fbpx
Wikipedia

Communist state

April 29, 2023

This article is about sovereign states governed by communist parties, usually Marxist–Leninist or some national variation thereof. For the social movement and political ideology, see Communism. For the hypothetical social stage proposed by Marxist theory, see Communist society. For a list of self-proclaimed socialist states, see List of socialist states.

A communist state, also known as a Marxist–Leninist state, is a one-party state that is administered and governed by a communist party guided by Marxism–Leninism. Marxism–Leninism was the state ideology of the Soviet Union, the Comintern after Bolshevisation and the communist states within the Comecon, the Eastern Bloc, and the Warsaw Pact.[1] Marxism–Leninism currently still remains the ideology of a few parties around the world. After its peak when many communist states were established, the Revolutions of 1989 brought down most of the communist states, however, it is still the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam,[2] and to a lesser extent, North Korea.[3][4] During most of the 20th century, before the Revolutions of 1989, around one-third of the world's population lived under communist states.[5]

The flags of the Communist Party of Vietnam that were flown besides the Vietnamese national flags in Hanoi, Vietnam

Communist states are typically authoritarian and are typically administered through democratic centralism by a single centralised communist party apparatus. These parties are usually Marxist–Leninist or some national variation thereof such as Maoism or Titoism, with the official aim of achieving socialism and progressing toward a communist society. There have been several instances of communist states with functioning political participation (i.e. Soviet democracy) processes involving several other non-party organisations such as direct democratic participation, factory committees, and trade unions, although the communist party remained the centre of power.[6][7][8][9][10]

As a term, communist state is used by Western historians, political scientists, and media to refer to these countries. However, these states do not describe themselves as communist nor do they claim to have achieved communism—they refer to themselves as socialist states that are in the process of constructing socialism.[11][12][13][14] Terms used by communist states include national-democratic, people's democratic, socialist-oriented, and workers and peasants' states.[15] Academics, political commentators, and other scholars tend to distinguish between communist states and democratic socialist states, with the first representing the Eastern Bloc and the latter representing Western Bloc countries that have been democratically-governed by socialist parties such as Britain, France, Sweden, and Western social-democracies in general, among others.[16][17][18][19]

Overview

Development

During the 20th century, the world's first constitutionally communist state was in Russia at the end of 1917. In 1922, it joined other former territories of the empire to become the Soviet Union. After World War II, the Soviet Army occupied much of Eastern Europe and helped bring the existing communist parties to power in those countries. Originally, the communist states in Eastern Europe were allied with the Soviet Union. Yugoslavia would declare itself non-aligned, and Albania later took a different path. After a war against Japanese occupation and a civil war resulting in a Communist victory, the People's Republic of China was established in 1949. Communist states were also established in Cambodia, Cuba, Laos, North Korea, and Vietnam. In 1989, the communist states in Eastern Europe collapsed after the Iron Curtain broke as a result of the Pan-European Picnic, under public pressure during a wave of mostly non-violent movements as part of the Revolutions of 1989 which led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. China's socio-economic structure has been referred to as "nationalistic state capitalism" and the Eastern Bloc (Eastern Europe and the Third World) as "bureaucratic-authoritarian systems."[20][21]

Today, the existing communist states in the world are in China, Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, and North Korea (DPRK). These communist states often do not claim to have achieved socialism or communism in their countries but to be building and working toward the establishment of socialism in their countries. The preamble to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam's Constitution states that Vietnam only entered a transition stage between capitalism and socialism after the country was re-unified under the communist party in 1976[22] and the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Cuba states that the role of the communist party is to "guide the common effort toward the goals and construction of socialism."[23] The DPRK's constitution outlines a socialist economy and the ruling Workers' Party of Korea remains ideologically committed to communism.

Institutions

Communist states share similar institutions which are organised on the premise that the communist party is a vanguard of the proletariat and represents the long-term interests of the people. The doctrine of democratic centralism, developed by Vladimir Lenin as a set of principles to be used in the internal affairs of the communist party, is extended to society at large.[24] According to democratic centralism, all leaders must be elected by the people and all proposals must be debated openly, but once a decision has been reached all people have a duty to account to that decision. When used within a political party, democratic centralism is meant to prevent factionalism and splits. When applied to an entire state, democratic centralism creates a one-party system.[24] The constitutions of most communist states describe their political system as a form of democracy.[25] They recognize the sovereignty of the people as embodied in a series of representative parliamentary institutions. Such states do not have a separation of powers and instead have one national legislative body (such as the Supreme Soviet in the Soviet Union) which is considered the highest organ of state power and which is legally superior to the executive and judicial branches of government.[26]

In communist states, national legislative politics often have a similar structure to the parliaments that exist in liberal republics, with two significant differences. First, the deputies elected to these national legislative bodies are not expected to represent the interests of any particular constituency, but rather the long-term interests of the people as a whole; and second, against Karl Marx's advice, the legislative bodies of communist states are not in permanent session. Rather, they convene once or several times per year in sessions which usually last only a few days.[27] When the national legislative body is not in session, its powers are transferred to a smaller council (often called a presidium) which combines legislative and executive power and in some communist states (such as the Soviet Union before 1990) acts as a collective head of state. In some systems, the presidium is composed of important communist party members who vote the resolutions of the communist party into law.[27]

A feature of communist states is the existence of numerous state-sponsored social organisations (associations of journalists, teachers, writers and other professionals, consumer cooperatives, sports clubs, trade unions, youth organisations, and women's organisations) which are integrated into the political system. In communist states, the social organisations are expected to promote social unity and cohesion, to serve as a link between the government and society and to provide a forum for recruitment of new communist party members.[28]

Historically, the political organisation of many socialist states has been dominated by a one-party monopoly. Some communist governments such as those in China, Czechoslovakia, or East Germany have or had more than one political party, but all minor parties are or were required to follow the leadership of the communist party. In communist states, the government may not tolerate criticism of policies that have already been implemented in the past or are being implemented in the present.[29] Nevertheless, communist parties have won elections and governed in the context of multi-party democracies without seeking to establish a one-party state and therefore these entities do not fall under the definition of communist state. In most of Europe, communist parties were highly popular and served in several coalition governments during the 20th century. Examples of direct ruling include San Marino (1945–1957), Nicaragua (1984–1990),[30] Guyana (1992–2015), Moldova (2001–2009),[31] Cyprus (2008–2013),[32] and Nepal (1994–1998; 2008–2013; 2015–2017; 2018–present) as well as several Brazilian, Indian (Kerala),[33] and Russian states.

State

According to Marxist–Leninist thought, the state is a repressive institution led by a ruling class.[34] This class dominates the state and expresses its will through it.[34] By formulating law, the ruling class uses the state to oppress other classes and forming a class dictatorship.[34] However, the goal of the communist state is to abolish that said state.[34] The Soviet Russia Constitution of 1918 stated: "The principal object of the Constitution of the R.S.F.S.R., which is adapted to the present transition period, consists in the establishment of a dictatorship of the urban and rural proletariat and the poorest peasantry, in the form of a powerful All-Russian Soviet power; the object of which is to secure complete suppression of the bourgeoisie, the abolition of exploitation of man by man, and the establishment of Socialism, under which there shall be neither class division nor state authority".[34] The communist state is the dictatorship of the proletariat, where the advanced elements of the proletariat are the ruling class.[35] In Marxist–Leninist thinking, the socialist state is the last repressive state since the next stage of development is that of pure communism, a classless and stateless society.[35] Friedrich Engels commented on the state, writing: "State interference in social relations, becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The state is not 'abolished'. It dies out."[36]

In "The Tax in Kind", Vladimir Lenin argued: "No one, I think, in studying the question of the economic system of Russia, has denied its transitional character. Nor, I think, has any Communist denied that the term Soviet Socialist Republic implies the determination of the Soviet power to achieve the transition to socialism, and not that the existing economic system is recognised as a socialist order."[37] The introduction of the first five-year plan in the Soviet Union got many communists to believe that the withering away of the state was imminent.[38] However, Joseph Stalin warned that the withering away of the state would not occur until after the socialist mode of production had achieved dominance over capitalism.[38] Soviet jurist Andrey Vyshinsky echoed this assumption and said that the socialist state was necessary "in order to defend, to secure, and to develop relationships and arrangements advantageous to the workers, and to annihilate completely capitalism and its remnants."[39]

Ideology permeates these states.[40] According to scholar Peter Tang, "[t]he supreme test of whether a Communist Party-state remains revolutionarily dedicated or degenerates into a revisionist or counterrevolutionary system lies in its attitude toward the Communist ideology."[41] Therefore, the sole ideological purpose of communist states is to spread socialism and to reach that goal these states have to be guided by Marxism–Leninism.[41] The communist states have opted for two ways to achieve this goal, namely govern indirectly by Marxism–Leninism through the party (Soviet model), or commit the state officially through the constitution to Marxism–Leninism (Maoist China–Albania model).[42] The Soviet model is the most common and is currently in use in China.[43]

Marxism–Leninism was mentioned in the Soviet constitution.[40] Article 6 of the 1977 Soviet constitution stated: "The Communist Party, armed with Marxism–Leninism, determines the general perspective of the development of society and the course of the domestic and foreign policy of the USSR."[40] This contrasts with the 1976 Albanian constitution which stated in Article 3: "In the People's Socialist Republic of Albania the dominant ideology is Marxism–Leninism. The entire social order is developing on the basis of its principles."[43] The 1975 Chinese constitution had a similar tone, stating in Article 2 that "Marxism–Leninism–Mao Zedong Thought is the theoretical basis guiding the thinking of our nation."[43] The 1977 Soviet constitution did also use phrases such as "building socialism and communism", "on the road to communism", "to build the material and technical basis of communism" and "to perfect socialist social relations and transform them into communist relations" in the preamble.[40]

People's democratic state

The people's democratic state was implemented in Eastern Europe after World War II.[44] It can be defined as a state and society in which feudal vestiges have been liquidated and where the system of private ownership exists, but it is eclipsed by the state-owned enterprises in the field of industry, transport, and credit.[45]

In the words of Eugene Varga, "the state itself and its apparatus of violence serve the interests, not of the monopolistic bourgeoisie, but of the toilers of town and country."[45] Soviet philosopher N. P. Farberov stated: "People's democracy in the people's republics is a democracy of the toiling classes, headed by the working class, a broad and full democracy for the overwhelming majority of the people, that is, a socialist democracy in its character and its trend. In this sense we call it popular."[45]

People's republican state

The people's republican state is a type of socialist state with a republican constitution. Although the term initially became associated with populist movements in the 19th century such as the German Völkisch movement and the Narodniks in Russia, it is now associated with communist states. A number of the short-lived communist states which formed during World War I and its aftermath called themselves people's republics. Many of these sprang up in the territory of the former Russian Empire following the October Revolution.[46][47][48][49][50]

Additional people's republics emerged following the Allied victory in World War II, mainly within the Soviet Union's Eastern Bloc.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57] In Asia, China became a people's republic following the Chinese Communist Revolution[58] and North Korea also became a people's republic.[59]

During the 1960s, Romania and Yugoslavia ceased to use the term people's republic in their official name, replacing it with the term socialist republic as a mark of their ongoing political development. Czechoslovakia also added the term socialist republic into its name during this period; it had become a people's republic in 1948, but the country had not used that term in its official name.[60] Albania used both terms in its official name from 1976 to 1991.[61]

National-democratic state

The concept of the national-democratic state tried to theorize how a state could develop socialism by bypassing the capitalist mode of production.[62] While the theory of non-capitalist development was first articulated by Vladimir Lenin, the novelty of this concept was applying it to the progressive elements of the national liberation movements in the Third World.[62] The term national-democratic state was introduced shortly after the death of Stalin, who believed colonies to be mere lackeys of Western imperialism and that the socialist movement had few prospects there.[62]

The countries in which the national liberations movements took power and which instituted an anti-imperialist foreign policy and sought to construct a form of socialism were considered as national-democratic states by Marxist–Leninists.[62] An example of a national-democratic state is Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser which was committed to constructing Arab socialism.[63] With the exception of Cuba, none of these states managed to develop socialism.[63] According to scholar Sylvia Woodby Edington, this might explain why the concept of the national-democratic state "never received full theoretical elaboration as a political system."[63] However, one feature was clearly defined, namely, that these states did not need to be led by a Marxist–Leninist party.[64]

Socialist-oriented state

A socialist-oriented state seeks to reach socialism by non-capitalist development.[65] As a term, it is substantially different from the concept of the national-democratic state.[65] The singular difference is that the socialist-oriented state was divided into two stages, firstly, into a national-democratic socialist-oriented state and secondly, into a people's democratic socialist-oriented state.[64] Countries belonging to the national-democratic socialist-oriented state category were also categorised as national-democratic states.[64] Examples of national-democratic socialist-oriented states are Algeria, ruled by the National Liberation Front, Ba'athist Iraq, and Socialist Burma.[64] In contrast, people's democratic socialist-oriented states had to be guided by Marxism–Leninism and accept the universal truths of Marxism–Leninism and reject other notions of socialism such as African socialism.[64]

The socialist-oriented states had seven defining features, namely, they were revolutionary democracies, had a revolutionary-democratic party, class dictatorship, defense of the socialist-oriented states, had organs of socialisation, initiated socialist construction, and the type of socialist-oriented state (either national-democratic or people's democratic).[66] The political goal of revolutionary democracy is to create the conditions for socialism in countries where the social, political, and economic conditions for socialism do not exist.[67] The second feature to be met is the establishment of a revolutionary-democratic party which has to establish itself as the leading force and guide the state by using Marxist–Leninist ideology.[68] While introduced in these states, democratic centralism is rarely upheld.[69]

Unlike capitalism which is ruled by the bourgeoisie class and socialism were the proletariat leads, the socialist-oriented state represents a broad and heterogeneous group of classes that seek to consolidate national independence.[69] Since the peasantry were usually the largest class in socialist-oriented states, their role were emphasised—similar to the working class in other socialist states.[70] However, Marxist–Leninists admitted that these states often fell under the control of certain cliques such as the military in Ethiopia.[70] The establishing of a legal system and coercive institutions are also noted to safeguard the socialist-oriented nature of the state.[71] The fifth feature is that the media and educational system has to be taken over by the socialist-oriented state while establishing mass organisations to mobilize the populace.[72] Unlike the Soviet economic model, the economy of the socialist-oriented states are mixed economies that seek to attract foreign capital and which seeks to maintain and develop the private sector.[73] In the words of Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, these states were in the process of taking over the commanding heights of the economy and instituting a state planned economy.[63] According to Soviet sources, Laos was the one socialist-oriented state that has managed to develop into a socialist state.[74]

Socialist state

A socialist state is more than a form of government and can only exist in countries with a socialist economy. There are examples of several states that have instituted a socialist form of government before achieving socialism. The former socialist states of Eastern Europe were established as people's democracies (a developmental stage between capitalism and socialism). On the question of the Marxist–Leninist-ruled countries of Africa and the Middle East, the Soviet Union deemed none of them to be socialist states—referring to them as socialist-oriented states. While many countries with constitutional references to socialism and countries ruled by long-standing socialist movements exist, within Marxist–Leninist theory a socialist state is led by a communist party that has instituted a socialist economy in a given country.[75] It deals with states that define themselves either as a socialist state or as a state led by a governing Marxist–Leninist party in their constitutions. For this reason alone, these states are often called communist states.[11][76][13]

Political system

Government

The highest administrative agency of state power is the government.[77] It functions as the executive organ of the legislature.[77] The Supreme Soviet has been introduced with variations in all communist states.[78] For most of its existence, the Soviet government was known as the Council of Ministers[77] and identical names were used for the governments of Albania, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Romania.[79] It was independent of the other central agencies such as the legislature and its standing committee, but the Supreme Soviet was empowered to decide on all questions it wished.[80] The Soviet government was responsible to the legislature and in between sessions of the legislature it reported to the legislature's standing committee.[81] The standing committee could reorganise and hold the Soviet government accountable, but it could not instruct the government.[81]

In communist states, the government was responsible for the overall economic system, public order, foreign relations, and defense.[81] The Soviet model was more or less identically implemented in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Romania, with few exceptions.[79] One exception was Czechoslovakia, where it had a president and not a collective head of state.[82] Another exception was in Bulgaria, where the State Council was empowered to instruct the Council of Ministers.[83]

Legislature

Powers and organisation

 
The meeting place of the Chinese National People's Congress

All state power is unified in the legislature in communist states. This is a firm rejection of the separation of powers found in constitutional democracies. The constitution is passed by the legislature and can only be amended by the legislature. Judicial review and extra-parliamentary review were denounced by Soviet legal theorists as bourgeoisie institutions. They also perceived it as a limitation of the people's supreme power. The legislature, together with its suborgans, was responsible for overseeing the constitutional order.[84] Since the legislature is the supreme judge of constitutionality, the legislature's own acts cannot, therefore, be unconstitutional.[85]

The Supreme Soviet was the first socialist legislature and the Soviet legislative system has been introduced in all communist states.[78] The Supreme Soviet convened twice a year, usually for two or three days each, making it one of the world's first frequently-convened legislatures during its existence.[86] The same meeting frequency was the norm in the Eastern Bloc countries as well as modern-day China.[87] China's legislature, the National People's Congress (NPC), is modeled on the Soviet one.[88] As with the Soviet one, the NPC is the highest organ of the state and elects a Standing Committee (the Soviets had a Presidium), the government, and the State Council (the Soviet counterpart being the Council of Ministers).[89] In addition, in all communist states the ruling party has either had a clear majority such as China, or held every seat as they did in the Soviet Union in their Supreme Soviet.[90]

Western researchers have devoted little attention to legislatures in communist states. The reason being that there are not significant bodies of political socialisation when compared to legislatures in constitutional democracies. While political leaders in communist states are often elected as members of legislatures, these posts are not relevant to political advancement. The role of legislatures is different from country to country. In the Soviet Union, the Supreme Soviet did "little more than listen to statements from Soviet political leaders and to legitimate decisions already made elsewhere" while in the legislatures of Poland, Vietnam, and Yugoslavia it has been more active and had an impact on rule-making.[91]

Representativity

Both Marx and Lenin abhorred the parliamentary systems of bourgeois democracy, but neither of them sought to abolish it.[92] Lenin wrote that it would be impossible to develop proletarian democracy "without representative institutions."[92] Both of them considered the governing model of the Paris Commune of 1871, in which executive and legislative were combined in one body, to be ideal.[92] More importantly, Marx applauded the election process by "universal suffrage in the various wards and town."[92] While the institution of such a legislature might not be important in itself, they "have a place in the literature and rhetoric of the ruling parties which cannot be ignored—in the language of the party's intimacy with working masses, of its alleged knowledge about interests of working people, of social justice and socialist democracy, of the mass line and learning from the people."[93]

By having legislatures, the Marxist–Leninist parties try to keep ideological consistency between supporting representative institutions and safeguarding the leading role of the party.[92] They seek to use the legislatures as a linkage between the rulers and the ruled.[92] These institutions are representative and usually mirror the population in areas such as ethnicity and language, "yet with occupations distributed in a manner skewed towards government officials."[92] Unlike in constitutional democracies, legislatures of communist states are not to act as a forum for conveying demands or interest articulation—they meet too infrequently for this to be the case.[94] This might explain why communist states have not developed terms such as delegates and trustees to give legislature representatives the power to vote according to their best judgement or in the interest of their constituency.[94] Scholar Daniel Nelson has noted: "As with the British parliament before the seventeenth-century turmoil secured its supremacy, legislative bodies in communist states physically portray the 'realm' ruled by (to stretch an analogy) 'kings'. Members of the assemblies 'represent' the population to whom the rulers speak and over whom they govern, convening a broader 'segment of society' [...] than the court itself."[94] Despite this, it does not mean that the communist states use legislatures to strengthen their communication with the populace—the party, rather than the legislature, could take that function.[94]

Ideologically, it has another function, namely, to prove that communist states do not only represent the interests of the working class, but all social strata.[95] Communist states are committed to establishing a classless society and use legislatures to show that all social strata, whether bureaucrat, worker, or intellectual, are committed and have interests in building such a society.[95] As is the case in China, national institutions such as the legislature "must exist which brings together representatives of all nationalities and geographic areas."[95] It does not matter if the legislatures only rubber stamp decisions because by having them, it shows that communist states are committed to incorporating minorities and areas of the country by including them in the composition of the legislature.[95] In communist states, there is usually a high proportion of members who are government officials.[96] In this instance, it might mean that it's less important what legislatures do and more important who its representatives are.[96] The members of such legislatures at central and local level are usually either government or party officials, leading figures in their community, or national figures outside the communist party.[96] This goes to show that legislatures are tools to garner popular support for the government in which leading figures campaign and spread information about the party's policies and ideological development.[96]

Military

Control

Communist states have established two types of civil-military systems. The armed forces of most socialist states have historically been state institutions based on the Soviet model,[97] but in China, Laos, North Korea, and Vietnam, the armed forces are party-state institutions. However, there are several differences between the statist (Soviet) model and the party-state model (China). In the Soviet model, the Soviet armed forces was led by the Council of Defense (an organ formed by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union) while the Council of Ministers was responsible for formulating defense policies.[98] The party leader was ex officio the Chairman of the Council of Defense.[98] Below the Council of Defense, there was the Main Military Council which was responsible for the strategic direction and leadership of the Soviet armed forces.[98] The working organ of the Council of Defense was the General Staff which was tasked with analysing military and political situations as they developed.[99] The party controlled the armed forces through the Main Political Directorate (MPD) of the Ministry of Defense, a state organ that functioned "with the authority of a department of the CPSU Central Committee."[100] The MPD organised political indoctrination and created political control mechanisms at the center to the company level in the field.[101] Formally, the MPD was responsible for organising party and Komsomol organs as well as subordinate organs within the armed forces; ensuring that the party and state retain control over the armed forces; evaluates the political performance of officers; supervising the ideological content of the military press; and supervising the political-military training institutes and their ideological content.[101] The head of the MPD was ranked fourth in military protocol, but it was not a member of the Council of Defense.[102] The Administrative Organs Department of the CPSU Central Committee was responsible for implementing the party personnel policies and supervised the KGB, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Defense.[103]

In the Chinese party-state model, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is a party institution.[104] In the preamble of the Constitution of the Chinese Communist Party, it is stated: "The Communist Party of China (CPC) shall uphold its absolute leadership over the People's Liberation Army and other people's armed forces."[104] The PLA carries out its work in accordance with the instructions of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.[105] Mao Zedong described the PLA's institutional situation as follows: "Every communist must grasp the truth, 'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' Our principle is that the party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party."[106] The Central Military Commission (CMC) is both an organ of the state and the party—it is an organ of the CCP Central Committee and an organ of the national legislature, the National People's Congress.[107] The CCP General Secretary is ex officio party CMC Chairman and the President of the People's Republic of China is by right state CMC Chairman.[107] The composition of the party CMC and the state CMC are identical.[107] The CMC is responsible for the command of the PLA and determines national defense policies.[107] There are fifteen departments that report directly to the CMC and that are responsible for everything from political work to administration of the PLA.[108] Of significance is that the CMC eclipses by far the prerogatives of the CPSU Administrative Organs Department while the Chinese counterpart to the Main Political Directorate supervises not only the military, but also intelligence, the security services, and counterespionage work.[109]

Representation

Unlike in constitutional democracies, active military personnel are members and partake in civilian institutions of governance.[110] This is the case in all communist states.[110] The Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) has elected at least one active military figure to its CPV Politburo since 1986.[111] In the 1986–2006 period, active military figures sitting in the CPV Central Committee stood at an average of 9,2 percent.[111] Military figures are also represented in the national legislature (the National Assembly) and other representative institutions.[111] In China, the two CMC vice chairmen have had by right office seats in the CCP Politburo since 1987.[112]

Ruling party

Leading role

Every communist state has been led by a Marxist–Leninist party.[75] This party seeks to represent and articulate the interests of the classes exploited by capitalism.[75] It seeks to lead the exploited classes to achieve communism.[75] However, the party cannot be identified with the exploited class in general.[75] Its membership is composed of members with advanced consciousness who are above sectional interests.[75] Therefore, the party represents the advanced section of the exploited classes and through them leads the exploited classes by interpreting the universal laws governing human history towards communism.[113]

In Foundations of Leninism (1924), Joseph Stalin wrote that "the proletariat [working class] needs the Party first of all as its General Staff, which it must have for the successful seizure of power. [...] But the proletariat needs the Party not only to achieve the [class] dictatorship; it needs it still more to maintain the [class] dictatorship."[114] The current Constitution of Vietnam states in Article 4 that "[t]he Communist Party of Vietnam, the vanguard of the Vietnamese working class, simultaneously the vanguard of the toiling people and of the Vietnamese nation, the faithful representative of the interests of the working class, the toiling people, and the whole nation, acting upon the Marxist–Leninist doctrine and Ho Chi Minh's thought, is the leading force of the state and society."[115] In a similar form, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) describes itself as "the vanguard of the Chinese working class, the Chinese people, and the Chinese nation."[116] As noted by both communist parties, the ruling parties of communist states are vanguard parties. Vladimir Lenin theorised that vanguard parties were "capable of assuming power and leading the whole people to socialism, of directing and organising the new system, of being the teacher, the guide, the leader of all the working and exploited people in organising their social life without the bourgeoisie."[117] This idea eventually evolved into the concept of the party's leading role in leading the state[117] as seen in the CCP's self-description and Vietnam's constitution.[115][116]

Internal organisation

The Marxist–Leninist governing party organises itself around the principle of democratic centralism and through it the state too.[118] It means that all directing bodies of the party, from top to bottom, shall be elected; that party bodies shall give periodical accounts of their activities to their respective party organisations; that there shall be strict party discipline and the subordination of the minority to the majority; and that all decisions of higher bodies shall be absolutely binding on lower bodies and on all party members.[118]

The highest organ of a Marxist–Leninist governing party is the party congress.[119] The congress elects the central committee and either an auditing commission and a control commission, or both, although not always.[119] The central committee is the party's highest decision-making organ in-between party congresses and elects a politburo and a secretariat amongst its members as well as the party's leader.[119] When the central committee is not in session, the politburo is the highest decision-making organ of the party and the secretariat is the highest administrative organ.[119] In certain parties, either the central committee or the politburo elects amongst its members a standing committee of the politburo which acts as the highest decision-making organ in between sessions of the politburo, central committee, and the congress. This leadership structure is identical all the way down to the primary party organisation of the ruling party.[119]

Economic system

From reading their works, many followers of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels drew the idea that the socialist economy would be based on planning and not market mechanism.[120] These ideas later developed into the belief that planning was superior to market mechanism.[121] Upon seizing power, the Bolsheviks began advocating a national state planning system.[121] The 8th Congress of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) resolved to institute "the maximum centralisation of production [...] simultaneously striving to establish a unified economic plan."[121] The Gosplan, the State Planning Commission, the Supreme Soviet of the National Economy, and other central planning organs were established during the 1920s in the era of the New Economic Policy.[122] On introducing the planning system, it became a common belief in the international communist movement that the Soviet planning system was a more advanced form of economic organisation than capitalism.[123] This led to the system being introduced voluntarily in countries such as China, Cuba, and Vietnam and in some cases imposed by the Soviet Union.[123]

In communist states, the state planning system had five main characteristics.[124] Firstly, with the exception of the field consumption and employment, practically all decisions were centralized at the top.[124] Secondly, the system was hierarchical—the center formulated a plan that was sent down to the level below which would imitate the process and send the plan further down the pyramid.[124] Thirdly, the plans were binding in nature, i.e. everyone had to follow and meet the goals set forth in it.[124] Fourthly, the predominance of calculating in physical terms to ensure planned allocation of commodities were not incompatible with planned production.[124] Finally, money played a passive role within the state sector since the planners focused on physical allocation.[124]

According to Michael Ellman, in a centrally-planned economy "the state owns the land and all other natural resources and all characteristics of the traditional model, the enterprises, and their productive assets. Collective ownership (e.g. the property of collective farms) also exists, but plays a subsidiary role, and is expected to be temporary."[124] The private ownership of the means of production still exist, although it plays a fairly smaller role.[125] Since the class struggle in capitalism is caused by the division between owners of the means of production and the workers who sell their labour, state ownership (defined as the property of the people in these systems) is considered as a tool to end the class struggle and empower the working class.[126]

Judicial system

Constitution

Role of constitutions

Marxist–Leninists view the constitution as a fundamental law and as an instrument of force.[127] The constitution is the source of law and legality.[128] Unlike in constitutional democracies, the Marxist–Leninist constitution is not a framework to limit the power of the state.[128] To the contrary, a Marxist–Leninist constitution seeks to empower the state—believing the state to be an organ of class domination and law to be the expression of the interests of the dominant class.[128] It is the belief of Marxist–Leninists that all national constitutions do this to ensure that countries can strengthen and enforce their own class system.[128] In this instance, it means that Marxist–Leninists conceive of constitutions as a tool to defend the socialist nature of the state and attack its enemies.[128] This contrasts with the liberal conception of constitutionalism that "law, rather than men, is supreme."[129]

Unlike the relatively constant (and, in some instances, permanently fixed) nature of democratic constitutions, a Marxist–Leninist constitution is ever-changing.[130] Andrey Vyshinsky, a Procurator General of the Soviet Union during the 1930s, notes that the "Soviet constitutions represent the sum total of the historic path along which the Soviet state has traveled. At the same time, they are the legislative basis of subsequent development of state life."[130] That is, the constitution sums up what already has been achieved.[131] This belief is also shared by the Chinese Communist Party which argued that "the Chinese Constitution blazes a path for China, recording what has been won in China and what is yet to be conquered."[130] A constitution in a communist state has an end.[132] The preamble of the 1954 Chinese constitution outlines the historical tasks of the Chinese communists, "step by step, to bring about the socialist industrialisation of the country and, step by step, to accomplish the socialist transformation of agriculture, handicraft and capitalist industry and commerce."[132]

In communist states, the constitution was a tool to analyse the development of society.[133] The Marxist–Leninist party in question would have to study the correlation of forces, literally society's class structure, before enacting changes.[133] Several terms were coined for different developmental states by Marxist–Leninists legal theorists, including new democracy, people's democracy, and the primary stage of socialism.[131] This is also why amendments to constitutions are not enough and major societal changes need a novel constitution which corresponds with the reality of the new class structure.[131]

With Nikita Khrushchev's repudiation of Stalin's practices in the "Secret Speech" and the Chinese Communist Party's repudiation of certain Maoist policies, Marxist–Leninist legal theories began to emphasise "the formal, formerly neglected constitutional order."[134] Deng Xiaoping, not long after Chairman Mao Zedong's death, noted that "[d]emocracy has to be institutionalised and written into law, so as to make sure that institutions and laws do not change whenever the leadership changes or whenever the leaders change their views. [...] The trouble now is that our legal system is incomplete. [...] Very often what leaders say is taken as law and anyone who disagrees is called a lawbreaker."[135] In 1986, Li Buyan wrote that "the policies of the Party usually are regulations and calls which to a certain extent are only principles. The law is different; it is rigorously standardised. It explicitly and concretely stipulates what the people should, can, or cannot do."[136] These legal developments have been echoed in later years in Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. This has led to the development of the communist concept of socialist rule of law which runs parallel to, and is distinct from, the liberal term of the same name.[137] In the last years, this emphasis on the constitution as both a legal document and a paper which documents society's development has been noted by Chinese Communist Party general secretary Xi Jinping, who stated in 2013 that "[n]o organisation or individual has the privilege to overstep the Constitution and law."[138]

Constitutional supervision

After Soviet Union general secretary Joseph Stalin's death, several communist states have experimented with some sort of constitutional supervision.[139] These organs were designed to safeguard the supreme power of the legislature from circumvention by political leaders.[139] Romania was the first to experiment with constitutional supervision when it established a Constitutional Committee in 1965.[139] It was elected by the legislature and leading jurists sat in the committee, but it was only empowered to advise the legislature.[139] Keith Hand has commented that "[i]t was not an effective institution in practice," being unable to prevent Nicolae Ceausescu's emasculation of Romania's Great National Assembly after the inauguration of the July Theses.[139]

Hungary and Poland experimented with constitutional supervision in the early 1980s.[139] Hungary established the Council of Constitutional Law which was elected by the legislature and consisted of several leading jurists.[139] It was empowered to review the constitutionality and legality of statutes, administrative regulations, and other normative documents; however, if the agency in question failed to heed its advice, it needed to petition the legislature.[139] In 1989, the Soviets established the Constitutional Supervision Committee which "was subordinate only to the USSR constitution."[140] It was empowered "to review the constitutionality and legality of a range of state acts of the USSR and its republics. Its jurisdiction included laws [passed by the legislature], decrees of the Supreme Soviet's Presidium, union republic constitutions and laws, some central administrative decrees, Supreme Court explanations, and other central normative documents."[140] If the committee deemed the legislature to have breached legality, the legislature was obliged to discuss the issue, but it could reject it if more than two-thirds voted against the findings of the Constitutional Supervision Committee.[140] While it was constitutionally powerful, it lacked enforcement powers, it was often ignored and it failed to defend the constitution during the coup against Mikhail Gorbachev.[141]

The Chinese leadership has argued against establishing any corresponding constitutional supervisory committee due to their association with the failed communist states of Europe.[142] None of the surviving communist states (China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam) have experimented with constitutional supervision committees or constitutional supervision of any kind outside the existing framework.[143]

Legal system

Main article: Socialist law

All communist states have been established in countries with a civil law system.[144] The countries of Eastern Europe had formally been governed by the Austro-Hungarian Empire, German Empire, and Russian Empire—all of whom had a civil law legal system.[144] Cuba had a civil law system imposed on them by Spain while China introduced civil law to overlay with Confucian elements and Vietnam used French law.[144] Since the establishment of the Soviet Union, there has been a scholarly debate on whether socialist law is a separate legal system or is a part of the civil law tradition.[144] Legal scholar Renè David wrote that the socialist legal system "possesses, in relation to our French law, particular features that give it a complete originality, to the extent that it is no longer possible to connect it, like the former Russian law, to the system of Roman law."[145] Similarly, Christoper Osakwe concludes that socialist law is "an autonomous legal system to be essentially distinguished from the other contemporary families of law."[146] Proponents of socialist law as a separate legal system, have identified the following features:[146]

  1. The socialist law is to disappear with the withering away of the state.[146]
  2. The rule of the Marxist–Leninist party.[146]
  3. The socialist law is subordinate and reflects changes to the economic order (the absorption of private law by public law).[146]
  4. The socialist law has a religious character.[147]
  5. The socialist law is prerogative rather than normative.[147]

Legal officials argue differently for their case compared to Westerners.[148] For instance, "[t]he predominant view among Soviet jurists in the 1920s was that Soviet law of that period was Western-style law appropriate for a Soviet economy that remained capitalist to a significant degree."[148] This changed with the introduction of the command economy and the term socialist law was conceived to reflect this in the 1930s.[148] Hungarian legal theorist Imre Szabó acknowledged similarities between socialist law and civil law, but he noted that "four basic types of law may be distinguished: the laws of the slave, feudal, capitalist, and socialist societies."[149] Using the Marxist theory of historical materialism, Szabó argues that socialist law cannot belong to the same law family since the material structure is different from the capitalist countries as their superstructure (state) has to reflect these differences.[150] In other words, law is a tool by the ruling class to govern.[150] As Renè David notes, socialist jurists "isolate their law, to put into another category, a reprobate category, the Romanist laws and the common law, is the fact that they reason less as jurists and more as philosophers and Marxists; it is in taking a not strictly legal viewpoint that they affirm the originality of their socialist law."[151] However, some socialist legal theorists such as Romanian jurist Victor Zlatescu differentiated between type of law and family of law. According to Zlatescu, "[t]he distinction between the law of the socialist countries and the law of the capitalist countries is not of the same nature as the difference between Roman-German law and the common law, for example. Socialist law is not a third family among the others, as appears in certain writings of Western comparatists."[152] In other words, socialist law is civil law, but it is a different type of law for a different type of society.[152]

Yugoslav jurist Borislav Blagojević [sr] noted that a "great number of legal institutions and legal relations remain the same in socialist law", further stating that it is "necessary and justified" to put them to use if they are "in conformity with the corresponding interests of the ruling class in the state in question."[153] Importantly, socialist law had retained civil law institutions, methodology, and organisation.[154] This can be discerned by the fact that East Germany retained the 1896 German civil code until 1976 while Poland used existing Austrian, French, German, and Russian civil codes until adoption of its own civil code in 1964.[155] Scholar John Quigley wrote that "[s]ocialist law retains the inquisitorial style of trial, law-creation predominantly by legislatures rather than courts, and a significant role for legal scholarship in construing codes."[154]

List of communist states

Current communist states

 
A map of current communist states

The following countries are one-party states in which the institutions of the ruling communist party and the state have become intertwined. They are adherents of Marxism–Leninism. They are listed here together with the year of their founding and their respective ruling parties.[156]

Overview of current states espousing Marxism–Leninism
Country Local name Since Ruling party Ideology
  People's Republic of China[nb 1] Chinese: 中华人民共和国
Pinyin: Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó 		1 October 1949 (1949-10-01) Chinese Communist Party Socialism with Chinese characteristics
  Republic of Cuba Spanish: República de Cuba 1 January 1959 (1959-01-01) Communist Party of Cuba
  Lao People's Democratic Republic Lao: ສາທາລະນະລັດ ປະຊາທິປະໄຕ ປະຊາຊົນລາວ
Lao romanisation: Sathalanalat Paxathipatai Paxaxon Lao 		2 December 1975 (1975-12-02) Lao People's Revolutionary Party Kaysone Phomvihane Thought
  Socialist Republic of Vietnam Vietnamese: Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam 2 September 1945 (North Vietnam[nb 2])
30 April 1975 (South Vietnam)
2 July 1976 (unified) 		Communist Party of Vietnam Ho Chi Minh Thought

Multi-party states with governing communist parties

See also: Socialism in liberal democratic constitutions

There are multi-party states with communist parties leading the government. Such states are not considered to be communist states because the countries themselves allow for multiple parties and do not provide a constitutional role for their communist parties. Nepal was previously ruled by the Nepal Communist Party, the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist–Leninist), and the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) between 1994 and 1998 and then again between 2008 and 2018 while states formerly ruled by one or more communist parties include San Marino (1945–1957), Nicaragua (1984–1990), Moldova (2001–2009), Cyprus (2008–2013), and Guyana (1992–2015).

Venezuela is currently ruled by Nicolás Maduro, who has been President since 2013 (disputed since 2019). Maduro is the leader of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), which is considered far-left and Marxist.[157]

During the socialist Free Peru party's rule over Peru, many international observers described the party as being somewhat Marxist[158][159][160] or even Marxist–Leninist.[161][162]

Former communist states

See also: People's republic
 
States that had communist governments in red, states that the Soviet Union believed at one point to be moving toward socialism in orange, and other socialist states in yellow (note that not all of the bright red states remained Soviet allies)
     Officially ruling parties in communist states
     Communist parties as ruling parties or part of a governing coalition in multi-party states
     Formerly ruling in a one-party system
     Formerly ruling in a parliamentary majority or minority government
     Formerly ruling as a coalition partner or supporter

The following communist states were socialist states committed to communism. Some were short-lived and preceded the widespread adoption of Marxism–Leninism by most communist states.

Analysis

See also: Criticism of communist party rule and Postsocialism

Countries such as the Soviet Union and China were criticised by Western authors and organisations on the basis of the lack of the representative nature of multi-party constitutional democracy,[168][169] in addition to several other areas where socialist society and Western societies differed. Socialist societies were commonly characterised by state ownership or social ownership of the means of production either through administration through communist party organisations, democratically elected councils and communes, and co-operative structures—in opposition to the liberal democratic capitalist free-market paradigm of management, ownership and control by corporations and private individuals.[170] Communist states have also been criticised for the influence and outreach of their respective ruling parties on society, in addition to lack of recognition for some Western legal rights and liberties such as the right to own property and the restriction of the right to free speech.[171] The early economic development policies of communist states have been criticised for focusing primarily on the development of heavy industry.[citation needed]

Soviet advocates and socialists responded to criticism by highlighting the ideological differences in the concept of freedom. McFarland and Ageyev noted that "Marxist–Leninist norms disparaged laissez-faire individualism (as when housing is determined by one's ability to pay), also [condemning] wide variations in personal wealth as the West has not. Instead, Soviet ideals emphasized equality—free education and medical care, little disparity in housing or salaries, and so forth."[172] When asked to comment on the claim that former citizens of communist states enjoy increased freedoms, Heinz Kessler, former East German Minister of National Defence, replied: "Millions of people in Eastern Europe are now free from employment, free from safe streets, free from health care, free from social security."[173]

In his analysis of states run under Marxist–Leninist ideology, economist Michael Ellman of the University of Amsterdam notes that such states compared favorably with Western states in some health indicators such as infant mortality and life expectancy.[174] Philipp Ther posits that there was an increase in the standard of living throughout Eastern Bloc countries as the result of modernisation programs under communist governments.[175] Similarly, Amartya Sen's own analysis of international comparisons of life expectancy found that several Marxist–Leninist states made significant gains and commented "one thought that is bound to occur is that communism is good for poverty removal."[176] The dissolution of the Soviet Union was followed by a rapid increase in poverty,[177][178][179] crime,[180][181] corruption,[182][183] unemployment,[184] homelessness,[185][186] rates of disease,[187][188][189] infant mortality, domestic violence,[190] and income inequality,[191] along with decreases in calorie intake, life expectancy, adult literacy, and income.[192]

Memory

Monuments to the victims of communist states exist in almost all the capitals of Eastern Europe and there are several museums documenting communist rule such as the Museum of Occupations and Freedom Fights in Lithuania, the Museum of the Occupation of Latvia in Riga, and the House of Terror in Budapest, all three of which also document Nazi rule.[193][194] In Washington D.C., a bronze statue based upon the 1989 Tiananmen Square Goddess of Democracy sculpture was dedicated as the Victims of Communism Memorial in 2007, having been authorized by the United States Congress in 1993.[195][196] The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation plans to build an International Museum on Communism in Washington. As of 2008, Russia contained 627 memorials and memorial plaques dedicated to victims of the communist states, most of which were created by private citizens and did not have a national monument or a national museum.[197] The Wall of Grief in Moscow, inaugurated in October 2017, is Russia's first monument for victims of political persecution by Stalin during the country's Soviet era.[198] In 2017, Canada's National Capital Commission approved the design for a memorial to the victims of communism to be built at the Garden of the Provinces and Territories in Ottawa.[199] On 23 August 2018, Estonia's Victims of Communism 1940–1991 Memorial was inaugurated in Tallinn by President Kersti Kaljulaid.[200] The memorial construction was financed by the state and is managed by the Estonian Institute of Historical Memory.[201] The opening ceremony was chosen to coincide with the official European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism.[202]

According to anthropologist Kristen Ghodsee, efforts to institutionalize the victims of communism narrative, or the moral equivalence between the Nazi Holocaust (race murder) and the victims of communism (class murder), and in particular the recent push at the beginning of the global financial crisis for commemoration of the latter in Europe, can be seen as the response by economic and political elites to fears of a leftist resurgence in the face of devastated economies and extreme inequalities in both the East and West as the result of the excesses of neoliberal capitalism. Ghodsee argues that any discussion of the achievements under communist states, including literacy, education, women's rights, and social security is usually silenced, and any discourse on the subject of communism is focused almost exclusively on Stalin's crimes and the double genocide theory.[203] According to Laure Neumayer, this is used as an anti-communist narrative "based on a series of categories and figures" to "denounce Communist state violence (qualified as 'Communist crimes', 'red genocide' or 'classicide') and to honour persecuted individuals (presented alternatively as 'victims of Communism' and 'heroes of anti totalitarian resistance')."[204]

See also

 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Communist countries.

Notes

  1. ^ Hong Kong and Macau are administrated under the "One country, two systems" principle.
  2. ^ Vietnam was divided on 21 July 1954
  3. ^ Although the government's official ideology is now the Juche part of Kimilsungism–Kimjongilism policy of Kim Il-sung as opposed to orthodox Marxism–Leninism, it is still considered a socialist state. In 1992, all references to Marxism–Leninism in the Constitution of North Korea were dropped and replaced with Juche.[165] In 2009, the constitution was quietly amended so that not only did it remove all Marxist–Leninist references present in the first draft, but it also dropped all reference to communism.[166] According to North Korea: A Country Study by Robert L. Worden, Marxism–Leninism was abandoned immediately after the start of de-Stalinisation in the Soviet Union and it has been totally replaced by Juche since at least 1974.[167]

References

  1. ^ Bottomore, T. B. (1991). A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 54.
  2. ^ Cooke, Chris, ed. (1998). Dictionary of Historical Terms (2nd ed.). pp. 221–222, 305.
  3. ^ Lee, Grace (Spring 2003)) "The Political Philosophy of Juche". v.3, n.1. Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs. Quote: "The DPRK claims that juche is Kim Il Sung’s creative application of Marxist-Leninist principle to the modern political realities in North Korea."
  4. ^ Atsuhito, Isozaki (21 June 2021). "A Revival of North Korean Communism?: The rhetoric is there. But what does it mean?". The Diplomat. Retrieved 2 December 2022. In his closing address at the Conference of Cell Secretaries of the Workers' Party of Korea in late April, Kim mentioned the word "communism" six times. His recent claim that North Korea aims to become a "communist utopia" is a notable change in rhetoric.
  5. ^ Ball, Terence; Dagger, Richard, eds. (2019) [1999]. "Communism". Encyclopædia Britannica (revised ed.). Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  6. ^ Webb, Sidney; Webb, Beatrice (1935). Soviet Communism: A New Civilisation?. London: Longmans.
  7. ^ Sloan, Pat (1937). Soviet Democracy. London: Left Book Club; Victor Gollancz Ltd.
  8. ^ Farber, Samuel (1992). "Before Stalinism: The Rise and Fall of Soviet Democracy". Studies in Soviet Thought. 44 (3): 229–230.
  9. ^ Getzler, Israel (2002) [1982]. Kronstadt 1917-1921: The Fate of a Soviet Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521894425.
  10. ^ Busky, Donald F. (20 July 2000). Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Praeger. p. 9. ISBN 978-0275968861. In a modern sense of the word, communism refers to the ideology of Marxism–Leninism.
  11. ^ a b Wilczynski 2008, p. 21: "Contrary to Western usage, these countries describe themselves as 'Socialist' (not 'Communist'). The second stage (Marx's 'higher phase'), or 'Communism' is to be marked by an age of plenty, distribution according to needs (not work), the absence of money and the market mechanism, the disappearance of the last vestiges of capitalism and the ultimate 'whithering away' of the State."
  12. ^ Steele 1999, p. 45: "Among Western journalists the term 'Communist' came to refer exclusively to regimes and movements associated with the Communist International and its offspring: regimes which insisted that they were not communist but socialist, and movements which were barely communist in any sense at all."
  13. ^ a b Rosser & Rosser 2003, p. 14 "Ironically, the ideological father of communism, Karl Marx, claimed that communism entailed the withering away of the state. The dictatorship of the proletariat was to be a strictly temporary phenomenon. Well aware of this, the Soviet Communists never claimed to have achieved communism, always labeling their own system socialist rather than communist and viewing their system as in transition to communism".
  14. ^ Williams, Raymond (1983). "Socialism". Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition. Oxford University Press. p. 289. ISBN 978-0-19-520469-8. The decisive distinction between socialist and communist, as in one sense these terms are now ordinarily used, came with the renaming, in 1918, of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks) as the All-Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks). From that time on, a distinction of socialist from communist, often with supporting definitions such as social democrat or democratic socialist, became widely current, although it is significant that all communist parties, in line with earlier usage, continued to describe themselves as socialist and dedicated to socialism.
  15. ^ Nation, R. Craig (1992). . Cornell University Press. pp. 85–6. ISBN 978-0801480072. Archived from the original on 1 August 2019. Retrieved 19 December 2014 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Barrett, William (1 April 1978). "Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy: A Symposium". Commentary. Retrieved 14 June 2020. If we were to extend the definition of socialism to include Labor Britain or socialist Sweden, there would be no difficulty in refuting the connection between capitalism and democracy.
  17. ^ Heilbroner, Robert L. (Winter 1991). "From Sweden to Socialism: A Small Symposium on Big Questions". Dissident. Barkan, Joanne; Brand, Horst; Cohen, Mitchell; Coser, Lewis; Denitch, Bogdan; Fehèr, Ferenc; Heller, Agnès; Horvat, Branko; Tyler, Gus. pp. 96–110. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  18. ^ Kendall, Diana (2011). Sociology in Our Time: The Essentials. Cengage Learning. pp. 125–127. ISBN 9781111305505. "Sweden, Great Britain, and France have mixed economies, sometimes referred to as democratic socialism—an economic and political system that combines private ownership of some of the means of production, governmental distribution of some essential goods and services, and free elections. For example, government ownership in Sweden is limited primarily to railroads, mineral resources, a public bank, and liquor and tobacco operations."
  19. ^ Li, He (2015). Political Thought and China's Transformation: Ideas Shaping Reform in Post-Mao China. Springer. pp. 60–69. ISBN 9781137427816. "The scholars in camp of democratic socialism believe that China should draw on the Sweden experience, which is suitable not only for the West but also for China. In the post-Mao China, the Chinese intellectuals are confronted with a variety of models. The liberals favor the American model and share the view that the Soviet model has become archaic and should be totally abandoned. Meanwhile, democratic socialism in Sweden provided an alternative model. Its sustained economic development and extensive welfare programs fascinated many. Numerous scholars within the democratic socialist camp argue that China should model itself politically and economically on Sweden, which is viewed as more genuinely socialist than China. There is a growing consensus among them that in the Nordic countries the welfare state has been extraordinarily successful in eliminating poverty."
  20. ^ Morgan, W. John (2001). "Marxism–Leninism: The Ideology of Twentieth-Century Communism". In Wright, James D., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 657–662.
  21. ^ Andrai, Charles F. (1994). Comparative Political Systems: Policy Performance and Social Change. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe. pp. 24–25.
  22. ^ "VN Embassy - Constitution of 1992". 9 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Full Text. From the Preamble: "On 2 July 1976, the National Assembly of reunified Vietnam decided to change the country's name to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam; the country entered a period of transition to socialism, strove for national construction, and unyieldingly defended its frontiers while fulfilling its internationalist duty".
  23. ^ "Cubanet - Constitution of the Republic of Cuba, 1992". 9 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Full Text. From Article 5: "The Communist Party of Cuba, a follower of Martí's ideas and of Marxism–Leninism, and the organised vanguard of the Cuban nation, is the highest leading force of society and of the state, which organises and guides the common effort toward the goals of the construction of socialism and the progress toward a communist society".
  24. ^ a b Furtak 1987, pp. 8–9.
  25. ^ Furtak 1987, p. 12.
  26. ^ Furtak 1987, p. 13.
  27. ^ a b Furtak 1987, p. 14.
  28. ^ Furtak 1987, pp. 16–17.
  29. ^ Furtak 1987, pp. 18–19.
  30. ^ Kinzer, Stephen (15 January 1987). "Nicaragua's Communist Party shifts to opposition". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  31. ^ Marandici, Ion (23 April 2010). "The Factors Leading to the Electoral Success, Consolidation and Decline of the Moldovan Communists' Party During the Transition Period". Rutgers University. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
  32. ^ Smith, Helena (25 February 2008). "Cyprus elects its first communist president". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  33. ^ "Kerala Assembly Elections-- 2006". 7 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 7 October 2011,
  34. ^ a b c d e Guins 1950, p. 187.
  35. ^ a b Guins 1950, pp. 187–188.
  36. ^ Imam 1986, p. 383.
  37. ^ Lenin, Vladimir (21 April 1921). "The Tax in Kind". Marxists Internet Archive. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  38. ^ a b Guins 1950, p. 188.
  39. ^ Guins 1950, pp. 188–189.
  40. ^ a b c d Tang 1980, p. 43.
  41. ^ a b Tang 1980, p. 41.
  42. ^ Tang 1980, pp. 42–43.
  43. ^ a b c Tang 1980, p. 42.
  44. ^ Skilling 1961, p. 16.
  45. ^ a b c Skilling 1961, p. 21.
  46. ^ Åslund, Anders (2009). How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy. Peterson Institute. p. 12. ISBN 9780881325461 – via Google Books.
  47. ^ Minahan, James (2013). Miniature Empires: A Historical Dictionary of the Newly Independent States. Routledge. p. 296. ISBN 9781135940102 – via Google Books.
  48. ^ Tunçer-Kılavuz, Idil (2014). Power, Networks and Violent Conflict in Central Asia: A Comparison of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Routledge advances in Central Asian studies. Vol. 5. Routledge. p. 53. ISBN 9781317805113 – via Google Books.
  49. ^ Khabtagaeva, Bayarma (2009). Mongolic Elements in Tuvan. Turcologica Series. Vol. 81. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 21. ISBN 9783447060950 – via Google Books.
  50. ^ Macdonald, Fiona; Stacey, Gillian; Steele, Philip (2004). Peoples of Eastern Asia. Vol. 8: Mongolia–Nepal. Marshall Cavendish. p. 413. ISBN 9780761475477 – via Google Books.
  51. ^ Gjevori, Elvin (2018). Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania. Springer. p. 21. ISBN 9783319730714 – via Google Books.
  52. ^ Stankova, Marietta (2014). Bulgaria in British Foreign Policy, 1943–1949. Anthem Series on Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies. Anthem Press. p. 148. ISBN 9781783082353 – via Google Books.
  53. ^ Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand; Mansfeldová, Zdenka (2001). "Chapter 5: Czech Republic". In Blondel, Jean; Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand (eds.). Cabinets in Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 62. doi:10.1057/9781403905215_6. ISBN 978-1-349-41148-1.
  54. ^ Hajdú, József (2011). Labour Law in Hungary. Kluwer Law International. p. 27. ISBN 9789041137920 – via Google Books.
  55. ^ Frankowski, Stanisław; Stephan, Paul B. (1995). Legal Reform in Post-Communist Europe: The View from Within. Martinus Nijhoff. p. 23. ISBN 9780792332183 – via Google Books.
  56. ^ Paquette, Laure (2001). NATO and Eastern Europe After 2000: Strategic Interactions with Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, and Bulgaria. Nova. p. 55. ISBN 9781560729693 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Lampe, John R. (2000). Yugoslavia as History: Twice There Was a Country. Cambridge University Press. p. 233. ISBN 9780521774017 – via Google Books.
  58. ^ "The Chinese Revolution of 1949". Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs. United States Department of State.
  59. ^ Kihl, Young Whan; Kim, Hong Nack (2014). North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival. Routledge. p. 8. ISBN 9781317463764 – via Google Books.
  60. ^ Webb, Adrian (2008). The Routledge Companion to Central and Eastern Europe Since 1919. Routledge Companions to History. Routledge. pp. 80, 88. ISBN 9781134065219 – via Google Books.
  61. ^ Da Graça, John V. (2000). Heads of State and Government (2nd ed.). St. Martin's Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-56159-269-2 – via Google Books.
  62. ^ a b c d Poelzer 1989, p. 13.
  63. ^ a b c d Poelzer 1989, p. 14.
  64. ^ a b c d e Poelzer 1989, p. 16.
  65. ^ a b Poelzer 1989, p. 15.
  66. ^ Poelzer 1989, p. 22.
  67. ^ Poelzer 1989, p. 23.
  68. ^ Poelzer 1989, p. 24.
  69. ^ a b Poelzer 1989, p. 25.
  70. ^ a b Poelzer 1989, p. 26.
  71. ^ Poelzer 1989, p. 44.
  72. ^ Poelzer 1989, pp. 50–52.
  73. ^ Poelzer 1989, pp. 54–55.
  74. ^ Poelzer 1989, p. 61.
  75. ^ a b c d e f Harding 1981, p. 27.
  76. ^ Steele 1999, p. 45: "Among Western journalists the term 'Communist' came to refer exclusively to regimes and movements associated with the Communist International and its offspring: regimes which insisted that they were not communist but socialist, and movements which were barely communist in any sense at all."
  77. ^ a b c Feldbrugge 1985, p. 202.
  78. ^ a b Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, p. 86.
  79. ^ a b Staar 1988, p. 36 (Bulgaria), 65 (Czechoslovakia), 133 (Hungary), 161 (Romania), 195 (Poland).
  80. ^ Feldbrugge 1985, pp. 202–203.
  81. ^ a b c Feldbrugge 1985, p. 203.
  82. ^ Staar 1988, p. 64.
  83. ^ Dimitrov 2006, p. 170.
  84. ^ Hand 2016, p. 2.
  85. ^ Hazard 1985, p. 163.
  86. ^ Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, p. 91.
  87. ^ Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, pp. 114–115.
  88. ^ Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, p. 114.
  89. ^ Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, p. 115.
  90. ^ Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, p. 82.
  91. ^ Nelson 1982, p. 1.
  92. ^ a b c d e f g Nelson 1982, p. 7.
  93. ^ Nelson 1982, p. 6.
  94. ^ a b c d Nelson 1982, p. 8.
  95. ^ a b c d Nelson 1982, p. 9.
  96. ^ a b c d Nelson 1982, p. 10.
  97. ^ Kramer 1985, p. 47.
  98. ^ a b c Snyder 1987, p. 28.
  99. ^ Snyder 1987, p. 30.
  100. ^ Loeber 1984, p. 13.
  101. ^ a b Staff writer 1980, p. 1.
  102. ^ Staff writer 1980, p. 3.
  103. ^ Kokoshin 2016, p. 19.
  104. ^ a b Mulvenon 2018, p. 3.
  105. ^ Tung 2012, p. 251.
  106. ^ Blasko 2006, p. 6.
  107. ^ a b c d Blasko 2006, p. 27.
  108. ^ Garafola, Cristina L. (23 September 2016). "People's Liberation Army Reforms and Their Ramifications". RAND Corporation. Retrieved 27 December 2019.
  109. ^ Kokoshin 2016, p. 23.
  110. ^ a b Staff writer 1980, p. 7.
  111. ^ a b c Thayer 2008, p. 68.
  112. ^ Miller 2018, p. 4.
  113. ^ Harding 1981, pp. 27–28.
  114. ^ Steiner 1951, p. 58.
  115. ^ a b Bui 2016, p. 223.
  116. ^ a b Li 2017, p. 219.
  117. ^ a b Evans 1993, p. 20.
  118. ^ a b Gardner, Schöpflin & White 1987, p. 131.
  119. ^ a b c d e "Central Committee". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
  120. ^ Ellman 2014, pp. 1–2.
  121. ^ a b c Ellman 2014, p. 2.
  122. ^ Ellman 2014, p. 9.
  123. ^ a b Ellman 2014, p. 11.
  124. ^ a b c d e f g Ellman 2014, p. 22.
  125. ^ Ellman 2014, p. 23.
  126. ^ Ellman 2014, p. 25.
  127. ^ Chang 1956, p. 520.
  128. ^ a b c d e Chang 1956, p. 521.
  129. ^ Chang 1956, p. xi.
  130. ^ a b c Chang 1956, p. 522.
  131. ^ a b c Chang 1956, p. xii.
  132. ^ a b Chang 1956, p. 524.
  133. ^ a b Triska 1968, p. xii.
  134. ^ Chang 1956, p. xiii.
  135. ^ Keith 1991, p. 112.
  136. ^ Keith 1991, p. 114.
  137. ^ Keith 1991, p. 118.
  138. ^ Wan, William; Qi, Li (3 June 2013). "China's constitution debate hits a sensitive nerve". The Washington Post. Retrieved 27 December 2019.
  139. ^ a b c d e f g h Hand 2016, p. 3.
  140. ^ a b c Hand 2016, p. 4.
  141. ^ Hand 2016, p. 5.
  142. ^ Hand 2016, p. 15.
  143. ^ Hand 2016, p. 16.
  144. ^ a b c d Quigley 1989, p. 781.
  145. ^ Quigley 1989, p. 782.
  146. ^ a b c d e Quigley 1989, p. 783.
  147. ^ a b Quigley 1989, p. 784.
  148. ^ a b c Quigley 1989, p. 796.
  149. ^ Quigley 1989, pp. 798–99.
  150. ^ a b Quigley 1989, p. 799.
  151. ^ Quigley 1989, p. 797.
  152. ^ a b Quigley 1989, p. 800.
  153. ^ Quigley 1989, p. 802.
  154. ^ a b Quigley 1989, p. 803.
  155. ^ Quigley 1989, p. 801.
  156. ^ . The World Factbook. .
  157. ^ "Libro Rojo" [Red Book] (PDF). psuv.org.ve (in Spanish). December 2014. Retrieved 10 March 2023.
  158. ^ "Pedro Castillo: The primary school teacher who became Peru's president". BBC News. 28 July 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021. Casting himself as a man of the people, Mr Castillo was rarely seen without the traditional white, broad-rimmed hat of his Cajamarca region, and a huge inflatable pencil, the symbol of his Marxist Free Peru party which also represents his background in education.
  159. ^ "Peru president challenged by his own party over Cabinet". AP News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  160. ^ "Havana-Trained Marxist Pushes Peru's New President to the Left". Bloomberg. 23 August 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  161. ^ "Peru's Congress postpones Cabinet confirmation vote to next week". Reuters. 25 October 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  162. ^ "Peru confirms new moderate-left cabinet". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  163. ^ Tarnas, R. (2006). Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View. Viking. p. 158. ISBN 978-0-670-03292-1. Retrieved 6 February 2023 – via Google Books.
  164. ^ Gallardo, P.; Russell, E. (2014). Yesterday's Tomorrows: On Utopia and Dystopia. Cambridge Scholars Publisher. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-4438-5877-9. Retrieved 6 February 2023 – via Google Books.
  165. ^ Dae-Kyu, Yoon (2003). "The Constitution of North Korea: Its Changes and Implications". Fordham International Law Journal. 27 (4): 1289–1305. Retrieved 10 August 2020.
  166. ^ Park, Seong-Woo (23 September 2009). "북 개정 헌법 '선군사상' 첫 명기" Bug gaejeong heonbeob 'seongunsasang' cheos myeong-gi [First stipulation of the 'Seongun Thought' of the North Korean Constitution] (in Korean). Radio Free Asia. Retrieved 10 August 2020.
  167. ^ Worden, Robert L. (2008). North Korea: A Country Study (PDF) (5th ed.). Washington, D. C.: Library of Congress. p. 206. ISBN 978-0-8444-1188-0.
  168. ^ Samuel P., Huntington (1970). Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-party Systems. Basic Books (AZ).
  169. ^ Lowy, Michael (1986). "Mass Organization, Party and State: Democracy in its Transition to Socialism". Transition and Development: Problems of Third World Socialism (94): 264.
  170. ^ Amandae, Sonja (2003). Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. University of Chicago Press.
  171. ^ "Need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian communist regimes". Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 25 January 2006. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  172. ^ McFarland, Sam; Ageyev, Vladimir; Abalakina-Paap, Marina (1992). "Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Union". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 63 (6): 1004–1010. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.397.4546. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.1004.
  173. ^ Parenti, Michael (1997). Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism. San Francisco: City Lights Books. p. 118. ISBN 978-0-87286-330-9.
  174. ^ Ellman, Michael (2014). Socialist Planning. Cambridge University Press. p. 372. ISBN 1107427320.
  175. ^ Ther, Philipp (2016). Europe Since 1989: A History. Princeton University Press. p. 132. ISBN 9780691167374. As a result of communist modernization, living standards in Eastern Europe rose.
  176. ^ Wilkinson, Richard G. (November 1996). Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. Routledge. p. 122. ISBN 0415092353.
  177. ^ McAaley, Alastair. . Archived from the original on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  178. ^ "An epidemic of street kids overwhelms Russian cities". The Globe and Mail. 16 April 2002. Retrieved 17 July 2016.
  179. ^ Targ, Harry (2006). Challenging Late Capitalism, Neoliberal Globalization, & Militarism.
  180. ^ Gerber, Theodore P.; Hout, Michael (July 1998). "More Shock than Therapy: Market Transition, Employment, and Income in Russia, 1991–1995". American Journal of Sociology. 104 (1): 1–50.
  181. ^ Volkov, Vladimir (26 April 2007). "The Bitter Legacy of Boris Yeltsin (1931-2007)". World Socialist Website. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
  182. ^ "Cops for Hire". The Economist. 18 March 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2015.
  183. ^ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2014". Transparency International. 3 December 2014. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  184. ^ Hardt, John (2003). Russia's Uncertain Economic Future: With a Comprehensive Subject Index. M. E Sharpe. p. 481.
  185. ^ Alexander, Catharine; Buchil, Victor; Humphrey, Caroline (12 September 2007). Urban Life in Post-Soviet Asia. CRC Press.
  186. ^ Smorodinskaya, Tatiana, ed. (2007). Encyclopaedia of Contemporary Russian. Routledge.
  187. ^ Galazkaa, Artur (2000). "Implications of the Diphtheria Epidemic in the Former Soviet Union for Immunization Programs". Journal of Infectious Diseases. 181: 244–248. doi:10.1086/315570. PMID 10657222.
  188. ^ Shubnikov, Eugene. "Non-communicable Diseases and Former Soviet Union countries". World Health Organization. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  189. ^ Wharton, Melinda; Vitek, Charles (1998). "Diphtheria in the Former Soviet Union: Reemergence of a Pandemic Disease". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 4 (4): 539–550. doi:10.3201/eid0404.980404. PMC 2640235. PMID 9866730. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  190. ^ Parenti, Michael (1997). Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism. San Francisco: City Lights Books. pp. 107, 115. ISBN 978-0872863293.
  191. ^ Hoepller, Cristopher (2011). "Russian Demographics: The Role of the Collapse of the Soviet Union". Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences. 10 (1).
  192. ^ Poland, Marshall. . Archived from the original on 8 July 2016. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
  193. ^ Gille, Zsuzsa; Todorova, Maria (2012). Post-Communist Nostalgia. Berghahn Books. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-857-45643-4.
  194. ^ Ghodsee, Kristen (Fall 2014). "A Tale of 'Two Totalitarianisms': The Crisis of Capitalism and the Historical Memory of Communism". History of the Present: A Journal of Critical History. 4 (2): 124. doi:10.5406/historypresent.4.2.0115. JSTOR 10.5406/historypresent.4.2.0115.
  195. ^ "Friendship Act (HR3000)". Act of 1993 (PDF). United States Congress. p. 15 at §905a1. Retrieved 14 November 2020 – via U.S. Government Publishing Office.
  196. ^ Fekeiki, Omar (13 June 2007). "The Toll of Communism". The Washington Post. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  197. ^ Satter, David (2011). It Was a Long Time Ago, and It Never Happened Anyway: Russia and the Communist Past. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-17842-5.
  198. ^ "Wall of Grief: Putin opens first Soviet victims memorial". BBC News. 30 October 2017. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  199. ^ "Victims of communism monument could be unveiled next spring". CBC News. 19 March 2018. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  200. ^ "Estonia's Victims of Communism 1940-1991". Kommunismiohvrite memoriaal. 23 August 2018. 2018. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  201. ^ "Cornerstone laid for new memorial for victims of communist crimes". ERR News. 4 May 2018. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  202. ^ "Victims of Communism Memorial opened in Tallinn". ERR News. 24 August 2018. Retrieved 19 November 2020.
  203. ^ Ghodsee, Kristen (Fall 2014). "A Tale of 'Two Totalitarianisms': The Crisis of Capitalism and the Historical Memory of Communism". History of the Present: A Journal of Critical History. 4 (2): 115–142. doi:10.5406/historypresent.4.2.0115. JSTOR 10.5406/historypresent.4.2.0115.
  204. ^ Neumayer, Laure (2018). The Criminalisation of Communism in the European Political Space after the Cold War. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781351141741.

Bibliography

General

References for when the individuals were elected to the office of CCP leader, the name of the offices and when they established and were abolished are found below.

Articles and journal entries

April 29, 2023
communist, state, this, article, about, sovereign, states, governed, communist, parties, usually, marxist, leninist, some, national, variation, thereof, social, movement, political, ideology, communism, hypothetical, social, stage, proposed, marxist, theory, c. This article is about sovereign states governed by communist parties usually Marxist Leninist or some national variation thereof For the social movement and political ideology see Communism For the hypothetical social stage proposed by Marxist theory see Communist society For a list of self proclaimed socialist states see List of socialist states A communist state also known as a Marxist Leninist state is a one party state that is administered and governed by a communist party guided by Marxism Leninism Marxism Leninism was the state ideology of the Soviet Union the Comintern after Bolshevisation and the communist states within the Comecon the Eastern Bloc and the Warsaw Pact 1 Marxism Leninism currently still remains the ideology of a few parties around the world After its peak when many communist states were established the Revolutions of 1989 brought down most of the communist states however it is still the official ideology of the ruling parties of China Cuba Laos Vietnam 2 and to a lesser extent North Korea 3 4 During most of the 20th century before the Revolutions of 1989 around one third of the world s population lived under communist states 5 The flags of the Communist Party of Vietnam that were flown besides the Vietnamese national flags in Hanoi Vietnam Communist states are typically authoritarian and are typically administered through democratic centralism by a single centralised communist party apparatus These parties are usually Marxist Leninist or some national variation thereof such as Maoism or Titoism with the official aim of achieving socialism and progressing toward a communist society There have been several instances of communist states with functioning political participation i e Soviet democracy processes involving several other non party organisations such as direct democratic participation factory committees and trade unions although the communist party remained the centre of power 6 7 8 9 10 As a term communist state is used by Western historians political scientists and media to refer to these countries However these states do not describe themselves as communist nor do they claim to have achieved communism they refer to themselves as socialist states that are in the process of constructing socialism 11 12 13 14 Terms used by communist states include national democratic people s democratic socialist oriented and workers and peasants states 15 Academics political commentators and other scholars tend to distinguish between communist states and democratic socialist states with the first representing the Eastern Bloc and the latter representing Western Bloc countries that have been democratically governed by socialist parties such as Britain France Sweden and Western social democracies in general among others 16 17 18 19 Contents 1 Overview 1 1 Development 1 2 Institutions 2 State 2 1 People s democratic state 2 2 People s republican state 2 3 National democratic state 2 4 Socialist oriented state 2 5 Socialist state 3 Political system 3 1 Government 3 2 Legislature 3 2 1 Powers and organisation 3 2 2 Representativity 3 3 Military 3 3 1 Control 3 3 2 Representation 3 4 Ruling party 3 4 1 Leading role 3 4 2 Internal organisation 4 Economic system 5 Judicial system 5 1 Constitution 5 1 1 Role of constitutions 5 1 2 Constitutional supervision 5 2 Legal system 6 List of communist states 6 1 Current communist states 6 2 Multi party states with governing communist parties 6 3 Former communist states 7 Analysis 7 1 Memory 8 See also 9 Notes 10 References 11 Bibliography 11 1 General 11 2 Articles and journal entries 11 3 BooksOverviewDevelopment During the 20th century the world s first constitutionally communist state was in Russia at the end of 1917 In 1922 it joined other former territories of the empire to become the Soviet Union After World War II the Soviet Army occupied much of Eastern Europe and helped bring the existing communist parties to power in those countries Originally the communist states in Eastern Europe were allied with the Soviet Union Yugoslavia would declare itself non aligned and Albania later took a different path After a war against Japanese occupation and a civil war resulting in a Communist victory the People s Republic of China was established in 1949 Communist states were also established in Cambodia Cuba Laos North Korea and Vietnam In 1989 the communist states in Eastern Europe collapsed after the Iron Curtain broke as a result of the Pan European Picnic under public pressure during a wave of mostly non violent movements as part of the Revolutions of 1989 which led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 China s socio economic structure has been referred to as nationalistic state capitalism and the Eastern Bloc Eastern Europe and the Third World as bureaucratic authoritarian systems 20 21 Today the existing communist states in the world are in China Cuba Laos Vietnam and North Korea DPRK These communist states often do not claim to have achieved socialism or communism in their countries but to be building and working toward the establishment of socialism in their countries The preamble to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam s Constitution states that Vietnam only entered a transition stage between capitalism and socialism after the country was re unified under the communist party in 1976 22 and the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Cuba states that the role of the communist party is to guide the common effort toward the goals and construction of socialism 23 The DPRK s constitution outlines a socialist economy and the ruling Workers Party of Korea remains ideologically committed to communism Institutions Communist states share similar institutions which are organised on the premise that the communist party is a vanguard of the proletariat and represents the long term interests of the people The doctrine of democratic centralism developed by Vladimir Lenin as a set of principles to be used in the internal affairs of the communist party is extended to society at large 24 According to democratic centralism all leaders must be elected by the people and all proposals must be debated openly but once a decision has been reached all people have a duty to account to that decision When used within a political party democratic centralism is meant to prevent factionalism and splits When applied to an entire state democratic centralism creates a one party system 24 The constitutions of most communist states describe their political system as a form of democracy 25 They recognize the sovereignty of the people as embodied in a series of representative parliamentary institutions Such states do not have a separation of powers and instead have one national legislative body such as the Supreme Soviet in the Soviet Union which is considered the highest organ of state power and which is legally superior to the executive and judicial branches of government 26 In communist states national legislative politics often have a similar structure to the parliaments that exist in liberal republics with two significant differences First the deputies elected to these national legislative bodies are not expected to represent the interests of any particular constituency but rather the long term interests of the people as a whole and second against Karl Marx s advice the legislative bodies of communist states are not in permanent session Rather they convene once or several times per year in sessions which usually last only a few days 27 When the national legislative body is not in session its powers are transferred to a smaller council often called a presidium which combines legislative and executive power and in some communist states such as the Soviet Union before 1990 acts as a collective head of state In some systems the presidium is composed of important communist party members who vote the resolutions of the communist party into law 27 A feature of communist states is the existence of numerous state sponsored social organisations associations of journalists teachers writers and other professionals consumer cooperatives sports clubs trade unions youth organisations and women s organisations which are integrated into the political system In communist states the social organisations are expected to promote social unity and cohesion to serve as a link between the government and society and to provide a forum for recruitment of new communist party members 28 Historically the political organisation of many socialist states has been dominated by a one party monopoly Some communist governments such as those in China Czechoslovakia or East Germany have or had more than one political party but all minor parties are or were required to follow the leadership of the communist party In communist states the government may not tolerate criticism of policies that have already been implemented in the past or are being implemented in the present 29 Nevertheless communist parties have won elections and governed in the context of multi party democracies without seeking to establish a one party state and therefore these entities do not fall under the definition of communist state In most of Europe communist parties were highly popular and served in several coalition governments during the 20th century Examples of direct ruling include San Marino 1945 1957 Nicaragua 1984 1990 30 Guyana 1992 2015 Moldova 2001 2009 31 Cyprus 2008 2013 32 and Nepal 1994 1998 2008 2013 2015 2017 2018 present as well as several Brazilian Indian Kerala 33 and Russian states StateAccording to Marxist Leninist thought the state is a repressive institution led by a ruling class 34 This class dominates the state and expresses its will through it 34 By formulating law the ruling class uses the state to oppress other classes and forming a class dictatorship 34 However the goal of the communist state is to abolish that said state 34 The Soviet Russia Constitution of 1918 stated The principal object of the Constitution of the R S F S R which is adapted to the present transition period consists in the establishment of a dictatorship of the urban and rural proletariat and the poorest peasantry in the form of a powerful All Russian Soviet power the object of which is to secure complete suppression of the bourgeoisie the abolition of exploitation of man by man and the establishment of Socialism under which there shall be neither class division nor state authority 34 The communist state is the dictatorship of the proletariat where the advanced elements of the proletariat are the ruling class 35 In Marxist Leninist thinking the socialist state is the last repressive state since the next stage of development is that of pure communism a classless and stateless society 35 Friedrich Engels commented on the state writing State interference in social relations becomes in one domain after another superfluous and then dies out of itself the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things and by the conduct of processes of production The state is not abolished It dies out 36 In The Tax in Kind Vladimir Lenin argued No one I think in studying the question of the economic system of Russia has denied its transitional character Nor I think has any Communist denied that the term Soviet Socialist Republic implies the determination of the Soviet power to achieve the transition to socialism and not that the existing economic system is recognised as a socialist order 37 The introduction of the first five year plan in the Soviet Union got many communists to believe that the withering away of the state was imminent 38 However Joseph Stalin warned that the withering away of the state would not occur until after the socialist mode of production had achieved dominance over capitalism 38 Soviet jurist Andrey Vyshinsky echoed this assumption and said that the socialist state was necessary in order to defend to secure and to develop relationships and arrangements advantageous to the workers and to annihilate completely capitalism and its remnants 39 Ideology permeates these states 40 According to scholar Peter Tang t he supreme test of whether a Communist Party state remains revolutionarily dedicated or degenerates into a revisionist or counterrevolutionary system lies in its attitude toward the Communist ideology 41 Therefore the sole ideological purpose of communist states is to spread socialism and to reach that goal these states have to be guided by Marxism Leninism 41 The communist states have opted for two ways to achieve this goal namely govern indirectly by Marxism Leninism through the party Soviet model or commit the state officially through the constitution to Marxism Leninism Maoist China Albania model 42 The Soviet model is the most common and is currently in use in China 43 Marxism Leninism was mentioned in the Soviet constitution 40 Article 6 of the 1977 Soviet constitution stated The Communist Party armed with Marxism Leninism determines the general perspective of the development of society and the course of the domestic and foreign policy of the USSR 40 This contrasts with the 1976 Albanian constitution which stated in Article 3 In the People s Socialist Republic of Albania the dominant ideology is Marxism Leninism The entire social order is developing on the basis of its principles 43 The 1975 Chinese constitution had a similar tone stating in Article 2 that Marxism Leninism Mao Zedong Thought is the theoretical basis guiding the thinking of our nation 43 The 1977 Soviet constitution did also use phrases such as building socialism and communism on the road to communism to build the material and technical basis of communism and to perfect socialist social relations and transform them into communist relations in the preamble 40 People s democratic state The people s democratic state was implemented in Eastern Europe after World War II 44 It can be defined as a state and society in which feudal vestiges have been liquidated and where the system of private ownership exists but it is eclipsed by the state owned enterprises in the field of industry transport and credit 45 In the words of Eugene Varga the state itself and its apparatus of violence serve the interests not of the monopolistic bourgeoisie but of the toilers of town and country 45 Soviet philosopher N P Farberov stated People s democracy in the people s republics is a democracy of the toiling classes headed by the working class a broad and full democracy for the overwhelming majority of the people that is a socialist democracy in its character and its trend In this sense we call it popular 45 People s republican state The people s republican state is a type of socialist state with a republican constitution Although the term initially became associated with populist movements in the 19th century such as the German Volkisch movement and the Narodniks in Russia it is now associated with communist states A number of the short lived communist states which formed during World War I and its aftermath called themselves people s republics Many of these sprang up in the territory of the former Russian Empire following the October Revolution 46 47 48 49 50 Additional people s republics emerged following the Allied victory in World War II mainly within the Soviet Union s Eastern Bloc 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 In Asia China became a people s republic following the Chinese Communist Revolution 58 and North Korea also became a people s republic 59 During the 1960s Romania and Yugoslavia ceased to use the term people s republic in their official name replacing it with the term socialist republic as a mark of their ongoing political development Czechoslovakia also added the term socialist republic into its name during this period it had become a people s republic in 1948 but the country had not used that term in its official name 60 Albania used both terms in its official name from 1976 to 1991 61 National democratic state The concept of the national democratic state tried to theorize how a state could develop socialism by bypassing the capitalist mode of production 62 While the theory of non capitalist development was first articulated by Vladimir Lenin the novelty of this concept was applying it to the progressive elements of the national liberation movements in the Third World 62 The term national democratic state was introduced shortly after the death of Stalin who believed colonies to be mere lackeys of Western imperialism and that the socialist movement had few prospects there 62 The countries in which the national liberations movements took power and which instituted an anti imperialist foreign policy and sought to construct a form of socialism were considered as national democratic states by Marxist Leninists 62 An example of a national democratic state is Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser which was committed to constructing Arab socialism 63 With the exception of Cuba none of these states managed to develop socialism 63 According to scholar Sylvia Woodby Edington this might explain why the concept of the national democratic state never received full theoretical elaboration as a political system 63 However one feature was clearly defined namely that these states did not need to be led by a Marxist Leninist party 64 Socialist oriented state A socialist oriented state seeks to reach socialism by non capitalist development 65 As a term it is substantially different from the concept of the national democratic state 65 The singular difference is that the socialist oriented state was divided into two stages firstly into a national democratic socialist oriented state and secondly into a people s democratic socialist oriented state 64 Countries belonging to the national democratic socialist oriented state category were also categorised as national democratic states 64 Examples of national democratic socialist oriented states are Algeria ruled by the National Liberation Front Ba athist Iraq and Socialist Burma 64 In contrast people s democratic socialist oriented states had to be guided by Marxism Leninism and accept the universal truths of Marxism Leninism and reject other notions of socialism such as African socialism 64 The socialist oriented states had seven defining features namely they were revolutionary democracies had a revolutionary democratic party class dictatorship defense of the socialist oriented states had organs of socialisation initiated socialist construction and the type of socialist oriented state either national democratic or people s democratic 66 The political goal of revolutionary democracy is to create the conditions for socialism in countries where the social political and economic conditions for socialism do not exist 67 The second feature to be met is the establishment of a revolutionary democratic party which has to establish itself as the leading force and guide the state by using Marxist Leninist ideology 68 While introduced in these states democratic centralism is rarely upheld 69 Unlike capitalism which is ruled by the bourgeoisie class and socialism were the proletariat leads the socialist oriented state represents a broad and heterogeneous group of classes that seek to consolidate national independence 69 Since the peasantry were usually the largest class in socialist oriented states their role were emphasised similar to the working class in other socialist states 70 However Marxist Leninists admitted that these states often fell under the control of certain cliques such as the military in Ethiopia 70 The establishing of a legal system and coercive institutions are also noted to safeguard the socialist oriented nature of the state 71 The fifth feature is that the media and educational system has to be taken over by the socialist oriented state while establishing mass organisations to mobilize the populace 72 Unlike the Soviet economic model the economy of the socialist oriented states are mixed economies that seek to attract foreign capital and which seeks to maintain and develop the private sector 73 In the words of Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev these states were in the process of taking over the commanding heights of the economy and instituting a state planned economy 63 According to Soviet sources Laos was the one socialist oriented state that has managed to develop into a socialist state 74 Socialist state A socialist state is more than a form of government and can only exist in countries with a socialist economy There are examples of several states that have instituted a socialist form of government before achieving socialism The former socialist states of Eastern Europe were established as people s democracies a developmental stage between capitalism and socialism On the question of the Marxist Leninist ruled countries of Africa and the Middle East the Soviet Union deemed none of them to be socialist states referring to them as socialist oriented states While many countries with constitutional references to socialism and countries ruled by long standing socialist movements exist within Marxist Leninist theory a socialist state is led by a communist party that has instituted a socialist economy in a given country 75 It deals with states that define themselves either as a socialist state or as a state led by a governing Marxist Leninist party in their constitutions For this reason alone these states are often called communist states 11 76 13 Political systemGovernment The highest administrative agency of state power is the government 77 It functions as the executive organ of the legislature 77 The Supreme Soviet has been introduced with variations in all communist states 78 For most of its existence the Soviet government was known as the Council of Ministers 77 and identical names were used for the governments of Albania East Germany Hungary Poland and Romania 79 It was independent of the other central agencies such as the legislature and its standing committee but the Supreme Soviet was empowered to decide on all questions it wished 80 The Soviet government was responsible to the legislature and in between sessions of the legislature it reported to the legislature s standing committee 81 The standing committee could reorganise and hold the Soviet government accountable but it could not instruct the government 81 In communist states the government was responsible for the overall economic system public order foreign relations and defense 81 The Soviet model was more or less identically implemented in Bulgaria Czechoslovakia East Germany Hungary Poland and Romania with few exceptions 79 One exception was Czechoslovakia where it had a president and not a collective head of state 82 Another exception was in Bulgaria where the State Council was empowered to instruct the Council of Ministers 83 Legislature Powers and organisation The meeting place of the Chinese National People s Congress All state power is unified in the legislature in communist states This is a firm rejection of the separation of powers found in constitutional democracies The constitution is passed by the legislature and can only be amended by the legislature Judicial review and extra parliamentary review were denounced by Soviet legal theorists as bourgeoisie institutions They also perceived it as a limitation of the people s supreme power The legislature together with its suborgans was responsible for overseeing the constitutional order 84 Since the legislature is the supreme judge of constitutionality the legislature s own acts cannot therefore be unconstitutional 85 The Supreme Soviet was the first socialist legislature and the Soviet legislative system has been introduced in all communist states 78 The Supreme Soviet convened twice a year usually for two or three days each making it one of the world s first frequently convened legislatures during its existence 86 The same meeting frequency was the norm in the Eastern Bloc countries as well as modern day China 87 China s legislature the National People s Congress NPC is modeled on the Soviet one 88 As with the Soviet one the NPC is the highest organ of the state and elects a Standing Committee the Soviets had a Presidium the government and the State Council the Soviet counterpart being the Council of Ministers 89 In addition in all communist states the ruling party has either had a clear majority such as China or held every seat as they did in the Soviet Union in their Supreme Soviet 90 Western researchers have devoted little attention to legislatures in communist states The reason being that there are not significant bodies of political socialisation when compared to legislatures in constitutional democracies While political leaders in communist states are often elected as members of legislatures these posts are not relevant to political advancement The role of legislatures is different from country to country In the Soviet Union the Supreme Soviet did little more than listen to statements from Soviet political leaders and to legitimate decisions already made elsewhere while in the legislatures of Poland Vietnam and Yugoslavia it has been more active and had an impact on rule making 91 Representativity Both Marx and Lenin abhorred the parliamentary systems of bourgeois democracy but neither of them sought to abolish it 92 Lenin wrote that it would be impossible to develop proletarian democracy without representative institutions 92 Both of them considered the governing model of the Paris Commune of 1871 in which executive and legislative were combined in one body to be ideal 92 More importantly Marx applauded the election process by universal suffrage in the various wards and town 92 While the institution of such a legislature might not be important in itself they have a place in the literature and rhetoric of the ruling parties which cannot be ignored in the language of the party s intimacy with working masses of its alleged knowledge about interests of working people of social justice and socialist democracy of the mass line and learning from the people 93 By having legislatures the Marxist Leninist parties try to keep ideological consistency between supporting representative institutions and safeguarding the leading role of the party 92 They seek to use the legislatures as a linkage between the rulers and the ruled 92 These institutions are representative and usually mirror the population in areas such as ethnicity and language yet with occupations distributed in a manner skewed towards government officials 92 Unlike in constitutional democracies legislatures of communist states are not to act as a forum for conveying demands or interest articulation they meet too infrequently for this to be the case 94 This might explain why communist states have not developed terms such as delegates and trustees to give legislature representatives the power to vote according to their best judgement or in the interest of their constituency 94 Scholar Daniel Nelson has noted As with the British parliament before the seventeenth century turmoil secured its supremacy legislative bodies in communist states physically portray the realm ruled by to stretch an analogy kings Members of the assemblies represent the population to whom the rulers speak and over whom they govern convening a broader segment of society than the court itself 94 Despite this it does not mean that the communist states use legislatures to strengthen their communication with the populace the party rather than the legislature could take that function 94 Ideologically it has another function namely to prove that communist states do not only represent the interests of the working class but all social strata 95 Communist states are committed to establishing a classless society and use legislatures to show that all social strata whether bureaucrat worker or intellectual are committed and have interests in building such a society 95 As is the case in China national institutions such as the legislature must exist which brings together representatives of all nationalities and geographic areas 95 It does not matter if the legislatures only rubber stamp decisions because by having them it shows that communist states are committed to incorporating minorities and areas of the country by including them in the composition of the legislature 95 In communist states there is usually a high proportion of members who are government officials 96 In this instance it might mean that it s less important what legislatures do and more important who its representatives are 96 The members of such legislatures at central and local level are usually either government or party officials leading figures in their community or national figures outside the communist party 96 This goes to show that legislatures are tools to garner popular support for the government in which leading figures campaign and spread information about the party s policies and ideological development 96 Military Control Communist states have established two types of civil military systems The armed forces of most socialist states have historically been state institutions based on the Soviet model 97 but in China Laos North Korea and Vietnam the armed forces are party state institutions However there are several differences between the statist Soviet model and the party state model China In the Soviet model the Soviet armed forces was led by the Council of Defense an organ formed by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union while the Council of Ministers was responsible for formulating defense policies 98 The party leader was ex officio the Chairman of the Council of Defense 98 Below the Council of Defense there was the Main Military Council which was responsible for the strategic direction and leadership of the Soviet armed forces 98 The working organ of the Council of Defense was the General Staff which was tasked with analysing military and political situations as they developed 99 The party controlled the armed forces through the Main Political Directorate MPD of the Ministry of Defense a state organ that functioned with the authority of a department of the CPSU Central Committee 100 The MPD organised political indoctrination and created political control mechanisms at the center to the company level in the field 101 Formally the MPD was responsible for organising party and Komsomol organs as well as subordinate organs within the armed forces ensuring that the party and state retain control over the armed forces evaluates the political performance of officers supervising the ideological content of the military press and supervising the political military training institutes and their ideological content 101 The head of the MPD was ranked fourth in military protocol but it was not a member of the Council of Defense 102 The Administrative Organs Department of the CPSU Central Committee was responsible for implementing the party personnel policies and supervised the KGB the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Defense 103 In the Chinese party state model the People s Liberation Army PLA is a party institution 104 In the preamble of the Constitution of the Chinese Communist Party it is stated The Communist Party of China CPC shall uphold its absolute leadership over the People s Liberation Army and other people s armed forces 104 The PLA carries out its work in accordance with the instructions of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party 105 Mao Zedong described the PLA s institutional situation as follows Every communist must grasp the truth Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun Our principle is that the party commands the gun and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party 106 The Central Military Commission CMC is both an organ of the state and the party it is an organ of the CCP Central Committee and an organ of the national legislature the National People s Congress 107 The CCP General Secretary is ex officio party CMC Chairman and the President of the People s Republic of China is by right state CMC Chairman 107 The composition of the party CMC and the state CMC are identical 107 The CMC is responsible for the command of the PLA and determines national defense policies 107 There are fifteen departments that report directly to the CMC and that are responsible for everything from political work to administration of the PLA 108 Of significance is that the CMC eclipses by far the prerogatives of the CPSU Administrative Organs Department while the Chinese counterpart to the Main Political Directorate supervises not only the military but also intelligence the security services and counterespionage work 109 Representation Unlike in constitutional democracies active military personnel are members and partake in civilian institutions of governance 110 This is the case in all communist states 110 The Communist Party of Vietnam CPV has elected at least one active military figure to its CPV Politburo since 1986 111 In the 1986 2006 period active military figures sitting in the CPV Central Committee stood at an average of 9 2 percent 111 Military figures are also represented in the national legislature the National Assembly and other representative institutions 111 In China the two CMC vice chairmen have had by right office seats in the CCP Politburo since 1987 112 Ruling party Leading role Every communist state has been led by a Marxist Leninist party 75 This party seeks to represent and articulate the interests of the classes exploited by capitalism 75 It seeks to lead the exploited classes to achieve communism 75 However the party cannot be identified with the exploited class in general 75 Its membership is composed of members with advanced consciousness who are above sectional interests 75 Therefore the party represents the advanced section of the exploited classes and through them leads the exploited classes by interpreting the universal laws governing human history towards communism 113 In Foundations of Leninism 1924 Joseph Stalin wrote that the proletariat working class needs the Party first of all as its General Staff which it must have for the successful seizure of power But the proletariat needs the Party not only to achieve the class dictatorship it needs it still more to maintain the class dictatorship 114 The current Constitution of Vietnam states in Article 4 that t he Communist Party of Vietnam the vanguard of the Vietnamese working class simultaneously the vanguard of the toiling people and of the Vietnamese nation the faithful representative of the interests of the working class the toiling people and the whole nation acting upon the Marxist Leninist doctrine and Ho Chi Minh s thought is the leading force of the state and society 115 In a similar form the Chinese Communist Party CCP describes itself as the vanguard of the Chinese working class the Chinese people and the Chinese nation 116 As noted by both communist parties the ruling parties of communist states are vanguard parties Vladimir Lenin theorised that vanguard parties were capable of assuming power and leading the whole people to socialism of directing and organising the new system of being the teacher the guide the leader of all the working and exploited people in organising their social life without the bourgeoisie 117 This idea eventually evolved into the concept of the party s leading role in leading the state 117 as seen in the CCP s self description and Vietnam s constitution 115 116 Internal organisation The Marxist Leninist governing party organises itself around the principle of democratic centralism and through it the state too 118 It means that all directing bodies of the party from top to bottom shall be elected that party bodies shall give periodical accounts of their activities to their respective party organisations that there shall be strict party discipline and the subordination of the minority to the majority and that all decisions of higher bodies shall be absolutely binding on lower bodies and on all party members 118 The highest organ of a Marxist Leninist governing party is the party congress 119 The congress elects the central committee and either an auditing commission and a control commission or both although not always 119 The central committee is the party s highest decision making organ in between party congresses and elects a politburo and a secretariat amongst its members as well as the party s leader 119 When the central committee is not in session the politburo is the highest decision making organ of the party and the secretariat is the highest administrative organ 119 In certain parties either the central committee or the politburo elects amongst its members a standing committee of the politburo which acts as the highest decision making organ in between sessions of the politburo central committee and the congress This leadership structure is identical all the way down to the primary party organisation of the ruling party 119 Economic systemFrom reading their works many followers of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels drew the idea that the socialist economy would be based on planning and not market mechanism 120 These ideas later developed into the belief that planning was superior to market mechanism 121 Upon seizing power the Bolsheviks began advocating a national state planning system 121 The 8th Congress of the Russian Communist Party Bolsheviks resolved to institute the maximum centralisation of production simultaneously striving to establish a unified economic plan 121 The Gosplan the State Planning Commission the Supreme Soviet of the National Economy and other central planning organs were established during the 1920s in the era of the New Economic Policy 122 On introducing the planning system it became a common belief in the international communist movement that the Soviet planning system was a more advanced form of economic organisation than capitalism 123 This led to the system being introduced voluntarily in countries such as China Cuba and Vietnam and in some cases imposed by the Soviet Union 123 In communist states the state planning system had five main characteristics 124 Firstly with the exception of the field consumption and employment practically all decisions were centralized at the top 124 Secondly the system was hierarchical the center formulated a plan that was sent down to the level below which would imitate the process and send the plan further down the pyramid 124 Thirdly the plans were binding in nature i e everyone had to follow and meet the goals set forth in it 124 Fourthly the predominance of calculating in physical terms to ensure planned allocation of commodities were not incompatible with planned production 124 Finally money played a passive role within the state sector since the planners focused on physical allocation 124 According to Michael Ellman in a centrally planned economy the state owns the land and all other natural resources and all characteristics of the traditional model the enterprises and their productive assets Collective ownership e g the property of collective farms also exists but plays a subsidiary role and is expected to be temporary 124 The private ownership of the means of production still exist although it plays a fairly smaller role 125 Since the class struggle in capitalism is caused by the division between owners of the means of production and the workers who sell their labour state ownership defined as the property of the people in these systems is considered as a tool to end the class struggle and empower the working class 126 Judicial systemConstitution Role of constitutions Marxist Leninists view the constitution as a fundamental law and as an instrument of force 127 The constitution is the source of law and legality 128 Unlike in constitutional democracies the Marxist Leninist constitution is not a framework to limit the power of the state 128 To the contrary a Marxist Leninist constitution seeks to empower the state believing the state to be an organ of class domination and law to be the expression of the interests of the dominant class 128 It is the belief of Marxist Leninists that all national constitutions do this to ensure that countries can strengthen and enforce their own class system 128 In this instance it means that Marxist Leninists conceive of constitutions as a tool to defend the socialist nature of the state and attack its enemies 128 This contrasts with the liberal conception of constitutionalism that law rather than men is supreme 129 Unlike the relatively constant and in some instances permanently fixed nature of democratic constitutions a Marxist Leninist constitution is ever changing 130 Andrey Vyshinsky a Procurator General of the Soviet Union during the 1930s notes that the Soviet constitutions represent the sum total of the historic path along which the Soviet state has traveled At the same time they are the legislative basis of subsequent development of state life 130 That is the constitution sums up what already has been achieved 131 This belief is also shared by the Chinese Communist Party which argued that the Chinese Constitution blazes a path for China recording what has been won in China and what is yet to be conquered 130 A constitution in a communist state has an end 132 The preamble of the 1954 Chinese constitution outlines the historical tasks of the Chinese communists step by step to bring about the socialist industrialisation of the country and step by step to accomplish the socialist transformation of agriculture handicraft and capitalist industry and commerce 132 In communist states the constitution was a tool to analyse the development of society 133 The Marxist Leninist party in question would have to study the correlation of forces literally society s class structure before enacting changes 133 Several terms were coined for different developmental states by Marxist Leninists legal theorists including new democracy people s democracy and the primary stage of socialism 131 This is also why amendments to constitutions are not enough and major societal changes need a novel constitution which corresponds with the reality of the new class structure 131 With Nikita Khrushchev s repudiation of Stalin s practices in the Secret Speech and the Chinese Communist Party s repudiation of certain Maoist policies Marxist Leninist legal theories began to emphasise the formal formerly neglected constitutional order 134 Deng Xiaoping not long after Chairman Mao Zedong s death noted that d emocracy has to be institutionalised and written into law so as to make sure that institutions and laws do not change whenever the leadership changes or whenever the leaders change their views The trouble now is that our legal system is incomplete Very often what leaders say is taken as law and anyone who disagrees is called a lawbreaker 135 In 1986 Li Buyan wrote that the policies of the Party usually are regulations and calls which to a certain extent are only principles The law is different it is rigorously standardised It explicitly and concretely stipulates what the people should can or cannot do 136 These legal developments have been echoed in later years in Cuba Laos and Vietnam This has led to the development of the communist concept of socialist rule of law which runs parallel to and is distinct from the liberal term of the same name 137 In the last years this emphasis on the constitution as both a legal document and a paper which documents society s development has been noted by Chinese Communist Party general secretary Xi Jinping who stated in 2013 that n o organisation or individual has the privilege to overstep the Constitution and law 138 Constitutional supervision After Soviet Union general secretary Joseph Stalin s death several communist states have experimented with some sort of constitutional supervision 139 These organs were designed to safeguard the supreme power of the legislature from circumvention by political leaders 139 Romania was the first to experiment with constitutional supervision when it established a Constitutional Committee in 1965 139 It was elected by the legislature and leading jurists sat in the committee but it was only empowered to advise the legislature 139 Keith Hand has commented that i t was not an effective institution in practice being unable to prevent Nicolae Ceausescu s emasculation of Romania s Great National Assembly after the inauguration of the July Theses 139 Hungary and Poland experimented with constitutional supervision in the early 1980s 139 Hungary established the Council of Constitutional Law which was elected by the legislature and consisted of several leading jurists 139 It was empowered to review the constitutionality and legality of statutes administrative regulations and other normative documents however if the agency in question failed to heed its advice it needed to petition the legislature 139 In 1989 the Soviets established the Constitutional Supervision Committee which was subordinate only to the USSR constitution 140 It was empowered to review the constitutionality and legality of a range of state acts of the USSR and its republics Its jurisdiction included laws passed by the legislature decrees of the Supreme Soviet s Presidium union republic constitutions and laws some central administrative decrees Supreme Court explanations and other central normative documents 140 If the committee deemed the legislature to have breached legality the legislature was obliged to discuss the issue but it could reject it if more than two thirds voted against the findings of the Constitutional Supervision Committee 140 While it was constitutionally powerful it lacked enforcement powers it was often ignored and it failed to defend the constitution during the coup against Mikhail Gorbachev 141 The Chinese leadership has argued against establishing any corresponding constitutional supervisory committee due to their association with the failed communist states of Europe 142 None of the surviving communist states China Cuba Laos and Vietnam have experimented with constitutional supervision committees or constitutional supervision of any kind outside the existing framework 143 Legal system Main article Socialist law All communist states have been established in countries with a civil law system 144 The countries of Eastern Europe had formally been governed by the Austro Hungarian Empire German Empire and Russian Empire all of whom had a civil law legal system 144 Cuba had a civil law system imposed on them by Spain while China introduced civil law to overlay with Confucian elements and Vietnam used French law 144 Since the establishment of the Soviet Union there has been a scholarly debate on whether socialist law is a separate legal system or is a part of the civil law tradition 144 Legal scholar Rene David wrote that the socialist legal system possesses in relation to our French law particular features that give it a complete originality to the extent that it is no longer possible to connect it like the former Russian law to the system of Roman law 145 Similarly Christoper Osakwe concludes that socialist law is an autonomous legal system to be essentially distinguished from the other contemporary families of law 146 Proponents of socialist law as a separate legal system have identified the following features 146 The socialist law is to disappear with the withering away of the state 146 The rule of the Marxist Leninist party 146 The socialist law is subordinate and reflects changes to the economic order the absorption of private law by public law 146 The socialist law has a religious character 147 The socialist law is prerogative rather than normative 147 Legal officials argue differently for their case compared to Westerners 148 For instance t he predominant view among Soviet jurists in the 1920s was that Soviet law of that period was Western style law appropriate for a Soviet economy that remained capitalist to a significant degree 148 This changed with the introduction of the command economy and the term socialist law was conceived to reflect this in the 1930s 148 Hungarian legal theorist Imre Szabo acknowledged similarities between socialist law and civil law but he noted that four basic types of law may be distinguished the laws of the slave feudal capitalist and socialist societies 149 Using the Marxist theory of historical materialism Szabo argues that socialist law cannot belong to the same law family since the material structure is different from the capitalist countries as their superstructure state has to reflect these differences 150 In other words law is a tool by the ruling class to govern 150 As Rene David notes socialist jurists isolate their law to put into another category a reprobate category the Romanist laws and the common law is the fact that they reason less as jurists and more as philosophers and Marxists it is in taking a not strictly legal viewpoint that they affirm the originality of their socialist law 151 However some socialist legal theorists such as Romanian jurist Victor Zlatescu differentiated between type of law and family of law According to Zlatescu t he distinction between the law of the socialist countries and the law of the capitalist countries is not of the same nature as the difference between Roman German law and the common law for example Socialist law is not a third family among the others as appears in certain writings of Western comparatists 152 In other words socialist law is civil law but it is a different type of law for a different type of society 152 Yugoslav jurist Borislav Blagojevic sr noted that a great number of legal institutions and legal relations remain the same in socialist law further stating that it is necessary and justified to put them to use if they are in conformity with the corresponding interests of the ruling class in the state in question 153 Importantly socialist law had retained civil law institutions methodology and organisation 154 This can be discerned by the fact that East Germany retained the 1896 German civil code until 1976 while Poland used existing Austrian French German and Russian civil codes until adoption of its own civil code in 1964 155 Scholar John Quigley wrote that s ocialist law retains the inquisitorial style of trial law creation predominantly by legislatures rather than courts and a significant role for legal scholarship in construing codes 154 List of communist statesCurrent communist states A map of current communist states The following countries are one party states in which the institutions of the ruling communist party and the state have become intertwined They are adherents of Marxism Leninism They are listed here together with the year of their founding and their respective ruling parties 156 Overview of current states espousing Marxism Leninism Country Local name Since Ruling party Ideology People s Republic of China nb 1 Chinese 中华人民共和国 Pinyin Zhōnghua Renmin Gongheguo 1 October 1949 1949 10 01 Chinese Communist Party Socialism with Chinese characteristics Republic of Cuba Spanish Republica de Cuba 1 January 1959 1959 01 01 Communist Party of Cuba CastroismGuevarism Lao People s Democratic Republic Lao ສາທາລະນະລ ດ ປະຊາທ ປະໄຕ ປະຊາຊ ນລາວ Lao romanisation Sathalanalat Paxathipatai Paxaxon Lao 2 December 1975 1975 12 02 Lao People s Revolutionary Party Kaysone Phomvihane Thought Socialist Republic of Vietnam Vietnamese Cộng hoa xa hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam 2 September 1945 North Vietnam nb 2 30 April 1975 South Vietnam 2 July 1976 unified Communist Party of Vietnam Ho Chi Minh ThoughtMulti party states with governing communist parties See also Socialism in liberal democratic constitutions There are multi party states with communist parties leading the government Such states are not considered to be communist states because the countries themselves allow for multiple parties and do not provide a constitutional role for their communist parties Nepal was previously ruled by the Nepal Communist Party the Communist Party of Nepal Unified Marxist Leninist and the Unified Communist Party of Nepal Maoist between 1994 and 1998 and then again between 2008 and 2018 while states formerly ruled by one or more communist parties include San Marino 1945 1957 Nicaragua 1984 1990 Moldova 2001 2009 Cyprus 2008 2013 and Guyana 1992 2015 Venezuela is currently ruled by Nicolas Maduro who has been President since 2013 disputed since 2019 Maduro is the leader of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela PSUV which is considered far left and Marxist 157 During the socialist Free Peru party s rule over Peru many international observers described the party as being somewhat Marxist 158 159 160 or even Marxist Leninist 161 162 Former communist states See also People s republic States that had communist governments in red states that the Soviet Union believed at one point to be moving toward socialism in orange and other socialist states in yellow note that not all of the bright red states remained Soviet allies Graphs are temporarily unavailable due to technical issues Officially ruling parties in communist states Communist parties as ruling parties or part of a governing coalition in multi party states Formerly ruling in a one party system Formerly ruling in a parliamentary majority or minority government Formerly ruling as a coalition partner or supporterThe following communist states were socialist states committed to communism Some were short lived and preceded the widespread adoption of Marxism Leninism by most communist states Russia Chita Republic 1905 1906 Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic 1917 1991 Amur Socialist Soviet Republic 1918 Turkestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1918 1924 Volga German Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1918 1941 Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1919 1991 Tatar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1920 1990 Kirghiz Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic 1920 1925 Mountain Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1921 1924 Dagestan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1921 1991 Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1921 1941 1944 1945 Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1922 1991 Buryat Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1923 1990 Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1923 1940 1956 1991 Kazakh Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic 1925 1936 Kirghiz Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic 1926 1936 Mordovian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1934 1990 Udmurt Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1934 1990 Kalmyk Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1935 1943 1957 1991 Checheno Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1944 1957 1991 Kabardino Balkarian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1944 1957 1991 Komi Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1991 Mari Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1991 North Ossetian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1993 Karelo Finnish Soviet Socialist Republic 1940 1956 Kabardin Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1944 1957 Tuvan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1961 1992 Gorno Altai Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1990 1991 Soviet Republic of Soldiers and Fortress Builders of Naissaar 1917 1918 Donetsk Krivoy Rog Soviet Republic 1918 Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic 1919 Far Eastern Republic 1920 1922 Tuvan People s Republic 1921 1944 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 1922 1991 Ukraine Ukrainian People s Republic of Soviets 1917 1918 Odessa Soviet Republic 1918 Donetsk Krivoy Rog Soviet Republic 1918 Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic 1919 Galician Soviet Socialist Republic 1920 Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 1922 1991 Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic 1919 1991 Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1924 1940 Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1991 1992 Finland Finnish Socialist Workers Republic 1918 Finnish Democratic Republic 1939 1940 Karelo Finnish Soviet Socialist Republic 1940 1956 Germany Munster rebellion 1534 1535 163 164 Free Socialist Republic of Germany 1918 1919 Mainz Workers and Soldiers Council 1918 Saxony Soviet 1918 1919 Bremen Soviet Republic 1919 Bavarian Soviet Republic 1919 Wurzburg Soviet Republic 1919 People s State of Bavaria 1918 1919 Soviet occupation of Germany 1945 1949 Soviet occupation of Berlin 1945 1949 German Democratic Republic 1949 1990 East Berlin 1949 1990 France June Rebellion 1831 Communard France 1870 1871 Second Paris Commune 1870 Lyon Commune 1870 1871 Third Paris Commune 1871 Besancon Commune 1871 Alsace Lorraine Soviet Republic 1918 Estonia Commune of the Working People of Estonia 1918 1919 First Soviet occupation of the Baltic states 1940 1941 Second Soviet occupation of the Baltic states 1944 1945 Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic 1944 1991 Latvia Executive Committee of the Soviet of Workers Soldiers and the Landless in Latvia 1917 1918 Latvian Socialist Soviet Republic 1918 1920 Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic 1944 1991 Lithuania Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic 1918 1919 Lithuanian Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic 1919 First Soviet occupation of the Baltic states 1940 1941 Second Soviet occupation of the Baltic states 1944 1945 Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic 1944 1991 Belarus Lithuanian Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic 1919 Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic 1922 1991 Hungary Hungarian Soviet Republic 1919 Serbian Hungarian Baranya Baja Republic 1921 Soviet occupation of Hungary 1944 1946 Second Hungarian Republic 1946 1949 Hungarian People s Republic 1949 1989 Azerbaijan Baku Commune 1918 Mughan Soviet Republic 1919 Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic 1920 1991 Nakhichevan Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1921 1990 Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic 1922 1936 Czechoslovakia Slovak Soviet Republic 1919 Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia 1944 1948 Fourth Czechoslovak Republic 1948 1960 Czechoslovak Socialist Republic 1960 1990 Tajikistan Bukharan People s Soviet Republic 1920 1925 Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic 1929 1991 Turkmenistan Khorezm People s Soviet Republic 1920 1925 Bukharan People s Soviet Republic 1920 1925 Turkmen Soviet Socialist Republic 1925 1991 Uzbekistan Khorezm People s Soviet Republic 1920 1925 Bukharan People s Soviet Republic 1920 1925 Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic 1924 1991 Tajik Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1924 1929 Karakalpak Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1932 1991 Iran Persian Socialist Soviet Republic 1920 1921 Soviet occupation of Iran 1941 1946 Azerbaijan People s Government 1945 1946 Republic of Mahabad 1946 1947 Poland Provisional Polish Revolutionary Committee Galician Soviet Socialist Republic 1920 Provisional Government of National Unity 1945 1947 Polish People s Republic 1947 1989 Armenia Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic 1920 1991 Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic 1922 1936 Georgia Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic 1921 1991 Adjar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1921 1990 Abkhaz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic 1931 1996 Transcaucasian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic 1922 1936 Mongolia People s Republic of Mongolia 1921 1924 Mongolian People s Republic 1924 1992 China Hailufeng Soviet 1927 Hunan Soviet 1927 Guangzhou Commune 1927 Soviet Zone of China 1927 1949 Chinese Soviet Republic 1931 1937 Jiangxi Fujian Soviet 1931 1934 People s Revolutionary Government of the Republic of China 1933 1934 Northwest Chinese Soviet Federation 1935 1936 Tibetan People s Republic 1936 Second East Turkestan Republic 1944 1949 Inner Mongolian People s Republic 1945 Soviet occupation of Manchuria 1945 1946 Spain Asturian Socialist Republic 1934 Kazakhstan Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1991 Kyrgyzstan Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic 1936 1991 Romania Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and northern Bukovina 1940 Soviet occupation of Romania 1944 1947 Romanian People s Republic 1947 1965 Socialist Republic of Romania 1965 1989 Moldova Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic 1940 1991 Pridnestrovian Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic 1990 1991 Greece Political Committee of National Liberation 1944 1949 Provisional Democratic Government 1947 1949 Albania Democratic Government of Albania 1944 1946 People s Republic of Albania 1946 1976 People s Socialist Republic of Albania 1976 1992 Bulgaria Strandzha Commune 1903 Soviet occupation of Bulgaria 1944 1946 People s Republic of Bulgaria 1946 1990 Norway Soviet occupation of Northern Norway 1944 1946 Austria Soviet occupation of Austria 1945 1946 Soviet occupation of Vienna 1945 1946 Denmark Soviet occupation of Bornholm 1945 1946 Japan Soviet occupation of the Kuril Islands 1945 Korea Soviet Civil Administration 1945 1946 Provisional People s Committee of North Korea 1946 1947 People s Committee of North Korea 1947 1948 Democratic People s Republic of Korea 1948 1992 2009 nb 3 Yugoslavia Federal People s Republic of Yugoslavia 1945 1963 Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 1963 1992 Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1945 1992 Socialist Republic of Croatia 1945 1991 Socialist Republic of Macedonia 1945 1991 Socialist Republic of Montenegro 1945 1992 Socialist Republic of Serbia 1945 1992 Socialist Republic of Slovenia 1945 1991 Colombia Marquetalia Republic 1948 1958 Vietnam Nghệ Tĩnh Soviet Democratic Republic of Vietnam 1954 1975 Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam 1969 1976 Yemen People s Democratic Republic of Yemen 1967 1990 Sudan Democratic Republic of the Sudan 1969 1985 Somalia Somali Democratic Republic 1969 1991 Republic of the Congo People s Republic of the Congo 1969 1992 Ethiopia Provisional Military Government of Socialist Ethiopia 1974 1987 People s Democratic Republic of Ethiopia 1987 1991 Mozambique People s Republic of Mozambique 1975 1990 Angola People s Republic of Angola 1975 1992 Benin People s Republic of Benin 1975 1990 Cambodia Democratic Kampuchea 1976 1979 People s Republic of Kampuchea 1979 1989 State of Cambodia 1989 1992 Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea 1982 1992 Provisional Government of National Union and National Salvation of Cambodia 1994 1998 Afghanistan Democratic Republic of Afghanistan 1978 1987 Republic of Afghanistan 1987 1992 Grenada People s Revolutionary Government of Grenada 1979 1983 Burkina Faso Burkina Faso 1984 1987 Turkey Strandzha Commune 1903 Brazil National Liberation Alliance of Brazil Seychelles Republic of SeychellesAnalysisSee also Criticism of communist party rule and Postsocialism Countries such as the Soviet Union and China were criticised by Western authors and organisations on the basis of the lack of the representative nature of multi party constitutional democracy 168 169 in addition to several other areas where socialist society and Western societies differed Socialist societies were commonly characterised by state ownership or social ownership of the means of production either through administration through communist party organisations democratically elected councils and communes and co operative structures in opposition to the liberal democratic capitalist free market paradigm of management ownership and control by corporations and private individuals 170 Communist states have also been criticised for the influence and outreach of their respective ruling parties on society in addition to lack of recognition for some Western legal rights and liberties such as the right to own property and the restriction of the right to free speech 171 The early economic development policies of communist states have been criticised for focusing primarily on the development of heavy industry citation needed Soviet advocates and socialists responded to criticism by highlighting the ideological differences in the concept of freedom McFarland and Ageyev noted that Marxist Leninist norms disparaged laissez faire individualism as when housing is determined by one s ability to pay also condemning wide variations in personal wealth as the West has not Instead Soviet ideals emphasized equality free education and medical care little disparity in housing or salaries and so forth 172 When asked to comment on the claim that former citizens of communist states enjoy increased freedoms Heinz Kessler former East German Minister of National Defence replied Millions of people in Eastern Europe are now free from employment free from safe streets free from health care free from social security 173 In his analysis of states run under Marxist Leninist ideology economist Michael Ellman of the University of Amsterdam notes that such states compared favorably with Western states in some health indicators such as infant mortality and life expectancy 174 Philipp Ther posits that there was an increase in the standard of living throughout Eastern Bloc countries as the result of modernisation programs under communist governments 175 Similarly Amartya Sen s own analysis of international comparisons of life expectancy found that several Marxist Leninist states made significant gains and commented one thought that is bound to occur is that communism is good for poverty removal 176 The dissolution of the Soviet Union was followed by a rapid increase in poverty 177 178 179 crime 180 181 corruption 182 183 unemployment 184 homelessness 185 186 rates of disease 187 188 189 infant mortality domestic violence 190 and income inequality 191 along with decreases in calorie intake life expectancy adult literacy and income 192 Memory Monuments to the victims of communist states exist in almost all the capitals of Eastern Europe and there are several museums documenting communist rule such as the Museum of Occupations and Freedom Fights in Lithuania the Museum of the Occupation of Latvia in Riga and the House of Terror in Budapest all three of which also document Nazi rule 193 194 In Washington D C a bronze statue based upon the 1989 Tiananmen Square Goddess of Democracy sculpture was dedicated as the Victims of Communism Memorial in 2007 having been authorized by the United States Congress in 1993 195 196 The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation plans to build an International Museum on Communism in Washington As of 2008 Russia contained 627 memorials and memorial plaques dedicated to victims of the communist states most of which were created by private citizens and did not have a national monument or a national museum 197 The Wall of Grief in Moscow inaugurated in October 2017 is Russia s first monument for victims of political persecution by Stalin during the country s Soviet era 198 In 2017 Canada s National Capital Commission approved the design for a memorial to the victims of communism to be built at the Garden of the Provinces and Territories in Ottawa 199 On 23 August 2018 Estonia s Victims of Communism 1940 1991 Memorial was inaugurated in Tallinn by President Kersti Kaljulaid 200 The memorial construction was financed by the state and is managed by the Estonian Institute of Historical Memory 201 The opening ceremony was chosen to coincide with the official European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism 202 According to anthropologist Kristen Ghodsee efforts to institutionalize the victims of communism narrative or the moral equivalence between the Nazi Holocaust race murder and the victims of communism class murder and in particular the recent push at the beginning of the global financial crisis for commemoration of the latter in Europe can be seen as the response by economic and political elites to fears of a leftist resurgence in the face of devastated economies and extreme inequalities in both the East and West as the result of the excesses of neoliberal capitalism Ghodsee argues that any discussion of the achievements under communist states including literacy education women s rights and social security is usually silenced and any discourse on the subject of communism is focused almost exclusively on Stalin s crimes and the double genocide theory 203 According to Laure Neumayer this is used as an anti communist narrative based on a series of categories and figures to denounce Communist state violence qualified as Communist crimes red genocide or classicide and to honour persecuted individuals presented alternatively as victims of Communism and heroes of anti totalitarian resistance 204 See also Communism portal Socialism portal Wikimedia Commons has media related to Communist countries List of socialist states List of anarchist communities Capitalist state List of anti capitalist and communist parties with national parliamentary representation List of communist parties Marxism Leninism Maoism StalinismNotes Hong Kong and Macau are administrated under the One country two systems principle Vietnam was divided on 21 July 1954 Although the government s official ideology is now the Juche part of Kimilsungism Kimjongilism policy of Kim Il sung as opposed to orthodox Marxism Leninism it is still considered a socialist state In 1992 all references to Marxism Leninism in the Constitution of North Korea were dropped and replaced with Juche 165 In 2009 the constitution was quietly amended so that not only did it remove all Marxist Leninist references present in the first draft but it also dropped all reference to communism 166 According to North Korea A Country Study by Robert L Worden Marxism Leninism was abandoned immediately after the start of de Stalinisation in the Soviet Union and it has been totally replaced by Juche since at least 1974 167 References Bottomore T B 1991 A Dictionary of Marxist Thought Wiley Blackwell p 54 Cooke Chris ed 1998 Dictionary of Historical Terms 2nd ed pp 221 222 305 Lee Grace Spring 2003 The Political Philosophy of Juche v 3 n 1 Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs Quote The DPRK claims that juche is Kim Il Sung s creative application of Marxist Leninist principle to the modern political realities in North Korea Atsuhito Isozaki 21 June 2021 A Revival of North Korean Communism The rhetoric is there But what does it mean The Diplomat Retrieved 2 December 2022 In his closing address at the Conference of Cell Secretaries of the Workers Party of Korea in late April Kim mentioned the word communism six times His recent claim that North Korea aims to become a communist utopia is a notable change in rhetoric Ball Terence Dagger Richard eds 2019 1999 Communism Encyclopaedia Britannica revised ed Retrieved 10 June 2020 Webb Sidney Webb Beatrice 1935 Soviet Communism A New Civilisation London Longmans Sloan Pat 1937 Soviet Democracy London Left Book Club Victor Gollancz Ltd Farber Samuel 1992 Before Stalinism The Rise and Fall of Soviet Democracy Studies in Soviet Thought 44 3 229 230 Getzler Israel 2002 1982 Kronstadt 1917 1921 The Fate of a Soviet Democracy Cambridge Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 0521894425 Busky Donald F 20 July 2000 Democratic Socialism A Global Survey Praeger p 9 ISBN 978 0275968861 In a modern sense of the word communism refers to the ideology of Marxism Leninism a b Wilczynski 2008 p 21 Contrary to Western usage these countries describe themselves as Socialist not Communist The second stage Marx s higher phase or Communism is to be marked by an age of plenty distribution according to needs not work the absence of money and the market mechanism the disappearance of the last vestiges of capitalism and the ultimate whithering away of the State Steele 1999 p 45 Among Western journalists the term Communist came to refer exclusively to regimes and movements associated with the Communist International and its offspring regimes which insisted that they were not communist but socialist and movements which were barely communist in any sense at all a b Rosser amp Rosser 2003 p 14 Ironically the ideological father of communism Karl Marx claimed that communism entailed the withering away of the state The dictatorship of the proletariat was to be a strictly temporary phenomenon Well aware of this the Soviet Communists never claimed to have achieved communism always labeling their own system socialist rather than communist and viewing their system as in transition to communism Williams Raymond 1983 Socialism Keywords A vocabulary of culture and society revised edition Oxford University Press p 289 ISBN 978 0 19 520469 8 The decisive distinction between socialist and communist as in one sense these terms are now ordinarily used came with the renaming in 1918 of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party Bolsheviks as the All Russian Communist Party Bolsheviks From that time on a distinction of socialist from communist often with supporting definitions such as social democrat or democratic socialist became widely current although it is significant that all communist parties in line with earlier usage continued to describe themselves as socialist and dedicated to socialism Nation R Craig 1992 Black Earth Red Star A History of Soviet Security Policy 1917 1991 Cornell University Press pp 85 6 ISBN 978 0801480072 Archived from the original on 1 August 2019 Retrieved 19 December 2014 via Google Books Barrett William 1 April 1978 Capitalism Socialism and Democracy A Symposium Commentary Retrieved 14 June 2020 If we were to extend the definition of socialism to include Labor Britain or socialist Sweden there would be no difficulty in refuting the connection between capitalism and democracy Heilbroner Robert L Winter 1991 From Sweden to Socialism A Small Symposium on Big Questions Dissident Barkan Joanne Brand Horst Cohen Mitchell Coser Lewis Denitch Bogdan Feher Ferenc Heller Agnes Horvat Branko Tyler Gus pp 96 110 Retrieved 17 April 2020 Kendall Diana 2011 Sociology in Our Time The Essentials Cengage Learning pp 125 127 ISBN 9781111305505 Sweden Great Britain and France have mixed economies sometimes referred to as democratic socialism an economic and political system that combines private ownership of some of the means of production governmental distribution of some essential goods and services and free elections For example government ownership in Sweden is limited primarily to railroads mineral resources a public bank and liquor and tobacco operations Li He 2015 Political Thought and China s Transformation Ideas Shaping Reform in Post Mao China Springer pp 60 69 ISBN 9781137427816 The scholars in camp of democratic socialism believe that China should draw on the Sweden experience which is suitable not only for the West but also for China In the post Mao China the Chinese intellectuals are confronted with a variety of models The liberals favor the American model and share the view that the Soviet model has become archaic and should be totally abandoned Meanwhile democratic socialism in Sweden provided an alternative model Its sustained economic development and extensive welfare programs fascinated many Numerous scholars within the democratic socialist camp argue that China should model itself politically and economically on Sweden which is viewed as more genuinely socialist than China There is a growing consensus among them that in the Nordic countries the welfare state has been extraordinarily successful in eliminating poverty Morgan W John 2001 Marxism Leninism The Ideology of Twentieth Century Communism In Wright James D ed International Encyclopedia of the Social amp Behavioral Sciences 2nd ed Oxford Elsevier pp 657 662 Andrai Charles F 1994 Comparative Political Systems Policy Performance and Social Change Armonk New York M E Sharpe pp 24 25 VN Embassy Constitution of 1992 Archived 9 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Full Text From the Preamble On 2 July 1976 the National Assembly of reunified Vietnam decided to change the country s name to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam the country entered a period of transition to socialism strove for national construction and unyieldingly defended its frontiers while fulfilling its internationalist duty Cubanet Constitution of the Republic of Cuba 1992 Archived 9 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine Full Text From Article 5 The Communist Party of Cuba a follower of Marti s ideas and of Marxism Leninism and the organised vanguard of the Cuban nation is the highest leading force of society and of the state which organises and guides the common effort toward the goals of the construction of socialism and the progress toward a communist society a b Furtak 1987 pp 8 9 Furtak 1987 p 12 Furtak 1987 p 13 a b Furtak 1987 p 14 Furtak 1987 pp 16 17 Furtak 1987 pp 18 19 Kinzer Stephen 15 January 1987 Nicaragua s Communist Party shifts to opposition The New York Times Retrieved 26 December 2019 Marandici Ion 23 April 2010 The Factors Leading to the Electoral Success Consolidation and Decline of the Moldovan Communists Party During the Transition Period Rutgers University Retrieved 22 January 2020 Smith Helena 25 February 2008 Cyprus elects its first communist president The Guardian Retrieved 26 December 2019 Kerala Assembly Elections 2006 Archived 7 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 7 October 2011 a b c d e Guins 1950 p 187 a b Guins 1950 pp 187 188 Imam 1986 p 383 Lenin Vladimir 21 April 1921 The Tax in Kind Marxists Internet Archive Retrieved 15 June 2020 a b Guins 1950 p 188 Guins 1950 pp 188 189 a b c d Tang 1980 p 43 a b Tang 1980 p 41 Tang 1980 pp 42 43 a b c Tang 1980 p 42 Skilling 1961 p 16 a b c Skilling 1961 p 21 Aslund Anders 2009 How Ukraine Became a Market Economy and Democracy Peterson Institute p 12 ISBN 9780881325461 via Google Books Minahan James 2013 Miniature Empires A Historical Dictionary of the Newly Independent States Routledge p 296 ISBN 9781135940102 via Google Books Tuncer Kilavuz Idil 2014 Power Networks and Violent Conflict in Central Asia A Comparison of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan Routledge advances in Central Asian studies Vol 5 Routledge p 53 ISBN 9781317805113 via Google Books Khabtagaeva Bayarma 2009 Mongolic Elements in Tuvan Turcologica Series Vol 81 Otto Harrassowitz Verlag p 21 ISBN 9783447060950 via Google Books Macdonald Fiona Stacey Gillian Steele Philip 2004 Peoples of Eastern Asia Vol 8 Mongolia Nepal Marshall Cavendish p 413 ISBN 9780761475477 via Google Books Gjevori Elvin 2018 Democratisation and Institutional Reform in Albania Springer p 21 ISBN 9783319730714 via Google Books Stankova Marietta 2014 Bulgaria in British Foreign Policy 1943 1949 Anthem Series on Russian East European and Eurasian Studies Anthem Press p 148 ISBN 9781783082353 via Google Books Muller Rommel Ferdinand Mansfeldova Zdenka 2001 Chapter 5 Czech Republic In Blondel Jean Muller Rommel Ferdinand eds Cabinets in Eastern Europe Palgrave Macmillan p 62 doi 10 1057 9781403905215 6 ISBN 978 1 349 41148 1 Hajdu Jozsef 2011 Labour Law in Hungary Kluwer Law International p 27 ISBN 9789041137920 via Google Books Frankowski Stanislaw Stephan Paul B 1995 Legal Reform in Post Communist Europe The View from Within Martinus Nijhoff p 23 ISBN 9780792332183 via Google Books Paquette Laure 2001 NATO and Eastern Europe After 2000 Strategic Interactions with Poland the Czech Republic Romania and Bulgaria Nova p 55 ISBN 9781560729693 via Google Books Lampe John R 2000 Yugoslavia as History Twice There Was a Country Cambridge University Press p 233 ISBN 9780521774017 via Google Books The Chinese Revolution of 1949 Office of the Historian Bureau of Public Affairs United States Department of State Kihl Young Whan Kim Hong Nack 2014 North Korea The Politics of Regime Survival Routledge p 8 ISBN 9781317463764 via Google Books Webb Adrian 2008 The Routledge Companion to Central and Eastern Europe Since 1919 Routledge Companions to History Routledge pp 80 88 ISBN 9781134065219 via Google Books Da Graca John V 2000 Heads of State and Government 2nd ed St Martin s Press p 56 ISBN 978 1 56159 269 2 via Google Books a b c d Poelzer 1989 p 13 a b c d Poelzer 1989 p 14 a b c d e Poelzer 1989 p 16 a b Poelzer 1989 p 15 Poelzer 1989 p 22 Poelzer 1989 p 23 Poelzer 1989 p 24 a b Poelzer 1989 p 25 a b Poelzer 1989 p 26 Poelzer 1989 p 44 Poelzer 1989 pp 50 52 Poelzer 1989 pp 54 55 Poelzer 1989 p 61 a b c d e f Harding 1981 p 27 Steele 1999 p 45 Among Western journalists the term Communist came to refer exclusively to regimes and movements associated with the Communist International and its offspring regimes which insisted that they were not communist but socialist and movements which were barely communist in any sense at all a b c Feldbrugge 1985 p 202 a b Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 p 86 a b Staar 1988 p 36 Bulgaria 65 Czechoslovakia 133 Hungary 161 Romania 195 Poland Feldbrugge 1985 pp 202 203 a b c Feldbrugge 1985 p 203 Staar 1988 p 64 Dimitrov 2006 p 170 Hand 2016 p 2 Hazard 1985 p 163 Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 p 91 Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 pp 114 115 Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 p 114 Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 p 115 Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 p 82 Nelson 1982 p 1 a b c d e f g Nelson 1982 p 7 Nelson 1982 p 6 a b c d Nelson 1982 p 8 a b c d Nelson 1982 p 9 a b c d Nelson 1982 p 10 Kramer 1985 p 47 a b c Snyder 1987 p 28 Snyder 1987 p 30 Loeber 1984 p 13 a b Staff writer 1980 p 1 Staff writer 1980 p 3 Kokoshin 2016 p 19 a b Mulvenon 2018 p 3 Tung 2012 p 251 Blasko 2006 p 6 a b c d Blasko 2006 p 27 Garafola Cristina L 23 September 2016 People s Liberation Army Reforms and Their Ramifications RAND Corporation Retrieved 27 December 2019 Kokoshin 2016 p 23 a b Staff writer 1980 p 7 a b c Thayer 2008 p 68 Miller 2018 p 4 Harding 1981 pp 27 28 Steiner 1951 p 58 a b Bui 2016 p 223 a b Li 2017 p 219 a b Evans 1993 p 20 a b Gardner Schopflin amp White 1987 p 131 a b c d e Central Committee Encyclopaedia Britannica Retrieved 26 December 2019 Ellman 2014 pp 1 2 a b c Ellman 2014 p 2 Ellman 2014 p 9 a b Ellman 2014 p 11 a b c d e f g Ellman 2014 p 22 Ellman 2014 p 23 Ellman 2014 p 25 Chang 1956 p 520 a b c d e Chang 1956 p 521 Chang 1956 p xi a b c Chang 1956 p 522 a b c Chang 1956 p xii a b Chang 1956 p 524 a b Triska 1968 p xii Chang 1956 p xiii Keith 1991 p 112 Keith 1991 p 114 Keith 1991 p 118 Wan William Qi Li 3 June 2013 China s constitution debate hits a sensitive nerve The Washington Post Retrieved 27 December 2019 a b c d e f g h Hand 2016 p 3 a b c Hand 2016 p 4 Hand 2016 p 5 Hand 2016 p 15 Hand 2016 p 16 a b c d Quigley 1989 p 781 Quigley 1989 p 782 a b c d e Quigley 1989 p 783 a b Quigley 1989 p 784 a b c Quigley 1989 p 796 Quigley 1989 pp 798 99 a b Quigley 1989 p 799 Quigley 1989 p 797 a b Quigley 1989 p 800 Quigley 1989 p 802 a b Quigley 1989 p 803 Quigley 1989 p 801 North Korea The World Factbook Libro Rojo Red Book PDF psuv org ve in Spanish December 2014 Retrieved 10 March 2023 Pedro Castillo The primary school teacher who became Peru s president BBC News 28 July 2021 Retrieved 31 July 2021 Casting himself as a man of the people Mr Castillo was rarely seen without the traditional white broad rimmed hat of his Cajamarca region and a huge inflatable pencil the symbol of his Marxist Free Peru party which also represents his background in education Peru president challenged by his own party over Cabinet AP News 14 October 2021 Retrieved 11 November 2021 Havana Trained Marxist Pushes Peru s New President to the Left Bloomberg 23 August 2021 Retrieved 11 November 2021 Peru s Congress postpones Cabinet confirmation vote to next week Reuters 25 October 2021 Retrieved 11 November 2021 Peru confirms new moderate left cabinet Al Jazeera Retrieved 15 November 2021 Tarnas R 2006 Cosmos and Psyche Intimations of a New World View Viking p 158 ISBN 978 0 670 03292 1 Retrieved 6 February 2023 via Google Books Gallardo P Russell E 2014 Yesterday s Tomorrows On Utopia and Dystopia Cambridge Scholars Publisher p 26 ISBN 978 1 4438 5877 9 Retrieved 6 February 2023 via Google Books Dae Kyu Yoon 2003 The Constitution of North Korea Its Changes and Implications Fordham International Law Journal 27 4 1289 1305 Retrieved 10 August 2020 Park Seong Woo 23 September 2009 북 개정 헌법 선군사상 첫 명기 Bug gaejeong heonbeob seongunsasang cheos myeong gi First stipulation of the Seongun Thought of the North Korean Constitution in Korean Radio Free Asia Retrieved 10 August 2020 Worden Robert L 2008 North Korea A Country Study PDF 5th ed Washington D C Library of Congress p 206 ISBN 978 0 8444 1188 0 Samuel P Huntington 1970 Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society The Dynamics of Established One party Systems Basic Books AZ Lowy Michael 1986 Mass Organization Party and State Democracy in its Transition to Socialism Transition and Development Problems of Third World Socialism 94 264 Amandae Sonja 2003 Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism University of Chicago Press Need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian communist regimes Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe 25 January 2006 Retrieved 31 January 2020 McFarland Sam Ageyev Vladimir Abalakina Paap Marina 1992 Authoritarianism in the Former Soviet Union Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 6 1004 1010 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 397 4546 doi 10 1037 0022 3514 63 6 1004 Parenti Michael 1997 Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism San Francisco City Lights Books p 118 ISBN 978 0 87286 330 9 Ellman Michael 2014 Socialist Planning Cambridge University Press p 372 ISBN 1107427320 Ther Philipp 2016 Europe Since 1989 A History Princeton University Press p 132 ISBN 9780691167374 As a result of communist modernization living standards in Eastern Europe rose Wilkinson Richard G November 1996 Unhealthy Societies The Afflictions of Inequality Routledge p 122 ISBN 0415092353 McAaley Alastair Russia and the Baltics Poverty and Poverty Research in a Changing World Archived from the original on 23 January 2017 Retrieved 18 July 2016 An epidemic of street kids overwhelms Russian cities The Globe and Mail 16 April 2002 Retrieved 17 July 2016 Targ Harry 2006 Challenging Late Capitalism Neoliberal Globalization amp Militarism Gerber Theodore P Hout Michael July 1998 More Shock than Therapy Market Transition Employment and Income in Russia 1991 1995 American Journal of Sociology 104 1 1 50 Volkov Vladimir 26 April 2007 The Bitter Legacy of Boris Yeltsin 1931 2007 World Socialist Website Retrieved 31 January 2020 Cops for Hire The Economist 18 March 2010 Retrieved 4 December 2015 Corruption Perceptions Index 2014 Transparency International 3 December 2014 Retrieved 18 July 2016 Hardt John 2003 Russia s Uncertain Economic Future With a Comprehensive Subject Index M E Sharpe p 481 Alexander Catharine Buchil Victor Humphrey Caroline 12 September 2007 Urban Life in Post Soviet Asia CRC Press Smorodinskaya Tatiana ed 2007 Encyclopaedia of Contemporary Russian Routledge Galazkaa Artur 2000 Implications of the Diphtheria Epidemic in the Former Soviet Union for Immunization Programs Journal of Infectious Diseases 181 244 248 doi 10 1086 315570 PMID 10657222 Shubnikov Eugene Non communicable Diseases and Former Soviet Union countries World Health Organization Retrieved 18 July 2016 Wharton Melinda Vitek Charles 1998 Diphtheria in the Former Soviet Union Reemergence of a Pandemic Disease Emerging Infectious Diseases 4 4 539 550 doi 10 3201 eid0404 980404 PMC 2640235 PMID 9866730 Retrieved 18 July 2016 Parenti Michael 1997 Blackshirts and Reds Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism San Francisco City Lights Books pp 107 115 ISBN 978 0872863293 Hoepller Cristopher 2011 Russian Demographics The Role of the Collapse of the Soviet Union Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences 10 1 Poland Marshall Russian Economy in the Aftermath of the Collapse of the Soviet Union Archived from the original on 8 July 2016 Retrieved 18 July 2016 Gille Zsuzsa Todorova Maria 2012 Post Communist Nostalgia Berghahn Books p 4 ISBN 978 0 857 45643 4 Ghodsee Kristen Fall 2014 A Tale of Two Totalitarianisms The Crisis of Capitalism and the Historical Memory of Communism History of the Present A Journal of Critical History 4 2 124 doi 10 5406 historypresent 4 2 0115 JSTOR 10 5406 historypresent 4 2 0115 Friendship Act HR3000 Act of 1993 PDF United States Congress p 15 at 905a1 Retrieved 14 November 2020 via U S Government Publishing Office Fekeiki Omar 13 June 2007 The Toll of Communism The Washington Post Retrieved 19 November 2020 Satter David 2011 It Was a Long Time Ago and It Never Happened Anyway Russia and the Communist Past Yale University Press ISBN 978 0 300 17842 5 Wall of Grief Putin opens first Soviet victims memorial BBC News 30 October 2017 Retrieved 19 November 2020 Victims of communism monument could be unveiled next spring CBC News 19 March 2018 Retrieved 19 November 2020 Estonia s Victims of Communism 1940 1991 Kommunismiohvrite memoriaal 23 August 2018 2018 Retrieved 19 November 2020 Cornerstone laid for new memorial for victims of communist crimes ERR News 4 May 2018 Retrieved 19 November 2020 Victims of Communism Memorial opened in Tallinn ERR News 24 August 2018 Retrieved 19 November 2020 Ghodsee Kristen Fall 2014 A Tale of Two Totalitarianisms The Crisis of Capitalism and the Historical Memory of Communism History of the Present A Journal of Critical History 4 2 115 142 doi 10 5406 historypresent 4 2 0115 JSTOR 10 5406 historypresent 4 2 0115 Neumayer Laure 2018 The Criminalisation of Communism in the European Political Space after the Cold War London Routledge ISBN 9781351141741 BibliographyGeneral References for when the individuals were elected to the office of CCP leader the name of the offices and when they established and were abolished are found below 19th National Congress 2017 Constitution of the Communist Party of China Chinese Communist Party Gungwu Wang 2012 China Development and Governance World Scientific Publishing Company pp 12 13 ISBN 978 9814425841 Articles and journal entries Bui T 2016 Constitutionalizing Single Party Leadership in Vietnam Dilemmas of Reform PDF Asian Journal of Comparative Law Cambridge University Press 11 2 219 234 doi 10 1017 asjcl 2016 22 Chang Yu nan August 1956 The Chinese Communist State System Under the Constitution of 1954 The Journal of Politics The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association 18 3 520 546 doi 10 2307 2127261 JSTOR 2127261 S2CID 154446161 Guins George July 1950 Law Does not Wither Away in the Soviet Union The Russian Review Wiley on behalf of The Editors and Board of Trustees of the Russian Review 9 3 187 204 doi 10 2307 125763 JSTOR 125763 Hand Keith 2016 An Assessment of Socialist Constitutional Supervision Models and Prospects for a Constitutional Supervision Committee in China The Constitution as Commander Legal Studies Research Paper Series University of California 150 SSRN 2624663 Hazard John August 1975 Soviet Model for Marxian Socialist Constitutions Cornell Law Review Cornell University 60 6 109 118 Imam Zafar July September 1986 The Theory of the Soviet State Today The Indian Journal of Political Science Indian Political Science Association 47 3 382 398 JSTOR 41855253, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.