fbpx
Wikipedia

Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination

On January 31, 2017, soon after taking office, President Donald Trump, a Republican, nominated Neil Gorsuch for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died almost one year earlier. Then-president Barack Obama, a Democrat, nominated Merrick Garland to succeed Scalia on March 16, 2016, but the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate did not vote on the nomination. Majority leader Mitch McConnell declared that as the presidential election cycle had already commenced, it made the appointment of the next justice a political issue to be decided by voters. The Senate Judiciary Committee refused to consider the Garland nomination, thus keeping the vacancy open through the end of Obama's presidency on January 20, 2017.

Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination
President Trump announcing the nomination, accompanied by Gorsuch and Gorsuch's wife, Louise
NomineeNeil Gorsuch
Nominated byDonald Trump (president of the United States)
SucceedingAntonin Scalia (associate justice)
Date nominatedJanuary 31, 2017
Date confirmedApril 7, 2017
OutcomeApproved by the U.S. Senate
Vote of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Votes in favor11
Votes against9
ResultReported favorably
Senate cloture votes
Votes in favor55
Votes against45
ResultFirst cloture motion failed, but the second cloture motion succeeded due to the passage of the "nuclear option
Senate confirmation vote
Votes in favor54
Votes against45
ResultConfirmed

When nominated, Gorsuch was a sitting judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, a position to which he had been appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006. Democratic Senators launched a filibuster against Gorsuch's nomination to block his confirmation. However, Republicans invoked the "nuclear option", eliminating the filibuster with respect to Supreme Court nominees.[1] The Senate ultimately confirmed Gorsuch's nomination to the Supreme Court by a 54–45 vote on April 7, 2017 (all Republicans and three Democrats voted in his favor). Ten days after his confirmation, Gorsuch heard his first case as the 101st associate justice of the Court, in Anthony Perry vs. Merit Systems Protection Board.[2]

Background edit

On February 13, 2016, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly.[3][4] His death triggered a protracted political battle that did not end until the Senate confirmed Gorsuch's nomination in April 2017.

Political commentators at the time widely recognized Scalia as one of the most conservative members of the Court, and noted that President Barack Obama had an opportunity to name a more liberal replacement, a move that could alter the Court's ideological balance for many years into the future.[5] The president ultimately nominated Merrick Garland on March 16, 2016. His confirmation would have given Democratic appointees a majority on the Supreme Court for the first time since the 1970s.[6] Republican Senate leaders, citing the fact that the vacancy arose during Obama's final year as president, declared that the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.[7]

Garland's nomination expired on January 3, 2017, with the end of the 114th Congress, 293 days after it had been submitted to the Senate.[7] As a result of the nomination's defeat, Scalia's seat remained vacant until after Donald Trump's January 20, 2017 presidential inauguration.[7] Only the 15th time in U.S. Senate history that a Supreme Court nomination had lapsed at the end of a session of Congress,[8] many Democrats reacted angrily to the Senate's refusal to consider Garland, with Senator Jeff Merkley describing the vacant seat as a "stolen seat".[9] However, Republicans such as Senator Chuck Grassley argued that the Senate was within its rights to refuse to consider a nominee until the inauguration of a new president.[10]

Nomination edit

Potential candidates edit

During the 2016 presidential campaign, while Garland remained before the Senate, Trump released two lists of potential nominees. On May 18, 2016, Trump released a short list of eleven judges for nomination to the Scalia vacancy.[11] In September 2016, Trump released a second list of ten possible nominees, this time including three minorities.[12]

Both lists were assembled by the Federalist Society and The Heritage Foundation.[13] Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society played a major role in the creation of the second list, which included Gorsuch.[14][15] The Trump administration also considered nominating Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett to the seat, who were later nominated and confirmed after the retirement of Anthony Kennedy in 2018 and the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020, respectively.[16]

After winning the presidential election, Trump and White House Counsel Don McGahn interviewed four individuals for the Supreme Court opening, all of whom had appeared on one of the two previously-released lists.[13] The four individuals were federal appellate judges Tom Hardiman, Bill Pryor and Neil Gorsuch, as well as federal district judge Amul Thapar, all appointed to the federal bench by President George W. Bush[13] While Pryor had been seen by many as the early front-runner due to the backing of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, many evangelicals expressed resistance to him, and the final decision ultimately came down to Gorsuch or Hardiman.[13] Hardiman had the support of Trump's sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry,[13] but Trump instead chose to nominate Gorsuch.[17]

Announcement edit

President Trump announced the nomination of Gorsuch on January 31, 2017. The nomination was formally received by the Senate on February 1, 2017, and was subsequently referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.[8] At the time of his nomination, Gorsuch was described as solidly conservative, but likely to be confirmed without much difficulty.[18][19][20] Richard Primus of Politico described Gorsuch as "Scalia 2.0" due to ideological similarities,[21] and a report prepared by Lee Epstein, Andrew Martin, and Kevin Quinn predicted that Gorsuch would be a "reliable conservative" similar to Scalia.[22]

According to The Washington Post, Trump considered rescinding Gorsuch's nomination, venting angrily to advisers after his Supreme Court pick was critical of the president's escalating attacks on the federal judiciary in a private February meeting with Democratic legislators.[23]

Responses to the nomination edit

 
Neil Gorsuch with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, February 1, 2017

Norm Eisen, Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform in the White House and Ambassador to the Czech Republic, endorsed Gorsuch.[24] Eisen was a classmate of both Gorsuch and Obama at Harvard Law.[24] Neal Katyal, who served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States during the Obama Administration and law professor at Georgetown University Law Center, endorsed Gorsuch for approval to the Supreme Court, and introduced him on the first day of the hearings.[25]

The National Rifle Association, the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the Second Amendment Foundation and other gun rights groups endorsed Gorsuch,[26][27][28] while Americans for Responsible Solutions, the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and other gun control proponents have opposed his nomination.[29][30] House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi claimed Gorsuch "comes down on the side of felons over gun safety". PolitiFact called her statement misleading and said that Gorsuch's past rulings do not "demonstrate that he thinks more felons should be allowed guns than what is already permitted under the law".[31]

The American Civil Liberties Union raised concerns about Gorsuch's respect for disability rights.[32] The Secular Coalition for America, Freedom from Religion Foundation and Union for Reform Judaism all voiced concerns with Gorsuch's nomination.[33]

The Judicial Crisis Network enthusiastically rallied behind Gorsuch after running a campaign against Merrick Garland, spending a total of $17 million to these ends.[34]

Judiciary Committee review edit

Confirmation hearings edit

 
Ticket for the March 2017 Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee

Gorsuch's nomination was first considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee, which holds hearings on all federal judicial nominations and decides whether or not to send nominations to the full Senate for a final confirmation vote.[35] In the 115th Congress the committee consisted of 11 Republicans and 9 Democrats, and was led by Republican Chuck Grassley. In preparation for the hearing, the committee requested the Department of Justice (DOJ) to send all documents they had regarding Gorsuch's work in the George W. Bush administration; and by the time the hearing commenced, the DOJ had sent the committee over 144,000 pages of documents and, according to a White House spokesman, more than 220,000 pages of documents altogether.[36] Gorsuch's confirmation hearing started on March 20, 2017, and lasted four days.[8][37]

On the first day of hearings, March 20, senators largely used their opening statements to criticize each other, with Ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein complaining of the "unprecedented treatment" of Judge Merrick Garland, while Democrat Michael Bennet felt "two wrongs don't make a right", with Republican Ted Cruz insisting President Trump's nomination now carried "super-legitimacy".[38]

Democratic senators repeatedly criticized Gorsuch for his dissent in Transam Trucking v. Administrative Review Bd., colloquially referred to as the "frozen trucker case", where the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a truck driver who, after waiting hours for relief, had finally abandoned his unheated truck and trailer in dangerously inclement conditions. Democrat Dick Durbin told Gorsuch that the cold weather described in the facts of the case was "not as cold as your dissent".[38] Durbin also criticized the accuracy of his opinion in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case, where Gorsuch contended that contraception "destroys a fertilized egg," and that he had held the Religious Freedom Restoration Act included protection for corporations, rather than just individuals.[39]

In his own 16-minute opening statement, Gorsuch repeated his belief that a judge who likes all his rulings is "probably a pretty bad judge." He emphasized his decisions were based on "the facts at issue in each particular case." He also noted that his extensive record included many examples where he ruled both for and against disadvantaged groups.[37][38]

 
Judge Gorsuch testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, March 22, 2017

On the second day of hearings, March 21, Gorsuch responded to questions by committee members. When Chairman Chuck Grassley asked Gorsuch if he would "have any trouble ruling against the president who appointed you", Gorsuch replied, no, and "that's a softball".[40] Ted Cruz used his time to ask Gorsuch about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, basketball, and mutton busting.[40] When asked by Republican Lindsey Graham how he would have reacted if during his interview at Trump Tower the President had asked him to vote against Roe v. Wade, Gorsuch replied "I would have walked out the door".[40]

Democratic senators continued to criticize Gorsuch on his dissent in the truck driver case, with Dianne Feinstein asking him "will you be for the little men" and Democrat Al Franken telling the judge the facts of the case constituted an "absurdity exception" to the Plain Meaning Rule, which Gorsuch relied upon in his dissent.[41] Franken went on to say "I had a career in identifying absurdity" (referring to his former career as a comedian).[40] Democrat Patrick Leahy used his time to criticize Republicans' obstructions of the Garland nomination, disparage the policies of President George W. Bush that Gorsuch had defended at the Justice Department, and to ask Gorsuch how he would rule in Washington v. Trump, a pending case concerning the legality of Trump's Executive Order 13769, colloquially referred to as the "Muslim Ban." Gorsuch refused to comment on active litigation and explained that Justice Department lawyers must defend their client, while characterizing Garland as someone whom he admires, "an outstanding judge" and that he always reads Garland's opinions with "special care".[40]

On the third day of hearings, March 22, Gorsuch continued to answer committee members' questions. Republican Orrin Hatch asked Gorsuch if he thought his writings reflected "a knee-jerk attitude against common-sense regulations", to which the judge replied "no".[42] Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse spent the bulk of his allotted time describing to Gorsuch the negative effects of "Dark money" contributed by unknown donors. He also warned that the Court's 2010 Citizens United ruling's elimination of limits for political spending by corporations in elections could result in undue corporate political influence, and asked Gorsuch if would be subject to "capture" by big business, to which he replied "nobody will capture me".[43][44]

During her allotted time, Democrat Amy Klobuchar pressed Gorsuch on what she viewed as his "selective originalism," observing that Gorsuch, who self-identifies as an originalist, had not consistently interpreted legal texts, including the Constitution, by the original public meaning that they would have had at the time that they became law.[43] Later, when Dianne Feinstein asked him a question on the Equal Protection Clause and tensions between originalism and the later expansion of constitutional protections for women and racial minorites after its original drafting, Gorsuch stated that originalism did not seek "to return us to horse and buggy days" and that "it matters not a whit that some of the drafters of the Fourteenth Amendment were racists. Because they were. Or sexists, because they were. The law they drafted promises equal protection of the laws to all persons. That's what they wrote."[43]

That same day, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Tenth Circuit in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act case Gorsuch had not been involved in, although in 2008 he had written for a unanimous panel applying the same circuit precedent.[44] Still, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer said this demonstrated "a continued, troubling pattern of Judge Gorsuch deciding against everyday Americans, even children who require special assistance at school".[43]

Gorsuch confirmation hearing witnesses
Date Name Role
March 20 Michael Bennet, Senator (D-CO) Introducer
Cory Gardner, Senator (R-CO) Introducer
Neal Katyal, former acting U.S. Solicitor General (May 2010 – June 2011) Introducer
March 20
through
March 22
Neil Gorsuch Nominee
March 23 Nancy Scott Degan, Chair, American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary Congressional witness
Shannon Edwards, Member, American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary Congressional witness
Deanell Reece Tacha, Pepperdine University School of Law Duane And Kelly Roberts Dean And Professor Of Law, U.S. Court Of Appeals Judge (Retired) Republican witness
Robert Harlan Henry, President of Oklahoma City University, U.S. Court Of Appeals Judge (Retired) Republican witness
John L. Kane Jr., United States federal judge, United States District Court for the District of Colorado Republican witness
Leah Bressack, former law clerk Republican witness
Elisa Massimino, President and CEO, Human Rights First Democratic witness
Jameel Jaffer, Executive Director, Columbia University/Knight First Amendment Institute Democratic witness
Jeff Perkins Democratic witness
Guerino J. Calemine, III, General Counsel, Communication Workers of America Democratic witness
Jeff Lamken, Partner, MoloLamken Republican witness
Lawrence Solum, Carmack Waterhouse Professor Of Law, Georgetown University Law Center Republican witness
Jonathan Turley, J.B. And Maurice C. Shapiro Professor Of Public Interest Law, The George Washington University Law School Republican witness
Karen Harned, Executive Director, National Federation Of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center Republican witness
Heather McGhee, President, Demos Democratic witness
Fatima Goss Graves, Senior Vice President For Program & President-Elect, National Women's Law Center Democratic witness
Patrick Gallagher, Director, Sierra Club Environmental Law Program Democratic witness
Eve Hill, Partner, Brown Goldstein Levy Democratic witness
Peter Kirsanow, Commissioner, U.S. Commission On Civil Rights; Partner, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff Republican witness
Alice Fisher, Partner, Latham & Watkins Republican witness
Hannah Smith, Senior Counsel, Becket Fund Republican witness
Timothy Meyer, former law clerk Republican witness
Jamil N. Jaffer, former law clerk Republican witness
Kristen Clarke, President & CEO, Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law Democratic witness
Sarah Warbelow, Legal Director, Human Rights Campaign Democratic witness
Amy Hagstrom Miller, President, CEO, & Founder, Whole Woman's Health Democratic witness
William Marshall, William Rand Kenan Jr. Distinguished Professor Of Law, University Of North Carolina Democratic witness
Sandy Phillips Democratic witness

Plagiarism allegations edit

On April 4, BuzzFeed and Politico ran articles highlighting similar language occurring in Gorsuch's book The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia and an earlier law review article by Abigail Lawlis Kuzma, Indiana's deputy attorney general. Academic experts contacted by Politico "differed in their assessment of what Gorsuch did, ranging from calling it a clear impropriety to mere sloppiness".[45][46][47][48]

John Finnis, who supervised Gorsuch's Oxford dissertation at Oxford stated, "The allegation is entirely without foundation. The book is meticulous in its citation of primary sources. The allegation that the book is guilty of plagiarism because it does not cite secondary sources which draw on those same primary sources is, frankly, absurd." Kuzma stated, "I have reviewed both passages and do not see an issue here, even though the language is similar. These passages are factual, not analytical in nature, framing both the technical legal and medical circumstances of the 'Baby/Infant Doe' case that occurred in 1982."[48] Noah Feldman, a Harvard Law professor, thought that Gorsuch had committed "minor plagiarism", that deserved "no more punishment than the embarrassment attendant on its revelation".[49]

Committee vote edit

On April 3, 2017, the Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed the Gorsuch nomination, sending it to the full Senate for final action by an 11–9[8] party-line vote, with all Republican members voting for him and all Democratic members voting against. The last time the committee's vote to approve a Supreme Court nominee split precisely along party lines was in 2006 on the Samuel Alito nomination.[50][51][52]

Filibuster and cloture vote edit

 
Protesters at Foley Square in Lower Manhattan, New York City urged Senate Democrats to filibuster the Neil Gorsuch nomination, April 1, 2017

Gorsuch needed to win a simple majority vote of the full Senate (51 votes) to be confirmed; however, a filibuster by the opposition would add an additional requirement, a three-fifths supermajority vote in favor of cloture (60 votes), which would allow debate to end and force a final vote on confirmation. At the time, Republicans held 52 seats in the 100-seat Senate, and could also count on (if needed) the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Pence, acting in his Constitutional capacity as President of the Senate.[53] After nominating Gorsuch, President Trump called on the Senate to use the "nuclear option" and abolish the filibuster for Supreme Court appointments if its continued existence would prevent Gorsuch's confirmation.[54] The nuclear option was used in 2013 by then-Majority Leader Harry Reid to abolish filibusters for all presidential appointments except nominations to the Supreme Court.[52]

While some Republicans such as John McCain expressed reluctance about abolishing the filibuster for executive appointments, others such as John Cornyn argued that the Republican majority should reserve all options necessary to confirm Gorsuch.[53]

During the last day of committee hearings, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced that he would filibuster the nomination.[55] Democratic opposition focused on complaints saying that Scalia's seat should have been filled by President Obama, rather than on Gorsuch himself.[56][57] In addition, Democrats Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris, along with Independent Bernie Sanders each criticized various aspects of Gorsuch's record. Additionally, Jeff Merkley said he would do "anything in his power"—including the power of filibustering—to oppose Gorsuch's nomination.[58]

On April 6, 2017, Democrats launched a filibuster against Gorsuch's nomination. In response, Republicans invoked the nuclear option and changed the Senate rules to end filibusters for Supreme Court nominees. The move came after Democrats blocked the nomination under the previous rule, when only four Democrats crossed-over and voted with Republicans for cloture: Michael Bennet, Joe Donnelly, Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Manchin.[59] After the rules change, a second cloture vote was held; this one, needing only a majority of Senators voting, passed, bringing debate to a close.[60][61]

Full Senate vote edit

The swearing-in ceremony of Gorsuch on April 10, 2017, attended by President Donald Trump and associate Justice Anthony Kennedy

The Senate confirmed Neil Gorsuch to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court on April 7, 2017, by a vote of 54–45.[8] All Republicans present, along with Democrats Joe Manchin, Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Donnelly, voted to confirm him.[62] Republican Johnny Isakson, who had supported the nomination, was absent for the vote because he was recovering from back surgery.[63]

Vote to confirm the Gorsuch nomination
April 7, 2017 Party Total votes
Democratic Republican Independent
Yea 3 51 0 54  (54.55%)
Nay 43 0 2 45  (45.45%)
Result: Confirmed
Roll call vote on the nomination
Senator Party State Vote
Lamar Alexander R Tennessee Yea
Tammy Baldwin D Wisconsin Nay
John Barrasso R Wyoming Yea
Michael Bennet D Colorado Nay
Richard Blumenthal D Connecticut Nay
Roy Blunt R Missouri Yea
Cory Booker D New Jersey Nay
John Boozman R Arkansas Yea
Sherrod Brown D Ohio Nay
Richard Burr R North Carolina Yea
Maria Cantwell D Washington Nay
Shelley Moore Capito R West Virginia Yea
Ben Cardin D Maryland Nay
Tom Carper D Delaware Nay
Bob Casey Jr. D Pennsylvania Nay
Bill Cassidy R Louisiana Yea
Thad Cochran R Mississippi Yea
Susan Collins R Maine Yea
Chris Coons D Delaware Nay
Bob Corker R Tennessee Yea
John Cornyn R Texas Yea
Catherine Cortez Masto D Nevada Nay
Tom Cotton R Arkansas Yea
Mike Crapo R Idaho Yea
Ted Cruz R Texas Yea
Steve Daines R Montana Yea
Joe Donnelly D Indiana Yea
Tammy Duckworth D Illinois Nay
Dick Durbin D Illinois Nay
Mike Enzi R Wyoming Yea
Joni Ernst R Iowa Yea
Dianne Feinstein D California Nay
Deb Fischer R Nebraska Yea
Jeff Flake R Arizona Yea
Al Franken D Minnesota Nay
Cory Gardner R Colorado Yea
Kirsten Gillibrand D New York Nay
Lindsey Graham R South Carolina Yea
Chuck Grassley R Iowa Yea
Kamala Harris D California Nay
Maggie Hassan D New Hampshire Nay
Orrin Hatch R Utah Yea
Martin Heinrich D New Mexico Nay
Heidi Heitkamp D North Dakota Yea
Dean Heller R Nevada Yea
Mazie Hirono D Hawaii Nay
John Hoeven R North Dakota Yea
Jim Inhofe R Oklahoma Yea
Johnny Isakson R Georgia Absent
Ron Johnson R Wisconsin Yea
Tim Kaine D Virginia Nay
John Neely Kennedy R Louisiana Yea
Angus King I Maine Nay
Amy Klobuchar D Minnesota Nay
James Lankford R Oklahoma Yea
Patrick Leahy D Vermont Nay
Mike Lee R Utah Yea
Joe Manchin D West Virginia Yea
Ed Markey D Massachusetts Nay
John McCain R Arizona Yea
Claire McCaskill D Missouri Nay
Mitch McConnell R Kentucky Yea
Bob Menendez D New Jersey Nay
Jeff Merkley D Oregon Nay
Jerry Moran R Kansas Yea
Lisa Murkowski R Alaska Yea
Chris Murphy D Connecticut Nay
Patty Murray D Washington Nay
Bill Nelson D Florida Nay
Rand Paul R Kentucky Yea
David Perdue R Georgia Yea
Gary Peters D Michigan Nay
Rob Portman R Ohio Yea
Jack Reed D Rhode Island Nay
Jim Risch R Idaho Yea
Pat Roberts R Kansas Yea
Mike Rounds R South Dakota Yea
Marco Rubio R Florida Yea
Bernie Sanders I Vermont Nay
Ben Sasse R Nebraska Yea
Brian Schatz D Hawaii Nay
Chuck Schumer D New York Nay
Tim Scott R South Carolina Yea
Jeanne Shaheen D New Hampshire Nay
Richard Shelby R Alabama Yea
Debbie Stabenow D Michigan Nay
Luther Strange R Alabama Yea
Dan Sullivan R Alaska Yea
Jon Tester D Montana Nay
John Thune R South Dakota Yea
Thom Tillis R North Carolina Yea
Pat Toomey R Pennsylvania Yea
Tom Udall D New Mexico Nay
Chris Van Hollen D Maryland Nay
Mark Warner D Virginia Nay
Elizabeth Warren D Massachusetts Nay
Sheldon Whitehouse D Rhode Island Nay
Roger Wicker R Mississippi Yea
Ron Wyden D Oregon Nay
Todd Young R Indiana Yea
Source: [64]

On April 10, Gorsuch took the prescribed constitutional and judicial (set by federal law) oaths of office, and became the 113th member of the Supreme Court.[65] At age 49, he was the youngest person to join the Court since Clarence Thomas, at age 43, in 1991. Also, having been a law clerk for Anthony Kennedy (1993–94), he became the first Supreme Court justice to serve alongside a justice for whom he had previously clerked.[66]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Killough, Ashley (April 7, 2017). "GOP triggers nuclear option on Neil Gorsuch nomination". CNN. from the original on April 11, 2019. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
  2. ^ Liptak, Adam (April 17, 2017). "Bitter Fight Behind Him, Justice Gorsuch Starts Day With Relish". The New York Times. from the original on April 18, 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2017.
  3. ^ Liptak, Alan (February 13, 2016). "Justice Antonin Scalia, Who Led a Conservative Renaissance on the Supreme Court, Is Dead at 79". The New York Times. from the original on February 18, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
  4. ^ Hennessy-Fiske, Molly (February 14, 2016). "Scalia's last moments on a Texas ranch – quail hunting to being found in 'perfect repose'". Los Angeles Times. from the original on February 18, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
  5. ^ Helmore, Edward (February 14, 2016). "Republicans and Democrats draw battle lines over supreme court nomination". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. from the original on February 15, 2016. Retrieved February 15, 2016.
  6. ^ Chemerinsky, Erwin (April 6, 2016). "What If the Supreme Court Were Liberal?". The Atlantic. from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 16, 2016.
  7. ^ a b c Bravin, Jess (January 3, 2017). "President Obama's Supreme Court Nomination of Merrick Garland Expires". Wall Street Journal. from the original on March 10, 2017. Retrieved October 3, 2020.
  8. ^ a b c d e McMillion, Barry J.; Rutkus, Denis Steven (July 6, 2018). "Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2017: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President" (PDF). CRS Report (RL33225). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. (PDF) from the original on August 9, 2019. Retrieved June 17, 2019.
  9. ^ Calfas, Jennifer (January 31, 2017). "Merkley vows to fight Trump's nominee to fill 'stolen' Supreme Court". The Hill. from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  10. ^ Everett, Burgess (October 27, 2016). "Republicans at war over Supreme Court". Politico. from the original on February 3, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  11. ^ Rappeport, Alan; Savage, Charlie (May 18, 2016). "Donald Trump Releases List of Possible Supreme Court Picks". The New York Times. from the original on July 22, 2016.
  12. ^ Flores, Reena; Garrett, Major (September 23, 2016). "Donald Trump expands list of possible Supreme Court picks". CBS News. from the original on November 30, 2016. Retrieved November 13, 2016.
  13. ^ a b c d e Goldmacher, Shane; Johnson, Eliana; Gerstein, Josh (January 31, 2017). "How Trump got to yes on Gorsuch". Politico. from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  14. ^ Eric Lipton; Jeremy W. Peters (March 19, 2017). "In Gorsuch, Conservative Activist Sees Test Case for Reshaping the Judiciary". The New York Times. p. A1. from the original on April 6, 2017. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
  15. ^ "A conservative activist's behind-the-scenes campaign to remake the nation's courts". Washington Post. from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved October 31, 2020.
  16. ^ Marcus, Ruth (December 3, 2019). Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-9821-2388-8.
  17. ^ Jackson, David (February 1, 2017). "Why Trump chose Neil Gorsuch as his Supreme Court nominee". USA Today. from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  18. ^ "Trump chooses Neil Gorsuch, a conservative seen as likely to be confirmed, for Supreme Court". Los Angeles Times. January 31, 2017. from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  19. ^ Enten, Harry (January 30, 2017). "How Conservative A Supreme Court Nominee Can Trump Get Through The Senate?". FiveThirtyEight. from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  20. ^ Konnikova, Maria (January 31, 2017). "The 4 Rules That Will Explain Neil Gorsuch's Confirmation Fight". Politico. from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  21. ^ Primus, Richard (January 31, 2017). "Trump Picks Scalia 2.0". Politico. from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  22. ^ Parlapano, Alicia; Yourish, Karen (February 1, 2017). "Where Neil Gorsuch Would Fit on the Supreme Court". The New York Times. from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  23. ^ Parker, Ashley; Dawsey, Josh; Barnes, Robert (December 18, 2017). "Trump talked about rescinding Gorsuch's nomination". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. from the original on December 19, 2017. Retrieved December 19, 2017.
  24. ^ a b Clauss, Kyle Scott (February 1, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch, Trump's Supreme Court Pick, Attended Harvard Law with Obama". Boston. Boston, Massachusetts. from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  25. ^ Boyer, Dave (February 1, 2017). "Former Obama official endorses Gorsuch nomination for Supreme Court". The Washington Times. Washington, DC. from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017. I have no doubt that if confirmed, Judge Gorsuch would help to restore confidence in the rule of law," Mr. Katyal wrote in a New York Times op-ed. "His years on the bench reveal a commitment to judicial independence – a record that should give the American people confidence that he will not compromise principle to favor the president who appointed him.
  26. ^ "NRA Applauds Neil Gorsuch's Nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court". NRA-ILA. January 31, 2017. from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  27. ^ Beckett, Lois (February 1, 2017). "NRA cheers nomination of Neil Gorsuch, seen as gun rights defender". The Guardian. from the original on February 25, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
  28. ^ "SAF Impressed With Judge Neil Gorsuch For Supreme Court". Yahoo!. from the original on February 25, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
  29. ^ "Opinion - Nancy Pelosi and gun control groups claim that Neil Gorsuch sides with 'felons over gun safety'". The Washington Post. from the original on February 3, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  30. ^ "Statement from Americans for Responsible Solutions and the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence on Nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to United States Supreme Court". americansforresponsiblesolutions.org. January 31, 2017. from the original on February 25, 2017. Retrieved February 24, 2017.
  31. ^ Carroll, Lauren (February 2, 2017). "Does Neil Gorsuch side with 'felons over gun safety,' as Pelosi says?". PolitiFact. from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  32. ^ Center, Claudia (February 2, 2017). "Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch Has a Troubling History When Ruling on Disability Rights Cases". ACLU. from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 3, 2017.
  33. ^ Zauzmer, Julie (February 1, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch belongs to a notably liberal church – and would be the first Protestant on the Court in years". The Washington Post. from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 4, 2017.
  34. ^ "Gorsuch's Dark-Money Benefactor Attended His White House Swearing-In Ceremony". Slate. from the original on February 26, 2018. Retrieved February 26, 2018.
  35. ^ Cowan, Richard (February 1, 2017). "Senate Judiciary Democrat says panel should hold hearings for Gorsuch". Reuters. from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  36. ^ Kim, Seung Min (March 9, 2017). "DOJ sends 144,000 pages of Gorsuch documents to Senate". Politico. from the original on March 15, 2017. Retrieved March 14, 2017.
  37. ^ a b "Nomination of the Honorable Neil M. Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States". Washington, D.C.: United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. March 20, 2017. from the original on March 22, 2017. Retrieved March 21, 2017.
  38. ^ a b c Matt Flegenheimer (March 21, 2017). "Gorsuch Tries to Put Himself Above Politics in Confirmation Hearing". The New York Times. p. A20. from the original on March 22, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  39. ^ Durbin, Gorsuch spar over Hobby Lobby ruling April 20, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Washington Post, Robert Barnes, March 21, 2011. Retrieved April 20, 2019.
  40. ^ a b c d e Adam Liptak; Matt Flegenheimer (March 22, 2017). "Gorsuch Asserts He Would Be Able To Buck Trump – Has Made 'No Promises' – Expansive and Evasive in Sometimes Tense Questioning". The New York Times. p. A1. from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  41. ^ Full Sen. Franken questioning of Judge Gorsuch, retrieved December 14, 2022
  42. ^ Matt Flegenheimer (March 22, 2017). "Of Horse v. Duck, Mutton Busting and Other Confirmation Diversions". The New York Times. p. A16. from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  43. ^ a b c d Liptak, Adam; Flegenheimer, Matt (March 23, 2017). "Democrats Fail to Move Gorsuch Off Script and Beyond Generalities". The New York Times. p. A17. from the original on March 23, 2017. Retrieved March 23, 2017.
  44. ^ a b Ford, Matt (March 22, 2017). "Gorsuch: Roe v. Wade Is the 'Law of the Land': At Wednesday's hearing, Democratic senators adopted a new strategy to press the Supreme Court nominee on abortion and campaign finance". The Atlantic. from the original on June 20, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  45. ^ Geidner, Chris (April 4, 2017). "A Short Section In Neil Gorsuch's 2006 Book Appears To Be Copied From A Law Review Article". BuzzFeed. from the original on April 10, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  46. ^ Bresnahan, John; Everett, Burgess (April 5, 2017). "Gorsuch's writings borrow from other authors: The White House rejects any suggestion of impropriety". Politico. from the original on April 11, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  47. ^ Blake, Aaron (April 5, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch's 11th-hour plagiarism scare". The Washington Post. from the original on December 3, 2018. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  48. ^ a b Logan, Bryan (April 4, 2016). "Neil Gorsuch is accused of plagiarism amid a heated Supreme Court confirmation fight". Business Insider. from the original on April 18, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  49. ^ Feldman, Noah (April 5, 2017). "Gorsuch's Plagiarism Is Worthy of Embarrassment: But the copying found in the judge's book isn't disqualifying for the Supreme Court". Bloomberg. from the original on April 8, 2017. Retrieved April 15, 2017.
  50. ^ "Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees". Washington, D.C.: Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Compiled by the Senate Library. from the original on June 5, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  51. ^ Flegenheimer, Matt (April 3, 2017). "Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Gorsuch in Party-Line Vote". The New York Times. from the original on April 6, 2019. Retrieved April 4, 2017.
  52. ^ a b Berenson, Tessa (April 3, 2017). "Senate Judiciary Committee Just Approved Neil Gorsuch's Nomination". Time. from the original on April 3, 2017. Retrieved April 4, 2017.
  53. ^ a b Everett, Burgess; Bresnahan, John; Min Kim, Seung (February 1, 2017). "GOP won't rule out killing the filibuster for Supreme Court pick". Politico. from the original on February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  54. ^ Jackson, David (February 1, 2017). "Trump: Go 'nuclear' and abolish filibuster on Gorsuch vote if needed". USA Today. from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  55. ^ Matt Flegenheimer; Charlie Savage; Adam Liptak (March 24, 2017). "Democrats Plan to Filibuster to Thwart Gorsuch Nomination". The New York Times. p. A17. from the original on April 6, 2017. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
  56. ^ "Trump's Supreme Court Nominee Is Going To Face An Angry, Partisan Senate Battle". NPR. March 30, 2016. from the original on February 1, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  57. ^ Shear, Michael D.; Liptak, Adam (January 24, 2017). "A Supreme Court Pick Is Promised. A Political Brawl Is Certain". The New York Times. from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  58. ^ "Facing a 'Massive Revolt', Senate Democrats Move to Block Neil Gorsuch". Vanity Fair. February 2017. from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.
  59. ^ Killough, Ashley; Barrett, Ted (April 7, 2017). "Senate GOP triggers nuclear option to break Democratic filibuster on Gorsuch". CNN. from the original on June 29, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  60. ^ Rogin, Ali (April 6, 2017). "Senate approves 'nuclear option,' clears path for Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination vote". ABC News. from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  61. ^ Heitshusen, Valerie (April 14, 2017). "Senate Proceedings Establishing Majority Cloture for Supreme Court Nominations: In Brief" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. (PDF) from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2020.
  62. ^ Liptak, Adam; Flegenheimer, Matt (April 7, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch Confirmed by Senate as Supreme Court Justice". The New York Times. from the original on July 10, 2018. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  63. ^ Wolf, Richard; Kelly, Erin (April 7, 2017). "Gorsuch confirmation to have major impact on all three branches of government". USA Today. from the original on June 1, 2019. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  64. ^ "Roll Call Vote 115th Congress – 1st Session (vote number 111)". senate.gov. April 7, 2017. from the original on April 29, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  65. ^ Wolf, Richard; Jackson, David (April 10, 2017). "Neil Gorsuch sworn in as 113th Supreme Court justice". USA Today. from the original on June 2, 2019. Retrieved June 1, 2019.
  66. ^ Enten, Harry (February 1, 2017). "Trump Picks Super Conservative, Super Qualified Neil Gorsuch For The Supreme Court". FiveThirtyEight. from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved February 1, 2017.

External links edit

Announcement of nominee

  • President Trump's Nominee for the Supreme Court Neil M. Gorsuch. The White House
  • President Trump Announces Supreme Court of the United States Nominee on YouTube

Confirmation hearing witness testimony

neil, gorsuch, supreme, court, nomination, january, 2017, soon, after, taking, office, president, donald, trump, republican, nominated, neil, gorsuch, associate, justice, supreme, court, united, states, succeed, antonin, scalia, died, almost, year, earlier, th. On January 31 2017 soon after taking office President Donald Trump a Republican nominated Neil Gorsuch for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia who had died almost one year earlier Then president Barack Obama a Democrat nominated Merrick Garland to succeed Scalia on March 16 2016 but the Republican controlled U S Senate did not vote on the nomination Majority leader Mitch McConnell declared that as the presidential election cycle had already commenced it made the appointment of the next justice a political issue to be decided by voters The Senate Judiciary Committee refused to consider the Garland nomination thus keeping the vacancy open through the end of Obama s presidency on January 20 2017 Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nominationPresident Trump announcing the nomination accompanied by Gorsuch and Gorsuch s wife LouiseNomineeNeil GorsuchNominated byDonald Trump president of the United States SucceedingAntonin Scalia associate justice Date nominatedJanuary 31 2017Date confirmedApril 7 2017OutcomeApproved by the U S SenateVote of the Senate Judiciary CommitteeVotes in favor11Votes against9ResultReported favorablySenate cloture votesVotes in favor55Votes against45ResultFirst cloture motion failed but the second cloture motion succeeded due to the passage of the nuclear option Senate confirmation voteVotes in favor54Votes against45ResultConfirmedWhen nominated Gorsuch was a sitting judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit a position to which he had been appointed by President George W Bush in 2006 Democratic Senators launched a filibuster against Gorsuch s nomination to block his confirmation However Republicans invoked the nuclear option eliminating the filibuster with respect to Supreme Court nominees 1 The Senate ultimately confirmed Gorsuch s nomination to the Supreme Court by a 54 45 vote on April 7 2017 all Republicans and three Democrats voted in his favor Ten days after his confirmation Gorsuch heard his first case as the 101st associate justice of the Court in Anthony Perry vs Merit Systems Protection Board 2 Contents 1 Background 2 Nomination 2 1 Potential candidates 2 2 Announcement 3 Responses to the nomination 4 Judiciary Committee review 4 1 Confirmation hearings 4 2 Plagiarism allegations 4 3 Committee vote 5 Filibuster and cloture vote 6 Full Senate vote 7 See also 8 References 9 External linksBackground editOn February 13 2016 Associate Justice Antonin Scalia died unexpectedly 3 4 His death triggered a protracted political battle that did not end until the Senate confirmed Gorsuch s nomination in April 2017 Political commentators at the time widely recognized Scalia as one of the most conservative members of the Court and noted that President Barack Obama had an opportunity to name a more liberal replacement a move that could alter the Court s ideological balance for many years into the future 5 The president ultimately nominated Merrick Garland on March 16 2016 His confirmation would have given Democratic appointees a majority on the Supreme Court for the first time since the 1970s 6 Republican Senate leaders citing the fact that the vacancy arose during Obama s final year as president declared that the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president 7 Garland s nomination expired on January 3 2017 with the end of the 114th Congress 293 days after it had been submitted to the Senate 7 As a result of the nomination s defeat Scalia s seat remained vacant until after Donald Trump s January 20 2017 presidential inauguration 7 Only the 15th time in U S Senate history that a Supreme Court nomination had lapsed at the end of a session of Congress 8 many Democrats reacted angrily to the Senate s refusal to consider Garland with Senator Jeff Merkley describing the vacant seat as a stolen seat 9 However Republicans such as Senator Chuck Grassley argued that the Senate was within its rights to refuse to consider a nominee until the inauguration of a new president 10 Nomination editPotential candidates edit During the 2016 presidential campaign while Garland remained before the Senate Trump released two lists of potential nominees On May 18 2016 Trump released a short list of eleven judges for nomination to the Scalia vacancy 11 In September 2016 Trump released a second list of ten possible nominees this time including three minorities 12 Both lists were assembled by the Federalist Society and The Heritage Foundation 13 Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society played a major role in the creation of the second list which included Gorsuch 14 15 The Trump administration also considered nominating Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett to the seat who were later nominated and confirmed after the retirement of Anthony Kennedy in 2018 and the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020 respectively 16 After winning the presidential election Trump and White House Counsel Don McGahn interviewed four individuals for the Supreme Court opening all of whom had appeared on one of the two previously released lists 13 The four individuals were federal appellate judges Tom Hardiman Bill Pryor and Neil Gorsuch as well as federal district judge Amul Thapar all appointed to the federal bench by President George W Bush 13 While Pryor had been seen by many as the early front runner due to the backing of Attorney General Jeff Sessions many evangelicals expressed resistance to him and the final decision ultimately came down to Gorsuch or Hardiman 13 Hardiman had the support of Trump s sister Judge Maryanne Trump Barry 13 but Trump instead chose to nominate Gorsuch 17 Announcement edit President Trump announced the nomination of Gorsuch on January 31 2017 The nomination was formally received by the Senate on February 1 2017 and was subsequently referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee 8 At the time of his nomination Gorsuch was described as solidly conservative but likely to be confirmed without much difficulty 18 19 20 Richard Primus of Politico described Gorsuch as Scalia 2 0 due to ideological similarities 21 and a report prepared by Lee Epstein Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn predicted that Gorsuch would be a reliable conservative similar to Scalia 22 According to The Washington Post Trump considered rescinding Gorsuch s nomination venting angrily to advisers after his Supreme Court pick was critical of the president s escalating attacks on the federal judiciary in a private February meeting with Democratic legislators 23 Responses to the nomination edit nbsp Neil Gorsuch with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley February 1 2017Norm Eisen Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform in the White House and Ambassador to the Czech Republic endorsed Gorsuch 24 Eisen was a classmate of both Gorsuch and Obama at Harvard Law 24 Neal Katyal who served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States during the Obama Administration and law professor at Georgetown University Law Center endorsed Gorsuch for approval to the Supreme Court and introduced him on the first day of the hearings 25 The National Rifle Association the National Shooting Sports Foundation the Second Amendment Foundation and other gun rights groups endorsed Gorsuch 26 27 28 while Americans for Responsible Solutions the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and other gun control proponents have opposed his nomination 29 30 House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi claimed Gorsuch comes down on the side of felons over gun safety PolitiFact called her statement misleading and said that Gorsuch s past rulings do not demonstrate that he thinks more felons should be allowed guns than what is already permitted under the law 31 The American Civil Liberties Union raised concerns about Gorsuch s respect for disability rights 32 The Secular Coalition for America Freedom from Religion Foundation and Union for Reform Judaism all voiced concerns with Gorsuch s nomination 33 The Judicial Crisis Network enthusiastically rallied behind Gorsuch after running a campaign against Merrick Garland spending a total of 17 million to these ends 34 Judiciary Committee review editSee also Senate Judiciary Committee reviews of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States Confirmation hearings edit nbsp Ticket for the March 2017 Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination hearing before the Senate Judiciary CommitteeGorsuch s nomination was first considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee which holds hearings on all federal judicial nominations and decides whether or not to send nominations to the full Senate for a final confirmation vote 35 In the 115th Congress the committee consisted of 11 Republicans and 9 Democrats and was led by Republican Chuck Grassley In preparation for the hearing the committee requested the Department of Justice DOJ to send all documents they had regarding Gorsuch s work in the George W Bush administration and by the time the hearing commenced the DOJ had sent the committee over 144 000 pages of documents and according to a White House spokesman more than 220 000 pages of documents altogether 36 Gorsuch s confirmation hearing started on March 20 2017 and lasted four days 8 37 On the first day of hearings March 20 senators largely used their opening statements to criticize each other with Ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein complaining of the unprecedented treatment of Judge Merrick Garland while Democrat Michael Bennet felt two wrongs don t make a right with Republican Ted Cruz insisting President Trump s nomination now carried super legitimacy 38 Democratic senators repeatedly criticized Gorsuch for his dissent in Transam Trucking v Administrative Review Bd colloquially referred to as the frozen trucker case where the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a truck driver who after waiting hours for relief had finally abandoned his unheated truck and trailer in dangerously inclement conditions Democrat Dick Durbin told Gorsuch that the cold weather described in the facts of the case was not as cold as your dissent 38 Durbin also criticized the accuracy of his opinion in the Burwell v Hobby Lobby case where Gorsuch contended that contraception destroys a fertilized egg and that he had held the Religious Freedom Restoration Act included protection for corporations rather than just individuals 39 In his own 16 minute opening statement Gorsuch repeated his belief that a judge who likes all his rulings is probably a pretty bad judge He emphasized his decisions were based on the facts at issue in each particular case He also noted that his extensive record included many examples where he ruled both for and against disadvantaged groups 37 38 nbsp Judge Gorsuch testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee March 22 2017On the second day of hearings March 21 Gorsuch responded to questions by committee members When Chairman Chuck Grassley asked Gorsuch if he would have any trouble ruling against the president who appointed you Gorsuch replied no and that s a softball 40 Ted Cruz used his time to ask Gorsuch about The Hitchhiker s Guide to the Galaxy basketball and mutton busting 40 When asked by Republican Lindsey Graham how he would have reacted if during his interview at Trump Tower the President had asked him to vote against Roe v Wade Gorsuch replied I would have walked out the door 40 Democratic senators continued to criticize Gorsuch on his dissent in the truck driver case with Dianne Feinstein asking him will you be for the little men and Democrat Al Franken telling the judge the facts of the case constituted an absurdity exception to the Plain Meaning Rule which Gorsuch relied upon in his dissent 41 Franken went on to say I had a career in identifying absurdity referring to his former career as a comedian 40 Democrat Patrick Leahy used his time to criticize Republicans obstructions of the Garland nomination disparage the policies of President George W Bush that Gorsuch had defended at the Justice Department and to ask Gorsuch how he would rule in Washington v Trump a pending case concerning the legality of Trump s Executive Order 13769 colloquially referred to as the Muslim Ban Gorsuch refused to comment on active litigation and explained that Justice Department lawyers must defend their client while characterizing Garland as someone whom he admires an outstanding judge and that he always reads Garland s opinions with special care 40 On the third day of hearings March 22 Gorsuch continued to answer committee members questions Republican Orrin Hatch asked Gorsuch if he thought his writings reflected a knee jerk attitude against common sense regulations to which the judge replied no 42 Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse spent the bulk of his allotted time describing to Gorsuch the negative effects of Dark money contributed by unknown donors He also warned that the Court s 2010 Citizens United ruling s elimination of limits for political spending by corporations in elections could result in undue corporate political influence and asked Gorsuch if would be subject to capture by big business to which he replied nobody will capture me 43 44 During her allotted time Democrat Amy Klobuchar pressed Gorsuch on what she viewed as his selective originalism observing that Gorsuch who self identifies as an originalist had not consistently interpreted legal texts including the Constitution by the original public meaning that they would have had at the time that they became law 43 Later when Dianne Feinstein asked him a question on the Equal Protection Clause and tensions between originalism and the later expansion of constitutional protections for women and racial minorites after its original drafting Gorsuch stated that originalism did not seek to return us to horse and buggy days and that it matters not a whit that some of the drafters of the Fourteenth Amendment were racists Because they were Or sexists because they were The law they drafted promises equal protection of the laws to all persons That s what they wrote 43 That same day the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Tenth Circuit in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act case Gorsuch had not been involved in although in 2008 he had written for a unanimous panel applying the same circuit precedent 44 Still Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer said this demonstrated a continued troubling pattern of Judge Gorsuch deciding against everyday Americans even children who require special assistance at school 43 Gorsuch confirmation hearing witnessesDate Name RoleMarch 20 Michael Bennet Senator D CO IntroducerCory Gardner Senator R CO IntroducerNeal Katyal former acting U S Solicitor General May 2010 June 2011 IntroducerMarch 20through March 22 Neil Gorsuch NomineeMarch 23 Nancy Scott Degan Chair American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary Congressional witnessShannon Edwards Member American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary Congressional witnessDeanell Reece Tacha Pepperdine University School of Law Duane And Kelly Roberts Dean And Professor Of Law U S Court Of Appeals Judge Retired Republican witnessRobert Harlan Henry President of Oklahoma City University U S Court Of Appeals Judge Retired Republican witnessJohn L Kane Jr United States federal judge United States District Court for the District of Colorado Republican witnessLeah Bressack former law clerk Republican witnessElisa Massimino President and CEO Human Rights First Democratic witnessJameel Jaffer Executive Director Columbia University Knight First Amendment Institute Democratic witnessJeff Perkins Democratic witnessGuerino J Calemine III General Counsel Communication Workers of America Democratic witnessJeff Lamken Partner MoloLamken Republican witnessLawrence Solum Carmack Waterhouse Professor Of Law Georgetown University Law Center Republican witnessJonathan Turley J B And Maurice C Shapiro Professor Of Public Interest Law The George Washington University Law School Republican witnessKaren Harned Executive Director National Federation Of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center Republican witnessHeather McGhee President Demos Democratic witnessFatima Goss Graves Senior Vice President For Program amp President Elect National Women s Law Center Democratic witnessPatrick Gallagher Director Sierra Club Environmental Law Program Democratic witnessEve Hill Partner Brown Goldstein Levy Democratic witnessPeter Kirsanow Commissioner U S Commission On Civil Rights Partner Benesch Friedlander Coplan amp Aronoff Republican witnessAlice Fisher Partner Latham amp Watkins Republican witnessHannah Smith Senior Counsel Becket Fund Republican witnessTimothy Meyer former law clerk Republican witnessJamil N Jaffer former law clerk Republican witnessKristen Clarke President amp CEO Lawyers Committee For Civil Rights Under Law Democratic witnessSarah Warbelow Legal Director Human Rights Campaign Democratic witnessAmy Hagstrom Miller President CEO amp Founder Whole Woman s Health Democratic witnessWilliam Marshall William Rand Kenan Jr Distinguished Professor Of Law University Of North Carolina Democratic witnessSandy Phillips Democratic witnessPlagiarism allegations edit On April 4 BuzzFeed and Politico ran articles highlighting similar language occurring in Gorsuch s book The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia and an earlier law review article by Abigail Lawlis Kuzma Indiana s deputy attorney general Academic experts contacted by Politico differed in their assessment of what Gorsuch did ranging from calling it a clear impropriety to mere sloppiness 45 46 47 48 John Finnis who supervised Gorsuch s Oxford dissertation at Oxford stated The allegation is entirely without foundation The book is meticulous in its citation of primary sources The allegation that the book is guilty of plagiarism because it does not cite secondary sources which draw on those same primary sources is frankly absurd Kuzma stated I have reviewed both passages and do not see an issue here even though the language is similar These passages are factual not analytical in nature framing both the technical legal and medical circumstances of the Baby Infant Doe case that occurred in 1982 48 Noah Feldman a Harvard Law professor thought that Gorsuch had committed minor plagiarism that deserved no more punishment than the embarrassment attendant on its revelation 49 Committee vote edit On April 3 2017 the Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed the Gorsuch nomination sending it to the full Senate for final action by an 11 9 8 party line vote with all Republican members voting for him and all Democratic members voting against The last time the committee s vote to approve a Supreme Court nominee split precisely along party lines was in 2006 on the Samuel Alito nomination 50 51 52 Filibuster and cloture vote edit nbsp Protesters at Foley Square in Lower Manhattan New York City urged Senate Democrats to filibuster the Neil Gorsuch nomination April 1 2017Gorsuch needed to win a simple majority vote of the full Senate 51 votes to be confirmed however a filibuster by the opposition would add an additional requirement a three fifths supermajority vote in favor of cloture 60 votes which would allow debate to end and force a final vote on confirmation At the time Republicans held 52 seats in the 100 seat Senate and could also count on if needed the tie breaking vote of Vice President Pence acting in his Constitutional capacity as President of the Senate 53 After nominating Gorsuch President Trump called on the Senate to use the nuclear option and abolish the filibuster for Supreme Court appointments if its continued existence would prevent Gorsuch s confirmation 54 The nuclear option was used in 2013 by then Majority Leader Harry Reid to abolish filibusters for all presidential appointments except nominations to the Supreme Court 52 While some Republicans such as John McCain expressed reluctance about abolishing the filibuster for executive appointments others such as John Cornyn argued that the Republican majority should reserve all options necessary to confirm Gorsuch 53 During the last day of committee hearings Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced that he would filibuster the nomination 55 Democratic opposition focused on complaints saying that Scalia s seat should have been filled by President Obama rather than on Gorsuch himself 56 57 In addition Democrats Al Franken Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris along with Independent Bernie Sanders each criticized various aspects of Gorsuch s record Additionally Jeff Merkley said he would do anything in his power including the power of filibustering to oppose Gorsuch s nomination 58 On April 6 2017 Democrats launched a filibuster against Gorsuch s nomination In response Republicans invoked the nuclear option and changed the Senate rules to end filibusters for Supreme Court nominees The move came after Democrats blocked the nomination under the previous rule when only four Democrats crossed over and voted with Republicans for cloture Michael Bennet Joe Donnelly Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Manchin 59 After the rules change a second cloture vote was held this one needing only a majority of Senators voting passed bringing debate to a close 60 61 Full Senate vote edit source source source source source source track The swearing in ceremony of Gorsuch on April 10 2017 attended by President Donald Trump and associate Justice Anthony KennedyThe Senate confirmed Neil Gorsuch to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court on April 7 2017 by a vote of 54 45 8 All Republicans present along with Democrats Joe Manchin Heidi Heitkamp and Joe Donnelly voted to confirm him 62 Republican Johnny Isakson who had supported the nomination was absent for the vote because he was recovering from back surgery 63 Vote to confirm the Gorsuch nominationApril 7 2017 Party Total votesDemocratic Republican IndependentYea 3 51 0 54 54 55 Nay 43 0 2 45 45 45 Result ConfirmedRoll call vote on the nominationSenator Party State VoteLamar Alexander R Tennessee YeaTammy Baldwin D Wisconsin NayJohn Barrasso R Wyoming YeaMichael Bennet D Colorado NayRichard Blumenthal D Connecticut NayRoy Blunt R Missouri YeaCory Booker D New Jersey NayJohn Boozman R Arkansas YeaSherrod Brown D Ohio NayRichard Burr R North Carolina YeaMaria Cantwell D Washington NayShelley Moore Capito R West Virginia YeaBen Cardin D Maryland NayTom Carper D Delaware NayBob Casey Jr D Pennsylvania NayBill Cassidy R Louisiana YeaThad Cochran R Mississippi YeaSusan Collins R Maine YeaChris Coons D Delaware NayBob Corker R Tennessee YeaJohn Cornyn R Texas YeaCatherine Cortez Masto D Nevada NayTom Cotton R Arkansas YeaMike Crapo R Idaho YeaTed Cruz R Texas YeaSteve Daines R Montana YeaJoe Donnelly D Indiana YeaTammy Duckworth D Illinois NayDick Durbin D Illinois NayMike Enzi R Wyoming YeaJoni Ernst R Iowa YeaDianne Feinstein D California NayDeb Fischer R Nebraska YeaJeff Flake R Arizona YeaAl Franken D Minnesota NayCory Gardner R Colorado YeaKirsten Gillibrand D New York NayLindsey Graham R South Carolina YeaChuck Grassley R Iowa YeaKamala Harris D California NayMaggie Hassan D New Hampshire NayOrrin Hatch R Utah YeaMartin Heinrich D New Mexico NayHeidi Heitkamp D North Dakota YeaDean Heller R Nevada YeaMazie Hirono D Hawaii NayJohn Hoeven R North Dakota YeaJim Inhofe R Oklahoma YeaJohnny Isakson R Georgia AbsentRon Johnson R Wisconsin YeaTim Kaine D Virginia NayJohn Neely Kennedy R Louisiana YeaAngus King I Maine NayAmy Klobuchar D Minnesota NayJames Lankford R Oklahoma YeaPatrick Leahy D Vermont NayMike Lee R Utah YeaJoe Manchin D West Virginia YeaEd Markey D Massachusetts NayJohn McCain R Arizona YeaClaire McCaskill D Missouri NayMitch McConnell R Kentucky YeaBob Menendez D New Jersey NayJeff Merkley D Oregon NayJerry Moran R Kansas YeaLisa Murkowski R Alaska YeaChris Murphy D Connecticut NayPatty Murray D Washington NayBill Nelson D Florida NayRand Paul R Kentucky YeaDavid Perdue R Georgia YeaGary Peters D Michigan NayRob Portman R Ohio YeaJack Reed D Rhode Island NayJim Risch R Idaho YeaPat Roberts R Kansas YeaMike Rounds R South Dakota YeaMarco Rubio R Florida YeaBernie Sanders I Vermont NayBen Sasse R Nebraska YeaBrian Schatz D Hawaii NayChuck Schumer D New York NayTim Scott R South Carolina YeaJeanne Shaheen D New Hampshire NayRichard Shelby R Alabama YeaDebbie Stabenow D Michigan NayLuther Strange R Alabama YeaDan Sullivan R Alaska YeaJon Tester D Montana NayJohn Thune R South Dakota YeaThom Tillis R North Carolina YeaPat Toomey R Pennsylvania YeaTom Udall D New Mexico NayChris Van Hollen D Maryland NayMark Warner D Virginia NayElizabeth Warren D Massachusetts NaySheldon Whitehouse D Rhode Island NayRoger Wicker R Mississippi YeaRon Wyden D Oregon NayTodd Young R Indiana YeaSource 64 On April 10 Gorsuch took the prescribed constitutional and judicial set by federal law oaths of office and became the 113th member of the Supreme Court 65 At age 49 he was the youngest person to join the Court since Clarence Thomas at age 43 in 1991 Also having been a law clerk for Anthony Kennedy 1993 94 he became the first Supreme Court justice to serve alongside a justice for whom he had previously clerked 66 See also editDemographics of the Supreme Court of the United States Donald Trump Supreme Court candidates First 100 days of Donald Trump s presidency List of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United StatesReferences edit Killough Ashley April 7 2017 GOP triggers nuclear option on Neil Gorsuch nomination CNN Archived from the original on April 11 2019 Retrieved April 7 2017 Liptak Adam April 17 2017 Bitter Fight Behind Him Justice Gorsuch Starts Day With Relish The New York Times Archived from the original on April 18 2017 Retrieved April 18 2017 Liptak Alan February 13 2016 Justice Antonin Scalia Who Led a Conservative Renaissance on the Supreme Court Is Dead at 79 The New York Times Archived from the original on February 18 2016 Retrieved February 18 2016 Hennessy Fiske Molly February 14 2016 Scalia s last moments on a Texas ranch quail hunting to being found in perfect repose Los Angeles Times Archived from the original on February 18 2016 Retrieved February 18 2016 Helmore Edward February 14 2016 Republicans and Democrats draw battle lines over supreme court nomination The Guardian ISSN 0261 3077 Archived from the original on February 15 2016 Retrieved February 15 2016 Chemerinsky Erwin April 6 2016 What If the Supreme Court Were Liberal The Atlantic Archived from the original on December 20 2016 Retrieved December 16 2016 a b c Bravin Jess January 3 2017 President Obama s Supreme Court Nomination of Merrick Garland Expires Wall Street Journal Archived from the original on March 10 2017 Retrieved October 3 2020 a b c d e McMillion Barry J Rutkus Denis Steven July 6 2018 Supreme Court Nominations 1789 to 2017 Actions by the Senate the Judiciary Committee and the President PDF CRS Report RL33225 Washington D C Congressional Research Service Archived PDF from the original on August 9 2019 Retrieved June 17 2019 Calfas Jennifer January 31 2017 Merkley vows to fight Trump s nominee to fill stolen Supreme Court The Hill Archived from the original on February 2 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Everett Burgess October 27 2016 Republicans at war over Supreme Court Politico Archived from the original on February 3 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Rappeport Alan Savage Charlie May 18 2016 Donald Trump Releases List of Possible Supreme Court Picks The New York Times Archived from the original on July 22 2016 Flores Reena Garrett Major September 23 2016 Donald Trump expands list of possible Supreme Court picks CBS News Archived from the original on November 30 2016 Retrieved November 13 2016 a b c d e Goldmacher Shane Johnson Eliana Gerstein Josh January 31 2017 How Trump got to yes on Gorsuch Politico Archived from the original on February 1 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Eric Lipton Jeremy W Peters March 19 2017 In Gorsuch Conservative Activist Sees Test Case for Reshaping the Judiciary The New York Times p A1 Archived from the original on April 6 2017 Retrieved April 8 2017 A conservative activist s behind the scenes campaign to remake the nation s courts Washington Post Archived from the original on February 15 2021 Retrieved October 31 2020 Marcus Ruth December 3 2019 Supreme Ambition Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover Simon and Schuster ISBN 978 1 9821 2388 8 Jackson David February 1 2017 Why Trump chose Neil Gorsuch as his Supreme Court nominee USA Today Archived from the original on February 2 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Trump chooses Neil Gorsuch a conservative seen as likely to be confirmed for Supreme Court Los Angeles Times January 31 2017 Archived from the original on January 31 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Enten Harry January 30 2017 How Conservative A Supreme Court Nominee Can Trump Get Through The Senate FiveThirtyEight Archived from the original on January 31 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Konnikova Maria January 31 2017 The 4 Rules That Will Explain Neil Gorsuch s Confirmation Fight Politico Archived from the original on February 1 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Primus Richard January 31 2017 Trump Picks Scalia 2 0 Politico Archived from the original on February 1 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Parlapano Alicia Yourish Karen February 1 2017 Where Neil Gorsuch Would Fit on the Supreme Court The New York Times Archived from the original on February 2 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Parker Ashley Dawsey Josh Barnes Robert December 18 2017 Trump talked about rescinding Gorsuch s nomination The Washington Post ISSN 0190 8286 Archived from the original on December 19 2017 Retrieved December 19 2017 a b Clauss Kyle Scott February 1 2017 Neil Gorsuch Trump s Supreme Court Pick Attended Harvard Law with Obama Boston Boston Massachusetts Archived from the original on February 2 2017 Retrieved February 3 2017 Boyer Dave February 1 2017 Former Obama official endorses Gorsuch nomination for Supreme Court The Washington Times Washington DC Archived from the original on February 2 2017 Retrieved February 3 2017 I have no doubt that if confirmed Judge Gorsuch would help to restore confidence in the rule of law Mr Katyal wrote in a New York Times op ed His years on the bench reveal a commitment to judicial independence a record that should give the American people confidence that he will not compromise principle to favor the president who appointed him NRA Applauds Neil Gorsuch s Nomination to the U S Supreme Court NRA ILA January 31 2017 Archived from the original on February 4 2017 Retrieved February 3 2017 Beckett Lois February 1 2017 NRA cheers nomination of Neil Gorsuch seen as gun rights defender The Guardian Archived from the original on February 25 2017 Retrieved February 24 2017 SAF Impressed With Judge Neil Gorsuch For Supreme Court Yahoo Archived from the original on February 25 2017 Retrieved February 24 2017 Opinion Nancy Pelosi and gun control groups claim that Neil Gorsuch sides with felons over gun safety The Washington Post Archived from the original on February 3 2017 Retrieved February 3 2017 Statement from Americans for Responsible Solutions and the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence on Nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to United States Supreme Court americansforresponsiblesolutions org January 31 2017 Archived from the original on February 25 2017 Retrieved February 24 2017 Carroll Lauren February 2 2017 Does Neil Gorsuch side with felons over gun safety as Pelosi says PolitiFact Archived from the original on February 4 2017 Retrieved February 3 2017 Center Claudia February 2 2017 Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch Has a Troubling History When Ruling on Disability Rights Cases ACLU Archived from the original on February 4 2017 Retrieved February 3 2017 Zauzmer Julie February 1 2017 Neil Gorsuch belongs to a notably liberal church and would be the first Protestant on the Court in years The Washington Post Archived from the original on February 4 2017 Retrieved February 4 2017 Gorsuch s Dark Money Benefactor Attended His White House Swearing In Ceremony Slate Archived from the original on February 26 2018 Retrieved February 26 2018 Cowan Richard February 1 2017 Senate Judiciary Democrat says panel should hold hearings for Gorsuch Reuters Archived from the original on February 1 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Kim Seung Min March 9 2017 DOJ sends 144 000 pages of Gorsuch documents to Senate Politico Archived from the original on March 15 2017 Retrieved March 14 2017 a b Nomination of the Honorable Neil M Gorsuch to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Washington D C United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary March 20 2017 Archived from the original on March 22 2017 Retrieved March 21 2017 a b c Matt Flegenheimer March 21 2017 Gorsuch Tries to Put Himself Above Politics in Confirmation Hearing The New York Times p A20 Archived from the original on March 22 2017 Retrieved March 23 2017 Durbin Gorsuch spar over Hobby Lobby ruling Archived April 20 2019 at the Wayback Machine Washington Post Robert Barnes March 21 2011 Retrieved April 20 2019 a b c d e Adam Liptak Matt Flegenheimer March 22 2017 Gorsuch Asserts He Would Be Able To Buck Trump Has Made No Promises Expansive and Evasive in Sometimes Tense Questioning The New York Times p A1 Archived from the original on March 23 2017 Retrieved March 23 2017 Full Sen Franken questioning of Judge Gorsuch retrieved December 14 2022 Matt Flegenheimer March 22 2017 Of Horse v Duck Mutton Busting and Other Confirmation Diversions The New York Times p A16 Archived from the original on March 23 2017 Retrieved March 23 2017 a b c d Liptak Adam Flegenheimer Matt March 23 2017 Democrats Fail to Move Gorsuch Off Script and Beyond Generalities The New York Times p A17 Archived from the original on March 23 2017 Retrieved March 23 2017 a b Ford Matt March 22 2017 Gorsuch Roe v Wade Is the Law of the Land At Wednesday s hearing Democratic senators adopted a new strategy to press the Supreme Court nominee on abortion and campaign finance The Atlantic Archived from the original on June 20 2019 Retrieved June 20 2019 Geidner Chris April 4 2017 A Short Section In Neil Gorsuch s 2006 Book Appears To Be Copied From A Law Review Article BuzzFeed Archived from the original on April 10 2017 Retrieved April 15 2017 Bresnahan John Everett Burgess April 5 2017 Gorsuch s writings borrow from other authors The White House rejects any suggestion of impropriety Politico Archived from the original on April 11 2017 Retrieved April 15 2017 Blake Aaron April 5 2017 Neil Gorsuch s 11th hour plagiarism scare The Washington Post Archived from the original on December 3 2018 Retrieved June 20 2019 a b Logan Bryan April 4 2016 Neil Gorsuch is accused of plagiarism amid a heated Supreme Court confirmation fight Business Insider Archived from the original on April 18 2017 Retrieved April 15 2017 Feldman Noah April 5 2017 Gorsuch s Plagiarism Is Worthy of Embarrassment But the copying found in the judge s book isn t disqualifying for the Supreme Court Bloomberg Archived from the original on April 8 2017 Retrieved April 15 2017 Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees Washington D C Senate Committee on the Judiciary Compiled by the Senate Library Archived from the original on June 5 2019 Retrieved June 20 2019 Flegenheimer Matt April 3 2017 Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Gorsuch in Party Line Vote The New York Times Archived from the original on April 6 2019 Retrieved April 4 2017 a b Berenson Tessa April 3 2017 Senate Judiciary Committee Just Approved Neil Gorsuch s Nomination Time Archived from the original on April 3 2017 Retrieved April 4 2017 a b Everett Burgess Bresnahan John Min Kim Seung February 1 2017 GOP won t rule out killing the filibuster for Supreme Court pick Politico Archived from the original on February 2 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Jackson David February 1 2017 Trump Go nuclear and abolish filibuster on Gorsuch vote if needed USA Today Archived from the original on February 1 2017 Retrieved February 2 2017 Matt Flegenheimer Charlie Savage Adam Liptak March 24 2017 Democrats Plan to Filibuster to Thwart Gorsuch Nomination The New York Times p A17 Archived from the original on April 6 2017 Retrieved April 8 2017 Trump s Supreme Court Nominee Is Going To Face An Angry Partisan Senate Battle NPR March 30 2016 Archived from the original on February 1 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Shear Michael D Liptak Adam January 24 2017 A Supreme Court Pick Is Promised A Political Brawl Is Certain The New York Times Archived from the original on January 31 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Facing a Massive Revolt Senate Democrats Move to Block Neil Gorsuch Vanity Fair February 2017 Archived from the original on February 4 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 Killough Ashley Barrett Ted April 7 2017 Senate GOP triggers nuclear option to break Democratic filibuster on Gorsuch CNN Archived from the original on June 29 2019 Retrieved June 20 2019 Rogin Ali April 6 2017 Senate approves nuclear option clears path for Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination vote ABC News Archived from the original on August 4 2019 Retrieved June 20 2019 Heitshusen Valerie April 14 2017 Senate Proceedings Establishing Majority Cloture for Supreme Court Nominations In Brief PDF Congressional Research Service Archived PDF from the original on February 15 2021 Retrieved October 18 2020 Liptak Adam Flegenheimer Matt April 7 2017 Neil Gorsuch Confirmed by Senate as Supreme Court Justice The New York Times Archived from the original on July 10 2018 Retrieved June 1 2019 Wolf Richard Kelly Erin April 7 2017 Gorsuch confirmation to have major impact on all three branches of government USA Today Archived from the original on June 1 2019 Retrieved June 1 2019 Roll Call Vote 115th Congress 1st Session vote number 111 senate gov April 7 2017 Archived from the original on April 29 2017 Retrieved June 1 2019 Wolf Richard Jackson David April 10 2017 Neil Gorsuch sworn in as 113th Supreme Court justice USA Today Archived from the original on June 2 2019 Retrieved June 1 2019 Enten Harry February 1 2017 Trump Picks Super Conservative Super Qualified Neil Gorsuch For The Supreme Court FiveThirtyEight Archived from the original on February 4 2017 Retrieved February 1 2017 External links edit nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination Announcement of nominee President Trump s Nominee for the Supreme Court Neil M Gorsuch The White House President Trump Announces Supreme Court of the United States Nominee on YouTube Confirmation hearing witness testimony Michael Bennet Archived March 23 2017 at the Wayback Machine Cory Gardner Archived March 23 2017 at the Wayback Machine Neil Katyal Archived March 23 2017 at the Wayback Machine Neil Gorsuch Archived March 23 2017 at the Wayback Machine Nancy Scott Degan Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Deanell Reece Tacha Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Leah Bressack Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Elisa Massimino Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Jameel Jaffer Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Jeff Perkins Archived March 24 2017 at the Wayback Machine Guerino Calemine Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Jeff Lamken Archived October 29 2020 at the Wayback Machine Lawrence Solum Archived October 29 2020 at the Wayback Machine Jonathan Turley Archived October 29 2020 at the Wayback Machine Karen Harned Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Heagther McGhee Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Fatima Goss Graves Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Patrick Gallagher Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Eve Hill Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Peter Kirsanow Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Alice Fisher Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Hannah Smith Archived October 29 2020 at the Wayback Machine Timothy Meyer Archived October 29 2020 at the Wayback Machine Jamil N Jaffer Archived October 29 2020 at the Wayback Machine Kristen Clarke Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Sarah Warbelow Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Amy Hagstrom Miller Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine William Marshall Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Sandy Phillips Archived March 30 2017 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination amp oldid 1180709358, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.