James Chadwick

For the bishop, see James Chadwick (bishop). For the American gynaecologist, see James Read Chadwick.

Sir James Chadwick, CH, FRS (20 October 1891 – 24 July 1974) was an English physicist who was awarded the 1935 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of the neutron in 1932. In 1941, he wrote the final draft of the MAUD Report, which inspired the U.S. government to begin serious atom bomb research efforts. He was the head of the British team that worked on the Manhattan Project during World War II. He was knighted in Britain in 1945 for his achievements in physics.

Sir James Chadwick CH FRS
Chadwick c. 1945
Born	(1891-10-20)20 October 1891 Bollington, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Died	24 July 1974(1974-07-24) (aged 82) Cambridge, United Kingdom
Alma mater	University of Manchester University of Cambridge
Known for	Discovery of the neutron MAUD Committee Report Manhattan Project
Awards	Fellow of the Royal Society (1927) Hughes Medal (1932) Nobel Prize in Physics (1935) Knight Bachelor (1945) Melchett Medal (1946) Copley Medal (1950) Faraday Medal (1950) Franklin Medal (1951) Guthrie Medal and Prize (1967) Companion of Honour (1970)
Scientific career
Fields	Physics
Institutions	Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt University of Liverpool Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge Manhattan Project
Doctoral advisor	Ernest Rutherford
Doctoral students	Étienne Biéler^[1] Charles Drummond Ellis^[1] Ernest C. Pollard^[1] Maurice Goldhaber^[1] Louis Harold Gray Joseph Rotblat
Signature

Chadwick graduated from the Victoria University of Manchester in 1911, where he studied under Ernest Rutherford (known as the "father of nuclear physics").^[2] At Manchester, he continued to study under Rutherford until he was awarded his MSc in 1913. The same year, Chadwick was awarded an 1851 Research Fellowship from the Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851. He elected to study beta radiation under Hans Geiger in Berlin. Using Geiger's recently developed Geiger counter, Chadwick was able to demonstrate that beta radiation produced a continuous spectrum, and not discrete lines as had been thought. Still in Germany when World War I broke out in Europe, he spent the next four years in the Ruhleben internment camp.

After the war, Chadwick followed Rutherford to the Cavendish Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, where Chadwick earned his Doctor of Philosophy degree under Rutherford's supervision from Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, in June 1921. He was Rutherford's assistant director of research at the Cavendish Laboratory for over a decade at a time when it was one of the world's foremost centres for the study of physics, attracting students like John Cockcroft, Norman Feather, and Mark Oliphant. Chadwick followed his discovery of the neutron by measuring its mass. He anticipated that neutrons would become a major weapon in the fight against cancer. Chadwick left the Cavendish Laboratory in 1935 to become a professor of physics at the University of Liverpool, where he overhauled an antiquated laboratory and, by installing a cyclotron, made it an important centre for the study of nuclear physics.

During the Second World War, Chadwick carried out research as part of the Tube Alloys project to build an atom bomb, while his Manchester lab and environs were harassed by Luftwaffe bombing. When the Quebec Agreement merged his project with the American Manhattan Project, he became part of the British Mission, and worked at the Los Alamos Laboratory and in Washington, D.C. He surprised everyone by earning the almost-complete trust of project director Leslie R. Groves, Jr. For his efforts, Chadwick received a knighthood in the New Year Honours on 1 January 1945. In July 1945, he viewed the Trinity nuclear test. After this, he served as the British scientific advisor to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission. Uncomfortable with the trend toward Big Science, he became the Master of Gonville and Caius College in 1948. He retired in 1959.

Education and early life

James Chadwick was born in Bollington, Cheshire, on 20 October 1891,^[3][4] the first child of John Joseph Chadwick, a cotton spinner, and Anne Mary Knowles, a domestic servant. He was named James after his paternal grandfather. In 1895, his parents moved to Manchester, leaving him in the care of his maternal grandparents. He went to Bollington Cross Primary School, and was offered a scholarship to Manchester Grammar School, which his family had to turn down as they could not afford the small fees that still had to be paid. Instead he attended the Central Grammar School for Boys in Manchester, rejoining his parents there. He now had two younger brothers, Harry and Hubert; a sister had died in infancy. At the age of 16, he sat two examinations for university scholarships, and won both of them.^[5][6]

Chadwick chose to attend Victoria University of Manchester, which he entered in 1908. He meant to study mathematics, but enrolled in physics by mistake. Like most students, he lived at home, walking the 4 miles (6.4 km) to the university and back each day. At the end of his first year, he was awarded a Heginbottom Scholarship to study physics. The physics department was headed by Ernest Rutherford, who assigned research projects to final-year students, and he instructed Chadwick to devise a means of comparing the amount of radioactive energy of two different sources. The idea was that they could be measured in terms of the activity of 1 gram (0.035 oz) of radium, a unit of measurement which would become known as the curie. Rutherford's suggested approach was unworkable—something Chadwick knew but was afraid to tell Rutherford—so Chadwick pressed on, and eventually devised the required method. The results became Chadwick's first paper, which, co-authored with Rutherford, was published in 1912.^[7] He graduated with first class honours in 1911.^[8]

Having devised a means of measuring gamma radiation, Chadwick proceeded to measure the absorption of gamma rays by various gases and liquids. This time the resulting paper was published under his name alone. He was awarded his Master of Science (MSc) degree in 1912, and was appointed a Beyer Fellow. The following year he was awarded an 1851 Exhibition Scholarship, which allowed him to study and research at a university in continental Europe. He elected to go to the Physikalisch-Technische Reichsanstalt in Berlin in 1913, to study beta radiation under Hans Geiger.^[9] Using Geiger's recently developed Geiger counter, which provided more accuracy than the earlier photographic techniques, he was able to demonstrate that beta radiation did not produce discrete lines, as has been previously thought, but rather a continuous spectrum with peaks in certain regions.^{[10][11][12][13]} On a visit to Geiger's laboratory, Albert Einstein told Chadwick that: "I can explain either of these things, but I can't explain them both at the same time."^[12] The continuous spectrum would remain an unexplained phenomenon for many years.^[14]

Chadwick was still in Germany at the start of the First World War, and was interned in the Ruhleben internment camp near Berlin, where he was allowed to set up a laboratory in the stables and conduct scientific experiments using improvised materials such as radioactive toothpaste.^[15] With the help of Charles Drummond Ellis, he worked on the ionisation of phosphorus, and the photochemical reaction of carbon monoxide and chlorine.^[16][17] He was released after the Armistice with Germany came into effect in November 1918, and returned to his parents' home in Manchester, where he wrote up his findings over the previous four years for the 1851 Exhibition commissioners.^[18]

Rutherford gave Chadwick a part-time teaching position at Manchester, allowing him to continue research.^[18] He looked at the nuclear charge of platinum, silver, and copper, and experimentally found that this was the same as the atomic number within an error of less than 1.5 per cent.^[19] In April 1919, Rutherford became director of the Cavendish Laboratory at the University of Cambridge, and Chadwick joined him there a few months later. Chadwick was awarded a Clerk-Maxwell studentship in 1920, and enrolled as a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) student at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. The first half of his thesis was his work with atomic numbers. In the second, he looked at the forces inside the nucleus. His degree was awarded in June 1921.^[20] In November, he became a Fellow of Gonville and Caius College.^[21]

Researcher

Cambridge

Chadwick's Clerk-Maxwell studentship expired in 1923, and he was succeeded by the Russian physicist Pyotr Kapitza. The Chairman of the Advisory Council of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Sir William McCormick arranged for Chadwick to become Rutherford's assistant director of research. In this role, Chadwick helped Rutherford select PhD students. Over the next few years these would include John Cockcroft, Norman Feather and Mark Oliphant, who would become firm friends with Chadwick. As many students had no idea what they wanted to research, Rutherford and Chadwick would suggest topics. Chadwick edited all the papers produced by the laboratory.^[22]

 

The original building of the Cavendish Laboratory was the home of some of the great discoveries in physics. It was founded in 1874 by the Duke of Devonshire (whose family name was Cavendish), and its first professor was James Clerk Maxwell. The Laboratory has since moved to West Cambridge.^[23]

In 1925, Chadwick met Aileen Stewart-Brown, the daughter of a Liverpool stockbroker. The two were married in August 1925,^[22] with Kapitza as Best Man. The couple had twin daughters, Joanna and Judith, who were born in February 1927.^[24]

In his research, Chadwick continued to probe the nucleus. In 1925, the concept of spin had allowed physicists to explain the Zeeman effect, but it also created unexplained anomalies. At the time it was believed that the nucleus consisted of protons and electrons, so nitrogen's nucleus, for example, with a mass number of 14, was assumed to contain 14 protons and 7 electrons. This gave it the right mass and charge, but the wrong spin.^[25]

At a conference at Cambridge on beta particles and gamma rays in 1928, Chadwick met Geiger again. Geiger had brought with him a new model of his Geiger counter, which had been improved by his post-doctoral student Walther Müller. Chadwick had not used one since the war, and the new Geiger–Müller counter was potentially a major improvement over the scintillation techniques then in use at Cambridge, which relied on the human eye for observation. The major drawback with it was that it detected alpha, beta and gamma radiation, and radium, which the Cavendish laboratory normally used in its experiments, emitted all three, and was therefore unsuitable for what Chadwick had in mind. However, polonium is an alpha emitter, and Lise Meitner sent Chadwick about 2 millicuries (about 0.5 μg) from Germany.^[26][27]

In Germany, Walther Bothe and his student Herbert Becker had used polonium to bombard beryllium with alpha particles, producing an unusual form of radiation. Chadwick had his Australian 1851 Exhibition scholar, Hugh Webster, duplicate their results. To Chadwick, this was evidence of something that he and Rutherford had been hypothesising for years: the neutron, a theoretical nuclear particle with no electric charge.^[26] Then in January 1932, Feather drew Chadwick's attention to another surprising result. Frédéric and Irène Joliot-Curie had succeeded in knocking protons from paraffin wax using polonium and beryllium as a source for what they thought was gamma radiation. Rutherford and Chadwick disagreed; protons were too heavy for that. But neutrons would need only a small amount of energy to achieve the same effect. In Rome, Ettore Majorana came to the same conclusion: the Joliot-Curies had discovered the neutron but did not know it.^[28]

 

Sir Ernest Rutherford's laboratory

Chadwick dropped all his other responsibilities to concentrate on proving the existence of the neutron, assisted by Feather^[29] and frequently working late at night. He devised a simple apparatus that consisted of a cylinder containing a polonium source and beryllium target. The resulting radiation could then be directed at a material such as paraffin wax; the displaced particles, which were protons, would go into a small ionisation chamber where they could be detected with an oscilloscope.^[28] In February 1932, after only about two weeks of experimentation with neutrons,^[15] Chadwick sent a letter to Nature titled "Possible Existence of a Neutron".^[30] He communicated his findings in detail in an article sent to Proceedings of the Royal Society A titled "The Existence of a Neutron" in May.^[31][32] His discovery of the neutron was a milestone in understanding the nucleus. Reading Chadwick's paper, Robert Bacher and Edward Condon realised that anomalies in the then-current theory, like the spin of nitrogen, would be resolved if the neutron has a spin of 1/2 and that a nitrogen nucleus consisted of seven protons and seven neutrons.^[33][34]

The theoretical physicists Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg considered whether the neutron could be a fundamental nuclear particle like the proton and electron, rather than a proton–electron pair.^{[35][36][37][38]} Heisenberg showed that the neutron was best described as a new nuclear particle,^[37][38] but its exact nature remained unclear. In his 1933 Bakerian Lecture, Chadwick estimated that a neutron had a mass of about 1.0067 u. Since a proton and an electron had a combined mass of 1.0078 u, this implied the neutron as a proton–electron composite had a binding energy of about 2 MeV, which sounded reasonable,^[39] although it was hard to understand how a particle with so little binding energy could be stable.^[38] Estimating such a small mass difference required challenging precise measurements, however, and several conflicting results were obtained in 1933–4. By bombarding boron with alpha particles, Frédéric and Irène Joliot-Curie obtained a large value for the mass of a neutron, but Ernest Lawrence's team at the University of California produced a small one.^[40] Then Maurice Goldhaber, a refugee from Nazi Germany and a graduate student at the Cavendish Laboratory, suggested to Chadwick that deuterons could be photodisintegrated by the 2.6 MeV gamma rays of ²⁰⁸Tl (then known as thorium C"):

^2 1D

+

γ

→

^1 1H

+

n

An accurate value for the mass of the neutron could be determined from this process. Chadwick and Goldhaber tried this and found that it worked.^[41][42][43] They measured the kinetic energy of the proton produced as 1.05 MeV, leaving the mass of the neutron as the unknown in the equation. Chadwick and Goldhaber calculated that it was either 1.0084 or 1.0090 atomic units, depending on the values used for the masses of the proton and deuteron.^[44][43] (The modern accepted value for the mass of the neutron is 1.00866 u.) The mass of the neutron was too large to be a proton–electron pair.^[44]

For his discovery of the neutron, Chadwick was awarded the Hughes Medal by the Royal Society in 1932, the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1935, the Copley Medal in 1950 and the Franklin Medal in 1951.^[6] His discovery of the neutron made it possible to produce elements heavier than uranium in the laboratory by the capture of slow neutrons followed by beta decay. Unlike the positively charged alpha particles, which are repelled by the electrical forces present in the nuclei of other atoms, neutrons do not need to overcome any Coulomb barrier, and can therefore penetrate and enter the nuclei of even the heaviest elements such as uranium. This inspired Enrico Fermi to investigate the nuclear reactions brought about by collisions of nuclei with slow neutrons, work for which Fermi would receive the Nobel Prize in 1938.^[45]

Wolfgang Pauli proposed another kind of particle on 4 December 1930 in order to explain the continuous spectrum of beta radiation that Chadwick had reported in 1914. Since not all of the energy of beta radiation could be accounted for, the law of conservation of energy appeared to be violated, but Pauli argued that this could be redressed if another, undiscovered, particle was involved.^[46] Pauli also called this particle a neutron, but it was clearly not the same particle as Chadwick's neutron. Fermi renamed it the neutrino, Italian for "little neutron".^[47] In 1934, Fermi proposed his theory of beta decay which explained that the electrons emitted from the nucleus were created by the decay of a neutron into a proton, an electron, and a neutrino.^[48][49] The neutrino could account for the missing energy, but a particle with little mass and no electric charge was difficult to observe. Rudolf Peierls and Hans Bethe calculated that neutrinos could easily pass through the Earth, so the chances of detecting them were slim.^[50][51] Frederick Reines and Clyde Cowan would confirm the neutrino on 14 June 1956 by placing a detector within a large antineutrino flux from a nearby nuclear reactor.^[52]

Liverpool

With the onset of the Great Depression in the United Kingdom, the government became more parsimonious with funding for science. At the same time, Lawrence's recent invention, the cyclotron, promised to revolutionise experimental nuclear physics, and Chadwick felt that the Cavendish laboratory would fall behind unless it also acquired one. He therefore chafed under Rutherford, who clung to the belief that good nuclear physics could still be done without large, expensive equipment, and turned down the request for a cyclotron.^[53]

 

"Red brick" Victoria Building at the University of Liverpool

Chadwick was himself a critic of Big Science in general, and Lawrence in particular, whose approach he considered careless and focused on technology at the expense of science. When Lawrence postulated the existence of a new and hitherto unknown particle that he claimed was a possible source of limitless energy at the Solvay Conference in 1933, Chadwick responded that the results were more likely attributable to contamination of the equipment.^[54] While Lawrence rechecked his results at Berkeley only to find that Chadwick was correct, Rutherford and Oliphant conducted an investigation at the Cavendish that found that deuterium fuses to form helium-3, thereby causing the effect that Lawrence had observed. This was another major discovery, but the Oliphant-Rutherford particle accelerator was an expensive state-of-the-art piece of equipment.^{[55][56][57][58]}

In March 1935, Chadwick received an offer of the Lyon Jones Chair of physics at the University of Liverpool, in his wife's home town, to succeed Lionel Wilberforce. The laboratory was so antiquated that it still ran on direct current electricity, but Chadwick seized the opportunity, assuming the chair on 1 October 1935. The university's prestige was soon bolstered by Chadwick's Nobel Prize, which was announced in November 1935.^[59] His medal was sold at auction in 2014 for $329,000.^[60]

Chadwick set about acquiring a cyclotron for Liverpool. He started by spending £700 to refurbish the antiquated laboratories at Liverpool, so some components could be made in-house.^[61] He was able to persuade the university to provide £2,000 and obtained a grant for another £2,000 from the Royal Society.^[62] To build his cyclotron, Chadwick brought in two young experts, Bernard Kinsey and Harold Walke, who had worked with Lawrence at the University of California. A local cable manufacturer donated the copper conductor for the coils. The cyclotron's 50-ton magnet was manufactured in Trafford Park by Metropolitan-Vickers, which also made the vacuum chamber.^[63] The cyclotron was completely installed and running in July 1939. The total cost of £5,184 was more than Chadwick had received from the University and the Royal Society, so Chadwick paid the rest from his 159,917 kr (£8,243) Nobel Prize money.^[64]

At Liverpool the Medicine and Science faculties worked together closely. Chadwick was automatically a committee member of both faculties, and in 1938 he was appointed to a commission headed by Lord Derby to investigate the arrangements for cancer treatment in Liverpool. Chadwick anticipated that neutrons and radioactive isotopes produced with the 37-inch cyclotron could be used to study biochemical processes, and might become a weapon in the fight against cancer.^[65][66]

Second World War

Tube Alloys and the MAUD Report

In Germany, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann bombarded uranium with neutrons, and noted that barium, a lighter element, was among the products produced. Hitherto, only the same or heavier elements had been produced by the process. In January 1939, Meitner and her nephew Otto Frisch astounded the physics community with a paper that explained this result.^[67] They theorised that uranium atoms bombarded with neutrons can break into two roughly equal fragments, a process they called fission. They calculated that this would result in the release of about 200 MeV, implying an energy release orders of magnitude greater than chemical reactions,^[68] and Frisch confirmed their theory experimentally.^[69] It was soon noted by Hahn that if neutrons were released during fission, then a chain reaction was possible.^[70] French scientists, Pierre Joliot, Hans von Halban and Lew Kowarski, soon verified that more than one neutron was indeed emitted per fission.^[71] In a paper co-authored with the American physicist John Wheeler, Bohr theorised that fission was more likely to occur in the uranium-235 isotope, which made up only 0.7 per cent of natural uranium.^[72][73]

 

Key British physicists. Left to right: William Penney, Otto Robert Frisch, Rudolf Peierls and John Cockcroft. They are wearing the American Medal of Freedom.

Chadwick did not believe that there was any likelihood of another war with Germany in 1939, and took his family for a holiday on a remote lake in northern Sweden. The news of the outbreak of the Second World War therefore came as a shock. Determined not to spend another war in an internment camp, Chadwick made his way to Stockholm as fast as he could, but when he arrived there with his family, he found that all air traffic between Stockholm and London had been suspended. They made their way back to England on a tramp steamer. When he reached Liverpool, Chadwick found Joseph Rotblat, a Polish post-doctoral fellow who had come to work with the cyclotron, was now destitute, as he was cut off from funds from Poland. Chadwick promptly hired Rotblat as a lecturer, despite his poor grasp of English.^[74]

In October 1939, Chadwick received a letter from Sir Edward Appleton, the Secretary of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, asking for his opinion on the feasibility of an atom bomb. Chadwick responded cautiously. He did not dismiss the possibility, but carefully went over the many theoretical and practical difficulties involved. Chadwick decided to investigate the properties of uranium oxide further with Rotblat.^[75] In March 1940, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls at the University of Birmingham re-examined the theoretical issues involved in a paper that became known as the Frisch–Peierls memorandum. Instead of looking at unenriched uranium oxide, they considered what would happen to a sphere of pure uranium-235, and found that not only could a chain reaction occur, but that it might require as little as 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of uranium-235, and unleash the energy of tons of dynamite.^[76]

 

Part of Liverpool devastated by the Blitz

A special subcommittee of the Committee for the Scientific Survey of Air Warfare (CSSAW), known as the MAUD Committee, was created to investigate the matter further. It was chaired by Sir George Thomson and its original membership included Chadwick, along with Mark Oliphant, John Cockcroft and Philip Moon.^[77] While other teams investigated uranium enrichment techniques, Chadwick's team at Liverpool concentrated on determining the nuclear cross section of uranium-235.^[78] By April 1941, it had been experimentally confirmed that the critical mass of uranium-235 might be 8 kilograms (18 lb) or less.^[79] His research into such matters was complicated by all-but-incessant Luftwaffe bombings of the environs of his Liverpool lab; the windows were blown out so often that they were replaced by cardboard.^[80]

In July 1941, Chadwick was chosen to write the final draft of the MAUD Report, which, when presented by Vannevar Bush to President Franklin D. Roosevelt in October 1941, inspired the U.S. government to pour millions of dollars into the pursuit of an atom bomb.^[81] When George B. Pegram and Harold Urey visited Britain to see how the project,^[82] now known as Tube Alloys,^[83] was going, Chadwick was able to tell them: "I wish I could tell you that the bomb is not going to work, but I am 90 per cent sure that it will."^[82]

In a recent book about the Bomb project, Graham Farmelo wrote that "Chadwick did more than any other scientist to give Churchill the Bomb. ... Chadwick was tested almost to the breaking point."^[84] So worried that he could not sleep, Chadwick resorted to sleeping pills, which he continued to take for most of his remaining years. Chadwick later said that he realised that "a nuclear bomb was not only possible—it was inevitable. Sooner or later these ideas could not be peculiar to us. Everybody would think about them before long, and some country would put them into action".^[85] Sir Hermann Bondi suggested that it was fortunate that Chadwick, not Rutherford, was the doyen of UK physics at the time, as the latter's prestige might otherwise have overpowered Chadwick's interest in "looking forward" to the Bomb's prospects.^[86]

Manhattan Project

 

Mackenzie King, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill at the first Quebec Conference in 1943

Owing to the danger from aerial bombardment, the Chadwicks sent their twins to Canada as part of a government evacuation scheme.^[87] Chadwick was reluctant to move Tube Alloys there, believing that the United Kingdom was a better location for the isotope separation plant.^[88] The enormous scope of the effort became more apparent in 1942: even a pilot separation plant would cost over £1 million and strain Britain's resources, to say nothing of a full-scale plant, which was estimated to cost somewhere in the vicinity of £25 million. It would have to be built in America.^[89] At the same time that the British became convinced that a joint project was necessary, the progress of the American Manhattan Project was such that British cooperation seemed less essential, although the Americans were still eager to utilise Chadwick's talents.^[90]

The matter of cooperation had to be taken up at the highest level. In September 1943, the Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, and President Roosevelt negotiated the Quebec Agreement, which reinstated cooperation between Britain, the United States and Canada. Chadwick, Oliphant, Peierls and Simon were summoned to the United States by the director of Tube Alloys, Sir Wallace Akers, to work with the Manhattan Project. The Quebec Agreement established a new Combined Policy Committee to direct the joint project. The Americans disliked Akers, so Chadwick was appointed technical advisor to the Combined Policy Committee, and the head of the British Mission.^[91]

Leaving Rotblat in charge in Liverpool, Chadwick began a tour of the Manhattan Project facilities in November 1943, except for the Hanford Site where plutonium was produced, which he was not allowed to see. He became the only man apart from Groves and his second in command to have access to all the American research and production facilities for the uranium bomb. Observing the work on the K-25 gaseous diffusion facility at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Chadwick realised how wrong he had been about building the plant in wartime Britain. The enormous structure could never have been concealed from the Luftwaffe.^[92] In early 1944, he moved to Los Alamos, New Mexico, with his wife and their twins, who now spoke with Canadian accents.^[93] For security reasons, he was given the cover name of James Chaffee.^[94]

 

Chadwick (left) with Major General Leslie R. Groves, Jr., the director of the Manhattan Project

Chadwick accepted that the Americans did not need British help, but that it could still be useful in bringing the project to an early and successful conclusion. Working closely with the director of the Manhattan Project, Major General Leslie R. Groves, Jr., he attempted to do everything he could to support the effort.^[95] He also endeavoured to place British scientists in as many parts of the project as possible in order to facilitate a post-war British nuclear weapons project to which Chadwick was committed. Requests from Groves via Chadwick for particular scientists tended to be met with an immediate rejection by the company, ministry or university currently employing them, only to be overcome by the overriding priority accorded to Tube Alloys.^[96] As a result, the British team was critical to the Project's success.^[97]

Although he had more knowledge of the project than anyone else from Britain,^[98] Chadwick had no access to the Hanford site. Lord Portal was offered a tour of Hanford in 1946. "This was the only plant to which Chadwick had been denied access in wartime, and now he asked Groves if he could accompany Portal. Groves replied that he could, but if he did then 'Portal will not see very much'."^[99] For his efforts, Chadwick received a knighthood in the New Year Honours on 1 January 1945.^[100] He considered this to be a recognition of the work of the whole Tube Alloys project.^[101]

By early 1945, Chadwick was spending most of his time in Washington, D.C., and his family relocated from Los Alamos to a house on Washington's Dupont Circle in April 1945.^[101] He was present at the meeting of the Combined Policy Committee on 4 July when Field Marshal Sir Henry Maitland Wilson gave Britain's agreement to use the atom bomb against Japan,^[102] and at the Trinity nuclear test on 16 July, when the first atom bomb was detonated.^[103] Inside its pit was a polonium-beryllium modulated neutron initiator, a development of the technique that Chadwick had used to discover the neutron over a decade before.^[104] William L. Laurence, The New York Times reporter attached to the Manhattan Project, wrote that "never before in history had any man lived to see his own discovery materialize itself with such telling effect on the destiny of man."^[105]

Later life

Shortly after the war ended, Chadwick was appointed to the Advisory Committee on Atomic Energy (ACAE). He was also appointed as the British scientific advisor to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission. He clashed with fellow ACAE member Patrick Blackett, who disagreed with Chadwick's conviction that Britain needed to acquire its own nuclear weapons; but it was Chadwick's position that was ultimately adopted. He returned to Britain in 1946, to find a country still beset by wartime rationing and shortages.^[106]

At this time, Sir James Mountford, the Vice Chancellor of the University of Liverpool, wrote in his diary "he had never seen a man 'so physically, mentally and spiritually tired" as Chadwick, for he "had plumbed such depths of moral decision as more fortunate men are never called upon even to peer into ... [and suffered] ... almost insupportable agonies of responsibility arising from his scientific work'."^[107]

In 1948, Chadwick accepted an offer to become the Master of Gonville and Caius College. The job was prestigious but ill-defined; the Master was the titular head of the College, but authority actually resided in a council of 13 fellows, of whom one was the Master. As Master, Chadwick strove to improve the academic reputation of the college. He increased the number of research fellowships from 31 to 49, and sought to bring talent into the college.^[108] This involved controversial decisions, such as hiring in 1951 the Chinese biochemist Tien-chin Tsao^[109] and the Hungarian-born economist Peter Bauer. In what became known as the Peasants' Revolt, fellows led by Patrick Hadley voted an old friend of Chadwick's off the council and replaced him with Bauer. More friends of Chadwick's were removed over the following years, and he retired in November 1958. It was during his mastership that Francis Crick, a PhD student at Gonville and Caius College, and James Watson discovered the structure of DNA.^[108]

By the 1970s Chadwick became more frail, and seldom left his flat, although he travelled to Liverpool for celebrations of his eightieth birthday. A lifelong atheist, he saw no reason to adopt religious faith in later life. He died in his sleep on 24 July 1974.^[110]

Honours

• Elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1927.^[111]
• Medal for Merit from the United States,
• Pour le Mérite from Germany.^[110]
• Foreign member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1946
• International member of the American Philosophical Society in 1948.^[112]
• Companion of Honour in the New Year Honours on 1 January 1970 for "services to science",^[113] and went to Buckingham Palace for the investiture ceremony.

Legacy

• Chadwick's papers are held at the Churchill Archives Centre in Cambridge, and are accessible to the public.^[114]
• The Chadwick Laboratory at the University of Liverpool.^[115]
• Sir James Chadwick Chair of Experimental Physics, also at the University of Liverpool. Named in 1991 as part of celebrations of the centenary of his birth.^[116]
• crater on the moon^[117]
• James Chadwick Building, which houses part of the School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Sciences, University of Manchester.^[118]
• Chadwick was described by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority official historian Lorna Arnold as "a physicist, a scientist-diplomat, and a good, wise, and humane man."^[119]

Notes

1. "James Chadwick". academictree.org. Retrieved 21 July 2014.
2. . Figures in Radiation History. Michigan State University. Archived from the original on 29 June 2015. Retrieved 3 June 2014.
3. Falconer 2004.
4. Oliphant 1974.
5. Brown 1997, pp. 3–5.
6. "James Chadwick – Biography". The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 21 April 2013.
7. Rutherford & Chadwick 1912.
8. Brown 1997, pp. 6–14.
9. Brown 1997, pp. 16–21.
10. Chadwick 1914.
11. Chadwick & Ellis 1922.
12. Weiner 1969.
13. Jensen 2000, pp. 88–90.
14. Brown 1997, pp. 24–26.
15. "This Month in Physics History: May 1932: Chadwick reports the discovery of the neutron". APS News. 16 (5): 2. 2007.
16. "Obituary: Sir James Chadwick". The Times. 25 July 1974. p. 20, column F.
17. "Obituary: Sir Charles Ellis". The Times. 15 January 1980. p. 14, column F.
18. Brown 1997, p. 39.
19. Brown 1997, pp. 43.
20. Brown 1997, pp. 43–50.
21. Brown 1997, p. 58.
22. Brown 1997, pp. 73–76.
23. "The History of the Cavendish". University of Cambridge. 13 August 2013. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
24. Brown 1997, p. 85.
25. Brown 1997, pp. 92–93.
26. Brown 1997, pp. 95–97.
27. Sublette 2006.
28. Brown 1997, pp. 103–104.
29. "Oral History interview transcript with Norman Feather, Session I". American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library and Archives. 25 February 1971.
30. Chadwick 1932a.
31. Chadwick 1932b.
32. Chadwick 1933.
33. Whaling 2009, pp. 8–9.
34. Bacher & Condon 1932.
35. Heisenberg 1932a.
36. Heisenberg 1932b.
37. Heisenberg 1933.
38. Bromberg 1971.
39. Brown 1997, pp. 115–116.
40. Heilbron & Seidel 1989, pp. 153–157.
41. Goldhaber 1934.
42. Chadwick & Goldhaber 1934.
43. Chadwick & Goldhaber 1935.
44. Brown 1997, pp. 122–125.
45. Brown 1997, pp. 125.
46. Brown 1997, pp. 119–120.
47. Close 2012, pp. 15–18.
48. Fermi 1968.
49. Close 2012, pp. 22–25.
50. Close 2012, pp. 26–28.
51. Bethe, H; Peierls, R (7 April 1934). "The Neutrino". Nature. 133 (3362): 532. Bibcode:1934Natur.133..532B. doi:10.1038/133532a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4001646.
52. Close 2012, pp. 37–41.
53. Brown 1997, pp. 129–132.
54. Herken 2002, p. 10.
55. Heilbron & Seidel 1989, pp. 165–167.
56. Oliphant & Rutherford 1933.
57. Oliphant, Kinsey & Rutherford 1933.
58. Oliphant, Harteck & Rutherford 1934.
59. Brown 1997, pp. 134–139.
60. Gannon, Megan (4 June 2014). "Sold! Nobel Prize for Neutron Discovery Auctioned for $329,000". Yahoo News. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
61. Brown 1997, p. 142.
62. Brown 1997, pp. 149–151.
63. Holt 1994.
64. Brown 1997, pp. 173–174.
65. King 1997.
66. Brown 1997, p. 150.
67. Brown 1997, p. 170.
68. Meitner & Frisch 1939.
69. Frisch 1939.
70. Hahn & Strassmann 1939.
71. von Halban, Joliot & Kowarski 1939.
72. Gowing 1964, pp. 24–27.
73. Bohr & Wheeler 1939.
74. Brown 1997, pp. 174–178.
75. Gowing 1964, pp. 38–39.
76. Gowing 1964, pp. 39–41.
77. Gowing 1964, p. 45.
78. Gowing 1964, p. 63.
79. Brown 1997, p. 206.
80. Brown 1997, p. 204.
81. Bundy 1988, pp. 48–49.
82. Gowing 1964, p. 85.
83. Gowing 1964, p. 109.
84. Farmelo 2013, p. 119.
85. Brown 1997, p. 205.
86. Bondi 1997.
87. Brown 1997, pp. 197–198.
88. Brown 1997, pp. 218–219.
89. Gowing 1964, pp. 141–142.
90. Gowing 1964, p. 152.
91. Gowing 1964, pp. 166–171.
92. Brown 1997, p. 253.
93. Brown 1997, pp. 250–261.
94. Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 95.
95. Brown 1997, pp. 247–51.
96. Gowing 1964, pp. 241–244.
97. Szasz 1992, p. xvi.
98. Gowing 1964, p. 329.
99. Brown 1997, p. 317.
100. "No. 36866". The London Gazette (Supplement). 29 December 1944. p. 1. Knight Bachelor
101. Brown 1997, p. 279.
102. Brown 1997, p. 290.
103. Brown 1997, p. 292.
104. Brown 1997, p. 287.
105. Laurence 1946, p. 26.
106. Brown 1997, pp. 306, 316.
107. Brown 1997, p. 323.
108. Brown 1997, pp. 340–353.
109. Zhang 2010.
110. Brown 1997, pp. 360–363.
111. Massey & Feather 1976, p. 11.
112. "J. Chadwick (1891–1974)". Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
113. "No. 44999". The London Gazette (Supplement). 30 December 1969. p. 23. Companion of Honour
114. "The Papers of Sir James Chadwick". Churchill Archives Centre, ArchiveSearch. Retrieved 30 September 2021.
115. "Liverpool Science Places". Scienceplaces.org. from the original on 15 August 2014. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
116. "University Chairs and their Holders Past and Present" (PDF). University of Liverpool. Retrieved 1 August 2014.^{[permanent dead link]}
117. . United States Geological Survey. Archived from the original on 22 November 2017. Retrieved 12 August 2012.
118. "James Chadwick Building – directions". The University of Manchester. Retrieved 18 May 2016.
119. Arnold 1998.

References

• Arnold, Lorna (1998). (PDF). Science. 282 (5388): 422. Bibcode:1998Sci...282..422A. doi:10.1126/science.282.5388.422. S2CID 161661986. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 August 2014.
• Bacher, Robert F.; Condon, Edward U. (1932). "The Spin of the Neutron". Physical Review. 41 (5): 683–685. Bibcode:1932PhRv...41..683B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.41.683.2.
• Bohr, Niels; Wheeler, John A. (1939). "The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission". Physical Review. 55 (5): 426–450. Bibcode:1939PhRv...56..426B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.426.
• Bondi, Hermann (30 June 1997). "How the Bomb's Creator Learned to Love the United States". Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved 20 July 2014.
• Bromberg, Joan (1971). "The Impact of the Neutron: Bohr and Heisenberg". Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences. 3: 307–341. doi:10.2307/27757321. ISSN 0890-9997. JSTOR 27757321. S2CID 8516458.
• Brown, Andrew (1997). The Neutron and the Bomb: A Biography of Sir James Chadwick. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-853992-6.
• Bundy, McGeorge (1988). Danger and Survival: Choices about the Bomb in the First Fifty Years. Random House. ISBN 978-0-394-52278-4.
• Chadwick, James (1914). "Intensitätsverteilung im magnetischen Spektrum von β-Strahlen von Radium B+C". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft (in German). 16: 383–391.
• —; Ellis, Charles D. (1922). "A Preliminary Investigation of the Intensity Distribution in the β-Ray Spectra of Radium B and C". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 21: 274–280.
• — (1932). "Possible Existence of a Neutron" (PDF). Nature. 129 (3252): 312. Bibcode:1932Natur.129Q.312C. doi:10.1038/129312a0. S2CID 4076465.
• — (1932). "The Existence of a Neutron". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 136 (830): 692–708. Bibcode:1932RSPSA.136..692C. doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0112. JSTOR 95816.
• — (1933). "Bakerian Lecture. The Neutron". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 142 (846): 1–26. Bibcode:1933RSPSA.142....1C. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0152. JSTOR 96108.
• —; Goldhaber, Maurice (1934). "A Nuclear 'Photo-effect': Disintegration of the Diplon by γ rays". Nature. 142 (3381): 237–238. Bibcode:1934Natur.134..237C. doi:10.1038/134237a0. S2CID 4137231.
• —; Goldhaber, Maurice (1935). "The Nuclear Photoelectric Effect". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 151 (873): 479–493. Bibcode:1935RSPSA.151..479C. doi:10.1098/rspa.1935.0162. JSTOR 96561.
• Close, Frank E. (2012). Neutrino. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-957459-9. OCLC 840096946.
• Falconer, Isobel (2004). "Chadwick, Sir James (1891–1974)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/30912. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
• Farmelo, Graham (2013). Churchill's Bomb: How the United States Overtook Britain in the First Nuclear Arms Race. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02195-6.
• Fermi, E. (1968). "Fermi's Theory of Beta Decay (English translation by Fred L. Wilson, 1968)". American Journal of Physics. 36 (12): 1150. Bibcode:1968AmJPh..36.1150W. doi:10.1119/1.1974382. Retrieved 20 January 2013.
• Frisch, Otto (1939). "Physical Evidence for the Division of Heavy Nuclei under Neutron Bombardment". Nature. 143 (3616): 276. Bibcode:1939Natur.143..276F. doi:10.1038/143276a0. S2CID 4076376.
• Goldhaber, Maurice (1934). "Spontaneous Emission of Neutrons by Artificially Produced Radioactive Bodies". Nature. 134 (3375): 25. Bibcode:1934Natur.134...25G. doi:10.1038/134025a0. S2CID 4092342.
• Gowing, Margaret (1964). Britain and Atomic Energy, 1939–1945. Macmillan Publishers. OCLC 3195209.
• Hahn, Otto; Strassmann, Fritz (1939). (PDF). Die Naturwissenschaften (in German). 27 (1): 11–15. Bibcode:1939NW.....27...11H. doi:10.1007/BF01488241. S2CID 5920336. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 December 2014.
• von Halban, Hans; Joliot, Frédéric; Kowarski, Lew (1939). "Number of Neutrons Liberated in the Nuclear Fission of Uranium". Nature. 143 (3625): 680. Bibcode:1939Natur.143..680V. doi:10.1038/143680a0. S2CID 4089039.
• Heilbron, John L.; Seidel, Robert W. (1989). Lawrence and his Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06426-3.
• Heisenberg, Werner (1932). "Über den Bau der Atomkerne. I". Zeitschrift für Physik (in German). 77 (1–2): 1–11. Bibcode:1932ZPhy...77....1H. doi:10.1007/BF01342433. S2CID 186218053.
• — (1932). "Über den Bau der Atomkerne. II". Zeitschrift für Physik (in German). 78 (3–4): 156–164. Bibcode:1932ZPhy...78..156H. doi:10.1007/BF01337585. S2CID 186221789.
• — (1933). "Über den Bau der Atomkerne. III". Zeitschrift für Physik (in German). 80 (9–10): 587–596. Bibcode:1933ZPhy...80..587H. doi:10.1007/BF01335696. S2CID 126422047.
• Herken, Gregg (2002). Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller. Holt Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0-8050-6589-3.
• Hoddeson, Lillian; Henriksen, Paul W.; Meade, Roger A.; Westfall, Catherine L. (1993). Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943–1945. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44132-2.
• Holt, John R. (1994). "James Chadwick at Liverpool". Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 48 (2): 299–308. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1994.0030. JSTOR 532169.
• Jensen, Carsten (2000). Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934. Birkhäuser. ISBN 978-3-7643-5313-1.
• King, Charles D. (1997). (PDF). Medical Historian. 9: 43–55. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 December 2014. Retrieved 7 August 2014.
• Laurence, William L. (1946). Dawn Over Zero: The Story of the Atomic Bomb. Alfred A. Knopf. OCLC 4354887.
• Massey, Harrie; Feather, Norman (1976). "James Chadwick. 20 October 1891 – 24 July 1974". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 22: 10–70. doi:10.1098/rsbm.1976.0002. JSTOR 769732.
• Meitner, Lise; Frisch, Otto R. (1939). "Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: A New Type of Nuclear Reaction". Nature. 143 (3615): 239–240. Bibcode:1939Natur.143..239M. doi:10.1038/143239a0. S2CID 4113262.
• Oliphant, M. L. E.; Rutherford, Lord (1933). "Experiments on the Transmutation of Elements by Protons". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 141 (843): 259–281. Bibcode:1933RSPSA.141..259O. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0117. JSTOR 96218.
• —; Kinsey, B. B.; Rutherford, Lord (1933). "The Transmutation of Lithium by Protons and by Ions of the Heavy Isotope of Hydrogen". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 141 (845): 722–733. Bibcode:1933RSPSA.141..722O. doi:10.1098/rspa.1933.0150. JSTOR 96179.
• —; Harteck, P.; Rutherford, Lord (1934). "Transmutation Effects Observed with Heavy Hydrogen". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 144 (853): 692–703. Bibcode:1934RSPSA.144..692O. doi:10.1098/rspa.1934.0077. JSTOR 2935553.
• — (1974). "James Chadwick". Physics Today. 27 (10): 87–89. Bibcode:1974PhT....27j..87O. doi:10.1063/1.3128956.
• Rutherford, Ernest; Chadwick, James (1912). "A Balance Method for Comparison of Quantities of Radium and Some of its Applications". Proceedings of the Physical Society. 24 (1): 141–151. Bibcode:1911PPSL...24..141R. doi:10.1088/1478-7814/24/1/320.
• Sublette, Carey (14 December 2006). "Polonium Poisoning". Nuclear Weapon Archive. Retrieved 1 August 2014.
• Szasz, Ferenc (1992). British Scientists and the Manhattan Project: The Los Alamos Years. St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-06167-8.
• Weiner, Charles (20 April 1969). . American Institute of Physics. Archived from the original on 16 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2014.
• Whaling, Ward (2009). (PDF). Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 May 2014. Retrieved 22 March 2013.
• Zhang, Youshang (2010). . Protein & Cell. 1 (6): 507–509. doi:10.1007/s13238-010-0074-2. PMC 4875321. PMID 21246905. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014.

Further reading

 

Wikimedia Commons has media related to James Chadwick.

• "Sir James Chadwick, F.R.S." Nature. 161 (4103): 964. 1948. Bibcode:1948Natur.161Q.964.. doi:10.1038/161964a0.
• "Sir James Chadwick, C.H., LL.D., F.R.S.: 80th birthday". Contemporary Physics. 13 (3): 310. 1972. Bibcode:1972ConPh..13..310.. doi:10.1080/00107517208205684.
• Rutherford, Ernest; Chadwick, James; Ellis, Charles D. (2010). Radiation from Radioactive Substances (Reprint of 2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-00901-0.

External links

• Oral history interview transcript with James Chadwick on 15 April 1969, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session I
• Oral history interview transcript with James Chadwick on 16 April 1969, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session II
• Oral history interview transcript with James Chadwick on 17 April 1969, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session III
• Oral history interview transcript with James Chadwick on 20 April 1969, American Institute of Physics, Niels Bohr Library & Archives – Session IV
• James Chadwick on Nobelprize.org  

Academic offices
Preceded by John Forbes Cameron	Master of Gonville and Caius College 1948–1959	Succeeded by Sir Nevill Francis Mott