fbpx
Wikipedia

List of biblical commentaries

This is an outline of commentaries and commentators. Discussed are the salient points of Jewish, patristic, medieval, and modern commentaries on the Bible. The article includes discussion of the Targums, Mishna, and Talmuds, which are not regarded as Bible commentaries in the modern sense of the word, but which provide the foundation for later commentary. With the exception of these classical Jewish works, this article focuses on Christian Biblical commentaries; for more on Jewish Biblical commentaries, see Jewish commentaries on the Bible.

Jewish commentaries

Philo

A visitor to Alexandria at the time when Christ was preaching in Galilee would find there and in its vicinity Jews using the Septuagint as their Bible, and could enter their Great Synagogue. Whoever had not seen it was not supposed to have beheld the glory of Israel. The members of their Sanhedrin, according to Sukkah, were seated on seventy-one golden thrones valued at tens of thousands of talents of gold; and the building was so vast that a flag had to be waved to show the people when to respond. At the head of this assembly, on the highest throne, was seated Alexander the Alabarch, the brother of Philo.

Philo himself was a man of wealth and learning, who mingled with all classes of men and frequented the theatre and the great library. Equally at home in the Septuagint and the Greek classics, he was struck and perplexed by the many beautiful and noble thoughts contained in the latter, which could bear comparison with many passages of the Bible. As this difficulty must have frequently presented itself to the minds of his coreligionists, he endeavoured to meet it by saying that all that was great in Socrates, Plato, etc. originated with Moses. He set about reconciling Pagan philosophy with the Old Testament, and for this purpose he made extensive use of the allegorical method of interpretation. He taught that many passages of the Pentateuch were not intended to be taken literally. In fact, he said that they were literally false, but allegorically true.

He did not make the distinction between natural and revealed religion. For example, Pagan systems may have natural religion highly developed, but, from a Judeo-Christian point of view, with much concomitant error. His exegesis served to tide over the difficulty for the time amongst the Hellenistic Jews, and had great influence on Origen of Alexandria and other Alexandrian Christian writers.

Targums

Farrar, in his "Life of Christ", says that it has been suggested that when Christ visited the Temple, at twelve years of age, there may have been present among the doctors Jonathan ben Uzziel, once thought the author of the Yonathan Targum, and the venerable teachers Hillel and Shammai, the handers-on of the Mishna.[1] The Targums (the most famous of which is that on the Pentateuch erroneously attributed to Onkelos, a misnomer for Aquila, according to Abrahams) were the only approach to anything like a commentary on the Bible before the time of Christ. They were interpretative translations or paraphrases from Hebrew into Aramaic for the use of the synagogues when, after the Exile, the people had lost the knowledge of Hebrew. It is doubtful whether any of them were committed to writing before the Christian Era. They are important as indicating the character of the Hebrew text used.

Shlomo Yitzchaki (1040–1105), more commonly known as Rashi (RAbbi SHlomo Itzhaki), was a medieval French rabbi and author of a comprehensive commentary on the Talmud and commentary on the Tanakh.

Mishna and Talmuds

Hillel and Shammai were the last "pair" of several generations of "pairs" (Zugot) of teachers. These pairs were the successors of the early scribes who lived after the Exile. These teachers are said to have handed down and expanded the Oral Law, which, according to the uncritical view of many Jews, began with Moses. This Oral Law consists of legal and liturgical interpretations and applications of the Pentateuch. As no part of it was written down, it was preserved by constant repetition (Mishna). On the destruction of Jerusalem several rabbis, learned in this Law, settled at Jamnia, near the sea, twenty-eight miles west of Jerusalem. Jamnia became the headquarters of Jewish learning until AD 135, due to the Third Jewish Revolt. Then schools were opened at Sepphoris and Tiberias to the west of the Sea of Galilee. The rabbis comforted their countrymen by teaching that the study of the Law (Oral as well as Written) took the place of the sacrifices. They devoted their energies to arranging the Unwritten Torah, or Law. One of the most successful at this was Rabbi Akiba who took part in the Third Jewish Revolt of Bar Kochba, against the Romans, and lost his life (135). The work of systematization was completed and probably committed to writing by the Jewish patriarch at Tiberias, Rabbi Jehudah ha-Nasi "The Prince" (150-210). He was of noble birth, wealthy, learned, and is called by the Jews "Our Master the Saint" or simply Rabbi par excellence. The compilation made by this Rabbi is the Mishna. It is written in Mishnaic Hebrew, and consists of six great divisions or orders, each division containing, on an average, about ten tractates, each tractate being made up of several chapters. The Mishna may be said to be a compilation of Jewish traditional moral theology, liturgy, law, etc. There were other traditions not embodied in the work of Rabbi, and these are called additional Mishna.

The discussions of later generations of rabbis all centred round the text of the Mishna. Interpreters or "speakers" laboured upon it both in Jerusalem and Babylonia (until 500), and the results are comprised in the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds. The word Talmud means teaching, doctrine. Each Talmud consists of two parts, the Mishna (in Hebrew), in sixty-three tractates, and an explanation of the same (Gemara), ten or twelve times as long. The explanatory portion of the Jerusalem Talmud is written in NeoWestern Aramaic and that of the Babylonian Talmud in Eastern Aramaic, which is closely allied to Syriac or Mandaic. The passages in the Gemara containing additional Mishna are, however, given in New Hebrew. Only thirty-nine tractates of the Mishna have Gemara. The Talmud, then, consists of the Mishna (traditions from 450 BC till 200 AD), together with a commentary thereon, Gemara, the latter being composed about 200-500 AD. Next to the Bible the Babylonian Talmud is the great religious book of orthodox Jews, though the Palestinian Talmud is more highly prized by modern scholars. From the year 500 till the Middle Ages the rabbis (geonim) in Babylonia and elsewhere were engaged in commenting on the Talmud and reconciling it with the Bible. A list of such commentaries is given in The Jewish Encyclopedia.

Midrashim

Simultaneously with the Mishna and Talmud there grew up a number of Midrashim, or commentaries on the Bible. some of these were legalistic, like the halakhic sections of the Talmud but the most important were of an edifying, homiletic character (Midrash Aggadah). These latter, although chronologically later, are important for the corroborative light which they throw on the language of the New Testament. The Gospel of John is seen to be steeped in early Jewish phraseology, and the words of Psalm 109 LXX Hebrew Bible 110], "The Lord said to my Lord", etc. are in one place[where?] applied to the Messiah, as they are in Gospel of Matthew 22:44 (referenced from Psalm 110:1), though Rashi following the Rabbis interpreted the words in the sense of applying them to Abraham.

Karaite commentators

Anan ben David, a prominent Babylonian Jew in the eighth century, rejected Rabbinism for the written Old Testament and became the founder of the sect known a Karaites (a word indicating their preference for the written Bible). This schism produced great energy and ability on both sides. The principal Karaite Bible commentators were Nahavendi (ninth century); Abu al-Faraj Harun (ninth century), exegete and Hebrew grammarian; Solomon ben Yerucham (tenth century); Sahal ben Mazliach (died 950), Hebrew grammarian and lexicographer; Joseph al-Bazir (died 930); Japhet ben Ali, the greatest Karaite commentator of the tenth century; and Judah Hadassi (died 1160).

Middle Ages

Saadiah of Fayûm (died 942), the most powerful writer against the Karaites, translated the Bible into Arabic and added notes. Besides commentaries on the Bible, Saadiah wrote a systematic treatise bringing revealed religion into harmony with Greek philosophy. He thus became the forerunner of Maimonides and the Catholic Schoolmen.

Solomon ben Isaac, called Rashi (born 1040) wrote very popular explanations of the Talmud and the Bible.

Tobiah ben Eliezer a Romaniote scholar and paytan in 11th century Kastoria (Greece), wrote the Leḳaḥ Ṭov or Pesiḳta Zuṭarta, a midrashic commentary on the Pentateuch and the Five Megillot.

Abraham Ibn Ezra of Toledo (died 1168) had a good knowledge of Oriental languages and wrote learned commentaries on the Old Testament. He was the first to maintain that Isaiah contains the work of two prophets.

Moses Maimonides (died 1204), the greatest Jewish scholar of the Middle Ages, of whom his coreligionists said that "from Moses to Moses there was none like Moses", wrote his "Guide to the Perplexed", which was read by St. Thomas. He was a great admirer of Aristotle, who was to him the representative of natural knowledge as the Bible was of the supernatural.

There were the two Kimchis, especially David (died 1235) of Narbonne, who was a celebrated grammarian, lexicographer, and commentator inclined to the literal sense. He was followed by Nachmanides of Catalonia (died 1270), a doctor of medicine who wrote commentaries of a cabbalistic tendency; Immanuel of Rome (born 1270); and the Karaites Aaron ben Joseph (1294), and Aaron ben Elias (fourteenth century).

Modern

Isaac Abarbanel (born Lisbon, 1437; died Venice, 1508) was a statesman and scholar. None of his predecessors came so near the modern ideal of a commentator as he did. He prefixed general introductions to each book, and was the first Jew to make extensive use of Christian commentaries. Elias Levita (died 1549) and Azarias de Rossi (died 1577) have also to be mentioned.

Moses Mendelssohn of Berlin (died 1786), a friend of Lessing, translated the Pentateuch into German. His commentaries (in Hebrew) are close, learned, critical, and acute. He had much influence, and was followed by Wessely, Jarosław, Homberg, Euchel, Friedlander, Hertz, Herxheimer, Ludwig Philippson, etc., called "Biurists", or expositors. The modern liberal school among the Jews is represented by Salomon Munk, Samuel David Luzzato, Leopold Zunz, Geiger, Julius Fürst, etc.

Rabbi Pesach Wolicki (born 1970) is a biblical scholar and commentator. His book, Cup of Salvation, also known as Cup of Salvation: A Powerful Journey Through King David's Psalms of Praise, which was published by the Center for Jewish–Christian Understanding and Cooperation (CJCUC) in 2017, is a devotional biblical commentary on Psalms 113-118 otherwise known as the Hallel.

Patristic commentaries

The history of Christian exegesis may be roughly divided into three periods: the Age of the Fathers, the Age of Catenæ and Scholia (seventh to sixteenth century), and the Age of Modern Commentaries (sixteenth to twentieth century). The earliest known commentary on Christian scriptures was by a Gnostic named Heracleon in the 170s CE. Most of the patristic commentaries are in the form of homilies, or discourses to the faithful, and range over the whole of Scripture. There are two schools of interpretation, that of Alexandria and that of Antioch.

Alexandrian School

The chief writers of the Alexandrian School were:

To these may be added

  • St. Ambrose, who, in a moderate degree, adopted their system

Its chief characteristic was the allegorical method. This was, doubtless, founded on passages in the Gospels and the Epistles of St. Paul, but it received a strong impulse from the writings of Alexandrian Jews, especially of Philo.

The great representative of this school was Origen (died 254). Origen was the son of Leonides of Alexandria, himself a saint and martyr. Origen became the master of many great saints and scholars, one of the most celebrated being St. Gregory Thaumaturgus; he was known as the "Adamantine" on account of his incessant application to study, writing, lecturing, and works of piety. He frequently kept seven amanuenses actively employed; it was said he became the author of 6000 works (Epiphanius, Hær., lxiv, 63); according to St. Jerome, who reduced the number to 2000 (Contra. Rufin., ii, 22), he left more writings than any man could read in a lifetime (Ep. xxxiii, ad Paulam). Besides his great labours on the Hexapla he wrote scholia, homilies, and commentaries on the Old and the New Testament. In his scholia he gave short explanations of difficult passages after the manner of his contemporaries, the annotators of the Greek classics. Most of the scholia, in which he chiefly sought the literal sense, are unfortunately lost, but it is supposed that their substance is embodied in the writings of St. John Chrysostom and other Fathers. In his other works Origen pushed the allegorical interpretation to the utmost extreme. In spite of this, however, his writings were of great value, and with the exception of St. Augustine, no writer of ancient times had such influence.

Antiochene School

The writers of the Antiochene School disliked the allegorical method, and sought almost exclusively the literal, primary, or historical sense of Holy Scripture. The principal writers of this school were

The great representatives of this school were Diodorus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, and St. John Chrysostom. Diodorus, who died Bishop of Tarsus (394), followed the literal to the exclusion of the mystical or allegorical sense. Theodore was born at Antioch, in 347, became Bishop of Mopsuestia, and died in the communion of the Church, 429. He was a powerful thinker, but an obscure and prolix writer. He felt intense dislike for the mystical sense, and explained the Scriptures in an extremely literal and almost rationalistic manner.

His pupil, Nestorius, became the subject of the Nestorian controversy; the Nestorians translated his books into Syriac and regarded Theodore as their great "Doctor". This made Catholics suspicious of his writings, which were finally condemned after the famous controversy on The Three Chapters. Theodore's commentary on St. John's Gospel, in Syriac, was published, with a Latin translation, by a Catholic scholar, Dr. Chabot.

St. John Chrysostom, priest of Antioch, became Patriarch of Constantinople in 398. He left homilies on most of the books of the Old and the New Testament. When St. Thomas Aquinas was asked by one of his brethren whether he would not like to be the owner of Paris, so that he could dispose of it to the King of France and with the proceeds promote the good works of his order, he answered that he would prefer to be the possessor of Chrysostom's Super Matthæum. St. Isidore of Pelusium said of him that if the Apostle St. Paul could have used Attic speech he would have explained his own Epistles in the identical words of St. John Chrysostom.

Intermediate School

Other writers combined both these systems, some leaning more to the allegorical and some to the literal sense. The principal contributors were

Jerome, besides his translations of Scripture and other works, left many commentaries, in some of which he departed from the literal meaning of the text. At times he did not always indicate when he was quoting from different authors, which according to Richard Simon accounts for his apparent discrepancies.

Medieval commentaries

The medieval writers were content to draw from the rich treasures left them by their predecessors. Their commentaries consisted, for the most part, of passages from the Church Fathers, which they connected together as in a chain, a catena.

Greek Catenists

Latin Catenists, Scholiasts, etc.

The principal Latin commentators of this period were the Venerable Bede, Walafrid Strabo, Anselm of Laon, Hugh of Saint-Cher, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Nicholas de Lyra.

The Venerable Bede (seventh to eighth century), a good Greek and Hebrew scholar, wrote a useful commentary on most of the books of the Old and the New Testament. It is in reality a catena of passages from Greek and Latin Fathers judiciously selected and digested.

Walafrid Strabo (ninth century), a Benedictine, was credited with the "Glossa Ordinaria" on the entire Bible. It is a brief explanation of the literal and mystical sense, based on Rabanus Maurus and other Latin writers, and was one of the most popular works during the Middle Ages, being as well known as "The Sentences" of Peter Lombard.

Anselm of Laon, professor at Paris (twelfth century), wrote the Glossa Interlinearis, so called because the explanation was inserted between the lines of the Vulgate.

Hugh of Saint-Cher (Hugo de Sancto Caro), thirteenth century), besides his pioneer Biblical concordance, composed a short commentary on the whole of the Scriptures, explaining the literal, allegorical, analogical, and moral sense of the text. His work was called Postillæ, i. e. post illa (verba textus), because the explanation followed the words of the text.

Thomas Aquinas (thirteenth century) left commentaries on Job, Psalms, Isaiah, Epistles of St. Paul, and was the author of the well-known Catena Aurea on the Gospels. This consists of quotations from over eighty Church Fathers. He throws much light on the literal sense and is most happy in illustrating difficult points by parallel passages from other parts of the Bible.

Nicholas de Lyra (thirteenth century), joined the Franciscans in 1291 and brought to the service of the Church knowledge of Hebrew and rabbinical learning. He wrote short notes or Postillæ on the entire Bible, and set forth the literal meaning with great ability, especially of the books written in Hebrew. This work was most popular, and in frequent use during the late Middle Ages, and Martin Luther was indebted to it.

A great impulse was given to exegetical studies by the Council of Vienne which decreed, in 1311, that chairs of Hebrew, Chaldean, and Arabic should be established at Paris, Oxford, Bologna, and Salamanca.

Besides the major writers already mentioned the following are some of the principal exegetes, many of them Benedictines, from patristic times till the Council of Trent:

Syriac commentators

Modern Catholic commentaries

The influx of Greek scholars into Italy after the fall of Constantinople, the Christian and anti-Christian Renaissance, the invention of printing, the controversial excitement caused by the rise of Protestantism, and the publication of polyglot Bibles by Cardinal Ximenes and others, gave renewed interest in the study of the Bible among Catholic scholars. Controversy showed them the necessity of devoting more attention to the literal meaning of the text, according to the wise principle laid down by St. Thomas in the beginning of his "Summa Theologica".

It was then that the Jesuits, founded in 1534, stepped into the front rank to counter the attacks on the Catholic Church. The Ratio Studiorum of the Jesuits made it incumbent on their professors of Scripture to acquire a mastery of Greek, Hebrew, and other Oriental languages. Alfonso Salmeron, one of the first companions of Ignatius Loyola, and the pope's theologian at the Council of Trent, was a distinguished Hebrew scholar and voluminous commentator. Bellarmine, one of the first Christians to write a Hebrew grammar, composed a valuable commentary on the Psalms, giving an exposition of the Hebrew, Septuagint, and Vulgate texts. It was published as part of Cornelius a Lapide's commentary on the whole Bible. Cornelius a Lapide, S. J. (born 1566), was a native of the Low Countries, and was well versed in Greek and Hebrew. During forty years he devoted himself to teaching and to the composition of his great work, which has been highly praised by Protestants as well as Catholics.

Juan Maldonato, a Spanish Jesuit, born 1584, wrote commentaries on Isaias, Baruch, Ezechiel, Daniel, Psalms, Proverbs, Canticles (Song of Solomon), and Ecclesiastes. His best work, however, is his Latin commentary on the Four Gospels, which is generally acknowledged to be one of the best ever written. When Maldonato was teaching at the University of Paris the hall was filled with eager students before the lecture began, and he had frequently to speak in the open air.

Great as was the merit of the work of Maldonato, it was equalled by the commentary on the Epistles by Estius (born at Gorcum, Holland, 1542), a secular priest, and superior of the College at Douai. These two works are still of the greatest help to the student.

Many other Jesuits were the authors of valuable exegetical works, e.g.:

The Jesuits were rivalled by

Nineteenth century

During the nineteenth century the following were a few of the Catholic writers on the Bible:

Catholics have also published scientific books. There is the great Latin "Cursus" on the whole of the Bible by the Jesuit Fathers, Karl Cornely, Joseph Knabenbauer, and Franz Hummelauer. The writings of Marie-Joseph Lagrange (Les Juges), Albert Condamin (Isaïe), Theodore Calmes (Saint Jean), Albin van Hoonacker (Les Douze Petits Prophètes).

For a list of Catholic publications on the Scripture, the reader may be referred to the "Revue biblique", edited by Lagrange (Jerusalem and Paris), and the "Biblische Zeitschrift', published by Herder (Freiburg im Breisgau). For further information concerning the principal Catholic commentators see respective articles.

Twentieth century

Twenty-first century

Modern Orthodox commentaries

  • The Explanatory Bible of Aleksandr Lopukhin and successors (1904-1913) is written by professors of Russian theological seminaries and academies. It's based on Russian Synodal Translation, its authors apply to ancient sources of the text (Masoretic Text, Septuagint, etc.). At the present time, is the only full Russian Orthodox Bible commentary on both canonical and deuterocanonical books of the Scripture. The Lopukhin Bible was republished in 1987 by Biblical Societies of Northern Europe countries.[2]
  • The Orthodox Study Bible is an English-language translation and annotation of the Septuagint with references to the Masoretic Text in its Old Testament part and its New Testament part it represents the NKJV, which uses the Textus Receptus, representing 94% of Greek manuscripts. It offers commentary and other material to show the Eastern Orthodox Christian understanding of Scripture often in opposite to catholic and Protestant ideas. Additionally the OSB provides basic daily prayers, a lectionary for personal use, and reproductions of icons in its pages.[3]

Protestant commentaries

In general

The commentaries of the first Reformers, Luther, Melanchthon, Calvin, Zwingli and their followers wrote on Holy Scripture during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries.

During the nineteenth century:

There were many commentaries published at Cambridge, Oxford, London, etc. (see publishers' catalogues, and notices in "Expositor", "Expository Times", and "Journal of Theological Studies"). Other notable writers include:

There are also the Bible dictionaries of Kitto, Smith, and Hastings. Many of these works, especially the later ones, are valuable for their scientific method, though not of equal value for their views or conclusions.

Prominent series include:

One-volume Commentaries:

A notable recent specialist commentary is Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament (2007), edited by G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson.

Rationalistic commentaries

The English deists included:

They were opposed by these writers:[author incomplete]

The opinions of the English rationalists were disseminated on the Continent by Voltaire and others. In Germany the ground was prepared by the philosophy of Wolff and the writings of his disciple Semler. The posthumous writings of Reimarus were published by Lessing between 1774-78 (The Fragments of Wolfenbüttel). Lessing pretended that the author was unknown. According to the "Fragments", Moses, Christ, and the Apostles were impostors. Lessing was vigorously attacked, especially by Goeze. Eichhorn, in his "Introduction to the Old Testament" (Leipzig 1780-83, 3 vols.), maintained that the Scriptures were genuine productions, but that, as the Jews saw the intervention of God in the most ordinary natural occurrences, the miracles should be explained naturally.

Heinrich Paulus (1761–1850), following the lead of Eichhorn, applied to the Gospels the naturalistic method of explaining miracles. G. L Bauer, Heyne (died 1812), and Creuzer denied the authenticity of the greater portion of the Pentateuch and compared it to the mythology of the Greeks and Romans. The greatest advocate of such views was de Wette (1780–1849), a pupil of Paulus. In his "Introduction to the Old Testament" (1806) he maintained that the miraculous narratives of the Old Testament were popular legends, which in the course of centuries, became transformed and transfused with the marvellous and the supernatural, and were finally committed to writing in perfectly good faith.

David Strauss (1808–74) applied this mythical explanation to the Gospels.[6] He showed most clearly, that if with Paulus the Gospels are allowed to be authentic, the attempt to explain the miracles naturally breaks down completely. Strauss rejected the authenticity and regarded the miraculous accounts in the Gospels as naive legends, the productions of the pious imaginations of the early generations of Christians.

The views of Strauss were severely criticized by the Catholics, Kuhn, Mack, Hug, and Sepp, and by the Protestants Neander, Tholuck, Ullman, Lange, Ewald, Riggenbach, Weiss, and Keim.

The German Protestant scholar F. C. Baur originated a theory which was for a time in great vogue, but which was afterwards abandoned by the majority of critics. He held that the New Testament contains the writings of two antagonistic parties amongst the Apostles and early Christians. His principal followers were Zeller, Schwegler, Planck, Köslin, Ritsch, Hilgenfeld, Volkmar, Tobler, Keim, Hosten, some of whom, however, emancipated themselves from their master.

Besides the writers already mentioned, the following wrote in a rationalistic spirit:

  • Ernesti (died 1781)
  • Berthold (1822)
  • the Rosenmüllers
  • Crusius (1843)
  • Bertheau
  • Hupfeld
  • Ewald
  • Thenius
  • Fritzsche
  • Justi
  • Gesenius (died 1842)
  • Longerke
  • Bleek
  • Bunsen (1860)
  • Umbreit
  • Kleinert
  • Knobel
  • Nicolas
  • Hirzel
  • Kuenen
  • J. C. K. von Hoffmann
  • Hitzig (died 1875)
  • Schulz (1869)
  • B. Weiss
  • Ernest Renan
  • Tuch
  • Heinrich A. W. Meyer (and his continuators Huther, Luneman, Dusterdieck, Brückner, etc.),
  • Julius Wellhausen
  • Wieseler
  • Jülicher
  • Beyschlag
  • H. Holtzmann, and his collaborators
  • Schmiedel, von Soden

Holtzmann, while practically admitting the authenticity of the Gospels, especially of St. Mark, explains away the miracles. He believes that miracles do not happen, and that the scripture are merely echoes of Old Testament miracle stories. Holtzmann was severely taken to task by several writers in the "International Critical Commentary". The activity of so many acute minds has thrown great light on the language and literature of the Bible.

Modern non aligned commentaries

See also

References

  1. ^   Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Commentaries on the Bible". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  2. ^ "Толковая Библия А.П. Лопухина". Ekzeget.ru - Commentaries on the Holy Scripture.
  3. ^ The Comprehensive New Testament notes that this is an accurate translation of the Koine (Received or Ecclesiastical) Text, instead of the modern "reasoned eclectic" Alexandrian text base in Nestle-Aland/UBS (based on three ancient manuscripts representative of a small part of Christian tradition, Codices Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and Alexandrinus. and Archimandrite Ephrem. "Book Review: The Orthodox Study Bible". Orthodox Christian Information Center.
  4. ^ Best Bible Commentaries, New Century Bible Commentary, accessed 8 February 2021
  5. ^ Kretzmann's Popular Commentary of the Bible
  6. ^ David Strauss (1835). The Life of Jesus Critically Examined (translated into English by Marian Evans 1860. Calvin Blanchard.

  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Commentaries on the Bible". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

External public domain Bible commentaries

With the rise of the Internet, many Public Domain or otherwise free-use Bible commentaries have become available online. Here is a list of some of the commentaries:

  • The Grace Commentary by Dr. Paul Ellis
  • Verse to Verse by Robb Moser
  • Notes on the New Testament by Albert Barnes
  • Commentaries by John Calvin
  • Commentaries by Adam Clarke
  • Exposition of the Bible by John Gill
  • Synopsis of the Bible by John Darby
  • Complete Commentary by Matthew Henry
  • The Popular Commentary of the Bible by Paul E. Kretzmann
  • Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible by Robert Jamieson, A.R. Fausset, and David Brown
  • Commentary by William Kelly
  • Commentary on Galatians, at CCEL, by Luther
  • Robertson's Word Pictures of the New Testament
  • Explanatory Notes by John Wesley
  • Bible Commentary Forever
  • EasyEnglish Bible Commentaries by MissionAssist

Many public domain commentaries are now available to view or download through the Google Books Project and the Internet Archive. FreeCommentaries.com is curating a list of free commentaries from these and other sources. The Christian Classics Ethereal Library has presented a unified reference tool to access many commentaries from different traditions in their World Wide Study Bible.

With all the commentaries now available, several resources review and recommend commentaries, including Tyndale Seminary's Old Testament Reading Room and New Testament Reading Room, Challies, Best Commentaries, and Lingonier Ministries.

Further reading

  • Evans, John (2010). A Guide to Biblical Commentaries & Reference Works: for students and pastors. Oakland, TN: Doulos Resources. ISBN 978-0-9828715-6-0.
  • Glynn, John (2003). Commentary & Reference Survey: A Comprehensive Guide to Biblical and Theological Resources. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Kregel Academic & Professional. ISBN 0-8254-2736-3.

list, biblical, commentaries, this, outline, commentaries, commentators, discussed, salient, points, jewish, patristic, medieval, modern, commentaries, bible, article, includes, discussion, targums, mishna, talmuds, which, regarded, bible, commentaries, modern. This is an outline of commentaries and commentators Discussed are the salient points of Jewish patristic medieval and modern commentaries on the Bible The article includes discussion of the Targums Mishna and Talmuds which are not regarded as Bible commentaries in the modern sense of the word but which provide the foundation for later commentary With the exception of these classical Jewish works this article focuses on Christian Biblical commentaries for more on Jewish Biblical commentaries see Jewish commentaries on the Bible Contents 1 Jewish commentaries 1 1 Philo 1 2 Targums 1 3 Mishna and Talmuds 1 4 Midrashim 1 5 Karaite commentators 1 6 Middle Ages 1 7 Modern 2 Patristic commentaries 2 1 Alexandrian School 2 2 Antiochene School 2 3 Intermediate School 3 Medieval commentaries 3 1 Greek Catenists 3 2 Latin Catenists Scholiasts etc 3 3 Syriac commentators 4 Modern Catholic commentaries 4 1 Nineteenth century 4 2 Twentieth century 4 3 Twenty first century 5 Modern Orthodox commentaries 6 Protestant commentaries 6 1 In general 6 2 Rationalistic commentaries 7 Modern non aligned commentaries 8 See also 9 References 10 External public domain Bible commentaries 11 Further readingJewish commentaries EditMain article Jewish commentaries on the Bible Philo Edit A visitor to Alexandria at the time when Christ was preaching in Galilee would find there and in its vicinity Jews using the Septuagint as their Bible and could enter their Great Synagogue Whoever had not seen it was not supposed to have beheld the glory of Israel The members of their Sanhedrin according to Sukkah were seated on seventy one golden thrones valued at tens of thousands of talents of gold and the building was so vast that a flag had to be waved to show the people when to respond At the head of this assembly on the highest throne was seated Alexander the Alabarch the brother of Philo Philo himself was a man of wealth and learning who mingled with all classes of men and frequented the theatre and the great library Equally at home in the Septuagint and the Greek classics he was struck and perplexed by the many beautiful and noble thoughts contained in the latter which could bear comparison with many passages of the Bible As this difficulty must have frequently presented itself to the minds of his coreligionists he endeavoured to meet it by saying that all that was great in Socrates Plato etc originated with Moses He set about reconciling Pagan philosophy with the Old Testament and for this purpose he made extensive use of the allegorical method of interpretation He taught that many passages of the Pentateuch were not intended to be taken literally In fact he said that they were literally false but allegorically true He did not make the distinction between natural and revealed religion For example Pagan systems may have natural religion highly developed but from a Judeo Christian point of view with much concomitant error His exegesis served to tide over the difficulty for the time amongst the Hellenistic Jews and had great influence on Origen of Alexandria and other Alexandrian Christian writers Targums Edit Farrar in his Life of Christ says that it has been suggested that when Christ visited the Temple at twelve years of age there may have been present among the doctors Jonathan ben Uzziel once thought the author of the Yonathan Targum and the venerable teachers Hillel and Shammai the handers on of the Mishna 1 The Targums the most famous of which is that on the Pentateuch erroneously attributed to Onkelos a misnomer for Aquila according to Abrahams were the only approach to anything like a commentary on the Bible before the time of Christ They were interpretative translations or paraphrases from Hebrew into Aramaic for the use of the synagogues when after the Exile the people had lost the knowledge of Hebrew It is doubtful whether any of them were committed to writing before the Christian Era They are important as indicating the character of the Hebrew text used Shlomo Yitzchaki 1040 1105 more commonly known as Rashi RAbbi SHlomo Itzhaki was a medieval French rabbi and author of a comprehensive commentary on the Talmud and commentary on the Tanakh Mishna and Talmuds Edit Hillel and Shammai were the last pair of several generations of pairs Zugot of teachers These pairs were the successors of the early scribes who lived after the Exile These teachers are said to have handed down and expanded the Oral Law which according to the uncritical view of many Jews began with Moses This Oral Law consists of legal and liturgical interpretations and applications of the Pentateuch As no part of it was written down it was preserved by constant repetition Mishna On the destruction of Jerusalem several rabbis learned in this Law settled at Jamnia near the sea twenty eight miles west of Jerusalem Jamnia became the headquarters of Jewish learning until AD 135 due to the Third Jewish Revolt Then schools were opened at Sepphoris and Tiberias to the west of the Sea of Galilee The rabbis comforted their countrymen by teaching that the study of the Law Oral as well as Written took the place of the sacrifices They devoted their energies to arranging the Unwritten Torah or Law One of the most successful at this was Rabbi Akiba who took part in the Third Jewish Revolt of Bar Kochba against the Romans and lost his life 135 The work of systematization was completed and probably committed to writing by the Jewish patriarch at Tiberias Rabbi Jehudah ha Nasi The Prince 150 210 He was of noble birth wealthy learned and is called by the Jews Our Master the Saint or simply Rabbi par excellence The compilation made by this Rabbi is the Mishna It is written in Mishnaic Hebrew and consists of six great divisions or orders each division containing on an average about ten tractates each tractate being made up of several chapters The Mishna may be said to be a compilation of Jewish traditional moral theology liturgy law etc There were other traditions not embodied in the work of Rabbi and these are called additional Mishna The discussions of later generations of rabbis all centred round the text of the Mishna Interpreters or speakers laboured upon it both in Jerusalem and Babylonia until 500 and the results are comprised in the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds The word Talmud means teaching doctrine Each Talmud consists of two parts the Mishna in Hebrew in sixty three tractates and an explanation of the same Gemara ten or twelve times as long The explanatory portion of the Jerusalem Talmud is written in NeoWestern Aramaic and that of the Babylonian Talmud in Eastern Aramaic which is closely allied to Syriac or Mandaic The passages in the Gemara containing additional Mishna are however given in New Hebrew Only thirty nine tractates of the Mishna have Gemara The Talmud then consists of the Mishna traditions from 450 BC till 200 AD together with a commentary thereon Gemara the latter being composed about 200 500 AD Next to the Bible the Babylonian Talmud is the great religious book of orthodox Jews though the Palestinian Talmud is more highly prized by modern scholars From the year 500 till the Middle Ages the rabbis geonim in Babylonia and elsewhere were engaged in commenting on the Talmud and reconciling it with the Bible A list of such commentaries is given in The Jewish Encyclopedia Midrashim Edit Simultaneously with the Mishna and Talmud there grew up a number of Midrashim or commentaries on the Bible some of these were legalistic like the halakhic sections of the Talmud but the most important were of an edifying homiletic character Midrash Aggadah These latter although chronologically later are important for the corroborative light which they throw on the language of the New Testament The Gospel of John is seen to be steeped in early Jewish phraseology and the words of Psalm 109 LXX Hebrew Bible 110 The Lord said to my Lord etc are in one place where applied to the Messiah as they are in Gospel of Matthew 22 44 referenced from Psalm 110 1 though Rashi following the Rabbis interpreted the words in the sense of applying them to Abraham Karaite commentators Edit Anan ben David a prominent Babylonian Jew in the eighth century rejected Rabbinism for the written Old Testament and became the founder of the sect known a Karaites a word indicating their preference for the written Bible This schism produced great energy and ability on both sides The principal Karaite Bible commentators were Nahavendi ninth century Abu al Faraj Harun ninth century exegete and Hebrew grammarian Solomon ben Yerucham tenth century Sahal ben Mazliach died 950 Hebrew grammarian and lexicographer Joseph al Bazir died 930 Japhet ben Ali the greatest Karaite commentator of the tenth century and Judah Hadassi died 1160 Middle Ages Edit Saadiah of Fayum died 942 the most powerful writer against the Karaites translated the Bible into Arabic and added notes Besides commentaries on the Bible Saadiah wrote a systematic treatise bringing revealed religion into harmony with Greek philosophy He thus became the forerunner of Maimonides and the Catholic Schoolmen Solomon ben Isaac called Rashi born 1040 wrote very popular explanations of the Talmud and the Bible Tobiah ben Eliezer a Romaniote scholar and paytan in 11th century Kastoria Greece wrote the Leḳaḥ Ṭov or Pesiḳta Zuṭarta a midrashic commentary on the Pentateuch and the Five Megillot Abraham Ibn Ezra of Toledo died 1168 had a good knowledge of Oriental languages and wrote learned commentaries on the Old Testament He was the first to maintain that Isaiah contains the work of two prophets Moses Maimonides died 1204 the greatest Jewish scholar of the Middle Ages of whom his coreligionists said that from Moses to Moses there was none like Moses wrote his Guide to the Perplexed which was read by St Thomas He was a great admirer of Aristotle who was to him the representative of natural knowledge as the Bible was of the supernatural There were the two Kimchis especially David died 1235 of Narbonne who was a celebrated grammarian lexicographer and commentator inclined to the literal sense He was followed by Nachmanides of Catalonia died 1270 a doctor of medicine who wrote commentaries of a cabbalistic tendency Immanuel of Rome born 1270 and the Karaites Aaron ben Joseph 1294 and Aaron ben Elias fourteenth century Modern Edit Isaac Abarbanel born Lisbon 1437 died Venice 1508 was a statesman and scholar None of his predecessors came so near the modern ideal of a commentator as he did He prefixed general introductions to each book and was the first Jew to make extensive use of Christian commentaries Elias Levita died 1549 and Azarias de Rossi died 1577 have also to be mentioned Moses Mendelssohn of Berlin died 1786 a friend of Lessing translated the Pentateuch into German His commentaries in Hebrew are close learned critical and acute He had much influence and was followed by Wessely Jaroslaw Homberg Euchel Friedlander Hertz Herxheimer Ludwig Philippson etc called Biurists or expositors The modern liberal school among the Jews is represented by Salomon Munk Samuel David Luzzato Leopold Zunz Geiger Julius Furst etc Rabbi Pesach Wolicki born 1970 is a biblical scholar and commentator His book Cup of Salvation also known as Cup of Salvation A Powerful Journey Through King David s Psalms of Praise which was published by the Center for Jewish Christian Understanding and Cooperation CJCUC in 2017 is a devotional biblical commentary on Psalms 113 118 otherwise known as the Hallel Patristic commentaries EditThe history of Christian exegesis may be roughly divided into three periods the Age of the Fathers the Age of Catenae and Scholia seventh to sixteenth century and the Age of Modern Commentaries sixteenth to twentieth century The earliest known commentary on Christian scriptures was by a Gnostic named Heracleon in the 170s CE Most of the patristic commentaries are in the form of homilies or discourses to the faithful and range over the whole of Scripture There are two schools of interpretation that of Alexandria and that of Antioch Alexandrian School Edit The chief writers of the Alexandrian School were Pantaenus Clement of Alexandria Origen of Alexandria Dionysius of Alexandria Didymus the Blind Cyril of Alexandria St Pierius To these may be added St Ambrose who in a moderate degree adopted their systemIts chief characteristic was the allegorical method This was doubtless founded on passages in the Gospels and the Epistles of St Paul but it received a strong impulse from the writings of Alexandrian Jews especially of Philo The great representative of this school was Origen died 254 Origen was the son of Leonides of Alexandria himself a saint and martyr Origen became the master of many great saints and scholars one of the most celebrated being St Gregory Thaumaturgus he was known as the Adamantine on account of his incessant application to study writing lecturing and works of piety He frequently kept seven amanuenses actively employed it was said he became the author of 6000 works Epiphanius Haer lxiv 63 according to St Jerome who reduced the number to 2000 Contra Rufin ii 22 he left more writings than any man could read in a lifetime Ep xxxiii ad Paulam Besides his great labours on the Hexapla he wrote scholia homilies and commentaries on the Old and the New Testament In his scholia he gave short explanations of difficult passages after the manner of his contemporaries the annotators of the Greek classics Most of the scholia in which he chiefly sought the literal sense are unfortunately lost but it is supposed that their substance is embodied in the writings of St John Chrysostom and other Fathers In his other works Origen pushed the allegorical interpretation to the utmost extreme In spite of this however his writings were of great value and with the exception of St Augustine no writer of ancient times had such influence Antiochene School Edit Main article School of Antioch The writers of the Antiochene School disliked the allegorical method and sought almost exclusively the literal primary or historical sense of Holy Scripture The principal writers of this school were St Lucian Eusebius of Nicomedia Maris of Chalcedon Eudoxius Theognis of Nicaea Asterius Arius the heresiarch Diodorus of Antioch Bishop of Tarsus and his three great pupils Theodore of Mopsuestia Theodore s brother Polychronius St John ChrysostomThe great representatives of this school were Diodorus Theodore of Mopsuestia and St John Chrysostom Diodorus who died Bishop of Tarsus 394 followed the literal to the exclusion of the mystical or allegorical sense Theodore was born at Antioch in 347 became Bishop of Mopsuestia and died in the communion of the Church 429 He was a powerful thinker but an obscure and prolix writer He felt intense dislike for the mystical sense and explained the Scriptures in an extremely literal and almost rationalistic manner His pupil Nestorius became the subject of the Nestorian controversy the Nestorians translated his books into Syriac and regarded Theodore as their great Doctor This made Catholics suspicious of his writings which were finally condemned after the famous controversy on The Three Chapters Theodore s commentary on St John s Gospel in Syriac was published with a Latin translation by a Catholic scholar Dr Chabot St John Chrysostom priest of Antioch became Patriarch of Constantinople in 398 He left homilies on most of the books of the Old and the New Testament When St Thomas Aquinas was asked by one of his brethren whether he would not like to be the owner of Paris so that he could dispose of it to the King of France and with the proceeds promote the good works of his order he answered that he would prefer to be the possessor of Chrysostom s Super Matthaeum St Isidore of Pelusium said of him that if the Apostle St Paul could have used Attic speech he would have explained his own Epistles in the identical words of St John Chrysostom Intermediate School Edit Other writers combined both these systems some leaning more to the allegorical and some to the literal sense The principal contributors were Isidore of Pelusium Theodoret St Basil St Gregory of Nazianzus St Gregory of Nyssa St Hilary of Poitiers Ambrosiaster St Jerome St Augustine St Gregory the Great PelagiusJerome besides his translations of Scripture and other works left many commentaries in some of which he departed from the literal meaning of the text At times he did not always indicate when he was quoting from different authors which according to Richard Simon accounts for his apparent discrepancies Medieval commentaries EditThe medieval writers were content to draw from the rich treasures left them by their predecessors Their commentaries consisted for the most part of passages from the Church Fathers which they connected together as in a chain a catena Greek Catenists Edit Procopius of Gaza sixth century one of the first to write a catena St Maximus Martyr seventh century St John Damascene eighth century Olympiodorus tenth century Ecumenius tenth century Nicetas of Constantinople eleventh century Blessed Theophylactus Archbishop in Bulgaria eleventh century Euthymius Zigabenus twelfth century writers of anonymous catenae edited by John Antony Cramer and Cardinal MaiLatin Catenists Scholiasts etc Edit The principal Latin commentators of this period were the Venerable Bede Walafrid Strabo Anselm of Laon Hugh of Saint Cher St Thomas Aquinas and Nicholas de Lyra The Venerable Bede seventh to eighth century a good Greek and Hebrew scholar wrote a useful commentary on most of the books of the Old and the New Testament It is in reality a catena of passages from Greek and Latin Fathers judiciously selected and digested Walafrid Strabo ninth century a Benedictine was credited with the Glossa Ordinaria on the entire Bible It is a brief explanation of the literal and mystical sense based on Rabanus Maurus and other Latin writers and was one of the most popular works during the Middle Ages being as well known as The Sentences of Peter Lombard Anselm of Laon professor at Paris twelfth century wrote the Glossa Interlinearis so called because the explanation was inserted between the lines of the Vulgate Hugh of Saint Cher Hugo de Sancto Caro thirteenth century besides his pioneer Biblical concordance composed a short commentary on the whole of the Scriptures explaining the literal allegorical analogical and moral sense of the text His work was called Postillae i e post illa verba textus because the explanation followed the words of the text Thomas Aquinas thirteenth century left commentaries on Job Psalms Isaiah Epistles of St Paul and was the author of the well known Catena Aurea on the Gospels This consists of quotations from over eighty Church Fathers He throws much light on the literal sense and is most happy in illustrating difficult points by parallel passages from other parts of the Bible Nicholas de Lyra thirteenth century joined the Franciscans in 1291 and brought to the service of the Church knowledge of Hebrew and rabbinical learning He wrote short notes or Postillae on the entire Bible and set forth the literal meaning with great ability especially of the books written in Hebrew This work was most popular and in frequent use during the late Middle Ages and Martin Luther was indebted to it A great impulse was given to exegetical studies by the Council of Vienne which decreed in 1311 that chairs of Hebrew Chaldean and Arabic should be established at Paris Oxford Bologna and Salamanca Besides the major writers already mentioned the following are some of the principal exegetes many of them Benedictines from patristic times till the Council of Trent Cassiodorus sixth century Saint Isidore of Seville seventh century Julian of Toledo seventh century Alcuin eighth century Rabanus Maurus ninth century Druthmar ninth century Remigius of Auxerre ninth century Bruno of Wurzburg a distinguished Greek and Hebrew scholar St Bruno founder of the Carthusians eleventh Gilbert of Poitiers Andrew of Saint Victor twelfth century Rupert of Deutz twelfth century Alexander of Hales thirteenth century Albertus Magnus thirteenth century Paul of Burgos fourteenth to fifteenth Alphonsus Tostatus of Avila fifteenth century Ludolph of Saxony and Dionysius the Carthusian who wrote a commentary on the whole of the Bible Jacobus Faber Stapulensis fifteenth to sixteenth centuries Gagnaeus fifteenth to sixteenth centuries Erasmus and Cardinal Cajetan sixteenth century Syriac commentators Edit Ishodad of Merv fl 850 Jacob Bar Salibi 12th century Gregory Bar Hebraeus 13th century Modern Catholic commentaries EditThe influx of Greek scholars into Italy after the fall of Constantinople the Christian and anti Christian Renaissance the invention of printing the controversial excitement caused by the rise of Protestantism and the publication of polyglot Bibles by Cardinal Ximenes and others gave renewed interest in the study of the Bible among Catholic scholars Controversy showed them the necessity of devoting more attention to the literal meaning of the text according to the wise principle laid down by St Thomas in the beginning of his Summa Theologica It was then that the Jesuits founded in 1534 stepped into the front rank to counter the attacks on the Catholic Church The Ratio Studiorum of the Jesuits made it incumbent on their professors of Scripture to acquire a mastery of Greek Hebrew and other Oriental languages Alfonso Salmeron one of the first companions of Ignatius Loyola and the pope s theologian at the Council of Trent was a distinguished Hebrew scholar and voluminous commentator Bellarmine one of the first Christians to write a Hebrew grammar composed a valuable commentary on the Psalms giving an exposition of the Hebrew Septuagint and Vulgate texts It was published as part of Cornelius a Lapide s commentary on the whole Bible Cornelius a Lapide S J born 1566 was a native of the Low Countries and was well versed in Greek and Hebrew During forty years he devoted himself to teaching and to the composition of his great work which has been highly praised by Protestants as well as Catholics Juan Maldonato a Spanish Jesuit born 1584 wrote commentaries on Isaias Baruch Ezechiel Daniel Psalms Proverbs Canticles Song of Solomon and Ecclesiastes His best work however is his Latin commentary on the Four Gospels which is generally acknowledged to be one of the best ever written When Maldonato was teaching at the University of Paris the hall was filled with eager students before the lecture began and he had frequently to speak in the open air Great as was the merit of the work of Maldonato it was equalled by the commentary on the Epistles by Estius born at Gorcum Holland 1542 a secular priest and superior of the College at Douai These two works are still of the greatest help to the student Many other Jesuits were the authors of valuable exegetical works e g Francis Ribera of Castile born 1514 Cardinal Toletus of Cordova born 1532 Manuel de Sa died 1596 Bonfrere of Dinant born 1573 Mariana of Talavera born 1537 Alcazar of Seville born 1554 Barradius the Apostle of Portugal Sanchez of Alcala died 1628 Nicholas Serarius of Lorraine died 1609 Lorinus of Avignon born 1559 Tirinus of Antwerp born 1580 Menochius of Pavia Pereira of Valencia died 1610 Pineda of SevilleThe Jesuits were rivalled by Arias Montanus died 1598 the editor of the Antwerp Polyglot Bible Sixtus of Siena O P died 1569 Johann Wild Ferus O S F Dominic Soto O P died 1560 Andreas Masius died 1573 Jansen of Ghent died 1576 Genebrard of Cluny died 1597 Antonio Agelli died 1608 Luke of Bruges died 1619 Calasius O S F died 1620 Malvenda O P died 1628 Jansen of Ypres Simeon de Muis died 1644 Jean Morin Oratorian died 1659 Isaac Le Maistre de Sacy John Sylveira Carmelite died 1687 Bossuet died 1704 Richard Simon Oratorian died 1712 Calmet Benedictine who wrote a valuable dictionary of the Bible of which there is an English translation and a highly esteemed commentary on all the books of Scripture died 1757 Louis de Carrieres Oratorian died 1717 Piconio Capuchin died 1709 Bernard Lamy Oratorian died 1715 Pierre Guarin O S B died 1729 Houbigant Oratorian died 1783 William Smits Recollect 1770 Jacques Le Long Oratorian died 1721 Dominikus von Brentano died 1797 Nineteenth century Edit During the nineteenth century the following were a few of the Catholic writers on the Bible John Martin Augustine Scholz Johann Leonhard Hug Johann Jahn Arthur Marie Le Hir Joseph Franz Allioli Mayer van Essen Jean Baptiste Glaire Daniel Bonifacius von Haneberg Guillaume Rene Meignan Franz Xaver Reithmayr Francis Xavier Patrizi Valentin Loch August Bisping his commentary on the New Testament styled excellent by Fulcran Vigouroux Joseph Corluy Louis Claude Fillion Henri Lesetre Trochon Introductions and Comm on Old and New Test La Sainte Bible 27 vols Peter Schegg Louis Bacuez Francis Kenrick John McEvilly Arnauld Paul Schanz Constant Fouard Anthony John Maas Fulcran Vigouroux works of Introduction Ward McIntyre Catholics have also published scientific books There is the great Latin Cursus on the whole of the Bible by the Jesuit Fathers Karl Cornely Joseph Knabenbauer and Franz Hummelauer The writings of Marie Joseph Lagrange Les Juges Albert Condamin Isaie Theodore Calmes Saint Jean Albin van Hoonacker Les Douze Petits Prophetes For a list of Catholic publications on the Scripture the reader may be referred to the Revue biblique edited by Lagrange Jerusalem and Paris and the Biblische Zeitschrift published by Herder Freiburg im Breisgau For further information concerning the principal Catholic commentators see respective articles Twentieth century Edit Haydock s Catholic Bible Commentary 1859 edition by Rev Fr George Leo Haydock following the Douay Rheims Bible A Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture 1953 edited by Bernard Orchard Edmund F Sutcliffe Reginald C Fuller Ralph Russell foreword by Cardinal Bernard Griffin Archbishop of Westminster A New Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture 1969 Thomas Nelson Publishers Collegeville Bible Commentary 1989 edited by Dianne Bergant C S A Robert J Karris O F M Liturgical Press Jerome Biblical Commentary 1968 edited by Raymond Edward Brown SS Joseph A Fitzmyer SJ and Roland E Murphy primarily Catholic authors New Jerome Biblical Commentary 1990 edited by Raymond Edward Brown SS Joseph A Fitzmyer SJ and Roland E Murphy primarily Catholic authors The International Bible Commentary 1998 edited by William R Farmer Liturgical PressTwenty first century Edit The Navarre Bible 2004 commentary to the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition text by the faculty of the University of Navarra Sacra Pagina 2008 edited by Daniel J Harrington SJ New Collegeville Bible Commentary 2015 edited by Daniel Durken OSB Ignatius Catholic Study Bible Series 2017 edited by Scott Hahn and Curtis Mitch The Paulist Biblical Commentary 2018 edited by Joel Enrique Aguilar Chiu Richard J Clifford SJ Carol J Dempsey OP Eileen M Schuller OSU Thomas D Stegman SJ Ronald D Witherup PSS Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture 2019 edited by Peter S Williamson and Mary Healey of the Pontifical Gregorian University The Jerome Biblical Commentary for the Twenty First Century 2022 edited by John J Collins Gina Hens Piazza Barbara Reid OP and Donald Senior CP Modern Orthodox commentaries EditThe Explanatory Bible of Aleksandr Lopukhin and successors 1904 1913 is written by professors of Russian theological seminaries and academies It s based on Russian Synodal Translation its authors apply to ancient sources of the text Masoretic Text Septuagint etc At the present time is the only full Russian Orthodox Bible commentary on both canonical and deuterocanonical books of the Scripture The Lopukhin Bible was republished in 1987 by Biblical Societies of Northern Europe countries 2 The Orthodox Study Bible is an English language translation and annotation of the Septuagint with references to the Masoretic Text in its Old Testament part and its New Testament part it represents the NKJV which uses the Textus Receptus representing 94 of Greek manuscripts It offers commentary and other material to show the Eastern Orthodox Christian understanding of Scripture often in opposite to catholic and Protestant ideas Additionally the OSB provides basic daily prayers a lectionary for personal use and reproductions of icons in its pages 3 Protestant commentaries EditIn general Edit The commentaries of the first Reformers Luther Melanchthon Calvin Zwingli and their followers wrote on Holy Scripture during the 16th 17th and 18th centuries Anglicans Lightfoot Arminians Grotius van Limborch le Clerc Calvinists Calvin Drusius de Dieu Cappel Samuel Bochart Cocceius Vitringa John Gill Lutherans Luther Gerhard Geier Calov Calov Bible S Schmid Michaelis Lange Melanchthon Socinians Crell Schlichting English writers Matthew Poole Annotations 1700 2 volumes Folio Genesis Isaiah 58 written by Poole Isaiah 59 Revelations by friends the basis of subsequent reprints Matthew Henry An Exposition of the Old and New Testaments 1708 1710 5 volumes Folio modern editions derive from early 19th century editions Mayer Samuel Clark The Old and New Testaments with Annotations and Parallel Scriptures 1690 and Survey of the Bible or An Analytical Account of the Holy Scriptures 1693 William Lowth Commentary on the Prophets 1714 1725 William Dodd Commentary on the Books of the Old and New Testaments 1770 3 volumes Folio John Wesley Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament ca 1791 2 volumes The so called Reformers Bible The Holy Bible containing the Old and New Testaments according to the Authorized Version with short Notes by several learned and pious Reformers as printed by Royal Authority at the time of the Reformation with additional Notes and Dissertations London 1810 During the nineteenth century Joseph Priestley 1803 George Burder 1809 George D Oyly and Richard Mant 1820 Adam Clarke 8 vols 1810 1826 Joseph Benson 5 vols 1811 1818 Benjamin Boothroyd 1823 Hebrew scholar Thomas Scott 1822 popular Bloomfield Greek Test with Eng notes 1832 Kuinoel Philological Comm on New Test 1828 Hermann Olshausen 1839 Haevernick 1845 Michael Baumgarten 1859 Friedrich Tholuck 1843 Richard Chenevix Trench Parables Sermon on the Mount Miracles N T Syn The Speakers Commentary edited by Frederic Charles Cook Henry Alford Greek Testament with critical and exegetical commentary 1856 Franz Delitzsch 1870 Ebrard Hengstenberg 1869 Christopher Wordsworth The Greek Testament with notes 1877 Johann Friedrich Karl Keil Charles Ellicott Epistles of St Paul W J Conybeare and J S Howson St Paul Johann Peter Lange together with Schroeder Fay Cassel Bacher Zoeckler Moll etc Old and N Test 1864 78 Thomas Lewin St Paul 1878 H C G Moule Epistles of St Paul Beet Gloag Perowne Joseph Barber Lightfoot Epistles of St Paul Brooke Foss WestcottThere were many commentaries published at Cambridge Oxford London etc see publishers catalogues and notices in Expositor Expository Times and Journal of Theological Studies Other notable writers include Frederic W Farrar Andrew B Davidson Andrew R Fausset Alfred A Plummer Robert Plumptre George Salmon Henry Barclay Swete F F Bruce Marcus Dods theologian born 1834 Dean Stanley S R Driver William T Kirkpatrick William Sanday A T Robinson Philip Schaff Charles Augustus Briggs Ezra Palmer Gould Cyrus ScofieldThere are also the Bible dictionaries of Kitto Smith and Hastings Many of these works especially the later ones are valuable for their scientific method though not of equal value for their views or conclusions Prominent series include Concordia Commentary series Expositor s Bible Commentary EBC Expositor s Bible Commentary revised REBC International Critical Commentary ICC Interpretation A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching New Century Bible Commentaries now out of print 4 New International Commentary on the Old Testament NICOT New International Commentary on the New Testament NICNT New International Greek Testament Commentary NIGTC Pillar New Testament Commentary PNTC Popular Commentary of the Bible Paul E Kretzmann 4 Vols 1921 1924 5 Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries TOTC Tyndale New Testament Commentaries TNTC One volume Commentaries Jamieson Fausset Brown Bible Commentary 1871 A Commentary on the Holy Bible edited by J R Dummelow 1909 Peake s Commentary on the Bible edited by Arthur Samuel Peake 1919 Revised edition edited by Matthew Black and H H Rowley 1962 The Interpreter s One Volume Commentary on the Bible 1971 Harper s Bible Commentary edited by James L Mays 1988 The Oxford Bible Commentary edited by John Barton and John Muddiman 2001 A notable recent specialist commentary is Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament 2007 edited by G K Beale and D A Carson Rationalistic commentaries Edit The English deists included Lord Herbert of Cherbury died 1648 Thomas Hobbes Charles Blount John Toland Anthony Ashley Cooper 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury Bernard Mandeville Anthony Collins Thomas Woolston Matthew Tindal Thomas Morgan Thomas Chubb Lord Bolingbroke died 1751 Peter Annet David Hume died 1776 who while admitting the existence of God rejected the supernatural and made attacks on different parts of the Old and the New TestamentThey were opposed by these writers author incomplete Isaac Newton Cudworth Boyle Bentley Lesley John Locke Ibbot Whiston S Clarke Thomas Sherlock Chandler Gilbert West George Lyttelton 1st Baron Lyttelton Waterland Foster Warburton Leland Law Lardner Watt Butler The opinions of the English rationalists were disseminated on the Continent by Voltaire and others In Germany the ground was prepared by the philosophy of Wolff and the writings of his disciple Semler The posthumous writings of Reimarus were published by Lessing between 1774 78 The Fragments of Wolfenbuttel Lessing pretended that the author was unknown According to the Fragments Moses Christ and the Apostles were impostors Lessing was vigorously attacked especially by Goeze Eichhorn in his Introduction to the Old Testament Leipzig 1780 83 3 vols maintained that the Scriptures were genuine productions but that as the Jews saw the intervention of God in the most ordinary natural occurrences the miracles should be explained naturally Heinrich Paulus 1761 1850 following the lead of Eichhorn applied to the Gospels the naturalistic method of explaining miracles G L Bauer Heyne died 1812 and Creuzer denied the authenticity of the greater portion of the Pentateuch and compared it to the mythology of the Greeks and Romans The greatest advocate of such views was de Wette 1780 1849 a pupil of Paulus In his Introduction to the Old Testament 1806 he maintained that the miraculous narratives of the Old Testament were popular legends which in the course of centuries became transformed and transfused with the marvellous and the supernatural and were finally committed to writing in perfectly good faith David Strauss 1808 74 applied this mythical explanation to the Gospels 6 He showed most clearly that if with Paulus the Gospels are allowed to be authentic the attempt to explain the miracles naturally breaks down completely Strauss rejected the authenticity and regarded the miraculous accounts in the Gospels as naive legends the productions of the pious imaginations of the early generations of Christians The views of Strauss were severely criticized by the Catholics Kuhn Mack Hug and Sepp and by the Protestants Neander Tholuck Ullman Lange Ewald Riggenbach Weiss and Keim The German Protestant scholar F C Baur originated a theory which was for a time in great vogue but which was afterwards abandoned by the majority of critics He held that the New Testament contains the writings of two antagonistic parties amongst the Apostles and early Christians His principal followers were Zeller Schwegler Planck Koslin Ritsch Hilgenfeld Volkmar Tobler Keim Hosten some of whom however emancipated themselves from their master Besides the writers already mentioned the following wrote in a rationalistic spirit Ernesti died 1781 Berthold 1822 the Rosenmullers Crusius 1843 Bertheau Hupfeld Ewald Thenius Fritzsche Justi Gesenius died 1842 Longerke Bleek Bunsen 1860 Umbreit Kleinert Knobel Nicolas Hirzel Kuenen J C K von Hoffmann Hitzig died 1875 Schulz 1869 B Weiss Ernest Renan Tuch Heinrich A W Meyer and his continuators Huther Luneman Dusterdieck Bruckner etc Julius Wellhausen Wieseler Julicher Beyschlag H Holtzmann and his collaborators Schmiedel von Soden Holtzmann while practically admitting the authenticity of the Gospels especially of St Mark explains away the miracles He believes that miracles do not happen and that the scripture are merely echoes of Old Testament miracle stories Holtzmann was severely taken to task by several writers in the International Critical Commentary The activity of so many acute minds has thrown great light on the language and literature of the Bible Modern non aligned commentaries EditAnchor Yale Bible International Critical CommentarySee also EditBiblical hermeneutics Biblical studies Exegesis Hermeneutics Jewish commentaries on the BibleReferences Edit Herbermann Charles ed 1913 Commentaries on the Bible Catholic Encyclopedia New York Robert Appleton Company Tolkovaya Bibliya A P Lopuhina Ekzeget ru Commentaries on the Holy Scripture The Comprehensive New Testamentnotes that this is an accurate translation of the Koine Received or Ecclesiastical Text instead of the modern reasoned eclectic Alexandrian text base in Nestle Aland UBS based on three ancient manuscripts representative of a small part of Christian tradition Codices Sinaiticus Vaticanus and Alexandrinus and Archimandrite Ephrem Book Review The Orthodox Study Bible Orthodox Christian Information Center Best Bible Commentaries New Century Bible Commentary accessed 8 February 2021 Kretzmann s Popular Commentary of the Bible David Strauss 1835 The Life of Jesus Critically Examined translated into English by Marian Evans 1860 Calvin Blanchard This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain Herbermann Charles ed 1913 Commentaries on the Bible Catholic Encyclopedia New York Robert Appleton Company External public domain Bible commentaries EditWith the rise of the Internet many Public Domain or otherwise free use Bible commentaries have become available online Here is a list of some of the commentaries The Grace Commentary by Dr Paul Ellis Verse to Verse by Robb Moser Notes on the New Testament by Albert Barnes Commentaries by John Calvin Commentaries by Adam Clarke Exposition of the Bible by John Gill Synopsis of the Bible by John Darby Complete Commentary by Matthew Henry The Popular Commentary of the Bible by Paul E Kretzmann Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible by Robert Jamieson A R Fausset and David Brown Commentary by William Kelly Commentary on Galatians at CCEL by Luther Robertson s Word Pictures of the New Testament Explanatory Notes by John Wesley Bible Commentary Forever EasyEnglish Bible Commentaries by MissionAssistMany public domain commentaries are now available to view or download through the Google Books Project and the Internet Archive FreeCommentaries com is curating a list of free commentaries from these and other sources The Christian Classics Ethereal Library has presented a unified reference tool to access many commentaries from different traditions in their World Wide Study Bible With all the commentaries now available several resources review and recommend commentaries including Tyndale Seminary s Old Testament Reading Room and New Testament Reading Room Challies Best Commentaries and Lingonier Ministries Further reading EditEvans John 2010 A Guide to Biblical Commentaries amp Reference Works for students and pastors Oakland TN Doulos Resources ISBN 978 0 9828715 6 0 Glynn John 2003 Commentary amp Reference Survey A Comprehensive Guide to Biblical and Theological Resources Grand Rapids Mich Kregel Academic amp Professional ISBN 0 8254 2736 3 Portals Bible Christianity Judaism Religion Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title List of biblical commentaries amp oldid 1105679238, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.