fbpx
Wikipedia

Uruk

Uruk, today known as Warka, was a city in the ancient Near East situated east of the present bed of the Euphrates River on the dried-up ancient channel of the Euphrates. The site lies 93 kilometers (58 miles) northwest of ancient Ur, 108 kilometers (67 miles) southeast of ancient Nippur, and 24 kilometers (15 miles) southeast of ancient Larsa. It is 30 km (19 mi) east of modern Samawah, Al-Muthannā, Iraq.[1]

Uruk
𒀕𒆠, Unugki (Sumerian)
𒌷𒀕 or 𒌷𒀔, Uruk (Akkadian)
Shown within Iraq
LocationAl-Warka, Muthanna Governorate, Iraq
RegionMesopotamia
Coordinates31°19′27″N 45°38′14″E / 31.32417°N 45.63722°E / 31.32417; 45.63722
TypeSettlement
Area6 km2 (2.3 sq mi)
History
Foundedc. 5000 BC
Abandonedc. 700 AD
PeriodsUruk period to Early Middle Ages
Site notes
Excavation dates1850, 1854, 1902, 1912–1913, 1928–1939, 1953–1978, 2001–2002, 2016–present
ArchaeologistsWilliam Loftus, Walter Andrae, Julius Jordan, Heinrich Lenzen, Margarete van Ess
Official nameUruk Archaeological City
Part ofAhwar of Southern Iraq
CriteriaMixed: (iii)(v)(ix)(x)
Reference1481-005
Inscription2016 (40th Session)
Area541 ha (2.09 sq mi)
Buffer zone292 ha (1.13 sq mi)

Uruk is the type site for the Uruk period. Uruk played a leading role in the early urbanization of Sumer in the mid-4th millennium BC. By the final phase of the Uruk period around 3100 BC, the city may have had 40,000 residents,[2] with 80,000–90,000 people living in its environs,[3] making it the largest urban area in the world at the time. King Gilgamesh, according to the chronology presented in the Sumerian King List (henceforth SKL), ruled Uruk in the 27th century BC. The city lost its prime importance around 2000 BC in the context of the struggle of Babylonia against Elam, but it remained inhabited throughout the Achaemenid (550–330 BC), Seleucid (312–63 BC) and Parthian (227 BC to AD 224) periods until it was finally abandoned shortly before or after the Islamic conquest of 633–638.

William Kennett Loftus visited the site of Uruk in 1849, identifying it as "Erech", known as "the second city of Nimrod", and led the first excavations from 1850 to 1854.[4]

Etymology edit

Uruk (/ˈʊrʊk/[5]) has several spellings in cuneiform; in Sumerian it is 𒀕𒆠 unugki;[6] in Akkadian, 𒌷𒀕 or 𒌷𒀔 Uruk (URUUNUG). Its names in other languages include: Arabic: وركاء or أوروك, Warkāʼ or Auruk; Syriac: ܐܘܿܪܘܿܟ,‘Úrūk; Hebrew: אֶרֶךְʼÉreḵ; Ancient Greek: Ὀρχόη, romanizedOrkhóē, Ὀρέχ Orékh, Ὠρύγεια Ōrúgeia.

Though the Arabic name of the present-day country of al-ʿIrāq is often thought to be derived directly from the name Uruk, it is more likely loaned via Middle Persian (Erāq) and then Aramaic ’yrg,[7] which nonetheless may still ultimately refer to the Uruk region of southern Mesopotamia.[8]

Prominence edit

 
Uruk expansion and colonial outposts, c. 3600–3200 BC

In myth and literature, Uruk was famous as the capital city of Gilgamesh, hero of the Epic of Gilgamesh. Scholars identify Uruk as the biblical Erech (Genesis 10:10), the second city founded by Nimrod in Shinar.[9]

Uruk period edit

In addition to being one of the first cities, Uruk was the main force of urbanization and state formation during the Uruk period, or 'Uruk expansion' (4000–3200 BC). This period of 800 years saw a shift from small, agricultural villages to a larger urban center with a full-time bureaucracy, military, and stratified society. Although other settlements coexisted with Uruk, they were generally about 10 hectares while Uruk was significantly larger and more complex. The Uruk period culture exported by Sumerian traders and colonists had an effect on all surrounding peoples, who gradually evolved their own comparable, competing economies and cultures. Ultimately, Uruk could not maintain long-distance control over colonies such as Tell Brak by military force.

Geographic factors edit

 
Map of Sumer

Geographic factors underpin Uruk's unprecedented growth. The city was located in the southern part of Mesopotamia, an ancient site of civilization, on the Euphrates river. Through the gradual and eventual domestication of native grains from the Zagros foothills and extensive irrigation techniques, the area supported a vast variety of edible vegetation. This domestication of grain and its proximity to rivers enabled Uruk's growth into the largest Sumerian settlement, in both population and area, with relative ease.[10]

Uruk's agricultural surplus and large population base facilitated processes such as trade, specialization of crafts and the evolution of writing; writing may have originated in Uruk around 3300 BC.[11] Evidence from excavations such as extensive pottery and the earliest known tablets of writing support these events. Excavation of Uruk is highly complex because older buildings were recycled into newer ones, thus blurring the layers of different historic periods. The topmost layer most likely originated in the Jemdet Nasr period (3100–2900 BC) and is built on structures from earlier periods dating back to the Ubaid period.

History edit

 
Devotional scene to Inanna, Warka Vase, c. 3200–3000 BC, Uruk. This is one of the earliest surviving works of narrative relief sculpture.

According to the SKL, Uruk was founded by the king Enmerkar. Though the king-list mentions a father before him, the epic Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta relates that Enmerkar constructed the House of Heaven (Sumerian: e2-anna; cuneiform: 𒂍𒀭 E2.AN) for the goddess Inanna in the Eanna District of Uruk. In the Epic of Gilgamesh, Gilgamesh builds the city wall around Uruk and is king of the city.

Uruk went through several phases of growth, from the Early Uruk period (4000–3500 BC) to the Late Uruk period (3500–3100 BC).[1] The city was formed when two smaller Ubaid settlements merged. The temple complexes at their cores became the Eanna District and the Anu District dedicated to Inanna and Anu, respectively.[1] The Anu District was originally called 'Kullaba' (Kulab or Unug-Kulaba) prior to merging with the Eanna District. Kullaba dates to the Eridu period when it was one of the oldest and most important cities of Sumer.

The Eanna District was composed of several buildings with spaces for workshops, and it was walled off from the city. By contrast, the Anu District was built on a terrace with a temple at the top. It is clear Eanna was dedicated to Inanna from the earliest Uruk period throughout the history of the city.[12] The rest of the city was composed of typical courtyard houses, grouped by profession of the occupants, in districts around Eanna and Anu. Uruk was extremely well penetrated by a canal system that has been described as "Venice in the desert".[13] This canal system flowed throughout the city connecting it with the maritime trade on the ancient Euphrates River as well as the surrounding agricultural belt.

The original city of Uruk was situated southwest of the ancient Euphrates River, now dry. Currently, the site of Warka is northeast of the modern Euphrates river. The change in position was caused by a shift in the Euphrates at some point in history, which, together with salination due to irrigation, may have contributed to the decline of Uruk.

Archaeological levels of Uruk edit

Archeologists have discovered multiple cities of Uruk built atop each other in chronological order.[14]

  • Uruk XVIII Eridu period (c. 5000 BC): the founding of Uruk
  • Uruk XVIII–XVI Late Ubaid period (4800–4200 BC)
  • Uruk XVI–X Early Uruk period (4000–3800 BC)
  • Uruk IX–VI Middle Uruk period (3800–3400 BC)
  • Uruk V–IV Late Uruk period (3400–3100 BC): the earliest monumental temples of Eanna District are built
  • Uruk III Jemdet Nasr period (3100–2900 BC): the 9 km city wall is built
  • Uruk II
  • Uruk I

Anu District edit

Anu/ White Temple ziggurat
 
 
Anu / White Temple ziggurat at Uruk. The original pyramidal structure, the "Anu Ziggurat" dates to around 4000 BC, and the White Temple was built on top of it circa 3500–3000 BC.[15]

Unlike the Eanna district, the Anu district consists of a single massive terrace, the Anu Ziggurat, dedicated to the Sumerian sky god Anu. Sometime in the Uruk III period the massive White Temple was built atop of the ziggurat. Under the northwest edge of the ziggurat an Uruk VI period structure, the Stone Temple, has been discovered.

The Stone Temple was built of limestone and bitumen on a podium of rammed earth and plastered with lime mortar. The podium itself was built over a woven reed mat called ĝipar, which was ritually used as a nuptial bed. The ĝipar was a source of generative power which then radiated upward into the structure.[16] The structure of the Stone Temple further develops some mythological concepts from Enuma Elish, perhaps involving libation rites as indicated from the channels, tanks, and vessels found there. The structure was ritually destroyed, covered with alternating layers of clay and stone, then excavated and filled with mortar sometime later.

 
Uruk King priest feeding the sacred herd

The Anu Ziggurat began with a massive mound topped by a cella during the Uruk period (c. 4000 BC), and was expanded through 14 phases of construction. These phases have been labeled L to A3 (L is sometimes called X).[17] The earliest phase used architectural features similar to PPNA cultures in Anatolia: a single chamber cella with a terrazzo floor beneath which bucrania were found. In phase E, corresponding to the Uruk III period (c. 3200–3000 BC), the White Temple was built. The White Temple could be seen from a great distance across the plain of Sumer, as it was elevated 21 m and covered in gypsum plaster which reflected sunlight like a mirror. In addition to this temple the Anu Ziggurat had a monumental limestone-paved staircase and a trough running parallel to the staircase was used to drain the ziggurat.

Eanna District edit

 
Eanna IVa (light brown) and IVb (dark brown)

The Eanna district is historically significant as both writing and monumental public architecture emerged here during Uruk periods VI–IV. The combination of these two developments places Eanna as arguably the first true city and civilization in human history. Eanna during period IVa contains the earliest examples of writing.[18]

The first building of Eanna, Stone-Cone Temple (Mosaic Temple), was built in period VI over a preexisting Ubaid temple and is enclosed by a limestone wall with an elaborate system of buttresses. The Stone-Cone Temple, named for the mosaic of colored stone cones driven into the adobe brick façade, may be the earliest water cult in Mesopotamia. It was "destroyed by force" in Uruk IVb period and its contents interred in the Riemchen Building.[19]

 
An Uruk period cylinder-seal and its impression, c. 3100 BC. Louvre

In the following period, Uruk V, about 100 m east of the Stone-Cone Temple the Limestone Temple was built on a 2 m high rammed-earth podium over a pre-existing Ubaid temple, which like the Stone-Cone Temple represents a continuation of Ubaid culture. However, the Limestone Temple was unprecedented for its size and use of stone, a clear departure from traditional Ubaid architecture. The stone was quarried from an outcrop at Umayyad about 60 km east of Uruk. It is unclear if the entire temple or just the foundation was built of this limestone. The Limestone Temple is probably the first Inanna temple, but it is impossible to know with certainty. Like the Stone-Cone temple the Limestone temple was also covered in cone mosaics. Both of these temples were rectangles with their corners aligned to the cardinal directions, a central hall flanked along the long axis by two smaller halls, and buttressed façades; the prototype of all future Mesopotamian temple architectural typology.

 
Tablet from Uruk III (c. 3200–3000 BC) recording beer distributions from the storerooms of an institution,[20] British Museum

Between these two monumental structures a complex of buildings (called A–C, E–K, Riemchen, Cone-Mosaic), courts, and walls was built during Eanna IVb. These buildings were built during a time of great expansion in Uruk as the city grew to 250 hectares and established long-distance trade, and are a continuation of architecture from the previous period. The Riemchen Building, named for the 16×16 cm brick shape called Riemchen by the Germans, is a memorial with a ritual fire kept burning in the center for the Stone-Cone Temple after it was destroyed. For this reason, Uruk IV period represents a reorientation of belief and culture. The facade of this memorial may have been covered in geometric and figural murals. The Riemchen bricks first used in this temple were used to construct all buildings of Uruk IV period Eanna. The use of colored cones as a façade treatment was greatly developed as well, perhaps used to greatest effect in the Cone-Mosaic Temple. Composed of three parts: Temple N, the Round Pillar Hall, and the Cone-Mosaic Courtyard, this temple was the most monumental structure of Eanna at the time. They were all ritually destroyed and the entire Eanna district was rebuilt in period IVa at an even grander scale.

During Eanna IVa, the Limestone Temple was demolished and the Red Temple built on its foundations. The accumulated debris of the Uruk IVb buildings were formed into a terrace, the L-Shaped Terrace, on which Buildings C, D, M, Great Hall, and Pillar Hall were built. Building E was initially thought to be a palace, but later proven to be a communal building. Also in period IV, the Great Court, a sunken courtyard surrounded by two tiers of benches covered in cone mosaic, was built. A small aqueduct drains into the Great Courtyard, which may have irrigated a garden at one time. The impressive buildings of this period were built as Uruk reached its zenith and expanded to 600 hectares. All the buildings of Eanna IVa were destroyed sometime in Uruk III, for unclear reasons.[citation needed]

The architecture of Eanna in period III was very different from what had preceded it. The complex of monumental temples was replaced with baths around the Great Courtyard and the labyrinthine Rammed-Earth Building. This period corresponds to Early Dynastic Sumer c. 2900 BC, a time of great social upheaval when the dominance of Uruk was eclipsed by competing city-states. The fortress-like architecture of this time is a reflection of that turmoil. The temple of Inanna continued functioning during this time in a new form and under a new name, 'The House of Inanna in Uruk' (Sumerian: e2-dinanna unuki-ga). The location of this structure is currently unknown.[12]

Uruk into Late Antiquity edit

Although it had been a thriving city in Early Dynastic Sumer, especially Early Dynastic II, Uruk was ultimately annexed by the Akkadian Empire and went into decline. Later, in the Neo-Sumerian period, Uruk enjoyed revival as a major economic and cultural center under the sovereignty of Ur. The Eanna District was restored as part of an ambitious building program, which included a new temple for Inanna. This temple included a ziggurat, the 'House of the Universe' (Cuneiform: E2.SAR.A) to the northeast of the Uruk period Eanna ruins.

 
Partially reconstructed facade and access staircase of the Ziggurat of Ur, originally built by Ur-Nammu, Neo-Sumerian period, circa 2100 BC

The ziggurat is also cited as Ur-Nammu Ziggurat for its builder Ur-Nammu. Following the collapse of Ur (c. 2000 BC), Uruk went into a steep decline until about 850 BC when the Neo-Assyrian Empire annexed it as a provincial capital. Under the Neo-Assyrians and Neo-Babylonians, Uruk regained much of its former glory. By 250 BC, a new temple complex the 'Head Temple' (Akkadian: Bīt Reš) was added to northeast of the Uruk period Anu district. The Bīt Reš along with the Esagila was one of the two main centers of Neo-Babylonian astronomy. All of the temples and canals were restored again under Nabopolassar. During this era, Uruk was divided into five main districts: the Adad Temple, Royal Orchard, Ištar Gate, Lugalirra Temple, and Šamaš Gate districts.[21]

Uruk, known as Orcha (Ὄρχα) to the Greeks, continued to thrive under the Seleucid Empire. During this period, Uruk was a city of 300 hectares and perhaps 40,000 inhabitants.[21][22][23] In 200 BC, the 'Great Sanctuary' (Cuneiform: E2.IRI12.GAL, Sumerian: eš-gal) of Ishtar was added between the Anu and Eanna districts. The ziggurat of the temple of Anu, which was rebuilt in this period, was the largest ever built in Mesopotamia.[23] When the Seleucids lost Mesopotamia to the Parthians in 141 BC, Uruk continued in use.[24] The decline of Uruk after the Parthians may have been in part caused by a shift in the Euphrates River. By 300 AD, Uruk was mostly abandoned, but a group of Mandaeans settled there,[25] and by c. 700 AD it was completely abandoned.

Political history edit

 
Mesopotamian king as Master of Animals on the Gebel el-Arak Knife (c. 3300–3200 BC, Abydos, Egypt), a work indicating Egypt-Mesopotamia relations and showing the early influence of Mesopotamia on Egypt and the state of Mesopotamian royal iconography in the Uruk period. Louvre.[26][27]

Uruk played a very important part in the political history of Sumer. Starting from the Early Uruk period, the city exercised hegemony over nearby settlements. At this time (c. 3800 BC), there were two centers of 20 hectares, Uruk in the south and Nippur in the north surrounded by much smaller 10 hectare settlements.[28] Later, in the Late Uruk period, its sphere of influence extended over all Sumer and beyond to external colonies in upper Mesopotamia and Syria.

In Uruk, in southern Mesopotamia, Sumerian civilization seems to have reached its creative peak. This is pointed out repeatedly in the references to this city in religious and, especially, in literary texts, including those of mythological content; the historical tradition as preserved in the Sumerian king-list confirms it. From Uruk the center of political gravity seems to have moved to Ur.

— Oppenheim[29]
 
Probable Uruk King-Priest with a beard and hat (c. 3300 BC, Uruk). Louvre.[30]

The recorded chronology of rulers over Uruk includes both mythological and historic figures in five dynasties. As in the rest of Sumer, power moved progressively from the temple to the palace. Rulers from the Early Dynastic period exercised control over Uruk and at times over all of Sumer. In myth, kingship was lowered from heaven to Eridu then passed successively through five cities until the deluge which ended the Uruk period. Afterwards, kingship passed to Kish at the beginning of the Early Dynastic period, which corresponds to the beginning of the Early Bronze Age in Sumer. In the Early Dynastic I period (2900–2800 BC), Uruk was in theory under the control of Kish. This period is sometimes called the Golden Age. During the Early Dynastic II period (2800–2600 BC), Uruk was again the dominant city exercising control of Sumer. This period is the time of the First Dynasty of Uruk sometimes called the Heroic Age. However, by the Early Dynastic IIIa period (2600–2500 BC) Uruk had lost sovereignty, this time to Ur. This period, corresponding to the Early Bronze Age III, is the end of the First Dynasty of Uruk. In the Early Dynastic IIIb period (2500–2334 BC), also called the Pre-Sargonic period (before the rise of the Akkadian Empire under Sargon of Akkad), Uruk continued to be ruled by Ur.

Early Dynastic, Akkadian, and Neo-Sumerian rulers of Uruk edit

 
Clay impression of a cylinder seal with monstrous lions and lion-headed eagles, Mesopotamia, Uruk Period (4100 BC–3000 BC). Louvre Museum.
 
Foundation peg of Lugal-kisal-si, king of Uruk, Ur and Kish, circa 2380 BC. The inscription reads "For (goddess) Namma, wife of (the god) An, Lugalkisalsi, King of Uruk, King of Ur, erected this temple of Namma". Pergamon Museum VA 4855.[31]
 
Dedication tablet of Sîn-gāmil, ruler of Uruk, 18th century BC.

Dynastic categorizations are described solely from the Sumerian King List, which is of problematic historical accuracy;[32][33] the organization might be analogous to Manetho's.

In 2009, two different copies of an inscription were put forth as evidence of a 19th-century BC ruler of Uruk named Naram-sin.[34]

Uruk continued as principality of Ur, Babylon, and later Achaemenid, Seleucid, and Parthian Empires. It enjoyed brief periods of independence during the Isin-Larsa period, under kings such as (possibly) Ikūn-pî-Ištar (c. 1800 BC), Sîn-kāšid, his son Sîn-irībam, his son Sîn-gāmil, Ilum-gāmil, brother of Sîn-gāmil, Etēia, Anam, ÌR-ne-ne, who was defeated by Rīm-Sîn I of Larsa in his year 14 (c. 1740 BC), Rīm-Anum and Nabi-ilīšu.[35] It is now believed that another king, Narām-Sîn, briefly ruled before Sîn-kāšid.[36] The city was finally destroyed by the Arab invasion of Mesopotamia and abandoned c. 700 AD.[citation needed]

Architecture edit

 
Relief on the front of the Inanna temple of Karaindash from Uruk. Mid 15th century BC. Pergamon Museum, Berlin
 
Male deity pouring a life-giving water from a vessel. Facade of Inanna Temple at Uruk, Iraq. 15th century BC. The Pergamon Museum
 
The Parthian Temple of Charyios at Uruk
 
Ruins of the Temple of Gareus at Uruk, c. 100 CE

Uruk has some of the first monumental constructions in architectural history, and certainly the largest of its era. Much of Near Eastern architecture can trace its roots to these prototypical buildings. The structures of Uruk are cited by two different naming conventions, one in German from the initial expedition, and the English translation of the same. The stratigraphy of the site is complex and as such much of the dating is disputed. In general, the structures follow the two main typologies of Sumerian architecture, Tripartite with 3 parallel halls and T-Shaped also with three halls, but the central one extends into two perpendicular bays at one end. The following table summarizes the significant architecture of the Eanna and Anu Districts.[37] Temple N, Cone-Mosaic Courtyard, and Round Pillar Hall are often referred to as a single structure; the Cone-Mosaic Temple.

Eanna district: 4000–2000 BC
Structure name German name Period Typology Material Area in m2
Stone-Cone Temple Steinstifttempel Uruk VI T-shaped Limestone and bitumen x
Limestone Temple Kalksteintempel Uruk V T-shaped Limestone and bitumen 2373
Riemchen Building Riemchengebäude Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick x
Cone-Mosaic Temple Stiftmosaikgebäude Uruk IVb unique x x
Temple A Gebäude A Uruk IVb Tripartite Adobe brick 738
Temple B Gebäude B Uruk IVb Tripartite Adobe brick 338
Temple C Gebäude C Uruk IVb T-shaped Adobe brick 1314
Temple/Palace E Gebäude E Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick 2905
Temple F Gebäude F Uruk IVb T-shaped Adobe brick 465
Temple G Gebäude G Uruk IVb T-shaped Adobe brick 734
Temple H Gebäude H Uruk IVb T-shaped Adobe brick 628
Temple D Gebäude D Uruk IVa T-shaped Adobe brick 2596
Room I Gebäude I Uruk V x x x
Temple J Gebäude J Uruk IVb x Adobe brick x
Temple K Gebäude K Uruk IVb x Adobe brick x
Temple L Gebäude L Uruk V x x x
Temple M Gebäude M Uruk IVa x Adobe brick x
Temple N Gebäude N Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick x
Temple O Gebäude O x x x x
Hall Building/Great Hall Hallenbau Uruk IVa unique Adobe brick 821
Pillar Hall Pfeilerhalle Uruk IVa unique x 219
Bath Building Bäder Uruk III unique x x
Red Temple Roter Tempel Uruk IVa x Adobe brick x
Great Court Großer Hof Uruk IVa unique Burnt Brick 2873
Rammed-Earth Building Stampflehm Uruk III unique x x
Round Pillar Hall Rundpeifeilerhalle Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick x
Anu district: 4000–2000 BC
Stone Building Steingebäude Uruk VI unique Limestone and bitumen x
White Temple x Uruk III Tripartite Adobe brick 382

It is clear Eanna was dedicated to Inanna symbolized by Venus from the Uruk period. At that time, she was worshipped in four aspects as Inanna of the netherworld (Sumerian: dinanna-kur), Inanna of the morning (Sumerian: dinanna-hud2), Inanna of the evening (Sumerian: dinanna-sig), and Inanna (Sumerian: dinanna-NUN).[12] The names of four temples in Uruk at this time are known, but it is impossible to match them with either a specific structure and in some cases a deity.[12]

  • sanctuary of Inanna (Sumerian: eš-dinanna)
  • sanctuary of Inanna of the evening (Sumerian: eš-dinanna-sig)
  • temple of heaven (Sumerian: e2-an)
  • temple of heaven and netherworld (Sumerian: e2-an-ki)

Archaeology edit

 
Mesopotamia in the 2nd millennium BC. From north to south: Nineveh, Qattara (or Karana), Dūr-Katlimmu, Assur, Arrapha, Terqa, Nuzi, Mari, Eshnunna, Dur-Kurigalzu, Der, Sippar, Babylon, Kish, Susa, Borsippa, Nippur, Isin, Uruk, Larsa and Ur

The site, which lies about 50 mi (80 km) northwest of ancient Ur, is one of the largest in the region at around 5.5 km2 (2.1 sq mi) in area. The maximum extent is 3 km (1.9 mi) north/south, and 2.5 km (1.6 mi) east/west. There are three major tells within the site: The Eanna district, Bit Resh (Kullaba), and Irigal. Archaeologically, the site is divided into six parts 1) the É-Anna ziggurat ' Egipar-imin, 2) the É-Anna enclosure (Zingel), 3) the Anu-Antum temple complex, BitRes and Anu-ziggurat, 4) Irigal, the South Building, 5) Parthian structures including the Gareus-temple, and the Multiple Apse building, 6) the "Gilgameš" city-wall with associated Sinkâsid Palace and the Seleucid Bit Akîtu.[38]

The location of Uruk was first noted by Fraser and Ross in 1835.[39] William Loftus excavated there in 1850 and 1854 after a scouting mission in 1849. By Loftus' own account, he admits that the first excavations were superficial at best, as his financiers forced him to deliver large museum artifacts at a minimal cost.[40] Warka was also scouted by archaeologist Walter Andrae in 1902.[41]

Reconstruction of Uruk (English subtitles)

From 1912 to 1913, Julius Jordan and his team from the German Oriental Society discovered the temple of Ishtar, one of four known temples located at the site. The temples at Uruk were quite remarkable as they were constructed with brick and adorned with colorful mosaics. Jordan also discovered part of the city wall. It was later discovered that this 40-to-50-foot (12 to 15 m) high brick wall, probably utilized as a defense mechanism, totally encompassed the city at a length of 9 km (5.6 mi). Utilizing sedimentary strata dating techniques, this wall is estimated to have been erected around 3000 BC. Jordan produced a contour map of the entire site. The GOS returned to Uruk in 1928 and excavated until 1939, when World War II intervened. The team was led by Jordan until 1931 when Jordan became Director of Antiquities in Baghdad, then by A. Nöldeke, Ernst Heinrich, and H. J. Lenzen.[42][43] Among the finds was the Stell of the Lion Hunt, excavated in a Jemdat Nadr layer but sylistically dated to Uruk IV.[44]

The German excavations resumed after the war and were under the direction of Heinrich Lenzen from 1954 to 1967.[45][19][46] He was followed in 1968 by J. Schmidt, and in 1978 by R.M. Boehmer.[47][48] In total, the German archaeologists spent 39 seasons working at Uruk. The results are documented in two series of reports:

  • Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk (ADFU), 17 volumes, 1912–2001 (titles listed at the German Archaeological Institute Index 38e378adbb1f14a174490017f0000011)
  • Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka, Endberichte (AUWE), 25 volumes, 1987–2007 (titles listed at the German Archaeological Institute )

Most recently, from 2001 to 2002, the German Archaeological Institute team led by Margarete van Ess, with Joerg Fassbinder and Helmut Becker, conducted a partial magnetometer survey in Uruk. In addition to the geophysical survey, core samples and aerial photographs were taken. This was followed up with high-resolution satellite imagery in 2005.[49] Work resumed in 2016 and is currently concentrated on the city wall area and a survey of the surrounding landscape.[50][51][52]

Cuneiform tablets edit

 
A massive ziggurat dating from the 4th millennium BC stands at the entrance to Uruk (Warka), 39 km east of Samawah, Iraq

About 400 Proto-cuneiform clay tablets were found at Uruk with Sumerian and pictorial inscriptions that are thought to be some of the earliest recorded writing, dating to approximately 3300 BC.[53][54] Later cuneiform tablets were deciphered and include the famous SKL, a record of kings of the Sumerian civilization. There was an even larger cache of legal and scholarly tablets of the Neo-Babylonian, Late Babylonian, and Seleucid period, that have been published by Adam Falkenstein and other Assyriological members of the German Archaeological Institute in Baghdad as Jan J. A. Djik,[55] Hermann Hunger, Antoine Cavigneaux, Egbert von Weiher,[56][57][58][59] and Karlheinz Kessler [de], or others as Erlend Gehlken.[60][61][62] Many of the cuneiform tablets form acquisitions by museums and collections as the British Museum, Yale Babylonian Collection, and the Louvre. The latter holds a unique cuneiform tablet in Aramaic known as the Aramaic Uruk incantation. The last dated cuneiform tablet from Uruk was W22340a, an astronomical almanac, which is dated to 79/80 AD.[63]

The oldest known writing to feature a person's name was found in Uruk, in the form of several tablets that mention Kushim, who (assuming they are an individual person) served as an accountant recording transactions made in trading barley – 29,086 measures barley 37 months Kushim.[64][65]

 
Late Uruk Period beveled rim bowls used for ration distribution

Beveled rim bowls were the most common type of container used during the Uruk period. They are believed to be vessels for serving rations of food or drink to dependent laborers. The introduction of the fast wheel for throwing pottery was developed during the later part of the Uruk period, and made the mass production of pottery simpler and more standardized.[66]

Artifacts edit

The Mask of Warka, also known as the 'Lady of Uruk' and the 'Sumerian Mona Lisa', dating from 3100 BC, is one of the earliest representations of the human face. The carved marble female face is probably a depiction of Inanna. It is approximately 20 cm tall, and may have been incorporated into a larger cult image. The mask was looted from the Iraq Museum during the fall of Baghdad in April 2003. It was recovered in September 2003 and returned to the museum.

List of rulers edit

The following list should not be considered complete:

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ a b c Harmansah, 2007
  2. ^ Nissen, Hans J (2003). "Uruk and the formation of the city". In Aruz, J (ed.). Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 11–20. ISBN 9780300098839.
  3. ^ Algaze, Guillermo (2013). "The end of prehistory and the Uruk period". In Crawford, Harriet (ed.). The Sumerian World (PDF). London: Routledge. pp. 68–95. ISBN 9781138238633. Retrieved 26 July 2020.[dead link]
  4. ^ William Kennett Loftus (1857). Travels and researches in Chaldaea and Susiana: with an account of excavations at Warka, the "Erech" of Nimrod, and Shush, "Shushan the Palace" of Esther, in 1849–52. Robert Carter & Brothers. Of the primeval cities founded by Nimrod, the son of Gush, four are represented, in Genesis x. 10, as giving origin to the rest : — 'And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Galneh, in the land of Shinar.' ...let us see if there be any site which will correspond with the biblical Erech — the second city of Nimrod. About 120 miles southeast of Babylon, are some enormous piles of mounds, which, from their name and importance, appear at once to justify their claim to consideration. The name of Warka is derivable from Erech without unnecessary contortion. The original Hebrew word 'Erk,' or 'Ark,' is transformed into 'Warka,' either by changing the aleph into vau, or by simply prefixing the vau for the sake of euphony, as is customary in the conversion of Hebrew names to Arabic. If any dependence can be placed upon the derivation of modern from ancient names, this is more worthy of credence than most others of like nature.... Sir Henry Rawlinson states his belief that Warka is Erech, and in this he is supported by concurrent testimony.... [Footnote: See page xvi. of the Twenty-ninth Annual Report of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1852 ; and Proceedings of the Royal Geogr. Society, vol. i., page 47]
  5. ^ "Uruk". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  6. ^ "Sumerian Dictionary". University of Pennsylvania.
  7. ^ Stephen A. Kaufman (1983). "Appendix C. Alphabetic Texts". In McGuire Gibson. Excavations at Nippur Eleventh Season. Oriental Institute Communications, 22, pp. 151–152.
  8. ^ "The name al-ʿIrāq, for all its Arabic appearance, is derived from Middle Persian erāq 'lowlands'" W. Eilers (1983), "Iran and Mesopotamia" in E. Yarshater, The Cambridge History of Iran, vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. ^ While earlier scholars such as Jerome (4th century) had identified Erech with the Syrian city of Edessa (now within Turkey), the modern consensus is that it refers to the Sumerian city-state of Uruk in southern Mesopotamia. See Warwick Ball, 2001, Rome in the East: the transformation of an empire, p. 89. Ball further speculates that the earlier traditions connecting Edessa (Orhai) with Erech might have arisen because the ancient Uruk was possibly 'transferred' to the more northerly location in the reign of Nabonidus of Babylon, 6th century BC.
  10. ^ Tertius Chandler. Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth: An Historical Census. Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 1987, ISBN 0-88946-207-0
  11. ^ Asimov, I. (1968) The Near East, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 16–18
  12. ^ a b c d Beaulieu, 2003
  13. ^ Fassbinder, 2003
  14. ^ Charvát 2002, p.119
  15. ^ Crüsemann, Nicola; Ess, Margarete van; Hilgert, Markus; Salje, Beate; Potts, Timothy (2019). Uruk: First City of the Ancient World. Getty Publications. p. 325. ISBN 978-1-60606-444-3.
  16. ^ Charvát, 2002 p.122
  17. ^ Charvát, 2002 p.126
  18. ^ Nissen, Hans J. (2015). "Urbanization and the techniques of communication: the Mesopotamian city of Uruk during the fourth millennium BCE". In Yoffee, Norman (ed.). Early Cities in Comparative Perspective, 4000 BCE–1200 CE. The Cambridge World History. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-521-19008-4.
  19. ^ a b [1]H. J. Lenzen, "The E-anna district after excavations in the winter of 1958–59", Sumer, vol. 16, pp. 3–11, 1960
  20. ^ . Archived from the original on 2013-10-29.
  21. ^ a b Baker, 2009
  22. ^ R. van der Spek "The Latest on Seleucid Empire Building in the East". Journal of the American Oriental Society 138.2 (2018): 385–394.
  23. ^ a b R. van der Spek. "Feeding Hellenistic Seleucia on the Tigris". In R. Alston & O. van Nijf, eds. Feeding the Ancient Greek City 36. Leuven ; Dudley, Massachusetts: Peeters Publishers, 2008.
  24. ^ C. A. Petrie, "Seleucid Uruk: An Analysis of Ceramic Distribution", Iraq, vol. 64, 2002, pp. 85–123, 2002
  25. ^ According to some finds of Mandaic incantation bowls. Rudolf Macuch, "Gefäßinschriften". İn Eva Strommenger (ed.), Gefässe aus Uruk von der Neubabylonischen Zeit bis zu den Sasaniden (= Ausgrabungen der deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka 7) (Berlin: Gebr. Mann, 1967), pp. 55–57, pl. 57.1–3.
  26. ^ "Site officiel du musée du Louvre". cartelfr.louvre.fr.
  27. ^ Cooper, Jerrol S. (1996). The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty-first Century: The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference. Eisenbrauns. pp. 10–14. ISBN 9780931464966.
  28. ^ Crawford 2004, p.53
  29. ^ Oppenheim 1977, p.?
  30. ^ "Site officiel du musée du Louvre". cartelfr.louvre.fr.
  31. ^ Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. Metropolitan Museum of Art. 2003. pp. 64–65. ISBN 978-1-58839-043-1.
  32. ^ Kesecker, Nshan (January 2018). "Lugalzagesi: The First Emperor of Mesopotamia?". ARAMAZD Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 12: 76–96. doi:10.32028/ajnes.v12i1.893. S2CID 257461809.
  33. ^ Marchesi, Gianni, "The Sumerian King List and the early history of Mesopotamia", Vicino Oriente Quaderno, pp. 231–248, 2010
  34. ^ Eva von Dassow, "Narām-Sîn of Uruk: A New King in an Old Shoebox", Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 61, pp. 63–91, 2009
  35. ^ Douglas Frayne (1990). Old Babylonian Period (2003–1595 B.C.): Early Periods, Volume 4. University of Toronto Press. pp. 439–483, 825.
  36. ^ von Dassow, Eva. "Narām-Sîn of Uruk: A New King in an Old Shoebox", Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 61, The American Schools of Oriental Research, 2009, pp. 63–91
  37. ^ Charvát 2002, p.122–126
  38. ^ North, Robert, "Status of the Warka Excavation", Orientalia, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 185–256, 1957
  39. ^ Fraser, James Baillie, Travels in Koordistan, Mesopotamia, Etc: Including an Account of Parts of Those Countries Hitherto Unvisited by Europeans, R. Bentley, 1840
  40. ^ William K. Loftus, Travels and Researches in Chaldaea and Susiana, Travels and Researches in Chaldaea and Susiana: With an Account of Excavations at Warka, the "Erech" of Nimrod, and Shush, "Shushan the Palace" of Esther, in 1849–52, Robert Carter & Brothers, 1857
  41. ^ Walter Andrae, Die deutschen Ausgrabungen in Warka (Uruk), Berlin, 1935
  42. ^ Julius Jordan, Uruk-Warka nach dem ausgrabungen durch die Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft, Hinrichs, 1928 (German)
  43. ^ Ernst Heinrich, Kleinfunde aus den archaischen Tempelschichten in Uruk, Harrassowitz, Leipzig 1936 (German)
  44. ^ [2]Faraj Basmachi,"The Lion-Hunt Stela from Warka" Sumer, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 87-90, 1949
  45. ^ H. J. Lenzen, "The Ningiszida Temple Built by Marduk-Apla-Iddina II at Uruk (Warka)", Iraq, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 146–150, 1957
  46. ^ H. J. Lenzen, "New discoveries at Warka in southern Iraq", Archaeology, vol. 17, pp. 122–131, 1964
  47. ^ J. Schmidt, "Uruk-Warka, Susammenfassender Bericht uber die 27. Kampagne 1969", Baghdader, vol. 5, pp. 51–96, 1970
  48. ^ Rainer Michael Boehmer, "Uruk 1980–1990: a progress report", Antiquity, vol. 65, pp. 465–478, 1991
  49. ^ M. van Ess and J. Fassbinder, "Magnetic prospection of Uruk (Warka) Iraq", in: La Prospection Géophysique, Dossiers d'Archeologie Nr. 308, pp. 20–25, Nov. 2005
  50. ^ Van Ess, Margarete, and J. Fassbinder, "Uruk-Warka. Archaeological Research 2016–2018, Preliminary Report", Sumer Journal of Archaeology of Iraq 65, pp. 47–85, 2019
  51. ^ Margarete van Ess, "Uruk, Irak. Wissenschaftliche Forschungen 2019", e-Forschungsberichte des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, vol. 2, pp. 117–121, 2019
  52. ^ van Ess, Margarete, et al., "Uruk, Irak. Wissenschaftliche Forschungen und Konservierungsarbeiten. Die Arbeiten der Jahre 2020 bis 2022", e-Forschungsberichte, pp. 1–31, 2022
  53. ^ Hans J. Nissen, "The Archaic Texts from Uruk", World Archaeology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 317–334, 1986
  54. ^ M. W. Green, "Archaic Uruk Cuneiform", American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 464–466, 1986
  55. ^ Jan J. A. Djik, Texte aus dem Rēš-Heiligtum in Uruk-Warka (= Baghdader Mitteilungen. Beiheft 2) (Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1980) ISBN 3-7861-1282-7
  56. ^ Egbert von Weiher, Spätbabylonischen Texte aus Uruk, Teil II (= Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka 10) (Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1983). ISBN 3-7861-1336-X
  57. ^ Egbert von Weiher, Spätbabylonischen Texte aus Uruk, Teil III (= Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk-Warka 12) (Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1988). ISBN 3-7861-1508-7
  58. ^ Egbert von Weiher, Uruk. Spätbabylonischen Texte aus aus dem Planquadrat U 18, Teil IV (= Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka. Endberichte 12) (Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 1993). ISBN 3-8053-1504-X
  59. ^ Egbert von Weiher, Uruk. Spätbabylonischen Texte aus aus dem Planquadrat U 18, Teil V (= Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka. Endberichte 13) (Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 1998). ISBN 3-8053-1850-2
  60. ^ Erlend Gehlken, Uruk. Spätbabylonischen Wirtschaftstext aus dem Eanna-Archiv, Teil 1 (= Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka. Endberichte 5) (Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 1990). ISBN 3-8053-1217-2
  61. ^ Erlend Gehlken, Uruk. Spätbabylonischen Wirtschaftstext aus dem Eanna-Archiv, Teil 2 (= Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka. Endberichte 11) (Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 1996). ISBN 3-8053-1545-7
  62. ^ Corò, Paola, "The Missing Link – Connections between Administrative and Legal Documents in Hellenistic Uruk", Archiv für Orientforschung, vol. 53, pp. 86–92, 2015
  63. ^ Hunger, Hermann and de Jong, Teije, "Almanac W22340a From Uruk: The Latest Datable Cuneiform Tablet", Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 182-194, 2014
  64. ^ Mattessich, Richard, "Recent Insights into Mesopotamian Accounting of the 3rd Millennium B.C — Successor to Token Accounting", The Accounting Historians Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 1998
  65. ^ Nissen, HansJörg; Damerow, Peter; Englund, Robert K., "Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East", Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993
  66. ^ Stefan, Burmeister (2017). The Interplay of People and Technologies Archaeological Case Studies on Innovations – Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 43. Bernbeck, Reinhard, Excellence Cluster Topoi (1st ed.). Berlin. ISBN 9783981675184. OCLC 987573072.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  67. ^ a b c Marchesi, Gianni (January 2015). Sallaberger, W.; Schrakamp, I. (eds.). "Toward a Chronology of Early Dynastic Rulers in Mesopotamia". History & Philology (ARCANE 3; Turnhout): 139–156.
  68. ^ Kesecker, Nshan (January 2018). "Lugalzagesi: The First Emperor of Mesopotamia?". ARAMAZD Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 12: 76–96. doi:10.32028/ajnes.v12i1.893. S2CID 257461809.
  69. ^ , Jerold S. Cooper, Sumerian and Akkadian Royal Inscriptions: Presargonic Inscriptions, Eisenbrauns, 1986, ISBN 0-940490-82-X
  70. ^ C.J Gadd, A Sumerian reading-book, Clarendon Press, 1924

References edit

  • Baker, H.D. "The Urban Landscape in First Millennium BC Babylonia". University of Vienna. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Beaulieu, Paul-Alain (2003). The Pantheon of Uruk During the Neo-Babylonian Period. BRILL. p. 424. ISBN 90-04-13024-1.
  • Charvát, Petr; Zainab Bahrani; Marc Van de Mieroop (2002). Mesopotamia Before History. London: Routledge. p. 281. ISBN 0-415-25104-4.
  • Crawford, Harriet E. W. (2004). Sumer and the Sumerians. Cambridge University Press. pp. 252. ISBN 0-521-53338-4.
  • Fassbinder, J.W.E., and H. Becker, Magnetometry at Uruk (Iraq): The city of King Gilgamesh, Archaeologia Polona, vol. 41, pp. 122–124, 2003
  • Harmansah, Ömür (2007-12-03). "The Archaeology of Mesopotamia: Ceremonial centers, urbanization and state formation in Southern Mesopotamia". Archived from the original on 2012-07-12. Retrieved 2011-08-28.
  • Oppenheim, A. Leo; Erica Reiner (1977). Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 445. ISBN 0-226-63187-7. Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization.

Further reading edit

  • Banks, Edgar James, "A Vase Inscription from Warka", The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 62–63, 1904
  • Green, MW (1984). "The Uruk Lament". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 104 (2): 253–279. doi:10.2307/602171. JSTOR 602171.
  • Kuhrt, Amélie (1995). The Ancient Near East. London: Routledge. p. 782. ISBN 0-415-16763-9.
  • Liverani, Mario; Zainab Bahrani; Marc Van de Mieroop (2006). Uruk: The First City. London: Equinox Publishing. p. 97. ISBN 1-84553-191-4.
  • Lloyd, Seton (1955). Foundations in the Dust. New York, New York: Penguin Books. p. 217. ISBN 0-500-05038-4.
  • Postgate, J.N. (1994). Early Mesopotamia, Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. New York, New York: Routledge Publishing. p. 367. ISBN 0-415-00843-3.
  • Rothman, Mitchell S. (2001). Uruk, Mesopotamia & Its Neighbors. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. p. 556. ISBN 1-930618-03-4.
  • Stevens, Kathryn, "Secrets in the Library: Protected Knowledge and Professional Identity in Late Babylonian Uruk", Iraq, vol. 75, pp. 211–53, 2013
  • Eva Strommenger, The Chronological Division of the Archaic Levels of Uruk-Eanna VI to III/II: Past and Present, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 479–487, (Oct., 1980)
  • Szarzyńska, Krystyna, "Offerings for the Goddess Inana in Archaic Uruk", Revue d’Assyriologie et d’archéologie Orientale, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 1993
  • Krystyna Szarzyńska, Observations on the Temple Precinct EŠ3 in Archaic Uruk, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, vol. 63, pp. 1–4, 2011
  • Vos, Howard F. (1977). Archaeology in Bible Lands. Chicago, Illinois: Moody Press. p. 399. ISBN 978-0-8024-0293-6.

External links edit

  • Archaeologists unearth ancient Sumerian riverboat in Iraq – Ars Technica – 4/8/2022
  • News from Old Uruk – Margarete van Ess 2021 Oriental Institute lecture on recent work
  • Earliest evidence for large scale organized warfare in the Mesopotamian world (Hamoukar vs. Uruk?)
  • Uruk at CDLI wiki
  • (in Sumerian)
  • Archaeological Expedition Mapping Ancient City Of Uruk in 2002
  • Digital images of tablets from Uruk – CDLI

uruk, other, uses, disambiguation, erech, redirects, here, fictional, location, works, tolkien, erech, middle, earth, fictional, monsters, same, works, today, known, warka, city, ancient, near, east, situated, east, present, euphrates, river, dried, ancient, c. For other uses see Uruk disambiguation Erech redirects here For the fictional location in the works of J R R Tolkien see Erech Middle earth For the fictional monsters in the same works see Uruk hai Uruk today known as Warka was a city in the ancient Near East situated east of the present bed of the Euphrates River on the dried up ancient channel of the Euphrates The site lies 93 kilometers 58 miles northwest of ancient Ur 108 kilometers 67 miles southeast of ancient Nippur and 24 kilometers 15 miles southeast of ancient Larsa It is 30 km 19 mi east of modern Samawah Al Muthanna Iraq 1 Uruk𒀕𒆠 Unugki Sumerian 𒌷𒀕 or 𒌷𒀔 Uruk Akkadian 1 Shown within IraqLocationAl Warka Muthanna Governorate IraqRegionMesopotamiaCoordinates31 19 27 N 45 38 14 E 31 32417 N 45 63722 E 31 32417 45 63722TypeSettlementArea6 km2 2 3 sq mi HistoryFoundedc 5000 BCAbandonedc 700 ADPeriodsUruk period to Early Middle AgesSite notesExcavation dates1850 1854 1902 1912 1913 1928 1939 1953 1978 2001 2002 2016 presentArchaeologistsWilliam Loftus Walter Andrae Julius Jordan Heinrich Lenzen Margarete van EssUNESCO World Heritage SiteOfficial nameUruk Archaeological CityPart ofAhwar of Southern IraqCriteriaMixed iii v ix x Reference1481 005Inscription2016 40th Session Area541 ha 2 09 sq mi Buffer zone292 ha 1 13 sq mi You may need rendering support to display the cuneiform script in this article correctly Uruk is the type site for the Uruk period Uruk played a leading role in the early urbanization of Sumer in the mid 4th millennium BC By the final phase of the Uruk period around 3100 BC the city may have had 40 000 residents 2 with 80 000 90 000 people living in its environs 3 making it the largest urban area in the world at the time King Gilgamesh according to the chronology presented in the Sumerian King List henceforth SKL ruled Uruk in the 27th century BC The city lost its prime importance around 2000 BC in the context of the struggle of Babylonia against Elam but it remained inhabited throughout the Achaemenid 550 330 BC Seleucid 312 63 BC and Parthian 227 BC to AD 224 periods until it was finally abandoned shortly before or after the Islamic conquest of 633 638 William Kennett Loftus visited the site of Uruk in 1849 identifying it as Erech known as the second city of Nimrod and led the first excavations from 1850 to 1854 4 Contents 1 Etymology 2 Prominence 2 1 Uruk period 2 2 Geographic factors 3 History 3 1 Archaeological levels of Uruk 3 2 Anu District 3 3 Eanna District 3 4 Uruk into Late Antiquity 4 Political history 4 1 Early Dynastic Akkadian and Neo Sumerian rulers of Uruk 5 Architecture 6 Archaeology 6 1 Cuneiform tablets 6 2 Artifacts 7 List of rulers 8 See also 9 Notes 10 References 11 Further reading 12 External linksEtymology editUruk ˈ ʊ r ʊ k 5 has several spellings in cuneiform in Sumerian it is 𒀕𒆠 unugki 6 in Akkadian 𒌷𒀕 or 𒌷𒀔 Uruk URUUNUG Its names in other languages include Arabic وركاء or أوروك Warkaʼ or Auruk Syriac ܐܘ ܪܘ ܟ Uruk Hebrew א ר ך ʼEreḵ Ancient Greek Ὀrxoh romanized Orkhoe Ὀrex Orekh Ὠrygeia Ōrugeia Though the Arabic name of the present day country of al ʿIraq is often thought to be derived directly from the name Uruk it is more likely loaned via Middle Persian Eraq and then Aramaic yrg 7 which nonetheless may still ultimately refer to the Uruk region of southern Mesopotamia 8 Prominence edit nbsp Uruk expansion and colonial outposts c 3600 3200 BCIn myth and literature Uruk was famous as the capital city of Gilgamesh hero of the Epic of Gilgamesh Scholars identify Uruk as the biblical Erech Genesis 10 10 the second city founded by Nimrod in Shinar 9 Uruk period edit Main article Uruk period In addition to being one of the first cities Uruk was the main force of urbanization and state formation during the Uruk period or Uruk expansion 4000 3200 BC This period of 800 years saw a shift from small agricultural villages to a larger urban center with a full time bureaucracy military and stratified society Although other settlements coexisted with Uruk they were generally about 10 hectares while Uruk was significantly larger and more complex The Uruk period culture exported by Sumerian traders and colonists had an effect on all surrounding peoples who gradually evolved their own comparable competing economies and cultures Ultimately Uruk could not maintain long distance control over colonies such as Tell Brak by military force Geographic factors edit nbsp Map of SumerGeographic factors underpin Uruk s unprecedented growth The city was located in the southern part of Mesopotamia an ancient site of civilization on the Euphrates river Through the gradual and eventual domestication of native grains from the Zagros foothills and extensive irrigation techniques the area supported a vast variety of edible vegetation This domestication of grain and its proximity to rivers enabled Uruk s growth into the largest Sumerian settlement in both population and area with relative ease 10 Uruk s agricultural surplus and large population base facilitated processes such as trade specialization of crafts and the evolution of writing writing may have originated in Uruk around 3300 BC 11 Evidence from excavations such as extensive pottery and the earliest known tablets of writing support these events Excavation of Uruk is highly complex because older buildings were recycled into newer ones thus blurring the layers of different historic periods The topmost layer most likely originated in the Jemdet Nasr period 3100 2900 BC and is built on structures from earlier periods dating back to the Ubaid period History edit nbsp Devotional scene to Inanna Warka Vase c 3200 3000 BC Uruk This is one of the earliest surviving works of narrative relief sculpture According to the SKL Uruk was founded by the king Enmerkar Though the king list mentions a father before him the epic Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta relates that Enmerkar constructed the House of Heaven Sumerian e2 anna cuneiform 𒂍𒀭 E2 AN for the goddess Inanna in the Eanna District of Uruk In the Epic of Gilgamesh Gilgamesh builds the city wall around Uruk and is king of the city Uruk went through several phases of growth from the Early Uruk period 4000 3500 BC to the Late Uruk period 3500 3100 BC 1 The city was formed when two smaller Ubaid settlements merged The temple complexes at their cores became the Eanna District and the Anu District dedicated to Inanna and Anu respectively 1 The Anu District was originally called Kullaba Kulab or Unug Kulaba prior to merging with the Eanna District Kullaba dates to the Eridu period when it was one of the oldest and most important cities of Sumer The Eanna District was composed of several buildings with spaces for workshops and it was walled off from the city By contrast the Anu District was built on a terrace with a temple at the top It is clear Eanna was dedicated to Inanna from the earliest Uruk period throughout the history of the city 12 The rest of the city was composed of typical courtyard houses grouped by profession of the occupants in districts around Eanna and Anu Uruk was extremely well penetrated by a canal system that has been described as Venice in the desert 13 This canal system flowed throughout the city connecting it with the maritime trade on the ancient Euphrates River as well as the surrounding agricultural belt The original city of Uruk was situated southwest of the ancient Euphrates River now dry Currently the site of Warka is northeast of the modern Euphrates river The change in position was caused by a shift in the Euphrates at some point in history which together with salination due to irrigation may have contributed to the decline of Uruk Archaeological levels of Uruk edit Archeologists have discovered multiple cities of Uruk built atop each other in chronological order 14 Uruk XVIII Eridu period c 5000 BC the founding of Uruk Uruk XVIII XVI Late Ubaid period 4800 4200 BC Uruk XVI X Early Uruk period 4000 3800 BC Uruk IX VI Middle Uruk period 3800 3400 BC Uruk V IV Late Uruk period 3400 3100 BC the earliest monumental temples of Eanna District are built Uruk III Jemdet Nasr period 3100 2900 BC the 9 km city wall is built Uruk II Uruk IAnu District edit Anu White Temple ziggurat nbsp nbsp Anu White Temple ziggurat at Uruk The original pyramidal structure the Anu Ziggurat dates to around 4000 BC and the White Temple was built on top of it circa 3500 3000 BC 15 Unlike the Eanna district the Anu district consists of a single massive terrace the Anu Ziggurat dedicated to the Sumerian sky god Anu Sometime in the Uruk III period the massive White Temple was built atop of the ziggurat Under the northwest edge of the ziggurat an Uruk VI period structure the Stone Temple has been discovered The Stone Temple was built of limestone and bitumen on a podium of rammed earth and plastered with lime mortar The podium itself was built over a woven reed mat called ĝipar which was ritually used as a nuptial bed The ĝipar was a source of generative power which then radiated upward into the structure 16 The structure of the Stone Temple further develops some mythological concepts from Enuma Elish perhaps involving libation rites as indicated from the channels tanks and vessels found there The structure was ritually destroyed covered with alternating layers of clay and stone then excavated and filled with mortar sometime later nbsp Uruk King priest feeding the sacred herdThe Anu Ziggurat began with a massive mound topped by a cella during the Uruk period c 4000 BC and was expanded through 14 phases of construction These phases have been labeled L to A3 L is sometimes called X 17 The earliest phase used architectural features similar to PPNA cultures in Anatolia a single chamber cella with a terrazzo floor beneath which bucrania were found In phase E corresponding to the Uruk III period c 3200 3000 BC the White Temple was built The White Temple could be seen from a great distance across the plain of Sumer as it was elevated 21 m and covered in gypsum plaster which reflected sunlight like a mirror In addition to this temple the Anu Ziggurat had a monumental limestone paved staircase and a trough running parallel to the staircase was used to drain the ziggurat Eanna District edit nbsp Eanna IVa light brown and IVb dark brown The Eanna district is historically significant as both writing and monumental public architecture emerged here during Uruk periods VI IV The combination of these two developments places Eanna as arguably the first true city and civilization in human history Eanna during period IVa contains the earliest examples of writing 18 The first building of Eanna Stone Cone Temple Mosaic Temple was built in period VI over a preexisting Ubaid temple and is enclosed by a limestone wall with an elaborate system of buttresses The Stone Cone Temple named for the mosaic of colored stone cones driven into the adobe brick facade may be the earliest water cult in Mesopotamia It was destroyed by force in Uruk IVb period and its contents interred in the Riemchen Building 19 nbsp An Uruk period cylinder seal and its impression c 3100 BC LouvreIn the following period Uruk V about 100 m east of the Stone Cone Temple the Limestone Temple was built on a 2 m high rammed earth podium over a pre existing Ubaid temple which like the Stone Cone Temple represents a continuation of Ubaid culture However the Limestone Temple was unprecedented for its size and use of stone a clear departure from traditional Ubaid architecture The stone was quarried from an outcrop at Umayyad about 60 km east of Uruk It is unclear if the entire temple or just the foundation was built of this limestone The Limestone Temple is probably the first Inanna temple but it is impossible to know with certainty Like the Stone Cone temple the Limestone temple was also covered in cone mosaics Both of these temples were rectangles with their corners aligned to the cardinal directions a central hall flanked along the long axis by two smaller halls and buttressed facades the prototype of all future Mesopotamian temple architectural typology nbsp Tablet from Uruk III c 3200 3000 BC recording beer distributions from the storerooms of an institution 20 British MuseumBetween these two monumental structures a complex of buildings called A C E K Riemchen Cone Mosaic courts and walls was built during Eanna IVb These buildings were built during a time of great expansion in Uruk as the city grew to 250 hectares and established long distance trade and are a continuation of architecture from the previous period The Riemchen Building named for the 16 16 cm brick shape called Riemchen by the Germans is a memorial with a ritual fire kept burning in the center for the Stone Cone Temple after it was destroyed For this reason Uruk IV period represents a reorientation of belief and culture The facade of this memorial may have been covered in geometric and figural murals The Riemchen bricks first used in this temple were used to construct all buildings of Uruk IV period Eanna The use of colored cones as a facade treatment was greatly developed as well perhaps used to greatest effect in the Cone Mosaic Temple Composed of three parts Temple N the Round Pillar Hall and the Cone Mosaic Courtyard this temple was the most monumental structure of Eanna at the time They were all ritually destroyed and the entire Eanna district was rebuilt in period IVa at an even grander scale During Eanna IVa the Limestone Temple was demolished and the Red Temple built on its foundations The accumulated debris of the Uruk IVb buildings were formed into a terrace the L Shaped Terrace on which Buildings C D M Great Hall and Pillar Hall were built Building E was initially thought to be a palace but later proven to be a communal building Also in period IV the Great Court a sunken courtyard surrounded by two tiers of benches covered in cone mosaic was built A small aqueduct drains into the Great Courtyard which may have irrigated a garden at one time The impressive buildings of this period were built as Uruk reached its zenith and expanded to 600 hectares All the buildings of Eanna IVa were destroyed sometime in Uruk III for unclear reasons citation needed The architecture of Eanna in period III was very different from what had preceded it The complex of monumental temples was replaced with baths around the Great Courtyard and the labyrinthine Rammed Earth Building This period corresponds to Early Dynastic Sumer c 2900 BC a time of great social upheaval when the dominance of Uruk was eclipsed by competing city states The fortress like architecture of this time is a reflection of that turmoil The temple of Inanna continued functioning during this time in a new form and under a new name The House of Inanna in Uruk Sumerian e2 dinanna unuki ga The location of this structure is currently unknown 12 Uruk into Late Antiquity edit Although it had been a thriving city in Early Dynastic Sumer especially Early Dynastic II Uruk was ultimately annexed by the Akkadian Empire and went into decline Later in the Neo Sumerian period Uruk enjoyed revival as a major economic and cultural center under the sovereignty of Ur The Eanna District was restored as part of an ambitious building program which included a new temple for Inanna This temple included a ziggurat the House of the Universe Cuneiform E2 SAR A to the northeast of the Uruk period Eanna ruins nbsp Partially reconstructed facade and access staircase of the Ziggurat of Ur originally built by Ur Nammu Neo Sumerian period circa 2100 BCThe ziggurat is also cited as Ur Nammu Ziggurat for its builder Ur Nammu Following the collapse of Ur c 2000 BC Uruk went into a steep decline until about 850 BC when the Neo Assyrian Empire annexed it as a provincial capital Under the Neo Assyrians and Neo Babylonians Uruk regained much of its former glory By 250 BC a new temple complex the Head Temple Akkadian Bit Res was added to northeast of the Uruk period Anu district The Bit Res along with the Esagila was one of the two main centers of Neo Babylonian astronomy All of the temples and canals were restored again under Nabopolassar During this era Uruk was divided into five main districts the Adad Temple Royal Orchard Istar Gate Lugalirra Temple and Samas Gate districts 21 Uruk known as Orcha Ὄrxa to the Greeks continued to thrive under the Seleucid Empire During this period Uruk was a city of 300 hectares and perhaps 40 000 inhabitants 21 22 23 In 200 BC the Great Sanctuary Cuneiform E2 IRI12 GAL Sumerian es gal of Ishtar was added between the Anu and Eanna districts The ziggurat of the temple of Anu which was rebuilt in this period was the largest ever built in Mesopotamia 23 When the Seleucids lost Mesopotamia to the Parthians in 141 BC Uruk continued in use 24 The decline of Uruk after the Parthians may have been in part caused by a shift in the Euphrates River By 300 AD Uruk was mostly abandoned but a group of Mandaeans settled there 25 and by c 700 AD it was completely abandoned Political history edit nbsp Mesopotamian king as Master of Animals on the Gebel el Arak Knife c 3300 3200 BC Abydos Egypt a work indicating Egypt Mesopotamia relations and showing the early influence of Mesopotamia on Egypt and the state of Mesopotamian royal iconography in the Uruk period Louvre 26 27 Uruk played a very important part in the political history of Sumer Starting from the Early Uruk period the city exercised hegemony over nearby settlements At this time c 3800 BC there were two centers of 20 hectares Uruk in the south and Nippur in the north surrounded by much smaller 10 hectare settlements 28 Later in the Late Uruk period its sphere of influence extended over all Sumer and beyond to external colonies in upper Mesopotamia and Syria In Uruk in southern Mesopotamia Sumerian civilization seems to have reached its creative peak This is pointed out repeatedly in the references to this city in religious and especially in literary texts including those of mythological content the historical tradition as preserved in the Sumerian king list confirms it From Uruk the center of political gravity seems to have moved to Ur Oppenheim 29 nbsp Probable Uruk King Priest with a beard and hat c 3300 BC Uruk Louvre 30 The recorded chronology of rulers over Uruk includes both mythological and historic figures in five dynasties As in the rest of Sumer power moved progressively from the temple to the palace Rulers from the Early Dynastic period exercised control over Uruk and at times over all of Sumer In myth kingship was lowered from heaven to Eridu then passed successively through five cities until the deluge which ended the Uruk period Afterwards kingship passed to Kish at the beginning of the Early Dynastic period which corresponds to the beginning of the Early Bronze Age in Sumer In the Early Dynastic I period 2900 2800 BC Uruk was in theory under the control of Kish This period is sometimes called the Golden Age During the Early Dynastic II period 2800 2600 BC Uruk was again the dominant city exercising control of Sumer This period is the time of the First Dynasty of Uruk sometimes called the Heroic Age However by the Early Dynastic IIIa period 2600 2500 BC Uruk had lost sovereignty this time to Ur This period corresponding to the Early Bronze Age III is the end of the First Dynasty of Uruk In the Early Dynastic IIIb period 2500 2334 BC also called the Pre Sargonic period before the rise of the Akkadian Empire under Sargon of Akkad Uruk continued to be ruled by Ur Early Dynastic Akkadian and Neo Sumerian rulers of Uruk edit nbsp Clay impression of a cylinder seal with monstrous lions and lion headed eagles Mesopotamia Uruk Period 4100 BC 3000 BC Louvre Museum nbsp Foundation peg of Lugal kisal si king of Uruk Ur and Kish circa 2380 BC The inscription reads For goddess Namma wife of the god An Lugalkisalsi King of Uruk King of Ur erected this temple of Namma Pergamon Museum VA 4855 31 nbsp Dedication tablet of Sin gamil ruler of Uruk 18th century BC Dynastic categorizations are described solely from the Sumerian King List which is of problematic historical accuracy 32 33 the organization might be analogous to Manetho s In 2009 two different copies of an inscription were put forth as evidence of a 19th century BC ruler of Uruk named Naram sin 34 Uruk continued as principality of Ur Babylon and later Achaemenid Seleucid and Parthian Empires It enjoyed brief periods of independence during the Isin Larsa period under kings such as possibly Ikun pi Istar c 1800 BC Sin kasid his son Sin iribam his son Sin gamil Ilum gamil brother of Sin gamil Eteia Anam IR ne ne who was defeated by Rim Sin I of Larsa in his year 14 c 1740 BC Rim Anum and Nabi ilisu 35 It is now believed that another king Naram Sin briefly ruled before Sin kasid 36 The city was finally destroyed by the Arab invasion of Mesopotamia and abandoned c 700 AD citation needed Architecture edit nbsp Relief on the front of the Inanna temple of Karaindash from Uruk Mid 15th century BC Pergamon Museum Berlin nbsp Male deity pouring a life giving water from a vessel Facade of Inanna Temple at Uruk Iraq 15th century BC The Pergamon Museum nbsp The Parthian Temple of Charyios at Uruk nbsp Ruins of the Temple of Gareus at Uruk c 100 CEUruk has some of the first monumental constructions in architectural history and certainly the largest of its era Much of Near Eastern architecture can trace its roots to these prototypical buildings The structures of Uruk are cited by two different naming conventions one in German from the initial expedition and the English translation of the same The stratigraphy of the site is complex and as such much of the dating is disputed In general the structures follow the two main typologies of Sumerian architecture Tripartite with 3 parallel halls and T Shaped also with three halls but the central one extends into two perpendicular bays at one end The following table summarizes the significant architecture of the Eanna and Anu Districts 37 Temple N Cone Mosaic Courtyard and Round Pillar Hall are often referred to as a single structure the Cone Mosaic Temple Eanna district 4000 2000 BCStructure name German name Period Typology Material Area in m2Stone Cone Temple Steinstifttempel Uruk VI T shaped Limestone and bitumen xLimestone Temple Kalksteintempel Uruk V T shaped Limestone and bitumen 2373Riemchen Building Riemchengebaude Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick xCone Mosaic Temple Stiftmosaikgebaude Uruk IVb unique x xTemple A Gebaude A Uruk IVb Tripartite Adobe brick 738Temple B Gebaude B Uruk IVb Tripartite Adobe brick 338Temple C Gebaude C Uruk IVb T shaped Adobe brick 1314Temple Palace E Gebaude E Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick 2905Temple F Gebaude F Uruk IVb T shaped Adobe brick 465Temple G Gebaude G Uruk IVb T shaped Adobe brick 734Temple H Gebaude H Uruk IVb T shaped Adobe brick 628Temple D Gebaude D Uruk IVa T shaped Adobe brick 2596Room I Gebaude I Uruk V x x xTemple J Gebaude J Uruk IVb x Adobe brick xTemple K Gebaude K Uruk IVb x Adobe brick xTemple L Gebaude L Uruk V x x xTemple M Gebaude M Uruk IVa x Adobe brick xTemple N Gebaude N Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick xTemple O Gebaude O x x x xHall Building Great Hall Hallenbau Uruk IVa unique Adobe brick 821Pillar Hall Pfeilerhalle Uruk IVa unique x 219Bath Building Bader Uruk III unique x xRed Temple Roter Tempel Uruk IVa x Adobe brick xGreat Court Grosser Hof Uruk IVa unique Burnt Brick 2873Rammed Earth Building Stampflehm Uruk III unique x xRound Pillar Hall Rundpeifeilerhalle Uruk IVb unique Adobe brick xAnu district 4000 2000 BCStone Building Steingebaude Uruk VI unique Limestone and bitumen xWhite Temple x Uruk III Tripartite Adobe brick 382It is clear Eanna was dedicated to Inanna symbolized by Venus from the Uruk period At that time she was worshipped in four aspects as Inanna of the netherworld Sumerian dinanna kur Inanna of the morning Sumerian dinanna hud2 Inanna of the evening Sumerian dinanna sig and Inanna Sumerian dinanna NUN 12 The names of four temples in Uruk at this time are known but it is impossible to match them with either a specific structure and in some cases a deity 12 sanctuary of Inanna Sumerian es dinanna sanctuary of Inanna of the evening Sumerian es dinanna sig temple of heaven Sumerian e2 an temple of heaven and netherworld Sumerian e2 an ki Architecture of Uruk nbsp Plan of Eanna VI V nbsp Plan of Eanna IVb nbsp Plan of Eanna IVa nbsp Plan of Eanna III nbsp Plan of Neo Sumerian Eanna nbsp Plan of Anu District Phase E nbsp Reconstruction of a mosaic from the Eanna temple nbsp Detail of Reconstruction of a mosaic from the Eanna temple Archaeology edit nbsp Mesopotamia in the 2nd millennium BC From north to south Nineveh Qattara or Karana Dur Katlimmu Assur Arrapha Terqa Nuzi Mari Eshnunna Dur Kurigalzu Der Sippar Babylon Kish Susa Borsippa Nippur Isin Uruk Larsa and UrThe site which lies about 50 mi 80 km northwest of ancient Ur is one of the largest in the region at around 5 5 km2 2 1 sq mi in area The maximum extent is 3 km 1 9 mi north south and 2 5 km 1 6 mi east west There are three major tells within the site The Eanna district Bit Resh Kullaba and Irigal Archaeologically the site is divided into six parts 1 the E Anna ziggurat Egipar imin 2 the E Anna enclosure Zingel 3 the Anu Antum temple complex BitRes and Anu ziggurat 4 Irigal the South Building 5 Parthian structures including the Gareus temple and the Multiple Apse building 6 the Gilgames city wall with associated Sinkasid Palace and the Seleucid Bit Akitu 38 The location of Uruk was first noted by Fraser and Ross in 1835 39 William Loftus excavated there in 1850 and 1854 after a scouting mission in 1849 By Loftus own account he admits that the first excavations were superficial at best as his financiers forced him to deliver large museum artifacts at a minimal cost 40 Warka was also scouted by archaeologist Walter Andrae in 1902 41 source source source source source source source track track Reconstruction of Uruk English subtitles From 1912 to 1913 Julius Jordan and his team from the German Oriental Society discovered the temple of Ishtar one of four known temples located at the site The temples at Uruk were quite remarkable as they were constructed with brick and adorned with colorful mosaics Jordan also discovered part of the city wall It was later discovered that this 40 to 50 foot 12 to 15 m high brick wall probably utilized as a defense mechanism totally encompassed the city at a length of 9 km 5 6 mi Utilizing sedimentary strata dating techniques this wall is estimated to have been erected around 3000 BC Jordan produced a contour map of the entire site The GOS returned to Uruk in 1928 and excavated until 1939 when World War II intervened The team was led by Jordan until 1931 when Jordan became Director of Antiquities in Baghdad then by A Noldeke Ernst Heinrich and H J Lenzen 42 43 Among the finds was the Stell of the Lion Hunt excavated in a Jemdat Nadr layer but sylistically dated to Uruk IV 44 The German excavations resumed after the war and were under the direction of Heinrich Lenzen from 1954 to 1967 45 19 46 He was followed in 1968 by J Schmidt and in 1978 by R M Boehmer 47 48 In total the German archaeologists spent 39 seasons working at Uruk The results are documented in two series of reports Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk ADFU 17 volumes 1912 2001 titles listed at the German Archaeological Institute Index 38e378adbb1f14a174490017f0000011 Ausgrabungen in Uruk Warka Endberichte AUWE 25 volumes 1987 2007 titles listed at the German Archaeological Institute Index 108 Most recently from 2001 to 2002 the German Archaeological Institute team led by Margarete van Ess with Joerg Fassbinder and Helmut Becker conducted a partial magnetometer survey in Uruk In addition to the geophysical survey core samples and aerial photographs were taken This was followed up with high resolution satellite imagery in 2005 49 Work resumed in 2016 and is currently concentrated on the city wall area and a survey of the surrounding landscape 50 51 52 Cuneiform tablets edit nbsp A massive ziggurat dating from the 4th millennium BC stands at the entrance to Uruk Warka 39 km east of Samawah IraqAbout 400 Proto cuneiform clay tablets were found at Uruk with Sumerian and pictorial inscriptions that are thought to be some of the earliest recorded writing dating to approximately 3300 BC 53 54 Later cuneiform tablets were deciphered and include the famous SKL a record of kings of the Sumerian civilization There was an even larger cache of legal and scholarly tablets of the Neo Babylonian Late Babylonian and Seleucid period that have been published by Adam Falkenstein and other Assyriological members of the German Archaeological Institute in Baghdad as Jan J A Djik 55 Hermann Hunger Antoine Cavigneaux Egbert von Weiher 56 57 58 59 and Karlheinz Kessler de or others as Erlend Gehlken 60 61 62 Many of the cuneiform tablets form acquisitions by museums and collections as the British Museum Yale Babylonian Collection and the Louvre The latter holds a unique cuneiform tablet in Aramaic known as the Aramaic Uruk incantation The last dated cuneiform tablet from Uruk was W22340a an astronomical almanac which is dated to 79 80 AD 63 The oldest known writing to feature a person s name was found in Uruk in the form of several tablets that mention Kushim who assuming they are an individual person served as an accountant recording transactions made in trading barley 29 086 measures barley 37 months Kushim 64 65 nbsp Late Uruk Period beveled rim bowls used for ration distributionBeveled rim bowls were the most common type of container used during the Uruk period They are believed to be vessels for serving rations of food or drink to dependent laborers The introduction of the fast wheel for throwing pottery was developed during the later part of the Uruk period and made the mass production of pottery simpler and more standardized 66 Artifacts edit Main article Art of Uruk The Mask of Warka also known as the Lady of Uruk and the Sumerian Mona Lisa dating from 3100 BC is one of the earliest representations of the human face The carved marble female face is probably a depiction of Inanna It is approximately 20 cm tall and may have been incorporated into a larger cult image The mask was looted from the Iraq Museum during the fall of Baghdad in April 2003 It was recovered in September 2003 and returned to the museum nbsp Lugal kisalsi king of Uruk nbsp Mask of Warka nbsp Bull sculpture Jemdet Nasr period c 3000 BC nbsp Stele of the Lion Hunt Uruk periodList of rulers editThe following list should not be considered complete Portrait or inscription Ruler Approximated dates Notes and referencesFirst dynasty of UrukMeshkiangasher Uncertain these rulers may have r c 3400 c 2900 BC sometime during the Late Uruk and or Jemdet Nasr period s Son of the god Utu and founder of Uruk who received kingship from the 1st Dynasty of Kish Enmerkar Led an assault on the city of Arrata Lugalbanda A soldier in the army of Enmerkar Dumuzid Defeated invading forces headed by Gudam nbsp Gilgamesh Uncertain these rulers may have r c 2900 c 2500 BC sometime during the Early Dynastic ED I and or II period s Built the walls of Uruk and defeated Aga of Kish nbsp Ur Nungal Little is known of these rulers the existence of most is unconfirmed Udul kalamaLa ba shumEn nun tarah anaMesh heMelem anaLugal kitunLumma Uncertain these rulers may have r c 2500 c 2450 BC sometime during the ED IIIa period 67 UrsangpaePortrait or inscription Ruler Approximated dates Notes and referencesSecond dynasty of UrukLugalnamnirsumma Uncertain these rulers may have r c 2500 c 2350 BC sometime during the ED IIIb period 67 nbsp Lugalsilasi I Assaulted Girsu on ten separate occasions 68 Urzage nbsp Lugal kinishe dudu King of Uruk and Ur nbsp Lugal kisal si King of Uruk and Ur Lugalsilasi IIUrni nbsp Enshakushanna Uncertain may have r c 2350 c 2334 BC sometime during the ED IIIb Proto Imperial and or Akkadian period s Established kingship over most of Sumer his kingdom was taken by Lugalzagesi Portrait or inscription Ruler Approximated dates Notes and referencesThird dynasty of Uruk nbsp Lugalzagesi Uncertain may have r c 2350 c 2154 BC sometime during the EDIIIb Proto Imperial and or Akkadian period s 67 Originally of Umma he made Uruk his new capital after conquering all Sumer Defeated Urukagina of Lagash and was in turn defeated by Sargon of Akkad 69 GirimesiPortrait or inscription Ruler Approximated dates Notes and referencesFourth dynasty of UrukUr nigin Uncertain these rulers may have r c 2334 c 2119 BC sometime during the Akkadian and or Gutian period s May have served as ensis of Uruk under the Akkadian empire Known from the SKL very little otherwise Ur gigirKudaPuzur iliUr UtuPortrait or inscription Ruler Approximated dates Notes and referencesFifth dynasty of Uruk nbsp Utu hengal Uncertain may have r c 2154 c 2112 BC sometime during the Gutian and or Ur III period s An ensi of Uruk who overthrew the Gutians and briefly ruled Sumer until he was succeeded by Ur Nammu who he had appointed governor of Ur thus ending the final Sumerian dynasty of Uruk 70 See also editList of cities of the ancient Near East Blau Monuments Warka Vase Chronology of the ancient Near East Geography of Mesopotamia Historical urban community sizesNotes edit a b c Harmansah 2007 Nissen Hans J 2003 Uruk and the formation of the city In Aruz J ed Art of the First Cities The Third Millennium B C from the Mediterranean to the Indus New York Metropolitan Museum of Art pp 11 20 ISBN 9780300098839 Algaze Guillermo 2013 The end of prehistory and the Uruk period In Crawford Harriet ed The Sumerian World PDF London Routledge pp 68 95 ISBN 9781138238633 Retrieved 26 July 2020 dead link William Kennett Loftus 1857 Travels and researches in Chaldaea and Susiana with an account of excavations at Warka the Erech of Nimrod and Shush Shushan the Palace of Esther in 1849 52 Robert Carter amp Brothers Of the primeval cities founded by Nimrod the son of Gush four are represented in Genesis x 10 as giving origin to the rest And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel and Erech and Accad and Galneh in the land of Shinar let us see if there be any site which will correspond with the biblical Erech the second city of Nimrod About 120 miles southeast of Babylon are some enormous piles of mounds which from their name and importance appear at once to justify their claim to consideration The name of Warka is derivable from Erech without unnecessary contortion The original Hebrew word Erk or Ark is transformed into Warka either by changing the aleph into vau or by simply prefixing the vau for the sake of euphony as is customary in the conversion of Hebrew names to Arabic If any dependence can be placed upon the derivation of modern from ancient names this is more worthy of credence than most others of like nature Sir Henry Rawlinson states his belief that Warka is Erech and in this he is supported by concurrent testimony Footnote See page xvi of the Twenty ninth Annual Report of the Royal Asiatic Society 1852 and Proceedings of the Royal Geogr Society vol i page 47 Uruk Oxford English Dictionary Online ed Oxford University Press Subscription or participating institution membership required Sumerian Dictionary University of Pennsylvania Stephen A Kaufman 1983 Appendix C Alphabetic Texts In McGuire Gibson Excavations at Nippur Eleventh Season Oriental Institute Communications 22 pp 151 152 The name al ʿIraq for all its Arabic appearance is derived from Middle Persian eraq lowlands W Eilers 1983 Iran and Mesopotamia in E Yarshater The Cambridge History of Iran vol 3 Cambridge Cambridge University Press While earlier scholars such as Jerome 4th century had identified Erech with the Syrian city of Edessa now within Turkey the modern consensus is that it refers to the Sumerian city state of Uruk in southern Mesopotamia See Warwick Ball 2001 Rome in the East the transformation of an empire p 89 Ball further speculates that the earlier traditions connecting Edessa Orhai with Erech might have arisen because the ancient Uruk was possibly transferred to the more northerly location in the reign of Nabonidus of Babylon 6th century BC Tertius Chandler Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth An Historical Census Lewiston New York Edwin Mellen Press 1987 ISBN 0 88946 207 0 Asimov I 1968 The Near East Boston Houghton Mifflin pp 16 18 a b c d Beaulieu 2003 Fassbinder 2003 Charvat 2002 p 119 Crusemann Nicola Ess Margarete van Hilgert Markus Salje Beate Potts Timothy 2019 Uruk First City of the Ancient World Getty Publications p 325 ISBN 978 1 60606 444 3 Charvat 2002 p 122 Charvat 2002 p 126 Nissen Hans J 2015 Urbanization and the techniques of communication the Mesopotamian city of Uruk during the fourth millennium BCE In Yoffee Norman ed Early Cities in Comparative Perspective 4000 BCE 1200 CE The Cambridge World History Vol 3 Cambridge University Press p 113 ISBN 978 0 521 19008 4 a b 1 H J Lenzen The E anna district after excavations in the winter of 1958 59 Sumer vol 16 pp 3 11 1960 Tablet MSVO 3 12 BM 140855 description on CDLI Archived from the original on 2013 10 29 a b Baker 2009 R van der Spek The Latest on Seleucid Empire Building in the East Journal of the American Oriental Society 138 2 2018 385 394 a b R van der Spek Feeding Hellenistic Seleucia on the Tigris In R Alston amp O van Nijf eds Feeding the Ancient Greek City 36 Leuven Dudley Massachusetts Peeters Publishers 2008 C A Petrie Seleucid Uruk An Analysis of Ceramic Distribution Iraq vol 64 2002 pp 85 123 2002 According to some finds of Mandaic incantation bowls Rudolf Macuch Gefassinschriften In Eva Strommenger ed Gefasse aus Uruk von der Neubabylonischen Zeit bis zu den Sasaniden Ausgrabungen der deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk Warka 7 Berlin Gebr Mann 1967 pp 55 57 pl 57 1 3 Site officiel du musee du Louvre cartelfr louvre fr Cooper Jerrol S 1996 The Study of the Ancient Near East in the Twenty first Century The William Foxwell Albright Centennial Conference Eisenbrauns pp 10 14 ISBN 9780931464966 Crawford 2004 p 53 Oppenheim 1977 p Site officiel du musee du Louvre cartelfr louvre fr Art of the First Cities The Third Millennium B C from the Mediterranean to the Indus Metropolitan Museum of Art 2003 pp 64 65 ISBN 978 1 58839 043 1 Kesecker Nshan January 2018 Lugalzagesi The First Emperor of Mesopotamia ARAMAZD Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 76 96 doi 10 32028 ajnes v12i1 893 S2CID 257461809 Marchesi Gianni The Sumerian King List and the early history of Mesopotamia Vicino Oriente Quaderno pp 231 248 2010 Eva von Dassow Naram Sin of Uruk A New King in an Old Shoebox Journal of Cuneiform Studies vol 61 pp 63 91 2009 Douglas Frayne 1990 Old Babylonian Period 2003 1595 B C Early Periods Volume 4 University of Toronto Press pp 439 483 825 von Dassow Eva Naram Sin of Uruk A New King in an Old Shoebox Journal of Cuneiform Studies vol 61 The American Schools of Oriental Research 2009 pp 63 91 Charvat 2002 p 122 126 North Robert Status of the Warka Excavation Orientalia vol 26 no 3 pp 185 256 1957 Fraser James Baillie Travels in Koordistan Mesopotamia Etc Including an Account of Parts of Those Countries Hitherto Unvisited by Europeans R Bentley 1840 William K Loftus Travels and Researches in Chaldaea and Susiana Travels and Researches in Chaldaea and Susiana With an Account of Excavations at Warka the Erech of Nimrod and Shush Shushan the Palace of Esther in 1849 52 Robert Carter amp Brothers 1857 Walter Andrae Die deutschen Ausgrabungen in Warka Uruk Berlin 1935 Julius Jordan Uruk Warka nach dem ausgrabungen durch die Deutsche Orient Gesellschaft Hinrichs 1928 German Ernst Heinrich Kleinfunde aus den archaischen Tempelschichten in Uruk Harrassowitz Leipzig 1936 German 2 Faraj Basmachi The Lion Hunt Stela from Warka Sumer vol 5 iss 1 pp 87 90 1949 H J Lenzen The Ningiszida Temple Built by Marduk Apla Iddina II at Uruk Warka Iraq vol 19 no 2 pp 146 150 1957 H J Lenzen New discoveries at Warka in southern Iraq Archaeology vol 17 pp 122 131 1964 J Schmidt Uruk Warka Susammenfassender Bericht uber die 27 Kampagne 1969 Baghdader vol 5 pp 51 96 1970 Rainer Michael Boehmer Uruk 1980 1990 a progress report Antiquity vol 65 pp 465 478 1991 M van Ess and J Fassbinder Magnetic prospection of Uruk Warka Iraq in La Prospection Geophysique Dossiers d Archeologie Nr 308 pp 20 25 Nov 2005 Van Ess Margarete and J Fassbinder Uruk Warka Archaeological Research 2016 2018 Preliminary Report Sumer Journal of Archaeology of Iraq 65 pp 47 85 2019 Margarete van Ess Uruk Irak Wissenschaftliche Forschungen 2019 e Forschungsberichte des Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts vol 2 pp 117 121 2019 van Ess Margarete et al Uruk Irak Wissenschaftliche Forschungen und Konservierungsarbeiten Die Arbeiten der Jahre 2020 bis 2022 e Forschungsberichte pp 1 31 2022 Hans J Nissen The Archaic Texts from Uruk World Archaeology vol 17 no 3 pp 317 334 1986 M W Green Archaic Uruk Cuneiform American Journal of Archaeology vol 90 no 4 pp 464 466 1986 Jan J A Djik Texte aus dem Res Heiligtum in Uruk Warka Baghdader Mitteilungen Beiheft 2 Berlin Gebr Mann Verlag 1980 ISBN 3 7861 1282 7 Egbert von Weiher Spatbabylonischen Texte aus Uruk Teil II Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk Warka 10 Berlin Gebr Mann Verlag 1983 ISBN 3 7861 1336 X Egbert von Weiher Spatbabylonischen Texte aus Uruk Teil III Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft in Uruk Warka 12 Berlin Gebr Mann Verlag 1988 ISBN 3 7861 1508 7 Egbert von Weiher Uruk Spatbabylonischen Texte aus aus dem Planquadrat U 18 Teil IV Ausgrabungen in Uruk Warka Endberichte 12 Mainz am Rhein Philipp von Zabern 1993 ISBN 3 8053 1504 X Egbert von Weiher Uruk Spatbabylonischen Texte aus aus dem Planquadrat U 18 Teil V Ausgrabungen in Uruk Warka Endberichte 13 Mainz am Rhein Philipp von Zabern 1998 ISBN 3 8053 1850 2 Erlend Gehlken Uruk Spatbabylonischen Wirtschaftstext aus dem Eanna Archiv Teil 1 Ausgrabungen in Uruk Warka Endberichte 5 Mainz am Rhein Philipp von Zabern 1990 ISBN 3 8053 1217 2 Erlend Gehlken Uruk Spatbabylonischen Wirtschaftstext aus dem Eanna Archiv Teil 2 Ausgrabungen in Uruk Warka Endberichte 11 Mainz am Rhein Philipp von Zabern 1996 ISBN 3 8053 1545 7 Coro Paola The Missing Link Connections between Administrative and Legal Documents in Hellenistic Uruk Archiv fur Orientforschung vol 53 pp 86 92 2015 Hunger Hermann and de Jong Teije Almanac W22340a From Uruk The Latest Datable Cuneiform Tablet Zeitschrift fur Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archaologie vol 104 no 2 pp 182 194 2014 Mattessich Richard Recent Insights into Mesopotamian Accounting of the 3rd Millennium B C Successor to Token Accounting The Accounting Historians Journal vol 25 no 1 pp 1 27 1998 Nissen HansJorg Damerow Peter Englund Robert K Archaic Bookkeeping Early Writing and Techniques of Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East Chicago University of Chicago Press 1993 Stefan Burmeister 2017 The Interplay of People and Technologies Archaeological Case Studies on Innovations Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 43 Bernbeck Reinhard Excellence Cluster Topoi 1st ed Berlin ISBN 9783981675184 OCLC 987573072 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link a b c Marchesi Gianni January 2015 Sallaberger W Schrakamp I eds Toward a Chronology of Early Dynastic Rulers in Mesopotamia History amp Philology ARCANE 3 Turnhout 139 156 Kesecker Nshan January 2018 Lugalzagesi The First Emperor of Mesopotamia ARAMAZD Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies 12 76 96 doi 10 32028 ajnes v12i1 893 S2CID 257461809 Jerold S Cooper Sumerian and Akkadian Royal Inscriptions Presargonic Inscriptions Eisenbrauns 1986 ISBN 0 940490 82 X C J Gadd A Sumerian reading book Clarendon Press 1924References editBaker H D The Urban Landscape in First Millennium BC Babylonia University of Vienna a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Beaulieu Paul Alain 2003 The Pantheon of Uruk During the Neo Babylonian Period BRILL p 424 ISBN 90 04 13024 1 Charvat Petr Zainab Bahrani Marc Van de Mieroop 2002 Mesopotamia Before History London Routledge p 281 ISBN 0 415 25104 4 Crawford Harriet E W 2004 Sumer and the Sumerians Cambridge University Press pp 252 ISBN 0 521 53338 4 Fassbinder J W E and H Becker Magnetometry at Uruk Iraq The city of King Gilgamesh Archaeologia Polona vol 41 pp 122 124 2003 Harmansah Omur 2007 12 03 The Archaeology of Mesopotamia Ceremonial centers urbanization and state formation in Southern Mesopotamia Archived from the original on 2012 07 12 Retrieved 2011 08 28 Oppenheim A Leo Erica Reiner 1977 Ancient Mesopotamia Portrait of a Dead Civilization Chicago University of Chicago Press pp 445 ISBN 0 226 63187 7 Ancient Mesopotamia Portrait of a Dead Civilization Further reading editBanks Edgar James A Vase Inscription from Warka The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures vol 21 no 1 pp 62 63 1904 Green MW 1984 The Uruk Lament Journal of the American Oriental Society 104 2 253 279 doi 10 2307 602171 JSTOR 602171 Kuhrt Amelie 1995 The Ancient Near East London Routledge p 782 ISBN 0 415 16763 9 Liverani Mario Zainab Bahrani Marc Van de Mieroop 2006 Uruk The First City London Equinox Publishing p 97 ISBN 1 84553 191 4 Lloyd Seton 1955 Foundations in the Dust New York New York Penguin Books p 217 ISBN 0 500 05038 4 Postgate J N 1994 Early Mesopotamia Society and Economy at the Dawn of History New York New York Routledge Publishing p 367 ISBN 0 415 00843 3 Rothman Mitchell S 2001 Uruk Mesopotamia amp Its Neighbors Santa Fe School of American Research Press p 556 ISBN 1 930618 03 4 Stevens Kathryn Secrets in the Library Protected Knowledge and Professional Identity in Late Babylonian Uruk Iraq vol 75 pp 211 53 2013 Eva Strommenger The Chronological Division of the Archaic Levels of Uruk Eanna VI to III II Past and Present American Journal of Archaeology vol 84 no 4 pp 479 487 Oct 1980 Szarzynska Krystyna Offerings for the Goddess Inana in Archaic Uruk Revue d Assyriologie et d archeologie Orientale vol 87 no 1 pp 7 28 1993 Krystyna Szarzynska Observations on the Temple Precinct ES3 in Archaic Uruk Journal of Cuneiform Studies vol 63 pp 1 4 2011 Vos Howard F 1977 Archaeology in Bible Lands Chicago Illinois Moody Press p 399 ISBN 978 0 8024 0293 6 External links edit nbsp Wikiquote has quotations related to Uruk nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to Uruk Archaeologists unearth ancient Sumerian riverboat in Iraq Ars Technica 4 8 2022 News from Old Uruk Margarete van Ess 2021 Oriental Institute lecture on recent work Earliest evidence for large scale organized warfare in the Mesopotamian world Hamoukar vs Uruk Uruk at CDLI wiki Lament for Unug in Sumerian Archaeological Expedition Mapping Ancient City Of Uruk in 2002 Digital images of tablets from Uruk CDLI Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Uruk amp oldid 1190299656, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.