2020 United States presidential election in Texas

Main article: 2020 United States presidential election

The 2020 United States presidential election in Texas was held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as part of the 2020 United States presidential election in which all 50 states plus the District of Columbia participated.^[3] Texan voters chose 38 electors to represent them in the Electoral College. In a popular vote the Republican Party's nominee, incumbent President Donald Trump, and running mate Vice President Mike Pence won all the electors against the Democratic Party's nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his running mate California Senator Kamala Harris.^[4]

2020 United States presidential election in Texas

← 2016 November 3, 2020 2024 →
Turnout	66.73% (of registered voters) ^[1] 52.39% (of voting age population)^[2]
Nominee Donald Trump Joe Biden Party Republican Democratic Home state Florida Delaware Running mate Mike Pence Kamala Harris Electoral vote 38 0 Popular vote 5,890,347 5,259,126 Percentage 52.06% 46.48%
County results Congressional district results Precinct results Trump   40–50%   50–60%   60–70%   70–80%   80–90%   90–100% Biden   40–50%   50–60%   60–70%   70–80%   80–90%   90–100%
President before election Donald Trump Republican Elected President Joe Biden Democratic

Although it was considered a vulnerable state for Trump by some pollsters and experts and a potential upset victory for Biden due to its recent demographic trends, Trump held Texas with 52.1% of the vote, roughly the same percentage he carried it with in 2016. Biden improved on Hillary Clinton's 2016 vote share by 3.24%, giving him the largest percentage in the state by a Democratic presidential candidate since Jimmy Carter carried the state in 1976. Trump's 5.58% margin of victory was also the narrowest for a Republican since 1996. Texas was the third-narrowest of Trump's state victories, behind only Florida and North Carolina, and the ninth-closest state overall. The election was also the first time Texas placed in the top ten closest states since 1968, and the first time since 1976 that Texas voted to the left of Ohio.^[5][6] This was also the first election since 1964 that the counties containing the five largest cities in Texas, consisting of Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, and Fort Worth, would vote Democratic at the same time. As in most other states in 2020, Trump significantly outperformed his polling.^[7] Voter turnout in the state increased to its highest level since 1992, when two Texans, George H. W. Bush and Ross Perot, were on the ballot, and the last time Texas was a battleground state.^[8]

Primary elections

Republican primary

Further information: 2020 Texas Republican presidential primary

The Republican primary was held on March 3, 2020. Donald Trump and Bill Weld were the only declared Republican candidates, as former South Carolina Governor and U.S. Representative Mark Sanford and U.S. Representative Joe Walsh had dropped out. Texas Governor Greg Abbott declined to run against Trump, as did 2016 Republican primary candidate and current senator Ted Cruz.^[9][10] The primary was won overwhelmingly by Trump with over 94% of the vote.

This section is an excerpt from 2020 Texas Republican presidential primary § TXresults.[edit]

2020 Texas Republican Party presidential primary^[11]
Candidate	Popular vote		Delegates
	Count	Percentage
Donald Trump	1,898,664	94.13%	117
Uncommitted	71,803	3.56%	0
Bill Weld	15,739	0.78%	0
Joe Walsh	15,824	0.78%	0
Rocky De La Fuente	7,563	0.38%	0
Bob Ely	3,582	0.37%	0
Matthew Matern	3,525	0.18%	0
Zoltan Istvan	1,447	0.07%	0
Total:	2,017,167	100%	155

Democratic primary

Further information: 2020 Texas Democratic presidential primary

The Democratic primary was held on March 3, 2020. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Michael Bloomberg and Joe Biden were among the major declared candidates.^[12][13][14] The primary was won by Biden, with Sanders coming second.

This section is an excerpt from 2020 Texas Democratic presidential primary § TXresults.[edit]

 

Popular vote share by county

Biden—<30%   Biden—30–40%   Biden—40–50%   Biden—50–60%   Biden—60–70%   Bloomberg—<30%   Bloomberg—30–40%   Bloomberg—50–60%

Sanders—<30%   Sanders—30–40%   Sanders—40–50%   Sanders—50–60%   Sanders—50–60%   Warren—<30%   Tie   Tie

2020 Texas Democratic presidential primary^[15]

Candidate	Votes	%	Delegates^[16]
Joe Biden	725,562	34.64	113
Bernie Sanders	626,339	29.91	99
Michael Bloomberg	300,608	14.35	11
Elizabeth Warren	239,237	11.42	5
Pete Buttigieg (withdrawn)^[a]	82,671	3.95
Amy Klobuchar (withdrawn)^[a]	43,291	2.07
Julian Castro (withdrawn)	16,688	0.80
Tom Steyer (withdrawn)^[a]	13,929	0.67
Michael Bennet (withdrawn)	10,324	0.49
Tulsi Gabbard	8,688	0.41
Andrew Yang (withdrawn)	6,674	0.32
Cory Booker (withdrawn)	4,941	0.24
Marianne Williamson (withdrawn)	3,918	0.19
John Delaney (withdrawn)	3,280	0.16
Deval Patrick (withdrawn)	1,304	0.06
Other candidates	6,974	0.33
Total	2,094,428	100%	228

General election

Final predictions

Source	Ranking
The Cook Political Report^[17]	Tossup
Inside Elections^[18]	Tossup
Sabato's Crystal Ball^[19]	Lean R
Politico^[20]	Lean R
RCP^[21]	Tossup
Niskanen^[22]	Tossup
CNN^[23]	Lean R
The Economist^[24]	Lean R
CBS News^[25]	Lean R
270towin^[26]	Lean R
ABC News^[27]	Tossup
NPR^[28]	Tossup
NBC News^[29]	Tossup
538^[30]	Lean R

Polling

Graphical summary

Aggregate polls

Source of poll aggregation	Dates administered	Dates updated	Joe Biden Democratic	Donald Trump Republican	Other/ Undecided ^[b]	Margin
270 to Win	Oct 29, 2020 – November 2, 2020	November 3, 2020	47.5%	48.8%	3.7%	Trump +1.3
Real Clear Politics	October 20–31, 2020	November 3, 2020	46.5%	47.8%	5.7%	Trump +1.3
FiveThirtyEight	until November 2, 2020	November 3, 2020	47.4%	48.6%	4.0%	Trump +1.1
Average			47.1%	48.4%	4.5%	Trump +1.2

Polls

Poll source	Date(s) administered	Sample size^[c]	Margin of error	Donald Trump Republican	Joe Biden Democratic	Jo Jorgensen Libertarian	Howie Hawkins Green	Other	Undecided
SurveyMonkey/Axios	Oct 20 – Nov 2, 2020	9,226 (LV)	± 1.5%	51%^[d]	47%	–	–	–	–
Swayable November 13, 2020, at the Wayback Machine	Oct 27 – Nov 1, 2020	1,151 (LV)	± 3.9%	51%	47%	1%	0%	–	–
Data For Progress	Oct 27 – Nov 1, 2020	926 (LV)	± 3.2%	48%	49%	1%	1%	0%^[e]	–
AtlasIntel	Oct 30–31, 2020	686 (LV)	± 4%	50%	47%	–	–	3%	–
Emerson College	Oct 29–31, 2020	763 (LV)	± 3.5%	49%^[f]	48%	-	-	2%^[g]	–
Morning Consult	Oct 22–31, 2020	3,267 (LV)	± 2%	48%	48%	–	–	–	–
Public Policy Polling	Oct 28–29, 2020	775 (V)	–	48%	50%	–	–	–	2%
Gravis Marketing	Oct 27–28, 2020	670 (LV)	± 3.8%	50%	45%	–	–	–	5%
RMG Research/PoliticalIQ October 30, 2020, at the Wayback Machine	Oct 27–28, 2020	800 (LV)	± 3.5%	50%^[h]	46%	–	–	2%^[g]	2%
				48%^[i]	48%	–	–	2%^[g]	2%
				52%^[j]	44%	–	–	2%^[g]	2%
SurveyMonkey/Axios	Oct 1–28, 2020	15,145 (LV)	–	51%	47%	–	–	–	–
Swayable	Oct 23–26, 2020	552 (LV)	± 5.7%	49%	48%	3%	1%	–	–
YouGov/UMass Amherst	Oct 20–26, 2020	873 (LV)	± 4.2%	48%	47%	2%	1%	0%^[k]	1%
Data for Progress (D)	Oct 22–25, 2020	1,018 (LV)	± 3.1%	48%	49%	1%	0%	–	2%
Siena College/NYT Upshot	Oct 20–25, 2020	802 (LV)	± 3.8%	47%	43%	3%	0%	2%^[l]	5%^[m]
Univision/University of Houston/Latino Decisions/North Star Opinion Research	Oct 17–25, 2020	758 (RV)	± 3.56%	49%	46%	–	–	3%^[n]	2%
Citizen Data	Oct 17–20, 2020	1,000 (LV)	± 3%	45%	49%	1%	0%	1%	4%
YouGov/University of Houston	Oct 13–20, 2020	1,000 (LV)	± 3.1%	50%	45%	2%	0%	–	3%
University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas Morning News	Oct 13–20, 2020	925 (LV)	± 3.2%	47%^[f]	49%	3%	1%	–	1%
Morning Consult	Oct 11–20, 2020	3,347 (LV)	± 1.7%	47%	48%	–	–	–	–
Quinnipiac University	Oct 16–19, 2020	1,145 (LV)	± 2.9%	47%	47%	–	–	1%^[o]	5%
Data for Progress (D)	Oct 15–18, 2020	933 (LV)	± 3.2%	46%^[f]	47%	2%	1%	–	5%
Morning Consult[1]	Oct 2–11, 2020	3,455 (LV)	± 1.7%	49%	47%	–	–	–	3%
Public Policy Polling/Texas Democrats October 14, 2020, at the Wayback Machine^[A]	Oct 7–8, 2020	721 (LV)	± 3.6%	48%	48%	–	–	–	1%
YouGov/CCES November 1, 2020, at the Wayback Machine	Sep 29 – Oct 7, 2020	2,947 (LV)	–	49%	47%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	Sep 28 – Oct 7, 2020	~2,700 (LV)	± 2%	49%	46%	–	–	–	–
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports/Crosswind PR	Oct 5–6, 2020	1,000 (LV)	± 3%	51%	44%	–	–	–	–
Civiqs/Daily Kos	Oct 3–6, 2020	895 (LV)	± 3.4%	48%	48%	–	–	2%^[g]	1%
Data For Progress (D)	Sep 30 – Oct 5, 2020	1,949 (LV)	± 2.2%	45%	47%	2%	1%	–	5%
YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune	Sep 25 – Oct 4, 2020	908 (LV)	± 3.25%	50%	45%	2%	2%	1%^[o]	–
EMC Research/Blue Texas PAC^[B]	Sep 27 – Oct 2, 2020	848 (LV)	–	49%	49%	–	–	–	–
SurveyMonkey/Axios	Sep 1–30, 2020	13,395 (LV)	–	52%	46%	–	–	–	2%
Hart Research Associates/Human Rights Campaign^[C]	Sep 24–27, 2020	400 (LV)	± 4.9%	49%	47%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	Sep 18–27, 2020	~2,700 (LV)	± 2%	48%	47%	–	–	–	–
Public Policy Polling/Texas Democrats[2] October 8, 2020, at the Wayback Machine^[D]	Sep 25–26, 2020	612 (LV)	± 3.6%	48%	48%	–	–	–	4%
YouGov/UMass Lowell	Sep 18–25, 2020	882 (LV)	± 4.3%	49%^[p]	46%	2%	1%	1%^[q]	1%
				50%^[r]	46%	–	–	2%^[s]	2%
Data For Progress^[E]	Sep 18–22, 2020	726 (LV)	± 3.6%	47%	45%	–	–	–	9%
Siena College/NYT Upshot	Sep 16–22, 2020	653 (LV)	± 4.3%	46%	43%	1%	1%	0%^[t]	9%^[m]
Quinnipiac University	Sep 17–21, 2020	1,078 (LV)	± 3%	50%	45%	–	–	No voters	4%
YouGov/CBS	Sep 15–18, 2020	1,129 (LV)	± 3.5%	48%	46%	–	–	2%^[u]	4%
Morning Consult	Sep 8–17, 2020	~2,700 (LV)	± 2%	47%	47%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	Aug 29 – Sep 7, 2020	2,829 (LV)	± 2%	46%^[v]	46%	–	–	–	–
Public Policy Polling/Giffords^[F]	Sep 1–2, 2020	743 (V)	–	48%	47%	–	–	–	5%
University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas Morning News	Aug 28 – Sep 2, 2020	901 (LV)	± 3.26%	49%^[f]	47%	1%	1%	1%	–
SurveyMonkey/Axios	Aug 1–31, 2020	12,607 (LV)	–	52%	46%	–	–	–	2%
Morning Consult	Aug 21–30, 2020	2,632 (LV)	± 2%	48%^[v]	47%	–	–	–	–
Tyson Group/Consumer Energy Alliance^[G]	Aug 20–25, 2020	906 (LV)	± 3%	44%	48%	0%	–	0%^[w]	5%
Data for Progress/Texas Youth Power Alliance	Aug 20–25, 2020	2,295 (LV)	± 2.0%	45%	48%	–	–	–	8%
Public Policy Polling/Texas Democrats[3]^[H]	Aug 21–22, 2020	764 (RV)	± 3.6%	47%	48%	–	–	–	5%
Morning Consult	Aug 13–22, 2020	~2,700 (LV)	± 2%	48%	47%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	Aug 7–16, 2020	2,559 (LV)	± 2%	47%^[x]	46%	–	–	–	–
Global Strategy Group/Chrysta for Texas^[I]	Aug 11–13, 2020	700 (LV)	± 3.7%	45%	47%	–	–	–	–
YouGov/Texas Hispanic Policy Foundation/Rice University's Baker Institute	Aug 4–13, 2020	846 (RV)	–	48%	41%	1%	1%	–	10.2%
		– (LV)^[J]		50%	44%	1%	0%	–	5%
Trafalgar Group (R)	Aug 1–5, 2020	1,015 (LV)	± 3.0%	49%	43%	2%	–	2%^[y]	3%
Morning Consult	Aug 3–12, 2020	~2,700 (LV)	± 2.0%	47%	46%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	Jul 24 – Aug 2, 2020	2,576 (LV)	± 2.0%	46%^[v]	47%	–	–	2%^[g]	5%
SurveyMonkey/Axios	Jul 1–31, 2020	13,721 (LV)	–	52%	46%	–	–	–	2%
Morning Consult	Jul 17–26, 2020	2,685 (LV)	± 1.9%	45%^[x]	47%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult[4]	Jul 16–25, 2020	~2,700 (LV)^[z]	± 2.0%	45%	47%	–	–	–	–
Spry Strategies/American Principles Project^[K]	Jul 16–20, 2020	750 (LV)	± 3.5%	49%	45%	–	–	–	6%
Quinnipiac University	Jul 16–20, 2020	880 (RV)	± 3.3%	44%	45%	–	–	7%^[aa]	4%
Morning Consult	Jul 6–15, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	46%	46%	–	–	–	–
YouGov/CBS	Jul 7–10, 2020	1,185 (LV)	± 3.6%	46%	45%	–	–	4%^[ab]	6%
Gravis Marketing/OANN	Jul 7, 2020	591 (LV)	± 4.3%	46%	44%	–	–	–	–
Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler	Jun 29 – Jul 7, 2020	1,677 (LV)	± 2.4%	43%	48%	–	–	4%	5%
Morning Consult	Jun 26 – Jul 5, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	46%	45%	–	–	–	–
SurveyMonkey/Axios	Jun 8–30, 2020	6,669 (LV)	–	51%	46%	–	–	–	2%
YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Politics Project	Jun 19–29, 2020	1,200 (RV)	± 2.89%	48%	44%	–	–	–	8%
Public Policy Polling[5]	Jun 24–25, 2020	729 (RV)	± 3.6%	46%	48%	–	–	–	5%
Morning Consult	Jun 16–25, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	47%	44%	–	–	–	–
Fox News	Jun 20–23, 2020	1,001 (RV)	± 3%	44%	45%	–	–	5%^[ac]	5%
Public Policy Polling/Progress Texas[6]^[L]	Jun 18–19, 2020	907 (V)	± 3%	48%	46%	–	–	–	6%
Morning Consult	Jun 6–15, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	48%	45%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	May 27 – Jun 5, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	48%	43%	–	–	–	–
Public Policy Polling/Texas Democrats June 5, 2020, at the Wayback Machine^[M]	Jun 2–3, 2020	683 (V)	–	48%	48%	–	–	–	4%
Quinnipiac	May 28 – Jun 1, 2020	1,166 (RV)	± 2.9%	44%	43%	–	–	6%^[ad]	7%
Morning Consult	May 17–26, 2020	2,551 (LV)	–	50%^[v]	43%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	May 16–25, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	50%	42%	–	–	–	–
Morning Consult	May 6–15, 2020	– (LV)^[z]	–	49%	43%	–	–	–	–
Emerson College	May 8–10, 2020	800 (RV)	± 3.4%	52%^[ae]	48%	–	–	–	–
Public Policy Polling	Apr 27–28, 2020	1,032 (V)	–	46%	47%	–	–	–	7%
Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler	Apr 18–27, 2020	1,183 (RV)	± 2.85%	43%	43%	–	–	5%	9%
University of Texas/Texas Tribune	Apr 10–19, 2020	1,200 (RV)	± 2.8%	49%	44%	–	–	–	7%
AtlasIntel	Feb 24 – Mar 2, 2020	1,100 (RV)	± 3.0%	47%	43%	–	–	11%	–
NBC News/Marist College	Feb 23–27, 2020	2,409 (RV)	± 2.5%	49%	45%	–	–	1%	5%
CNN/SSRS	Feb 22–26, 2020	1,003 (RV)	± 3.4%	47%	48%	–	–	3%^[af]	2%
Univision	Feb 21–26, 2020	1,004 (RV)	± 3.1%	43%	46%	–	–	–	11%
Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler	Feb 17–26, 2020	1,221 (RV)	± 2.8%	45%	44%	–	–	11%	–
YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune	Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020	1,200 (RV)	± 2.83%	47%	44%	–	–	–	10%
University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine	Jan 21–30, 2020	910 (LV)	± 3.24%	46%	44%	–	–	10%^[ag]	–
Data For Progress^[N]	Jan 16–21, 2020	1,486 (LV)	–	54%	40%	–	–	3%^[ah]	3%
Texas Lyceum	Jan 10–19, 2020	520 (LV)	± 4.3%	51%	46%	–	–	–	3%
CNN/SSRS	Dec 4–9, 2019	1,003 (RV)	–	48%	47%	–	–	2%^[ai]	3%
Beacon Research (R)	Nov 9–21, 2019	1,601 (RV)	± 3.0%	45%	44%	–	–	–	–
University of Texas at Tyler	Nov 5–14, 2019	1,093 (RV)	± 3.0%	45%	39%	–	–	–	16%
University of Texas/ Texas Tribune	Oct 18–27, 2019	1,200 (RV)	± 2.8%	46%	39%	–	–	9%^[aj]	6%
University of Texas at Tyler	Sep 13–15, 2019	1,199 (RV)	± 2.8%	38%	40%	–	–	13%	9%
Univision	Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019	1,004 (RV)	–	43%	47%	–	–	–	10%
Climate Nexus	Aug 20–25, 2019	1,660 (RV)	± 2.4%	43%	43%	–	–	–	9%
University of Texas at Tyler	Aug 1–4, 2019	1,261 (RV)	± 2.8%	37%	41%	–	–	14%	8%
Emerson	Aug 1–3, 2019	1,033 (RV)	± 3.0%	49%	51%	–	–	–	–
University of Texas at Tyler	Jul 24–27, 2019	1,414 (RV)	± 2.6%	37%	37%	–	–	12%	14%
Quinnipiac University	May 29 – Jun 4, 2019	1,159 (RV)	± 3.4%	44%	48%	–	–	1%	4%
WPA Intelligence	Apr 27–30, 2019	200 (LV)	± 6.9%	49%	42%	–	–	–	7%
Emerson College July 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine	Apr 25–28, 2019	799 (RV)	± 3.4%	50%^[ae]	51%	–	–	–	–
Quinnipiac University	Feb 20–25, 2019	1,222 (RV)	± 3.4%	47%	46%	–	–	1%	5%
Public Policy Polling (D)^[O]	Feb 13–14, 2019	743 (RV)	± 3.6%	49%	46%	–	–	–	5%

Former candidates

Donald Trump vs. Bernie Sanders Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Bernie Sanders (D) Other Undecided AtlasIntel Feb 24 – Mar 2, 2020 1,100 (RV) ± 3.0% 49% 43% 9% – NBC News/Marist College Feb 23–27, 2020 2,409 (RV) ± 2.5% 49% 45% 1% 5% CNN/SSRS Feb 22–26, 2020 1,003 (RV) ± 3.4% 48% 46% 3%^[ak] 3% Univision Feb 21–26, 2020 1,004 (RV) ± 3.1% 45% 45% – 10% Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler Feb 17–26, 2020 1,221 (RV) ± 2.8% 45% 44% 11% – YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 47% 45% – 7% University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Jan 21–30, 2020 910 (LV) ± 3.24% 47% 42% 12%^[al] – Data for Progress^[N] Jan 16–21, 2020 1,486 (LV) – 55% 40% 3%^[ah] 2% Texas Lyceum Jan 10–19, 2020 520 (LV) ± 4.3% 50% 47% – 3% CNN/SSRS Dec 4–9, 2019 1,003 (RV) – 50% 43% 4%^[am] 3% University of Texas at Tyler Nov 5–14, 2019 1,093 (RV) ± 3.0% 44% 40% – 16% University of Texas/ Texas Tribune Oct 18–27, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.8% 45% 40% 9%^[aj] 5% University of Texas at Tyler Sep 13–15, 2019 1,199 (RV) ± 2.8% 40% 38% 14% 8% Univision Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019 1,004 (RV) – 42% 48% – 10% Climate Nexus Aug 20–25, 2019 1,660 (RV) ± 2.4% 45% 41% – 7% University of Texas at Tyler Aug 1–4, 2019 1,261 (RV) ± 2.8% 38% 42% 13% 7% Emerson Aug 1–3, 2019 1,033 (RV) ± 3.0% 49% 51% – – University of Texas at Tyler Jul 24–27, 2019 1,414 (RV) ± 2.6% 37% 39% 11% 12% Quinnipiac University May 29 – Jun 4, 2019 1,159 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 44% 1% 4% Emerson College July 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Apr 25–28, 2019 799 (RV) ± 3.4% 51%^[ae] 49% – – Quinnipiac University Feb 20–25, 2019 1,222 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 45% 2% 4% Donald Trump vs. Elizabeth Warren Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Elizabeth Warren (D) Other Undecided AtlasIntel Feb 24 – Mar 2, 2020 1,100 (RV) ± 3.0% 49% 40% 12% – CNN/SSRS Feb 22–26, 2020 1,003 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 47% 2%^[ai] 4% Univision Feb 21–26, 2020 1,004 (RV) ± 3.1% 48% 41% – 11% Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler Feb 17–26, 2020 1,221 (RV) ± 2.8% 47% 37% 16% - YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 47% 44% – 9% University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Jan 21–30, 2020 907 (LV) ± 3.24% 48% 41% 12%^[al] – Data for Progress^[N] Jan 16–21, 2020 1,486 (LV) – 56% 38% 3%^[ah] 3% Texas Lyceum Jan 10–19, 2020 520 (LV) ± 4.3% 50% 43% – 7% CNN/SSRS Dec 4–9, 2019 1,003 (RV) – 51% 44% 3%^[af] 2% Beacon Research (R) Nov 9–21, 2019 1,601 (RV) ± 3.0% 46% 41% – – University of Texas at Tyler Nov 5–14, 2019 1,093 (RV) ± 3.0% 46% 35% – 20% University of Texas/ Texas Tribune Oct 18–27, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.8% 46% 39% 10%^[an] 6% University of Texas at Tyler Sep 13–15, 2019 1,199 (RV) ± 2.8% 40% 37% 15% 9% Univision Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019 1,004 (RV) – 42% 44% – 14% Emerson Aug 1–3, 2019 1,033 (RV) ± 3.0% 52% 48% – – Quinnipiac University May 29 – Jun 4, 2019 1,159 (RV) ± 3.4% 46% 45% 1% 5% Emerson College July 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Apr 25–28, 2019 799 (RV) ± 3.4% 53% 47% – – Quinnipiac University Feb 20–25, 2019 1,222 (RV) ± 3.4% 48% 41% 2% 6% Donald Trump vs. Michael Bloomberg Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Michael Bloomberg (D) Other Undecided AtlasIntel Feb 24 – Mar 2, 2020 1,100 (RV) ± 3.0% 48% 36% 17% – CNN/SSRS Feb 22–26, 2020 1,003 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 46% 3%^[ak] 4% Univision Feb 21–26, 2020 1,004 (RV) ± 3.1% 43% 44% – 13% Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler Feb 17–26, 2020 1,221 (RV) ± 2.8% 45% 44% 10% - YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 46% 41% – 13% University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Jan 21–30, 2020 906 (LV) ± 3.24% 47% 44% 9%^[ao] – Donald Trump vs. Amy Klobuchar Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Amy Klobuchar (D) Other Undecided CNN/SSRS Feb 22–26, 2020 1,003 (RV) ± 3.4% 48% 45% 2%^[ai] 5% Univision Feb 21–26, 2020 1,004 (RV) ± 3.1% 46% 39% – 15% Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler Feb 17–26, 2020 1,221 (RV) ± 2.8% 45% 38% 17% - YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 46% 41% – 13% University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Jan 21–30, 2020 909 (LV) ± 3.24% 46% 38% 16%^[ap] – Donald Trump vs. Pete Buttigieg Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Pete Buttigieg (D) Other Undecided CNN/SSRS Feb 22–26, 2020 1,003 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 46% 2%^[ai] 4% Univision Feb 21–26, 2020 1,004 (RV) ± 3.1% 46% 40% – 15% Dallas Morning News/University of Texas at Tyler Feb 17–26, 2020 1,221 (RV) ± 2.8% 45% 41% 15% - YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 47% 42% – 11% University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Jan 21–30, 2020 905 (LV) ± 3.24% 47% 37% 15%^[aq] – Data for Progress^[N] Jan 16–21, 2020 1,486 (LV) – 56% 36% 4%^[ar] 4% Texas Lyceum Jan 10–19, 2020 520 (LV) ± 4.3% 51% 43% – 6% CNN/SSRS Dec 4–9, 2019 1,003 (RV) – 50% 43% 2%^[ai] 6% University of Texas at Tyler Nov 5–14, 2019 1,093 (RV) ± 3.0% 45% 33% - 22% University of Texas at Tyler Sep 13–15, 2019 1,199 (RV) ± 2.8% 39% 30% 21% 10% Emerson Aug 1–3, 2019 1,033 (RV) ± 3.0% 52% 48% – – Quinnipiac University May 29 – Jun 4, 2019 1,159 (RV) ± 3.4% 46% 44% 1% 6% Emerson College July 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Apr 25–28, 2019 799 (RV) ± 3.4% 54% 46% – – Donald Trump vs. Tom Steyer Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Tom Steyer (D) Other Undecided University of Texas at Tyler/Dallas News February 2, 2020, at the Wayback Machine Jan 21–30, 2020 909 (LV) ± 3.24% 47% 36% 17%^[as] – Donald Trump vs. Andrew Yang Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Andrew Yang (D) Other Undecided YouGov/University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 45% 43% – 12% Donald Trump vs. Cory Booker Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Cory Booker (D) Other Undecided Univision Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019 1,004 (RV) – 41% 43% – 16% with Donald Trump and Julian Castro Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Julian Castro (D) Other Undecided University of Texas at Tyler Nov 5–14, 2019 1,093 (RV) ± 3.0% 45% 34% – 21% University of Texas/Texas Tribune Oct 18–27, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.8% 46% 33% 14%^[at] 7% Univision Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019 1,004 (RV) – 41% 44% – 16% Emerson Aug 1–3, 2019 1,033 (RV) ± 3.0% 53% 47% – – Quinnipiac University May 29 – Jun 4, 2019 1,159 (RV) ± 3.4% 46% 43% 1% 6% Quinnipiac University Feb 20–25, 2019 1,222 (RV) ± 3.4% 46% 41% 2% 8% with Donald Trump and Kamala Harris Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Kamala Harris (D) Other Undecided University of Texas at Tyler Nov 5–14, 2019 1,093 (RV) ± 3.0% 46% 33% - 21% University of Texas at Tyler Sep 13–15, 2019 1,199 (RV) ± 2.8% 39% 32% 19% 10% Univision Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019 1,004 (RV) – 44% 45% – 11% Emerson Aug 1–3, 2019 1,033 (RV) ± 3.0% 54% 46% – – Quinnipiac University May 29 – Jun 4, 2019 1,159 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 43% 1% 6% Emerson College July 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Apr 25–28, 2019 799 (RV) ± 3.4% 54% 46% – – Quinnipiac University Feb 20–25, 2019 1,222 (RV) ± 3.4% 48% 41% 2% 5% Public Policy Polling (D)^[O] Feb 13–14, 2019 743 (RV) ± 3.6% 49% 40% – 11% with Donald Trump and Beto O'Rourke Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Beto O'Rourke (D) Other Undecided University of Texas/ Texas Tribune Oct 18–27, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.8% 47% 41% 7%^[au] 5% University of Texas at Tyler Sep 13–15, 2019 1,199 (RV) ± 2.8% 40% 42% 11% 8% Emerson Aug 1–3, 2019 1,033 (RV) ± 3.0% 52% 48% – – Quinnipiac University May 29 – Jun 4, 2019 1,159 (RV) ± 3.4% 48% 45% 1% 3% Emerson College July 3, 2019, at the Wayback Machine Apr 25–28, 2019 799 (RV) ± 3.4% 50% 50% – – Quinnipiac University Feb 20–25, 2019 1,222 (RV) ± 3.4% 47% 46% 1% 4% Atlantic Media & Research (R)^[P] Jan 5–11, 2019 504 (LV) ± 4.4% 52% 39% – –

Hypothetical polling

with Donald Trump and Mark Cuban Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Mark Cuban (D) Undecided Public Policy Polling Dec 2017 – (V)^[z] – 44% 47% – with Donald Trump and a Generic Democrat Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Generic Democrat (D) Undecided Univision Aug 31 – Sep 6, 2019 1,004 (RV) – 42% 47% 11% with Donald Trump and a generic opponent Poll source Date(s) administered Sample size^[c] Margin of error Donald Trump (R) Generic Opponent Undecided University of Texas/Texas Tribune[7] Apr 10–19, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.8% 49% 50%^[av] 7% University of Texas/Texas Tribune Jan 31 – Feb 9, 2020 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 48% 52%^[av] – University of Texas/Texas Tribune Oct 18–27, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 48% 52%^[av] – Quinnipiac Sep 4–9, 2019 1,410 (RV) ± 3.1% 35% 48%^[aw] 17%^[ax] University of Texas/Texas Tribune May 31–Jun 9, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 50% 50%^[av] – University of Texas/Texas Tribune Feb 15–24, 2019 1,200 (RV) ± 2.83% 49% 51%^[av] –

Voting access

Matters of election administration and ease of voting during an ongoing pandemic were heavily litigated in Texas in 2020. Harris County, the most populous one in Texas, spearheaded a number of innovative approaches and was the focal point of several legal challenges.

For the 2020 elections, Harris County Commissioners approved a budget of $33 million, higher than the $4 million budget for the 2016 United States presidential election. Chris Hollins, the interim Harris County Clerk and Texas Democratic Party finance vice chairperson, created a 23-point voting access expansion program, which included promotion of voting by mail, expansion of early voting accessibility, and drive-through voting, an innovation to facilitate voting while at the same time mitigating infection risks during the COVID-19 pandemic.^[31] On October 29 several voting locations in Harris County were available for 24 hours to accommodate voters whose work shifts or other responsibilities overlapped with regular voting hours.^[32]

Local Republican activists and officials challenged the voter-friendly measures in multiple legal actions, with mixed success. Several lawsuits complained about early voting and about Harris County providing multiple drop-off locations for absentee ballots. Responding to pressure from within his own party, Governor Abbott then restricted the number of drop-offs to a single one per county regardless of population and size, forcing Harris County to close eleven sites at county clerk branch offices called annexes.^[33]

When a legal action challenging drive-through voting was dismissed,^[31] the Republican Party in Texas sought relief in the Texas Supreme Court (SCOTX), which denied the petition because the case had not been brought promptly.^[34] The first lawsuit was filed on October 15 even though Harris County had obtained prior clearance from the Office of the Texas Secretary of State (which is led by a Republican appointed by Republican Governor Abbott) and had tested drive-in voting in the primary runoff elections in July without complaint.^[35][36] SCOTX denied the petition and drive-thru voting continued.^[37] On October 29 another action was filed seeking to invalidate drive-thru ballots based on the contention that this was a form of curbside voting that the Texas Election Code authorized only for voters with disabilities.^[38] In an order issued on Sunday, November 1, the Texas Supreme Court denied the petition challenging the legality of drive-through voting, but did not resolve the legal argument one way or the other.^[39][40] The next day, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen heard an almost identical case by the same group of plaintiff, which included Republican candidates, on an emergency basis. Slate described the judge as "one of the most notoriously partisan conservatives in the federal judiciary."^[36] Hanen ruled against the plaintiffs, dismissing their action for lack of standing, with the result that drive-in voting remained in effect. The Plaintiffs, which included Steve Toth,^[41] immediately sought emergency relief in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, but were unsuccessful.^[42] Hollins nevertheless cancelled drive-thru voting in tent structures on the eve of Election Day.^[43] He reversed himself out of concern that ballots cast there might be declared invalid, should the Fifth Circuit disagree with Judge Hanen on the standing issue and agree with Judge Hanen that tents were not permissible polling places on Election Day.^[44]

Some counties also set up an online system that allowed voters to check for wait times at early voting centers and make their voting plans accordingly.^[45]

On October 5, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued a proclamation under the Texas Disaster Act limiting each county to a single drop-off location for mail ballots.^[46] Federal judge Robert Pitman blocked Abbott's order on October 9.^[47] The next day, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for an emergency stay of Pitman's ruling, which a three-judge motion panel temporarily granted on an interim basis, pending consideration of the appeal on the merits.^[48] A Texas state judge also blocked Abbott's order on October 15, and a state appeals court upheld that decision on October 23. Paxton then sought emergency relief from the Texas Supreme Court, which backed the Governor and lifted the temporary injunction in an October 27 decision with no dissent.^[49][50][51]

Turnout

Voter registration in Texas ended on October 5, and the Secretary of State reported a registration total of 16,955,519 voters, an increase of 1,854,432 since the 2016 elections, and 1.2 million of which had occurred after the 2018 midterm elections.

Early voting began on October 13. Over one million ballots were received on that day,^[52] and by October 15 fewer than two million ballots were counted.^[53] The following day the count was 2.6 million, which meant 15.51% of the state's registered voters had already voted.^[54]

For the whole early voting period, votes in the age 18-29 range were higher than the total of that age group of 2016, with 1.3 million votes.^[55]

On October 13, Dallas County recorded 59,905 ballots and Tarrant County recorded 42,428 ballots, with the former setting a record for that county and the latter below the 2016 count on the first day of early voting.^[56]

On October 13, Harris County had an unofficial tally of 128,186 ballots received, the highest ever first day early voting count and over 5% of the county's registered voters.^[57] By the second day, the count was 287,931, 11% of the county's registered voters.^[58] On the third day, over 100,000 ballots were counted, and in those three days 387,000 ballots were counted, with 44,000 of them issued through the mail.^[59] On the fourth day, a similar number of ballots were cast, which meant the number of ballots cast total was about 500,000.^[60] On October 23, there were 1 million ballots cast from Harris County.^[61]

On October 13, Travis County received 35,873 ballots,^[62] while it received 38,119 the following day,^[63] and by 3 P.M. on Thursday over 26,000.^[64] When voting closed on Thursday the percentage of Travis County voters who had already voted was 16.44%. On Friday 41,328 additional votes were counted.^[54] Williamson County by the third day had a 64,891 votes out of 376,931 people registered to vote, which meant its turnout was already 17.25%.^[65]

On October 13, Bexar County recorded 78,000 votes, with over 45,000 by mail and the remainder in person.^[52]

On October 13, El Paso County recorded fewer than 34,000 votes.^[52]

By October 19, Texas voters cast 50% of the votes cast in the 2016 presidential election in Texas. By October 22, 65.5% of 2016 votes were cast (or 34.65% of registered voters). By October 25, over 80% of 2016 votes were cast (or 43% of registered voters),^[66] and by October 29, 50% of registered voters had cast ballots by early in-person and absentee ballot. By October 30, statewide voter turnout, as well as turnout in Harris County, had already surpassed the total of 2016.^[67]

General results

2020 United States presidential election in Texas^[68]

Party		Candidate	Votes	%	±%
	Republican	Donald Trump Mike Pence	5,890,347	52.06%	-0.17%
	Democratic	Joe Biden Kamala Harris	5,259,126	46.48%	+3.24%
	Libertarian	Jo Jorgensen Spike Cohen	126,243	1.12%	-2.04%
	Green	Howie Hawkins Angela Walker	33,396	0.30%	-0.50%
	Write-in		5,944	0.04%	-0.53%
Total votes			11,315,056	100.00%

Results by county

County	Donald Trump Republican		Joe Biden Democratic		Jo Jorgensen Libertarian		Howie Hawkins Green		Other votes		Margin		Total votes
	%	#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%	#	%	#
Anderson	78.59%	15,110	20.57%	3,955	0.70%	134	0.11%	22	0.04%	6	58.02%	11,155	19,227
Andrews	84.31%	4,943	14.50%	850	1.02%	60	0.17%	10	0.00%	0	69.81%	4,093	5,863
Angelina	72.40%	25,076	26.40%	9,143	0.79%	274	0.22%	75	0.20%	67	46.00%	15,933	34,635
Aransas	75.17%	9,239	23.73%	2,916	0.84%	103	0.25%	31	0.01%	1	51.44%	6,323	12,290
Archer	89.66%	4,300	9.30%	446	0.94%	45	0.08%	4	0.02%	1	80.36%	3,854	4,796
Armstrong	93.08%	1,035	6.74%	75	0.18%	2	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	86.34%	960	1,112
Atascosa	66.37%	12,039	32.40%	5,876	0.79%	143	0.32%	58	0.12%	22	33.97%	6,163	18,138
Austin	78.48%	11,447	20.23%	2,951	0.84%	123	0.23%	33	0.22%	32	58.25%	8,496	14,586
Bailey	77.10%	1,434	21.99%	409	0.75%	14	0.11%	2	0.05%	1	55.11%	1,025	1,860
Bandera	79.03%	10,057	19.68%	2,505	0.94%	120	0.24%	30	0.11%	14	59.35%	7,552	12,726
Bastrop	55.81%	20,516	42.09%	15,474	1.44%	531	0.35%	128	0.30%	113	13.72%	5,042	36,762
Baylor	87.78%	1,494	10.75%	183	1.29%	22	0.06%	1	0.12%	2	77.03%	1,311	1,702
Bee	63.72%	6,006	34.88%	3,288	0.99%	93	0.29%	27	0.13%	12	28.84%	2,718	9,426
Bell	53.17%	67,893	44.65%	57,014	1.55%	1,980	0.34%	440	0.28%	363	8.52%	10,879	127,690
Bexar	40.05%	308,618	58.20%	448,452	1.15%	8,837	0.36%	2,798	0.24%	1,866	-18.15%	-139,834	770,571
Blanco	72.97%	5,443	25.62%	1,911	0.97%	72	0.20%	15	0.24%	18	47.35%	3,532	7,459
Borden	95.43%	397	3.85%	16	0.48%	2	0.24%	1	0.00%	0	91.58%	381	416
Bosque	81.84%	7,469	17.10%	1,561	0.91%	83	0.14%	13	0.00%	0	64.74%	5,908	9,126
Bowie	70.87%	27,116	28.09%	10,747	0.78%	300	0.24%	91	0.02%	7	42.78%	16,369	38,261
Brazoria	58.35%	90,433	40.15%	62,228	1.20%	1,860	0.27%	417	0.03%	46	18.20%	28,205	154,984
Brazos	55.71%	47,530	41.43%	35,349	2.12%	1,812	0.30%	252	0.43%	370	14.28%	12,181	85,313
Brewster	51.04%	2,461	46.83%	2,258	1.85%	89	0.29%	14	0.00%	0	4.21%	203	4,822
Briscoe	88.14%	639	10.76%	78	0.97%	7	0.14%	1	0.00%	0	77.38%	561	725
Brooks	40.18%	998	59.18%	1,470	0.40%	10	0.24%	6	0.00%	0	-19.00%	-472	2,484
Brown	85.78%	13,698	13.19%	2,107	0.84%	134	0.15%	24	0.05%	6	72.59%	11,591	15,969
Burleson	78.33%	6,743	20.77%	1,788	0.73%	63	0.17%	15	0.00%	0	57.56%	4,955	8,609
Burnet	75.93%	18,767	22.81%	5,639	1.08%	268	0.14%	34	0.04%	9	53.12%	13,128	24,717
Caldwell	53.64%	8,031	44.56%	6,672	1.27%	190	0.31%	47	0.22%	33	9.08%	1,359	14,973
Calhoun	71.80%	5,641	27.34%	2,148	0.78%	61	0.08%	6	0.00%	0	44.46%	3,493	7,856
Callahan	87.92%	6,012	10.73%	734	1.04%	71	0.22%	15	0.09%	6	77.19%	5,278	6,838
Cameron	42.89%	49,032	56.04%	64,063	0.64%	728	0.29%	336	0.15%	167	-13.15%	-15,031	114,326
Camp	71.66%	3,626	27.55%	1,394	0.61%	31	0.14%	7	0.04%	2	44.11%	2,232	5,060
Carson	89.01%	2,779	9.51%	297	1.19%	37	0.10%	3	0.19%	6	79.50%	2,482	3,122
Cass	79.22%	11,033	20.07%	2,795	0.57%	79	0.12%	17	0.02%	3	59.15%	8,238	13,927
Castro	76.91%	1,602	22.37%	466	0.43%	9	0.29%	6	0.00%	0	54.54%	1,136	2,083
Chambers	80.15%	17,353	18.46%	3,997	1.15%	250	0.23%	50	0.00%	2	61.69%	13,356	21,652
Cherokee	77.41%	15,101	21.58%	4,210	0.83%	161	0.18%	36	0.00%	0	55.83%	10,891	19,508
Childress	85.26%	1,943	13.60%	310	0.79%	18	0.35%	8	0.00%	0	71.66%	1,633	2,279
Clay	88.25%	5,069	10.69%	614	0.80%	46	0.21%	12	0.05%	3	77.56%	4,455	5,744
Cochran	80.90%	809	17.70%	177	1.10%	11	0.30%	3	0.00%	0	63.20%	632	1,000
Coke	89.15%	1,586	10.01%	178	0.56%	10	0.28%	5	0.00%	0	79.14%	1,408	1,779
Coleman	88.18%	3,641	10.92%	451	0.56%	23	0.22%	9	0.12%	5	77.26%	3,190	4,129
Collin	51.26%	252,318	46.92%	230,945	1.23%	6,075	0.25%	1,246	0.33%	1,632	4.34%	21,373	492,216
Collingsworth	86.04%	1,048	12.73%	155	0.99%	12	0.08%	1	0.16%	2	73.31%	893	1,218
Colorado	74.91%	7,472	24.26%	2,420	0.50%	50	0.19%	19	0.14%	14	50.65%	5,052	9,975
Comal	70.58%	62,740	27.93%	24,826	1.24%	1,106	0.21%	191	0.03%	29	42.65%	37,914	88,892
Comanche	85.06%	5,177	14.02%	853	0.81%	49	0.08%	5	0.03%	2	71.04%	4,324	6,086
Concho	83.44%	1,058	15.54%	197	0.79%	10	0.24%	3	0.00%	0	67.90%	861	1,268
Cooke	81.98%	15,596	16.87%	3,210	0.82%	156	0.14%	26	0.20%	37	65.11%	12,386	19,025
Coryell	65.71%	15,438	32.20%	7,565	1.75%	410	0.33%	77	0.01%	3	33.51%	7,873	23,493
Cottle	81.57%	540	17.07%	113	0.91%	6	0.45%	3	0.00%	0	64.50%	427	662
Crane	82.97%	1,247	16.03%	241	0.67%	10	0.27%	4	0.07%	1	66.94%	1,006	1,503
Crockett	77.51%	1,220	21.86%	344	0.57%	9	0.06%	1	0.00%	0	55.65%	876	1,574
Crosby	71.48%	1,396	26.98%	527	1.13%	22	0.41%	8	0.00%	0	44.50%	869	1,953
Culberson	48.03%	415	50.69%	438	1.04%	9	0.23%	2	0.00%	0	-2.66%	-23	864
Dallam	86.33%	1,389	12.24%	197	1.12%	18	0.31%	5	0.00%	0	74.09%	1,192	1,609
Dallas	33.29%	307,076	64.89%	598,576	1.04%	9,635	0.40%	3,667	0.39%	3,559	-31.60%	-291,500	922,513
Dawson	77.88%	2,951	21.32%	808	0.66%	25	0.13%	5	0.00%	0	56.56%	2,143	3,789
Deaf Smith	71.45%	3,294	27.42%	1,264	0.76%	35	0.37%	17	0.00%	0	64.03%	2,030	4,610
Delta	83.41%	2,162	15.55%	403	0.93%	24	0.12%	3	0.00%	0	67.86%	1,759	2,592
Denton	53.23%	222,480	45.15%	188,695	1.30%	5,421	0.26%	1,092	0.07%	276	8.08%	33,785	417,964
DeWitt	80.89%	6,567	18.40%	1,494	0.57%	46	0.14%	11	0.00%	0	62.49%	5,073	8,118
Dickens	86.34%	853	13.16%	130	0.30%	3	0.20%	2	0.00%	0	73.18%	723	988
Dimmit	37.75%	1,384	61.76%	2,264	0.27%	10	0.22%	8	0.00%	0	-24.01%	-880	3,666
Donley	87.26%	1,438	12.01%	198	0.67%	11	0.06%	1	0.00%	0	75.25%	1,240	1,648
Duval	48.35%	2,443	50.96%	2,575	0.44%	22	0.26%	13	0.00%	0	-2.61%	-132	5,053
Eastland	87.27%	7,237	11.85%	983	0.72%	60	0.14%	12	0.01%	1	75.42%	6,254	8,293
Ector	73.33%	32,697	25.49%	11,367	0.96%	428	0.20%	89	0.02%	10	47.84%	21,330	44,591
Edwards	83.77%	893	15.76%	168	0.47%	5	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	68.01%	725	1,066
El Paso	31.56%	84,331	66.66%	178,126	1.03%	2,746	0.54%	1,445	0.21%	567	-35.10%	-93,795	267,215
Ellis	66.19%	56,717	32.17%	27,565	1.11%	954	0.26%	220	0.27%	232	34.02%	29,152	85,688
Erath	81.08%	13,684	17.28%	2,916	1.29%	218	0.21%	35	0.14%	24	63.80%	10,768	16,877
Falls	68.11%	4,177	30.96%	1,899	0.72%	44	0.21%	13	0.00%	0	37.15%	2,278	6,133
Fannin	81.10%	12,171	17.69%	2,655	1.03%	155	0.15%	23	0.02%	3	63.41%	9,516	15,007
Fayette	78.60%	10,171	20.56%	2,661	0.64%	83	0.20%	26	0.00%	0	58.04%	7,510	12,941
Fisher	79.30%	1,448	19.28%	352	1.15%	21	0.27%	5	0.00%	0	60.02%	1,096	1,826
Floyd	77.69%	1,584	21.48%	438	0.74%	15	0.10%	2	0.00%	0	56.21%	1,146	2,039
Foard	80.76%	445	17.97%	99	1.09%	6	0.18%	1	0.00%	0	62.79%	346	551
Fort Bend	44.01%	157,718	54.57%	195,552	0.85%	3,028	0.30%	1,091	0.26%	944	-10.56%	-37,834	358,333
Franklin	83.07%	4,161	16.05%	804	0.72%	36	0.16%	8	0.00%	0	67.02%	3,357	5,009
Freestone	80.25%	6,991	18.77%	1,635	0.77%	67	0.21%	18	0.00%	0	61.48%	5,356	8,711
Frio	53.48%	2,823	45.88%	2,422	0.44%	23	0.21%	11	0.00%	0	7.60%	401	5,279
Gaines	89.31%	5,355	9.61%	576	0.90%	54	0.17%	10	0.02%	1	79.70%	4,779	5,996
Galveston	60.56%	93,911	37.95%	58,842	1.23%	1,913	0.25%	393	0.00%	1	22.61%	35,069	155,060
Garza	85.48%	1,413	13.97%	231	0.30%	5	0.24%	4	0.00%	0	71.51%	1,182	1,653
Gillespie	78.95%	12,514	20.04%	3,176	0.88%	140	0.10%	16	0.03%	4	58.91%	9,338	15,850
Glasscock	93.57%	611	5.97%	39	0.46%	3	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	87.60%	572	653
Goliad	77.22%	3,085	21.95%	877	0.60%	24	0.05%	2	0.18%	7	55.27%	2,208	3,995
Gonzales	73.57%	5,627	25.47%	1,948	0.75%	57	0.20%	15	0.01%	1	48.10%	3,679	7,648
Gray	87.90%	6,840	10.65%	829	1.25%	97	0.21%	16	0.00%	0	77.25%	6,011	7,782
Grayson	74.26%	44,163	24.39%	14,506	1.07%	634	0.23%	136	0.07%	35	49.87%	29,657	59,474
Gregg	67.72%	32,493	30.84%	14,796	1.15%	551	0.24%	113	0.06%	29	36.88%	17,697	47,982
Grimes	75.98%	9,432	22.82%	2,833	0.95%	118	0.24%	30	0.01%	1	53.16%	6,599	12,414
Guadalupe	61.16%	47,553	37.04%	28,805	1.32%	1,023	0.27%	211	0.21%	166	24.12%	18,748	77,758
Hale	74.87%	7,177	23.77%	2,279	1.01%	97	0.32%	31	0.02%	2	51.10%	4,898	9,586
Hall	85.12%	995	14.37%	168	0.34%	4	0.09%	1	0.09%	1	70.75%	827	1,169
Hamilton	83.11%	3,616	14.73%	641	1.20%	52	0.92%	40	0.05%	2	68.38%	2,975	4,351
Hansford	90.33%	1,849	8.11%	166	1.32%	27	0.15%	3	0.10%	2	82.22%	1,683	2,047
Hardeman	84.18%	1,330	15.25%	241	0.57%	9	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	68.93%	1,089	1,580
Hardin	86.33%	23,858	12.57%	3,474	1.00%	276	0.10%	27	0.00%	0	73.76%	20,384	27,635
Harris	42.69%	700,630	55.94%	918,193	1.02%	16,819	0.31%	5,129	0.03%	486	-13.25%	-217,563	1,641,257
Harrison	72.23%	21,466	26.61%	7,908	0.99%	294	0.14%	42	0.02%	7	45.62%	13,558	29,717
Hartley	89.89%	1,868	9.38%	195	0.67%	14	0.05%	1	0.00%	0	80.51%	1,673	2,078
Haskell	83.11%	1,840	15.94%	353	0.68%	15	0.27%	6	0.00%	0	67.17%	1,487	2,214
Hays	43.59%	47,680	54.41%	59,524	1.59%	1,735	0.38%	418	0.03%	38	-10.82%	-11,844	109,395
Hemphill	86.40%	1,486	11.98%	206	1.45%	25	0.17%	3	0.00%	0	74.42%	1,280	1,720
Henderson	79.61%	28,911	19.44%	7,060	0.73%	264	0.21%	75	0.02%	7	60.17%	21,851	36,317
Hidalgo	40.98%	90,527	58.04%	128,199	0.57%	1,261	0.39%	865	0.01%	32	-17.06%	-37,672	220,884
Hill	79.87%	11,926	19.15%	2,860	0.80%	119	0.17%	26	0.00%	0	60.82%	9,066	14,931
Hockley	80.69%	6,536	18.30%	1,482	0.75%	61	0.20%	16	0.06%	5	62.39%	5,054	8,100
Hood	81.42%	26,496	17.36%	5,648	0.98%	319	0.22%	71	0.02%	7	64.06%	20,848	32,541
Hopkins	79.79%	12,719	19.11%	3,046	0.90%	143	0.19%	31	0.01%	2	60.68%	9,673	15,941
Houston	74.80%	7,060	24.52%	2,314	0.59%	56	0.07%	7	0.01%	1	50.28%	4,746	9,438
Howard	78.64%	8,054	20.20%	2,069	0.87%	89	0.27%	28	0.01%	1	58.44%	5,985	10,241
Hudspeth	66.87%	779	31.85%	371	0.86%	10	0.43%	5	0.00%	0	35.02%	408	1,165
Hunt	75.56%	29,163	23.07%	8,906	1.12%	434	0.18%	71	0.07%	23	52.49%	20,257	38,597
Hutchinson	87.55%	7,681	11.00%	965	1.31%	115	0.11%	10	0.02%	2	76.55%	6,716	8,773
Irion	85.38%	759	13.50%	120	0.90%	8	0.22%	2	0.00%	0	71.88%	639	889
Jack	90.38%	3,418	8.75%	331	0.63%	24	0.24%	9	0.00%	0	81.63%	3,087	3,782
Jackson	82.34%	5,231	16.26%	1,033	0.83%	53	0.36%	23	0.20%	13	66.08%	4,198	6,353
Jasper	80.34%	12,542	18.92%	2,954	0.67%	105	0.04%	7	0.02%	3	61.42%	9,588	15,611
Jeff Davis	60.08%	784	38.39%	501	1.30%	17	0.23%	3	0.00%	0	21.69%	283	1,305
Jefferson	50.20%	47,570	48.62%	46,073	0.95%	897	0.21%	199	0.02%	20	1.58%	1,497	94,759
Jim Hogg	40.91%	833	58.79%	1,197	0.20%	4	0.10%	2	0.00%	0	-17.88%	-364	2,036
Jim Wells	54.52%	7,453	44.77%	6,119	0.50%	69	0.20%	28	0.00%	0	9.75%	1,334	13,669
Johnson	75.85%	54,628	22.86%	16,464	1.07%	771	0.20%	142	0.01%	15	52.99%	38,164	72,020
Jones	83.96%	5,660	14.82%	999	0.93%	63	0.28%	19	0.00%	0	69.14%	4,661	6,741
Karnes	75.55%	3,968	23.50%	1,234	0.57%	30	0.32%	17	0.06%	3	52.05%	2,734	5,252
Kaufman	66.34%	37,624	32.45%	18,405	0.93%	528	0.26%	146	0.03%	15	33.89%	19,219	56,718
Kendall	75.92%	20,083	22.76%	6,020	1.09%	289	0.17%	46	0.05%	14	53.16%	14,063	26,452
Kenedy	65.46%	127	33.51%	65	0.52%	1	0.52%	1	0.00%	0	31.95%	62	194
Kent	88.96%	411	10.17%	47	0.65%	3	0.22%	1	0.00%	0	78.79%	364	462
Kerr	75.25%	20,879	23.51%	6,524	1.02%	283	0.18%	51	0.03%	8	51.74%	14,355	27,745
Kimble	86.69%	1,987	12.39%	284	0.74%	17	0.17%	4	0.00%	0	74.30%	1,703	2,292
King	94.97%	151	5.03%	8	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	89.94%	143	159
Kinney	71.37%	1,144	27.82%	446	0.69%	11	0.12%	2	0.00%	0	43.55%	698	1,603
Kleberg	50.29%	5,504	48.56%	5,314	0.89%	97	0.26%	29	0.00%	0	1.73%	190	10,944
Knox	81.04%	1,180	18.20%	265	0.48%	7	0.27%	4	0.00%	0	52.84%	915	1,456
La Salle	55.49%	1,335	43.72%	1,052	0.50%	12	0.29%	7	0.00%	0	11.77%	283	2,406
Lamar	78.16%	16,760	20.79%	4,458	0.80%	172	0.13%	28	0.11%	24	57.37%	12,302	21,442
Lamb	79.84%	3,521	19.05%	840	0.91%	40	0.16%	7	0.04%	2	60.79%	2,681	4,410
Lampasas	77.76%	8,086	20.62%	2,144	1.39%	145	0.23%	24	0.00%	0	57.14%	5,942	10,399
Lavaca	86.34%	8,804	13.07%	1,333	0.45%	46	0.08%	8	0.06%	6	73.27%	7,471	10,197
Lee	77.22%	6,255	21.60%	1,750	0.80%	65	0.20%	16	0.17%	14	55.62%	4,505	8,100
Leon	86.62%	7,523	12.34%	1,072	0.66%	57	0.16%	14	0.23%	19	74.28%	6,451	8,685
Liberty	79.44%	23,302	19.72%	5,785	0.74%	218	0.10%	29	0.00%	0	59.72%	17,517	29,334
Limestone	74.65%	6,789	24.33%	2,213	0.73%	66	0.30%	27	0.00%	0	50.32%	4,576	9,095
Lipscomb	89.06%	1,205	9.68%	131	1.26%	17	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	79.38%	1,074	1,353
Live Oak	83.08%	4,199	16.20%	819	0.59%	30	0.12%	6	0.00%	0	66.88%	3,380	5,054
Llano	79.61%	10,079	19.47%	2,465	0.78%	99	0.13%	16	0.01%	1	60.14%	7,614	12,660
Loving	90.91%	60	6.06%	4	3.03%	2	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	84.85%	56	66
Lubbock	65.27%	78,861	33.12%	40,017	1.34%	1,617	0.23%	276	0.03%	46	32.15%	38,844	120,817
Lynn	80.81%	1,853	18.67%	428	0.44%	10	0.09%	2	0.00%	0	64.14%	1,425	2,293
Madison	78.69%	4,169	20.54%	1,088	0.57%	30	0.19%	10	0.02%	1	58.15%	3,081	5,298
Marion	71.34%	3,470	27.53%	1,339	0.97%	47	0.16%	8	0.00%	0	43.81%	2,131	4,864
Martin	85.97%	1,857	13.33%	288	0.60%	13	0.09%	2	0.00%	0	72.64%	1,569	2,160
Mason	80.48%	1,991	18.47%	457	0.77%	19	0.08%	2	0.20%	5	62.01%	1,534	2,474
Matagorda	71.72%	9,845	27.19%	3,733	0.84%	115	0.24%	33	0.01%	1	44.53%	6,112	13,727
Maverick	44.84%	6,881	54.29%	8,332	0.48%	73	0.39%	60	0.00%	0	-9.45%	-1,451	15,346
McCulloch	84.52%	2,904	14.26%	490	1.05%	36	0.17%	6	0.00%	0	70.26%	2,414	3,436
McLennan	60.84%	59,543	37.49%	36,688	1.33%	1,297	0.25%	243	0.10%	101	23.35%	22,855	97,872
McMullen	89.15%	460	10.27%	53	0.39%	2	0.19%	1	0.00%	0	78.88%	407	516
Medina	69.04%	15,642	29.89%	6,773	0.81%	184	0.20%	45	0.06%	13	39.15%	8,869	22,657
Menard	80.06%	823	19.16%	197	0.58%	6	0.19%	2	0.00%	0	60.90%	626	1,028
Midland	77.34%	45,624	20.90%	12,329	1.32%	777	0.21%	126	0.22%	132	56.44%	33,295	58,988
Milam	75.48%	7,984	23.60%	2,496	0.68%	72	0.23%	24	0.02%	2	51.88%	5,488	10,578
Mills	88.50%	2,217	10.82%	271	0.60%	15	0.08%	2	0.00%	0	77.68%	1,946	2,505
Mitchell	84.14%	2,170	15.39%	397	0.43%	11	0.04%	1	0.00%	0	68.75%	1,773	2,579
Montague	87.74%	8,615	11.17%	1,097	0.79%	78	0.24%	24	0.05%	5	76.57%	7,518	9,819
Montgomery	71.22%	193,382	27.39%	74,377	1.17%	3,166	0.19%	526	0.03%	92	43.83%	119,005	271,543
Moore	79.14%	4,359	19.28%	1,062	1.20%	66	0.38%	21	0.00%	0	59.86%	3,297	5,508
Morris	69.30%	3,872	29.87%	1,669	0.64%	36	0.18%	10	0.00%	0	39.43%	2,203	5,587
Motley	92.64%	604	7.06%	46	0.31%	2	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	85.56%	558	652
Nacogdoches	64.88%	17,378	33.60%	9,000	1.13%	302	0.31%	83	0.08%	22	31.28%	8,378	26,785
Navarro	72.16%	13,800	26.67%	5,101	0.87%	167	0.28%	53	0.01%	2	45.49%	8,699	19,123
Newton	80.11%	4,882	19.25%	1,173	0.56%	34	0.08%	5	0.00%	0	60.86%	3,709	6,094
Nolan	77.11%	4,131	21.69%	1,162	0.99%	53	0.19%	10	0.02%	1	55.42%	2,969	5,357
Nueces	50.75%	64,617	47.85%	60,925	1.10%	1,404	0.29%	368	0.01%	8	2.90%	3,692	127,322
Ochiltree	89.10%	2,812	9.57%	302	1.17%	37	0.10%	3	0.06%	2	79.53%	2,510	3,156
Oldham	90.88%	917	8.03%	81	0.99%	10	0.10%	1	0.00%	0	82.85%	836	1,009
Orange	81.09%	29,186	17.66%	6,357	1.04%	376	0.14%	51	0.06%	24	63.43%	22,829	35,994
Palo Pinto	81.50%	10,179	17.44%	2,178	0.81%	101	0.22%	27	0.04%	4	64.06%	8,001	12,489
Panola	81.44%	9,326	17.96%	2,057	0.50%	57	0.10%	11	0.00%	0	63.48%	7,269	11,451
Parker	81.50%	62,045	17.10%	13,017	1.16%	880	0.21%	158	0.04%	28	64.40%	49,028	76,128
Parmer	80.57%	2,135	18.42%	488	0.87%	23	0.15%	4	0.00%	0	62.15%	1,627	2,650
Pecos	68.87%	3,215	29.61%	1,382	1.07%	50	0.45%	21	0.00%	0	39.26%	1,833	4,668
Polk	76.79%	18,573	22.27%	5,387	0.71%	171	0.21%	50	0.02%	5	54.52%	13,186	24,186
Potter	68.45%	22,820	29.76%	9,921	1.36%	454	0.38%	126	0.05%	16	38.69%	12,899	33,337
Presidio	32.52%	721	65.99%	1,463	0.95%	21	0.54%	12	0.00%	0	-33.47%	-742	2,217
Rains	85.16%	5,155	13.91%	842	0.71%	43	0.21%	13	0.00%	0	71.25%	4,313	6,053
Randall	78.54%	50,796	19.79%	12,802	1.41%	910	0.20%	129	0.06%	37	58.75%	37,994	64,674
Reagan	83.81%	942	15.30%	172	0.62%	7	0.27%	3	0.00%	0	68.51%	770	1,124
Real	82.90%	1,643	16.15%	320	0.71%	14	0.25%	5	0.00%	0	66.75%	1,323	1,982
Red River	77.80%	4,517	21.46%	1,246	0.62%	36	0.12%	7	0.00%	0	56.34%	3,271	5,806
Reeves	61.10%	2,254	37.82%	1,395	0.81%	30	0.22%	8	0.05%	2	23.28%	859	3,689
Refugio	65.66%	2,210	32.92%	1,108	0.77%	26	0.62%	21	0.03%	1	32.74%	1,102	3,366
Roberts	96.18%	529	3.09%	17	0.73%	4	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	93.09%	512	550
Robertson	69.71%	5,646	29.31%	2,374	0.81%	66	0.16%	13	0.00%	0	40.40%	3,272	8,099
Rockwall	68.15%	36,726	30.45%	16,412	1.13%	611	0.22%	121	0.04%	21	37.70%	20,314	53,891
Runnels	86.35%	3,807	12.52%	552	0.88%	39	0.25%	11	0.00%	0	73.83%	3,255	4,409
Rusk	77.34%	16,534	21.65%	4,629	0.73%	155	0.23%	50	0.04%	9	55.69%	11,905	21,377
Sabine	87.12%	4,784	12.18%	669	0.49%	27	0.13%	7	0.07%	4	74.94%	4,115	5,491
San Augustine	75.14%	3,007	24.49%	980	0.32%	13	0.05%	2	0.00%	0	50.65%	2,027	4,002
San Jacinto	80.39%	10,161	18.49%	2,337	0.80%	101	0.31%	39	0.02%	2	61.90%	7,824	12,640
San Patricio	63.79%	16,516	34.71%	8,988	1.12%	291	0.36%	93	0.01%	3	29.08%	7,528	25,891
San Saba	88.70%	2,308	11.03%	287	0.27%	7	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	77.67%	2,021	2,602
Schleicher	81.10%	940	18.21%	211	0.52%	6	0.17%	2	0.00%	0	62.89%	729	1,159
Scurry	84.89%	4,983	13.94%	818	0.90%	53	0.26%	15	0.02%	1	70.95%	4,165	5,870
Shackelford	91.15%	1,484	7.99%	130	0.61%	10	0.25%	4	0.00%	0	83.16%	1,354	1,628
Shelby	79.06%	7,975	20.50%	2,068	0.37%	37	0.04%	4	0.03%	3	58.56%	5,907	10,087
Sherman	89.31%	886	9.17%	91	0.91%	9	0.50%	5	0.10%	1	80.14%	795	992
Smith	68.85%	69,080	29.52%	29,615	1.12%	1,126	0.25%	254	0.26%	259	39.33%	39,465	100,334
Somervell	82.98%	4,105	15.52%	768	1.13%	56	0.20%	10	0.16%	8	67.46%	3,337	4,947
Starr	47.06%	8,247	52.06%	9,123	0.52%	92	0.36%	63	0.00%	0	-5.00%	-876	17,525
Stephens	88.96%	3,385	10.43%	397	0.42%	16	0.05%	2	0.13%	5	78.53%	2,988	3,805
Sterling	91.39%	584	7.98%	51	0.47%	3	0.16%	1	0.00%	0	83.41%	533	639
Stonewall	83.56%	615	15.76%	116	0.54%	4	0.14%	1	0.00%	0	67.80%	499	736
Sutton	78.48%	1,222	20.68%	322	0.58%	9	0.26%	4	0.00%	0	57.80%	900	1,557
Swisher	78.34%	1,845	20.30%	478	0.93%	22	0.42%	10	0.00%	0	58.04%	1,367	2,355
Tarrant	49.09%	409,741	49.31%	411,567	1.24%	10,368	0.31%	2,617	0.05%	404	-0.22%	-1,826	834,697
Taylor	71.73%	39,547	26.46%	14,588	1.50%	827	0.27%	150	0.04%	23	45.27%	24,959	55,135
Terrell	72.93%	334	25.98%	119	0.66%	3	0.44%	2	0.00%	0	46.95%	215	458
Terry	77.85%	2,812	20.96%	757	0.91%	33	0.28%	10	0.00%	0	56.89%	2,055	3,612
Throckmorton	90.16%	806	9.17%	82	0.56%	5	0.11%	1	0.00%	0	80.99%	724	894
Titus	71.81%	7,570	27.09%	2,856	0.89%	94	0.18%	19	0.02%	2	44.72%	4,714	10,541
Tom Green	71.47%	32,313	27.07%	12,239	1.21%	546	0.21%	96	0.03%	16	44.40%	20,074	45,210
Travis	26.43%	161,337	71.41%	435,860	1.46%	8,905	0.34%	2,094	0.36%	2,153	-44.98%	-274,523	610,349
Trinity	80.41%	5,579	19.07%	1,323	0.36%	25	0.16%	11	0.00%	0	61.34%	4,256	6,938
Tyler	84.82%	8,194	14.52%	1,403	0.54%	52	0.11%	11	0.00%	0	70.30%	6,791	9,660
Upshur	83.56%	15,809	15.21%	2,877	0.95%	179	0.12%	22	0.18%	32	68.35%	12,932	18,919
Upton	86.11%	1,178	12.43%	170	0.95%	13	0.51%	7	0.00%	0	73.68%	1,008	1,368
Uvalde	59.69%	6,174	39.38%	4,073	0.64%	66	0.28%	29	0.02%	2	20.31%	2,101	10,344
Val Verde	54.21%	8,284	44.31%	6,771	1.11%	170	0.31%	47	0.05%	8	9.90%	1,513	15,280
Van Zandt	85.56%	22,270	13.51%	3,516	0.67%	175	0.13%	33	0.13%	35	72.05%	18,754	26,029
Victoria	68.25%	23,358	30.33%	10,380	0.99%	339	0.30%	103	0.13%	46	37.92%	12,978	34,226
Walker	65.12%	15,375	33.39%	7,884	1.22%	287	0.27%	63	0.01%	3	31.73%	7,491	23,612
Waller	62.73%	14,260	36.03%	8,191	0.88%	201	0.36%	82	0.00%	0	26.70%	6,069	22,734
Ward	79.83%	3,241	18.82%	764	0.71%	29	0.64%	26	0.00%	0	61.01%	2,477	4,060
Washington	74.27%	12,959	24.42%	4,261	1.02%	178	0.11%	20	0.18%	31	49.85%	8,698	17,449
Webb	37.80%	25,898	61.05%	41,820	0.65%	446	0.34%	233	0.16%	109	-23.25%	-15,922	68,506
Wharton	71.15%	11,926	28.01%	4,694	0.63%	105	0.21%	36	0.00%	0	43.14%	7,232	16,761
Wheeler	92.38%	2,159	7.19%	168	0.30%	7	0.13%	3	0.00%	0	85.19%	1,991	2,337
Wichita	69.65%	32,069	28.59%	13,161	1.47%	675	0.27%	125	0.02%	10	41.06%	18,908	46,040
Wilbarger	77.90%	3,524	21.13%	956	0.73%	33	0.24%	11	0.00%	0	56.77%	2,568	4,524
Willacy	43.99%	2,441	56.01%	3,108	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	0.00%	0	-12.02%	-667	5,549
Williamson	48.15%	139,729	49.56%	143,795	1.72%	4,998	0.27%	790	0.30%	856	-1.41%	-4,066	290,168
Wilson	73.76%	18,463	25.37%	6,350	0.60%	151	0.16%	39	0.11%	29	48.39%	12,113	25,032
Winkler	82.46%	1,753	16.84%	358	0.66%	14	0.05%	1	0.00%	0	65.62%	1,395	2,126
Wise	83.52%	27,032	15.37%	4,973	0.96%	310	0.15%	47	0.01%	3	67.15%	22,059	32,365
Wood	83.63%	19,049	15.40%	3,509	0.77%	175	0.18%	40	0.02%	6	68.23%	15,540	22,779
Yoakum	82.63%	2,174	15.96%	420	1.18%	31	0.23%	6	0.00%	0	66.67%	1,754	2,631
Young	86.30%	7,110	12.55%	1,034	0.92%	76	0.22%	18	0.01%	1	73.75%	6,076	8,239
Zapata	52.48%	2,033	47.13%	1,826	0.28%	11	0.10%	4	0.00%	0	5.35%	207	3,874
Zavala	34.03%	1,490	65.40%	2,864	0.30%	13	0.27%	12	0.00%	0	-31.37%	-1,374	4,379

 Swing by county

Legend

•   Democratic — +12.5-15%
•   Democratic — +10-12.5%
•   Democratic — +7.5-10%
•   Democratic — +5-7.5%
•   Democratic — +2.5-5%
•   Democratic — +0-2.5%
•   Republican — +0-2.5%
•   Republican — +2.5-5%
•   Republican — +5-7.5%
•   Republican — +7.5-10%
•   Republican — +10-12.5%
•   Republican — +12.5-15%
•   Republican — +>15%

 Trend relative to the state by county

Legend

•   Democratic — +12.5-15%
•   Democratic — +10-12.5%
•   Democratic — +7.5-10%
•   Democratic — +5-7.5%
•   Democratic — +2.5-5%
•   Democratic — +0-2.5%
•   Republican — +0-2.5%
•   Republican — +2.5-5%
•   Republican — +5-7.5%
•   Republican — +7.5-10%
•   Republican — +10-12.5%
•   Republican — +12.5-15%
•   Republican — +>15%

 County flips

Legend

• Democratic   Hold   Gain from Republican

  Republican   Hold   Gain from Democratic

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

• Frio (largest municipality: Pearsall)
• Jim Wells (largest municipality: Alice)
• Kenedy (largest municipality: Sarita)
• Kleberg (largest municipality: Kingsville)
• La Salle (largest municipality: Cotulla)
• Reeves (largest municipality: Pecos)
• Val Verde (largest municipality: Del Rio)
• Zapata (largest municipality: Zapata)

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

• Hays (largest municipality: San Marcos)
• Tarrant (largest municipality: Fort Worth)
• Williamson (largest municipality: Round Rock)

Results by congressional district

Trump won 22 out of the 36 congressional districts in Texas, while Biden won 14, including one held by a Republican.

District	Trump	Biden	Representative
1st	71.6%	27.2%	Louie Gohmert
2nd	50.9%	48.6%	Dan Crenshaw
3rd	50.2%	48.7%	Van Taylor
4th	74.4%	24.4%	Vacant
			Pat Fallon
5th	60.9%	37.9%	Lance Gooden
6th	50.8%	47.8%	Ron Wright
7th	45.1%	53.6%	Lizzie Fletcher
8th	70.6%	28.1%	Kevin Brady
9th	23.3%	75.7%	Al Green
10th	50%	48.4%	Michael McCaul
11th	79.2%	19.7%	Mike Conaway
			August Pfluger
12th	60.5%	37.9%	Kay Granger
13th	79.8%	18.9%	Mac Thornberry
			Ronny Jackson
14th	59%	39.6%	Randy Weber
15th	48.5%	50.4%	Vicente Gonzalez
16th	32%	66.4%	Veronica Escobar
17th	54.6%	43.6%	Bill Flores
			Pete Sessions
18th	23%	75.7%	Sheila Jackson Lee
19th	72.2%	26.3%	Jodey Arrington
20th	34.7%	63.7%	Joaquín Castro
21st	50.6%	47.9%	Chip Roy
22nd	50.8%	48.9%	Pete Olson
			Troy Nehls
23rd	50.3%	48.5%	Will Hurd
			Tony Gonzales
24th	46.5%	51.9%	Kenny Marchant
			Beth Van Duyne
25th	54%	44.4%	Roger Williams
26th	56.3%	42.1%	Michael Burgess
27th	61.2%	37.5%	Michael Cloud
28th	47.2%	51.6%	Henry Cuellar
29th	32.9%	65.9%	Sylvia Garcia
30th	19.4%	79.1%	Eddie Bernice Johnson
31st	50.4%	47.6%	John Carter
32nd	44%	54.4%	Colin Allred
33rd	25.6%	73%	Marc Veasey
34th	47.5%	51.5%	Filemon Vela Jr.
35th	30.5%	67.7%	Lloyd Doggett
36th	71.9%	26.9%	Brian Babin

Analysis

While Biden still won Latino voters in Texas with 58%^[69] and Latinos of Mexican heritage with 63%,^[70] Trump significantly improved his numbers among Hispanic voters in the state, particularly in the Rio Grande Valley.^[71] Trump flipped Jim Wells County and La Salle County which had not voted Republican since 1972. He also flipped Frio County, Kleberg County, Reeves County, Val Verde County, and Kenedy County; the first 4 having last voted Republican in 2004 and the last having last voted Republican in 2012. He also became the first Republican to win Zapata County since Warren G. Harding in 1920, flipping it by five points after losing it by 33 points in 2016. Trump's total of eight counties flipped in South Texas was the most flipped by any candidate in any state in 2020, and he flipped more counties in South Texas than he did in the rest of the nation combined.

Biden significantly outperformed Clinton in Greater Austin, which was a significant contributor to Trump's relatively weak performance statewide. He flipped Hays County and Williamson County, both of them suburban counties located outside of the state capital that a Democrat had not won since 1992 and 1976, respectively. This is also the first election since 1956 when the latter voted for the statewide loser.^[72] Biden also became the first Democratic candidate to garner at least 50,000 votes in Bell County, a county just outside of Greater Austin and had the center of Texas population within it in the 2010 census. At 44.76%, he outperformed Obama's record for the highest percentage of votes a Democratic presidential nominee received in Bell County since 1976, the last time the county voted for a Democrat.

Also, Biden became the first Democrat to ever win the White House without Jefferson County.^[73] Biden also became the first Democrat to win without Frio County since it was formed in 1871, the first to win without La Salle County since it was formed in 1880, the first to win without Reeves County since it was formed in 1883, the first to win without Val Verde County since it was formed in 1885, the first to win without Jim Wells County since it was founded in 1911, the first to win without Kleberg County since it was founded in 1913, and the first Democrat to win the White House without winning Zapata County since Woodrow Wilson in 1916.^[74] Because of Trump's substantial gains in heavily Hispanic areas, Biden's best performance in Texas came not from the southern border region, but Travis County, encompassing the college-educated, cosmopolitan, liberal bastion of Austin, home to the University of Texas, where he won the highest percentage for a Democrat since Harry S. Truman in 1948.

Biden also improved throughout the three most significant metropolitan areas in Texas. While not significantly outperforming Clinton in Harris and Bexar counties, he did make considerable inroads into their surrounding suburbs, thus eking out narrow wins in Greater Houston and Greater San Antonio,^[75][76] the first time a Democratic presidential nominee had accomplished such a feat in the 21st century. However, in the former, gains were incredibly mixed. Trump saw substantial growth in Houston's north and east, home to large concentrations of Latinos. He also improved in diverse Alief, along Harris County's southwest border, which is heavily Hispanic, Filipino, and Vietnamese. On the other hand, Biden continued Clinton's gains in the wealthy college-educated "Houston Arrow" suburbs in the city's west, though his improvements were significantly more minor.^[77]

Perhaps the biggest reason for Biden narrowing the Lone Star State's margin of victory was the surge of Democratic support in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, the largest metropolitan area in the state, which he also narrowly won. He scored nearly 65% of the vote in Dallas County, the highest percentage won by a Democrat since 1940. Additionally, Biden narrowly flipped Tarrant County, winning by fewer than 2,000 votes. Tarrant County is home to the fifth-largest city in Texas, Fort Worth, and had not been won by a Democrat since 1964, when favorite son Lyndon B. Johnson carried it. His growth in the profoundly Republican Fort Worth suburbs, which historically kept Democratic candidates from capturing Tarrant, was a critical factor in winning the county and the Metroplex as a whole. Biden improved substantially in the large DFW suburbs of Collin County and Denton County, which have rapidly grown and diversified in the past decade, narrowing Trump's victory margins from 16.57% and 20% in 2016, down to 4.37% and 8.08%, respectively. Both of their county seats (the two suburban cities of McKinney and Denton, respectively) have trended leftward since 2016 due to the influx of younger professionals and families in the past decade, which shifted to the Democrats in this election. Biden also won the city of Plano, the largest city in Collin County, and narrowly won the city of Allen.^[78][79]

Dianne Solis et al. of The Dallas Morning News stated that according to polls, "Democrat Joe Biden overwhelmingly won the Latino vote in Texas' urban areas."^[80] In the historically Democratic Rio Grande Valley, Biden's lead significantly narrowed from 2016.^[80]

In 2021, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton stated on Steve Bannon's podcast War Room that without blocking Harris County from sending out applications for mail-in ballots to registered voters, Trump would have lost the state.^[81]

Edison exit polls

2020 presidential election in Texas by demographic subgroup (Edison exit polling)^[82]^[83]
Demographic subgroup	Biden	Trump	% of total vote
Total vote	46.48	52.06	100
Ideology
Liberals	88	11	17
Moderates	66	32	38
Conservatives	13	86	45
Party
Democrats	96	4	30
Republicans	5	94	41
Independents	51	45	29
Gender
Men	40	57	45
Women	51	48	55
Race/ethnicity
White	33	66	60
Black	90	9	12
Latino	58	41	23
Asian	63	30	3
Other	42	56	2
Age
18–24 years old	58	38	8
25–29 years old	55	42	6
30–39 years old	50	47	14
40–49 years old	47	51	15
50–64 years old	43	56	30
65 and older	41	58	26
Sexual orientation
LGBT	72	27	5
Not LGBT	43	56	95
Education
High school or less	40	59	17
Some college education	42	57	28
Associate's degree	51	47	16
Bachelor's degree	48	50	24
Postgraduate degree	54	44	15
Income
Under $30,000	52	47	12
$30,000–49,999	63	35	16
$50,000–99,999	44	55	35
$100,000–199,999	43	56	26
Over $200,000	54	42	10
Issue regarded as most important
Racial inequality	93	5	18
Coronavirus	88	10	14
Economy	15	84	40
Crime and safety	16	83	10
Health care	78	21	11
Region
East	26	72	14
Dallas/Ft. Worth	54	45	24
Houston area	53	46	21
South Central	51	48	15
West	22	76	11
Southwest	57	42	16
Area type
Urban	56	42	42
Suburban	41	57	51
Rural	25	74	7
Family's financial situation today
Better than four years ago	22	76	46
Worse than four years ago	89	11	18
About the same	70	29	35

See also

• United States presidential elections in Texas
• Voter suppression in the United States 2019–2020: Texas
• 2020 Texas elections
• 2020 United States presidential election
• 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries
• 2020 Republican Party presidential primaries
• 2020 United States elections

Notes

Partisan clients

1. Poll sponsored by the Texas arm of the party which nominated Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
2. The Blue Texas PAC exclusively supports Democratic candidates
3. The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
4. Poll sponsored by the Texas arm of the party which nominated Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
5. Poll sponsored by the Defend Students Action Fund.
6. Giffords' founder, Gabby Giffords, endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
7. The Consumer Energy Alliance is a pro-Keystone XL lobbying group
8. The Texas Democratic Party exclusively supports Democratic candidates
9. Poll sponsored by Chrysta Castañeda's campaign
10. Size of "extremely likely to vote" sample not yet released
11. This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501(c)(4) organization that supports the Republican Party.
12. Poll sponsored by Progress Texas, an organisation promoting progressive policies
13. Poll sponsored by the Texas Democratic Party
14. By the time of this poll, Data for Progress, which has worked with both the Sanders and Warren campaigns, had endorsed Warren
15. Poll sponsored by Democracy Toolbox
16. Poll sponsored by Courageous Conservatives PAC

Samples

1. Candidate withdrew shortly before the primary after early voting had already started.
2. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
3. Key:
   A – all adults
   RV – registered voters
   LV – likely voters
   V – unclear
4. Overlapping sample with the previous SurveyMonkey/Axios poll, but more information available regarding sample size
5. "Other candidate or write-in" with 0%
6. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
7. "Someone else" with 2%
8. Standard VI response
9. Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
10. Results generated with high Republican turnout model
11. "Another candidate" with no voters
12. "Someone else" and would not vote with 1%
13. Includes "Refused"
14. "Someone else" with 3%
15. "Someone else" with 1%
16. Standard IV response
17. "Another candidate" with 1%
18. With only Biden, Trump and "another candidate" as options
19. "Another candidate" with 2%
20. "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%
21. "Someone else/third party" with 2%
22. Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sample size
23. "Refused" with 0%
24. Overlapping sample with the previous and subsequent Morning Consult polls, but more information available regarding sample size
25. "Another party candidate" with 2%
26. Not yet released
27. "Someone else" with 4%; would not vote with 3%
28. "Someone else/third party" with 4%; would not vote with 0%
29. "Other" with 4%; would not vote with 1%
30. "Someone else" and would not vote with 3%
31. Including voters who lean towards a given candidate
32. Other with 1%; neither with 2%
33. "Neither-other" with 10%
34. Would not vote with 3%
35. Other with 0%; neither with 2%
36. "Someone else" with 9%
37. Other with 0%; neither with 3%
38. "Neither-other" with 12%
39. Other with 1%; neither with 3%
40. "Someone else" with 10%
41. "Neither-other" with 9%
42. "Neither-other" with 16%
43. "Neither-other" with 15%
44. Would not vote with 4%
45. "Neither-other" with 17%
46. "Someone else" with 14%
47. "Someone else" with 7%
48. Listed as the combination of these responses: "Definitely or probably would not vote to re-elect Donald Trump"
49. "Would definitely not vote for Trump" with 48%
50. "Would consider voting for Trump" with 14%; "Don't know/no answer" with 3%

References

1. "Official Canvass Report - 2020 November 3rd General Election" (PDF). Texas Secretary of State. November 2020.
2. "Turnout and Voter Registration Figures (1970-current)".
3. Kelly, Ben (August 13, 2018). "US elections key dates: When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign?". The Independent. from the original on August 2, 2018. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
4. "Distribution of Electoral Votes". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
5. Leip, Dave. "Ohio Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
6. Leip, Dave. "Texas Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
7. "Who's ahead in Texas?". June 28, 2018.
8. Ramsey, Ross (November 6, 2020). "Analysis: Texas voters elect to stay the course". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
9. "Governor Greg Abbott for President in 2020?". News/Talk 95.1 & 790 KFYO. November 8, 2016.
10. Garrett, Robert T. (March 8, 2018). "Texas Gov. Greg Abbott rules out running for president – in 2020, at least". Dallas News.
11. "Races". results.texas-election.com. Retrieved April 6, 2023.
12. Taylor, Kate (February 9, 2019). "Elizabeth Warren Formally Announces 2020 Presidential Bid in Lawrence, Mass". The New York Times. Retrieved February 10, 2019.
13. Herndon, Astead W.; Burns, Alexander (December 31, 2018). "Elizabeth Warren Announces Iowa Trip as She Starts Running for President in 2020". The New York Times. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
14. Arlette Saenz (April 25, 2019). "Joe Biden announces he is running for president in 2020". CNN. Retrieved May 18, 2019.
15. "2020 MARCH 3RD DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY". Texas Secretary of State. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
16. "Delegate Tracker". Associated Press. June 7, 2020. Retrieved June 7, 2020.
17. "2020 Electoral College Ratings" (PDF). The Cook Political Report. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
18. "POTUS Ratings | Inside Elections". insideelections.com. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
19. "Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » 2020 President". crystalball.centerforpolitics.org. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
20. "2020 Election Forecast". Politico. November 19, 2019.
21. "Battle for White House". RCP. April 19, 2019.
22. Niskanen Center Electoral Map, Niskanen Center, March 24, 2020, retrieved: April 19, 2020
23. David Chalian; Terence Burlij. "Road to 270". CNN. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
24. "Forecasting the US elections". The Economist. Retrieved July 7, 2020.
25. "2020 Election Battleground Tracker". CBS News. July 12, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
26. "2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map". 270 to Win.
27. "ABC News Race Ratings". CBS News. July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
28. "Final NPR Electoral Map: Biden Has The Edge, But Trump Retains Narrow Path". NPR.org. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
29. "Road to 270: Choose potential paths to a White House victory". NBC News. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
30. "2020 Election Forecast". FiveThirtyEight. August 12, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
31. Harper, Karen Brooks (October 15, 2020). "Harris County tried to make voting easier during the pandemic. Texas Republicans fought every step of the way". Texas Tribune. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
32. Rosenthal, Abigail (September 11, 2020). "Harris County implementing 24-hour polling locations for one day of early voting". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
33. Platoff, Emma (October 1, 2020). "Gov. Greg Abbott limits counties to one absentee ballot drop-off location, bolstering GOP efforts to restrict voting". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
34. McGuinness, Dylan (October 15, 2020). "Harris County, Texas GOP take drive-thru voting challenge to state Supreme Court". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
35. (PDF). Harris County Clerk. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 30, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
36. Stern, Mark Joseph (October 31, 2020). "Texas Republicans Ask Federal Judge to Throw Out 117,000 Legally Cast Ballots". Slate. Retrieved October 31, 2002.
37. Despart, Zach (October 22, 2020). "Texas Supreme Court allows Harris County drive-thru voting to continue". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
38. Medley, Alison (October 29, 2020). "Last-minute challenge threatens to reject thousands of drive-thru votes in Harris County". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
39. Scherer, Jasper (November 1, 2020). "Texas Supreme Court rejects GOP attempt to toss drive-thru votes; federal case remains pending". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
40. Montgomery, David; Corasaniti, Nick (November 1, 2020). "Texas' top court denies a G.O.P. push to throw out over 120,000 votes; a federal case is pending". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 1, 2020.
41. Medley, Alison (November 2, 2020). "Federal judge rejects GOP-led challenge to toss out over 127,000 drive-thru ballots in Harris County". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved November 2, 2020.
42. Hiller, Jennifer (November 2, 2020). "Texas Drive-Through Voting Upheld". Reuters. Retrieved November 3, 2020.
43. Ferman, Mitchell (November 3, 2020). "Harris County voters will only have one drive-thru polling site on Election Day". The Texas Tribune. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
44. "Federal judge rejects GOP push to toss 127,000 ballots in Texas". POLITICO. November 2, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
45. Plasencia, Ariel (October 13, 2020). "Tarrant County launches new website that allows voters to check wait times at county polling locations". WFAA. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
46. Ashley Killough, Ed Lavandera and Paul LeBlanc (October 2020). "Texas governor limits election drop boxes to one per county in sprawling state". CNN.
47. Ross Levitt and Chandelis Duster (October 10, 2020). "Federal judge blocks Texas governor's directive limiting ballot drop boxes to one per county". CNN.
48. Goldenstein, Taylor (October 10, 2020). "Fifth Circuit stays lower court ruling allowing multiple ballot dropoff sites". HoustonChronicle.com.
49. Abbot v. Anti-Defamation League Austin, Sw., & Texoma Regions, No. 20-0846, 2020 WL 6295076 (Tex. Oct. 27, 2020)(per curiam).
50. Lindell, Chuck. "Appeals court upholds order against Abbott's limit on ballot drop sites". Austin American-Statesman.
51. McCullough, Jolie (October 27, 2020). "Texas counties will only be allowed one drop-off location for mail-in ballots, state Supreme Court rules". The Texas Tribune.
52. Wallace, Jeremy (October 14, 2020). "Texas surpassed 1 million votes on first day of early voting". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
53. Harris, Cayla (October 15, 2020). "Texas nears 2 million ballots cast as early voting surge continues". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
54. Lozano-Moreno, Luz (October 16, 2020). "Travis County early voting: 41,328 cast ballots Friday, clerk says". Austin American-Statesman. Retrieved October 17, 2020.
55. Ahmed, Amal (November 2, 2020). "Millennials and Gen Zers are Breaking Voter Turnout Records in Texas". Texas Observer. Retrieved November 2, 2020.
56. Joy, William (October 13, 2020). "Dallas County sees record turnout for first day of early voting, Tarrant County falls just short of 2016". WFAA. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
57. Debenedetto, Paul (October 13, 2020). "Harris County Shatters Single-Day Early Voting Record". Houston Public Media. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
58. Despart, Zach; Morris, Mike (October 14, 2020). "Harris County continues to set records with second day of 100,000-plus early voters". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
59. McGuinness, Dylan (October 15, 2020). "Harris County on pace for another 100,000 ballots cast today". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
60. "Another day, another 100,000 Harris County ballots cast Friday". Houston Chronicle. October 16, 2020. Retrieved October 16, 2020.
61. Rosenthal, Abigail (October 23, 2020). "Harris County reaches 1 million ballots cast during early voting, breaking record". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
62. . Austin American-Statesman. October 13, 2020. Archived from the original on October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
63. Cobler, Nicole; Bradshaw, Kelsey (October 14, 2020). "Travis County breaks another record on 2nd day of early voting". Retrieved October 15, 2020.
64. "Travis County early voting: More than 26,000 ballots cast by 3 p.m Thursday". Austin American Statesman. October 15, 2020. Retrieved October 15, 2020.^{[permanent dead link]}
65. Osborn, Claire (October 15, 2020). "Williamson County voter turnout reaches 17% in third day of early voting". Austin American Statesman. Retrieved October 15, 2020.
66. Villarreal, Alexandra (October 26, 2020). "How Texas went from low voter turnout to nation's top early voting state". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved October 27, 2020.
67. Cohen, Ethan; Stracqualursi, Veronica (October 30, 2020). "Texas' 2020 early voting surpasses total turnout in 2016 election". CNN. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
68. "Official Canvass Report - 2020 November 3rd General Election" (PDF). Texas Secretary of State. November 2020.
69. "Texas 2020 President exit polls". www.cnn.com. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
70. "Texas Voter Surveys: How Different Groups Voted". The New York Times. November 3, 2020. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
71. Hernández, Arelis R.; Martin, Brittney. "Why Texas's overwhelmingly Latino Rio Grande Valley turned toward Trump". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
72. Jacobson, Louis (November 10, 2020). "Biden Gained Votes Nationwide on the Way to Victory". U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
73. Bain, Kaitlin (November 15, 2020). "Jefferson County: From 'blue' to one of few". Beaumont Enterprise. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
74. Dobbins, James; Fernandez, Manny (November 7, 2020). "In Texas, an Emerging Problem for Democrats on the Border". The New York Times. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
75. . Daves Redistricting. Archived from the original on April 4, 2023. Retrieved April 6, 2022.
76. . Daves Redistricting. Archived from the original on April 4, 2023. Retrieved April 6, 2022.
77. Samuels, Alex (October 19, 2021). "Why Democratic Gains In Texas's Big Metro Areas Could Outweigh Republican Success In South Texas". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved January 26, 2023.
78. "Election Results". www.collincountytx.gov. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
79. "Denton County, TX Elections". www.votedenton.gov. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
80. Solis, Dianne; Corchado, Alfredo; Morris, Allie; Cobler, Paul (November 6, 2020). "With the Latino vote up for grabs, how did Trump make inroads in South Texas?". The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved November 10, 2020.
81. Lemon, Jason (June 5, 2021). "Paxton: Trump Would've Lost Texas If It Hadn't Blocked Mail-in Ballot Forms". Newsweek. Retrieved June 2, 2023.
82. "Texas 2020 President exit polls". www.cnn.com. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
83. "Texas Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted". www.nytimes.com. Retrieved December 28, 2020.

Further reading

• "Democrats eye Arizona, Georgia and Texas as potentially winnable", Theguardian.com, UK, September 5, 2020
• Nick Corasaniti; Stephanie Saul; Patricia Mazzei (September 13, 2020), , The New York Times, archived from the original on September 13, 2020, Both parties are waging legal battles around the country over who gets to vote and how
• David Weigel; Lauren Tierney (October 4, 2020), , Washingtonpost.com, archived from the original on October 5, 2020
• David Wasserman (October 6, 2020), "The 10 Bellwether Counties That Show How Trump Is in Serious Trouble", The New York Times. (Describes bellwether Collin County, Texas)
• Carrasco, Luis (November 8, 2020). "Essay: What happened in the Valley? Latino voters were for Democrats to lose — and they did". Houston Chronicle. - Opinion piece

External links

• Elections Division at the Texas Secretary of State official website
• Texas at Ballotpedia
• Government Documents Round Table of the American Library Association, "Texas", Voting & Elections Toolkits
• "Texas: Election Tools, Deadlines, Dates, Rules, and Links", Vote.org, Oakland, CA
• University of Texas Libraries, "Voting and Elections", Research Guides
• "League of Women Voters of Texas". (state affiliate of the U.S. League of Women Voters)