fbpx
Wikipedia

United States presidential nominating convention

A United States presidential nominating convention is a political convention held every four years in the United States by most of the political parties who will be fielding nominees in the upcoming U.S. presidential election. The formal purpose of such a convention is to select the party's nominee for popular election as President, as well as to adopt a statement of party principles and goals known as the party platform and adopt the rules for the party's activities, including the presidential nominating process for the next election cycle.

The 1876 Democratic National Convention at the Merchants Exchange Building in St. Louis, Missouri. Samuel J. Tilden and Thomas A. Hendricks were nominated for president and vice president respectively

Since 1972, the delegates have been mostly selected in presidential primaries state by state. This allows the nominees to be decided before the convention opens. In the 1976 GOP race, Ronald Reagan did well in the primaries but had clearly lost to incumbent Gerald Ford when the convention opened. Other delegates to these conventions include political party members who are seated automatically, and are called "unpledged delegates" because they can choose for themselves for which candidate they vote.

Generally, use of "presidential campaign nominating convention" refers to the two major parties' quadrennial events: the Democratic and Republican National Conventions. Some minor parties also select their nominees by convention, including the Green Party, the Socialist Party USA, the Libertarian Party, the Constitution Party, and the Reform Party USA. The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic forced both the major and third parties to cancel their usual conventions that year and instead schedule virtual affairs with minimal participation, as large energetic crowds risked spreading the virus.

Logistics

Calendars

The convention cycle begins with the Call to Convention. Usually issued about 18 months in advance, the Call is an invitation from the national party to the state and territory parties to convene to select a presidential nominee. It also sets out the number of delegates to be awarded to each, as well as the rules for the nomination process. The conventions are usually scheduled for four days of business, with the exception of the 1972 Republican and 2012 Democratic conventions, which were three days each. (The 2008 and 2012 Republican conventions were also three days each, but in each case was shortened from the scheduled four days due to weather issues.)

There is no statute dictating the order of the conventions, but since 1956 the party to which the incumbent president belongs has held its convention second. Between 1864 and 1952, the Democrats went second every year (except for 1888). In 1956, when Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower was the incumbent, the Democrats went first, and the party out of power has gone first ever since. (Between 1936 and 1952, during administrations led by Democratic presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman, the Democrats had their convention after the Republicans, but it is unclear whether they went second because they held the White House or because they had almost always gone second.) Since 1952, all major party conventions have been held in the months of July, August or (for the first time in 2004), early September. (Election laws in some states would likely prevent conventions from moving into mid-September.) Between the middle of the 20th century and 2004, the two major party conventions were primarily scheduled about one month apart, often with the Summer Olympics in between so they did not have to compete for viewers. In 1996, both were held in August to accommodate the Atlanta Olympics in July, the last Summer Olympics to date to be played in the U.S. In 2000, both conventions preceded the Sydney Olympics in late September.

In 2008 and 2012, the Democratic and Republican conventions were moved to back-to-back weeks following the conclusion of the Beijing and London Olympics, respectively. One reason for these late conventions had to do with campaign finance laws, which allow the candidates to spend an unlimited amount of money before the convention, but forbid fundraising after the convention, for the parties to receive federal campaign funds.[1] However, if Barack Obama's choice not to receive federal campaign funds for the 2008 general election is repeated in future elections, this reason for the late scheduling of conventions will no longer be valid. Another reason for the lateness of the conventions is due to the primary calendar, which ends in early June, and the political party's desire to turn the convention into a four-day tightly scripted political rally for their nominee, which coincidentally happens to have a roll call vote for president. This includes such logistics as where each delegation sits on the convention floor, the order of speeches, how the nominee wants to present him or herself, and allows time for any negotiations in regards to the running mate. Finally, the parties also did not want to schedule their conventions around the Olympics. One reason why the Democratic Party held its 2008 convention after the two-week-long Beijing Olympics was, according to them, to "maximize momentum for our Democratic ticket in the final months of the Presidential election".[2] But moving the conventions later into early September led to conflicts with the National Football League's season kickoff game, which opens the season on the first Thursday of September. However, the NFL accommodated the conventions and moved its games to an earlier start time in 2008,[3] and an earlier date in 2012.

In 2016, both the Republican and Democratic conventions moved to July, before the Rio de Janeiro Olympics in August. One reason why the Republican Party wanted a July convention was to help avoid a drawn-out primary battle similar to what happened in 2012 that left the party fractured heading into the general election. The Democrats then followed suit so they could provide a quicker response to the Republicans, rather than wait for more than two weeks until after the Olympics were over.[4]

The 2020 Democratic National Convention was originally scheduled to take place July 13–16,[5] but was postponed to August 17–20, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 2020 Republican National Convention took place from August 24–27.[6] The Tokyo Olympics, originally scheduled to open on July 24, 2020, were also postponed, because of the pandemic, to July 2021. This was the first time that nominating conventions did not coincide with the Olympics since 1944, when the games were cancelled due to World War II.

Participation

 
The 2008 Green Party National Convention held in Chicago. Various third parties also hold their own national conventions.

Each party sets its own rules for the participation and format of the convention. Broadly speaking, each U.S. state and territory party is apportioned a select number of voting representatives, individually known as delegates and collectively as the delegation. Each party uses its own formula for determining the size of each delegation, factoring in such considerations as population, proportion of that state's Congressional representatives or state government officials who are members of the party, and the state's voting patterns in previous presidential elections. The selection of individual delegates and their alternates, too, is governed by the bylaws of each state party, or in some cases by state law.

The 2004 Democratic National Convention counted 4,353 delegates and 611 alternates. The 2004 Republican National Convention had 2,509 delegates and 2,344 alternates. However, other attendees who do not participate in the formal business of the convention dwarf these individuals numerically. These include non-delegate party officials and activists, invited guests and companions, and international observers, not to mention numerous members of the news media, volunteers, protesters, and local business proprietors and promoters hoping to capitalize on the quadrennial event.

Locations

 
The Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans was the site of the 1988 Republican National Convention, which nominated George H.W. Bush and Dan Quayle for president and vice president. In recent decades, the two major parties have held their conventions at sports stadiums and arenas.

The convention is typically held in a major city selected by the national party organization 18–24 months before the election is to be held, although the Republican National Committee voted in 2022 to allow the party to select its presidential convention sites six years in advance.[7] As the two major conventions have grown into large, publicized affairs with significant economic impact, cities today compete vigorously to be awarded host responsibilities, citing their meeting venues, lodging facilities, and entertainment as well as offering economic incentives.

The location of early conventions was dictated by the difficulty of transporting delegates from far-flung parts of the country; early Democratic and Whig Conventions were frequently held in the central Eastern Seaboard port of Baltimore, Maryland. As the U.S. expanded westward and railroads connected cities, Midwestern locations such as Chicago, Illinois—which since 1860 has held 25 Republican and Democratic Conventions combined, more than any other city—became the favored hosts. In present times, political symbolism affects the selection of the host city as much as economic or logistical considerations do. A particular city might be selected to enhance the standing of a favorite son, or in an effort to curry favor with residents of that state. For example, in 2011, Obama campaign manager Jim Messina noted: "We put the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina in part because we believe so deeply in" a "New South map."[8] Likewise, New York City was selected as the host of the 2004 Republican National Convention to evoke memories of George W. Bush's leadership during the September 11 attacks. Milwaukee, in the politically competitive state of Wisconsin, was chosen as the site of both the 2020 Democratic National Convention (although due to COVID-19 it was essentially not held there), and has been selected to be the host of the subsequent 2024 Republican National Convention.

Having been the site of 25 major party conventions, Chicago, Illinois has been the most frequent host city of major party conventions, hosting more than a quarter of all of them. Chicago has been both the most frequent host of Democratic conventions (hosting 11) and Republican conventions (hosting 14). Chicago was last the site of a major party convention in 1996, when it was the host of that year's Democratic convention. Nine of the conventions held in Chicago took place in the 19th century, and sixteen of them took place in the 20th century. Chicago's frequency as a host significantly dropped-off after the 1968 Democratic National Convention, which saw infamous protest activity and police response, with Chicago only hosting a single convention since.[9]

In the 19th century, the most frequent host city of major party conventions was Baltimore, Maryland (the site of the first presidential nominating convention[10]). Between 1832 and 1872, Baltimore saw twelve major party conventions. However, the city has only since played host city to a single other major party convention (the 1912 DNC).[9] At the time that it was a frequent host of major party conventions, the city was seen as an appealing location for these events due to its accessibility by various means of transit (railroads, steamships, and turnpikes), the presence of several meeting spaces in the city considered spacious by the era's standards, quality hotels in the city, and quality dining in the city.[11] Baltimore is currently considered to lack an appropriate venue by the standards and requirements of modern conventions in terms of seating capacity, space and logistics.[12][10] When the city made a longshot bid for the 2004 Democratic National Convention, the city proposed hosting the convention underneath a temporary canopy that would be erected at Oriole Park at Camden Yards (which would have likely necessitated its baseball team tenant to vacate the venue for a roughly two-month period of their season).[12] Potential lack of sufficient hotels has also been cited as an obstacle to Baltimore playing host to another major party convention any time soon.[10]

The conventions historically have been held inside convention centers, but in recent decades the two major parties have favored sports arenas and stadiums to accommodate the increasing capacity, the former because indoor arenas are usually off-season outside of WNBA sites, allowing plenty of time for preparation (the major political parties have avoided baseball stadiums ever since the 1992 Republican National Convention at the Houston Astrodome forced the Houston Astros to play 26 consecutive road games). Bids for the 2008 Republican National Convention, for example, were required to have a facility with a seating capacity of at least 20,500 people, including a convention floor of about 5,500 delegates and alternates;[13] the Xcel Energy Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota was eventually selected. Meanwhile, approximately 84,000 people attended the last day of the 2008 Democratic National Convention at Denver's Invesco Field at Mile High.[14] The last day of the 2012 Democratic Convention originally also was scheduled for an outdoor football stadium, but was moved indoors due to weather concerns. Excepting the pandemic-affected 2020 conventions, the last non-sporting venue to host the Democratic National Convention was San Francisco's Moscone Center in 1984. In 1996, the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego became the last non-sporting venue to host the Republican National Convention.

Table of cities (metro areas) by number of major party conventions hosted

Of the 95 major-party conventions held through the 2020 election cycle, 27 different metro areas have hosted conventions. On two occasions, parties had more than one official "host city" for their conventions, these being the 1860 Democratic National Conventions, and the 2020 Republican National Convention.

More than half of all major party conventions have been held in just three cities: Chicago, Baltimore, and Philadelphia.

On six occasions, both the Democratic and Republican parties held their conventions in the same city. However, this has not occurred since 1972.[15] Chicago played double-duty as a host city four times, in 1884, 1932, 1944, and 1952. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was host of both major-party conventions in 1948, and Miami Beach, Florida was host to both in 1972.

Two metro areas have seen more than one of their municipalities be the site of major party conventions. Minneapolis–Saint Paul is home to Minneapolis (site of the 1892 RNC) and St. Paul (site of the 2008 RNC). The San Francisco Bay Area is home to Daly City (site of the 1956 RNC and 1964 RNC) and San Francisco (site of the 1920 DNC and 1984 DNC).

Cities/metro areas by number of conventions hosted[9]
Cities/metro-areas Total number hosted Democratic
conventions
Republican
conventions
Whig
conventions
Number hosted Years Number hosted Years Number hosted Years
Chicago, Illinois 25 11 1864, 1884, 1892, 1896, 1932, 1940, 1944, 1952, 1956, 1968, 1996 14 1860, 1868, 1880, 1884, 1888, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1916, 1920, 1932, 1944, 1952, 1960 0
Baltimore, Maryland 13 9 1832, 1835, 1840, 1844, 1848, 1852, 1860**, 1872, 1912 1 1864 3 1844, 1852, 1856
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 10 3 1936, 1948, 2016 6 1856, 1872, 1900, 1940, 1948, 2000 1 1848
New York City 6 5 1868, 1924, 1976, 1980, 1992 1 2004 0
St. Louis, Missouri 5 4 1876, 1888, 1904, 1916 1 1896 0
San Francisco Bay Area, California (cities of Daly City and San Francisco) 4 2 1920, 1984 2 1956, 1964 0
Cincinnati, Ohio 3 2 1856, 1880 1 1876 0
Cleveland, Ohio 3 0 3 1924, 1936, 2016 0
Kansas City, Missouri 3 1 1900 2 1928, 1976 0
Miami Beach, Florida (located in the Miami metropolitan area) 3 1 1972 2 1968, 1972 0
Charlotte, North Carolina 2 1 2012 1 2020** 0
Denver, Colorado 2 2 1908, 2008 0 0
Houston, Texas 2 1 1928 1 1992 0
Los Angeles, California 2 2 1960, 2000 0 0
MinneapolisSaint Paul, Minnesota 2 0 2 1892, 2008 0
Atlanta, Georgia 1 1 1988 0 0
Atlantic City, New Jersey 1 1 1964 0 0
Boston, Massachusetts 1 1 2004 0 0
Charleston, South Carolina 1 1 1860** 0 0
Dallas, Texas 1 0 1 1984 0
Detroit, Michigan 1 0 1 1980 0
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 1 0 0 1 1839
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1 1 2020 0 0
New Orleans, Louisiana 1 0 1 1988 0
San Diego, California 1 0 1 1996 0
Tampa, Florida 1 0 1 2012 0
Washington, D.C. 1 0 1 2020** 0

**Years with multiple convention host cities

Table of states/federal districts by number of major party conventions hosted

As of the 2020 election cycle, nineteen states and the District of Columbia have hosted major party presidential nominating conventions. Thirty-one states have never hosted one (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming).

On the two aforementioned occasions in which more than one city was the host of a major party's convention(s) (the 1860 Democratic conventions and 2020 Republican convention), the different cities were also located in different states/districts.

Of the 95 major party conventions held up through the 2020 election cycle, more than a quarter have taken place in Illinois. Combined, the states of Illinois, Maryland, and Pennsylvania have been the sites of more than half of all major party conventions. Combined, the seven states that have each held six or more major party conventions (California, Illinois, Maryland, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania) have been the locations of more than three-quarters of all major party conventions.

Six states have seen more than one of their metro-areas host a convention: California (Los Angeles, San Diego, and the San Francisco Bay area), Florida (Miami Beach and Tampa), Missouri (Kansas City and St. Louis), Ohio (Cincinnati and Cleveland), Pennsylvania (Harrisburg and Philadelphia), Texas (Dallas and Houston).

Up through the 2020 election cycle, states located in the midwestern United States (Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Wisconsin) have been the locations of a combined 43 major party conventions. States and districts located in the northeastern United States (the District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania) have hosted a combined 33 major party conventions. States located in the southern United States (Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas) have hosted a combined 12 major party conventions. States located in the western United States (California and Colorado) have hosted a combined nine major party conventions. The region that has gone the longest since hosting a major party convention is the western United States, which has not been the site of a major party convention since the 2008 DNC was held in Denver, Colorado.

States by number of conventions hosted
States Total number hosted Democratic
conventions
Republican
conventions
Whig
conventions
Number hosted Years Number hosted Years Number hosted Years
Illinois
(Chicago)
25 11 1864, 1884, 1892, 1896, 1932, 1940, 1944, 1952, 1956, 1968, 1996 14 1860, 1868, 1880, 1884, 1888, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1916, 1920, 1932, 1944, 1952, 1960 0
Maryland
(Baltimore)
13 9 1832, 1835, 1840, 1844, 1848, 1852, 1860**, 1872, 1912 1 1864 3 1844, 1852, 1856
Pennsylvania
(Harrisburg, Philadelphia)
11 3 1936, 1948, 2016 6 1856, 1872, 1900, 1940, 1948, 2000 2 1839, 1848
Missouri
(Kansas City, St. Louis)
8 5 1876, 1888, 1900, 1904, 1916 3 1896, 1928, 1976 0
California
(Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco Bay area)
7 4 1920, 1960, 1984, 2000 3 1956, 1964, 1996 0
New York
(New York City)
6 5 1868, 1924, 1976, 1980, 1992 1 2004 0
Ohio
(Cincinnati, Cleveland)
6 2 1856, 1880 4 1876, 1924, 1936, 2016 0
Florida
(Miami Beach, Tampa)
4 1 1972 3 1968, 1972, 2012 0
Texas
(Dallas, Houston)
3 1 1928 2 1984, 1992 0
Colorado
(Denver)
2 2 1908, 2008 0 0
Minnesota
(Minneapolis-St. Paul)
2 0 2 1892, 2008 0
North Carolina
(Charlotte)
2 1 2012 1 2020** 0
Georgia
(Atlanta)
1 1 1988 0 0
Louisiana
(New Orleans)
1 0 1 1988 0
Massachusetts
(Boston)
1 1 2004 0 0
Michigan
(Detroit)
1 0 1 1980 0
New Jersey
(Atlantic City)
1 1 1964 0 0
South Carolina
(Charleston)
1 1 1860** 0 0
Washington, D.C. 1 0 1 2020** 0
Wisconsin
(Milwaukee)
1 1 2020 0 0

**Years with multiple convention host states

Delegate selection process

Every year of a presidential election, the United States' political parties have national conventions that result in presidential candidates. However, selected delegates from each state choose candidates rather than members of the public.

Including delegates in the nomination process began after the Presidential election year of 1968, when there was widespread dissatisfaction with the presidential nominating process.[16] Minor-party movements also threatened the chances of Democratic and Republican candidates to win majorities of the electoral votes, which resulted in the reformation of the presidential election process.[17]

Democratic selection process

Each party and state has its own process to selecting delegates.

Generally speaking, delegates of both major parties usually pledge their votes to a specific candidate, and those who are associated with the Democratic Party and are unpledged are considered super delegates. These super delegates may include governors who identify with the party, members of the U.S. Congress, as well as members of the Democratic National Committee.[18] Super Delegates aren't pledged to a particular candidate, and can vote for who they please.[18] Any registered Democrat may run to be a delegate, and wins are based on congressional votes.[18] Once Democrats choose their delegates, they distribute delegates to each candidate evenly, according to the number of congressional district votes they get (must be at least 15%).[18]

Republican selection process

Rule 14 of the Republican Party's national rules determines the size of delegates for each state, territory, or political subdivision. Delegate selection for the Republican Party must take between March 1 and the second Saturday in June in the year that the convention is held (except for Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada, which are exempt from the rule and may hold earlier selection processes).[19] The Republican Party uses a "Proportional Allocation" rule, which states that delegates should be based on the statewide votes or the number of congressional district votes in proportion to the number of votes received by each candidate.[19] Also, each state must advocate to have an equal number of men and women in its delegation.[19]

Delegates and alternate delegates for the Republican National Convention may be selected or bound by only one of the following:[19]

  • Primary election
  • Republican State Committee
  • State and Congressional district conventions
  • Any method that stays consistent with the rules by which they were selected

Favorite son, dark horse, bolter

Favorite son

A powerful state politician, typically the governor or senator, can set up as a "favorite son".[20] The state delegates are pledged to vote for him at least for the first round. Today the role is honorific, but before 1972 control of a delegation gave bargaining power regarding the platform or the nomination.[21] The technique was widely used in the 19th and early 20th centuries.[22] Since nationwide campaigns by candidates and binding primary elections have replaced brokered conventions, the technique has fallen out of use,[23][24] as party rule changes in the early 1970s required candidates to have nominations from more than one state.[25]

In 1860, Senator Robert M. T. Hunter was Virginia's favorite at the Democratic Party convention. He offered a proslavery voice of moderation amidst the strident rhetoric of secession.[26] In 1952, California Governor Earl Warren was the favorite son at the Republican convention, but he was challenged by Senator Richard Nixon. Nixon leveraged his way into becoming Eisenhower's choice for the vice presidential nomination.[27]

Dark horse

The term "dark horse candidate" was used at the 1844 Democratic National Convention, at which little-known Tennessee politician James K. Polk emerged as the candidate after the failure of the leading candidates to secure the necessary two-thirds majority.[28][29] Other successful dark horse candidates include:

Bolter

Delegates to the convention are expected to support whichever candidate wins the nomination. A delegate who refuses to do that walks out or bolts, sometimes in public fashion, can be referred to as a bolter.[31][32] A group of bolters may form an alternate convention that can be called a bolting convention; the remnants of the party or convention they leave behind can be called a rump convention.

At the intensely fought 1896 Republican convention, the decisive battle was on support for gold or silver. When gold forces won by tally of 812 to 110, 25 of the 110 bolted while the others supported the party nominee, William McKinley. The next day the bolters formed a new political party, dubbed the Silver Republican Party. It had a strong base of support in the silver-mining Mountain states. The Democratic nominee, William Jennings Bryan, appealed to the bolters by accepting the Silver Republican nomination; he also accepted the People's party nomination, so he ran on three tickets.[33]

Conservative Democrats from the South bolted from the 1948 Democratic Convention to form the States' Rights Party under the banner of Strom Thurmond when Minneapolis Mayor Hubert Humphrey successfully added a civil rights plank to the Democratic platform.

The most notorious instance of bolting was in 1912 when, having lost a credentials fight, the supporters of former President Theodore Roosevelt formed the so-called Bull Moose party, splitting the GOP down the middle, holding a bolting convention to nominate Roosevelt who came in second in the election, something that would never happen again.[34]

Proceedings

 
Roll call of states during the 2008 Democratic National Convention at the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado.
 
The floor of the 2008 Republican National Convention at the Xcel Energy Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

During the day, party activists hold meetings and rallies, and work on the platform. Voting and important convention-wide addresses usually take place in the evening hours.

In recent conventions, routine business such as examining the credentials of delegations, ratifying rules and procedures, election of convention officers, and adoption of the platform usually take up the business of the first two days of the convention. Balloting was usually held on the third day, with the nomination and acceptance made on the last day, but even some of these traditions have fallen away in 21st-century conventions. The only constant is that the convention ends with the nominee's acceptance speech.

Platform

Each convention produces a statement of principles known as its platform, containing goals and proposals known as planks. Relatively little of a party platform is even proposed as public policy. Much of the language is generic, while other sections are narrowly written to appeal to factions or interest groups within the party. Unlike electoral manifestos in many European countries, the platform is not binding on either the party or the candidate.

Because it is ideological rather than pragmatic, however, the platform is sometimes itself politicized. For example, defenders of abortion rights lobbied heavily to remove the Human Life Amendment plank from the 1996 Republican National Convention platform, a move fiercely resisted by conservatives despite the fact that no such amendment had ever come up for debate.

Voting

Since the 1970s, voting has for the most part been perfunctory; the selection of the major parties' nominees have rarely been in doubt, so a single ballot has always been sufficient. Each delegation announces its vote tallies, usually accompanied with some boosterism of their state or territory. The delegation may pass, nominally to retally their delegates' preferences, but often to allow a different delegation to give the leading candidate the honor of casting the majority-making vote.

Before the presidential nomination season actually begins, there is often speculation about whether a single front runner would emerge. If there is no single candidate receiving a majority of delegates at the end of the primary season, a scenario called a brokered convention would result, where a candidate would be selected either at or near the convention, through political horse-trading and lesser candidates compelling their delegates to vote for one of the front runners. The best example was the 1924 Democratic Convention, which took 103 ballots. The situation is more likely to occur in the Democratic Party, because of its proportional representation system,[35] but such a scenario has been the subject of speculation with regard to most contested nominations of both parties without actually coming to pass in recent years.[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] It is a common scenario in fiction, most recently in an episode of The West Wing. The closest to a brokered convention in recent years was at the 1976 Republican National Convention, when neither Gerald Ford nor Ronald Reagan received enough votes in the primary to lock up the nomination.[44] Since then, candidates have received enough momentum to reach a majority through pledged and bound delegates before the date of the convention.

More recently, a customary practice has been for the losing candidates in the primary season to release their delegates and exhort them to vote for the winning nominee as a sign of party unity. Thus, the vote tallied on the floor is unanimous or nearly so. Some delegates may nevertheless choose to vote for their candidate. And in 2008 both happened: Hillary Clinton received over 1,000 votes before she herself moved to nominate Barack Obama by acclamation, officially making it a unanimous vote.

The voting method at the conventions is a "roll call of the states", which include territories such as Washington D.C., American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and a catch-all "delegates abroad" category. The states are called in alphabetical order (beginning with Alabama and ending with Wyoming). The state's spokesperson (who generally begins with glowing comments about the state's history, geography, and notable party elected officials) can either choose to announce its delegate count or pass. Once all states have either declared or passed, those states which passed are called upon again to announce their delegate count. (Generally, a decision is made beforehand that some states will pass in the first round, to allow a particular state—generally either the presidential or vice-presidential nominee's home state—to be the one whose delegate count pushes the candidate "over the top", thus securing the nomination.)

Vice-presidential voting has been problematic since the beginning: at the 1972 Democratic National Convention, the vote was scattered between 50 candidates and at the 1976 Republican National Convention, the vote was also scattered widely. In 1988, both parties decided to have their designated candidates nominated by suspending the rules and declaring them nominated by acclamation; the most recent vice-presidential roll call vote was at the 1984 Republican National Convention.

If, after the first round of voting, there is no candidate with a majority of votes, subsequent roll calls are held. In between, candidates can make backroom deals, swapping delegates in exchange for positions in the administration or other favors, or candidates can release their delegates to vote for whoever they personally prefer. Roll calls continue until one candidate has a majority: the 1924 Democratic National Convention holds the record as the longest ever, as divisions within the party concerning Prohibition led to 102 ballots between Alfred E. Smith and William G. McAdoo, before the relatively unknown John W. Davis was chosen as a compromise candidate on the 103rd ballot.

Speeches

 
First Lady Pat Nixon being honored at the 1972 Republican National Convention.
 
Michelle Obama speaking at the 2008 Democratic National Convention.

Minor figures in the party are given the opportunity to address the floor of the convention during the daytime, when only the small audiences of C-SPAN and other cable television outlets are watching. The evening's speeches—designed for broadcast to a large national audience—are reserved for major speeches by notable, respected public figures; the speakers at the 2004 Democratic Convention included Ted Kennedy, a forty-two-year veteran of the United States Senate, and Jimmy Carter, a former Democratic President, while speakers at the Republican Convention included Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California and Governor George Pataki of New York, two of the largest states in the nation.

The organizers of the convention may designate one of these speeches as the keynote address, one which above all others is stated to underscore the convention's themes or political goals. For instance, the 1992 Democratic National Convention keynote address was delivered by Georgia Governor Zell Miller, whose stories of an impoverished childhood echoed the economic themes of the nominee, Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton. The 1996 Republican National Convention was keynoted by U.S. Representative Susan Molinari of New York, intended to reassure political moderates about the centrism of the nominee, former Senator Bob Dole. And the 2004 Democratic National Convention featured Senator Barack Obama, whose speech brought the future President national recognition for the first time.

Uniquely, Miller, by then a Senator, would also be the keynote speaker at the 2004 Republican Convention, despite still maintaining his Democratic registration.

The final day of the convention usually features the formal acceptance speeches from the nominees for president and vice president. Despite recent controversy maintaining that recent conventions were scripted from beginning to end, and that very little news (if any) comes out of the convention, the acceptance speech has always been televised by the networks, because it receives the highest ratings of the convention. In addition, the halls of the convention are packed at this time, with many party loyalists sneaking in. Afterwards, balloons are usually dropped and the delegates celebrate the nomination.

History

 
Barack Obama and Joe Biden appear together at the 2008 Democratic National Convention.
 
Primary foes Ronald Reagan (left) and Gerald Ford (right) shake hands during the 1976 Republican National Convention, the last major party convention whose outcome was in doubt.

First conventions

The Federalist Party invented the first national conventions in 1808 and 1812 when they held secret national meetings to pick their candidates. The Democratic-Republican Party never used conventions. Instead its members of Congress met in party caucuses to select the nominee. Regional conflicts erupted in the hotly contested 1824 election, in which factions of the Democratic-Republican Party outright rejected taking part in the caucus because of its little, heavily dwindling participation and in their view undemocratic character, rejected the eventual caucus nominee, William H. Crawford of Georgia, and backed three regional candidates, nominated by state legislatures, John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and Andrew Jackson of Tennessee (all of whom carried more states than Crawford in the election) instead.[45]

Second Party System

In 1831 the Anti-Masonic Party convened in Baltimore, Maryland to select a single presidential candidate agreeable to the whole party leadership in the 1832 presidential election. The National Republican and Democratic parties soon followed suit.[46]

1860 conventions

In Chicago, Abraham Lincoln was nominated by the Republicans.[47] The Democratic Party convention nominated Stephen A. Douglas: however, after Southern delegates walked out of or boycotted the convention, they held their own convention and nominated John C. Breckinridge.[48]

Third Party System

Chicago with its central location was the favorite convention city. In addition St. Louis, Missouri, hosted Democratic national nominating conventions in 1876, 1888, 1904, and 1916, as well as the national Republican convention of 1896 and a national Populist convention in the same year. The city had easy railroad access, numerous elegant hotels and expansive meeting facilities. Democrats wanted to meet close to their base in the "Solid South."[49]

1872 Democrats

The Democrats held a very short 1872 Democratic National Convention which endorsed the nominee of the 1872 Liberal Republican convention. The Liberal Republicans were bitterly opposed to incumbent Republican Ulysses S. Grant, and bolted to form their own party. They nominated Horace Greeley, who lost to Grant in a landslide, and the new party soon collapsed.[50]

1884 Republican

In the run-up to the 1884 GOP convention, reformers called "Mugwumps" organized their forces in the swing states, especially New York and Massachusetts. They failed to block James G. Blaine, and many bolted to the Democrats, who had nominated reformer Grover Cleveland. Young Theodore Roosevelt and Henry Cabot Lodge, leading reformers, refused to bolt—an action that preserved their leadership role in the GOP.[51]

1896 conventions

Fourth Party System

Conventions were often heated affairs, playing a vital role in deciding each party's nominee. The process remained far from democratic or transparent, however. The party convention was a scene of intrigue among political bosses, who appointed and otherwise controlled nearly all of the delegates.

1912 Republicans

Entering the convention, the forces of President Taft and ex-president Roosevelt seemed evenly matched.[52] Taft had better planning, better organizers, and more top convention officials.[53] The camps engaged in a fight for the delegations, with Taft emerging victorious, and Roosevelt claiming that several delegations were fraudulently seated because of the machinations of conservative party leaders including William Barnes Jr. and Boies Penrose.[54] Following the seating of the anti-Roosevelt delegations, California Governor Hiram Johnson proclaimed that progressives would form a new party to nominate Roosevelt.[54] Though many of Roosevelt's delegates remained at the convention, most refused to take part in the presidential ballot in protest of the contested delegates.[55] Roosevelt ultimately ran a third party campaign as part of the Progressive Party (nicknamed the "Bull Moose Party"). Taft and Roosevelt both lost the 1912 election to the Democratic nominee, Woodrow Wilson.

1924 Democrats

The party was deeply factionalized along regional and cultural lines, with two powerful factions, led by William McAdoo leaving the rural/Protestant/Southern faction, and New York Governor Al Smith representing the urban/Catholic/machine element.[56] The second Ku Klux Klan was flourishing nationwide, although no nationally prominent Democrat acknowledged membership, and the factions battled over a resolution to condemn the KKK. No compromises seemed possible as the convention dragged on for 17 days, with the balloting for presidential candidate being deadlocked for 103 ballots until dark horse John W. Davis, a neutral figure, was nominated.

Naming the younger brother of William Jennings Bryan as running mate was a sop to the rural faction.[57][58] Oklahoma was a representative border state, with the delegation deeply divided on the KKK issue.[59]

Fifth Party System

1968 Democrats

The Vietnam War energized a large number of supporters of anti-war Senator Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota, but they had no say in the matter. Vice President Hubert Humphrey—associated with the increasingly unpopular administration of Lyndon B. Johnson—did not compete in a single primary, yet controlled enough delegates to secure the Democratic nomination. This proved one of several factors behind rioting which broke out at the Democratic convention in Chicago.[60][61]

Switch to primary system

A few, mostly western, states adopted primary elections in the late 19th century and during the Progressive Era, but the catalyst for their widespread adoption came during the election of 1968. Media images of the event—angry mobs facing down police—damaged the image of the Democratic Party, which appointed a commission headed by South Dakota Senator George McGovern to select a new, less controversial method of choosing nominees. The McGovern–Fraser Commission settled on the primary election, adopted by the Democratic National Committee in 1968. The Republicans adopted the primary as their preferred method in 1972.[62] Henceforth, candidates would be given convention delegates based on their performance in primaries, and these delegates were bound to vote for their candidate. As a result, the major party presidential nominating convention has lost almost all of its old drama. The last attempt to release delegates from their candidates came at the 1980 Democratic National Convention, when Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts sought votes of delegates held by incumbent President Jimmy Carter. The last major party convention whose outcome was in doubt was the 1976 Republican National Convention, when former California Governor Ronald Reagan nearly won the nomination away from the incumbent president, Gerald Ford.[63]

Television coverage

While rank and file members had no input in early nominations, they were still drawn by the aura of mystery surrounding the convention, and networks began to broadcast speeches and debates to the general public. NBC affiliate W2XBS in New York City made the first telecast of a national party convention, of the 1940 Republican National Convention in Philadelphia, and the other two of the Big Three television networks soon followed. NBC News anchorman John Chancellor said just before the start of the 1972 Democratic National Convention, "Convention coverage is the most important thing we do. The conventions are not just political theater, but really serious stuff, and that's why all the networks have an obligation to give gavel-to-gavel coverage. It's a time when we all ought to be doing our duty."[64]

The presence of journalists at presidential nominating conventions have increased with the television networks. In 1976, the Democratic Convention consisted of 3,381 delegates and 11,500 reporters, broadcasters, editors and camera operators.[65] This is on par with the increase in the number of televisions in American homes. In 1960, 87 percent of people had a television; by 1976, 98 percent did.[66] By the 1992 conventions, network coverage increased from three networks (NBC, ABC and CBS) to five networks (NBC, ABC, CBS, Fox and PBS).[67] At the 1996 Republican National Convention there were approximately seven journalists per one delegate, or about 15,000 journalists.[65]

The increase of the media at these conventions originally led to a growth in the public's interest in elections. Voter turnout in the primaries increased from fewer than five million voters in 1948 to around thirteen million in 1952.[68] By broadcasting the conventions on the television, people were more connected to the suspense and the decisions being made, therefore making them more politically aware, and more educated voters. When scholars studied the 1976 conventions they determined that by watching nomination conventions, even viewers that were not previously very politically active developed a much stronger interest in the election process and the candidate.[69]

Decrease in importance

 
News anchor Ted Koppel (pictured in 2002), who midway through the 1996 Republican National Convention told viewers that he was going home because it has become "more of an infomercial than a news event."[70]

With the rise of the direct primary, and in particular with states moving earlier and earlier in the primary calendar since the 1988 election, the nominee has often secured a commanding majority of delegates far in advance of the convention. As such, any actual business conducted at the major parties' conventions (such as the roll call of delegates) have largely become a formality, and the main focus is on promoting the nominee and party platform to a wider audience. For instance, speeches by noted and popular party figures are scheduled for the coveted primetime hours, when most people would be watching.[71][70][72]

During the 1996 Republican National Convention (where the RNC had purchased time-brokered blocks of party-produced coverage on the cable network The Family Channel in response to decreasing network coverage),[70][72] ABC News Nightline host Ted Koppel abruptly ended his coverage of the 1996 conventions, arguing that the events had effectively become an "infomercial" for the party's nominee rather than a bona fide news event.[70] In 2020, political historian Michael Barone argued in an op-ed that the advents of direct distance dialing and television had made the original purposes of the conventions—being "the only place and time where party politicians could communicate frankly and bargain personally", and "discover which candidates had genuine support and which just gave lip service"–increasingly redundant, and that the events had become largely "choreographed" celebrations of the party nominee.[73]

The changing nature of the conventions, as well as overall changes in television viewing habits, have changed how broadcasters cover the conventions. Coverage of the conventions is now typically relegated to news channels, C-SPAN, and streaming outlets; by 2012, the major networks usually only provided an hour of coverage per-night, focusing on the headlining speakers.[74][75] PBS continues to provide full primetime coverage of the conventions, although it breaks away from minor speakers and mundane business for analysis and discussion.[76]

COVID-19 affected 2020 conventions

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 forced both major and third parties to modify the format of their conventions to comply with social distancing and restrictions on public gatherings. The Democratic convention was conducted as a virtual event with all speakers appearing from remote locations, and no in-person gatherings of delegates. To fulfill the host city contract with Milwaukee, the event's production was conducted from the Wisconsin Center.[77][78][79] The acceptance speeches of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were held at the Chase Center on the Riverfront in Biden's hometown of Wilmington, Delaware.[80]

Donald Trump repeatedly pushed for the Republican convention to be held in-person as normal. The event was originally scheduled for Spectrum Center in Charlotte; after North Carolina's Democratic governor Roy Cooper refused to allow it to be held at full scale or without mandatory masking or social distancing, the RNC announced plans to move most of the in-person events to Jacksonville, Florida,[81] but still conduct the official business from Charlotte. However, after Jacksonville enacted similar restrictions, and amid nationwide increases in cases, Trump announced in July 2020 that the events in Jacksonville had been called off.[82][83][84][85][86]

As with the Democratic convention, the Republican convention was conducted in a downsized form. To fulfill the host city contract with Charlotte, a program of official business was conducted in-person on August 24 with a smaller contingent of 336 delegates,[87] including the roll call.[88][89] The remainder of the event consisted of primetime programs of pre-recorded speeches, filmed mainly at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium in Washington, D.C.[90][91] The speeches by Vice President Pence (from Fort McHenry in Baltimore), and by First Lady Melania Trump and President Trump (from the White House Rose Garden), were conducted live and in-person with audiences of supporters; CDC-recommended mitigations were largely ignored.[92][93]

2024 conventions

The 2024 Republican National Convention will be held in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The 2024 Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago, Illinois.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Presidential Campaign Finance". Eric M. Appleman/Democracy in Action.
  2. ^ . democrats.org. November 2005. Archived from the original on March 10, 2008. Retrieved December 28, 2007.
  3. ^ "NFL season opener yields to McCain speech". Reuters. March 26, 2008.
  4. ^ Jaffe, Alexandra (January 23, 2015). "Democratic National Convention date set". CNN.com. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  5. ^ "Exclusive: Democrats, anticipating heated primary, set earlier 2020 convention date". CNN. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
  6. ^ "2020 Republican National Convention dates announced". WCNC.com. October 1, 2018.
  7. ^ Gabby Orr (April 14, 2022). "Republicans may decide this year on host cities for 2024 and 2028 conventions". CNN. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
  8. ^ Evan McMorris-Santoro (November 29, 2011). "Team Obama Likes Its Chances: AZ, VA, NC Could Go Democrat In 2012 (VIDEO)". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  9. ^ a b c "5.3 Cities That Have Hosted Conventions of Major National Political Parties 1832–2020 | The American Presidency Project". www.presidency.ucsb.edu. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  10. ^ a b c Grauer, Neil A. (August 5, 2000). "A long time between political conventions". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  11. ^ Rasmussen, Frederick N. (August 2, 2012). "Baltimore has been site of many national political conventions". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
  12. ^ a b Johnson, Glen (April 25, 2002). "Hub, 4 rivals buff their Democratic party ware". Newspapers.com. The Boston Globe. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  13. ^ Dena Bunis. . Ocregister.com. Archived from the original on October 15, 2008. Retrieved October 25, 2009.
  14. ^ Lloyd, Robert (August 29, 2008). "Barack Obama, Al Gore raise the roof at Invesco Field". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved October 31, 2009.
  15. ^ "1972 Political Conventions in Miami Beach | Flashback Miami". flashbackmiami.com. Miami Herald. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  16. ^ "Raucous '68 Convention Led to Changes in Nomination Process". newswise.com. July 15, 2008.
  17. ^ "Constitutional Safeguards in the Selection of Delegates to Presidential Nominating Conventions". The Yale Law Journal. 78 (7): 1228–1252. 1969. doi:10.2307/795003. JSTOR 795003.
  18. ^ a b c d "Who gets to be a Delegate at the Presidential Nominating Conventions?". CBS News.
  19. ^ a b c d "The Rules of the Republican Party" (PDF). The Republican National Committee. July 18, 2016. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
  20. ^ Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, Dictionary of American political terms (Wayne State UP, 1962) pp 147–148.
  21. ^ "How 'Favorite Son' Politics Works". The Pittsburgh Press. January 12, 1928 – via Google News Archive Search.
  22. ^ "How Term 'Favorite Son' Got Started in Politics". The Free Lance-Star. January 30, 1960 – via Google News Archive Search.
  23. ^ "No Demo Favorite Sons". The Deseret News. September 20, 1971 – via Google News Archive Search.
  24. ^ Shafer, Byron E. (1988). Bifurcated Politics: Evolution and Reform in the National Party Convention. Harvard University Press. p. 71. ISBN 9780674072565. Favorite son politics.
  25. ^ Tarr, Dave; Benenson, Bob (October 22, 2013). Elections A to Z. CQ Press. ISBN 9781506331508 – via Google Books.
  26. ^ R. Randall Moore, "Robert MT Hunter and the Crisis of the Union, 1860–1861." Southern Historian 13 (1992): 25–35.
  27. ^ Irwin F. Gellman, The Contender: Richard Nixon, the Congress Years, 1946–1952 (2017) pp. 403, 433, 438, 442.
  28. ^ William Safire, Safire's political dictionary (Oxford UP, 2008) pp 166–167.
  29. ^ Sperber and Trittschuh, Dictionary of American political terms (1962) pp 112–113.
  30. ^ Kenneth D. Ackerman, Dark Horse: The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A. Garfield (2003) online.
  31. ^ Safire, Safire's political dictionary (2008) p 69.
  32. ^ Sperber and Trittschuh, Dictionary of American political terms (1962) p 52.
  33. ^ Arthur M, Schlesinger, Jr., ed. Critical presidential elections in American history (1972) pp.  241–44, 250.
  34. ^ Robert M. La Follette. "La Follette's autobiography; a personal narrative of political experiences" (PDF). Library of Congress. Retrieved March 22, 2023. Roosevelt and his followers held a meeting in Orchestra Hall, where, in a speech to the delegates, he bade them return to their constituencies, to test the sentiment of the people, and meet again at a later time to determine as to the advisability of creating a new party—a Roosevelt party—a party, the sole excuse for the formation of which was based upon the contention that delegates in the Republican Convention were stolen from one candidate and given to another. "Thou shalt not steal," was made the keynote of the Roosevelt bolting convention.
  35. ^ Robert Moran on Election 2004 on National Review Online
  36. ^ Frum, David (February 20, 2012). "GOP's worst nightmare – a contested convention". CNN.com. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (2012 Republicans)
  37. ^ Garber, Kent (February 8, 2008). "Obama, Clinton Head Toward Contested Convention". USNews.com. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (2008 Democrats)
  38. ^ Blankley, Tony (December 19, 2007). "None of the Above: GOP Heading to a Brokered Convention". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved June 30, 2005. (2008 Republicans)
  39. ^ Orin, Deborah (January 22, 2004). "Dems May Be In for Brokered Convention". New York Post. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (2004 Democrats)
  40. ^ Rusher, William (March 1, 1996). "A fun idea: Brokered convention". Rome News-Tribune. p. 4. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (1996 Republicans)
  41. ^ Wicker, Tom (September 3, 1991). "Snakeskins and Democrats". Lakeland Ledger. p. 7A. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (1992 Democrats)
  42. ^ "Democrats worrying about a brokered convention". The Spokesman-Review. Spokane, Wash. Associated Press. March 17, 1988. p. A6. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (1988 Democrats)
  43. ^ Greenfield, Jeff (May 18, 1984). "Brokered convention: Is it possible?". The Milwaukee Sentinel. p. 16. Part 1. Retrieved June 30, 2015. (1984 Democrats)
  44. ^ . Time. August 2, 1976. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved May 27, 2010.
  45. ^ Kolodny, Robin. "The Several Elections of 1824." Congress & the Presidency: A Journal of Capital Studies 23#2 (1996) online[dead link].
  46. ^ Michael Kazin et al. eds. The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History (2011) pp 155–62, 310–314.
  47. ^ Kenneth M. Stampp, The Imperiled Union: Essays on the Background of the Civil War (1858) pp 136–62.
  48. ^ Douglas R. Egerton, Year of Meteors: Stephen Douglas, Abraham Lincoln, and the Election that Brought on the Civil War (2010) excerpt
  49. ^ Gary N. Smith, "St. Louis Hosts the Political Conventions," Gateway Heritage: The Magazine of the Missouri Historical Society (Spring 1981) 1#4 pp 10–17.
  50. ^ Matthew T. Downey, "Horace Greeley and the Politicians: The Liberal Republican Convention in 1872." Journal of American History 53.4 (1967): 727–750 online.
  51. ^ Edward Kohn, "Crossing the Rubicon: Theodore Roosevelt, Henry Cabot Lodge, and the 1884 Republican National Convention." Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 5.1 (2006): 19–45 online
  52. ^ "Taft Victory in the First Clash; Root Chosen Chairman, 558 to 502". The New York Times. June 19, 1912.
  53. ^ Thomas E. Felt, "Organizing A National Convention: A Lesson From Senator Dick." Ohio Historical Quarterly (1958) 87#1 pp 50–62.
  54. ^ a b "Roosevelt, Beaten, to Bolt Today; Gives the Word in Early Morning; Taft's Nomination Seems Assured". The New York Times. June 20, 1912. Retrieved October 8, 2015.
  55. ^ "Taft Renominated by the Republican Convention; Roosevelt Named as Candidate by Bolters". The New York Times. June 23, 1912.
  56. ^ James C. Prude, "William Gibbs McAdoo and the Democratic National Convention of 1924." Journal of Southern History 38.4 (1972): 621–628 online.
  57. ^ David B. Burner, "The Democratic Party in the Election of 1924." Mid-America 46 (1964): 92–113.
  58. ^ Robert K. Murray, The 103rd Ballot: Democrats and the Disaster in Madison Square Garden (1976).
  59. ^ William D. Pennington, "The Oklahoma Delegation to the Democratic Convention of 1924." Chronicles of Oklahoma (Dec 1984) 52#4 pp 408–419.
  60. ^ Michael A. Cohen, American Maelstrom: The 1968 Election and the Politics of Division (Oxford UP, 2016) pp. 261–286.
  61. ^ Jules Witcover, Party of the People: A History of the Democrats (2003)
  62. ^ Judith A. Center, "1972 Democratic Convention Reforms and Party Democracy," Political Science Quarterly 89#2 (1974): 325–350 online
  63. ^ Michael Kazin et al. eds. The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History (2011) pp 152–55, 310–314.
  64. ^ Paletz & Elson (1976). "Television Coverage of Presidential Conventions: Now You See It, Now You Don't". Political Science Quarterly. 91 (1): 109–131. doi:10.2307/2149161. JSTOR 2149161.
  65. ^ a b Trent & Friedenberg (2004). Political Campaign Communication Principles & Practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  66. ^ Kraus, Sidney (1979). The Great Debates. Indiana University Press.
  67. ^ Trent & Friedenberg (2004). Political Campaign Communication Principles and Practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  68. ^ Valley, David (1974). "Significant Characteristics of Democratic Presidential Nomination Acceptance Speeches". Central States Speech Journal. 25: 56–62. doi:10.1080/10510977409367769.
  69. ^ Kraus, Sidney (1979). The Great Debate. Indiana University Press.
  70. ^ a b c d Bennet, James (August 15, 1996). "'Nightline' Pulls the Plug on Convention Coverage". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  71. ^ Peters, Jeremy W. (August 20, 2012). "Romney Campaign Works Feverishly to Project Relaxed Image". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  72. ^ a b Johnson, Steve. "Some Media Chafe Under Choreography of 'News'". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  73. ^ Barone, Michael (July 24, 2020). "Goodbye, After Nearly Two Centuries, to the National Conventions". Rasmussen Reports.
  74. ^ Hagey, Keach (August 20, 2012). "Online Media Will Star at the Conventions". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  75. ^ Mirkinson, Jack (August 20, 2012). "Networks Reducing Convention Coverage Yet Again". HuffPost. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
  76. ^ "Political conventions lose drama, TV audience". July 25, 2004.
  77. ^ Epstein, Reid J. (June 24, 2020). "Democratic Convention Moves to Smaller Venue, as Delegates Are Urged to Stay Away". The New York Times. from the original on June 24, 2020. Retrieved June 24, 2020.
  78. ^ "2020 DNC pulled from Fiserv Forum, will move toward mostly virtual event". CBS58. June 24, 2020. from the original on June 25, 2020. Retrieved June 24, 2020.
  79. ^ Spicuzza, Mary; Glauber, Bill (June 24, 2020). "Scaled-back Democratic National Convention overhauled as state delegates no longer traveling to Milwaukee, event moved out of Fiserv Forum". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. from the original on August 19, 2020. Retrieved August 15, 2020.
  80. ^ Holveck, Brandon (August 16, 2020). "Downtown Wilmington prepares to play host to Democratic National Convention". The News Journal. from the original on August 19, 2020. Retrieved August 18, 2020.
  81. ^ Bloch, Emily. "New RNC memo discloses multiple convention venues, restricted number of attendees". USA Today. from the original on July 17, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  82. ^ Haberman, Maggie; Mazzei, Patricia; Karni, Annie (July 23, 2020). "Trump Abruptly Cancels Republican Convention in Florida: 'It's Not the Right Time'". The New York Times. from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  83. ^ Linskey, Annie (June 11, 2020). "Republicans announce Trump convention events will move to Jacksonville". The Washington Post. from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved June 11, 2020.
  84. ^ Samuels, Brett (June 11, 2020). "GOP moves main 2020 convention events, including Trump speech, to Jacksonville". The Hill. from the original on June 12, 2020. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
  85. ^ Oprysko, Caitlin. "Trump cancels GOP convention events in Jacksonville". Politico. from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  86. ^ Karni, Annie; Haberman, Maggie (June 6, 2020). "How Trump's Demands for a Full House in Charlotte Derailed a Convention". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 19, 2022.
  87. ^ Corasaniti, Nick (August 17, 2020). "The M.V.P.s of This Year's Conventions? The Digital and I.T. Teams". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  88. ^ Morrill, Jim (August 7, 2020). "NC officials say they can be flexible for crowd size at RNC | Charlotte Observer". Charlotte Observer. from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  89. ^ "Republican National Convention kicks off in Charlotte, subdued – then Trump shows up". Charlotte Observer. August 24, 2020. from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  90. ^ Vazquez, Maegan (August 25, 2020). "What to watch on the second night of the Republican convention". CNN. from the original on August 27, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  91. ^ Kilgore, Ed (August 14, 2020). "Most Republican Convention Speeches Will Be Delivered From D.C." Intelligencer. from the original on August 15, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  92. ^ Vigdor, Neil (August 26, 2020). "Masks and social distancing are mostly absent from Republican convention events". The New York Times. from the original on September 7, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  93. ^ Colvin, Jill (August 27, 2020). "What virus? At the Republican National Convention, the COVID-19 pandemic is largely ignored". Chicago Tribune. from the original on August 28, 2020. Retrieved August 28, 2020.

Bibliography

  • Arterton, F. Christopher. Media politics: The news strategies of presidential campaigns (Free Press, 1984).
  • Becker, Carl. "The Unit Rule in National Nominating Conventions." American Historical Review 5.1 (1899): 64–82. online
  • Binkley, Wilfred E. American political parties: their natural history (1962) online
  • Carleton, William G. "The revolution in the presidential nominating convention." Political Science Quarterly 72.2 (1957): 224–240. online
  • Chase, James S. Emergence of the Presidential Nominating Convention, 1789–1832 (Houghton Mifflin: 1973).
  • Chester, Edward W A guide to political platforms (1977) pp 127–135 online
  • Congressional Research Service. Presidential Elections in the United States: A Primer. (Washington, Congressional Research Service, 2000).
  • Costain, Anne N. "An analysis of voting in american national nominating conventions, 1940–1976." American Politics Quarterly 6.1 (1978): 95–120.
  • Cowan, Geoffrey. Let the People Rule: Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of the Presidential Primary (WW Norton & Company, 2016).
  • Davis, James W. National conventions in an age of party reform (Greenwood, 1983).
  • Eaton, Herbert. Presidential timber: A history of nominating conventions, 1868–1960 (1964) online.
  • Key, Jr., V.O. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups (4th ed. 1958) pp 414–470. online
  • Miles, Edwin A. "The keynote speech at national nominating conventions." Quarterly journal of Speech 46.1 (1960): 26–31.
  • Morison, Samuel E. "The First National Nominating Convention, 1808." American Historical Review 17.4 (1912): 744–763. on 1808 Federalists online
  • Murdock, John S. "The First National Nominating Convention." American Historical Review 1.4 (1896): 680–683. online on 1812 Federalists
  • Nichols, Roy F. "It Happens Every Four Years," American Heritage (June 1956) 7#4 pp 20–33.
  • Pfau, Michael William. "Conventions of Deliberation? Convention Addresses and Deliberative Containment in the Second Party System' Rhetoric and Public Affairs 9#4 (2006), pp. 635–654 online
  • Republican National Convention 2004: Convention History
  • Sautter, R. Craig, and Edward M. Burke. Inside the Wigwam: Chicago Presidential Conventions, 1860–1996 (Loyola Press, 1996).
  • Silver, Adam. "Consensus and Conflict: A Content Analysis of American Party Platforms, 1840–1896." Social Science History 42.3 (2018): 441–467 online.

Primary sources

  • Chester, Edward W A guide to political platforms (1977) online
  • Porter, Kirk H. and Donald Bruce Johnson, eds. National party platforms, 1840–1964 (1965) online 1840–1956

External links

  • NewsHour: Interview with historian Michael Beschloss on the origins of the convention process
  • History House: Conventional Wisdom
  • National Party Conventions eGuide, The Campaign Finance Institute,
  • Corpus of Political Speeches Free access to political speeches by American and other politicians, developed by Hong Kong Baptist University Library

united, states, presidential, nominating, convention, list, presidential, nominating, conventions, list, presidential, nominating, conventions, united, states, political, convention, held, every, four, years, united, states, most, political, parties, will, fie. For a list of U S presidential nominating conventions see List of presidential nominating conventions in the United States A United States presidential nominating convention is a political convention held every four years in the United States by most of the political parties who will be fielding nominees in the upcoming U S presidential election The formal purpose of such a convention is to select the party s nominee for popular election as President as well as to adopt a statement of party principles and goals known as the party platform and adopt the rules for the party s activities including the presidential nominating process for the next election cycle The 1876 Democratic National Convention at the Merchants Exchange Building in St Louis Missouri Samuel J Tilden and Thomas A Hendricks were nominated for president and vice president respectivelySince 1972 the delegates have been mostly selected in presidential primaries state by state This allows the nominees to be decided before the convention opens In the 1976 GOP race Ronald Reagan did well in the primaries but had clearly lost to incumbent Gerald Ford when the convention opened Other delegates to these conventions include political party members who are seated automatically and are called unpledged delegates because they can choose for themselves for which candidate they vote Generally use of presidential campaign nominating convention refers to the two major parties quadrennial events the Democratic and Republican National Conventions Some minor parties also select their nominees by convention including the Green Party the Socialist Party USA the Libertarian Party the Constitution Party and the Reform Party USA The 2020 COVID 19 pandemic forced both the major and third parties to cancel their usual conventions that year and instead schedule virtual affairs with minimal participation as large energetic crowds risked spreading the virus Contents 1 Logistics 1 1 Calendars 1 2 Participation 1 3 Locations 1 3 1 Table of cities metro areas by number of major party conventions hosted 1 3 2 Table of states federal districts by number of major party conventions hosted 2 Delegate selection process 2 1 Democratic selection process 2 2 Republican selection process 3 Favorite son dark horse bolter 3 1 Favorite son 3 2 Dark horse 3 3 Bolter 4 Proceedings 4 1 Platform 4 2 Voting 4 3 Speeches 5 History 5 1 First conventions 5 2 Second Party System 5 2 1 1860 conventions 5 3 Third Party System 5 3 1 1872 Democrats 5 3 2 1884 Republican 5 3 3 1896 conventions 5 4 Fourth Party System 5 4 1 1912 Republicans 5 4 2 1924 Democrats 5 5 Fifth Party System 5 5 1 1968 Democrats 5 5 2 Switch to primary system 5 5 3 Television coverage 5 5 4 Decrease in importance 5 5 5 COVID 19 affected 2020 conventions 5 5 6 2024 conventions 6 See also 7 References 7 1 Bibliography 7 2 Primary sources 8 External linksLogistics EditCalendars Edit The convention cycle begins with the Call to Convention Usually issued about 18 months in advance the Call is an invitation from the national party to the state and territory parties to convene to select a presidential nominee It also sets out the number of delegates to be awarded to each as well as the rules for the nomination process The conventions are usually scheduled for four days of business with the exception of the 1972 Republican and 2012 Democratic conventions which were three days each The 2008 and 2012 Republican conventions were also three days each but in each case was shortened from the scheduled four days due to weather issues There is no statute dictating the order of the conventions but since 1956 the party to which the incumbent president belongs has held its convention second Between 1864 and 1952 the Democrats went second every year except for 1888 In 1956 when Republican Dwight D Eisenhower was the incumbent the Democrats went first and the party out of power has gone first ever since Between 1936 and 1952 during administrations led by Democratic presidents Franklin D Roosevelt and Harry S Truman the Democrats had their convention after the Republicans but it is unclear whether they went second because they held the White House or because they had almost always gone second Since 1952 all major party conventions have been held in the months of July August or for the first time in 2004 early September Election laws in some states would likely prevent conventions from moving into mid September Between the middle of the 20th century and 2004 the two major party conventions were primarily scheduled about one month apart often with the Summer Olympics in between so they did not have to compete for viewers In 1996 both were held in August to accommodate the Atlanta Olympics in July the last Summer Olympics to date to be played in the U S In 2000 both conventions preceded the Sydney Olympics in late September In 2008 and 2012 the Democratic and Republican conventions were moved to back to back weeks following the conclusion of the Beijing and London Olympics respectively One reason for these late conventions had to do with campaign finance laws which allow the candidates to spend an unlimited amount of money before the convention but forbid fundraising after the convention for the parties to receive federal campaign funds 1 However if Barack Obama s choice not to receive federal campaign funds for the 2008 general election is repeated in future elections this reason for the late scheduling of conventions will no longer be valid Another reason for the lateness of the conventions is due to the primary calendar which ends in early June and the political party s desire to turn the convention into a four day tightly scripted political rally for their nominee which coincidentally happens to have a roll call vote for president This includes such logistics as where each delegation sits on the convention floor the order of speeches how the nominee wants to present him or herself and allows time for any negotiations in regards to the running mate Finally the parties also did not want to schedule their conventions around the Olympics One reason why the Democratic Party held its 2008 convention after the two week long Beijing Olympics was according to them to maximize momentum for our Democratic ticket in the final months of the Presidential election 2 But moving the conventions later into early September led to conflicts with the National Football League s season kickoff game which opens the season on the first Thursday of September However the NFL accommodated the conventions and moved its games to an earlier start time in 2008 3 and an earlier date in 2012 In 2016 both the Republican and Democratic conventions moved to July before the Rio de Janeiro Olympics in August One reason why the Republican Party wanted a July convention was to help avoid a drawn out primary battle similar to what happened in 2012 that left the party fractured heading into the general election The Democrats then followed suit so they could provide a quicker response to the Republicans rather than wait for more than two weeks until after the Olympics were over 4 The 2020 Democratic National Convention was originally scheduled to take place July 13 16 5 but was postponed to August 17 20 2020 due to the COVID 19 pandemic The 2020 Republican National Convention took place from August 24 27 6 The Tokyo Olympics originally scheduled to open on July 24 2020 were also postponed because of the pandemic to July 2021 This was the first time that nominating conventions did not coincide with the Olympics since 1944 when the games were cancelled due to World War II Participation Edit The 2008 Green Party National Convention held in Chicago Various third parties also hold their own national conventions Each party sets its own rules for the participation and format of the convention Broadly speaking each U S state and territory party is apportioned a select number of voting representatives individually known as delegates and collectively as the delegation Each party uses its own formula for determining the size of each delegation factoring in such considerations as population proportion of that state s Congressional representatives or state government officials who are members of the party and the state s voting patterns in previous presidential elections The selection of individual delegates and their alternates too is governed by the bylaws of each state party or in some cases by state law The 2004 Democratic National Convention counted 4 353 delegates and 611 alternates The 2004 Republican National Convention had 2 509 delegates and 2 344 alternates However other attendees who do not participate in the formal business of the convention dwarf these individuals numerically These include non delegate party officials and activists invited guests and companions and international observers not to mention numerous members of the news media volunteers protesters and local business proprietors and promoters hoping to capitalize on the quadrennial event Locations Edit The Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans was the site of the 1988 Republican National Convention which nominated George H W Bush and Dan Quayle for president and vice president In recent decades the two major parties have held their conventions at sports stadiums and arenas The convention is typically held in a major city selected by the national party organization 18 24 months before the election is to be held although the Republican National Committee voted in 2022 to allow the party to select its presidential convention sites six years in advance 7 As the two major conventions have grown into large publicized affairs with significant economic impact cities today compete vigorously to be awarded host responsibilities citing their meeting venues lodging facilities and entertainment as well as offering economic incentives The location of early conventions was dictated by the difficulty of transporting delegates from far flung parts of the country early Democratic and Whig Conventions were frequently held in the central Eastern Seaboard port of Baltimore Maryland As the U S expanded westward and railroads connected cities Midwestern locations such as Chicago Illinois which since 1860 has held 25 Republican and Democratic Conventions combined more than any other city became the favored hosts In present times political symbolism affects the selection of the host city as much as economic or logistical considerations do A particular city might be selected to enhance the standing of a favorite son or in an effort to curry favor with residents of that state For example in 2011 Obama campaign manager Jim Messina noted We put the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte North Carolina in part because we believe so deeply in a New South map 8 Likewise New York City was selected as the host of the 2004 Republican National Convention to evoke memories of George W Bush s leadership during the September 11 attacks Milwaukee in the politically competitive state of Wisconsin was chosen as the site of both the 2020 Democratic National Convention although due to COVID 19 it was essentially not held there and has been selected to be the host of the subsequent 2024 Republican National Convention Having been the site of 25 major party conventions Chicago Illinois has been the most frequent host city of major party conventions hosting more than a quarter of all of them Chicago has been both the most frequent host of Democratic conventions hosting 11 and Republican conventions hosting 14 Chicago was last the site of a major party convention in 1996 when it was the host of that year s Democratic convention Nine of the conventions held in Chicago took place in the 19th century and sixteen of them took place in the 20th century Chicago s frequency as a host significantly dropped off after the 1968 Democratic National Convention which saw infamous protest activity and police response with Chicago only hosting a single convention since 9 In the 19th century the most frequent host city of major party conventions was Baltimore Maryland the site of the first presidential nominating convention 10 Between 1832 and 1872 Baltimore saw twelve major party conventions However the city has only since played host city to a single other major party convention the 1912 DNC 9 At the time that it was a frequent host of major party conventions the city was seen as an appealing location for these events due to its accessibility by various means of transit railroads steamships and turnpikes the presence of several meeting spaces in the city considered spacious by the era s standards quality hotels in the city and quality dining in the city 11 Baltimore is currently considered to lack an appropriate venue by the standards and requirements of modern conventions in terms of seating capacity space and logistics 12 10 When the city made a longshot bid for the 2004 Democratic National Convention the city proposed hosting the convention underneath a temporary canopy that would be erected at Oriole Park at Camden Yards which would have likely necessitated its baseball team tenant to vacate the venue for a roughly two month period of their season 12 Potential lack of sufficient hotels has also been cited as an obstacle to Baltimore playing host to another major party convention any time soon 10 The conventions historically have been held inside convention centers but in recent decades the two major parties have favored sports arenas and stadiums to accommodate the increasing capacity the former because indoor arenas are usually off season outside of WNBA sites allowing plenty of time for preparation the major political parties have avoided baseball stadiums ever since the 1992 Republican National Convention at the Houston Astrodome forced the Houston Astros to play 26 consecutive road games Bids for the 2008 Republican National Convention for example were required to have a facility with a seating capacity of at least 20 500 people including a convention floor of about 5 500 delegates and alternates 13 the Xcel Energy Center in Saint Paul Minnesota was eventually selected Meanwhile approximately 84 000 people attended the last day of the 2008 Democratic National Convention at Denver s Invesco Field at Mile High 14 The last day of the 2012 Democratic Convention originally also was scheduled for an outdoor football stadium but was moved indoors due to weather concerns Excepting the pandemic affected 2020 conventions the last non sporting venue to host the Democratic National Convention was San Francisco s Moscone Center in 1984 In 1996 the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego became the last non sporting venue to host the Republican National Convention Table of cities metro areas by number of major party conventions hosted Edit Of the 95 major party conventions held through the 2020 election cycle 27 different metro areas have hosted conventions On two occasions parties had more than one official host city for their conventions these being the 1860 Democratic National Conventions and the 2020 Republican National Convention More than half of all major party conventions have been held in just three cities Chicago Baltimore and Philadelphia On six occasions both the Democratic and Republican parties held their conventions in the same city However this has not occurred since 1972 15 Chicago played double duty as a host city four times in 1884 1932 1944 and 1952 Philadelphia Pennsylvania was host of both major party conventions in 1948 and Miami Beach Florida was host to both in 1972 Two metro areas have seen more than one of their municipalities be the site of major party conventions Minneapolis Saint Paul is home to Minneapolis site of the 1892 RNC and St Paul site of the 2008 RNC The San Francisco Bay Area is home to Daly City site of the 1956 RNC and 1964 RNC and San Francisco site of the 1920 DNC and 1984 DNC Cities metro areas by number of conventions hosted 9 Cities metro areas Total number hosted Democraticconventions Republicanconventions WhigconventionsNumber hosted Years Number hosted Years Number hosted YearsChicago Illinois 25 11 1864 1884 1892 1896 1932 1940 1944 1952 1956 1968 1996 14 1860 1868 1880 1884 1888 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1932 1944 1952 1960 0 Baltimore Maryland 13 9 1832 1835 1840 1844 1848 1852 1860 1872 1912 1 1864 3 1844 1852 1856Philadelphia Pennsylvania 10 3 1936 1948 2016 6 1856 1872 1900 1940 1948 2000 1 1848New York City 6 5 1868 1924 1976 1980 1992 1 2004 0 St Louis Missouri 5 4 1876 1888 1904 1916 1 1896 0 San Francisco Bay Area California cities of Daly City and San Francisco 4 2 1920 1984 2 1956 1964 0 Cincinnati Ohio 3 2 1856 1880 1 1876 0 Cleveland Ohio 3 0 3 1924 1936 2016 0 Kansas City Missouri 3 1 1900 2 1928 1976 0 Miami Beach Florida located in the Miami metropolitan area 3 1 1972 2 1968 1972 0 Charlotte North Carolina 2 1 2012 1 2020 0 Denver Colorado 2 2 1908 2008 0 0 Houston Texas 2 1 1928 1 1992 0 Los Angeles California 2 2 1960 2000 0 0 Minneapolis Saint Paul Minnesota 2 0 2 1892 2008 0 Atlanta Georgia 1 1 1988 0 0 Atlantic City New Jersey 1 1 1964 0 0 Boston Massachusetts 1 1 2004 0 0 Charleston South Carolina 1 1 1860 0 0 Dallas Texas 1 0 1 1984 0 Detroit Michigan 1 0 1 1980 0 Harrisburg Pennsylvania 1 0 0 1 1839Milwaukee Wisconsin 1 1 2020 0 0 New Orleans Louisiana 1 0 1 1988 0 San Diego California 1 0 1 1996 0 Tampa Florida 1 0 1 2012 0 Washington D C 1 0 1 2020 0 Years with multiple convention host cities Table of states federal districts by number of major party conventions hosted Edit As of the 2020 election cycle nineteen states and the District of Columbia have hosted major party presidential nominating conventions Thirty one states have never hosted one Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Idaho Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Maine Mississippi Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Rhode Island South Dakota Tennessee Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wyoming On the two aforementioned occasions in which more than one city was the host of a major party s convention s the 1860 Democratic conventions and 2020 Republican convention the different cities were also located in different states districts Of the 95 major party conventions held up through the 2020 election cycle more than a quarter have taken place in Illinois Combined the states of Illinois Maryland and Pennsylvania have been the sites of more than half of all major party conventions Combined the seven states that have each held six or more major party conventions California Illinois Maryland Missouri New York Ohio Pennsylvania have been the locations of more than three quarters of all major party conventions Six states have seen more than one of their metro areas host a convention California Los Angeles San Diego and the San Francisco Bay area Florida Miami Beach and Tampa Missouri Kansas City and St Louis Ohio Cincinnati and Cleveland Pennsylvania Harrisburg and Philadelphia Texas Dallas and Houston Up through the 2020 election cycle states located in the midwestern United States Illinois Michigan Minnesota Missouri Ohio Wisconsin have been the locations of a combined 43 major party conventions States and districts located in the northeastern United States the District of Columbia Maryland Massachusetts New Jersey New York and Pennsylvania have hosted a combined 33 major party conventions States located in the southern United States Florida Georgia Louisiana North Carolina South Carolina and Texas have hosted a combined 12 major party conventions States located in the western United States California and Colorado have hosted a combined nine major party conventions The region that has gone the longest since hosting a major party convention is the western United States which has not been the site of a major party convention since the 2008 DNC was held in Denver Colorado States by number of conventions hosted States Total number hosted Democraticconventions Republicanconventions WhigconventionsNumber hosted Years Number hosted Years Number hosted YearsIllinois Chicago 25 11 1864 1884 1892 1896 1932 1940 1944 1952 1956 1968 1996 14 1860 1868 1880 1884 1888 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1932 1944 1952 1960 0 Maryland Baltimore 13 9 1832 1835 1840 1844 1848 1852 1860 1872 1912 1 1864 3 1844 1852 1856Pennsylvania Harrisburg Philadelphia 11 3 1936 1948 2016 6 1856 1872 1900 1940 1948 2000 2 1839 1848Missouri Kansas City St Louis 8 5 1876 1888 1900 1904 1916 3 1896 1928 1976 0 California Los Angeles San Diego San Francisco Bay area 7 4 1920 1960 1984 2000 3 1956 1964 1996 0 New York New York City 6 5 1868 1924 1976 1980 1992 1 2004 0 Ohio Cincinnati Cleveland 6 2 1856 1880 4 1876 1924 1936 2016 0 Florida Miami Beach Tampa 4 1 1972 3 1968 1972 2012 0 Texas Dallas Houston 3 1 1928 2 1984 1992 0 Colorado Denver 2 2 1908 2008 0 0 Minnesota Minneapolis St Paul 2 0 2 1892 2008 0 North Carolina Charlotte 2 1 2012 1 2020 0 Georgia Atlanta 1 1 1988 0 0 Louisiana New Orleans 1 0 1 1988 0 Massachusetts Boston 1 1 2004 0 0 Michigan Detroit 1 0 1 1980 0 New Jersey Atlantic City 1 1 1964 0 0 South Carolina Charleston 1 1 1860 0 0 Washington D C 1 0 1 2020 0 Wisconsin Milwaukee 1 1 2020 0 0 Years with multiple convention host statesDelegate selection process EditMain article United States presidential primary Delegate selection rules Every year of a presidential election the United States political parties have national conventions that result in presidential candidates However selected delegates from each state choose candidates rather than members of the public Including delegates in the nomination process began after the Presidential election year of 1968 when there was widespread dissatisfaction with the presidential nominating process 16 Minor party movements also threatened the chances of Democratic and Republican candidates to win majorities of the electoral votes which resulted in the reformation of the presidential election process 17 Democratic selection process Edit Main article Democratic National Convention Delegations Each party and state has its own process to selecting delegates Generally speaking delegates of both major parties usually pledge their votes to a specific candidate and those who are associated with the Democratic Party and are unpledged are considered super delegates These super delegates may include governors who identify with the party members of the U S Congress as well as members of the Democratic National Committee 18 Super Delegates aren t pledged to a particular candidate and can vote for who they please 18 Any registered Democrat may run to be a delegate and wins are based on congressional votes 18 Once Democrats choose their delegates they distribute delegates to each candidate evenly according to the number of congressional district votes they get must be at least 15 18 Republican selection process Edit Main article Republican National Convention Delegations Rule 14 of the Republican Party s national rules determines the size of delegates for each state territory or political subdivision Delegate selection for the Republican Party must take between March 1 and the second Saturday in June in the year that the convention is held except for Iowa New Hampshire South Carolina and Nevada which are exempt from the rule and may hold earlier selection processes 19 The Republican Party uses a Proportional Allocation rule which states that delegates should be based on the statewide votes or the number of congressional district votes in proportion to the number of votes received by each candidate 19 Also each state must advocate to have an equal number of men and women in its delegation 19 Delegates and alternate delegates for the Republican National Convention may be selected or bound by only one of the following 19 Primary election Republican State Committee State and Congressional district conventions Any method that stays consistent with the rules by which they were selectedFavorite son dark horse bolter EditFavorite son Edit A powerful state politician typically the governor or senator can set up as a favorite son 20 The state delegates are pledged to vote for him at least for the first round Today the role is honorific but before 1972 control of a delegation gave bargaining power regarding the platform or the nomination 21 The technique was widely used in the 19th and early 20th centuries 22 Since nationwide campaigns by candidates and binding primary elections have replaced brokered conventions the technique has fallen out of use 23 24 as party rule changes in the early 1970s required candidates to have nominations from more than one state 25 In 1860 Senator Robert M T Hunter was Virginia s favorite at the Democratic Party convention He offered a proslavery voice of moderation amidst the strident rhetoric of secession 26 In 1952 California Governor Earl Warren was the favorite son at the Republican convention but he was challenged by Senator Richard Nixon Nixon leveraged his way into becoming Eisenhower s choice for the vice presidential nomination 27 Dark horse Edit The term dark horse candidate was used at the 1844 Democratic National Convention at which little known Tennessee politician James K Polk emerged as the candidate after the failure of the leading candidates to secure the necessary two thirds majority 28 29 Other successful dark horse candidates include Franklin Pierce the Democratic nominee elected in 1852 Rutherford B Hayes elected in 1876 James A Garfield elected in 1880 30 Warren G Harding elected president in 1920 after his surprise Republican nomination Wendell Willkie a businessman who came out of nowhere to win the Republican nomination in 1940 He lost to President Franklin Roosevelt Bolter Edit Delegates to the convention are expected to support whichever candidate wins the nomination A delegate who refuses to do that walks out or bolts sometimes in public fashion can be referred to as a bolter 31 32 A group of bolters may form an alternate convention that can be called a bolting convention the remnants of the party or convention they leave behind can be called a rump convention At the intensely fought 1896 Republican convention the decisive battle was on support for gold or silver When gold forces won by tally of 812 to 110 25 of the 110 bolted while the others supported the party nominee William McKinley The next day the bolters formed a new political party dubbed the Silver Republican Party It had a strong base of support in the silver mining Mountain states The Democratic nominee William Jennings Bryan appealed to the bolters by accepting the Silver Republican nomination he also accepted the People s party nomination so he ran on three tickets 33 Conservative Democrats from the South bolted from the 1948 Democratic Convention to form the States Rights Party under the banner of Strom Thurmond when Minneapolis Mayor Hubert Humphrey successfully added a civil rights plank to the Democratic platform The most notorious instance of bolting was in 1912 when having lost a credentials fight the supporters of former President Theodore Roosevelt formed the so called Bull Moose party splitting the GOP down the middle holding a bolting convention to nominate Roosevelt who came in second in the election something that would never happen again 34 Proceedings Edit Roll call of states during the 2008 Democratic National Convention at the Pepsi Center in Denver Colorado The floor of the 2008 Republican National Convention at the Xcel Energy Center in Saint Paul Minnesota During the day party activists hold meetings and rallies and work on the platform Voting and important convention wide addresses usually take place in the evening hours In recent conventions routine business such as examining the credentials of delegations ratifying rules and procedures election of convention officers and adoption of the platform usually take up the business of the first two days of the convention Balloting was usually held on the third day with the nomination and acceptance made on the last day but even some of these traditions have fallen away in 21st century conventions The only constant is that the convention ends with the nominee s acceptance speech Platform Edit Each convention produces a statement of principles known as its platform containing goals and proposals known as planks Relatively little of a party platform is even proposed as public policy Much of the language is generic while other sections are narrowly written to appeal to factions or interest groups within the party Unlike electoral manifestos in many European countries the platform is not binding on either the party or the candidate Because it is ideological rather than pragmatic however the platform is sometimes itself politicized For example defenders of abortion rights lobbied heavily to remove the Human Life Amendment plank from the 1996 Republican National Convention platform a move fiercely resisted by conservatives despite the fact that no such amendment had ever come up for debate Voting Edit Since the 1970s voting has for the most part been perfunctory the selection of the major parties nominees have rarely been in doubt so a single ballot has always been sufficient Each delegation announces its vote tallies usually accompanied with some boosterism of their state or territory The delegation may pass nominally to retally their delegates preferences but often to allow a different delegation to give the leading candidate the honor of casting the majority making vote Before the presidential nomination season actually begins there is often speculation about whether a single front runner would emerge If there is no single candidate receiving a majority of delegates at the end of the primary season a scenario called a brokered convention would result where a candidate would be selected either at or near the convention through political horse trading and lesser candidates compelling their delegates to vote for one of the front runners The best example was the 1924 Democratic Convention which took 103 ballots The situation is more likely to occur in the Democratic Party because of its proportional representation system 35 but such a scenario has been the subject of speculation with regard to most contested nominations of both parties without actually coming to pass in recent years 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 It is a common scenario in fiction most recently in an episode of The West Wing The closest to a brokered convention in recent years was at the 1976 Republican National Convention when neither Gerald Ford nor Ronald Reagan received enough votes in the primary to lock up the nomination 44 Since then candidates have received enough momentum to reach a majority through pledged and bound delegates before the date of the convention More recently a customary practice has been for the losing candidates in the primary season to release their delegates and exhort them to vote for the winning nominee as a sign of party unity Thus the vote tallied on the floor is unanimous or nearly so Some delegates may nevertheless choose to vote for their candidate And in 2008 both happened Hillary Clinton received over 1 000 votes before she herself moved to nominate Barack Obama by acclamation officially making it a unanimous vote The voting method at the conventions is a roll call of the states which include territories such as Washington D C American Samoa Guam Puerto Rico the U S Virgin Islands and a catch all delegates abroad category The states are called in alphabetical order beginning with Alabama and ending with Wyoming The state s spokesperson who generally begins with glowing comments about the state s history geography and notable party elected officials can either choose to announce its delegate count or pass Once all states have either declared or passed those states which passed are called upon again to announce their delegate count Generally a decision is made beforehand that some states will pass in the first round to allow a particular state generally either the presidential or vice presidential nominee s home state to be the one whose delegate count pushes the candidate over the top thus securing the nomination Vice presidential voting has been problematic since the beginning at the 1972 Democratic National Convention the vote was scattered between 50 candidates and at the 1976 Republican National Convention the vote was also scattered widely In 1988 both parties decided to have their designated candidates nominated by suspending the rules and declaring them nominated by acclamation the most recent vice presidential roll call vote was at the 1984 Republican National Convention If after the first round of voting there is no candidate with a majority of votes subsequent roll calls are held In between candidates can make backroom deals swapping delegates in exchange for positions in the administration or other favors or candidates can release their delegates to vote for whoever they personally prefer Roll calls continue until one candidate has a majority the 1924 Democratic National Convention holds the record as the longest ever as divisions within the party concerning Prohibition led to 102 ballots between Alfred E Smith and William G McAdoo before the relatively unknown John W Davis was chosen as a compromise candidate on the 103rd ballot Speeches Edit First Lady Pat Nixon being honored at the 1972 Republican National Convention Michelle Obama speaking at the 2008 Democratic National Convention Minor figures in the party are given the opportunity to address the floor of the convention during the daytime when only the small audiences of C SPAN and other cable television outlets are watching The evening s speeches designed for broadcast to a large national audience are reserved for major speeches by notable respected public figures the speakers at the 2004 Democratic Convention included Ted Kennedy a forty two year veteran of the United States Senate and Jimmy Carter a former Democratic President while speakers at the Republican Convention included Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California and Governor George Pataki of New York two of the largest states in the nation The organizers of the convention may designate one of these speeches as the keynote address one which above all others is stated to underscore the convention s themes or political goals For instance the 1992 Democratic National Convention keynote address was delivered by Georgia Governor Zell Miller whose stories of an impoverished childhood echoed the economic themes of the nominee Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton The 1996 Republican National Convention was keynoted by U S Representative Susan Molinari of New York intended to reassure political moderates about the centrism of the nominee former Senator Bob Dole And the 2004 Democratic National Convention featured Senator Barack Obama whose speech brought the future President national recognition for the first time Uniquely Miller by then a Senator would also be the keynote speaker at the 2004 Republican Convention despite still maintaining his Democratic registration The final day of the convention usually features the formal acceptance speeches from the nominees for president and vice president Despite recent controversy maintaining that recent conventions were scripted from beginning to end and that very little news if any comes out of the convention the acceptance speech has always been televised by the networks because it receives the highest ratings of the convention In addition the halls of the convention are packed at this time with many party loyalists sneaking in Afterwards balloons are usually dropped and the delegates celebrate the nomination History Edit Barack Obama and Joe Biden appear together at the 2008 Democratic National Convention Primary foes Ronald Reagan left and Gerald Ford right shake hands during the 1976 Republican National Convention the last major party convention whose outcome was in doubt First conventions Edit Further information First Party System The Federalist Party invented the first national conventions in 1808 and 1812 when they held secret national meetings to pick their candidates The Democratic Republican Party never used conventions Instead its members of Congress met in party caucuses to select the nominee Regional conflicts erupted in the hotly contested 1824 election in which factions of the Democratic Republican Party outright rejected taking part in the caucus because of its little heavily dwindling participation and in their view undemocratic character rejected the eventual caucus nominee William H Crawford of Georgia and backed three regional candidates nominated by state legislatures John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts Henry Clay of Kentucky and Andrew Jackson of Tennessee all of whom carried more states than Crawford in the election instead 45 Second Party System Edit Further information Second Party System In 1831 the Anti Masonic Party convened in Baltimore Maryland to select a single presidential candidate agreeable to the whole party leadership in the 1832 presidential election The National Republican and Democratic parties soon followed suit 46 1860 conventions Edit In Chicago Abraham Lincoln was nominated by the Republicans 47 The Democratic Party convention nominated Stephen A Douglas however after Southern delegates walked out of or boycotted the convention they held their own convention and nominated John C Breckinridge 48 Third Party System Edit Further information Third Party System Chicago with its central location was the favorite convention city In addition St Louis Missouri hosted Democratic national nominating conventions in 1876 1888 1904 and 1916 as well as the national Republican convention of 1896 and a national Populist convention in the same year The city had easy railroad access numerous elegant hotels and expansive meeting facilities Democrats wanted to meet close to their base in the Solid South 49 1872 Democrats Edit The Democrats held a very short 1872 Democratic National Convention which endorsed the nominee of the 1872 Liberal Republican convention The Liberal Republicans were bitterly opposed to incumbent Republican Ulysses S Grant and bolted to form their own party They nominated Horace Greeley who lost to Grant in a landslide and the new party soon collapsed 50 1884 Republican Edit In the run up to the 1884 GOP convention reformers called Mugwumps organized their forces in the swing states especially New York and Massachusetts They failed to block James G Blaine and many bolted to the Democrats who had nominated reformer Grover Cleveland Young Theodore Roosevelt and Henry Cabot Lodge leading reformers refused to bolt an action that preserved their leadership role in the GOP 51 1896 conventions Edit Fourth Party System Edit Further information Fourth Party System Conventions were often heated affairs playing a vital role in deciding each party s nominee The process remained far from democratic or transparent however The party convention was a scene of intrigue among political bosses who appointed and otherwise controlled nearly all of the delegates 1912 Republicans Edit Main article 1912 Republican National Convention Entering the convention the forces of President Taft and ex president Roosevelt seemed evenly matched 52 Taft had better planning better organizers and more top convention officials 53 The camps engaged in a fight for the delegations with Taft emerging victorious and Roosevelt claiming that several delegations were fraudulently seated because of the machinations of conservative party leaders including William Barnes Jr and Boies Penrose 54 Following the seating of the anti Roosevelt delegations California Governor Hiram Johnson proclaimed that progressives would form a new party to nominate Roosevelt 54 Though many of Roosevelt s delegates remained at the convention most refused to take part in the presidential ballot in protest of the contested delegates 55 Roosevelt ultimately ran a third party campaign as part of the Progressive Party nicknamed the Bull Moose Party Taft and Roosevelt both lost the 1912 election to the Democratic nominee Woodrow Wilson 1924 Democrats Edit Main article 1924 Democratic National Convention The party was deeply factionalized along regional and cultural lines with two powerful factions led by William McAdoo leaving the rural Protestant Southern faction and New York Governor Al Smith representing the urban Catholic machine element 56 The second Ku Klux Klan was flourishing nationwide although no nationally prominent Democrat acknowledged membership and the factions battled over a resolution to condemn the KKK No compromises seemed possible as the convention dragged on for 17 days with the balloting for presidential candidate being deadlocked for 103 ballots until dark horse John W Davis a neutral figure was nominated Naming the younger brother of William Jennings Bryan as running mate was a sop to the rural faction 57 58 Oklahoma was a representative border state with the delegation deeply divided on the KKK issue 59 Fifth Party System Edit Further information Fifth Party System 1968 Democrats Edit The Vietnam War energized a large number of supporters of anti war Senator Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota but they had no say in the matter Vice President Hubert Humphrey associated with the increasingly unpopular administration of Lyndon B Johnson did not compete in a single primary yet controlled enough delegates to secure the Democratic nomination This proved one of several factors behind rioting which broke out at the Democratic convention in Chicago 60 61 Switch to primary system Edit A few mostly western states adopted primary elections in the late 19th century and during the Progressive Era but the catalyst for their widespread adoption came during the election of 1968 Media images of the event angry mobs facing down police damaged the image of the Democratic Party which appointed a commission headed by South Dakota Senator George McGovern to select a new less controversial method of choosing nominees The McGovern Fraser Commission settled on the primary election adopted by the Democratic National Committee in 1968 The Republicans adopted the primary as their preferred method in 1972 62 Henceforth candidates would be given convention delegates based on their performance in primaries and these delegates were bound to vote for their candidate As a result the major party presidential nominating convention has lost almost all of its old drama The last attempt to release delegates from their candidates came at the 1980 Democratic National Convention when Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts sought votes of delegates held by incumbent President Jimmy Carter The last major party convention whose outcome was in doubt was the 1976 Republican National Convention when former California Governor Ronald Reagan nearly won the nomination away from the incumbent president Gerald Ford 63 Television coverage Edit While rank and file members had no input in early nominations they were still drawn by the aura of mystery surrounding the convention and networks began to broadcast speeches and debates to the general public NBC affiliate W2XBS in New York City made the first telecast of a national party convention of the 1940 Republican National Convention in Philadelphia and the other two of the Big Three television networks soon followed NBC News anchorman John Chancellor said just before the start of the 1972 Democratic National Convention Convention coverage is the most important thing we do The conventions are not just political theater but really serious stuff and that s why all the networks have an obligation to give gavel to gavel coverage It s a time when we all ought to be doing our duty 64 The presence of journalists at presidential nominating conventions have increased with the television networks In 1976 the Democratic Convention consisted of 3 381 delegates and 11 500 reporters broadcasters editors and camera operators 65 This is on par with the increase in the number of televisions in American homes In 1960 87 percent of people had a television by 1976 98 percent did 66 By the 1992 conventions network coverage increased from three networks NBC ABC and CBS to five networks NBC ABC CBS Fox and PBS 67 At the 1996 Republican National Convention there were approximately seven journalists per one delegate or about 15 000 journalists 65 The increase of the media at these conventions originally led to a growth in the public s interest in elections Voter turnout in the primaries increased from fewer than five million voters in 1948 to around thirteen million in 1952 68 By broadcasting the conventions on the television people were more connected to the suspense and the decisions being made therefore making them more politically aware and more educated voters When scholars studied the 1976 conventions they determined that by watching nomination conventions even viewers that were not previously very politically active developed a much stronger interest in the election process and the candidate 69 Decrease in importance Edit News anchor Ted Koppel pictured in 2002 who midway through the 1996 Republican National Convention told viewers that he was going home because it has become more of an infomercial than a news event 70 With the rise of the direct primary and in particular with states moving earlier and earlier in the primary calendar since the 1988 election the nominee has often secured a commanding majority of delegates far in advance of the convention As such any actual business conducted at the major parties conventions such as the roll call of delegates have largely become a formality and the main focus is on promoting the nominee and party platform to a wider audience For instance speeches by noted and popular party figures are scheduled for the coveted primetime hours when most people would be watching 71 70 72 During the 1996 Republican National Convention where the RNC had purchased time brokered blocks of party produced coverage on the cable network The Family Channel in response to decreasing network coverage 70 72 ABC News Nightline host Ted Koppel abruptly ended his coverage of the 1996 conventions arguing that the events had effectively become an infomercial for the party s nominee rather than a bona fide news event 70 In 2020 political historian Michael Barone argued in an op ed that the advents of direct distance dialing and television had made the original purposes of the conventions being the only place and time where party politicians could communicate frankly and bargain personally and discover which candidates had genuine support and which just gave lip service increasingly redundant and that the events had become largely choreographed celebrations of the party nominee 73 The changing nature of the conventions as well as overall changes in television viewing habits have changed how broadcasters cover the conventions Coverage of the conventions is now typically relegated to news channels C SPAN and streaming outlets by 2012 the major networks usually only provided an hour of coverage per night focusing on the headlining speakers 74 75 PBS continues to provide full primetime coverage of the conventions although it breaks away from minor speakers and mundane business for analysis and discussion 76 COVID 19 affected 2020 conventions Edit Main articles 2020 Democratic National Convention 2020 Republican National Convention 2020 Libertarian National Convention 2020 Green National Convention and Constitution Party National Convention 2020 Convention The COVID 19 pandemic in 2020 forced both major and third parties to modify the format of their conventions to comply with social distancing and restrictions on public gatherings The Democratic convention was conducted as a virtual event with all speakers appearing from remote locations and no in person gatherings of delegates To fulfill the host city contract with Milwaukee the event s production was conducted from the Wisconsin Center 77 78 79 The acceptance speeches of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were held at the Chase Center on the Riverfront in Biden s hometown of Wilmington Delaware 80 Donald Trump repeatedly pushed for the Republican convention to be held in person as normal The event was originally scheduled for Spectrum Center in Charlotte after North Carolina s Democratic governor Roy Cooper refused to allow it to be held at full scale or without mandatory masking or social distancing the RNC announced plans to move most of the in person events to Jacksonville Florida 81 but still conduct the official business from Charlotte However after Jacksonville enacted similar restrictions and amid nationwide increases in cases Trump announced in July 2020 that the events in Jacksonville had been called off 82 83 84 85 86 As with the Democratic convention the Republican convention was conducted in a downsized form To fulfill the host city contract with Charlotte a program of official business was conducted in person on August 24 with a smaller contingent of 336 delegates 87 including the roll call 88 89 The remainder of the event consisted of primetime programs of pre recorded speeches filmed mainly at the Andrew W Mellon Auditorium in Washington D C 90 91 The speeches by Vice President Pence from Fort McHenry in Baltimore and by First Lady Melania Trump and President Trump from the White House Rose Garden were conducted live and in person with audiences of supporters CDC recommended mitigations were largely ignored 92 93 2024 conventions Edit The 2024 Republican National Convention will be held in Milwaukee Wisconsin The 2024 Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago Illinois See also EditList of Democratic National Conventions List of Republican National Conventions List of Whig National Conventions Libertarian National Convention Green National Convention Constitution Party National Convention National conventions of the Communist Party USAReferences Edit Presidential Campaign Finance Eric M Appleman Democracy in Action Week In Review National Organizing Kickoff a Great Success democrats org November 2005 Archived from the original on March 10 2008 Retrieved December 28 2007 NFL season opener yields to McCain speech Reuters March 26 2008 Jaffe Alexandra January 23 2015 Democratic National Convention date set CNN com Retrieved August 25 2015 Exclusive Democrats anticipating heated primary set earlier 2020 convention date CNN Retrieved June 15 2018 2020 Republican National Convention dates announced WCNC com October 1 2018 Gabby Orr April 14 2022 Republicans may decide this year on host cities for 2024 and 2028 conventions CNN Retrieved April 18 2022 Evan McMorris Santoro November 29 2011 Team Obama Likes Its Chances AZ VA NC Could Go Democrat In 2012 VIDEO Talking Points Memo Retrieved January 6 2012 a b c 5 3 Cities That Have Hosted Conventions of Major National Political Parties 1832 2020 The American Presidency Project www presidency ucsb edu Retrieved June 21 2022 a b c Grauer Neil A August 5 2000 A long time between political conventions Baltimore Sun Retrieved June 22 2022 Rasmussen Frederick N August 2 2012 Baltimore has been site of many national political conventions Baltimore Sun Retrieved June 22 2022 a b Johnson Glen April 25 2002 Hub 4 rivals buff their Democratic party ware Newspapers com The Boston Globe Retrieved February 24 2022 Dena Bunis News Anaheim asked to make bid for Republican convention OCRegister com Ocregister com Archived from the original on October 15 2008 Retrieved October 25 2009 Lloyd Robert August 29 2008 Barack Obama Al Gore raise the roof at Invesco Field Los Angeles Times Retrieved October 31 2009 1972 Political Conventions in Miami Beach Flashback Miami flashbackmiami com Miami Herald Retrieved June 21 2022 Raucous 68 Convention Led to Changes in Nomination Process newswise com July 15 2008 Constitutional Safeguards in the Selection of Delegates to Presidential Nominating Conventions The Yale Law Journal 78 7 1228 1252 1969 doi 10 2307 795003 JSTOR 795003 a b c d Who gets to be a Delegate at the Presidential Nominating Conventions CBS News a b c d The Rules of the Republican Party PDF The Republican National Committee July 18 2016 Retrieved September 28 2022 Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh Dictionary of American political terms Wayne State UP 1962 pp 147 148 How Favorite Son Politics Works The Pittsburgh Press January 12 1928 via Google News Archive Search How Term Favorite Son Got Started in Politics The Free Lance Star January 30 1960 via Google News Archive Search No Demo Favorite Sons The Deseret News September 20 1971 via Google News Archive Search Shafer Byron E 1988 Bifurcated Politics Evolution and Reform in the National Party Convention Harvard University Press p 71 ISBN 9780674072565 Favorite son politics Tarr Dave Benenson Bob October 22 2013 Elections A to Z CQ Press ISBN 9781506331508 via Google Books R Randall Moore Robert MT Hunter and the Crisis of the Union 1860 1861 Southern Historian 13 1992 25 35 Irwin F Gellman The Contender Richard Nixon the Congress Years 1946 1952 2017 pp 403 433 438 442 William Safire Safire s political dictionary Oxford UP 2008 pp 166 167 Sperber and Trittschuh Dictionary of American political terms 1962 pp 112 113 Kenneth D Ackerman Dark Horse The Surprise Election and Political Murder of President James A Garfield 2003 online Safire Safire s political dictionary 2008 p 69 Sperber and Trittschuh Dictionary of American political terms 1962 p 52 Arthur M Schlesinger Jr ed Critical presidential elections in American history 1972 pp 241 44 250 Robert M La Follette La Follette s autobiography a personal narrative of political experiences PDF Library of Congress Retrieved March 22 2023 Roosevelt and his followers held a meeting in Orchestra Hall where in a speech to the delegates he bade them return to their constituencies to test the sentiment of the people and meet again at a later time to determine as to the advisability of creating a new party a Roosevelt party a party the sole excuse for the formation of which was based upon the contention that delegates in the Republican Convention were stolen from one candidate and given to another Thou shalt not steal was made the keynote of the Roosevelt bolting convention Robert Moran on Election 2004 on National Review Online Frum David February 20 2012 GOP s worst nightmare a contested convention CNN com Retrieved June 30 2015 2012 Republicans Garber Kent February 8 2008 Obama Clinton Head Toward Contested Convention USNews com Retrieved June 30 2015 2008 Democrats Blankley Tony December 19 2007 None of the Above GOP Heading to a Brokered Convention Real Clear Politics Retrieved June 30 2005 2008 Republicans Orin Deborah January 22 2004 Dems May Be In for Brokered Convention New York Post Retrieved June 30 2015 2004 Democrats Rusher William March 1 1996 A fun idea Brokered convention Rome News Tribune p 4 Retrieved June 30 2015 1996 Republicans Wicker Tom September 3 1991 Snakeskins and Democrats Lakeland Ledger p 7A Retrieved June 30 2015 1992 Democrats Democrats worrying about a brokered convention The Spokesman Review Spokane Wash Associated Press March 17 1988 p A6 Retrieved June 30 2015 1988 Democrats Greenfield Jeff May 18 1984 Brokered convention Is it possible The Milwaukee Sentinel p 16 Part 1 Retrieved June 30 2015 1984 Democrats REPUBLICANS Ford Is Close but Watch Those Trojan Horses Time August 2 1976 Archived from the original on September 30 2007 Retrieved May 27 2010 Kolodny Robin The Several Elections of 1824 Congress amp the Presidency A Journal of Capital Studies 23 2 1996 online dead link Michael Kazin et al eds The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History 2011 pp 155 62 310 314 Kenneth M Stampp The Imperiled Union Essays on the Background of the Civil War 1858 pp 136 62 Douglas R Egerton Year of Meteors Stephen Douglas Abraham Lincoln and the Election that Brought on the Civil War 2010 excerpt Gary N Smith St Louis Hosts the Political Conventions Gateway Heritage The Magazine of the Missouri Historical Society Spring 1981 1 4 pp 10 17 Matthew T Downey Horace Greeley and the Politicians The Liberal Republican Convention in 1872 Journal of American History 53 4 1967 727 750 online Edward Kohn Crossing the Rubicon Theodore Roosevelt Henry Cabot Lodge and the 1884 Republican National Convention Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era5 1 2006 19 45 online Taft Victory in the First Clash Root Chosen Chairman 558 to 502 The New York Times June 19 1912 Thomas E Felt Organizing A National Convention A Lesson From Senator Dick Ohio Historical Quarterly 1958 87 1 pp 50 62 a b Roosevelt Beaten to Bolt Today Gives the Word in Early Morning Taft s Nomination Seems Assured The New York Times June 20 1912 Retrieved October 8 2015 Taft Renominated by the Republican Convention Roosevelt Named as Candidate by Bolters The New York Times June 23 1912 James C Prude William Gibbs McAdoo and the Democratic National Convention of 1924 Journal of Southern History 38 4 1972 621 628 online David B Burner The Democratic Party in the Election of 1924 Mid America 46 1964 92 113 Robert K Murray The 103rd Ballot Democrats and the Disaster in Madison Square Garden 1976 William D Pennington The Oklahoma Delegation to the Democratic Convention of 1924 Chronicles of Oklahoma Dec 1984 52 4 pp 408 419 Michael A Cohen American Maelstrom The 1968 Election and the Politics of Division Oxford UP 2016 pp 261 286 Jules Witcover Party of the People A History of the Democrats 2003 Judith A Center 1972 Democratic Convention Reforms and Party Democracy Political Science Quarterly 89 2 1974 325 350 online Michael Kazin et al eds The Concise Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History 2011 pp 152 55 310 314 Paletz amp Elson 1976 Television Coverage of Presidential Conventions Now You See It Now You Don t Political Science Quarterly 91 1 109 131 doi 10 2307 2149161 JSTOR 2149161 a b Trent amp Friedenberg 2004 Political Campaign Communication Principles amp Practices Lanham MD Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers Inc Kraus Sidney 1979 The Great Debates Indiana University Press Trent amp Friedenberg 2004 Political Campaign Communication Principles and Practices Lanham MD Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers Inc Valley David 1974 Significant Characteristics of Democratic Presidential Nomination Acceptance Speeches Central States Speech Journal 25 56 62 doi 10 1080 10510977409367769 Kraus Sidney 1979 The Great Debate Indiana University Press a b c d Bennet James August 15 1996 Nightline Pulls the Plug on Convention Coverage The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved December 4 2019 Peters Jeremy W August 20 2012 Romney Campaign Works Feverishly to Project Relaxed Image The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved December 4 2019 a b Johnson Steve Some Media Chafe Under Choreography of News chicagotribune com Retrieved December 4 2019 Barone Michael July 24 2020 Goodbye After Nearly Two Centuries to the National Conventions Rasmussen Reports Hagey Keach August 20 2012 Online Media Will Star at the Conventions Wall Street Journal ISSN 0099 9660 Retrieved December 4 2019 Mirkinson Jack August 20 2012 Networks Reducing Convention Coverage Yet Again HuffPost Retrieved December 4 2019 Political conventions lose drama TV audience July 25 2004 Epstein Reid J June 24 2020 Democratic Convention Moves to Smaller Venue as Delegates Are Urged to Stay Away The New York Times Archived from the original on June 24 2020 Retrieved June 24 2020 2020 DNC pulled from Fiserv Forum will move toward mostly virtual event CBS58 June 24 2020 Archived from the original on June 25 2020 Retrieved June 24 2020 Spicuzza Mary Glauber Bill June 24 2020 Scaled back Democratic National Convention overhauled as state delegates no longer traveling to Milwaukee event moved out of Fiserv Forum Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Archived from the original on August 19 2020 Retrieved August 15 2020 Holveck Brandon August 16 2020 Downtown Wilmington prepares to play host to Democratic National Convention The News Journal Archived from the original on August 19 2020 Retrieved August 18 2020 Bloch Emily New RNC memo discloses multiple convention venues restricted number of attendees USA Today Archived from the original on July 17 2020 Retrieved July 18 2020 Haberman Maggie Mazzei Patricia Karni Annie July 23 2020 Trump Abruptly Cancels Republican Convention in Florida It s Not the Right Time The New York Times Archived from the original on July 24 2020 Retrieved July 24 2020 Linskey Annie June 11 2020 Republicans announce Trump convention events will move to Jacksonville The Washington Post Archived from the original on December 2 2020 Retrieved June 11 2020 Samuels Brett June 11 2020 GOP moves main 2020 convention events including Trump speech to Jacksonville The Hill Archived from the original on June 12 2020 Retrieved June 12 2020 Oprysko Caitlin Trump cancels GOP convention events in Jacksonville Politico Archived from the original on December 2 2020 Retrieved July 23 2020 Karni Annie Haberman Maggie June 6 2020 How Trump s Demands for a Full House in Charlotte Derailed a Convention The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved May 19 2022 Corasaniti Nick August 17 2020 The M V P s of This Year s Conventions The Digital and I T Teams The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved May 20 2022 Morrill Jim August 7 2020 NC officials say they can be flexible for crowd size at RNC Charlotte Observer Charlotte Observer Archived from the original on December 2 2020 Retrieved August 10 2020 Republican National Convention kicks off in Charlotte subdued then Trump shows up Charlotte Observer August 24 2020 Archived from the original on December 2 2020 Retrieved August 24 2020 Vazquez Maegan August 25 2020 What to watch on the second night of the Republican convention CNN Archived from the original on August 27 2020 Retrieved August 27 2020 Kilgore Ed August 14 2020 Most Republican Convention Speeches Will Be Delivered From D C Intelligencer Archived from the original on August 15 2020 Retrieved August 14 2020 Vigdor Neil August 26 2020 Masks and social distancing are mostly absent from Republican convention events The New York Times Archived from the original on September 7 2020 Retrieved August 27 2020 Colvin Jill August 27 2020 What virus At the Republican National Convention the COVID 19 pandemic is largely ignored Chicago Tribune Archived from the original on August 28 2020 Retrieved August 28 2020 Bibliography Edit Arterton F Christopher Media politics The news strategies of presidential campaigns Free Press 1984 Becker Carl The Unit Rule in National Nominating Conventions American Historical Review 5 1 1899 64 82 online Binkley Wilfred E American political parties their natural history 1962 online Carleton William G The revolution in the presidential nominating convention Political Science Quarterly 72 2 1957 224 240 online Chase James S Emergence of the Presidential Nominating Convention 1789 1832 Houghton Mifflin 1973 Chester Edward W A guide to political platforms 1977 pp 127 135 online Congressional Research Service Presidential Elections in the United States A Primer Washington Congressional Research Service 2000 Costain Anne N An analysis of voting in american national nominating conventions 1940 1976 American Politics Quarterly 6 1 1978 95 120 Cowan Geoffrey Let the People Rule Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of the Presidential Primary WW Norton amp Company 2016 Davis James W National conventions in an age of party reform Greenwood 1983 Eaton Herbert Presidential timber A history of nominating conventions 1868 1960 1964 online Key Jr V O Politics Parties and Pressure Groups 4th ed 1958 pp 414 470 online Miles Edwin A The keynote speech at national nominating conventions Quarterly journal of Speech 46 1 1960 26 31 Morison Samuel E The First National Nominating Convention 1808 American Historical Review 17 4 1912 744 763 on 1808 Federalists online Murdock John S The First National Nominating Convention American Historical Review 1 4 1896 680 683 online on 1812 Federalists Nichols Roy F It Happens Every Four Years American Heritage June 1956 7 4 pp 20 33 Pfau Michael William Conventions of Deliberation Convention Addresses and Deliberative Containment in the Second Party System Rhetoric and Public Affairs 9 4 2006 pp 635 654 online Republican National Convention 2004 Convention History Sautter R Craig and Edward M Burke Inside the Wigwam Chicago Presidential Conventions 1860 1996 Loyola Press 1996 Silver Adam Consensus and Conflict A Content Analysis of American Party Platforms 1840 1896 Social Science History 42 3 2018 441 467 online Primary sources Edit Chester Edward W A guide to political platforms 1977 online Porter Kirk H and Donald Bruce Johnson eds National party platforms 1840 1964 1965 online 1840 1956External links EditNewsHour Interview with historian Michael Beschloss on the origins of the convention process History House Conventional Wisdom National Party Conventions eGuide The Campaign Finance Institute 1 Corpus of Political Speeches Free access to political speeches by American and other politicians developed by Hong Kong Baptist University Library Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title United States presidential nominating convention amp oldid 1149662065, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.