Fossil fuel phase-out

Not to be confused with Fossil fuel divestment.

Fossil fuel phase-out is the gradual reduction of the use and production of fossil fuels to zero, to reduce deaths and illness from air pollution, limit climate change, and strengthen energy independence. It is part of the ongoing renewable energy transition, but is being hindered by fossil fuel subsidies.

Investment: Companies, governments and households have been investing increasing amounts in decarbonisation, including renewable energy, electric vehicles and associated infrastructure, energy storage, energy-efficient heating systems, carbon capture and storage, and hydrogen energy.^[1][2]

Cost: With increasingly widespread implementation of renewable energy sources, the levelised cost of energy has declined, most notably for energy generated by solar panels.^[3][4]

Although many countries are shutting down coal-fired power stations,^[5][6][7] electricity generation is not moving off coal fast enough to meet climate goals.^[8] Many countries have set dates to stop selling petrol and diesel cars and trucks, but a timetable to stop burning fossil gas has not yet been agreed.^[9]

Current efforts in fossil fuel phase-out involve replacing fossil fuels with sustainable energy sources in sectors such as transport and heating. Alternatives to fossil fuels include electrification, green hydrogen and biofuel. Phase-out policies include both demand-side and supply-side measures.^[10] Whereas demand-side approaches seek to reduce fossil-fuel consumption, supply-side initiatives seek to constrain production to accelerate the pace of energy transition and reduction in emissions. It has been suggested that laws should be passed to make fossil fuel companies bury the same amount of carbon as they emit.^[11] The International Energy Agency estimates that in order to achieve carbon neutrality by the middle of the century, global investments in renewable energy must treble by 2030, reaching over $4 trillion annually.^[12][13]

Scope

While crude oil and natural gas are also being phased out in chemical processes (e.g. production of new building blocks for plastics) as the circular economy and biobased economy (e.g. bioplastics) are being developed^[14] to reduce plastic pollution, the fossil fuel phase out specifically aims to end the burning of fossil fuels and the consequent production of greenhouse gases. Therefore, attempts to reduce the use of oil and gas in the plastic industry do not form part of fossil fuel phase-out or reduction plans.

Types of fossil fuels

Main article: Fossil fuel

Coal

Main article: Coal phase-out

See also: Beyond Coal

 

The annual amount of coal plant capacity being retired increased into the mid-2010s.^[15] However, the rate of retirement has since stalled,^[15] and global coal phase-out is not yet compatible with the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement.^[16]

 

In parallel with retirement of some coal plant capacity, other coal plants are still being added, though the annual amount of added capacity has been declining since the 2010s.^[17]

To meet the Paris Agreement target of keeping global warming to well below 2 °C (3.6 °F), coal use needs to halve from 2020 to 2030.^[18] However, as of 2017^[update], coal supplied over a quarter of the world's primary energy^[19] and about 40% of the greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels.^[20] Phasing out coal has short-term health and environmental benefits which exceed the costs,^[21] and without it the 2 °C target in the Paris Agreement cannot be met;^[22] but some countries still favour coal,^[23] and there is much disagreement about how quickly it should be phased out.^[24][25]

As of 2018^[update], 30 countries and many sub-national governments and businesses^[26] had become members of the Powering Past Coal Alliance, each making a declaration to advance the transition away from unabated (abated means with carbon capture and storage (CCS), but almost all power plants are unabated as CCS is so expensive) coal power generation.^[27] As of 2019^[update], however, the countries which use the most coal have not joined, and some countries continue to build and finance new coal-fired power stations. A just transition from coal is supported by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.^[28]

In 2019 the UN Secretary General said that countries should stop building new coal power plants from 2020 or face 'total disaster'.^[29]

In 2020, although China built some plants, globally more coal power was retired than built: the UN Secretary General has said that OECD countries should stop generating electricity from coal by 2030 and the rest of the world by 2040.^[30]

Oil

 

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill discharges 4.9 million barrels (780,000 m³).

See also: Peak oil

Crude oil is refined into fuel oil, diesel and petrol. The refined products are primarily for transportation by conventional cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships. Popular alternatives are human-powered transport, public transport, electric vehicles, and biofuels.^[31]

Natural gas

See also: Natural gas § Environmental effects, and Peak gas

 

Natural gas well in Germany

Natural gas is widely used to generate electricity and has an emission intensity of about 500 g/kWh. Heating is also a major source of carbon dioxide emissions. Leaks are also a large source of atmospheric methane.

In some countries natural gas is being used as a temporary "bridge fuel" to replace coal, in turn to be replaced by renewable sources or a hydrogen economy.^[32] However this "bridge fuel" may significantly extend the use of fossil fuel or strand assets, such as gas-fired power plants built in the 2020s, as the average plant life is 35 years.^[33] Although natural gas assets are likely to be stranded later than oil and coal assets, perhaps not until 2050, some investors are concerned by reputational risk.^[34]

As of 2019^[update], natural gas phase-out progressed in some regions, for example with increasing use of hydrogen by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG)^[35] and changes to building regulations to reduce the use of gas heating.^[36][37]

Reasons

Commonly cited reasons for phasing out fossil fuels are to:

• reduce deaths and illness caused by air pollution
• limit climate change
• reduce fossil fuel subsidies^[38][39]
• strengthen energy independence – countries with low or no fossil fuel deposits often transition away from fossil fuels to gain energy independently^{[citation needed]}

Health

See also: Air pollution § Health effects

Most of the millions^[40] of premature deaths from air pollution are due to fossil fuels.^[41] Pollution may be indoors e.g. from heating and cooking, or outdoors from vehicle exhaust. One estimate is that the proportion is 65% and the number 3.5 million each year.^[42] According to Professor Sir Andy Haines at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine the health benefits of phasing out fossil fuels measured in money (estimated by economists using the value of life for each country) are substantially more than the cost of achieving the 2 °C goal of the Paris Agreement.^[43]

Climate change mitigation

Fossil-fuel phase-out is the largest part of limiting global warming as fossil fuels account for over 70% of greenhouse gas emissions.^[44] In 2020, the International Energy Agency said that to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, the phase-out of fossil fuels would need to "move four times faster".^[45] To achieve the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, the vast majority of fossil fuel reserves owned by countries and companies as of 2021 would have to remain in the ground.^[46][47]

Employment

The renewable energy transition can create jobs through the construction of new power plants and the manufacturing of the equipment that they need, as was seen in the case of Germany and the wind power industry.^[48]

Energy independence

Countries which lack fossil fuel deposits, particularly coal but also petroleum and natural gas, often cite energy independence in their shift away from fossil fuels.

In Switzerland the decision to electrify virtually the entire railway network was taken in light of the two world wars (during which Switzerland was neutral) when coal imports became increasingly difficult. As Switzerland has ample hydropower resources, electric trains (as opposed to those driven by steam locomotives or diesel) could be run on domestic energy resources, reducing the need for coal imports.^[49][50]

The 1973 oil crisis also led to a shift in energy policy in many places to become (more) independent of fossil fuel imports. In France the government announced an ambitious plan to expand nuclear power which by the end of the 1980s had shifted France's electricity sector almost entirely away from coal gas and oil and towards nuclear power.^[51][52]

The trend towards encouraging cycling in the Netherlands^[53][54] and Denmark^[55][56] also coincided with the 1973 oil crisis and aimed in part at reducing the need for oil imports in the transportation sector.

Phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies

See also: Fossil fuel subsidies § Phase-out

Significant fossil fuel subsidies are present in many countries.^[57] Fossil fuel subsidies in 2019 for consumption totalled US$320 billion^[58] spread over many countries.^[59] As of 2019^[update] governments subsidise fossil fuels by about $500 billion per year: however using an unconventional definition of subsidy which includes failing to price greenhouse gas emissions, the International Monetary Fund estimated that fossil fuel subsidies were $5.2 trillion in 2017, which was 6.4% of global GDP.^[60] Some fossil fuel companies lobby governments.^[61]

Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies is crucial to address the climate crisis.^[62] It must however be done carefully to avoid protests^[63] and making poor people poorer.^[64] In most cases, however, low fossil fuel prices benefit wealthier households more than poorer households. So to help poor and vulnerable people, other measures than fossil fuel subsidies would be more targeted.^[65] This could in turn increase public support for subsidy reform.^[66]

Economic theory indicates that the optimal policy would be to remove coal mining and burning subsidies and replace them with optimal^{[clarification needed]} taxes. Global studies indicate that even without introducing taxes, subsidy and trade barrier removal at a sectoral level would improve efficiency and reduce environmental damage.^[67] Removal of these subsidies would substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions and create jobs in renewable energy.^[68] The IMF estimated in 2023 that removal of fossil fuel subsidies would limit global heating to the Paris goal of substantially less than 2 °C.^[69]

The actual effects of removing fossil fuel subsidies would depend heavily on the type of subsidy removed and the availability and economics of other energy sources.^{[67][obsolete source]} There is also the issue of carbon leakage, where removal of a subsidy to an energy-intensive industry could lead to a shift in production to another country with less regulation, and thus to a net increase in global emissions.

In developed countries, energy costs are low and heavily subsidised, whereas in developing countries, the poor pay high costs for low-quality services.^[70]

In 2009, studies have put forward a plan to power 100% of the world's energy with wind, hydroelectric, and solar power by the year 2030.^[71][72] It recommends transfer of energy subsidies from fossil fuel to renewable, and a price on carbon reflecting its cost for flood, cyclone, hurricane, drought, and related extreme weather expenses.

Excluding subsidies, the levelised cost of electricity from new large-scale solar power in India and China has been below existing coal-fired power stations since 2021.^[73]

A study by Rice University Center for Energy Studies suggested the following steps for countries:^[39]

1. Countries should commit to a specific time frame for a full phaseout of implicit and explicit fossil fuel subsidies.
2. Clarify the language on subsidy reform to remove ambiguous terminology.
3. Seek formal legislation in affected countries that codifies reform pathways and reduces opportunities for backsliding.
4. Publish transparent formulas for market-linked pricing, and adhere to a regular schedule for price adjustments.
5. Phase-in full reforms in a sequence of gradual steps. Increasing prices gradually but on a defined schedule signals intent to consumers while allowing time to invest in energy efficiency to partially offset the increases.
6. Aspire to account for externalities over time by imposing a fee or tax on fossil energy products and services, and eliminating preferences for fossil fuels that remain embedded in the tax code.
7. Use direct cash transfers to maintain benefits for poor segments of society rather than preserving subsidised prices for vulnerable socioeconomic groups.
8. Launch a comprehensive public communications campaign.
9. Any remaining fossil fuel subsidies should be clearly budgeted at full international prices and paid for by the national treasury.
10. Document price and emissions changes with reporting requirements.

Phasing-out specific processes

Further information: Coal phase-out

Phase-out of fossil fuel power plants

See also: Energy transition and 100% renewable energy

 

Bloomberg NEF reported that in 2022, global energy transition investment equaled fossil fuels investment for the first time.^[74]

 

In 2020, renewables overtook fossil fuels as the European Union's main source of electricity for the first time.^[75]

Energy efficiency is complementary to the use of sustainable energy sources, when phasing-out fossil fuels.

Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles

Main article: Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles

 

Sales of electric vehicles (EVs) indicate a trend away from gas-powered vehicles that generate greenhouse gases.^[76]

Many countries and cities have introduced bans on the sales of new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, requiring all new cars to be electric vehicles or otherwise powered by clean, non-emitting sources.^[77][78] Such bans include the United Kingdom by 2035^[79] and Norway by 2025. Many transit authorities are working to purchase only electric buses while also restricting use of ICE vehicles in the city center to limit air pollution. Many US states have a zero-emissions vehicle mandate, incrementally requiring a certain per cent of cars sold to be electric. The German term Verkehrswende ("traffic transition" analogous to Energiewende, energetic transition) calls for a shift from combustion powered road transport to bicycles, walking and rail transport and the replacement of remaining road vehicles with electric traction.

Biofuels, in the form of liquid fuels derived from plant materials, are entering the market. However, many of the biofuels that are currently being supplied have been criticised for their adverse impacts on the natural environment, food security, and land use.^[80][81]

Oil fuel phase-out

 

The standard Hubbert curve, plotting crude oil production of a region over time

 

World energy consumption, 1970–2025. Source: International Energy Outlook 2004.

The mitigation of peak oil is the attempt to delay the date and minimize the social and economic effects of peak oil by reducing the consumption of and reliance on petroleum.^{[citation needed]} By reducing petroleum consumption, mitigation efforts seek to favorably change the shape of the Hubbert curve, which is the graph of real oil production over time predicted by Hubbert peak theory. The peak of this curve is known as peak oil, and by changing the shape of the curve, the timing of the peak in oil production is affected. An analysis by the author of the Hirsch report showed that while the shape of the oil production curve can be affected by mitigation efforts, mitigation efforts are also affected by the shape of Hubbert curve.^[82]

For the most part, mitigation involves fuel conservation, and the use of alternative and renewable energy sources. The development of unconventional oil resources can extend the supply of petroleum,^[83] but does not reduce consumption.

Historically, world oil consumption data show that mitigation efforts during the 1973 and 1979 oil shocks lowered oil consumption, while general recessions since the 1970s have had no effect on curbing the oil consumption until 2007.^{[citation needed]} In the United States, oil consumption declines in reaction to high prices.^[84][85]

Key questions for mitigation are the viability of methods, the roles of government and private sector and how early these solutions are implemented.^[86][87] The responses to such questions and steps taken towards mitigation may determine whether or not the lifestyle of a society can be maintained, and may affect the population capacity of the planet.

The most effective method of mitigating peak oil is to use renewable or alternative energy sources in place of petroleum.

Because most oil is consumed for transportation^[88] most mitigation discussions revolve around transportation issues.

Mobile applications

See also: Biofuel, Hydrogen economy, Methanol economy, and Hydrogen-powered aircraft

Due to its high energy density and ease of handling, oil has a unique role as a transportation fuel. There are, however, a number of possible alternatives. Among the biofuels the use of bioethanol and biodiesel is already established to some extent in some countries.

The use of hydrogen fuel is another alternative under development in various countries, alongside, hydrogen vehicles^[89] though hydrogen is actually an energy storage medium, not a primary energy source, and consequently the use of a non-petroleum source would be required to extract the hydrogen for use. Though hydrogen is currently outperformed in terms of cost and efficiency by battery powered vehicles^{[90][citation needed]}, there are applications where it would come in useful. Short haul ferries and very cold climates are two examples. Hydrogen fuel cells are about a third as efficient as batteries and double the efficiency of petrol vehicles.

Alternative aviation fuel

The Airbus A380 flew on alternative fuel for the first time on 1 February 2008.^{[citation needed]} Boeing also plans to use alternative fuel on the 747.^[91] Because some biofuels such as ethanol contains less energy, more "tankstops" might be necessary for such planes.

The US Air Force is currently in the process of certifying its entire fleet to run on a 50/50 blend of synthetic fuel derived from the Fischer–Tropsch process and JP-8 jet fuel.^[92]

Studies

Reduction in fossil fuel capacity compared to renewables

 

Renewable energy sources, especially solar photovoltaic and wind power, are providing an increasing share of power capacity.^[93]

 

In 2023, electricity generation from wind and solar sources was projected to exceed 30% by 2030, as fossil fuels' use continues to decline.^[94]

 

The countries most reliant on fossil fuels for electricity vary widely on how great a percentage of that electricity is generated from renewables, leaving wide variation in renewables' growth potential.^[95]

In 2015, Greenpeace and Climate Action Network Europe released a report highlighting the need for an active phase-out of coal-fired generation across Europe. Their analysis derived from a database of 280 coal plants and included emissions data from official EU registries.^[96]

A 2016 report by Oil Change International, concludes that the carbon emissions embedded in the coal, oil, and gas in currently working mines and fields, assuming that these run to the end of their working lifetimes, will take the world to just beyond the 2 °C limit contained in the 2015 Paris Agreement and even further from the 1.5 °C goal.^[97][98][99] The report observes that "one of the most powerful climate policy levers is also the simplest: stop digging for more fossil fuels".^[99]: 5

In 2016, the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and 11 other NGOs released a report on the impact of building new coal-fired power plants in countries where a significant proportion of the population lacks access to electricity. The report concludes that, on the whole, building coal-fired power plants does little to help the poor and may make them poorer. Moreover, wind and solar generation are beginning to challenge coal on cost.^{[100][101][102]}

A 2018 study in Nature Energy, suggests that 10 countries in Europe could completely phase out coal-fired electricity generation with their current infrastructure, whilst the United States and Russia could phase out at least 30%.^[103]

In 2020, the Fossil Fuel Cuts Database provided the first global account of supply-side initiatives to constrain fossil fuel production.^[104] The latest update of the database recorded 1967 initiatives implemented between 1988 and October 2021 in 110 countries across seven major types of supply-side approaches (Divestment, n=1201; Blockades, n= 374; Litigation, n= 192; Moratoria and Bans, n= 146; Production subsidies removal, n=31; Carbon tax on fossil fuel production, n=16; Emissions Trading Schemes, n= 7).

The GeGaLo index of geopolitical gains and losses assesses how the geopolitical position of 156 countries may change if the world fully transitions to renewable energy resources. Former fossil fuel exporters are expected to lose power, while the positions of former fossil fuel importers and countries rich in renewable energy resources is expected to strengthen.^[105]

Multiple decarbonisation plans that get to zero CO₂ emissions have been presented.

A Guardian investigation showed in 2022, that big fossil fuel firms continue to plan huge investments in new fossil fuel production projects that would drive the climate past internationally agreed temperature limits.^[106]

Renewable energy potentials

In June 2021 Dr Sven Teske and Dr Sarah Niklas from the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney found that "existing coal, oil and gas production puts the world on course to overshoot Paris climate targets." In co-operation with the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative they published a report entitled, Fossil Fuel Exit Strategy: An orderly wind down of coal, oil, and gas to meet the Paris Agreement. It analyses global renewable energy potential, and finds that "every region on Earth can replace fossil fuels with renewable energy to keep warming below 1.5 °C and provide reliable energy access to all."^[107]

Assessment of extraction prevention responsibilities

In September 2021, the first scientific assessment of the minimum amount of fossil fuels that would need to be secured from extraction per region as well as globally, to allow for a 50% probability of limiting global warming by 2050 to 1.5 °C was provided.^[108][109]

Challenges

 

Net income of the global oil and gas industry reached a record US$4 trillion in 2022.^[110]

 

After recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, energy company profits increased with greater revenues from higher fuel prices resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, falling debt levels, tax write-downs of projects shut down in Russia, and backing off from earlier plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.^[111] Record profits sparked public calls for windfall taxes.^[111]

The phase-out of fossil fuels involves many challenges, and one of them is the reliance that the world currently has on them. In 2014, fossil fuels provided over 80% of the primary energy consumption of the world.^[112]

Fossil fuel phase-out may lead to an increment in electricity prices, because of the new investments needed to replace their share in the electricity mix with alternative energy sources.^{[113][obsolete source]}

Another impact of a phase-out of fossil fuels is in employment. In the case of employment in the fossil fuel industry, a phase-out is logically undesired, therefore, people employed in the industry will usually oppose any measures that put their industries under scrutiny.^[48] Endre Tvinnereim and Elisabeth Ivarsflaten studied the relationship between employment in the fossil fuel industry with the support to climate change policies. They proposed that one opportunity for displaced drilling employments in the fossil fuel industry could be in the geothermal energy industry. This was suggested as a result of their conclusion: people and companies in the fossil fuel industry will likely oppose measures that endanger their employment, unless they have other stronger alternatives.^[114] This can be extrapolated to political interests, that can push against the phase-out of fossil fuels initiative.^[115] One example is how the vote of United States Congress members is related to the preeminence of fossil fuel industries in their respective states.^[116]

Other challenges include ensuring sustainable recycling, sourcing of the required materials, disruptions of existing power structures, managing variable renewable energy, developing optimal national transition policies, transforming transportation infrastructure and responsibilities of fossil fuel extraction prevention. There is active research and development on such issues.^{[117][118][119]}

According to the people present at COP27 in Egypt, Saudi Arabian representatives pushed to block a call for the world to burn less oil. After objections from Saudi Arabia and a few other oil producers, summit's final statement failed to include a call for nations to phase out fossil fuels. In March 2022, at a United Nations meeting with climate scientists, Saudi Arabia, together with Russia, pushed to delete a reference to "human-induced climate change" from an official document, disputing the scientifically established fact that the burning of fossil fuels by humans is the main driver of the climate crisis.^[120]

Major initiatives and legislation

China

China has pledged to become carbon neutral by 2060, which would need a just transition for over 3 million workers in the coal-mining and power industry.^[121] It is not yet clear whether China aims to phase-out all fossil fuel use by that date or whether a small proportion will still be in use with the carbon captured and stored.^[121] In 2021, coal mining was ordered to run at maximum capacity.^[122]

European Union

At the end of 2019, the European Union launched its European Green Deal. It included:

• a revision of the Energy Taxation Directive which is looking closely at fossil fuel subsidies and tax exemptions (aviation, shipping)
• a circular economy action plan,^[123]
• a review and possible revision (where needed) of the all relevant climate-related policy instruments, including the Emissions Trading System
• a sustainable and smart mobility strategy
• potential carbon tariffs for countries that don't curtail their greenhouse gas pollution at the same rate.^[124] The mechanism to achieve this is called the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).^[125]

It also leans on Horizon Europe, to play a pivotal role in leveraging national public and private investments. Through partnerships with industry and member States, it will support research and innovation on transport technologies, including batteries, clean hydrogen, low-carbon steel making, circular bio-based sectors and the built environment.^[126]

The European Investment Bank contributed over €81 billion to help the energy industry between 2017 and 2022, in line with EU energy policy. This comprised nearly €76 billion for initiatives related to power grids, energy efficiency, and renewable energy throughout Europe and other parts of the world.^[12]

India

India is confident of exceeding Paris COP commitments.^[127] In the Paris Agreement, India has committed to an Intended Nationally Determined Contributions target of achieving 40% of its total electricity generation from non-fossil fuel sources by 2030.^[128]

Japan

Japan has pledged to become carbon neutral by 2050.^[129]

United Kingdom

See also: Energy policy of the United Kingdom

The UK is legally committed to be carbon neutral by 2050, and moving away from the heating of homes by natural gas is likely to be the most difficult part of the country's fossil fuel phase out.^[130] Alternative green recovery legislative plans have been proposed by multiple groups to phase out fossil fuels as fast as technology allows.^[131]

Voices of support

 

Protest at the Legislative Building in Olympia, Washington. Ted Nation, a long-time environmental activist, beside protest sign.

Prominent individuals supporting a coal moratorium or phase-out:

• US politician Al Gore stated:^[132]

If you're a young person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is being done right now, and not done, I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration.

• Eric Schmidt, then CEO of Google, called for replacing all fossil fuels with renewable sources of energy in twenty years.^[133]

• Christiana Figueres, then executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: "Those corporations that continue to invest in new fossil fuel exploration, new fossil fuel exploitation, are really in flagrant breach of their fiduciary duty because the science is abundantly clear that this is something we can no longer do."^[134]

See also

•  Energy portal
•  Climate change portal
•  Renewable energy portal

• Gas boiler phase out
• Backstop resources
• Carbon bubble
• Carbon-neutral fuel
• Downshifting (lifestyle)
• Eco-economic decoupling
• Financial market impact of the COVID-19 pandemic – pandemic's effect on the fossil fuel industry
• Global strategic petroleum reserves
• Health and environmental impact of the coal industry
• Measures taken to address the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
• Making Sweden an Oil-Free Society – a mitigation proposal
• Pickens Plan
• Prospective Outlook on Long-term Energy Systems POLES, an energy model
• Renewable energy commercialization
• Sustainable energy
• Repurposing offshore drilling rigs for storing carbon
• World energy resources and consumption

References

1. "Energy Transition Investment Hit $500 Billion in 2020 – For First Time". Bloomberg New Energy Finance. 19 January 2021. from the original on 19 January 2021.
2. Catsaros, Oktavia (26 January 2023). "Global Low-Carbon Energy Technology Investment Surges Past $1 Trillion for the First Time - Figure 1". Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). from the original on 22 May 2023. Defying supply chain disruptions and macroeconomic headwinds, 2022 energy transition investment jumped 31% to draw level with fossil fuels
3. Chrobak, Ula; Chodosh, Sara (28 January 2021). "Solar power got cheap. So why aren't we using it more?". Popular Science. from the original on 29 January 2021. ● Chodosh's graphic is derived from data in "Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Version 14.0" (PDF). Lazard.com. Lazard. 19 October 2020. (PDF) from the original on 28 January 2021.
4. "2023 Levelized Cost Of Energy+". Lazard. 12 April 2023. p. 9. from the original on 27 August 2023. (Download link labeled "Lazard's LCOE+ (April 2023) (1) PDF—1MB")
5. "Nearly a quarter of the operating U.S. coal-fired fleet scheduled to retire by 2029". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
6. "Australia hastens coal plant closures to catch up on climate". Nikkei Asia. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
7. "Our members". PPCA. 2 August 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
8. "Coal-Fired Electricity – Analysis". IEA. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
9. . Argus Media. 20 February 2023. Archived from the original on 20 February 2023. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
10. Green, F.; Denniss, R. (2018). "Cutting with both arms of the scissors: the economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies". Climatic Change. 150 (1): 73–87. Bibcode:2018ClCh..150...73G. doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2162-x. S2CID 59374909.
11. "Fossil fuel producers must be forced to 'take back' carbon, say scientists". The Guardian. 12 January 2023. Retrieved 12 January 2023.
12. Bank, European Investment (2 February 2023). Energy Overview 2023 (Report).
13. Nations, United. "Renewable energy – powering a safer future". United Nations. Retrieved 9 March 2023.
14. "EU's circular economy action plan released in 2020 A.D." from the original on 29 October 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
15. "Retired Coal-fired Power Capacity by Country / Global Coal Plant Tracker". Global Energy Monitor. 2023. from the original on 9 April 2023. — Global Energy Monitor's Summary of Tables ()
16. Shared attribution: Global Energy Monitor, CREA, E3G, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club, SFOC, Kiko Network, CAN Europe, Bangladesh Groups, ACJCE, Chile Sustentable (5 April 2023). "Boom and Bust Coal / Tracking the Global Coal Plant Pipeline" (PDF). Global Energy Monitor. p. 3. (PDF) from the original on 7 April 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
17. "New Coal-fired Power Capacity by Country / Global Coal Plant Tracker". Global Energy Monitor. 2023. from the original on 19 March 2023. — Global Energy Monitor's Summary of Tables ()
18. "Analysis: Why coal use must plummet this decade to keep global warming below 1.5C". Carbon Brief. 6 February 2020. from the original on 16 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
19. "Statistics". iea.org. from the original on 28 June 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
20. "China's unbridled export of coal power imperils climate goals". from the original on 6 December 2018. Retrieved 7 December 2018.
21. "Coal exit benefits outweigh its costs – PIK Research Portal". pik-potsdam.de. from the original on 24 March 2020. Retrieved 24 March 2020.
22. "The Production Gap Executive Summary" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 21 November 2019. Retrieved 20 November 2019.
23. "In coal we trust: Australian voters back PM Morrison's faith in fossil fuel". Reuters. 19 May 2019. from the original on 28 May 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
24. Rockström, Johan; et al. (2017). "A roadmap for rapid decarbonization" (PDF). Science. 355 (6331): 1269–1271. Bibcode:2017Sci...355.1269R. doi:10.1126/science.aah3443. PMID 28336628. S2CID 36453591. (PDF) from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
25. "Time for China to Stop Bankrolling Coal". The Diplomat. 29 April 2019. from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
26. "Powering Past Coal Alliance members list". Poweringpastcoal.org. from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
27. "Powering Past Coal Alliance declaration". Poweringpastcoal.org. from the original on 2 February 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
28. "The EBRD's just transition initiative". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. from the original on 26 September 2020. Retrieved 4 August 2020.
29. "UN Secretary-General calls for end to new coal plants after 2020". Business Green. 10 May 2019. from the original on 19 May 2019. Retrieved 28 May 2019.
30. "The dirtiest fossil fuel is on the back foot". The Economist. 3 December 2020. ISSN 0013-0613. from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
31. "Clean Vehicles". from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
32. "COP26 Energy Transition Council launched". GOV.UK. 21 September 2020. from the original on 6 October 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2020. In the next phase of this partnership, we must focus even more strongly on working with business to accelerate the development of solutions that are critical to achieve net zero, such as energy storage and clean hydrogen production.
33. "Natural Gas as a Bridge Fuel : Measuring the Bridge" (PDF). Energycenter.org. 2016. (PDF) from the original on 24 April 2017. Retrieved 9 June 2017.
34. "Stranded assets are an increasing risk for investors". Raconteur. 21 March 2019. from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 26 May 2019.
35. Simon, Frédéric (27 March 2019). "Gas network chief: 'By 2050, we assume CO2 emissions from energy will be zero'". euractiv.com. from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 26 May 2019.
36. . European Climate Foundation. Archived from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 26 May 2019.
37. "Seattle Bans Natural Gas in New Buildings". The National Law Review. from the original on 16 February 2021. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
38. "End fossil fuel subsidies and reset the economy – IMF head". World Economic Forum. 3 June 2020. from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
39. Krane, Jim; Matar, Walid; Monaldi, Francisco (October 2020). "Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform Since the Pittsburgh G20: A Lost Decade?". Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. doi:10.25613/sk5h-f056. from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
40. Carrington, Damian (12 March 2019). "Air pollution deaths are double previous estimates, finds research". The Guardian. from the original on 4 February 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2019.
41. Ramanathan, V.; Haines, A.; Burnett, R. T.; Pozzer, A.; Klingmüller, K.; Lelieveld, J. (9 April 2019). "Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (15): 7192–7197. Bibcode:2019PNAS..116.7192L. doi:10.1073/pnas.1819989116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6462052. PMID 30910976.
42. "Rapid global switch to renewable energy estimated to save millions of lives annually". LSHTM. from the original on 2 March 2020. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
43. "Letters to the editor". The Economist. 9 May 2019. ISSN 0013-0613. from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
44. "Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2019 Report" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
45. "COP26 Energy Transition Council launched". GOV.UK. 21 September 2020. from the original on 6 October 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2020. The International Energy Agency has told us that to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, the global transition to clean power needs to move four times faster than our current pace.
46. Welsby, Dan; Price, James; Pye, Steve; Ekins, Paul (8 September 2021). "Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world". Nature. 597 (7875): 230–234. Bibcode:2021Natur.597..230W. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03821-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 34497394. S2CID 237455006.
47. Damian, Carrington (8 September 2021). "How much of the world's oil needs to stay in the ground?". The Guardian. from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
48. Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula; Schumann, Diana; Vögele, Stefan; Biß, Klaus Hendrik; Shamon, Hawal; Markewitz, Peter; Többen, Johannes; Gillessen, Bastian; Gotzens, Fabian (1 May 2017). "Integrated assessment of a phase-out of coal-fired power plants in Germany". Energy. 126: 285–305. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.017.
49. "Elektrifizierung 2.0". October 2021.
50. Boss, Stefan (8 July 2018). "Unter Strom – wie die Schweiz elektrifiziert wurde". swissinfo.ch (in German).
51. "Why France has a nuclear-powered economy — and America doesn't | AEI".
52. "France Presses Ahead with Nuclear Power". NPR.org.
53. "America, the Netherlands, and the Oil Crisis: 50 Years Later". 26 April 2019.
54. "Why is cycling so popular in the Netherlands?". BBC News. 7 August 2013.
55. "The Danish Solution to the Oil Crisis". 10 August 2014.
56. "Danish cycling history".
57. Browning, Noah; Kelly, Stephanie (8 March 2022). "Analysis: Ukraine crisis could boost ballooning fossil fuel subsidies". Reuters. Retrieved 2 April 2022.
58. "Energy subsidies – Topics". IEA. from the original on 26 January 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
59. "Data – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". oecd.org. from the original on 10 November 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
60. Irfan, Umair (17 May 2019). "Fossil fuels are underpriced by a whopping $5.2 trillion". Vox. Retrieved 23 November 2019.
61. Laville, Sandra (24 October 2019). "Fossil fuel big five 'spent €251m lobbying EU' since 2010". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 23 November 2019.
62. . UNDP. Archived from the original on 3 June 2023. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
63. Gencsu, Ipek; Walls, Ginette; Picciariello, Angela; Alasia, Ibifuro Joy (2 November 2022). "Nigeria's energy transition: reforming fossil fuel subsidies and other financing opportunities". ODI: Think change. Retrieved 24 November 2022.
64. "How Reforming Fossil Fuel Subsidies Can Go Wrong: A lesson from Ecuador". IISD. Retrieved 11 November 2019.
65. Carrington, Damian (6 October 2021). "Fossil fuel industry gets subsidies of $11m a minute, IMF finds". The Guardian. from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 11 December 2021.
66. "| Fossil Fuel Subsidies". IMF. from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
67. Barker; et al. (2001). "9.2.1.2 Reducing Subsidies in the Energy Sector". . Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 568. Archived from the original on 5 August 2009. Retrieved 1 September 2010.
68. "Fossil Fuel to Clean Energy Subsidy Swaps: How to pay for an energy revolution". IISD. 7 June 2019. Retrieved 23 November 2019.
69. "Fossil Fuel Subsidies". IMF. Retrieved 2 January 2024. Raising fuel prices to their fully efficient levels reduces projected global fossil fuel CO2 emissions 43 percent below baseline levels in 2030—or 34 percent below 2019 emissions. This reduction is in line with the 25-50 percent reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions below 2019 levels needed by 2030 to be on track with containing global warming to the Paris goal of 1.5-2C.
70. Hostettler, Silvia; Gadgil, Ashok; Hazboun, Eileen, eds. (2015). Sustainable Access to Energy in the Global South: Essential Technologies and Implementation Approaches. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-20209-9. OCLC 913742250.
71. Jacobson, M.Z. and Delucchi, M.A. (November 2009) "A Plan to Power 100 Percent of the Planet with Renewables" (originally published as "A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030") Scientific American 301(5):58–65
72. Jacobson, M.Z. (2009) Energy and Environmental Science 2:148-73 doi:10.1039/b809990c (review)
73. Runyon, Jennifer (23 June 2021). "Report: New solar is cheaper to build than to run existing coal plants in China, India and most of Europe". Renewable Energy World.
74. "Energy Transition Investment Now On Par with Fossil Fuel". Bloomberg NEF (New Energy Finance). 10 February 2023. from the original on 27 March 2023.
75. "The European Power Sector in 2020 / Up-to-Date Analysis on the Electricity Transition" (PDF). ember-climate.org. Ember and Agora Energiewende. 25 January 2021. (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2021.
76. Data from McKerracher, Colin (12 January 2023). "Electric Vehicles Look Poised for Slower Sales Growth This Year". BloombergNEF. Archived from the original on 12 January 2023.
77. Burch, Isabella (September 2018). (PDF). Climateprotection.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
78. (PDF). International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. December 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2019.
79. Asthana, Anushka; Taylor, Matthew (25 July 2017). "Britain to ban sale of all diesel and petrol cars and vans from 2040". The Guardian. from the original on 26 January 2019. Retrieved 27 January 2019.
80. The Royal Society (January 2008). Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges, ISBN 978-0-85403-662-2, p. 61.
81. Gordon Quaiattini. Biofuels are part of the solution Canada.com, 25 April 2008. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
82. Robert L. Hirsch. "The Shape of World Oil Peaking: Learning From Experience" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 21 June 2007. Retrieved 21 June 2007.
83. Jim Bartis, RAND Corporation (2006). (PDF). Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas - USA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
84. Frank Langfitt (5 March 2008). "Americans Using Less Gasoline". NPR. from the original on 27 August 2009. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
85. Marianne Lavelle (4 March 2008). "Oil Demand Is Dropping, but Prices Aren't". U.S. News & World Report. from the original on 12 October 2008. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
86. "President Discusses Advanced Energy Initiative In Milwaukee". from the original on 5 October 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
87. (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 June 2007.
88. "EIA - International Energy Outlook 2007 - Figure 33". from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 24 August 2007.
89. . California Hydrogen Highway. California Environmental Protection Agency. 26 November 2012. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 9 September 2013.
90. Spiryagin, Maksym; Dixon, Roger; Oldknow, Kevin; Cole, Colin (1 September 2021). "Preface to special issue on hybrid and hydrogen technologies for railway operations". Railway Engineering Science. 29 (3): 211. doi:10.1007/s40534-021-00254-x. ISSN 2662-4753. S2CID 240522190.
91. "Boeing announce plans to accelerate bio-jet fuel development". 8 October 2007. from the original on 6 July 2008. Retrieved 2 July 2008.
92. . Archived from the original on 3 March 2016.
93. "Share of cumulative power capacity by technology, 2010-2027". IEA.org. International Energy Agency (IEA). 5 December 2022. from the original on 4 February 2023. Source states "Fossil fuel capacity from IEA (2022), World Energy Outlook 2022. IEA. Licence: CC BY 4.0."
94. Bond, Kingsmill; Butler-Sloss, Sam; Lovins, Amory; Speelman, Laurens; Topping, Nigel (13 June 2023). "Report / 2023 / X-Change: Electricity / On track for disruption". Rocky Mountain Institute. from the original on 13 July 2023.
95. Data: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, and Ember Climate (3 November 2021). "Electricity consumption from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, 2020". OurWorldInData.org. Our World in Data consolidated data from BP and Ember. from the original on 3 November 2021.
96. Jones, Dave; Gutmann, Kathrin (December 2015). End of an era: why every European country needs a coal phase-out plan (PDF). London, UK and Brussels, Belgium: Greenpeace and Climate Action Network Europe. (PDF) from the original on 17 October 2016. Retrieved 14 September 2016.
97. Mathiesen, Karl (23 September 2016). "Existing coal, oil and gas fields will blow carbon budget – study". The Guardian. London, UK. from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 28 September 2016.
98. Turnbull, David (22 September 2016). "Fossil Fuel Expansion Has Reached the Sky's Limit: Report" (Press release). Washington DC, US: Oil Change International. from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
99. Muttitt, Greg (September 2016). The sky's limit: why the Paris climate goals require a managed decline of fossil fuel production (PDF). Washington DC, US: Oil Change International. (PDF) from the original on 20 January 2020. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
100. Nuccitelli, Dana (31 October 2016). "Coal doesn't help the poor; it makes them poorer". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. from the original on 9 January 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
101. Granoff, Ilmi; Hogarth, James Ryan; Wykes, Sarah; Doig, Alison (October 2016). "Beyond coal: scaling up clean energy to fight global poverty". Overseas Development Institute (ODI). London, United Kingdom. from the original on 1 November 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
102. Granoff, Ilmi; Hogarth, James Ryan; Wykes, Sarah; Doig, Alison (October 2016). (PDF). London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
103. Wilson, IAG; Staffell, I (2018). "Rapid fuel switching from coal to natural gas through effective carbon pricing" (PDF). Nature Energy. 3 (5): 365–372. Bibcode:2018NatEn...3..365W. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0109-0. S2CID 169652126. (PDF) from the original on 1 May 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2019.
104. Gaulin, N.; Le Billon, P. (2020). "Climate change and fossil fuel production cuts: Assessing global supply-side constraints and policy implications". Climate Policy. 20 (8): 888–901. Bibcode:2020CliPo..20..888G. doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1725409. S2CID 214511488. from the original on 3 November 2021. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
105. Overland, Indra; Bazilian, Morgan; Ilimbek Uulu, Talgat; Vakulchuk, Roman; Westphal, Kirsten (2019). "The GeGaLo index: Geopolitical gains and losses after energy transition". Energy Strategy Reviews. 26: 100406. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2019.100406. hdl:11250/2634876.
106. Taylor, Damian Carrington Matthew (11 May 2022). "Revealed: the 'carbon bombs' set to trigger catastrophic climate breakdown". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
107. Niklas, Sarah; Teske, Sven (June 2021). "Fossil Fuel Exit Strategy: An orderly wind down of coal, oil, and gas to meet the Paris Agreement". Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney. p. 6. from the original on 11 August 2021. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
108. Ramirez, Rachel. "Majority of remaining fossil fuels must stay in the ground to limit climate crisis below critical threshold, study shows". CNN. from the original on 18 October 2021. Retrieved 18 October 2021.
109. Welsby, Dan; Price, James; Pye, Steve; Ekins, Paul (September 2021). "Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world". Nature. 597 (7875): 230–234. Bibcode:2021Natur.597..230W. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03821-8. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 34497394. S2CID 237455006.
110. "World Energy Investment 2023" (PDF). IEA.org. International Energy Agency. May 2023. p. 61. (PDF) from the original on 7 August 2023.
111. Bousso, Ron (8 February 2023). "Big Oil doubles profits in blockbuster 2022". Reuters. from the original on 31 March 2023. ● Details for 2020 from the more detailed diagram in King, Ben (12 February 2023). "Why are BP, Shell, and other oil giants making so much money right now?". BBC. from the original on 22 April 2023.
112. "Key World Energy Statistics" (PDF). International Energy Agency. 2016. (PDF) from the original on 26 October 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
113. Green, R; Staffell, I (2016). "Electricity in Europe: exiting fossil fuels?". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 32 (2): 282–303. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw003. hdl:10044/1/29487.
114. Tvinnereim, Endre; Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (1 September 2016). "Fossil fuels, employment, and support for climate policies". Energy Policy. 96: 364–371. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.052.
115. "The West's Nuclear Mistake". MSN. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
116. Cragg, Michael I.; Zhou, Yuyu; Gurney, Kevin; Kahn, Matthew E. (1 April 2013). "Carbon Geography: The Political Economy of Congressional Support for Legislation Intended to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Production" (PDF). Economic Inquiry. 51 (2): 1640–1650. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00462.x. S2CID 8804524. SSRN 2225690. (PDF) from the original on 2 June 2018. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
117. "Integrating Variable Renewable Energy: Challenges and Solutions" (PDF). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (PDF) from the original on 21 May 2021. Retrieved 8 November 2021.
118. Rempel, Arthur; Gupta, Joyeeta (1 October 2021). "Fossil fuels, stranded assets and COVID-19: Imagining an inclusive & transformative recovery". World Development. 146: 105608. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105608. ISSN 0305-750X. PMC 9758387. PMID 36569408. S2CID 237663504.
119. Heath, Garvin A.; Silverman, Timothy J.; Kempe, Michael; Deceglie, Michael; Ravikumar, Dwarakanath; Remo, Timothy; Cui, Hao; Sinha, Parikhit; Libby, Cara; Shaw, Stephanie; Komoto, Keiichi; Wambach, Karsten; Butler, Evelyn; Barnes, Teresa; Wade, Andreas (July 2020). "Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy". Nature Energy. 5 (7): 502–510. Bibcode:2020NatEn...5..502H. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0645-2. ISSN 2058-7546. S2CID 220505135. from the original on 21 August 2021. Retrieved 26 June 2021.
120. Tabuchi, Hiroko (21 November 2022). "Inside the Saudi Strategy to Keep the World Hooked on Oil". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 November 2022.
121. Mallapaty, Smriti (19 October 2020). "How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century". Nature. 586 (7830): 482–483. Bibcode:2020Natur.586..482M. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02927-9. PMID 33077972.
122. "China coal output hits record in Nov to ensure winter supply | Reuters". Reuters. 15 December 2021.
123. "A new circular economy action plan". from the original on 29 October 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
124. "Coal Information Overview 2019" (PDF). International Energy Agency. (PDF) from the original on 16 May 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020. peak production in 2013
125. "Initiative". from the original on 21 October 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
126. "COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 24 October 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
127. "India will exceed its climate commitments: PM Narendra Modi". from the original on 13 December 2020. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
128. "INDC submission" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 28 September 2018. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
129. McCurry, Justin (26 October 2020). "Japan will become carbon neutral by 2050, PM pledges". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. from the original on 6 April 2021. Retrieved 26 October 2020.
130. Hanna Ziady (6 October 2020). "All 30 million British homes could be powered by offshore wind in 2030". CNN. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
131. See McGaughey, E.; Lawrence, M. . Common Wealth. Archived from the original on 15 July 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2023. and Green New Deal for Europe (Report) (II ed.). 2019.
132. Nichols, Michelle (24 September 2008). "Gore urges civil disobedience to stop coal plants". Reuters. from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
133. "Google CEO ERic Schmidt offers energy plan," 20 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine San Jose Mercury News, 9 September 2008
134. Flannery, Tim (2015). Atmosphere of Hope. Solutions to the Climate Crisis. Penguin Books. pp. 123–124.

Sources

• Renewables 2021 Global Status Report (PDF). Paris: REN21 Secretariat. 2021. ISBN 978-3-948393-03-8. (PDF) from the original on 15 June 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
• Renewables Global Futures Report: Great debates towards 100% renewable energy (PDF). Paris: REN21 Secretariat. 2017. ISBN 978-3-9818107-4-5. (PDF) from the original on 12 June 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
• Kutscher, C.F.; Milford, J.B.; Kreith, F. (2019). Principles of Sustainable Energy Systems. Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Series (Third ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-429-93916-7. from the original on 6 June 2020.
• McGaughey, E.; Lawrence, M. . Common Wealth. Archived from the original on 15 July 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2023.

External links

• Oil Depletion Analysis Centre in the United Kingdom
• Big Shift: Campaign to end to public financing of fossil fuels
• "Global Fossil Infrastructure Tracker" 10 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine