fbpx
Wikipedia

Post-Soviet states

January 16, 2023

The post-Soviet states, also known as the former Soviet Union (FSU),[1] the former Soviet Republics and in Russia as the near abroad (Russian: ближнее зарубежье, romanized: blizhneye zarubezhye), are the 15 sovereign states that were union republics of the Soviet Union, which emerged and re-emerged from the Soviet Union following its dissolution in 1991.

Post-Soviet states in English alphabetical order: 1.  Armenia • 2.  Azerbaijan • 3.  Belarus • 4.  Estonia • 5.  Georgia • 6.  Kazakhstan • 7.  Kyrgyzstan • 8.  Latvia • 9.  Lithuania • 10.  Moldova • 11.  Russia • 12.  Tajikistan • 13.  Turkmenistan • 14.  Ukraine • 15.  Uzbekistan

Russia is the primary de facto internationally recognized successor state to the Soviet Union after the Cold War; while Ukraine has, by law, proclaimed that it is a state-successor of both the Ukrainian SSR and the Soviet Union which remained under dispute over formerly Soviet-owned properties.[2][3][4]

The three Baltic states – Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania – were the first to declare their independence from the USSR, between March and May 1990, claiming continuity from the original states that existed prior to their annexation by the Soviet Union in 1940.[5][6] The remaining 12 republics all subsequently seceded, all 12 of which joined the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and most of the 12 joining the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). In contrast, the Baltic states focused on European Union (EU) and NATO membership.[7] EU officials have stressed the importance of Association Agreements between the EU and post-Soviet states.[8][9]

Several disputed states with varying degrees of recognition exist within the territory of the former Soviet Union: Transnistria in eastern Moldova, Abkhazia and South Ossetia in northern Georgia and Artsakh in southwestern Azerbaijan. Since 2014, the Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic in far eastern Ukraine have claimed independence. All of these unrecognized states except Artsakh depend on Russian armed support and financial aid. Artsakh is integrated to Armenia at a de-facto level, which also maintains close cooperation with Russia. Prior to its annexation to Russia in March 2014, which is not recognized by most countries, Crimea briefly declared itself an independent state.[10]

In the political language of Russia and some other post-Soviet states, the term near abroad (Russian ближнее зарубежье "blizhnee zarubezhe") refers to the independent republics that emerged after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Increasing usage of the term in English is connected to assertions of Russia's right to maintain significant influence in the region.[11][12][13] Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared the region to be a component of Russia's "sphere of influence", and strategically vital to Russian interests.[13] The concept has been compared to the Monroe Doctrine.[11]

Country comparison

The 15 states may be divided into four subregions. Not included in these categories are the several de facto independent states presently lacking international recognition (read below: Separatist conflicts).

Subregion Country Symbols Capital Form of
government 		Independence Area[14] Population Ethnic majority, percent Density Notes
Coat of arms Flag km2 mi2 1989 now p/km2 p/mi2
Central Asia Kazakhstan
(Republic of Kazakhstan) 		    Astana Unitary dominant-party
presidential republic 		December 16, 1991 2,724,900 1,052,090 19,000,336 39.7%   69.6% 7 18 [15][16]
Kyrgyzstan
(Kyrgyz Republic) 		    Bishkek Unitary presidential
republic 		August 31, 1991 199,945 77,199 6,663,000 52.4%   73.8% 33 85 [17][18]
Tajikistan
(Republic of Tajikistan) 		    Dushanbe Unitary presidential
republic under a dictatorship 		September 9, 1991 143,100 55,251 9,504,000 62.3%   84.3% 64 166 [19][20]
Turkmenistan
(formerly the Republic of Turkmenistan) 		    Ashgabat Unitary presidential
republic under a hereditary
dictatorship 		October 27, 1991 491,210 189,657 6,118,000 72.0%   85.6% 11 28 [21][22]
Uzbekistan
(Republic of Uzbekistan) 		    Tashkent Unitary presidential
republic 		August 31, 1991 444,103 171,469 35,064,893 71.4%   84.4% 76 197 [19][23]
Total Central Asia 4,003,258 1,545,667 76,350,229 59.6%   79.5% 38.2 99
Eastern Europe Belarus
(Republic of Belarus) 		    Minsk Unitary presidential
republic under a dictatorship 		December 10, 1991 207,600 80,155 9,349,645 77.9%   84.9% 46 119 [24][25]
Moldova
(Republic of Moldova) 		    Chișinău Unitary parliamentary
republic 		August 27, 1991 33,843 13,067 2,597,100 64.5%   75.1% 79 205 [26][27]
Russia
(Russian Federation) 		    Moscow Federal semi-presidential
republic 		December 12, 1991 17,098,242 6,601,668 146,171,015 81.5%   77.7% 9 23 [28][29][30][31]
Ukraine     Kyiv Unitary semi-presidential
republic 		August 24, 1991 603,700 233,090 41,383,182 72.7%   77.5% 72 186 [32][33]
Total Eastern Europe 17,943,385 6,927,980 199,500,942 74.2%   78.8% 51.5 133
Baltics Estonia
(Republic of Estonia) 		    Tallinn Unitary parliamentary
republic 		May 8, 1990 45,339 17,505 1,330,068 61.5%   69.4% 29 75 [34][35]
Latvia
(Republic of Latvia) 		    Riga Unitary parliamentary
republic 		May 4, 1990 64,562 24,928 1,882,200 52.0%   63.0% 30 78 [19][36]
Lithuania
(Republic of Lithuania) 		    Vilnius Unitary semi-presidential
republic 		March 11, 1990 65,300 25,212 2,786,006 79.6%   84.6% 43 111 [19][37]
Total Baltic states 175,201 67,645 5,998,274 64.4%   72.0% 34 88
South Caucasus Armenia
(Republic of Armenia) 		    Yerevan Unitary parliamentary
republic 		September 21, 1991 29,743 11,484 2,963,300 93.3%   98.1% 100 259 [38][39]
Azerbaijan
(Republic of Azerbaijan) 		    Baku Unitary semi-presidential
republic under a hereditary
dictatorship 		August 30, 1991 86,600 33,436 10,139,196 82.7%   91.6% 115 298 [40][41]
Georgia
(formerly the Republic of Georgia) 		    Tbilisi Unitary parliamentary
republic 		April 9, 1991 69,700 26,911 3,728,573 70.1%   86.8% 53 137 [19][42]
Total South Caucasus 186,043 71,832 16,831,069 82.0%   92.2% 89.3 231
Total former Soviet Union 22,307,815 8,613,096 296,582,638 50.6%   44.5% 9 23 [43]

Current leaders

Heads of state

Heads of government

Economy

The dissolution of the Soviet Union took place as a result and against the backdrop of general economic stagnation, even regression. As the Gosplan, which had set up production chains to cross SSR lines, broke down, the inter-republic economic connections were also disrupted, leading to even more serious breakdown of the post-Soviet economies.

Most of the formerly Soviet states began the transition to a market economy from a command economy in 1990–1991 and made efforts to rebuild and restructure their economic systems, with varying results. In all, the process triggered severe economic declines, with gross domestic product (GDP) dropping by more than 40% overall between 1990 and 1995.[45] This decline in GDP was much more intense than the 27% decline that the United States suffered in the wake of the Great Depression between 1930 and 1934.[46] The reconfiguration of public finance in compliance with capitalist principles resulted in dramatically reduced spending on health, education and other social programs, leading to a sharp increase in poverty and economic inequality.[47][48] The economic shocks associated with wholesale privatization resulted in the excess deaths of roughly 1 million working age individuals throughout the former Soviet bloc in the 1990s.[49][50] A study by economist Steven Rosefielde asserts that 3.4 million Russians died premature deaths from 1990 to 1998, partly as the result of "shock therapy" imposed by the Washington Consensus.[51]

The initial transition decline was eventually arrested by the cumulative effect of market reforms, and after 1995 the economy in the post-Soviet states began to recover, with GDP switching from negative to positive growth rates. A good example could be considered Armenia as its government worked on the stabilization of the economy between 1994-1995 and succeeded in decreasing the inflation rate of the country from 4 to 2 digits by 1996.[52] By 2007, 10 of the 15 post-Soviet states had recovered and reached GDP greater than what they had in 1991.[53] According to economist Branko Milanović in 2015, many former Soviet Republics and Warsaw Pact countries still have not caught up to their levels of output during the twilight of the Soviet era, including Bosnia-Herzegovina, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Serbia, Tajikistan, and Ukraine. He concluded that "only 1 out of 10 people living in "transition" countries have seen a successful transition to capitalism and more democracy."[54][55] Commenting on Milanović's report in 2021, Kristen Ghodsee says this view is "essentially correct" and perhaps underestimates "the negative impacts of transition by focusing only on GDP, inequality and democratic consolidation" whereas Mitchell A. Orenstein says this view is "overly pessimistic" and notes that "living standards had increased in many countries."[56]

The economic changes were in harmony with the constitutional reforms, while provisions on public finances can be identified and in some countries, a separate chapter deals with public finances. Most of the constitutions define directly or indirectly the economic system of the countries parallel to the democratic transition of the 1990s: free market economy, which sometimes complemented with the social or socially (and ecologically) oriented attribute, economic development, or only the economic rights are included as a ground for the economy. In the case of fiscal policy, the legislative, the executive and other state organs (Budget Council, Economic and Social Council) define and manage the budgeting. The average government debt in the countries is nearly 44%, but the deviation is great, because the lowest figure is close to 10% but the highest is 97%. The trend shows, that the sovereign debt ratio to GDP in most of the countries has been rising. The constitutional background for taxation is similar. The contribution to cover the finances for common needs is declared, the principle of just tax burden sharing is supplemented sometimes with special aspects. Tax revenues expose typically 15 – 19% of the GDP, and rates above 20% only rarely can be found. The state audit of the government budget and expenditures is an essential control element in public finances, and an important part of the concept of checks and balances. The central banks are independent state institutions, which possess the monopoly on managing and implementing a state's or federation's monetary policy. Besides monetary policy, some of them even perform the supervision of the financial intermediary system. In the case of price stability function, the inflation rate, in the examined area, relatively quickly dropped to below 5% by 2000. The majority of the constitutions determine the national currency, legal tender or monetary unit. The local currency exchange rate to U.S. dollar shows that drastic interventions were not necessary. National wealth or assets are the property of the state and/or the local governments, and as an exclusive property, the management and protection of them aim at serving the public interest.[57]

Change in gross domestic product (GDP) in constant prices, 1991–2015[58]

Country 1991* 1996 2001 2006 2011 2015 2021 Turnaround
year**
Central Asia
Kazakhstan 100 69.3 88.5 141.4 185.7 219.0 252.3 1996
Kyrgyzstan 100 58.9 76.1 89.6 114.4 133.9 154.5 1996
Tajikistan 100 34.1 45.2 56.0 98.1 124.5 189.5 1997
Turkmenistan 100 68.4 107.7 215.5 351.8 515.5 ? 1998
Uzbekistan 100 82.9 102.6 137.5 208.4 281.2 363.6 1996
Eastern Europe
Belarus 100 67.9 94.0 141.5 192.5 193.9 206.0 1996
Moldova 100 45.2 45.0 62.5 74.5 83.2 104.6 1997
Russia 100 63.1 74.5 103.3 118.3 119.8 135.2 1997
Ukraine 100 47.2 51.8 73.7 75.9 63.4 68.8 2000
Baltic states
Estonia 100 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Latvia 100 67.8 92.9 143.1 130.1 145.8 165.3 1993
Lithuania 100 64.6 81.5 119.8 123.9 139.6 173.2 1995
South Caucasus
Armenia 100 63.3 84.2 154.7 172.5 202.6 244.2 1994
Azerbaijan 100 42.7 65.2 150.2 241.1 276.5 269.6 1996
Georgia 100 39.8 49.8 74.1 93.2 109.3 136.0 1995

*Economy of most Soviet republics started to decline in 1989–1990, thus indices for 1991 do not match pre-reform maximums.

**The year when GDP decline switched to GDP growth.

List of the present gross domestic product (GDP) (figures are given in 2021 United States dollars for the year 2021 according to the IMF[59])

No. Country Nominal
(billions USD) 		Nominal
per capita (USD) 		PPP
(billions USD) 		PPP
per capita (USD)
1   Armenia 12 4,125 42 14,180
2   Azerbaijan 50 4,883 150 15,080
3   Belarus 61 6,487 189 19,940
4   Estonia 35 26,470 51 38,540
5   Georgia 16 4,361 58 15,630
6   Kazakhstan 188 9,828 509 27,290
7   Kyrgyzstan 7 1,123 35 5,520
8   Latvia 38 19,824 61 32,010
9   Lithuania 62 22,245 107 38,590
10   Moldova 12 4,638 36 13,440
11   Russia 1,710 11,654 4,140 28,180
12   Tajikistan 8 810 33 3,540
13   Turkmenistan 54 9,032 96 16,430
14   Ukraine 164 3,984 561 13,440
15   Uzbekistan 61 1,775 245 7,370

Developmental progress

The post-Soviet states listed according to their Human Development Index scores in 2021.[60]

 

Very High Human Development:

High Human Development:

Medium Human Development:

Regional organizations

GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic DevelopmentGeorgia (country)AzerbaijanUkraineMoldovaTajikistanTurkmenistanCollective Security Treaty OrganizationEurasian Economic UnionUzbekistanKyrgyzstanKazakhstanArmeniaUnion StateBelarusRussiaCommonwealth of Independent StatesCommonwealth of Independent States Free Trade AreaBaltic AssemblyLithuaniaLatviaEstoniaCommunity for Democracy and Rights of NationsTransnistriaAbkhaziaSouth OssetiaRepublic of Artsakh 
An Euler diagram showing the relationships among various supranational organisations in the territory of the former Soviet Unionv • d • e
 
  CIS members
  States that joined EU, NATO
and OECD
  Other EU or NATO members

A number of regional organizations and cooperating blocs have sprung up since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Only organizations that are mainly (or completely) composed of post-Soviet states are listed in this section; organizations with wider memberships are not discussed. The 15 post-Soviet states are divided in their participation to the regional blocs:

  • Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine founded the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in December 1991. It was conceived as a successor organization to the USSR, and in December 1993 it included 12 of the 15 former Soviet republics (except the three Baltic states).[61] It currently consists of nine of the 15 former Soviet republics, with one associate state (Turkmenistan). Georgia withdrew from the CIS in August 2008, while Ukraine stopped participating from the CIS in May 2018.
  • The three Baltic states have not sought membership in any of these post-Soviet organizations, seeking and achieving membership in the European Union and NATO instead, although their electricity and rail systems remain closely connected with former Soviet organizations. The sole exception to the above has been their recent membership in the Community of Democratic Choice.
  • The Central Asian states of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan (as well as Belarus) are members of the CIS and participate in several regional organizations that have Russia as a primary mover. Such organizations are the Eurasian Economic Community (later merged with Eurasian Economic Union, which Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are not members of), Collective Security Treaty Organization, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. The last two groups only became distinct once Uzbekistan withdrew from GUAM and sought membership in EurAsEc and CSTO (which it subsequently withdrew from in 2008 and 2012, respectively).
  • Armenia, besides its membership in CIS participates in Collective Security Treaty Organization and the Eurasian Economic Union.
  • Moldova and Azerbaijan participate in the CIS but other than that they mostly cooperate within regional organizations that are not dominated by Russia. Such organizations are GUAM and the Community of Democratic Choice. Although Ukraine is one of the three founding countries of the CIS, it is legally not a member because it has never ratified the 1993 CIS Charter.[61]
  • Turkmenistan is an associate member of CIS (having withdrawn from full membership in August 2005)[62] and a member in the Economic Cooperation Organization; it has not sought closer integration in any of the other Western or post-Soviet organizations.
  • In 2008, Georgia notified the CIS executive bodies of its decision to leave the regional organization,[63][64] and according to the CIS Charter (sec. 1, art. 9) this decision went into force 12 months after the notification date.[65]

Commonwealth of Independent States

Main article: Commonwealth of Independent States

The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) consists of 10 former Soviet Republics that differ in their membership status. As of December 2010, 9 countries have ratified the CIS charter and are full CIS members (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan), one country (Turkmenistan) is an associate member and two countries (Georgia, Ukraine) left the organization in 2009 and in 2018. In 2014, Ukraine declined its CIS chairmanship and considered withdrawal from the organization.[66]

In 1994, the CIS countries agreed to create a free trade area, but the agreements were never signed. On 19 October 2011, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, and Ukraine signed a free trade agreement.[67] Uzbekistan joined the free trade area in 2013.[citation needed]

Eurasian Economic Community

 
  EAEC members
  GUAM members
  Other CIS members
Main article: Eurasian Economic Community

The Eurasian Economic Community (EURASEC), formerly the CIS Customs Union, was established by Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Ukraine and Moldova have observer status in the community; however, Ukraine has declared its desire not to become a full member state. Because having common borders with the rest of the community is a prerequisite for full membership, Moldova is barred from seeking it. Uzbekistan applied for membership in October 2005,[68] when the process of merging Central Asian Cooperation Organization and the Eurasian Economic Community began; it joined on 25 January 2006. Uzbekistan subsequently suspended its membership in 2008.[69]

On 10 October 2014 an agreement on the termination of the Eurasian Economic Community was signed in Minsk after a session of the Interstate Council of the EAEC. The Eurasian Economic Community was terminated from 1 January 2015 in connection with the launch of the Eurasian Economic Union.[citation needed]

Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia

 
Economical integration blocs in Post-Soviet area: EU, EFTA, CEFTA and Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia
Main article: Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia

Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan created a customs union that entered into force in July 2010. Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan indicated interest in joining at the time.[70][71] Russia has been eager for Armenia, Moldova and Ukraine to join the custom union instead of the European Union, and the Moldovan break-away state of Transnistria has supported this. In 2013, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia announced plans to seek membership, but division over the issue in Ukraine led to the Revolution of Dignity after the Ukrainian government backed out of an EU Eastern Partnership in favor of the union. In 2014, voters in the Moldovan autonomous region of Gagauzia rejected closer ties to the EU in favor of the union.[72]

On 1 January 2012, Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus established the Single Economic Space which ensures the effective functioning of a single market for goods, services, capital and labour, and to establish coherent industrial, transport, energy and agricultural policies.[73][74] The agreement included a roadmap for future integration and established the Eurasian Economic Commission (modelled on the European Commission).[75] The Eurasian Economic Commission serves as the regulatory agency for the Eurasian Customs Union, the Single Economic Space and the Eurasian Economic Union.[73]

Eurasian Economic Union

 
  EAEU members
  Acceding EAEU Members
  Other CIS Members
Main articles: Eurasian Union and Enlargement of the Eurasian Economic Union

The Eurasian Economic Union is an economic union of post-Soviet states. The treaty aiming for the establishment of the EAEU was signed on 29 May 2014 by the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia, and came into force on 1 January 2015.[76] Treaties aiming for Armenia's and Kyrgyzstan's accession to the Eurasian Economic Union were signed on 9 October 2014 and 23 December respectively. Armenia's accession treaty came into force on 2 January 2015.[77] Although Kyrgyzstan's accession treaty will not come into force until May 2015, provided it has been ratified,[78] it will participate in the EAEU from the day of its establishment as an acceding state.[79][80][81][82][83] Moldova and Tajikistan are prospective members.[citation needed]

Collective Security Treaty Organization

 
  CSTO members
  GUAM members
  Other CIS members
Main article: Collective Security Treaty Organization

Seven CIS member states, namely Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Armenia, have enhanced their military cooperation, establishing the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), this being an expansion of the previous Collective Security Treaty (CST). Uzbekistan which (alongside Georgia and Azerbaijan) withdrew from the CST in 1999, joined GUAM. Then in 2005, it withdrew from GUAM and joined the CSTO in 2006. On 28 June 2012, Uzbekistan suspended its membership in the CSTO.[84]

North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Main article: North Atlantic Treaty Organization
 
NATO/CSTO

Three former Soviet states are members of NATO: Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Georgia, where both public opinion and the ruling government favor NATO membership, is in the Intensified Dialogue program with NATO. Ukraine also declared joining NATO as its geopolitical goal once again in 2017 (the first time being right after the Orange Revolution and in the beginning of presidency of Viktor Yushchenko), after the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych, during which the government officially declared neutrality and ceased to seek NATO membership.[85][86]

Other states in the Partnership for Peace and Individual Partnership Action Plan program include Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

GUAM

Main article: GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic Development

Four member states, namely Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova, established the GUAM group that was largely seen as intending to counter Russian dominance in the region. Notably, these four nations do not participate in any of the other regional organizations that sprang up in the region since the dissolution of the Soviet Union (other than the CIS).

Union State

 
  Members of the Union
  CIS members who have shown interest in becoming members of the Union
  Other CIS members
Main article: Union State

The Union State of Russia and Belarus was originally formed on 2 April 1996 under the name Commonwealth of Russia and Belarus, before being tightened further on 8 December 1999. It was initiated by the president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko. On paper, the Union of Russia and Belarus intends further integration, beyond the scope of mere cooperation, including the introduction of the rouble as a common currency.

Other regional organizations

Economic Cooperation Organization

Main article: Economic Cooperation Organization
 
  Community of Democratic Choice
  Economic Cooperation Organization

The Economic Cooperation Organization was originally formed in 1985 by Turkey, Iran and Pakistan but in 1992 the organization was expanded to include Afghanistan and the six primarily Muslim former Soviet republics: Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations

Main article: Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations

The post-Soviet disputed states of Abkhazia, Artsakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria are all members of the Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations which aims to forge closer integration.

Community of Democratic Choice

Main article: Community of Democratic Choice

The Community of Democratic Choice (CDC) was formed in December 2005 at the primary instigation of Ukraine and Georgia, and composed of six post-Soviet states (Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and three other countries of Eastern and Central Europe (Slovenia, Romania and North Macedonia). The Black Sea Forum (BSF) is a closely related organization. Observer countries include Armenia, Bulgaria, and Poland.

Just like GUAM before it, this forum is largely seen as intending to counteract Russian influence in the area. This is the only international forum centered in the post-Soviet space in which the Baltic countries also participate. In addition, the other three post-Soviet states in it are all members of GUAM.

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation

Main article: Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
 
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation:
  Member state
  Observer state
  Dialogue partner
  Applicants for observer status

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), is composed of China and five post-Soviet states, namely Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The organization was founded in 2001, though its predecessor, the Shanghai Five grouping, has existed since 1996. Its aims revolve around security-related issues such as border demarcation, terrorism and energy.[87]

Economic cooperation organizations

  • Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA) with Moldova (it includes also non post-Soviet countries of the former Yugoslavia; previously, also included other Central European countries that left CEFTA when joining the European Union; CEFTA plays a role in Central Europe similar to what European Free Trade Association (EFTA) provides in Western Europe for non EU-members; this alliance an economical organization with strong cooperation with the European Union, for countries that do not want to participate in EurAsEC centered on Russia but that are seeking alliances to the West); even if Moldova is the only CEFTA country that is still within a weakening CIS, it no longer participates to the CSTO for most of the common security policy (but cannot join the EU because of incompatibility with WEU stability rules and the unsolved problem of Transnistria) but can still benefit from the Free Trade Area notably with Romania and Bulgaria (in the EU).
  • Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) with Russia, Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey, Albania, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and Armenia (an economic organisation closely related to the SCO but more focused regionally to include also Armenia; it also aims for the harmonious development of democracy for increasing the commerce in South-East Europe and includes some EU members, so it cannot be a regional free-trade union).
  • The European Union (EU) with the three Baltic countries that were the first ones to declare independence from the former USSR have never joined CIS after the collapse of USSR (it includes also now some post-communist countries in Central Europe, that have left CEFTA when entering the EU : Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and Slovenia).

Political integration and security alliances

  • Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe (SPforSEE) with Moldova (similar in structure to CEFTA, but does not focus on economy but security, for those countries that are not NATO members); this organization largely cooperates with NATO, and is related to the group of observers at Western European Union (WEU).
  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), for Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Central European countries that have also joined the EU (the EU membership includes also WEU membership because they follow the Common Foreign and Security Policy and European Security and Defence Policy policies shared now by the EU, the WEU and all European NATO members).
  • The other remaining countries are those part of the former Yugoslavia, but their recent conflict and political tensions still does not allow them to cooperate efficiently for their political integration and for their mutual security; in addition, they still do not have full sovereignty in this domain (some of them are still under surveillance by EU or NATO, as mandated by UNO). They still need to find an internal stability and they can collaborate economically with the help of other organizations focusing on economy or political cooperation and development. However a more limited cooperation for security is possible through their membership to the larger Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).
  • The only exception is Belarus (whose post-soviet democratic transition did not occur) that still rejects political integration, and all security alliances with NATO, OSCE, WEU or other countries in Europe other than Russia (which the process of reintegration of Belarus has been tightened in almost all domains).

Organizations in other domains

  • Southeast European Cooperation Process (SEECP) with Moldova (similar to SPforSEE, but focuses on political integration than cooperation for security, and to CEFTA but does not focus on trade).
  • Southeast European Cooperative Initiative (SECI) with Moldova (closely related to SEECP).
  • Central European Initiative (CEI) with Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus (and also Central and South-Western European countries in the European Union; it aims at helping Eastern European countries to reach the EU standards and cooperate politically and find a better economic development and a strong, working but more democratic legal system); it is the only regional organization where Belarus is still a member (but the political cooperation with Belarus is almost stalled, as it is the only country of the former Communist bloc country that balances in favor of stronger cooperation with Russia and against integration with EU and NATO; however Belarus remains isolated and still does not cooperate too in the SCO group led by Russia and China).
  • Black Sea Forum for Partnership and Dialogue (BSF) with Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Moldova and Armenia (also non post-soviet countries that are NATO members, interested in their maintaining political stability and avoiding conflicts in the region: Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, whose first two are also now EU and CEI members, using EU rules for their political development); however this organization does not focus on helping countries to join the EU, but reaching common standards and good governance and internal stability and democracy like in the CEI.[citation needed]
  • Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations

Other organizations

Apart from above, the former Soviet republics also hold membership in a number of multinational organizations such as:

Politics

Regarding political freedom in the former Soviet republics, Freedom House's 2021 report listed the following:

Similarly, the Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders in 2022 recorded the following as regards press freedom:[88]

It has been remarked that several post-Soviet states did not change leadership for decades since their independence, such as Nursultan Nazarbayev in Kazakhstan until his surprise resignation in 2019,[89] and Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan, until his death in September 2016.[90] All of these had originally more limited terms but through decrees or referendums prolonged their stay in office (a practice also followed by Presidents Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus and Emomali Rahmon of Tajikistan). Askar Akayev of Kyrgyzstan had likewise served as President since its independence until he was forced to resign as a result of the Kyrgyz revolution of 2005.[91] Saparmurat Niyazov in Turkmenistan ruled from independence until his death in 2006, creating a personality cult around himself.[92] His successor, Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, has maintained a personality cult of his own that has replaced the worshipping of Niyazov.[93]

The issue of dynastical succession has been another element affecting the politics of some post-Soviet States. Heydar Aliyev, after constructing an extensive and ongoing cult of personality, handed the Presidency of Azerbaijan to his son, Ilham Aliyev. Theories about the children of other leaders in Central Asia being groomed for succession abound.[94] The participation of Akayev's son and daughter in the 2005 Kyrgyz parliamentary elections boosted fears of dynastic succession being used in Kyrgyzstan as well, and may have contributed to the anti-Akayev climate that led to his overthrow.

Separatist conflicts

See also: Post-Soviet conflicts

Economic, political, national, military, and social problems have all been factors in separatism in the post-Soviet space. In many cases, problems due to factors such as ethnic divisions existed before the fall of the Soviet Union, and upon the fall of the union were brought into the open.[95] Such territories and resulting military conflicts have so far been:

Current self-declared states

Region Country name
Coat of arms
 Flag Capital Independence Recognition Area[14] Population Density
km2 mi2 p/km2 p/mi2
Eastern Europe Transnistria
(Transnistrian Moldavian Republic) 		    Tiraspol 25 August 1991
(from   Moldova) 		Not recognised 4,163 1,607 306,000 73.5 190.4
South Caucasus Artsakh
(Republic of Artsakh) 		    Stepanakert 10 December 1991
(from   Azerbaijan) 		Not recognised 3,000 1,158 120,000 13.17 34.1
South Ossetia
(Republic of South Ossetia –
the State of Alania) 		    Tskhinval 21 December 1991
(from   Georgia) 		Limited 3,900 1,506 53,532 13.73 35.6
Abkhazia
(Republic of Abkhazia) 		    Sukhumi 23 July 1992
(from   Georgia) 		8,660 3,344 254,246 29.36 76.0
  •   Transnistria, which is de facto independent from Moldova. It declared independence in 1990, due to its majority Russian-speaking population fearing union with Romania. A ceasefire between Transnistrian forces and Moldovan forces has been in place since 1992, enforced by the presence of Russian forces in Transnistria.[96]
  •   Republic of Artsakh, which is de facto independent from Azerbaijan. Ethnic conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis began in 1988, and expanded into a war which lasted until a ceasefire in 1994. Sporadic attempts at negotiating a final peace and sporadic bursts of violence have continued since then.[97]
  •   South Ossetia, which is de facto independent from Georgia. The region declared its intent to seek independence in 1990, leading to a conflict which led to a ceasefire in 1992. Separatism became powerful after the election of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili in 2004, and a referendum in 2006 was in favour of declaring independence. The 2008 war between Georgian forces and the separatist and Russian forces led to Russia's recognition of South Ossetia's independence.[98]
  •   Abkhazia, which is de facto independent from Georgia. Tensions in the area broke out when Georgia sent in troops in 1992 to control groups who wanted separation. The troops and most of the Georgian and Mingrelian speaking population were forced out in 1993, and the region declared independence in 1999. The 2008 war between Georgian forces and the separatist and Russian forces led to Russia's recognition of Abkhazia's independence.[99]

Former self-declared states

Region Country name
Coat of arms
 Flag Capital Independence Fate Area[14] Population Density
km2 mi2 p/km2 p/mi2
Eastern Europe Gagauzia
(Gagauz Republic) 		    Comrat 19 August 1990
(from   SSR Moldova) 		Reincorporated into Moldova
as an autonomy in 1994 		1,848 714 134,132 72.58 188.0
Crimea
(Republic of Crimea) 		    Simferopol 17 March 2014
(from   Ukraine) 		Occupied by Russia after an
illegal referendum on the next day 		26,100 10,077 1,913,731 73.32 189.9
Donetsk
(Donetsk People's Republic) 		    Donetsk 12 May 2014
(from   Ukraine) 		Partly occupied by Russia after an
illegal referendum in September 2022 		7,853 3,032 2,302,444 293.19 759.4
Luhansk
(Luhansk People's Republic) 		    Luhansk 12 May 2014
(from   Ukraine) 		8,377 3,234 1,464,039 174.77 452.7
Central Asia Tatarstan
(Republic of Tatarstan) 		    Kazan 21 March 1992
(from   Russia) 		Reincorporated into Russia
after peaceful negotiations in 1994 		68,000 26,255 3,786,488 55.68 144.2
South Caucasus Chechnya
(Chechen Republic of Ichkeria) 		    Grozny 8 June 1991
(from   Russian SFSR) 		Disestablished in 2000
after the Second Chechen War 		15,300 5,907 1,103,686 72.14 186.8
Talysh-Mughan
(Толъш-Мъғонә Мохтарә Республикә) 		    Lankaran June 1993
(from   Azerbaijan) 		Reincorporated into Azerbaijan in August 1993 7,465 2,882 960,000 128.6 333.1
  •   Gagauz Republic, declared itself the "Gagauz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic" within Moldova on 12 November 1989, and the "Gagauz Soviet Socialist Republic", independent of Moldova but still within the Soviet Union, on 19 August 1990, but was reintegrated into Moldova as an autonomous region on 23 December 1994.[100][101][102]
  •   Tatarstan, declared itself to be a sovereign state after a referendum on 21 March 1992. Negotiations with Russia led to the signing of a treaty in 1994 which ended Tatarstan's de facto independence, but reserved significant autonomy for the Tatarstan government. In 2002 a new constitution was enacted for Tatarstan which removed the prior constitution's declaration that Tatarstan was a sovereign state.
  •   Republic of Crimea. The entire Crimean Peninsula has been outside the control of Ukrainian authorities since late February 2014, when Russian special forces and pro-Russian militias occupied the region.[103][104][105][106][107] In March 2014, a popular referendum in favor of accession to Russia was held in Crimea and Sevastopol, although Ukraine[108] and most of the international community refused to recognize the vote. The next day, the Republic of Crimea declared independence, and within days Russia absorbed the peninsula. Ukraine continues to claim Crimea as an integral part of its territory.
  •   Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, where Dzhokhar Dudayev declared independence from Russia in 1991, leading to a violent war between local separatist forces and the Russian army. Russia first invaded in 1994, withdrawing after a deal for increased autonomy was granted in 1996. Tensions have continued in the years since then, and the conflict has spilled over into neighbouring regions such as Dagestan, Ingushetia and North Ossetia–Alania. Russia claims that the situation in Chechnya has normalised.[109]
  •   Donetsk People's Republic and   Luhansk People's Republic, states which declared independence from Ukraine in 2014. The two breakaway states were recognized by Russia on 21 February 2022, followed by North Korea and Syria, and they were subsequently annexed by Russia on 4 October of that year after a controversial referendum that were recognized as sham referendums.
  •   Talysh-Mughan, declared autonomy within Azerbaijan, that lasted from June to August 1993.[110]

Civil wars

See also: Post-Soviet conflicts

Civil wars unrelated to separatist movements have occurred twice in the region:

Colour revolutions

Since 2003, a number of (largely) peaceful "colour revolutions" have happened in some post-Soviet states after disputed elections, with popular protests bringing into power the former opposition.

Russian population in post-Soviet states

Main articles: Russians in Ukraine, Russians in Kazakhstan, Russians in Latvia, Russians in Estonia, Russians in Lithuania, Russians in Georgia, Russians in Armenia, and Russians in Moldova

There is a significant Russophone population in most of the post-Soviet states, whose political position as an ethnic minority varies from country to country.[111] While Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, in addition to Russia, have kept Russian as an official language, the language lost its status in other post-Soviet states after the end of the Soviet Union. It maintains semi-official status in all CIS member states, because it is the organisation's official working language, but in the three Baltic states, the Russian language is not recognized in any official capacity. Georgia, since its departure from the CIS in 2009, has begun operating its government almost exclusively in the Georgian language.

Religion

While the Soviet system placed severe restrictions on religious intellectual life, traditions continued to survive. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Islamic movements have emerged alongside ethnic and secular ones. Vitaly Naumkin gives the following assessment: "Throughout the time of change, Islam has served as a symbol of identity, a force for mobilization, and a pressure for democracy. This is one of the few social disasters that the church has survived, in which it was not the cause. But if successful politically, it faces economic challenges beyond its grasp."[112]

The Central Asian states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) plus Azerbaijan in the Southern Caucasus are Muslim, except for their dwindling Russian and other European minorities. The Baltic countries are historically Western Christian (Protestant and Roman Catholic), which adds another layer of pro-Western orientation to those countries, although the majority of what has been the traditionally Protestant population there (in Estonia and northern Latvia) is now relatively irreligious. The dominant religion in the other former Soviet countries (Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine) is Eastern Orthodox Christianity. In most countries, religiosity has increased since the Soviet collapse.

LGBT rights

Main article: LGBT rights in the Post-Soviet states

LGBT people may encounter difficulties not shared by non-LGBT residents. In Transnistria homosexuality is illegal. In some other regions, such as Russia and Ukraine, homosexual actions are legal, but there is still discrimination and bias towards the gay community.

Environment

The Soviet Union inherited environmental problems from the pre-Revolutionary era that it blamed on the failings and evils of capitalism.[113] The Soviet Union promoted environmental sentiments; it had a constitutional clause on environmental protection and promoted the idea that, by ending capitalism, environmental problems would cease to arise.[113][114] Some environmental strides were made, such as the banning of lead-based paint and leaded gasoline in the 20th century.[114] However, the prioritization of industrial production over environmental protection meant that many environmental issues were left to post-Soviet institutions, particularly air and water pollution in the Northern regions where industrialism was heaviest.[115] The Northern countries of Central Europe, including Poland, East Germany, and Czechoslovakia formed what is referred to as the "black triangle" due to their heavy use of brown coal for energy.[115] Environmental degradation in the former Soviet Union is attributed to rapid industrialization and a lack of institutions that were able to curb pollution levels.[116] Many republics of the Soviet Union experienced soil degradation due to collective farming[115] In the 1970s, a Soviet study revealed vast technological inefficiencies in the USSR: compared to the West, the USSR created double the amount of pollutants for each product produced, and quadruple the amount of pollution for each car.[113] The Soviet regime also withheld information regarding the environmental problems facing them, and when these problems became evident to the public, authorities continued to attribute them to capitalism.[113] The Chernobyl disaster was a turning point in which the Soviets had to take responsibility for a huge environmental disaster amid pressures to disclose information regarding its causes and consequences, and this led to a broader discussion about the state of the environment as well as to concerns about nuclear energy.[113] As general unrest grew in the final years of the Soviet Union, the public began to demand environmental reform as part of their resistance to Communism. Many citizens wanted to capitalize on the political turnover to achieve an environmentalist agenda.[117] There was a push away from coal and towards cleaner forms of energy in the 1980s,[115] and 1986–1987 saw the first wave of environmental protests.[113] Village Prose literature by authors such as Valentin Rasputin fostered an environmentalist sentiment.[113] The Soviet "Green Front" was a populist environmental movement that had five subgroups: the Social-Ecological Union which promoted environmental solutions based in ecological practice, the Ecological Union which advocated for greater monitoring of pollution, the Ecological Foundation that sought to create funds through pollution taxes, the Ecological Society of the Soviet Union that called for a return to the Russian way of life that was closely connected to nature, and the All-Union Movement of Greens which was a culminating body of the four preceding groups.[113] Russian oil-drilling and the military were among the things they took issue with.[113] Critics of the Green Front opposed their effects on the chemical industry and claimed that it led to reduced commercial product availability of items such as soap, which was in very short supply in the late 1980s, and restricted access to pharmaceutical goods.[113]

It was expected that the transition to post-Soviet society would bring about environmental change from both democratic governments and NGOs, but the dissolution of the Soviet Union had both positive and negative effects on the environment. Transition brought about numerous changes that had both positive and negative environmental effects. The abandonment of croplands following dissolution of the Soviet Union led to the creation of carbon sinks.[118] Industrial activity drastically decreased, which reduced air pollution even as the economy took an upturn.[115] However, the introduction of a capitalist market caused new environmental problems: the increase in privately owned cars and the infrastructure changes to accommodate them, the increase in consumerism with no waste management to handle its byproducts, and the poorly planned construction of retail sites.[115][119] Environmental clean-up efforts by post-Soviet regimes included institutional changes through the creation of or reformation of environmental agencies, and legislative changes through the introduction of new environmental regulations and their enforcement.[115] However, some contend that the efficacy of these reforms was curtailed by economic troubles in the 1990s.[115] New environmental standards were sometimes used by governments to lower preexisting ones, and many of the post-Soviet initiatives have been criticized as "neoliberal" for their basis in free market principles and belief that the market would correct for environmental problems.[115] Technological innovation was generally directed towards "end-of-pipe" technologies, which deal with the clean-up of emissions and their byproducts rather than the reduction of emissions.[119]

Nongovernmental environmental organizations did not exist under the Soviet Union.[120] Rather, some republics had state and local institutions for environmental oversight where citizens could voice concerns, but open criticism of the state was prohibited.[120] Conservation brigades, otherwise known as druzhiny,[113] engaged in preservationist and recreational outdoor activities.[120] However, environmental damage and openings in political freedom in the 1980s led to greater grassroots activism.[120] The Chernobyl disaster of 1986, its cover-up by national, republic and local government officials, and its environmental and health effects spurred many to action.[120] General dissatisfaction with the socialist regime and a push for democratization took an environmental focus.[120] As Soviet citizens became more comfortable with the Gorbachev-era ideals of glasnost and perestroika in the late 20th century, environmentalists became more outspoken in their demands, and radical splinter groups formed in the late 1980s.[120] The opening of borders led to the spread of ideas and partnership with international environmental NGOs who were able to visit and converse with environmentalists of post-Soviet nations.[120] The conservation state institutions from the Soviet era continued to exist into the post-Soviet era but experienced difficulty getting funding due to their connection with the socialist regime in national memory.[120] New environmental NGOs had challenges receiving funding as well as organizing, and the NGOs that survived were not as influential on national decision-making as the state.[120][117] Many NGOs expressed disappointment with the lack of substantial environmental change during times of political transformation.[119] It has also been contended that environmental issues are of little importance to Russian citizens today.[117] Many former-Soviet citizens abandoned their earlier interest in the environment after the achievement of independence, while continued demands for environmental reform were suppressed.

Russia

 
Nizhnehopersky Nature Park

Russia has an expansive amount of land which contains a high amount of natural resources and biodiversity. Protected natural areas, or zapovedniki, were created under the Soviet Union.[121] Soviet leaders attributed former pollution and environmental degradation in Russia to private enterprise and capitalism.[121] However, environmental problems arose in Russia under the Soviets because industrialization was favored over environmentalism, and there was little discussion on how to properly use resources and they were depreciated.[121] The task of environmental governance was distributed among 15 different ministries.[121] There is controversy among academics as to whether environmental destruction under the Soviet Union can be attributed more to Marxist ideology or to the industrialization push.[121]

In 1988, the Central Committee and the USSR Council of Ministers formed the USSR Union Republic State Committee for Environmental Control, or the Goskompriroda.[113][121] The intention of this institution was resource management and environmental testing and oversight.[113] Eventually, however, the Goskompriroda was accused of holding "entrepreneurial interests," particularly related to nuclear power.[113] The 1990s saw experiments in taxing pollution of various forms, though this was largely ineffective due to the low charge levels and inflation, as well as more areas of protected land, but there was difficulty overseeing these areas due to small budgets.[121] In 1991, the Federal Act on the Protection of the Natural Environment was passed in the independent Russian Federation, and the Goskompriroda became the Ministry of the Environment, or the Minpriroda, and developed sustainable development goals.[113][121] In 1996, Yeltsin demoted the Ministry of the Environment to the State Committee on Environmental Protection, and in 2000 Putin ended the State Committee on Environmental Protection and the Federal Forestry Service and tasked the Ministry of Natural Resources with their responsibilities.[121] In 2001, to the ire of many environmental advocates, Russia passed a law that allowed the acceptance, treatment, and storage of nuclear fuel from other nations for profit.[121] The Environmental Doctrine was passed in 2002, the Water Code was passed in 2006, and the Forest Code was passed in 2007, though these policies have been critiqued for the difficulty in enforcing them.[121] Today, Russia has a low population density with most citizens gathered in the cities, so environmental degradation is concentrated in certain areas.[121] Putin is criticized by environmental advocates for prioritizing economic gain over environmental protection, and there are high levels of greenhouse gas emissions and frequent oil spills.[121]

Ukraine

Ukraine is made up of a diverse landscape consisting of plains, temperate forest, and mountains, five densely populated cities, and agricultural land that makes up 70% of the country.[122] Ukraine heavily increased industrial and agricultural production in the Soviet period, which had negative effects on the environment, as did the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.[122] Many of these issues have not been addressed post-independence due to lack of funding. Since independence, Ukraine has experienced a decrease in agricultural and industrial productivity and an increase in diseases, birth abnormalities, and child mortality, claimed to have been caused at least in part from the Chernobyl disaster and from polluted water and air.[122] The number of cars in Ukraine has increased post-independence.[122] Sewage waste has increased, but there has been no increase in wastewater treatment facilities to accommodate it, diverting the waste into natural bodies of water; the Black and Azov seas have been polluted by wastewater, though this occurs less with the reduction of industry; agricultural runoff has led to decreased fish populations, particularly in the Azov Sea.[122] The damming of the Dnipro for hydroelectric power caused flooding in local and residential areas, though the river has been recovering from contamination caused by the Chernobyl disaster.[122] Radioactive waste remains from the Chernobyl accident, the uranium industry, mining, and industrial processing.[122] There are numerous environmental agencies in Ukraine. In 1991, the Ukrainian Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP) was formed. It manages the environment and its resources, but it has experienced decreased funding and staff since 1996.[122] There is also the Ministry for Forestry, the State Committee on Geology and Natural Resource Use, the State Committee on Water Management, the State Committee on Land Use, the Health Ministry, the Road Traffic Inspectorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the State Committee on Hydrometeorology. Environmental education was also introduced into the school curriculum in the 1990s by the Ministry of Education.[122] Zelenyi svit, or "Green World," was a successful Ukrainian environmental organization whose mission was to hold the Ukrainian government accountable for their environmental failings, particularly the Chernobyl disaster, and to protect the Azov Sea through preventing construction of the Danube-Dnieper Canal.[113]

Central Asia

Proper water resource management is a significant environmental concern in the post-Soviet nations of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and the Karakalpakstan region, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan.[123] Central Asia has an arid climate with hot summers and cold winters.[123] Once within the USSR, the Aral Sea Basin now crosses the geopolitical boundaries of these independent nations. Along with the Aral Sea Basin, Central Asia nations also extract freshwater from the Syr Darya, Amu Darya, and Zeravshan rivers.[123] These rivers receive the snowmelt of surrounding mountains.[123]
Following the fall of the Soviet Union, the newly independent states kept their Soviet-era internal administrative structure but were unpracticed in cross-national natural resource management.[123] This has led to conflict regarding proper water allocation to meet the agricultural, industrial, and consumer demands of these nations.[123] Water quality degradation, diversion, and withdrawal has led to increased insecurity and conflict.[123]

Most of the water is used for irrigation of agriculture, with Uzbekistan the largest user of agricultural water.[123] Uzbekistan has double the population of its fellow nations and uses 3/5 of regional water supplies.[123] Together, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan use twice the amount of water for industrial activities used by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.[123]

The Interstate Coordinating Commission for Water Resources was formed in 1991 to allocate water from the Syr Darya and Amu Darya but has had difficulty distributing water fairly among nations due to limited funding and physical infrastructure.[123] This has led to conflict between the states.

To alleviate the stress on water resources in Central Asia, international organizations looking at the situation have advocated for creation of a river basin commission to represent each nation, equitably distribute water, and peacefully resolve conflicts.[123] It has also been suggested that each nation take responsibility by limiting its downstream environmental effects through reducing agricultural runoff, informing fellow nations of proposed actions which may impact water quality and supply, and sharing data regarding these natural water sources.[123]

Baltic states

The three Baltic countries — Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania — were de facto part of the Soviet Union after WWII until they restored independence in 1991. Afterwards, they have had difficulty acquiring fuels and meeting their energy needs.[124] For this reason, they were reliant on Russian oil, and did not have the capacity to acquire fuel from other producers, which had led to frequent fuel shortages.[124] Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania primarily used fossil fuels for energy including imported gas, oil, and petroleum products.[124] The Baltic states used fuels with high amounts of sulfur and pollutants, which has had a negative effect on the environment. Power plants constructed in the Baltic states under the USSR were inefficient, as they were designed to power the entire northwestern region of Soviet territory.[124] During this time, environmental monitoring and regulation were controlled at the local level, but the Baltic states had little influence over the state-managed industrial activities in their area.[124]

Concern for the environment fueled a desire for independence from the USSR.[124] Since declaring independence, the energy consumption of the Baltic states has declined due to a decrease in industrial activity, and each nation has created its own environmental oversight body: the Ministry of Environment in Estonia, the Environmental Protection Committee in Latvia, and the Environmental Protection Department in Latvia, all of which were under the legislative branch but independent from executive government.[124] Air pollution was high in the Baltic states due to the high sulfur and other pollutants emitted from their fuel sources. Water pollution was also considerable due to agricultural and industrial activity, as well as the legacy of Soviet military installations.[124] Emission charges were enacted in the Baltic states to reduce pollution levels.[124]

Estonia

Northeastern Estonia and the Narva region in particular was the site of an oil-shale industry which provided electricity and heat.[124] Estonia was the only nation to have ever had an oil-shale based energy system.[124] Mining for oil-shale caused Estonia to have the highest amounts of pollution in the Baltic states.[124] Surrounding nations pressured Estonia to reduce its emissions, but a lack of desulfurization equipment has forced Estonia to instead lower its energy production, which has hurt the nation economically.[124] Water pollution has also been considered among the worst of Estonia's environmental problems because it does not have the infrastructure to effectively treat as much sewage as is created.[124]

Latvia

Latvia produces the least amount of power and pollution and has the highest amount of forest damage of all the Baltic states.[124]

Lithuania

Lithuania is the largest producer of electricity of all three Baltic states.[124] Lithuania's land area is roughly 31% forested and is both state and privately owned.[125] Under the USSR, forest and other natural resources were state-owned and centrally managed.[125] The State determined how resources would be used and excluded the public from influencing forest policy.[125] The transition to a post-Soviet political and economic system led to privatization of forests and a market economy.[125] Today, Lithuania's forests are managed democratically and sustainably so as to preserve biodiversity and forest resources.[125]

Health

Post-Soviet nostalgia

See also: Nostalgia for the Soviet Union and Communist nostalgia
 
People in Donetsk celebrate the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany on 9 May 2018

Ever since the dissolution of the Soviet Union a certain number of people (predominantly people around the age of ~ 55–80, which is most likely due to the USSR's peak performance in the time of Brezhnev) have expressed a longing for the Soviet period and its values. The level of post-Soviet nostalgia varies across the former republics. For example, certain groups of people may blend the Soviet and post-Soviet experience in their daily lives.[clarification needed][126]

A 2009 Pew Research Center poll showed that 62% of Ukrainians felt that their lives were worse off after 1989, when free markets were made dominant.[127] A follow-up poll by Pew Research Center in 2011 showed that 45% of Lithuanians, 42% of Russians, and 34% of Ukrainians approved of the change to a post-Soviet market economy.[128]

According to July 2012 polling in Ukraine by RATING, 42% of respondents supported the formation of a unified state of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus; earlier in 2012 this support had been 48%.[129]

A 2016 poll of Russian citizens conducted by Levada Center showed that the majority viewed the collapse of the USSR negatively and felt that it could have been avoided, and an even greater number would openly welcome a revival of the Soviet system.[citation needed] A 2018 poll showed that 66% of Russians regretted the collapse of the USSR, setting a 15-year record. The majority were people older than 55.[130][131] A 2019 poll found that 59% of Russians felt that the Soviet government "took care of ordinary people". Joseph Stalin's favorability also hit record highs that same year.[132]

Characteristics of regionalization

 
Regional categorization of post-Soviet states:
  Central Asia
  Eastern Europe
  Baltic states
  Russian Federation
  South Caucasus

Various regional structures have emerged in the post-Soviet geography, which is fragmented in political and geopolitical terms. The first of these was the Independent State Society (CIS), which included former Soviet countries outside the Baltic countries. The failure of the CIS to meet the foreign policy needs of many post-Soviet countries has set the stage for a new regional integration. At the initiative of Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova, a GUAM organization was established in Strasbourg on 10 October 1997.[133] The purpose and principles of the organization were determined at the first summit of GUAM on 7 June 2001 in Yalta. The countries participating in the GUAM aimed to maintain their national independence and sovereignty and to increase their maneuverability against Russia.[134]

See also

References

  1. ^ . harvard.edu. 30 October 1997. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  2. ^ On Legal Succession of Ukraine, Articles 7 and 8.
  3. ^ "Про правонаступництво України". Zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  4. ^ "Раздел СССР. РФ обсудит нулевой вариант долгов СССР, если Украина компенсирует $20 млрд долга‏". Korrespondent.net.
  5. ^ Van Elsuwege, Peter (2008). From Soviet Republics to Eu Member States: A Legal and Political Assessment of the Baltic States' Accession to the EU. Studies in EU External Relations. Vol. 1. BRILL. p. xxii. ISBN 9789004169456.
  6. ^ Smith, David James (2001). Estonia. Routledge. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-415-26728-1.
  7. ^ Lane, David (December 2007). "Post-Communist States and the European Union". Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. 23 (4): 461–477. doi:10.1080/13523270701674558. ISSN 1352-3279.
  8. ^ Moga, Teodor Lucian; Alexeev, Denis (2013). "Post-Soviet States Between Russia and the EU: Reviving Geopolitical Competition? A Dual Perspective" (PDF). Connections. 13 (1): 41–52. doi:10.11610/Connections.13.1.03. JSTOR 26326349 – via JSTOR.
  9. ^ Jozwiak, Rikard (5 April 2019). "EU, Ex-Soviet Republics To Extend Partnership Beyond 2020". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  10. ^ Danilova, Maria; Dahlburg, John-Thor (17 March 2014). "Crimea declares independence". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  11. ^ a b William Safire (22 May 1994). "ON LANGUAGE; The Near Abroad". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 April 2008.
  12. ^ Robert Kagan (6 February 2008). "New Europe, Old Russia". The Washington Post. Retrieved 18 April 2008.
  13. ^ a b Steven Erlanger (25 February 2001). "The World; Learning to Fear Putin's Gaze". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 April 2008.
  14. ^ a b c Area includes land and water.
  15. ^ Population data as of February 1, 2014.
  16. ^ . Archived from the original on 1 August 2013. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  17. ^ Population data as of 2015.
  18. ^ "Official estimate". Stat.kg. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  19. ^ a b c d e Population data as of January 1, 2014.
  20. ^ . 6 March 2012. Archived from the original on 6 March 2012.
  21. ^ Population data as of July 1, 2013.
  22. ^ UN estimate
  23. ^ "Государственный комитет Республики Узбекистан по статистике - Демографические данные". Archived from the original on 23 July 2014.
  24. ^ Population data as of July 1, 2014.
  25. ^ . 29 July 2014. Archived from the original on 29 July 2014.
  26. ^ Population data as of January 1, 2017.
  27. ^ Statistică, Biroul Naţional de. "// Populaţia și procesele demografice". statistica.gov.md.
  28. ^ The Russian Federation technically achieved de facto independence from the Soviet Union after ratifying the Belavezha Accords. After the Almaty Protocol, the RF took over the Soviet Union's UN membership.
  29. ^ Population data as of January 1, 2018.
  30. ^ . Gks.ru. Archived from the original (XLS) on 17 March 2018. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  31. ^ Includes the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, claimed by Ukraine.
  32. ^ Population data as of April 1, 2014.
  33. ^ "Population as of April 1, 2014. Average annual populations January-March 2014". Ukrstat.gov.ua.
  34. ^ Population data as of January 1, 2015.
  35. ^ . Stat.ee. Archived from the original on 23 November 2012. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  36. ^ . 28 June 2013. Archived from the original on 28 June 2013.
  37. ^ . 19 August 2010. Archived from the original on 19 August 2010.
  38. ^ Population data as of 2012.
  39. ^ "Feedback / Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia". Armstat.am. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  40. ^ Population data as of December 31, 2013.
  41. ^ Samadov, Anar. "2013-cü ildə ölkənin iqtisadi və sosial inkişafının makroiqtisadi göstəriciləri". Stat.gov.az. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  42. ^ "საქართველოს სტატისტიკის ეროვნული სამსახური". Geostat.ge.
  43. ^ Frank Lorimer. "The Population of the Soviet Union : History and Prospects" (PDF). Marxists.org. Retrieved 5 March 2022.
  44. ^ a b Holds both presidency and executive powers as the Prime Minister of Turkmenistan role was abolished.
  45. ^ Transition: The First Ten Years – Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, The World Bank, Washington, DC, 2002, p. 4.
  46. ^ GDP decline: transition and Great Depression compared, Kalikova and Associates Law Firm, Kyrgyzstan. Retrieved 13 January 2009.
  47. ^ Study Finds Poverty Deepening in Former Communist Countries, New York Times, 12 October 2000
  48. ^ Scheidel, Walter (2017). The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton University Press. p. 222. ISBN 978-0691165028.
  49. ^ . University of Oxford. 2009. Archived from the original on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 28 June 2015.
  50. ^ Privatisation 'raised death rate'. BBC, 15 January 2009. Retrieved 19 November 2014.
  51. ^ Rosefielde, Steven (2001). "Premature Deaths: Russia's Radical Economic Transition in Soviet Perspective". Europe-Asia Studies. 53 (8): 1159–1176. doi:10.1080/09668130120093174. S2CID 145733112.
  52. ^ Armenia-World Bank. Armenia. (n.d.). Retrieved December 9, 2022, from http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00504/WEB/OTHER/85256C-4.HTM
  53. ^ . 9 May 2006. Archived from the original on 9 May 2006.
  54. ^ Ghodsee, Kristen (2017). Red Hangover: Legacies of Twentieth-Century Communism. Duke University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0822369493.
  55. ^ Milanović, Branko (2015). "After the Wall Fell: The Poor Balance Sheet of the Transition to Capitalism". Challenge. 58 (2): 135–138. doi:10.1080/05775132.2015.1012402. S2CID 153398717.
  56. ^ Ghodsee, Kristen; Orenstein, Mitchell A. (2021). Taking Stock of Shock: Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions. Oxford University Press. p. 184. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197549230.001.0001. ISBN 978-0197549247. Ghodsee, who had conducted much of her research in the Balkans or East Germany among women and ethnic minorities, believed that Milanović's findings were essentially correct but were most likely underestimating the negative impacts of transition by focusing only on GDP, inequality, and democratic consolidation. Orenstein, on the other hand, whose early career was spent conducting research on the transition process in Poland and the Czech Republic, believed that Milanović's findings were overly pessimistic. Poland had done spectacularly well and living standards had increased in many countries.
  57. ^ Vértesy, László (2017). "Constitutional Bases of Public Finances in the Central and Eastern European Countries". 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference: Innovation Governance in the Public Sector. Rochester, NY. SSRN 3157175.
  58. ^ "GDP growth (annual %)". worldbank.org. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  59. ^ "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". Imf.org.
  60. ^ "Human Development Report 2021-22: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives: Shaping our Future in a Transforming World" (PDF). Hdr.undp.org. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  61. ^ a b Ratification status of CIS documents as of 15 January 2008 30 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine (Russian).
  62. ^ Turkmenistan reduces CIS ties to "Associate Member", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 29 August 2005.
  63. ^ Georgian parliament votes to withdraw from CIS on BBC News, 14 August 2008.
  64. ^ Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia on Georgia's withdrawal from CIS 3 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine, 18 August 2008.
  65. ^ CIS Charter, 22 January 1993 (unofficial English translation).
  66. ^ "Ukraine Says It Could Quit Russia-Led Bloc". Reuters. Reuters. 19 March 2014. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  67. ^ RFE/RL (19 October 2011). "Most CIS Countries Sign Up To Free-Trade Zone". RFE/RL. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  68. ^ Sputnik (10 November 2005). . rian.ru. Archived from the original on 1 May 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  69. ^ Sputnik (12 November 2008). . rian.ru. Archived from the original on 25 June 2013. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  70. ^ RIA Novosti report, 6 July 2010, "Customs Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan to become fully operational" 27 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 22 December 2010
  71. ^ RIA Novosti report, 26 November 2010, "Ukraine eyes customs union with Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus" 24 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved 22 December 2010
  72. ^ "Gagauzia Voters Reject Closer EU Ties For Moldova". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  73. ^ a b Ukraine cannot get observer status at Eurasian Econ Union due to Association Agreement with EU, Russia, Interfax-Ukraine (14 June 2013)
  74. ^ Barron, Lisa (1 October 2013). "Belarus eases current account deficit with Customs Union, Common Economic Space". Cistran Finance. Retrieved 25 October 2013.
  75. ^ . Tut.By (in Russian). 17 November 2011. Archived from the original on 9 October 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2011.
  76. ^ . Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2015.
  77. ^ Дмитрий. . customs-code.ru. Archived from the original on 25 December 2014. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  78. ^ "Finalization of ratification procedures on Armenia's accession to EAEU to be declared in Moscow today". Public Radio of Armenia. Retrieved 9 December 2022.
  79. ^ "Kyrgyzstan, Armenia officially enter Eurasian Economic Union". World Bulletin. 24 December 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2014. Signed agreement opens up new possibilities for Kyrgyzstan and Armenia, starting from 1st January 2015
  80. ^ "Putin said the accession of Kyrgyzstan to the EAEC" (in Russian). Life News. 23 December 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2014. Kyrgyzstan is among the member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEC). Kyrgyzstan will participate in the governing bodies of the EAEC since the start of the Union – from 1 January 2015.
  81. ^ "EAEC: stillborn union?" (in Russian). Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 26 December 2014. Eurasian Economic Union added December 23 Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.
  82. ^ Farchy, Jack (23 December 2014). "Eurasian unity under strain even as bloc expands". The Financial Times. Retrieved 26 December 2014. Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday a signed a treaty to join the Eurasian Economic Union, expanding the membership of Moscow-led project to five even as its unity is strained by the market turmoil gripping Russia.
  83. ^ "Eurasian Economic Union to Launch on January 1". The Trumpet. 24 December 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2014. Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan agreed to a January 1 inauguration.
  84. ^ "Uzbekistan Suspends Its Membership in CSTO". The Gazette of Central Asia. 29 June 2012. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  85. ^ Kizilov, Yevhen (8 June 2017). "Рада зробила пріоритетом для України вступ до НАТО" [Verkhovna Rada made joining NATO a priority for Ukraine]. Ukrayinska Pravda (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  86. ^ "Poroshenko: EU, NATO membership remains Ukraine's strategic goal, not prospect of 2018". UNIAN. 6 January 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  87. ^ "Regional organisations in the post-Soviet space" (PDF). Europarl1.europa.eu. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  88. ^ "2020 World Press Freedom Index | Reporters Without Borders". Rsf.org. Retrieved 12 June 2021.
  89. ^ "Managed leadership succession in Kazakhstan: A model for gradual departure?". Fiia.fi (in Finnish). 16 March 2020. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  90. ^ Higgins, Andrew (2 April 2018). "As Authoritarianism Spreads, Uzbekistan Goes the Other Way". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  91. ^ "Kyrgyzstan: between democratisation and authoritarianism". Gis-reseau-asie.org. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  92. ^ agencies, Staff and (21 December 2006). "The personality cult of Turkmenbashi". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  93. ^ Sattarov, Rafael. "Turkmen Leader's Personality Cult Goes Viral". Carnegie.ru. Retrieved 10 August 2021.
  94. ^ . Archived from the original on 12 March 2005. Retrieved 5 April 2005.
  95. ^ "National Construction, Territorial Separatism and Post-Soviet Geopolitics: The Example of the Transdniester Moldovan Republic" (PDF). Colorado.edu. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  96. ^ "Trans-Dniester profile". BBC News. 26 December 2011.
  97. ^ "Regions and territories: Nagorno-Karabakh". BBC News. 10 January 2012.
  98. ^ "Regions and territories: South Ossetia". BBC News. 25 April 2012.
  99. ^ "Regions and territories: Abkhazia". BBC News. 12 March 2012.
  100. ^ Chinn, Jeff; Roper, Steven (1998). "Territorial autonomy in Gagauzia". Nationalities Papers. 26 (1): 87–101. doi:10.1080/00905999808408552. S2CID 154359743. But on 19 August 1990, the Gagauz elite, led by President Stepan Topal and Supreme Soviet Chairperson Mihail Kendighelean, quickly took the next step, declaring Gagauzia to be independent of Moldova and subject only to central Soviet authority
  101. ^ Neukirch, Claus. (PDF). European Centre for Minority Issues. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 October 2014. Retrieved 9 October 2014. On 12 November 1989, a "Gagauz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic" was proclaimed by an assembly in Comrat ... In reaction to the Moldovan declaration of sovereignty, on 19 August 1990 the Gagauz leadership proclaimed a "Gagauz Soviet Socialist Republic", which would be independent from Moldova, but part of the Soviet Union ... on 23 December 1994 the Moldovan Parliament passed the "Law on the Special Juridical Status of Gagauzia (Gagauz-Yeri)" {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  102. ^ Zabarah, Dareg (2012). "Opportunity structures and group building processes: An institutional analysis of the secession processes in Pridnestrovie and Gagauzia between 1989 and 1991". Soviet and Communist Studies. 45 (1–2). According to the first point of its declaration, the Gagauz Republic "is a sovereign, socialist, soviet and multinational state
  103. ^ Herszenhorn, David; Kramer, Andrew (19 March 2014). "Ukraine Plans to Withdraw Troops From Russia-Occupied Crimea". New York Times. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
  104. ^ Kristina Zakurdaeva; Mikhail Maglov (3 December 2019). "The Crimea Circumvention: How EU Firms Are Sidestepping Sanctions And Making Money On The Peninsula". Current Time TV. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  105. ^ Carl Schreck (26 February 2019). "From 'Not Us' To 'Why Hide It?': How Russia Denied Its Crimea Invasion, Then Admitted It". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  106. ^ . The Daily Telegraph. 17 April 2014. Archived from the original on 17 April 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2014.
  107. ^ "Russian Special Forces Storm Crimea Base". Sky News. 23 March 2014. Retrieved 13 August 2014.
  108. ^ "Ukraine PM rejects Crimea referendum, vows to defend country". CBC News. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
  109. ^ "Regions and territories: Chechnya". BBC News. 22 November 2011.
  110. ^ "Azerbaijan in a stir over political prisoner". News.bbc.co.uk. 6 February 2003. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  111. ^ Robert Greenall, Russians left behind in Central Asia, BBC News, 23 November 2005.
  112. ^ Naumkin, Vitaly (November 1992). "Islam in the States of the Former USSR". Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 524: 131–142. doi:10.1177/0002716292524001011. S2CID 145812443.
  113. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Bowers, Stephen (1993). (PDF). Faculty Publications and Presentations (Liberty University). S2CID 41347149. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 December 2018.
  114. ^ a b Thomas, Valerie M.; Orlova, Anna O. (2001). "Soviet and Post-Soviet Environmental Management: Lessons from a Case Study on Lead Pollution". Ambio. 30 (2): 104–111. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-30.2.104. JSTOR 4315114. PMID 11374307. S2CID 27761136.
  115. ^ a b c d e f g h i Pavlínek, Petr; Pickles, John (2004). "Environmental Pasts/Environmental Futures in Post-Socialist Europe". Environmental Politics. 13: 237–265. doi:10.1080/09644010410001685227. S2CID 155024373.
  116. ^ Wernstedt, Kris (July 2002). "Environmental Protection in the Russian Federation: Lessons and Opportunities". Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 45 (4): 493–516. doi:10.1080/09640560220143521. ISSN 0964-0568. S2CID 154142478.
  117. ^ a b c Coumel, Laurent; Elie, Marc (1 January 2013). "A Belated and Tragic Ecological Revolution: Nature, Disasters, and Green Activists in the Soviet Union and the Post-Soviet States, 1960s–2010s*". The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review. 40 (2): 157–165. doi:10.1163/18763324-04002005. ISSN 1075-1262.
  118. ^ Schierhorn, Florian; Müller, Daniel; Beringer, Tim; Prishchepov, Alexander V.; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Balmann, Alfons (1 December 2013). "Post-Soviet cropland abandonment and carbon sequestration in European Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 27 (4): 1175–1185. Bibcode:2013GBioC..27.1175S. doi:10.1002/2013GB004654. ISSN 1944-9224. S2CID 53637765.
  119. ^ a b c Pavlínek, Petr; Pickles, John (1999). "Environmental Change and Post-Communist Transformations in the Czech Republic and Slovakia". Post-Soviet Geography and Economics. 40 (5): 354–382. doi:10.1080/10889388.1999.10641120.
  120. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Carmin, Joann; Fagan, Adam (2010). "Environmental mobilisation and organisations in post-socialist Europe and the former Soviet Union". Environmental Politics. 19 (5): 689–707. doi:10.1080/09644016.2010.508300. S2CID 144224257.
  121. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Henry, Laura A.; Douhovnikoff, Vladimir (November 2008). "Environmental Issues in Russia". Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 33 (1): 437–460. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.33.051007.082437. ISSN 1543-5938.
  122. ^ a b c d e f g h i Nazarov, Nikolai; Cook, Hadrian F.; Woodgate, Graham (September 2001). "Environmental issues in the post-communist Ukraine". Journal of Environmental Management. 63 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0460. ISSN 0301-4797. PMID 11591031.
  123. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Smith, David R. (June 1995). "Environmental Security and Shared Water Resources in Post-Soviet Central Asia". Post-Soviet Geography. 36 (6): 351–370. doi:10.1080/10605851.1995.10640997. ISSN 1060-5851.
  124. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Salay, Jürgen; Fenhann, Jörgen; Jaanimägi, Karl; Kristoferson, Lars (1 November 1993). "Energy and Environment in the Baltic States". Annual Review of Energy and the Environment. 18 (1): 169–216. doi:10.1146/annurev.eg.18.110193.001125. ISSN 1056-3466.
  125. ^ a b c d e Lazdinis, Imantas; Angelstam, Per; Lazdinis, Marius (1 July 2007). "Maintenance of Forest Biodiversity in a Post-Soviet Governance Model: Perceptions by Local Actors in Lithuania". Environmental Management. 40 (1): 20–33. Bibcode:2007EnMan..40...20L. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0387-8. ISSN 1432-1009. PMID 17464529. S2CID 21279014.
  126. ^ See: Kaprans, M. (2009) Then and now: Comparing the Soviet and Post-Soviet experience in Latvian autobiographies 14 September 2010 at the Wayback MachineKeywords 2.
  127. ^ "End of Communism Cheered but Now with More Reservations". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. 2 November 2009. from the original on 19 May 2018. Retrieved 14 May 2018.
  128. ^ "Confidence in Democracy and Capitalism Wanes in Former Soviet Union". Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. 5 December 2011. from the original on 20 May 2018. Retrieved 14 May 2018.
  129. ^ The language question, the results of recent research in 2012, RATING (25 May 2012)
  130. ^ "Ностальгия по СССР". levada.ru. 19 December 2018.
  131. ^ Maza, Christina (19 December 2018). "Russia vs. Ukraine: More Russians Want the Soviet Union and Communism Back Amid Continued Tensions". Newsweek. Retrieved 21 December 2018.
  132. ^ "Most Russians Say Soviet Union 'Took Care of Ordinary People' – Poll". The Moscow Times. 24 June 2019. Retrieved 5 July 2019.
  133. ^ Papava, V. (2008). "On The Role of The 'Caucasian Tandem' in GUAM" (PDF). Central Asia and the Caucasus. S2CID 55012247.
  134. ^ "Promoting Geopolitical Pluralism in the CIS: GUAM and Western Foreign Policy" (PDF). Taraskuzio.com. Retrieved 21 February 2022.

Further reading

  • "Geopolitical and Economic Significance of Central Eurasia: Indian Perspective". Kundu, Nivedita Das. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal; New Delhi Vol. 5, Iss. 3, (Jul–Sep 2010): 324–337.

External links

  • Candid photos of the Eastern Bloc September–December 1991, in the last months of the USSR
  • from the
  • from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives
  • Discovering The Centuries-Old State Tradition, professor Pål Kolstø, University of Oslo
  • Former Soviet war zones |The hazards of a long, hard freeze, The Economist, 19 August 2004
  • , The Seattle Times, 20 August 2006
  • Are Independence Referendums First Step Toward Kremlin's 'Historical Revanchism'?, Radio Free Europe, 15 September 2006

January 16, 2023
post, soviet, states, post, soviet, states, also, known, former, soviet, union, former, soviet, republics, russia, near, abroad, russian, ближнее, зарубежье, romanized, blizhneye, zarubezhye, sovereign, states, that, were, union, republics, soviet, union, whic. The post Soviet states also known as the former Soviet Union FSU 1 the former Soviet Republics and in Russia as the near abroad Russian blizhnee zarubezhe romanized blizhneye zarubezhye are the 15 sovereign states that were union republics of the Soviet Union which emerged and re emerged from the Soviet Union following its dissolution in 1991 Post Soviet states in English alphabetical order 1 Armenia 2 Azerbaijan 3 Belarus 4 Estonia 5 Georgia 6 Kazakhstan 7 Kyrgyzstan 8 Latvia 9 Lithuania 10 Moldova 11 Russia 12 Tajikistan 13 Turkmenistan 14 Ukraine 15 Uzbekistan Russia is the primary de facto internationally recognized successor state to the Soviet Union after the Cold War while Ukraine has by law proclaimed that it is a state successor of both the Ukrainian SSR and the Soviet Union which remained under dispute over formerly Soviet owned properties 2 3 4 The three Baltic states Estonia Latvia and Lithuania were the first to declare their independence from the USSR between March and May 1990 claiming continuity from the original states that existed prior to their annexation by the Soviet Union in 1940 5 6 The remaining 12 republics all subsequently seceded all 12 of which joined the Commonwealth of Independent States CIS and most of the 12 joining the Collective Security Treaty Organization CSTO In contrast the Baltic states focused on European Union EU and NATO membership 7 EU officials have stressed the importance of Association Agreements between the EU and post Soviet states 8 9 Several disputed states with varying degrees of recognition exist within the territory of the former Soviet Union Transnistria in eastern Moldova Abkhazia and South Ossetia in northern Georgia and Artsakh in southwestern Azerbaijan Since 2014 the Donetsk People s Republic and Luhansk People s Republic in far eastern Ukraine have claimed independence All of these unrecognized states except Artsakh depend on Russian armed support and financial aid Artsakh is integrated to Armenia at a de facto level which also maintains close cooperation with Russia Prior to its annexation to Russia in March 2014 which is not recognized by most countries Crimea briefly declared itself an independent state 10 In the political language of Russia and some other post Soviet states the term near abroad Russian blizhnee zarubezhe blizhnee zarubezhe refers to the independent republics that emerged after the dissolution of the Soviet Union Increasing usage of the term in English is connected to assertions of Russia s right to maintain significant influence in the region 11 12 13 Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared the region to be a component of Russia s sphere of influence and strategically vital to Russian interests 13 The concept has been compared to the Monroe Doctrine 11 Contents 1 Country comparison 1 1 Current leaders 1 1 1 Heads of state 1 1 2 Heads of government 2 Economy 3 Developmental progress 4 Regional organizations 4 1 Commonwealth of Independent States 4 2 Eurasian Economic Community 4 3 Customs Union of Belarus Kazakhstan and Russia 4 4 Eurasian Economic Union 4 5 Collective Security Treaty Organization 4 6 North Atlantic Treaty Organization 4 7 GUAM 4 8 Union State 5 Other regional organizations 5 1 Economic Cooperation Organization 5 2 Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations 5 3 Community of Democratic Choice 5 4 Shanghai Cooperation Organisation 5 5 Economic cooperation organizations 5 6 Political integration and security alliances 5 6 1 Organizations in other domains 5 7 Other organizations 6 Politics 6 1 Separatist conflicts 6 1 1 Current self declared states 6 1 2 Former self declared states 6 2 Civil wars 6 3 Colour revolutions 6 4 Russian population in post Soviet states 6 5 Religion 6 6 LGBT rights 6 7 Environment 6 7 1 Russia 6 7 2 Ukraine 6 7 3 Central Asia 6 7 4 Baltic states 6 7 4 1 Estonia 6 7 4 2 Latvia 6 7 4 3 Lithuania 7 Health 8 Post Soviet nostalgia 9 Characteristics of regionalization 10 See also 11 References 12 Further reading 13 External linksCountry comparison EditThe 15 states may be divided into four subregions Not included in these categories are the several de facto independent states presently lacking international recognition read below Separatist conflicts Subregion Country Symbols Capital Form ofgovernment Independence Area 14 Population Ethnic majority percent Density NotesCoat of arms Flag km2 mi2 1989 now p km2 p mi2Central Asia Kazakhstan Republic of Kazakhstan Astana Unitary dominant partypresidential republic December 16 1991 2 724 900 1 052 090 19 000 336 39 7 69 6 7 18 15 16 Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyz Republic Bishkek Unitary presidentialrepublic August 31 1991 199 945 77 199 6 663 000 52 4 73 8 33 85 17 18 Tajikistan Republic of Tajikistan Dushanbe Unitary presidentialrepublic under a dictatorship September 9 1991 143 100 55 251 9 504 000 62 3 84 3 64 166 19 20 Turkmenistan formerly the Republic of Turkmenistan Ashgabat Unitary presidentialrepublic under a hereditarydictatorship October 27 1991 491 210 189 657 6 118 000 72 0 85 6 11 28 21 22 Uzbekistan Republic of Uzbekistan Tashkent Unitary presidentialrepublic August 31 1991 444 103 171 469 35 064 893 71 4 84 4 76 197 19 23 Total Central Asia 4 003 258 1 545 667 76 350 229 59 6 79 5 38 2 99Eastern Europe Belarus Republic of Belarus Minsk Unitary presidentialrepublic under a dictatorship December 10 1991 207 600 80 155 9 349 645 77 9 84 9 46 119 24 25 Moldova Republic of Moldova Chișinău Unitary parliamentaryrepublic August 27 1991 33 843 13 067 2 597 100 64 5 75 1 79 205 26 27 Russia Russian Federation Moscow Federal semi presidentialrepublic December 12 1991 17 098 242 6 601 668 146 171 015 81 5 77 7 9 23 28 29 30 31 Ukraine Kyiv Unitary semi presidentialrepublic August 24 1991 603 700 233 090 41 383 182 72 7 77 5 72 186 32 33 Total Eastern Europe 17 943 385 6 927 980 199 500 942 74 2 78 8 51 5 133Baltics Estonia Republic of Estonia Tallinn Unitary parliamentaryrepublic May 8 1990 45 339 17 505 1 330 068 61 5 69 4 29 75 34 35 Latvia Republic of Latvia Riga Unitary parliamentaryrepublic May 4 1990 64 562 24 928 1 882 200 52 0 63 0 30 78 19 36 Lithuania Republic of Lithuania Vilnius Unitary semi presidentialrepublic March 11 1990 65 300 25 212 2 786 006 79 6 84 6 43 111 19 37 Total Baltic states 175 201 67 645 5 998 274 64 4 72 0 34 88South Caucasus Armenia Republic of Armenia Yerevan Unitary parliamentaryrepublic September 21 1991 29 743 11 484 2 963 300 93 3 98 1 100 259 38 39 Azerbaijan Republic of Azerbaijan Baku Unitary semi presidentialrepublic under a hereditarydictatorship August 30 1991 86 600 33 436 10 139 196 82 7 91 6 115 298 40 41 Georgia formerly the Republic of Georgia Tbilisi Unitary parliamentaryrepublic April 9 1991 69 700 26 911 3 728 573 70 1 86 8 53 137 19 42 Total South Caucasus 186 043 71 832 16 831 069 82 0 92 2 89 3 231Total former Soviet Union 22 307 815 8 613 096 296 582 638 50 6 44 5 9 23 43 Current leaders Edit Heads of state Edit ArmeniaVahagn KhachaturyanPresident of Armenia AzerbaijanIlham AliyevPresident of Azerbaijan BelarusAlexander LukashenkoPresident of Belarus EstoniaAlar KarisPresident of Estonia GeorgiaSalome ZourabichviliPresident of Georgia KazakhstanKassym Jomart TokayevPresident of Kazakhstan KyrgyzstanSadyr JaparovPresident of Kyrgyzstan LatviaEgils LevitsPresident of Latvia LithuaniaGitanas NausedaPresident of Lithuania MoldovaMaia SanduPresident of Moldova RussiaVladimir PutinPresident of Russia TajikistanEmomali RahmonPresident of Tajikistan TurkmenistanSerdar BerdimuhamedowPresident of Turkmenistan 44 UkraineVolodymyr ZelenskyyPresident of Ukraine UzbekistanShavkat MirziyoyevPresident of UzbekistanHeads of government Edit ArmeniaNikol PashinyanPrime Minister of Armenia AzerbaijanAli AsadovPrime Minister of Azerbaijan BelarusRoman GolovchenkoPrime Minister of Belarus EstoniaKaja KallasPrime Minister of Estonia GeorgiaIrakli GaribashviliPrime Minister of Georgia KazakhstanAlihan SmaiylovPrime Minister of Kazakhstan KyrgyzstanAkylbek DzaparovChairman of the Cabinet of Ministers of Kyrgyzstan LatviaKrisjanis KarinsPrime Minister of Latvia LithuaniaIngrida SimonytePrime Minister of Lithuania MoldovaNatalia GavrilițaPrime Minister of Moldova RussiaMikhail MishustinPrime Minister of Russia TajikistanKokhir RasulzodaPrime Minister of Tajikistan TurkmenistanSerdar BerdimuhamedowPresident of Turkmenistan 44 UkraineDenys ShmyhalPrime Minister of Ukraine UzbekistanAbdulla AripovPrime Minister of UzbekistanEconomy EditThe dissolution of the Soviet Union took place as a result and against the backdrop of general economic stagnation even regression As the Gosplan which had set up production chains to cross SSR lines broke down the inter republic economic connections were also disrupted leading to even more serious breakdown of the post Soviet economies Most of the formerly Soviet states began the transition to a market economy from a command economy in 1990 1991 and made efforts to rebuild and restructure their economic systems with varying results In all the process triggered severe economic declines with gross domestic product GDP dropping by more than 40 overall between 1990 and 1995 45 This decline in GDP was much more intense than the 27 decline that the United States suffered in the wake of the Great Depression between 1930 and 1934 46 The reconfiguration of public finance in compliance with capitalist principles resulted in dramatically reduced spending on health education and other social programs leading to a sharp increase in poverty and economic inequality 47 48 The economic shocks associated with wholesale privatization resulted in the excess deaths of roughly 1 million working age individuals throughout the former Soviet bloc in the 1990s 49 50 A study by economist Steven Rosefielde asserts that 3 4 million Russians died premature deaths from 1990 to 1998 partly as the result of shock therapy imposed by the Washington Consensus 51 The initial transition decline was eventually arrested by the cumulative effect of market reforms and after 1995 the economy in the post Soviet states began to recover with GDP switching from negative to positive growth rates A good example could be considered Armenia as its government worked on the stabilization of the economy between 1994 1995 and succeeded in decreasing the inflation rate of the country from 4 to 2 digits by 1996 52 By 2007 10 of the 15 post Soviet states had recovered and reached GDP greater than what they had in 1991 53 According to economist Branko Milanovic in 2015 many former Soviet Republics and Warsaw Pact countries still have not caught up to their levels of output during the twilight of the Soviet era including Bosnia Herzegovina Georgia Kyrgyzstan Moldova Serbia Tajikistan and Ukraine He concluded that only 1 out of 10 people living in transition countries have seen a successful transition to capitalism and more democracy 54 55 Commenting on Milanovic s report in 2021 Kristen Ghodsee says this view is essentially correct and perhaps underestimates the negative impacts of transition by focusing only on GDP inequality and democratic consolidation whereas Mitchell A Orenstein says this view is overly pessimistic and notes that living standards had increased in many countries 56 The economic changes were in harmony with the constitutional reforms while provisions on public finances can be identified and in some countries a separate chapter deals with public finances Most of the constitutions define directly or indirectly the economic system of the countries parallel to the democratic transition of the 1990s free market economy which sometimes complemented with the social or socially and ecologically oriented attribute economic development or only the economic rights are included as a ground for the economy In the case of fiscal policy the legislative the executive and other state organs Budget Council Economic and Social Council define and manage the budgeting The average government debt in the countries is nearly 44 but the deviation is great because the lowest figure is close to 10 but the highest is 97 The trend shows that the sovereign debt ratio to GDP in most of the countries has been rising The constitutional background for taxation is similar The contribution to cover the finances for common needs is declared the principle of just tax burden sharing is supplemented sometimes with special aspects Tax revenues expose typically 15 19 of the GDP and rates above 20 only rarely can be found The state audit of the government budget and expenditures is an essential control element in public finances and an important part of the concept of checks and balances The central banks are independent state institutions which possess the monopoly on managing and implementing a state s or federation s monetary policy Besides monetary policy some of them even perform the supervision of the financial intermediary system In the case of price stability function the inflation rate in the examined area relatively quickly dropped to below 5 by 2000 The majority of the constitutions determine the national currency legal tender or monetary unit The local currency exchange rate to U S dollar shows that drastic interventions were not necessary National wealth or assets are the property of the state and or the local governments and as an exclusive property the management and protection of them aim at serving the public interest 57 Change in gross domestic product GDP in constant prices 1991 2015 58 Country 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2015 2021 Turnaround year Central AsiaKazakhstan 100 69 3 88 5 141 4 185 7 219 0 252 3 1996Kyrgyzstan 100 58 9 76 1 89 6 114 4 133 9 154 5 1996Tajikistan 100 34 1 45 2 56 0 98 1 124 5 189 5 1997Turkmenistan 100 68 4 107 7 215 5 351 8 515 5 1998Uzbekistan 100 82 9 102 6 137 5 208 4 281 2 363 6 1996Eastern EuropeBelarus 100 67 9 94 0 141 5 192 5 193 9 206 0 1996Moldova 100 45 2 45 0 62 5 74 5 83 2 104 6 1997Russia 100 63 1 74 5 103 3 118 3 119 8 135 2 1997Ukraine 100 47 2 51 8 73 7 75 9 63 4 68 8 2000Baltic statesEstonia 100 Latvia 100 67 8 92 9 143 1 130 1 145 8 165 3 1993Lithuania 100 64 6 81 5 119 8 123 9 139 6 173 2 1995South CaucasusArmenia 100 63 3 84 2 154 7 172 5 202 6 244 2 1994Azerbaijan 100 42 7 65 2 150 2 241 1 276 5 269 6 1996Georgia 100 39 8 49 8 74 1 93 2 109 3 136 0 1995 Economy of most Soviet republics started to decline in 1989 1990 thus indices for 1991 do not match pre reform maximums The year when GDP decline switched to GDP growth List of the present gross domestic product GDP figures are given in 2021 United States dollars for the year 2021 according to the IMF 59 No Country Nominal billions USD Nominalper capita USD PPP billions USD PPPper capita USD 1 Armenia 12 4 125 42 14 1802 Azerbaijan 50 4 883 150 15 0803 Belarus 61 6 487 189 19 9404 Estonia 35 26 470 51 38 5405 Georgia 16 4 361 58 15 6306 Kazakhstan 188 9 828 509 27 2907 Kyrgyzstan 7 1 123 35 5 5208 Latvia 38 19 824 61 32 0109 Lithuania 62 22 245 107 38 59010 Moldova 12 4 638 36 13 44011 Russia 1 710 11 654 4 140 28 18012 Tajikistan 8 810 33 3 54013 Turkmenistan 54 9 032 96 16 43014 Ukraine 164 3 984 561 13 44015 Uzbekistan 61 1 775 245 7 370Developmental progress EditThe post Soviet states listed according to their Human Development Index scores in 2021 60 Very High Human Development Estonia 0 890 Lithuania 0 875 Latvia 0 863 Russia 0 822 Kazakhstan 0 811 Belarus 0 808 Georgia 0 802High Human Development Ukraine 0 773 Moldova 0 767 Armenia 0 759 Azerbaijan 0 745 Turkmenistan 0 745 Uzbekistan 0 727Medium Human Development Kyrgyzstan 0 692 Tajikistan 0 685Regional organizations Edit An Euler diagram showing the relationships among various supranational organisations in the territory of the former Soviet Unionv d e CIS members States that joined EU NATO and OECD Other EU or NATO members A number of regional organizations and cooperating blocs have sprung up since the dissolution of the Soviet Union Only organizations that are mainly or completely composed of post Soviet states are listed in this section organizations with wider memberships are not discussed The 15 post Soviet states are divided in their participation to the regional blocs Belarus Russia and Ukraine founded the Commonwealth of Independent States CIS in December 1991 It was conceived as a successor organization to the USSR and in December 1993 it included 12 of the 15 former Soviet republics except the three Baltic states 61 It currently consists of nine of the 15 former Soviet republics with one associate state Turkmenistan Georgia withdrew from the CIS in August 2008 while Ukraine stopped participating from the CIS in May 2018 The three Baltic states have not sought membership in any of these post Soviet organizations seeking and achieving membership in the European Union and NATO instead although their electricity and rail systems remain closely connected with former Soviet organizations The sole exception to the above has been their recent membership in the Community of Democratic Choice The Central Asian states of Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan and Uzbekistan as well as Belarus are members of the CIS and participate in several regional organizations that have Russia as a primary mover Such organizations are the Eurasian Economic Community later merged with Eurasian Economic Union which Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are not members of Collective Security Treaty Organization and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation The last two groups only became distinct once Uzbekistan withdrew from GUAM and sought membership in EurAsEc and CSTO which it subsequently withdrew from in 2008 and 2012 respectively Armenia besides its membership in CIS participates in Collective Security Treaty Organization and the Eurasian Economic Union Moldova and Azerbaijan participate in the CIS but other than that they mostly cooperate within regional organizations that are not dominated by Russia Such organizations are GUAM and the Community of Democratic Choice Although Ukraine is one of the three founding countries of the CIS it is legally not a member because it has never ratified the 1993 CIS Charter 61 Turkmenistan is an associate member of CIS having withdrawn from full membership in August 2005 62 and a member in the Economic Cooperation Organization it has not sought closer integration in any of the other Western or post Soviet organizations In 2008 Georgia notified the CIS executive bodies of its decision to leave the regional organization 63 64 and according to the CIS Charter sec 1 art 9 this decision went into force 12 months after the notification date 65 Commonwealth of Independent States Edit Main article Commonwealth of Independent States The Commonwealth of Independent States CIS consists of 10 former Soviet Republics that differ in their membership status As of December 2010 9 countries have ratified the CIS charter and are full CIS members Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Moldova Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russia Tajikistan Uzbekistan one country Turkmenistan is an associate member and two countries Georgia Ukraine left the organization in 2009 and in 2018 In 2014 Ukraine declined its CIS chairmanship and considered withdrawal from the organization 66 In 1994 the CIS countries agreed to create a free trade area but the agreements were never signed On 19 October 2011 Armenia Belarus Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Moldova Russia Tajikistan and Ukraine signed a free trade agreement 67 Uzbekistan joined the free trade area in 2013 citation needed Eurasian Economic Community Edit EAEC members GUAM members Other CIS members Main article Eurasian Economic Community The Eurasian Economic Community EURASEC formerly the CIS Customs Union was established by Russia Belarus Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan Ukraine and Moldova have observer status in the community however Ukraine has declared its desire not to become a full member state Because having common borders with the rest of the community is a prerequisite for full membership Moldova is barred from seeking it Uzbekistan applied for membership in October 2005 68 when the process of merging Central Asian Cooperation Organization and the Eurasian Economic Community began it joined on 25 January 2006 Uzbekistan subsequently suspended its membership in 2008 69 On 10 October 2014 an agreement on the termination of the Eurasian Economic Community was signed in Minsk after a session of the Interstate Council of the EAEC The Eurasian Economic Community was terminated from 1 January 2015 in connection with the launch of the Eurasian Economic Union citation needed Customs Union of Belarus Kazakhstan and Russia Edit Economical integration blocs in Post Soviet area EU EFTA CEFTA and Customs Union of Belarus Kazakhstan and Russia Main article Customs Union of Belarus Kazakhstan and Russia Russia Belarus Kazakhstan created a customs union that entered into force in July 2010 Ukraine Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan indicated interest in joining at the time 70 71 Russia has been eager for Armenia Moldova and Ukraine to join the custom union instead of the European Union and the Moldovan break away state of Transnistria has supported this In 2013 Kyrgyzstan and Armenia announced plans to seek membership but division over the issue in Ukraine led to the Revolution of Dignity after the Ukrainian government backed out of an EU Eastern Partnership in favor of the union In 2014 voters in the Moldovan autonomous region of Gagauzia rejected closer ties to the EU in favor of the union 72 On 1 January 2012 Russia Kazakhstan and Belarus established the Single Economic Space which ensures the effective functioning of a single market for goods services capital and labour and to establish coherent industrial transport energy and agricultural policies 73 74 The agreement included a roadmap for future integration and established the Eurasian Economic Commission modelled on the European Commission 75 The Eurasian Economic Commission serves as the regulatory agency for the Eurasian Customs Union the Single Economic Space and the Eurasian Economic Union 73 Eurasian Economic Union Edit EAEU members Acceding EAEU Members Other CIS Members Main articles Eurasian Union and Enlargement of the Eurasian Economic Union The Eurasian Economic Union is an economic union of post Soviet states The treaty aiming for the establishment of the EAEU was signed on 29 May 2014 by the leaders of Belarus Kazakhstan and Russia and came into force on 1 January 2015 76 Treaties aiming for Armenia s and Kyrgyzstan s accession to the Eurasian Economic Union were signed on 9 October 2014 and 23 December respectively Armenia s accession treaty came into force on 2 January 2015 77 Although Kyrgyzstan s accession treaty will not come into force until May 2015 provided it has been ratified 78 it will participate in the EAEU from the day of its establishment as an acceding state 79 80 81 82 83 Moldova and Tajikistan are prospective members citation needed Collective Security Treaty Organization Edit CSTO members GUAM members Other CIS members Main article Collective Security Treaty Organization Seven CIS member states namely Russia Belarus Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Uzbekistan and Armenia have enhanced their military cooperation establishing the Collective Security Treaty Organization CSTO this being an expansion of the previous Collective Security Treaty CST Uzbekistan which alongside Georgia and Azerbaijan withdrew from the CST in 1999 joined GUAM Then in 2005 it withdrew from GUAM and joined the CSTO in 2006 On 28 June 2012 Uzbekistan suspended its membership in the CSTO 84 North Atlantic Treaty Organization Edit Main article North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO CSTO Three former Soviet states are members of NATO Estonia Latvia and Lithuania Georgia where both public opinion and the ruling government favor NATO membership is in the Intensified Dialogue program with NATO Ukraine also declared joining NATO as its geopolitical goal once again in 2017 the first time being right after the Orange Revolution and in the beginning of presidency of Viktor Yushchenko after the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych during which the government officially declared neutrality and ceased to seek NATO membership 85 86 Other states in the Partnership for Peace and Individual Partnership Action Plan program include Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Moldova Russia Tajikistan Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan GUAM Edit Main article GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic Development Four member states namely Georgia Ukraine Azerbaijan and Moldova established the GUAM group that was largely seen as intending to counter Russian dominance in the region Notably these four nations do not participate in any of the other regional organizations that sprang up in the region since the dissolution of the Soviet Union other than the CIS Union State Edit Members of the Union CIS members who have shown interest in becoming members of the Union Other CIS members Main article Union State The Union State of Russia and Belarus was originally formed on 2 April 1996 under the name Commonwealth of Russia and Belarus before being tightened further on 8 December 1999 It was initiated by the president of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko On paper the Union of Russia and Belarus intends further integration beyond the scope of mere cooperation including the introduction of the rouble as a common currency Other regional organizations EditEconomic Cooperation Organization Edit Main article Economic Cooperation Organization Community of Democratic Choice Economic Cooperation Organization The Economic Cooperation Organization was originally formed in 1985 by Turkey Iran and Pakistan but in 1992 the organization was expanded to include Afghanistan and the six primarily Muslim former Soviet republics Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations Edit Main article Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations The post Soviet disputed states of Abkhazia Artsakh South Ossetia and Transnistria are all members of the Community for Democracy and Rights of Nations which aims to forge closer integration Community of Democratic Choice Edit Main article Community of Democratic Choice The Community of Democratic Choice CDC was formed in December 2005 at the primary instigation of Ukraine and Georgia and composed of six post Soviet states Ukraine Georgia Moldova Estonia Latvia and Lithuania and three other countries of Eastern and Central Europe Slovenia Romania and North Macedonia The Black Sea Forum BSF is a closely related organization Observer countries include Armenia Bulgaria and Poland Just like GUAM before it this forum is largely seen as intending to counteract Russian influence in the area This is the only international forum centered in the post Soviet space in which the Baltic countries also participate In addition the other three post Soviet states in it are all members of GUAM Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Edit Main article Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Member state Observer state Dialogue partner Applicants for observer status The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation SCO is composed of China and five post Soviet states namely Russia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan and Uzbekistan The organization was founded in 2001 though its predecessor the Shanghai Five grouping has existed since 1996 Its aims revolve around security related issues such as border demarcation terrorism and energy 87 Economic cooperation organizations Edit Central European Free Trade Agreement CEFTA with Moldova it includes also non post Soviet countries of the former Yugoslavia previously also included other Central European countries that left CEFTA when joining the European Union CEFTA plays a role in Central Europe similar to what European Free Trade Association EFTA provides in Western Europe for non EU members this alliance an economical organization with strong cooperation with the European Union for countries that do not want to participate in EurAsEC centered on Russia but that are seeking alliances to the West even if Moldova is the only CEFTA country that is still within a weakening CIS it no longer participates to the CSTO for most of the common security policy but cannot join the EU because of incompatibility with WEU stability rules and the unsolved problem of Transnistria but can still benefit from the Free Trade Area notably with Romania and Bulgaria in the EU Black Sea Economic Cooperation BSEC with Russia Georgia Ukraine Azerbaijan Moldova Turkey Albania Greece Romania Bulgaria Serbia and Armenia an economic organisation closely related to the SCO but more focused regionally to include also Armenia it also aims for the harmonious development of democracy for increasing the commerce in South East Europe and includes some EU members so it cannot be a regional free trade union The European Union EU with the three Baltic countries that were the first ones to declare independence from the former USSR have never joined CIS after the collapse of USSR it includes also now some post communist countries in Central Europe that have left CEFTA when entering the EU Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Bulgaria and Slovenia Political integration and security alliances Edit Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe SPforSEE with Moldova similar in structure to CEFTA but does not focus on economy but security for those countries that are not NATO members this organization largely cooperates with NATO and is related to the group of observers at Western European Union WEU The North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO for Estonia Latvia Lithuania Poland and Central European countries that have also joined the EU the EU membership includes also WEU membership because they follow the Common Foreign and Security Policy and European Security and Defence Policy policies shared now by the EU the WEU and all European NATO members The other remaining countries are those part of the former Yugoslavia but their recent conflict and political tensions still does not allow them to cooperate efficiently for their political integration and for their mutual security in addition they still do not have full sovereignty in this domain some of them are still under surveillance by EU or NATO as mandated by UNO They still need to find an internal stability and they can collaborate economically with the help of other organizations focusing on economy or political cooperation and development However a more limited cooperation for security is possible through their membership to the larger Organization for Security and Co operation in Europe OSCE The only exception is Belarus whose post soviet democratic transition did not occur that still rejects political integration and all security alliances with NATO OSCE WEU or other countries in Europe other than Russia which the process of reintegration of Belarus has been tightened in almost all domains Organizations in other domains Edit Southeast European Cooperation Process SEECP with Moldova similar to SPforSEE but focuses on political integration than cooperation for security and to CEFTA but does not focus on trade Southeast European Cooperative Initiative SECI with Moldova closely related to SEECP Central European Initiative CEI with Moldova Ukraine and Belarus and also Central and South Western European countries in the European Union it aims at helping Eastern European countries to reach the EU standards and cooperate politically and find a better economic development and a strong working but more democratic legal system it is the only regional organization where Belarus is still a member but the political cooperation with Belarus is almost stalled as it is the only country of the former Communist bloc country that balances in favor of stronger cooperation with Russia and against integration with EU and NATO however Belarus remains isolated and still does not cooperate too in the SCO group led by Russia and China Black Sea Forum for Partnership and Dialogue BSF with Georgia Ukraine Azerbaijan Moldova and Armenia also non post soviet countries that are NATO members interested in their maintaining political stability and avoiding conflicts in the region Romania Bulgaria and Turkey whose first two are also now EU and CEI members using EU rules for their political development however this organization does not focus on helping countries to join the EU but reaching common standards and good governance and internal stability and democracy like in the CEI citation needed Community for Democracy and Rights of NationsOther organizations Edit Apart from above the former Soviet republics also hold membership in a number of multinational organizations such as FIBA FIFA International Ice Hockey Federation International Olympic Committee International Paralympic Committee Kontinental Hockey League Belarus Kazakhstan Russia UNESCO World Health Organization World Trade OrganizationPolitics EditRegarding political freedom in the former Soviet republics Freedom House s 2021 report listed the following Estonia Latvia and Lithuania as free countries Armenia Georgia Moldova and Ukraine were listed as partly free Azerbaijan Belarus Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Russia Tajikistan Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan were listed as not free Similarly the Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders in 2022 recorded the following as regards press freedom 88 Estonia Good situation Latvia Lithuania Moldova Satisfactory situation Armenia Georgia Kyrgyzstan Ukraine Problematic situation Kazakhstan Tajikistan Uzbekistan Difficult situation Azerbaijan Belarus Russia Turkmenistan Very serious situation It has been remarked that several post Soviet states did not change leadership for decades since their independence such as Nursultan Nazarbayev in Kazakhstan until his surprise resignation in 2019 89 and Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan until his death in September 2016 90 All of these had originally more limited terms but through decrees or referendums prolonged their stay in office a practice also followed by Presidents Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus and Emomali Rahmon of Tajikistan Askar Akayev of Kyrgyzstan had likewise served as President since its independence until he was forced to resign as a result of the Kyrgyz revolution of 2005 91 Saparmurat Niyazov in Turkmenistan ruled from independence until his death in 2006 creating a personality cult around himself 92 His successor Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov has maintained a personality cult of his own that has replaced the worshipping of Niyazov 93 The issue of dynastical succession has been another element affecting the politics of some post Soviet States Heydar Aliyev after constructing an extensive and ongoing cult of personality handed the Presidency of Azerbaijan to his son Ilham Aliyev Theories about the children of other leaders in Central Asia being groomed for succession abound 94 The participation of Akayev s son and daughter in the 2005 Kyrgyz parliamentary elections boosted fears of dynastic succession being used in Kyrgyzstan as well and may have contributed to the anti Akayev climate that led to his overthrow Separatist conflicts Edit See also Post Soviet conflicts Economic political national military and social problems have all been factors in separatism in the post Soviet space In many cases problems due to factors such as ethnic divisions existed before the fall of the Soviet Union and upon the fall of the union were brought into the open 95 Such territories and resulting military conflicts have so far been Current self declared states Edit Region Country name Coat of arms Flag Capital Independence Recognition Area 14 Population Densitykm2 mi2 p km2 p mi2Eastern Europe Transnistria Transnistrian Moldavian Republic Tiraspol 25 August 1991 from Moldova Not recognised 4 163 1 607 306 000 73 5 190 4South Caucasus Artsakh Republic of Artsakh Stepanakert 10 December 1991 from Azerbaijan Not recognised 3 000 1 158 120 000 13 17 34 1South Ossetia Republic of South Ossetia the State of Alania Tskhinval 21 December 1991 from Georgia Limited 3 900 1 506 53 532 13 73 35 6Abkhazia Republic of Abkhazia Sukhumi 23 July 1992 from Georgia 8 660 3 344 254 246 29 36 76 0 Transnistria which is de facto independent from Moldova It declared independence in 1990 due to its majority Russian speaking population fearing union with Romania A ceasefire between Transnistrian forces and Moldovan forces has been in place since 1992 enforced by the presence of Russian forces in Transnistria 96 Republic of Artsakh which is de facto independent from Azerbaijan Ethnic conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis began in 1988 and expanded into a war which lasted until a ceasefire in 1994 Sporadic attempts at negotiating a final peace and sporadic bursts of violence have continued since then 97 South Ossetia which is de facto independent from Georgia The region declared its intent to seek independence in 1990 leading to a conflict which led to a ceasefire in 1992 Separatism became powerful after the election of Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili in 2004 and a referendum in 2006 was in favour of declaring independence The 2008 war between Georgian forces and the separatist and Russian forces led to Russia s recognition of South Ossetia s independence 98 Abkhazia which is de facto independent from Georgia Tensions in the area broke out when Georgia sent in troops in 1992 to control groups who wanted separation The troops and most of the Georgian and Mingrelian speaking population were forced out in 1993 and the region declared independence in 1999 The 2008 war between Georgian forces and the separatist and Russian forces led to Russia s recognition of Abkhazia s independence 99 Former self declared states Edit Region Country name Coat of arms Flag Capital Independence Fate Area 14 Population Densitykm2 mi2 p km2 p mi2Eastern Europe Gagauzia Gagauz Republic Comrat 19 August 1990 from SSR Moldova Reincorporated into Moldovaas an autonomy in 1994 1 848 714 134 132 72 58 188 0Crimea Republic of Crimea Simferopol 17 March 2014 from Ukraine Occupied by Russia after anillegal referendum on the next day 26 100 10 077 1 913 731 73 32 189 9Donetsk Donetsk People s Republic Donetsk 12 May 2014 from Ukraine Partly occupied by Russia after anillegal referendum in September 2022 7 853 3 032 2 302 444 293 19 759 4Luhansk Luhansk People s Republic Luhansk 12 May 2014 from Ukraine 8 377 3 234 1 464 039 174 77 452 7Central Asia Tatarstan Republic of Tatarstan Kazan 21 March 1992 from Russia Reincorporated into Russiaafter peaceful negotiations in 1994 68 000 26 255 3 786 488 55 68 144 2South Caucasus Chechnya Chechen Republic of Ichkeria Grozny 8 June 1991 from Russian SFSR Disestablished in 2000after the Second Chechen War 15 300 5 907 1 103 686 72 14 186 8Talysh Mughan Tolsh Mgonә Mohtarә Respublikә Lankaran June 1993 from Azerbaijan Reincorporated into Azerbaijan in August 1993 7 465 2 882 960 000 128 6 333 1 Gagauz Republic declared itself the Gagauz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic within Moldova on 12 November 1989 and the Gagauz Soviet Socialist Republic independent of Moldova but still within the Soviet Union on 19 August 1990 but was reintegrated into Moldova as an autonomous region on 23 December 1994 100 101 102 Tatarstan declared itself to be a sovereign state after a referendum on 21 March 1992 Negotiations with Russia led to the signing of a treaty in 1994 which ended Tatarstan s de facto independence but reserved significant autonomy for the Tatarstan government In 2002 a new constitution was enacted for Tatarstan which removed the prior constitution s declaration that Tatarstan was a sovereign state Republic of Crimea The entire Crimean Peninsula has been outside the control of Ukrainian authorities since late February 2014 when Russian special forces and pro Russian militias occupied the region 103 104 105 106 107 In March 2014 a popular referendum in favor of accession to Russia was held in Crimea and Sevastopol although Ukraine 108 and most of the international community refused to recognize the vote The next day the Republic of Crimea declared independence and within days Russia absorbed the peninsula Ukraine continues to claim Crimea as an integral part of its territory Chechen Republic of Ichkeria where Dzhokhar Dudayev declared independence from Russia in 1991 leading to a violent war between local separatist forces and the Russian army Russia first invaded in 1994 withdrawing after a deal for increased autonomy was granted in 1996 Tensions have continued in the years since then and the conflict has spilled over into neighbouring regions such as Dagestan Ingushetia and North Ossetia Alania Russia claims that the situation in Chechnya has normalised 109 Donetsk People s Republic and Luhansk People s Republic states which declared independence from Ukraine in 2014 The two breakaway states were recognized by Russia on 21 February 2022 followed by North Korea and Syria and they were subsequently annexed by Russia on 4 October of that year after a controversial referendum that were recognized as sham referendums Talysh Mughan declared autonomy within Azerbaijan that lasted from June to August 1993 110 Civil wars Edit See also Post Soviet conflicts Civil wars unrelated to separatist movements have occurred twice in the region The Georgian Civil War between the forces of Zviad Gamsakhurdia and Eduard Shevardnadze The war ended after Russian forces intervened in support of Shevardnadze s government which in turn agreed to join the Commonwealth of Independent States The Tajikistani Civil War that lasted between 1992 and 1997 Colour revolutions Edit Since 2003 a number of largely peaceful colour revolutions have happened in some post Soviet states after disputed elections with popular protests bringing into power the former opposition The Rose Revolution in Georgia leading to the resignation of Eduard Shevardnadze The Orange Revolution in Ukraine bringing into power Viktor Yushchenko and toppling the pro Russian leader Viktor Yanukovych The Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan leading to the resignation of Askar Akayev The Velvet Revolution in Armenia leading to the resignation of Serzh Sargsyan Russian population in post Soviet states Edit Main articles Russians in Ukraine Russians in Kazakhstan Russians in Latvia Russians in Estonia Russians in Lithuania Russians in Georgia Russians in Armenia and Russians in Moldova There is a significant Russophone population in most of the post Soviet states whose political position as an ethnic minority varies from country to country 111 While Belarus Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan in addition to Russia have kept Russian as an official language the language lost its status in other post Soviet states after the end of the Soviet Union It maintains semi official status in all CIS member states because it is the organisation s official working language but in the three Baltic states the Russian language is not recognized in any official capacity Georgia since its departure from the CIS in 2009 has begun operating its government almost exclusively in the Georgian language Religion Edit While the Soviet system placed severe restrictions on religious intellectual life traditions continued to survive After the dissolution of the Soviet Union Islamic movements have emerged alongside ethnic and secular ones Vitaly Naumkin gives the following assessment Throughout the time of change Islam has served as a symbol of identity a force for mobilization and a pressure for democracy This is one of the few social disasters that the church has survived in which it was not the cause But if successful politically it faces economic challenges beyond its grasp 112 The Central Asian states Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan plus Azerbaijan in the Southern Caucasus are Muslim except for their dwindling Russian and other European minorities The Baltic countries are historically Western Christian Protestant and Roman Catholic which adds another layer of pro Western orientation to those countries although the majority of what has been the traditionally Protestant population there in Estonia and northern Latvia is now relatively irreligious The dominant religion in the other former Soviet countries Armenia Belarus Georgia Moldova Russia and Ukraine is Eastern Orthodox Christianity In most countries religiosity has increased since the Soviet collapse LGBT rights Edit Main article LGBT rights in the Post Soviet statesLGBT people may encounter difficulties not shared by non LGBT residents In Transnistria homosexuality is illegal In some other regions such as Russia and Ukraine homosexual actions are legal but there is still discrimination and bias towards the gay community Environment Edit The Soviet Union inherited environmental problems from the pre Revolutionary era that it blamed on the failings and evils of capitalism 113 The Soviet Union promoted environmental sentiments it had a constitutional clause on environmental protection and promoted the idea that by ending capitalism environmental problems would cease to arise 113 114 Some environmental strides were made such as the banning of lead based paint and leaded gasoline in the 20th century 114 However the prioritization of industrial production over environmental protection meant that many environmental issues were left to post Soviet institutions particularly air and water pollution in the Northern regions where industrialism was heaviest 115 The Northern countries of Central Europe including Poland East Germany and Czechoslovakia formed what is referred to as the black triangle due to their heavy use of brown coal for energy 115 Environmental degradation in the former Soviet Union is attributed to rapid industrialization and a lack of institutions that were able to curb pollution levels 116 Many republics of the Soviet Union experienced soil degradation due to collective farming 115 In the 1970s a Soviet study revealed vast technological inefficiencies in the USSR compared to the West the USSR created double the amount of pollutants for each product produced and quadruple the amount of pollution for each car 113 The Soviet regime also withheld information regarding the environmental problems facing them and when these problems became evident to the public authorities continued to attribute them to capitalism 113 The Chernobyl disaster was a turning point in which the Soviets had to take responsibility for a huge environmental disaster amid pressures to disclose information regarding its causes and consequences and this led to a broader discussion about the state of the environment as well as to concerns about nuclear energy 113 As general unrest grew in the final years of the Soviet Union the public began to demand environmental reform as part of their resistance to Communism Many citizens wanted to capitalize on the political turnover to achieve an environmentalist agenda 117 There was a push away from coal and towards cleaner forms of energy in the 1980s 115 and 1986 1987 saw the first wave of environmental protests 113 Village Prose literature by authors such as Valentin Rasputin fostered an environmentalist sentiment 113 The Soviet Green Front was a populist environmental movement that had five subgroups the Social Ecological Union which promoted environmental solutions based in ecological practice the Ecological Union which advocated for greater monitoring of pollution the Ecological Foundation that sought to create funds through pollution taxes the Ecological Society of the Soviet Union that called for a return to the Russian way of life that was closely connected to nature and the All Union Movement of Greens which was a culminating body of the four preceding groups 113 Russian oil drilling and the military were among the things they took issue with 113 Critics of the Green Front opposed their effects on the chemical industry and claimed that it led to reduced commercial product availability of items such as soap which was in very short supply in the late 1980s and restricted access to pharmaceutical goods 113 It was expected that the transition to post Soviet society would bring about environmental change from both democratic governments and NGOs but the dissolution of the Soviet Union had both positive and negative effects on the environment Transition brought about numerous changes that had both positive and negative environmental effects The abandonment of croplands following dissolution of the Soviet Union led to the creation of carbon sinks 118 Industrial activity drastically decreased which reduced air pollution even as the economy took an upturn 115 However the introduction of a capitalist market caused new environmental problems the increase in privately owned cars and the infrastructure changes to accommodate them the increase in consumerism with no waste management to handle its byproducts and the poorly planned construction of retail sites 115 119 Environmental clean up efforts by post Soviet regimes included institutional changes through the creation of or reformation of environmental agencies and legislative changes through the introduction of new environmental regulations and their enforcement 115 However some contend that the efficacy of these reforms was curtailed by economic troubles in the 1990s 115 New environmental standards were sometimes used by governments to lower preexisting ones and many of the post Soviet initiatives have been criticized as neoliberal for their basis in free market principles and belief that the market would correct for environmental problems 115 Technological innovation was generally directed towards end of pipe technologies which deal with the clean up of emissions and their byproducts rather than the reduction of emissions 119 Nongovernmental environmental organizations did not exist under the Soviet Union 120 Rather some republics had state and local institutions for environmental oversight where citizens could voice concerns but open criticism of the state was prohibited 120 Conservation brigades otherwise known as druzhiny 113 engaged in preservationist and recreational outdoor activities 120 However environmental damage and openings in political freedom in the 1980s led to greater grassroots activism 120 The Chernobyl disaster of 1986 its cover up by national republic and local government officials and its environmental and health effects spurred many to action 120 General dissatisfaction with the socialist regime and a push for democratization took an environmental focus 120 As Soviet citizens became more comfortable with the Gorbachev era ideals of glasnost and perestroika in the late 20th century environmentalists became more outspoken in their demands and radical splinter groups formed in the late 1980s 120 The opening of borders led to the spread of ideas and partnership with international environmental NGOs who were able to visit and converse with environmentalists of post Soviet nations 120 The conservation state institutions from the Soviet era continued to exist into the post Soviet era but experienced difficulty getting funding due to their connection with the socialist regime in national memory 120 New environmental NGOs had challenges receiving funding as well as organizing and the NGOs that survived were not as influential on national decision making as the state 120 117 Many NGOs expressed disappointment with the lack of substantial environmental change during times of political transformation 119 It has also been contended that environmental issues are of little importance to Russian citizens today 117 Many former Soviet citizens abandoned their earlier interest in the environment after the achievement of independence while continued demands for environmental reform were suppressed Russia Edit Nizhnehopersky Nature Park Russia has an expansive amount of land which contains a high amount of natural resources and biodiversity Protected natural areas or zapovedniki were created under the Soviet Union 121 Soviet leaders attributed former pollution and environmental degradation in Russia to private enterprise and capitalism 121 However environmental problems arose in Russia under the Soviets because industrialization was favored over environmentalism and there was little discussion on how to properly use resources and they were depreciated 121 The task of environmental governance was distributed among 15 different ministries 121 There is controversy among academics as to whether environmental destruction under the Soviet Union can be attributed more to Marxist ideology or to the industrialization push 121 In 1988 the Central Committee and the USSR Council of Ministers formed the USSR Union Republic State Committee for Environmental Control or the Goskompriroda 113 121 The intention of this institution was resource management and environmental testing and oversight 113 Eventually however the Goskompriroda was accused of holding entrepreneurial interests particularly related to nuclear power 113 The 1990s saw experiments in taxing pollution of various forms though this was largely ineffective due to the low charge levels and inflation as well as more areas of protected land but there was difficulty overseeing these areas due to small budgets 121 In 1991 the Federal Act on the Protection of the Natural Environment was passed in the independent Russian Federation and the Goskompriroda became the Ministry of the Environment or the Minpriroda and developed sustainable development goals 113 121 In 1996 Yeltsin demoted the Ministry of the Environment to the State Committee on Environmental Protection and in 2000 Putin ended the State Committee on Environmental Protection and the Federal Forestry Service and tasked the Ministry of Natural Resources with their responsibilities 121 In 2001 to the ire of many environmental advocates Russia passed a law that allowed the acceptance treatment and storage of nuclear fuel from other nations for profit 121 The Environmental Doctrine was passed in 2002 the Water Code was passed in 2006 and the Forest Code was passed in 2007 though these policies have been critiqued for the difficulty in enforcing them 121 Today Russia has a low population density with most citizens gathered in the cities so environmental degradation is concentrated in certain areas 121 Putin is criticized by environmental advocates for prioritizing economic gain over environmental protection and there are high levels of greenhouse gas emissions and frequent oil spills 121 Ukraine Edit Ukraine is made up of a diverse landscape consisting of plains temperate forest and mountains five densely populated cities and agricultural land that makes up 70 of the country 122 Ukraine heavily increased industrial and agricultural production in the Soviet period which had negative effects on the environment as did the 1986 Chernobyl disaster 122 Many of these issues have not been addressed post independence due to lack of funding Since independence Ukraine has experienced a decrease in agricultural and industrial productivity and an increase in diseases birth abnormalities and child mortality claimed to have been caused at least in part from the Chernobyl disaster and from polluted water and air 122 The number of cars in Ukraine has increased post independence 122 Sewage waste has increased but there has been no increase in wastewater treatment facilities to accommodate it diverting the waste into natural bodies of water the Black and Azov seas have been polluted by wastewater though this occurs less with the reduction of industry agricultural runoff has led to decreased fish populations particularly in the Azov Sea 122 The damming of the Dnipro for hydroelectric power caused flooding in local and residential areas though the river has been recovering from contamination caused by the Chernobyl disaster 122 Radioactive waste remains from the Chernobyl accident the uranium industry mining and industrial processing 122 There are numerous environmental agencies in Ukraine In 1991 the Ukrainian Ministry of Environmental Protection MEP was formed It manages the environment and its resources but it has experienced decreased funding and staff since 1996 122 There is also the Ministry for Forestry the State Committee on Geology and Natural Resource Use the State Committee on Water Management the State Committee on Land Use the Health Ministry the Road Traffic Inspectorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the State Committee on Hydrometeorology Environmental education was also introduced into the school curriculum in the 1990s by the Ministry of Education 122 Zelenyi svit or Green World was a successful Ukrainian environmental organization whose mission was to hold the Ukrainian government accountable for their environmental failings particularly the Chernobyl disaster and to protect the Azov Sea through preventing construction of the Danube Dnieper Canal 113 Central Asia Edit Proper water resource management is a significant environmental concern in the post Soviet nations of Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan and the Karakalpakstan region Tajikistan and Turkmenistan 123 Central Asia has an arid climate with hot summers and cold winters 123 Once within the USSR the Aral Sea Basin now crosses the geopolitical boundaries of these independent nations Along with the Aral Sea Basin Central Asia nations also extract freshwater from the Syr Darya Amu Darya and Zeravshan rivers 123 These rivers receive the snowmelt of surrounding mountains 123 Following the fall of the Soviet Union the newly independent states kept their Soviet era internal administrative structure but were unpracticed in cross national natural resource management 123 This has led to conflict regarding proper water allocation to meet the agricultural industrial and consumer demands of these nations 123 Water quality degradation diversion and withdrawal has led to increased insecurity and conflict 123 Most of the water is used for irrigation of agriculture with Uzbekistan the largest user of agricultural water 123 Uzbekistan has double the population of its fellow nations and uses 3 5 of regional water supplies 123 Together Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan use twice the amount of water for industrial activities used by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan 123 The Interstate Coordinating Commission for Water Resources was formed in 1991 to allocate water from the Syr Darya and Amu Darya but has had difficulty distributing water fairly among nations due to limited funding and physical infrastructure 123 This has led to conflict between the states To alleviate the stress on water resources in Central Asia international organizations looking at the situation have advocated for creation of a river basin commission to represent each nation equitably distribute water and peacefully resolve conflicts 123 It has also been suggested that each nation take responsibility by limiting its downstream environmental effects through reducing agricultural runoff informing fellow nations of proposed actions which may impact water quality and supply and sharing data regarding these natural water sources 123 Baltic states Edit The three Baltic countries Estonia Latvia Lithuania were de facto part of the Soviet Union after WWII until they restored independence in 1991 Afterwards they have had difficulty acquiring fuels and meeting their energy needs 124 For this reason they were reliant on Russian oil and did not have the capacity to acquire fuel from other producers which had led to frequent fuel shortages 124 Estonia Latvia and Lithuania primarily used fossil fuels for energy including imported gas oil and petroleum products 124 The Baltic states used fuels with high amounts of sulfur and pollutants which has had a negative effect on the environment Power plants constructed in the Baltic states under the USSR were inefficient as they were designed to power the entire northwestern region of Soviet territory 124 During this time environmental monitoring and regulation were controlled at the local level but the Baltic states had little influence over the state managed industrial activities in their area 124 Concern for the environment fueled a desire for independence from the USSR 124 Since declaring independence the energy consumption of the Baltic states has declined due to a decrease in industrial activity and each nation has created its own environmental oversight body the Ministry of Environment in Estonia the Environmental Protection Committee in Latvia and the Environmental Protection Department in Latvia all of which were under the legislative branch but independent from executive government 124 Air pollution was high in the Baltic states due to the high sulfur and other pollutants emitted from their fuel sources Water pollution was also considerable due to agricultural and industrial activity as well as the legacy of Soviet military installations 124 Emission charges were enacted in the Baltic states to reduce pollution levels 124 Estonia Edit Northeastern Estonia and the Narva region in particular was the site of an oil shale industry which provided electricity and heat 124 Estonia was the only nation to have ever had an oil shale based energy system 124 Mining for oil shale caused Estonia to have the highest amounts of pollution in the Baltic states 124 Surrounding nations pressured Estonia to reduce its emissions but a lack of desulfurization equipment has forced Estonia to instead lower its energy production which has hurt the nation economically 124 Water pollution has also been considered among the worst of Estonia s environmental problems because it does not have the infrastructure to effectively treat as much sewage as is created 124 Latvia Edit Latvia produces the least amount of power and pollution and has the highest amount of forest damage of all the Baltic states 124 Lithuania Edit Lithuania is the largest producer of electricity of all three Baltic states 124 Lithuania s land area is roughly 31 forested and is both state and privately owned 125 Under the USSR forest and other natural resources were state owned and centrally managed 125 The State determined how resources would be used and excluded the public from influencing forest policy 125 The transition to a post Soviet political and economic system led to privatization of forests and a market economy 125 Today Lithuania s forests are managed democratically and sustainably so as to preserve biodiversity and forest resources 125 Health EditThis section is empty You can help by adding to it September 2020 Post Soviet nostalgia EditSee also Nostalgia for the Soviet Union and Communist nostalgia People in Donetsk celebrate the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany on 9 May 2018 Ever since the dissolution of the Soviet Union a certain number of people predominantly people around the age of 55 80 which is most likely due to the USSR s peak performance in the time of Brezhnev have expressed a longing for the Soviet period and its values The level of post Soviet nostalgia varies across the former republics For example certain groups of people may blend the Soviet and post Soviet experience in their daily lives clarification needed 126 A 2009 Pew Research Center poll showed that 62 of Ukrainians felt that their lives were worse off after 1989 when free markets were made dominant 127 A follow up poll by Pew Research Center in 2011 showed that 45 of Lithuanians 42 of Russians and 34 of Ukrainians approved of the change to a post Soviet market economy 128 According to July 2012 polling in Ukraine by RATING 42 of respondents supported the formation of a unified state of Ukraine Russia and Belarus earlier in 2012 this support had been 48 129 A 2016 poll of Russian citizens conducted by Levada Center showed that the majority viewed the collapse of the USSR negatively and felt that it could have been avoided and an even greater number would openly welcome a revival of the Soviet system citation needed A 2018 poll showed that 66 of Russians regretted the collapse of the USSR setting a 15 year record The majority were people older than 55 130 131 A 2019 poll found that 59 of Russians felt that the Soviet government took care of ordinary people Joseph Stalin s favorability also hit record highs that same year 132 Characteristics of regionalization Edit Regional categorization of post Soviet states Central Asia Eastern Europe Baltic states Russian Federation South Caucasus Various regional structures have emerged in the post Soviet geography which is fragmented in political and geopolitical terms The first of these was the Independent State Society CIS which included former Soviet countries outside the Baltic countries The failure of the CIS to meet the foreign policy needs of many post Soviet countries has set the stage for a new regional integration At the initiative of Georgia Ukraine Azerbaijan and Moldova a GUAM organization was established in Strasbourg on 10 October 1997 133 The purpose and principles of the organization were determined at the first summit of GUAM on 7 June 2001 in Yalta The countries participating in the GUAM aimed to maintain their national independence and sovereignty and to increase their maneuverability against Russia 134 See also EditSoviet Empire Border states Eastern Europe Russian world Russian irredentism Eastern Bloc Frozen conflict Operation Provide Hope Organization for Security and Co operation in Europe statistics Russification Russophilia Russophobia Second World Union of Sovereign States Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization Portals 1990s Geography Europe Asia HistoryReferences Edit Managing Conflict in the Former Soviet Union Russian and American Perspectives harvard edu 30 October 1997 Archived from the original on 3 March 2016 Retrieved 2 December 2015 On Legal Succession of Ukraine Articles 7 and 8 Pro pravonastupnictvo Ukrayini Zakon rada gov ua Retrieved 21 February 2022 Razdel SSSR RF obsudit nulevoj variant dolgov SSSR esli Ukraina kompensiruet 20 mlrd dolga Korrespondent net Van Elsuwege Peter 2008 From Soviet Republics to Eu Member States A Legal and Political Assessment of the Baltic States Accession to the EU Studies in EU External Relations Vol 1 BRILL p xxii ISBN 9789004169456 Smith David James 2001 Estonia Routledge p 20 ISBN 978 0 415 26728 1 Lane David December 2007 Post Communist States and the European Union Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23 4 461 477 doi 10 1080 13523270701674558 ISSN 1352 3279 Moga Teodor Lucian Alexeev Denis 2013 Post Soviet States Between Russia and the EU Reviving Geopolitical Competition A Dual Perspective PDF Connections 13 1 41 52 doi 10 11610 Connections 13 1 03 JSTOR 26326349 via JSTOR Jozwiak Rikard 5 April 2019 EU Ex Soviet Republics To Extend Partnership Beyond 2020 Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty Retrieved 10 August 2021 Danilova Maria Dahlburg John Thor 17 March 2014 Crimea declares independence The Boston Globe Associated Press Retrieved 10 August 2021 a b William Safire 22 May 1994 ON LANGUAGE The Near Abroad The New York Times Retrieved 18 April 2008 Robert Kagan 6 February 2008 New Europe Old Russia The Washington Post Retrieved 18 April 2008 a b Steven Erlanger 25 February 2001 The World Learning to Fear Putin s Gaze The New York Times Retrieved 18 April 2008 a b c Area includes land and water Population data as of February 1 2014 The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan Latest data Archived from the original on 1 August 2013 Retrieved 5 March 2022 Population data as of 2015 Official estimate Stat kg Retrieved 5 March 2022 a b c d e Population data as of January 1 2014 Statistical Agency under President of the Republic of Tajikistan 6 March 2012 Archived from the original on 6 March 2012 Population data as of July 1 2013 UN estimate Gosudarstvennyj komitet Respubliki Uzbekistan po statistike Demograficheskie dannye Archived from the original on 23 July 2014 Population data as of July 1 2014 Demographic situation in Half Year 2014 29 July 2014 Archived from the original on 29 July 2014 Population data as of January 1 2017 Statistică Biroul Naţional de Populaţia și procesele demografice statistica gov md The Russian Federation technically achieved de facto independence from the Soviet Union after ratifying the Belavezha Accords After the Almaty Protocol the RF took over the Soviet Union s UN membership Population data as of January 1 2018 Official estimate Gks ru Archived from the original XLS on 17 March 2018 Retrieved 5 March 2022 Includes the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol claimed by Ukraine Population data as of April 1 2014 Population as of April 1 2014 Average annual populations January March 2014 Ukrstat gov ua Population data as of January 1 2015 Official estimate Stat ee Archived from the original on 23 November 2012 Retrieved 5 March 2022 Population Key Indicators Latvijas statistika 28 June 2013 Archived from the original on 28 June 2013 Number of persons by month Database of Indicators data and statistics 19 August 2010 Archived from the original on 19 August 2010 Population data as of 2012 Feedback Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia Armstat am Retrieved 5 March 2022 Population data as of December 31 2013 Samadov Anar 2013 cu ilde olkenin iqtisadi ve sosial inkisafinin makroiqtisadi gostericileri Stat gov az Retrieved 5 March 2022 საქართველოს სტატისტიკის ეროვნული სამსახური Geostat ge Frank Lorimer The Population of the Soviet Union History and Prospects PDF Marxists org Retrieved 5 March 2022 a b Holds both presidency and executive powers as the Prime Minister of Turkmenistan role was abolished Transition The First Ten Years Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union The World Bank Washington DC 2002 p 4 GDP decline transition and Great Depression compared Kalikova and Associates Law Firm Kyrgyzstan Retrieved 13 January 2009 Study Finds Poverty Deepening in Former Communist Countries New York Times 12 October 2000 Scheidel Walter 2017 The Great Leveler Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty First Century Princeton University Press p 222 ISBN 978 0691165028 Death surge linked with mass privatisation University of Oxford 2009 Archived from the original on 2 July 2014 Retrieved 28 June 2015 Privatisation raised death rate BBC 15 January 2009 Retrieved 19 November 2014 Rosefielde Steven 2001 Premature Deaths Russia s Radical Economic Transition in Soviet Perspective Europe Asia Studies 53 8 1159 1176 doi 10 1080 09668130120093174 S2CID 145733112 Armenia World Bank Armenia n d Retrieved December 9 2022 from http web worldbank org archive website00504 WEB OTHER 85256C 4 HTM Edit Review Countries 9 May 2006 Archived from the original on 9 May 2006 Ghodsee Kristen 2017 Red Hangover Legacies of Twentieth Century Communism Duke University Press p 63 ISBN 978 0822369493 Milanovic Branko 2015 After the Wall Fell The Poor Balance Sheet of the Transition to Capitalism Challenge 58 2 135 138 doi 10 1080 05775132 2015 1012402 S2CID 153398717 Ghodsee Kristen Orenstein Mitchell A 2021 Taking Stock of Shock Social Consequences of the 1989 Revolutions Oxford University Press p 184 doi 10 1093 oso 9780197549230 001 0001 ISBN 978 0197549247 Ghodsee who had conducted much of her research in the Balkans or East Germany among women and ethnic minorities believed that Milanovic s findings were essentially correct but were most likely underestimating the negative impacts of transition by focusing only on GDP inequality and democratic consolidation Orenstein on the other hand whose early career was spent conducting research on the transition process in Poland and the Czech Republic believed that Milanovic s findings were overly pessimistic Poland had done spectacularly well and living standards had increased in many countries Vertesy Laszlo 2017 Constitutional Bases of Public Finances in the Central and Eastern European Countries 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference Innovation Governance in the Public Sector Rochester NY SSRN 3157175 GDP growth annual worldbank org Retrieved 2 December 2015 Report for Selected Countries and Subjects Imf org Human Development Report 2021 22 Uncertain Times Unsettled Lives Shaping our Future in a Transforming World PDF Hdr undp org United Nations Development Programme Retrieved 25 September 2022 a b Ratification status of CIS documents as of 15 January 2008 Archived 30 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine Russian Turkmenistan reduces CIS ties to Associate Member Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty 29 August 2005 Georgian parliament votes to withdraw from CIS on BBC News 14 August 2008 Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia on Georgia s withdrawal from CIS Archived 3 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine 18 August 2008 CIS Charter 22 January 1993 unofficial English translation Ukraine Says It Could Quit Russia Led Bloc Reuters Reuters 19 March 2014 Retrieved 14 January 2015 RFE RL 19 October 2011 Most CIS Countries Sign Up To Free Trade Zone RFE RL Retrieved 14 January 2015 Sputnik 10 November 2005 Working group discusses Uzbekistan s accession to EurAsEC rian ru Archived from the original on 1 May 2013 Retrieved 2 December 2015 Sputnik 12 November 2008 Uzbekistan suspends Eurasec membership Moscow unruffled rian ru Archived from the original on 25 June 2013 Retrieved 2 December 2015 RIA Novosti report 6 July 2010 Customs Union of Russia Belarus Kazakhstan to become fully operational Archived 27 September 2010 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 22 December 2010 RIA Novosti report 26 November 2010 Ukraine eyes customs union with Russia Kazakhstan Belarus Archived 24 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 22 December 2010 Gagauzia Voters Reject Closer EU Ties For Moldova RadioFreeEurope RadioLiberty Retrieved 2 December 2015 a b Ukraine cannot get observer status at Eurasian Econ Union due to Association Agreement with EU Russia Interfax Ukraine 14 June 2013 Barron Lisa 1 October 2013 Belarus eases current account deficit with Customs Union Common Economic Space Cistran Finance Retrieved 25 October 2013 Evrazijskie komissary poluchat status federalnyh ministrov Tut By in Russian 17 November 2011 Archived from the original on 9 October 2019 Retrieved 19 November 2011 Dogovor o Evrazijskom ekonomicheskom soyuze Archived from the original on 1 December 2017 Retrieved 13 January 2015 Dmitrij DOGOVOR O PRISOEDINENII RESPUBLIKI ARMENIYa K DOGOVORU O EVRAZIJSKOM EKONOMIChESKOM SOYuZE OT 29 MAYa 2014 GODA Minsk 10 oktyabrya 2014 goda customs code ru Archived from the original on 25 December 2014 Retrieved 2 December 2015 Finalization of ratification procedures on Armenia s accession to EAEU to be declared in Moscow today Public Radio of Armenia Retrieved 9 December 2022 Kyrgyzstan Armenia officially enter Eurasian Economic Union World Bulletin 24 December 2014 Retrieved 26 December 2014 Signed agreement opens up new possibilities for Kyrgyzstan and Armenia starting from 1st January 2015 Putin said the accession of Kyrgyzstan to the EAEC in Russian Life News 23 December 2014 Retrieved 26 December 2014 Kyrgyzstan is among the member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union EAEC Kyrgyzstan will participate in the governing bodies of the EAEC since the start of the Union from 1 January 2015 EAEC stillborn union in Russian Deutsche Welle Retrieved 26 December 2014 Eurasian Economic Union added December 23 Armenia and Kyrgyzstan Farchy Jack 23 December 2014 Eurasian unity under strain even as bloc expands The Financial Times Retrieved 26 December 2014 Kyrgyzstan on Tuesday a signed a treaty to join the Eurasian Economic Union expanding the membership of Moscow led project to five even as its unity is strained by the market turmoil gripping Russia Eurasian Economic Union to Launch on January 1 The Trumpet 24 December 2014 Retrieved 26 December 2014 Russia Belarus Kazakhstan Armenia and Kyrgyzstan agreed to a January 1 inauguration Uzbekistan Suspends Its Membership in CSTO The Gazette of Central Asia 29 June 2012 Retrieved 29 June 2012 Kizilov Yevhen 8 June 2017 Rada zrobila prioritetom dlya Ukrayini vstup do NATO Verkhovna Rada made joining NATO a priority for Ukraine Ukrayinska Pravda in Ukrainian Retrieved 14 February 2018 Poroshenko EU NATO membership remains Ukraine s strategic goal not prospect of 2018 UNIAN 6 January 2018 Retrieved 14 February 2018 Regional organisations in the post Soviet space PDF Europarl1 europa eu Retrieved 21 February 2022 2020 World Press Freedom Index Reporters Without Borders Rsf org Retrieved 12 June 2021 Managed leadership succession in Kazakhstan A model for gradual departure Fiia fi in Finnish 16 March 2020 Retrieved 10 August 2021 Higgins Andrew 2 April 2018 As Authoritarianism Spreads Uzbekistan Goes the Other Way The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved 10 August 2021 Kyrgyzstan between democratisation and authoritarianism Gis reseau asie org Retrieved 10 August 2021 agencies Staff and 21 December 2006 The personality cult of Turkmenbashi The Guardian Retrieved 10 August 2021 Sattarov Rafael Turkmen Leader s Personality Cult Goes Viral Carnegie ru Retrieved 10 August 2021 Kazakhstan flirts with dynastic succession Dariga Nazarbayeva has led a charmed life Kazakhstan s Democratic Forces Forum Archived from the original on 12 March 2005 Retrieved 5 April 2005 National Construction Territorial Separatism and Post Soviet Geopolitics The Example of the Transdniester Moldovan Republic PDF Colorado edu Retrieved 21 February 2022 Trans Dniester profile BBC News 26 December 2011 Regions and territories Nagorno Karabakh BBC News 10 January 2012 Regions and territories South Ossetia BBC News 25 April 2012 Regions and territories Abkhazia BBC News 12 March 2012 Chinn Jeff Roper Steven 1998 Territorial autonomy in Gagauzia Nationalities Papers 26 1 87 101 doi 10 1080 00905999808408552 S2CID 154359743 But on 19 August 1990 the Gagauz elite led by President Stepan Topal and Supreme Soviet Chairperson Mihail Kendighelean quickly took the next step declaring Gagauzia to be independent of Moldova and subject only to central Soviet authority Neukirch Claus Autonomy And Conflict Transformation The Case Of The Gagauz Territorial Autonomy In The Republic Of Moldova PDF European Centre for Minority Issues Archived from the original PDF on 14 October 2014 Retrieved 9 October 2014 On 12 November 1989 a Gagauz Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was proclaimed by an assembly in Comrat In reaction to the Moldovan declaration of sovereignty on 19 August 1990 the Gagauz leadership proclaimed a Gagauz Soviet Socialist Republic which would be independent from Moldova but part of the Soviet Union on 23 December 1994 the Moldovan Parliament passed the Law on the Special Juridical Status of Gagauzia Gagauz Yeri a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Zabarah Dareg 2012 Opportunity structures and group building processes An institutional analysis of the secession processes in Pridnestrovie and Gagauzia between 1989 and 1991 Soviet and Communist Studies 45 1 2 According to the first point of its declaration the Gagauz Republic is a sovereign socialist soviet and multinational state Herszenhorn David Kramer Andrew 19 March 2014 Ukraine Plans to Withdraw Troops From Russia Occupied Crimea New York Times Retrieved 6 August 2014 Kristina Zakurdaeva Mikhail Maglov 3 December 2019 The Crimea Circumvention How EU Firms Are Sidestepping Sanctions And Making Money On The Peninsula Current Time TV Retrieved 15 November 2020 Carl Schreck 26 February 2019 From Not Us To Why Hide It How Russia Denied Its Crimea Invasion Then Admitted It Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty Retrieved 15 November 2020 Vladimir Putin in TV denial that Russian special forces are in eastern Ukraine The Daily Telegraph 17 April 2014 Archived from the original on 17 April 2014 Retrieved 13 August 2014 Russian Special Forces Storm Crimea Base Sky News 23 March 2014 Retrieved 13 August 2014 Ukraine PM rejects Crimea referendum vows to defend country CBC News 6 March 2014 Retrieved 6 August 2014 Regions and territories Chechnya BBC News 22 November 2011 Azerbaijan in a stir over political prisoner News bbc co uk 6 February 2003 Retrieved 21 February 2022 Robert Greenall Russians left behind in Central Asia BBC News 23 November 2005 Naumkin Vitaly November 1992 Islam in the States of the Former USSR Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 524 131 142 doi 10 1177 0002716292524001011 S2CID 145812443 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Bowers Stephen 1993 Soviet and Post Soviet Environmental Problems PDF Faculty Publications and Presentations Liberty University S2CID 41347149 Archived from the original PDF on 9 December 2018 a b Thomas Valerie M Orlova Anna O 2001 Soviet and Post Soviet Environmental Management Lessons from a Case Study on Lead Pollution Ambio 30 2 104 111 doi 10 1579 0044 7447 30 2 104 JSTOR 4315114 PMID 11374307 S2CID 27761136 a b c d e f g h i Pavlinek Petr Pickles John 2004 Environmental Pasts Environmental Futures in Post Socialist Europe Environmental Politics 13 237 265 doi 10 1080 09644010410001685227 S2CID 155024373 Wernstedt Kris July 2002 Environmental Protection in the Russian Federation Lessons and Opportunities Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45 4 493 516 doi 10 1080 09640560220143521 ISSN 0964 0568 S2CID 154142478 a b c Coumel Laurent Elie Marc 1 January 2013 A Belated and Tragic Ecological Revolution Nature Disasters and Green Activists in the Soviet Union and the Post Soviet States 1960s 2010s The Soviet and Post Soviet Review 40 2 157 165 doi 10 1163 18763324 04002005 ISSN 1075 1262 Schierhorn Florian Muller Daniel Beringer Tim Prishchepov Alexander V Kuemmerle Tobias Balmann Alfons 1 December 2013 Post Soviet cropland abandonment and carbon sequestration in European Russia Ukraine and Belarus Global Biogeochemical Cycles 27 4 1175 1185 Bibcode 2013GBioC 27 1175S doi 10 1002 2013GB004654 ISSN 1944 9224 S2CID 53637765 a b c Pavlinek Petr Pickles John 1999 Environmental Change and Post Communist Transformations in the Czech Republic and Slovakia Post Soviet Geography and Economics 40 5 354 382 doi 10 1080 10889388 1999 10641120 a b c d e f g h i j Carmin Joann Fagan Adam 2010 Environmental mobilisation and organisations in post socialist Europe and the former Soviet Union Environmental Politics 19 5 689 707 doi 10 1080 09644016 2010 508300 S2CID 144224257 a b c d e f g h i j k l m Henry Laura A Douhovnikoff Vladimir November 2008 Environmental Issues in Russia Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 1 437 460 doi 10 1146 annurev environ 33 051007 082437 ISSN 1543 5938 a b c d e f g h i Nazarov Nikolai Cook Hadrian F Woodgate Graham September 2001 Environmental issues in the post communist Ukraine Journal of Environmental Management 63 1 71 86 doi 10 1006 jema 2001 0460 ISSN 0301 4797 PMID 11591031 a b c d e f g h i j k l m Smith David R June 1995 Environmental Security and Shared Water Resources in Post Soviet Central Asia Post Soviet Geography 36 6 351 370 doi 10 1080 10605851 1995 10640997 ISSN 1060 5851 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Salay Jurgen Fenhann Jorgen Jaanimagi Karl Kristoferson Lars 1 November 1993 Energy and Environment in the Baltic States Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 18 1 169 216 doi 10 1146 annurev eg 18 110193 001125 ISSN 1056 3466 a b c d e Lazdinis Imantas Angelstam Per Lazdinis Marius 1 July 2007 Maintenance of Forest Biodiversity in a Post Soviet Governance Model Perceptions by Local Actors in Lithuania Environmental Management 40 1 20 33 Bibcode 2007EnMan 40 20L doi 10 1007 s00267 005 0387 8 ISSN 1432 1009 PMID 17464529 S2CID 21279014 See Kaprans M 2009 Then and now Comparing the Soviet and Post Soviet experience in Latvian autobiographies Archived 14 September 2010 at the Wayback MachineKeywords 2 End of Communism Cheered but Now with More Reservations Pew Research Center s Global Attitudes Project 2 November 2009 Archived from the original on 19 May 2018 Retrieved 14 May 2018 Confidence in Democracy and Capitalism Wanes in Former Soviet Union Pew Research Center s Global Attitudes Project 5 December 2011 Archived from the original on 20 May 2018 Retrieved 14 May 2018 The language question the results of recent research in 2012 RATING 25 May 2012 Nostalgiya po SSSR levada ru 19 December 2018 Maza Christina 19 December 2018 Russia vs Ukraine More Russians Want the Soviet Union and Communism Back Amid Continued Tensions Newsweek Retrieved 21 December 2018 Most Russians Say Soviet Union Took Care of Ordinary People Poll The Moscow Times 24 June 2019 Retrieved 5 July 2019 Papava V 2008 On The Role of The Caucasian Tandem in GUAM PDF Central Asia and the Caucasus S2CID 55012247 Promoting Geopolitical Pluralism in the CIS GUAM and Western Foreign Policy PDF Taraskuzio com Retrieved 21 February 2022 Further reading Edit Geopolitical and Economic Significance of Central Eurasia Indian Perspective Kundu Nivedita Das Indian Foreign Affairs Journal New Delhi Vol 5 Iss 3 Jul Sep 2010 324 337 External links EditCandid photos of the Eastern Bloc September December 1991 in the last months of the USSR New Directions Post Independence from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives Post Soviet Russia and its Neighbor States from the Dean Peter Krogh Foreign Affairs Digital Archives Discovering The Centuries Old State Tradition professor Pal Kolsto University of Oslo Former Soviet war zones The hazards of a long hard freeze The Economist 19 August 2004 4 enclaves post Soviet fate in limbo The Seattle Times 20 August 2006 Are Independence Referendums First Step Toward Kremlin s Historical Revanchism Radio Free Europe 15 September 2006 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Post Soviet states amp oldid 1130949930, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.