Observable universe

The observable universe is a ball-shaped region of the universe consisting of all matter that can be observed from Earth or its space-based telescopes and exploratory probes at the present time; the electromagnetic radiation from these objects has had time to reach the Solar System and Earth since the beginning of the cosmological expansion. Initially, it was estimated that there may be 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe.^[7][8] That number was reduced in 2021 to only several hundred billion based on data from New Horizons.^[9][10][11] Assuming the universe is isotropic, the distance to the edge of the observable universe is roughly the same in every direction. That is, the observable universe is a spherical region centered on the observer. Every location in the universe has its own observable universe, which may or may not overlap with the one centered on Earth.

Observable universe

Visualization of the observable universe. The scale is such that the fine grains represent collections of large numbers of superclusters. The Virgo Supercluster—home of Milky Way—is marked at the center, but is too small to be seen.
Diameter	8.8×10^26 m or 880 Ym (28.5 Gpc or 93 Gly)^[1]
Circumference	2.764×10^27 m or 2.764 Rm (89.6 Gpc or 292.2 Gly)
Volume	3.566×10^80 m^3^[2]
Mass (ordinary matter)	1.5×10^53 kg^[note 1]
Density (of total energy)	9.9×10^−27 kg/m^3 (equivalent to 6 protons per cubic meter of space)^[3]
Age	13.787±0.020 billion years^[4]
Average temperature	2.72548±0.00057 K^[5]
Contents	Ordinary (baryonic) matter (4.9%) Dark matter (26.8%) Dark energy (68.3%)^[6]

The word observable in this sense does not refer to the capability of modern technology to detect light or other information from an object, or whether there is anything to be detected. It refers to the physical limit created by the speed of light itself. No signal can travel faster than light. Hence there is a maximum distance, called the particle horizon, beyond which nothing can be detected, as the signals could not have reached us yet. Sometimes astrophysicists distinguish between the observable universe and the visible universe. The former includes signals since the end of the inflationary epoch, while the latter includes only signals emitted since recombination.^{[note 2]}

According to calculations, the current comoving distance to particles from which the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) was emitted, which represents the radius of the visible universe, is about 14.0 billion parsecs (about 45.7 billion light-years). The comoving distance to the edge of the observable universe is about 14.3 billion parsecs (about 46.6 billion light-years),^[12] about 2% larger. The radius of the observable universe is therefore estimated to be about 46.5 billion light-years.^[13][14] Using the critical density and the diameter of the observable universe, the total mass of ordinary matter in the universe can be calculated to be about 1.5×10⁵³ kg.^[15] In November 2018, astronomers reported that extragalactic background light (EBL) amounted to 4×10⁸⁴ photons.^[16][17]

As the universe's expansion is accelerating, all currently observable objects, outside the local supercluster, will eventually appear to freeze in time, while emitting progressively redder and fainter light. For instance, objects with the current redshift z from 5 to 10 will only be observable up to an age of 4–6 billion years. In addition, light emitted by objects currently situated beyond a certain comoving distance (currently about 19 billion parsecs) will never reach Earth.^[18]

Overview

 

Observable Universe as a function of time and distance, in context of the expanding Universe

The universe's size is unknown, and it may be infinite in extent.^[19] Some parts of the universe are too far away for the light emitted since the Big Bang to have had enough time to reach Earth or space-based instruments, and therefore lie outside the observable universe. In the future, light from distant galaxies will have had more time to travel, so one might expect that additional regions will become observable. Owing to Hubble's law, regions sufficiently distant from Earth are expanding away from it faster than the speed of light.^{[note 3]} The expansion rate appears to be accelerating owing to dark energy.

Assuming dark energy remains constant (an unchanging cosmological constant) so that the expansion rate of the universe continues to accelerate, there is a "future visibility limit" beyond which objects will never enter the observable universe at any time in the future because light emitted by objects outside that limit could never reach the Earth. Note that, because the Hubble parameter is decreasing with time, there can be cases where a galaxy that is receding from Earth only slightly faster than light emits a signal that eventually reaches Earth.^[14][20] This future visibility limit is calculated at a comoving distance of 19 billion parsecs (62 billion light-years), assuming the universe will keep expanding forever, which implies the number of galaxies that can ever be theoretically observed in the infinite future is only larger than the number currently observable by a factor of 2.36 (ignoring redshift effects).^{[note 4]}

In principle, more galaxies will become observable in the future; in practice, an increasing number of galaxies will become extremely redshifted due to ongoing expansion, so much so that they will seem to disappear from view and become invisible.^[21][22][23] A galaxy at a given comoving distance is defined to lie within the "observable universe" if we can receive signals emitted by the galaxy at any age in its history, say, a signal sent from the galaxy only 500 million years after the Big Bang. Because of the universe's expansion, there may be some later age at which a signal sent from the same galaxy can never reach the Earth at any point in the infinite future, so, for example, we might never see what the galaxy looked like 10 billion years after the Big Bang,^[24] even though it remains at the same comoving distance less than that of the observable universe.

This can be used to define a type of cosmic event horizon whose distance from the Earth changes over time. For example, the current distance to this horizon is about 16 billion light-years, meaning that a signal from an event happening at present can eventually reach the Earth if the event is less than 16 billion light-years away, but the signal will never reach the Earth if the event is further away.^[14]

The space before this cosmic event horizon can be called "reachable universe", that is all galaxies closer than that could be reached if we left for them today, at the speed of light; all galaxies beyond that are unreachable.^[25][26] Simple observation will show the future visibility limit (62 billion light-years) is exactly equal to the reachable limit (16 billion light-years) added to the current visibility limit (46 billion light-years).^[27][12]

 

The reachable Universe as a function of time and distance, in context of the expanding Universe.

"The universe" versus "the observable universe"

Both popular and professional research articles in cosmology often use the term "universe" to mean "observable universe".^{[citation needed]} This can be justified on the grounds that we can never know anything by direct observation about any part of the universe that is causally disconnected from the Earth, although many credible theories require a total universe much larger than the observable universe.^{[citation needed]} No evidence exists to suggest that the boundary of the observable universe constitutes a boundary on the universe as a whole, nor do any of the mainstream cosmological models propose that the universe has any physical boundary in the first place. However, some models propose it could be finite but unbounded,^{[note 5]} like a higher-dimensional analogue of the 2D surface of a sphere that is finite in area but has no edge.

It is plausible that the galaxies within the observable universe represent only a minuscule fraction of the galaxies in the universe. According to the theory of cosmic inflation initially introduced by Alan Guth and D. Kazanas,^[28] if it is assumed that inflation began about 10⁻³⁷ seconds after the Big Bang and that the pre-inflation size of the universe was approximately equal to the speed of light times its age, that would suggest that at present the entire universe's size is at least 1.5×10³⁴ light-years—at least 3×10²³ times the radius of the observable universe.^[29]

If the universe is finite but unbounded, it is also possible that the universe is smaller than the observable universe. In this case, what we take to be very distant galaxies may actually be duplicate images of nearby galaxies, formed by light that has circumnavigated the universe. It is difficult to test this hypothesis experimentally because different images of a galaxy would show different eras in its history, and consequently might appear quite different. Bielewicz et al.^[30] claim to establish a lower bound of 27.9 gigaparsecs (91 billion light-years) on the diameter of the last scattering surface. This value is based on matching-circle analysis of the WMAP 7-year data. This approach has been disputed.^[31]

Size

 

Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image of a region of the observable universe (equivalent sky area size shown in bottom left corner), near the constellation Fornax. Each spot is a galaxy, consisting of billions of stars. The light from the smallest, most redshifted galaxies originated nearly 13.8 billion years ago.

The comoving distance from Earth to the edge of the observable universe is about 14.26 gigaparsecs (46.5 billion light-years or 4.40×10²⁶ m) in any direction. The observable universe is thus a sphere with a diameter of about 28.5 gigaparsecs^[32] (93 billion light-years or 8.8×10²⁶ m).^[33] Assuming that space is roughly flat (in the sense of being a Euclidean space), this size corresponds to a comoving volume of about 1.22×10⁴ Gpc³ (4.22×10⁵ Gly³ or 3.57×10⁸⁰ m³).^[34]

These are distances now (in cosmological time), not distances at the time the light was emitted. For example, the cosmic microwave background radiation that we see right now was emitted at the time of photon decoupling, estimated to have occurred about 380,000 years after the Big Bang,^[35][36] which occurred around 13.8 billion years ago. This radiation was emitted by matter that has, in the intervening time, mostly condensed into galaxies, and those galaxies are now calculated to be about 46 billion light-years from Earth.^[12][14] To estimate the distance to that matter at the time the light was emitted, we may first note that according to the Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric, which is used to model the expanding universe, if we receive light with a redshift of z, then the scale factor at the time the light was originally emitted is given by^[37][38]

${\displaystyle a(t)={\frac {1}{1+z}}}$ .

WMAP nine-year results combined with other measurements give the redshift of photon decoupling as z = 1091.64±0.47,^[39] which implies that the scale factor at the time of photon decoupling would be 1⁄1092.64. So if the matter that originally emitted the oldest CMBR photons has a present distance of 46 billion light-years, then the distance would have been only about 42 million light-years at the time of decoupling.

The light-travel distance to the edge of the observable universe is the age of the universe times the speed of light, 13.8 billion light years. This is the distance that a photon emitted shortly after the Big Bang, such as one from the cosmic microwave background, has traveled to reach observers on Earth. Because spacetime is curved, corresponding to the expansion of space, this distance does not correspond to the true distance at any moment in time.^[40]

Matter and mass

Number of galaxies and stars

The observable universe contains as many as an estimated 2 trillion galaxies^[41][42][43] and, overall, as many as an estimated 10²⁴ stars^[44][45] – more stars (and earth-like planets) than all the grains of beach sand on planet Earth.^[46][47][48] As mentioned earlier, the estimated number of galaxies was reduced in 2021 to several hundred billion based on data from New Horizons.^[9][10][11] The estimated total number of stars in an inflationary universe (observed and unobserved) is 10¹⁰⁰.^[49]

Matter content—number of atoms

Main article: Abundance of the chemical elements

Assuming the mass of ordinary matter is about 1.45×10⁵³ kg as discussed above, and assuming all atoms are hydrogen atoms (which are about 74% of all atoms in the Milky Way by mass), the estimated total number of atoms in the observable universe is obtained by dividing the mass of ordinary matter by the mass of a hydrogen atom. The result is approximately 10⁸⁰ hydrogen atoms, also known as the Eddington number.

Mass of ordinary matter

The mass of the observable universe is often quoted as 10⁵³ kg.^[50] In this context, mass refers to ordinary (baryonic) matter and includes the interstellar medium (ISM) and the intergalactic medium (IGM). However, it excludes dark matter and dark energy. This quoted value for the mass of ordinary matter in the universe can be estimated based on critical density. The calculations are for the observable universe only as the volume of the whole is unknown and may be infinite.

Estimates based on critical density

Critical density is the energy density for which the universe is flat.^[51] If there is no dark energy, it is also the density for which the expansion of the universe is poised between continued expansion and collapse.^[52] From the Friedmann equations, the value for ${\displaystyle \rho _{\text{c}}}$  critical density, is:^[53]

${\displaystyle \rho _{\text{c}}={\frac {3H^{2}}{8\pi G}},}$ 

where G is the gravitational constant and H = H₀ is the present value of the Hubble constant. The value for H₀, as given by the European Space Agency's Planck Telescope, is H₀ = 67.15 kilometres per second per megaparsec. This gives a critical density of 0.85×10⁻²⁶ kg/m³, or about 5 hydrogen atoms per cubic metre. This density includes four significant types of energy/mass: ordinary matter (4.8%), neutrinos (0.1%), cold dark matter (26.8%), and dark energy (68.3%).^[54]

Although neutrinos are Standard Model particles, they are listed separately because they are ultra-relativistic and hence behave like radiation rather than like matter. The density of ordinary matter, as measured by Planck, is 4.8% of the total critical density or 4.08×10⁻²⁸ kg/m³. To convert this density to mass we must multiply by volume, a value based on the radius of the "observable universe". Since the universe has been expanding for 13.8 billion years, the comoving distance (radius) is now about 46.6 billion light-years. Thus, volume (4/3πr³) equals 3.58×10⁸⁰ m³ and the mass of ordinary matter equals density (4.08×10⁻²⁸ kg/m³) times volume (3.58×10⁸⁰ m³) or 1.46×10⁵³ kg.

Large-scale structure

 

Galaxy clusters, like RXC J0142.9+4438, are the nodes of the cosmic web that permeates the entire Universe.^[55]

Video of a cosmological simulation of the local universe, showing large-scale structure of clusters of galaxies and dark matter^[56]

Sky surveys and mappings of the various wavelength bands of electromagnetic radiation (in particular 21-cm emission) have yielded much information on the content and character of the universe's structure. The organization of structure appears to follow a hierarchical model with organization up to the scale of superclusters and filaments. Larger than this (at scales between 30 and 200 megaparsecs),^[57] there seems to be no continued structure, a phenomenon that has been referred to as the End of Greatness.^[58]

Walls, filaments, nodes, and voids

 

Map of the cosmic web generated from a slime mould-inspired algorithm^[59]

The organization of structure arguably begins at the stellar level, though most cosmologists rarely address astrophysics on that scale. Stars are organized into galaxies, which in turn form galaxy groups, galaxy clusters, superclusters, sheets, walls and filaments, which are separated by immense voids, creating a vast foam-like structure^[60] sometimes called the "cosmic web". Prior to 1989, it was commonly assumed that virialized galaxy clusters were the largest structures in existence, and that they were distributed more or less uniformly throughout the universe in every direction. However, since the early 1980s, more and more structures have been discovered. In 1983, Adrian Webster identified the Webster LQG, a large quasar group consisting of 5 quasars. The discovery was the first identification of a large-scale structure, and has expanded the information about the known grouping of matter in the universe.

In 1987, Robert Brent Tully identified the Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, the galaxy filament in which the Milky Way resides. It is about 1 billion light-years across. That same year, an unusually large region with a much lower than average distribution of galaxies was discovered, the Giant Void, which measures 1.3 billion light-years across. Based on redshift survey data, in 1989 Margaret Geller and John Huchra discovered the "Great Wall",^[61] a sheet of galaxies more than 500 million light-years long and 200 million light-years wide, but only 15 million light-years thick. The existence of this structure escaped notice for so long because it requires locating the position of galaxies in three dimensions, which involves combining location information about the galaxies with distance information from redshifts.

Two years later, astronomers Roger G. Clowes and Luis E. Campusano discovered the Clowes–Campusano LQG, a large quasar group measuring two billion light-years at its widest point which was the largest known structure in the universe at the time of its announcement. In April 2003, another large-scale structure was discovered, the Sloan Great Wall. In August 2007, a possible supervoid was detected in the constellation Eridanus.^[62] It coincides with the 'CMB cold spot', a cold region in the microwave sky that is highly improbable under the currently favored cosmological model. This supervoid could cause the cold spot, but to do so it would have to be improbably big, possibly a billion light-years across, almost as big as the Giant Void mentioned above.

Unsolved problem in physics:

The largest structures in the universe are larger than expected. Are these actual structures or random density fluctuations?

(more unsolved problems in physics)

 

Computer simulated image of an area of space more than 50 million light-years across, presenting a possible large-scale distribution of light sources in the universe—precise relative contributions of galaxies and quasars are unclear.

Another large-scale structure is the SSA22 Protocluster, a collection of galaxies and enormous gas bubbles that measures about 200 million light-years across.

In 2011, a large quasar group was discovered, U1.11, measuring about 2.5 billion light-years across. On January 11, 2013, another large quasar group, the Huge-LQG, was discovered, which was measured to be four billion light-years across, the largest known structure in the universe at that time.^[63] In November 2013, astronomers discovered the Hercules–Corona Borealis Great Wall,^[64][65] an even bigger structure twice as large as the former. It was defined by the mapping of gamma-ray bursts.^[64][66]

In 2021, the American Astronomical Society announced the detection of the Giant Arc; a crescent-shaped string of galaxies that span 3.3 billion light years in length, located 9.2 billion light years from Earth in the constellation Boötes from observations captured by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.^[67]

End of Greatness

The End of Greatness is an observational scale discovered at roughly 100 Mpc (roughly 300 million light-years) where the lumpiness seen in the large-scale structure of the universe is homogenized and isotropized in accordance with the Cosmological Principle.^[58] At this scale, no pseudo-random fractalness is apparent.^[68]

The superclusters and filaments seen in smaller surveys are randomized to the extent that the smooth distribution of the universe is visually apparent. It was not until the redshift surveys of the 1990s were completed that this scale could accurately be observed.^[58]

Observations

 

"Panoramic view of the entire near-infrared sky reveals the distribution of galaxies beyond the Milky Way. The image is derived from the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog (XSC)—more than 1.5 million galaxies, and the Point Source Catalog (PSC)—nearly 0.5 billion Milky Way stars. The galaxies are color-coded by 'redshift' obtained from the UGC, CfA, Tully NBGC, LCRS, 2dF, 6dFGS, and SDSS surveys (and from various observations compiled by the NASA Extragalactic Database), or photo-metrically deduced from the K band (2.2 μm). Blue are the nearest sources (z < 0.01); green are at moderate distances (0.01 < z < 0.04) and red are the most distant sources that 2MASS resolves (0.04 < z < 0.1). The map is projected with an equal area Aitoff in the Galactic system (Milky Way at center)."^[69]

 

Constellations grouped in galactic quadrants (N/S, 1–4) and their approximate divisions vis-a-vis celestial quadrants (NQ/SQ)

Another indicator of large-scale structure is the 'Lyman-alpha forest'. This is a collection of absorption lines that appear in the spectra of light from quasars, which are interpreted as indicating the existence of huge thin sheets of intergalactic (mostly hydrogen) gas. These sheets appear to collapse into filaments, which can feed galaxies as they grow where filaments either cross or are dense. An early direct evidence for this cosmic web of gas was the 2019 detection, by astronomers from the RIKEN Cluster for Pioneering Research in Japan and Durham University in the U.K., of light from the brightest part of this web, surrounding and illuminated by a cluster of forming galaxies, acting as cosmic flashlights for intercluster medium hydrogen fluorescence via Lyman-alpha emissions.^[70][71]

In 2021, an international team, headed by Roland Bacon from the Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon (France), reported the first observation of diffuse extended Lyman-alpha emission from redshift 3.1 to 4.5 that traced several cosmic web filaments on scales of 2.5−4 cMpc (comoving mega-parsecs), in filamentary environments outside massive structures typical of web nodes.^[72]

Some caution is required in describing structures on a cosmic scale because they are often different from how they appear. Gravitational lensing can make an image appear to originate in a different direction from its real source, when foreground objects curve surrounding spacetime (as predicted by general relativity) and deflect passing light rays. Rather usefully, strong gravitational lensing can sometimes magnify distant galaxies, making them easier to detect. Weak lensing by the intervening universe in general also subtly changes the observed large-scale structure.

The large-scale structure of the universe also looks different if only redshift is used to measure distances to galaxies. For example, galaxies behind a galaxy cluster are attracted to it and fall towards it, and so are blueshifted (compared to how they would be if there were no cluster). On the near side, objects are redshifted. Thus, the environment of the cluster looks somewhat pinched if using redshifts to measure distance. The opposite effect is observed on galaxies already within a cluster: the galaxies have some random motion around the cluster center, and when these random motions are converted to redshifts, the cluster appears elongated. This creates a "finger of God"—the illusion of a long chain of galaxies pointed at Earth.

Cosmography of Earth's cosmic neighborhood

At the centre of the Hydra–Centaurus Supercluster, a gravitational anomaly called the Great Attractor affects the motion of galaxies over a region hundreds of millions of light-years across. These galaxies are all redshifted, in accordance with Hubble's law. This indicates that they are receding from us and from each other, but the variations in their redshift are sufficient to reveal the existence of a concentration of mass equivalent to tens of thousands of galaxies.

The Great Attractor, discovered in 1986, lies at a distance of between 150 million and 250 million light-years in the direction of the Hydra and Centaurus constellations. In its vicinity there is a preponderance of large old galaxies, many of which are colliding with their neighbours, or radiating large amounts of radio waves.

In 1987, astronomer R. Brent Tully of the University of Hawaii's Institute of Astronomy identified what he called the Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, a structure one billion light-years long and 150 million light-years across in which, he claimed, the Local Supercluster is embedded.^[73]

Most distant objects

Main article: List of the most distant astronomical objects

The most distant astronomical object identified (as of September of 2022) is a galaxy classified as JADES-GS-z13-0.^[74] In 2009, a gamma ray burst, GRB 090423, was found to have a redshift of 8.2, which indicates that the collapsing star that caused it exploded when the universe was only 630 million years old.^[75] The burst happened approximately 13 billion years ago,^[76] so a distance of about 13 billion light-years was widely quoted in the media, or sometimes a more precise figure of 13.035 billion light-years.^[75]

This would be the "light travel distance" (see Distance measures (cosmology)) rather than the "proper distance" used in both Hubble's law and in defining the size of the observable universe. Cosmologist Ned Wright argues against using this measure.^[77] The proper distance for a redshift of 8.2 would be about 9.2 Gpc,^[78] or about 30 billion light-years.

Horizons

Main article: Cosmological horizon

The limit of observability in the universe is set by cosmological horizons which limit—based on various physical constraints—the extent to which information can be obtained about various events in the universe. The most famous horizon is the particle horizon which sets a limit on the precise distance that can be seen due to the finite age of the universe. Additional horizons are associated with the possible future extent of observations, larger than the particle horizon owing to the expansion of space, an "optical horizon" at the surface of last scattering, and associated horizons with the surface of last scattering for neutrinos and gravitational waves.

Location of Earth in the Universe

 

Earth

 

Solar System

 

Molecular clouds around the Sun inside the Orion-Cygnus Arm

 

Orion Arm

 

Milky Way

 

Local Group

 

Virgo SCl

 

Laniakea SCl

 

Our Universe

 

A diagram of the Earth's location in the observable universe. (Alternative image.)

 

A logarithmic map of the observable universe. From left to right, spacecraft and celestial bodies are arranged according to their proximity to the Earth.

Gallery

 

Artist's logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe with the Solar System at the center, inner and outer planets, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri, Perseus Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda Galaxy, nearby galaxies, Cosmic web, Cosmic microwave radiation and the Big Bang's invisible plasma on the edge. Celestial bodies appear enlarged to appreciate their shapes.

 

DTFE reconstruction of the inner parts of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey

See also

• Bolshoi Cosmological Simulation – Computer simulation of the universe
• Causality (physics) – Physics of the cause–effect relation
• Chronology of the universe – History and future of the universe
• Dark flow – A possible non-random component of the peculiar velocity of galaxy clusters
• Hubble volume – Region of the observable universe
• Illustris project – Computer-simulated universes
• Multiverse – Hypothetical group of multiple universes
• Orders of magnitude (length) – Range of lengths from the subatomic to the astronomical scales
• UniverseMachine – Computer simulated universes

Notes

1. Multiply percentage of ordinary matter given by Planck below, with total energy density given by WMAP below
2. This is when hydrogen atoms were formed from protons and electrons and the universe became transparent to electromagnetic radiation.
3. Special relativity prevents nearby objects in the same local region from moving faster than the speed of light with respect to each other, but there is no such constraint for distant objects when the space between them is expanding; see uses of the proper distance for a discussion.
4. The comoving distance of the future visibility limit is calculated on p. 8 of Gott et al.'s A Map of the Universe to be 4.50 times the Hubble radius, given as 4.220 billion parsecs (13.76 billion light-years), whereas the current comoving radius of the observable universe is calculated on p. 7 to be 3.38 times the Hubble radius. The number of galaxies in a sphere of a given comoving radius is proportional to the cube of the radius, so as shown on p. 8 the ratio between the number of galaxies observable in the future visibility limit to the number of galaxies observable today would be (4.50/3.38)³ = 2.36.
5. This does not mean "unbounded" in the mathematical sense; a finite universe would have an upper bound on the distance between two points. Rather, it means that there is no boundary past which there is nothing. See Geodesic manifold.

References

1. Itzhak Bars; John Terning (2009). Extra Dimensions in Space and Time. Springer. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-0387776378. Retrieved 2011-05-01.
2. "volume universe Wolfram|Alpha". www.wolframalpha.com.
3. "What is the Universe Made Of?". NASA. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
4. Planck Collaboration (2020). "Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 641. page A6 (see PDF page 15, Table 2: "Age/Gyr", last column). arXiv:1807.06209. Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...6P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910. S2CID 119335614.
5. Fixsen, D. J. (30 November 2009). "The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 707 (2): 916–920. arXiv:0911.1955. Bibcode:2009ApJ...707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916. S2CID 119217397.
6. "Planck cosmic recipe".
7. Conselice, Christopher J.; et al. (2016). "The Evolution of Galaxy Number Density at z < 8 and Its Implications". The Astrophysical Journal. 830 (2): 83. arXiv:1607.03909v2. Bibcode:2016ApJ...830...83C. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/83. S2CID 17424588.
8. Fountain, Henry (17 October 2016). "Two Trillion Galaxies, at the Very Least". New York Times. Retrieved 17 October 2016.
9. Lauer, T. R.; Postman, M.; Spencer, J. R.; Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S. A.; Gladstone, G. R.; Binzel, R. P.; Britt, D. T.; Buie, M. W.; Buratti, B. J.; Cheng, A. F.; Grundy, W. M.; Horányi, M.; Kavelaars, J. J.; Linscott, I. R.; Lisse, C. M.; McKinnon, W. B.; McNutt, R. L.; Moore, J. M.; Núñez, J. I.; Olkin, C. B.; Parker, J. W.; Porter, S. B.; Reuter, D. C.; Robbins, S. J.; Schenk, P. M.; Showalter, M. R.; Singer, K. N.; Verbiscer, A. J.; Young, L. A. (2022). "Anomalous Flux in the Cosmic Optical Background Detected with New Horizons Observations". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 927 (1): l8. arXiv:2202.04273. Bibcode:2022ApJ...927L...8L. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac573d.
10. Lauer, Todd (12 January 2021). "NOIRLab Scientist Finds the Universe to be Brighter than Expected". NOIRLab. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
11. Lauer, Tod R.; Postman, Marc; Weaver, Harold A.; Spencer, John R.; Stern, S. Alan; Buie, Marc W.; Durda, Daniel D.; Lisse, Carey M.; Poppe, A. R.; Binzel, Richard P.; Britt, Daniel T.; Buratti, Bonnie J.; Cheng, Andrew F.; Grundy, W. M.; Horányi, Mihaly; Kavelaars, J. J.; Linscott, Ivan R.; McKinnon, William B.; Moore, Jeffrey M.; Núñez, J. I.; Olkin, Catherine B.; Parker, Joel W.; Porter, Simon B.; Reuter, Dennis C.; Robbins, Stuart J.; Schenk, Paul; Showalter, Mark R.; Singer, Kelsi N.; Verbiscer, Anne J.; Young, Leslie A. (11 January 2021). "New Horizons Observations of the Cosmic Optical Background". The Astrophysical Journal. 906 (2): 77. arXiv:2011.03052. Bibcode:2021ApJ...906...77L. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc881. hdl:1721.1/133770. S2CID 226277978.
12. Gott III, J. Richard; Mario Jurić; David Schlegel; Fiona Hoyle; et al. (2005). "A Map of the Universe" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 624 (2): 463–484. arXiv:astro-ph/0310571. Bibcode:2005ApJ...624..463G. doi:10.1086/428890. S2CID 9654355.
13. "Frequently Asked Questions in Cosmology". astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
14. Lineweaver, Charles; Davis, Tamara M. (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. 292 (3): 36–45. Bibcode:2005SciAm.292c..36L. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0305-36.
15. See the "Mass of ordinary matter" section in this article.
16. Overbye, Dennis (3 December 2018). "All the Light There Is to See? 4 x 10⁸⁴ Photons". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 December 2018.
17. The Fermi-LAT Collaboration (30 November 2018). "A gamma-ray determination of the Universe's star formation history". Science. 362 (6418): 1031–1034. arXiv:1812.01031. Bibcode:2018Sci...362.1031F. doi:10.1126/science.aat8123. PMID 30498122.
18. Loeb, Abraham (2002). "Long-term future of extragalactic astronomy". Physical Review D. 65 (4): 047301. arXiv:astro-ph/0107568. Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65d7301L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.047301. S2CID 1791226.
19. Liddle, Andrew (2015). An Introduction to Modern Cosmology. John Wiley. ISBN 978-1118502143.
20. Is the universe expanding faster than the speed of light? (see the last two paragraphs).
21. Krauss, Lawrence M.; Scherrer, Robert J. (2007). "The Return of a Static Universe and the End of Cosmology". General Relativity and Gravitation. 39 (10): 1545–1550. arXiv:0704.0221. Bibcode:2007GReGr..39.1545K. doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0472-9. S2CID 123442313.
22. Using Tiny Particles To Answer Giant Questions. Science Friday, 3 Apr 2009. According to the transcript, Brian Greene makes the comment "And actually, in the far future, everything we now see, except for our local galaxy and a region of galaxies will have disappeared. The entire universe will disappear before our very eyes, and it's one of my arguments for actually funding cosmology. We've got to do it while we have a chance."
23. See also Faster than light#Universal expansion and Future of an expanding universe#Galaxies outside the Local Supercluster are no longer detectable.
24. Loeb, Abraham (2002). "The Long-Term Future of Extragalactic Astronomy". Physical Review D. 65 (4): 047301. arXiv:astro-ph/0107568. Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65d7301L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.047301. S2CID 1791226.
25. Siegel, Ethan. "How Much Of The Unobservable Universe Will We Someday Be Able To See?". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
26. Siegel, Ethan (2021-10-25). "94% of the universe's galaxies are permanently beyond our reach". Starts With A Bang!. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
27. Ord, Toby. (2021). The Edges of Our Universe. [1]
28. Kazanas, D. (1980). "Dynamics of the universe and spontaneous symmetry breaking". The Astrophysical Journal. 241: L59–L63. Bibcode:1980ApJ...241L..59K. doi:10.1086/183361.
29. Guth, Alan H. (1997). The inflationary universe: the quest for a new theory of cosmic origins. Basic Books. pp. 186–. ISBN 978-0201328400. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
30. Bielewicz, P.; Banday, A. J.; Gorski, K. M. (2013). Auge, E.; Dumarchez, J.; Tran Thanh Van, J. (eds.). "Constraints on the Topology of the Universe". Proceedings of the XLVIIth Rencontres de Moriond. 2012 (91). arXiv:1303.4004. Bibcode:2013arXiv1303.4004B.
31. Mota, B.; Reboucas, M. J.; Tavakol, R. (1 July 2010). "Observable circles-in-the-sky in flat universes". arXiv:1007.3466 [astro-ph.CO].
32. "WolframAlpha". Retrieved 29 November 2011.
33. "WolframAlpha". Retrieved 29 November 2011.
34. "WolframAlpha". Retrieved 15 February 2016.
35. "Seven-Year Wilson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Sky Maps, Systematic Errors, and Basic Results" (PDF). nasa.gov. Retrieved 2010-12-02. (see p. 39 for a table of best estimates for various cosmological parameters).
36. Abbott, Brian (May 30, 2007). "Microwave (WMAP) All-Sky Survey". Hayden Planetarium. Retrieved 2008-01-13.
37. Davies, Paul (1992). The new physics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 187–. ISBN 978-0521438315. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
38. Mukhanov, V. F. (2005). Physical foundations of cosmology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 58–. ISBN 978-0521563987. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
39. Bennett, C. L.; Larson, D.; Weiland, J. L.; Jarosik, N.; et al. (1 October 2013). "Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 208 (2): 20. arXiv:1212.5225. Bibcode:2013ApJS..208...20B. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20. S2CID 119271232.
40. Wright, Ned. "Light Travel Time Distance". astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
41. Gunn, Alistair (29 November 2023). "How many galaxies are there in the universe? – Do astronomers know how many galaxies exist? How many can we see in the observable Universe?". BBC Sky at Night. Archived from the original on 3 December 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
42. "New Horizons spacecraft answers the question: How dark is space?". phys.org. from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved January 15, 2021.
43. Howell, Elizabeth (March 20, 2018). "How Many Galaxies Are There?". Space.com. from the original on February 28, 2021. Retrieved March 5, 2021.
44. Staff (2019). "How Many Stars Are There In The Universe?". European Space Agency. from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 21, 2019.
45. Marov, Mikhail Ya. (2015). "The Structure of the Universe". The Fundamentals of Modern Astrophysics. pp. 279–294. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8730-2_10. ISBN 978-1-4614-8729-6.
46. Mackie, Glen (February 1, 2002). "To see the Universe in a Grain of Taranaki Sand". Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved January 28, 2017.
47. Mack, Eric (19 March 2015). "There may be more Earth-like planets than grains of sand on all our beaches – New research contends that the Milky Way alone is flush with billions of potentially habitable planets – and that's just one sliver of the universe". CNET. Archived from the original on 1 December 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
48. Bovaird, T. T.; Lineweaver, C. H.; Jacobsen, S. K. (13 March 2015). "Using the inclinations of Kepler systems to prioritize new Titius–Bode-based exoplanet predictions". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 448 (4): 3608–3627. arXiv:1412.6230. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv221. Archived from the original on 1 December 2023. Retrieved 1 December 2023.
49. Totani, Tomonori (3 February 2020). "Emergence of life in an inflationary universe". Scientific Reports. 10 (1671): 1671. arXiv:1911.08092. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.1671T. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58060-0. PMC 6997386. PMID 32015390.
50. Davies, Paul (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma. First Mariner Books. p. 43–. ISBN 978-0618592265.
51. See Friedmann equations#Density parameter.
52. Kaku, Michio (2006). Parallel Worlds: A Journey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, and the Future of the Cosmos. Knopf Doubleday. p. 385. ISBN 978-0307276988.
53. Schutz, Bernard F. (2003). Gravity from the ground up. Cambridge University Press. pp. 361–. ISBN 978-0521455060.
54. Planck collaboration (2013). "Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 571: A16. arXiv:1303.5076. Bibcode:2014A&A...571A..16P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591. S2CID 118349591.
55. "Galactic treasure chest". www.spacetelescope.org. Retrieved 13 August 2018.
56. "Blueprints of the Universe". www.eso.org. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
57. Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2013). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (International ed.). Pearson. p. 1178. ISBN 978-1292022932.
58. Kirshner, Robert P. (2002). The Extravagant Universe: Exploding Stars, Dark Energy and the Accelerating Cosmos. Princeton University Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-0691058627.
59. "Map of the Cosmic Web Generated from Slime Mould Algorithm". www.spacetelescope.org.
60. Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2013). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics (International ed.). Pearson. pp. 1173–1174. ISBN 978-1292022932.
61. Geller, M. J.; Huchra, J. P. (1989). "Mapping the universe". Science. 246 (4932): 897–903. Bibcode:1989Sci...246..897G. doi:10.1126/science.246.4932.897. PMID 17812575. S2CID 31328798.
62. "Biggest void in space is 1 billion light years across". New Scientist. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
63. Wall, Mike (2013-01-11). "Largest structure in universe discovered". Fox News.
64. Horváth, I.; Hakkila, Jon; Bagoly, Z. (2014). "Possible structure in the GRB sky distribution at redshift two". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 561: L12. arXiv:1401.0533. Bibcode:2014A&A...561L..12H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323020. S2CID 24224684.
65. Horvath, I.; Hakkila, J.; Bagoly, Z. (2013). "The largest structure of the Universe, defined by Gamma-Ray Bursts". arXiv:1311.1104 [astro-ph.CO].
66. Klotz, Irene (2013-11-19). . Discovery. Archived from the original on 2016-05-16. Retrieved 2013-11-20.
67. Ferreira, Becky (2021-06-23). "A Structure In Deep Space Is So Giant It's Challenging Standard Physics". Vice.
68. Natalie Wolchover, "The Universe Isn't a Fractal, Study Finds", LiveScience.com, 22 August 2012.
69. Jarrett, T. H. (2004). "Large Scale Structure in the Local Universe: The 2MASS Galaxy Catalog". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 21 (4): 396–403. arXiv:astro-ph/0405069. Bibcode:2004PASA...21..396J. doi:10.1071/AS04050. S2CID 56151100.
70. Hamden, Erika (4 October 2019). "Observing the cosmic web". Science. 366 (6461): 31–32. Bibcode:2019Sci...366...31H. doi:10.1126/science.aaz1318. PMID 31604290. S2CID 203717729.
71. Byrd, Deborah (6 October 2019). "Cosmic Web Fuels Stars And Supermassive Black Holes". earthsky.org.
72. Bacon, R.; Mary, D.; Garel, T.; Blaizot, J.; Maseda, M.; Schaye, J.; Wisotzki, L.; Conseil, S.; Brinchmann, J.; Leclercq, F.; Abril-Melgarejo, V.; Boogaard, L.; Bouché, N. F.; Contini, T.; Feltre, A.; Guiderdoni, B.; Herenz, C.; Kollatschny, W.; Kusakabe, H.; Matthee, J.; Michel-Dansac, L.; Nanayakkara, T.; Richard, J.; Roth, M.; Schmidt, K. B.; Steinmetz, M.; Tresse, L.; Urrutia, T.; Verhamme, A.; Weilbacher, P. M.; Zabl, J.; and Zoutendijk, S. L. (18 March 2021). "The MUSE Extremely Deep Field: The cosmic web in emission at high redshift". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 647 (A107): A107. arXiv:2102.05516. Bibcode:2021A&A...647A.107B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039887. S2CID 231861819. This first detection of the cosmic web structure in Lyα emission in typical filamentary environments, namely outside massive structures typical of web nodes, is a milestone in the long search for the cosmic web signature at high z. This has been possible because of the unprecedented faint surface brightness of 5 × 10−20 erg s−1 cm−2 arcsec−2 achieved by 140 h MUSE observations on the VLT.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
73. Wilford, John Noble (November 10, 1987). "Massive Clusters of Galaxies Defy Concepts of the Universe". The New York Times.
74. "James Webb Space Telescope finds 2 of the most distant galaxies ever seen". Space.com.
75. "New Gamma-Ray Burst Smashes Cosmic Distance Record | Science Mission Directorate". science.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
76. Atkinson, Nancy (2009-10-28). "More Observations of GRB 090423, the Most Distant Known Object in the Universe". Universe Today. Retrieved 2023-09-15.
77. "Light Travel Time Distance". www.astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2023-07-01.
78. Meszaros, Attila; et al. (2009). "Impact on cosmology of the celestial anisotropy of the short gamma-ray bursts". Baltic Astronomy. 18: 293–296. arXiv:1005.1558. Bibcode:2009BaltA..18..293M.

Further reading

• Vicent J. Martínez; Jean-Luc Starck; Enn Saar; David L. Donoho; et al. (2005). "Morphology Of The Galaxy Distribution From Wavelet Denoising". The Astrophysical Journal. 634 (2): 744–755. arXiv:astro-ph/0508326. Bibcode:2005ApJ...634..744M. doi:10.1086/497125. S2CID 14905675.
• Mureika, J. R. & Dyer, C. C. (2004). "Review: Multifractal Analysis of Packed Swiss Cheese Cosmologies". General Relativity and Gravitation. 36 (1): 151–184. arXiv:gr-qc/0505083. Bibcode:2004GReGr..36..151M. doi:10.1023/B:GERG.0000006699.45969.49. S2CID 13977714.
• Gott, III, J. R.; et al. (May 2005). "A Map of the Universe". The Astrophysical Journal. 624 (2): 463–484. arXiv:astro-ph/0310571. Bibcode:2005ApJ...624..463G. doi:10.1086/428890. S2CID 9654355.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Labini, F. Sylos; Montuori, M. & Pietronero, L. (1998). "Scale-invariance of galaxy clustering". Physics Reports. 293 (1): 61–226. arXiv:astro-ph/9711073. Bibcode:1998PhR...293...61S. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(97)00044-6. S2CID 119519125.

External links

• "Millennium Simulation" of structure forming – Max Planck Institute of Astrophysics, Garching, Germany
• NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day: The Sloan Great Wall: Largest Known Structure? (7 November 2007)
• Cosmology FAQ
• Forming Galaxies Captured In The Young Universe By Hubble, VLT & Spitzer
• Animation of the cosmic light horizon
• Inflation and the Cosmic Microwave Background by Charles Lineweaver
• Logarithmic Maps of the Universe
• List of publications of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey
• The Universe Within 14 Billion Light Years – NASA Atlas of the Universe – Note, this map only gives a rough cosmographical estimate of the expected distribution of superclusters within the observable universe; very little actual mapping has been done beyond a distance of one billion light-years.
• Video: The Known Universe, from the American Museum of Natural History
• NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
• Cosmography of the Local Universe at irfu.cea.fr (17:35) (arXiv)
• There are about 10⁸² atoms in the observable universe – LiveScience, July 2021
• Limits to knowledge about Universe – Forbes, May 2019