Pesticide

"Crop spraying" redirects here. For crop-spraying aircraft, see Aerial application. For other vehicles and devices used to spray crops, see Sprayer.

Pesticides are substances that are used to control pests.^[1] They include herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, fungicides, and many others (see table).^[2] The most common of these are herbicides, which account for approximately 50% of all pesticide use globally.^[3] Most pesticides are used as plant protection products (also known as crop protection products), which in general protect plants from weeds, fungi, or insects. In general, a pesticide is a chemical or biological agent (such as a virus, bacterium, or fungus) that deters, incapacitates, kills, or otherwise discourages pests. Target pests can include insects, plant pathogens, weeds, molluscs, birds, mammals, fish, nematodes (roundworms), and microbes that destroy property, cause nuisance, or spread disease, or are disease vectors. Along with these benefits, pesticides also have drawbacks, such as potential toxicity to humans and other species.

A crop-duster spraying pesticide on a field

A self-propelled crop sprayer spraying pesticide on a field

Definition

Type of pesticide	Target pest group
Algicides or algaecides	Algae
Avicides	Birds
Bactericides	Bacteria
Fungicides	Fungi and oomycetes
Herbicides	Plant
Insecticides	Insects
Lampricides	Lampreys^[4]
Miticides or acaricides	Mites
Molluscicides	Snails
Nematicides	Nematodes
Rodenticides	Rodents
Slimicides	Algae, Bacteria, Fungi, and Slime molds
Virucides	Viruses

The word pesticide derives from the Latin pestis (plague) and caedere (kill).^[5]

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has defined pesticide as:

any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, or controlling any pest, including vectors of human or animal disease, unwanted species of plants or animals, causing harm during or otherwise interfering with the production, processing, storage, transport, or marketing of food, agricultural commodities, wood and wood products or animal feedstuffs, or substances that may be administered to animals for the control of insects, arachnids, or other pests in or on their bodies. The term includes substances intended for use as a plant growth regulator, defoliant, desiccant, or agent for thinning fruit or preventing the premature fall of fruit. Also used as substances applied to crops either before or after harvest to protect the commodity from deterioration during storage and transport.^[6]

Classifications

Pesticides can be classified by target organism (e.g., herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, rodenticides, and pediculicides – see table),^[7]

Biopesticides according to the EPA include microbial pesticides, biochemical pesticides, and plant-incorporated protectants.^[8]

Pesticides can be classified into structural classes, with many structural classes developed for each of the target organisms listed and linked in the table above. A structural class is usually associated with a single mode of action, whereas a mode of action may encompass more than one structural class.

The pesticidal chemical (active ingredient) is mixed (formulated) with other components to form the product that is sold, and which is applied in various ways. Pesticides in gas form are fumigants.

Pesticides can be classified based upon their mode of action, which indicates the exact biological mechanism which the pesticide disrupts. The modes of action are important for resistance management, and are categorized and administered by the insecticide, herbicide, and fungicide resistance action committees.

Pesticides may be systemic or non-systemic.^[9][10] A systemic pesticide moves (translocates) inside the plant. Translocation may be upward in the xylem, or downward in the phloem or both. Non-systemic pesticides (contact pesticides) remain on the surface and act though direct contact with target organism. Pesticdes are more effective if they are systemic. Systemicity is a prerequisite for the pesticide to be used as a seed-treatment.

Pesticides can be classified as persistent (non-biodegradable) or non-persistent (biodegradable). A pesticide must be persistent enough to kill or control its target but must degrade fast enough not to accumulate in the environment or the food chain in order to be approved by the authorities.^[11][12] Persistent pesticides, including DDT, were banned decades ago, an exception being spraying in houses to combat malaria vectors.^[13]

History

Since before 2000 BC, humans have utilized pesticides to protect their crops. The first known pesticide was elemental sulfur dusting used in Sumer about 4,500 years ago in ancient Mesopotamia.^[14] By the 15th century, toxic chemicals such as arsenic, mercury, and lead were being applied to crops to kill pests. In the 17th century, nicotine sulfate was extracted from tobacco leaves for use as an insecticide. The 19th century saw the introduction of two more natural pesticides, pyrethrum, which is derived from chrysanthemums, and rotenone, which is derived from the roots of tropical vegetables.^[15] Until the 1950s, arsenic-based pesticides (such as calcium arsenate, lead arsenate and Paris green) were dominant.^[16] Paul Müller discovered that DDT was a very effective insecticide. Chlorinates such as DDT were dominant, but they were replaced in the U.S. by organophosphates and carbamates by 1975. Since then, pyrethroids have become the dominant insecticide.^[16] Herbicides became common in the 1960s, led by "triazine and other nitrogen-based compounds, carboxylic acids such as 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and glyphosate".^[16]

The first legislation providing federal authority for regulating pesticides was enacted in 1910.^[17] During the 1940s, manufacturers produced large amounts of synthetic pesticides and their use became widespread.^[18] Before the first World War, Germany was the world's leading chemical industry and exported most of the dyes and other chemicals that were used in the United States. War implemented tariffs that stimulated the growth of the chemical industry in the U.S., which made chemistry a prestigious occupation as this industry expanded and became profitable. Money and ideas flowed back from Europe after the U.S. entered WWI, changing the way Americans interacted with themselves and nature, and the industrialization of war hastened the industrialization of pest control.^[19] Some sources consider the 1940s and 1950s to have been the start of the "pesticide era."^[20] Although the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was established in 1970 and amendments to the pesticide law in 1972,^[17] pesticide use has increased 50-fold since 1950 and 2.3 million tonnes (2.5 million short tons) of industrial pesticides are now^[when?] used each year.^[15] Seventy-five percent of all pesticides in the world are used in developed countries, but use in developing countries is increasing.^[21] A study of USA pesticide use trends through 1997 was published in 2003 by the National Science Foundation's Center for Integrated Pest Management.^[16][22]

In the 1960s, it was discovered that DDT was preventing many fish-eating birds from reproducing, which was a serious threat to biodiversity. Rachel Carson wrote the best-selling book Silent Spring about biological magnification. The agricultural use of DDT is now banned under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, which allowed as an exception spraying on interior walls to kill or repel mosquitoes to prevent malaria and other tropical diseases.^[13]

Development of new pesticides

The aim is to find new compounds or agents with improved properties such as a new mode of action or lower application rate. Another aim is to replace older pesticides which have been banned for reasons of toxicity or environmental harm or have become less effective due to development of resistance.^{[23][24][25][26]}

The process starts with testing (screening) against target organisms such as insects, fungi or plants. Inputs are typically random compounds, natural products,^[27] compounds designed to disrupt a biochemical target, compounds described in patents or literature, or biocontrol organisms.

Compounds that are active in the screening process, known as hits or leads, cannot be used as pesticides, except for biocontrol organisms and some potent natural products. These lead compounds need to be optimised by a series of cycles of synthesis and testing of analogs. For approval by regulatory authorities for use as pesticides, the optimized compounds must meet several requirements.^[11][12] In addition to being potent (low application rate), they must show low toxicity, low environmental impact, and viable manufacturing cost. The cost of developing a pesticide in 2022 was estimated to be 350 million US dollars.^[28]

More than 25% of existing chemical pesticides contain one or more chiral centres (stereogenic centres).^[29] Newer pesticides with lower application rates tend to have more complex structures, and thus more often contain chiral centres.^[29] In cases when most or all of the pesticidal activity in a new compound is found in one enantiomer (the eutomer), the registration and use of the compound as this single enantiomer is preferred. This reduces the total application rate and avoids the tedious environmental testing required when registering a racemate.^[30][31] However if a viable enantioselective manufacturing route cannot be found, then the racemate is registered and used.

Insecticides with systemic activity against sucking pests, which are safe to pollinators, are sought after,^[32][28][23] particularly in view of the partial bans on neonicotinoids. Revised 2023 guidance by registration authorities describes the bee testing that is required for new insecticides to be approved for commercial use.^{[33][34][35][36]}

Uses

In addition to their main use in agriculture, pesticides have a number of other applications. Pesticides are used to control organisms that are considered to be harmful, or pernicious to their surroundings.^[37] For example, they are used to kill mosquitoes that can transmit potentially deadly diseases like West Nile virus, yellow fever, and malaria. They can also kill bees, wasps or ants that can cause allergic reactions. Insecticides can protect animals from illnesses that can be caused by parasites such as fleas.^[37] Pesticides can prevent sickness in humans that could be caused by moldy food or diseased produce. Herbicides can be used to clear roadside weeds, trees, and brush. They can also kill invasive weeds that may cause environmental damage. Herbicides are commonly applied in ponds and lakes to control algae and plants such as water grasses that can interfere with activities like swimming and fishing and cause the water to look or smell unpleasant.^[38] Uncontrolled pests such as termites and mold can damage structures such as houses.^[37] Pesticides are used in grocery stores and food storage facilities to manage rodents and insects that infest food such as grain. Each use of a pesticide carries some associated risk. Proper pesticide use decreases these associated risks to a level deemed acceptable by pesticide regulatory agencies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) of Canada.

DDT, sprayed on the walls of houses, is an organochlorine that has been used to fight malaria vectors (mosquitos) since the 1940s. The World Health Organization recommend this approach.^[39] It and other organochlorine pesticides have been banned in most countries worldwide because of their persistence in the environment and human toxicity. DDT has become less effective, as resistance was identified in Africa as early as 1955, and by 1972 nineteen species of mosquito worldwide were resistant to DDT.^[40][41]

Amount used

 

Pesticide use by region

In 2006 and 2007, the world used approximately 2.4 megatonnes (5.3×10⁹ lb) of pesticides, with herbicides constituting the biggest part of the world pesticide use at 40%, followed by insecticides (17%) and fungicides (10%). In 2006 and 2007 the U.S. used approximately 0.5 megatonnes (1.1×10⁹ lb) of pesticides, accounting for 22% of the world total, including 857 million pounds (389 kt) of conventional pesticides, which are used in the agricultural sector (80% of conventional pesticide use) as well as the industrial, commercial, governmental and home & garden sectors. The state of California alone used 117 million pounds. Pesticides are also found in majority of U.S. households with 88 million out of the 121.1 million households indicating that they use some form of pesticide in 2012.^[42][43] As of 2007, there were more than 1,055 active ingredients registered as pesticides,^[17] which yield over 20,000 pesticide products that are marketed in the United States.^[44] Pesticide use increased by 62% between 2000 and 2021, with the Americas accounting for half the use in 2021.^[45]

The US used some 1 kg (2.2 pounds) per hectare of arable land compared with: 4.7 kg in China, 1.3 kg in the UK, 0.1 kg in Cameroon, 5.9 kg in Japan and 2.5 kg in Italy. Insecticide use in the US has declined by more than half since 1980 (0.6%/yr), mostly due to the near phase-out of organophosphates. In corn fields, the decline was even steeper, due to the switchover to transgenic Bt corn.^[46]

Benefits

Pesticides can save farmers' money by preventing crop losses to insects and other pests; in the U.S., farmers get an estimated fourfold return on money they spend on pesticides.^[47] One study found that not using pesticides reduced crop yields by about 10%.^[48] Another study, conducted in 1999, found that a ban on pesticides in the United States may result in a rise of food prices, loss of jobs, and an increase in world hunger.^[49]

There are two levels of benefits for pesticide use, primary and secondary. Primary benefits are direct gains from the use of pesticides and secondary benefits are effects that are more long-term.^[50]

Biological

Controlling pests and plant disease vectors

• Improved crop yields
• Improved crop/livestock quality
• Invasive species controlled

Controlling human/livestock disease vectors and nuisance organisms

• Human lives saved and disease reduced. Diseases controlled include malaria,^[50] with millions of lives having been saved or enhanced with the use of DDT alone.^[51]
• Animal lives saved and disease reduced

Controlling organisms that harm other human activities and structures

• Drivers view unobstructed
• Tree/brush/leaf hazards prevented
• Wooden structures protected^[50]

Monetary

In one study, it was estimated that for every dollar ($1) that is spent on pesticides for crops can yield up to four dollars ($4) in crops saved.^[52] This means based that, on the amount of money spent per year on pesticides, $10 billion, there is an additional $40 billion savings in crop that would be lost due to damage by insects and weeds. In general, farmers benefit from having an increase in crop yield and from being able to grow a variety of crops throughout the year. Consumers of agricultural products also benefit from being able to afford the vast quantities of produce available year-round.^[50]

Post-WWII conditions caused the pesticide industry to flourish for several reasons including the growing middle class and the invention of cheap tractor-drawn spraying equipment. By the 1980s the demand for pesticides had dropped due to farmers struggling financially and the market for chemicals becoming oversaturated. There were also new costs for producing pesticides due to the strict EPA laws surrounding the chemicals. The modern pesticide market is seven billion dollars and is growing 4% per year due to the invention of the lawn and the stigma surrounding the untamed yard.^[53]

Disadvantages

On the cost side of pesticide use there can be costs to the environment, costs to human health.^[54]

Health effects

Main article: Health effects of pesticides

Further information: Pesticide poisoning, Bhopal disaster, and Environmental impact of pesticides § Humans

 

A sign warning about potential pesticide exposure

Pesticides may cause acute and delayed health effects in people who are exposed.^[55] Pesticide exposure can cause a variety of adverse health effects, ranging from simple irritation of the skin and eyes to more severe effects such as affecting the nervous system, hearing,^[56] mimicking hormones causing reproductive problems, and also causing cancer.^[57] A 2007 systematic review found that "most studies on non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia showed positive associations with pesticide exposure" and thus concluded that cosmetic use of pesticides should be decreased.^[58] There is substantial evidence of associations between organophosphate insecticide exposures and neurobehavioral alterations.^{[59][60][61][62]} Limited evidence also exists for other negative outcomes from pesticide exposure including neurological, birth defects, and fetal death.^[63]

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends limiting exposure of children to pesticides and using safer alternatives:^[64]

Owing to inadequate regulation and safety precautions, 99% of pesticide-related deaths occur in developing countries that account for only 25% of pesticide usage.^[65]

One study found pesticide self-poisoning the method of choice in one third of suicides worldwide, and recommended, among other things, more restrictions on the types of pesticides that are most harmful to humans.^[66]

A 2014 epidemiological review found associations between autism and exposure to certain pesticides, but noted that the available evidence was insufficient to conclude that the relationship was causal.^[67]

Occupational exposure among agricultural workers

The World Health Organization and the UN Environment Programme estimate that 3 million agricultural workers in the developing world experience severe poisoning from pesticides each year, resulting in 18,000 deaths.^[21] According to one study, as many as 25 million workers in developing countries may suffer mild pesticide poisoning yearly.^[68] Other occupational exposures besides agricultural workers, including pet groomers, groundskeepers, and fumigators, may also put individuals at risk of health effects from pesticides.^[44]

Pesticide use is widespread in Latin America, as around US$3 billion are spent each year in the region. Records indicate an increase in the frequency of pesticide poisonings over the past two decades. The most common incidents of pesticide poisoning is thought to result from exposure to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides.^[69] At-home pesticide use, use of unregulated products, and the role of undocumented workers within the agricultural industry makes characterizing true pesticide exposure a challenge. It is estimated that 50–80% of pesticide poisoning cases are unreported.

Underreporting of pesticide poisoning is especially common in areas where agricultural workers are less likely to seek care from a healthcare facility that may be monitoring or tracking the incidence of acute poisoning. The extent of unintentional pesticide poisoning may be much greater than available data suggest, particularly among developing countries. Globally, agriculture and food production remain one of the largest industries. In East Africa, the agricultural industry represents one of the largest sectors of the economy, with nearly 80% of its population relying on agriculture for income.^[70] Farmers in these communities rely on pesticide products to maintain high crop yields.

Some East Africa governments are shifting to corporate farming, and opportunities for foreign conglomerates to operate commercial farms have led to more accessible research on pesticide use and exposure among workers. In other areas where large proportions of the population rely on subsistence, small-scale farming, estimating pesticide use and exposure is more difficult.

Pesticide poisoning

 

The cholinergic synapse and the breakdown of acetylcholine into choline and acetate by acetylcholinesterase

Pesticides may exhibit toxic effects on humans and other non-target species, the severity of which depends on the frequency and magnitude of exposure. Toxicity also depends on the rate of absorption, distribution within the body, metabolism, and elimination of compounds from the body. Commonly used pesticides like organophosphates and carbamates act by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity, which prevents the breakdown of acetylcholine at the neural synapse. Excess acetylcholine can lead to symptoms like muscle cramps or tremors, confusion, dizziness and nausea. Studies show that farm workers in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Zimbabwe have decreased concentrations of plasma acetylcholinesterase, the enzyme responsible for breaking down acetylcholine acting on synapses throughout the nervous system.^[71][72][73] Other studies in Ethiopia have observed reduced respiratory function among farm workers who spray crops with pesticides.^[74] Numerous exposure pathways for farm workers increase the risk of pesticide poisoning, including dermal absorption walking through fields and applying products, as well as inhalation exposure.

Measuring exposure to pesticides

There are multiple approaches to measuring a person's exposure to pesticides, each of which provides an estimate of an individual's internal dose. Two broad approaches include measuring biomarkers and markers of biological effect.^[75] The former involves taking direct measurement of the parent compound or its metabolites in various types of media: urine, blood, serum. Biomarkers may include a direct measurement of the compound in the body before it's been biotransformed during metabolism. Other suitable biomarkers may include the metabolites of the parent compound after they've been biotransformed during metabolism.^[75] Toxicokinetic data can provide more detailed information on how quickly the compound is metabolized and eliminated from the body, and provide insights into the timing of exposure.

Markers of biological effect provide an estimation of exposure based on cellular activities related to the mechanism of action. For example, many studies investigating exposure to pesticides often involve the quantification of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme at the neural synapse to determine the magnitude of the inhibitory effect of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides.^{[71][72][73][75]}

Another method of quantifying exposure involves measuring, at the molecular level, the amount of pesticide interacting with the site of action. These methods are more commonly used for occupational exposures where the mechanism of action is better understood, as described by WHO guidelines published in "Biological Monitoring of Chemical Exposure in the Workplace".^[76] Better understanding of how pesticides elicit their toxic effects is needed before this method of exposure assessment can be applied to occupational exposure of agricultural workers.

Alternative methods to assess exposure include questionnaires to discern from participants whether they are experiencing symptoms associated with pesticide poisoning. Self-reported symptoms may include headaches, dizziness, nausea, joint pain, or respiratory symptoms.^[72]

Challenges in assessing pesticide exposure

Multiple challenges exist in assessing exposure to pesticides in the general population, and many others that are specific to occupational exposures of agricultural workers. Beyond farm workers, estimating exposure to family members and children presents additional challenges, and may occur through "take-home" exposure from pesticide residues collected on clothing or equipment belonging to parent farm workers and inadvertently brought into the home. Children may also be exposed to pesticides prenatally from mothers who are exposed to pesticides during pregnancy.^[59] Characterizing children's exposure resulting from drift of airborne and spray application of pesticides is similarly challenging, yet well documented in developing countries.^[77] Because of critical development periods of the fetus and newborn children, these non-working populations are more vulnerable to the effects of pesticides, and may be at increased risk of developing neurocognitive effects and impaired development.^[59][65]

While measuring biomarkers or markers of biological effects may provide more accurate estimates of exposure, collecting these data in the field is often impractical and many methods are not sensitive enough to detect low-level concentrations. Rapid cholinesterase test kits exist to collect blood samples in the field. Conducting large scale assessments of agricultural workers in remote regions of developing countries makes the implementation of these kits a challenge.^[75] The cholinesterase assay is a useful clinical tool to assess individual exposure and acute toxicity. Considerable variability in baseline enzyme activity among individuals makes it difficult to compare field measurements of cholinesterase activity to a reference dose to determine health risk associated with exposure.^[75] Another challenge researchers face in deriving a reference dose is identifying health endpoints that are relevant to exposure. More epidemiological research is needed to identify critical health endpoints, particularly among populations who are occupationally exposed.

Prevention

Minimizing harmful exposure to pesticides can be achieved by proper use of personal protective equipment, adequate reentry times into recently sprayed areas, and effective product labeling for hazardous substances as per FIFRA regulations. Training high-risk populations, including agricultural workers, on the proper use and storage of pesticides, can reduce the incidence of acute pesticide poisoning and potential chronic health effects associated with exposure. Continued research into the human toxic health effects of pesticides serves as a basis for relevant policies and enforceable standards that are health protective to all populations.

Environmental effects

Main article: Environmental effects of pesticides

Pesticide use raises a number of environmental concerns. Over 98% of sprayed insecticides and 95% of herbicides reach a destination other than their target species, including non-target species, air, water and soil.^[21] Pesticide drift occurs when pesticides suspended in the air as particles are carried by wind to other areas, potentially contaminating them. Pesticides are one of the causes of water pollution, and some pesticides are persistent organic pollutants and contribute to soil and flower (pollen, nectar) contamination.^[78] Furthermore, pesticide use can adversely impact neighboring agricultural activity, as pests themselves drift to and harm nearby crops that have no pesticide used on them.^[79]

In addition, pesticide use reduces biodiversity, contributes to pollinator decline,^[80][81][82] destroys habitat (especially for birds),^[83] and threatens endangered species.^[21] Pests can develop a resistance to the pesticide (pesticide resistance), necessitating a new pesticide. Alternatively a greater dose of the pesticide can be used to counteract the resistance, although this will cause a worsening of the ambient pollution problem.

The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, listed 9 of the 12 most dangerous and persistent organic chemicals that were (now mostly obsolete) organochlorine pesticides.^[84][85] Since chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides dissolve in fats and are not excreted, organisms tend to retain them almost indefinitely. Biological magnification is the process whereby these chlorinated hydrocarbons (pesticides) are more concentrated at each level of the food chain. Among marine animals, pesticide concentrations are higher in carnivorous fishes, and even more so in the fish-eating birds and mammals at the top of the ecological pyramid.^[86] Global distillation is the process whereby pesticides are transported from warmer to colder regions of the Earth, in particular the Poles and mountain tops. Pesticides that evaporate into the atmosphere at relatively high temperature can be carried considerable distances (thousands of kilometers) by the wind to an area of lower temperature, where they condense and are carried back to the ground in rain or snow.^[87]

In order to reduce negative impacts, it is desirable that pesticides be degradable or at least quickly deactivated in the environment. Such loss of activity or toxicity of pesticides is due to both innate chemical properties of the compounds and environmental processes or conditions.^[88] For example, the presence of halogens within a chemical structure often slows down degradation in an aerobic environment.^[89] Adsorption to soil may retard pesticide movement, but also may reduce bioavailability to microbial degraders.^[90]

Economics

Harm	Annual US cost
Public health	$1.1 billion
Pesticide resistance in pest	$1.5 billion
Crop losses caused by pesticides	$1.4 billion
Bird losses due to pesticides	$2.2 billion
Groundwater contamination	$2.0 billion
Other costs	$1.4 billion
Total costs	$9.6 billion

In one study, the human health and environmental costs due to pesticides in the United States was estimated to be $9.6 billion: offset by about $40 billion in increased agricultural production.^[91]

Additional costs include the registration process and the cost of purchasing pesticides: which are typically borne by agrichemical companies and farmers respectively. The registration process can take several years to complete (there are 70 different types of field tests) and can cost $50–70 million for a single pesticide.^[91] At the beginning of the 21st century, the United States spent approximately $10 billion on pesticides annually.^[91]

Resistance

Main article: Pesticide resistance

The use of pesticides inherently entails the risk of resistance developing. Various techniques and procedures of pesticide application can slow the development of resistance, as can some natural features of the target population and surrounding environment.^[4]

Alternatives

Alternatives to pesticides are available and include methods of cultivation, use of biological pest controls (such as pheromones and microbial pesticides), genetic engineering (mostly of crops), and methods of interfering with insect breeding.^[21] Application of composted yard waste has also been used as a way of controlling pests.^[92]

These methods are becoming increasingly popular and often are safer than traditional chemical pesticides. In addition, EPA is registering reduced-risk pesticides in increasing numbers.^{[citation needed]}

Cultivation practices

Cultivation practices include polyculture (growing multiple types of plants), crop rotation, planting crops in areas where the pests that damage them do not live, timing planting according to when pests will be least problematic, and use of trap crops that attract pests away from the real crop.^[21] Trap crops have successfully controlled pests in some commercial agricultural systems while reducing pesticide usage.^[93] In other systems, trap crops can fail to reduce pest densities at a commercial scale, even when the trap crop works in controlled experiments.^[94]

Use of other organisms

Release of other organisms that fight the pest is another example of an alternative to pesticide use. These organisms can include natural predators or parasites of the pests.^[21] Biological pesticides based on entomopathogenic fungi, bacteria and viruses causing disease in the pest species can also be used.^[21]

Biological control engineering

Interfering with insects' reproduction can be accomplished by sterilizing males of the target species and releasing them, so that they mate with females but do not produce offspring.^[21] This technique was first used on the screwworm fly in 1958 and has since been used with the medfly, the tsetse fly,^[95] and the gypsy moth.^[96] This is a costly and slow approach that only works on some types of insects.^[21]

Other alternatives

Other alternatives include "laserweeding" – the use of novel agricultural robots for weed control using lasers.^[97]

Push pull strategy

Main article: Push–pull technology

The term "push-pull" was established in 1987 as an approach for integrated pest management (IPM). This strategy uses a mixture of behavior-modifying stimuli to manipulate the distribution and abundance of insects. "Push" means the insects are repelled or deterred away from whatever resource is being protected. "Pull" means that certain stimuli (semiochemical stimuli, pheromones, food additives, visual stimuli, genetically altered plants, etc.) are used to attract pests to trap crops where they will be killed.^[98] There are numerous different components involved in order to implement a Push-Pull Strategy in IPM.

Many case studies testing the effectiveness of the push-pull approach have been done across the world. The most successful push-pull strategy was developed in Africa for subsistence farming. Another successful case study was performed on the control of Helicoverpa in cotton crops in Australia. In Europe, the Middle East, and the United States, push-pull strategies were successfully used in the controlling of Sitona lineatus in bean fields.^[98]

Some advantages of using the push-pull method are less use of chemical or biological materials and better protection against insect habituation to this control method. Some disadvantages of the push-pull strategy are that if there is a lack of appropriate knowledge of the behavioral and chemical ecology of the host-pest interactions then this method becomes unreliable. Furthermore, because the push-pull method is not a very popular method of IPM operational and registration costs are higher.

Effectiveness

Some evidence shows that alternatives to pesticides can be equally effective as the use of chemicals. A study of Maize fields in northern Florida found that the application of composted yard waste with high carbon to nitrogen ratio to agricultural fields was highly effective at reducing the population of plant-parasitic nematodes and increasing crop yield, with yield increases ranging from 10% to 212%; the observed effects were long-term, often not appearing until the third season of the study.^[92] Additional silicon nutrition protects some horticultural crops against fungal diseases almost completely, while insufficient silicon sometimes leads to severe infection even when fungicides are used.^[99]

Pesticide resistance is increasing and that may make alternatives more attractive.

Types

Biopesticides

Main article: Biopesticide

Biopesticides are certain types of pesticides derived from such natural materials as animals, plants, bacteria, and certain minerals. For example, canola oil and baking soda have pesticidal applications and are considered biopesticides. Biopesticides fall into three major classes:

• Microbial pesticides which consist of bacteria, entomopathogenic fungi or viruses (and sometimes includes the metabolites that bacteria or fungi produce). Entomopathogenic nematodes are also often classed as microbial pesticides, even though they are multi-cellular.^[100][101]
• Biochemical pesticides or herbal pesticides^[102] are naturally occurring substances that control (or monitor in the case of pheromones) pests and microbial diseases.
• Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) have genetic material from other species incorporated into their genetic material (i.e. GM crops). Their use is controversial, especially in many European countries.^[103]

By pest type

Pesticides that are related to the type of pests are^[104]:

Type	Action
Algicides	Control algae in lakes, canals, swimming pools, water tanks, and other sites
Avicides	kill birds
Antifouling agents	Kill or repel organisms that attach to underwater surfaces, such as boat bottoms
Antimicrobials	Kill microorganisms (such as bacteria and viruses)
Attractants	Attract pests (for example, to lure an insect or rodent to a trap).
Bactericides	Kill bacteria
Biopesticides	Certain types of pesticides derived from such natural materials as animals, plants, bacteria, and certain minerals
Biocides	Kill microorganisms
Defoliants	Cause leaves or foliage to drop from a plant, usually to facilitate harvest.
Desiccants	Promote drying of living tissues, such as unwanted plant tops.
Disinfectants and sanitizers	Kill or inactivate disease-producing microorganisms on inanimate objects
Fungicides	Kill fungi (including blights, mildews, molds, and rusts)
Fumigants	Produce gas or vapor intended to destroy pests in buildings or soil
Gene drives	A genetic mechanism embedded into the genetic material of the target species, which can kill or suppress the reproductive of its descendants.^[105]
Herbicides	Kill weeds and other plants that grow where they are not wanted
Insect growth regulators	Disrupt the molting, maturing from pupal stage to adult, or other life processes of insects.
Insecticides	Kill insects and other arthropods
Lampricides	Kills Lampreys
Miticides or acaricides	Kill mites that feed on plants and animals
Microbial pesticides	Microorganisms that kill, inhibit, or out compete pests, including insects or other microorganisms
Molluscicides	Kill snails and slugs
Nematicides	Kill nematodes (microscopic, worm-like organisms that feed on plant roots)
Ovicides	Kill eggs of insects and mites
Pheromones	Biochemicals used to disrupt the mating behavior of insects
Piscicide	Kills fish
Plant growth regulators	Alter the expected growth, flowering or reproduction rate of plants (does not include fertilizers).
Plant Incorporated protectants	Substances that plants produce from genetic material that has been added to the plant.
Repellents	Repel pests, including insects (such as mosquitoes) and birds
Rodenticides	Control mice and other rodents
Slimicides	Kill slime-producing microorganisms such as algae, bacteria, fungi, and slime molds
Soil sterilant	Temporarily or permanently prevents the growth of all plants and animals^[106]
Virucides	Kills viruses.
Wood preservatives	Used to make wood resistant to insects, fungi, and other pests.

Regulation

International

In many countries, pesticides must be approved for sale and use by a government agency.^[107][108]

Worldwide, 85% of countries have pesticide legislation for the proper storage of pesticides and 51% include provisions to ensure proper disposal of all obsolete pesticides.^[109]

In Europe, EU legislation has been approved banning the use of highly toxic pesticides including those that are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, those that are endocrine-disrupting, and those that are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) or very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB) and measures have been approved to improve the general safety of pesticides across all EU member states.^[110]

Though pesticide regulations differ from country to country, pesticides, and products on which they were used are traded across international borders. To deal with inconsistencies in regulations among countries, delegates to a conference of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization adopted an International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides in 1985 to create voluntary standards of pesticide regulation for different countries.^[107] The Code was updated in 1998 and 2002.^[111] The FAO claims that the code has raised awareness about pesticide hazards and decreased the number of countries without restrictions on pesticide use.^[6]

Three other efforts to improve regulation of international pesticide trade are the United Nations London Guidelines for the Exchange of Information on Chemicals in International Trade and the United Nations Codex Alimentarius Commission. The former seeks to implement procedures for ensuring that prior informed consent exists between countries buying and selling pesticides, while the latter seeks to create uniform standards for maximum levels of pesticide residues among participating countries.^[112]

Pesticides safety education and pesticide applicator regulation are designed to protect the public from pesticide misuse, but do not eliminate all misuse. Reducing the use of pesticides and choosing less toxic pesticides may reduce risks placed on society and the environment from pesticide use.^[38] Integrated pest management, the use of multiple approaches to control pests, is becoming widespread and has been used with success in countries such as Indonesia, China, Bangladesh, the U.S., Australia, and Mexico.^[21] IPM attempts to recognize the more widespread impacts of an action on an ecosystem, so that natural balances are not upset.^[18] New pesticides are being developed, including biological and botanical derivatives and alternatives that are thought to reduce health and environmental risks. In addition, applicators are being encouraged to consider alternative controls and adopt methods that reduce the use of chemical pesticides.

Pesticides can be created that are targeted to a specific pest's lifecycle, which can be environmentally more friendly.^[113] For example, potato cyst nematodes emerge from their protective cysts in response to a chemical excreted by potatoes; they feed on the potatoes and damage the crop.^[113] A similar chemical can be applied to fields early before the potatoes are planted, causing the nematodes to emerge early and starve in the absence of potatoes.^[113]

United States

Main article: Pesticide regulation in the United States

 

Preparation for an application of hazardous herbicide in the US

In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for regulating pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA).^[114]

Studies must be conducted to establish the conditions in which the material is safe to use and the effectiveness against the intended pest(s).^[115] The EPA regulates pesticides to ensure that these products do not pose adverse effects to humans or the environment, with an emphasis on the health and safety of children.^[116] Pesticides produced before November 1984 continue to be reassessed in order to meet the current scientific and regulatory standards. All registered pesticides are reviewed every 15 years to ensure they meet the proper standards.^[114] During the registration process, a label is created. The label contains directions for proper use of the material in addition to safety restrictions. Based on acute toxicity, pesticides are assigned to a Toxicity Class. Pesticides are the most thoroughly tested chemicals after drugs in the United States; those used on food require more than 100 tests to determine a range of potential impacts.^[116]

Some pesticides are considered too hazardous for sale to the general public and are designated restricted use pesticides. Only certified applicators, who have passed an exam, may purchase or supervise the application of restricted use pesticides.^[107] Records of sales and use are required to be maintained and may be audited by government agencies charged with the enforcement of pesticide regulations.^[117][118] These records must be made available to employees and state or territorial environmental regulatory agencies.^[119][120]

In addition to the EPA, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set standards for the level of pesticide residue that is allowed on or in crops.^[121] The EPA looks at what the potential human health and environmental effects might be associated with the use of the pesticide.^[122]

In addition, the U.S. EPA uses the National Research Council's four-step process for human health risk assessment: (1) Hazard Identification, (2) Dose-Response Assessment, (3) Exposure Assessment, and (4) Risk Characterization.^[123]

In 2013 Kaua'i County (Hawai'i) passed Bill No. 2491 to add an article to Chapter 22 of the county's code relating to pesticides and GMOs. The bill strengthens protections of local communities in Kaua'i where many large pesticide companies test their products.^[124]

Canada

Main article: Pest Management Regulatory Agency

EU

Main article: Regulation of pesticides in the European Union

In 2023 The Environment Committee of European Parliament approved a decision aiming to reduce pesticide use by 50% (the most hazardous by 65%) by the year 2030 and ensure sustainable use of pesticides (for example use them only as a last resort). The decision also includes measures for providing farmers with alternatives.^[125]

Residue

Main article: Pesticide residue

Pesticide residue refers to the pesticides that may remain on or in food after they are applied to food crops.^[126] The maximum allowable levels of these residues in foods are often stipulated by regulatory bodies in many countries. Regulations such as pre-harvest intervals also often prevent harvest of crop or livestock products if recently treated in order to allow residue concentrations to decrease over time to safe levels before harvest. Exposure of the general population to these residues most commonly occurs through consumption of treated food sources, or being in close contact to areas treated with pesticides such as farms or lawns.^[127]

Many of these chemical residues, especially derivatives of chlorinated pesticides, exhibit bioaccumulation which could build up to harmful levels in the body as well as in the environment.^[128] The problem is most acute in China, the largest producer of chlorinated pesticides.^[129] Persistent chemicals can be magnified through the food chain and have been detected in products ranging from meat, poultry, and fish, to vegetable oils, nuts, and various fruits and vegetables.^[130]

Pesticide contamination in the environment can be monitored through bioindicators such as bee pollinators.^[78]

There is an ongoing research focused on pesticide residues in farming system.^[131]

See also

• Index of pesticide articles
• Environmental hazard
• Pest control
• Pesticide residue
• Pesticide standard value
• WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme

References

1. "Basic Information about Pesticide Ingredients". Environmental Protection Agency. Apr 2, 2018. Retrieved 2018-12-01.
2. Randall C, Hock W, Crow E, Hudak-Wise C, Kasai J (2014). . National Pesticide Applicator Certification Core Manual (2nd ed.). Washington: National Association of State Departments of Agriculture Research Foundation. Archived from the original on 2019-12-10. Retrieved 2018-12-01.
3. "Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage, 2008 – 2012 Market Estimates" (PDF). EPA. Retrieved 2023-02-17.
4. Dunlop ES, McLaughlin R, Adams JV, Jones M, et al. (2018). "Rapid evolution meets invasive species control: the potential for pesticide resistance in sea lamprey". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. National Research Council Canada. 75 (1): 152–168. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2017-0015. hdl:1807/78674. ISSN 0706-652X.
5. Sykes, J. B. (1989). The Concise Oxford dictionary of current english (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-861131-8. OCLC 848516593.
6. (PDF). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-04-04.
7. "Types of pesticides". National Pesticide Information Center. Retrieved 2024-01-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
8. "Types of Pesticide Ingredients". US Environmental Protection Agency. Jan 3, 2017. Retrieved 2018-12-01.
9. Zhang Y, Lorsbach BA, Castetter S, Lambert WT, et al. (2018). "Physicochemical property guidelines for modern agrochemicals". Pest Management Science. 74 (9): 1979–1991. doi:10.1002/ps.5037. PMID 29667318. S2CID 4937939.
10. Hofstetter, Sandro (2018). "How To Design for a Tailored Subcellular Distribution of Systemic Agrochemicals in Plant Tissues" (PDF). J. Agric. Food Chem. 66 (33): 8687–8697. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02221. PMID 30024749. S2CID 261974999.
11. "About Pesticide Registration". Environmental Protection Agency. Jan 25, 2023. Retrieved 2023-12-13.
12. "Approval of active substances". European Commision. Retrieved 2023-12-13.
13. Lobe J (Sep 16, 2006). . Common Dreams News Center. Inter Press Service. Archived from the original on 2006-10-17. Retrieved 2007-09-15.
14. Rao GV, Rupela OP, Rao VR, Reddy YV (2007). "Role of biopesticides in crop protection: present status and future prospects" (PDF). Indian Journal of Plant Protection. 35 (1): 1–9. (PDF) from the original on 2018-12-02.
15. Miller, G. Tyler (2002). Living in the Environment (12th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. ISBN 9780534376970. OCLC 819417923.
16. Ritter SK (2009). "Pinpointing Trends In Pesticide Use. Limited data indicate that pesticide use has dropped since the 1970s". Chemical & Engineering News. Vol. 87, no. 7. ACS. ISSN 0009-2347.
17. Goldman LR (2007). "Managing pesticide chronic health risks: U.S. policies". Journal of Agromedicine. 12 (1): 67–75. doi:10.1300/J096v12n02_08. PMID 18032337. S2CID 216149465.
18. Daly HV, Doyen JT, Purcell AH (1998). "Chapter 14". Introduction to insect biology and diversity (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 279–300. ISBN 978-0195100334. OCLC 37211384.
19. Steen-Adams, Michelle (2002). "Russell, E. 2001. War and Nature: Fighting Humans and Insects with Chemicals from World War I to Silent Spring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, New York, USA". Conservation Ecology. 6 (2). doi:10.5751/es-00407-060201. ISSN 1195-5449.
20. Murphy G (Dec 1, 2005). . Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2007-09-15.
21. Miller, G. Tyler (2004). "Ch. 9. Biodiversity". Sustaining the Earth (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thompson Learning, Inc. pp. 211–216. ISBN 9780495556879. OCLC 52134759.
22. Aspelin AL (Feb 2003). "Pesticide Usage in the United States: Trends During the 20th Century" (PDF). NSF CIPM Technical Bulletin 105. (PDF) from the original on 2006-12-31. Retrieved 2010-10-28.
23. Umetsu, Noriharu (May 2020). "Development of novel pesticides in the 21st century". Journal of Pesticide Science. 45 (2): 54–74. doi:10.1584/jpestics.D20-201. PMC 7581488. PMID 33132734.
24. Sparks, Thomas C. (2021). "Crop protection compounds - trends and perspective". Pest Management Science. 77 (8): 3608–3616. doi:10.1002/ps.6293. PMID 33486823. S2CID 231704006.
25. Ling, Kenneth (2014). "Discovery of Agrochemicals" (PDF). Oxford University. Retrieved 2023-12-13.
26. Bebber, Daniel P.; Gurr, Sarah J. (2015). "Crop-destroying fungal and oomycete pathogens challenge food security". Fungal Genetics and Biology. Academic Press. 74: 62–64. doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2014.10.012. ISSN 1087-1845. PMID 25459533.
27. Sparks, Thomas C. (2023). "Natural Product-Based Crop Protection Compounds─Origins and Future Prospects". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 71 (5): 2259–2269. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06938. PMID 36693160. S2CID 256230724.
28. Sparks, Thomas (May 2023). "Insecticide discovery–"Chance favors the prepared mind"". Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 192: 105412. doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2023.105412. PMID 37105622. S2CID 257790593.
29. Ulrich, Elin M.; Morrison, Candice N.; Goldsmith, Michael R.; Foreman, William T. (2012). "Chiral Pesticides: Identification, Description, and Environmental Implications". Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 217. Vol. 217. Boston: Springer US. pp. 1–74. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2329-4_1. ISBN 978-1-4614-2328-7. ISSN 0179-5953. PMID 22350557. (WTF RID: N-2573-2016).
30. Bura, László (2019). "2019". ESFA Journal. 17 (8): e05804. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5804. PMC 7009100. PMID 32626414.
31. "Interim Policy for Evaluation of Stereoisomeric Pesticides". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Oct 26, 2000. Retrieved 2023-12-04.
32. Sparks, Thomas (Aug 2022). "Innovation in insecticide discovery: Approaches to the discovery of new classes of insecticides". Pest Management Science. 78 (8): 3226–3247. doi:10.1002/ps.6942. PMID 35452182. S2CID 248322585.
33. "Bees and pesticides: updated guidance for assessing risks". European Food Safety Authority. May 11, 2023. Retrieved 2023-11-26.
34. Adriaanse, Pauline (May 11, 2023). "Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees)". EFSA Journal. 21 (5): 7989. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. PMC 10173852. PMID 37179655.
35. "How We Assess Risks to Pollinators". United States Environmental Protection Agency. Jun 28, 2023.
36. "Managing Pesticide Risk to Insect Pollinators; Laws, Policies and Guidance". Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved 2023-11-28.
37. Whitford, F. (2009). The Benefits of Pesticides, A Story Worth Telling (PDF). Purdue Extension.
38. Helfrich LA, Weigmann DL, Hipkins P, Stinson ER (Jun 1996). . Virginia Cooperative Extension. Archived from the original on 2009-03-05. Retrieved 2007-10-14.
39. . WHO. Sep 15, 2006. Archived from the original on 2006-09-21. Retrieved 2007-09-13.
40. . PAN Magazine. Archived from the original on 2008-01-18.
41. (PDF). WHO WPRO. Nov 6, 2000. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2003-10-05.
42. "Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage 2008-2012" (PDF). US EPA. 2012. (PDF) from the original on 2017-04-17. Retrieved 2012-03-26.
43. "U.S.: Number of households 1960-2017". Statista. Retrieved 2018-03-26.
44. "Pesticide Illness & Injury Surveillance". CDC.gov. NIOSH. Feb 7, 2017. Retrieved 2014-01-28.
45. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2023. doi:10.4060/cc8166en. ISBN 978-92-5-138262-2. Retrieved 2023-12-13 – via FAODocuments.
46. "Infographic: Pesticide Planet". Science. 341 (6147): 730–1. Aug 2013. Bibcode:2013Sci...341..730.. doi:10.1126/science.341.6147.730. PMID 23950524.
47. Kellogg RL, Nehring RF, Grube A, Goss DW, Plotkin S (2002). . In Ball VE, Norton GW (eds.). Agricultural Productivity. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency. Vol. 2. Boston: Springer. pp. 213–56. ISBN 978-1461352709. Archived from the original on 2002-06-18.
48. Saitoh K, Kuroda T, Kumano S (2001). "Effects of Organic Fertilization and Pesticide Application on Growth and Yield of Field-Grown Rice for 10 Years". Japanese Journal of Crop Science (in Japanese). 70 (4): 530–540. doi:10.1626/jcs.70.530.
49. Knutson R (1999). "Economic Impact of Reduced Pesticide Use in the United States: Measurement of Costs and Benefits" (PDF). AFPC Policy Issues. 99 (2). (PDF) from the original on 2018-12-03.
50. Cooper J, Dobson H (2007). (PDF). Crop Protection. 26 (9): 1337–1348. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2007.03.022. S2CID 84808730. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-27.
51. Yamey G (May 2004). "Roll Back Malaria: a failing global health campaign". BMJ. 328 (7448): 1086–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1086. PMC 406307. PMID 15130956.
52. Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M (1992). "Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use". BioScience. 42 (10): 750–60. doi:10.2307/1311994. JSTOR 1311994.
53. Robbins P (2003). "The Lawn-Chemical Economy and Its Discontents". Antipode. 35 (5): 955–979. Bibcode:2003Antip..35..955R. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00366.x. S2CID 154002130.
54. Fantke P, Friedrich R, Jolliet O (Nov 2012). "Health impact and damage cost assessment of pesticides in Europe". Environment International. 49: 9–17. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.001. PMID 22940502.
55. . Pesticides: Health and Safety. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Aug 30, 2007. Archived from the original on 2009-09-27.
56. "Occupational exposure to chemicals and hearing impairment" (PDF). norskoljeoggass.no. (PDF) from the original on 2020-03-29.
57. . Pesticides: Health and Safety. US EPA. Jun 28, 2006. Archived from the original on 2015-05-28.
58. Bassil KL, Vakil C, Sanborn M, Cole DC, Kaur JS, Kerr KJ (Oct 2007). "Cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review". Canadian Family Physician. 53 (10): 1704–11. PMC 2231435. PMID 17934034.
59. Jurewicz J, Hanke W (2008). "Prenatal and Childhood Exposure to Pesticides and Neurobehavioral Development: Review of Epidemiological Studies". International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 21 (2): 121–32. doi:10.2478/v10001-008-0014-z. ISSN 1896-494X. PMID 18614459.
60. Weselak M, Arbuckle TE, Foster W (2007). "Pesticide exposures and developmental outcomes: the epidemiological evidence". Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews. 10 (1–2): 41–80. Bibcode:2007JTEHB..10...41W. doi:10.1080/10937400601034571. PMID 18074304. S2CID 25304655.
61. Wigle DT, Arbuckle TE, Turner MC, Bérubé A, et al. (May 2008). "Epidemiologic evidence of relationships between reproductive and child health outcomes and environmental chemical contaminants". Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews. 11 (5–6): 373–517. Bibcode:2008JTEHB..11..373W. doi:10.1080/10937400801921320. PMID 18470797. S2CID 33463851.
62. Mink PJ, Mandel JS, Lundin JI, Sceurman BK (Nov 2011). "Epidemiologic studies of glyphosate and non-cancer health outcomes: a review". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 61 (2): 172–84. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.07.006. PMID 21798302.
63. Sanborn M, Kerr KJ, Sanin LH, Cole DC, Bassil KL, Vakil C (Oct 2007). "Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for family doctors". Canadian Family Physician. 53 (10): 1712–20. PMC 2231436. PMID 17934035.
64. Roberts JR, Karr CJ, et al. (Council On Environmental Health) (Dec 2012). "Pesticide exposure in children". Pediatrics. 130 (6): e1757–63. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2757. PMID 23184103.
65. Goldmann, Lynn (May 2004). (PDF) (Report). WHO. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-05-17.
66. Gunnell D, Eddleston M, Phillips MR, Konradsen F (Dec 2007). "The global distribution of fatal pesticide self-poisoning: systematic review". BMC Public Health. 7 (1): 357. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-357. PMC 2262093. PMID 18154668.
67. Kalkbrenner AE, Schmidt RJ, Penlesky AC (Nov 2014). "Environmental chemical exposures and autism spectrum disorders: a review of the epidemiological evidence". Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care. 44 (10): 277–318. doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2014.06.001. PMC 4855851. PMID 25199954.
68. Jeyaratnam J (1990). "Acute pesticide poisoning: a major global health problem". World Health Statistics Quarterly. Rapport Trimestriel de Statistiques Sanitaires Mondiales. 43 (3): 139–44. PMID 2238694.
69. Laborde A, Tomasina F, Bianchi F, Bruné M, et al. (2015). "Children's Health in Latin America: The Influence of Environmental Exposures". Environmental Health Perspectives. 123 (3): 201–209. doi:10.1289/ehp.1408292. ISSN 0091-6765. PMC 4348745. PMID 25499717.
70. "Agriculture & Food Security". www.eac.int. Retrieved 2020-11-30.
71. Mekonnen Y, Ejigu D (Sep 2005). "Plasma cholinesterase level of Ethiopian farm workers exposed to chemical pesticide". Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England). 55 (6): 504–505. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi088. ISSN 0962-7480. PMID 16140842.
72. Ohayo-Mitoko GJ, Kromhout H, Simwa JM, Boleij JS, Heederik D (2000). "Self reported symptoms and inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity among Kenyan agricultural workers". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 57 (3): 195–200. doi:10.1136/oem.57.3.195. ISSN 1351-0711. PMC 1739922. PMID 10810102.
73. Magauzi R, Mabaera B, Rusakaniko S, Chimusoro A, et al. (Jul 11, 2011). "Health effects of agrochemicals among farm workers in commercial farms of Kwekwe district, Zimbabwe". The Pan African Medical Journal. 9 (1): 26. doi:10.4314/pamj.v9i1.71201. ISSN 1937-8688. PMC 3215548. PMID 22145061.
74. Mekonnen Y, Agonafir T (2004). "Lung function and respiratory symptoms of pesticide sprayers in state farms of Ethiopia". Ethiopian Medical Journal. 42 (4): 261–266. ISSN 0014-1755. PMID 16122117.
75. He F (Sep 5, 1999). "Biological monitoring of exposure to pesticides: current issues". Toxicology Letters. 108 (2–3): 277–283. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00099-5. PMID 10511272.
76. World Health Organization. Office of Occupational Health. (1996). Biological monitoring of chemical exposure in the workplace: guidelines. World Health Organization. hdl:10665/41856. ISBN 978-951-802-158-5.
77. Wesseling C, De Joode BV, Ruepert C, León C, et al. (Oct 2001). "Paraquat in Developing Countries". International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 7 (4): 275–286. doi:10.1179/oeh.2001.7.4.275. ISSN 1077-3525. PMID 11783857.
78. Tosi S, Costa C, Vesco U, Quaglia G, Guido G (2018). "A survey of honey bee-collected pollen reveals widespread contamination by agricultural pesticides". Science of the Total Environment. 615: 208–218. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.226. PMID 28968582. S2CID 19956612.
79. "Soyalism | DW Documentary". YouTube (AV media). Brazil. Feb 21, 2020.
80. Dicks LV, Breeze TD, Ngo HT, Senapathi D, et al. (Aug 16, 2021). "A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5 (10): 1453–1461. Bibcode:2021NatEE...5.1453D. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01534-9. PMID 34400826. S2CID 237148742.
81. Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL (Mar 27, 2015). "Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers". Science. 347 (6229): 1255957. doi:10.1126/science.1255957. PMID 25721506. S2CID 206558985.
82. Wells, Matt (Mar 11, 2007). "Vanishing bees threaten U.S. crops". BBC News. London. Retrieved 2007-09-19.
83. Palmer WE, Bromley PT, Brandenburg RL. . North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Archived from the original on 2008-02-17. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
84. Gilden RC, Huffling K, Sattler B (Jan 2010). "Pesticides and health risks". Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 39 (1): 103–10. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01092.x. PMID 20409108.
85. (PDF). United Nations Environment Programme. Apr 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-03-15. Retrieved 2017-02-05.
86. Castro P, Huber ME (2010). Marine Biology (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. ISBN 9780073524160. OCLC 488863548.
87. Quinn, Amie L. (2007). The impacts of agricultural chemicals and temperature on the physiological stress response in fish (MSc Thesis). Lethbridge: University of Lethbridge.
88. Sims GK, Cupples AM (1999). "Factors controlling degradation of pesticides in soil". Pesticide Science. 55 (5): 598–601. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199905)55:5<598::AID-PS962>3.0.CO;2-N. ISSN 1096-9063.
89. Sims GK, Sommers LE (1986). "Biodegradation of pyridine derivatives in soil suspensions". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 5 (6): 503–509. doi:10.1897/1552-8618(1986)5[503:bopdis]2.0.co;2.
90. Wolt JD, Smith JK, Sims JK, Duebelbeis DO (1996). "Products and kinetics of cloramsulam-methyl aerobic soil metabolism". J. Agric. Food Chem. 44: 324–332. doi:10.1021/jf9503570.
91. Pimentel D (2005). "Environmental and Economic Costs of the Application of Pesticides Primarily in the United States" (PDF). Environment, Development and Sustainability. 7 (2): 229–252. doi:10.1007/s10668-005-7314-2. S2CID 35964365.
92. McSorley R, Gallaher RN (Dec 1996). "Effect of yard waste compost on nematode densities and maize yield". Journal of Nematology. 28 (4S): 655–60. PMC 2619736. PMID 19277191.
93. Shelton AM, Badenes-Perez FR (Dec 6, 2005). "Concepts and applications of trap cropping in pest management". Annual Review of Entomology. 51 (1): 285–308. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.150959. PMID 16332213.
94. Holden MH, Ellner SP, Lee D, Nyrop JP, Sanderson JP (Jun 1, 2012). "Designing an effective trap cropping strategy: the effects of attraction, retention and plant spatial distribution". Journal of Applied Ecology. 49 (3): 715–722. Bibcode:2012JApEc..49..715H. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02137.x.
95. . Jul 25, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-21. Retrieved 2007-09-17.
96. Summerlin, Lee B., ed. (1977). "Chapter 17: Life Sciences". Skylab, Classroom in Space. Washington: MSFC. Retrieved 2007-09-17.
97. Papadopoulos, Loukia (Oct 21, 2022). "This new farming robot uses lasers to kill 200,000 weeds per hour". interestingengineering.com. Retrieved 2022-11-17.
98. Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA (2007). "The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management". Annual Review of Entomology. 52 (1): 375–400. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407. PMID 16968206.
99. Epstein, Emanuel (1999). "Silicon". Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. Annual Reviews. 50 (1): 641–664. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641. ISSN 1040-2519. PMID 15012222.
100. Coombs, Amy (Jan 1, 2013). "Fighting Microbes with Microbes". The Scientist. Retrieved 2013-04-18.
101. Borgio JF, Sahayaraj K, Susurluk IA, eds. (2011). Microbial Insecticides: Principles and Applications. New York: Nova Science Publishers. p. 492. ISBN 9781619427709. OCLC 780442651.
102. Pal GK, Kumar B (2013). "Antifungal activity of some common weed extracts against wilt causing fungi, Fusarium oxysporum". Current Discovery. 2 (1): 62–67. ISSN 2320-4400 – via Academia.
103. "Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) / Genetically Modified Plants". npic.orst.edu. US NPIC. Feb 9, 2017. Retrieved 2018-12-09.
104. . US EPA. Archived from the original on 2013-03-28. Retrieved 2013-02-20.
105. Dhole S, Lloyd AL, Gould F (Nov 2, 2020). "Gene Drive Dynamics in Natural Populations: The Importance of Density Dependence, Space, and Sex". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. Annual Reviews. 51 (1): 505–531. arXiv:2005.01838. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-031120-101013. ISSN 1543-592X. PMC 8340601. PMID 34366722. S2CID 218502293.
106.   This article incorporates public domain material from Jasper Womach. Report for Congress: Agriculture: A Glossary of Terms, Programs, and Laws, 2005 Edition (PDF). Congressional Research Service.
107. Willson HR (1996). "Pesticide Regulations". In Radcliffe EB, Hutchison WD, Cancelado RE (eds.). Radcliffe's IPM World Textbook. St. Paul: University of Minnesota. from the original on 2017-07-13.
108. "Laws of Malaysia. Act 149: Pesticides Act 1974" (PDF). pest-aside.com.my. Jun 1, 2015. (PDF) from the original on 2018-07-04. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
109. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Health Organization (Nov 14, 2019). Global situation of pesticide management in agriculture and public health: Report of a 2018 WHO–FAO survey. Food & Agriculture Org. pp. 25–. ISBN 978-92-5-131969-7.
110. . europarl.europa.eu. EU Parliament. Jan 13, 2009. Archived from the original on 2009-02-01. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
111. . UN FAO. Archived from the original on 2008-12-02. Retrieved 2007-10-25.
112. Reynolds JD (1997). . Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law. 13 (1): 69–105. JSTOR 42842699. Archived from the original on 2012-05-27.
113. Netherlands Organization For Scientific Research (Oct 11, 2001). "Environmentally-Friendly Pesticide To Combat Potato Cyst Nematodes". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
114. . Pesticides: Health and Safety. US EPA. Aug 20, 2015. Archived from the original on 2014-01-14. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
115. . Pesticides: Regulating Pesticides. US EPA. Aug 20, 2015. Archived from the original on 2013-04-01. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
116. Wayland, Susan; Fenner-Crisp, Penelope (Apr 2020) [March 2016]. (PDF). EPA Alumni Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-10-22.
117. (PDF). epa.gov. US EPA. 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-01. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
118. "Ch. 11. Restricted-Use Pesticides: Dealer and Applicator Records Inspections" (PDF). Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Inspection Manual. Washington: US EPA. 2013. pp. 11–1–11–4. (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-21.
119. "Chemical Hazard Communication". United States Department of Labor; OSHA. 1998.
120. "Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)". US EPA. Jul 24, 2013. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
121. Toth, Stephen J. Jr. (Mar 1996). (PDF). North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-04-03. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
122. . Pesticides: Topical & Chemical Fact Sheets. US EPA. 2010. Archived from the original on 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-02-25.
123. . Pesticides: Topical & Chemical Fact Sheets. US EPA. Apr 5, 2007. Archived from the original on 2014-04-01. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
124. "Bill No. 2491, Draft 2" (PDF). Council of the County of Kaua'i. Oct 17, 2013.
125. Hemingway Jaynes, Cristen (Oct 25, 2023). McDermott, Chris (ed.). "EU Votes to Cut Pesticide Use in Half by 2030". Ecowatch. Retrieved 2023-11-06.
126. McNaught AD, Wilkinson A, eds. (1987). "Pesticide Residue". Compendium of Chemical Terminology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. doi:10.1351/goldbook.P04520. ISBN 978-0-9678550-9-7. OCLC 901451465. XML on-line corrected version created by Nic M, Jirat J, Kosata B; updates compiled by Jenkins A.
127. . US EPA. Dec 5, 2011. Archived from the original on 2013-11-04. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
128. Crinnion WJ (Dec 2009). "Chlorinated pesticides: threats to health and importance of detection". Alternative Medicine Review. 14 (4): 347–59. PMID 20030461.
129. Li Q, Lu Y, Wang P, Wang T, et al. (2018). "Distribution, source, and risk of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBS) in urban and rural soils around the Yellow and Bohai Seas, China". Environmental Pollution. 239: 233–241. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.055. PMID 29656247. S2CID 4896932.
130. Chung SW, Chen BL (Aug 2011). "Determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in fatty foods: a critical review on the analytical methods and their testing capabilities". Journal of Chromatography A. 1218 (33): 5555–67. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.06.066. PMID 21742333.
131. Schusterova D, Hajslova J, Kocourek V, Pulkrabova J (2021). "Pesticide Residues and Their Metabolites in Grapes and Wines from Conventional and Organic Farming System". Foods. 10 (2): 307. doi:10.3390/foods10020307. PMC 7913069. PMID 33540835.

Bibliography

• Davis, Frederick Rowe. "Pesticides and the perils of synecdoche in the history of science and environmental history." History of Science 57.4 (2019): 469–492.
• Davis, Frederick Rowe. Banned: a history of pesticides and the science of toxicology (Yale UP, 2014).
• Matthews, Graham A. A history of pesticides (CABI, 2018).
• S.Safe; H.Plugge; J.F.S.Crocker (1977). "Analysis of an aromatic solvent used in a forest spray program". Chemosphere. 6 (10): 641–651. Bibcode:1977Chmsp...6..641S. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(77)90075-3.

Sources

  This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC BY-SA IGO 3.0 (license statement/permission). Text taken from World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023​, FAO, FAO.

External links

 

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Pesticides.

• Pesticides at the World Health Organization (WHO)
• Pesticides at the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
• Pesticides at the European Commission
• Pesticides at the United States Environmental Protection Agency.