fbpx
Wikipedia

Achumawi language

The Achumawi language (also Achomawi or Pit River language) is the indigenous language spoken by the Pit River people in the northeast corner of present-day California. The term Achumawi is an anglicization of the name of the Fall River band, ajúmmááwí, from ajúmmá "river". Originally there were nine bands, with dialect differences primarily between upriver (Atwamwi, Astariwawi; Kosalektawi, Hammawi, Hewisedawi dialects) and downriver (Madesiwi, Itsatawi, Ilmawi, and Achumawi (proper) dialects), demarcated by the Big Valley mountains east of the Fall River valley.

Achumawi
ís siwa wó disi
Native toCalifornia
Ethnicity1,000 Achumawi people
Extinct2013
Hokan ?
Language codes
ISO 639-3acv
Glottologachu1247
ELPAchumawi
Achumawi is classified as Extinct by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger

Genetic relationships edit

Together, Achumawi and Atsugewi are said to comprise the Palaihnihan language family separate from the adjacent and related Shastan family. The basis of this grouping is weakened by poor quality of data. David Olmsted's data dictionary[1] depends almost entirely upon de Angulo, and carelessly includes Pomo vocabulary from a manuscript in which he (de Angulo) set out to demonstrate that Achumawi and Pomo are not related.[2] William Bright[3] and Shirley Silver[4] questioned Olmsted's results and methods of reconstruction. Kroeber (1925:279) acknowledged that

there would have been almost as much justification for separating Atsugewi from Achomawi and erecting it into a separate family as for keeping Achomawi and Shasta apart, as ethnologists did for half a century. What lay at the bottom of this inconsistence was that the Atsugewi live in a region topographically tributary to the larger Achomawi habitat; that the two tribes were in close association and friendly; and that they followed very similar customs.

The phenomenon of non-reciprocal intelligibility[5][6] is a matter of bilingualism in the smaller and more dependent of two exogamous communities; Kroeber (1925:308) estimated that the Achumawi were ten times more numerous than the Atsugewi.[7]

Phonology edit

Achumawi has 29 consonants. The stops and affricate (aside from the marginally contrastive glottal stop) are in three series, plain, aspirated, and laryngealized or glottalized. The aspirated series is contrastive only syllable-initially and probably derives historically from the voiceless-released first member of a consonant cluster, as in the neighboring and possibly related Yana language. This is seen morphophonemically in e.g. it "I, me", itʰˑú "my, mine".[8]

The plain-aspirated distinction is neutralized and realized with voiceless release in syllable-final position and before another consonant; the aspirates are much more fortis than this voiceless release. Syllable-initial plain stops are voiceless (without voiceless release) after long vowel or when geminate (long), and voiced elsewhere. The laryngealized stops are similar in articulation to the ejective glottalized stops of neighboring languages, but more lenis, that is, not "popped" unless an unusual effort is made at articulating the distinction.[8]

The language has a 5-vowel system /i e a o u/. Two degrees of length are contrastive for both vowels and consonants. Long vowels are typically more peripheral and short vowels more centralized, phonetically [ɪ ɛ ʌ ə ʊ]. The mid vowels /e o/ are probably of secondary origin historically, as in Yana and Atsugewi. A short centralized vowel [ə ɨ] appears epenthetically between the consonants of certain prefixes, as in lhúpta "let's go!". Vowel length assimilates the next successive laryngeal state, that is, the second mora of a long vowel is devoiced before a plain or aspirated consonant (preaspiration) and word finally before silence, and is laryngealized before a laryngealized consonant. In upriver dialects vowels and plain stops are more fully voiced. In downriver dialects, utterance-final syllables may be devoiced or whispered, especially under interrogative intonation.[8] A light syllable consists of a consonant and vowel (CV), and a heavy syllable either contains a long vowel (CVˑ) or is closed with a second consonant (CVC).

Unlike the neighboring and related language Atsugewi, Achumawi has contrastive high and low tones.[8][9]

Morphology edit

The Achumawi language does not have gender but it has two forms of the copula ("to be") distinguishing animate and inanimate. The verb stem comprises one or more verb roots plus optional adverbial affixes. Inflectional affixes on verbs distinguish singular, dual, and plural number, and suffixes may optionally express severality and plurality of nouns. Many nouns and adjectives are derived from verb stems or participles, and some verb stems are formed by noun incorporation. The language has independent adjectives and numerals.[8][10]

Current status edit

 
An elderly Ahjumawi Indian woman, ca. 1920

Today, the Achumawi language is critically endangered.[11] Out of an estimated 1500 Achumawi people remaining in northeastern California, perhaps ten spoke the language in 1991, with only eight in 2000.

As of 2013, a mobile app was planned for the language.

Louise Davis, who lives in northern California, is almost tearful when she describes hearing people using the language of her Pit River tribe in conversation for the first time. It happened years ago when an older man from another part of the state met up with her grandmother.

It was such a powerful, emotional experience that Davis is driven to use flashcards at home with her children and do whatever it takes to preserve the language.

“You can say things in our language that you can’t say in English,” she said.

Testing out a language app in February [2013], she said she couldn’t wait to see it being used among young people in the tribe.[12]

References edit

  1. ^ Olmsted, David L. (1966). Achumawi dictionary. University of California Publications in Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  2. ^ Gursky, Karl-Heinz (1987). "Achumawi und Pomo, eine besondere Beziehung?". Abhandlungen der Völkerkundlichen Arbsgemeinschaft. 57.
  3. ^ Bright, William (1965). "Review of A history of Palaihnihan phonology by D. L. Olmsted". Language. 41 (1): 175–178. doi:10.2307/411871. JSTOR 411871.
  4. ^ Silver, Shirley (1966). "A History of Palaihnihan Phonology. D. L. Olmsted". International Journal of American Linguistics. 32 (2): 210–212. doi:10.1086/464903.
  5. ^ Olmsted, David L. (1954). "Achumawi-Atsugewi non-reciprocal intelligibility". International Journal of American Linguistics. 20 (3): 181–184. doi:10.1086/464275. S2CID 144619581.
  6. ^ Voegelin, Carl (1946). "Notes on Klamath-Modoc and Achumawi dialects". International Journal of American Linguistics. 12 (2): 96–101. doi:10.1086/463897. S2CID 145332398.
  7. ^ Kroeber, Alfred L. (1925). Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No. 78. The Smithsonian Institution.
  8. ^ a b c d e Nevin, Bruce (1998). Aspects of Pit River Phonology (PDF) (Ph.D.). The University of Pennsylvania.
  9. ^ Mithun, Marianne (2001). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-521-29875-9.
  10. ^ de Angulo, Jaime; Freeland, L. S. (1930). "The Achumawi Language". International Journal of American Linguistics. 6 (2): 77–120. doi:10.1086/463788. JSTOR 1263305. S2CID 143822451.
  11. ^ Moseley, Christopher, ed. (2010). Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger. Memory of Peoples (3rd ed.). Paris: UNESCO Publishing. ISBN 978-92-3-104096-2. Retrieved 2015-04-11.
  12. ^ "American Indian tribes turn to technology in race to save endangered languages". Washington Post. 2013-04-17. Retrieved 2013-04-19.[dead link]

Bibliography edit

  • Bright, William. (1965). "[Review of A history of Palaihnihan phonology by D. L. Olmsted]." Language, 41 (1), 175–178.
  • Bauman, James. 1980. Introduction to the Pit River language and culture. Anchorage, AK: National Bilingual Materials Development Center, University of Alaska.
  • Good, Jeff. (2004). "A sketch of Atsugewi phonology." Boston, Massachusetts. (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, January 8 – January 11).
  • Good, Jeff, Teresa McFarland, and Mary Paster. (2003). "Reconstructing Achumawi and Atsugewi: Proto-Palaihnihan revisited." Atlanta, Georgia. (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, January 2 – January 5).
  • Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin No. 78.
  • Mithun, Marianne. (1999). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-29875-X.
  • Nevin, Bruce E. (1991). "Obsolescence in Achumawi: Why Uldall Too?". Papers from the American Indian Languages Conferences, held at the University of California, Santa Cruz, July and August 1991. Occasional Papers on Linguistics 16:97–127. Department of Linguistics, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
  • Nevin, Bruce E. (1998). Aspects of Pit River phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics.
  • Nevin, Bruce E. (In review). "Why Proto-Palaihnihan is neither". 10.13140/RG.2.2.33917.20966.
  • Olmsted, David L. (1954). "Achumawi-Atsugewi non-reciprocal intelligibility." International Journal of American Linguistics, 20, 181–184.
  • Olmsted, David L. (1956). "Palaihnihan and Shasta I: Labial stops." Language, 32 (1), 73–77.
  • Olmsted, David L. (1957). "Palaihnihan and Shasta II: Apical stops." Language, 33 (2), 136–138.
  • Olmsted, David L. (1959). "Palaihnihan and Shasta III: Dorsal stops." Language, 35 (4), 637–644.
  • Olmsted, David L. (1964). "A history of Palaihnihan phonology." University of California Publications in Linguistics (Vol. 35). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Dictionaries edit

  • Bauman, James. Ruby Miles, and Ike Leaf. Pit River Teaching Dictionary. Anchorage, AK: National Bilingual Materials Development Center, University of Alaska.
  • Olmsted, D. L. 1966. Achumawi dictionary. Berkeley: University of California Press.

External links edit

  • Bruce Nevin (Achumawi database, texts, and Android app)
  • Bruce Nevin (1998) Aspects of Pit River Phonology
  • Jeff Good, Teresa McFarland & Mary Paster (2003)
  • Achumawi language overview at the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages
  • Lomax Collection Recording of Achumawi, Internet Archive, retrieved 2012-08-26
  • OLAC Resources in and about the Achumawi language
  • Pit River (2022) ('A Treasury of Rare and Unusual Languages' podcast, episode 1). MLX (Minority Language eXperience).
  • Dryer, Matthew S.; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Achumawi language". World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

achumawi, language, also, achomawi, river, language, indigenous, language, spoken, river, people, northeast, corner, present, california, term, achumawi, anglicization, name, fall, river, band, ajúmmááwí, from, ajúmmá, river, originally, there, were, nine, ban. The Achumawi language also Achomawi or Pit River language is the indigenous language spoken by the Pit River people in the northeast corner of present day California The term Achumawi is an anglicization of the name of the Fall River band ajummaawi from ajumma river Originally there were nine bands with dialect differences primarily between upriver Atwamwi Astariwawi Kosalektawi Hammawi Hewisedawi dialects and downriver Madesiwi Itsatawi Ilmawi and Achumawi proper dialects demarcated by the Big Valley mountains east of the Fall River valley Achumawiis siwa wo disiNative toCaliforniaEthnicity1 000 Achumawi peopleExtinct2013Language familyHokan Shasta Palaihnihan PalaihnihanAchumawiLanguage codesISO 639 3 a href https iso639 3 sil org code acv class extiw title iso639 3 acv acv a Glottologachu1247ELPAchumawiAchumawi is classified as Extinct by the UNESCO Atlas of the World s Languages in Danger Contents 1 Genetic relationships 2 Phonology 3 Morphology 4 Current status 5 References 6 Bibliography 6 1 Dictionaries 7 External linksGenetic relationships editTogether Achumawi and Atsugewi are said to comprise the Palaihnihan language family separate from the adjacent and related Shastan family The basis of this grouping is weakened by poor quality of data David Olmsted s data dictionary 1 depends almost entirely upon de Angulo and carelessly includes Pomo vocabulary from a manuscript in which he de Angulo set out to demonstrate that Achumawi and Pomo are not related 2 William Bright 3 and Shirley Silver 4 questioned Olmsted s results and methods of reconstruction Kroeber 1925 279 acknowledged that there would have been almost as much justification for separating Atsugewi from Achomawi and erecting it into a separate family as for keeping Achomawi and Shasta apart as ethnologists did for half a century What lay at the bottom of this inconsistence was that the Atsugewi live in a region topographically tributary to the larger Achomawi habitat that the two tribes were in close association and friendly and that they followed very similar customs The phenomenon of non reciprocal intelligibility 5 6 is a matter of bilingualism in the smaller and more dependent of two exogamous communities Kroeber 1925 308 estimated that the Achumawi were ten times more numerous than the Atsugewi 7 Phonology editAchumawi has 29 consonants The stops and affricate aside from the marginally contrastive glottal stop are in three series plain aspirated and laryngealized or glottalized The aspirated series is contrastive only syllable initially and probably derives historically from the voiceless released first member of a consonant cluster as in the neighboring and possibly related Yana language This is seen morphophonemically in e g it I me itʰˑu my mine 8 Bilabial Alveolar Palato Alveolar Velar Uvular Epiglottal Glottalcentral lateralStop plain p t tʃ k q ʔaspirated pʰ tʰ tʃʰ kʰ qʰlaryngealized pʼ tʼ tʃʼ kʼ qʼFricative s ʜ hSonorant plain m n l j wglottalized mˀ nˀ lˀ jˀ wˀThe plain aspirated distinction is neutralized and realized with voiceless release in syllable final position and before another consonant the aspirates are much more fortis than this voiceless release Syllable initial plain stops are voiceless without voiceless release after long vowel or when geminate long and voiced elsewhere The laryngealized stops are similar in articulation to the ejective glottalized stops of neighboring languages but more lenis that is not popped unless an unusual effort is made at articulating the distinction 8 The language has a 5 vowel system i e a o u Two degrees of length are contrastive for both vowels and consonants Long vowels are typically more peripheral and short vowels more centralized phonetically ɪ ɛ ʌ e ʊ The mid vowels e o are probably of secondary origin historically as in Yana and Atsugewi A short centralized vowel e ɨ appears epenthetically between the consonants of certain prefixes as in lhupta let s go Vowel length assimilates the next successive laryngeal state that is the second mora of a long vowel is devoiced before a plain or aspirated consonant preaspiration and word finally before silence and is laryngealized before a laryngealized consonant In upriver dialects vowels and plain stops are more fully voiced In downriver dialects utterance final syllables may be devoiced or whispered especially under interrogative intonation 8 A light syllable consists of a consonant and vowel CV and a heavy syllable either contains a long vowel CVˑ or is closed with a second consonant CVC Unlike the neighboring and related language Atsugewi Achumawi has contrastive high and low tones 8 9 Morphology editThe Achumawi language does not have gender but it has two forms of the copula to be distinguishing animate and inanimate The verb stem comprises one or more verb roots plus optional adverbial affixes Inflectional affixes on verbs distinguish singular dual and plural number and suffixes may optionally express severality and plurality of nouns Many nouns and adjectives are derived from verb stems or participles and some verb stems are formed by noun incorporation The language has independent adjectives and numerals 8 10 Current status edit nbsp An elderly Ahjumawi Indian woman ca 1920Today the Achumawi language is critically endangered 11 Out of an estimated 1500 Achumawi people remaining in northeastern California perhaps ten spoke the language in 1991 with only eight in 2000 As of 2013 a mobile app was planned for the language Louise Davis who lives in northern California is almost tearful when she describes hearing people using the language of her Pit River tribe in conversation for the first time It happened years ago when an older man from another part of the state met up with her grandmother It was such a powerful emotional experience that Davis is driven to use flashcards at home with her children and do whatever it takes to preserve the language You can say things in our language that you can t say in English she said Testing out a language app in February 2013 she said she couldn t wait to see it being used among young people in the tribe 12 References edit Olmsted David L 1966 Achumawi dictionary University of California Publications in Linguistics Berkeley University of California Press Gursky Karl Heinz 1987 Achumawi und Pomo eine besondere Beziehung Abhandlungen der Volkerkundlichen Arbsgemeinschaft 57 Bright William 1965 Review of A history of Palaihnihan phonology by D L Olmsted Language 41 1 175 178 doi 10 2307 411871 JSTOR 411871 Silver Shirley 1966 A History of Palaihnihan Phonology D L Olmsted International Journal of American Linguistics 32 2 210 212 doi 10 1086 464903 Olmsted David L 1954 Achumawi Atsugewi non reciprocal intelligibility International Journal of American Linguistics 20 3 181 184 doi 10 1086 464275 S2CID 144619581 Voegelin Carl 1946 Notes on Klamath Modoc and Achumawi dialects International Journal of American Linguistics 12 2 96 101 doi 10 1086 463897 S2CID 145332398 Kroeber Alfred L 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No 78 The Smithsonian Institution a b c d e Nevin Bruce 1998 Aspects of Pit River Phonology PDF Ph D The University of Pennsylvania Mithun Marianne 2001 The Languages of Native North America Cambridge Cambridge University Press p 24 ISBN 978 0 521 29875 9 de Angulo Jaime Freeland L S 1930 The Achumawi Language International Journal of American Linguistics 6 2 77 120 doi 10 1086 463788 JSTOR 1263305 S2CID 143822451 Moseley Christopher ed 2010 Atlas of the World s Languages in Danger Memory of Peoples 3rd ed Paris UNESCO Publishing ISBN 978 92 3 104096 2 Retrieved 2015 04 11 American Indian tribes turn to technology in race to save endangered languages Washington Post 2013 04 17 Retrieved 2013 04 19 dead link Bibliography editBright William 1965 Review of A history of Palaihnihan phonology by D L Olmsted Language 41 1 175 178 Bauman James 1980 Introduction to the Pit River language and culture Anchorage AK National Bilingual Materials Development Center University of Alaska Good Jeff 2004 A sketch of Atsugewi phonology Boston Massachusetts Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas January 8 January 11 Good Jeff Teresa McFarland and Mary Paster 2003 Reconstructing Achumawi and Atsugewi Proto Palaihnihan revisited Atlanta Georgia Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas January 2 January 5 Kroeber Alfred L 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No 78 Mithun Marianne 1999 The Languages of Native North America Cambridge Cambridge University Press ISBN 0 521 23228 7 hbk ISBN 0 521 29875 X Nevin Bruce E 1991 Obsolescence in Achumawi Why Uldall Too Papers from the American Indian Languages Conferences held at the University of California Santa Cruz July and August 1991 Occasional Papers on Linguistics 16 97 127 Department of Linguistics Southern Illinois University at Carbondale Nevin Bruce E 1998 Aspects of Pit River phonology Ph D dissertation University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics Nevin Bruce E In review Why Proto Palaihnihan is neither 10 13140 RG 2 2 33917 20966 Olmsted David L 1954 Achumawi Atsugewi non reciprocal intelligibility International Journal of American Linguistics 20 181 184 Olmsted David L 1956 Palaihnihan and Shasta I Labial stops Language 32 1 73 77 Olmsted David L 1957 Palaihnihan and Shasta II Apical stops Language 33 2 136 138 Olmsted David L 1959 Palaihnihan and Shasta III Dorsal stops Language 35 4 637 644 Olmsted David L 1964 A history of Palaihnihan phonology University of California Publications in Linguistics Vol 35 Berkeley University of California Press Dictionaries edit Bauman James Ruby Miles and Ike Leaf Pit River Teaching Dictionary Anchorage AK National Bilingual Materials Development Center University of Alaska Olmsted D L 1966 Achumawi dictionary Berkeley University of California Press External links editBruce Nevin Achumawi database texts and Android app Bruce Nevin 1998 Aspects of Pit River Phonology Jeff Good Teresa McFarland amp Mary Paster 2003 Reconstructing Achumawi and Atsugewi Achumawi language overview at the Survey of California and Other Indian Languages Lomax Collection Recording of Achumawi Internet Archive retrieved 2012 08 26 OLAC Resources in and about the Achumawi language Pit River 2022 A Treasury of Rare and Unusual Languages podcast episode 1 MLX Minority Language eXperience Dryer Matthew S Haspelmath Martin eds 2013 Achumawi language World Atlas of Language Structures Online Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Achumawi language amp oldid 1218462799, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.