fbpx
Wikipedia

Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople

The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople (Greek: Οἰκουμενικὸν Πατριαρχεῖον Κωνσταντινουπόλεως, romanizedOikoumenikón Patriarkhíon Konstantinoupóleos, IPA: [ikumeniˈkon patriarˈçion konstandinuˈpoleos]; Latin: Patriarchatus Oecumenicus Constantinopolitanus;[4] Turkish: Rum Ortodoks Patrikhanesi, İstanbul Ekümenik Patrikhanesi,[5][6] "Roman Orthodox Patriarchate, Ecumenical Patriarchate") is one of the fifteen to seventeen autocephalous churches (or "jurisdictions") that together compose the Eastern Orthodox Church. It is headed by the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople.

Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
Symbol of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, as found atop the front entrance of the Patriarchal Cathedral of St. George
AbbreviationEP
ClassificationEastern Orthodox
OrientationGreek Orthodoxy
ScriptureSeptuagint, New Testament
TheologyEastern Orthodox theology
PolityEpiscopal
PrimateArchbishop of Constantinople-New Rome and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I
Bishops125 (73 acting, 52 titular)
Parishes525 (in the United States)[1]
Monastics~1,800 (Mt. Athos)
Monasteries20 (U.S),[1] 20 (Mt. Athos), 8 (Australia), 6 (Meteora), 2 (Korea)
LanguageGreek, Turkish, Ukrainian, English, French, Korean
HeadquartersHagia Sophia, Constantinople (537–1453)
Church of the Holy Apostles (1453–1456)
Pammakaristos Church (1456–1587)
Church of the Panagia Paramythia (1587–1597)
Church of St. Demetrius Xyloportas (1597–1601)
St. George's Cathedral, Istanbul (1601–present)
41°01′45″N 28°57′06″E / 41.02917°N 28.95167°E / 41.02917; 28.95167
TerritoryIstanbul, most of Turkey, Mount Athos, Crete, part of northern Greece, the Dodecanese, Korea, Greek Orthodox Churches in the Diaspora
FounderSt. Andrew the Apostle
Independence330 AD from the Metropolis of Heraclea
Separationsseveral, see list below
Members~5,000 (Turkey)[2][3]
~3,800,000 (Greece)
~1,500,000 (in diaspora)
=5,305,000 (total)
Official websiteec-patr.org

Because of its historical location as the capital of the former Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire and its role as the mother church of most modern Orthodox churches, Constantinople holds a special place of honor within Orthodoxy and serves as the seat for the Ecumenical Patriarch, who enjoys the status of primus inter pares (first among equals) among the world's Eastern Orthodox prelates and is regarded as the representative and spiritual leader of Eastern Orthodox Christians.[7][8][9][10][11][12]

The status of Ecumenical Patriarchate is not officially recognized by the Republic of Turkey; Turkey only recognises the authority of the Ecumenical Patriarchate over the Greek minority in Istanbul, Bozcaada and Gökçeada.[13]

The Ecumenical Patriarchate promotes the expansion of the Christian faith and Eastern Orthodox doctrine, and the Ecumenical Patriarchs are involved in ecumenism and interfaith dialogue, charitable work, and the defense of Orthodox Christian traditions. Prominent issues for the Ecumenical Patriarchate's policy in the 21st century include the safety of the believers in the Middle East, reconciliation of the Eastern Orthodox and Catholic churches,[14] and the reopening of the Theological School of Halki, which was closed down by the Turkish authorities in 1971.[15][16]

History edit

The Great Church of Christ edit

 
The Church of Hagia Irene, was the cathedral church of the Patriarchate before Hagia Sophia was completed in 360

Christianity in the Greek city of Byzantium was brought by Apostle Andrew himself who visited Byzantium, founded the See of Byzantium in 38 AD and appointed the bishop Stachys the Apostle who remained until 54 AD. Therefore, the Greek Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople claims its legitimate appointment from Apostle Andrew from whom the subsequent ordination of ministries claim legitimate inheritance through the sacrament of Holy Orders.

In the year 330 the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great moved his residence to the town renaming it Nova Roma (Νέα Ῥώμη), or "New Rome". Thenceforth, the importance of the church there grew, along with the influence of its bishop.

Prior to the moving of the imperial capital, the bishop of Byzantium had been under the authority of the metropolitan of Heraclea, but from the 4th century on, he grew to become independent in his own right and even to exercise authority throughout what is now Greece, Asia Minor, Pontus, and Thrace. With the development of the hierarchical structure of the Church, the bishop of Constantinople came to be styled as exarch (a position superior to metropolitan). Constantinople was recognized as the fourth patriarchate at the First Council of Constantinople in 381, after Antioch, Alexandria, and Rome. The patriarch was usually appointed by Antioch.

Because of the importance of the position of Constantinople's church at the center of the Roman Empire, affairs involving the various churches outside Constantinople's direct authority came to be discussed in the capital, particularly where the intervention of the emperor was desired. The patriarch naturally became a liaison between the emperor and bishops traveling to the capital, thus establishing the position of the patriarch as one involving the unity of the whole Church, particularly in the East.

In turn, the affairs of the Constantinopolitan church were overseen not just by the patriarch, but also by synods held including visiting bishops. This pan-Orthodox synod came to be referred to as the ἐνδημοῦσα σύνοδος (endemousa synodos, "resident synod"). The resident synod not only governed the business of the patriarchate but also examined questions pertinent to the whole Church as well as the eastern half of the old empire.[17]

The patriarch thus came to have the title of Ecumenical, which referenced not a universal episcopacy over other bishops but rather the position of the patriarch as at the center of the oikoumeni, the "household" of the empire.

As the Roman Empire stabilized and grew, so did the influence of the patriarchate at its capital. This influence came to be enshrined in Orthodox canon law, to such an extent that it was elevated even beyond more ancient patriarchates: Canon 3 of the First Council of Constantinople (381) stated that the bishop of that city "shall have primacy of honor after the Bishop of Rome because Constantinople is the New Rome."

 
Hagia Sophia was the patriarchal cathedral until 1453

In its disputed 28th Canon, the Council of Chalcedon in 451 recognized an expansion of the boundaries of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and of its authority over bishops of dioceses "among the barbarians", which has been variously interpreted as referring either to areas outside the Byzantine Empire or to non-Greeks. The council resulted in a schism with the Patriarchate of Alexandria.

In any case, for almost a thousand years the Patriarch of Constantinople presided over the church in the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire and its missionary activity that brought the Christian faith in its Byzantine form to many peoples north of the imperial borders. The cathedral church of Constantinople, Hagia Sophia (Holy Wisdom), was the center of religious life in the eastern Christian world.[18]

The Ecumenical Patriarchate came to be called the "Great Church of Christ" and it was the touchstone and reference point for ecclesiastical affairs in the East, whether in terms of church government, relations with the state, or liturgical matters.

Prerogatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate edit

In history and in canonical literature (i.e. the Church's canons and traditional commentaries on them), the Ecumenical Patriarchate has been granted certain prerogatives (πρεσβεία, presveía) that other autocephalous Orthodox churches do not have. Not all of these prerogatives are today universally acknowledged, though all do have precedents in history and canonical references. The following is a (non-exhaustive) list of these prerogatives and their reference points:

  • Equal prerogatives to Old Rome (Canon 28 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council, Canon 36 of the Quinisext Council);
  • The right to hear appeals, if invited, regarding disputes between clergy (Canons 9 and 17 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council);
  • The right to ordain bishops for areas outside defined canonical boundaries (Canon 28 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council);
  • The right to establish stavropegial monasteries even in the territories of other patriarchates (the Epanagoge, commentaries of Matthew Blastares and Theodore Balsamon)

Iconoclast controversy edit

In the eighth and ninth centuries the iconoclast movement caused serious political unrest throughout the Empire. The emperor Leo III issued a decree in 726 against images and ordered the destruction of an image of Christ over one of the doors of the Chalke, an act which was fiercely resisted by the citizens.[19] Constantine V convoked a church council in 754, which condemned the worship of images, after which many treasures were broken, burned, or painted over with depictions of trees, birds or animals: one source refers to the church of the Holy Virgin at Blachernae as having been transformed into a "fruit store and aviary".[20] Following the death of his son Leo IV in 780, the empress Irene restored the veneration of images through the agency of the Second Council of Nicaea in 787.

The iconoclast controversy returned in the early 9th century, only to be resolved once more in 843 during the regency of Empress Theodora, who restored the icons.

Great Schism of 1054 edit

The relations between the papacy and the Byzantine court were good in the years leading up to 1054. The emperor Constantine IX and the Pope Leo IX were allied through the mediation of the Lombard catepan of Italy, Argyrus, who had spent years in Constantinople, originally as a political prisoner.

Patriarch Michael I Cerularius ordered a letter to be written to John, the Bishop of Trani in which he attacked the "Judaistic" practices of the West, namely the use of unleavened bread. The letter was to be sent by John to all the bishops of the West, including the Pope. John promptly complied and the letter was passed to Humbert of Mourmoutiers, the cardinal-bishop of Silva Candida, who translated the letter into Latin and brought it to the Pope, who ordered a reply to be made to each charge and a defence of papal supremacy to be laid out in a response.

Although he was hot-headed, Michael was convinced to cool the debate and thus attempt to prevent the impending breach. However, Humbert and the pope made no concessions and the former was sent with legatine powers to the imperial capital to solve the questions raised once and for all. Humbert, Frederick of Lorraine, and Peter, Archbishop of Amalfi, arrived in April 1054 and were met with a hostile reception; they stormed out of the palace, leaving the papal response with Michael, who in turn was even more angered by their actions. The patriarch refused to recognise their authority or, practically, their existence.[21] When Pope Leo died on April 19, 1054, the legates' authority legally ceased, but they effectively ignored this technicality.[22]

In response to Michael's refusal to address the issues at hand, the legatine mission took the extreme measure of entering the church of the Hagia Sophia during the Divine Liturgy and placing a bull of excommunication on the altar.

The events of the East-West Schism are generally dated from the acts of 1054. However, these events only triggered the beginning of the schism. The full schism was not actually consummated by the seemingly mutual excommunications. The New Catholic Encyclopedia reports that the legates had been careful not to intimate that the bull of excommunication implied a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church. The bull excommunicated only Cerularius, Leo of Achrida, and their adherents. Thus, the New Catholic Encyclopedia argues that the dispute need not have produced a permanent schism any more than excommunication of any "contumacious bishop". The schism began to develop when all the other Eastern patriarchs supported Cerularius. According to the New Catholic Encyclopedia, it was the support of Emperor Michael VI Stratiotikos that impelled them to support Cerularius.[23] Some have questioned the validity of the bull on the grounds that Pope Leo IX had died at that time and so the authority of the legates to issue such a bull is unclear.[22]

The legates left for Rome two days after issuing the bull of excommunication, leaving behind a city near riot. The patriarch had the immense support of the people against the emperor, who had supported the legates to his own detriment. To assuage popular anger, the bull was burnt, and the legates were anathematised. Only the legates were anathematised and, in this case too, there was no explicit indication that the entire Western church was being anathematised.

In the bull of excommunication issued against Patriarch Michael I Cerularius by the papal legates, one of the reasons cited was the alleged deletion by the Eastern Church of the "Filioque" from the original Nicene Creed. In fact, it was precisely the opposite: the Eastern Church had not deleted anything; it was the Western Church that had added this phrase to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.[22]

As Bishop Kallistos Ware writes, "Even after 1054 friendly relations between East and West continued. The two parts of Christendom were not yet conscious of a great gulf of separation between them. […] The dispute remained something of which ordinary Christians in East and West were largely unaware".[24] In fact, efforts were made in subsequent centuries by Popes and Patriarchs to heal the rift between the churches. However, a number of factors and historical events worked to widen the separation over time.[25]

Fall of Constantinople in 1204 and the exile in Nicaea edit

 
The Hagia Sophia church in Nicaea

The Fourth Crusade in exchange for promised funds attempted to help the deposed emperor Alexius IV regain his throne. After taking Constantinople, returning Alexius IV to the throne, the revolt against and murder of Alexius IV left the Crusaders without payment. On 12 April 1204, the crusaders inflicted a severe sacking on Constantinople for three days, during which many ancient and medieval Roman and Greek works were either stolen or destroyed. Despite their oaths and the threat of excommunication, the Crusaders ruthlessly and systematically violated the city's holy sanctuaries, destroying, defiling, or stealing all they could lay hands on; nothing was spared. It was said that the total amount looted from Constantinople was about 900,000 silver marks. The Venetians received 150,000 silver marks that was their due, while the Crusaders received 50,000 silver marks. A further 100,000 silver marks were divided evenly up between the Crusaders and Venetians. The remaining 500,000 silver marks were secretly kept back by many Crusader knights.

Nicetas Choniates gives a vivid account of the sack of Constantinople by the Frankish and Venetian Crusaders of the Fourth Crusade:

The Latin soldiery subjected the greatest city in Europe to an indescribable sack. For three days they murdered, raped, looted and destroyed on a scale which even the ancient Vandals and Goths would have found unbelievable. Constantinople had become a veritable museum of ancient and Byzantine art, an emporium of such incredible wealth that the Latins were astounded at the riches they found. Though the Venetians had an appreciation for the art which they discovered (they were themselves semi-Byzantines) and saved much of it, the French and others destroyed indiscriminately, halting to refresh themselves with wine, violation of nuns, and murder of Orthodox clerics. The Crusaders vented their hatred for the Greeks most spectacularly in the desecration of the greatest Church in Christendom. They smashed the silver iconostasis, the icons and the holy books of Hagia Sophia, and seated upon the patriarchal throne a whore who sang coarse songs as they drank wine from the Church's holy vessels. The estrangement of East and West, which had proceeded over the centuries, culminated in the horrible massacre that accompanied the conquest of Constantinople. The Greeks were convinced that even the Turks, had they taken the city, would not have been as cruel as the Latin Christians. The defeat of Byzantium, already in a state of decline, accelerated political degeneration so that the Byzantines eventually became an easy prey to the Turks. The Crusading movement thus resulted, ultimately, in the victory of Islam, a result which was of course the exact opposite of its original intention.[26]

Meanwhile, the Latin Empire of Constantinople was established, and Byzantine refugees founded their own successor states, the most notable of these being the Empire of Nicaea under Theodore Lascaris (a relative of Alexius III), the Empire of Trebizond, and the Despotate of Epirus.

The new seat of the Patriarchate was established in the city of Nicaea until in 1261, when Constantinople was reconquered by the Byzantine Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos.

Fall of Constantinople in 1453 and Ottoman period edit

 
Patriarch Gennadios with Sultan Mehmed II

In accordance with the traditional custom at the time, Sultan Mehmed II allowed his troops and his entourage three full days of unbridled pillage and looting in the city shortly after it was captured. Once the three days passed, he would then claim its remaining contents for himself.[27][28] However, by the end of the first day, he proclaimed that the looting should cease as he felt profound sadness when he toured the looted and enslaved city.[29][27] Hagia Sophia was not exempted from the pillage and looting and specifically became its focal point as the invaders believed it to contain the greatest treasures and valuables of the city.[30] Shortly after the defence of the Walls of Constantinople collapsed and the Ottoman troops entered the city victoriously, the pillagers and looters made their way to the Hagia Sophia and battered down its doors before storming in.[31]

Throughout the period of the siege of Constantinople, the trapped worshippers of the city participated in the Divine Liturgy and the Prayer of the Hours at the Hagia Sophia and the church formed a safe-haven and a refuge for many of those who were unable to contribute to the city's defence, which comprised women, children, elderly, the sick and the wounded.[32][33] Being trapped in the church, the many congregants and yet more refugees inside became spoils-of-war to be divided amongst the triumphant invaders. The building was desecrated and looted, with the helpless occupants who sought shelter within the church being enslaved.[30] While most of the elderly and the infirm/wounded and sick were killed, and the remainder (mainly teenage males and young boys) were chained up and sold into slavery.[34]

The women of Constantinople also suffered from rape at the hands of Ottoman forces.[35] According to Barbaro, "all through the day the Turks made a great slaughter of Christians through the city". According to historian Philip Mansel, widespread persecution of the city's civilian inhabitants took place, resulting in thousands of murders and rapes, and 30,000 civilians being enslaved or forcibly deported.[36][37][38][39] George Sphrantzes says that people of both genders were raped inside Hagia Sophia.

After Constantinople was overrun by the Ottoman Turks in 1453, the Patriarchate came to care more directly for all the Orthodox living in the Ottoman Empire. Mehmed II appointed Gennadios II Scholarios as the Patriarch in 1454 and designated him as the spiritual leader as well as the ethnarch or, in Turkish, milletbashi of all the Orthodox Christians in the Empire, regardless of ethnic origin; not only Greeks, but also Bulgarians, Serbs, Albanians, Wallachians, Moldavians, Croatis, Syrians, orthodox Arabs, Georgians and Lazs came under the spiritual, administrative,[40] fiscal, cultural and legal[40] jurisdiction of the Patriarchate.[41] Some of the other patriarchs came at various points to live permanently in Constantinople and function as part of the local church government. This situation, according to some of the Orientalists and historians, shows the Pax Ottomana (or Pax Ottomanica, literally "the Ottoman Peace").

 
An image from the Vatican Codex of 1162, believed to be a representation of the Church of the Holy Apostles, the first seat of the Patriarchate in the Ottoman age

The Russian Orthodox Church, which for centuries had been a diocese of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, declared its independence in 1448 shortly before Constantinople fell owing to its protest over the Council of Florence, in which representatives of the patriarchate had signed onto union with Rome, trading doctrinal concessions for military aid against the encroaching Ottomans. The military aid never came and those concessions were subsequently repudiated by the patriarchate but, from 1448, the Russian church came to function independently. Within decades after the Fall of Constantinople to Mehmed II of the Ottoman Empire on 29 May 1453, some were nominating Moscow as the "Third Rome", or the "New Rome".[citation needed] In 1589, 141 years later, Constantinople came to recognize Russia's independence and led the Eastern Orthodox Church in declaring Russia also to be a patriarchate, numbering Moscow's bishop as fifth in rank behind the ancient patriarchates. The Russian Orthodox Church became the largest of the Eastern Orthodox churches in the world.

As Ottoman rule weakened, various parts of the Orthodox Church that had been under the direct influence of the Ecumenical Patriarchate came to be independent. These churches at first usually declared their independence without universal approval, which came after Constantinople gave its blessing. The rate at which these new autocephalous ("self-headed") churches came into being increased in the 19th century, particularly with the independence of Greece.

 
Saint Peter's Gate at the Patriarchate. In 1821, Patriarch Gregory V remained hanged in full robes for three days at its architrave, because he was blamed by Mahmud II for his inability to suppress the Greek War of Independence. The Gate has not been opened since.

In 1833, the Church of Greece declared its autocephaly, which was subsequently recognized by the patriarchate in 1850. In 1865, the Romanian Orthodox Church, against the protests of Constantinople, declared its independence, which was acknowledged in 1885. A year before Greece's autocephaly was self-proclaimed, the Serbian Orthodox Church was named autocephalous by the local secular government but Constantinople refused recognition until 1879. In 1860 the Bulgarians de facto seceded from the Ecumenical Patriarchate; in 1870 the Bulgarian church was politically recognized as autonomous under the name Bulgarian Exarchate by the Sultan's firman, but it was not until 1945 that it was recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarchate. In 1922, the Albanian Orthodox Church declared its autocephaly, being granted recognition of it in 1937.

In addition to these churches, whose territory had been agreed upon by all as within Constantinople's jurisdiction, several other disputed areas' Eastern Orthodox churches have had recognition by the Ecumenical Patriarchate as either autocephalous or autonomous, including the Finnish Orthodox Church and Estonian Orthodox Church in 1923, the Polish Orthodox Church in 1924, and the Czech and Slovak Orthodox Church in 1998. The majority of these disputes are a result of the expansion of the Russian Empire, which often included a subjugation of the Orthodox churches in conquered lands to the Moscow Patriarchate. Due to this, the Moscow Patriarchate often disputes the Ecumenical Patriarch's role as prime representative and spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians, citing that it represents the numerically largest Orthodox community.[42]

Ecclesiastical buildings in Ottoman cities edit

As a ruling institution, the Ottoman Empire brought regulations on how the cities would be built (quality reassurances) and how the architecture (structural integrity, social needs, etc.) should be shaped.[citation needed] Special restrictions were imposed concerning the construction, renovation, size and usage of bells in churches. For example, in a town a church should not be larger in size than the largest mosque. Some churches were destroyed (e.g. the Church of the Holy Apostles), many were converted into mosques (among them the Hagia Sophia and Chora Church in Constantinople, and the Rotunda and Hagios Demetrios in Thessaloniki) or served for other uses (e.g. Hagia Irene in Constantinople, which became an armory for the Janissaries, and the Gül Mosque [Hagia Theodosia or Christ Euergetes], also in Constantinople, which after the Conquest served for a while as a naval dockyard). Such rules, however, although very strict in the beginning, with time and the increasing importance in the Ottoman Empire of the Rum millet were more and more disregarded, so that in the 19th century in Istanbul there was a veritable building boom of Orthodox churches, many among them having high bell towers and brick domes, both of which had previously been strictly prohibited.

Patriarchate under the secular Republic of Turkey edit

 
The exterior of the Patriarchal Basilica of St. George located in the Fener district of Istanbul. The facade dates from the mid-19th century and shows a neoclassical influence.
 
The Theological School of Halki at the top of the Hill of Hope
 
The current Ecumenical Patriarch, Bartholomew I.

Since 1586 the Ecumenical Patriarchate has had its headquarters in the relatively modest Church of St George in the Fener (Phanar) district of Istanbul. The current territory of the Patriarchate is significantly reduced from what it was at its height. Its canonical territory currently includes most of modern Turkey, northern Greece and Mount Athos, the Dodecanese and Crete. By its interpretation of Canon 28 of Chalcedon, Constantinople also claims jurisdiction over all areas outside the canonically defined territories of other Orthodox churches, which includes the entire Western hemisphere, Oceania, the United Kingdom, Western Europe, Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia. This claim is disputed by other autocephalous churches with dioceses in those areas, as well as the Turkish government.

The Orthodox presence in Turkey itself is small; however the majority of Orthodox in North America (about two-thirds) are under the Ecumenical Patriarchate, primarily in the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. The Patriarchate also enjoys an even greater majority in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, the Albanian, Rusyn and Ukrainian jurisdictions in America are also part of the Patriarchate.

Most of the Patriarchate's funding does not come directly from its member churches but rather from the government of Greece, due to an arrangement whereby the Patriarchate had transferred property it had owned to Greece. In exchange, the employees, including the clergy, of the Patriarchate are remunerated by the Greek government. The Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America provides substantial support through an annual contribution, known as the logia, and its institutions, including the American-based Greek Orthodox Ladies Philoptochos Society and the Archons of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, usually important laymen who make large donations for the upkeep of the Patriarchate. In turn, they are granted honorary titles which once belonged to members of the Patriarchal staff in centuries past.

The Patriarchate acts in the capacity of being an intermediary and facilitator between the Orthodox churches and also in relations with other Christians and religions. This role sometimes brings the Patriarchate into conflict with other Orthodox churches, as its role in the church is debated. The question centers around whether the Ecumenical Patriarchate is simply the most honored among the Orthodox churches or whether it has any real authority or prerogatives (πρεσβεία, presveía) that differ from the other autocephalous churches. This dispute is often between Constantinople and Moscow, the largest Orthodox church in terms of population, especially as expressed in the Third Rome theory which places Moscow in the place of Constantinople as the center of world Orthodoxy. Such disputes sometimes result in temporary breaks in full communion, though usually not for very long.

The relationship between Constantinople and the Ottoman Empire was frequently bitter, due in no small part to the privilege given to Islam. In the secular Republic of Turkey, tensions are still constant. Turkey requires by law that the Patriarch be a Turkish citizen by birth, which all Patriarchs have been since 1923—all ethnic Greeks from the minuscule and steadily decreasing Greek minority of Turkey, which is causing a shortage of priests and consequently potential candidates for the post of Ecumenical Patriarch.[43] The state's expropriation of church property and the closing of the Orthodox Theological School of Halki are also difficulties faced by the Patriarchate.

Administration and structure edit

Holy Synod edit

The affairs of the patriarchate are conducted by the Holy Synod, presided over by the Ecumenical Patriarch. The synod has existed since some time prior to the fourth century and assists the patriarch in determining the affairs of the possessions under his jurisdiction. The synod first developed from what was referred to as the resident synod, composed of the patriarch, local bishops, and any Orthodox bishops who were visiting in the imperial capital of Constantinople. After the fall of Constantinople, the synod's membership became limited to bishops of the patriarchate.

The Holy and Sacred Synod, presided over by His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, is composed of twelve hierarchs, each serving a year-long term, with half of the synod's members changing every six months in March and September.

The current members of the Holy and Sacred Synod serving from September 1, 2023 – February 29, 2024, are as follows:

  • Panteleimon of Vryoula
  • Evangelos of Sardis
  • Cyril of Rhodes
  • Ilarion of Winnipeg
  • Evgenios of Crete
  • Ambrosios of Korea
  • Arsenios of Austria
  • Job of Pisidia
  • Apostolos of New Jersey
  • Chrysostomos of Syme
  • Prodromos of Rethymno and Avlopotamos
  • Dimitrios of France

Notable hierarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarchate are the popular writer Kallistos (Timothy) Ware, an assistant-bishop in the Archdiocese of Thyateira and author of The Orthodox Church, the best-known introduction to the Orthodox Church in English, and John Zizioulas, Metropolitan of Pergamon, a well-known professor of systematic theology.

The right of non-Turkish members of the synod (from Northern Greece, the Dodecanese, America and Western Europe) to convene appears to be threatened by a recent[when?] declaration from the Istanbul Governor reported in the Freiburg archdiocesan magazine.[44]

Structure edit

 
World jurisdictions of Eastern Orthodox Churches.

Head of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and of the Holy Synod is the Archbishop of Constantinople, New Rome and Ecumenical Patriarch and Co-Head of State of Mount Athos,[citation needed] who since 1991 has been Bartholomew I (Dimítrios Archontónis). The local churches of the Ecumenical Patriarchate consist of six archdioceses, 66 metropolises, 2 dioceses and one exarchate, each of which reports directly to the Patriarch of Constantinople with no intervening authority.

 
Map of the Greek Orthodox Metropolises in Asia Minor c. 1880

Archdioceses and Archbishops edit

Spiritually assigned to the Ecumenical Patriarchate by the Patriarchal and Synodic Act of 4 September 1928:

Metropolises and Metropolitans edit

Dioceses and Bishops edit

Titular archdioceses edit

Titular metropolises edit

Titular dioceses edit

  • Diocese of Abydos: Gregorios Tsoutsoules (2022-)
  • Diocese of Amorion: Nikiforos Psihloudes (2014-)
  • Diocese of Andidon:Vacant
  • Diocese of Apamea: Païsios Larentzakis (2018-)
  • Diocese of Arianzos: Vartholomeos (Ioannis) Kessidis (2004–)
  • Diocese of Ariste: Vacant
  • Diocese of Aspendos: Jeremy Ferens (1995–)
  • Diocese of Claudiopolis: Iakovos Savva (2021–)
  • Diocese of Cotyaeum: Dionysios Papavasileiou (2022–)
  • Diocese of Christoupolis: Emmanuel Sfiatkos (2020-)
  • Diocese of Cyneae: Elpidios Karelis (2020–)
  • Diocese of Dervis: Ezekiel Kefalas (1977–)
  • Diocese of Dioclea: Kallistos Ware (1982–2022)
  • Diocese of Dorylaeum: Damaskenos Lionakis (2019-)
  • Diocese of Eumeneia:Irinaeos Verykakis (2019-)
  • Diocese of Halicarnassus: Adrianos Sergakis (2015-)
  • Diocese of Irenopolis: Nikandros Palyvos (2019-)
  • Diocese of Kratea: Georgios Antonopoulos(2022-)
  • Diocese of Lampsacus: Vacant
  • Diocese of Lefki: Eumenios Tamiolakis (1994–)
  • Diocese of Meloa: Aimilianos Coutouzes (2019–)
  • Diocese of Mokissos: Demetrios Kantzavelos (2006–)
  • Diocese of Olympos:Kyrillos Papanthimou(2017-)
  • Diocese of Pamphylos: Daniel Zelinsky (2008–)
  • Diocese of Parnassus: John Derevianka (1995–)
  • Diocese of Phasiane: Antonios Paropoulos (2002–)
  • Diocese of Philomelion: Theophan Koja (2023-)
  • Diocese of Sinope: Silouan Fotineas (2020–)
  • Diocese of Synnada: Vacant
  • Diocese of Telmessos: Vacant
  • Diocese of Theoupolis: Vacant
  • Diocese of Thermon: Athenagoras Fasiolo (2022-)
  • Diocese of Troas: Petros Bozines (2015-)
  • Diocese of Tropaeon: Vacant
  • Diocese of Zelon: Sevastianos Skordallos (2012–)

Historical Archdioceses edit

Historical Metropolises edit

Historical Dioceses edit

Stauropegions edit

Present-day autocephalous churches previously under the Ecumenical Patriarchate edit

 
Metropolitan Epiphanius and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko hugging Andriy Parubiy, after the unification council of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on 15 December 2018

References edit

Citations edit

  1. ^ a b Krindatch, Alexei (2011). Atlas of American Orthodox Christian Churches. Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-935317-23-4.
  2. ^ . Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 2020-10-22.
  3. ^ Erol, Su (2015). . Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions (171): 59–80. doi:10.4000/assr.27027. Archived from the original on 2019-06-26.
  4. ^ Pontificia Commissio Codici Iuris Canonici Orientalis Recognoscendo Vatican City State, 1978, p. 3 (in Latin)
  5. ^ Ortaylı, İlber (2003). "Osmanlı Barışı", p. 14. ISBN 975-6571-50-0.
  6. ^ In Turkey it is also referred to unofficially as Fener Rum Patrikhanesi, "Roman Patriarchate of the Phanar"
  7. ^ Fairchild, Mary. . about.com. Archived from the original on 5 June 2016. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  8. ^ "The Patriarch Bartholomew". 60 Minutes. CBS. 20 December 2009. from the original on 2021-06-26. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
  9. ^ "Biography - The Ecumenical Patriarchate". www.patriarchate.org. Retrieved 2019-12-11.
  10. ^ Winfield, Nicole; Fraser, Suzan (30 November 2014). . Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 2016-03-17. Retrieved 2019-12-11.
  11. ^ Finding Global Balance. World Bank Publications. 2005. p. 119. Retrieved 2 August 2015. His All Holiness is the spiritual leader of 300 million Orthodox Christians worldwide
  12. ^ . www.apostolicpilgrimage.org. Archived from the original on 2021-06-04. Retrieved 2019-12-11.
  13. ^ "Fener Rum Patrikhanesinin "ekümeniklik" İddiasına İlişkin Basın Açıklamamız". www.fatih.gov.tr. Retrieved 2022-08-29.
  14. ^ "Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch sign Christian unity declaration". 30 November 2014.
  15. ^ Commander opposed Halki Seminary reopening over fears 2011-01-22 at the Wayback Machine Today's Zaman, 21 January 2011.
  16. ^ H. CON. RES. 50 United States, House of Representatives, 28 March 1995.
  17. ^ Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, p. 697
  18. ^ The Patriarchate of Constantinople (The Ecumenical Patriarchate) 2010-01-09 at the Wayback Machine by Ronald Roberson
  19. ^ The officer given the task was killed by the crowd, and in the end the image was removed rather than destroyed: It was to be restored by Irene and removed again by Leo V: Finlay 1906, p. 111.
  20. ^ A. A. Vasiliev, History of the Byzantine Empire, 1952, vol I, p. 261.
  21. ^ Norwich, John J. (1967). The Normans in the South 1016-1130. p.102.
  22. ^ a b c Norwich, John J. (1992). Byzantium, The Apogee. pp.320–321.
  23. ^ New Catholic Encyclopedia. ...in 1053 he [Michael Caerularius] sends off a declaration of war, then shuts up the Latin churches at Constantinople, hurls a string of wild accusations, and shows in every possible way that he wants a schism, apparently for the mere pleasure of not being in communion with the West. He got his wish. After a series of wanton aggressions, unparalleled in church history, after he had begun by striking the pope's name from his diptychs, the Roman legates excommunicated him (16 July 1054). But still there was no idea of a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church, still less of all the East. The legates carefully provided against that in their Bull. They acknowledged that the emperor (Constantine IX, who was excessively annoyed at the whole quarrel), the Senate, and the majority of the inhabitants of the city were "most pious and orthodox". They excommunicated Caerularius, Leo of Achrida, and their adherents. This quarrel, too, need no more have produced a permanent state of schism than the excommunication of any other contumacious bishop. The real tragedy is that gradually all the other Eastern patriarchs took sides with Caerularius, obeyed him by striking the pope's name from their diptychs, and chose of their own accord to share his schism. At first they do not seem to have wanted to do so. John III of Antioch certainly refused to go into schism at Caerularius's bidding. But, eventually, the habit they had acquired of looking to Constantinople for orders proved too strong. The emperor (not Constantine IX, but his successor) was on the side of his patriarch and they had learned too well to consider the emperor as their over-lord in spiritual matters too. Again, it was the usurped authority of Constantinople, the Erastianism of the East that turned a personal quarrel into a great schism.
  24. ^ Bishop Kallistos (Ware), p. 67
  25. ^ Gallagher, Clarence (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies. Oxford University Press. p. 596. ISBN 978-0-19-925246-6.
  26. ^ Vryonis, Byzantium and Europe, p. 152.
  27. ^ a b Runciman, Steven (1965). The Fall of Constantinople 1453. Cambridge University Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0-521-39832-9.
  28. ^ Nicol, Donald MacGillivray (1979). The End of the Byzantine Empire. London: Edward Arnold. p. 88. ISBN 978-0-7131-6250-9.
  29. ^ Inalcik, Halil (1969). "The Policy of Mehmed II toward the Greek Population of Istanbul and the Byzantine Buildings of the City". Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 23/24: 229–249. doi:10.2307/1291293. ISSN 0070-7546. JSTOR 1291293.
  30. ^ a b Nicol. The End of the Byzantine Empire, p. 90.
  31. ^ Runciman, Steven (1965). The Fall of Constantinople 1453. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 978-0-521-39832-9.
  32. ^ Runciman. The Fall of Constantinople, pp. 133–34.
  33. ^ Nicol, Donald M. The Last Centuries of Byzantium 1261–1453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972, p. 389.
  34. ^ Runciman, Steven (1965). The Fall of Constantinople 1453. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 978-0-521-39832-9.
  35. ^ Smith, Cyril J. (1974). "History of Rape and Rape Laws". Women Law Journal. No. 60. p. 188. from the original on 26 April 2020. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  36. ^ Mansel, Philip. "Constantinople: City of the World's Desire 1453–1924". Washington Post. from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2020.
  37. ^ Roger Crowley (6 August 2009). Constantinople: The Last Great Siege, 1453. Faber & Faber. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-571-25079-0. The vast majority of the ordinary citizens - about 30,000 - were marched off to the slave markets of Edirne, Bursa and Ankara.
  38. ^ M.J Akbar (3 May 2002). The Shade of Swords: Jihad and the Conflict Between Islam and Christianity. Routledge. p. 86. ISBN 978-1-134-45259-0. from the original on 12 October 2020. Retrieved 6 August 2020. Some 30,000 Christians were either enslaved or sold.
  39. ^ Jim Bradbury (1992). The Medieval Siege. Boydell & Brewer. p. 322. ISBN 978-0-85115-312-4.
  40. ^ a b Jelavich, Barbara, “History of the Balkans, 18th and 19th Centuries” (1983), ISBN 0-521-27458-3 p.52
  41. ^ Ortaylı, İlber (2003). "Osmanlı Barışı", p.15. ISBN 975-6571-50-0
  42. ^ Константинопольская Православная Церковь (in Russian). Retrieved 18 June 2011.
  43. ^ Turkey - Rum (Greek) Orthodox Christians Minorityrights.org
  44. ^ . Konradsblatte. Archived from the original on 2010-06-27. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
  45. ^ a b c d e f g "Ecumenical Patriarchate". www.ec-patr.org. Retrieved 2019-05-21.
  46. ^ a b c d e f "Ecumenical Patriarchate". www.ec-patr.org. Retrieved 2019-05-24.
  47. ^ Dmytro Hordiyenko. History of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Історія Української Православної Церкви). Glagoslav Publications.
  48. ^ Cazabonne, Emma (2019-01-15). "Decision of the Constantinople Patriarchate Holy Synod concerning the restoration of its stavropegion in Kyiv". Orthodoxie.com. Retrieved 2019-01-17.
  49. ^ "Ανακοινωθέν του Οικουμενικού Πατριαρχείου για Σταυροπήγιο στο Κίεβο". ROMFEA (in Greek). 12 January 2019. Retrieved 2019-01-12.
  50. ^ Panagiotisandriopoulos (2019-01-12). "Φως Φαναρίου : Η ΑΓΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΙΕΡΑ ΣΥΝΟΔΟΣ ΔΙΟΡΙΣΕ ΕΠΙΚΕΦΑΛΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΤΡΙΑΡΧΙΚΟΥ ΣΤΑΥΡΟΠΗΓΙΟΥ ΣΤΟ ΚΙΕΒΟ". Φως Φαναρίου. Retrieved 2019-01-12.
  51. ^ Panossian, Razmik (2006). The Armenians: From Kings and Priests to Merchants and Commissars. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 43–44. ISBN 9780231139267. The Armenian Apostolic Church formally became autocephalous—i.e. independent of external authority—in 554 by severing its links with the patriarchate of Constantinople.
  52. ^ "Ukraine hails Church independence move as ‘blow’ to Moscow", The Guardian, 12 October 2018 (Retrieved 13 October 2018)
  53. ^ "Announcement of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople". Ecumenical Patriarchate. 11 October 2018. Retrieved 12 October 2018. 1) To renew the decision already made that the Ecumenical Patriarchate proceed to the granting of Autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine.
  54. ^ Tomos ante portas: a short guide to Ukrainian church independence. Euromaidan Press. 14 October 2018. Retrieved 16 October 2018. the Synod ... of the Ecumenical Patriarchate ... gave further confirmation that Ukraine is on the path to receiving church independence from Moscow. ... Although President Poroshenko triumphantly announced that in result of the meeting Ukraine had received the long-awaited Tomos, or decree of Church independence – a claim circulated in Ukraine with great enthusiasm, this is not true. ... Constantinople's decision will benefit other jurisdictions in Ukraine – the UOC KP and UAOC, which will have to effectively dismantle their own administrative structures and set up a new Church, which will receive the Tomos of autocephaly. ... Right now it's unclear which part of the UOC MP will join the new Church. 10 out of 90 UOC MP bishops signed the appeal for autocephaly to the Ecumenical Patriarch – only 11%. But separate priests could join even if their bishops don't, says Zuiev.

Sources edit

This article incorporates text from several articles on OrthodoxWiki:

Literature edit

  • Darrouzès, Jean, ed. (1981). Notitiae Episcopatuum Ecclesiae Constantinopolitanae. Paris: Institut français d'études byzantines. ISBN 978-9042931183.
  • Kiminas, Demetrius (2009). The Ecumenical Patriarchate: A History of Its Metropolitanates with Annotated Hierarch Catalogs. Wildside Press LLC. ISBN 978-1434458766.
  • Kursar, Vjeran (2013). "Non-Muslim Communal Divisions and Identities in the Early Modern Ottoman Balkans and the Millet System Theory". Power and Influence in South-Eastern Europe, 16th–19th century. Berlin: LIT Verlag. pp. 97–108. ISBN 978-3643903310.
  • Laurent, Vitalien (1968). "Les premiers patriarches de Constantinople sous la domination turque (1454–1476): Succession et chronologie d'après un catalogue inédit". Revue des études byzantines. 26: 229–263. doi:10.3406/rebyz.1968.1407.
  • Meyendorff, John (1989). Imperial unity and Christian divisions: The Church 450–680 A.D. The Church in history. Vol. 2. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0881410563.
  • Meyendorff, John (1996). Rome, Constantinople, Moscow: Historical and Theological Studies. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0881411348.
  • Ostrogorsky, George (1956). History of the Byzantine State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Radojević, Mira; Mićić, Srđan B. (2015). "Serbian Orthodox Church cooperation and frictions with Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople and Bulgarian Exarchate during interwar period". Studia academica šumenesia. 2: 126‒143.
  • Runciman, Steven (1985) [1968]. The Great Church in Captivity: A Study of the Patriarchate of Constantinople from the Eve of the Turkish Conquest to the Greek War of Independence (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521313100.
  • Thomas, John P. (1987). Private Religious Foundations in the Byzantine Empire. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks. ISBN 978-0884021643.

External links edit

  • Official website
  • Article on the Ecumenical Patriarchate by Ronald Roberson on the website of CNEWA, a papal agency for humanitarian and pastoral support

ecumenical, patriarchate, constantinople, patriarchate, constantinople, redirects, here, other, patriarchates, that, have, historically, resided, city, latin, patriarchate, constantinople, armenian, patriarchate, constantinople, greek, Οἰκουμενικὸν, Πατριαρχεῖ. Patriarchate of Constantinople redirects here For other patriarchates that have historically resided in the city see Latin Patriarchate of Constantinople and Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople Greek Oἰkoymenikὸn Patriarxeῖon Kwnstantinoypolews romanized Oikoumenikon Patriarkhion Konstantinoupoleos IPA ikumeniˈkon patriarˈcion konstandinuˈpoleos Latin Patriarchatus Oecumenicus Constantinopolitanus 4 Turkish Rum Ortodoks Patrikhanesi Istanbul Ekumenik Patrikhanesi 5 6 Roman Orthodox Patriarchate Ecumenical Patriarchate is one of the fifteen to seventeen autocephalous churches or jurisdictions that together compose the Eastern Orthodox Church It is headed by the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Ecumenical Patriarchate of ConstantinopleSymbol of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople as found atop the front entrance of the Patriarchal Cathedral of St GeorgeAbbreviationEPClassificationEastern OrthodoxOrientationGreek OrthodoxyScriptureSeptuagint New TestamentTheologyEastern Orthodox theologyPolityEpiscopalPrimateArchbishop of Constantinople New Rome and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew IBishops125 73 acting 52 titular Parishes525 in the United States 1 Monastics 1 800 Mt Athos Monasteries20 U S 1 20 Mt Athos 8 Australia 6 Meteora 2 Korea LanguageGreek Turkish Ukrainian English French KoreanHeadquartersHagia Sophia Constantinople 537 1453 Church of the Holy Apostles 1453 1456 Pammakaristos Church 1456 1587 Church of the Panagia Paramythia 1587 1597 Church of St Demetrius Xyloportas 1597 1601 St George s Cathedral Istanbul 1601 present 41 01 45 N 28 57 06 E 41 02917 N 28 95167 E 41 02917 28 95167TerritoryIstanbul most of Turkey Mount Athos Crete part of northern Greece the Dodecanese Korea Greek Orthodox Churches in the DiasporaFounderSt Andrew the ApostleIndependence330 AD from the Metropolis of HeracleaSeparationsseveral see list belowMembers 5 000 Turkey 2 3 3 800 000 Greece 1 500 000 in diaspora 5 305 000 total Official websiteec patr orgBecause of its historical location as the capital of the former Eastern Roman Byzantine Empire and its role as the mother church of most modern Orthodox churches Constantinople holds a special place of honor within Orthodoxy and serves as the seat for the Ecumenical Patriarch who enjoys the status of primus inter pares first among equals among the world s Eastern Orthodox prelates and is regarded as the representative and spiritual leader of Eastern Orthodox Christians 7 8 9 10 11 12 The status of Ecumenical Patriarchate is not officially recognized by the Republic of Turkey Turkey only recognises the authority of the Ecumenical Patriarchate over the Greek minority in Istanbul Bozcaada and Gokceada 13 The Ecumenical Patriarchate promotes the expansion of the Christian faith and Eastern Orthodox doctrine and the Ecumenical Patriarchs are involved in ecumenism and interfaith dialogue charitable work and the defense of Orthodox Christian traditions Prominent issues for the Ecumenical Patriarchate s policy in the 21st century include the safety of the believers in the Middle East reconciliation of the Eastern Orthodox and Catholic churches 14 and the reopening of the Theological School of Halki which was closed down by the Turkish authorities in 1971 15 16 Contents 1 History 1 1 The Great Church of Christ 1 1 1 Prerogatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate 1 2 Iconoclast controversy 1 3 Great Schism of 1054 1 4 Fall of Constantinople in 1204 and the exile in Nicaea 1 5 Fall of Constantinople in 1453 and Ottoman period 1 5 1 Ecclesiastical buildings in Ottoman cities 1 6 Patriarchate under the secular Republic of Turkey 2 Administration and structure 2 1 Holy Synod 2 2 Structure 2 2 1 Archdioceses and Archbishops 2 2 2 Metropolises and Metropolitans 2 2 3 Dioceses and Bishops 2 2 4 Titular archdioceses 2 2 5 Titular metropolises 2 2 6 Titular dioceses 2 2 7 Historical Archdioceses 2 2 8 Historical Metropolises 2 2 9 Historical Dioceses 2 2 10 Stauropegions 3 Present day autocephalous churches previously under the Ecumenical Patriarchate 4 References 4 1 Citations 4 2 Sources 5 Literature 6 External linksHistory editThe Great Church of Christ edit See also History of the Eastern Orthodox Church and Great Church nbsp The Church of Hagia Irene was the cathedral church of the Patriarchate before Hagia Sophia was completed in 360Christianity in the Greek city of Byzantium was brought by Apostle Andrew himself who visited Byzantium founded the See of Byzantium in 38 AD and appointed the bishop Stachys the Apostle who remained until 54 AD Therefore the Greek Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople claims its legitimate appointment from Apostle Andrew from whom the subsequent ordination of ministries claim legitimate inheritance through the sacrament of Holy Orders In the year 330 the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great moved his residence to the town renaming it Nova Roma Nea Ῥwmh or New Rome Thenceforth the importance of the church there grew along with the influence of its bishop Prior to the moving of the imperial capital the bishop of Byzantium had been under the authority of the metropolitan of Heraclea but from the 4th century on he grew to become independent in his own right and even to exercise authority throughout what is now Greece Asia Minor Pontus and Thrace With the development of the hierarchical structure of the Church the bishop of Constantinople came to be styled as exarch a position superior to metropolitan Constantinople was recognized as the fourth patriarchate at the First Council of Constantinople in 381 after Antioch Alexandria and Rome The patriarch was usually appointed by Antioch Because of the importance of the position of Constantinople s church at the center of the Roman Empire affairs involving the various churches outside Constantinople s direct authority came to be discussed in the capital particularly where the intervention of the emperor was desired The patriarch naturally became a liaison between the emperor and bishops traveling to the capital thus establishing the position of the patriarch as one involving the unity of the whole Church particularly in the East In turn the affairs of the Constantinopolitan church were overseen not just by the patriarch but also by synods held including visiting bishops This pan Orthodox synod came to be referred to as the ἐndhmoῦsa synodos endemousa synodos resident synod The resident synod not only governed the business of the patriarchate but also examined questions pertinent to the whole Church as well as the eastern half of the old empire 17 The patriarch thus came to have the title of Ecumenical which referenced not a universal episcopacy over other bishops but rather the position of the patriarch as at the center of the oikoumeni the household of the empire As the Roman Empire stabilized and grew so did the influence of the patriarchate at its capital This influence came to be enshrined in Orthodox canon law to such an extent that it was elevated even beyond more ancient patriarchates Canon 3 of the First Council of Constantinople 381 stated that the bishop of that city shall have primacy of honor after the Bishop of Rome because Constantinople is the New Rome nbsp Hagia Sophia was the patriarchal cathedral until 1453In its disputed 28th Canon the Council of Chalcedon in 451 recognized an expansion of the boundaries of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and of its authority over bishops of dioceses among the barbarians which has been variously interpreted as referring either to areas outside the Byzantine Empire or to non Greeks The council resulted in a schism with the Patriarchate of Alexandria In any case for almost a thousand years the Patriarch of Constantinople presided over the church in the Eastern Roman Byzantine Empire and its missionary activity that brought the Christian faith in its Byzantine form to many peoples north of the imperial borders The cathedral church of Constantinople Hagia Sophia Holy Wisdom was the center of religious life in the eastern Christian world 18 The Ecumenical Patriarchate came to be called the Great Church of Christ and it was the touchstone and reference point for ecclesiastical affairs in the East whether in terms of church government relations with the state or liturgical matters Prerogatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate edit In history and in canonical literature i e the Church s canons and traditional commentaries on them the Ecumenical Patriarchate has been granted certain prerogatives presbeia presveia that other autocephalous Orthodox churches do not have Not all of these prerogatives are today universally acknowledged though all do have precedents in history and canonical references The following is a non exhaustive list of these prerogatives and their reference points Equal prerogatives to Old Rome Canon 28 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council Canon 36 of the Quinisext Council The right to hear appeals if invited regarding disputes between clergy Canons 9 and 17 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council The right to ordain bishops for areas outside defined canonical boundaries Canon 28 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council The right to establish stavropegial monasteries even in the territories of other patriarchates the Epanagoge commentaries of Matthew Blastares and Theodore Balsamon Iconoclast controversy edit See also Byzantine Iconoclasm In the eighth and ninth centuries the iconoclast movement caused serious political unrest throughout the Empire The emperor Leo III issued a decree in 726 against images and ordered the destruction of an image of Christ over one of the doors of the Chalke an act which was fiercely resisted by the citizens 19 Constantine V convoked a church council in 754 which condemned the worship of images after which many treasures were broken burned or painted over with depictions of trees birds or animals one source refers to the church of the Holy Virgin at Blachernae as having been transformed into a fruit store and aviary 20 Following the death of his son Leo IV in 780 the empress Irene restored the veneration of images through the agency of the Second Council of Nicaea in 787 The iconoclast controversy returned in the early 9th century only to be resolved once more in 843 during the regency of Empress Theodora who restored the icons Great Schism of 1054 edit See also Eastern Orthodox Roman Catholic theological differences and Eastern Orthodox Roman Catholic ecclesiastical differences The relations between the papacy and the Byzantine court were good in the years leading up to 1054 The emperor Constantine IX and the Pope Leo IX were allied through the mediation of the Lombard catepan of Italy Argyrus who had spent years in Constantinople originally as a political prisoner Patriarch Michael I Cerularius ordered a letter to be written to John the Bishop of Trani in which he attacked the Judaistic practices of the West namely the use of unleavened bread The letter was to be sent by John to all the bishops of the West including the Pope John promptly complied and the letter was passed to Humbert of Mourmoutiers the cardinal bishop of Silva Candida who translated the letter into Latin and brought it to the Pope who ordered a reply to be made to each charge and a defence of papal supremacy to be laid out in a response Although he was hot headed Michael was convinced to cool the debate and thus attempt to prevent the impending breach However Humbert and the pope made no concessions and the former was sent with legatine powers to the imperial capital to solve the questions raised once and for all Humbert Frederick of Lorraine and Peter Archbishop of Amalfi arrived in April 1054 and were met with a hostile reception they stormed out of the palace leaving the papal response with Michael who in turn was even more angered by their actions The patriarch refused to recognise their authority or practically their existence 21 When Pope Leo died on April 19 1054 the legates authority legally ceased but they effectively ignored this technicality 22 In response to Michael s refusal to address the issues at hand the legatine mission took the extreme measure of entering the church of the Hagia Sophia during the Divine Liturgy and placing a bull of excommunication on the altar The events of the East West Schism are generally dated from the acts of 1054 However these events only triggered the beginning of the schism The full schism was not actually consummated by the seemingly mutual excommunications The New Catholic Encyclopedia reports that the legates had been careful not to intimate that the bull of excommunication implied a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church The bull excommunicated only Cerularius Leo of Achrida and their adherents Thus the New Catholic Encyclopedia argues that the dispute need not have produced a permanent schism any more than excommunication of any contumacious bishop The schism began to develop when all the other Eastern patriarchs supported Cerularius According to the New Catholic Encyclopedia it was the support of Emperor Michael VI Stratiotikos that impelled them to support Cerularius 23 Some have questioned the validity of the bull on the grounds that Pope Leo IX had died at that time and so the authority of the legates to issue such a bull is unclear 22 The legates left for Rome two days after issuing the bull of excommunication leaving behind a city near riot The patriarch had the immense support of the people against the emperor who had supported the legates to his own detriment To assuage popular anger the bull was burnt and the legates were anathematised Only the legates were anathematised and in this case too there was no explicit indication that the entire Western church was being anathematised In the bull of excommunication issued against Patriarch Michael I Cerularius by the papal legates one of the reasons cited was the alleged deletion by the Eastern Church of the Filioque from the original Nicene Creed In fact it was precisely the opposite the Eastern Church had not deleted anything it was the Western Church that had added this phrase to the Nicene Constantinopolitan Creed 22 As Bishop Kallistos Ware writes Even after 1054 friendly relations between East and West continued The two parts of Christendom were not yet conscious of a great gulf of separation between them The dispute remained something of which ordinary Christians in East and West were largely unaware 24 In fact efforts were made in subsequent centuries by Popes and Patriarchs to heal the rift between the churches However a number of factors and historical events worked to widen the separation over time 25 Fall of Constantinople in 1204 and the exile in Nicaea edit See also Sack of Constantinople nbsp The Hagia Sophia church in NicaeaThe Fourth Crusade in exchange for promised funds attempted to help the deposed emperor Alexius IV regain his throne After taking Constantinople returning Alexius IV to the throne the revolt against and murder of Alexius IV left the Crusaders without payment On 12 April 1204 the crusaders inflicted a severe sacking on Constantinople for three days during which many ancient and medieval Roman and Greek works were either stolen or destroyed Despite their oaths and the threat of excommunication the Crusaders ruthlessly and systematically violated the city s holy sanctuaries destroying defiling or stealing all they could lay hands on nothing was spared It was said that the total amount looted from Constantinople was about 900 000 silver marks The Venetians received 150 000 silver marks that was their due while the Crusaders received 50 000 silver marks A further 100 000 silver marks were divided evenly up between the Crusaders and Venetians The remaining 500 000 silver marks were secretly kept back by many Crusader knights Nicetas Choniates gives a vivid account of the sack of Constantinople by the Frankish and Venetian Crusaders of the Fourth Crusade The Latin soldiery subjected the greatest city in Europe to an indescribable sack For three days they murdered raped looted and destroyed on a scale which even the ancient Vandals and Goths would have found unbelievable Constantinople had become a veritable museum of ancient and Byzantine art an emporium of such incredible wealth that the Latins were astounded at the riches they found Though the Venetians had an appreciation for the art which they discovered they were themselves semi Byzantines and saved much of it the French and others destroyed indiscriminately halting to refresh themselves with wine violation of nuns and murder of Orthodox clerics The Crusaders vented their hatred for the Greeks most spectacularly in the desecration of the greatest Church in Christendom They smashed the silver iconostasis the icons and the holy books of Hagia Sophia and seated upon the patriarchal throne a whore who sang coarse songs as they drank wine from the Church s holy vessels The estrangement of East and West which had proceeded over the centuries culminated in the horrible massacre that accompanied the conquest of Constantinople The Greeks were convinced that even the Turks had they taken the city would not have been as cruel as the Latin Christians The defeat of Byzantium already in a state of decline accelerated political degeneration so that the Byzantines eventually became an easy prey to the Turks The Crusading movement thus resulted ultimately in the victory of Islam a result which was of course the exact opposite of its original intention 26 Meanwhile the Latin Empire of Constantinople was established and Byzantine refugees founded their own successor states the most notable of these being the Empire of Nicaea under Theodore Lascaris a relative of Alexius III the Empire of Trebizond and the Despotate of Epirus The new seat of the Patriarchate was established in the city of Nicaea until in 1261 when Constantinople was reconquered by the Byzantine Emperor Michael VIII Palaiologos Fall of Constantinople in 1453 and Ottoman period edit nbsp Patriarch Gennadios with Sultan Mehmed IIIn accordance with the traditional custom at the time Sultan Mehmed II allowed his troops and his entourage three full days of unbridled pillage and looting in the city shortly after it was captured Once the three days passed he would then claim its remaining contents for himself 27 28 However by the end of the first day he proclaimed that the looting should cease as he felt profound sadness when he toured the looted and enslaved city 29 27 Hagia Sophia was not exempted from the pillage and looting and specifically became its focal point as the invaders believed it to contain the greatest treasures and valuables of the city 30 Shortly after the defence of the Walls of Constantinople collapsed and the Ottoman troops entered the city victoriously the pillagers and looters made their way to the Hagia Sophia and battered down its doors before storming in 31 Throughout the period of the siege of Constantinople the trapped worshippers of the city participated in the Divine Liturgy and the Prayer of the Hours at the Hagia Sophia and the church formed a safe haven and a refuge for many of those who were unable to contribute to the city s defence which comprised women children elderly the sick and the wounded 32 33 Being trapped in the church the many congregants and yet more refugees inside became spoils of war to be divided amongst the triumphant invaders The building was desecrated and looted with the helpless occupants who sought shelter within the church being enslaved 30 While most of the elderly and the infirm wounded and sick were killed and the remainder mainly teenage males and young boys were chained up and sold into slavery 34 The women of Constantinople also suffered from rape at the hands of Ottoman forces 35 According to Barbaro all through the day the Turks made a great slaughter of Christians through the city According to historian Philip Mansel widespread persecution of the city s civilian inhabitants took place resulting in thousands of murders and rapes and 30 000 civilians being enslaved or forcibly deported 36 37 38 39 George Sphrantzes says that people of both genders were raped inside Hagia Sophia After Constantinople was overrun by the Ottoman Turks in 1453 the Patriarchate came to care more directly for all the Orthodox living in the Ottoman Empire Mehmed II appointed Gennadios II Scholarios as the Patriarch in 1454 and designated him as the spiritual leader as well as the ethnarch or in Turkish milletbashi of all the Orthodox Christians in the Empire regardless of ethnic origin not only Greeks but also Bulgarians Serbs Albanians Wallachians Moldavians Croatis Syrians orthodox Arabs Georgians and Lazs came under the spiritual administrative 40 fiscal cultural and legal 40 jurisdiction of the Patriarchate 41 Some of the other patriarchs came at various points to live permanently in Constantinople and function as part of the local church government This situation according to some of the Orientalists and historians shows the Pax Ottomana or Pax Ottomanica literally the Ottoman Peace nbsp An image from the Vatican Codex of 1162 believed to be a representation of the Church of the Holy Apostles the first seat of the Patriarchate in the Ottoman ageThe Russian Orthodox Church which for centuries had been a diocese of the Ecumenical Patriarchate declared its independence in 1448 shortly before Constantinople fell owing to its protest over the Council of Florence in which representatives of the patriarchate had signed onto union with Rome trading doctrinal concessions for military aid against the encroaching Ottomans The military aid never came and those concessions were subsequently repudiated by the patriarchate but from 1448 the Russian church came to function independently Within decades after the Fall of Constantinople to Mehmed II of the Ottoman Empire on 29 May 1453 some were nominating Moscow as the Third Rome or the New Rome citation needed In 1589 141 years later Constantinople came to recognize Russia s independence and led the Eastern Orthodox Church in declaring Russia also to be a patriarchate numbering Moscow s bishop as fifth in rank behind the ancient patriarchates The Russian Orthodox Church became the largest of the Eastern Orthodox churches in the world As Ottoman rule weakened various parts of the Orthodox Church that had been under the direct influence of the Ecumenical Patriarchate came to be independent These churches at first usually declared their independence without universal approval which came after Constantinople gave its blessing The rate at which these new autocephalous self headed churches came into being increased in the 19th century particularly with the independence of Greece nbsp Saint Peter s Gate at the Patriarchate In 1821 Patriarch Gregory V remained hanged in full robes for three days at its architrave because he was blamed by Mahmud II for his inability to suppress the Greek War of Independence The Gate has not been opened since In 1833 the Church of Greece declared its autocephaly which was subsequently recognized by the patriarchate in 1850 In 1865 the Romanian Orthodox Church against the protests of Constantinople declared its independence which was acknowledged in 1885 A year before Greece s autocephaly was self proclaimed the Serbian Orthodox Church was named autocephalous by the local secular government but Constantinople refused recognition until 1879 In 1860 the Bulgarians de facto seceded from the Ecumenical Patriarchate in 1870 the Bulgarian church was politically recognized as autonomous under the name Bulgarian Exarchate by the Sultan s firman but it was not until 1945 that it was recognized by the Ecumenical Patriarchate In 1922 the Albanian Orthodox Church declared its autocephaly being granted recognition of it in 1937 In addition to these churches whose territory had been agreed upon by all as within Constantinople s jurisdiction several other disputed areas Eastern Orthodox churches have had recognition by the Ecumenical Patriarchate as either autocephalous or autonomous including the Finnish Orthodox Church and Estonian Orthodox Church in 1923 the Polish Orthodox Church in 1924 and the Czech and Slovak Orthodox Church in 1998 The majority of these disputes are a result of the expansion of the Russian Empire which often included a subjugation of the Orthodox churches in conquered lands to the Moscow Patriarchate Due to this the Moscow Patriarchate often disputes the Ecumenical Patriarch s role as prime representative and spiritual leader of the world s Orthodox Christians citing that it represents the numerically largest Orthodox community 42 Ecclesiastical buildings in Ottoman cities edit As a ruling institution the Ottoman Empire brought regulations on how the cities would be built quality reassurances and how the architecture structural integrity social needs etc should be shaped citation needed Special restrictions were imposed concerning the construction renovation size and usage of bells in churches For example in a town a church should not be larger in size than the largest mosque Some churches were destroyed e g the Church of the Holy Apostles many were converted into mosques among them the Hagia Sophia and Chora Church in Constantinople and the Rotunda and Hagios Demetrios in Thessaloniki or served for other uses e g Hagia Irene in Constantinople which became an armory for the Janissaries and the Gul Mosque Hagia Theodosia or Christ Euergetes also in Constantinople which after the Conquest served for a while as a naval dockyard Such rules however although very strict in the beginning with time and the increasing importance in the Ottoman Empire of the Rum millet were more and more disregarded so that in the 19th century in Istanbul there was a veritable building boom of Orthodox churches many among them having high bell towers and brick domes both of which had previously been strictly prohibited Patriarchate under the secular Republic of Turkey edit nbsp The exterior of the Patriarchal Basilica of St George located in the Fener district of Istanbul The facade dates from the mid 19th century and shows a neoclassical influence nbsp The Theological School of Halki at the top of the Hill of Hope nbsp The current Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I Since 1586 the Ecumenical Patriarchate has had its headquarters in the relatively modest Church of St George in the Fener Phanar district of Istanbul The current territory of the Patriarchate is significantly reduced from what it was at its height Its canonical territory currently includes most of modern Turkey northern Greece and Mount Athos the Dodecanese and Crete By its interpretation of Canon 28 of Chalcedon Constantinople also claims jurisdiction over all areas outside the canonically defined territories of other Orthodox churches which includes the entire Western hemisphere Oceania the United Kingdom Western Europe Northeast Asia Southeast Asia This claim is disputed by other autocephalous churches with dioceses in those areas as well as the Turkish government The Orthodox presence in Turkey itself is small however the majority of Orthodox in North America about two thirds are under the Ecumenical Patriarchate primarily in the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America The Patriarchate also enjoys an even greater majority in the United Kingdom Furthermore the Albanian Rusyn and Ukrainian jurisdictions in America are also part of the Patriarchate Most of the Patriarchate s funding does not come directly from its member churches but rather from the government of Greece due to an arrangement whereby the Patriarchate had transferred property it had owned to Greece In exchange the employees including the clergy of the Patriarchate are remunerated by the Greek government The Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America provides substantial support through an annual contribution known as the logia and its institutions including the American based Greek Orthodox Ladies Philoptochos Society and the Archons of the Ecumenical Patriarchate usually important laymen who make large donations for the upkeep of the Patriarchate In turn they are granted honorary titles which once belonged to members of the Patriarchal staff in centuries past The Patriarchate acts in the capacity of being an intermediary and facilitator between the Orthodox churches and also in relations with other Christians and religions This role sometimes brings the Patriarchate into conflict with other Orthodox churches as its role in the church is debated The question centers around whether the Ecumenical Patriarchate is simply the most honored among the Orthodox churches or whether it has any real authority or prerogatives presbeia presveia that differ from the other autocephalous churches This dispute is often between Constantinople and Moscow the largest Orthodox church in terms of population especially as expressed in the Third Rome theory which places Moscow in the place of Constantinople as the center of world Orthodoxy Such disputes sometimes result in temporary breaks in full communion though usually not for very long The relationship between Constantinople and the Ottoman Empire was frequently bitter due in no small part to the privilege given to Islam In the secular Republic of Turkey tensions are still constant Turkey requires by law that the Patriarch be a Turkish citizen by birth which all Patriarchs have been since 1923 all ethnic Greeks from the minuscule and steadily decreasing Greek minority of Turkey which is causing a shortage of priests and consequently potential candidates for the post of Ecumenical Patriarch 43 The state s expropriation of church property and the closing of the Orthodox Theological School of Halki are also difficulties faced by the Patriarchate Administration and structure editSee also List of Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople Holy Synod edit The affairs of the patriarchate are conducted by the Holy Synod presided over by the Ecumenical Patriarch The synod has existed since some time prior to the fourth century and assists the patriarch in determining the affairs of the possessions under his jurisdiction The synod first developed from what was referred to as the resident synod composed of the patriarch local bishops and any Orthodox bishops who were visiting in the imperial capital of Constantinople After the fall of Constantinople the synod s membership became limited to bishops of the patriarchate The Holy and Sacred Synod presided over by His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I is composed of twelve hierarchs each serving a year long term with half of the synod s members changing every six months in March and September The current members of the Holy and Sacred Synod serving from September 1 2023 February 29 2024 are as follows Panteleimon of Vryoula Evangelos of Sardis Cyril of Rhodes Ilarion of Winnipeg Evgenios of Crete Ambrosios of Korea Arsenios of Austria Job of Pisidia Apostolos of New Jersey Chrysostomos of Syme Prodromos of Rethymno and Avlopotamos Dimitrios of FranceNotable hierarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarchate are the popular writer Kallistos Timothy Ware an assistant bishop in the Archdiocese of Thyateira and author of The Orthodox Church the best known introduction to the Orthodox Church in English and John Zizioulas Metropolitan of Pergamon a well known professor of systematic theology The right of non Turkish members of the synod from Northern Greece the Dodecanese America and Western Europe to convene appears to be threatened by a recent when declaration from the Istanbul Governor reported in the Freiburg archdiocesan magazine 44 Structure edit nbsp World jurisdictions of Eastern Orthodox Churches Head of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and of the Holy Synod is the Archbishop of Constantinople New Rome and Ecumenical Patriarch and Co Head of State of Mount Athos citation needed who since 1991 has been Bartholomew I Dimitrios Archontonis The local churches of the Ecumenical Patriarchate consist of six archdioceses 66 metropolises 2 dioceses and one exarchate each of which reports directly to the Patriarch of Constantinople with no intervening authority nbsp Map of the Greek Orthodox Metropolises in Asia Minor c 1880Archdioceses and Archbishops edit Archdiocese of Constantinople and New Rome Patriarchal archdiocese Metropolis of Chalcedon Emmanuel Adamakis 2021 45 Metropolis of Derkoi Apostolos Daniilidis 2011 45 Metropolis of Imbros and Tenedos Cyril Sykis 2020 45 Metropolis of the Princes Islands Dimitrios Kommatas 2018 45 Metropolis of Pisidia Job Getcha 2022 45 Metropolis of Prusa Ioakeim Billis 2021 Metropolis of Smyrna Bartholomew Samaras 2016 45 Metropolis of Adrianopolis Amfilochios of Adrianoupolis 45 Metropolis of Karpathos and Kasos Ambrosios Panagiotidis 1983 46 Metropolis of Kos and Nisyros Nathaniel II Philippos Diakopanagiotis 2009 46 Metropolis of Leros Kalymnos and Astypalaia and Exarchate of the Southern Sporades Paisios Panagiotis Aravantinos 2005 46 Metropolis of Rhodes Cyril II Konstantinos Kogerakis 2004 46 Metropolis of Syme Chrysostomos Pitsis 2018 46 Exarchate of Patmos Archimandrite Cyril Pentes 46 Exarchate of Malta Metropolitan Kyrillos Katerelos 2021 Spiritually assigned to the Ecumenical Patriarchate by the Patriarchal and Synodic Act of 4 September 1928 Metropolis of Alexandroupolis Anthimos Koukouridis 2004 Metropolis of Chios Psara and Inousses Markos Basilakis 2011 Metropolis of Didymoteichon and Orestias Damaskinos Minas Karpathakis 2009 Metropolis of Drama Dorotheos Paparis 2022 Metropolis of Dryinoupolis Pogoniani and Konitsa Andreas Trempelas 1995 Metropolis of Edessa Pella and Almopia Joel Panagiotis Phrankakos 2002 Metropolis of Elassona Hariton Toumbas 2014 Metropolis of Eleftheroupolis Chrysostomos Abagianos 2004 Metropolis of Florina Prespes and Eordaia Eirinaios Laftsis 2023 Metropolis of Goumenissa Axioupoli and Polykastro Dimitrios Bekiaris 1989 Metropolis of Grevena David Tzioumakas 2014 Metropolis of Ierissos Mount Athos and Ardameri Theoklitos Athanasopoulos 2012 Metropolis of Ioannina Maximos Papagiannis 2014 Metropolis of Kassandria Nikodemos Konstatinos Korakis 2001 Metropolis of Kastoria Kallinikos Georgatos 2021 Metropolis of Kitros Katerini and Platamonas Georgios Chrysostomou 2014 Metropolis of Langadas Liti and Rentina Platon Crikris 2021 Metropolis of Lemnos and Agios Efstratios Hierotheos Calogeropoulos 2019 Metropolis of Maronia and Komotini Panteleimon Moutafis 2013 Metropolis of Mithymna Chrysostomos Kalamatianos 1984 Metropolis of Mytilini Eresos and Plomari Iakovos Frantzes 1988 Metropolis of Neapolis and Stavroupolis Barnabas Tyris 2004 Metropolis of Nea Krini and Kalamaria Ioustinos Bardakas 2015 Metropolis of Nea Zichni and Nevrokopion Hierotheos Dimitrios Tsoliakos 2003 Metropolis of Nicopolis and Preveza Meletios Kalamaras 1980 2012 Chrysostom Tsirigas 2012 Metropolis of Paramythia Filiates Giromeri and Parga Serapion Michalakis 2023 Metropolis of Philippi Neapolis and Thasos Stefanos Tolios 2017 Metropolis of Polyani and Kilkis Vartholomeos Antoniou Triantafyllides 2021 Metropolis of Samos and Ikaria Eusebios Evangelos Pistolis 1995 Metropolis of Serres and Nigrita Theologos Ioannis Apostolidis 2001 Metropolis of Servia and Kozani Paulos Papalexiou 2004 Metropolis of Siderokastron Makarios Sotirios Philotheou 2001 Metropolis of Sisanion and Siatista Athanasios Giannousas 2019 Metropolis of Thessaloniki Filotheos Theocharis 2023 Metropolis of Veria and Naousa Panteleimon Ioannis Kalpakidis 1994 Metropolis of Xanthi and Peritheorion Panteleimon Mikhael Kalaphatis 1995 Archdiocese of Crete Heraklion Evgenios Antonopoulos 2022 Metropolis of Gortyna and Arkadia and Exarchate of Middle Crete Makarios Douloufakis 2005 Metropolis of Rethymnon and Avlopotamos and Exarchate of Upper Crete Prodromos Xenakes 2022 Metropolis of Kydonia and Apokoronos Damaskinos Papagiannakis 2006 Metropolis of Lampi Syvritos and Sfakia Eirinaios Nikolaos Mesarchakis 1990 Metropolis of Ierapytna and Siteia and Exarchate of Eastern Crete Cyrillos Diamantakes 2016 Metropolis of Petra and Cherronisos Nektarios Papadakis 1990 2015 Gerasimos Marmatakes 2015 Metropolis of Kissamos and Selino Amphilochios Andronikakis 2005 Metropolis of Arkalochorion Kastelion and Viannos Andreas Nanakis 2001 Archdiocese of Canada and Exarchate of the Arctic Toronto Sotirios Athanasoulas 1979 Archdiocese of Italy and Exarchate of Southern Europe Venice Polycarpos Stavropoulos 2021 Archdiocese of Thyateira and Great Britain London includes the UK Ireland and the Crown dependencies Nikitas Loulias 2019 1 Archived 2006 03 03 at the Wayback Machine Archdiocese of Australia and Exarchate of Papua New Guinea Makarios Griniezakis 2019 Archdiocesan District of Adelaide South Australia and the Northern Territory Archdiocesan District of Brisbane Queensland and Papua New Guinea Archdiocesan District of Canberra southern New South Wales and Tasmania Archdiocesan District of Melbourne and Victoria Archdiocesan District of Northcote Archdiocesan District of Perth and Western Australia Archdiocesan District of Sydney and New South Wales Archdiocese of America and Exarchate of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans headquartered in New York City Elpidoforos Lampriniadis 2019 Metropolis of Chicago Nathanael Symeonides 2018 Metropolis of New Jersey Apostolos Koufallakis 2023 Metropolis of Atlanta Alexios Panagiotopoulos 1999 Metropolis of Denver Vacant Metropolis of Pittsburgh Savas Zembillas 2012 Metropolis of Boston Methodios Georgios Tournas 1984 Metropolis of Detroit Nicholas Pissaris 1999 Metropolis of San Francisco Gerasimos Michaleas 2005 Vicariate for Palestinian Jordanian Communities in the USA Protopresbyter George Jweinat Archiepiscopal Vicar 2019 Vicariate for the Communities of Slavic Tradition in the USA Alexander Belya 2020 Metropolises and Metropolitans edit Metropolis of Austria and Exarchate of Hungary and Middle Europe Vienna Arsenios Kardamakis 2011 Metropolis of Belgium and Exarchate of the Netherlands and Luxembourg Brussels Athenagoras Yves Peckstadt 2013 Metropolis of France Paris Dimitrios Ploumes 2021 Metropolis of Germany Bonn Augustinos Labardakis 1980 Metropolis of Sweden and all Scandinavia and Exarchate of the Northern Countries Stockholm Cleopas Strongylis 2014 Metropolis of Spain and Portugal and Exarchate of the Mediterranean Sea Madrid Visarion Comzias 2021 Metropolis of Switzerland Chambesy Geneva Maximos Pothos 2018 Metropolis of Buenos Aires and Exarchate of All South America Joseph Bosch 2019 Metropolis of Mexico and Exarchate of All Central America and the Caribbean Iakovos Andriopoulos 2024 Metropolis of Hong Kong and Southeast Asia and Exarchate of the Philippines Nektarios Tsilis 2008 Metropolis of Korea and Exarchate of All the Upper East Seoul Ambrosios Aristotelis Zografos 2008 Metropolis of New Zealand and Exarchate of All Oceania Wellington Myron Ktistakis 2018 Metropolis of Singapore and South Asia Konstantinos Tsilis 2011 Metropolis of Winnipeg and Central Canada Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada vacant acting Bishop Ilarion of Edmonton Diocese of Toronto and Eastern Canada Andrew Peshko of Toronto 2021 Diocese of Edmonton and Western Canada Hilarion Rudnyk 2008 Metropolis of Western Europe Ukrainian Orthodox Church John Derevianka 1991 Metropolis of Eastern Eparchy Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA Anthony Scharba 1995 Diocese of Western Eparchy Chicago Pamphylos Daniel Zelinsky 2009 Dioceses and Bishops edit Diocese of America Albanian Orthodox church Philomelion Theophan Koja 2023 Diocese of North America American Carpatho Russian Orthodox church Nyssa Gregory Tatsis 2012 Titular archdioceses edit Archdiocese of Komana and All Cappadocia Michael Anisenko 2020 Archdiocese of Hierapolis Anthony Scharba 1995 present Archdiocese of Thyatira Nikitas Loulias 2019 present Titular metropolises edit Metropolis of Caesarea Vacant Metropolis of Ephesus Vacant Metropolis of Heraclea and Exarchate of Thrace Vacant Metropolis of Cyzicus Vacant Metropolis of Nicomedia Vacant Metropolis of Nicaea and Exarchate of Bithynia Vacant Metropolis of Aenos Vacant Metropolis of Amasya and Exarchate of All Euxinous Pontus Vacant Metropolis of Hadrianopolis Amphilochios Stergiou 2014 Metropolis of Anea Makarios Pavlidis 2018 Metropolis of Ankyra and Exarchate of All Galatia Ieremias Kalligiorgis 2018 Metropolis of Augustopolis Vacant Metropolis of Chaldia Cheriana and Kerasous and Exarchate of Helenopontus Vacant Metropolis of Crine and Exarchate of Ionia Kyrillos Katerelos 2021 Metropolis of Cydonies Athenagoras Hrysanes 2012 Metropolis of the Dardanelles and Exarchate of All Hellespontus Vacant Metropolis of Eucarpia Bishop Ierotheos Zaharis 2017 Metropolis of Euchaita Vacant Metropolis of Eudoxias Bishop Amvrosios Horozides 2019 Metropolis of Ganos and Chora and All the Thracian Coast Vacant Metropolis of Helioupolis and Theira and Exarchate of All Caria Vacant Metropolis of Helenopolis Vacant Metropolis of Kolonia Athanasios Theoharous 2021 Metropolis of Iconium and Exarchate of Lycaonia Theoleptos Jacob Fenerlis 2000 Metropolis of Kallipolis and Madytos Stephanos Ntinides 2011 Metropolis of Laodicea and Exarchate of Phrygia Theodoritos Polyzoyopoulos 2018 Metropolis of Lititsa Vacant Metropolis of Lystra Isaiah Chronopoulos 2024 Metropolis of Metres and Athyra Vacant Metropolis of Melitene Bishop Maximos Pafilis 2018 Metropolis of Miletus Apostolos Voulgaris 1990 Metropolis of Moschonisia and Exarchate of Aeolis Cyril Dragounis 2020 Metropolis of Myra Chrysostomos Kalaitzis 1995 Metropolis of Myriophyton and Peristasis Irinaios Ioannidis 2000 Metropolis of Neocaesaria and Exarchate of Pontus Polemoniacus Vacant Metropolis of Pergamon and Adramyttion Vacant Metropolis of Perge and Exarchate of Pamphylia Vacant Metropolis of Philadelphia and Exarchate of Lydia Meliton Dimitrios Karras 1990 Metropolis of Pisidia and Exarchate of Side Myra and Attalia Job Getcha 2022 Metropolis of Prokonnesos and Exarchate of All Propontis Joseph Emmanuel Charkiolakis 2008 Metropolis of Prousa Ioakeim Billis 2021 Metropolis of Rhodopolis Tarasios Antonopoulos 2019 Metropolis of Saranta Ecclesies Andreas Sofianopoulos 2021 Metropolis of Sardis Evangelos Courounis 2021 Metropolis of Sasima and Cappadocia Secunda Bishop Constantine Moralis 2022 Metropolis of Sebasteia and Exarchate of All Paphlagonia Seraphim Ginis 2019 Metropolis of Seleucia and Pamphylia Theodoros Meimares 2023 Metropolis of Silyvria Maximos Vgenopoulos 2014 Metropolis of Smyrna and Exarchate of All Asia Minor Bartholomeos Samaras 2016 Metropolis of Traianopolis Vacant Metropolis of Trapezous and Exarchate of Lazica Vacant Metropolis of Troas Bishop Petros Bozinis 2015 Metropolis of Tyana Vacant Metropolis of Tyroloi and Serention Vacant Metropolis of Bizye and Medea Athenagoras Anastasiadis 2024 Metropolis of Vryoula and Erythrae Panteleimon Sklavos 2018 Titular dioceses edit Diocese of Abydos Gregorios Tsoutsoules 2022 Diocese of Amorion Nikiforos Psihloudes 2014 Diocese of Andidon Vacant Diocese of Apamea Paisios Larentzakis 2018 Diocese of Arianzos Vartholomeos Ioannis Kessidis 2004 Diocese of Ariste Vacant Diocese of Aspendos Jeremy Ferens 1995 Diocese of Claudiopolis Iakovos Savva 2021 Diocese of Cotyaeum Dionysios Papavasileiou 2022 Diocese of Christoupolis Emmanuel Sfiatkos 2020 Diocese of Cyneae Elpidios Karelis 2020 Diocese of Dervis Ezekiel Kefalas 1977 Diocese of Dioclea Kallistos Ware 1982 2022 Diocese of Dorylaeum Damaskenos Lionakis 2019 Diocese of Eumeneia Irinaeos Verykakis 2019 Diocese of Halicarnassus Adrianos Sergakis 2015 Diocese of Irenopolis Nikandros Palyvos 2019 Diocese of Kratea Georgios Antonopoulos 2022 Diocese of Lampsacus Vacant Diocese of Lefki Eumenios Tamiolakis 1994 Diocese of Meloa Aimilianos Coutouzes 2019 Diocese of Mokissos Demetrios Kantzavelos 2006 Diocese of Olympos Kyrillos Papanthimou 2017 Diocese of Pamphylos Daniel Zelinsky 2008 Diocese of Parnassus John Derevianka 1995 Diocese of Phasiane Antonios Paropoulos 2002 Diocese of Philomelion Theophan Koja 2023 Diocese of Sinope Silouan Fotineas 2020 Diocese of Synnada Vacant Diocese of Telmessos Vacant Diocese of Theoupolis Vacant Diocese of Thermon Athenagoras Fasiolo 2022 Diocese of Troas Petros Bozines 2015 Diocese of Tropaeon Vacant Diocese of Zelon Sevastianos Skordallos 2012 Historical Archdioceses edit Archdiocese of Syracuse Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe Exarchate for Orthodox Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe Paris disestablished 2018 Historical Metropolises edit Metropolis of Anchialos Metropolis of Balgrad one of founding archdioceses of Romanian Orthodox Church Metropolis of Calabria Metropolis of Devron and Velissus under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1767 to 1920 Metropolis of Gothia and Caffa liquidated by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1779 see Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Empire Metropolis of Kamianets 47 Podolia Eyalet Metropolis of Kolonia Metropolis of Kyiv and all Ruthenia Rus 988 1448 some territories of Upper Volga and Oka assumed a schism Metropolis reorganized as Metropolis of Kyiv Galicia and all Ruthenia Rus Metropolis of Halych 1303 1347 succeeded and reintegrated back into Metropolis of Kyiv Metropolis of Lithuania 1317 1435 succeeded and reintegrated back into Metropolis of Kyiv Metropolis of Kyiv Galicia and all Ruthenia Rus 1448 1596 accepted a union with Rome see Ruthenian Uniate Church Metropolis of Kyiv Galicia and all Ruthenia Rus 1620 1696 annexed by Russian Orthodox Church Metropolis of Miletopolis Iakovos Tsigounis 2011 Metropolis of Melenikon Metropolis of Moldo Wallachia Metropolis of Moldavia and Bukovina one of founding archdioceses of Romanian Orthodox Church Metropolis of Monastirion and Pelagonia under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1767 to 1920 Metropolis of Nevrokopion Metropolis of Philippopolis Metropolis of Prespes and Achrida under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1767 to 1920 Metropolis of Proilaviei ro Ottoman Ukraine Metropolis of Raskopresrena under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1766 to 1920 Metropolis of Riga and All Latvia Metropolis of Skopia under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1766 to 1920 Metropolis of Sozopolis and later Sozoagathopolis Kyriakos Michael 2021 Metropolis of Stromnitsa under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1767 to 1920 Metropolis of Ugro Wallachia Metropolis of Muntenia and Dobrudja one of founding archdioceses of Romanian Orthodox Church Metropolis of Vanialuka under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1900 to 1920 Metropolis of Varna Metropolis of Vellegradon under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1766 to 1879 Metropolis of Nissa under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1766 to 1879 Metropolis of Vosna under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1766 to 1920 Metropolis of Svornikion under jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate from 1766 to 1920 Historical Dioceses edit Diocese of Agia and Sykourion Diocese of Agrafa and Litza Diocese of Amphipolis Diocese of Amylcae Diocese of Christianoupolis Diocese of Angon Diocese of Argyropolis Diocese of Agathopolis Diocese of Agathonicea Diocese of Katania Diocese of Konstantia Diocese of Daphnusia Diocese of Dodona Diocese of Elaea Diocese of Kampania Diocese of Meloe Diocese of Messene Diocese of Myrina Diocese of Nyssa Diocese of Petra Diocese of Platamon and Lykostomion Diocese of Ravenna Diocese of Skopelos Diocese of Talantion Diocese of Thermia and Kea Diocese of Trachaea Diocese of Vilna Stauropegions edit Stauropegion of St Andrew s Church in Kyiv Bishop Michael Anischenko 2019 48 49 50 Kyiv Pechersk Lavra 1589 1686 Lviv Dormition Brotherhood 1589 1709 Kyiv Epiphany Brotherhood 1620 1686 Manyava Skete 1620 1785 Exaltation of the Cross Lutsk Brotherhood 1623 Mezhyhirya Monastery 1609 1703 Present day autocephalous churches previously under the Ecumenical Patriarchate editSee also Autocephaly nbsp Metropolitan Epiphanius and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko hugging Andriy Parubiy after the unification council of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on 15 December 2018Armenian Apostolic Church autocephaly granted in 554 51 Bulgarian Orthodox Church autocephaly granted in 870 autocephaly re recognised in 1235 and 1945 Russian Orthodox Church autocephaly recognized in 1589 Church of Greece Archdiocese of Athens and All Greece autocephaly recognised in 1850 Serbian Orthodox Church autocephaly granted in 1219 abolished in 1463 and 1766 re recognized in 1557 and 1879 Romanian Orthodox Church autocephaly recognized in 1885 Polish Autocephalous Orthodox Church autocephaly recognised in 1924 by the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople and in 1948 by the Russian Orthodox Church Orthodox Autocephalous Church of Albania Archdiocese of Tirana Durres and All Albania autocephaly recognised in 1937 Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia Metropolis of Prague Czech Lands and Slovakia autocephaly recognised in 1951 by the Russian Orthodox Church and in 1998 by the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople Orthodox Church of Ukraine intention to grant autocephaly announced in 2018 52 53 54 Rejected by the Russian Orthodox Church the Polish Orthodox Church and the Serbian Orthodox Church The Ecumenical Patriarchate granted autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine on 5 January 2019 References editCitations edit a b Krindatch Alexei 2011 Atlas of American Orthodox Christian Churches Brookline MA Holy Cross Orthodox Press p 143 ISBN 978 1 935317 23 4 Christians in Turkey are second class citizens DW 08 05 2014 Deutsche Welle Archived from the original on 2020 10 22 Erol Su 2015 The Syriacs of Turkey Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 171 59 80 doi 10 4000 assr 27027 Archived from the original on 2019 06 26 Pontificia Commissio Codici Iuris Canonici Orientalis Recognoscendo Vatican City State 1978 p 3 in Latin Ortayli Ilber 2003 Osmanli Barisi p 14 ISBN 975 6571 50 0 In Turkey it is also referred to unofficially as Fener Rum Patrikhanesi Roman Patriarchate of the Phanar Fairchild Mary Christianity Basics Eastern Orthodox Church Denomination about com Archived from the original on 5 June 2016 Retrieved 22 May 2014 The Patriarch Bartholomew 60 Minutes CBS 20 December 2009 Archived from the original on 2021 06 26 Retrieved 26 June 2021 Biography The Ecumenical Patriarchate www patriarchate org Retrieved 2019 12 11 Winfield Nicole Fraser Suzan 30 November 2014 Pope Francis Bows Asks For Blessing From Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew In Extraordinary Display Of Christian Unity Huffington Post Archived from the original on 2016 03 17 Retrieved 2019 12 11 Finding Global Balance World Bank Publications 2005 p 119 Retrieved 2 August 2015 His All Holiness is the spiritual leader of 300 million Orthodox Christians worldwide Who is the Ecumenical Patriarch Apostolic Pilgrimage of Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to Jerusalem www apostolicpilgrimage org Archived from the original on 2021 06 04 Retrieved 2019 12 11 Fener Rum Patrikhanesinin ekumeniklik Iddiasina Iliskin Basin Aciklamamiz www fatih gov tr Retrieved 2022 08 29 Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch sign Christian unity declaration 30 November 2014 Commander opposed Halki Seminary reopening over fears Archived 2011 01 22 at the Wayback Machine Today s Zaman 21 January 2011 H CON RES 50 United States House of Representatives 28 March 1995 Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium p 697 The Patriarchate of Constantinople The Ecumenical Patriarchate Archived 2010 01 09 at the Wayback Machine by Ronald Roberson The officer given the task was killed by the crowd and in the end the image was removed rather than destroyed It was to be restored by Irene and removed again by Leo V Finlay 1906 p 111 A A Vasiliev History of the Byzantine Empire 1952 vol I p 261 Norwich John J 1967 The Normans in the South 1016 1130 p 102 a b c Norwich John J 1992 Byzantium The Apogee pp 320 321 New Catholic Encyclopedia in 1053 he Michael Caerularius sends off a declaration of war then shuts up the Latin churches at Constantinople hurls a string of wild accusations and shows in every possible way that he wants a schism apparently for the mere pleasure of not being in communion with the West He got his wish After a series of wanton aggressions unparalleled in church history after he had begun by striking the pope s name from his diptychs the Roman legates excommunicated him 16 July 1054 But still there was no idea of a general excommunication of the Byzantine Church still less of all the East The legates carefully provided against that in their Bull They acknowledged that the emperor Constantine IX who was excessively annoyed at the whole quarrel the Senate and the majority of the inhabitants of the city were most pious and orthodox They excommunicated Caerularius Leo of Achrida and their adherents This quarrel too need no more have produced a permanent state of schism than the excommunication of any other contumacious bishop The real tragedy is that gradually all the other Eastern patriarchs took sides with Caerularius obeyed him by striking the pope s name from their diptychs and chose of their own accord to share his schism At first they do not seem to have wanted to do so John III of Antioch certainly refused to go into schism at Caerularius s bidding But eventually the habit they had acquired of looking to Constantinople for orders proved too strong The emperor not Constantine IX but his successor was on the side of his patriarch and they had learned too well to consider the emperor as their over lord in spiritual matters too Again it was the usurped authority of Constantinople the Erastianism of the East that turned a personal quarrel into a great schism Bishop Kallistos Ware p 67 Gallagher Clarence 2008 The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies Oxford University Press p 596 ISBN 978 0 19 925246 6 Vryonis Byzantium and Europe p 152 a b Runciman Steven 1965 The Fall of Constantinople 1453 Cambridge University Press pp 145 148 ISBN 978 0 521 39832 9 Nicol Donald MacGillivray 1979 The End of the Byzantine Empire London Edward Arnold p 88 ISBN 978 0 7131 6250 9 Inalcik Halil 1969 The Policy of Mehmed II toward the Greek Population of Istanbul and the Byzantine Buildings of the City Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23 24 229 249 doi 10 2307 1291293 ISSN 0070 7546 JSTOR 1291293 a b Nicol The End of the Byzantine Empire p 90 Runciman Steven 1965 The Fall of Constantinople 1453 Cambridge University Press p 147 ISBN 978 0 521 39832 9 Runciman The Fall of Constantinople pp 133 34 Nicol Donald M The Last Centuries of Byzantium 1261 1453 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1972 p 389 Runciman Steven 1965 The Fall of Constantinople 1453 Cambridge University Press p 147 ISBN 978 0 521 39832 9 Smith Cyril J 1974 History of Rape and Rape Laws Women Law Journal No 60 p 188 Archived from the original on 26 April 2020 Retrieved 12 October 2020 Mansel Philip Constantinople City of the World s Desire 1453 1924 Washington Post Archived from the original on 24 July 2019 Retrieved 7 August 2020 Roger Crowley 6 August 2009 Constantinople The Last Great Siege 1453 Faber amp Faber p 226 ISBN 978 0 571 25079 0 The vast majority of the ordinary citizens about 30 000 were marched off to the slave markets of Edirne Bursa and Ankara M J Akbar 3 May 2002 The Shade of Swords Jihad and the Conflict Between Islam and Christianity Routledge p 86 ISBN 978 1 134 45259 0 Archived from the original on 12 October 2020 Retrieved 6 August 2020 Some 30 000 Christians were either enslaved or sold Jim Bradbury 1992 The Medieval Siege Boydell amp Brewer p 322 ISBN 978 0 85115 312 4 a b Jelavich Barbara History of the Balkans 18th and 19th Centuries 1983 ISBN 0 521 27458 3 p 52 Ortayli Ilber 2003 Osmanli Barisi p 15 ISBN 975 6571 50 0 Konstantinopolskaya Pravoslavnaya Cerkov in Russian Retrieved 18 June 2011 Turkey Rum Greek Orthodox Christians Minorityrights org Konradsblatte Konradsblatte Archived from the original on 2010 06 27 Retrieved 2008 09 07 a b c d e f g Ecumenical Patriarchate www ec patr org Retrieved 2019 05 21 a b c d e f Ecumenical Patriarchate www ec patr org Retrieved 2019 05 24 Dmytro Hordiyenko History of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church Istoriya Ukrayinskoyi Pravoslavnoyi Cerkvi Glagoslav Publications Cazabonne Emma 2019 01 15 Decision of the Constantinople Patriarchate Holy Synod concerning the restoration of its stavropegion in Kyiv Orthodoxie com Retrieved 2019 01 17 Anakoinw8en toy Oikoymenikoy Patriarxeioy gia Stayrophgio sto Kiebo ROMFEA in Greek 12 January 2019 Retrieved 2019 01 12 Panagiotisandriopoulos 2019 01 12 Fws Fanarioy H AGIA KAI IERA SYNODOS DIORISE EPIKEFALHS TOY PATRIARXIKOY STAYROPHGIOY STO KIEBO Fws Fanarioy Retrieved 2019 01 12 Panossian Razmik 2006 The Armenians From Kings and Priests to Merchants and Commissars New York Columbia University Press pp 43 44 ISBN 9780231139267 The Armenian Apostolic Church formally became autocephalous i e independent of external authority in 554 by severing its links with the patriarchate of Constantinople Ukraine hails Church independence move as blow to Moscow The Guardian 12 October 2018 Retrieved 13 October 2018 Announcement of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople Ecumenical Patriarchate 11 October 2018 Retrieved 12 October 2018 1 To renew the decision already made that the Ecumenical Patriarchate proceed to the granting of Autocephaly to the Church of Ukraine Tomos ante portas a short guide to Ukrainian church independence Euromaidan Press 14 October 2018 Retrieved 16 October 2018 the Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate gave further confirmation that Ukraine is on the path to receiving church independence from Moscow Although President Poroshenko triumphantly announced that in result of the meeting Ukraine had received the long awaited Tomos or decree of Church independence a claim circulated in Ukraine with great enthusiasm this is not true Constantinople s decision will benefit other jurisdictions in Ukraine the UOC KP and UAOC which will have to effectively dismantle their own administrative structures and set up a new Church which will receive the Tomos of autocephaly Right now it s unclear which part of the UOC MP will join the new Church 10 out of 90 UOC MP bishops signed the appeal for autocephaly to the Ecumenical Patriarch only 11 But separate priests could join even if their bishops don t says Zuiev Sources edit This article incorporates text from several articles on OrthodoxWiki OrthodoxWiki Byzantine response to OCA autocephaly OrthodoxWiki Church of Constantinople OrthodoxWiki Mount Athos OrthodoxWiki Prerogatives of the Ecumenical PatriarchateLiterature editDarrouzes Jean ed 1981 Notitiae Episcopatuum Ecclesiae Constantinopolitanae Paris Institut francais d etudes byzantines ISBN 978 9042931183 Kiminas Demetrius 2009 The Ecumenical Patriarchate A History of Its Metropolitanates with Annotated Hierarch Catalogs Wildside Press LLC ISBN 978 1434458766 Kursar Vjeran 2013 Non Muslim Communal Divisions and Identities in the Early Modern Ottoman Balkans and the Millet System Theory Power and Influence in South Eastern Europe 16th 19th century Berlin LIT Verlag pp 97 108 ISBN 978 3643903310 Laurent Vitalien 1968 Les premiers patriarches de Constantinople sous la domination turque 1454 1476 Succession et chronologie d apres un catalogue inedit Revue des etudes byzantines 26 229 263 doi 10 3406 rebyz 1968 1407 Meyendorff John 1989 Imperial unity and Christian divisions The Church 450 680 A D The Church in history Vol 2 Crestwood NY St Vladimir s Seminary Press ISBN 978 0881410563 Meyendorff John 1996 Rome Constantinople Moscow Historical and Theological Studies Crestwood NY St Vladimir s Seminary Press ISBN 978 0881411348 Ostrogorsky George 1956 History of the Byzantine State Oxford Basil Blackwell Radojevic Mira Micic Srđan B 2015 Serbian Orthodox Church cooperation and frictions with Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople and Bulgarian Exarchate during interwar period Studia academica sumenesia 2 126 143 Runciman Steven 1985 1968 The Great Church in Captivity A Study of the Patriarchate of Constantinople from the Eve of the Turkish Conquest to the Greek War of Independence 2nd ed Cambridge Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 0521313100 Thomas John P 1987 Private Religious Foundations in the Byzantine Empire Washington D C Dumbarton Oaks ISBN 978 0884021643 External links editOfficial website Patriarchs of Constantinople Article on the Ecumenical Patriarchate by Ronald Roberson on the website of CNEWA a papal agency for humanitarian and pastoral support Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople amp oldid 1215374397, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.