fbpx
Wikipedia

1852 United States presidential election

The 1852 United States presidential election was the 17th quadrennial presidential election, held on Tuesday, November 2, 1852. Democrat Franklin Pierce defeated Whig nominee General Winfield Scott. A third party candidate from the Free Soil party, John P. Hale, also ran and came in third place, but got no electoral votes.

1852 United States presidential election

← 1848 November 2, 1852 1856 →

296 members of the Electoral College
149 electoral votes needed to win
Turnout69.6%[1] 3.1 pp
 
Nominee Franklin Pierce Winfield Scott John P. Hale
Party Democratic Whig Free Soil
Home state New Hampshire New Jersey New Hampshire
Running mate William R. King William A. Graham George Washington Julian
Electoral vote 254 42 0
States carried 27 4 0
Popular vote 1,607,521 1,386,943 155,210
Percentage 50.8% 43.9% 4.9%

1852 United States presidential election in California1852 United States presidential election in Oregon1852 United States presidential election in Texas1852 United States presidential election in Iowa1852 United States presidential election in Missouri1852 United States presidential election in Arkansas1852 United States presidential election in Louisiana1852 United States presidential election in Wisconsin1852 United States presidential election in Illinois1852 United States presidential election in Michigan1852 United States presidential election in Indiana1852 United States presidential election in Ohio1852 United States presidential election in Kentucky1852 United States presidential election in Tennessee1852 United States presidential election in Mississippi1852 United States presidential election in Alabama1852 United States presidential election in Georgia1852 United States presidential election in Florida1852 United States presidential election in South Carolina1852 United States presidential election in North Carolina1852 United States presidential election in Virginia1852 United States presidential election in Maryland1852 United States presidential election in Delaware1852 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania1852 United States presidential election in New Jersey1852 United States presidential election in New York1852 United States presidential election in Connecticut1852 United States presidential election in Rhode Island1852 United States presidential election in Maryland1852 United States presidential election in Vermont1852 United States presidential election in New Hampshire1852 United States presidential election in Maine1852 United States presidential election in Massachusetts1852 United States presidential election in Maryland1852 United States presidential election in Delaware1852 United States presidential election in New Jersey1852 United States presidential election in Connecticut1852 United States presidential election in Rhode Island1852 United States presidential election in Massachusetts1852 United States presidential election in Vermont1852 United States presidential election in New Hampshire
Presidential election results map. Blue denotes states won by Pierce/King and buff by Scott/Graham. Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes cast by each state.

President before election

Millard Fillmore
Whig

Elected President

Franklin Pierce
Democratic

Incumbent Whig President Millard Fillmore had succeeded to the presidency in 1850 upon the death of President Zachary Taylor. Fillmore endorsed the Compromise of 1850 and enforced the Fugitive Slave Law. This earned Fillmore Southern voter support and Northern voter opposition. On the 53rd ballot of the sectionally divided 1852 Whig National Convention, Scott defeated Fillmore for the nomination. Democrats divided among four major candidates at the 1852 Democratic National Convention. On the 49th ballot, dark horse candidate Franklin Pierce won nomination by consensus compromise. The Free Soil Party, a third party opposed to the extension of slavery in the United States and into the territories, nominated New Hampshire Senator John P. Hale.

With few policy differences between the two major candidates, the election became a personality contest. Though Scott had commanded in the Mexican–American War, Pierce also served. Scott strained Whig Party unity as his anti-slavery reputation gravely damaged his campaign in the South. A group of Southern Whigs and a separate group of Southern Democrats each nominated insurgent tickets, but both efforts failed to attract support.

Pierce and running mate William R. King won a comfortable popular majority, carrying 27 of the 31 states. Pierce won the highest share of the electoral vote since James Monroe's uncontested 1820 re-election. The Free Soil Party regressed to less than five percent of the national popular vote, down from more than ten percent in 1848, while overwhelming defeat and disagreement about slavery soon drove the Whig Party to disintegrate. Anti-slavery Whigs and Free Soilers would ultimately coalesce into the new Republican Party, which would quickly become a formidable movement in the free states.

Not until 1876 would Democrats again win a majority of the popular vote for president, and not until 1932 would they win a majority in both the popular vote and the electoral college.

Nominations

Democratic Party nomination

1852 Democratic Party ticket
Franklin Pierce William R. King
for President for Vice President
 
 
U.S. senator from New Hampshire
(1837–1842)
U.S. senator from Alabama
(1819–1844 & 1848–1852)
 
Pierce/King campaign poster

The Democratic Party held its national convention in Baltimore, Maryland, in June 1852. Benjamin F. Hallett, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, limited the sizes of the delegations to their electoral votes and a vote to maintain the two-thirds requirement for the presidential and vice-presidential nomination was passed by a vote of 269 to 13.[2]

James Buchanan, Lewis Cass, William L. Marcy, and Stephen A. Douglas were the main candidates for the nomination. All of the candidates led the ballot for the presidential nomination at one point, but all of them failed to meet the two-thirds requirement. Franklin Pierce was put up for the nomination by the Virginia delegation. Pierce won the nomination when the delegates switched their support to him after he had received the unamious support of the delegates from New England. He won on the second day of balloting after forty-nine ballots.[2][3]

The delegation from Maine proposed that the vice-presidential nomination should be given to somebody from the Southern United States with William R. King being specifically named. King led on the first ballot before winning on the second ballot.[2]

Whig Party nomination

1852 Whig Party ticket
Winfield Scott William A. Graham
for President for Vice President
 
 
3rd
Commanding General of the U.S. Army
(1841–1861)
20th
U.S. Secretary of the Navy
(1850–1852)
 
Scott/Graham campaign poster

The Whig Party held its national convention in Baltimore, Maryland, in June 1852. The call for the convention had been made by Whig members of the United States Congress and thirty-one states were represented. A vote to have each state's vote be based on its electoral college strength was passed by a vote of 149 to 144, but it was rescinded due to disagreements from the Southern states and smaller Northern states.[2]

The party had been divided by the Compromise of 1850 and was divided over the presidential nomination between incumbent President Millard Fillmore, who received support from the South, and Winfield Scott, who received his support from the North. William H. Seward, who had been the main opponent of the compromise in the United States Senate and advised President Zachary Taylor against it, supported Scott. Fillmore offered to give his delegates to Daniel Webster if he received the support of forty-one delegates on his own, but Webster was unsuccessful. Scott won the nomination on the 53rd ballot. William Alexander Graham won the vice-presidential nomination without a formal vote.[2][4]

Free Soil Party nomination

The Free Soil Party was still the strongest third party in 1852. However, following the Compromise of 1850, most of the "Barnburners" who supported it in 1848 had returned to the Democratic Party while most of the Conscience Whigs rejoined the Whig Party. The second Free Soil National Convention assembled in the Masonic Hall in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. New Hampshire senator John P. Hale was nominated for president with 192 delegate votes (sixteen votes were cast for a smattering of candidates). George Washington Julian of Indiana was nominated for vice president over Samuel Lewis of Ohio and Joshua R. Giddings of Ohio.

Union Party nomination

The Union party was formed in 1850, an offshoot of the Whig party in several Southern states, including Georgia. As the 1852 presidential election approached, Union party leaders decided to wait and see who was nominated by the two major parties. The movement to nominate Daniel Webster as a third-party candidate began in earnest following the Whig Convention, largely driven by those who had been strenuously opposed to Winfield Scott's nomination for president, among them Alexander Stephens, Robert Toombs, and George Curtis. While Webster was against what he perceived as a "revolt" from the Whig Party and preferred not to be nominated, he let Americans vote for him should the party choose to nominate him.

The Union Party held its Georgia state convention on August 9, 1852, and nominated Webster for president and Charles J. Jenkins of Georgia for vice president. A formal convention was held at Faneuil Hall in Boston, Massachusetts, on September 15, affirming the nominations made at the state convention in Georgia and rejecting Winfield Scott as nothing more than a military figure. The Webster/Jenkins ticket received nationwide support, particularly among Southern Whigs, but also in Massachusetts and New York, but it was largely perceived by many as nothing more than getting voters who would, in different circumstances, support Scott.

Webster had no real chance of winning the election, but even the new Know-Nothing party endorsed Webster and Jenkins, nominating them without even their own permission. However, Webster died nine days before the election of a cerebral hemorrhage on October 24, 1852.

Native American (Know-Nothing) Party nomination

Around the mid-1830s, nativists were present in New York politics, under the aegis of the American Republican Party. The American Republican party was formed in 1843 in major opposition to Catholicism and Catholic immigrants. In 1845, the party changed its name to the Native American Party. Their opponents nicknamed them the "Know Nothings" and the party liked the name and it became the nickname of the party after that until it collapsed in 1860. In 1852, the original presidential nominee planned by the Native American Party was Daniel Webster, the presidential nominee of the Union party. They nominated Webster without his permission, with George Corbin Washington (grandnephew of George Washington) as his vice presidential running mate. Webster died of natural causes nine days before the election, and the Know-Nothings quickly replaced Webster by nominating Jacob Broom for president and replaced Washington with Reynell Coates for vice president. In the future, former President Millard Fillmore would be their presidential nominee in 1856.[5]

Southern Rights Party nomination

The Southern Rights Party was an offshoot of the Democratic party in several Southern states which advocated secession from the Union, electing a number of Congressmen and holding referendums on secession in a number of southern states, none of which were successful.

It was unclear in early 1852 if the Party would contest the presidential election. When the Alabama state convention was held in early March, only nine counties were represented. The party decided to see who was nominated by the two major national parties and support one of them if possible. When Georgia held its state convention, it acted as the state Democratic Party and sent delegates to the national convention.

After the Democratic National Convention, the Party was not sure that it wanted to support Franklin Pierce and William R. King, the Democratic nominees. Alabama held a state convention from July 13–15 and discussed at length the options of running a separate ticket or supporting Pierce and King. The convention was unable to arrive at a decision, deciding to appoint a committee to review the positions of Scott/Graham and Pierce/King with the option of calling a "national" convention if the two major-party tickets appeared deficient. The committee took its time reviewing the positions of Pierce and Scott, finally deciding on August 25 to call a convention for a Southern Rights Party ticket.

The convention assembled in Montgomery, Alabama, with 62 delegates present, a committee to recommend a ticket being appointed while the delegates listened to speeches in the interim. The committee eventually recommended former senator George Troup of Georgia for president, and former Governor John Quitman of Mississippi for vice president; they were unanimously nominated.

The two nominees accepted their nominations soon after the convention, which was held rather late in the season. Troup stated in a letter, dated September 27 and printed in the New York Times on October 16, that he had planned to vote for Pierce/King and had always wholeheartedly supported William R.D. King. He indicated in the letter that he preferred to decline the honor, as he was rather ill at the time and feared that he would die before the election. The Party's executive committee edited the letter to excise those portions which indicated that Troup preferred to decline, a fact which was revealed after the election.

Liberty Party nomination

The Liberty Party had ceased to become a significant political force after most of its members joined the Free Soil Party in 1848. Nonetheless, some of those who rejected the fusion strategy held a Liberty Party National Convention in Buffalo, New York. There were few delegates present, so a ticket was recommended and a later convention called. The Convention recommended Gerrit Smith of New York for president and Charles Durkee of Wisconsin for vice president. A second convention was held in Syracuse, New York, in early September 1852, but it too failed to draw enough delegates to select nominees. Yet a third convention gathered in Syracuse later that month and nominated William Goodell of New York for president and S.M. Bell of Virginia for vice president.

General election

Fall campaign

 
Political cartoon favoring Winfield Scott

The Whigs' platform was almost indistinguishable from that of the Democrats, reducing the campaign to a contest between the personalities of the two candidates. The lack of clearcut issues between the two parties helped drive voter turnout down to its lowest level since 1836. The decline was further exacerbated by Scott's antislavery reputation, which decimated the Southern Whig vote at the same time as the pro-slavery Whig platform undermined the Northern Whig vote. After the Compromise of 1850 was passed, many of the southern Whig Party members broke with the party's key figure, Henry Clay.[6]

Finally, Scott's status as a war hero was somewhat offset by the fact that Pierce was himself a Mexican–American War brigadier general.

The Democrats adopted the slogan: The Whigs we Polked in forty-four, We'll Pierce in fifty-two, playing on the names of Pierce and former President James K. Polk.[7]

Just nine days before the election, Webster died, causing many Union state parties to remove their slates of electors. The Union ticket appeared on the ballot in Georgia and Massachusetts, however.

Results

 
Results by county explicitly indicating the percentage of the winning candidate in each county. Shades of blue are for Pierce (Democratic), shades of yellow are for Scott (Whig), shades of red are for Hale (Free Soil), shades of orange are for Webster (Union), shades of green are for (Independent Democrats), and shades of purple are for Troup (Southern Rights).

When American voters went to the polls, Pierce won the electoral college in a landslide; Scott won only the states of Kentucky, Tennessee, Massachusetts, and Vermont, while the Free Soil vote collapsed to less than half of what Martin Van Buren had earned in the previous election, with the party taking no states. The fact that Daniel Webster received a substantial share of the vote in Georgia and Massachusetts, even though he was dead, shows how disenchanted voters were with the two main candidates.

In the popular vote, while Pierce outpolled Scott by 220,000 votes, 17 states were decided by less than 10%, and eight by less than 5%. A shift of 69,000 votes to Scott in Delaware, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania would have left the electoral college in a 148–148 tie, forcing a contingent election in the House of Representatives.

As a result of the devastating defeat and the growing tensions within the party between pro-slavery Southerners and anti-slavery Northerners, the Whig Party quickly fell apart after the 1852 election and ceased to exist. Some Southern Whigs would join the Democratic Party, and many Northern Whigs would help to form the new Republican Party in 1854.

Some Whigs in both sections would support the so-called "Know-Nothing" party in the 1856 presidential election. Similarly, the Free Soil Party rapidly fell away into obscurity after the election, and the remaining members mostly opted to join the former Northern Whigs in forming the Republican Party.

The Southern Rights Party effectively collapsed following the election, attaining only five percent of the vote in Alabama, and a few hundred in its nominee's home state of Georgia. It would elect a number of Congressmen in 1853, but they would rejoin the Democratic Party upon taking their seats in Congress.

 

Electoral results
Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote[a] Electoral
vote
Running mate
Count Percentage Vice-presidential candidate Home state Electoral vote
Franklin Pierce Democratic New Hampshire 1,607,510 50.84% 254 William Rufus DeVane King Alabama 254
Winfield Scott Whig New Jersey 1,386,942 43.87% 42 William Alexander Graham North Carolina 42
John Parker Hale Free Soil New Hampshire 155,210 4.91% 0 George Washington Julian Indiana 0
Daniel Webster[b] Union[c] Massachusetts 6,994 0.22% 0 Charles Jones Jenkins Georgia 0
Jacob Broom Native American Pennsylvania 2,566 0.08% 0 Reynell Coates New Jersey 0
George McIntosh Troup Southern Rights Georgia 2,331 0.07% 0 John Anthony Quitman Mississippi 0
Other 277 0.00% Other
Total 3,161,830 100% 296 296
Needed to win 149 149

Source (Popular Vote): Leip, David. "1852 Presidential Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved July 27, 2005.
Source (Electoral Vote): "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 31, 2005.

  • The leading candidates for vice president were both born in North Carolina and in fact both attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, albeit two decades apart. While there, they were members of opposing debate societies: the Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies. Both also served in North Carolina politics: King was a representative from North Carolina before he moved to Alabama, and Graham was a governor of North Carolina.
Popular vote
Pierce
50.84%
Scott
43.87%
Hale
4.91%
Others
0.38%
Electoral vote
Pierce
85.81%
Scott
14.19%

Records

This was the last election in which the Democrats won Michigan until 1932,[d] the last in which the Democrats won Iowa, Maine, New Hampshire, Ohio[e] or Rhode Island until 1912, the last in which the Democrats won Wisconsin until 1892, the last in which the Democrats won Connecticut until 1876 and the last in which the Democrats won New York until 1868. It was, however, the last election in which the Democrats' chief opponent won Kentucky until 1896,[f][8] and indeed the last until 1928 in which the Democrats' opponent obtained an absolute majority in the Bluegrass State.

Geography of results

Cartographic gallery

Results by state

Source: Data from Walter Dean Burnham, Presidential ballots, 1836–1892 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955) pp 247–57.

States/districts won by Pierce/King
States/districts won by Scott/Graham
Franklin Pierce
Democratic
Winfield Scott
Whig
John P. Hale
Free Soil
Margin State Total
State electoral
votes
# % electoral
votes
# % electoral
votes
# % electoral
votes
# % #
Alabama 9 0001361826,881 60.89 9 0004866915,061 34.12 - no ballots 11,280 26.77 44,147 AL
Arkansas 4 12,173 62.18 4 7,404 37.82 - no ballots 4,769 24.36 19,577 AR
California 4 40,721 53.02 4 35,972 46.83 - 61 0.08 - 4,749 6.19 76,810 CA
Connecticut 6 33,249 49.79 6 30,359 45.56 - 3,161 4.73 - 2,890 4.23 66,781 CT
Delaware 3 6,318 49.85 3 6,293 49.66 - 62 0.49 - 25 0.19 12,673 DE
Florida 3 4,318 60.03 3 2,875 39.97 - no ballots 1,443 20.06 7,193 FL
Georgia 10 40,516 64.70 10 16,660 26.60 - no ballots 23,856 38.10 62,626 GA
Illinois 11 80,378 51.87 11 64,733 41.77 - 9,863 6.36 - 15,645 10.10 154,974 IL
Indiana 13 95,340 52.05 13 80,901 44.17 - 6,929 3.78 - 14,439 7.88 183,170 IN
Iowa 4 17,763 50.23 4 15,856 44.84 - 1,606 4.54 - 1,907 5.39 35,364 IA
Kentucky 12 53,494 48.32 - 57,428 51.44 12 266 0.24 - -3,934 -3.12 111,643 KY
Louisiana 6 18,647 51.94 6 17,255 48.06 - no ballots 1,392 3.88 35,902 LA
Maine 8 41,609 50.63 8 32,543 39.60 - 8,030 9.77 - 9,066 11.03 82,182 ME
Maryland 8 40,022 53.28 8 35,077 46.69 - 21 0.03 - 4,945 6.59 75,120 MD
Massachusetts 13 44,569 35.07 - 52,683 41.45 13 28,203 22.19 - -8,114 -6.38 127,103 MA
Michigan 6 41,842 50.45 6 33,860 40.83 - 7,237 8.73 - 7,982 9.62 82,939 MI
Mississippi 7 26,896 60.50 7 17,558 39.50 - no ballots 9,338 21.00 44,454 MS
Missouri 9 38,817 56.42 9 29,984 43.58 - no ballots 8,833 12.84 68,801 MO
New Hampshire 5 28,503 56.40 5 15,486 30.64 - 6,546 12.95 - 13,017 25.76 50,535 NH
New Jersey 7 44,305 53.24 7 38,556 46.33 - 359 0.43 - 5,749 6.91 83,220 NJ
New York 35 262,083 50.18 35 234,882 44.97 - 25,329 4.85 - 27,201 5.21 522,294 NY
North Carolina 10 39,778 50.43 10 39,043 49.49 - no ballots 735 0.94 78,891 NC
Ohio 23 168,933 47.83 23 152,523 43.18 - 31,732 8.98 - 16,410 4.65 353,188 OH
Pennsylvania 27 198,562 51.20 27 179,104 46.18 - 8,495 2.19 - 19,458 5.02 387,389 PA
Rhode Island 4 8,735 51.37 4 7,626 44.85 - 644 3.79 - 1,109 6.52 17,005 RI
South Carolina 8 no popular vote 8 no popular vote no popular vote - - - SC
Tennessee 12 56,900 49.27 - 58,586 50.73 12 no ballots -1,686 -1.46 115,486 TN
Texas 4 13,552 73.07 4 4,995 26.93 - no ballots 8,557 46.14 18,547 TX
Vermont 5 13,044 29.72 - 22,173 50.52 5 8,621 19.64 - -9,129 -20.80 43,890 VT
Virginia 15 73,872 55.71 15 58,732 44.29 - no ballots 15,140 11.42 132,604 VA
Wisconsin 5 33,658 52.04 5 22,210 34.34 - 8,814 13.63 - 11,448 17.70 64,682 WI
TOTALS: 296 1,605,943 50.83 254 1,386,418 43.88 42 155,799 4.93 - 3,159,640 the US
TO WIN: 149

Close states

States where the margin of victory was under 1%:

  1. Delaware 0.19% (25 votes)
  2. North Carolina 0.90% (735 votes)

States where the margin of victory was under 5%:

  1. Tennessee 1.46% (1,686 votes)
  2. Kentucky 3.12% (3,934 votes)
  3. Louisiana 3.88% (1,392 votes)
  4. Connecticut 4.23% (2,890 votes)
  5. Ohio 4.65% (16,410 votes)

States where the margin of victory was under 10%:

  1. Pennsylvania 5.02% (19,458 votes)
  2. New York 5.21% (27,201 votes) (tipping point state)
  3. Iowa 5.39% (1,907 votes)
  4. California 6.19% (4,749 votes)
  5. Massachusetts 6.38% (8,114 votes)
  6. Rhode Island 6.52% (1,109 votes)
  7. Maryland 6.59% (4,945 votes)
  8. New Jersey 6.91% (5,749 votes)
  9. Indiana 7.88% (14,439 votes)
  10. Michigan 9.62% (7,982 votes)

Electoral college selection

Method of choosing electors State(s)
Each Elector appointed by state legislature South Carolina
Each Elector chosen by voters statewide (all other States)


See also

Notes

  1. ^ The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the Electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote.
  2. ^ Daniel Webster died on October 24, 1852, one week before the election. However, his name remained on the ballot in Massachusetts and Georgia, and he still managed to poll nearly seven thousand votes. He was also the original candidate of the Native American Party but was replaced on his death by Jacob Broom.
  3. ^ For a detailed discussion of the Union Party formed by Pro-Union Whigs, see Michael F. Holt, The Rise and Fall of the Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), Chapters 19 and 20.
  4. ^ In 1892 Democrat Grover Cleveland did win one electoral vote from each of five Michigan congressional districts he carried despite losing the state
  5. ^ In 1892 the direct election of Presidential electors meant Grover Cleveland received one Ohio electoral vote
  6. ^ Constitutional Union Party candidate John Bell won Kentucky in 1860; however, Bell was surpassed in the popular vote by two Democratic factions and Republican Abraham Lincoln. Apart from this, the Democrats won Kentucky in all ten elections between 1856 and 1892.

References

  1. ^ "Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections". The American Presidency Project. UC Santa Barbara.
  2. ^ a b c d e National Party Conventions, 1831-1976. Congressional Quarterly. 1979.
  3. ^ William DeGregorio, The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents, Gramercy 1997
  4. ^ Gienapp, William (1984). The Whig Party, the Compromise of 1850, and the Nomination of Winfield Scott. Presidential Studies Quarterly.
  5. ^ Charles O. Paullin, "The National Ticket of Broom and Coates, 1852." American Historical Review 25.4 (1920): 689-691. online
  6. ^ "Franklin Pierce". whitehouse.gov. December 29, 2014 – via National Archives.
  7. ^ "Democratic Rallying Song for 1852". The Mountain Sentinel. Ebensburg, PA: 1. October 7, 1852.
  8. ^ Counting the Votes; Kentucky November 20, 2017, at the Wayback Machine

Further reading

  • Blue, Frederick J. The Free Soilers: Third-Party Politics, 1848-54 (U of Illinois Press, 1973).
  • Chambers, William N., and Philip C. Davis. "Party, Competition, and Mass Participation: The Case of the Democratizing Party System, 1824-1852." in The history of American electoral behavior (Princeton University Press, reprinted 2015) pp. 174-197.
  • Foner, Eric. "Politics and prejudice: The Free Soil party and the Negro, 1849-1852." Journal of Negro History 50.4 (1965): 239-256. online
  • Gara, Larry. The Presidency of Franklin Pierce (UP of Kansas, 1991).
  • Gienapp, William E. The origins of the Republican Party, 1852-1856 (Oxford UP, 1987).
  • Holt, Michael F. The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War. (Oxford University Press, 1999).
  • Holt, Michael F. Franklin Pierce: The American Presidents Series: The 14th President, 1853-1857 (Macmillan, 2010).
  • Marshall, Schuyler C. "The Free Democratic Convention of 1852." Pennsylvania History 22.2 (1955): 146-167. online
  • Morrison, Michael A. "The Election of 1852." American Presidential Campaigns and Elections (Routledge, 2020) pp. 349–366.
  • Nevins, Allan. Ordeal of the Union: A house dividing, 1852-1857. Vol. 2 (1947) pp 3–42.
  • Nichols, Roy Franklin. The Democratic Machine, 1850–1854 (1923) online
  • Riddle, Wesley Allen. "Unrestraint Begets Calamity: The American Whig Review, 1845-1852." Humanitas 11.2 (1998). online
  • Wilentz, Sean. The rise of American democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (2006) pp 659–667.

States

  • Baum, Dale. "Know-Nothingism and the Republican majority in Massachusetts: The political realignment of the 1850s." Journal of American History 64.4 (1978): 959-986. online
  • Beeler, Dale. "The Election of 1852 in Indiana." Indiana Magazine of History (1915): 301–323. online
  • Campbell, Randolph. "The Whig Party of Texas in the Elections of 1848 and 1852." Southwestern Historical Quarterly 73.1 (1969): 17-34. online
  • Huston, James L. "The Illinois Political Realignment of 1844–1860: Revisiting the Analysis." Journal of the Civil War Era 1.4 (2011): 506-535. online
  • Morrill, James R. "The Presidential Election of 1852: Death Knell of the Whig Party of North Carolina." North Carolina Historical Review 44.4 (1967): 342-359 online.
  • Rosenberg, Morton M. "The Iowa Elections of 1852." Annals of Iowa 38.4 (1966). online
  • Solomon, Irvin D. "The Grass Roots Appearance of a National Party: The Formation of the Republican Party in Erie, Pennsylvania, 1852-1856." Western Pennsylvania History (1983): 209-222. online
  • Sweeney, Kevin. "Rum, Romanism, Representation, and Reform: Coalition Politics in Massachusetts, 1847-1853." Civil War History 22.2 (1976): 116-137.
  • Walton, Brian G. "Arkansas Politics during the Compromise Crisis, 1848-1852." Arkansas Historical Quarterly 36.4 (1977): 307-337. online

Primary sources

  • Chester, Edward W A guide to political platforms (1977) online
  • Porter, Kirk H. and Donald Bruce Johnson, eds. National party platforms, 1840-1964 (1965) online 1840-1956

Web sites

  • "A Historical Analysis of the Electoral College". The Green Papers. Retrieved September 17, 2005.

External links

  • Presidential Election of 1852: A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress
  • 1852 popular vote by counties
  • 1852 state-by-state popular vote
  • Election of 1852 in Counting the Votes October 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine

1852, united, states, presidential, election, 17th, quadrennial, presidential, election, held, tuesday, november, 1852, democrat, franklin, pierce, defeated, whig, nominee, general, winfield, scott, third, party, candidate, from, free, soil, party, john, hale,. The 1852 United States presidential election was the 17th quadrennial presidential election held on Tuesday November 2 1852 Democrat Franklin Pierce defeated Whig nominee General Winfield Scott A third party candidate from the Free Soil party John P Hale also ran and came in third place but got no electoral votes 1852 United States presidential election 1848 November 2 1852 1856 296 members of the Electoral College149 electoral votes needed to winTurnout69 6 1 3 1 pp Nominee Franklin Pierce Winfield Scott John P HaleParty Democratic Whig Free SoilHome state New Hampshire New Jersey New HampshireRunning mate William R King William A Graham George Washington JulianElectoral vote 254 42 0States carried 27 4 0Popular vote 1 607 521 1 386 943 155 210Percentage 50 8 43 9 4 9 Presidential election results map Blue denotes states won by Pierce King and buff by Scott Graham Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes cast by each state President before electionMillard FillmoreWhig Elected President Franklin PierceDemocraticIncumbent Whig President Millard Fillmore had succeeded to the presidency in 1850 upon the death of President Zachary Taylor Fillmore endorsed the Compromise of 1850 and enforced the Fugitive Slave Law This earned Fillmore Southern voter support and Northern voter opposition On the 53rd ballot of the sectionally divided 1852 Whig National Convention Scott defeated Fillmore for the nomination Democrats divided among four major candidates at the 1852 Democratic National Convention On the 49th ballot dark horse candidate Franklin Pierce won nomination by consensus compromise The Free Soil Party a third party opposed to the extension of slavery in the United States and into the territories nominated New Hampshire Senator John P Hale With few policy differences between the two major candidates the election became a personality contest Though Scott had commanded in the Mexican American War Pierce also served Scott strained Whig Party unity as his anti slavery reputation gravely damaged his campaign in the South A group of Southern Whigs and a separate group of Southern Democrats each nominated insurgent tickets but both efforts failed to attract support Pierce and running mate William R King won a comfortable popular majority carrying 27 of the 31 states Pierce won the highest share of the electoral vote since James Monroe s uncontested 1820 re election The Free Soil Party regressed to less than five percent of the national popular vote down from more than ten percent in 1848 while overwhelming defeat and disagreement about slavery soon drove the Whig Party to disintegrate Anti slavery Whigs and Free Soilers would ultimately coalesce into the new Republican Party which would quickly become a formidable movement in the free states Not until 1876 would Democrats again win a majority of the popular vote for president and not until 1932 would they win a majority in both the popular vote and the electoral college Contents 1 Nominations 1 1 Democratic Party nomination 1 2 Whig Party nomination 1 3 Free Soil Party nomination 1 4 Union Party nomination 1 5 Native American Know Nothing Party nomination 1 6 Southern Rights Party nomination 1 7 Liberty Party nomination 2 General election 2 1 Fall campaign 2 2 Results 2 3 Records 2 4 Geography of results 2 4 1 Cartographic gallery 3 Results by state 3 1 Close states 4 Electoral college selection 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 Further reading 8 1 States 8 2 Primary sources 9 Web sites 10 External linksNominations EditDemocratic Party nomination Edit Main article 1852 Democratic National Convention 1852 Democratic Party ticketFranklin Pierce William R Kingfor President for Vice President U S senator from New Hampshire 1837 1842 U S senator from Alabama 1819 1844 amp 1848 1852 Franklin Pierce former U S senator from New Hampshire Lewis Cass U S senator from Michigan James Buchanan former U S secretary of state from Pennsylvania William L Marcy former U S secretary of war from New York Stephen Douglas U S senator from Illinois Former Senator Franklin Pierce from New Hampshire Senator Lewis Cass from Michigan Former Secretary of State James Buchanan Former Secretary of War William L Marcy Senator Stephen A Douglas from Illinois Pierce King campaign poster The Democratic Party held its national convention in Baltimore Maryland in June 1852 Benjamin F Hallett the chair of the Democratic National Committee limited the sizes of the delegations to their electoral votes and a vote to maintain the two thirds requirement for the presidential and vice presidential nomination was passed by a vote of 269 to 13 2 James Buchanan Lewis Cass William L Marcy and Stephen A Douglas were the main candidates for the nomination All of the candidates led the ballot for the presidential nomination at one point but all of them failed to meet the two thirds requirement Franklin Pierce was put up for the nomination by the Virginia delegation Pierce won the nomination when the delegates switched their support to him after he had received the unamious support of the delegates from New England He won on the second day of balloting after forty nine ballots 2 3 The delegation from Maine proposed that the vice presidential nomination should be given to somebody from the Southern United States with William R King being specifically named King led on the first ballot before winning on the second ballot 2 Whig Party nomination Edit Main article 1852 Whig National Convention 1852 Whig Party ticketWinfield Scott William A Grahamfor President for Vice President 3rdCommanding General of the U S Army 1841 1861 20thU S Secretary of the Navy 1850 1852 Winfield Scott commanding general of the U S Army from New Jersey Millard Fillmore president of the United States from New York Daniel Webster U S secretary of state from Massachusetts Commanding General Winfield Scott President Millard Fillmore U S Secretary of State Daniel Webster Scott Graham campaign poster The Whig Party held its national convention in Baltimore Maryland in June 1852 The call for the convention had been made by Whig members of the United States Congress and thirty one states were represented A vote to have each state s vote be based on its electoral college strength was passed by a vote of 149 to 144 but it was rescinded due to disagreements from the Southern states and smaller Northern states 2 The party had been divided by the Compromise of 1850 and was divided over the presidential nomination between incumbent President Millard Fillmore who received support from the South and Winfield Scott who received his support from the North William H Seward who had been the main opponent of the compromise in the United States Senate and advised President Zachary Taylor against it supported Scott Fillmore offered to give his delegates to Daniel Webster if he received the support of forty one delegates on his own but Webster was unsuccessful Scott won the nomination on the 53rd ballot William Alexander Graham won the vice presidential nomination without a formal vote 2 4 Free Soil Party nomination Edit Main article Free Soil Party John P Hale U S senator from New Hampshire Senator John P Hale from New HampshireThe Free Soil Party was still the strongest third party in 1852 However following the Compromise of 1850 most of the Barnburners who supported it in 1848 had returned to the Democratic Party while most of the Conscience Whigs rejoined the Whig Party The second Free Soil National Convention assembled in the Masonic Hall in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania New Hampshire senator John P Hale was nominated for president with 192 delegate votes sixteen votes were cast for a smattering of candidates George Washington Julian of Indiana was nominated for vice president over Samuel Lewis of Ohio and Joshua R Giddings of Ohio Union Party nomination Edit The Union party was formed in 1850 an offshoot of the Whig party in several Southern states including Georgia As the 1852 presidential election approached Union party leaders decided to wait and see who was nominated by the two major parties The movement to nominate Daniel Webster as a third party candidate began in earnest following the Whig Convention largely driven by those who had been strenuously opposed to Winfield Scott s nomination for president among them Alexander Stephens Robert Toombs and George Curtis While Webster was against what he perceived as a revolt from the Whig Party and preferred not to be nominated he let Americans vote for him should the party choose to nominate him The Union Party held its Georgia state convention on August 9 1852 and nominated Webster for president and Charles J Jenkins of Georgia for vice president A formal convention was held at Faneuil Hall in Boston Massachusetts on September 15 affirming the nominations made at the state convention in Georgia and rejecting Winfield Scott as nothing more than a military figure The Webster Jenkins ticket received nationwide support particularly among Southern Whigs but also in Massachusetts and New York but it was largely perceived by many as nothing more than getting voters who would in different circumstances support Scott Webster had no real chance of winning the election but even the new Know Nothing party endorsed Webster and Jenkins nominating them without even their own permission However Webster died nine days before the election of a cerebral hemorrhage on October 24 1852 Native American Know Nothing Party nomination Edit Around the mid 1830s nativists were present in New York politics under the aegis of the American Republican Party The American Republican party was formed in 1843 in major opposition to Catholicism and Catholic immigrants In 1845 the party changed its name to the Native American Party Their opponents nicknamed them the Know Nothings and the party liked the name and it became the nickname of the party after that until it collapsed in 1860 In 1852 the original presidential nominee planned by the Native American Party was Daniel Webster the presidential nominee of the Union party They nominated Webster without his permission with George Corbin Washington grandnephew of George Washington as his vice presidential running mate Webster died of natural causes nine days before the election and the Know Nothings quickly replaced Webster by nominating Jacob Broom for president and replaced Washington with Reynell Coates for vice president In the future former President Millard Fillmore would be their presidential nominee in 1856 5 Southern Rights Party nomination Edit George Troup former U S senator from Georgia Former senator George Troup from GeorgiaThe Southern Rights Party was an offshoot of the Democratic party in several Southern states which advocated secession from the Union electing a number of Congressmen and holding referendums on secession in a number of southern states none of which were successful It was unclear in early 1852 if the Party would contest the presidential election When the Alabama state convention was held in early March only nine counties were represented The party decided to see who was nominated by the two major national parties and support one of them if possible When Georgia held its state convention it acted as the state Democratic Party and sent delegates to the national convention After the Democratic National Convention the Party was not sure that it wanted to support Franklin Pierce and William R King the Democratic nominees Alabama held a state convention from July 13 15 and discussed at length the options of running a separate ticket or supporting Pierce and King The convention was unable to arrive at a decision deciding to appoint a committee to review the positions of Scott Graham and Pierce King with the option of calling a national convention if the two major party tickets appeared deficient The committee took its time reviewing the positions of Pierce and Scott finally deciding on August 25 to call a convention for a Southern Rights Party ticket The convention assembled in Montgomery Alabama with 62 delegates present a committee to recommend a ticket being appointed while the delegates listened to speeches in the interim The committee eventually recommended former senator George Troup of Georgia for president and former Governor John Quitman of Mississippi for vice president they were unanimously nominated The two nominees accepted their nominations soon after the convention which was held rather late in the season Troup stated in a letter dated September 27 and printed in the New York Times on October 16 that he had planned to vote for Pierce King and had always wholeheartedly supported William R D King He indicated in the letter that he preferred to decline the honor as he was rather ill at the time and feared that he would die before the election The Party s executive committee edited the letter to excise those portions which indicated that Troup preferred to decline a fact which was revealed after the election Liberty Party nomination Edit The Liberty Party had ceased to become a significant political force after most of its members joined the Free Soil Party in 1848 Nonetheless some of those who rejected the fusion strategy held a Liberty Party National Convention in Buffalo New York There were few delegates present so a ticket was recommended and a later convention called The Convention recommended Gerrit Smith of New York for president and Charles Durkee of Wisconsin for vice president A second convention was held in Syracuse New York in early September 1852 but it too failed to draw enough delegates to select nominees Yet a third convention gathered in Syracuse later that month and nominated William Goodell of New York for president and S M Bell of Virginia for vice president General election EditFall campaign Edit Political cartoon favoring Winfield Scott The Whigs platform was almost indistinguishable from that of the Democrats reducing the campaign to a contest between the personalities of the two candidates The lack of clearcut issues between the two parties helped drive voter turnout down to its lowest level since 1836 The decline was further exacerbated by Scott s antislavery reputation which decimated the Southern Whig vote at the same time as the pro slavery Whig platform undermined the Northern Whig vote After the Compromise of 1850 was passed many of the southern Whig Party members broke with the party s key figure Henry Clay 6 Finally Scott s status as a war hero was somewhat offset by the fact that Pierce was himself a Mexican American War brigadier general The Democrats adopted the slogan The Whigs we Polked in forty four We ll Pierce in fifty two playing on the names of Pierce and former President James K Polk 7 Just nine days before the election Webster died causing many Union state parties to remove their slates of electors The Union ticket appeared on the ballot in Georgia and Massachusetts however Results Edit Results by county explicitly indicating the percentage of the winning candidate in each county Shades of blue are for Pierce Democratic shades of yellow are for Scott Whig shades of red are for Hale Free Soil shades of orange are for Webster Union shades of green are for Independent Democrats and shades of purple are for Troup Southern Rights When American voters went to the polls Pierce won the electoral college in a landslide Scott won only the states of Kentucky Tennessee Massachusetts and Vermont while the Free Soil vote collapsed to less than half of what Martin Van Buren had earned in the previous election with the party taking no states The fact that Daniel Webster received a substantial share of the vote in Georgia and Massachusetts even though he was dead shows how disenchanted voters were with the two main candidates In the popular vote while Pierce outpolled Scott by 220 000 votes 17 states were decided by less than 10 and eight by less than 5 A shift of 69 000 votes to Scott in Delaware Maryland New York North Carolina Ohio and Pennsylvania would have left the electoral college in a 148 148 tie forcing a contingent election in the House of Representatives As a result of the devastating defeat and the growing tensions within the party between pro slavery Southerners and anti slavery Northerners the Whig Party quickly fell apart after the 1852 election and ceased to exist Some Southern Whigs would join the Democratic Party and many Northern Whigs would help to form the new Republican Party in 1854 Some Whigs in both sections would support the so called Know Nothing party in the 1856 presidential election Similarly the Free Soil Party rapidly fell away into obscurity after the election and the remaining members mostly opted to join the former Northern Whigs in forming the Republican Party The Southern Rights Party effectively collapsed following the election attaining only five percent of the vote in Alabama and a few hundred in its nominee s home state of Georgia It would elect a number of Congressmen in 1853 but they would rejoin the Democratic Party upon taking their seats in Congress Electoral results Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote a Electoralvote Running mateCount Percentage Vice presidential candidate Home state Electoral voteFranklin Pierce Democratic New Hampshire 1 607 510 50 84 254 William Rufus DeVane King Alabama 254Winfield Scott Whig New Jersey 1 386 942 43 87 42 William Alexander Graham North Carolina 42John Parker Hale Free Soil New Hampshire 155 210 4 91 0 George Washington Julian Indiana 0Daniel Webster b Union c Massachusetts 6 994 0 22 0 Charles Jones Jenkins Georgia 0Jacob Broom Native American Pennsylvania 2 566 0 08 0 Reynell Coates New Jersey 0George McIntosh Troup Southern Rights Georgia 2 331 0 07 0 John Anthony Quitman Mississippi 0Other 277 0 00 Other Total 3 161 830 100 296 296Needed to win 149 149Source Popular Vote Leip David 1852 Presidential Election Results Dave Leip s Atlas of U S Presidential Elections Retrieved July 27 2005 Source Electoral Vote Electoral College Box Scores 1789 1996 National Archives and Records Administration Retrieved July 31 2005 The leading candidates for vice president were both born in North Carolina and in fact both attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill albeit two decades apart While there they were members of opposing debate societies the Dialectic and Philanthropic Societies Both also served in North Carolina politics King was a representative from North Carolina before he moved to Alabama and Graham was a governor of North Carolina Popular votePierce 50 84 Scott 43 87 Hale 4 91 Others 0 38 Electoral votePierce 85 81 Scott 14 19 Records Edit This was the last election in which the Democrats won Michigan until 1932 d the last in which the Democrats won Iowa Maine New Hampshire Ohio e or Rhode Island until 1912 the last in which the Democrats won Wisconsin until 1892 the last in which the Democrats won Connecticut until 1876 and the last in which the Democrats won New York until 1868 It was however the last election in which the Democrats chief opponent won Kentucky until 1896 f 8 and indeed the last until 1928 in which the Democrats opponent obtained an absolute majority in the Bluegrass State Geography of results Edit Cartographic gallery Edit Map of presidential election results by county Map of Democratic presidential election results by county Map of Whig presidential election results by county Map of Free Soil presidential election results by county Map of Other presidential election results by countyResults by state EditSource Data from Walter Dean Burnham Presidential ballots 1836 1892 Johns Hopkins University Press 1955 pp 247 57 States districts won by Pierce KingStates districts won by Scott GrahamFranklin PierceDemocratic Winfield ScottWhig John P HaleFree Soil Margin State TotalState electoralvotes electoralvotes electoralvotes electoralvotes Alabama 9 00013618 26 881 60 89 9 00048669 15 061 34 12 no ballots 11 280 26 77 44 147 ALArkansas 4 12 173 62 18 4 7 404 37 82 no ballots 4 769 24 36 19 577 ARCalifornia 4 40 721 53 02 4 35 972 46 83 61 0 08 4 749 6 19 76 810 CAConnecticut 6 33 249 49 79 6 30 359 45 56 3 161 4 73 2 890 4 23 66 781 CTDelaware 3 6 318 49 85 3 6 293 49 66 62 0 49 25 0 19 12 673 DEFlorida 3 4 318 60 03 3 2 875 39 97 no ballots 1 443 20 06 7 193 FLGeorgia 10 40 516 64 70 10 16 660 26 60 no ballots 23 856 38 10 62 626 GAIllinois 11 80 378 51 87 11 64 733 41 77 9 863 6 36 15 645 10 10 154 974 ILIndiana 13 95 340 52 05 13 80 901 44 17 6 929 3 78 14 439 7 88 183 170 INIowa 4 17 763 50 23 4 15 856 44 84 1 606 4 54 1 907 5 39 35 364 IAKentucky 12 53 494 48 32 57 428 51 44 12 266 0 24 3 934 3 12 111 643 KYLouisiana 6 18 647 51 94 6 17 255 48 06 no ballots 1 392 3 88 35 902 LAMaine 8 41 609 50 63 8 32 543 39 60 8 030 9 77 9 066 11 03 82 182 MEMaryland 8 40 022 53 28 8 35 077 46 69 21 0 03 4 945 6 59 75 120 MDMassachusetts 13 44 569 35 07 52 683 41 45 13 28 203 22 19 8 114 6 38 127 103 MAMichigan 6 41 842 50 45 6 33 860 40 83 7 237 8 73 7 982 9 62 82 939 MIMississippi 7 26 896 60 50 7 17 558 39 50 no ballots 9 338 21 00 44 454 MSMissouri 9 38 817 56 42 9 29 984 43 58 no ballots 8 833 12 84 68 801 MONew Hampshire 5 28 503 56 40 5 15 486 30 64 6 546 12 95 13 017 25 76 50 535 NHNew Jersey 7 44 305 53 24 7 38 556 46 33 359 0 43 5 749 6 91 83 220 NJNew York 35 262 083 50 18 35 234 882 44 97 25 329 4 85 27 201 5 21 522 294 NYNorth Carolina 10 39 778 50 43 10 39 043 49 49 no ballots 735 0 94 78 891 NCOhio 23 168 933 47 83 23 152 523 43 18 31 732 8 98 16 410 4 65 353 188 OHPennsylvania 27 198 562 51 20 27 179 104 46 18 8 495 2 19 19 458 5 02 387 389 PARhode Island 4 8 735 51 37 4 7 626 44 85 644 3 79 1 109 6 52 17 005 RISouth Carolina 8 no popular vote 8 no popular vote no popular vote SCTennessee 12 56 900 49 27 58 586 50 73 12 no ballots 1 686 1 46 115 486 TNTexas 4 13 552 73 07 4 4 995 26 93 no ballots 8 557 46 14 18 547 TXVermont 5 13 044 29 72 22 173 50 52 5 8 621 19 64 9 129 20 80 43 890 VTVirginia 15 73 872 55 71 15 58 732 44 29 no ballots 15 140 11 42 132 604 VAWisconsin 5 33 658 52 04 5 22 210 34 34 8 814 13 63 11 448 17 70 64 682 WITOTALS 296 1 605 943 50 83 254 1 386 418 43 88 42 155 799 4 93 3 159 640 the USTO WIN 149Close states Edit States where the margin of victory was under 1 Delaware 0 19 25 votes North Carolina 0 90 735 votes States where the margin of victory was under 5 Tennessee 1 46 1 686 votes Kentucky 3 12 3 934 votes Louisiana 3 88 1 392 votes Connecticut 4 23 2 890 votes Ohio 4 65 16 410 votes States where the margin of victory was under 10 Pennsylvania 5 02 19 458 votes New York 5 21 27 201 votes tipping point state Iowa 5 39 1 907 votes California 6 19 4 749 votes Massachusetts 6 38 8 114 votes Rhode Island 6 52 1 109 votes Maryland 6 59 4 945 votes New Jersey 6 91 5 749 votes Indiana 7 88 14 439 votes Michigan 9 62 7 982 votes Electoral college selection EditMethod of choosing electors State s Each Elector appointed by state legislature South CarolinaEach Elector chosen by voters statewide all other States See also EditHistory of the United States 1849 65 Inauguration of Franklin Pierce Second Party System 1852 United States House of Representatives elections 1852 and 1853 United States Senate electionsNotes Edit The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the Electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote Daniel Webster died on October 24 1852 one week before the election However his name remained on the ballot in Massachusetts and Georgia and he still managed to poll nearly seven thousand votes He was also the original candidate of the Native American Party but was replaced on his death by Jacob Broom For a detailed discussion of the Union Party formed by Pro Union Whigs see Michael F Holt The Rise and Fall of the Whig Party Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War New York Oxford University Press 1999 Chapters 19 and 20 In 1892 Democrat Grover Cleveland did win one electoral vote from each of five Michigan congressional districts he carried despite losing the state In 1892 the direct election of Presidential electors meant Grover Cleveland received one Ohio electoral vote Constitutional Union Party candidate John Bell won Kentucky in 1860 however Bell was surpassed in the popular vote by two Democratic factions and Republican Abraham Lincoln Apart from this the Democrats won Kentucky in all ten elections between 1856 and 1892 References Edit Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections The American Presidency Project UC Santa Barbara a b c d e National Party Conventions 1831 1976 Congressional Quarterly 1979 William DeGregorio The Complete Book of U S Presidents Gramercy 1997 Gienapp William 1984 The Whig Party the Compromise of 1850 and the Nomination of Winfield Scott Presidential Studies Quarterly Charles O Paullin The National Ticket of Broom and Coates 1852 American Historical Review 25 4 1920 689 691 online Franklin Pierce whitehouse gov December 29 2014 via National Archives Democratic Rallying Song for 1852 The Mountain Sentinel Ebensburg PA 1 October 7 1852 Counting the Votes Kentucky Archived November 20 2017 at the Wayback MachineFurther reading EditBlue Frederick J The Free Soilers Third Party Politics 1848 54 U of Illinois Press 1973 Chambers William N and Philip C Davis Party Competition and Mass Participation The Case of the Democratizing Party System 1824 1852 in The history of American electoral behavior Princeton University Press reprinted 2015 pp 174 197 Foner Eric Politics and prejudice The Free Soil party and the Negro 1849 1852 Journal of Negro History 50 4 1965 239 256 online Gara Larry The Presidency of Franklin Pierce UP of Kansas 1991 Gienapp William E The origins of the Republican Party 1852 1856 Oxford UP 1987 Holt Michael F The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War Oxford University Press 1999 Holt Michael F Franklin Pierce The American Presidents Series The 14th President 1853 1857 Macmillan 2010 Marshall Schuyler C The Free Democratic Convention of 1852 Pennsylvania History 22 2 1955 146 167 onlineMorrison Michael A The Election of 1852 American Presidential Campaigns and Elections Routledge 2020 pp 349 366 Nevins Allan Ordeal of the Union A house dividing 1852 1857 Vol 2 1947 pp 3 42 Nichols Roy Franklin The Democratic Machine 1850 1854 1923 online Riddle Wesley Allen Unrestraint Begets Calamity The American Whig Review 1845 1852 Humanitas 11 2 1998 online Wilentz Sean The rise of American democracy Jefferson to Lincoln 2006 pp 659 667 States Edit Baum Dale Know Nothingism and the Republican majority in Massachusetts The political realignment of the 1850s Journal of American History 64 4 1978 959 986 online Beeler Dale The Election of 1852 in Indiana Indiana Magazine of History 1915 301 323 online Campbell Randolph The Whig Party of Texas in the Elections of 1848 and 1852 Southwestern Historical Quarterly 73 1 1969 17 34 onlineHuston James L The Illinois Political Realignment of 1844 1860 Revisiting the Analysis Journal of the Civil War Era 1 4 2011 506 535 onlineMorrill James R The Presidential Election of 1852 Death Knell of the Whig Party of North Carolina North Carolina Historical Review 44 4 1967 342 359 online Rosenberg Morton M The Iowa Elections of 1852 Annals of Iowa 38 4 1966 online Solomon Irvin D The Grass Roots Appearance of a National Party The Formation of the Republican Party in Erie Pennsylvania 1852 1856 Western Pennsylvania History 1983 209 222 onlineSweeney Kevin Rum Romanism Representation and Reform Coalition Politics in Massachusetts 1847 1853 Civil War History 22 2 1976 116 137 Walton Brian G Arkansas Politics during the Compromise Crisis 1848 1852 Arkansas Historical Quarterly 36 4 1977 307 337 onlinePrimary sources Edit Chester Edward W A guide to political platforms 1977 online Porter Kirk H and Donald Bruce Johnson eds National party platforms 1840 1964 1965 online 1840 1956Web sites Edit A Historical Analysis of the Electoral College The Green Papers Retrieved September 17 2005 External links Edit Wikimedia Commons has media related to United States presidential election 1852 Presidential Election of 1852 A Resource Guide from the Library of Congress 1852 popular vote by counties 1852 state by state popular voteElection of 1852 in Counting the Votes Archived October 23 2017 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 1852 United States presidential election amp oldid 1134000036, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.