fbpx
Wikipedia

Incarceration in the United States

Incarceration in the United States is one of the primary means of punishment for crime in the United States. In 2023, over five million people are under supervision by the criminal justice system,[2][3] with nearly two million people incarcerated in state or federal prisons and local jails. The United States has the largest known prison population in the world.[4][5] Prison populations grew dramatically beginning in the 1970s, but began a decline around 2009, dropping 25% by year-end 2021.[6]

US timeline graphs of number of people incarcerated in jails and prisons.[1]

Drug offenses account for the incarceration of about 1 in 5 people in U.S. prisons.[7] Violent offenses account for over 3 in 5 people (62%) in state prisons.[7] Property offenses account for the incarceration of about 1 in 7 people (14%) in state prisons.[7]

The United States maintains a higher incarceration rate than most developed countries.[8] According to the World Prison Brief on May 7, 2023, the United States has the sixth highest incarceration rate in the world, at 531 people per 100,000. Expenses related to prison, parole, and probation operations have an annual estimated cost of around $81 billion. Court costs, bail bond fees, and prison phone fees amounted to another $38 billion in costs annually.[9]

Since reaching its peak level of imprisonment in 2009, the U.S. has averaged a rate of decarceration of 2.3% per year.[7][10] This figure includes the anomalous 14.1% drop in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is significant variation among state prison population declines. Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York have reduced their prison populations by over 50% since reaching their peak levels.[11] Twenty-five states have reduced their prison populations by 25% since reaching their peaks.[11] The federal prison population downsized 27% relative to its peak in 2011.[12]

Although debtor's prisons no longer exist in the United States, residents of some U.S. states can still be incarcerated for debt as of 2016.[13][14][15][16] The Vera Institute of Justice reported in 2015 that the majority of those incarcerated in local and county jails are there for minor violations and have been jailed for longer periods of time over the past 30 years because they are unable to pay court-imposed costs.[17]

History edit

 
Lines of men in prisoner's uniforms marching towards a building

In the 18th century, English philanthropists began to focus on the reform of convicted criminals in prison, whom they believed needed a chance to become morally pure in order to stop or slow crime. Since at least 1740, some of these philosophers have thought of solitary confinement as a way to create and maintain spiritually clean people in prisons. As English people immigrated to North America, so did these theories of penology.[18]

Spanish colonizers in Florida also brought their own ideas of confinement, and Spanish soldiers in St. Augustine, Florida, built the first substantial prison in North America in 1570.[19]

Some of the first structures built in English-settled America were jails, and by the 18th century, every English-speaking North American county had a jail. These jails served a variety of functions, such as a holding place for debtors, prisoners-of-war, and political prisoners, those bound in the penal transportation and slavery systems; and those accused but not tried for crimes.[18][20] Sentences for those convicted of crimes were rarely longer than three months and often lasted only a day. Poor citizens were often imprisoned for longer than their richer neighbors, as bail was rarely refused.[18]

 
Total incarceration in the United States by year (1920–2014)

One of the first prisons in America was founded in 1790 by the Pennsylvanian Quakers, to make a system they viewed as less cruel than dungeon prisons. They created a space where imprisoned people could read scriptures and repent as a means of self-improvement.[21]

In 1841, Dorothea Dix claimed that prison conditions in the US were, in her opinion, inhumane. Imprisoned people were chained naked and whipped with rods. Others, who were criminally insane, were caged, or placed in cellars or closets. She insisted on changes throughout the rest of her life. While focusing on the insane, her comments also resulted in changes for other inmates.[22]

Following the Civil War and during the Progressive Era of America, new concepts of the prison system, such as parole, indeterminate sentencing, and probation, were introduced. These soon became mainstream practices in America. At this time, there was an increase in crime, causing officials to handle crime in a more retributive way. Many Sicilian Americans were harshly affected by this.[23] However, as the crime rate declined, the prison system started to focus more on rehabilitation.

US incarceration count, and rate per 100,000 population. Jails, state prisons, federal prisons.[24]
Year Count Rate
1940 264,834 201
1950 264,620 176
1960 346,015 193
1970 328,020 161
1980 503,586 220
1985 744,208 311
1990 1,148,702 457
1995 1,585,586 592
2000 1,937,482 683
2002 2,033,022 703
2004 2,135,335 725
2006 2,258,792 752
2008 2,307,504 755
2010 2,270,142 731
2012 2,228,424 707
2014 2,217,947 693
2016 2,157,800 666
2018 2,102,400 642
2020 1,675,400 505
2021 1,767,200 531

On June 18, 1971, President Richard Nixon declared drug abuse "public enemy number one" in a message to Congress. His message also called for federal resources to be used for the "prevention of new addicts and the rehabilitation of those who are addicted." Following this, the media began using the term "War on Drugs".[25] According to author Emily Dufton, Nixon "transformed the public image of the drug user into one of a dangerous and anarchic threat to American civilization."[26]

The presidency of Ronald Reagan saw the expansion of federal efforts to prevent drug abuse and prosecute offenders. Reagan signed the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, which established mandatory minimum sentences and expanded penalties for marijuana possession. He also signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986.[27] Support for Reagan's crime legislation was bipartisan. The 1980s saw a dramatic rise in the prison population, especially among non-violent offenders and people convicted of drug offenses.[28][29]

Researcher Valerie Jenness writes, "Since the 1970s, the final wave of expansion of the prison system, there has been a huge expansion of prisons that exist at the federal and state level. Now, prisons are starting to become a private industry as more and more prisons are starting to become privatized rather than being under government control."[21]

Incarcerated population edit

As of 2023, 59% of incarcerated people are in state prisons; 12% are in federal prisons; and 29% are in local jails.[2] Of the total state and federal prison population, 8% or 96,370 people are incarcerated in private prisons. An additional 2.9 million people are on probation, and over 800,000 people are on parole.[2][3] At year-end 2021, 1,000,000 people were incarcerated in state prisons; 157,000 people were incarcerated in federal prisons; and 636,000 people were incarcerated in local jails.[2][7]

Approximately 1.8 million people are incarcerated in state or federal prisons or local jails.[2][7] There are over 1 million people who are incarcerated in state prisons. There are 656,000 people incarcerated for violent offenses, 142,000 for property offenses, 132,000 for drug offenses, and 110,000 for public order offenses. The percentage breakdown of people in state prisons by offense-type is as follows: 63% of people are incarcerated for violent offenses, 13% for property offenses, 13% for drug offenses, and 11% for public order offenses.[30]

The federal prison population is approximately 209,000. There are 69,000 people incarcerated for drug offenses, 61,000 for public order offenses, 11,000 for violent offenses, and 6,000 for property offenses. The percentage breakdown of people in state prisons by offense-type is as follows: 47% of people are incarcerated for drug offenses, 42% for public order offenses, 7% for violent offenses, and 4% for property offenses.[30]

Finally, 619,000 people are incarcerated in local jails. Jail incarceration accounts for a third of all incarceration. Over 80% of people incarcerated in local jails have not yet been convicted.[30]

Demographics edit

Race and ethnicity edit

2021. People incarcerated in state or federal prisons by race and ethnicity.[7][31]
Race, ethnicity % of US population % of incarcerated
population
Incarceration rate
(per 100,000)
White (non-Hispanic) 59 31 181
Hispanic 19 24 434
Black 14 32 901

Racial and ethnic disparities are a significant feature of the American prison system. These disparities accumulate across the criminal legal system. The National Academies of Sciences explains:

"Blacks are more likely than whites to be confined awaiting trial (which increases the probability that an incarcerative sentence will be imposed), to receive incarcerative rather than community sentences, and to receive longer sentences. Racial differences found at each stage are typically modest, but their cumulative effect is significant."[32]

Broader socioeconomic inequality and disparities at each stage of the criminal legal process result in the disproportionate imprisonment of people of color.[33] In 2021, people of color constituted over two thirds (69%) of the prison population.[2] Black Americans are imprisoned at 5 times the rate of white people, and American Indians and Hispanic people are imprisoned at 4 times and 2 times the white rate, respectively.[2] Black and Hispanic people make up 33% of the U.S. population but 56% of the incarceration population.[2][31] Nationally, one in 81 Black adults are serving time in state prison.[34]

Although significant gaps remain, there have been reductions in imprisonment disparities over the past decades.[35] The extent of decarceration has varied by race and ethnicity, but all major racial and ethnic groups experienced decarceration since reaching their highest levels.[2][36] The Black prison population has decreased the most. Since 2002, the year it reached its peak levels, the number of Black people in prison declined from 622,700 to 378,000 (a 39% decrease).[2][36] Since 1998, the year the white prison population reached its peak, the number of white people in prison declined from 533,200 to 356,000 (a 25% decrease).[2][36] Since 2011, the year the Hispanic prison population reached its peak, the number of Hispanic people in prison declined from 347,300 to 273,800 (a 21% decrease).[2][36] Since 2010, the year the American Indian prison population reached its peak, the number of American Indians in prison declined from 23,800 to 18,700 (a 21% decrease).[2][36] Finally, since 2016, the year the Asian prison population reached its peak, the number of Asian people in prison declined from 18,000 to 14,700.[2][36]

Gender edit

2010 adult incarceration rates
by race, ethnicity, and sex
per 100,000 adult US residents[37]
Race or
ethnicity
Male Female

White 678 91
Black 4,347 260
Hispanic 1,775 133

In 2013, there were 102,400 adult females in local jails in the United States, and 111,300 adult females in state and federal prisons.[38] Within the US, the rate of female incarceration increased fivefold in a two decade span ending in 2001; the increase occurred because of increased prosecutions and convictions of offenses related to recreational drugs, increases in the severities of offenses, and a lack of community sanctions and treatment for women who violate laws.[39] In the United States, authorities began housing women in correctional facilities separate from men in the 1870s.[40] According to the ACLU, “More than half of the women in prisons and jails (56%) are incarcerated for drug or property offenses, and Black women are two times as likely to be incarcerated as white women.”[41] Black women tend to receive longer sentences and harsher punishments than white women for committing the same crimes. According to Angela Davis (2003), in many situations, white women are put in mental institutions, whereas black women are sent to prison for the same crime.[42]

However, since the early 2000s, the incarceration rates for African American and Hispanic American women have declined, while incarceration rates have increased for white women. Between 2000 and 2017, the incarceration rate for white women increased by 44%, while at the same time declining by 55% for African American women.[43] The Sentencing Project reports that by 2021, incarceration rates had declined by 70% for African American women, while rising by 7% for white women.[44] In 2017, the Washington Post reported that white women's incarceration rate was growing faster than ever before, as the rate for black women declined.[45] The incarceration rate of African American males is also falling sharply, even faster that white men's incarceration rate, contrary to the popular opinion that black males are increasingly incarcerated.[46]

In 2011, it was reported that 85 to 90% of women incarcerated were victims of sexual and domestic violence, which is significantly higher than the national average of 22.3% of women in the United States.[47] Women who face sexual or domestic violence are more likely to commit crimes themselves and become incarcerated.[48] The history of black women experiencing higher rates of abuse than white women provides one of many explanations for why African American women have faced higher rates of incarceration than white women.[1]

In 2013, there were 628,900 adult males in local jails in the United States, and 1,463,500 adult males in state and federal prisons.[38] In a study of sentencing in the United States in 1984, David B. Mustard found that males received 12 percent longer prison terms than females after "controlling for the offense level, criminal history, district, and offense type," and noted that "females receive even shorter sentences relative to men than whites relative to blacks."[49] A later study by Sonja B. Starr found sentences for men to be up to 60% higher when controlling for more variables.[50] Several explanations for this disparity have been offered, including that women have more to lose from incarceration, and that men are the targets of discrimination in sentencing.[51]

Youth edit

Juveniles in residential
placement, 1997–2015. US[52]
Year Male Female Total

1997 90,771 14,284 105,055
1999 92,985 14,508 107,493
2001 89,115 15,104 104,219
2003 81,975 14,556 96,531
2006 78,998 13,723 92,721
2007 75,017 11,797 86,814
2010 61,359 9,434 70,793
2011 53,079 8,344 61,423
2013 46,421 7,727 54,148
2015 40,750 7,293 48,043

Through the juvenile courts and the adult criminal justice system, the United States incarcerates more of its youth than any other country in the world, a reflection of the larger trends in incarceration practices in the United States. This has been a source of controversy for a number of reasons, including the overcrowding and violence in youth detention facilities, the prosecution of youths as adults and the long term consequences of incarceration on the individual's chances for success in adulthood. In 2014, the United Nations Human Rights Committee criticized the United States for about ten judicial abuses, including the mistreatment of juvenile inmates.[53] A UN report published in 2015 criticized the US for being the only nation in the world to sentence juveniles to life imprisonment without parole.[54]

According to federal data from 2011, around 40% of the nation's juvenile inmates are housed in private facilities.[55]

The incarceration of youths has been linked to the effects of family and neighborhood influences. One study found that the "behaviors of family members and neighborhood peers appear to substantially affect the behavior and outcomes of disadvantaged youths".[56]

Nearly 53,000 youth were incarcerated in 2015.[57] 4,656 of those were held in adult facilities, while the rest were in juvenile facilities. Of those in juvenile facilities, 69% are 16 or older, while over 500 are 12 or younger.[57] As arrest and crime rates are not equal across demographic groups, neither is prison population. The Prison Policy Initiative broke down those numbers, finding that, relative to their share of the U.S. population, "black and American Indian youth are over represented in juvenile facilities while white youth are under represented.",[57] Black youth comprise 14% of the national youth population, but "43% of boys and 34% of girls in juvenile facilities are Black. And even excluding youth held in Indian country facilities, American Indians make up 3% of girls and 1.5% of boys in juvenile facilities, despite comprising less than 1% of all youth nationally.".[57]

Elderly edit

The percentage of prisoners in federal and state prisons aged 55 and older increased by 33% from 2000 to 2005 while the prison population grew by 8%. The Southern Legislative Conference found that in 16 southern states, the elderly prisoner population increased on average by 145% between 1997 and 2007. The growth in the elderly population brought along higher health care costs, most notably seen in the 10% average increase in state prison budgets from 2005 to 2006.

The SLC expects the percentage of elderly prisoners relative to the overall prison population to continue to rise. Ronald Aday, a professor of aging studies at Middle Tennessee State University and author of Aging Prisoners: Crisis in American Corrections, concurs. One out of six prisoners in California is serving a life sentence. Aday predicts that by 2020 16% percent of those serving life sentences will be elderly.[58][59]

State governments pay all of their inmates' housing costs which significantly increase as prisoners age. Inmates are unable to apply for Medicare and Medicaid. Most Departments of Correction report spending more than 10 percent of the annual budget on elderly care.[58][59]

The American Civil Liberties Union published a report in 2012 which asserts that the elderly prison population has climbed 1300% since the 1980s, with 125,000 inmates aged 55 or older now incarcerated.[60]

LGBT people edit

LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender) youth are disproportionately more likely than the general population to come into contact with the criminal justice system. According to the National Center for Transgender Equality, 16 percent of transgender adults have been in prison and/or jail, compared to 2.7 percent of all adults.[61] It has also been found that 13–15 percent of youth in detention identify as LGBT, whereas an estimated 4–8 percent of the general youth population identify as such.[62]

According to Yarbrough (2021), higher rates of poverty, homelessness, and profiling of transgendered people by law enforcement are the cause of the higher rate of imprisonment experienced by transgender and gender non-conforming people.[63] LGBT youth not only experience these same challenges, but many also live in homes unwelcoming to their identities.[64] This often results in LGBT youth running away and/or engaging in criminal activities, such as the drug trade, sex work, and/or theft, which places them at higher risk for arrest. Because of discriminatory practices and limited access to resources, transgender adults are also more likely to engage in criminal activities to be able to pay for housing, health care, and other basic needs.[64]

LGBT people in jail and prison are particularly vulnerable to mistreatment by other inmates and staff. This mistreatment includes solitary confinement (which may be described as "protective custody"), physical and sexual violence, verbal abuse, and denial of medical care and other services.[61][65] According to the National Inmate Survey, in 2011–12, 40 percent of transgender inmates reported sexual victimization compared to 4 percent of all inmates.[66]

Mentally disabled edit

In the United States, the percentage of inmates with mental illness has been steadily increasing, with rates more than quadrupling from 1998 to 2006.[67] Many have attributed this trend to the deinstitutionalization of mentally ill persons beginning in the 1960s, when mental hospitals across the country began closing their doors.[68][69] However, other researchers indicate that "there is no evidence for the basic criminalization premise that decreased psychiatric services explain the disproportionate risk of incarceration for individuals with mental illness".[70]

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, over half of all prisoners in 2005 had experienced mental illness as identified by "a recent history or symptoms of a mental health problem"; of this population, jail inmates experienced the highest rates of symptoms of mental illness at 60 percent, followed by 49 percent of state prisoners and 40 percent of federal prisoners.[71] Not only do people with recent histories of mental illness end up incarcerated, but many who have no history of mental illness end up developing symptoms while in prison. In 2006, the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that a quarter of state prisoners had a history of mental illness, whereas 3 in 10 state prisoners had developed symptoms of mental illness since becoming incarcerated with no recent history of mental illness.[71]

According to Human Rights Watch, one of the contributing factors to the disproportionate rates of mental illness in prisons and jails is the increased use of solitary confinement, for which "socially and psychologically meaningful contact is reduced to the absolute minimum, to a point that is insufficient for most detainees to remain mentally well functioning".[72] Another factor to be considered is that most inmates do not get the mental health services that they need while incarcerated. Due to limited funding, prisons are not able to provide a full range of mental health services and thus are typically limited to inconsistent administration of psychotropic medication, or no psychiatric services at all.[69][72] Human Rights Watch also claims that corrections officers routinely use excessive violence against mentally ill inmates for nonthreatening behaviors related to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. These reports found that some inmates had been shocked, shackled and pepper sprayed.[73]

Mental illness rarely stands alone when analyzing the risk factors associated with incarceration and recidivism rates.[71][74] The American Psychological Association recommends a holistic approach to reducing recidivism rates among offenders by providing "cognitive–behavioral treatment focused on criminal cognition" or "services that target variable risk factors for high-risk offenders" due to the numerous intersecting risk factors experienced by mentally ill and non-mentally ill offenders alike.[74]

To prevent the recidivism of individuals with mental illness, a variety of programs are in place that are based on criminal justice or mental health intervention models. Programs modeled after criminal justice strategies include diversion programs, mental health courts, specialty mental health probation or parole, and jail aftercare/prison re-entry. Programs modeled after mental health interventions include forensic assertive community treatment and forensic intensive case management. It has been argued that the wide diversity of these program interventions points to a lack of clarity on which specific program components are most effective in reducing recidivism rates among individuals with mental illness. Inmates who have a mental illness tend to stay for longer days in jail compared to inmates who don't have a mental illness. Inmates with mental illness may struggle to understand and follow prison rules. Inmates with mental illness will usually get in trouble with more facility violation rules. Suicide is the leading cause of death in many prisons. People who have a serious mental illness tend to die by suicide more often in prison.[75]

Students edit

The term "school-to-prison pipeline", also known as the "schoolhouse-to-jailhouse track", is a concept that was named in the 1980s.[76] The school-to-prison pipeline is the idea that a school's harsh punishments—which typically push students out of the classroom—lead to the criminalization of students' misbehaviors and result in increasing a student's probability of entering the prison system.[77] Although the school-to-prison pipeline is aggravated by a combination of ingredients, zero-tolerance policies are viewed as main contributors.[78] Additionally, the "School to Prison Pipeline disproportionately impacts the poor, students with disabilities, and youth of color, especially African Americans, who are suspended and expelled at the highest rates, despite comparable rates of infraction."[76]

In 1994, the Gun-Free Schools Act was passed. It required that students have at least a year long suspension from school if they brought a weapon to school. Many states then adopted the Zero-tolerance policy which lead to an increase in suspensions, mainly for Black and Hispanic kids.

At the same time these policies were growing, school districts adopted their own version of the "broken windows theory". The broken windows theory emphasizes the importance of cracking down on small offenses in order to make residents feel safer and discourage more serious crime. For schools, this meant more suspensions for small offenses like talking back to teachers, skipping class, or being disobedient or disruptive. This led to schools having police officers in schools, which in turn led to students being arrested and handled more harshly.

Zero-tolerance policies are regulations that mandate specific consequences in response to outlined student misbehavior, typically without any consideration for the unique circumstances surrounding a given incident.[79] Zero-tolerance policies both implicitly and explicitly usher the student into the prison track. Implicitly, when a student is extracted from the classroom, the more likely that student is to drop out of school as a result of being in class less. As a dropout, that child is then ill-prepared to obtain a job and become a fruitful citizen.[80] Explicitly, schools sometimes do not funnel their pupils to the prison systems inadvertently; rather, they send them directly.[81] Once in juvenile court, even sympathetic judges are not likely to evaluate whether the school's punishment was warranted or fair. For these reasons, it is argued that zero-tolerance policies lead to an exponential increase in the juvenile prison populations.[82]

The national suspension rate doubled from 3.7% to 7.4% from 1973 to 2010.[83] The claim that Zero Tolerance Policies affect students of color at a disproportionate rate is supported in the Code of Maryland Regulations study, that found black students were suspended at more than double the rate of white students.[84] This data is further backed by Moriah Balingit, who states that when compared to white students, black students are suspended and expelled at greater rates according to the Civil Rights Data Collection, that has records with specific information for the 2015–2016 school year of about 96,000 schools.[85] In addition, further data shows that although black students only accounted for 15% of the student population, they represented a 31% of the arrests.[85] Hispanic children share this in common with their black counterparts, as they too are more susceptible to harsher discipline like suspension and expulsion.[86] This trend can be seen throughout numerous studies of this type of material and particularly in the south.[87][88] Furthermore, between 1985 and 1989, there was an increase in referrals of minority youth to juvenile court, petitioned cases, adjudicated delinquency cases, and delinquency cases placed outside the home.[89] During this time period, the number of African American youth detained increased by 9% and the number of Hispanic youths detained increased by 4%, yet the proportion of White youth declined by 13%.[88] Documentation of this phenomenon can be seen as early as 1975 with the book School Suspensions: Are they helping children?[90] Additionally, as punitive action leads to dropout rates, so does imprisonment. Data shows in the year 2000, one in three black male students ages 20–40 who did not complete high school were incarcerated.[91] Moreover, about 70% of those in state prison have not finished high school.[91] Lastly, if one is a black male living post-Civil Rights Movement with no high school diploma, there is a 60% chance that they will be incarcerated in their lifetime.[91]

Immigrants and foreign nationals edit

The United States government holds tens of thousands of immigrants in detention under the control of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). These immigrants seek asylum into the United states and are detained prior to release into the United States or deportation and removal from the country. During 2018, 396,448 people were booked into ICE custody: 242,778 of whom were detained by CBP and 153,670 by ICE's own enforcement operations.[92]

The BOP receives all prisoner transfer treaty inmates sent from foreign countries, even if their crimes would have been, if committed in the United States, tried in state, DC, or territorial courts.[93] Non-US citizens incarcerated in federal and state prisons are eligible to be transferred to their home countries if they qualify.[94]

Class and poverty edit

The poor in the United States are incarcerated at a much higher rate than their counterparts in other developed nations.[95] According to a 2015 study by the Vera Institute of Justice, jails in the U.S. have become "massive warehouses" of the impoverished since the 1980s.[96]

A December 2017 report by Philip Alston, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, asserted that the justice system throughout the U.S. is designed to keep people mired in poverty and to generate revenue to fund the justice system and other governmental programs.[97]

Sociologist Matthew Desmond of Princeton University writes that the "overwhelming majority" of prisoners and former prisoners of the US prison system, which "has no equal in any other country or any other epoch," are extremely poor. And they stay poor as prison jobs pay an average wage of between 14 cents and $1.41 an hour. He notes that the carceral state also "disappears" the incarcerated poor by erasing them from poverty statistics and national surveys, "which means there are millions more poor Americans than official statistics let on."[98]

Features of the criminal justice system edit

Duration edit

Many legislatures continually have reduced discretion of judges in both the sentencing process and the determination of when the conditions of a sentence have been satisfied. Determinate sentencing, use of mandatory minimums, and guidelines-based sentencing continue to remove the human element from sentencing, such as the prerogative of the judge to consider the mitigating or extenuating circumstances of a crime to determine the appropriate length of the incarceration. As the consequence of "three strikes laws", the increase in the duration of incarceration in the last decade was most pronounced in the case of life prison sentences, which increased by 83% between 1992 and 2003 while violent crimes fell in the same period.[99]

Violent and nonviolent crime edit

In 2016, there were an estimated 1.2 million violent crimes committed in the United States.[100] Over the course of that year, U.S. law enforcement agencies made approximately 10.7 million arrests, excluding arrests for traffic violations.[100] In that year, approximately 2.3 million people were incarcerated in jail or prison.[101]

 
Felony Sentences in State Courts, study by the United States Department of Justice

As of September 30, 2009 in federal prisons, 7.9% of sentenced people were incarcerated for violent crimes,[102] while at year end 2008 of sentenced people in state prisons, 52.4% had been jailed for violent crimes.[102] In 2002 (latest available data by type of offense), 21.6% of convicted inmates in jails were in prison for violent crimes. Among unconvicted inmates in jails in 2002, 34% had a violent offense as the most serious charge. 41% percent of convicted and unconvicted jail inmates in 2002 had a current or prior violent offense; 46% were nonviolent recidivists.[103]

From 2000 to 2008, the state prison population increased by 159,200 imprisoned people, and violent offenders accounted for 60% of this increase. The number of drug offenders in state prisons declined by 12,400 over this period. Furthermore, while the number of sentenced violent offenders in state prison increased from 2000 through 2008, the expected length of stays for these offenders declined slightly during this period.[102]

In 2013, The Week reported that at least 3,278 Americans were serving life sentences without parole for nonviolent crimes, including "cursing at a policeman and selling $10 worth of drugs. More than 80 percent of these life sentences are the result of mandatory sentencing laws."[104]

In 2016, about 200,000, under 16%, of the 1.3 million people in state jails, were serving time for drug offenses. 700,000 were incarcerated for violent offenses.[105]

Nonviolent crime was the main driver of the increase in the incarcerated population in the United States from 1980 to 2003. Violent crime rates had been relatively constant or declining over those decades. The prison population was increased primarily by public policy changes causing more prison sentences and lengthening time served, for example through mandatory minimum sentencing, "three strikes" laws, and reductions in the availability of parole or early release.

Perhaps the single greatest force behind the growth of the prison population has been the national "War on Drugs". The War on Drugs initiative expanded during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. During Reagan's term, a bi-partisan Congress established the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, galvanized by the death of Len Bias. According to the Human Rights Watch, legislation like this led to the extreme increase in drug offense imprisonment and "increasing racial disproportions among the arrestees".[106] The number of incarcerated drug offenders has increased twelvefold since 1980. In 2000, 22 percent of those in federal and state prisons were convicted on drug charges.[107][108] In 2011, 55.6% of the 1,131,210 sentenced people in state prisons were being held for violent crimes (this number excludes the 200,966 imprisoned people being held due to parole violations, of which 39.6% were re-incarcerated for a subsequent violent crime).[109] Also in 2011, 3.7% of the state prison population consisted of imprisoned people whose highest conviction was for drug possession (again excluding those incarcerated for parole violations of which 6.0% were re-incarcerated for a subsequent act of drug possession).[109]

Pre-trial detention edit

In 2020, the non-profit Prison Policy Initiative issued a report, "Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2020", that said, based on the most recent census data and information from the Bureau of Prisons, an overwhelming majority of inmates in county and municipal jails were being held pre-trial, without having been convicted of a crime. The Pre-Trial Justice Institute noted, "Six out of 10 people in U.S. jails—nearly a half million individuals on any given day—are awaiting trial. People who have not been found guilty of the charges against them account for 95% of all jail population growth between 2000–2014."[110][111]

In 2017, 482,100 inmates in federal and state prisons were held pre-trial.[112]

Advocates for decarceration contend the large pre-trial detention population serves as a compelling reason for bail reform anchored in a presumption of innocence.[113] "We don't want people sitting in jails only because they cannot afford their financial bail," said Representative John Tilley (D) of Kentucky, a state that has eliminated commercial bail and relies on a risk assessment to determine a defendant's flight risk.[114]

In March, 2020, the Department of Justice issued its report, noting the county and municipal jail population, totaling 738,400 inmates, had decreased by 12% over the last decade, from an estimated 258 jail inmates per 100,000 U.S. residents in 2008 to 226 per 100,000 in 2018. For the first time since 1990, the 2018 jail incarceration rate for African Americans fell below 600 per 100,000, while the juvenile jail population dropped 56%, from 7,700 to 3,400.[115]

In 2018, sixty-eight percent of jail inmates were behind bars on felony charges, about two-thirds of the total jail population was awaiting court action or held for other reasons.[116]

Prison education edit

Prison education encompasses any type of educational program offered within a prison, including literacy programs, high school or GED equivalent programs, vocational education, and tertiary education. In the early 1800s, tutors began to enter prisons and the idea of punishment began to shift towards rehabilitation. By the early 1990s, there were over 350 prison education programs nationwide.[117] In 1994, Bill Clinton signed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act into law, which barred incarcerated people from receiving Pell Grants. This caused the number of educational programs to quickly decline due to a lack of federal funding.[118]

Prison education has proven to lower recidivism rates and increase employment for graduates upon release. A 2013 study conducted by the Rand Corporation found that correctional education led to a significant reduction in recidivism rates, and those who participated in prison education programs showed "43% lower odds of recidivating than inmates who did not.”[119] That same study showed that individuals who received vocational education and training saw a 28% increase in employment following incarceration, and those who participated in strictly academic educational programs saw an 8% increase in employment.[119]

Recidivism edit

A 2002 study survey, showed that among nearly 275,000 prisoners released in 1994, 67.5% were rearrested within 3 years, and 51.8% were back in prison.[120] However, the study found no evidence that spending more time in prison raises the recidivism rate, and found that those serving the longest time, 61 months or more, had a slightly lower re-arrest rate (54.2%) than every other category of prisoners. This is most likely explained by the older average age of those released with the longest sentences, and the study shows a strong negative correlation between recidivism and age upon release. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, a study was conducted that tracked 404,638 prisoners in 30 states after their release from prison in 2005. From the examination it was found that within three years after their release 67.8% of the released prisoners were rearrested; within five years, 76.6% of the released prisoners were rearrested, and of the prisoners that were rearrested 56.7% of them were rearrested by the end of their first year of release.[121]

Comparison with other countries edit

 
A map of incarceration rates by country[5]

With around 100 prisoners per 100,000, the United States had an average prison and jail population until 1980. Afterwards it drifted apart considerably.[122] The United States has the highest prison and jail population (2,121,600 in adult facilities in 2016) as well as the highest incarceration rate in the world (655 per 100,000 population in 2016).[5][123][124] According to the World Prison Population List (11th edition) there were around 10.35 million people in penal institutions worldwide in 2015.[125] The US had 2,173,800 prisoners in adult facilities in 2015.[126] That means the US held 21.0% of the world's prisoners in 2015, even though the US represented only around 4.4 percent of the world's population in 2015,[127][128]

Comparing other English-speaking developed countries, whereas the incarceration rate of the US is 655 per 100,000 population of all ages,[5] the incarceration rate of Canada is 114 per 100,000 (as of 2015),[129] England and Wales is 146 per 100,000 (as of 2016),[130] Australia is 160 per 100,000 (as of 2016) [131] and Ireland is 82 per 100,000 (as of Aug 2022).[132] Comparing other developed countries, the rate of Spain is 133 per 100,000 (as of 2016),[133] Greece is 89 per 100,000 (as of 2016),[134] Norway is 73 per 100,000 (as of 2016),[135] Netherlands is 69 per 100,000 (as of 2014),[136] and Japan is 48 per 100,000 (as of 2014).[137]

According to a 2021 report by the Prison Policy Initiative, every state has a higher incarceration rate than "virtually any independent democracy on earth."[138] Louisiana has the highest incarceration rate at 1,094.[138] In 2012, The Times-Picayune described the state as the prison capital of the world.[139]

A 2008 New York Times article,[124] said that "it is the length of sentences that truly distinguishes American prison policy. Indeed, the mere number of sentences imposed here would not place the United States at the top of the incarceration lists. If lists were compiled based on annual admissions to prison per capita, several European countries would outpace the United States. But American prison stays are much longer, so the total incarceration rate is higher."

The number of incarcerated individuals in U.S. jails and prisons jumped 500% in the three decades following the implementation of tougher sentencing laws associated with the War on Drugs and the "tough on crime" movement.[122] The U.S. incarceration rate peaked in 2008 when about 1 in 100 US adults was behind bars.[140] This incarceration rate exceeded the average incarceration levels in the Soviet Union during the existence of the Gulag system, when the Soviet Union's population reached 168 million, and 1.2 to 1.5 million people were in the Gulag prison camps and colonies (i.e. about 0.8 imprisoned per 100 USSR residents, according to numbers from Anne Applebaum and Steven Rosefielde).[141][142] In The New Yorker article The Caging of America (2012), Adam Gopnik writes: "Over all, there are now more people under 'correctional supervision' in America—more than six million—than were in the Gulag Archipelago under Stalin at its height."[143]

Operational edit

 
U.S. federal prisoner distribution since 1950

Prison systems edit

The American prison system is one of significant heterogeneity. In fact, it would be misleading to suggest that the U.S. has one "criminal justice system." Instead, there are thousands of systems across federal, state, local, tribal levels. In 2023, there were a reported "1,566 state prisons, 98 federal prisons, 3,116 local jails, 1,323 juvenile correctional facilities, 181 immigrant detention facilities, and 80 Indian country jails, as well as military prisons, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric hospitals, and prisons in the U.S. territories."[30]

Despite the country's disparate systems of confinement, the U.S. prison system may be generally identified with four main institutions: state prisons, federal prisons, local jails, and juvenile correctional facilities.[32] State prisons are run by state departments of correction, holding sentenced people serving time for felony offenses, usually longer than a year.[32] Federal prisons are run by the U.S. Bureau of Prisons and hold people who have been convicted of federal crimes and pretrial detainees.[32] Local jails are county or municipal facilities that incarcerate defendants prior to trial, and also hold those serving short sentences, typically under a year.[32] Juvenile correctional facilities are operated by local authorities or the state and serve as longer-term placements for youth who have been adjudicated as delinquent and ordered by a judge to be confined.[144]

Security levels edit

In some, but not all, states' department of corrections, inmates reside in different facilities that vary by security level, especially in security measures, administration of inmates, type of housing, and weapons and tactics used by corrections officers. The federal government's Bureau of Prisons uses a numbered scale from one to five to represent the security level. Level five is the most secure, while level one is the least. State prison systems operate similar systems. California, for example, classifies its facilities from Reception Center through Levels I to V (minimum to maximum security) to specialized high security units (all considered Level V) including Security Housing Unit (SHU)—California's version of supermax—and related units. As a general rule, county jails, detention centers, and reception centers, where new commitments are first held while either awaiting trial or before being transferred to "mainline" institutions to serve out their sentences, operate at a relatively high level of security, usually close security or higher.

Supermax prison facilities provide the highest level of prison security. These units hold those considered the most dangerous inmates, as well as inmates that have been deemed too high-profile or too great a national security risk for a normal prison. These include inmates who have committed assaults, murders, or other serious violations in less secure facilities, and inmates known to be or accused of being prison gang members. Most states have either a supermax section of a prison facility or an entire prison facility designated as a supermax. The United States Federal Bureau of Prisons operates a federal supermax, A.D.X. Florence, located in Florence, Colorado, also known as the "Alcatraz of the Rockies" and is widely considered to possibly be the most secure prison in the United States. A.D.X. Florence has a standard supermax section where assaultive, violent, and gang-related inmates are kept under normal supermax conditions of 23-hour confinement and abridged amenities. A.D.X. Florence is considered to be of a security level above that of all other prisons in the United States, at least in the "ideological" ultramax part of it, which features permanent, 24-hour solitary confinement with rare human contacts or opportunity to earn better conditions through good behavior.

In a maximum security prison or area (called high security in the federal system), all prisoners have individual cells[145] with sliding doors controlled from a secure remote control station. Prisoners are allowed out of their cells one out of twenty four hours (one hour and 30 minutes for prisoners in California). When out of their cells, prisoners remain in the cell block or an exterior cage. Movement out of the cell block or "pod" is tightly restricted using restraints and escorts by correctional officers.

 
Incarceration Rate by State, 2016; excludes jail inmates.[146]

Under close security, prisoners usually have one- or two-person cells operated from a remote control station. Each cell has its own toilet and sink. Inmates may leave their cells for work assignments or correctional programs and otherwise may be allowed in a common area in the cellblock or an exercise yard. The fences are generally double fences with watchtowers housing armed guards, plus often a third, lethal-current electric fence in the middle.

Prisoners that fall into the medium security group may sleep in cells, but share them two and two, and use bunk beds[145] with lockers to store their possessions. Depending upon the facility, each cell may have showers, toilets and sinks. Cells are locked at night with one or more correctional officers supervising. There is less supervision over the internal movements of prisoners. The perimeter is generally double fenced and regularly patrolled.

Prisoners in minimum security facilities are considered to pose little physical risk to the public and are mainly non-violent "white collar criminals". Minimum security prisoners live in less-secure dormitories,[145] which are regularly patrolled by correctional officers. As in medium security facilities, they have communal showers, toilets, and sinks. A minimum-security facility generally has a single fence that is watched, but not patrolled, by armed guards. At facilities in very remote and rural areas, there may be no fence at all. Prisoners may often work on community projects, such as roadside litter cleanup with the state department of transportation or wilderness conservation. Many minimum security facilities are small camps located in or near military bases, larger prisons (outside the security perimeter) or other government institutions to provide a convenient supply of convict labor to the institution. Many states allow persons in minimum-security facilities access to the Internet.

Correspondence edit

Inmates who maintain contact with family and friends in the outside world are less likely to be convicted of further crimes and usually have an easier reintegration period back into society.[147] Inmates benefit from corresponding with friends and family members, especially when in-person visits are infrequent.[148] However, guidelines exist as to what constitutes acceptable mail, and these policies are strictly enforced.

Mail sent to inmates in violation of prison policies can result in sanctions such as loss of imprisonment time reduced for good behavior. Most Department of Corrections websites provide detailed information regarding mail policies. These rules can even vary within a single prison depending on which part of the prison an inmate is housed. For example, death row and maximum security inmates are usually under stricter mail guidelines for security reasons.

There have been several notable challenges to prison corresponding services. The Missouri Department of Corrections (DOC) stated that effective June 1, 2007, inmates would be prohibited from using pen pal websites, citing concerns that inmates were using them to solicit money and defraud the public.[149] Service providers such as WriteAPrisoner.com, together with the ACLU, planned to challenge the ban in Federal Court.[needs update] Similar bans on an inmate's rights or a website's right to post such information has been ruled unconstitutional in other courts, citing First Amendment freedoms.[150] Some faith-based initiatives promote the positive effects of correspondence on inmates, and some have made efforts to help ex-offenders reintegrate into society through job placement assistance.[151] Inmates' ability to mail letters to other inmates has been limited by the courts.[152]

Conditions edit

 
Living facilities in Mule Creek State Prison (2006).[153]

The non-governmental organization Human Rights Watch claims that prisoners and detainees face "abusive, degrading and dangerous" conditions within local, state and federal facilities, including those operated by for-profit contractors.[154] The organization also raised concerns with prisoner rape and medical care for inmates.[155] In a survey of 1,788 male inmates in Midwestern prisons by Prison Journal, about 21% responded they had been coerced or pressured into sexual activity during their incarceration, and 7% that they had been raped in their current facility.[156]

In August 2003, a Harper's article by Wil S. Hylton estimated that "somewhere between 20 and 40% of American prisoners are, at this very moment, infected with hepatitis C".[157] Prisons may outsource medical care to private companies such as Correctional Medical Services (now Corizon) that, according to Hylton's research, try to minimize the amount of care given to prisoners in order to maximize profits.[157][158] After the privatization of healthcare in Arizona's prisons, medical spending fell by 30 million dollars and staffing was greatly reduced. Some 50 prisoners died in custody in the first 8 months of 2013, compared to 37 for the preceding two years combined.[159]

The poor quality of food provided to inmates has become an issue, as over the last decade corrections officials looking to cut costs have been outsourcing food services to corporations such as Aramark, A'Viands Food & Services Management, and ABL Management.[160] A prison riot in Kentucky has been blamed on the low quality of food Aramark provided to inmates, which was tainted with worms and human feces.[161] A 2017 study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that because of lapses in food safety, prison inmates are 6.4 times more likely to contract a food-related illness than the general population.[162]

Also identified as an issue within the prison system is gang violence, because many gang members retain their gang identity and affiliations when imprisoned. Segregation of identified gang members from the general population of inmates, with different gangs being housed in separate units often results in the imprisonment of these gang members with their friends and criminal cohorts. Some feel this has the effect of turning prisons into "institutions of higher criminal learning".[163]

Many prisons in the United States are overcrowded. For example, California's 33 prisons have a total capacity of 100,000, but they hold 170,000 inmates.[164] Many prisons in California and around the country are forced to turn old gymnasiums and classrooms into huge bunkhouses for inmates. They do this by placing hundreds of bunk beds next to one another, in these gyms, without any type of barriers to keep inmates separated. In California, the inadequate security engendered by this situation, coupled with insufficient staffing levels, have led to increased violence and a prison health system that causes one death a week. This situation has led the courts to order California to release 27% of the current prison population, citing the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.[165] The three-judge court considering requests by the Plata v. Schwarzenegger and Coleman v. Schwarzenegger courts found California's prisons have become criminogenic as a result of prison overcrowding.[166]

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court case of Cutter v. Wilkinson established that prisons that received federal funds could not deny prisoners accommodations necessary for religious practices.

According to a Supreme Court ruling issued on May 23, 2011, California — which has the highest overcrowding rate of any prison system in the country — must alleviate overcrowding in the state's prisons, reducing the prisoner population by 30,000 over the next two years.[167][168][169][170][needs update]

 
Inmates in an Orleans Parish Prison yard

Solitary confinement is widely used in US prisons, yet it is underreported by most states, while some do not report it at all. Isolation of prisoners has been condemned by the UN in 2011 as a form of torture.[171] At over 80,000 at any given time, the US has more prisoners confined in isolation than any other country in the world. In Louisiana, with 843 prisoners per 100,000 citizens, there have been prisoners, such as the Angola Three, held for as long as forty years in isolation.[172][171] A June 2023 study by Solitary Watch found that over 120,000 people on any given day are in solitary confinement in the United States.[173]

In 1999, the Supreme Court of Norway refused to extradite American hashish-smuggler Henry Hendricksen, as they declared that US prisons do not meet their minimum humanitarian standards.[174]

In 2011, some 885 people died while being held in local jails (not in prisons after being convicted of a crime and sentenced) throughout the United States.[175] According to federal statistics, roughly 4,400 inmates die in US prisons and jails annually, excluding executions.[176]

As of September 2013, condoms for prisoners are only available in the U.S. State of Vermont (on September 17, 2013, the California Senate approved a bill for condom distribution inside the state's prisons, but the bill was not yet law at the time of approval)[177] and in county jails in San Francisco.[178]

In September 2016, a group of corrections officers at Holman Correctional Facility have gone on strike over safety concerns and overcrowding. Prisoners refer to the facility as a "slaughterhouse" as stabbings are a routine occurrence.[179]

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the US, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) requested health data from 54 state and territorial health department jurisdictions. 32 (86%) of 37 jurisdictions that responded reported at least one confirmed COVID-19 case among inmates or staff members. As of April 21, 2020, there were 4,893 cases and 88 deaths among inmates and 2,778 cases and 15 deaths among staff members.[180]

Conditions for Women edit

The conditions for women, especially Black women, are often poor. Many prisons are known to do less in order to help Black women get out of the prison system. Because prisons are male dominated, a larger portion of the resources are allocated towards them. Another major issue that women face in prisons is sexual assault, which often comes from guards. Though this is a major issue for women, these types of assaults do not usually get the attention that they need, and the victims are often left not being taken care of.[181]

Based on Angela Davis' "Are Prisons Obsolete?", the prison industrial complex and mass incarceration is shaped by gender. There are significant differences in the treatment of imprisoned men and women. Women endure physical, mental, and emotional trauma as they are forced to endure sexual abuse and a lack of resources for their intimate needs. In prison, women are dehumanized and treated like objects in a way that has become normal. Like many other socio-political issues, women seem to be left out of the conversation when it comes to prison reform. Again, not many people consider the experiences that women have endured in their time of imprisonment. Women were degraded to an extreme extent, and sexual abuse was often brought on by the guards and officers who are supposed to watch over them. They are sexualized, and often sent to prison for a longer duration than men.[citation needed]

The petty crimes of women are also not met with the same intensity of murder charges for men. According to Davis, "masculine criminality has always been deemed more "normal" than feminine criminality" (Davis, 2011). When a woman commits a crime, it is not as common and so it is practically considered psychotic. Because of this, "deviant women have been constructed as insane" (Davis, 2011). Women are treated as if their crimes are more irrational because of their gender, and their sentencing can be harsher as a result. Women are even more inclined to be imprisoned in psychiatric hospitals than men, and prescribed psychiatric treatment.[182]

Privatization edit

Prior to the 1980s, private prisons did not exist in the U.S. During the 1980s, as a result of the War on Drugs by the Reagan Administration, the number of people incarcerated rose. This created a demand for more prison space. The result was the development of privatization and the for-profit prison industry.[183][184][185][186]

A 1998 study was performed using three comparable Louisiana medium security prisons, two of which were privately run by different corporations and one of which was publicly run. The data from this study suggested that the privately run prisons operated more cost-effectively without sacrificing the safety of inmates and staff. The study concluded that both privately run prisons had a lower cost per inmate, a lower rate of critical incidents, a safer environment for employees and inmates, and a higher proportional rate of inmates who completed basic education, literacy, and vocational training courses. However, the publicly run prison outperformed the privately run prisons in areas such as experiencing fewer escape attempts, controlling substance abuse through testing, offering a wider range of educational and vocational courses, and providing a broader range of treatment, recreation, social services, and rehabilitative services.[187]

According to Marie Gottschalk, a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, studies that claim private prisons are cheaper to run than public prisons fail to "take into account the fundamental differences between private and public facilities," and that the prison industry "engages in a lot of cherry-picking and cost-shifting to maintain the illusion that the private sector does it better for less."[188] The American Civil Liberties Union reported in 2013 that numerous studies indicate private jails are actually filthier, more violent, less accountable, and possibly more costly than their public counterparts. The ACLU stated that the for-profit prison industry is "a major contributor to bloated state budgets and mass incarceration – not a part of any viable solution to these urgent problems."[189] The primary reason Louisiana is the prison capital of the world is because of the for-profit prison industry.[139] According to The Times-Picayune, "a majority of Louisiana inmates are housed in for-profit facilities, which must be supplied with a constant influx of human beings or a $182 million industry will go bankrupt."[139]

In Mississippi, a 2013 Bloomberg report stated that assault rates in private facilities were three times higher on average than in their public counterparts. In 2012, the for-profit Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility was the most violent prison in the state with 27 assaults per 100 offenders.[190] A federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center on behalf of prisoners at the privately run East Mississippi Correctional Facility in 2013 claims the conditions there are "hyper-violent", "barbaric" and "chaotic", with gangs routinely beating and exploiting mentally ill inmates who are denied medical care by prison staff.[191][192] A May 2012 riot in the Corrections Corporation of America-run Adams County Correctional Facility, also in Mississippi, left one corrections officer dead and dozens injured. Similar riots have occurred in privatized facilities in Idaho, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Florida, California and Texas.[193][194][195]

 
Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility in Mississippi, operated by Corrections Corporation of America (CCA)

Sociologist John L. Campbell of Dartmouth College claims that private prisons in the U.S. have become "a lucrative business".[196] Between 1990 and 2000, the number of private facilities grew from five to 100, operated by nearly 20 private firms. Over the same time period the stock price of the industry leader, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), which rebranded as CoreCivic in 2016 amid increased scrutiny of the private prison industry,[197] climbed from $8 a share to $30.[196] According to journalist Matt Taibbi, major investors in the prison industry include Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Fidelity Investments, General Electric and The Vanguard Group.[198] The aforementioned Bloomberg report also notes that in the past decade the number of inmates in for-profit prisons throughout the U.S. rose 44 percent.[190]

Controversy has surrounded the privatization of prisons with the exposure of the genesis of the landmark Arizona SB 1070 law. This law was written by Arizona State Congressman Russell Pearce and the CCA at a meeting of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) in the Grand Hyatt in Washington, D.C.[199][200] Both CCA and GEO Group, the two largest operators of private facilities, have been contributors to ALEC, which lobbies for policies that would increase incarceration, such as three-strike laws and "truth-in-sentencing" legislation.[201][202][203][204][205] In fact, in the early 1990s, when CCA was co-chair of ALEC, it co-sponsored (with the National Rifle Association) the so-called "truth-in-sentencing" and "three-strikes-you're-out" laws.[206] Truth-in-sentencing called for all violent offenders to serve 85 percent of their sentences before being eligible for release; three strikes called for mandatory life imprisonment for a third felony conviction. Some prison officers unions in publicly run facilities such as California Correctional Peace Officers Association have, in the past, also supported measures such as three-strike laws. Such laws increased the prison population.[207][208]

In addition to CCA and GEO Group, companies operating in the private prison business include Management and Training Corporation, and Community Education Centers. The GEO Group was formerly known as the Wackenhut Corrections division. It includes the former Correctional Services Corporation and Cornell Companies, which were purchased by GEO in 2005 and 2010. Such companies often sign contracts with states obliging them to fill prison beds or reimburse them for those that go unused.[209]

Private companies which provide services to prisons combine in the American Correctional Association, a 501(c)3 which advocates legislation favorable to the industry. Such private companies comprise what has been termed the prison–industrial complex.[184][210][211][212] An example of this phenomenon would be the Kids for cash scandal, in which two judges in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan, were receiving judicial kickbacks for sending youths, convicted of minor crimes,[213] to a privatized, for-profit juvenile facility run by the Mid Atlantic Youth Service Corporation.[203]

The industry is aware of what reduced crime rates could mean to their bottom line. This from the CCA's SEC report in 2010:

Our growth … depends on a number of factors we cannot control, including crime rates …[R]eductions in crime rates … could lead to reductions in arrests, convictions and sentences requiring incarceration at correctional facilities.[189]

Marie Gottschalk claims that while private prison companies and other economic interests were not the primary drivers of mass incarceration originally, they do much to sustain it today.[214] The private prison industry has successfully lobbied for changes that increase the profit of their employers. They have opposed measures that would bring reduced sentencing or shorter prison terms.[215][216] The private prison industry has been accused of being at least partly responsible for America's high rates of incarceration.[217]

According to The Corrections Yearbook, 2000, the average annual starting salary for public corrections officers was $23,002, compared to $17,628 for private prison guards. The poor pay is a likely factor in the high turnover rate in private prisons, at 52.2 percent compared to 16 percent in public facilities.[218]

In September 2015, Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the "Justice Is Not for Sale" Act,[219] which would prohibit the United States government at federal, state and local levels from contracting with private firms to provide and/or operate detention facilities within two years.[220]

An August 2016 report by the U.S. Department of Justice asserts that privately operated federal facilities are less safe, less secure and more punitive than other federal prisons.[221] Shortly after this report was published, the DoJ announced it will stop using private prisons.[222] On February 23, the DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions overturned the ban on using private prisons. According to Sessions, "the (Obama administration) memorandum changed long-standing policy and practice, and impaired the bureau's ability to meet the future needs of the federal correctional system. Therefore, I direct the bureau to return to its previous approach."[223] The private prison industry has been booming under the Trump Administration.[224][225][226]

Additionally, both CCA and GEO Group have been expanding into the immigrant detention market. Although the combined revenues of CCA and GEO Group were about $4 billion in 2017 from private prison contracts, their number one customer was ICE.[227]

Labor edit

About 18% of eligible prisoners held in federal prisons are employed by UNICOR and are paid less than $1.25 an hour.[228][229][230] Prisons have gradually become a source of low-wage labor for corporations seeking to outsource work to inmates.[196] Corporations that utilize prison labor include Walmart, Eddie Bauer, Victoria's Secret, Microsoft, Starbucks, McDonald's, Nintendo, Chevron Corporation, Bank of America, Koch Industries, Boeing and Costco Wholesale.[231][232][233][234]

Initially, laws passed during the era of the New Deal prohibited the use of prison labor with the exception of state institutions. However, lobbying by corporations eventually allowed them to use prison labor by 1979, and by 1995 businesses won exemptions from minimum wage laws.[235]

It is estimated that one in nine state government employees works in corrections.[140] As the overall U.S. prison population declined in 2010, states are closing prisons. For instance, Virginia has removed 11 prisons since 2009. Like other small towns, Boydton in Virginia has to contend with unemployment woes resulting from the closure of the Mecklenburg Correctional Center.[236]

In 2010, Prisoners in Georgia engaged in the 2010 Georgia prison strike to garner more rights.

In September 2016, large, coordinated prison strikes took place in 11 states, with inmates claiming they are subjected to poor sanitary conditions and jobs that amount to forced labor and modern day slavery.[237][238][239][240] Organizers, which include the Industrial Workers of the World labor union, asserted that it was the largest prison strike in U.S. history.[237]

Starting August 21, 2018, another prison strike, sponsored by Jailhouse Lawyers Speak and the Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee, took place in 17 states from coast to coast to protest what inmates regard as unfair treatment by the criminal justice system. In particular, inmates objected to being excluded from the 13th amendment which forces them to work for pennies a day, a condition they assert is tantamount to "modern-day slavery". The strike was the result of a call to action after a deadly riot occurred at Lee Correctional Institution in April of that year, which was sparked by neglect and inhumane living conditions.[241][242][243][244][245]

According to a 2022 report by the ACLU, prison labor produces $11 billion worth of goods and services annually, with inmates often being forced to work dangerous jobs with no labor protections and little training, and are compensated with pennies per hour or sometimes nothing at all.[246]

In 2023, a nation-wide movement had called to close the 'slavery loophole' in the 13th Amendment, allowing an exception for punishment of crime. According to constitutional scholars, the 13th amendment had been violated as most US states forced inmates to work for no or marginal compensation.[247]

Cost edit

 
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Not adjusted for inflation. To view the inflation-adjusted data, see chart.[248][249]
 
Federal prison yearly cost

Judicial, police, and corrections costs totaled $212 billion in 2011 according to the U.S. Census Bureau.[250] In 2007, around $74 billion was spent on corrections according to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.[248][249] Despite federal statistics including statements made by former Attorney General Eric Holder, according to research on corrections expenditure published in the ▲Church white paper "On Security", Federal Prisons and Detention FY15 Requested Budget was just $8.5 billion.[251] Federal Bureau of Prisons' spending was $6.9 billion counting 20,911 correctional officers of 43,297 positions.[252] Total U.S. States' and Federal Prisons and Detention including county jail subsidies was only $56.9 billion. Adding local jails' spending, $64.9 billion was spent on corrections in nominal 2014 dollars.[253]

In 2014, among facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the average cost of incarceration for federal inmates in fiscal year 2014 was $30,619.85. The average annual cost to confine an inmate in a residential re-entry center was $28,999.25.[254]

State prisons averaged $31,286 per inmate in 2010 according to a Vera Institute of Justice study. It ranged from $14,603 in Kentucky to $60,076 in New York.[255]

In California in 2008, it cost the state an average of $47,102 a year to incarcerate an inmate in a state prison. From 2001 to 2009, the average annual cost increased by about $19,500.[256]

Housing the approximately 500,000 people in jail in the US awaiting trial who cannot afford bail costs $9 billion a year.[257] Most jail inmates are petty, nonviolent offenders. In the early 1990s, most nonviolent defendants were released on their own recognizance (trusted to show up at trial). Now most are given bail, and most pay a bail bondsman to afford it.[258] 62% of local jail inmates are awaiting trial.[259] This rate varies from state to state. As of 2019, Illinois has the highest rate with 89% of inmates in local jails unconvicted.[260]

Bondsmen have lobbied to cut back local pretrial programs from Texas to California, pushed for legislation in four states limiting pretrial's resources, and lobbied Congress so that they won't have to pay the bond if the defendant commits a new crime. Behind them, the bondsmen have powerful special interest group and millions of dollars. Pretrial release agencies have a smattering of public employees and the remnants of their once-thriving programs.

— National Public Radio, January 22, 2010.[261]

To ease jail overcrowding over 10 counties every year consider building new jails. As an example Lubbock County, Texas has decided to build a $110 million megajail to ease jail overcrowding. Jail costs an average of $60 a day nationally.[258][262] In Broward County, Florida supervised pretrial release costs about $7 a day per person while jail costs $115 a day. The jail system costs a quarter of every county tax dollar in Broward County and is the single largest expense to the county taxpayer.[261]

The National Association of State Budget Officers reports: "In fiscal 2009, corrections spending represented 3.4 percent of total state spending and 7.2 percent of general fund spending." They also report: "Some states exclude certain items when reporting corrections expenditures. Twenty-one states wholly or partially excluded juvenile delinquency counseling from their corrections figures and fifteen states wholly or partially excluded spending on juvenile institutions. Seventeen states wholly or partially excluded spending on drug abuse rehabilitation centers and forty-one states wholly or partially excluded spending on institutions for the criminally insane. Twenty-two states wholly or partially excluded aid to local governments for jails. For details, see Table 36."[263]

As of 2007, the cost of medical care for inmates was growing by 10 percent annually.[264][140]

According to a 2016 study by researchers at Washington University in St. Louis, the true cost of incarceration exceeds $1 trillion, with half of that falling on the families, children and communities of those incarcerated.[265]

According to a 2016 analysis of federal data by the U.S. Education Department, state and local spending on incarceration has grown three times as much as spending on public education since 1980.[266]

Effects edit

 
Property crime rates in the United States per 100,000 population beginning in 1960 (Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics)
 
Violent crime rates by gender 1973–2003[267]

Crime edit

Three articles written in the early 2000s claim that increasing incarceration has a negative effect on crime, but this effect becomes smaller as the incarceration rate increases.[268][269] Higher rates of prison admissions increase crime rates, whereas moderate rates of prison admissions decrease crime. The rate of prisoner releases in a given year in a community is also positively related to that community's crime rate the following year.[270]

A 2010 study of panel data from 1978 to 2003 indicated that the crime-reducing effects of increasing incarceration are totally offset by the crime-increasing effects of prisoner re-entry.[271]

According to a 2015 study by the Brennan Center for Justice, falling crime rates cannot be ascribed to mass incarceration.[272]

Society edit

Within three years of being released, 67% of ex-prisoners are re-arrested, and 52% are re-incarcerated, according to a study based on 1994 data.[273][120] Former inmate Wenona Thompson argues "I realized that I became part of a cycle, a system, that looked forward to seeing me there. And I was aware that ... I would be one of those people who fill up their prisons".[274]

In 1995, the government allocated $5.1 billion for new prison space. Every $100 million spent in construction costs $53 million per year in finance and operational costs over the next three decades.[275] The government spends nearly $60 billion a year for prisons, and in 2005, it cost an average of $23,876 a year to house a prisoner.[276] It takes about $30,000 per year per person to provide drug rehabilitation treatment to inmates. By contrast, the cost of drug rehabilitation treatment outside of a prison costs about $8,000 per year per person.[274]

In 2016, over 6 million Americans had lost their right to vote for conviction of a felony.[277] In addition, people who have been recently released from prison are ineligible for welfare in most states. They are not eligible for subsidized housing and must wait two years for eligibility for Section 8. It can be difficult for people to find employment, as employers often check a potential employee's criminal record.[278] Formerly incarcerated individuals may experience employment discrimination, and frequently have smaller social networks. This contributes to their struggle finding employment upon release into the community. [279]

In The New Jim Crow in 2011, legal scholar and advocate Michelle Alexander contended that the U.S. incarceration system worked to bar Black men from voting. She wrote "there are more African Americans under correctional control – in prison or jail, on probation or parole – than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began".[280] Alexander's work has drawn increased attention in the years since.

Yale Law Professor, and opponent of mass incarceration James Forman Jr. has countered that 1) African Americans, as represented by such cities as the District of Columbia, have generally supported tough on crime policies. 2) There appears to be a connection between drugs and violent crimes, the discussion of which, he says, New Jim Crow theorists have avoided. 3) New theorists have overlooked class as a factor in incarceration. Black people with advanced degrees have fewer convictions, and Black people without advanced education have more.[281]

Family edit

Incarceration of an individual does not have a singular effect: it affects those in the individual's tight-knit circle as well. For every mother that is incarcerated in the United States there are about another ten people (children, grandparents, community, etc.) that are directly affected.[282][283]  Moreover, more than 2.7 million children in the United States have an incarcerated parent.[284] That translates to one out of every 27 children in the United States having an incarcerated parent.[285] Approximately 80 percent of women who go to jail each year are mothers.[286] This ripple effect on the individual's family amplifies the debilitating effect that entails arresting individuals. Given the general vulnerability and naivete of children, it is important to understand how such a traumatic event adversely affects children. The effects of a parent's incarceration on their children have been found as early as three years old.[287] Local and state governments in the United States have recognized these harmful effects and have attempted to address them through public policy solutions.

Impact on children edit

The effects of an early traumatic experience of a child can be categorized into health effects and behavioral externalizations. Many studies have searched for a correlation between witnessing a parent's arrest and a wide variety of physiological issues. For example, Lee et al. showed significant correlation between high cholesterol, migraines, and HIV/AIDS diagnosis to children with a parental incarceration.[288]  Even while adjusting for various socioeconomic and racial factors, children with an incarcerated parent have a significantly higher chance of developing a wide variety of physical problems such as obesity, asthma, and developmental delays.[289]  The current literature acknowledges that there are a variety of poor health outcomes as a direct result of being separated from a parent by law enforcement.[290]  It is hypothesized that the chronic stress that results directly from the uncertainty of the parent's legal status is the primary influence for the extensive list of acute and chronic conditions that could develop later in life.[291]  In addition to the chronic stress, the immediate instability in a child's life deprives them of certain essentials e.g. money for food and parental love that are compulsory for leading a healthy life. Though most of the adverse effects that result from parental incarceration are regardless of whether the mother or father was arrested, some differences have been discovered. For example, males whose father have been incarcerated display more behavioral issues than any other combination of parent/child.[287]

There has also been a substantial effort to understand how this traumatic experience manifests in the child's mental health and to identify externalizations that may be helpful for a diagnosis. The most prominent mental health outcomes in these children are anxiety disorders, depression (mood), and post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD).[292][293] These problems worsen in a typical positive feedback loop without the presence of a parental figure. Given the chronic nature of these diseases, they can be detected and observed at distinct points in a child's development, allowing for research to determine if additional health services can be used to intervene in their lives and prevent increased risk of future health challenges.[294] Murray et al. have been able to isolate the cause of the expression of Anti-social behaviours specific to the parental incarceration.[295]  In a specific case study in Boston by Sack, within two months of the father being arrested, the adolescent boy in the family developed severe aggressive and antisocial behaviors.[296]  This observation is not unique; Sack and other researchers have noticed an immediate and strong reaction to sudden departures from family structure norms. These behavioral externalizations are most evident at school when the child interacts with peers and adults. This behavior leads to punishment and less focus on education, which has obvious consequences for future educational and career prospects.[297]

In addition to externalizing undesirable behaviors, children of incarcerated parents are more likely to be incarcerated compared to those without incarcerated parents.[298] More formally, transmission of severe emotional strain on a parent negatively impacts the children by disrupting the home environment. Societal stigma against individuals, specifically parents, who are incarcerated is passed down to their children. The children find this stigma to be overwhelming and it negatively impacts their short- and long-term prospects.[299]

Health edit

With rising levels of mass incarceration, the prison population faces significant health issues while incarcerated. Health surveys of inmates show that the prison population faces higher rates of chronic and infectious diseases, mental illness, and substance use disorders than the general U.S. population.[300] Based on analysis of the 2002-4 Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, incarcerated individuals had higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, asthma, arthritis, cervical cancer, and hepatitis.[300] The prison environment exacerbates chronic health conditions since they cannot be properly addressed and due to the stress of social isolation.[301] In addition, low-income and POC populations are often more susceptible to poor health outcomes due to social determinants of health prior to incarceration such as poor nutrition, lower average levels of education, higher levels of community violence and drug use, and lower rates of healthcare access.[300]

The incarcerated population also has lower rates of health literacy. A 2016 study found that over 60% of patients had inadequate health literacy in a sample of formerly incarcerated individuals.[302] According to the Health Resources & Services Administration, health literacy is the ability to obtain, process, and understand health information in order to make appropriate health decisions.[303] In the incarcerated population, low health literacy is linked with decreased confidence in taking medications, increased likelihood of emergency department visits, and difficulty self-managing chronic health conditions.[302]

Policy solutions edit

There are four main phases that can be distinguished in the process of arresting a parent: arrest, sentencing, incarceration, and re-entry. Re-entry is not relevant if a parent is not arrested for other crimes. During each of these phases, solutions can be implemented that mitigate the harm placed on the children during the process. While their parents are away, children rely on other caretakers (family or friends) to satisfy their basic need. Solutions for the children of incarcerated parents have identified caretakers as a focal point for successful intervention.

Arrest phase edit

 
Forced home entry is a primary stressor for children in a residence.

One in five children witness their parent arrested by authorities, and a study interviewing 30 children reported that the children experienced flashbulb memories and nightmares associated with the day their parent was arrested.[304] These single, adverse moments have long-reaching effects and policymakers around the country have attempted to ameliorate the situation. For example, the city of San Francisco in 2005 implemented training policies for its police officers with the goal of making them more cognizant of the familial situation before entering the home. The guidelines go a step further and stipulate that if no information is available before the arrest, that officers ask the suspect about the possibility of any children in the house.[305] San Francisco is not alone: New Mexico passed a law in 2009 advocating for child safety during parental arrest and California provides funding to agencies to train personnel how to appropriately conduct an arrest in the presence of family members.[306] Extending past the state level, the Department of Justice has provided guidelines for police officers around the country to better accommodate for children in difficult family situations.[307]

Sentencing phase edit

During the sentencing phase, the judge is the primary authority in determining the appropriate punishment. Consideration of the sentencing effects on the defendant's children could help with the preservation of the parent-child relationship. A law passed in Oklahoma in 2014 requires judges to inquire if convicted individuals are single custodial parents, and if so, to authorize the mobility of important resources so the child's transition to different circumstances is monitored.[308] The distance that the jail or prison is from the arrested individual's home is a contributing factor to the parent-child relationship. Allowing a parent to serve their sentence closer to their residence allows for easier visitation and a healthier relationship. Recognizing this, the New York Senate passed a bill in 2015 that would ensure convicted individuals be jailed in the nearest facility.

In 1771, Baron Auckland wrote in Principles of Penal Law that: "Imprisonment, inflicted by law as a punishment, is not according to the principles of wise legislation. It sinks useful subjects into burdens on the community, and has always a bad effect on their morals: nor can it communicate the benefit of example, being in its nature secluded from the eye of the people."[309]

Incarceration phase edit

While serving a sentence, measures have been put in place to allow parents to exercise their duty as role models and caretakers. New York State allows newborns to be with their mothers for up to one year.[310] Studies have shown that parental, specifically maternal, presence during a newborn's early development are crucial to both physical and cognitive development.[311] Ohio law requires nursery support for pregnant inmates in its facilities.[312] California also has a stake in the support of incarcerated parents, too, through its requirement that women in jail with children be transferred to a community facility that can provide pediatric care.[313] These regulations are supported by the research on early child development that argue it is imperative that infants and young children are with a parental figure, preferably the mother, to ensure proper development.[314] This approach received support at the federal level when then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates instituted several family-friendly measures, for certain facilities, including: improving infrastructure for video conferencing and informing inmates on how to contact their children if they were placed in the foster care system, among other improvements.[315]

Re-entry phase edit

The last phase of the incarceration process is re-entry back into the community, but more importantly, back into the family structure. Though the time away is painful for the family, it does not always welcome back the previously incarcerated individual with open arms.[316] Not only is the transition into the family difficult, but also into society as they are faced with establishing secure housing, insurance, and a new job.[317]  As such, policymakers find it necessary to ease the transition of an incarcerated individual to the pre-arrest situation. Of the four outlined phases, re-entry is the least emphasized from a public policy perspective. This is not to say it is the least important, however, as there are concerns that time in a correctional facility can deteriorate the caretaking ability of some prisoners. As a result, Oklahoma has taken measurable strides by providing parents with the tools they need to re-enter their families, including classes on parenting skills.[318]

Caretakers edit

 
Grandmothers are a common caregiver of children with an incarcerated parent

Though the effects on caregivers of these children vary based on factors such as the relationship to the prisoner and his or her support system, it is well known that it is a financial and emotional burden to take care of a child.[319] In addition to taking care of their nuclear family, caregivers are now responsible for another individual who requires attention and resources to flourish. Depending on the relationship to the caregiver, the transition to a new household may not be easy for the child. The rationale behind targeting caregivers for intervention policies is to ensure the new environment for the children is healthy and productive. The federal government funds states to provide counseling to caretaking family members to alleviate some of the associated emotional burden. A more comprehensive program from Washington (state) employs "kinship navigators" to address caretakers' needs with initiatives such as parental classes and connections to legal services.[320]

Employment edit

Felony records greatly influence the chances of people finding employment. Many employers seem to use criminal history as a screening mechanism without attempting to probe deeper.[321] They are often more interested in incarceration as a measure of employability and trustworthiness instead of its relation to any specific job.[322] People who have felony records have a harder time finding a job.[323] The psychological effects of incarceration can also impede an ex-felon's search for employment. Prison can cause social anxiety, distrust, and other psychological issues that negatively affect a person's reintegration into an employment setting.[324] Men who are unemployed are more likely to participate in crime[323] which leads to there being a 67% chance of a person with a previous felony conviction being charged again.[322] In 2008, the difficulties males with a previous felony conviction in the United States had finding employment lead to approximately a 1.6% decrease in the employment rate alone. This is a loss of between $57 and $65 billion of output to the US economy.[325]

Although incarceration in general has a huge effect on employment, the effects become even more pronounced when looking at race. Devah Pager performed a study in 2003 and found that white males with no criminal record had a 34% chance of callback compared to 17% for white males with a criminal record. Black males with no criminal record were called back at a rate of 14% while the rate dropped to 5% for those with a criminal record. Black men with no criminal background have a harder time finding employment than white men who have a history of criminal activity. While having a criminal record decreases the chance of a callback for white men by 50%, it decreases the callback chances for Black men by 64%.[321]

While Pager's study is greatly informative, it does lack some valuable information. Pager only studied white and Black men, which leaves out women and people of other races. It also fails to account for the fact that applying for jobs has largely shifted from applying in person to applying over the Internet. A study conducted at Arizona State University in 2014 accounts for this missing information. This study was set up similarly to the Pager study, but with the addition of female job applicants, Hispanic job applicants, and online job applications.[326] Men and women of white, Black, and Hispanic ethnicities account for 92% of the US prison population.[327]

The Arizona State University study also found that incarceration decreased employment opportunities. The findings indicated that the presence of a criminal record reduced callbacks by approximately 50%. Hispanic women with a prison record fared most favorably in receiving a phone call back from potential employmers, while African American women had modest results, and white women received the poorest results, having the lowest probability of receiving a phone call from a potential employer.[326]

For men with a criminal record, white men fared most favorably, being 125% more likely to receive a call back from an employer than black men, and 18% more likely than Hispanic men.[326] Males with a prison record were less likely than males without a prison record to receive a callback. However, the effects of incarceration on male applicants applying online were nearly nonexistent. In fact, the study found that "there was no effect of race/ethnicity, prison record, or community college [education] on men's success in advancing through the [online] hiring process". The Arizona State University study also had results that contradicted Pager's study.

Effects of other types of incarceration, such as shorter stays in local county jails, can also affect employment at both the individual and macro level. At the community level, for example, jail incarceration has been found to diminish local labor markets, especially in areas with relatively high proportions of Black residents.[328]

Criticism edit

Mass incarceration on a scale almost unexampled in human history is a fundamental fact of our country today—perhaps the fundamental fact, as slavery was the fundamental fact of 1850.

High rates of incarceration may be due to sentence length, which is further driven by many other factors.[329] Shorter sentences may even diminish the criminal culture by possibly reducing re-arrest rates for first-time convicts.[330] The U.S. Congress has ordered federal judges to make imprisonment decisions "recognizing that imprisonment is not an appropriate means of promoting correction and rehabilitation."[331]

Critics have lambasted the United States for incarcerating a large number of non-violent and victimless offenders;[332][333] half of all persons incarcerated under state jurisdiction are for non-violent offenses, and 20% are incarcerated for drug offenses (in state prisons; federal prison percentages are higher).[334][335] "Human Rights Watch believes the extraordinary rate of incarceration in the United States wreaks havoc on individuals, families and communities, and saps the strength of the nation as a whole."[332] The population of inmates housed in prisons and jails in the United States exceeds 2 million, with the per capita incarceration population higher than that officially reported by any other country.[140] Criminal justice policy in the United States has also been criticized for a number of other reasons.[336] In the 2014 book The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap, journalist Matt Taibbi argues that the expanding disparity of wealth and the increasing criminalization of those in poverty have culminated in the U.S. having the largest prison population "in the history of human civilization".[337] The scholars Michael Meranze and Marie Gottschalk contend that the massive "carceral state" extends far beyond prisons, and distorts democracy, degrades society, and obstructs meaningful discourse on criminal punishment.[338] More recently, scholars have argued that a system of mass incarceration necessarily interferes with a free society "characterized by industry, discovery, and creation."[339]

Some scholars have linked the ascent of neoliberal, free market ideology in the late 1970s to mass incarceration.[184][196][340][341][342][343] Sociologist Loïc Wacquant argues that the "explosive growth" of the incarcerated poor can be seen as part of the "punitive regulation" of poverty in the neoliberal era in order to mitigate societal fallout from economic deregulation, welfare state retrenchment, increasing inequality and the imposition of workfare and underpaid, precarious employment on the marginalized urban "postindustrial proletariat". In this, he posits that the expansive prison system has become a core political institution, and that this "overgrown and intrusive penal state" is "deeply injurious to the ideals of democratic citizenship."[344] Academic and activist Angela Davis argues that prisons in the U.S. have "become venues of profit as well as punishment;" as mass incarceration has increased, the prison system has become more about economic factors than criminality.[345] Professor of Law at Columbia University Bernard Harcourt contends that neoliberalism holds the state as incompetent when it comes to economic regulation but proficient at policing and punishing, and that this paradox has resulted in the expansion of penal confinement.[346] According to The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States, "neoliberal social and economic policy has more deeply embedded the carceral state within the lives of the poor, transforming what it means to be poor in America."[122] Historian Gary Gerstle reasons that while it may seem contradictory that the notions of market freedom and the establishment of a robust market economy occurred simultaneously with the reality of mass incarceration during the neoliberal period, neoliberals and even the classical economic liberals who preceded them "had long argued for the need to ringfence free markets, limiting participation to those who could handle its rigors." Only then could they operate "freely".[347]

The sociologists John Clegg and Adaner Usmani assert that the high incarceration rates are partly the result of anemic social policy. As such, resolving the issue will necessitate significant redistribution coming from economic elites. They add that mass incarceration is "not a technical problem for which there are smart, straightforward, but just not-yet-realized solutions. Rather they argue, it is a political problem, the solution of which will require "confronting the entrenched power of the wealthy."[348]

Another possibly cause for this increase of incarceration since the 1970s could be the "war on drugs", which started around that time. More elected prosecutors were favored by voters for promising to take more harsh approaches than their opponents, such as locking up more people.[349]

Our vast network of federal and state prisons, with some 2.3 million inmates, rivals the gulags of totalitarian states.

Reporting at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association (August 3, 2008), Becky Pettit, associate professor of sociology from the University of Washington and Bryan Sykes, a UW post-doctoral researcher, revealed that the increase in the United States's prison population since the 1970s is having profound demographic consequences that affect 1 in 50 Americans. Drawing data from a variety of sources that looked at prison and general populations, the researchers found that the boom in prison population is hiding lowered rates of fertility and increased rates of involuntary migration to rural areas and morbidity that is marked by a greater exposure to and risk of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and HIV or AIDS.[351]

Guilty plea bargains concluded 97% of all federal cases in 2011.[352]

As of December 2012, two state prison systems, Alabama and South Carolina, segregated prisoners based on their HIV status. On December 21, U.S. District Court Judge Myron Thompson ruled in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of several inmates that Alabama's practice in doing so violated federal disabilities law. He noted the state's "outdated and unsupported assumptions about HIV and the prison system's ability to deal with HIV-positive prisoners."[353]

In 2022, the bi-partisan Federal Prison Oversight Act was introduced which would require the Department of Justice's Inspector General to conduct detailed inspections of each of the Bureau of Prisons' 122 facilities and would create an independent Justice Department position to investigate complaints.[354] This was introduced shortly after corruption and abuse was discovered at a federal prison complex in Atlanta with the hopes that it would prevent such occurrences in the future.[355]

Department of Justice "Smart on Crime" Program edit

On August 12, 2013, at the American Bar Association's House of Delegates meeting, Attorney General Eric Holder announced the "Smart on Crime" program, which is "a sweeping initiative by the Justice Department that in effect renounces several decades of tough-on-crime anti-drug legislation and policies."[356][357] Holder said the program "will encourage U.S. attorneys to charge defendants only with crimes "for which the accompanying sentences are better suited to their individual conduct, rather than excessive prison terms more appropriate for violent criminals or drug kingpins…"[356][357] Running through Holder's statements, the increasing economic burden of over-incarceration was stressed.[356][357] As of August 2013, the Smart on Crime program is not a legislative initiative but an effort "limited to the DOJ's policy parameters".[356][357]

Strip searches and cavity searches edit

The procedural use of strip searches and cavity searches in the prison system has raised human rights concerns.[358]

References in popular culture edit

In relation to popular culture, mass incarceration has become a popular issue in the Hip-Hop community. Artists like Tupac Shakur, NWA, LL Cool J, and Kendrick Lamar have written songs and poems that condemn racial disparities in the criminal justice system, specifically the alleged practice of police officers targeting African Americans. By presenting the negative implications of mass incarceration in a way that is widespread throughout popular culture, rap music is more likely to impact younger generations than a book or scholarly article would. Hip hop accounts of mass incarceration are based on victim-based testimony and are effective in inspiring others to speak out against the corrupt criminal justice system.[359] The soul singer Raphael Saadiq's 2019 album, Jimmy Lee, thematizes racial disparities in mass incarceration as well as other societal and family issues affecting African Americans.[360]

In addition to references in popular music, mass incarceration has also played a role in modern film. For example, Ava DuVernay's Netflix film 13th, released in 2017, criticizes mass incarceration and compares it to the history of slavery throughout the United States, beginning with the provision of the 13th Amendment that allows for involuntary servitude "as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted". The film equates mass incarceration with the post-Civil War Jim Crow Era.[361]

The fight against mass incarceration has also been a part of the larger discourse in the 21st century movement for Black Lives. #BlackLivesMatter, a progressive movement created by Alicia Garza after the death of Trayvon Martin, was designed as an online platform to fight against anti-Black sentiments such as mass incarceration, police brutality, and ingrained racism within modern society. According to Garza, "Black Lives Matter is an ideological and political intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise. It is an affirmation of Black folks' contributions to this society, our humanity, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression." This movement has focused on specific racial issues faced by African Americans in the justice system including police brutality, ending capital punishment, and eliminating "the criminalization and dehumanization of Black youth across all areas of society."[362]

Federal prisons edit

The Federal Bureau of Prisons, a division of the United States Department of Justice, is responsible for the administration of United States federal prisons.

State prisons edit

Imprisonment by the state judicial systems has steadily diminished since 2006 to 2012, from 689,536 annually to 553,843 annually.[363]

Military prisons edit

Across the world, the U.S. military operates several detention facilities. At year-end 2021, a total of 1,131 prisoners were held under military jurisdiction.[7]

See also edit

Administration
Conditions of confinement
Controversies
Prison advocacy groups
Related
By state

References edit

  1. ^ a b Jacob Kang-Brown, Chase Montagnet, and Jasmine Heiss. People in Jail and Prison in Spring 2021. New York: Vera Institute of Justice, 2021.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "Correctional Populations in the United States, 2021 – Statistical Tables". Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
  3. ^ a b Wang, Leah. "Punishment Beyond Prisons: Incarceration and Supervision by State". Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  4. ^ Robertson, Campbell (April 25, 2019). "Crime Is Down, Yet U.S. Incarceration Rates Are Still Among the Highest in the World". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 21, 2023.
  5. ^ a b c d Highest to Lowest. World Prison Brief (WPB). Use the dropdown menu to choose lists of countries by region or the whole world. Use the menu to select highest-to-lowest lists of prison population totals, prison population rates, percentage of pre-trial detainees/remand imprisoned people, percentage of imprisoned females, percentage of imprisoned foreign people, and occupancy rate. Column headings in WPB tables can be clicked to reorder columns lowest to highest, or alphabetically. For detailed information for each country click on any country name in lists. See also the WPB main data page and click on the map links and/or the sidebar links to get to the region and country desired.
  6. ^ Ghandnoosh, Nazgol (February 8, 2023). "Ending 50 Years of Mass Incarceration: Urgent Reform Needed to Protect Future Generations". The Sentencing Project. Retrieved June 3, 2023.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h Carson, E. Ann (December 2022). "Prisoners in 2021 - Statistical Tables" (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice.
  8. ^ Cullen, James (January 18, 2017). "The United States is (Very) Slowly Reducing Incarceration". Brennan Center of Justice.
  9. ^ "Mass Incarceration Costs $182 Billion Every Year". Equal Justice Initiative. February 6, 2017. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
  10. ^ "Prisoners, 1925-81". Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
  11. ^ a b "Search Publications". Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
  12. ^ "BOP: Population Statistics". www.bop.gov. Retrieved July 7, 2023.
  13. ^ Staff Writer (April 14, 2009). . The Tampa Bay Times. United States. Archived from the original on July 6, 2010. Retrieved June 21, 2013.
  14. ^ California, State of (2012). "CAL. PEN. CODE § 1205". Find Law.com. California Penal Code.
  15. ^ Knafo, Saki (February 12, 2014). The U.S. Is Locking People Up For Being Poor. The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 12, 2014.
  16. ^ Genevieve LeBaron and Adrienne Roberts (March 2012). "Confining Social Insecurity: Neoliberalism and the Rise of the 21st Century Debtors' Prison". Politics & Gender. 8 (1): 25–49. doi:10.1017/S1743923X12000062. S2CID 145437287.
  17. ^ Timothy Williams (February 11, 2015). Jails Have Become Warehouses for the Poor, Ill and Addicted, a Report Says. The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2015.
  18. ^ a b c "Rise of the Penitentiary | Yale University Press". yalebooks.yale.edu. Retrieved November 19, 2018.
  19. ^ Christianson, Scott (October 19, 2000). With Liberty for Some: 500 Years of Imprisonment in America. UPNE. ISBN 9781555534684. Spanish soldiers in 1570 erected the first substantial prison, at St. Augustine, Florida.
  20. ^ Christianson, Scott (October 19, 2000). With Liberty for Some: 500 Years of Imprisonment in America. UPNE. ISBN 9781555534684.
  21. ^ a b Jenness, Valerie (August 27, 2016). . Valerie Jenness | UCI Professor | Criminology Department. Archived from the original on September 11, 2016. Retrieved September 11, 2016.
  22. ^ Dix, Dorothea L (1843), Memorial to the Legislature of Massachusetts 1843, p. 2, retrieved November 12, 2010
  23. ^ Dickie, John (2007). Cosa Nostra: A History of the Sicilian Mafia. Hodder. ISBN 978-0-340-93526-2.
  24. ^ United States of America. World Prison Brief.
  25. ^ "Richard Nixon: Special Message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control". from the original on December 12, 2013. Retrieved December 8, 2013.
  26. ^ Dufton, Emily (March 26, 2012). "The War on Drugs: How President Nixon Tied Addiction to Crime". The Atlantic. Retrieved June 28, 2020.
  27. ^ Beckett, Katherine (1997). Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics (1999 Revised ed.). London: Oxford University Press. pp. 52–53, 167. ISBN 0195136268.
  28. ^ Hinton, Elizabeth. "From the War on Crime to the War on Drugs". From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: the Making of Mass Incarceration in America, by Elizabeth Hinton, Harvard University Press, 2017, pp. 307–332.
  29. ^ Nation Behind Bars: A Human Rights Solution. Human Rights Watch, May 2014. Retrieved May 8, 2014.
  30. ^ a b c d Sawyer, Wendy; Wagner, Peter. "Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2023". Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  31. ^ a b "U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States". www.census.gov. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
  32. ^ a b c d e The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. April 24, 2014. ISBN 978-0-309-29801-8.
  33. ^ Western, Bruce; Muhammad, Khalil Gibran; Negussie, Yamrot; Backes, Emily, eds. (May 17, 2023). Reducing Racial Inequality in Crime and Justice: Science, Practice, and Policy. Committee on Reducing Racial Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System, Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-69337-0.
  34. ^ Ph.D, Ashley Nellis (October 13, 2021). "The Color of Justice: Racial and Ethnic Disparity in State Prisons". The Sentencing Project. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  35. ^ "National Trends - Racial Disparities". counciloncj.foleon.com. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  36. ^ a b c d e f "Search Publications". Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  37. ^ Correctional Populations in the United States, 2010[permanent dead link] (NCJ 236319). By Lauren E. Glaze, BJS Statistician. US Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), published in December 2011. See PDF. See page 2 for explanation of the difference between number of prisoners in custody and the number under jurisdiction. See appendix table 3 for "Estimated number of inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails per 100,000 U.S. residents, by sex, race and Hispanic/Latino origin, and age, June 30, 2010". See appendix table 2 for "Inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails, December 31, 2000, and 2009–2010."
  38. ^ a b Correctional Populations in the United States, 2013 (NCJ 248479). Published December 2014 by U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). By Lauren E. Glaze and Danielle Kaeble, BJS Statisticians. See PDF. See page 1 "highlights" section for the "1 in ..." numbers. See table 1 on page 2 for adult numbers. See table 5 on page 6 for male and female numbers. See appendix table 5 on page 13, for "Estimated number of persons supervised by adult correctional systems, by correctional status, 2000–2013." See appendix table 2: "Inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails, 2000 and 2012–2013".
  39. ^ Barbara H. Zaitzow; Jim Thomas (2003). Women in Prison: Gender and Social Control. Lynne Rienner Publishers. p. vii. ISBN 978-1-58826-228-8.
  40. ^ Cyndi Banks (2003). Women in Prison: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-1-57607-929-4.
  41. ^ American Civil Liberties Union. "HOW INCARCERATING WOMEN FUELS OUR MASS INCARCERATION CRISIS". ACLU. Retrieved April 22, 2022.
  42. ^ Davis, Angela (2003). Are Prisons Obsolete?. Seven Stories Press. ISBN 9781583225813.
  43. ^ Sultan, Bonnie; Myrent, Mark. "Women and Girls in Corrections" (PDF). Justice Research and Statistics Association (JRSA).
  44. ^ Budd, Kristen (April 3, 2023). "Incarcerated Women and Girls". The Sentencing Project.
  45. ^ Humphreys, Keith (January 24, 2017). "White women are going to prison at a higher rate than ever before". Washington Post. Retrieved August 27, 2023.
  46. ^ Lane, Charles (July 12, 2023). "New data show a dire forecast about incarceration rates didn't come true". Washington Post. Retrieved August 27, 2023.
  47. ^ Gross, Kali Nicole. "African American women, mass incarceration, and the politics of protection." The Journal of American History 102.1 (2015): 25-33.
  48. ^ Potter, Hillary. Battle cries: Black women and intimate partner abuse. NYU Press, 2008.
  49. ^ Mustard, David B. "Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts". The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy. 285.
  50. ^ "Men Sentenced to Longer Prison Terms for Same Crimes, Study Says". The Huffington Post.
  51. ^ Stacey, Ann Martin (2006). "Gender and the Social Costs of Sentencing: An Analysis of Sentences Imposed on Male and Female Offenders in Three U.S. District Courts". Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law. doi:10.15779/Z38F32G.
  52. ^ Sickmund, M., Sladky, T.J., Kang, W., & Puzzanchera, C.. "Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement". Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Click "National Crosstabs" at the top, and then choose the census years. Click "Show table" to get the total number of juvenile inmates for those years. Or go here for all the years. And here.
  53. ^ Ed Pilkington (March 13, 2014). US criticised by UN for human rights failings on NSA, guns and drones. The Guardian. Retrieved April 5, 2014.
  54. ^ Natasja Sheriff (March 9, 2015). UN expert slams US as only nation to imprison kids for life without parole. Al Jazeera America. Retrieved March 13, 2015.
  55. ^ Chris Kirkham (October 22, 2013). Prisoners of Profit: Private Prison Empire Rises Despite Startling Record Of Juvenile Abuse. The Huffington Post. Retrieved October 22, 2013.
  56. ^ Case, Anne C., and Lawrence F. Katz. The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths. No. w3705. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.
  57. ^ a b c d Sawyer, Wendy (February 27, 2018). "Youth Confinement: The Whole Pie". www.prisonpolicy.org. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
  58. ^ a b "Aging inmates clogging nation's prisons". Associated Press. September 30, 2007.
  59. ^ a b Aday, Ronald H. (2003). Aging Prisoners: Crisis in American Corrections. Praeger. ISBN 978-0-275-97123-6.
  60. ^ "Elderly Inmate Population Soared 1,300 Percent Since 1980s: Report". The Huffington Post. June 13, 2012.
  61. ^ a b Marksamer, Jody; Tobin, Harper (2013). Standing With LGBT Prisoners: An Advocate's Guide to Ending Abuse and Combating Imprisonment (PDF). Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality. pp. 1–88. Retrieved February 14, 2015.
  62. ^ Tobin, Harper (April 1, 2014). "Putting Prisons on the LGBT Agenda". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 14, 2015.
  63. ^ Yarbrough, Dilara (May 24, 2021). "The carceral production of transgender poverty: How racialized gender policing deprives transgender women of housing and safety". Punishment & Society. SAGE Publications. 25 (1): 141–161. doi:10.1177/14624745211017818. ISSN 1462-4745.
  64. ^ a b Bassichis, Daniel (2007). "It's War In Here": A Report on the Treatment of Transgender and Intersex People in New York State Men's Prisons (PDF). Sylvia Rivera Law Project. pp. 1–50. Retrieved February 14, 2015.
  65. ^ Whitlock, Kay (December 15, 2005). "Corrupting Justice: A Primer for LGBT Communities on Racism, Violence, Human Degradation & the Prison Industrial Complex" (PDF). American Friends Service Committee. American Friends Service Committee. Retrieved February 14, 2015.
  66. ^ Beck, Allan; Berzofsky, Marcus; Caspar, Rachel; Krebs, Christopher (May 2013). Sexual Victimization in Prisons and Jails Reported by Inmates, 2011–12. National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
  67. ^ Horowitz, Alana (February 4, 2013). "Mental Illness Soars In Prisons, Jails While Inmates Suffer". Huffington Post. Retrieved February 15, 2015.
  68. ^ "Mentally Ill Persons in Corrections". nicic.gov. National Institute of Corrections. Retrieved February 15, 2015.
  69. ^ a b Geller, Adam (July 15, 2014). "U.S. Jails Struggle With Role As Makeshift Asylums". The Seattle Times. Retrieved October 18, 2018.
  70. ^ Skeem, Jennifer; Manchak, Sarah; Peterson, Jillian (April 2011). "Correctional Policy for Offenders with Mental Illness: Creating a New Paradigm for Recidivism Reduction". Law and Human Behavior. 35 (2): 110–126. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9223-7. PMID 20390443. S2CID 13116080.
  71. ^ a b c James, Doris; Glaze, Lauren (December 14, 2006). Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs: Bureau of Justice Statistics. pp. 1–12. Retrieved February 16, 2015.
  72. ^ a b Mental Illness, Human Rights, and US Prisons: Human Rights Watch Statement for the Record Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law (PDF). Human Rights Watch. September 22, 2009. pp. 1–14. Retrieved February 20, 2015. See p. 10.
  73. ^ Marisa Taylor (May 12, 2015). Report: Mentally ill inmates are routinely abused by corrections officers. Al Jazeera America. Retrieved May 17, 2015.
  74. ^ a b Peterson, Jillian; Skeem, Jennifer; Kennealy, Patrick; Bray, Beth; Zvonkovic, Andrea (2014). "How Often and How Consistently do Symptoms Directly Precede Criminal Behavior Among Offenders With Mental Illness?" (PDF). Law and Human Behavior. 38 (5): 439–449. doi:10.1037/lhb0000075. PMID 24730388. Retrieved February 20, 2015.
  75. ^ Carroll, Heather. "Serious Mental Illness Prevalence in Jails and Prisons". Treatment Advocacy Center. Retrieved October 26, 2022.
  76. ^ a b Heitzeg, Nancy. "Education Or Incarceration: Zero Tolerance Policies And The School To Prison Pipeline" (PDF).
  77. ^ Sarah Biehl, The School-to-Prison Pipeline, 28 OHIO LAWYER, Jan.–Feb. 2014,
  78. ^ David M. Pedersen, Zero-Tolerance Policies, in SCHOOL VIOLENCE: FROM DISCIPLINE TO DUE PROCESS 48 (James C. Hanks ed., 2004); see also CATHERINE Y. KIM, DANIEL J. LOSEN & DAMON T. HEWITT, THE SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE: STRUCTURING LEGAL REFORM 79 (2010)
  79. ^ Ralph M. Gerstein & Lois A. Gerstein Education Law: An Essential Guide for Attorneys, Teachers, Administrators, Parents and Students 195 (2nd ed. 2007).
  80. ^ U.S. Dep't of Educ. Office for Civil Rights, School Climate and Discipline, http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/school-discipline/index.html
  81. ^ Catherine Y. Kim, Policing School Discipline, 77 BROOK. L. REV. 861, 901–02 (2012); Moll & Simmons, supra note 22, at 7; Advancement Project, Clayton County, GA, http://safequalityschools.org/pages/clayton-county-ga [https://perma.cc/8CKX-URDD] (last visited February 1, 2017).
  82. ^ Heitzeg, Nancy A. (2009). "Education Or Incarceration: Zero Tolerance Policies And The School To Prison Pipeline" (PDF).
  83. ^ Koon, Danfeng Soto-Vigil. "Exclusionary School Discipline: An Issue Brief and the Review of Literature." The Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy . University of California, Berkeley School of Law, n.d. Web. Apr. 2013.
  84. ^ O'Conner, R.; Porowski, A.; Passa (2014). "Disproportionality in school discipline: An assessment of trends in Maryland, 2009–12" (PDF).
  85. ^ a b Balingit, Moriah. . Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 2, 2019.
  86. ^ Balingit, Moriah. . The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 2, 2019.
  87. ^ Mallet, Christopher A. (2016). "The School-to-Prison Pipeline: Disproportionate Impact on Vulnerable Children and Adolescents" (PDF).
  88. ^ a b Smith & Harper (2015). (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 21, 2017. Retrieved July 12, 2018.
  89. ^ Feld, Barry C. (1999). "Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court".
  90. ^ Edelman & Smith (1975). School Suspensions: Are they helping children?. Washington Research Project.
  91. ^ a b c Desmond & Emirbayer (2016). Race in America. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  92. ^ "ERO FY18 Achievements". www.ice.gov. Retrieved November 23, 2021.
  93. ^ "Transfer Of State Prisoners." United States Department of Justice. Retrieved on April 14, 2016.
  94. ^ "How The Program Works." United States Department of Justice. Retrieved on April 14, 2016.
  95. ^ Bruce Western (May 2011). "Poverty Politics and Crime Control in Europe and America". Contemporary Sociology. 40 (3): 283–286. doi:10.1177/0094306110404514d. JSTOR 23042281. S2CID 17527457.
  96. ^ Tom Hall (February 13, 2015).Study says US jails have become "massive warehouses" for the poor. World Socialist Web Site. Retrieved September 1, 2023.
  97. ^ Alston, Philp (December 15, 2017). "Statement on Visit to the USA, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights". OHCHR. Retrieved December 21, 2017. In many cities and counties the criminal justice system is effectively a system for keeping the poor in poverty while generating revenue to fund not only the justice system but diverse other programs. The use of the legal system, not to promote justice, but to raise revenue, as documented so powerfully in the Department of Justice's report on Ferguson, is pervasive around the country.
  98. ^ Desmond, Matthew (2023). Poverty, by America. Crown Publishing Group. pp. 22–23. ISBN 9780593239919.
  99. ^ Mauer, Marc; King, Ryan S; Young, Malcolm C (May 2004). (PDF). The Sentencing Project. p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 10, 2010. Retrieved January 11, 2010.
  100. ^ a b "2016 Crime Statistics Released". FBI.gov. Federal Bureau of Investigation. September 25, 2017. Retrieved November 25, 2017.
  101. ^ "Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2016". Prison Policy Initiative. March 16, 2016. Retrieved July 14, 2023.
  102. ^ a b c West, Heather; Sabol, William (December 2010). (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 27, 2011. Retrieved December 25, 2010.
  103. ^ Profile of Jail Inmates, 2002 December 8, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. By Doris J. James. July 18, 2004. NCJ 201932. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. See Table 3 of the PDF file October 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine for the percent of inmates in for violent offenses.
  104. ^ "News brief". The Week. December 6, 2013. p. 16.
  105. ^ John Pfaff (January 28, 2017). "A Better Approach to Violent Crime". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 28, 2017.
  106. ^ "United States – Punishment and Prejudice: Racial Disparities in the War on Drugs". www.hrw.org. Retrieved April 24, 2017.
  107. ^ "Incarcerated America" Human Rights Watch (April 2003)
  108. ^ United States Crime Rates 1960–2009. Source: FBI, Uniform Crime Reports.
  109. ^ a b U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics: "Prisoners in 2012 Trends in Admissions and Releases, 1991–2012" by E. Ann Carson and Daniela Golinelli Table 11: Estimated sentenced state imprisoned people on December 31, by most serious offense and type of admission, 1991, 2001, 2006, and 2011 | December 2013
  110. ^ . Pretrial Justice Institute. Archived from the original on May 9, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
  111. ^ "Jail Inmates in 2016" (PDF). 2018.
  112. ^ "United States of America | World Prison Brief". www.prisonstudies.org. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
  113. ^ Hunter, Lea (March 16, 2020). "What You Need To Know About Ending Cash Bail". Center for American Progress. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
  114. ^ "Bail or Jail". www.ncsl.org. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
  115. ^ "Jail Incarceration Rate Decreased" (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics. March 31, 2020.
  116. ^ Watkins (March 31, 2020). "Jail Incarceration Rate Decreased by 12 Percent" (PDF). DOJ.
  117. ^ Altschuler, David Skorton and Glenn. "College Behind Bars: How Educating Prisoners Pays Off". Forbes. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
  118. ^ Strait, Abigail; Eaton, Susan (2016). "Post-Secondary Education for People in Prison" (PDF). Social Justice Funders Opportunity Brief. 1 – via The Sillerman Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy.
  119. ^ a b Davis, Lois M.; Bozick, Robert; Steele, Jennifer L.; Saunders, Jessica; Miles, Jeremy N. V. (August 22, 2013). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Correctional Education: A Meta-Analysis of Programs That Provide Education to Incarcerated Adults. doi:10.7249/rr266. ISBN 9780833081087. S2CID 148650060.
  120. ^ a b Langan, Patrick A.; Levin, David J. (June 2, 2002). (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 14, 2011. Retrieved January 11, 2010.
  121. ^ Durose, Matthew (April 2014). "Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010" (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  122. ^ a b c Haymes, Stephen N.; de Haymes, María V.; Miller, Reuben J., eds. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 346, 389. ISBN 978-0-41-567344-0.
  123. ^ Gefangenenraten im internationalen und nationalen Vergleich (Prison rates international comparison) July 14, 2018, at the Wayback Machine, University Greifswald, FRIEDER DÜNKEL • BERND GENG • STEFAN HARRENDORF, Bewährungshilfe – Soziales • Strafrecht • Kriminalpolitik, Jg. 63, 2016, Heft 2, S. 178–200, 2016.
  124. ^ a b American Exception. Inmate Count in US Dwarfs Other Nations'. New York Times. April 22, 2008. Page 1, Section A, Front Page.
  125. ^ Walmsley, Roy (Feb 2, 2016). World Prison Population List (11th edition) (PDF). From the Research & Publications page of the World Prison Brief website. From page 1 of the PDF: "The information is the latest available at the end of October 2015." And from page 2: "This report shows that more than 10.35 million people are held in penal institutions throughout the world, either as pre-trial detainees/remand prisoners or having been convicted and sentenced."
  126. ^ Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015. By Danielle Kaeble and Lauren Glaze, BJS Statisticians. Dec. 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics. See PDF. Page 2 says: "At yearend 2015, an estimated 2,173,800 persons were either under the jurisdiction of state or federal prisons or in the custody of local jails in the United States".
  127. ^ Population Clock. U.S. Census Bureau. 321,032,786 people in the US on June 30, 2015.
  128. ^ The World Population Prospects: 2015 Revision. July 29, 2015 article. From United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 7.3 billion people in 2015.
  129. ^ Canada. World Prison Brief.
  130. ^ United Kingdom: England & Wales. World Prison Brief.
  131. ^ Australia. World Prison Brief.
  132. ^ Ireland Irish Penal Reform Trust.
  133. ^ Spain. World Prison Brief.
  134. ^ Greece. World Prison Brief.
  135. ^ Norway. World Prison Brief.
  136. ^ Netherlands. World Prison Brief.
  137. ^ Japan. World Prison Brief.
  138. ^ a b Widra, Emily; Herring, Tiana (2021). "States of Incarceration: The Global Context 2021". Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  139. ^ a b c Chang, Cindy (May 29, 2012). . The Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on March 3, 2015. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
  140. ^ a b c d Liptak, Adam (Feb 28, 2008). 1 in 100 U.S. Adults Behind Bars, New Study Says. New York Times.
  141. ^ Rosefielde, Steven (2007). The Russian economy: from Lenin to Putin. By Steven Rosefielde. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-1337-3.
  142. ^ Applebaum, Anne (2003). Gulag: a history. By Anne Applebaum. Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-7679-0056-0.
  143. ^ a b Gopnik, Adam (January 30, 2012). The Caging of America. The New Yorker.
  144. ^ Foundation, The Annie E. Casey (November 14, 2020). "Juvenile Detention Explained". The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved July 6, 2023.
  145. ^ a b c "What Do Security Levels Means". Injustice Security. Retrieved August 28, 2016.
  146. ^ "Correctional Populations in the United States, 2016". Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  147. ^ diZerega, M., & Agudelo, S. V. (2011). Piloting a tool for reentry: A promising approach to engaging family members. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
  148. ^ Christian, Johnna; Mellow, Jeff; Thomas, Shenique (July 2006). "Social and economic implications of family connections to prisoners". Journal of Criminal Justice. 34 (4): 443–452. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.010.
  149. ^ – Missouri Department of Corrections, press release May 13, 2007. "During our review, we have identified numerous offenders who, through misleading web postings and photos, have solicited thousands of dollars from individuals and have devised other creative and purposeful intents to defraud the public"
  150. ^ "Arizona Inmates Back on the Net". Wired News. December 17, 2002. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
  151. ^ Neal Moore (March 28, 2011). "Employment Upon Release". CNN. Retrieved March 28, 2011.
  152. ^ "Prisoners' Rights – Legal Correspondence". FindLaw. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
  153. ^ . California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Archived from the original on February 18, 2011. Retrieved May 9, 2011.
  154. ^ Prison and Detention Conditions. Human Rights Watch, retrieved May 22, 2015.
  155. ^ "Inhumane Prison Conditions Still Threaten Life, Health of Alabama Inmates Living with HIV/AIDS, According to Court Filings". Human Rights Watch. February 27, 2005. Retrieved June 13, 2006.
  156. ^ Cindy Struckman-Johnson & David Struckman-Johnson (December 2000). (PDF). The Prison Journal. 80 (4): 379–390. doi:10.1177/0032885500080004004. S2CID 145791880. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 17, 2012. Retrieved September 3, 2006.
  157. ^ a b Hylton, Wil S. (July 2003). "Sick on the Inside". Harper's Magazine. Retrieved February 29, 2012.
  158. ^ Liliana Segura (October 1, 2013).With 2.3 Million People Incarcerated in the US, Prisons Are Big Business. The Nation. Retrieved October 9, 2013.
  159. ^ Abigail Leonard & Adam May (May 28, 2014). Whistleblower: Arizona inmates are dying from inadequate health care. Al Jazeera America. Retrieved July 22, 2014.
  160. ^ David M. Reutter, Gary Hunter & Brandon Sample. Appalling Prison and Jail Food Leaves Prisoners Hungry for Justice. Prison Legal News. Retrieved January 4, 2013.
  161. ^ Marx, Rebecca (2009). "Prison Riot Caused by Prison Food". The Village Voice. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
  162. ^ Fassler, Joe; Brown, Claire (December 27, 2017). "Prison Food Is Making U.S. Inmates Disproportionately Sick". The Atlantic. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  163. ^ . Florida Department of Corrections. Archived from the original on June 19, 2006. Retrieved June 13, 2006.
  164. ^ Thompson, Don (April 5, 2008). "Prison Attacks Calling Attention to Overcrowding". Associated Press. Retrieved August 6, 2009.
  165. ^ Moore, Solomon (August 5, 2009). "California Prisons Must Cut Inmate Population". New York Times. p. A10. Retrieved August 6, 2009.
  166. ^ Order for population reduction plan, pg. 9, three-judge court convened by the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit hearing Plata v. Schwarzenegger and Coleman v. Schwarzenegger
  167. ^ Medina, Jennifer (May 24, 2011). "In a California Prison, Bunk Beds Replace Pickup Games". The New York Times.
  168. ^ . PBS. Archived from the original on January 21, 2014. Retrieved September 1, 2017.
  169. ^ Liptak, Adam (May 23, 2011). "Justices, 5-4, Tell California to Cut Prisoner Population". The New York Times. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
  170. ^ "RBGG and Co-Counsel Win Affirmance at Supreme Court of the United States". Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP. San Francisco, CA. May 23, 2011. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
  171. ^ a b UN News (October 18, 2011). "Solitary confinement should be banned in most cases".
  172. ^ "How Many Prisoners Are in Solitary Confinement in the United States?". February 2012.
  173. ^ Young, Jeremy (June 27, 2023). "Solitary confinement is still widespread in US prisons and jails". Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 5, 2023.
  174. ^ Dana Larson (December 8, 1999). . Cannabis Culture. Archived from the original on May 2, 2013. Retrieved April 3, 2013.
  175. ^ Cara Tabachnick (December 27, 2013). There's an alarming number of deaths in US jails. The Guardian. Retrieved December 28, 2013.
  176. ^ Berman, Mark (July 23, 2015). "How often do prisoners die behind bars?". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 24, 2018.
  177. ^ Holly Richmond (September 18, 2013). "Everybody wants condom vending machines". Grist Magazine. Grist Magazine, Inc. Retrieved September 19, 2013.
  178. ^ George Lavender (January 21, 2015). "California Prisons Aim To Keep Sex Between Inmates Safe, If Illegal". Around the Nation. NPR. Retrieved June 17, 2017.
  179. ^ Alabama Guards Stage Work Strike Months After Prisoner Uprising at Overcrowded Holman Facility. Democracy Now! September 28, 2016.
  180. ^ Wallace M; Hagan L; Curran KG; et al. (May 15, 2020). "COVID-19 in Correctional and Detention Facilities — United States, February–April 2020". MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 69 (19): 587–590. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e1. PMID 32407300. from the original on May 21, 2020. Retrieved May 25, 2020. Among 37 jurisdictions reporting, 32 (86%) reported at least one confirmed COVID-19 case among incarcerated or detained persons or staff members, across 420 correctional and detention facilities. As of April 21, 2020, 4,893 cases and 88 deaths among incarcerated and detained persons and 2,778 cases and 15 deaths among staff members have been reported.
  181. ^ Gross, Kali (June 1, 2015). "African American Women, Mass Incarceration, and the Politics of Protection". The Journal of American History. 102: 25–33. doi:10.1093/jahist/jav226. Retrieved April 22, 2022.
  182. ^ Davis, A. Y. (2011). How Gender Structures the Prison System. In Are prisons obsolete? (pp. 60–67). essay, Seven Stories Press.
  183. ^ Khalek, Rania. How private prisons game the system. Salon.com. December 1, 2011.
  184. ^ a b c Harcourt, Bernard (2012). The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674066162 pp. 235 & 236
  185. ^ Selman, Donna and Paul Leighton (2010). Punishment for Sale: Private Prisons, Big Business, and the Incarceration Binge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 1442201738 p. xi
  186. ^ Smith and Hattery. African American Families.
  187. ^ Archambeault, William G.; Donald R. Deis Jr. (1997–1998). "Cost Effectiveness Comparisons of Private Versus Public Prisons in Louisiana: A Comprehensive Analysis of Allen, Avoyelles, and Winn Correction Centers". Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium. 4.
  188. ^ Marie Gottschalk. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton University Press, 2014. p. 70
  189. ^ a b Shapiro, David. "Banking on Bondage: Private Prisons and Mass Incarceration" (PDF). American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved March 31, 2013.
  190. ^ a b Margaret Newkirk & William Selway (July 12, 2013). "Gangs Ruled Prison as For-Profit Model Put Blood on Floor." Bloomberg. Retrieved July 16, 2013.
  191. ^ Jerry Mitchell (September 25, 2014). East Mississippi prison called 'barbaric'. The Clarion-Ledger. Retrieved December 1, 2014. See also: A Tour of East Mississippi Correctional Facility. ACLU.
  192. ^ Timothy Williams (November 6, 2014). Christopher Epps, Former Chief of Prisons in Mississippi, Is Arraigned. The New York Times. Received December 2, 2014.
  193. ^ Stroud, Matt (February 24, 2014). The Private Prison Racket. Politico. Retrieved February 25, 2014.
  194. ^ Kirkham, Chris (September 27, 2012). Private Prisons: Immigration Convictions In Record Numbers Fueling Corporate Profits. The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 25, 2014.
  195. ^ Renee Lewis (February 23, 2015). Inmates riot at for-profit Texas immigrant detention facility. Al Jazeera America. Retrieved February 24, 2015.
  196. ^ a b c d John L. Campbell (2010). "Neoliberalism's penal and debtor states". Theoretical Criminology. 14 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1177/1362480609352783. S2CID 145694058.
  197. ^ Boucher, Dave (October 28, 2016). "CCA changes name to CoreCivic amid ongoing scrutiny". The Tennessean. Retrieved October 26, 2017.
  198. ^ Matt Taibbi (2014). The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap. Spiegel & Grau. ISBN 081299342X pp. 214–216.
  199. ^ "Prison Economics Help Drive Ariz. Immigration Law". NPR. October 28, 2010. Retrieved August 17, 2012.
  200. ^ Sullivan, Laura (2010). Shaping State Laws With Little Scrutiny. National Public Radio.
  201. ^ Elk, Mike and Sloan, Bob (2011). The Hidden History of ALEC and Prison Labor. The Nation.
  202. ^ Prison Privatization and the Use of Incarceration July 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. The Sentencing Project, September 2004.
  203. ^ a b Whitehead, John (April 10, 2012). "Jailing Americans for Profit: The Rise of the Prison Industrial Complex". The Rutherford Institute. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
  204. ^ Pat Beall (November 22, 2013). Big business, legislators pushed for stiff sentences. The Palm Beach Post. Retrieved November 10, 2014.
  205. ^ Greenblatt, Alan (October 2003). "What Makes Alec Smart?". Governing.
  206. ^ Beau Hodai, "Corporate Con Game. How the private prison industry helped shape Arizona's anti-immigrant law", In These Times, June 20, 2010, http://inthesetimes.com/article/6084/corporate_con_game, retrieved July 25, 2015.
  207. ^ Page, Joshua (2011). Toughest Beat – Oxford Scholarship. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195384055.001.0001. ISBN 9780195384055.
  208. ^ California Prison Guards Union Pushes For Prison Expansion. The Huffington Post. September 9, 2013.
  209. ^ Chris Kirkham (September 19, 2013). Prison Quotas Push Lawmakers To Fill Beds, Derail Reform. The Huffington Post. Retrieved September 20, 2013.
  210. ^ Eric Schlosser (December 1998). The Prison-Industrial Complex. The Atlantic. Retrieved December 31, 2013.
  211. ^ Ray Downs (May 17, 2013). Who's Getting Rich Off the Prison-Industrial Complex? Vice. Retrieved December 31, 2013.
  212. ^ Selman, Donna and Paul Leighton (2010). Punishment for Sale: Private Prisons, Big Business, and the Incarceration Binge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 1442201738 p. 78
  213. ^ Prison Payback on YouTube. Russia Today on YouTube
  214. ^ Marie Gottschalk (March 5, 2015). It's Not Just the Drug War. Jacobin. Retrieved March 5, 2015.
  215. ^ Detention Watch Network, "The Influence of the Private Prison Industry in Immigration Detention", 2012, http://www.detentionwatchnetwork.org/privateprisons, retrieved July 25, 2015.
  216. ^ DiversityInc, "The Prison Industrial Complex: Biased, Predatory and Growing", October 8, 2010, http://www.diversityinc.com/diversity-management/the-prison-industrial-complex-biased-predatory-and-growing/ June 7, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, retrieved July 25, 2015.
  217. ^ David Harris-Gershon, "America's Corrupt Justice System: Federal Private Prison Populations Grew by 784% in 10 Year Span", Alternet, crossposted on Tikkun Daily, May 23, 2013, http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/tikkundaily/americas-corrupt-justice-system-federal-private-prison-populations-grew-784-10 July 20, 2015, at the Wayback Machine, retrieved July 25, 2015.
  218. ^ Camp, Camille; Camp, George (2000). "Corrections Yearbook 2000: Private Prisons". National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Retrieved June 14, 2015.
  219. ^ Justice Is Not For Sale Act. Sanders.senate.gov
  220. ^ Bernie Sanders declares war on the prison-industrial complex with major new bill. Salon. September 17, 2015.
  221. ^ Private federal prisons more dangerous, damning DoJ investigation reveals. The Guardian. August 12, 2016.
  222. ^ Justice Department Will Stop the Use of Private Prisons. Time. August 18, 2016.
  223. ^ U.S. reverses Obama-era move to phase out private prisons. Reuters. February 23, 2017
  224. ^ Watkins, Eli; Tatum, Sophie (August 18, 2017). "Private prison industry sees boon under Trump administration". CNN. Retrieved August 22, 2017.
  225. ^ Washington, John (December 14, 2017). . The Nation. Archived from the original on December 17, 2017. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
  226. ^ Lartey, Jamiles (December 28, 2017). "Private prison investors set for giant windfall from Trump tax bill". The Guardian. Retrieved December 29, 2017.
  227. ^ Conlin, Michelle; Cooke, Kristina (January 18, 2019). "$11 toothpaste: Immigrants pay big for basics at private ICE lock-ups". www.reuters.com. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
  228. ^ Nathan James. Federal Prison Industries. CRS Report for Congress. Updated July 13, 2007.
  229. ^ McCollum, William (1996). Federal Prison Industries, Inc: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. DIANE Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7567-0060-7.
  230. ^ Nate C. Hindman (August 15, 2012). Unicor Under Fire For Dominating Small Competitors With Cheap Prison Labor. The Huffington Post. Retrieved May 9, 2014.
  231. ^ Beth Schwartzapfel (February 12, 2009). Your Valentine, Made in Prison. The Nation. Retrieved April 15, 2015.
  232. ^ Simon McCormack (December 10, 2012). Prison Labor Booms As Unemployment Remains High; Companies Reap Benefits. The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 15, 2015.
  233. ^ Chris Hedges (April 5, 2015). Boycott, Divest and Sanction Corporations That Feed on Prisons. Truthdig. Retrieved April 4, 2015.
  234. ^ Marie Gottschalk. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton University Press, 2014. p. 61
  235. ^ Anderson, Elizabeth (2023). Hijacked: How Neoliberalism Turned the Work Ethic against Workers and How Workers Can Take It Back. Cambridge University Press. pp. 270–271. ISBN 978-1009275439.
  236. ^ Justin Jouvenal (January 28, 2012). "Town struggles to survive close of prison". Washington Post.
  237. ^ a b Inmates strike in prisons nationwide over 'slave labor' working conditions. The Guardian September 9, 2016.
  238. ^ The Largest Prison Strike in U.S. History Enters Its Second Week. The Intercept September 16, 2016.
  239. ^ Work Stoppage Prison Strike Continues in 11 US States September 22, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. The Real News. September 20, 2016.
  240. ^ Kamala Kelkar (December 18, 2016). "From media cutoffs to lockdown, tracing the fallout from the U.S. prison strike". PBS Newshour.
  241. ^ Tarr, Duncan; Onderchanin, Stephanie (August 21, 2018). "How the National Prisoner Strike Is Working to Help Incarcerated People in the United States". Teen Vogue. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  242. ^ Neufeld, Jennie (August 22, 2018). "A mass incarceration expert says the 2018 prison strike could be "one of the largest the country has ever seen"". Vox. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  243. ^ Pilkington, Ed (August 23, 2018). "Major prison strike spreads across US and Canada as inmates refuse food". The Guardian. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  244. ^ Corley, Cheryl (August 21, 2018). "U.S. Inmates Plan Nationwide Prison Strike To Protest Labor Conditions". NPR. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  245. ^ Bozelko, Chandra; Lo, Ryan (August 25, 2018). "As prison strikes heat up, former inmates talk about horrible state of labor and incarceration". USA Today. Retrieved August 30, 2018.
  246. ^ Anguiano, Dani (June 15, 2022). "US prison workers produce $11bn worth of goods and services a year for pittance". The Guardian. Retrieved June 20, 2022.
  247. ^ ‘Slavery by any name is wrong’: the push to end forced labor in prisons The Guardian. Accessed 26 March 2023.
  248. ^ a b . Inflation adjusted to 2007 dollars. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Retrieved January 1, 2012 by the Internet Archive. See .
  249. ^ a b Justice Expenditures and Employment, FY 1982–2007 – Statistical Tables (NCJ 236218). Published December 2011. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). By Tracey Kyckelhahn, Ph.D., BJS statistician. See table 2 of the PDF. "Total justice expenditures, by justice function, FY 1982–2007 (real dollars)". A total of around $74 billion for corrections in 2007.
  250. ^ As Arrest Records Rise, Americans Find Consequences Can Last a Lifetime. August 18, 2014. Wall Street Journal.
  251. ^ White Paper on Security Fact Sheet. December 1, 2014. Retrieved October 16, 2020. ▲Church Publishing.
  252. ^ Federal Prison System Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) FY 2015 Budget Request At A Glance. December 21, 2013. Retrieved September 2014. The United States Department of Justice.
  253. ^ white paper On Security: 50 States' Departments of Corrections insert. February 2, 2015. Retrieved October 16, 2014. ▲Church Publishing.
  254. ^ Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration. A notice by the Prisons Bureau on March 9, 2015 in the Federal Register.
  255. ^ The Price of Prisons: What Incarceration Costs Taxpayers August 13, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. February 29, 2012, the Vera Institute of Justice. By Christian Henrichson and Ruth Delaney. "Total taxpayer cost per inmate. Among the 40 states surveyed, representing more than 1.2 million inmates (of 1.4 million total people incarcerated in all 50 state prison systems), the total per-inmate cost averaged $31,286 and ranged from $14,603 in Kentucky to $60,076 in New York (see Figure 4)."
  256. ^ California Criminal Justice FAQ: How much does it cost to incarcerate an inmate? California Legislative Analyst's Office.
  257. ^ Inmates Who Can't Make Bail Face Stark Options. By Laura Sullivan. January 22, 2010. National Public Radio.
  258. ^ a b Bail Burden Keeps U.S. Jails Stuffed With Inmates. By Laura Sullivan. January 21, 2010. National Public Radio.
  259. ^ Jail Inmates at Midyear 2009 – Statistical Tables November 7, 2011, at the Wayback Machine. By Minton D. Todd. June 3, 2010. NCJ 230122. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. See Table 7 of the PDF file December 14, 2011, at the Wayback Machine for percent unconvicted.
  260. ^ Census of Jails, 2005–2019 – Statistical Tables. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. October 2021.
  261. ^ a b Bondsman Lobby Targets Pretrial Release Programs. By Laura Sullivan. January 22, 2010. National Public Radio.
  262. ^ Jails Stuffed To Capacity In Many U.S. Counties. January 20, 2010. National Public Radio. Chart using 2008 jail statistics showing "50 U.S. counties with the largest numbers of inmates."
  263. ^ . National Association of State Budget Officers. Archived from the original on August 23, 2011. Retrieved October 10, 2011.
  264. ^ One in 100: Behind Bars in America 2008. February 28, 2008. The Pew Center on the States.
  265. ^ The Full Cost Of Incarceration In The U.S. Is Over $1 Trillion, Study Finds. The Huffington Post. September 13, 2016.
  266. ^ Emma Brown and Danielle Douglas-Gabriel (July 7, 2016). Since 1980, spending on prisons has grown three times as much as spending on public education. The Washington Post. Retrieved July 12, 2016.
  267. ^ "Violent crime rate per 1,000 persons age 12 and up".
  268. ^ Liedka, Raymond V.; Piehl, Anne Morrison; Useem, Bert (May 1, 2006). "The Crime-Control Effect of Incarceration: Does Scale Matter?". Criminology & Public Policy. 5 (2): 245–276. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00376.x.
  269. ^ DeFina, Robert H.; Avanites, Thomas M. (2002). "The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime: 1971-1998". Social Science Quarterly. 83 (3): 635–653. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00106.
  270. ^ Clear, Todd R.; Rose, Dina R.; Waring, Elin; Scully, Kristen (March 1, 2003). "Coercive mobility and crime: A preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization". Justice Quarterly. 20 (1): 33–64. doi:10.1080/07418820300095451. ISSN 0741-8825. S2CID 145522279.
  271. ^ DeFina, Robert; Hannon, Lance (November 1, 2010). "For incapacitation, there is no time like the present: The lagged effects of prisoner reentry on property and violent crime rates". Social Science Research. 39 (6): 1004–1014. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.001.
  272. ^ Oliver Laughland (February 12, 2015). Mass incarceration does not explain dramatic fall in US crime, study finds. The Guardian. Retrieved February 14, 2015. "Researchers at the Brennan Center for Justice placed crime statistics from all 50 states over the past four decades against 13 other potential explainers of crime reduction, including decreases in alcohol consumption, growth in income and data-driven policing techniques. The conclusion was that the sharp increase in prison numbers has had a negligible effect on the downward trend in crime, with mass incarceration responsible for around 6% of property crime reduction in the 1990s and less than a single percentage point in the 2000s."
  273. ^ John J. Gibbons and Nicholas de B. Katzenbach (June 2006). "Confronting Confinement". Vera Institute of Justice.
  274. ^ a b Lyons, John. War on the Family: Mothers in Prison and the Children They Leave Behind (DVD). Peace Productions.
  275. ^ Alexander, Elizabeth (Fall 1998). "A Troubling Response To Overcrowded Prisons". Civil Rights Journal.
  276. ^ Aizenman, N.C. (February 29, 2008). "The high cost of incarceration". The Denver Post.
  277. ^ Uggen, Christopher; Ryan Larson; Sarah Shannon (October 6, 2016). . The Sentencing Project. Archived from the original on February 21, 2020. Retrieved February 22, 2020.
  278. ^ "Majority of employers background check employees … Here's why".
  279. ^ Beckett, Katherine; Goldberg, Allison (January 1, 2022). "The Effects of Imprisonment in a Time of Mass Incarceration". Crime and Justice. 51: 349–398. doi:10.1086/721018. ISSN 0192-3234.
  280. ^ Michelle Alexander (December 6, 2010). . The American Prospect. Archived from the original on October 1, 2011. Retrieved November 9, 2014.
  281. ^ Michael O'Hear (November 8, 2014). "The "New Jim Crow" Reconsidered". Retrieved November 8, 2014.
  282. ^ Wakefield, Sara; Wildeman, Christopher. Children of the Prison Boom: Mass Incarceration and the Future of American Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
  283. ^ Renny., Golden (October 18, 2013). War on the family : mothers in prison and the families they leave behind. New York. ISBN 9781135939700. OCLC 861692996.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  284. ^ Cochran, Joshua C.; Siennick, Sonja E.; Mears, Daniel P. (April 2018). "Social Exclusion and Parental Incarceration Impacts on Adolescents' Networks and School Engagement". Journal of Marriage and the Family. 80 (2): 478–498. doi:10.1111/jomf.12464. ISSN 0022-2445. PMC 5880045. PMID 29622839.
  285. ^ "POP1 Child population: Number of children (in millions) ages 0–17 in the United States by age, 1950–2017 and projected 2018–2050". www.childstats.gov. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
  286. ^ Sawyer, Wendy (May 8, 2017). "Bailing moms out for Mother's Day". Prison Policy Initiative. Retrieved April 5, 2019.
  287. ^ a b Geller, Amanda; Garfinkel, Irwin; Cooper, Carey E.; Mincy, Ronald B. (December 1, 2009). "Parental Incarceration and Child Wellbeing: Implications for Urban Families". Social Science Quarterly. 90 (5): 1186–1202. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00653.x. ISSN 0038-4941. PMC 2835345. PMID 20228880.
  288. ^ Lee, Rosalyn D.; Fang, Xiangming; Luo, Feijun (April 2013). "The impact of parental incarceration on the physical and mental health of young adults". Pediatrics. 131 (4): e1188–1195. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0627. ISSN 1098-4275. PMC 3608482. PMID 23509174.
  289. ^ Turney, Kristin (September 2014). "Stress proliferation across generations? Examining the relationship between parental incarceration and childhood health". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 55 (3): 302–319. doi:10.1177/0022146514544173. ISSN 2150-6000. PMID 25138199. S2CID 16824554.
  290. ^ Geller, Amanda; Cooper, Carey E.; Garfinkel, Irwin; Schwartz-Soicher, Ofira; Mincy, Ronald B. (February 2012). "Beyond absenteeism: father incarceration and child development". Demography. 49 (1): 49–76. doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0081-9. ISSN 0070-3370. PMC 3703506. PMID 22203452.
  291. ^ Garner, Andrew S.; Shonkoff, Jack P. (January 2012). "Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health". Pediatrics. 129 (1): e224–231. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2662. ISSN 1098-4275. PMID 22201148.
  292. ^ Murray, Joseph; Murray, Lynne (July 2010). "Parental incarceration, attachment and child psychopathology". Attachment & Human Development. 12 (4): 289–309. doi:10.1080/14751790903416889. ISSN 1469-2988. PMID 20582842. S2CID 1113521.
  293. ^ Poehlmann, Julie (September 2005). "Incarcerated mothers' contact with children, perceived family relationships, and depressive symptoms". Journal of Family Psychology. 19 (3): 350–357. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.350. ISSN 0893-3200. PMID 16221015.
  294. ^ Boch, Samantha; Sezgin, Emre; Ruch, Donna; Kelleher, Kelly; Chisolm, Deena; Lin, Simon (2021). "Unjust: the health records of youth with personal/family justice involvement in a large pediatric health system". Health & Justice. 9 (1): 20. doi:10.1186/s40352-021-00147-5. ISSN 2194-7899. PMC 8327457. PMID 34337696.
  295. ^ Murray, Joseph; Farrington, David P.; Sekol, Ivana (March 2012). "Children's antisocial behavior, mental health, drug use, and educational performance after parental incarceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 138 (2): 175–210. doi:10.1037/a0026407. ISSN 1939-1455. PMC 3283435. PMID 22229730.
  296. ^ Sack, W. H. (May 1977). "Children of imprisoned fathers". Psychiatry. 40 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1080/00332747.1977.11023929. ISSN 0033-2747. PMID 870921.
  297. ^ Petsch, P., & Rochlen, A. B. (2009). Children of Incarcerated Parents: Implications for School Counselors. Journal of School Counseling, 7(40), n40.
  298. ^ Dacass, Tennecia (July 25, 2017). "Intergenerational Effects of Mass Incarceration" (PDF).
  299. ^ Shaw, Marcus (December 2016). "The racial implications of the effects of parental incarceration on intergenerational mobility". Sociology Compass. 10 (12): 1102–1109. doi:10.1111/soc4.12440. ISSN 1751-9020.
  300. ^ a b c Binswanger, I. A.; Krueger, P. M.; Steiner, J. F. (November 1, 2009). "Prevalence of chronic medical conditions among jail and prison inmates in the USA compared with the general population". Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 63 (11): 912–919. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.090662. ISSN 0143-005X. PMID 19648129. S2CID 206990171.
  301. ^ Semenza, Daniel C.; Link, Nathan W. (December 1, 2019). "How does reentry get under the skin? Cumulative reintegration barriers and health in a sample of recently incarcerated men". Social Science & Medicine. 243: 112618. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112618. ISSN 0277-9536. PMID 31665655. S2CID 204965417.
  302. ^ a b Hadden, Kristie B.; Puglisi, Lisa; Prince, Latrina; Aminawung, Jenerius A.; Shavit, Shira; Pflaum, David; Calderon, Joe; Wang, Emily A.; Zaller, Nickolas (August 1, 2018). "Health Literacy Among a Formerly Incarcerated Population Using Data from the Transitions Clinic Network". Journal of Urban Health. 95 (4): 547–555. doi:10.1007/s11524-018-0276-0. ISSN 1468-2869. PMC 6095766. PMID 29943227.
  303. ^ "Health Literacy". Official web site of the U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration. March 31, 2017. Retrieved May 11, 2022.
  304. ^ Gabel, Katherine.; Johnston, Denise (1995). Children of incarcerated parents. New York: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0029110423. OCLC 31739788.
  305. ^ Peterson, Bryce (June 2015). "Children of Incarcerated Parents Framework Document" (PDF). Urban Institute. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  306. ^ N.M. Stat. Ann. §29-7-7.3
  307. ^ "Safeguarding Children of Arrested Parents" (PDF). Bureau of Justice Assistance. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  308. ^ Okla. Stat. tit. 22, §22–20
  309. ^ Eden, Lord Auckland, William (1771). Principles of Penal Law.
  310. ^ N.Y. Corrections Law §611
  311. ^ Winston, Robert; Chicot, Rebecca (2016). "The importance of early bonding on the long-term mental health and resilience of children". London Journal of Primary Care. 8 (1): 12–14. doi:10.1080/17571472.2015.1133012. ISSN 1757-1472. PMC 5330336. PMID 28250823.
  312. ^ Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §5120.65
  313. ^ Cal. Penal Code §§3410–3424
  314. ^ Perry, Bruce (2013). (PDF). The ChildTrauma Academy. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 22, 2018. Retrieved October 4, 2018.
  315. ^ "Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates Announces Family-Friendly Prison Policies to Strengthen Inmate-Familial Bonds". April 26, 2016. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  316. ^ Naser, Rebecca L.; La Vigne, Nancy G. (March 2006). "Family Support in the Prisoner Reentry Process". Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 43 (1): 93–106. doi:10.1300/j076v43n01_05. hdl:11323/9875. ISSN 1050-9674. S2CID 142630617.
  317. ^ Serin, Ralph C.; Lloyd, Caleb D.; Hanby, Laura J. (August 2010). "Enhancing Offender Re-Entry an Integrated Model for Enhancing Offender Re-Entry". European Journal of Probation. 2 (2): 53–75. doi:10.1177/206622031000200205. ISSN 2066-2203. S2CID 153754025.
  318. ^ 2007 Okla. Sess. Laws, Chap. 274
  319. ^ Turanovic, Jillian J.; Rodriguez, Nancy; Pratt, Travis C. (2012). "The Collateral Consequences of Incarceration Revisited: A Qualitative Analysis of the Effects on Caregivers of Children of Incarcerated Parents". Criminology. 50 (4): 913–959. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00283.x.
  320. ^ "Having a Parent Behind Bars Costs Children, States". www.pewtrusts.org. May 24, 2016. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  321. ^ a b Pager, Devah (March 2003). "The Mark of a Criminal Record" (PDF). American Journal of Sociology. 108 (5): 937–975. doi:10.1086/374403. S2CID 11568703.
incarceration, united, states, incarceration, rate, particular, united, states, incarceration, rate, primary, means, punishment, crime, united, states, 2023, over, five, million, people, under, supervision, criminal, justice, system, with, nearly, million, peo. For the incarceration rate in particular see United States incarceration rate Incarceration in the United States is one of the primary means of punishment for crime in the United States In 2023 over five million people are under supervision by the criminal justice system 2 3 with nearly two million people incarcerated in state or federal prisons and local jails The United States has the largest known prison population in the world 4 5 Prison populations grew dramatically beginning in the 1970s but began a decline around 2009 dropping 25 by year end 2021 6 US timeline graphs of number of people incarcerated in jails and prisons 1 Drug offenses account for the incarceration of about 1 in 5 people in U S prisons 7 Violent offenses account for over 3 in 5 people 62 in state prisons 7 Property offenses account for the incarceration of about 1 in 7 people 14 in state prisons 7 The United States maintains a higher incarceration rate than most developed countries 8 According to the World Prison Brief on May 7 2023 the United States has the sixth highest incarceration rate in the world at 531 people per 100 000 Expenses related to prison parole and probation operations have an annual estimated cost of around 81 billion Court costs bail bond fees and prison phone fees amounted to another 38 billion in costs annually 9 Since reaching its peak level of imprisonment in 2009 the U S has averaged a rate of decarceration of 2 3 per year 7 10 This figure includes the anomalous 14 1 drop in 2020 in response to the COVID 19 pandemic There is significant variation among state prison population declines Connecticut New Jersey and New York have reduced their prison populations by over 50 since reaching their peak levels 11 Twenty five states have reduced their prison populations by 25 since reaching their peaks 11 The federal prison population downsized 27 relative to its peak in 2011 12 Although debtor s prisons no longer exist in the United States residents of some U S states can still be incarcerated for debt as of 2016 update 13 14 15 16 The Vera Institute of Justice reported in 2015 that the majority of those incarcerated in local and county jails are there for minor violations and have been jailed for longer periods of time over the past 30 years because they are unable to pay court imposed costs 17 Contents 1 History 2 Incarcerated population 3 Demographics 3 1 Race and ethnicity 3 2 Gender 3 3 Youth 3 4 Elderly 3 5 LGBT people 3 6 Mentally disabled 3 7 Students 3 8 Immigrants and foreign nationals 3 9 Class and poverty 4 Features of the criminal justice system 4 1 Duration 4 2 Violent and nonviolent crime 4 3 Pre trial detention 4 4 Prison education 4 5 Recidivism 4 6 Comparison with other countries 5 Operational 5 1 Prison systems 5 2 Security levels 5 3 Correspondence 5 4 Conditions 5 5 Conditions for Women 5 6 Privatization 5 7 Labor 5 8 Cost 6 Effects 6 1 Crime 6 2 Society 6 3 Family 6 3 1 Impact on children 6 4 Health 6 5 Policy solutions 6 5 1 Arrest phase 6 5 2 Sentencing phase 6 5 3 Incarceration phase 6 5 4 Re entry phase 6 6 Caretakers 6 7 Employment 7 Criticism 7 1 Department of Justice Smart on Crime Program 7 2 Strip searches and cavity searches 8 References in popular culture 9 Federal prisons 10 State prisons 11 Military prisons 12 See also 13 References 14 Further reading 14 1 Books 14 2 Articles and interviewsHistory editMain article History of United States prison systems This section needs expansion You can help by adding to it July 2014 nbsp Lines of men in prisoner s uniforms marching towards a buildingIn the 18th century English philanthropists began to focus on the reform of convicted criminals in prison whom they believed needed a chance to become morally pure in order to stop or slow crime Since at least 1740 some of these philosophers have thought of solitary confinement as a way to create and maintain spiritually clean people in prisons As English people immigrated to North America so did these theories of penology 18 Spanish colonizers in Florida also brought their own ideas of confinement and Spanish soldiers in St Augustine Florida built the first substantial prison in North America in 1570 19 Some of the first structures built in English settled America were jails and by the 18th century every English speaking North American county had a jail These jails served a variety of functions such as a holding place for debtors prisoners of war and political prisoners those bound in the penal transportation and slavery systems and those accused but not tried for crimes 18 20 Sentences for those convicted of crimes were rarely longer than three months and often lasted only a day Poor citizens were often imprisoned for longer than their richer neighbors as bail was rarely refused 18 nbsp Total incarceration in the United States by year 1920 2014 One of the first prisons in America was founded in 1790 by the Pennsylvanian Quakers to make a system they viewed as less cruel than dungeon prisons They created a space where imprisoned people could read scriptures and repent as a means of self improvement 21 In 1841 Dorothea Dix claimed that prison conditions in the US were in her opinion inhumane Imprisoned people were chained naked and whipped with rods Others who were criminally insane were caged or placed in cellars or closets She insisted on changes throughout the rest of her life While focusing on the insane her comments also resulted in changes for other inmates 22 Following the Civil War and during the Progressive Era of America new concepts of the prison system such as parole indeterminate sentencing and probation were introduced These soon became mainstream practices in America At this time there was an increase in crime causing officials to handle crime in a more retributive way Many Sicilian Americans were harshly affected by this 23 However as the crime rate declined the prison system started to focus more on rehabilitation US incarceration count and rate per 100 000 population Jails state prisons federal prisons 24 Year Count Rate1940 264 834 2011950 264 620 1761960 346 015 1931970 328 020 1611980 503 586 2201985 744 208 3111990 1 148 702 4571995 1 585 586 5922000 1 937 482 6832002 2 033 022 7032004 2 135 335 7252006 2 258 792 7522008 2 307 504 7552010 2 270 142 7312012 2 228 424 7072014 2 217 947 6932016 2 157 800 6662018 2 102 400 6422020 1 675 400 5052021 1 767 200 531 On June 18 1971 President Richard Nixon declared drug abuse public enemy number one in a message to Congress His message also called for federal resources to be used for the prevention of new addicts and the rehabilitation of those who are addicted Following this the media began using the term War on Drugs 25 According to author Emily Dufton Nixon transformed the public image of the drug user into one of a dangerous and anarchic threat to American civilization 26 The presidency of Ronald Reagan saw the expansion of federal efforts to prevent drug abuse and prosecute offenders Reagan signed the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 which established mandatory minimum sentences and expanded penalties for marijuana possession He also signed the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986 27 Support for Reagan s crime legislation was bipartisan The 1980s saw a dramatic rise in the prison population especially among non violent offenders and people convicted of drug offenses 28 29 Researcher Valerie Jenness writes Since the 1970s the final wave of expansion of the prison system there has been a huge expansion of prisons that exist at the federal and state level Now prisons are starting to become a private industry as more and more prisons are starting to become privatized rather than being under government control 21 Incarcerated population editMain article List of U S states by incarceration and correctional supervision rate As of 2023 59 of incarcerated people are in state prisons 12 are in federal prisons and 29 are in local jails 2 Of the total state and federal prison population 8 or 96 370 people are incarcerated in private prisons An additional 2 9 million people are on probation and over 800 000 people are on parole 2 3 At year end 2021 1 000 000 people were incarcerated in state prisons 157 000 people were incarcerated in federal prisons and 636 000 people were incarcerated in local jails 2 7 Approximately 1 8 million people are incarcerated in state or federal prisons or local jails 2 7 There are over 1 million people who are incarcerated in state prisons There are 656 000 people incarcerated for violent offenses 142 000 for property offenses 132 000 for drug offenses and 110 000 for public order offenses The percentage breakdown of people in state prisons by offense type is as follows 63 of people are incarcerated for violent offenses 13 for property offenses 13 for drug offenses and 11 for public order offenses 30 The federal prison population is approximately 209 000 There are 69 000 people incarcerated for drug offenses 61 000 for public order offenses 11 000 for violent offenses and 6 000 for property offenses The percentage breakdown of people in state prisons by offense type is as follows 47 of people are incarcerated for drug offenses 42 for public order offenses 7 for violent offenses and 4 for property offenses 30 Finally 619 000 people are incarcerated in local jails Jail incarceration accounts for a third of all incarceration Over 80 of people incarcerated in local jails have not yet been convicted 30 Demographics editRace and ethnicity edit See also Race and crime in the United States and Racial inequality in the American criminal justice system 2021 People incarcerated in state or federal prisons by race and ethnicity 7 31 Race ethnicity of US population of incarcerated population Incarceration rate per 100 000 White non Hispanic 59 31 181Hispanic 19 24 434Black 14 32 901Racial and ethnic disparities are a significant feature of the American prison system These disparities accumulate across the criminal legal system The National Academies of Sciences explains Blacks are more likely than whites to be confined awaiting trial which increases the probability that an incarcerative sentence will be imposed to receive incarcerative rather than community sentences and to receive longer sentences Racial differences found at each stage are typically modest but their cumulative effect is significant 32 Broader socioeconomic inequality and disparities at each stage of the criminal legal process result in the disproportionate imprisonment of people of color 33 In 2021 people of color constituted over two thirds 69 of the prison population 2 Black Americans are imprisoned at 5 times the rate of white people and American Indians and Hispanic people are imprisoned at 4 times and 2 times the white rate respectively 2 Black and Hispanic people make up 33 of the U S population but 56 of the incarceration population 2 31 Nationally one in 81 Black adults are serving time in state prison 34 Although significant gaps remain there have been reductions in imprisonment disparities over the past decades 35 The extent of decarceration has varied by race and ethnicity but all major racial and ethnic groups experienced decarceration since reaching their highest levels 2 36 The Black prison population has decreased the most Since 2002 the year it reached its peak levels the number of Black people in prison declined from 622 700 to 378 000 a 39 decrease 2 36 Since 1998 the year the white prison population reached its peak the number of white people in prison declined from 533 200 to 356 000 a 25 decrease 2 36 Since 2011 the year the Hispanic prison population reached its peak the number of Hispanic people in prison declined from 347 300 to 273 800 a 21 decrease 2 36 Since 2010 the year the American Indian prison population reached its peak the number of American Indians in prison declined from 23 800 to 18 700 a 21 decrease 2 36 Finally since 2016 the year the Asian prison population reached its peak the number of Asian people in prison declined from 18 000 to 14 700 2 36 Gender edit 2010 adult incarceration ratesby race ethnicity and sexper 100 000 adult US residents 37 Race orethnicity Male FemaleWhite 678 91Black 4 347 260Hispanic 1 775 133See also Incarceration of women in the United States In 2013 there were 102 400 adult females in local jails in the United States and 111 300 adult females in state and federal prisons 38 Within the US the rate of female incarceration increased fivefold in a two decade span ending in 2001 the increase occurred because of increased prosecutions and convictions of offenses related to recreational drugs increases in the severities of offenses and a lack of community sanctions and treatment for women who violate laws 39 In the United States authorities began housing women in correctional facilities separate from men in the 1870s 40 According to the ACLU More than half of the women in prisons and jails 56 are incarcerated for drug or property offenses and Black women are two times as likely to be incarcerated as white women 41 Black women tend to receive longer sentences and harsher punishments than white women for committing the same crimes According to Angela Davis 2003 in many situations white women are put in mental institutions whereas black women are sent to prison for the same crime 42 However since the early 2000s the incarceration rates for African American and Hispanic American women have declined while incarceration rates have increased for white women Between 2000 and 2017 the incarceration rate for white women increased by 44 while at the same time declining by 55 for African American women 43 The Sentencing Project reports that by 2021 incarceration rates had declined by 70 for African American women while rising by 7 for white women 44 In 2017 the Washington Post reported that white women s incarceration rate was growing faster than ever before as the rate for black women declined 45 The incarceration rate of African American males is also falling sharply even faster that white men s incarceration rate contrary to the popular opinion that black males are increasingly incarcerated 46 In 2011 it was reported that 85 to 90 of women incarcerated were victims of sexual and domestic violence which is significantly higher than the national average of 22 3 of women in the United States 47 Women who face sexual or domestic violence are more likely to commit crimes themselves and become incarcerated 48 The history of black women experiencing higher rates of abuse than white women provides one of many explanations for why African American women have faced higher rates of incarceration than white women 1 In 2013 there were 628 900 adult males in local jails in the United States and 1 463 500 adult males in state and federal prisons 38 In a study of sentencing in the United States in 1984 David B Mustard found that males received 12 percent longer prison terms than females after controlling for the offense level criminal history district and offense type and noted that females receive even shorter sentences relative to men than whites relative to blacks 49 A later study by Sonja B Starr found sentences for men to be up to 60 higher when controlling for more variables 50 Several explanations for this disparity have been offered including that women have more to lose from incarceration and that men are the targets of discrimination in sentencing 51 Youth edit Main article Youth incarceration in the United States Juveniles in residentialplacement 1997 2015 US 52 Year Male Female Total1997 90 771 14 284 105 0551999 92 985 14 508 107 4932001 89 115 15 104 104 2192003 81 975 14 556 96 5312006 78 998 13 723 92 7212007 75 017 11 797 86 8142010 61 359 9 434 70 7932011 53 079 8 344 61 4232013 46 421 7 727 54 1482015 40 750 7 293 48 043Through the juvenile courts and the adult criminal justice system the United States incarcerates more of its youth than any other country in the world a reflection of the larger trends in incarceration practices in the United States This has been a source of controversy for a number of reasons including the overcrowding and violence in youth detention facilities the prosecution of youths as adults and the long term consequences of incarceration on the individual s chances for success in adulthood In 2014 the United Nations Human Rights Committee criticized the United States for about ten judicial abuses including the mistreatment of juvenile inmates 53 A UN report published in 2015 criticized the US for being the only nation in the world to sentence juveniles to life imprisonment without parole 54 According to federal data from 2011 around 40 of the nation s juvenile inmates are housed in private facilities 55 The incarceration of youths has been linked to the effects of family and neighborhood influences One study found that the behaviors of family members and neighborhood peers appear to substantially affect the behavior and outcomes of disadvantaged youths 56 Nearly 53 000 youth were incarcerated in 2015 57 4 656 of those were held in adult facilities while the rest were in juvenile facilities Of those in juvenile facilities 69 are 16 or older while over 500 are 12 or younger 57 As arrest and crime rates are not equal across demographic groups neither is prison population The Prison Policy Initiative broke down those numbers finding that relative to their share of the U S population black and American Indian youth are over represented in juvenile facilities while white youth are under represented 57 Black youth comprise 14 of the national youth population but 43 of boys and 34 of girls in juvenile facilities are Black And even excluding youth held in Indian country facilities American Indians make up 3 of girls and 1 5 of boys in juvenile facilities despite comprising less than 1 of all youth nationally 57 Elderly edit The percentage of prisoners in federal and state prisons aged 55 and older increased by 33 from 2000 to 2005 while the prison population grew by 8 The Southern Legislative Conference found that in 16 southern states the elderly prisoner population increased on average by 145 between 1997 and 2007 The growth in the elderly population brought along higher health care costs most notably seen in the 10 average increase in state prison budgets from 2005 to 2006 The SLC expects the percentage of elderly prisoners relative to the overall prison population to continue to rise Ronald Aday a professor of aging studies at Middle Tennessee State University and author of Aging Prisoners Crisis in American Corrections concurs One out of six prisoners in California is serving a life sentence Aday predicts that by 2020 16 percent of those serving life sentences will be elderly 58 59 State governments pay all of their inmates housing costs which significantly increase as prisoners age Inmates are unable to apply for Medicare and Medicaid Most Departments of Correction report spending more than 10 percent of the annual budget on elderly care 58 59 The American Civil Liberties Union published a report in 2012 which asserts that the elderly prison population has climbed 1300 since the 1980s with 125 000 inmates aged 55 or older now incarcerated 60 LGBT people edit Further information LGBT people in prison LGBT lesbian gay bisexual or transgender youth are disproportionately more likely than the general population to come into contact with the criminal justice system According to the National Center for Transgender Equality 16 percent of transgender adults have been in prison and or jail compared to 2 7 percent of all adults 61 It has also been found that 13 15 percent of youth in detention identify as LGBT whereas an estimated 4 8 percent of the general youth population identify as such 62 According to Yarbrough 2021 higher rates of poverty homelessness and profiling of transgendered people by law enforcement are the cause of the higher rate of imprisonment experienced by transgender and gender non conforming people 63 LGBT youth not only experience these same challenges but many also live in homes unwelcoming to their identities 64 This often results in LGBT youth running away and or engaging in criminal activities such as the drug trade sex work and or theft which places them at higher risk for arrest Because of discriminatory practices and limited access to resources transgender adults are also more likely to engage in criminal activities to be able to pay for housing health care and other basic needs 64 LGBT people in jail and prison are particularly vulnerable to mistreatment by other inmates and staff This mistreatment includes solitary confinement which may be described as protective custody physical and sexual violence verbal abuse and denial of medical care and other services 61 65 According to the National Inmate Survey in 2011 12 40 percent of transgender inmates reported sexual victimization compared to 4 percent of all inmates 66 Mentally disabled edit Main article Mentally ill people in United States jails and prisons In the United States the percentage of inmates with mental illness has been steadily increasing with rates more than quadrupling from 1998 to 2006 67 Many have attributed this trend to the deinstitutionalization of mentally ill persons beginning in the 1960s when mental hospitals across the country began closing their doors 68 69 However other researchers indicate that there is no evidence for the basic criminalization premise that decreased psychiatric services explain the disproportionate risk of incarceration for individuals with mental illness 70 According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics over half of all prisoners in 2005 had experienced mental illness as identified by a recent history or symptoms of a mental health problem of this population jail inmates experienced the highest rates of symptoms of mental illness at 60 percent followed by 49 percent of state prisoners and 40 percent of federal prisoners 71 Not only do people with recent histories of mental illness end up incarcerated but many who have no history of mental illness end up developing symptoms while in prison In 2006 the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that a quarter of state prisoners had a history of mental illness whereas 3 in 10 state prisoners had developed symptoms of mental illness since becoming incarcerated with no recent history of mental illness 71 According to Human Rights Watch one of the contributing factors to the disproportionate rates of mental illness in prisons and jails is the increased use of solitary confinement for which socially and psychologically meaningful contact is reduced to the absolute minimum to a point that is insufficient for most detainees to remain mentally well functioning 72 Another factor to be considered is that most inmates do not get the mental health services that they need while incarcerated Due to limited funding prisons are not able to provide a full range of mental health services and thus are typically limited to inconsistent administration of psychotropic medication or no psychiatric services at all 69 72 Human Rights Watch also claims that corrections officers routinely use excessive violence against mentally ill inmates for nonthreatening behaviors related to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder These reports found that some inmates had been shocked shackled and pepper sprayed 73 Mental illness rarely stands alone when analyzing the risk factors associated with incarceration and recidivism rates 71 74 The American Psychological Association recommends a holistic approach to reducing recidivism rates among offenders by providing cognitive behavioral treatment focused on criminal cognition or services that target variable risk factors for high risk offenders due to the numerous intersecting risk factors experienced by mentally ill and non mentally ill offenders alike 74 To prevent the recidivism of individuals with mental illness a variety of programs are in place that are based on criminal justice or mental health intervention models Programs modeled after criminal justice strategies include diversion programs mental health courts specialty mental health probation or parole and jail aftercare prison re entry Programs modeled after mental health interventions include forensic assertive community treatment and forensic intensive case management It has been argued that the wide diversity of these program interventions points to a lack of clarity on which specific program components are most effective in reducing recidivism rates among individuals with mental illness Inmates who have a mental illness tend to stay for longer days in jail compared to inmates who don t have a mental illness Inmates with mental illness may struggle to understand and follow prison rules Inmates with mental illness will usually get in trouble with more facility violation rules Suicide is the leading cause of death in many prisons People who have a serious mental illness tend to die by suicide more often in prison 75 Students edit Main article School to prison pipeline The term school to prison pipeline also known as the schoolhouse to jailhouse track is a concept that was named in the 1980s 76 The school to prison pipeline is the idea that a school s harsh punishments which typically push students out of the classroom lead to the criminalization of students misbehaviors and result in increasing a student s probability of entering the prison system 77 Although the school to prison pipeline is aggravated by a combination of ingredients zero tolerance policies are viewed as main contributors 78 Additionally the School to Prison Pipeline disproportionately impacts the poor students with disabilities and youth of color especially African Americans who are suspended and expelled at the highest rates despite comparable rates of infraction 76 In 1994 the Gun Free Schools Act was passed It required that students have at least a year long suspension from school if they brought a weapon to school Many states then adopted the Zero tolerance policy which lead to an increase in suspensions mainly for Black and Hispanic kids At the same time these policies were growing school districts adopted their own version of the broken windows theory The broken windows theory emphasizes the importance of cracking down on small offenses in order to make residents feel safer and discourage more serious crime For schools this meant more suspensions for small offenses like talking back to teachers skipping class or being disobedient or disruptive This led to schools having police officers in schools which in turn led to students being arrested and handled more harshly Zero tolerance policies are regulations that mandate specific consequences in response to outlined student misbehavior typically without any consideration for the unique circumstances surrounding a given incident 79 Zero tolerance policies both implicitly and explicitly usher the student into the prison track Implicitly when a student is extracted from the classroom the more likely that student is to drop out of school as a result of being in class less As a dropout that child is then ill prepared to obtain a job and become a fruitful citizen 80 Explicitly schools sometimes do not funnel their pupils to the prison systems inadvertently rather they send them directly 81 Once in juvenile court even sympathetic judges are not likely to evaluate whether the school s punishment was warranted or fair For these reasons it is argued that zero tolerance policies lead to an exponential increase in the juvenile prison populations 82 The national suspension rate doubled from 3 7 to 7 4 from 1973 to 2010 83 The claim that Zero Tolerance Policies affect students of color at a disproportionate rate is supported in the Code of Maryland Regulations study that found black students were suspended at more than double the rate of white students 84 This data is further backed by Moriah Balingit who states that when compared to white students black students are suspended and expelled at greater rates according to the Civil Rights Data Collection that has records with specific information for the 2015 2016 school year of about 96 000 schools 85 In addition further data shows that although black students only accounted for 15 of the student population they represented a 31 of the arrests 85 Hispanic children share this in common with their black counterparts as they too are more susceptible to harsher discipline like suspension and expulsion 86 This trend can be seen throughout numerous studies of this type of material and particularly in the south 87 88 Furthermore between 1985 and 1989 there was an increase in referrals of minority youth to juvenile court petitioned cases adjudicated delinquency cases and delinquency cases placed outside the home 89 During this time period the number of African American youth detained increased by 9 and the number of Hispanic youths detained increased by 4 yet the proportion of White youth declined by 13 88 Documentation of this phenomenon can be seen as early as 1975 with the book School Suspensions Are they helping children 90 Additionally as punitive action leads to dropout rates so does imprisonment Data shows in the year 2000 one in three black male students ages 20 40 who did not complete high school were incarcerated 91 Moreover about 70 of those in state prison have not finished high school 91 Lastly if one is a black male living post Civil Rights Movement with no high school diploma there is a 60 chance that they will be incarcerated in their lifetime 91 Immigrants and foreign nationals edit Main article Immigration detention in the United States The United States government holds tens of thousands of immigrants in detention under the control of Customs and Border Protection CBP and Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE These immigrants seek asylum into the United states and are detained prior to release into the United States or deportation and removal from the country During 2018 396 448 people were booked into ICE custody 242 778 of whom were detained by CBP and 153 670 by ICE s own enforcement operations 92 The BOP receives all prisoner transfer treaty inmates sent from foreign countries even if their crimes would have been if committed in the United States tried in state DC or territorial courts 93 Non US citizens incarcerated in federal and state prisons are eligible to be transferred to their home countries if they qualify 94 Class and poverty edit The poor in the United States are incarcerated at a much higher rate than their counterparts in other developed nations 95 According to a 2015 study by the Vera Institute of Justice jails in the U S have become massive warehouses of the impoverished since the 1980s 96 A December 2017 report by Philip Alston the U N Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights asserted that the justice system throughout the U S is designed to keep people mired in poverty and to generate revenue to fund the justice system and other governmental programs 97 Sociologist Matthew Desmond of Princeton University writes that the overwhelming majority of prisoners and former prisoners of the US prison system which has no equal in any other country or any other epoch are extremely poor And they stay poor as prison jobs pay an average wage of between 14 cents and 1 41 an hour He notes that the carceral state also disappears the incarcerated poor by erasing them from poverty statistics and national surveys which means there are millions more poor Americans than official statistics let on 98 Features of the criminal justice system editDuration edit Main article Criminal sentencing in the United States Many legislatures continually have reduced discretion of judges in both the sentencing process and the determination of when the conditions of a sentence have been satisfied Determinate sentencing use of mandatory minimums and guidelines based sentencing continue to remove the human element from sentencing such as the prerogative of the judge to consider the mitigating or extenuating circumstances of a crime to determine the appropriate length of the incarceration As the consequence of three strikes laws the increase in the duration of incarceration in the last decade was most pronounced in the case of life prison sentences which increased by 83 between 1992 and 2003 while violent crimes fell in the same period 99 Violent and nonviolent crime edit See also Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act In 2016 there were an estimated 1 2 million violent crimes committed in the United States 100 Over the course of that year U S law enforcement agencies made approximately 10 7 million arrests excluding arrests for traffic violations 100 In that year approximately 2 3 million people were incarcerated in jail or prison 101 nbsp Felony Sentences in State Courts study by the United States Department of JusticeAs of September 30 2009 in federal prisons 7 9 of sentenced people were incarcerated for violent crimes 102 while at year end 2008 of sentenced people in state prisons 52 4 had been jailed for violent crimes 102 In 2002 latest available data by type of offense 21 6 of convicted inmates in jails were in prison for violent crimes Among unconvicted inmates in jails in 2002 34 had a violent offense as the most serious charge 41 percent of convicted and unconvicted jail inmates in 2002 had a current or prior violent offense 46 were nonviolent recidivists 103 From 2000 to 2008 the state prison population increased by 159 200 imprisoned people and violent offenders accounted for 60 of this increase The number of drug offenders in state prisons declined by 12 400 over this period Furthermore while the number of sentenced violent offenders in state prison increased from 2000 through 2008 the expected length of stays for these offenders declined slightly during this period 102 In 2013 The Week reported that at least 3 278 Americans were serving life sentences without parole for nonviolent crimes including cursing at a policeman and selling 10 worth of drugs More than 80 percent of these life sentences are the result of mandatory sentencing laws 104 In 2016 about 200 000 under 16 of the 1 3 million people in state jails were serving time for drug offenses 700 000 were incarcerated for violent offenses 105 Nonviolent crime was the main driver of the increase in the incarcerated population in the United States from 1980 to 2003 Violent crime rates had been relatively constant or declining over those decades The prison population was increased primarily by public policy changes causing more prison sentences and lengthening time served for example through mandatory minimum sentencing three strikes laws and reductions in the availability of parole or early release Perhaps the single greatest force behind the growth of the prison population has been the national War on Drugs The War on Drugs initiative expanded during the presidency of Ronald Reagan During Reagan s term a bi partisan Congress established the Anti Drug Abuse Act of 1986 galvanized by the death of Len Bias According to the Human Rights Watch legislation like this led to the extreme increase in drug offense imprisonment and increasing racial disproportions among the arrestees 106 The number of incarcerated drug offenders has increased twelvefold since 1980 In 2000 22 percent of those in federal and state prisons were convicted on drug charges 107 108 In 2011 55 6 of the 1 131 210 sentenced people in state prisons were being held for violent crimes this number excludes the 200 966 imprisoned people being held due to parole violations of which 39 6 were re incarcerated for a subsequent violent crime 109 Also in 2011 3 7 of the state prison population consisted of imprisoned people whose highest conviction was for drug possession again excluding those incarcerated for parole violations of which 6 0 were re incarcerated for a subsequent act of drug possession 109 Pre trial detention edit In 2020 the non profit Prison Policy Initiative issued a report Mass Incarceration The Whole Pie 2020 that said based on the most recent census data and information from the Bureau of Prisons an overwhelming majority of inmates in county and municipal jails were being held pre trial without having been convicted of a crime The Pre Trial Justice Institute noted Six out of 10 people in U S jails nearly a half million individuals on any given day are awaiting trial People who have not been found guilty of the charges against them account for 95 of all jail population growth between 2000 2014 110 111 In 2017 482 100 inmates in federal and state prisons were held pre trial 112 Advocates for decarceration contend the large pre trial detention population serves as a compelling reason for bail reform anchored in a presumption of innocence 113 We don t want people sitting in jails only because they cannot afford their financial bail said Representative John Tilley D of Kentucky a state that has eliminated commercial bail and relies on a risk assessment to determine a defendant s flight risk 114 In March 2020 the Department of Justice issued its report noting the county and municipal jail population totaling 738 400 inmates had decreased by 12 over the last decade from an estimated 258 jail inmates per 100 000 U S residents in 2008 to 226 per 100 000 in 2018 For the first time since 1990 the 2018 jail incarceration rate for African Americans fell below 600 per 100 000 while the juvenile jail population dropped 56 from 7 700 to 3 400 115 In 2018 sixty eight percent of jail inmates were behind bars on felony charges about two thirds of the total jail population was awaiting court action or held for other reasons 116 Prison education edit Main article Prison education Prison education encompasses any type of educational program offered within a prison including literacy programs high school or GED equivalent programs vocational education and tertiary education In the early 1800s tutors began to enter prisons and the idea of punishment began to shift towards rehabilitation By the early 1990s there were over 350 prison education programs nationwide 117 In 1994 Bill Clinton signed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act into law which barred incarcerated people from receiving Pell Grants This caused the number of educational programs to quickly decline due to a lack of federal funding 118 Prison education has proven to lower recidivism rates and increase employment for graduates upon release A 2013 study conducted by the Rand Corporation found that correctional education led to a significant reduction in recidivism rates and those who participated in prison education programs showed 43 lower odds of recidivating than inmates who did not 119 That same study showed that individuals who received vocational education and training saw a 28 increase in employment following incarceration and those who participated in strictly academic educational programs saw an 8 increase in employment 119 Recidivism edit Main article Recidivism in the United States A 2002 study survey showed that among nearly 275 000 prisoners released in 1994 67 5 were rearrested within 3 years and 51 8 were back in prison 120 However the study found no evidence that spending more time in prison raises the recidivism rate and found that those serving the longest time 61 months or more had a slightly lower re arrest rate 54 2 than every other category of prisoners This is most likely explained by the older average age of those released with the longest sentences and the study shows a strong negative correlation between recidivism and age upon release According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics a study was conducted that tracked 404 638 prisoners in 30 states after their release from prison in 2005 From the examination it was found that within three years after their release 67 8 of the released prisoners were rearrested within five years 76 6 of the released prisoners were rearrested and of the prisoners that were rearrested 56 7 of them were rearrested by the end of their first year of release 121 Comparison with other countries edit nbsp A map of incarceration rates by country 5 Main article Comparison of United States incarceration rate with other countries See also List of countries by incarceration rate With around 100 prisoners per 100 000 the United States had an average prison and jail population until 1980 Afterwards it drifted apart considerably 122 The United States has the highest prison and jail population 2 121 600 in adult facilities in 2016 as well as the highest incarceration rate in the world 655 per 100 000 population in 2016 5 123 124 According to the World Prison Population List 11th edition there were around 10 35 million people in penal institutions worldwide in 2015 125 The US had 2 173 800 prisoners in adult facilities in 2015 126 That means the US held 21 0 of the world s prisoners in 2015 even though the US represented only around 4 4 percent of the world s population in 2015 127 128 Comparing other English speaking developed countries whereas the incarceration rate of the US is 655 per 100 000 population of all ages 5 the incarceration rate of Canada is 114 per 100 000 as of 2015 129 England and Wales is 146 per 100 000 as of 2016 130 Australia is 160 per 100 000 as of 2016 131 and Ireland is 82 per 100 000 as of Aug 2022 132 Comparing other developed countries the rate of Spain is 133 per 100 000 as of 2016 133 Greece is 89 per 100 000 as of 2016 134 Norway is 73 per 100 000 as of 2016 135 Netherlands is 69 per 100 000 as of 2014 136 and Japan is 48 per 100 000 as of 2014 137 According to a 2021 report by the Prison Policy Initiative every state has a higher incarceration rate than virtually any independent democracy on earth 138 Louisiana has the highest incarceration rate at 1 094 138 In 2012 The Times Picayune described the state as the prison capital of the world 139 A 2008 New York Times article 124 said that it is the length of sentences that truly distinguishes American prison policy Indeed the mere number of sentences imposed here would not place the United States at the top of the incarceration lists If lists were compiled based on annual admissions to prison per capita several European countries would outpace the United States But American prison stays are much longer so the total incarceration rate is higher The number of incarcerated individuals in U S jails and prisons jumped 500 in the three decades following the implementation of tougher sentencing laws associated with the War on Drugs and the tough on crime movement 122 The U S incarceration rate peaked in 2008 when about 1 in 100 US adults was behind bars 140 This incarceration rate exceeded the average incarceration levels in the Soviet Union during the existence of the Gulag system when the Soviet Union s population reached 168 million and 1 2 to 1 5 million people were in the Gulag prison camps and colonies i e about 0 8 imprisoned per 100 USSR residents according to numbers from Anne Applebaum and Steven Rosefielde 141 142 In The New Yorker article The Caging of America 2012 Adam Gopnik writes Over all there are now more people under correctional supervision in America more than six million than were in the Gulag Archipelago under Stalin at its height 143 Operational edit nbsp U S federal prisoner distribution since 1950Prison systems edit See also Lists of United States state prisons The American prison system is one of significant heterogeneity In fact it would be misleading to suggest that the U S has one criminal justice system Instead there are thousands of systems across federal state local tribal levels In 2023 there were a reported 1 566 state prisons 98 federal prisons 3 116 local jails 1 323 juvenile correctional facilities 181 immigrant detention facilities and 80 Indian country jails as well as military prisons civil commitment centers state psychiatric hospitals and prisons in the U S territories 30 Despite the country s disparate systems of confinement the U S prison system may be generally identified with four main institutions state prisons federal prisons local jails and juvenile correctional facilities 32 State prisons are run by state departments of correction holding sentenced people serving time for felony offenses usually longer than a year 32 Federal prisons are run by the U S Bureau of Prisons and hold people who have been convicted of federal crimes and pretrial detainees 32 Local jails are county or municipal facilities that incarcerate defendants prior to trial and also hold those serving short sentences typically under a year 32 Juvenile correctional facilities are operated by local authorities or the state and serve as longer term placements for youth who have been adjudicated as delinquent and ordered by a judge to be confined 144 Security levels edit This section needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section Unsourced material may be challenged and removed November 2012 Learn how and when to remove this template message In some but not all states department of corrections inmates reside in different facilities that vary by security level especially in security measures administration of inmates type of housing and weapons and tactics used by corrections officers The federal government s Bureau of Prisons uses a numbered scale from one to five to represent the security level Level five is the most secure while level one is the least State prison systems operate similar systems California for example classifies its facilities from Reception Center through Levels I to V minimum to maximum security to specialized high security units all considered Level V including Security Housing Unit SHU California s version of supermax and related units As a general rule county jails detention centers and reception centers where new commitments are first held while either awaiting trial or before being transferred to mainline institutions to serve out their sentences operate at a relatively high level of security usually close security or higher Supermax prison facilities provide the highest level of prison security These units hold those considered the most dangerous inmates as well as inmates that have been deemed too high profile or too great a national security risk for a normal prison These include inmates who have committed assaults murders or other serious violations in less secure facilities and inmates known to be or accused of being prison gang members Most states have either a supermax section of a prison facility or an entire prison facility designated as a supermax The United States Federal Bureau of Prisons operates a federal supermax A D X Florence located in Florence Colorado also known as the Alcatraz of the Rockies and is widely considered to possibly be the most secure prison in the United States A D X Florence has a standard supermax section where assaultive violent and gang related inmates are kept under normal supermax conditions of 23 hour confinement and abridged amenities A D X Florence is considered to be of a security level above that of all other prisons in the United States at least in the ideological ultramax part of it which features permanent 24 hour solitary confinement with rare human contacts or opportunity to earn better conditions through good behavior In a maximum security prison or area called high security in the federal system all prisoners have individual cells 145 with sliding doors controlled from a secure remote control station Prisoners are allowed out of their cells one out of twenty four hours one hour and 30 minutes for prisoners in California When out of their cells prisoners remain in the cell block or an exterior cage Movement out of the cell block or pod is tightly restricted using restraints and escorts by correctional officers nbsp Incarceration Rate by State 2016 excludes jail inmates 146 Under close security prisoners usually have one or two person cells operated from a remote control station Each cell has its own toilet and sink Inmates may leave their cells for work assignments or correctional programs and otherwise may be allowed in a common area in the cellblock or an exercise yard The fences are generally double fences with watchtowers housing armed guards plus often a third lethal current electric fence in the middle Prisoners that fall into the medium security group may sleep in cells but share them two and two and use bunk beds 145 with lockers to store their possessions Depending upon the facility each cell may have showers toilets and sinks Cells are locked at night with one or more correctional officers supervising There is less supervision over the internal movements of prisoners The perimeter is generally double fenced and regularly patrolled Prisoners in minimum security facilities are considered to pose little physical risk to the public and are mainly non violent white collar criminals Minimum security prisoners live in less secure dormitories 145 which are regularly patrolled by correctional officers As in medium security facilities they have communal showers toilets and sinks A minimum security facility generally has a single fence that is watched but not patrolled by armed guards At facilities in very remote and rural areas there may be no fence at all Prisoners may often work on community projects such as roadside litter cleanup with the state department of transportation or wilderness conservation Many minimum security facilities are small camps located in or near military bases larger prisons outside the security perimeter or other government institutions to provide a convenient supply of convict labor to the institution Many states allow persons in minimum security facilities access to the Internet Correspondence edit Inmates who maintain contact with family and friends in the outside world are less likely to be convicted of further crimes and usually have an easier reintegration period back into society 147 Inmates benefit from corresponding with friends and family members especially when in person visits are infrequent 148 However guidelines exist as to what constitutes acceptable mail and these policies are strictly enforced Mail sent to inmates in violation of prison policies can result in sanctions such as loss of imprisonment time reduced for good behavior Most Department of Corrections websites provide detailed information regarding mail policies These rules can even vary within a single prison depending on which part of the prison an inmate is housed For example death row and maximum security inmates are usually under stricter mail guidelines for security reasons There have been several notable challenges to prison corresponding services The Missouri Department of Corrections DOC stated that effective June 1 2007 inmates would be prohibited from using pen pal websites citing concerns that inmates were using them to solicit money and defraud the public 149 Service providers such as WriteAPrisoner com together with the ACLU planned to challenge the ban in Federal Court needs update Similar bans on an inmate s rights or a website s right to post such information has been ruled unconstitutional in other courts citing First Amendment freedoms 150 Some faith based initiatives promote the positive effects of correspondence on inmates and some have made efforts to help ex offenders reintegrate into society through job placement assistance 151 Inmates ability to mail letters to other inmates has been limited by the courts 152 Conditions edit Further information Pregnancy and prenatal care in American women s prisons Prisoner abuse in the United States and Prison rape in the United States nbsp Living facilities in Mule Creek State Prison 2006 153 The non governmental organization Human Rights Watch claims that prisoners and detainees face abusive degrading and dangerous conditions within local state and federal facilities including those operated by for profit contractors 154 The organization also raised concerns with prisoner rape and medical care for inmates 155 In a survey of 1 788 male inmates in Midwestern prisons by Prison Journal about 21 responded they had been coerced or pressured into sexual activity during their incarceration and 7 that they had been raped in their current facility 156 In August 2003 a Harper s article by Wil S Hylton estimated that somewhere between 20 and 40 of American prisoners are at this very moment infected with hepatitis C 157 Prisons may outsource medical care to private companies such as Correctional Medical Services now Corizon that according to Hylton s research try to minimize the amount of care given to prisoners in order to maximize profits 157 158 After the privatization of healthcare in Arizona s prisons medical spending fell by 30 million dollars and staffing was greatly reduced Some 50 prisoners died in custody in the first 8 months of 2013 compared to 37 for the preceding two years combined 159 The poor quality of food provided to inmates has become an issue as over the last decade corrections officials looking to cut costs have been outsourcing food services to corporations such as Aramark A Viands Food amp Services Management and ABL Management 160 A prison riot in Kentucky has been blamed on the low quality of food Aramark provided to inmates which was tainted with worms and human feces 161 A 2017 study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that because of lapses in food safety prison inmates are 6 4 times more likely to contract a food related illness than the general population 162 Also identified as an issue within the prison system is gang violence because many gang members retain their gang identity and affiliations when imprisoned Segregation of identified gang members from the general population of inmates with different gangs being housed in separate units often results in the imprisonment of these gang members with their friends and criminal cohorts Some feel this has the effect of turning prisons into institutions of higher criminal learning 163 Many prisons in the United States are overcrowded For example California s 33 prisons have a total capacity of 100 000 but they hold 170 000 inmates 164 Many prisons in California and around the country are forced to turn old gymnasiums and classrooms into huge bunkhouses for inmates They do this by placing hundreds of bunk beds next to one another in these gyms without any type of barriers to keep inmates separated In California the inadequate security engendered by this situation coupled with insufficient staffing levels have led to increased violence and a prison health system that causes one death a week This situation has led the courts to order California to release 27 of the current prison population citing the Eighth Amendment s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment 165 The three judge court considering requests by the Plata v Schwarzenegger and Coleman v Schwarzenegger courts found California s prisons have become criminogenic as a result of prison overcrowding 166 In 2005 the U S Supreme Court case of Cutter v Wilkinson established that prisons that received federal funds could not deny prisoners accommodations necessary for religious practices According to a Supreme Court ruling issued on May 23 2011 California which has the highest overcrowding rate of any prison system in the country must alleviate overcrowding in the state s prisons reducing the prisoner population by 30 000 over the next two years 167 168 169 170 needs update nbsp Inmates in an Orleans Parish Prison yardSolitary confinement is widely used in US prisons yet it is underreported by most states while some do not report it at all Isolation of prisoners has been condemned by the UN in 2011 as a form of torture 171 At over 80 000 at any given time the US has more prisoners confined in isolation than any other country in the world In Louisiana with 843 prisoners per 100 000 citizens there have been prisoners such as the Angola Three held for as long as forty years in isolation 172 171 A June 2023 study by Solitary Watch found that over 120 000 people on any given day are in solitary confinement in the United States 173 In 1999 the Supreme Court of Norway refused to extradite American hashish smuggler Henry Hendricksen as they declared that US prisons do not meet their minimum humanitarian standards 174 In 2011 some 885 people died while being held in local jails not in prisons after being convicted of a crime and sentenced throughout the United States 175 According to federal statistics roughly 4 400 inmates die in US prisons and jails annually excluding executions 176 As of September 2013 condoms for prisoners are only available in the U S State of Vermont on September 17 2013 the California Senate approved a bill for condom distribution inside the state s prisons but the bill was not yet law at the time of approval 177 and in county jails in San Francisco 178 In September 2016 a group of corrections officers at Holman Correctional Facility have gone on strike over safety concerns and overcrowding Prisoners refer to the facility as a slaughterhouse as stabbings are a routine occurrence 179 During the coronavirus disease 2019 COVID 19 pandemic in the US the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC requested health data from 54 state and territorial health department jurisdictions 32 86 of 37 jurisdictions that responded reported at least one confirmed COVID 19 case among inmates or staff members As of April 21 2020 there were 4 893 cases and 88 deaths among inmates and 2 778 cases and 15 deaths among staff members 180 Conditions for Women edit The conditions for women especially Black women are often poor Many prisons are known to do less in order to help Black women get out of the prison system Because prisons are male dominated a larger portion of the resources are allocated towards them Another major issue that women face in prisons is sexual assault which often comes from guards Though this is a major issue for women these types of assaults do not usually get the attention that they need and the victims are often left not being taken care of 181 Based on Angela Davis Are Prisons Obsolete the prison industrial complex and mass incarceration is shaped by gender There are significant differences in the treatment of imprisoned men and women Women endure physical mental and emotional trauma as they are forced to endure sexual abuse and a lack of resources for their intimate needs In prison women are dehumanized and treated like objects in a way that has become normal Like many other socio political issues women seem to be left out of the conversation when it comes to prison reform Again not many people consider the experiences that women have endured in their time of imprisonment Women were degraded to an extreme extent and sexual abuse was often brought on by the guards and officers who are supposed to watch over them They are sexualized and often sent to prison for a longer duration than men citation needed The petty crimes of women are also not met with the same intensity of murder charges for men According to Davis masculine criminality has always been deemed more normal than feminine criminality Davis 2011 When a woman commits a crime it is not as common and so it is practically considered psychotic Because of this deviant women have been constructed as insane Davis 2011 Women are treated as if their crimes are more irrational because of their gender and their sentencing can be harsher as a result Women are even more inclined to be imprisoned in psychiatric hospitals than men and prescribed psychiatric treatment 182 Privatization edit Main article Private prisons in the United States See also Prison industrial complex Prior to the 1980s private prisons did not exist in the U S During the 1980s as a result of the War on Drugs by the Reagan Administration the number of people incarcerated rose This created a demand for more prison space The result was the development of privatization and the for profit prison industry 183 184 185 186 A 1998 study was performed using three comparable Louisiana medium security prisons two of which were privately run by different corporations and one of which was publicly run The data from this study suggested that the privately run prisons operated more cost effectively without sacrificing the safety of inmates and staff The study concluded that both privately run prisons had a lower cost per inmate a lower rate of critical incidents a safer environment for employees and inmates and a higher proportional rate of inmates who completed basic education literacy and vocational training courses However the publicly run prison outperformed the privately run prisons in areas such as experiencing fewer escape attempts controlling substance abuse through testing offering a wider range of educational and vocational courses and providing a broader range of treatment recreation social services and rehabilitative services 187 According to Marie Gottschalk a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania studies that claim private prisons are cheaper to run than public prisons fail to take into account the fundamental differences between private and public facilities and that the prison industry engages in a lot of cherry picking and cost shifting to maintain the illusion that the private sector does it better for less 188 The American Civil Liberties Union reported in 2013 that numerous studies indicate private jails are actually filthier more violent less accountable and possibly more costly than their public counterparts The ACLU stated that the for profit prison industry is a major contributor to bloated state budgets and mass incarceration not a part of any viable solution to these urgent problems 189 The primary reason Louisiana is the prison capital of the world is because of the for profit prison industry 139 According to The Times Picayune a majority of Louisiana inmates are housed in for profit facilities which must be supplied with a constant influx of human beings or a 182 million industry will go bankrupt 139 In Mississippi a 2013 Bloomberg report stated that assault rates in private facilities were three times higher on average than in their public counterparts In 2012 the for profit Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility was the most violent prison in the state with 27 assaults per 100 offenders 190 A federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center on behalf of prisoners at the privately run East Mississippi Correctional Facility in 2013 claims the conditions there are hyper violent barbaric and chaotic with gangs routinely beating and exploiting mentally ill inmates who are denied medical care by prison staff 191 192 A May 2012 riot in the Corrections Corporation of America run Adams County Correctional Facility also in Mississippi left one corrections officer dead and dozens injured Similar riots have occurred in privatized facilities in Idaho Oklahoma New Mexico Florida California and Texas 193 194 195 nbsp Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility in Mississippi operated by Corrections Corporation of America CCA Sociologist John L Campbell of Dartmouth College claims that private prisons in the U S have become a lucrative business 196 Between 1990 and 2000 the number of private facilities grew from five to 100 operated by nearly 20 private firms Over the same time period the stock price of the industry leader Corrections Corporation of America CCA which rebranded as CoreCivic in 2016 amid increased scrutiny of the private prison industry 197 climbed from 8 a share to 30 196 According to journalist Matt Taibbi major investors in the prison industry include Wells Fargo Bank of America Fidelity Investments General Electric and The Vanguard Group 198 The aforementioned Bloomberg report also notes that in the past decade the number of inmates in for profit prisons throughout the U S rose 44 percent 190 Controversy has surrounded the privatization of prisons with the exposure of the genesis of the landmark Arizona SB 1070 law This law was written by Arizona State Congressman Russell Pearce and the CCA at a meeting of the American Legislative Exchange Council ALEC in the Grand Hyatt in Washington D C 199 200 Both CCA and GEO Group the two largest operators of private facilities have been contributors to ALEC which lobbies for policies that would increase incarceration such as three strike laws and truth in sentencing legislation 201 202 203 204 205 In fact in the early 1990s when CCA was co chair of ALEC it co sponsored with the National Rifle Association the so called truth in sentencing and three strikes you re out laws 206 Truth in sentencing called for all violent offenders to serve 85 percent of their sentences before being eligible for release three strikes called for mandatory life imprisonment for a third felony conviction Some prison officers unions in publicly run facilities such as California Correctional Peace Officers Association have in the past also supported measures such as three strike laws Such laws increased the prison population 207 208 In addition to CCA and GEO Group companies operating in the private prison business include Management and Training Corporation and Community Education Centers The GEO Group was formerly known as the Wackenhut Corrections division It includes the former Correctional Services Corporation and Cornell Companies which were purchased by GEO in 2005 and 2010 Such companies often sign contracts with states obliging them to fill prison beds or reimburse them for those that go unused 209 Private companies which provide services to prisons combine in the American Correctional Association a 501 c 3 which advocates legislation favorable to the industry Such private companies comprise what has been termed the prison industrial complex 184 210 211 212 An example of this phenomenon would be the Kids for cash scandal in which two judges in Luzerne County Pennsylvania Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan were receiving judicial kickbacks for sending youths convicted of minor crimes 213 to a privatized for profit juvenile facility run by the Mid Atlantic Youth Service Corporation 203 The industry is aware of what reduced crime rates could mean to their bottom line This from the CCA s SEC report in 2010 Our growth depends on a number of factors we cannot control including crime rates R eductions in crime rates could lead to reductions in arrests convictions and sentences requiring incarceration at correctional facilities 189 Marie Gottschalk claims that while private prison companies and other economic interests were not the primary drivers of mass incarceration originally they do much to sustain it today 214 The private prison industry has successfully lobbied for changes that increase the profit of their employers They have opposed measures that would bring reduced sentencing or shorter prison terms 215 216 The private prison industry has been accused of being at least partly responsible for America s high rates of incarceration 217 According to The Corrections Yearbook 2000 the average annual starting salary for public corrections officers was 23 002 compared to 17 628 for private prison guards The poor pay is a likely factor in the high turnover rate in private prisons at 52 2 percent compared to 16 percent in public facilities 218 In September 2015 Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the Justice Is Not for Sale Act 219 which would prohibit the United States government at federal state and local levels from contracting with private firms to provide and or operate detention facilities within two years 220 An August 2016 report by the U S Department of Justice asserts that privately operated federal facilities are less safe less secure and more punitive than other federal prisons 221 Shortly after this report was published the DoJ announced it will stop using private prisons 222 On February 23 the DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions overturned the ban on using private prisons According to Sessions the Obama administration memorandum changed long standing policy and practice and impaired the bureau s ability to meet the future needs of the federal correctional system Therefore I direct the bureau to return to its previous approach 223 The private prison industry has been booming under the Trump Administration 224 225 226 Additionally both CCA and GEO Group have been expanding into the immigrant detention market Although the combined revenues of CCA and GEO Group were about 4 billion in 2017 from private prison contracts their number one customer was ICE 227 Labor edit See also Penal labor in the United States About 18 of eligible prisoners held in federal prisons are employed by UNICOR and are paid less than 1 25 an hour 228 229 230 Prisons have gradually become a source of low wage labor for corporations seeking to outsource work to inmates 196 Corporations that utilize prison labor include Walmart Eddie Bauer Victoria s Secret Microsoft Starbucks McDonald s Nintendo Chevron Corporation Bank of America Koch Industries Boeing and Costco Wholesale 231 232 233 234 Initially laws passed during the era of the New Deal prohibited the use of prison labor with the exception of state institutions However lobbying by corporations eventually allowed them to use prison labor by 1979 and by 1995 businesses won exemptions from minimum wage laws 235 It is estimated that one in nine state government employees works in corrections 140 As the overall U S prison population declined in 2010 states are closing prisons For instance Virginia has removed 11 prisons since 2009 Like other small towns Boydton in Virginia has to contend with unemployment woes resulting from the closure of the Mecklenburg Correctional Center 236 In 2010 Prisoners in Georgia engaged in the 2010 Georgia prison strike to garner more rights In September 2016 large coordinated prison strikes took place in 11 states with inmates claiming they are subjected to poor sanitary conditions and jobs that amount to forced labor and modern day slavery 237 238 239 240 Organizers which include the Industrial Workers of the World labor union asserted that it was the largest prison strike in U S history 237 Starting August 21 2018 another prison strike sponsored by Jailhouse Lawyers Speak and the Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee took place in 17 states from coast to coast to protest what inmates regard as unfair treatment by the criminal justice system In particular inmates objected to being excluded from the 13th amendment which forces them to work for pennies a day a condition they assert is tantamount to modern day slavery The strike was the result of a call to action after a deadly riot occurred at Lee Correctional Institution in April of that year which was sparked by neglect and inhumane living conditions 241 242 243 244 245 According to a 2022 report by the ACLU prison labor produces 11 billion worth of goods and services annually with inmates often being forced to work dangerous jobs with no labor protections and little training and are compensated with pennies per hour or sometimes nothing at all 246 In 2023 a nation wide movement had called to close the slavery loophole in the 13th Amendment allowing an exception for punishment of crime According to constitutional scholars the 13th amendment had been violated as most US states forced inmates to work for no or marginal compensation 247 Cost edit nbsp U S Bureau of Justice Statistics Not adjusted for inflation To view the inflation adjusted data see chart 248 249 nbsp Federal prison yearly costJudicial police and corrections costs totaled 212 billion in 2011 according to the U S Census Bureau 250 In 2007 around 74 billion was spent on corrections according to the U S Bureau of Justice Statistics 248 249 Despite federal statistics including statements made by former Attorney General Eric Holder according to research on corrections expenditure published in the Church white paper On Security Federal Prisons and Detention FY15 Requested Budget was just 8 5 billion 251 Federal Bureau of Prisons spending was 6 9 billion counting 20 911 correctional officers of 43 297 positions 252 Total U S States and Federal Prisons and Detention including county jail subsidies was only 56 9 billion Adding local jails spending 64 9 billion was spent on corrections in nominal 2014 dollars 253 In 2014 among facilities operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons the average cost of incarceration for federal inmates in fiscal year 2014 was 30 619 85 The average annual cost to confine an inmate in a residential re entry center was 28 999 25 254 State prisons averaged 31 286 per inmate in 2010 according to a Vera Institute of Justice study It ranged from 14 603 in Kentucky to 60 076 in New York 255 In California in 2008 it cost the state an average of 47 102 a year to incarcerate an inmate in a state prison From 2001 to 2009 the average annual cost increased by about 19 500 256 Housing the approximately 500 000 people in jail in the US awaiting trial who cannot afford bail costs 9 billion a year 257 Most jail inmates are petty nonviolent offenders In the early 1990s most nonviolent defendants were released on their own recognizance trusted to show up at trial Now most are given bail and most pay a bail bondsman to afford it 258 62 of local jail inmates are awaiting trial 259 This rate varies from state to state As of 2019 Illinois has the highest rate with 89 of inmates in local jails unconvicted 260 Bondsmen have lobbied to cut back local pretrial programs from Texas to California pushed for legislation in four states limiting pretrial s resources and lobbied Congress so that they won t have to pay the bond if the defendant commits a new crime Behind them the bondsmen have powerful special interest group and millions of dollars Pretrial release agencies have a smattering of public employees and the remnants of their once thriving programs National Public Radio January 22 2010 261 To ease jail overcrowding over 10 counties every year consider building new jails As an example Lubbock County Texas has decided to build a 110 million megajail to ease jail overcrowding Jail costs an average of 60 a day nationally 258 262 In Broward County Florida supervised pretrial release costs about 7 a day per person while jail costs 115 a day The jail system costs a quarter of every county tax dollar in Broward County and is the single largest expense to the county taxpayer 261 The National Association of State Budget Officers reports In fiscal 2009 corrections spending represented 3 4 percent of total state spending and 7 2 percent of general fund spending They also report Some states exclude certain items when reporting corrections expenditures Twenty one states wholly or partially excluded juvenile delinquency counseling from their corrections figures and fifteen states wholly or partially excluded spending on juvenile institutions Seventeen states wholly or partially excluded spending on drug abuse rehabilitation centers and forty one states wholly or partially excluded spending on institutions for the criminally insane Twenty two states wholly or partially excluded aid to local governments for jails For details see Table 36 263 As of 2007 update the cost of medical care for inmates was growing by 10 percent annually 264 140 According to a 2016 study by researchers at Washington University in St Louis the true cost of incarceration exceeds 1 trillion with half of that falling on the families children and communities of those incarcerated 265 According to a 2016 analysis of federal data by the U S Education Department state and local spending on incarceration has grown three times as much as spending on public education since 1980 266 Effects editSee also Collateral consequences of criminal charges nbsp Property crime rates in the United States per 100 000 population beginning in 1960 Source Bureau of Justice Statistics nbsp Violent crime rates by gender 1973 2003 267 Crime edit Three articles written in the early 2000s claim that increasing incarceration has a negative effect on crime but this effect becomes smaller as the incarceration rate increases 268 269 Higher rates of prison admissions increase crime rates whereas moderate rates of prison admissions decrease crime The rate of prisoner releases in a given year in a community is also positively related to that community s crime rate the following year 270 A 2010 study of panel data from 1978 to 2003 indicated that the crime reducing effects of increasing incarceration are totally offset by the crime increasing effects of prisoner re entry 271 According to a 2015 study by the Brennan Center for Justice falling crime rates cannot be ascribed to mass incarceration 272 Society edit Within three years of being released 67 of ex prisoners are re arrested and 52 are re incarcerated according to a study based on 1994 data 273 120 Former inmate Wenona Thompson argues I realized that I became part of a cycle a system that looked forward to seeing me there And I was aware that I would be one of those people who fill up their prisons 274 In 1995 the government allocated 5 1 billion for new prison space Every 100 million spent in construction costs 53 million per year in finance and operational costs over the next three decades 275 The government spends nearly 60 billion a year for prisons and in 2005 it cost an average of 23 876 a year to house a prisoner 276 It takes about 30 000 per year per person to provide drug rehabilitation treatment to inmates By contrast the cost of drug rehabilitation treatment outside of a prison costs about 8 000 per year per person 274 In 2016 over 6 million Americans had lost their right to vote for conviction of a felony 277 In addition people who have been recently released from prison are ineligible for welfare in most states They are not eligible for subsidized housing and must wait two years for eligibility for Section 8 It can be difficult for people to find employment as employers often check a potential employee s criminal record 278 Formerly incarcerated individuals may experience employment discrimination and frequently have smaller social networks This contributes to their struggle finding employment upon release into the community 279 In The New Jim Crow in 2011 legal scholar and advocate Michelle Alexander contended that the U S incarceration system worked to bar Black men from voting She wrote there are more African Americans under correctional control in prison or jail on probation or parole than were enslaved in 1850 a decade before the Civil War began 280 Alexander s work has drawn increased attention in the years since Yale Law Professor and opponent of mass incarceration James Forman Jr has countered that 1 African Americans as represented by such cities as the District of Columbia have generally supported tough on crime policies 2 There appears to be a connection between drugs and violent crimes the discussion of which he says New Jim Crow theorists have avoided 3 New theorists have overlooked class as a factor in incarceration Black people with advanced degrees have fewer convictions and Black people without advanced education have more 281 Family edit Incarceration of an individual does not have a singular effect it affects those in the individual s tight knit circle as well For every mother that is incarcerated in the United States there are about another ten people children grandparents community etc that are directly affected 282 283 Moreover more than 2 7 million children in the United States have an incarcerated parent 284 That translates to one out of every 27 children in the United States having an incarcerated parent 285 Approximately 80 percent of women who go to jail each year are mothers 286 This ripple effect on the individual s family amplifies the debilitating effect that entails arresting individuals Given the general vulnerability and naivete of children it is important to understand how such a traumatic event adversely affects children The effects of a parent s incarceration on their children have been found as early as three years old 287 Local and state governments in the United States have recognized these harmful effects and have attempted to address them through public policy solutions Impact on children edit The effects of an early traumatic experience of a child can be categorized into health effects and behavioral externalizations Many studies have searched for a correlation between witnessing a parent s arrest and a wide variety of physiological issues For example Lee et al showed significant correlation between high cholesterol migraines and HIV AIDS diagnosis to children with a parental incarceration 288 Even while adjusting for various socioeconomic and racial factors children with an incarcerated parent have a significantly higher chance of developing a wide variety of physical problems such as obesity asthma and developmental delays 289 The current literature acknowledges that there are a variety of poor health outcomes as a direct result of being separated from a parent by law enforcement 290 It is hypothesized that the chronic stress that results directly from the uncertainty of the parent s legal status is the primary influence for the extensive list of acute and chronic conditions that could develop later in life 291 In addition to the chronic stress the immediate instability in a child s life deprives them of certain essentials e g money for food and parental love that are compulsory for leading a healthy life Though most of the adverse effects that result from parental incarceration are regardless of whether the mother or father was arrested some differences have been discovered For example males whose father have been incarcerated display more behavioral issues than any other combination of parent child 287 There has also been a substantial effort to understand how this traumatic experience manifests in the child s mental health and to identify externalizations that may be helpful for a diagnosis The most prominent mental health outcomes in these children are anxiety disorders depression mood and post traumatic stress disorder PTSD 292 293 These problems worsen in a typical positive feedback loop without the presence of a parental figure Given the chronic nature of these diseases they can be detected and observed at distinct points in a child s development allowing for research to determine if additional health services can be used to intervene in their lives and prevent increased risk of future health challenges 294 Murray et al have been able to isolate the cause of the expression of Anti social behaviours specific to the parental incarceration 295 In a specific case study in Boston by Sack within two months of the father being arrested the adolescent boy in the family developed severe aggressive and antisocial behaviors 296 This observation is not unique Sack and other researchers have noticed an immediate and strong reaction to sudden departures from family structure norms These behavioral externalizations are most evident at school when the child interacts with peers and adults This behavior leads to punishment and less focus on education which has obvious consequences for future educational and career prospects 297 In addition to externalizing undesirable behaviors children of incarcerated parents are more likely to be incarcerated compared to those without incarcerated parents 298 More formally transmission of severe emotional strain on a parent negatively impacts the children by disrupting the home environment Societal stigma against individuals specifically parents who are incarcerated is passed down to their children The children find this stigma to be overwhelming and it negatively impacts their short and long term prospects 299 Health edit With rising levels of mass incarceration the prison population faces significant health issues while incarcerated Health surveys of inmates show that the prison population faces higher rates of chronic and infectious diseases mental illness and substance use disorders than the general U S population 300 Based on analysis of the 2002 4 Survey of Inmates in Local Jails incarcerated individuals had higher rates of hypertension diabetes myocardial infarction asthma arthritis cervical cancer and hepatitis 300 The prison environment exacerbates chronic health conditions since they cannot be properly addressed and due to the stress of social isolation 301 In addition low income and POC populations are often more susceptible to poor health outcomes due to social determinants of health prior to incarceration such as poor nutrition lower average levels of education higher levels of community violence and drug use and lower rates of healthcare access 300 The incarcerated population also has lower rates of health literacy A 2016 study found that over 60 of patients had inadequate health literacy in a sample of formerly incarcerated individuals 302 According to the Health Resources amp Services Administration health literacy is the ability to obtain process and understand health information in order to make appropriate health decisions 303 In the incarcerated population low health literacy is linked with decreased confidence in taking medications increased likelihood of emergency department visits and difficulty self managing chronic health conditions 302 Policy solutions edit There are four main phases that can be distinguished in the process of arresting a parent arrest sentencing incarceration and re entry Re entry is not relevant if a parent is not arrested for other crimes During each of these phases solutions can be implemented that mitigate the harm placed on the children during the process While their parents are away children rely on other caretakers family or friends to satisfy their basic need Solutions for the children of incarcerated parents have identified caretakers as a focal point for successful intervention Arrest phase edit nbsp Forced home entry is a primary stressor for children in a residence One in five children witness their parent arrested by authorities and a study interviewing 30 children reported that the children experienced flashbulb memories and nightmares associated with the day their parent was arrested 304 These single adverse moments have long reaching effects and policymakers around the country have attempted to ameliorate the situation For example the city of San Francisco in 2005 implemented training policies for its police officers with the goal of making them more cognizant of the familial situation before entering the home The guidelines go a step further and stipulate that if no information is available before the arrest that officers ask the suspect about the possibility of any children in the house 305 San Francisco is not alone New Mexico passed a law in 2009 advocating for child safety during parental arrest and California provides funding to agencies to train personnel how to appropriately conduct an arrest in the presence of family members 306 Extending past the state level the Department of Justice has provided guidelines for police officers around the country to better accommodate for children in difficult family situations 307 Sentencing phase edit During the sentencing phase the judge is the primary authority in determining the appropriate punishment Consideration of the sentencing effects on the defendant s children could help with the preservation of the parent child relationship A law passed in Oklahoma in 2014 requires judges to inquire if convicted individuals are single custodial parents and if so to authorize the mobility of important resources so the child s transition to different circumstances is monitored 308 The distance that the jail or prison is from the arrested individual s home is a contributing factor to the parent child relationship Allowing a parent to serve their sentence closer to their residence allows for easier visitation and a healthier relationship Recognizing this the New York Senate passed a bill in 2015 that would ensure convicted individuals be jailed in the nearest facility In 1771 Baron Auckland wrote in Principles of Penal Law that Imprisonment inflicted by law as a punishment is not according to the principles of wise legislation It sinks useful subjects into burdens on the community and has always a bad effect on their morals nor can it communicate the benefit of example being in its nature secluded from the eye of the people 309 Incarceration phase edit While serving a sentence measures have been put in place to allow parents to exercise their duty as role models and caretakers New York State allows newborns to be with their mothers for up to one year 310 Studies have shown that parental specifically maternal presence during a newborn s early development are crucial to both physical and cognitive development 311 Ohio law requires nursery support for pregnant inmates in its facilities 312 California also has a stake in the support of incarcerated parents too through its requirement that women in jail with children be transferred to a community facility that can provide pediatric care 313 These regulations are supported by the research on early child development that argue it is imperative that infants and young children are with a parental figure preferably the mother to ensure proper development 314 This approach received support at the federal level when then Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates instituted several family friendly measures for certain facilities including improving infrastructure for video conferencing and informing inmates on how to contact their children if they were placed in the foster care system among other improvements 315 Re entry phase edit Main article Prisoner reentry The last phase of the incarceration process is re entry back into the community but more importantly back into the family structure Though the time away is painful for the family it does not always welcome back the previously incarcerated individual with open arms 316 Not only is the transition into the family difficult but also into society as they are faced with establishing secure housing insurance and a new job 317 As such policymakers find it necessary to ease the transition of an incarcerated individual to the pre arrest situation Of the four outlined phases re entry is the least emphasized from a public policy perspective This is not to say it is the least important however as there are concerns that time in a correctional facility can deteriorate the caretaking ability of some prisoners As a result Oklahoma has taken measurable strides by providing parents with the tools they need to re enter their families including classes on parenting skills 318 Caretakers edit nbsp Grandmothers are a common caregiver of children with an incarcerated parentThough the effects on caregivers of these children vary based on factors such as the relationship to the prisoner and his or her support system it is well known that it is a financial and emotional burden to take care of a child 319 In addition to taking care of their nuclear family caregivers are now responsible for another individual who requires attention and resources to flourish Depending on the relationship to the caregiver the transition to a new household may not be easy for the child The rationale behind targeting caregivers for intervention policies is to ensure the new environment for the children is healthy and productive The federal government funds states to provide counseling to caretaking family members to alleviate some of the associated emotional burden A more comprehensive program from Washington state employs kinship navigators to address caretakers needs with initiatives such as parental classes and connections to legal services 320 Employment edit Felony records greatly influence the chances of people finding employment Many employers seem to use criminal history as a screening mechanism without attempting to probe deeper 321 They are often more interested in incarceration as a measure of employability and trustworthiness instead of its relation to any specific job 322 People who have felony records have a harder time finding a job 323 The psychological effects of incarceration can also impede an ex felon s search for employment Prison can cause social anxiety distrust and other psychological issues that negatively affect a person s reintegration into an employment setting 324 Men who are unemployed are more likely to participate in crime 323 which leads to there being a 67 chance of a person with a previous felony conviction being charged again 322 In 2008 the difficulties males with a previous felony conviction in the United States had finding employment lead to approximately a 1 6 decrease in the employment rate alone This is a loss of between 57 and 65 billion of output to the US economy 325 Although incarceration in general has a huge effect on employment the effects become even more pronounced when looking at race Devah Pager performed a study in 2003 and found that white males with no criminal record had a 34 chance of callback compared to 17 for white males with a criminal record Black males with no criminal record were called back at a rate of 14 while the rate dropped to 5 for those with a criminal record Black men with no criminal background have a harder time finding employment than white men who have a history of criminal activity While having a criminal record decreases the chance of a callback for white men by 50 it decreases the callback chances for Black men by 64 321 While Pager s study is greatly informative it does lack some valuable information Pager only studied white and Black men which leaves out women and people of other races It also fails to account for the fact that applying for jobs has largely shifted from applying in person to applying over the Internet A study conducted at Arizona State University in 2014 accounts for this missing information This study was set up similarly to the Pager study but with the addition of female job applicants Hispanic job applicants and online job applications 326 Men and women of white Black and Hispanic ethnicities account for 92 of the US prison population 327 The Arizona State University study also found that incarceration decreased employment opportunities The findings indicated that the presence of a criminal record reduced callbacks by approximately 50 Hispanic women with a prison record fared most favorably in receiving a phone call back from potential employmers while African American women had modest results and white women received the poorest results having the lowest probability of receiving a phone call from a potential employer 326 For men with a criminal record white men fared most favorably being 125 more likely to receive a call back from an employer than black men and 18 more likely than Hispanic men 326 Males with a prison record were less likely than males without a prison record to receive a callback However the effects of incarceration on male applicants applying online were nearly nonexistent In fact the study found that there was no effect of race ethnicity prison record or community college education on men s success in advancing through the online hiring process The Arizona State University study also had results that contradicted Pager s study Effects of other types of incarceration such as shorter stays in local county jails can also affect employment at both the individual and macro level At the community level for example jail incarceration has been found to diminish local labor markets especially in areas with relatively high proportions of Black residents 328 Criticism editSee also Torture in the United States Domestic police and prisons and Human rights in the United States Prison system Mass incarceration on a scale almost unexampled in human history is a fundamental fact of our country today perhaps the fundamental fact as slavery was the fundamental fact of 1850 Adam Gopnik 143 High rates of incarceration may be due to sentence length which is further driven by many other factors 329 Shorter sentences may even diminish the criminal culture by possibly reducing re arrest rates for first time convicts 330 The U S Congress has ordered federal judges to make imprisonment decisions recognizing that imprisonment is not an appropriate means of promoting correction and rehabilitation 331 Critics have lambasted the United States for incarcerating a large number of non violent and victimless offenders 332 333 half of all persons incarcerated under state jurisdiction are for non violent offenses and 20 are incarcerated for drug offenses in state prisons federal prison percentages are higher 334 335 Human Rights Watch believes the extraordinary rate of incarceration in the United States wreaks havoc on individuals families and communities and saps the strength of the nation as a whole 332 The population of inmates housed in prisons and jails in the United States exceeds 2 million with the per capita incarceration population higher than that officially reported by any other country 140 Criminal justice policy in the United States has also been criticized for a number of other reasons 336 In the 2014 book The Divide American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap journalist Matt Taibbi argues that the expanding disparity of wealth and the increasing criminalization of those in poverty have culminated in the U S having the largest prison population in the history of human civilization 337 The scholars Michael Meranze and Marie Gottschalk contend that the massive carceral state extends far beyond prisons and distorts democracy degrades society and obstructs meaningful discourse on criminal punishment 338 More recently scholars have argued that a system of mass incarceration necessarily interferes with a free society characterized by industry discovery and creation 339 Some scholars have linked the ascent of neoliberal free market ideology in the late 1970s to mass incarceration 184 196 340 341 342 343 Sociologist Loic Wacquant argues that the explosive growth of the incarcerated poor can be seen as part of the punitive regulation of poverty in the neoliberal era in order to mitigate societal fallout from economic deregulation welfare state retrenchment increasing inequality and the imposition of workfare and underpaid precarious employment on the marginalized urban postindustrial proletariat In this he posits that the expansive prison system has become a core political institution and that this overgrown and intrusive penal state is deeply injurious to the ideals of democratic citizenship 344 Academic and activist Angela Davis argues that prisons in the U S have become venues of profit as well as punishment as mass incarceration has increased the prison system has become more about economic factors than criminality 345 Professor of Law at Columbia University Bernard Harcourt contends that neoliberalism holds the state as incompetent when it comes to economic regulation but proficient at policing and punishing and that this paradox has resulted in the expansion of penal confinement 346 According to The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States neoliberal social and economic policy has more deeply embedded the carceral state within the lives of the poor transforming what it means to be poor in America 122 Historian Gary Gerstle reasons that while it may seem contradictory that the notions of market freedom and the establishment of a robust market economy occurred simultaneously with the reality of mass incarceration during the neoliberal period neoliberals and even the classical economic liberals who preceded them had long argued for the need to ringfence free markets limiting participation to those who could handle its rigors Only then could they operate freely 347 The sociologists John Clegg and Adaner Usmani assert that the high incarceration rates are partly the result of anemic social policy As such resolving the issue will necessitate significant redistribution coming from economic elites They add that mass incarceration is not a technical problem for which there are smart straightforward but just not yet realized solutions Rather they argue it is a political problem the solution of which will require confronting the entrenched power of the wealthy 348 Another possibly cause for this increase of incarceration since the 1970s could be the war on drugs which started around that time More elected prosecutors were favored by voters for promising to take more harsh approaches than their opponents such as locking up more people 349 Our vast network of federal and state prisons with some 2 3 million inmates rivals the gulags of totalitarian states Chris Hedges 350 Reporting at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association August 3 2008 Becky Pettit associate professor of sociology from the University of Washington and Bryan Sykes a UW post doctoral researcher revealed that the increase in the United States s prison population since the 1970s is having profound demographic consequences that affect 1 in 50 Americans Drawing data from a variety of sources that looked at prison and general populations the researchers found that the boom in prison population is hiding lowered rates of fertility and increased rates of involuntary migration to rural areas and morbidity that is marked by a greater exposure to and risk of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and HIV or AIDS 351 Guilty plea bargains concluded 97 of all federal cases in 2011 352 As of December 2012 update two state prison systems Alabama and South Carolina segregated prisoners based on their HIV status On December 21 U S District Court Judge Myron Thompson ruled in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU on behalf of several inmates that Alabama s practice in doing so violated federal disabilities law He noted the state s outdated and unsupported assumptions about HIV and the prison system s ability to deal with HIV positive prisoners 353 In 2022 the bi partisan Federal Prison Oversight Act was introduced which would require the Department of Justice s Inspector General to conduct detailed inspections of each of the Bureau of Prisons 122 facilities and would create an independent Justice Department position to investigate complaints 354 This was introduced shortly after corruption and abuse was discovered at a federal prison complex in Atlanta with the hopes that it would prevent such occurrences in the future 355 Department of Justice Smart on Crime Program edit On August 12 2013 at the American Bar Association s House of Delegates meeting Attorney General Eric Holder announced the Smart on Crime program which is a sweeping initiative by the Justice Department that in effect renounces several decades of tough on crime anti drug legislation and policies 356 357 Holder said the program will encourage U S attorneys to charge defendants only with crimes for which the accompanying sentences are better suited to their individual conduct rather than excessive prison terms more appropriate for violent criminals or drug kingpins 356 357 Running through Holder s statements the increasing economic burden of over incarceration was stressed 356 357 As of August 2013 update the Smart on Crime program is not a legislative initiative but an effort limited to the DOJ s policy parameters 356 357 Strip searches and cavity searches edit The procedural use of strip searches and cavity searches in the prison system has raised human rights concerns 358 References in popular culture editIn relation to popular culture mass incarceration has become a popular issue in the Hip Hop community Artists like Tupac Shakur NWA LL Cool J and Kendrick Lamar have written songs and poems that condemn racial disparities in the criminal justice system specifically the alleged practice of police officers targeting African Americans By presenting the negative implications of mass incarceration in a way that is widespread throughout popular culture rap music is more likely to impact younger generations than a book or scholarly article would Hip hop accounts of mass incarceration are based on victim based testimony and are effective in inspiring others to speak out against the corrupt criminal justice system 359 The soul singer Raphael Saadiq s 2019 album Jimmy Lee thematizes racial disparities in mass incarceration as well as other societal and family issues affecting African Americans 360 In addition to references in popular music mass incarceration has also played a role in modern film For example Ava DuVernay s Netflix film 13th released in 2017 criticizes mass incarceration and compares it to the history of slavery throughout the United States beginning with the provision of the 13th Amendment that allows for involuntary servitude as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted The film equates mass incarceration with the post Civil War Jim Crow Era 361 The fight against mass incarceration has also been a part of the larger discourse in the 21st century movement for Black Lives BlackLivesMatter a progressive movement created by Alicia Garza after the death of Trayvon Martin was designed as an online platform to fight against anti Black sentiments such as mass incarceration police brutality and ingrained racism within modern society According to Garza Black Lives Matter is an ideological and political intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise It is an affirmation of Black folks contributions to this society our humanity and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression This movement has focused on specific racial issues faced by African Americans in the justice system including police brutality ending capital punishment and eliminating the criminalization and dehumanization of Black youth across all areas of society 362 Federal prisons editFurther information List of U S federal prisons The Federal Bureau of Prisons a division of the United States Department of Justice is responsible for the administration of United States federal prisons State prisons editMain article List of United States state correction agencies Imprisonment by the state judicial systems has steadily diminished since 2006 to 2012 from 689 536 annually to 553 843 annually 363 Military prisons editMain article List of U S military prisons Across the world the U S military operates several detention facilities At year end 2021 a total of 1 131 prisoners were held under military jurisdiction 7 See also editDecarceration in the United States Capital punishment in the United States Death in custody History of United States Prison Systems Religion in United States prisons Prison gangs in the United States Prisoner rights in the United States Prisoner suicide Prisoner abuse Social groups in male and female prisons in the United States United States incarceration rateAdministrationFederal Prison Industries Inc Inmate telephone systemConditions of confinementPrison Legal NewsControversiesKids for cash scandalPrison advocacy groupsNovember Coalition Prison Policy InitiativeRelatedParole in the United States Crime in the United States Law enforcement in the United States Penal labor in the United States Penal populism Civilian noninstitutional population Felony disenfranchisement in the United States Human rights in the United States Prison system Race in the United States criminal justice system Race and the War on Drugs Racial profiling in the United StatesBy statePrisons in California Incarceration in FloridaReferences edit a b Jacob Kang Brown Chase Montagnet and Jasmine Heiss People in Jail and Prison in Spring 2021 New York Vera Institute of Justice 2021 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Correctional Populations in the United States 2021 Statistical Tables Bureau of Justice Statistics Retrieved June 3 2023 a b Wang Leah Punishment Beyond Prisons Incarceration and Supervision by State Prison Policy Initiative Retrieved July 6 2023 Robertson Campbell April 25 2019 Crime Is Down Yet U S Incarceration Rates Are Still Among the Highest in the World The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved October 21 2023 a b c d Highest to Lowest World Prison Brief WPB Use the dropdown menu to choose lists of countries by region or the whole world Use the menu to select highest to lowest lists of prison population totals prison population rates percentage of pre trial detainees remand imprisoned people percentage of imprisoned females percentage of imprisoned foreign people and occupancy rate Column headings in WPB tables can be clicked to reorder columns lowest to highest or alphabetically For detailed information for each country click on any country name in lists See also the WPB main data page and click on the map links and or the sidebar links to get to the region and country desired Ghandnoosh Nazgol February 8 2023 Ending 50 Years of Mass Incarceration Urgent Reform Needed to Protect Future Generations The Sentencing Project Retrieved June 3 2023 a b c d e f g h Carson E Ann December 2022 Prisoners in 2021 Statistical Tables PDF U S Department of Justice Cullen James January 18 2017 The United States is Very Slowly Reducing Incarceration Brennan Center of Justice Mass Incarceration Costs 182 Billion Every Year Equal Justice Initiative February 6 2017 Retrieved July 11 2019 Prisoners 1925 81 Bureau of Justice Statistics Retrieved July 7 2023 a b Search Publications Bureau of Justice Statistics Retrieved July 7 2023 BOP Population Statistics www bop gov Retrieved July 7 2023 Staff Writer April 14 2009 Debtors prison again The Tampa Bay Times United States Archived from the original on July 6 2010 Retrieved June 21 2013 California State of 2012 CAL PEN CODE 1205 Find Law com California Penal Code Knafo Saki February 12 2014 The U S Is Locking People Up For Being Poor The Huffington Post Retrieved February 12 2014 Genevieve LeBaron and Adrienne Roberts March 2012 Confining Social Insecurity Neoliberalism and the Rise of the 21st Century Debtors Prison Politics amp Gender 8 1 25 49 doi 10 1017 S1743923X12000062 S2CID 145437287 Timothy Williams February 11 2015 Jails Have Become Warehouses for the Poor Ill and Addicted a Report Says The New York Times Retrieved February 11 2015 a b c Rise of the Penitentiary Yale University Press yalebooks yale edu Retrieved November 19 2018 Christianson Scott October 19 2000 With Liberty for Some 500 Years of Imprisonment in America UPNE ISBN 9781555534684 Spanish soldiers in 1570 erected the first substantial prison at St Augustine Florida Christianson Scott October 19 2000 With Liberty for Some 500 Years of Imprisonment in America UPNE ISBN 9781555534684 a b Jenness Valerie August 27 2016 United States Prison System History Valerie Jenness Valerie Jenness UCI Professor Criminology Department Archived from the original on September 11 2016 Retrieved September 11 2016 Dix Dorothea L 1843 Memorial to the Legislature of Massachusetts 1843 p 2 retrieved November 12 2010 Dickie John 2007 Cosa Nostra A History of the Sicilian Mafia Hodder ISBN 978 0 340 93526 2 United States of America World Prison Brief Richard Nixon Special Message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Archived from the original on December 12 2013 Retrieved December 8 2013 Dufton Emily March 26 2012 The War on Drugs How President Nixon Tied Addiction to Crime The Atlantic Retrieved June 28 2020 Beckett Katherine 1997 Making Crime Pay Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics 1999 Revised ed London Oxford University Press pp 52 53 167 ISBN 0195136268 Hinton Elizabeth From the War on Crime to the War on Drugs From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime the Making of Mass Incarceration in America by Elizabeth Hinton Harvard University Press 2017 pp 307 332 Nation Behind Bars A Human Rights Solution Human Rights Watch May 2014 Retrieved May 8 2014 a b c d Sawyer Wendy Wagner Peter Mass Incarceration The Whole Pie 2023 Prison Policy Initiative Retrieved July 6 2023 a b U S Census Bureau QuickFacts United States www census gov Retrieved July 17 2023 a b c d e The Growth of Incarceration in the United States Exploring Causes and Consequences Washington D C National Academies Press April 24 2014 ISBN 978 0 309 29801 8 Western Bruce Muhammad Khalil Gibran Negussie Yamrot Backes Emily eds May 17 2023 Reducing Racial Inequality in Crime and Justice Science Practice and Policy Committee on Reducing Racial Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System Committee on Law and Justice Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine Washington D C National Academies Press ISBN 978 0 309 69337 0 Ph D Ashley Nellis October 13 2021 The Color of Justice Racial and Ethnic Disparity in State Prisons The Sentencing Project Retrieved July 21 2023 National Trends Racial Disparities counciloncj foleon com Retrieved July 21 2023 a b c d e f Search Publications Bureau of Justice Statistics Retrieved July 21 2023 Correctional Populations in the United States 2010 permanent dead link NCJ 236319 By Lauren E Glaze BJS Statistician US Bureau of Justice Statistics BJS published in December 2011 See PDF See page 2 for explanation of the difference between number of prisoners in custody and the number under jurisdiction See appendix table 3 for Estimated number of inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails per 100 000 U S residents by sex race and Hispanic Latino origin and age June 30 2010 See appendix table 2 for Inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails December 31 2000 and 2009 2010 a b Correctional Populations in the United States 2013 NCJ 248479 Published December 2014 by U S Bureau of Justice Statistics BJS By Lauren E Glaze and Danielle Kaeble BJS Statisticians See PDF See page 1 highlights section for the 1 in numbers See table 1 on page 2 for adult numbers See table 5 on page 6 for male and female numbers See appendix table 5 on page 13 for Estimated number of persons supervised by adult correctional systems by correctional status 2000 2013 See appendix table 2 Inmates held in custody in state or federal prisons or in local jails 2000 and 2012 2013 Barbara H Zaitzow Jim Thomas 2003 Women in Prison Gender and Social Control Lynne Rienner Publishers p vii ISBN 978 1 58826 228 8 Cyndi Banks 2003 Women in Prison A Reference Handbook ABC CLIO pp 1 ISBN 978 1 57607 929 4 American Civil Liberties Union HOW INCARCERATING WOMEN FUELS OUR MASS INCARCERATION CRISIS ACLU Retrieved April 22 2022 Davis Angela 2003 Are Prisons Obsolete Seven Stories Press ISBN 9781583225813 Sultan Bonnie Myrent Mark Women and Girls in Corrections PDF Justice Research and Statistics Association JRSA Budd Kristen April 3 2023 Incarcerated Women and Girls The Sentencing Project Humphreys Keith January 24 2017 White women are going to prison at a higher rate than ever before Washington Post Retrieved August 27 2023 Lane Charles July 12 2023 New data show a dire forecast about incarceration rates didn t come true Washington Post Retrieved August 27 2023 Gross Kali Nicole African American women mass incarceration and the politics of protection The Journal of American History 102 1 2015 25 33 Potter Hillary Battle cries Black women and intimate partner abuse NYU Press 2008 Mustard David B Racial ethnic and gender disparities in sentencing Evidence from the U S Federal Courts The Journal of Law Economics amp Policy 285 Men Sentenced to Longer Prison Terms for Same Crimes Study Says The Huffington Post Stacey Ann Martin 2006 Gender and the Social Costs of Sentencing An Analysis of Sentences Imposed on Male and Female Offenders in Three U S District Courts Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law doi 10 15779 Z38F32G Sickmund M Sladky T J Kang W amp Puzzanchera C Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Click National Crosstabs at the top and then choose the census years Click Show table to get the total number of juvenile inmates for those years Or go here for all the years And here Ed Pilkington March 13 2014 US criticised by UN for human rights failings on NSA guns and drones The Guardian Retrieved April 5 2014 Natasja Sheriff March 9 2015 UN expert slams US as only nation to imprison kids for life without parole Al Jazeera America Retrieved March 13 2015 Chris Kirkham October 22 2013 Prisoners of Profit Private Prison Empire Rises Despite Startling Record Of Juvenile Abuse The Huffington Post Retrieved October 22 2013 Case Anne C and Lawrence F Katz The company you keep The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths No w3705 National Bureau of Economic Research 1991 a b c d Sawyer Wendy February 27 2018 Youth Confinement The Whole Pie www prisonpolicy org Retrieved March 22 2019 a b Aging inmates clogging nation s prisons Associated Press September 30 2007 a b Aday Ronald H 2003 Aging Prisoners Crisis in American Corrections Praeger ISBN 978 0 275 97123 6 Elderly Inmate Population Soared 1 300 Percent Since 1980s Report The Huffington Post June 13 2012 a b Marksamer Jody Tobin Harper 2013 Standing With LGBT Prisoners An Advocate s Guide to Ending Abuse and Combating Imprisonment PDF Washington DC National Center for Transgender Equality pp 1 88 Retrieved February 14 2015 Tobin Harper April 1 2014 Putting Prisons on the LGBT Agenda The Huffington Post Retrieved February 14 2015 Yarbrough Dilara May 24 2021 The carceral production of transgender poverty How racialized gender policing deprives transgender women of housing and safety Punishment amp Society SAGE Publications 25 1 141 161 doi 10 1177 14624745211017818 ISSN 1462 4745 a b Bassichis Daniel 2007 It s War In Here A Report on the Treatment of Transgender and Intersex People in New York State Men s Prisons PDF Sylvia Rivera Law Project pp 1 50 Retrieved February 14 2015 Whitlock Kay December 15 2005 Corrupting Justice A Primer for LGBT Communities on Racism Violence Human Degradation amp the Prison Industrial Complex PDF American Friends Service Committee American Friends Service Committee Retrieved February 14 2015 Beck Allan Berzofsky Marcus Caspar Rachel Krebs Christopher May 2013 Sexual Victimization in Prisons and Jails Reported by Inmates 2011 12 National Criminal Justice Reference Service Horowitz Alana February 4 2013 Mental Illness Soars In Prisons Jails While Inmates Suffer Huffington Post Retrieved February 15 2015 Mentally Ill Persons in Corrections nicic gov National Institute of Corrections Retrieved February 15 2015 a b Geller Adam July 15 2014 U S Jails Struggle With Role As Makeshift Asylums The Seattle Times Retrieved October 18 2018 Skeem Jennifer Manchak Sarah Peterson Jillian April 2011 Correctional Policy for Offenders with Mental Illness Creating a New Paradigm for Recidivism Reduction Law and Human Behavior 35 2 110 126 doi 10 1007 s10979 010 9223 7 PMID 20390443 S2CID 13116080 a b c James Doris Glaze Lauren December 14 2006 Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates PDF U S Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics pp 1 12 Retrieved February 16 2015 a b Mental Illness Human Rights and US Prisons Human Rights Watch Statement for the Record Senate Judiciary Committee Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law PDF Human Rights Watch September 22 2009 pp 1 14 Retrieved February 20 2015 See p 10 Marisa Taylor May 12 2015 Report Mentally ill inmates are routinely abused by corrections officers Al Jazeera America Retrieved May 17 2015 a b Peterson Jillian Skeem Jennifer Kennealy Patrick Bray Beth Zvonkovic Andrea 2014 How Often and How Consistently do Symptoms Directly Precede Criminal Behavior Among Offenders With Mental Illness PDF Law and Human Behavior 38 5 439 449 doi 10 1037 lhb0000075 PMID 24730388 Retrieved February 20 2015 Carroll Heather Serious Mental Illness Prevalence in Jails and Prisons Treatment Advocacy Center Retrieved October 26 2022 a b Heitzeg Nancy Education Or Incarceration Zero Tolerance Policies And The School To Prison Pipeline PDF Sarah Biehl The School to Prison Pipeline 28 OHIO LAWYER Jan Feb 2014 David M Pedersen Zero Tolerance Policies in SCHOOL VIOLENCE FROM DISCIPLINE TO DUE PROCESS 48 James C Hanks ed 2004 see also CATHERINE Y KIM DANIEL J LOSEN amp DAMON T HEWITT THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE STRUCTURING LEGAL REFORM 79 2010 Ralph M Gerstein amp Lois A Gerstein Education Law An Essential Guide for Attorneys Teachers Administrators Parents and Students 195 2nd ed 2007 U S Dep t of Educ Office for Civil Rights School Climate and Discipline http www2 ed gov policy gen guid school discipline index html Catherine Y Kim Policing School Discipline 77 BROOK L REV 861 901 02 2012 Moll amp Simmons supra note 22 at 7 Advancement Project Clayton County GA http safequalityschools org pages clayton county ga https perma cc 8CKX URDD last visited February 1 2017 Heitzeg Nancy A 2009 Education Or Incarceration Zero Tolerance Policies And The School To Prison Pipeline PDF Koon Danfeng Soto Vigil Exclusionary School Discipline An Issue Brief and the Review of Literature The Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy University of California Berkeley School of Law n d Web Apr 2013 O Conner R Porowski A Passa 2014 Disproportionality in school discipline An assessment of trends in Maryland 2009 12 PDF a b Balingit Moriah Racial disparities in school discipline are growing federal data show Washington Post Archived from the original on September 2 2019 Balingit Moriah Racial disparities in school discipline are growing federal data show The Washington Post Archived from the original on September 2 2019 Mallet Christopher A 2016 The School to Prison Pipeline Disproportionate Impact on Vulnerable Children and Adolescents PDF a b Smith amp Harper 2015 Disproportionate impact of K 12 school suspension and expulsion on black students in southern states PDF Archived from the original PDF on October 21 2017 Retrieved July 12 2018 Feld Barry C 1999 Bad Kids Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court Edelman amp Smith 1975 School Suspensions Are they helping children Washington Research Project a b c Desmond amp Emirbayer 2016 Race in America New York W W Norton amp Company ERO FY18 Achievements www ice gov Retrieved November 23 2021 Transfer Of State Prisoners United States Department of Justice Retrieved on April 14 2016 How The Program Works United States Department of Justice Retrieved on April 14 2016 Bruce Western May 2011 Poverty Politics and Crime Control in Europe and America Contemporary Sociology 40 3 283 286 doi 10 1177 0094306110404514d JSTOR 23042281 S2CID 17527457 Tom Hall February 13 2015 Study says US jails have become massive warehouses for the poor World Socialist Web Site Retrieved September 1 2023 Alston Philp December 15 2017 Statement on Visit to the USA by Professor Philip Alston United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights OHCHR Retrieved December 21 2017 In many cities and counties the criminal justice system is effectively a system for keeping the poor in poverty while generating revenue to fund not only the justice system but diverse other programs The use of the legal system not to promote justice but to raise revenue as documented so powerfully in the Department of Justice s report on Ferguson is pervasive around the country Desmond Matthew 2023 Poverty by America Crown Publishing Group pp 22 23 ISBN 9780593239919 Mauer Marc King Ryan S Young Malcolm C May 2004 The Meaning of Life Long Prison Sentences in Context PDF The Sentencing Project p 3 Archived from the original PDF on July 10 2010 Retrieved January 11 2010 a b 2016 Crime Statistics Released FBI gov Federal Bureau of Investigation September 25 2017 Retrieved November 25 2017 Mass Incarceration The Whole Pie 2016 Prison Policy Initiative March 16 2016 Retrieved July 14 2023 a b c West Heather Sabol William December 2010 Prisoners in 2009 PDF Bureau of Justice Statistics Archived from the original PDF on October 27 2011 Retrieved December 25 2010 Profile of Jail Inmates 2002 Archived December 8 2011 at the Wayback Machine By Doris J James July 18 2004 NCJ 201932 U S Bureau of Justice Statistics See Table 3 of the PDF file Archived October 5 2011 at the Wayback Machine for the percent of inmates in for violent offenses News brief The Week December 6 2013 p 16 John Pfaff January 28 2017 A Better Approach to Violent Crime Wall Street Journal Retrieved January 28 2017 United States Punishment and Prejudice Racial Disparities in the War on Drugs www hrw org Retrieved April 24 2017 Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch April 2003 United States Crime Rates 1960 2009 Source FBI Uniform Crime Reports a b U S Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics Prisoners in 2012 Trends in Admissions and Releases 1991 2012 by E Ann Carson and Daniela Golinelli Table 11 Estimated sentenced state imprisoned people on December 31 by most serious offense and type of admission 1991 2001 2006 and 2011 December 2013 Why We Need Pretrial Reform Pretrial Justice Institute Archived from the original on May 9 2020 Retrieved May 31 2020 Jail Inmates in 2016 PDF 2018 United States of America World Prison Brief www prisonstudies org Retrieved May 31 2020 Hunter Lea March 16 2020 What You Need To Know About Ending Cash Bail Center for American Progress Retrieved May 31 2020 Bail or Jail www ncsl org Retrieved May 31 2020 Jail Incarceration Rate Decreased PDF Bureau of Justice Statistics March 31 2020 Watkins March 31 2020 Jail Incarceration Rate Decreased by 12 Percent PDF DOJ Altschuler David Skorton and Glenn College Behind Bars How Educating Prisoners Pays Off Forbes Retrieved May 19 2023 Strait Abigail Eaton Susan 2016 Post Secondary Education for People in Prison PDF Social Justice Funders Opportunity Brief 1 via The Sillerman Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy a b Davis Lois M Bozick Robert Steele Jennifer L Saunders Jessica Miles Jeremy N V August 22 2013 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Correctional Education A Meta Analysis of Programs That Provide Education to Incarcerated Adults doi 10 7249 rr266 ISBN 9780833081087 S2CID 148650060 a b Langan Patrick A Levin David J June 2 2002 Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994 PDF Bureau of Justice Statistics Archived from the original PDF on December 14 2011 Retrieved January 11 2010 Durose Matthew April 2014 Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005 Patterns from 2005 to 2010 PDF Bureau of Justice Statistics a b c Haymes Stephen N de Haymes Maria V Miller Reuben J eds 2015 The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States London and New York Routledge pp 346 389 ISBN 978 0 41 567344 0 Gefangenenraten im internationalen und nationalen Vergleich Prison rates international comparison Archived July 14 2018 at the Wayback Machine University Greifswald FRIEDER DUNKEL BERND GENG STEFAN HARRENDORF Bewahrungshilfe Soziales Strafrecht Kriminalpolitik Jg 63 2016 Heft 2 S 178 200 2016 a b American Exception Inmate Count in US Dwarfs Other Nations New York Times April 22 2008 Page 1 Section A Front Page Walmsley Roy Feb 2 2016 World Prison Population List 11th edition PDF From the Research amp Publications page of the World Prison Brief website From page 1 of the PDF The information is the latest available at the end of October 2015 And from page 2 This report shows that more than 10 35 million people are held in penal institutions throughout the world either as pre trial detainees remand prisoners or having been convicted and sentenced Correctional Populations in the United States 2015 By Danielle Kaeble and Lauren Glaze BJS Statisticians Dec 2016 Bureau of Justice Statistics See PDF Page 2 says At yearend 2015 an estimated 2 173 800 persons were either under the jurisdiction of state or federal prisons or in the custody of local jails in the United States Population Clock U S Census Bureau 321 032 786 people in the US on June 30 2015 The World Population Prospects 2015 Revision July 29 2015 article From United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs 7 3 billion people in 2015 Canada World Prison Brief United Kingdom England amp Wales World Prison Brief Australia World Prison Brief Ireland Irish Penal Reform Trust Spain World Prison Brief Greece World Prison Brief Norway World Prison Brief Netherlands World Prison Brief Japan World Prison Brief a b Widra Emily Herring Tiana 2021 States of Incarceration The Global Context 2021 Prison Policy Initiative Retrieved February 14 2023 a b c Chang Cindy May 29 2012 Louisiana is the world s prison capital The Times Picayune Archived from the original on March 3 2015 Retrieved April 4 2013 a b c d Liptak Adam Feb 28 2008 1 in 100 U S Adults Behind Bars New Study Says New York Times Rosefielde Steven 2007 The Russian economy from Lenin to Putin By Steven Rosefielde Wiley ISBN 978 1 4051 1337 3 Applebaum Anne 2003 Gulag a history By Anne Applebaum Doubleday ISBN 978 0 7679 0056 0 a b Gopnik Adam January 30 2012 The Caging of America The New Yorker Foundation The Annie E Casey November 14 2020 Juvenile Detention Explained The Annie E Casey Foundation Retrieved July 6 2023 a b c What Do Security Levels Means Injustice Security Retrieved August 28 2016 Correctional Populations in the United States 2016 Bureau of Justice Statistics diZerega M amp Agudelo S V 2011 Piloting a tool for reentry A promising approach to engaging family members New York NY Vera Institute of Justice Christian Johnna Mellow Jeff Thomas Shenique July 2006 Social and economic implications of family connections to prisoners Journal of Criminal Justice 34 4 443 452 doi 10 1016 j jcrimjus 2006 05 010 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS TO BAN INMATES FROM SOLICITING PEN PALS ON WEBSITES Missouri Department of Corrections press release May 13 2007 During our review we have identified numerous offenders who through misleading web postings and photos have solicited thousands of dollars from individuals and have devised other creative and purposeful intents to defraud the public Arizona Inmates Back on the Net Wired News December 17 2002 Retrieved January 26 2008 Neal Moore March 28 2011 Employment Upon Release CNN Retrieved March 28 2011 Prisoners Rights Legal Correspondence FindLaw Retrieved January 26 2008 California Prison Reform and Rehabilitation California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Archived from the original on February 18 2011 Retrieved May 9 2011 Prison and Detention Conditions Human Rights Watch retrieved May 22 2015 Inhumane Prison Conditions Still Threaten Life Health of Alabama Inmates Living with HIV AIDS According to Court Filings Human Rights Watch February 27 2005 Retrieved June 13 2006 Cindy Struckman Johnson amp David Struckman Johnson December 2000 Sexual Coercion Rates in Seven Midwestern Prisons for Men PDF The Prison Journal 80 4 379 390 doi 10 1177 0032885500080004004 S2CID 145791880 Archived from the original PDF on February 17 2012 Retrieved September 3 2006 a b Hylton Wil S July 2003 Sick on the Inside Harper s Magazine Retrieved February 29 2012 Liliana Segura October 1 2013 With 2 3 Million People Incarcerated in the US Prisons Are Big Business The Nation Retrieved October 9 2013 Abigail Leonard amp Adam May May 28 2014 Whistleblower Arizona inmates are dying from inadequate health care Al Jazeera America Retrieved July 22 2014 David M Reutter Gary Hunter amp Brandon Sample Appalling Prison and Jail Food Leaves Prisoners Hungry for Justice Prison Legal News Retrieved January 4 2013 Marx Rebecca 2009 Prison Riot Caused by Prison Food The Village Voice Retrieved July 17 2023 Fassler Joe Brown Claire December 27 2017 Prison Food Is Making U S Inmates Disproportionately Sick The Atlantic Retrieved December 29 2017 Gang and Security Threat Group Awareness Florida Department of Corrections Archived from the original on June 19 2006 Retrieved June 13 2006 Thompson Don April 5 2008 Prison Attacks Calling Attention to Overcrowding Associated Press Retrieved August 6 2009 Moore Solomon August 5 2009 California Prisons Must Cut Inmate Population New York Times p A10 Retrieved August 6 2009 Order for population reduction plan pg 9 three judge court convened by the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit hearing Plata v Schwarzenegger and Coleman v Schwarzenegger Medina Jennifer May 24 2011 In a California Prison Bunk Beds Replace Pickup Games The New York Times Calif Faces Tough Choices on Overcrowded Prisons PBS Archived from the original on January 21 2014 Retrieved September 1 2017 Liptak Adam May 23 2011 Justices 5 4 Tell California to Cut Prisoner Population The New York Times Retrieved February 15 2016 RBGG and Co Counsel Win Affirmance at Supreme Court of the United States Rosen Bien Galvan amp Grunfeld LLP San Francisco CA May 23 2011 Retrieved February 15 2016 a b UN News October 18 2011 Solitary confinement should be banned in most cases How Many Prisoners Are in Solitary Confinement in the United States February 2012 Young Jeremy June 27 2023 Solitary confinement is still widespread in US prisons and jails Al Jazeera Retrieved July 5 2023 Dana Larson December 8 1999 Norway Grants Refuge to US Smuggler Cannabis Culture Archived from the original on May 2 2013 Retrieved April 3 2013 Cara Tabachnick December 27 2013 There s an alarming number of deaths in US jails The Guardian Retrieved December 28 2013 Berman Mark July 23 2015 How often do prisoners die behind bars The Washington Post Retrieved February 24 2018 Holly Richmond September 18 2013 Everybody wants condom vending machines Grist Magazine Grist Magazine Inc Retrieved September 19 2013 George Lavender January 21 2015 California Prisons Aim To Keep Sex Between Inmates Safe If Illegal Around the Nation NPR Retrieved June 17 2017 Alabama Guards Stage Work Strike Months After Prisoner Uprising at Overcrowded Holman Facility Democracy Now September 28 2016 Wallace M Hagan L Curran KG et al May 15 2020 COVID 19 in Correctional and Detention Facilities United States February April 2020 MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 69 19 587 590 doi 10 15585 mmwr mm6919e1 PMID 32407300 Archived from the original on May 21 2020 Retrieved May 25 2020 Among 37 jurisdictions reporting 32 86 reported at least one confirmed COVID 19 case among incarcerated or detained persons or staff members across 420 correctional and detention facilities As of April 21 2020 4 893 cases and 88 deaths among incarcerated and detained persons and 2 778 cases and 15 deaths among staff members have been reported Gross Kali June 1 2015 African American Women Mass Incarceration and the Politics of Protection The Journal of American History 102 25 33 doi 10 1093 jahist jav226 Retrieved April 22 2022 Davis A Y 2011 How Gender Structures the Prison System In Are prisons obsolete pp 60 67 essay Seven Stories Press Khalek Rania How private prisons game the system Salon com December 1 2011 a b c Harcourt Bernard 2012 The Illusion of Free Markets Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order Harvard University Press ISBN 0674066162 pp 235 amp 236 Selman Donna and Paul Leighton 2010 Punishment for Sale Private Prisons Big Business and the Incarceration Binge Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers ISBN 1442201738 p xi Smith and Hattery African American Families Archambeault William G Donald R Deis Jr 1997 1998 Cost Effectiveness Comparisons of Private Versus Public Prisons in Louisiana A Comprehensive Analysis of Allen Avoyelles and Winn Correction Centers Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium 4 Marie Gottschalk Caught The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics Princeton University Press 2014 p 70 a b Shapiro David Banking on Bondage Private Prisons and Mass Incarceration PDF American Civil Liberties Union Retrieved March 31 2013 a b Margaret Newkirk amp William Selway July 12 2013 Gangs Ruled Prison as For Profit Model Put Blood on Floor Bloomberg Retrieved July 16 2013 Jerry Mitchell September 25 2014 East Mississippi prison called barbaric The Clarion Ledger Retrieved December 1 2014 See also A Tour of East Mississippi Correctional Facility ACLU Timothy Williams November 6 2014 Christopher Epps Former Chief of Prisons in Mississippi Is Arraigned The New York Times Received December 2 2014 Stroud Matt February 24 2014 The Private Prison Racket Politico Retrieved February 25 2014 Kirkham Chris September 27 2012 Private Prisons Immigration Convictions In Record Numbers Fueling Corporate Profits The Huffington Post Retrieved February 25 2014 Renee Lewis February 23 2015 Inmates riot at for profit Texas immigrant detention facility Al Jazeera America Retrieved February 24 2015 a b c d John L Campbell 2010 Neoliberalism s penal and debtor states Theoretical Criminology 14 1 59 73 doi 10 1177 1362480609352783 S2CID 145694058 Boucher Dave October 28 2016 CCA changes name to CoreCivic amid ongoing scrutiny The Tennessean Retrieved October 26 2017 Matt Taibbi 2014 The Divide American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap Spiegel amp Grau ISBN 081299342X pp 214 216 Prison Economics Help Drive Ariz Immigration Law NPR October 28 2010 Retrieved August 17 2012 Sullivan Laura 2010 Shaping State Laws With Little Scrutiny National Public Radio Elk Mike and Sloan Bob 2011 The Hidden History of ALEC and Prison Labor The Nation Prison Privatization and the Use of Incarceration Archived July 14 2007 at the Wayback Machine The Sentencing Project September 2004 a b Whitehead John April 10 2012 Jailing Americans for Profit The Rise of the Prison Industrial Complex The Rutherford Institute Retrieved April 2 2013 Pat Beall November 22 2013 Big business legislators pushed for stiff sentences The Palm Beach Post Retrieved November 10 2014 Greenblatt Alan October 2003 What Makes Alec Smart Governing Beau Hodai Corporate Con Game How the private prison industry helped shape Arizona s anti immigrant law In These Times June 20 2010 http inthesetimes com article 6084 corporate con game retrieved July 25 2015 Page Joshua 2011 Toughest Beat Oxford Scholarship doi 10 1093 acprof oso 9780195384055 001 0001 ISBN 9780195384055 California Prison Guards Union Pushes For Prison Expansion The Huffington Post September 9 2013 Chris Kirkham September 19 2013 Prison Quotas Push Lawmakers To Fill Beds Derail Reform The Huffington Post Retrieved September 20 2013 Eric Schlosser December 1998 The Prison Industrial Complex The Atlantic Retrieved December 31 2013 Ray Downs May 17 2013 Who s Getting Rich Off the Prison Industrial Complex Vice Retrieved December 31 2013 Selman Donna and Paul Leighton 2010 Punishment for Sale Private Prisons Big Business and the Incarceration Binge Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers ISBN 1442201738 p 78 Prison Payback on YouTube Russia Today on YouTube Marie Gottschalk March 5 2015 It s Not Just the Drug War Jacobin Retrieved March 5 2015 Detention Watch Network The Influence of the Private Prison Industry in Immigration Detention 2012 http www detentionwatchnetwork org privateprisons retrieved July 25 2015 DiversityInc The Prison Industrial Complex Biased Predatory and Growing October 8 2010 http www diversityinc com diversity management the prison industrial complex biased predatory and growing Archived June 7 2015 at the Wayback Machine retrieved July 25 2015 David Harris Gershon America s Corrupt Justice System Federal Private Prison Populations Grew by 784 in 10 Year Span Alternet crossposted on Tikkun Daily May 23 2013 http www alternet org speakeasy tikkundaily americas corrupt justice system federal private prison populations grew 784 10 Archived July 20 2015 at the Wayback Machine retrieved July 25 2015 Camp Camille Camp George 2000 Corrections Yearbook 2000 Private Prisons National Criminal Justice Reference Service Retrieved June 14 2015 Justice Is Not For Sale Act Sanders senate gov Bernie Sanders declares war on the prison industrial complex with major new bill Salon September 17 2015 Private federal prisons more dangerous damning DoJ investigation reveals The Guardian August 12 2016 Justice Department Will Stop the Use of Private Prisons Time August 18 2016 U S reverses Obama era move to phase out private prisons Reuters February 23 2017 Watkins Eli Tatum Sophie August 18 2017 Private prison industry sees boon under Trump administration CNN Retrieved August 22 2017 Washington John December 14 2017 Under Trump the Private Prison Boom Shows No Sign of Slowing The Nation Archived from the original on December 17 2017 Retrieved December 18 2017 Lartey Jamiles December 28 2017 Private prison investors set for giant windfall from Trump tax bill The Guardian Retrieved December 29 2017 Conlin Michelle Cooke Kristina January 18 2019 11 toothpaste Immigrants pay big for basics at private ICE lock ups www reuters com Retrieved January 18 2019 Nathan James Federal Prison Industries CRS Report for Congress Updated July 13 2007 McCollum William 1996 Federal Prison Industries Inc Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary U S House of Representatives DIANE Publishing p 7 ISBN 978 0 7567 0060 7 Nate C Hindman August 15 2012 Unicor Under Fire For Dominating Small Competitors With Cheap Prison Labor The Huffington Post Retrieved May 9 2014 Beth Schwartzapfel February 12 2009 Your Valentine Made in Prison The Nation Retrieved April 15 2015 Simon McCormack December 10 2012 Prison Labor Booms As Unemployment Remains High Companies Reap Benefits The Huffington Post Retrieved April 15 2015 Chris Hedges April 5 2015 Boycott Divest and Sanction Corporations That Feed on Prisons Truthdig Retrieved April 4 2015 Marie Gottschalk Caught The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics Princeton University Press 2014 p 61 Anderson Elizabeth 2023 Hijacked How Neoliberalism Turned the Work Ethic against Workers and How Workers Can Take It Back Cambridge University Press pp 270 271 ISBN 978 1009275439 Justin Jouvenal January 28 2012 Town struggles to survive close of prison Washington Post a b Inmates strike in prisons nationwide over slave labor working conditions The Guardian September 9 2016 The Largest Prison Strike in U S History Enters Its Second Week The Intercept September 16 2016 Work Stoppage Prison Strike Continues in 11 US States Archived September 22 2016 at the Wayback Machine The Real News September 20 2016 Kamala Kelkar December 18 2016 From media cutoffs to lockdown tracing the fallout from the U S prison strike PBS Newshour Tarr Duncan Onderchanin Stephanie August 21 2018 How the National Prisoner Strike Is Working to Help Incarcerated People in the United States Teen Vogue Retrieved August 23 2018 Neufeld Jennie August 22 2018 A mass incarceration expert says the 2018 prison strike could be one of the largest the country has ever seen Vox Retrieved August 23 2018 Pilkington Ed August 23 2018 Major prison strike spreads across US and Canada as inmates refuse food The Guardian Retrieved August 23 2018 Corley Cheryl August 21 2018 U S Inmates Plan Nationwide Prison Strike To Protest Labor Conditions NPR Retrieved August 23 2018 Bozelko Chandra Lo Ryan August 25 2018 As prison strikes heat up former inmates talk about horrible state of labor and incarceration USA Today Retrieved August 30 2018 Anguiano Dani June 15 2022 US prison workers produce 11bn worth of goods and services a year for pittance The Guardian Retrieved June 20 2022 Slavery by any name is wrong the push to end forced labor in prisons The Guardian Accessed 26 March 2023 a b Direct expenditures by justice function 1982 2007 billions of dollars Inflation adjusted to 2007 dollars U S Bureau of Justice Statistics BJS Retrieved January 1 2012 by the Internet Archive See BJS timeline graph based on the data a b Justice Expenditures and Employment FY 1982 2007 Statistical Tables NCJ 236218 Published December 2011 U S Bureau of Justice Statistics BJS By Tracey Kyckelhahn Ph D BJS statistician See table 2 of the PDF Total justice expenditures by justice function FY 1982 2007 real dollars A total of around 74 billion for corrections in 2007 As Arrest Records Rise Americans Find Consequences Can Last a Lifetime August 18 2014 Wall Street Journal White Paper on Security Fact Sheet December 1 2014 Retrieved October 16 2020 Church Publishing Federal Prison System Federal Bureau of Prisons BOP FY 2015 Budget Request At A Glance December 21 2013 Retrieved September 2014 The United States Department of Justice white paper On Security 50 States Departments of Corrections insert February 2 2015 Retrieved October 16 2014 Church Publishing Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration A notice by the Prisons Bureau on March 9 2015 in the Federal Register The Price of Prisons What Incarceration Costs Taxpayers Archived August 13 2014 at the Wayback Machine February 29 2012 the Vera Institute of Justice By Christian Henrichson and Ruth Delaney Total taxpayer cost per inmate Among the 40 states surveyed representing more than 1 2 million inmates of 1 4 million total people incarcerated in all 50 state prison systems the total per inmate cost averaged 31 286 and ranged from 14 603 in Kentucky to 60 076 in New York see Figure 4 California Criminal Justice FAQ How much does it cost to incarcerate an inmate California Legislative Analyst s Office Inmates Who Can t Make Bail Face Stark Options By Laura Sullivan January 22 2010 National Public Radio a b Bail Burden Keeps U S Jails Stuffed With Inmates By Laura Sullivan January 21 2010 National Public Radio Jail Inmates at Midyear 2009 Statistical Tables Archived November 7 2011 at the Wayback Machine By Minton D Todd June 3 2010 NCJ 230122 U S Bureau of Justice Statistics See Table 7 of the PDF file Archived December 14 2011 at the Wayback Machine for percent unconvicted Census of Jails 2005 2019 Statistical Tables U S Bureau of Justice Statistics October 2021 a b Bondsman Lobby Targets Pretrial Release Programs By Laura Sullivan January 22 2010 National Public Radio Jails Stuffed To Capacity In Many U S Counties January 20 2010 National Public Radio Chart using 2008 jail statistics showing 50 U S counties with the largest numbers of inmates Fiscal Year 2009 State Expenditure Report National Association of State Budget Officers Archived from the original on August 23 2011 Retrieved October 10 2011 One in 100 Behind Bars in America 2008 February 28 2008 The Pew Center on the States The Full Cost Of Incarceration In The U S Is Over 1 Trillion Study Finds The Huffington Post September 13 2016 Emma Brown and Danielle Douglas Gabriel July 7 2016 Since 1980 spending on prisons has grown three times as much as spending on public education The Washington Post Retrieved July 12 2016 Violent crime rate per 1 000 persons age 12 and up Liedka Raymond V Piehl Anne Morrison Useem Bert May 1 2006 The Crime Control Effect of Incarceration Does Scale Matter Criminology amp Public Policy 5 2 245 276 doi 10 1111 j 1745 9133 2006 00376 x DeFina Robert H Avanites Thomas M 2002 The Weak Effect of Imprisonment on Crime 1971 1998 Social Science Quarterly 83 3 635 653 doi 10 1111 1540 6237 00106 Clear Todd R Rose Dina R Waring Elin Scully Kristen March 1 2003 Coercive mobility and crime A preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization Justice Quarterly 20 1 33 64 doi 10 1080 07418820300095451 ISSN 0741 8825 S2CID 145522279 DeFina Robert Hannon Lance November 1 2010 For incapacitation there is no time like the present The lagged effects of prisoner reentry on property and violent crime rates Social Science Research 39 6 1004 1014 doi 10 1016 j ssresearch 2010 08 001 Oliver Laughland February 12 2015 Mass incarceration does not explain dramatic fall in US crime study finds The Guardian Retrieved February 14 2015 Researchers at the Brennan Center for Justice placed crime statistics from all 50 states over the past four decades against 13 other potential explainers of crime reduction including decreases in alcohol consumption growth in income and data driven policing techniques The conclusion was that the sharp increase in prison numbers has had a negligible effect on the downward trend in crime with mass incarceration responsible for around 6 of property crime reduction in the 1990s and less than a single percentage point in the 2000s John J Gibbons and Nicholas de B Katzenbach June 2006 Confronting Confinement Vera Institute of Justice a b Lyons John War on the Family Mothers in Prison and the Children They Leave Behind DVD Peace Productions Alexander Elizabeth Fall 1998 A Troubling Response To Overcrowded Prisons Civil Rights Journal Aizenman N C February 29 2008 The high cost of incarceration The Denver Post Uggen Christopher Ryan Larson Sarah Shannon October 6 2016 6 Million Lost Voters State Level Estimates of Felony Disenfranchisement 2016 The Sentencing Project Archived from the original on February 21 2020 Retrieved February 22 2020 Majority of employers background check employees Here s why Beckett Katherine Goldberg Allison January 1 2022 The Effects of Imprisonment in a Time of Mass Incarceration Crime and Justice 51 349 398 doi 10 1086 721018 ISSN 0192 3234 Michelle Alexander December 6 2010 How mass incarceration turns people of color into permanent second class citizens The American Prospect Archived from the original on October 1 2011 Retrieved November 9 2014 Michael O Hear November 8 2014 The New Jim Crow Reconsidered Retrieved November 8 2014 Wakefield Sara Wildeman Christopher Children of the Prison Boom Mass Incarceration and the Future of American Inequality New York Oxford University Press Renny Golden October 18 2013 War on the family mothers in prison and the families they leave behind New York ISBN 9781135939700 OCLC 861692996 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Cochran Joshua C Siennick Sonja E Mears Daniel P April 2018 Social Exclusion and Parental Incarceration Impacts on Adolescents Networks and School Engagement Journal of Marriage and the Family 80 2 478 498 doi 10 1111 jomf 12464 ISSN 0022 2445 PMC 5880045 PMID 29622839 POP1 Child population Number of children in millions ages 0 17 in the United States by age 1950 2017 and projected 2018 2050 www childstats gov Retrieved October 21 2018 Sawyer Wendy May 8 2017 Bailing moms out for Mother s Day Prison Policy Initiative Retrieved April 5 2019 a b Geller Amanda Garfinkel Irwin Cooper Carey E Mincy Ronald B December 1 2009 Parental Incarceration and Child Wellbeing Implications for Urban Families Social Science Quarterly 90 5 1186 1202 doi 10 1111 j 1540 6237 2009 00653 x ISSN 0038 4941 PMC 2835345 PMID 20228880 Lee Rosalyn D Fang Xiangming Luo Feijun April 2013 The impact of parental incarceration on the physical and mental health of young adults Pediatrics 131 4 e1188 1195 doi 10 1542 peds 2012 0627 ISSN 1098 4275 PMC 3608482 PMID 23509174 Turney Kristin September 2014 Stress proliferation across generations Examining the relationship between parental incarceration and childhood health Journal of Health and Social Behavior 55 3 302 319 doi 10 1177 0022146514544173 ISSN 2150 6000 PMID 25138199 S2CID 16824554 Geller Amanda Cooper Carey E Garfinkel Irwin Schwartz Soicher Ofira Mincy Ronald B February 2012 Beyond absenteeism father incarceration and child development Demography 49 1 49 76 doi 10 1007 s13524 011 0081 9 ISSN 0070 3370 PMC 3703506 PMID 22203452 Garner Andrew S Shonkoff Jack P January 2012 Early childhood adversity toxic stress and the role of the pediatrician translating developmental science into lifelong health Pediatrics 129 1 e224 231 doi 10 1542 peds 2011 2662 ISSN 1098 4275 PMID 22201148 Murray Joseph Murray Lynne July 2010 Parental incarceration attachment and child psychopathology Attachment amp Human Development 12 4 289 309 doi 10 1080 14751790903416889 ISSN 1469 2988 PMID 20582842 S2CID 1113521 Poehlmann Julie September 2005 Incarcerated mothers contact with children perceived family relationships and depressive symptoms Journal of Family Psychology 19 3 350 357 doi 10 1037 0893 3200 19 3 350 ISSN 0893 3200 PMID 16221015 Boch Samantha Sezgin Emre Ruch Donna Kelleher Kelly Chisolm Deena Lin Simon 2021 Unjust the health records of youth with personal family justice involvement in a large pediatric health system Health amp Justice 9 1 20 doi 10 1186 s40352 021 00147 5 ISSN 2194 7899 PMC 8327457 PMID 34337696 Murray Joseph Farrington David P Sekol Ivana March 2012 Children s antisocial behavior mental health drug use and educational performance after parental incarceration a systematic review and meta analysis Psychological Bulletin 138 2 175 210 doi 10 1037 a0026407 ISSN 1939 1455 PMC 3283435 PMID 22229730 Sack W H May 1977 Children of imprisoned fathers Psychiatry 40 2 163 174 doi 10 1080 00332747 1977 11023929 ISSN 0033 2747 PMID 870921 Petsch P amp Rochlen A B 2009 Children of Incarcerated Parents Implications for School Counselors Journal of School Counseling 7 40 n40 Dacass Tennecia July 25 2017 Intergenerational Effects of Mass Incarceration PDF Shaw Marcus December 2016 The racial implications of the effects of parental incarceration on intergenerational mobility Sociology Compass 10 12 1102 1109 doi 10 1111 soc4 12440 ISSN 1751 9020 a b c Binswanger I A Krueger P M Steiner J F November 1 2009 Prevalence of chronic medical conditions among jail and prison inmates in the USA compared with the general population Journal of Epidemiology amp Community Health 63 11 912 919 doi 10 1136 jech 2009 090662 ISSN 0143 005X PMID 19648129 S2CID 206990171 Semenza Daniel C Link Nathan W December 1 2019 How does reentry get under the skin Cumulative reintegration barriers and health in a sample of recently incarcerated men Social Science amp Medicine 243 112618 doi 10 1016 j socscimed 2019 112618 ISSN 0277 9536 PMID 31665655 S2CID 204965417 a b Hadden Kristie B Puglisi Lisa Prince Latrina Aminawung Jenerius A Shavit Shira Pflaum David Calderon Joe Wang Emily A Zaller Nickolas August 1 2018 Health Literacy Among a Formerly Incarcerated Population Using Data from the Transitions Clinic Network Journal of Urban Health 95 4 547 555 doi 10 1007 s11524 018 0276 0 ISSN 1468 2869 PMC 6095766 PMID 29943227 Health Literacy Official web site of the U S Health Resources amp Services Administration March 31 2017 Retrieved May 11 2022 Gabel Katherine Johnston Denise 1995 Children of incarcerated parents New York Lexington Books ISBN 978 0029110423 OCLC 31739788 Peterson Bryce June 2015 Children of Incarcerated Parents Framework Document PDF Urban Institute Retrieved October 2 2018 N M Stat Ann 29 7 7 3 Safeguarding Children of Arrested Parents PDF Bureau of Justice Assistance Retrieved November 12 2018 Okla Stat tit 22 22 20 Eden Lord Auckland William 1771 Principles of Penal Law N Y Corrections Law 611 Winston Robert Chicot Rebecca 2016 The importance of early bonding on the long term mental health and resilience of children London Journal of Primary Care 8 1 12 14 doi 10 1080 17571472 2015 1133012 ISSN 1757 1472 PMC 5330336 PMID 28250823 Ohio Rev Code Ann 5120 65 Cal Penal Code 3410 3424 Perry Bruce 2013 Bonding and Attachment in Maltreated Children PDF The ChildTrauma Academy Archived from the original PDF on October 22 2018 Retrieved October 4 2018 Deputy Attorney General Sally Q Yates Announces Family Friendly Prison Policies to Strengthen Inmate Familial Bonds April 26 2016 Retrieved November 12 2018 Naser Rebecca L La Vigne Nancy G March 2006 Family Support in the Prisoner Reentry Process Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 43 1 93 106 doi 10 1300 j076v43n01 05 hdl 11323 9875 ISSN 1050 9674 S2CID 142630617 Serin Ralph C Lloyd Caleb D Hanby Laura J August 2010 Enhancing Offender Re Entry an Integrated Model for Enhancing Offender Re Entry European Journal of Probation 2 2 53 75 doi 10 1177 206622031000200205 ISSN 2066 2203 S2CID 153754025 2007 Okla Sess Laws Chap 274 Turanovic Jillian J Rodriguez Nancy Pratt Travis C 2012 The Collateral Consequences of Incarceration Revisited A Qualitative Analysis of the Effects on Caregivers of Children of Incarcerated Parents Criminology 50 4 913 959 doi 10 1111 j 1745 9125 2012 00283 x Having a Parent Behind Bars Costs Children States www pewtrusts org May 24 2016 Retrieved November 12 2018 a b Pager Devah March 2003 The Mark of a Criminal Record PDF American Journal of Sociology 108 5 937 975 doi 10 1086 374403 S2CID 11568703 span, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.