber and paper production.^[93]

See also

• List of garden plants
• List of plant orders
• List of plants by common name
• List of systems of plant taxonomy

Notes

1. The major exception to the dominance of terrestrial ecosystems by flowering plants is the coniferous forest.

References

1. APG 2016.
2. Cronquist 1960.
3. Reveal, James L. (2011) [or later]. . Archived from the original on 27 August 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
4. Takhtajan 1964.
5. Lindley, J. (1830). Introduction to the Natural System of Botany. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green. xxxvi. from the original on 27 August 2017. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
6. Cantino, Philip D.; Doyle, James A.; Graham, Sean W.; Judd, Walter S.; Olmstead, Richard G.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Soltis, Pamela S.; Donoghue, Michael J. (2007). "Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta". Taxon. 56 (3): E1–E44. doi:10.2307/25065865. JSTOR 25065865.
7. Christenhusz, M. J. M.; Byng, J. W. (2016). "The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase". Phytotaxa. 261 (3): 201–217. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1. from the original on 6 April 2017. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
8. Takhtajan 1980.
9. "Angiosperms | OpenStax Biology 2e". courses.lumenlearning.com. from the original on 19 July 2021. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
10. Raven, Peter H.; Evert, Ray F.; Eichhorn, Susan E. (2005). Biology of Plants. W. H. Freeman. pp. 376–. ISBN 978-0-7167-1007-3.
11. Shivanna, K. R. (24 April 2019). Pollen Biology and Biotechnology. CRC Press. p. 1924. ISBN 978-0-429-53041-8.
12. Williams, Joseph H. (2012). "The evolution of pollen germination timing in flowering plants: Austrobaileya scandens (Austrobaileyaceae)". AoB Plants. 2012: pls010. doi:10.1093/aobpla/pls010. PMC 3345124. PMID 22567221.
13. "Monocots vs. Dicots". ucmp.berkeley.edu. from the original on 1 October 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
14. Chisholm 1911, p. 10.
15. Willson, Mary F. (1 June 1979). "Sexual Selection in Plants". The American Naturalist. 113 (6): 777–790. doi:10.1086/283437. S2CID 84970789. from the original on 9 November 2021. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
16. Salisbury, Frank B.; Parke, Robert V. (1970). Salisbury, Frank B.; Parke, Robert V. (eds.). Sexual Reproduction. Vascular Plants: Form and Function. Fundamentals of Botany Series. London: Macmillan Education. pp. 185–195. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-00364-8_13. ISBN 978-1-349-00364-8. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
17. Ainsworth, C. (August 2000). "Boys and Girls Come Out to Play: The Molecular Biology of Dioecious Plants". Annals of Botany. 86 (2): 211–221. doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1201.
18. Chisholm 1911, p. 9.
19. Brown, Robert (1827). "Character and description of Kingia, a new genus of plants found on the southwest coast of New Holland: with observations on the structure of its unimpregnated ovulum; and on the female flower of Cycadeae and Coniferae". In King, Philip Parker (ed.). Narrative of a Survey of the Intertropical and Western Coasts of Australia: Performed Between the Years 1818 and 1822. J. Murray. pp. 534–565. OCLC 185517977.
20. Buggs, Richard J.A. (January 2021). "The origin of Darwin's "abominable mystery"". American Journal of Botany. 108 (1): 22–36. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1592. PMID 33482683. S2CID 231689158.
21. Frohne & Jensen ex Reveal (29 April 1996). "Magnoliophytina". Phytologia. 79 (2): 70.
22. APG 2003.
23. APG 2009.
24. Chase & Reveal 2009.
25. (Press release). The Linnean Society of London. 8 October 2009. Archived from the original on 26 November 2010. Retrieved 2 October 2009.
26. Palmer, Jeffrey D.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Chase, Mark W. (October 2004). "The plant tree of life: an overview and some points of view". American Journal of Botany. 91 (10): 1437–45. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1437. PMID 21652302., Figure 2 2 February 2011 at the Wayback Machine
27. Christenhusz, Maarten J. M.; Fay, Michael F.; Chase, Mark W. (13 November 2017). Plants of the World: An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Vascular Plants. ISBN 978-0226522920. from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
28. Massoni, Julien; Couvreur, Thomas L.P.; Sauquet, Hervé (18 March 2015). "Five major shifts of diversification through the long evolutionary history of Magnoliidae (angiosperms)". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 15 (1): 49. doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0320-6. PMC 4377182. PMID 25887386.
29. Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E. (October 2004). "The origin and diversification of angiosperms". American Journal of Botany. 91 (10): 1614–1626. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1614. PMID 21652312.
30. Zeng et al 2014.
31. Bell, Soltis & Soltis 2010.
32. Edwards, D. (June 2000). "The role of mid-palaeozoic mesofossils in the detection of early bryophytes". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 355 (1398): 733–54, discussion 754–5. doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0613. PMC 1692787. PMID 10905607.
33. Herendeen, Patrick S.; Friis, Else Marie; Pedersen, Kaj Raunsgaard; Crane, Peter R. (3 March 2017). "Palaeobotanical redux: revisiting the age of the angiosperms". Nature Plants. 3 (3): 17015. doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.15. ISSN 2055-0278. PMID 28260783. S2CID 205458714.
34. Friedman, William E. (January 2009). "The meaning of Darwin's "abominable mystery"". American Journal of Botany. 96 (1): 5–21. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800150. PMID 21628174.
35. Briggs, H. (23 January 2021). "New light shed on Darwin's 'Abominable Mystery'". BBC News. from the original on 30 January 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
36. Bateman, Richard M. (1 January 2020). "Hunting the Snark: the flawed search for mythical Jurassic angiosperms". Journal of Experimental Botany. 71 (1): 22–35. doi:10.1093/jxb/erz411. ISSN 0022-0957. PMID 31538196.
37. Taylor, David Winship; Li, Hongqi; Dahl, Jeremy; Fago, Fred J.; Zinniker, David; Moldowan, J. Michael (March 2006). "Biogeochemical evidence for the presence of the angiosperm molecular fossil oleanane in Paleozoic and Mesozoic non-angiospermous fossils". Paleobiology. 32 (2): 179–190. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2006)32[179:BEFTPO]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 83801635.
38. "Oily Fossils Provide Clues To The Evolution Of Flowers". ScienceDaily. Stanford University. 5 April 2001. from the original on 19 August 2010. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
39. Glasspool, Ian J.; Hilton, Jason; Collinson, Margaret E.; Wang, Shi-Jun; Li-Cheng-Sen (20 March 2004). "Foliar physiognomy in Cathaysian gigantopterids and the potential to track Palaeozoic climates using an extinct plant group". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 205 (1): 69–110. Bibcode:2004PPP...205...69G. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2003.12.002. from the original on 4 November 2012. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
40. Stull, Gregory W.; Qu, Xiao-Jian; Parins-Fukuchi, Caroline; Yang, Ying-Ying; Yang, Jun-Bo; Yang, Zhi-Yun; Hu, Yi; Ma, Hong; Soltis, Pamela S.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Li, De-Zhu (19 July 2021). "Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms". Nature Plants. 7 (8): 1015–1025. doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00964-4. PMID 34282286. S2CID 236141481. from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
41. Hochuli, P. A.; Feist-Burkhardt, S. (2013). "Angiosperm-like pollen and Afropollis from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of the Germanic Basin (Northern Switzerland)". Frontiers in Plant Science. 4: 344. doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00344. PMC 3788615. PMID 24106492.
42. Qiu, Yin‐Long; Li, Libo; Wang, Bin; Chen, Zhiduan; Dombrovska, Olena; Lee, Jungho; Kent, Livija; Li, Ruiqi; Jobson, Richard W.; Hendry, Tory A.; Taylor, David W.; Testa, Christopher M.; Ambros, Mathew (June 2007). "A Nonflowering Land Plant Phylogeny Inferred from Nucleotide Sequences of Seven Chloroplast, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Genes". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 168 (5): 691–708. doi:10.1086/513474. S2CID 83781896.
43. Coiro, Mario; Chomicki, Guillaume; Doyle, James A. (30 July 2018). "Experimental signal dissection and method sensitivity analyses reaffirm the potential of fossils and morphology in the resolution of the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales". Paleobiology. 44 (3): 490–510. doi:10.1017/pab.2018.23. S2CID 91488394.
44. Fu, Qiang; Diez, Jose Bienvenido; Pole, Mike; García Ávila, Manuel; Liu, Zhong-Jian; Chu, Hang; et al. (December 2018). "An unexpected noncarpellate epigynous flower from the Jurassic of China". eLife. 7: e38827. doi:10.7554/eLife.38827. PMC 6298773. PMID 30558712. from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
45. Coiro, Mario; Doyle, James A.; Hilton, Jason (July 2019). "How deep is the conflict between molecular and fossil evidence on the age of angiosperms?". The New Phytologist. 223 (1): 83–99. doi:10.1111/nph.15708. PMID 30681148.
46. Sokoloff, Dmitry D.; Remizowa, Margarita V.; El, Elena S.; Rudall, Paula J.; Bateman, Richard M. (October 2020). "Supposed Jurassic angiosperms lack pentamery, an important angiosperm-specific feature". The New Phytologist. 228 (2): 420–426. doi:10.1111/nph.15974. PMID 31418869.
47. Jiao, Yuannian; Wickett, No4rman J.; Ayyampalayam, Saravanaraj; et al. (May 2011). "Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms". Nature. 473 (7345): 97–100. Bibcode:2011Natur.473...97J. doi:10.1038/nature09916. PMID 21478875. S2CID 4313258.
48. Callaway, Ewen (December 2013). "Shrub genome reveals secrets of flower power". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.14426. S2CID 88293665. from the original on 21 April 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
49. Adams, Keith (December 2013). "Genomics. Genomic clues to the ancestral flowering plant". Science. 342 (6165): 1456–7. Bibcode:2013Sci...342.1456A. doi:10.1126/science.1248709. PMID 24357306. S2CID 206553839.
50. Wing, Xin; Duan, Shuying; Geng, Baoyin; Cui, Jinzhong; Yang, Yong (February 2007). "Schmeissneria: a missing link to angiosperms?". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7: 14. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-14. PMC 1805421. PMID 17284326.
51. Shi, Gongle; Herrera, Fabiany; Herendeen, Patrick S.; Clark, Elizabeth G.; Crane, Peter R. (June 2021). "Mesozoic cupules and the origin of the angiosperm second integument". Nature. 594 (7862): 223–226. Bibcode:2021Natur.594..223S. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03598-w. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 34040260. S2CID 235217720.
52. Briggs, H. (14 January 2018). "How flowering plants conquered the world". BBC News. from the original on 2 February 2021. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
53. Simonin, Kevin A.; Roddy, Adam B. (11 January 2018). "Genome downsizing, physiological novelty, and the global dominance of flowering plants". PLOS Biology. 16 (1): e2003706. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706. PMC 5764239. PMID 29324757.
54. Simonin, K. A.; Roddy, A. B. (January 2018). "Genome downsizing, physiological novelty, and the global dominance of flowering plants". PLOS Biology. 16 (1): e2003706. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706. PMC 5764239. PMID 29324757.
55. Sun, G.; Ji, Q.; Dilcher, D.L.; Zheng, S.; Nixon, K.C.; Wang, X. (May 2002). "Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family". Science. 296 (5569): 899–904. Bibcode:2002Sci...296..899S. doi:10.1126/science.1069439. PMID 11988572. S2CID 1910388.
56. "When flowers reached Australia: First blooms made it to Australia 126 millions years ago". ScienceDaily. from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
57. Poinar, George O., Jr.; Chambers, Kenton .L; Wunderlich, Joerg (10 December 2013). . J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas. 7 (2): 745–750. Archived from the original on 5 January 2014.
    • "Amber fossil reveals ancient reproduction in flowering plants". ScienceDaily (Press release). 3 January 2014.
58. Gabbott S (1 August 2017). "Did the first flower look like this?". BBC News. from the original on 1 August 2017. Retrieved 1 August 2017.
59. Sauquet, Hervé; von Balthazar, M.; Magallón, S.; et al. (August 2017). "The ancestral flower of angiosperms and its early diversification". Nature Communications. 8 (2017): 16047. Bibcode:2017NatCo...816047S. doi:10.1038/ncomms16047. PMC 5543309. PMID 28763051.
60. Foster, Charles S.P.; Ho, Simon Y.W. (October 2017). "Strategies for Partitioning Clock Models in Phylogenomic Dating: Application to the Angiosperm Evolutionary Timescale". Genome Biology and Evolution. 9 (10): 2752–2763. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx198. PMC 5647803. PMID 29036288.
61. "First Flower". NOVA. PBS. 17 April 2007. Transcripts.
62. Soltis, D. E.; Soltis, P. S. (June 2004). "Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast". American Journal of Botany. 91 (6): 997–1001. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.6.997. PMID 21653455.
63. "South Pacific plant may be missing link in evolution of flowering plants". EurekAlert!. AAAS. 17 May 2006. from the original on 24 July 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
64. Vialette-Guiraud, A.C.; Alaux, M.; Legeai, F.; et al. (September 2011). "Cabomba as a model for studies of early angiosperm evolution". Annals of Botany. 108 (4): 589–598. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr088. PMC 3170152. PMID 21486926.
65. Moore, M. J.; Bell, C. D.; Soltis, P. S.; Soltis, D. E. (December 2007). "Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (49): 19363–8. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10419363M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708072104. PMC 2148295. PMID 18048334.
66. Buchmann, Stephen L.; Nabhan, Gary Paul (2012). The Forgotten Pollinators. Island Press. pp. 41–42. ISBN 978-1-59726-908-7. from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
67. Froelich, W.R.; Clancy, S. (15 June 2001). "Age-Old Question On Evolution Of Flowers Answered". UniSci.com. from the original on 22 August 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
68. Britt, Robert Roy (26 May 2005). "Human Affection Altered Evolution of Flowers". LiveScience. from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
69. Bakker, Robert T. (17 August 1978). "Dinosaur Feeding Behaviour and the Origin of Flowering Plants". Nature. 274 (5672): 661–663. Bibcode:1978Natur.274..661B. doi:10.1038/274661a0. S2CID 4162574.
70. Sadava, David; Heller, H. Craig; Orians, Gordon H.; Purves, William K.; Hillis, David M. (December 2006). Life: the science of biology. Macmillan. pp. 477–. ISBN 978-0-7167-7674-1. from the original on 23 December 2011. Retrieved 4 August 2010.
71. Stewart, Wilson Nichols; Rothwell, Gar W. (1993). Paleobotany and the evolution of plants (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 498. ISBN 978-0-521-23315-6.
72. Thorne, R.F. (2002). "How many species of seed plants are there?". Taxon. 51 (3): 511–522. doi:10.2307/1554864. JSTOR 1554864.
73. Scotland, R. W.; Wortley, A. H. (2003). "How many species of seed plants are there?". Taxon. 52 (1): 101–104. doi:10.2307/3647306. JSTOR 3647306.
74. Govaerts, R. (2003). "How many species of seed plants are there? – a response". Taxon. 52 (3): 583–584. doi:10.2307/3647457. JSTOR 3647457.^{[dead link]}
75. Goffinet, Bernard; Buck, William R. (2004). "Systematics of the Bryophyta (Mosses): From molecules to a revised classification". Monographs in Systematic Botany. 98: 205–239.
76. Raven, Peter H.; Evert, Ray F.; Eichhorn, Susan E. (2005). Biology of Plants (7th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 0-7167-1007-2.
77. Rhodes, Frank Harold Trevor (1 January 1974). Evolution. Golden Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-307-64360-5. from the original on 5 February 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
78. Stevens, P.F. (2011). "Angiosperm Phylogeny Website (at Missouri Botanical Garden)". from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
79. (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2007.
80. Berger, F. (January 2008). "Double-fertilization, from myths to reality". Sexual Plant Reproduction. 21 (1): 3–5. doi:10.1007/s00497-007-0066-4. S2CID 8928640.
81. Eriksson, O. (2008). "Evolution of Seed Size and Biotic Seed Dispersal in Angiosperms: Paleoecological and Neoecological Evidence". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 169 (7): 863–870. doi:10.1086/589888. S2CID 52905335.
82. Gardocki, M. E., Zablocki, H., El-Keblawy, A., & Freeman, D. C. (2000). Heterocarpy in Calendula micrantha (Asteraceae): The effects of competition and availability of water on the performance of offspring from different fruit morphs. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 2(6):701-718
83. Snustad DP, Simmons MJ (2008). Principles of Genetics (5th ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-38825-9.
84. Ehrendorfer, F.; Krendl, F.; Habeler, E.; Sauer, W. (1 August 1968). "Chromosome Numbers and Evolution in Primitive Angiosperms". Taxon. 17 (4): 337–353. doi:10.2307/1217392. JSTOR 1217392.
85. Harrison, C.J.; Alvey, E.; Henderson, I.R. (June 2010). "Meiosis in flowering plants and other green organisms". Journal of Experimental Botany. 61 (11): 2863–75. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq191. PMID 20576791.
86. Mirzaghaderi G, Hörandl E (September 2016). "The evolution of meiotic sex and its alternatives". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 283 (1838): 20161221. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1221. PMC 5031655. PMID 27605505.
87. Hojsgaard, D.; Klatt, S.; Baier, R.; Carman, J.G.; Hörandl, E. (September 2014). "Taxonomy and Biogeography of Apomixis in Angiosperms and Associated Biodiversity Characteristics". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 33 (5): 414–427. doi:10.1080/07352689.2014.898488. PMC 4786830. PMID 27019547.
88. van Baarlen, P.; van Dijk, P.J.; Hoekstra, R.F.; de Jong, J.H. (October 2000). "Meiotic recombination in sexual diploid and apomictic triploid dandelions (Taraxacum officinale L.)". Genome. 43 (5): 827–35. doi:10.1139/g00-047. PMID 11081973.
89. Gentile, Alessandra (18 March 2020). The Citrus Genome. Springer Nature. p. 171. ISBN 978-3-030-15308-3. from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
90. Zhang, Shu-Dong; Jin, Jian-Jun; Chen, Si-Yun; Chase, Mark W.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Li, Hong-Tao; Yang, Jun-Bo; Li, De-Zhu; Yi, Ting-Shuang (2017). "Diversification of Rosaceae since the Late Cretaceous based on plastid phylogenomics". New Phytologist. 214 (3): 1355–1367. doi:10.1111/nph.14461. ISSN 1469-8137. PMID 28186635.
91. "RUTACEAE". Botanical Dermatology Database. from the original on 19 July 2019.
92. Loumou, Angeliki; Giourga, Christina (2003). "Olive groves: 'The life and identity of the Mediterranean'". Agriculture and Human Values. 20 (1): 87–95. doi:10.1023/a:1022444005336. S2CID 154378090.
93. Dilcher et al 2016.

Bibliography

Articles, books and chapters

•   This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Angiosperms". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• APG (2003). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 141 (4): 399–436. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x.
• APG (2009). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (2): 105–121. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x.
• APG (2016). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 181 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1111/boj.12385.
• Becker, Kenneth M. (February 1973). "A Comparison of Angiosperm Classification Systems". Taxon. 22 (1): 19–50. doi:10.2307/1218032. JSTOR 1218032.
• Bell, Adrian D. (2008) [1991]. Plant Form. An Illustrated Guide to Flowering Plant Morphology. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press. ISBN 978-0-88192-850-1.
  • 1st edition published by Oxford University Press in 1991 ISBN 978-0-19854-219-3
• Bell, C.D.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S. (2010). "The Age and Diversification of the Angiosperms Revisited". American Journal of Botany. 97 (8): 1296–1303. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900346. PMID 21616882.
• Chase, Mark W.; Reveal, James L. (2009). "A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (2): 122–127. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01002.x.
• Cromie, William J. (December 16, 1999). . Harvard University Gazette.
• Cronquist, Arthur (October 1960). "The divisions and classes of plants". The Botanical Review. 26 (4): 425–482. doi:10.1007/BF02940572. S2CID 43144314.
• Cronquist, Arthur (1981). An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-231-03880-5.
• Dahlgren, R. M. T. (February 1980). "A revised system of classification of the angiosperms". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 80 (2): 91–124. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb01661.x.
• Dahlgren, Rolf (February 1983). "General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics". Nordic Journal of Botany. 3 (1): 119–149. doi:10.1111/j.1756-1051.1983.tb01448.x.
• Dilcher, D. (2000). "Toward a new synthesis: Major evolutionary trends in the angiosperm fossil record". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97 (13): 7030–7036. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.7030D. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.13.7030. PMC 34380. PMID 10860967.
• Dilcher, David L; Cronquist, Arthur; Zimmermann, Martin Huldrych; Stevens, Peter; Stevenson, Dennis William; Berry, Paul E. (8 March 2016). "Angiosperm". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 January 2017.
• Heywood, V. H.; Brummitt, R. K.; Culham, A.; Seberg, O. (2007). Flowering Plant Families of the World. Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada: Firefly Books. ISBN 978-1-55407-206-4.
• Hill, Christopher; Crane, Peter (January 1982). "Evolutionary Cladistics and the origin of Angiosperms". In Joysey, Kenneth Alan; Friday, A.E. (eds.). Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Special Volumes. Vol. 21. London: Systematics Association. pp. 269–361. ISBN 978-0-12-391250-3.
• Lersten, Nels R. (2004). Flowering plant embryology with emphasis on economic species. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub. ISBN 9780470752678.
• Pooja (2004). Angiosperms. New Delhi: Discovery. ISBN 9788171417889. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
• Raven, P.H., R.F. Evert, S.E. Eichhorn. Biology of Plants, 7th Edition. W.H. Freeman. 2004
• Sattler, R. 1973. Organogenesis of Flowers. A Photographic Text-Atlas. University of Toronto Press.
• Simpson, Michael G. (2010). Plant Systematics (2nd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 9780080922089.
• Soltis, Pamela S; Soltis, Douglas E (April 2016). "Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms". Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 30: 159–165. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2016.03.015. PMID 27064530.
• Takhtajan, A. (June 1964). "The Taxa of the Higher Plants above the Rank of Order". Taxon. 13 (5): 160–164. doi:10.2307/1216134. JSTOR 1216134.
• Takhtajan, A. (July–September 1980). "Outline of the Classification of Flowering Plants (Magnoliophyta)". Botanical Review. 46 (3): 225–359. doi:10.1007/bf02861558. JSTOR 4353970. S2CID 30764910.
• Zeng, Liping; Zhang, Qiang; Sun, Renran; Kong, Hongzhi; Zhang, Ning; Ma, Hong (24 September 2014). "Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times". Nature Communications. 5 (4956): 4956. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.4956Z. doi:10.1038/ncomms5956. PMC 4200517. PMID 25249442.

Websites

• Cole, Theodor C.H.; Hilger, Harmut H.; Stevens, Peter F. (2017). "Angiosperm Phylogeny Poster – Flowering Plant Systematics" (PDF).
• Watson, L.; Dallwitz, M.J. (1992). . 14 December 2000. Archived from the original on 2 August 2014.
• "Flowering plant" at the Encyclopedia of Life

External links

•   Media related to Angiosperms at Wikimedia Commons
•   Data related to Magnoliophyta at Wikispecies
•   Magnoliophyta at Wikibooks