fbpx
Wikipedia

History of AT&T

The history of AT&T dates back to the invention of the telephone. The Bell Telephone Company was established in 1877 by Alexander Graham Bell, who obtained the first US patent for the telephone, and his father-in-law, Gardiner Greene Hubbard. Bell and Hubbard also established American Telephone and Telegraph Company in 1885, which acquired the Bell Telephone Company and became the primary telephone company in the United States. This company maintained an effective monopoly on local telephone service in the United States until anti-trust regulators agreed to allow AT&T to retain Western Electric and enter general trades computer manufacture and sales in return for its offer to split the Bell System by divesting itself of ownership of the Bell Operating Companies in 1982.

AT&T Corporation was eventually purchased by one of the Regional Bell Operating Companies, the former Southwestern Bell Company, in 2005, and the combined company became known as AT&T Inc.

Origins

 
A Bell System logo (called the Blue Bell) used from 1889 to 1900.[citation needed]
 
AT&T's lines and metallic circuit connections. March 1, 1891.

The formation of the Bell Telephone Company superseded an agreement between Alexander Graham Bell and his financiers, principal among them Gardiner Greene Hubbard and Thomas Sanders. Renamed the National Bell Telephone Company in March 1879, it became the American Bell Telephone Company in March 1880. By 1881, it had bought a controlling interest in the Western Electric Company from Western Union. Only three years earlier, Western Union had turned down Gardiner Hubbard's offer to sell it all rights to the telephone for $100,000 ($2.81 million in 2009 dollars[1]).

In 1880, the management of American Bell created what would become AT&T Long Lines. The project was the first of its kind to create a nationwide long-distance network with a commercially viable cost-structure. This project was formally incorporated into a separate company named American Telephone and Telegraph Company on March 3, 1885. Starting from New York, the network reached Chicago in 1892.

Bell's patent on the telephone expired in 1893, but the company's much larger customer base made its service much more valuable than alternatives and substantial growth continued.

On December 30, 1899, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company bought the assets of American Bell; this was because Massachusetts corporate laws (which limited market capitalization to ten million dollars, preventing the direct growth of American Bell itself) were more restrictive than those of New York, where AT&T was headquartered.[2] With this transfer of assets, AT&T became the parent of the Bell System.[2]

National long-distance service reached San Francisco with the First transcontinental telephone call in 1915. This connection used a system of lines with loading coils and the Audion vacuum tube repeater first tested between New York and Philadelphia in 1913.[3] Transatlantic services started in 1927 using two-way radio, but the first trans-Atlantic telephone cable did not arrive until Sept. 25, 1956, with TAT-1.

Monopoly

 
The Bell System logo and trademark as it appeared in 1972.[citation needed]

As a result of a combination of regulatory actions by government and actions by AT&T, the firm eventually gained what most regard as monopoly status. In 1907, AT&T president Theodore Vail made it known that he was pursuing a goal of "One Policy, One System, Universal Service." AT&T began purchasing competitors, which attracted the attention of antitrust regulators. To avoid antitrust action, in a deal with the government, Vail agreed to the Kingsbury Commitment of 1913. One of the three terms of the agreement forbade AT&T from acquiring any more independent phone companies without the approval of the Interstate Commerce Commission.[4]

G.W. Brock says in The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics Of Market Structure, "[The] provision allowed Bell and the independents to exchange telephones in order to give each other geographical monopolies. So long as only one company served a given geographical area there was little reason to expect price competition to take place."[5] AT&T focused on purchasing companies within specific geographic areas that increased its effective control of the telephone system market, while selling its less-desirable and previously acquired companies to independent buyers. Also included in the Kingsbury Commitment was the requirement that AT&T allow competitors to connect through its phone lines, which reduced the incentive of these companies to build competing long-distance lines.

In 1913, after vacuum-tube inventor Lee de Forest began to suffer financial difficulties, AT&T bought De Forest's vacuum-tube patents for the bargain price of $50,000 ($1.37 million in 2009 dollars[1]). In particular, AT&T acquired ownership of the 'Audion', the first triode (three-element) vacuum tube, which greatly amplified telephone signals. The patent increased AT&T's control over the manufacture and distribution of long-distance telephone services and allowed the Bell System to build the United States' first coast-to-coast telephone line. Thanks to the pressures of World War I, AT&T and RCA owned all useful patents on vacuum tubes. RCA staked a position in wireless communication; AT&T pursued the use of tubes in telephone amplifiers. Some patent allies and partners in RCA were angered when the two companies' research on tubes began to overlap, and there were many patent disputes.

Around 1917, the idea that everyone in the country should have phone service and that the government should promote that began being discussed in government. AT&T agreed, saying in a 1917 annual report: "A combination of like activities under proper control and regulation, the service to the public would be better, more progressive, efficient, and economical than competitive systems." In 1918 the federal government nationalized the entire telecommunications industry, with national security as the stated intent. Rates were regulated so that customers in large cities would pay higher rates to subsidize those in more remote areas. Vail was appointed to manage the telephone system with AT&T being paid a percentage of the telephone revenues. AT&T profited well from the nationalization arrangement which ended a year later. States then began regulating rates so that those in rural areas would not have to pay high prices, and the competition was highly regulated or prohibited in local markets. Also, potential competitors were forbidden from installing new lines to compete, with state governments wishing to avoid "duplication." The claim was that telephone service was a "natural monopoly," meaning that one firm could better serve the public than two or more. Eventually, AT&T's market share amounted to what most would regard as a monopolistic share.

AT&T, RCA, and their patent allies and partners finally settled their disputes in 1926 by compromise. AT&T decided to focus on the telephone business as a communications common carrier and sold its broadcasting subsidiary Broadcasting Company of America to RCA. The assets included station WEAF, which for some time had broadcast from AT&T headquarters in New York City. In return, RCA signed a service agreement with AT&T, ensuring any radio network RCA started would have transmission connections provided by AT&T. Both companies agreed to cross-license patents, ending that aspect of the dispute. RCA, GE, and Westinghouse were now free to combine their assets to form the National Broadcasting Company, or NBC network.

In 1925, AT&T created a new unit called Bell Telephone Laboratories, commonly known as Bell Labs. This research and development unit proved highly successful, pioneering, among other things, radio astronomy, the transistor, the photovoltaic cell, the Unix operating system, and the C programming language. AT&T ranked 13th among United States corporations in the value of World War II military contracts.[6] In 1949, the Justice Department filed an antitrust suit aimed at forcing the divestiture of Western Electric, which was settled seven years later by AT&T's agreement to confine its products and services to common carrier telecommunications and license its patents to "all interested parties." A key effect of this was to ban AT&T from selling computers despite its key role in electronics research and development. Nonetheless, technological innovation continued. For example, AT&T commissioned the first experimental communications satellite, Telstar I in 1962.

 
Standard Western Electric 500-type telephone set, rented to U.S. telephone subscribers.

Public utility commissions in state and local jurisdictions regulated the Bell System and all the other telephone companies. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulated all services across state lines. These commissions controlled the rates that companies could charge and the specific services and equipment they could offer.

AT&T increased its control of the telephone system through its leasing arrangements for telephones and telephone equipment made by its subsidiary, Western Electric. Like most telephones of the time in the United States, Western Electric-made phones were owned not by individual customers, but by local Bell System telephone companies — all of which were in turn owned by AT&T, which also owned Western Electric itself. Each phone was leased from AT&T on a monthly basis by customers, who generally paid for their phone and its connection many times over in cumulative lease fees. This monopoly made millions of extra dollars for AT&T, which had the secondary effect of greatly limiting phone choices and styles. AT&T strictly enforced policies against buying and using phones by other manufacturers that had not first been transferred to and re-rented from the local Bell monopoly. Many phones made by Western Electric thus carried the following disclaimer permanently molded into their housings: "BELL SYSTEM PROPERTY — NOT FOR SALE." Telephones were also labeled with a sticker marking the Bell Operating Company that owned the telephone.

In 1968, the Federal Communications Commission allowed the Carterfone and other devices to be connected directly to the AT&T network, as long as they did not cause damage to the system. This ruling (13 F.C.C.2d 420) created the possibility of selling devices that could connect to the phone system and opened up the market to numerous products, including answering machines, fax machines, cordless phones, computer modems and the early, dialup Internet.

In the 1980s, after some consumers began buying phones from other manufacturers anyway, AT&T changed its policy by selling customers the phone's housing, retaining ownership of the mechanical components — which still required paying AT&T a monthly leasing fee.

For most of the 20th century, AT&T subsidiary AT&T Long Lines thus enjoyed a near-total monopoly on long-distance telephone service in the United States. AT&T also controlled 22 Bell Operating Companies which provided local telephone service to most of the United States. While there were many "independent telephone companies", General Telephone being the most significant, the Bell System was far larger than all the others, and widely considered a monopoly itself.

Erosion of "a natural monopoly"

For many years, AT&T had been permitted to retain its monopoly status under the assumption that it was a natural monopoly. The first erosion to this monopoly occurred in 1956 where the Hush-A-Phone v. United States ruling allowed a third-party device to be attached to rented telephones owned by AT&T. This was followed by the 1968 Carterfone decision that allowed third-party equipment to be connected to the AT&T telephone network. The rise of cheap microwave communications equipment in the 1960s and 1970s opened a window of opportunity for competitors — no longer was the acquisition of expensive rights-of-way necessary for the construction of a long-distance telephone network. In light of this, the FCC permitted MCI (Microwave Communications, Inc) to sell communication services to large businesses. This technical-economic argument against the necessity of AT&T's monopoly position would hold for a mere fifteen years until the beginning of the fiber-optics revolution sounded the end of microwave-based long distance.

Breakup

The rest of the telephone monopoly lasted until January 8, 1982, the date of settlement of United States v. AT&T, a 1974 United States Department of Justice antitrust suit against AT&T. Under the settlement, AT&T ("Ma Bell") agreed to divest its local exchange service operating companies, in return for a chance to go into the computer business (see AT&T Computer Systems). AT&T's local operations were split into seven independent Regional Bell operating companies, commonly known as "Baby Bells".

With the American consumer's new ability to purchase phones outright, AT&T and the Bell System lost the considerable revenues earned from phone leasing by local Bell companies. Forced to compete with other manufacturers for new phone sales, the aging Western Electric phone designs still marketed through AT&T failed to sell, and Western Electric eventually closed all of its U.S. phone manufacturing plants. AT&T, reduced in value by about 70%, continued to run all its long-distance services through AT&T Communications (the new name of AT&T Long Lines), although it lost some market share in the ensuing years to competitors MCI and Sprint.

A sign that hung in many Bell facilities in 1983 read:

There are two giant entities at work in our country, and they both have an amazing influence on our daily lives ... one has given us radar, sonar, stereo, teletype, the transistor, hearing aids, artificial larynxes, talking movies, and the telephone. The other has given us the Civil War, the Spanish–American War, the First World War, the Second World War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, double-digit inflation, double-digit unemployment, the Great Depression, the gasoline crisis, and the Watergate fiasco. Guess which one is now trying to tell the other one how to run its business?[7]

Post break-up restructuring

1991–2004: Spinoffs and change in services

Western Electric was renamed AT&T Technologies and was divided into several units focused on specific customer groups, such as AT&T Network Systems and AT&T Consumer Products. It, along with Bell Labs, would be fully merged and absorbed into American Telephone and Telegraph Company in 1991.

In 1991, AT&T discontinued telegraph services.[8]

After its own attempt to penetrate the computer marketplace failed, in 1991, AT&T acquired NCR Corporation (National Cash Register), hoping to capitalize on the burgeoning personal computer and Unix networked server markets, but was unable to extract lasting financial or technological gains from the merger. After deregulation of the U.S. telecom industry via the Telecommunications Act of 1996, NCR was divested again. At the same time, the majority of AT&T Technologies and the renowned Bell Labs was spun off as Lucent Technologies. The industry as a whole had many other reorganizations since the 1990s, both due to deregulation and because of technological advances reducing demand and pricing power in telecommunications.

In 1994, AT&T purchased the largest cellular carrier, McCaw Cellular, for $11.5 billion and kick-started its cellular division with 2 million subscribers.[9][10]

In 1995, AT&T purchased long-distance provider Alaska Communications System. FCC approval required the company be run as an AT&T subsidiary rather than a more likely absorption into AT&T Communications, giving the company the AT&T Alascom name.

In 1997, AT&T hired former IBM executive C Michael Armstrong as its chief executive officer. Armstrong's vision was to change AT&T from a long-distance carrier into a global "telecommunications supermarket", eying Internet services for the booming dot-com industry.

Armstrong's most prominent strategy was buying significant cable television assets. After acquiring John Malone's TCI and Media One (gaining through the latter a 25% share of Time Warner Cable),[citation needed] AT&T was the largest provider of cable television in the world.[11] It intended to use these assets to bridge the so-called "last mile" and break the Regional Bell Companies' access-monopoly of the consumer household for data and telephony services, but the wager was costly, substantially increasing the company's debt. AT&T acquired TCI in a $48 billion all-stock transaction including the assumption of $16 billion of debt. AT&T acquired MediaOne for $54 billion in cash and stock, after a bidding war with Comcast.

In 1998, AT&T announced a US$1 billion alliance with BT to offer global voice over IP (VoIP) services, called Concert, sparking rumors of a potential merger.[12] But the parties fought for control of the project and could not even agree on the alliance's name. By mid-2001, customers were being directed to sign contracts with the parent companies, and Concert Communications Services, as the venture was eventually known, was scrapped in October that year.


In 1999, AT&T acquired the Olivetti & Oracle Research Lab, from Olivetti and Oracle Corporation. In 2002, it closed down the research part of the lab.

Also in 1999, AT&T paid US$5 billion to purchase IBM's Global Network business, which became AT&T Global Network Services, LLC. As part of the purchase agreement, IBM granted AT&T a five-year, US$5-billion contract to handle much of IBM's networking needs, and AT&T outsourced some of its application processing and data management work to IBM. IBM also committed to billing and installation for AT&T's long-distance customers in a 10-year deal valued at US$4 billion; and assumed management of AT&T's data processing centers.

With long-distance rates falling and the market for telecommunications services overall weakening, AT&T could not sustain the debt it had incurred in these ventures. Moreover, the cost of upgrading TCI's equipment to handle two-way communications proved far higher than pre-merger estimates. AT&T undertook a major reorganization in October 2000, moving its mobile phone and broadband units into separate companies, to allow each unit to raise capital independently.

 
The logo for AT&T Comcast, the original name for the AT&T Broadband/Comcast merger.[citation needed]

On July 9, 2001, it spun off AT&T Wireless Services in what was then the world's largest initial public offering (IPO). Later that year it spun off AT&T Broadband and Liberty Media, which comprised its cable TV assets. AT&T Broadband was subsequently acquired by Comcast in 2002, and AT&T Wireless merged with Cingular Wireless LLC in 2004. The merged wireless phone company operated as Cingular until 2007 when it became AT&T Mobility.

In 2004, the U.S. government eliminated equal access regulations that allowed long-distance phone companies to access the networks owned by the regional Bell carriers at fixed rates. This ultimately caused AT&T to move away from the residential telephone business — declaring in the process that it would no longer market residential telephone service. Instead, its residential focus shifted to offering a voice service over a broadband Internet connection called AT&T CallVantage.

Rise of SBC

One of the new companies formed by the breakup of AT&T was Southwestern Bell Corporation. This company grew continuously over the years until it acquired AT&T in 2005. After this acquisition, SBC took on AT&T's name and branding, and this is the company known as AT&T today.

1984–2001: Southwestern Bell Corporation

American Telephone and Telegraph Company officially transferred full ownership of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to Southwestern Bell Corporation on January 1, 1984. It had three other subsidiaries: Southwestern Bell Publications, Inc., a directory publisher; Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., in the business of mobile telephone service; and Southwestern Bell Telecommunications, Inc., focusing on marketing phone equipment to business customers. The holding company's new president was Zane Edison Barnes.

In 1987, SBC bought Metromedia Inc.'s cellular and paging business. That, in turn, boosted the company to the third-largest cellular communications company in the United States, behind McCaw Cellular and Pacific Telesis. In January 1990, Edward Whitacre took over as president of Southwestern Bell.[13] Headquarters were moved from St. Louis to San Antonio, Texas, in February 1993. It acquired two cable companies in Maryland and Virginia from Hauser Communications for $650 million, becoming the first regional Bell telephone company to acquire a cable company outside its service area. In 1994, it called off a $1.6 billion acquisition attempt for 40% of Cox Cable because of FCC rules on cable companies. SBC would later start selling its current cable company interests.

1995–2000: Changes to the company

 
SBC Communications logo, 2001–2005[citation needed]

In 1995, Southwestern Bell Corp. became SBC Communications. They then combined the Southwestern Bell Telecom division (which made telephone equipment) into the company, due to new FCC rules.

In 1996, SBC announced it would acquire Pacific Telesis Group, a Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC) in California and Nevada. 1997 brought rumors of a proposed merger between AT&T Corporation (the USA's largest long-distance provider) and SBC (the USA's largest local provider). The FCC disapproved of the merger, and it came to end. Later in 1997, SBC sold its last two cable companies, exiting the cable telecom field.

In January 1998, SBC announced it would take over the Southern New England Telephone Company (SNET) for $4.4 billion in stock (the FCC would approve in October 1998). SBC also won a court judgment that would make it easier for RBOCs to enter the long-distance phone service, but it was being challenged by AT&T and the FCC. In May 1998, Ameritech and SBC announced a $62 billion merger, in which SBC would take over Ameritech. After making several organizational changes (such as the sale of Ameritech Wireless to GTE) to satisfy state and federal regulators, the two merged on October 8, 1999. The FCC later fined SBC Communications $6 million for failure to comply with agreements made in order to secure approval of the merger. SBC became the largest RBOC until the Bell Atlantic and the GTE merger. 1998 revenues were $46 billion, placing SBC among the top 15 companies in the Fortune 500.[13]

In January 1999, SBC announced it would purchase Comcast Cellular, for $1.7 billion, plus $1.3 billion of debt. During 1999 SBC continued to prepare to be allowed to provide long-distance phone service. In February SBC acquired up to ten percent of Williams Companies' telecommunications division for about $500 million, who were building a fiber-optic network across the country and would carry SBC's future service. On November 1, 1999, SBC became a part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (lasting through 2015).

2000–2005: One national brand, and acquisition of AT&T Corporation

In 2002, SBC ended marketing its operating companies under different names, and simply opted to give its companies different doing business as names based on the state (a practice already in use by Ameritech since 1993), and it gave the holding companies it had purchased d/b/a names based on their general region.


On January 31, 2005, SBC announced that it would purchase AT&T Corporation for more than US$16 billion. The announcement came almost eight years after SBC and AT&T (originally known as the American Telephone and Telegraph Company) called off their first merger talks and nearly a year after initial merger talks between AT&T Corp. and BellSouth fell apart. AT&T stockholders' meeting in Denver, approved the merger on June 30, 2005. The U.S. Department of Justice cleared the merger on October 27, 2005, and the Federal Communications Commission approved it on October 31, 2005.

The merger was finalized on November 18, 2005.[14] The merger left SBC as the nominal survivor. However, the merged company took the better-known AT&T name and branding, changing its corporate name to AT&T Inc. to differentiate the company from the former AT&T Corporation. On December 1, 2005, the merged company's New York Stock Exchange ticker symbol was changed from "SBC" to the traditional "T" used by AT&T.

While the new AT&T claims the old AT&T's history (dating to 1885) as its own, it retains SBC's corporate structure and pre-2005 stock price history. All pre-2005 regulatory filings are for Southwestern Bell/SBC, not AT&T.

The new AT&T updated the former AT&T's graphic logo (a new "marble" designed by Interbrand took over the "Death Star"); however, the existing AT&T sound trademark (voiced by Pat Fleet) continues to be used.[citation needed]

2006: BellSouth acquisition

 
The BellSouth logo

On Friday December 29, 2006, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved the new AT&T's acquisition of a regional Bell Operating Company, BellSouth, valued at approximately $86 billion (or 1.325 shares of AT&T for each share of BellSouth at the close of trading December 29, 2006).[15] The new combined company retained the name AT&T.[16] The deal consolidated ownership of both Cingular Wireless, which had purchased AT&T's cellular service in 2004, and Yellowpages.com. Cingular reassumed the AT&T name and all of BellSouth's other properties also took the AT&T branding.[17]

2007–2008: restructuring

Transition to new media

 
The AT&T Switching Center in Downtown Los Angeles.

In June 2007, AT&T's new chairman and CEO, Randall Stephenson, discussed how wireless services are the core of "The New AT&T".[18] With declining sales of traditional home phone lines, AT&T plans to roll out various new media such as Video Share, U-verse, and to extend its reach in high speed Internet into rural areas across the country. AT&T announced on June 29, 2007, however, that it was acquiring Dobson Communications. It was then reported on October 2, 2007 that AT&T would purchase Interwise[clarification needed] for $121 million, which it completed on November 2, 2007. Interwise was a leading global provider of voice, Web and video conferencing services to businesses. On October 9, 2007, AT&T purchased 12 MHz of spectrum in the prime 700 MHz spectrum band from privately held Aloha Partners for nearly $2.5 billion; the deal was approved by the FCC on February 4, 2008. On December 4, 2007 AT&T announced plans to acquire Edge Wireless, a regional GSM carrier in the Pacific Northwest.[19] The Edge Wireless acquisition was completed in April 2008.[20]

Headquarters moves and job cuts

On June 27, 2008, AT&T announced that it would move its corporate headquarters from 175 East Houston Street in Downtown San Antonio to One AT&T Plaza in Downtown Dallas.[21][22] The company said that it moved to gain better access to its customers and operations throughout the world, and to the key technology partners, suppliers, innovation and human resources needed as it continues to grow, domestically and internationally.[23] AT&T Inc. previously relocated its corporate headquarters to San Antonio from St. Louis in 1992 when it was then named Southwestern Bell Corporation. The company's Telecom Operations group, which serves residential and regional business customers in 22 U.S. states, remains in San Antonio.[citation needed] Atlanta continues to be the headquarters for AT&T Mobility, with significant offices in Redmond, Washington, the former home of AT&T Wireless. Bedminster, New Jersey, which was the HQ for the original AT&T Corporation, is now the headquarters for the company's Global Business Services group and AT&T Labs. St. Louis continues as home to the company's Directory operations, AT&T Advertising Solutions.[24]

On December 4, 2008, AT&T announced they would be cutting 12,000 jobs due to "economic pressures, a changing business mix and a more streamlined organizational structure".[25]

Post-consolidation wireless acquisitions

2007: Cellular One acquisition

On June 29, 2007 AT&T announced that they had reached an agreement to purchase Dobson Cellular, which provided services in the US under the name Cellular One in primarily rural areas. The closing price was $2.8B USD, or $13 per share. AT&T also agreed to assume the outstanding debt of $2.3B USD. The sale completed on November 15, 2007, with market transition beginning December 9, 2007.[26]

2008: Centennial and Wayport acquisitions

On November 11, 2008, AT&T announced a $944 million buyout of Centennial Communications Corp. The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval, the approval of Centennial's stockholders and other customary closing conditions. Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, Centennial's largest stockholder, has agreed to vote in support of this transaction. In an attempt to quell regulators, on May 9, 2009, AT&T entered an agreement with Verizon Wireless to sell off certain existing Centennial service areas in the states of Louisiana and Mississippi for $240 million pending the successful merger of AT&T and Centennial.[27]

On December 12, 2008, AT&T acquired Wayport, Inc., a major provider of Internet hotspots in the United States. With the acquisition, AT&T's public Wi-Fi deployment climbed to 20,000 hotspots in the United States, the most of any U.S. provider.[28]

2011: Qualcomm spectrum purchase

On December 20, 2011, AT&T and Qualcomm announced that AT&T would buy $1.93 billion worth of spectrum from Qualcomm. Formerly used for FLO TV, this spectrum will be used to expand AT&T's 4G wireless services. AT&T already had spectrum for the purpose close to what it is buying.[29]

2011: Attempted acquisition of T-Mobile USA

On March 20, 2011, AT&T announced its intention to buy T-Mobile USA for $39 billion from Deutsche Telekom. The deal would have seen the addition of 33.7 million subscribers, making AT&T Mobility the largest mobile phone company in the United States.[30][31] AT&T Mobility would have had a 43% market share of mobile phones in the U.S. making AT&T Mobility significantly larger than any of its competitors. Regulators questioned the effects such a deal would have had on both competitors and consumers.[30] AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson however stated that the merger would increase network quality and would lead to large savings for the company. AT&T stated it may have had to sell some assets to gain approval from regulators, but claimed to have done their "homework" on regulations.[32]

Reaction to the announced merger generated both support as well as opposition among various groups and communities.

The merger gained support from a wide number of civil rights, environmental, and business organizations. These include the NAACP, League of United Latin American Citizens, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), and the Sierra Club.[33] Labor organizations such as the AFL–CIO, Teamsters, and the Communications Workers of America also voiced support for the merger. These organizations pointed to AT&T's commitment to labor, social, and environmental standards. Many of these organizations also cited how the merger is likely to accelerate 4G wireless deployment, thus helping underserved communities such as rural areas and disadvantaged urban communities.[33] According to the NAACP, the merger would have "advance[d] increased access to affordable and sustainable wireless broadband services and in turn stimulate job creation and civic engagement throughout our country."[33]

By August 2, 2011, the governors of 26 states had written letters supporting the merger.[34] On July 27 the attorneys general of Utah, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, North Dakota, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming sent a joint letter of support to the FCC.[34] By August 2011 state regulatory agencies in Arizona and Louisiana approved the acquisition.

A diverse group of industry and public-interest organizations opposed AT&T's merger with T-Mobile. Consumer groups including Public Knowledge, Consumers Union, Free Press, and the Media Access Project publicly opposed the AT&T merger. These groups attempted to persuade a majority of the Federal Communications Commission and members of Congress. These organizations feared that the merger will raise prices and stifle innovation by consolidating so much of the wireless industry in one company. Free Press and Public Knowledge started letter-writing campaigns against the deal.[35]

Internet companies were generally skeptical of the merger because it leaves them with fewer counter-parties to negotiate with for getting their content and applications to customers. The AT&T merger might leave them dependent on just two, AT&T, and Verizon. The Computer & Communication Industry Association (CCIA), which counts Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and eBay among its members, opposed the merger. "A deal like this, if not blocked on antitrust grounds, is of deep concern to all the innovative businesses that build everything from apps to handsets. It would be hypocritical for our nation to talk about unleashing innovation on one hand and then stand by as threats to innovation like this are proposed," said Ed Black, head of CCIA.[35]

On April 21, 2011, AT&T defended its proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA before a U.S. Senate committee, saying the combined company would deliver high-speed wireless services to 97 percent of Americans and provide consumer benefits such as fewer dropped calls.[36]

As part of the original negotiations, if AT&T's acquisition of T-Mobile USA were to be rejected by federal regulators, AT&T would need to pay $6 billion, including $3 billion in cash, to T-Mobile USA's parent company Deutsche Telekom.[37]

On August 31, 2011, the Department of Justice officially filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking to block the acquisition.[38][39]

On November 30, 2011, the FCC allowed AT&T to withdraw their merger, saving both carriers from divulging documentation about internal operations. The FCC cited job loss and higher consumer prices as reasons to deny the merger.[40]

On December 19, 2011, AT&T announced that it would permanently end its merger bid after a "thorough review of its options". As per the original acquisition agreement, T-Mobile will receive $3 billion in cash as well as access to $1 billion worth of AT&T-held wireless spectrum.[41][42]

2013–2014: Leap Wireless acquisition

On July 12, 2013, AT&T announced it is agreeing to acquire Leap Wireless (Cricket) for $1.2 billion. The deal says AT&T will be acquiring all of Leap's towers, stores and their 5.3 million subscribers.[43] The merger between AT&T and Leap Wireless was approved by the Federal Communications Commission on March 13, 2014.[44]

Recent developments (2013–present)

In September 2013, AT&T announced it would expand into Latin America through a collaboration with Carlos Slim's América Móvil.[45] On December 17, 2013, AT&T announced plans to sell its Connecticut wireline operations to Stamford-based Frontier Communications. Roughly 2,700 wireline employees supporting AT&T's operations in Connecticut were expected to transfer with the business to Frontier, as well as 900,000 voice connections, 415,000 broadband connections, and 180,000 U-verse video subscribers.[46]

On May 18, 2014, AT&T announced it had agreed to purchase DirecTV for $48.5 billion, or $67.1 billion including assumed debt. The deal was aimed at increasing AT&T's market share in the pay-TV sector and give AT&T access to fast-growing Latin American markets. The transaction closed in July 2015.[47] The deal is subject to conditions for four years, including a requirement for AT&T to expand its fiberoptic broadband service to at least 12.5 million customer locations, not to discriminate against other online video services using bandwidth caps, submit any "interconnection agreements" for government review, and offer low-cost internet services for low-income households.[48][49] AT&T subsequently announced plans to converge its existing U-verse home internet and IPTV brands into a combined platform with DirecTV, tentatively known as AT&T Entertainment.[50][51][52]

On November 7, 2014, AT&T announced its purchase of Iusacell to create a wider North American network.[53] In January 2015, AT&T announced it would be acquiring the bankrupt Mexican wireless business of NII Holdings for around $1.875 billion.[54] AT&T subsequently merged the two companies to create AT&T Mexico.[55]

On March 6, 2015, it was announced that AT&T will be removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average, being replaced by Apple.[56]

On October 20, 2016, it was reported that AT&T was in talks to acquire Time Warner, in an effort to increase its media holdings.[57][58][59] On October 22, 2016, AT&T announced a deal to buy Time Warner for $108.7 billion. If approved by federal regulators, the merger would bring AT&T's telecommunication holdings under the same umbrella as HBO, Turner Broadcasting System and the Warner Bros. studio.[60][61][62]

On February 15, 2017, Time Warner shareholders approved the merger.[63] On February 28, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced that his agency will not review the deal, leaving the review to the US Department of Justice.[64]

On March 15, 2017, the European Commission approved the merger.[65]

AT&T also owns a ~2% stake in Canadian-domiciled entertainment company Lionsgate.[66]

On July 13, 2017, it was reported that AT&T is going to introduce a cloud-based DVR streaming service as part of its effort to create a unified platform across DirecTV and its DirecTV Now streaming service, with U-verse to be added soon.[67][68][69]

On August 22, 2017, the merger was approved by Mexican authorities.[70] On September 5, 2017, the merger was approved by Chilean authorities.[71]

On September 12, 2017, it was reported that AT&T is planning to launch a brand new cable TV-like service for delivery over-the-top over its own or a competitor's broadband network sometime next year.[72]

On October 23, 2017, the deadline was extended for a short period of time to finalize the deal. The original deadline was on October 22.[73] On November 28, 2017, it was announced that the merger would be extended until April 2018.[74]

On November 8, 2017, the United States Department of Justice informed AT&T and Time Warner that they must sell either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System, the group of channels that includes CNN, if they want approval for their $84.5 billion merger, according to a New York Times report citing people briefed on the matter. AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson told Business Insider on November 8 that he had no plans to do that.[75] On November 20, 2017, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim filed a lawsuit under the Clayton Act of 1914 to block the acquisition.[76]

On January 31, 2018, it was reported that AT&T's next generation update of DirecTV Now will launch sometime this Spring.[77]

On March 7, 2018, the company prepared to sell a minority stake of DirecTV Latin America through an IPO, creating a new holding company for those assets named Vrio Corp.[78][79] However, on April 18, just a day before the public debut of Vrio, AT&T canceled the IPO due to market conditions.[80][81]

On March 13, 2018, it was reported that AT&T had filed a trademark for "AT&T TV" with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, a possible signal that the telco company will finally eliminate its current brand names DirecTV and U-verse.[82][83][84]

On June 14, 2018, the acquisition of Time Warner was completed, and Time Warner was renamed to WarnerMedia.[85] In September 2018, AT&T then reorganized operations into four main units: Communications, including consumer and business wireline telephony, AT&T Mobility, and consumer entertainment video services; WarnerMedia, including Turner cable television networks, Warner Bros. film and television production, and HBO; AT&T Latin America, consisting of wireless service in Mexico and video in Latin America and the Caribbean under the Vrio brand; and Advertising and Analytics, since renamed Xandr.[86][87]

On February 26, 2019, it was announced that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals uphold the AT&T acquisition of Time Warner.[88][89]

By 2019, AT&T had developed partnerships with health care providers to develop mobile health-related connectivity devices that aid inpatient care. Key products include a telemetry device that monitors patient metrics, while toggling between WIFI and cellular connectivity.[90]

On April 24, 2020, AT&T announced that effective July 1, 2020, company COO John Stankey will replace Randall Stephenson as CEO of AT&T.[91] It was also acknowledged that AT&T's acquisitions of DirectTV and Time Warner had by this point resulted in a massive debt burden of $200 billion for the company.[91]

As a result of planned cost cutting programs, the sale of Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment was proposed, but ultimately abandoned due to COVID-19 related growth in the Gaming industry, as well as a positive reception to upcoming DC Comics, Lego Star Wars, and Harry Potter titles from fans and critics.[92]

Crunchyroll was sold to Sony's Funimation for US$1.175 billion in December 2020, with the acquisition closing in August 2021.[93][94]

On December 25, 2020, a bombing in Nashville, Tennessee, caused AT&T service outages across the U.S., but primarily in Middle Tennessee. Cellular, wireline telephone, Internet, and U-verse television services were affected due to infrastructure damage to an AT&T service facility located near the blast site.[95][96]

In January 2021, AT&T announced that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, around 300 jobs might get affected as it was planning to cut its workforce in Slovakia.[97]

On February 25, 2021, AT&T announced that it would spin-off DirecTV, U-Verse TV, and DirecTV Stream into a separate entity, selling a 30% stake to TPG Capital (owners of Astound Broadband cable), while retaining a 70% stake in the new standalone company. The deal was closed on August 2, 2021.[98][99]

In May 2021, AT&T announced it will spin off WarnerMedia which will merge with Discovery, Inc. for $43 billion.[100] The merger was completed on April 8, 2022.[101]

Electronic Arts, who were a bidder in the proposed sale of Warner Bros Interactive Entertainment, purchased the mobile gaming studio Playdemic from WBIE for US$1.4 billion in June 2021.[102]

On December 21, 2021, AT&T announced that they had agreed to sell Xandr (and AppNexus) to Microsoft for an undisclosed price, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory reviews.[103]

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b 1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  2. ^ a b Brooks 1976, p. 107.
  3. ^ "First Telephone Repeater". 23 November 2017. from the original on 2020-11-12. Retrieved 2020-01-08.
  4. ^ Brooks 1976, p. 136.
  5. ^ Brock 1981, p. 156.
  6. ^ Peck, Merton J. & Scherer, Frederic M. The Weapons Acquisition Process: An Economic Analysis (1962) Harvard Business School p. 619.
  7. ^ . Archived from the original on 2007-05-12. Retrieved 2013-01-09.
  8. ^ "AT&T exits telegraph business" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 2012-12-09. Retrieved 2013-01-09.
  9. ^ . United States Department of Justice. 1994-07-15. Archived from the original on 2006-10-04.
  10. ^ Richman, Dan (2004-09-21). "The fall of AT&T Wireless". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
  11. ^ "75 Power Players: The Outsides". Next Generation. Imagine Media (11): 61. November 1995.
  12. ^ "AT&T and British Telecom plan a new telecommunications company that will provide new technology in phone, computer, and news delivery services". PBS.org. 1998-07-27.
  13. ^ a b Wu, Tim, The Master Switch 2017-01-09 at the Wayback Machine, New York: Random House, 2010. Cf. especially Chapter 18, "The Return of AT&T" 2021-02-28 at the Wayback Machine, pp. 238–253.
  14. ^ "New AT&T Launches" (Press release). AT&T. November 18, 2005. from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved September 29, 2007.
  15. ^ Vorman, Julie (December 29, 2006). "AT&T closes $86 billion BellSouth deal". Reuters. from the original on January 24, 2008. Retrieved September 29, 2007.
  16. ^ Bartash, Jeffry; Jonathan Burton (March 5, 2006). "AT&T to pay $67 billion for BellSouth". Dow Jones Market Watch. Retrieved September 29, 2007.
  17. ^ "AT&T and BellSouth Join to Create a Premier Global Communications Company" (Press release). AT&T. December 29, 2006. from the original on 11 October 2007. Retrieved September 29, 2007.
  18. ^ Johnson, K C (June 24, 2007). "AT&T's new chief dialed in". Chicago Tribune. from the original on September 20, 2015. Retrieved June 27, 2007.
  19. ^ "AT&T Buys Edge Wireless". www.phonescoop.com. December 4, 2007. Archived from the original on September 7, 2012. Retrieved July 26, 2008.
  20. ^ Antonio, San (April 18, 2008). "AT&T completes buy out of Edge Wireless". American City Business Journals. from the original on December 31, 2008. Retrieved July 26, 2008.
  21. ^ Godinez, Victor and David McLemore. "AT&T moving headquarters to Dallas from San Antonio 2009-06-26 at the Wayback Machine." The Dallas Morning News. Saturday June 28, 2008. Retrieved on June 18, 2009.
  22. ^ "Corporate Inquiries 2009-03-19 at the Wayback Machine." AT&T. Retrieved on March 25, 2009.
  23. ^ . Dallas News. June 27, 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-07-04.
  24. ^ AT&T – News Room (June 27, 2008). AT&T Corporate Headquarters to Move to Dallas 2008-08-28 at the Wayback Machine. Press release. Retrieved on June 27, 2008.
  25. ^ "Job cuts mount as year-end nears" (Press release). AT&T. December 4, 2008. from the original on August 5, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2020.
  26. ^ "AT&T Completes Acquisition of Dobson Communications to Enhance Wireless Coverage" (Press release). Dallas, Texas: AT&T Inc. November 15, 2007. from the original on 24 June 2009. Retrieved May 11, 2009.
  27. ^ . newsticker.welt.de. April 9, 2009. Archived from the original (Webpage) on 22 June 2009. Retrieved May 9, 2009.
  28. ^ "AT&T Advanced Wi-Fi Strategy" (Press release). Dallas, Texas: AT&T Inc. December 12, 2008. from the original on 7 January 2009. Retrieved December 22, 2008.
  29. ^ "AT&T buys $2 billion worth of 4G spectrum from Qualcomm". News & Record. Associated Press. December 20, 2010. Archived from the original on January 3, 2011. Retrieved December 20, 2010.
  30. ^ a b "AT&T to Buy T-Mobile USA for $39 billion". New York Times. March 20, 2011. from the original on 22 March 2011. Retrieved March 20, 2011.
  31. ^ Segan, Sascha (March 20, 2011). "AT&T Buys T-Mobile: Great For Them, Bad For You". Pcmag.com. from the original on March 28, 2012. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
  32. ^ "AT&T and T-Mobile create biggest US firm in $39bn deal". BBC News. March 21, 2011. from the original on November 25, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
  33. ^ a b c German, Kent. "On Call: Civil rights groups line up behind AT&T-T-Mobile merger". CNET. from the original on March 28, 2021. Retrieved August 17, 2011.
  34. ^ a b German, Kent. "States weigh in on AT&T-T-Mobile merger". CNET. from the original on March 28, 2021. Retrieved August 17, 2011.
  35. ^ a b Sara Jerome (March 23, 2011). "T-Mobile, AT&T merger to draw torrent of opposition". The Hill.
  36. ^ Declan McCullagh, CNET. "AT&T defends T-Mobile deal to U.S. Senate." May 11, 2011. Retrieved May 11, 2011.
  37. ^ Don Reisinger, CNET. "Report: AT&T pays $6B if T-Mobile deal fails." May 13, 2011. Retrieved May 13, 2011.
  38. ^ Schoenberg, Tom (September 1, 2011). "T-Mobile Antitrust Challenge Leaves AT&T With Little Recourse on Takeover". Bloomberg. from the original on November 16, 2011. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
  39. ^ Goldman, David (September 1, 2011). "AT&T and T-Mobile: Is the deal dead? No one knows. – September 1, 2011". CNN. from the original on March 9, 2012. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
  40. ^ Shields, Todd (November 30, 2011). "FCC Allows AT&T to Withdraw Merger Application". Bloomberg. from the original on December 1, 2011. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
  41. ^ AT&T (December 19, 2011). "AT&T Ends Bid To Add Network Capacity Through T-Mobile USA Purchase". AT&T. from the original on February 7, 2012. Retrieved December 19, 2011.
  42. ^ Lee, Timothy B. (19 December 2011). "AT&T admits defeat on T-Mobile takeover, will pay $4 billion breakup fee". Ars Technica. from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  43. ^ "AT&T To Acquire Leap Wireless (Cricket) For Around $1.2B". TechCrunch. from the original on July 14, 2013. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
  44. ^ Welch, Chris (March 13, 2014). "FCC approves AT&T's purchase of Leap Wireless, says it's 'in the public interest'". The Verge. from the original on March 13, 2014. Retrieved March 13, 2014.
  45. ^ Sinead Carew (18 September 2013). "AT&T to expand in Latin America with America Movil deal". Reuters. from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
  46. ^ AT&T (17 December 2013). "AT&T Announces Plans to Sell Connecticut Wireline Operations to Frontier Communications for $2.0 Billion". AT&T. from the original on 17 December 2013. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
  47. ^ "AT&T Completes Acquisition of DirecTV". Reuters. January 26, 2015. from the original on January 29, 2017. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  48. ^ "AT&T & DirecTV Merger Gets FCC Approval – With Conditions". Deadline Hollywood. July 24, 2015. from the original on July 25, 2015. Retrieved July 24, 2015.
  49. ^ "FCC approves AT&T–DirecTV merger". The Verge. Vox Media. July 24, 2015. from the original on July 24, 2015. Retrieved July 24, 2015.
  50. ^ Bode, Karl (December 2, 2015). "AT&T Plans on Killing the DirecTV Name Starting in January". DSL Reports. from the original on December 8, 2015. Retrieved December 2, 2015.
  51. ^ Farrell, Mike (December 2, 2015). "AT&T Enters Next Phase in DirecTV Branding". MultiChannel News. from the original on December 4, 2015. Retrieved December 3, 2015.
  52. ^ Littleton, Cynthia (April 26, 2016). "AT&T Sees DirecTV, Broadband Subscriber Gains in Q1 as U-verse Fades". Variety. from the original on April 27, 2016. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  53. ^ Nguyen, Chuong (November 7, 2014). "AT&T to expand North American coverage area with Mexico carrier Iusacell acquisition". Android Central. from the original on January 3, 2016. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  54. ^ "AT&T to buy NII Holdings' wireless business in Mexico". Reuters. January 26, 2015. from the original on September 18, 2015. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  55. ^ "AT&T to merge Nextel and Iusacell, but retain Unefon – BNamericas". BNamericas. 25 August 2015. from the original on 6 March 2017. Retrieved 5 March 2017.
  56. ^ McGrath, Maggie. "Apple To Replace AT&T In Dow Jones Industrial Average". Forbes. from the original on 2016-09-14. Retrieved 2016-08-12.
  57. ^ Hammond, Ed; Sherman, Alex; Moritz, Scott (October 20, 2016). "AT&T Discussed Idea of Takeover in Time Warner Meetings". Bloomberg. from the original on October 21, 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
  58. ^ Yu, Robert (October 20, 2016). "Report: AT&T considering buying Time Warner". USA Today. from the original on October 24, 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
  59. ^ Hagey, Keach; Sharma, Amol; Cimilluca, Dana (October 21, 2016). "AT&T Is in Advanced Talks to Acquire Time Warner". The Wall Street Journal. from the original on October 22, 2016. Retrieved October 21, 2016.
  60. ^ Yu, Roger (October 22, 2016). "AT&T agrees to buy Time Warner for more than $80B". USA Today. from the original on October 23, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  61. ^ Gryta, Thomas; Hagey, Keach; Cimilluca, Dana (October 22, 2016). "AT&T Reaches Deal to Buy Time Warner for $86 Billion". The Wall Street Journal. from the original on October 23, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2016.
  62. ^ Littleton, Cynthia (October 22, 2016). "AT&T Sets $85.4 Billion Time Warner Deal, CEOs Talk 'Unique' Potential of Combination". Variety. from the original on October 23, 2016. Retrieved October 23, 2016.
  63. ^ Kludt, Tom (15 February 2017). "Time Warner shareholders vote to approve AT&T merger". CNNMoney. from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 3 August 2020.
  64. ^ "FCC chief: AT&T-Time Warner deal won't face agency's scrutiny". USA TODAY. from the original on 2017-10-11. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  65. ^ Reuters, Thomson (March 15, 2017). "AT&T's $85.4 billion deal for Time Warner wins EU thumbs-up". Business Insider. from the original on March 16, 2017. Retrieved April 7, 2017. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  66. ^ "Starz Accepts Rate Cut As Lionsgate Offers Stock For New Deals With AT&T". Deadline. 22 September 2016. from the original on May 19, 2017. Retrieved August 2, 2017.
  67. ^ Lawler, Richard (July 13, 2017). "AT&T's 'next-gen' TV platform rollout will start on DirecTV Now". Engadget. from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  68. ^ Lieberman, David (July 13, 2017). "AT&T To Offer Cloud-Based DVR To Streaming Services". Deadline Hollywood. from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  69. ^ Frankel, Daniel (July 13, 2017). "DirecTV Now to finally get cloud DVR as part of AT&T video platform rollout". Fierce Cable. from the original on July 23, 2017. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  70. ^ Aycock, Jason (August 22, 2017). "AT&T's $85B Time Warner deal gets Mexico's approval". Seeking Alpha. from the original on June 17, 2018. Retrieved August 22, 2017.
  71. ^ Munson, Ben (September 5, 2017). "AT&T-Time Warner merger approved with conditions by Chilean regulators". Fierce Cable. from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
  72. ^ Engebretson, Joan (September 12, 2017). "AT&T CEO: Bye-Bye DirecTV, Hello AT&T OTT Video". Telecompetitor. from the original on September 14, 2017. Retrieved September 13, 2017.
  73. ^ "AT&T extends Time Warner merger deadline". New York Post. October 23, 2017. from the original on October 23, 2017. Retrieved October 23, 2017.
  74. ^ Patten, Dade Hayes, Dominic (29 November 2017). "AT&T & DOJ Fire Off Dueling Trial Dates In Merger War – Update". from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
  75. ^ Ciolli, Joe (November 8, 2017). "AT&T has 'no intention' of selling CNN". AOL. from the original on November 9, 2017. Retrieved November 8, 2017.
  76. ^ Fung, Brian (November 21, 2017). "The Justice Department is suing AT&T to block its $85 billion bid for Time Warner". The Washington Post. from the original on November 21, 2017. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
  77. ^ Fingas, Jon (January 31, 2018). "AT&T's big DirecTV Now update arrives this Spring". Engadget. from the original on February 1, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
  78. ^ "AT&T Inc. Announces Filing of a Registration Statement for Potential IPO of Minority Stake in DIRECTV Latin America". Business Wire. March 7, 2018. from the original on March 15, 2018. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  79. ^ Spangler, Todd (March 7, 2018). "AT&T's DirecTV Latin America Unit Files for IPO as Prelude to Possible Spinoff". Variety. from the original on March 10, 2018. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  80. ^ . PR Newswire. April 18, 2018. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved June 14, 2018.
  81. ^ "At the last minute, AT&T withdraws the planned IPO of its Vrio unit". CNBC. Reuters. April 19, 2018. from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved June 14, 2018.
  82. ^ Swann, Phillip (March 13, 2018). "AT&T Files Trademark For AT&T TV". TV Answer Man. from the original on March 13, 2018. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  83. ^ Bode, Karl (March 16, 2018). "'AT&T TV' Trademark Hints At Another New Streaming Service". DSL Reports. from the original on March 17, 2018. Retrieved March 18, 2018.
  84. ^ Swann, Phillip (March 19, 2018). "Will AT&T Get Rid Of U-verse?". TV Answer Man. from the original on March 20, 2018. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  85. ^ Patel, Nilay (15 June 2018). "The court's decision to let AT&T and Time Warner to merge is ridiculously bad". The Verge. Vox Media. from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2019.
  86. ^ "SEC Form 8-K". otp.tools.investis.com}. September 21, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2019.
  87. ^ Betz, Brandy (September 21, 2018). "AT&T revises segment structure on Time Warner buy". Seeking Alpha. Retrieved May 15, 2019.
  88. ^ Gardner, Eriq (February 26, 2019). "Appeals Court Won't Stop the AT&T-Time Warner Merger". The Hollywood Reporter. from the original on February 27, 2019. Retrieved February 26, 2019.
  89. ^ Bartz, Diane; Shepardson, David (February 26, 2019). "UPDATE 2-AT&T defeats U.S. in merger fight to buy Time Warner". CNBC. from the original on February 26, 2019. Retrieved February 26, 2019.
  90. ^ Donovan, Fred (March 12, 2019). "AT&T, Nihon Kohden Expand Telemeter Wireless Networking Options". Hit Infrastructure. Hit Infrastructure. Retrieved October 14, 2019.
  91. ^ a b "AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson to step down, COO Stankey to take over". CNBC. from the original on 2020-09-25. Retrieved 2020-05-09.
  92. ^ Ahmed, Nabila; Moritz, Scott (September 1, 2020). "AT&T to Scrap Sale of Warner Bros. Video-Game Unit". Bloomberg.com. from the original on September 4, 2020. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
  93. ^ Moore, D.M. (December 9, 2020). "Sony's Funimation acquires anime streaming service Crunchyroll for $1.175 billion". Polygon. from the original on February 2, 2021. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
  94. ^ Mateo, Alex (August 9, 2021). "Sony's Funimation Global Group Completes Acquisition of Crunchyroll from AT&T". Anime News Network. from the original on August 9, 2021. Retrieved August 9, 2021.
  95. ^ Gill, Joey; Posey, Sebastian (December 25, 2020). "AT&T outages across Tennessee, Kentucky affecting multiple 911 services". WKRN News 2. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
  96. ^ Timms, Mariah (December 25, 2020). "AT&T outage reported: Planes grounded, 911 disrupted in wake of Nashville explosion. See the outage map". The Tennessean. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
  97. ^ "AT&T to cut Slovakia workforce, unions expect 300 jobs to go". Reuters. January 18, 2021. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
  98. ^ Goldsmith, Jill (February 25, 2021). "WarnerMedia Parent AT&T Sells DirecTV Stake To Private Equity Firm TPG". Deadline.
  99. ^ Hayes, Dade (August 2, 2021). "AT&T Completes DirecTV Spinoff; Satellite Operator Unites Its Internet-Delivered Bundles Under New Brand DirecTV Stream". Deadline Hollywood.
  100. ^ Stelter, Brian (17 May 2021). "AT&T spins off WarnerMedia, combines it with Discovery". CNN.
  101. ^ Koblin, John (April 8, 2022). "Hollywood Gets a New Giant". The New York Times. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  102. ^ Goldsmith, Jill (June 23, 2021). "AT&T, WarnerMedia Sell Playdemic Mobile Game Studio To Electronic Arts For $1.4 Billion". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved June 23, 2021.
  103. ^ Foley, Mary Jo (December 21, 2021). "Microsoft to buy Xandr ad marketplace from AT&T". ZDNet. Retrieved December 21, 2021.

Bibliography

External links

  • Official website
  • History and science resources at The Franklin Institute's Case Files online exhibit.

Further reading

  • Coll, Steve, The Deal of the Century: The Breakup of AT&T, New York: Atheneum.

history, history, dates, back, invention, telephone, bell, telephone, company, established, 1877, alexander, graham, bell, obtained, first, patent, telephone, father, gardiner, greene, hubbard, bell, hubbard, also, established, american, telephone, telegraph, . The history of AT amp T dates back to the invention of the telephone The Bell Telephone Company was established in 1877 by Alexander Graham Bell who obtained the first US patent for the telephone and his father in law Gardiner Greene Hubbard Bell and Hubbard also established American Telephone and Telegraph Company in 1885 which acquired the Bell Telephone Company and became the primary telephone company in the United States This company maintained an effective monopoly on local telephone service in the United States until anti trust regulators agreed to allow AT amp T to retain Western Electric and enter general trades computer manufacture and sales in return for its offer to split the Bell System by divesting itself of ownership of the Bell Operating Companies in 1982 AT amp T Corporation was eventually purchased by one of the Regional Bell Operating Companies the former Southwestern Bell Company in 2005 and the combined company became known as AT amp T Inc Contents 1 Origins 2 Monopoly 2 1 Erosion of a natural monopoly 3 Breakup 4 Post break up restructuring 4 1 1991 2004 Spinoffs and change in services 5 Rise of SBC 5 1 1984 2001 Southwestern Bell Corporation 5 2 1995 2000 Changes to the company 5 3 2000 2005 One national brand and acquisition of AT amp T Corporation 5 4 2006 BellSouth acquisition 5 5 2007 2008 restructuring 5 5 1 Transition to new media 5 5 2 Headquarters moves and job cuts 6 Post consolidation wireless acquisitions 6 1 2007 Cellular One acquisition 6 2 2008 Centennial and Wayport acquisitions 6 3 2011 Qualcomm spectrum purchase 6 4 2011 Attempted acquisition of T Mobile USA 6 5 2013 2014 Leap Wireless acquisition 7 Recent developments 2013 present 8 See also 9 Footnotes 10 Bibliography 11 External links 12 Further readingOrigins Edit A Bell System logo called the Blue Bell used from 1889 to 1900 citation needed AT amp T s lines and metallic circuit connections March 1 1891 The formation of the Bell Telephone Company superseded an agreement between Alexander Graham Bell and his financiers principal among them Gardiner Greene Hubbard and Thomas Sanders Renamed the National Bell Telephone Company in March 1879 it became the American Bell Telephone Company in March 1880 By 1881 it had bought a controlling interest in the Western Electric Company from Western Union Only three years earlier Western Union had turned down Gardiner Hubbard s offer to sell it all rights to the telephone for 100 000 2 81 million in 2009 dollars 1 In 1880 the management of American Bell created what would become AT amp T Long Lines The project was the first of its kind to create a nationwide long distance network with a commercially viable cost structure This project was formally incorporated into a separate company named American Telephone and Telegraph Company on March 3 1885 Starting from New York the network reached Chicago in 1892 Bell s patent on the telephone expired in 1893 but the company s much larger customer base made its service much more valuable than alternatives and substantial growth continued On December 30 1899 the American Telephone and Telegraph Company bought the assets of American Bell this was because Massachusetts corporate laws which limited market capitalization to ten million dollars preventing the direct growth of American Bell itself were more restrictive than those of New York where AT amp T was headquartered 2 With this transfer of assets AT amp T became the parent of the Bell System 2 National long distance service reached San Francisco with the First transcontinental telephone call in 1915 This connection used a system of lines with loading coils and the Audion vacuum tube repeater first tested between New York and Philadelphia in 1913 3 Transatlantic services started in 1927 using two way radio but the first trans Atlantic telephone cable did not arrive until Sept 25 1956 with TAT 1 Monopoly EditFurther information Bell System The Bell System logo and trademark as it appeared in 1972 citation needed As a result of a combination of regulatory actions by government and actions by AT amp T the firm eventually gained what most regard as monopoly status In 1907 AT amp T president Theodore Vail made it known that he was pursuing a goal of One Policy One System Universal Service AT amp T began purchasing competitors which attracted the attention of antitrust regulators To avoid antitrust action in a deal with the government Vail agreed to the Kingsbury Commitment of 1913 One of the three terms of the agreement forbade AT amp T from acquiring any more independent phone companies without the approval of the Interstate Commerce Commission 4 G W Brock says in The Telecommunications Industry The Dynamics Of Market Structure The provision allowed Bell and the independents to exchange telephones in order to give each other geographical monopolies So long as only one company served a given geographical area there was little reason to expect price competition to take place 5 AT amp T focused on purchasing companies within specific geographic areas that increased its effective control of the telephone system market while selling its less desirable and previously acquired companies to independent buyers Also included in the Kingsbury Commitment was the requirement that AT amp T allow competitors to connect through its phone lines which reduced the incentive of these companies to build competing long distance lines In 1913 after vacuum tube inventor Lee de Forest began to suffer financial difficulties AT amp T bought De Forest s vacuum tube patents for the bargain price of 50 000 1 37 million in 2009 dollars 1 In particular AT amp T acquired ownership of the Audion the first triode three element vacuum tube which greatly amplified telephone signals The patent increased AT amp T s control over the manufacture and distribution of long distance telephone services and allowed the Bell System to build the United States first coast to coast telephone line Thanks to the pressures of World War I AT amp T and RCA owned all useful patents on vacuum tubes RCA staked a position in wireless communication AT amp T pursued the use of tubes in telephone amplifiers Some patent allies and partners in RCA were angered when the two companies research on tubes began to overlap and there were many patent disputes Around 1917 the idea that everyone in the country should have phone service and that the government should promote that began being discussed in government AT amp T agreed saying in a 1917 annual report A combination of like activities under proper control and regulation the service to the public would be better more progressive efficient and economical than competitive systems In 1918 the federal government nationalized the entire telecommunications industry with national security as the stated intent Rates were regulated so that customers in large cities would pay higher rates to subsidize those in more remote areas Vail was appointed to manage the telephone system with AT amp T being paid a percentage of the telephone revenues AT amp T profited well from the nationalization arrangement which ended a year later States then began regulating rates so that those in rural areas would not have to pay high prices and the competition was highly regulated or prohibited in local markets Also potential competitors were forbidden from installing new lines to compete with state governments wishing to avoid duplication The claim was that telephone service was a natural monopoly meaning that one firm could better serve the public than two or more Eventually AT amp T s market share amounted to what most would regard as a monopolistic share AT amp T RCA and their patent allies and partners finally settled their disputes in 1926 by compromise AT amp T decided to focus on the telephone business as a communications common carrier and sold its broadcasting subsidiary Broadcasting Company of America to RCA The assets included station WEAF which for some time had broadcast from AT amp T headquarters in New York City In return RCA signed a service agreement with AT amp T ensuring any radio network RCA started would have transmission connections provided by AT amp T Both companies agreed to cross license patents ending that aspect of the dispute RCA GE and Westinghouse were now free to combine their assets to form the National Broadcasting Company or NBC network In 1925 AT amp T created a new unit called Bell Telephone Laboratories commonly known as Bell Labs This research and development unit proved highly successful pioneering among other things radio astronomy the transistor the photovoltaic cell the Unix operating system and the C programming language AT amp T ranked 13th among United States corporations in the value of World War II military contracts 6 In 1949 the Justice Department filed an antitrust suit aimed at forcing the divestiture of Western Electric which was settled seven years later by AT amp T s agreement to confine its products and services to common carrier telecommunications and license its patents to all interested parties A key effect of this was to ban AT amp T from selling computers despite its key role in electronics research and development Nonetheless technological innovation continued For example AT amp T commissioned the first experimental communications satellite Telstar I in 1962 Standard Western Electric 500 type telephone set rented to U S telephone subscribers Public utility commissions in state and local jurisdictions regulated the Bell System and all the other telephone companies The Federal Communications Commission FCC regulated all services across state lines These commissions controlled the rates that companies could charge and the specific services and equipment they could offer AT amp T increased its control of the telephone system through its leasing arrangements for telephones and telephone equipment made by its subsidiary Western Electric Like most telephones of the time in the United States Western Electric made phones were owned not by individual customers but by local Bell System telephone companies all of which were in turn owned by AT amp T which also owned Western Electric itself Each phone was leased from AT amp T on a monthly basis by customers who generally paid for their phone and its connection many times over in cumulative lease fees This monopoly made millions of extra dollars for AT amp T which had the secondary effect of greatly limiting phone choices and styles AT amp T strictly enforced policies against buying and using phones by other manufacturers that had not first been transferred to and re rented from the local Bell monopoly Many phones made by Western Electric thus carried the following disclaimer permanently molded into their housings BELL SYSTEM PROPERTY NOT FOR SALE Telephones were also labeled with a sticker marking the Bell Operating Company that owned the telephone In 1968 the Federal Communications Commission allowed the Carterfone and other devices to be connected directly to the AT amp T network as long as they did not cause damage to the system This ruling 13 F C C 2d 420 created the possibility of selling devices that could connect to the phone system and opened up the market to numerous products including answering machines fax machines cordless phones computer modems and the early dialup Internet In the 1980s after some consumers began buying phones from other manufacturers anyway AT amp T changed its policy by selling customers the phone s housing retaining ownership of the mechanical components which still required paying AT amp T a monthly leasing fee For most of the 20th century AT amp T subsidiary AT amp T Long Lines thus enjoyed a near total monopoly on long distance telephone service in the United States AT amp T also controlled 22 Bell Operating Companies which provided local telephone service to most of the United States While there were many independent telephone companies General Telephone being the most significant the Bell System was far larger than all the others and widely considered a monopoly itself Erosion of a natural monopoly Edit For many years AT amp T had been permitted to retain its monopoly status under the assumption that it was a natural monopoly The first erosion to this monopoly occurred in 1956 where the Hush A Phone v United States ruling allowed a third party device to be attached to rented telephones owned by AT amp T This was followed by the 1968 Carterfone decision that allowed third party equipment to be connected to the AT amp T telephone network The rise of cheap microwave communications equipment in the 1960s and 1970s opened a window of opportunity for competitors no longer was the acquisition of expensive rights of way necessary for the construction of a long distance telephone network In light of this the FCC permitted MCI Microwave Communications Inc to sell communication services to large businesses This technical economic argument against the necessity of AT amp T s monopoly position would hold for a mere fifteen years until the beginning of the fiber optics revolution sounded the end of microwave based long distance Breakup EditFurther information Breakup of AT amp T and Regional Bell Operating Company The rest of the telephone monopoly lasted until January 8 1982 the date of settlement of United States v AT amp T a 1974 United States Department of Justice antitrust suit against AT amp T Under the settlement AT amp T Ma Bell agreed to divest its local exchange service operating companies in return for a chance to go into the computer business see AT amp T Computer Systems AT amp T s local operations were split into seven independent Regional Bell operating companies commonly known as Baby Bells With the American consumer s new ability to purchase phones outright AT amp T and the Bell System lost the considerable revenues earned from phone leasing by local Bell companies Forced to compete with other manufacturers for new phone sales the aging Western Electric phone designs still marketed through AT amp T failed to sell and Western Electric eventually closed all of its U S phone manufacturing plants AT amp T reduced in value by about 70 continued to run all its long distance services through AT amp T Communications the new name of AT amp T Long Lines although it lost some market share in the ensuing years to competitors MCI and Sprint A sign that hung in many Bell facilities in 1983 read There are two giant entities at work in our country and they both have an amazing influence on our daily lives one has given us radar sonar stereo teletype the transistor hearing aids artificial larynxes talking movies and the telephone The other has given us the Civil War the Spanish American War the First World War the Second World War the Korean War the Vietnam War double digit inflation double digit unemployment the Great Depression the gasoline crisis and the Watergate fiasco Guess which one is now trying to tell the other one how to run its business 7 Post break up restructuring Edit1991 2004 Spinoffs and change in services Edit Western Electric was renamed AT amp T Technologies and was divided into several units focused on specific customer groups such as AT amp T Network Systems and AT amp T Consumer Products It along with Bell Labs would be fully merged and absorbed into American Telephone and Telegraph Company in 1991 In 1991 AT amp T discontinued telegraph services 8 After its own attempt to penetrate the computer marketplace failed in 1991 AT amp T acquired NCR Corporation National Cash Register hoping to capitalize on the burgeoning personal computer and Unix networked server markets but was unable to extract lasting financial or technological gains from the merger After deregulation of the U S telecom industry via the Telecommunications Act of 1996 NCR was divested again At the same time the majority of AT amp T Technologies and the renowned Bell Labs was spun off as Lucent Technologies The industry as a whole had many other reorganizations since the 1990s both due to deregulation and because of technological advances reducing demand and pricing power in telecommunications In 1994 AT amp T purchased the largest cellular carrier McCaw Cellular for 11 5 billion and kick started its cellular division with 2 million subscribers 9 10 In 1995 AT amp T purchased long distance provider Alaska Communications System FCC approval required the company be run as an AT amp T subsidiary rather than a more likely absorption into AT amp T Communications giving the company the AT amp T Alascom name In 1997 AT amp T hired former IBM executive C Michael Armstrong as its chief executive officer Armstrong s vision was to change AT amp T from a long distance carrier into a global telecommunications supermarket eying Internet services for the booming dot com industry Armstrong s most prominent strategy was buying significant cable television assets After acquiring John Malone s TCI and Media One gaining through the latter a 25 share of Time Warner Cable citation needed AT amp T was the largest provider of cable television in the world 11 It intended to use these assets to bridge the so called last mile and break the Regional Bell Companies access monopoly of the consumer household for data and telephony services but the wager was costly substantially increasing the company s debt AT amp T acquired TCI in a 48 billion all stock transaction including the assumption of 16 billion of debt AT amp T acquired MediaOne for 54 billion in cash and stock after a bidding war with Comcast In 1998 AT amp T announced a US 1 billion alliance with BT to offer global voice over IP VoIP services called Concert sparking rumors of a potential merger 12 But the parties fought for control of the project and could not even agree on the alliance s name By mid 2001 customers were being directed to sign contracts with the parent companies and Concert Communications Services as the venture was eventually known was scrapped in October that year In 1999 AT amp T acquired the Olivetti amp Oracle Research Lab from Olivetti and Oracle Corporation In 2002 it closed down the research part of the lab Also in 1999 AT amp T paid US 5 billion to purchase IBM s Global Network business which became AT amp T Global Network Services LLC As part of the purchase agreement IBM granted AT amp T a five year US 5 billion contract to handle much of IBM s networking needs and AT amp T outsourced some of its application processing and data management work to IBM IBM also committed to billing and installation for AT amp T s long distance customers in a 10 year deal valued at US 4 billion and assumed management of AT amp T s data processing centers With long distance rates falling and the market for telecommunications services overall weakening AT amp T could not sustain the debt it had incurred in these ventures Moreover the cost of upgrading TCI s equipment to handle two way communications proved far higher than pre merger estimates AT amp T undertook a major reorganization in October 2000 moving its mobile phone and broadband units into separate companies to allow each unit to raise capital independently The logo for AT amp T Comcast the original name for the AT amp T Broadband Comcast merger citation needed On July 9 2001 it spun off AT amp T Wireless Services in what was then the world s largest initial public offering IPO Later that year it spun off AT amp T Broadband and Liberty Media which comprised its cable TV assets AT amp T Broadband was subsequently acquired by Comcast in 2002 and AT amp T Wireless merged with Cingular Wireless LLC in 2004 The merged wireless phone company operated as Cingular until 2007 when it became AT amp T Mobility In 2004 the U S government eliminated equal access regulations that allowed long distance phone companies to access the networks owned by the regional Bell carriers at fixed rates This ultimately caused AT amp T to move away from the residential telephone business declaring in the process that it would no longer market residential telephone service Instead its residential focus shifted to offering a voice service over a broadband Internet connection called AT amp T CallVantage Rise of SBC EditFurther information AT amp T One of the new companies formed by the breakup of AT amp T was Southwestern Bell Corporation This company grew continuously over the years until it acquired AT amp T in 2005 After this acquisition SBC took on AT amp T s name and branding and this is the company known as AT amp T today 1984 2001 Southwestern Bell Corporation Edit American Telephone and Telegraph Company officially transferred full ownership of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to Southwestern Bell Corporation on January 1 1984 It had three other subsidiaries Southwestern Bell Publications Inc a directory publisher Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems Inc in the business of mobile telephone service and Southwestern Bell Telecommunications Inc focusing on marketing phone equipment to business customers The holding company s new president was Zane Edison Barnes In 1987 SBC bought Metromedia Inc s cellular and paging business That in turn boosted the company to the third largest cellular communications company in the United States behind McCaw Cellular and Pacific Telesis In January 1990 Edward Whitacre took over as president of Southwestern Bell 13 Headquarters were moved from St Louis to San Antonio Texas in February 1993 It acquired two cable companies in Maryland and Virginia from Hauser Communications for 650 million becoming the first regional Bell telephone company to acquire a cable company outside its service area In 1994 it called off a 1 6 billion acquisition attempt for 40 of Cox Cable because of FCC rules on cable companies SBC would later start selling its current cable company interests 1995 2000 Changes to the company Edit SBC Communications logo 2001 2005 citation needed In 1995 Southwestern Bell Corp became SBC Communications They then combined the Southwestern Bell Telecom division which made telephone equipment into the company due to new FCC rules In 1996 SBC announced it would acquire Pacific Telesis Group a Regional Bell Operating Company RBOC in California and Nevada 1997 brought rumors of a proposed merger between AT amp T Corporation the USA s largest long distance provider and SBC the USA s largest local provider The FCC disapproved of the merger and it came to end Later in 1997 SBC sold its last two cable companies exiting the cable telecom field In January 1998 SBC announced it would take over the Southern New England Telephone Company SNET for 4 4 billion in stock the FCC would approve in October 1998 SBC also won a court judgment that would make it easier for RBOCs to enter the long distance phone service but it was being challenged by AT amp T and the FCC In May 1998 Ameritech and SBC announced a 62 billion merger in which SBC would take over Ameritech After making several organizational changes such as the sale of Ameritech Wireless to GTE to satisfy state and federal regulators the two merged on October 8 1999 The FCC later fined SBC Communications 6 million for failure to comply with agreements made in order to secure approval of the merger SBC became the largest RBOC until the Bell Atlantic and the GTE merger 1998 revenues were 46 billion placing SBC among the top 15 companies in the Fortune 500 13 In January 1999 SBC announced it would purchase Comcast Cellular for 1 7 billion plus 1 3 billion of debt During 1999 SBC continued to prepare to be allowed to provide long distance phone service In February SBC acquired up to ten percent of Williams Companies telecommunications division for about 500 million who were building a fiber optic network across the country and would carry SBC s future service On November 1 1999 SBC became a part of the Dow Jones Industrial Average lasting through 2015 2000 2005 One national brand and acquisition of AT amp T Corporation Edit This section needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed February 2010 Learn how and when to remove this template message In 2002 SBC ended marketing its operating companies under different names and simply opted to give its companies different doing business as names based on the state a practice already in use by Ameritech since 1993 and it gave the holding companies it had purchased d b a names based on their general region On January 31 2005 SBC announced that it would purchase AT amp T Corporation for more than US 16 billion The announcement came almost eight years after SBC and AT amp T originally known as the American Telephone and Telegraph Company called off their first merger talks and nearly a year after initial merger talks between AT amp T Corp and BellSouth fell apart AT amp T stockholders meeting in Denver approved the merger on June 30 2005 The U S Department of Justice cleared the merger on October 27 2005 and the Federal Communications Commission approved it on October 31 2005 The merger was finalized on November 18 2005 14 The merger left SBC as the nominal survivor However the merged company took the better known AT amp T name and branding changing its corporate name to AT amp T Inc to differentiate the company from the former AT amp T Corporation On December 1 2005 the merged company s New York Stock Exchange ticker symbol was changed from SBC to the traditional T used by AT amp T While the new AT amp T claims the old AT amp T s history dating to 1885 as its own it retains SBC s corporate structure and pre 2005 stock price history All pre 2005 regulatory filings are for Southwestern Bell SBC not AT amp T The new AT amp T updated the former AT amp T s graphic logo a new marble designed by Interbrand took over the Death Star however the existing AT amp T sound trademark voiced by Pat Fleet continues to be used citation needed 2006 BellSouth acquisition Edit The BellSouth logo On Friday December 29 2006 the Federal Communications Commission FCC approved the new AT amp T s acquisition of a regional Bell Operating Company BellSouth valued at approximately 86 billion or 1 325 shares of AT amp T for each share of BellSouth at the close of trading December 29 2006 15 The new combined company retained the name AT amp T 16 The deal consolidated ownership of both Cingular Wireless which had purchased AT amp T s cellular service in 2004 and Yellowpages com Cingular reassumed the AT amp T name and all of BellSouth s other properties also took the AT amp T branding 17 2007 2008 restructuring Edit Transition to new media Edit The AT amp T Switching Center in Downtown Los Angeles In June 2007 AT amp T s new chairman and CEO Randall Stephenson discussed how wireless services are the core of The New AT amp T 18 With declining sales of traditional home phone lines AT amp T plans to roll out various new media such as Video Share U verse and to extend its reach in high speed Internet into rural areas across the country AT amp T announced on June 29 2007 however that it was acquiring Dobson Communications It was then reported on October 2 2007 that AT amp T would purchase Interwise clarification needed for 121 million which it completed on November 2 2007 Interwise was a leading global provider of voice Web and video conferencing services to businesses On October 9 2007 AT amp T purchased 12 MHz of spectrum in the prime 700 MHz spectrum band from privately held Aloha Partners for nearly 2 5 billion the deal was approved by the FCC on February 4 2008 On December 4 2007 AT amp T announced plans to acquire Edge Wireless a regional GSM carrier in the Pacific Northwest 19 The Edge Wireless acquisition was completed in April 2008 20 Headquarters moves and job cuts Edit On June 27 2008 AT amp T announced that it would move its corporate headquarters from 175 East Houston Street in Downtown San Antonio to One AT amp T Plaza in Downtown Dallas 21 22 The company said that it moved to gain better access to its customers and operations throughout the world and to the key technology partners suppliers innovation and human resources needed as it continues to grow domestically and internationally 23 AT amp T Inc previously relocated its corporate headquarters to San Antonio from St Louis in 1992 when it was then named Southwestern Bell Corporation The company s Telecom Operations group which serves residential and regional business customers in 22 U S states remains in San Antonio citation needed Atlanta continues to be the headquarters for AT amp T Mobility with significant offices in Redmond Washington the former home of AT amp T Wireless Bedminster New Jersey which was the HQ for the original AT amp T Corporation is now the headquarters for the company s Global Business Services group and AT amp T Labs St Louis continues as home to the company s Directory operations AT amp T Advertising Solutions 24 On December 4 2008 AT amp T announced they would be cutting 12 000 jobs due to economic pressures a changing business mix and a more streamlined organizational structure 25 Post consolidation wireless acquisitions Edit2007 Cellular One acquisition Edit On June 29 2007 AT amp T announced that they had reached an agreement to purchase Dobson Cellular which provided services in the US under the name Cellular One in primarily rural areas The closing price was 2 8B USD or 13 per share AT amp T also agreed to assume the outstanding debt of 2 3B USD The sale completed on November 15 2007 with market transition beginning December 9 2007 26 2008 Centennial and Wayport acquisitions Edit On November 11 2008 AT amp T announced a 944 million buyout of Centennial Communications Corp The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval the approval of Centennial s stockholders and other customary closing conditions Welsh Carson Anderson amp Stowe Centennial s largest stockholder has agreed to vote in support of this transaction In an attempt to quell regulators on May 9 2009 AT amp T entered an agreement with Verizon Wireless to sell off certain existing Centennial service areas in the states of Louisiana and Mississippi for 240 million pending the successful merger of AT amp T and Centennial 27 On December 12 2008 AT amp T acquired Wayport Inc a major provider of Internet hotspots in the United States With the acquisition AT amp T s public Wi Fi deployment climbed to 20 000 hotspots in the United States the most of any U S provider 28 2011 Qualcomm spectrum purchase Edit On December 20 2011 AT amp T and Qualcomm announced that AT amp T would buy 1 93 billion worth of spectrum from Qualcomm Formerly used for FLO TV this spectrum will be used to expand AT amp T s 4G wireless services AT amp T already had spectrum for the purpose close to what it is buying 29 2011 Attempted acquisition of T Mobile USA Edit Main article Attempted purchase of T Mobile USA by AT amp T On March 20 2011 AT amp T announced its intention to buy T Mobile USA for 39 billion from Deutsche Telekom The deal would have seen the addition of 33 7 million subscribers making AT amp T Mobility the largest mobile phone company in the United States 30 31 AT amp T Mobility would have had a 43 market share of mobile phones in the U S making AT amp T Mobility significantly larger than any of its competitors Regulators questioned the effects such a deal would have had on both competitors and consumers 30 AT amp T CEO Randall Stephenson however stated that the merger would increase network quality and would lead to large savings for the company AT amp T stated it may have had to sell some assets to gain approval from regulators but claimed to have done their homework on regulations 32 Reaction to the announced merger generated both support as well as opposition among various groups and communities The merger gained support from a wide number of civil rights environmental and business organizations These include the NAACP League of United Latin American Citizens Gay amp Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation GLAAD and the Sierra Club 33 Labor organizations such as the AFL CIO Teamsters and the Communications Workers of America also voiced support for the merger These organizations pointed to AT amp T s commitment to labor social and environmental standards Many of these organizations also cited how the merger is likely to accelerate 4G wireless deployment thus helping underserved communities such as rural areas and disadvantaged urban communities 33 According to the NAACP the merger would have advance d increased access to affordable and sustainable wireless broadband services and in turn stimulate job creation and civic engagement throughout our country 33 By August 2 2011 the governors of 26 states had written letters supporting the merger 34 On July 27 the attorneys general of Utah Alabama Arkansas Georgia Kentucky Michigan Mississippi North Dakota South Dakota West Virginia and Wyoming sent a joint letter of support to the FCC 34 By August 2011 state regulatory agencies in Arizona and Louisiana approved the acquisition A diverse group of industry and public interest organizations opposed AT amp T s merger with T Mobile Consumer groups including Public Knowledge Consumers Union Free Press and the Media Access Project publicly opposed the AT amp T merger These groups attempted to persuade a majority of the Federal Communications Commission and members of Congress These organizations feared that the merger will raise prices and stifle innovation by consolidating so much of the wireless industry in one company Free Press and Public Knowledge started letter writing campaigns against the deal 35 Internet companies were generally skeptical of the merger because it leaves them with fewer counter parties to negotiate with for getting their content and applications to customers The AT amp T merger might leave them dependent on just two AT amp T and Verizon The Computer amp Communication Industry Association CCIA which counts Google Microsoft Yahoo and eBay among its members opposed the merger A deal like this if not blocked on antitrust grounds is of deep concern to all the innovative businesses that build everything from apps to handsets It would be hypocritical for our nation to talk about unleashing innovation on one hand and then stand by as threats to innovation like this are proposed said Ed Black head of CCIA 35 On April 21 2011 AT amp T defended its proposed acquisition of T Mobile USA before a U S Senate committee saying the combined company would deliver high speed wireless services to 97 percent of Americans and provide consumer benefits such as fewer dropped calls 36 As part of the original negotiations if AT amp T s acquisition of T Mobile USA were to be rejected by federal regulators AT amp T would need to pay 6 billion including 3 billion in cash to T Mobile USA s parent company Deutsche Telekom 37 On August 31 2011 the Department of Justice officially filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking to block the acquisition 38 39 On November 30 2011 the FCC allowed AT amp T to withdraw their merger saving both carriers from divulging documentation about internal operations The FCC cited job loss and higher consumer prices as reasons to deny the merger 40 On December 19 2011 AT amp T announced that it would permanently end its merger bid after a thorough review of its options As per the original acquisition agreement T Mobile will receive 3 billion in cash as well as access to 1 billion worth of AT amp T held wireless spectrum 41 42 2013 2014 Leap Wireless acquisition Edit On July 12 2013 AT amp T announced it is agreeing to acquire Leap Wireless Cricket for 1 2 billion The deal says AT amp T will be acquiring all of Leap s towers stores and their 5 3 million subscribers 43 The merger between AT amp T and Leap Wireless was approved by the Federal Communications Commission on March 13 2014 44 Recent developments 2013 present EditSee also 2019 AT amp T strike In September 2013 AT amp T announced it would expand into Latin America through a collaboration with Carlos Slim s America Movil 45 On December 17 2013 AT amp T announced plans to sell its Connecticut wireline operations to Stamford based Frontier Communications Roughly 2 700 wireline employees supporting AT amp T s operations in Connecticut were expected to transfer with the business to Frontier as well as 900 000 voice connections 415 000 broadband connections and 180 000 U verse video subscribers 46 On May 18 2014 AT amp T announced it had agreed to purchase DirecTV for 48 5 billion or 67 1 billion including assumed debt The deal was aimed at increasing AT amp T s market share in the pay TV sector and give AT amp T access to fast growing Latin American markets The transaction closed in July 2015 47 The deal is subject to conditions for four years including a requirement for AT amp T to expand its fiberoptic broadband service to at least 12 5 million customer locations not to discriminate against other online video services using bandwidth caps submit any interconnection agreements for government review and offer low cost internet services for low income households 48 49 AT amp T subsequently announced plans to converge its existing U verse home internet and IPTV brands into a combined platform with DirecTV tentatively known as AT amp T Entertainment 50 51 52 On November 7 2014 AT amp T announced its purchase of Iusacell to create a wider North American network 53 In January 2015 AT amp T announced it would be acquiring the bankrupt Mexican wireless business of NII Holdings for around 1 875 billion 54 AT amp T subsequently merged the two companies to create AT amp T Mexico 55 On March 6 2015 it was announced that AT amp T will be removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average being replaced by Apple 56 On October 20 2016 it was reported that AT amp T was in talks to acquire Time Warner in an effort to increase its media holdings 57 58 59 On October 22 2016 AT amp T announced a deal to buy Time Warner for 108 7 billion If approved by federal regulators the merger would bring AT amp T s telecommunication holdings under the same umbrella as HBO Turner Broadcasting System and the Warner Bros studio 60 61 62 On February 15 2017 Time Warner shareholders approved the merger 63 On February 28 FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced that his agency will not review the deal leaving the review to the US Department of Justice 64 On March 15 2017 the European Commission approved the merger 65 AT amp T also owns a 2 stake in Canadian domiciled entertainment company Lionsgate 66 On July 13 2017 it was reported that AT amp T is going to introduce a cloud based DVR streaming service as part of its effort to create a unified platform across DirecTV and its DirecTV Now streaming service with U verse to be added soon 67 68 69 On August 22 2017 the merger was approved by Mexican authorities 70 On September 5 2017 the merger was approved by Chilean authorities 71 On September 12 2017 it was reported that AT amp T is planning to launch a brand new cable TV like service for delivery over the top over its own or a competitor s broadband network sometime next year 72 On October 23 2017 the deadline was extended for a short period of time to finalize the deal The original deadline was on October 22 73 On November 28 2017 it was announced that the merger would be extended until April 2018 74 On November 8 2017 the United States Department of Justice informed AT amp T and Time Warner that they must sell either DirecTV or Turner Broadcasting System the group of channels that includes CNN if they want approval for their 84 5 billion merger according to a New York Times report citing people briefed on the matter AT amp T CEO Randall Stephenson told Business Insider on November 8 that he had no plans to do that 75 On November 20 2017 Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim filed a lawsuit under the Clayton Act of 1914 to block the acquisition 76 On January 31 2018 it was reported that AT amp T s next generation update of DirecTV Now will launch sometime this Spring 77 On March 7 2018 the company prepared to sell a minority stake of DirecTV Latin America through an IPO creating a new holding company for those assets named Vrio Corp 78 79 However on April 18 just a day before the public debut of Vrio AT amp T canceled the IPO due to market conditions 80 81 On March 13 2018 it was reported that AT amp T had filed a trademark for AT amp T TV with the U S Patent amp Trademark Office a possible signal that the telco company will finally eliminate its current brand names DirecTV and U verse 82 83 84 On June 14 2018 the acquisition of Time Warner was completed and Time Warner was renamed to WarnerMedia 85 In September 2018 AT amp T then reorganized operations into four main units Communications including consumer and business wireline telephony AT amp T Mobility and consumer entertainment video services WarnerMedia including Turner cable television networks Warner Bros film and television production and HBO AT amp T Latin America consisting of wireless service in Mexico and video in Latin America and the Caribbean under the Vrio brand and Advertising and Analytics since renamed Xandr 86 87 On February 26 2019 it was announced that the D C Circuit Court of Appeals uphold the AT amp T acquisition of Time Warner 88 89 By 2019 AT amp T had developed partnerships with health care providers to develop mobile health related connectivity devices that aid inpatient care Key products include a telemetry device that monitors patient metrics while toggling between WIFI and cellular connectivity 90 On April 24 2020 AT amp T announced that effective July 1 2020 company COO John Stankey will replace Randall Stephenson as CEO of AT amp T 91 It was also acknowledged that AT amp T s acquisitions of DirectTV and Time Warner had by this point resulted in a massive debt burden of 200 billion for the company 91 As a result of planned cost cutting programs the sale of Warner Bros Interactive Entertainment was proposed but ultimately abandoned due to COVID 19 related growth in the Gaming industry as well as a positive reception to upcoming DC Comics Lego Star Wars and Harry Potter titles from fans and critics 92 Crunchyroll was sold to Sony s Funimation for US 1 175 billion in December 2020 with the acquisition closing in August 2021 93 94 On December 25 2020 a bombing in Nashville Tennessee caused AT amp T service outages across the U S but primarily in Middle Tennessee Cellular wireline telephone Internet and U verse television services were affected due to infrastructure damage to an AT amp T service facility located near the blast site 95 96 In January 2021 AT amp T announced that due to the COVID 19 pandemic around 300 jobs might get affected as it was planning to cut its workforce in Slovakia 97 On February 25 2021 AT amp T announced that it would spin off DirecTV U Verse TV and DirecTV Stream into a separate entity selling a 30 stake to TPG Capital owners of Astound Broadband cable while retaining a 70 stake in the new standalone company The deal was closed on August 2 2021 98 99 In May 2021 AT amp T announced it will spin off WarnerMedia which will merge with Discovery Inc for 43 billion 100 The merger was completed on April 8 2022 101 Electronic Arts who were a bidder in the proposed sale of Warner Bros Interactive Entertainment purchased the mobile gaming studio Playdemic from WBIE for US 1 4 billion in June 2021 102 On December 21 2021 AT amp T announced that they had agreed to sell Xandr and AppNexus to Microsoft for an undisclosed price subject to customary closing conditions including regulatory reviews 103 See also EditAT amp TFootnotes Edit a b 1634 1699 McCusker J J 1997 How Much Is That in Real Money A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States Addenda et Corrigenda PDF American Antiquarian Society 1700 1799 McCusker J J 1992 How Much Is That in Real Money A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States PDF American Antiquarian Society 1800 present Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Consumer Price Index estimate 1800 Retrieved April 16 2022 a b Brooks 1976 p 107 First Telephone Repeater 23 November 2017 Archived from the original on 2020 11 12 Retrieved 2020 01 08 Brooks 1976 p 136 Brock 1981 p 156 Peck Merton J amp Scherer Frederic M The Weapons Acquisition Process An Economic Analysis 1962 Harvard Business School p 619 Bell System History The Bell System Archived from the original on 2007 05 12 Retrieved 2013 01 09 AT amp T exits telegraph business PDF Archived PDF from the original on 2012 12 09 Retrieved 2013 01 09 Justice Department Files Antitrust Suit and Consent Decree in AT amp T McCaw Merger United States Department of Justice 1994 07 15 Archived from the original on 2006 10 04 Richman Dan 2004 09 21 The fall of AT amp T Wireless Seattle Post Intelligencer 75 Power Players The Outsides Next Generation Imagine Media 11 61 November 1995 AT amp T and British Telecom plan a new telecommunications company that will provide new technology in phone computer and news delivery services PBS org 1998 07 27 a b Wu Tim The Master Switch Archived 2017 01 09 at the Wayback Machine New York Random House 2010 Cf especially Chapter 18 The Return of AT amp T Archived 2021 02 28 at the Wayback Machine pp 238 253 New AT amp T Launches Press release AT amp T November 18 2005 Archived from the original on 11 October 2007 Retrieved September 29 2007 Vorman Julie December 29 2006 AT amp T closes 86 billion BellSouth deal Reuters Archived from the original on January 24 2008 Retrieved September 29 2007 Bartash Jeffry Jonathan Burton March 5 2006 AT amp T to pay 67 billion for BellSouth Dow Jones Market Watch Retrieved September 29 2007 AT amp T and BellSouth Join to Create a Premier Global Communications Company Press release AT amp T December 29 2006 Archived from the original on 11 October 2007 Retrieved September 29 2007 Johnson K C June 24 2007 AT amp T s new chief dialed in Chicago Tribune Archived from the original on September 20 2015 Retrieved June 27 2007 AT amp T Buys Edge Wireless www phonescoop com December 4 2007 Archived from the original on September 7 2012 Retrieved July 26 2008 Antonio San April 18 2008 AT amp T completes buy out of Edge Wireless American City Business Journals Archived from the original on December 31 2008 Retrieved July 26 2008 Godinez Victor and David McLemore AT amp T moving headquarters to Dallas from San Antonio Archived 2009 06 26 at the Wayback Machine The Dallas Morning News Saturday June 28 2008 Retrieved on June 18 2009 Corporate Inquiries Archived 2009 03 19 at the Wayback Machine AT amp T Retrieved on March 25 2009 AT amp T moving headquarters to Dallas from San Antonio Dallas News June 27 2008 Archived from the original on 2008 07 04 AT amp T News Room June 27 2008 AT amp T Corporate Headquarters to Move to Dallas Archived 2008 08 28 at the Wayback Machine Press release Retrieved on June 27 2008 Job cuts mount as year end nears Press release AT amp T December 4 2008 Archived from the original on August 5 2020 Retrieved August 3 2020 AT amp T Completes Acquisition of Dobson Communications to Enhance Wireless Coverage Press release Dallas Texas AT amp T Inc November 15 2007 Archived from the original on 24 June 2009 Retrieved May 11 2009 AT amp T Agrees to Sell Certain Centennial Communications Corp Assets to Verizon Wireless newsticker welt de April 9 2009 Archived from the original Webpage on 22 June 2009 Retrieved May 9 2009 AT amp T Advanced Wi Fi Strategy Press release Dallas Texas AT amp T Inc December 12 2008 Archived from the original on 7 January 2009 Retrieved December 22 2008 AT amp T buys 2 billion worth of 4G spectrum from Qualcomm News amp Record Associated Press December 20 2010 Archived from the original on January 3 2011 Retrieved December 20 2010 a b AT amp T to Buy T Mobile USA for 39 billion New York Times March 20 2011 Archived from the original on 22 March 2011 Retrieved March 20 2011 Segan Sascha March 20 2011 AT amp T Buys T Mobile Great For Them Bad For You Pcmag com Archived from the original on March 28 2012 Retrieved November 28 2011 AT amp T and T Mobile create biggest US firm in 39bn deal BBC News March 21 2011 Archived from the original on November 25 2011 Retrieved November 28 2011 a b c German Kent On Call Civil rights groups line up behind AT amp T T Mobile merger CNET Archived from the original on March 28 2021 Retrieved August 17 2011 a b German Kent States weigh in on AT amp T T Mobile merger CNET Archived from the original on March 28 2021 Retrieved August 17 2011 a b Sara Jerome March 23 2011 T Mobile AT amp T merger to draw torrent of opposition The Hill Declan McCullagh CNET AT amp T defends T Mobile deal to U S Senate May 11 2011 Retrieved May 11 2011 Don Reisinger CNET Report AT amp T pays 6B if T Mobile deal fails May 13 2011 Retrieved May 13 2011 Schoenberg Tom September 1 2011 T Mobile Antitrust Challenge Leaves AT amp T With Little Recourse on Takeover Bloomberg Archived from the original on November 16 2011 Retrieved November 28 2011 Goldman David September 1 2011 AT amp T and T Mobile Is the deal dead No one knows September 1 2011 CNN Archived from the original on March 9 2012 Retrieved November 28 2011 Shields Todd November 30 2011 FCC Allows AT amp T to Withdraw Merger Application Bloomberg Archived from the original on December 1 2011 Retrieved November 30 2011 AT amp T December 19 2011 AT amp T Ends Bid To Add Network Capacity Through T Mobile USA Purchase AT amp T Archived from the original on February 7 2012 Retrieved December 19 2011 Lee Timothy B 19 December 2011 AT amp T admits defeat on T Mobile takeover will pay 4 billion breakup fee Ars Technica Archived from the original on 8 October 2020 Retrieved 8 October 2020 AT amp T To Acquire Leap Wireless Cricket For Around 1 2B TechCrunch Archived from the original on July 14 2013 Retrieved July 12 2013 Welch Chris March 13 2014 FCC approves AT amp T s purchase of Leap Wireless says it s in the public interest The Verge Archived from the original on March 13 2014 Retrieved March 13 2014 Sinead Carew 18 September 2013 AT amp T to expand in Latin America with America Movil deal Reuters Archived from the original on 24 September 2015 Retrieved 1 July 2017 AT amp T 17 December 2013 AT amp T Announces Plans to Sell Connecticut Wireline Operations to Frontier Communications for 2 0 Billion AT amp T Archived from the original on 17 December 2013 Retrieved 12 November 2016 AT amp T Completes Acquisition of DirecTV Reuters January 26 2015 Archived from the original on January 29 2017 Retrieved January 1 2016 AT amp T amp DirecTV Merger Gets FCC Approval With Conditions Deadline Hollywood July 24 2015 Archived from the original on July 25 2015 Retrieved July 24 2015 FCC approves AT amp T DirecTV merger The Verge Vox Media July 24 2015 Archived from the original on July 24 2015 Retrieved July 24 2015 Bode Karl December 2 2015 AT amp T Plans on Killing the DirecTV Name Starting in January DSL Reports Archived from the original on December 8 2015 Retrieved December 2 2015 Farrell Mike December 2 2015 AT amp T Enters Next Phase in DirecTV Branding MultiChannel News Archived from the original on December 4 2015 Retrieved December 3 2015 Littleton Cynthia April 26 2016 AT amp T Sees DirecTV Broadband Subscriber Gains in Q1 as U verse Fades Variety Archived from the original on April 27 2016 Retrieved April 28 2016 Nguyen Chuong November 7 2014 AT amp T to expand North American coverage area with Mexico carrier Iusacell acquisition Android Central Archived from the original on January 3 2016 Retrieved January 1 2016 AT amp T to buy NII Holdings wireless business in Mexico Reuters January 26 2015 Archived from the original on September 18 2015 Retrieved January 1 2016 AT amp T to merge Nextel and Iusacell but retain Unefon BNamericas BNamericas 25 August 2015 Archived from the original on 6 March 2017 Retrieved 5 March 2017 McGrath Maggie Apple To Replace AT amp T In Dow Jones Industrial Average Forbes Archived from the original on 2016 09 14 Retrieved 2016 08 12 Hammond Ed Sherman Alex Moritz Scott October 20 2016 AT amp T Discussed Idea of Takeover in Time Warner Meetings Bloomberg Archived from the original on October 21 2016 Retrieved October 20 2016 Yu Robert October 20 2016 Report AT amp T considering buying Time Warner USA Today Archived from the original on October 24 2016 Retrieved October 20 2016 Hagey Keach Sharma Amol Cimilluca Dana October 21 2016 AT amp T Is in Advanced Talks to Acquire Time Warner The Wall Street Journal Archived from the original on October 22 2016 Retrieved October 21 2016 Yu Roger October 22 2016 AT amp T agrees to buy Time Warner for more than 80B USA Today Archived from the original on October 23 2016 Retrieved October 22 2016 Gryta Thomas Hagey Keach Cimilluca Dana October 22 2016 AT amp T Reaches Deal to Buy Time Warner for 86 Billion The Wall Street Journal Archived from the original on October 23 2016 Retrieved October 22 2016 Littleton Cynthia October 22 2016 AT amp T Sets 85 4 Billion Time Warner Deal CEOs Talk Unique Potential of Combination Variety Archived from the original on October 23 2016 Retrieved October 23 2016 Kludt Tom 15 February 2017 Time Warner shareholders vote to approve AT amp T merger CNNMoney Archived from the original on 1 April 2019 Retrieved 3 August 2020 FCC chief AT amp T Time Warner deal won t face agency s scrutiny USA TODAY Archived from the original on 2017 10 11 Retrieved 2017 08 29 Reuters Thomson March 15 2017 AT amp T s 85 4 billion deal for Time Warner wins EU thumbs up Business Insider Archived from the original on March 16 2017 Retrieved April 7 2017 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a last has generic name help Starz Accepts Rate Cut As Lionsgate Offers Stock For New Deals With AT amp T Deadline 22 September 2016 Archived from the original on May 19 2017 Retrieved August 2 2017 Lawler Richard July 13 2017 AT amp T s next gen TV platform rollout will start on DirecTV Now Engadget Archived from the original on July 13 2017 Retrieved July 13 2017 Lieberman David July 13 2017 AT amp T To Offer Cloud Based DVR To Streaming Services Deadline Hollywood Archived from the original on July 13 2017 Retrieved July 13 2017 Frankel Daniel July 13 2017 DirecTV Now to finally get cloud DVR as part of AT amp T video platform rollout Fierce Cable Archived from the original on July 23 2017 Retrieved July 13 2017 Aycock Jason August 22 2017 AT amp T s 85B Time Warner deal gets Mexico s approval Seeking Alpha Archived from the original on June 17 2018 Retrieved August 22 2017 Munson Ben September 5 2017 AT amp T Time Warner merger approved with conditions by Chilean regulators Fierce Cable Archived from the original on December 1 2017 Retrieved November 21 2017 Engebretson Joan September 12 2017 AT amp T CEO Bye Bye DirecTV Hello AT amp T OTT Video Telecompetitor Archived from the original on September 14 2017 Retrieved September 13 2017 AT amp T extends Time Warner merger deadline New York Post October 23 2017 Archived from the original on October 23 2017 Retrieved October 23 2017 Patten Dade Hayes Dominic 29 November 2017 AT amp T amp DOJ Fire Off Dueling Trial Dates In Merger War Update Archived from the original on 28 October 2020 Retrieved 17 April 2020 Ciolli Joe November 8 2017 AT amp T has no intention of selling CNN AOL Archived from the original on November 9 2017 Retrieved November 8 2017 Fung Brian November 21 2017 The Justice Department is suing AT amp T to block its 85 billion bid for Time Warner The Washington Post Archived from the original on November 21 2017 Retrieved November 21 2017 Fingas Jon January 31 2018 AT amp T s big DirecTV Now update arrives this Spring Engadget Archived from the original on February 1 2018 Retrieved February 1 2018 AT amp T Inc Announces Filing of a Registration Statement for Potential IPO of Minority Stake in DIRECTV Latin America Business Wire March 7 2018 Archived from the original on March 15 2018 Retrieved March 14 2018 Spangler Todd March 7 2018 AT amp T s DirecTV Latin America Unit Files for IPO as Prelude to Possible Spinoff Variety Archived from the original on March 10 2018 Retrieved March 14 2018 AT amp T Inc Statement Regarding Planned Vrio Corp IPO PR Newswire April 18 2018 Archived from the original on June 15 2018 Retrieved June 14 2018 At the last minute AT amp T withdraws the planned IPO of its Vrio unit CNBC Reuters April 19 2018 Archived from the original on June 15 2018 Retrieved June 14 2018 Swann Phillip March 13 2018 AT amp T Files Trademark For AT amp T TV TV Answer Man Archived from the original on March 13 2018 Retrieved March 14 2018 Bode Karl March 16 2018 AT amp T TV Trademark Hints At Another New Streaming Service DSL Reports Archived from the original on March 17 2018 Retrieved March 18 2018 Swann Phillip March 19 2018 Will AT amp T Get Rid Of U verse TV Answer Man Archived from the original on March 20 2018 Retrieved March 19 2018 Patel Nilay 15 June 2018 The court s decision to let AT amp T and Time Warner to merge is ridiculously bad The Verge Vox Media Archived from the original on June 15 2018 Retrieved May 15 2019 SEC Form 8 K otp tools investis com September 21 2018 Retrieved May 15 2019 Betz Brandy September 21 2018 AT amp T revises segment structure on Time Warner buy Seeking Alpha Retrieved May 15 2019 Gardner Eriq February 26 2019 Appeals Court Won t Stop the AT amp T Time Warner Merger The Hollywood Reporter Archived from the original on February 27 2019 Retrieved February 26 2019 Bartz Diane Shepardson David February 26 2019 UPDATE 2 AT amp T defeats U S in merger fight to buy Time Warner CNBC Archived from the original on February 26 2019 Retrieved February 26 2019 Donovan Fred March 12 2019 AT amp T Nihon Kohden Expand Telemeter Wireless Networking Options Hit Infrastructure Hit Infrastructure Retrieved October 14 2019 a b AT amp T CEO Randall Stephenson to step down COO Stankey to take over CNBC Archived from the original on 2020 09 25 Retrieved 2020 05 09 Ahmed Nabila Moritz Scott September 1 2020 AT amp T to Scrap Sale of Warner Bros Video Game Unit Bloomberg com Archived from the original on September 4 2020 Retrieved October 9 2020 Moore D M December 9 2020 Sony s Funimation acquires anime streaming service Crunchyroll for 1 175 billion Polygon Archived from the original on February 2 2021 Retrieved December 9 2020 Mateo Alex August 9 2021 Sony s Funimation Global Group Completes Acquisition of Crunchyroll from AT amp T Anime News Network Archived from the original on August 9 2021 Retrieved August 9 2021 Gill Joey Posey Sebastian December 25 2020 AT amp T outages across Tennessee Kentucky affecting multiple 911 services WKRN News 2 Retrieved December 25 2020 Timms Mariah December 25 2020 AT amp T outage reported Planes grounded 911 disrupted in wake of Nashville explosion See the outage map The Tennessean Retrieved December 25 2020 AT amp T to cut Slovakia workforce unions expect 300 jobs to go Reuters January 18 2021 Retrieved January 18 2021 Goldsmith Jill February 25 2021 WarnerMedia Parent AT amp T Sells DirecTV Stake To Private Equity Firm TPG Deadline Hayes Dade August 2 2021 AT amp T Completes DirecTV Spinoff Satellite Operator Unites Its Internet Delivered Bundles Under New Brand DirecTV Stream Deadline Hollywood Stelter Brian 17 May 2021 AT amp T spins off WarnerMedia combines it with Discovery CNN Koblin John April 8 2022 Hollywood Gets a New Giant The New York Times Retrieved April 16 2022 Goldsmith Jill June 23 2021 AT amp T WarnerMedia Sell Playdemic Mobile Game Studio To Electronic Arts For 1 4 Billion Deadline Hollywood Retrieved June 23 2021 Foley Mary Jo December 21 2021 Microsoft to buy Xandr ad marketplace from AT amp T ZDNet Retrieved December 21 2021 Bibliography EditBrooks John Telephone The First Hundred Years Harper amp Row 1976 ISBN 978 0 06 010540 2 Bruce Robert V Bell Alexander Bell and the Conquest of Solitude Ithaca New York Cornell University Press 1990 ISBN 0 8014 9691 8 Pizer Russell A The Tangled Web of Patent 174465 AuthorHouse 2009 1 ISBN 1 4389 8402 2 ISBN 978 1 4389 8402 5 Yurick William Judge Harold H Greene A Pivotal Judicial Figure in Telecommunications Policy and His Legacy 2 External links Edit Wikimedia Commons has media related to AT amp T Official website AT amp T History and science resources at The Franklin Institute s Case Files online exhibit Further reading EditColl Steve The Deal of the Century The Breakup of AT amp T New York Atheneum Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title History of AT 26T amp oldid 1118753323 1995 2000 Changes to the company, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.