Finno-Ugric languages

Finno-Ugric (/ˌfɪnoʊˈjuːɡrɪk/ or /ˌfɪnoʊˈuːɡrɪk/; Fenno-Ugric)^[1] or Finno-Ugrian (Fenno-Ugrian) is a traditional grouping of all languages in the Uralic language family except the Samoyedic languages. Its formerly commonly accepted status as a subfamily of Uralic is based on criteria formulated in the 19th century and is criticized by some contemporary linguists such as Tapani Salminen and Ante Aikio as inaccurate and misleading.^[2][3] The three most-spoken Uralic languages, Hungarian, Finnish, and Estonian, are all included in Finno-Ugric.

Finno-Ugric
Finno-Ugrian
Geographic distribution	Eastern, Central and Northern Europe, North Asia
Linguistic classification	Uralic Finno-Ugric
Subdivisions	Finno-Permic Ugric
ISO 639-2 / 5	fiu
Glottolog	None
The Finno-Ugric languages

The term Finno-Ugric, which originally referred to the entire family, is sometimes used as a synonym for the term Uralic, which includes the Samoyedic languages, as commonly happens when a language family is expanded with further discoveries.^[4][5][6] Before the 20th century, the language family might be referred to as Finnish, Ugric, Finno-Hungarian or with a variety of other names.^[7] The name Finno-Ugric came in general use in the late 19th or early 20th century.^[8][9]

Status

The validity of Finno-Ugric as a phylogenic grouping is under challenge,^[10][11] with some linguists maintaining that the Finno-Permic languages are as distinct from the Ugric languages as they are from the Samoyedic languages spoken in Siberia, or even that none of the Finno-Ugric, Finno-Permic, or Ugric branches has been established. Received opinion is that the easternmost (and last-discovered) Samoyed had separated first and the branching into Ugric and Finno-Permic took place later, but this reconstruction does not have strong support in the linguistic data.^{[citation needed]}

Origins

Attempts at reconstructing a Proto-Finno-Ugric proto-language, a common ancestor of all Uralic languages except for the Samoyedic languages, are largely indistinguishable from Proto-Uralic, suggesting that Finno-Ugric might not be a historical grouping but a geographical one, with Samoyedic being distinct by lexical borrowing rather than actually being historically divergent. It has been proposed that the area in which Proto-Finno-Ugric was spoken reached between the Baltic Sea and the Ural Mountains.^[12]

Traditionally, the main set of evidence for the genetic proposal of Proto-Finno-Ugric has come from vocabulary. A large amount of vocabulary (e.g. the numerals "one", "three", "four" and "six"; the body-part terms "hand", "head") is only reconstructed up to the Proto-Finno-Ugric level, and only words with a Samoyedic equivalent have been reconstructed for Proto-Uralic. That methodology has been criticised, as no coherent explanation other than inheritance has been presented for the origin of most of the Finno-Ugric vocabulary (though a small number has been explained as old loanwords from Proto-Indo-European or its immediate successors).

The Samoyedic group has undergone a longer period of independent development, and its divergent vocabulary could be caused by mechanisms of replacement such as language contact. (The Finno-Ugric group is usually dated to approximately 4,000 years ago, the Samoyedic a little over 2,000.) Proponents of the traditional binary division note, however, that the invocation of extensive contact influence on vocabulary is at odds with the grammatical conservatism of Samoyedic.

The consonant *š (voiceless postalveolar fricative, [ʃ]) has not been conclusively shown to occur in the traditional Proto-Uralic lexicon, but it is attested in some of the Proto-Finno-Ugric material. Another feature attested in the Finno-Ugric vocabulary is that *i now behaves as a neutral vowel with respect to front-back vowel harmony, and thus there are roots such as *niwa- "to remove the hair from hides".^[13]

Regular sound changes proposed for this stage are few and remain open to interpretation. Sammallahti (1988)^[13] proposes five, following Janhunen's (1981) reconstruction of Proto-Finno-Permic:

• Compensatory lengthening: development of long vowels from the cluster of vowel plus a particular syllable-final element, of unknown quality, symbolized by *x
  • Long open *aa and *ää are then raised to mid *oo and *ee respectively.
    • E.g. *ńäxli- → *ńääli- → *ńeeli- "to swallow" (→ Finnish niele-, Hungarian nyel etc.)
• Raising of short *o to *u in open syllables before a subsequent *i
• Shortening of long vowels in closed syllables and before a subsequent open vowel *a, *ä, predating the raising of *ää and *ee
  • E.g. *ńäxl+mä → *ńäälmä → *ńälmä "tongue" (→ Northern Sámi njalbmi, Hungarian nyelv, etc.)

Sammallahti (1988) further reconstructs sound changes *oo, *ee → *a, *ä (merging with original *a, *ä) for the development from Proto-Finno-Ugric to Proto-Ugric. Similar sound laws are required for other languages as well. Thus, the origin and raising of long vowels may actually belong at a later stage,^[14] and the development of these words from Proto-Uralic to Proto-Ugric can be summarized as simple loss of *x (if it existed in the first place at all; vowel length only surfaces consistently in the Baltic-Finnic languages.^[15]) The proposed raising of *o has been alternatively interpreted instead as a lowering *u → *o in Samoyedic (PU *lumi → *lomə → Proto-Samoyedic *jom).^[14]

Janhunen (2007, 2009)^[16][17] notes a number of derivational innovations in Finno-Ugric, including *ńoma "hare" → *ńoma-la, (vs. Samoyedic *ńomå), *pexli "side" → *peel-ka → *pelka "thumb", though involving Proto-Uralic derivational elements.

Structural features

Main article: Uralic languages § Typology

The Finno-Ugric group is not typologically distinct from Uralic as a whole: the most widespread structural features among the group all extend to the Samoyedic languages as well.

Classification models

Main article: Uralic languages § Classification

Modern linguistic research has shown that Volgaic languages is a geographical classification rather than a linguistic one, because the Mordvinic languages are more closely related to the Finno-Lappic languages than the Mari languages.

The relation of the Finno-Permic and the Ugric groups is adjudged remote by some scholars. On the other hand, with a projected time depth of only 3,000 to 4,000 years, the traditionally accepted Finno-Ugric grouping would be far younger than many major families such as Indo-European or Semitic, and would be about the same age as, for instance, the Eastern subfamily of Nilotic. But the grouping is far from transparent or securely established. The absence of early records is a major obstacle. As for the Finno-Ugric Urheimat, most of what has been said about it is speculation.

Some linguists criticizing the Finno-Ugric genetic proposal, especially Angela Marcantonio,^[18] also question the validity of the entire Uralic family, instead proposing a Ural–Altaic hypothesis, within which they believe Finno-Permic may be as distant from Ugric as from Turkic. However, this approach has been rejected by nearly all other specialists in Uralic linguistics.^{[19][20][21][22][23][24]}

Common vocabulary

Loanwords

One argument in favor of the Finno-Ugric grouping has come from loanwords. Several loans from the Indo-European languages are present in most or all of the Finno-Ugric languages, while being absent from Samoyedic.^{[citation needed]}

According to Häkkinen (1983) the alleged Proto-Finno-Ugric loanwords are disproportionally well-represented in Hungarian and the Permic languages, and disproportionally poorly represented in the Ob-Ugric languages; hence it is possible that such words have been acquired by the languages only after the initial dissolution of the Uralic family into individual dialects, and that the scarcity of loanwords in Samoyedic results from its peripheric location.^[25]

Numbers

The number systems among the Finno-Ugric languages are particularly distinct from the Samoyedic languages: only the numerals "2", "5", and "7" have cognates in Samoyedic, while also the numerals, "1", "3", "4", "6", "10" are shared by all or most Finno-Ugric languages.

Below are the numbers 1 to 10 in several Finno-Ugric languages. Forms in italic do not descend from the reconstructed forms.

Number	Baltic Finnic				Sámi		Mordvinic		Mari	Permic	Ugric			Proto- Finno- Ugric
	Finnish	Estonian	Võro	Livonian	Northern Sámi	Inari Sámi	Erzya	Moksha	Meadow Mari	Komi-Zyrian	Mansi	Khanty	Hungarian
1	yksi gen. yhden, part. yhtä	üks gen. ühe, part. üht(e)	ütś	ikš	okta	ohtâ	vejke	fkä	ik/ikyt/iktyt/ikte	öťi	akwa	i	egy^[26]	*ükte
2	kaksi gen. kahden, part. kahta	kaks gen. kahe, part. kaht(e)	katś	kakš	guokte	kyeh´ti	kavto	kaftə	kok/kokyt/koktyt	kyk	kitig	kat	kettő/két	*kakta
3	kolme	kolm	kolm	kuolm	golbma	kulmâ	kolmo	kolmə	kum/kumyt	kuim	xūrum	xołəm	három, harm-	*kolme
4	neljä	neli	nelli	nēļa	njeallje	nelji	ńiľe	ńiľä	nyl/nylyt	ńoľ	ńila	ńał	négy	*neljä
5	viisi	viis	viiś	vīž	vihtta	vittâ	veƭe	veťä	vič/vizyt	vit	at	wet	öt	*viite
6	kuusi	kuus	kuuś	kūž	guhtta	kuttâ	koto	kotə	kud/kudyt	kvajt	xōt	xot	hat	*kuute
7	seitsemän	seitse	säidse	seis	čieža	čiččâm	śiśem	śiśäm	šym/šymyt	śiźim	sāt	łapət	hét	śäjććemä
8	kahdeksan	kaheksa	katõsa	kōdõks	gávcci	käävci	kavkso	kafksə	kandaš/kandaše	kökjamys	ńololow	niwł	nyolc	N/A
9	yhdeksän	üheksa	ütesä	īdõks	ovcci	oovce	vejkse	veçksə	indeš/indeše	ökmys	ontolow	jarťaŋ	kilenc	N/A
10	kymmenen	kümme	kümme	kim	logi	love	kemeń	keməń	lu	das	low	jaŋ	tíz	luka/kümmen

The number '2' descends in Ugric from a front-vocalic variant *kektä.

The numbers '9' and '8' in Finnic through Mari are considered to be derived from the numbers '1' and '2' as '10–1' and '10–2'. One reconstruction is *yk+teksa and *kak+teksa, respectively, where *teksa cf. deka is an Indo-European loan; the difference between /t/ and /d/ is not phonemic, unlike in Indo-European. Another analysis is *ykt-e-ksa, *kakt-e-ksa, with *e being the negative verb.

Finno-Ugric Swadesh lists

100-word Swadesh lists for certain Finno-Ugric languages can be compared and contrasted at the Rosetta Project website: , , , and .

Speakers

The four largest ethnic groups that speak Finno-Ugric languages are the Hungarians (14.5 million), Finns (6.5 million), Estonians (1.1 million), and Mordvins (0.85 million). Majorities of three (the Hungarians, Finns, and Estonians) inhabit their respective nation states in Europe, i.e. Hungary, Finland, and Estonia, while a large minority of Mordvins inhabit the federal Mordovian Republic within Russia (Russian Federation).^[27]

The indigenous area of the Sámi people is known as Sápmi and it consists of the northern parts of the Fennoscandian Peninsula. Some other peoples that speak Finno-Ugric languages have been assigned autonomous republics within Russia. These are the Karelians (Republic of Karelia), Komi (Komi Republic), Udmurts (Udmurt Republic) and Mari (Mari El Republic). The Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug was set up for the Khanty and Mansi of Russia. A once-autonomous Komi-Permyak Okrug was set up for a region of high Komi habitation outside the Komi Republic.^{[citation needed]}

Some of the ethnicities speaking Finno-Ugric languages are:^{[citation needed]}

• Baltic Finnic
  • Estonians
  • Finns
  • Izhorians
  • Karelians
  • Livonians
  • Setos
  • Veps
  • Votes
  • Tornedalians
  • Kvens
• Volgaic
  • Meryans †
  • Meshchyoras†
  • Muromians †
  • Mari
  • Mokshas
  • Erzyas
• Sámi
• Permic
  • Besermyan
  • Komi
  • Udmurts
• Ugric
  • Hungarians
    • Székely
    • Csángó
    • Jász
    • Kun
    • Palóc
  • Khanty
  • Mansi

International Finno-Ugric societies

 

Proposed flag of the Finno-Ugric-speaking peoples.

In the Finno-Ugric countries of Finland, Estonia and Hungary that find themselves surrounded by speakers of unrelated tongues, language origins and language history have long been relevant to national identity. In 1992, the 1st World Congress of Finno-Ugric Peoples was organized in Syktyvkar in the Komi Republic in Russia, the 2nd World Congress in 1996 in Budapest in Hungary, the 3rd Congress in 2000 in Helsinki in Finland, the 4th Congress in 2004 in Tallinn in Estonia, the 5th Congress in 2008 in Khanty-Mansiysk in Russia, the 6th Congress in 2012 in Siófok in Hungary,^{[28][29][30][31]} the 7th Congress in 2016 in Lahti in Finland,^[32] and the 8th Congress in 2021 in Tartu in Estonia.^[33] The members of the Finno-Ugric Peoples' Consultative Committee include: the Erzyas, Estonians, Finns, Hungarians, Ingrian Finns, Ingrians, Karelians, Khants, Komis, Mansis, Maris, Mokshas, Nenetses, Permian Komis, Saamis, Tver Karelians, Udmurts, Vepsians; Observers: Livonians, Setos.^[34][35]

In 2007, the 1st Festival of the Finno-Ugric Peoples was hosted by President Vladimir Putin of Russia, and visited by Finnish President, Tarja Halonen, and Hungarian Prime Minister, Ferenc Gyurcsány.^[36][37]

The International Finno-Ugric Students' Conference (IFUSCO) is organised annually by students of Finno-Ugric languages to bring together people from all over the world who are interested in the languages and cultures. The first conference was held in 1984 in Göttingen in Germany. IFUSCO features presentations and workshops on topics such as linguistics, ethnography, history and more.^[38][39]

Population genetics

The linguistic reconstruction of the Finno-Ugric language family has led to the postulation that the ancient Proto-Finno-Ugric people were ethnically related, and that even the modern Finno-Ugric-speaking peoples are ethnically related.^[40] Such hypotheses are based on the assumption that heredity can be traced through linguistic relatedness,^[41] although it must be kept in mind that language shift and ethnic admixture, a relatively frequent and common occurrence both in recorded history and most likely also in prehistory, confuses the picture and there is no straightforward relationship, if at all, between linguistic and genetic affiliation. Still, the premise that the speakers of the ancient proto-language were ethnically homogeneous is generally accepted.^[17]

Modern genetic studies have shown that the Y-chromosome haplogroup N3, and sometimes N2, is almost specific though certainly not restricted to Uralic- or Finno-Ugric-speaking populations, especially as high frequency or primary paternal haplogroup.^[42][43] These haplogroups branched from haplogroup N, which probably spread north, then west and east from Northern China about 12,000–14,000 years before present from father haplogroup NO (haplogroup O being the most common Y-chromosome haplogroup in Southeast Asia).

A study of the Finno-Ugric-speaking peoples of northern Eurasia (i.e., excluding the Hungarians), carried out between 2002 and 2008 in the Department of Forensic Medicine at the University of Helsinki, showed that the Finno-Ugric-speaking populations do not retain genetic evidence of a common founder. Most possess an amalgamation of West and East Eurasian gene pools that may have been present in central Asia, with subsequent genetic drift and recurrent founder effects among speakers of various branches of Finno-Ugric. Not all branches show evidence of a single founder effect. North Eurasian Finno-Ugric-speaking populations were found to be genetically a heterogeneous group showing lower haplotype diversities compared to more southern populations. North Eurasian Finno-Ugric-speaking populations possess unique genetic features due to complex genetic changes shaped by molecular and population genetics and adaptation to the areas of Boreal and Arctic North Eurasia.^[44]

See also

•  language portal

• Baltic Finnic peoples
• Budinos
• Finnic languages
• Volga Finns
• Comb Ceramic culture
• Uralo-Siberian languages
• Old Hungarian script
• Old Permic script
• Pre-Finno-Ugric substrate
• Proto-Finnic language
• Proto-Uralic homeland hypotheses
• International Finno-Ugric Students' Conference

References

Notes

1. Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 11th Edition. Retrieved 4 September 2012 from website: http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/Finno-Ugric 11 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine
2. Tapani Salminen, "The rise of the Finno-Ugric language family." In Carpelan, Parpola, & Koskikallio (eds.), Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: linguistic and archaeological considerations. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 242; Helsinki 2001. 385–396.[1] 30 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine
3. Aikio, Ante (2019). "Proto-Uralic". In Bakró-Nagy, Marianne; Laakso, Johanna; Skribnik, Elena (eds.). Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–4. from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
4. Tommola, Hannu (2010). "Finnish among the Finno-Ugrian languages". Mood in the Languages of Europe. John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. 155. ISBN 978-90-272-0587-2.
5. "Introduction". The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages: liv–lvi. 24 March 2022. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198767664.002.0013. ISBN 978-0-19-876766-4.
6. Bakró-Nagy, Marianne (2012). "The Uralic Languages". Revue belge de Philologie et d'Histoire. 90 (3): 1001–1027. doi:10.3406/rbph.2012.8272.
7. Sommer, Łukasz (1 January 2023). "Conceptualizing language kinship or How Finnocentric is Finno-Ugricity?". Academia.edu.
8. Décsy, Guyla (1965). Einführung in die finnisch-ugrische Sprachwissenschaft (in German). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. p. 1.
9. Hajdú, Péter (1998). "A magyar–ugor vs. altaji összehasonlítótól az uráli nyelvészetig (via finnugor)". In Domokos, Péter; Csepregi, Márta (eds.). 125 éves a Budapesti Finnugor Tanszék: jubileumi kötet [From the Hungarian-Ugric vs. Altaic comparative study to Uralic linguistics (via Finno-Ugric)]. Urálisztikai tanulmányok (in Hungarian). Budapest: ELTE, BFT. pp. 56–62. ISBN 978-963-463-213-9.
10. Salminen, Tapani (2002): Problems in the taxonomy of the Uralic languages in the light of modern comparative studies 13 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine; the clade has also been abandoned by Ethnologue.
11. Aikio, Ante (24 March 2022). "Chapter 1: Proto-Uralic". In Bakró-Nagy, Marianne; Laakso, Johanna; Skribnik, Elena (eds.). The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198767664. from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
12. Campbell, Lyle (2004). Historical linguistics: an introduction. MIT Press. p. 405. ISBN 978-0-262-53267-9.
13. Sammallahti, Pekka (1988). "Historical Phonology of the Uralic languages". In Denis, Sinor (ed.). The Uralic languages – Description, history and foreign influences. BRILL. pp. 478–554. ISBN 978-90-04-07741-6.
14. Häkkinen, Jaakko 2009: Kantauralin ajoitus ja paikannus: perustelut puntarissa. – Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja 92. http://www.sgr.fi/susa/92/hakkinen.pdf 14 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine
15. Aikio, Ante (2012), "On Finnic long vowels, Samoyed vowel sequences, and Proto-Uralic *x", Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia, 264, ISSN 0355-0230
16. Janhunen, Juha (2007), "The primary laryngeal in Uralic and beyond" (PDF), Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia, 253, ISSN 0355-0230, (PDF) from the original on 15 October 2013, retrieved 5 May 2010
17. Janhunen, Juha (2009), "Proto-Uralic – what, where and when?" (PDF), Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia, 258, ISBN 978-952-5667-11-0, ISSN 0355-0230, (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2012, retrieved 24 May 2012
18. Marcantonio, Angela (2002). The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics. Publications of the Philological Society. Vol. 35. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-23170-7. OCLC 803186861.
19. Aikio, Ante (2003). "Angela Marcantonio, The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics". Book review. Word. 54 (3): 401–412. doi:10.1080/00437956.2003.11432539.
20. Bakro-Nagy, Marianne (2005). "The Uralic Language Family. Facts, Myths and Statistics". Book review. Lingua. 115 (7): 1053–1062. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.008.
21. Georg, Stefan (2004). "Marcantonio, Angela: The Uralic Language Family. Facts, Myths and Statistics". Book review. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen. 26/27: 155–168.
22. Kallio, Petri (2004). "The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics. Angela Marcantonio". Book review. Anthropological Linguistics. 46: 486–490.
23. Kulonen, Ulla-Maija (2004). "Myyttejä uralistiikasta. Angela Marcantonio. The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics". Book review. Virittäjä (2/2004): 314–320.
24. Laakso, Johanna (2004). "Sprachwissenschaftliche Spiegelfechterei (Angela Marcantonio: The Uralic language family. Facts, myths and statistics)". Book review. Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen (in German). 58: 296–307.
25. Häkkinen, Kaisa (1983). Suomen kielen vanhimmasta sanastosta ja sen tutkimisesta (PhD) (in Finnish). Turun yliopisto. ISBN 951-642-445-7.
26. According to Zaich, Gábor (2006). Etimológiai szótár (in Hungarian). p. 167. ISBN 978-963-7094-01-9., the Hungarian word for "one" is an internal development, i.e. it is not related to the Proto-Finno-Ugric *ükte
27. Iurchenkov, Valerii (March 2001). "The Mordvins: Dilemmas of Mobilization in a Biethnic Community". Nationalities Papers. 29 (1): 85–95. doi:10.1080/00905990120036394. ISSN 0090-5992.
28. . World Congress of the Finno-Ugric Peoples. Archived from the original on 17 March 2019. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
29. "Statutes of the Consultative Committee of Finno-Ugrian peoples". Finno-Ugric Peoples' Consultative Committee. from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
30. . Russia. Archived from the original on 6 August 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
31. "Fenno-Ugria". Estonia. from the original on 19 September 2016. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
32. "The VII (7th) World Congress of Finno-Ugric Peoples". Fenno-Ugria. from the original on 17 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
33. "The VIII(8th) World Congress of Finno-Ugric Peoples". Fenno-Ugria. from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
34. "Finno-Ugric Peoples' Consultative Committee, Members". World Congresses of the Finno-Ugric Peoples. Finno-Ugric Peoples' Consultative Committee. from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
35. "Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura (in Finnish)". Finno-Ugrian Society (in English). from the original on 3 March 2018. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
36. "International Festival of the Finno-Ugric Peoples". Press Release from the Kremlin in Russia. 19 July 2007. from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
37. "Press Statements by President Vladimir Putin, leaders of Finland and Hungary". Press Release from the Kremlin in Russia. 19 July 2007. from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
38. . Archived from the original on 16 June 2018.
39. "IFUSCO XXXVII Prague 2022 | FAQ". ifusco2022.ff.cuni.cz/faq/. from the original on 28 May 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
40. Sámuel Gyarmathi (1983). Grammatical Proof of the Affinity of the Hungarian Language with Languages of Fennic Origin: (Gottingen Dieterich, 1799). John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 978-90-272-0976-4.
41. "Where do Finnish come from?". 19 November 2014. from the original on 17 November 2010. Retrieved 22 March 2010.
42. Rootsi, Siiri; Zhivotovsky, L. A.; Baldovic, M.; Kayser, M.; Kutuev, I. A.; Khusainova, R.; Bermisheva, M. A.; Gubina, M.; Fedorova, S. A.; Ilumäe, A. M.; Khusnutdinova, E. K.; Voevoda, M. I.; Osipova, L. P.; Stoneking, M.; Lin, A. A.; Ferak, V.; Parik, J.; Kivisild, T.; Underhill, P. A.; Villems, R. (February 2007). "European Journal of Human Genetics – Abstract of article: A counter-clockwise northern route of the Y-chromosome haplogroup N from Southeast Asia towards Europe". European Journal of Human Genetics. 15 (2): 204–211. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201748. PMID 17149388. S2CID 19265287.
43. "Journals Home" (PDF).
44. Pimenoff, Ville (2008). "Living on the edge : Population genetics of Finno-Ugric-speaking humans in North Eurasia". University of Helsinki, Finland. from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2019.PhD thesis

Further reading

• Bakró-Nagy, Marianne; Laakso, Johanna; Skribnik, Elena, eds. (24 March 2022). The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198767664.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-182151-6.
• Björn Collinder (1977). Fenno-Ugric Vocabulary: An Etymolog. Buske Verlag. ISBN 978-3-87118-187-0.
• Campbell, Lyle: Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press 1998.
• Encyclopædia Britannica 15th ed.: Languages of the World: Uralic languages. Chicago, 1990.
• Oja, Vilja (2007). "Color naming in Estonian and cognate languages". In: MacLaury, Robert E.; Paramei, Galina V.; Dedrick, Don (Ed.). Anthropology of Color: Interdistiplinary multilevel modeling. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins B V Publ. pp. 189–209.
• Sinor, Denis (ed.): Studies in Finno-Ugric Linguistics: In Honor of Alo Raun (Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series: Volume 131). Indiana Univ Research, 1977, ISBN 978-0-933070-00-4.
• Vikør, Lars S. (ed.): Fenno-Ugric. In: The Nordic Languages. Their Status and Interrelations. Novus Press, pp. 62–74, 1993.

External links

• Eliot, Charles Norton Edgcumbe (1911). "Finno-Ugrian" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). pp. 388–393.
• Swadesh lists for the Finno-Ugric languages (from Wiktionary's Swadesh-list appendix)
• by the Finno-Ugric Information Center in Syktyvkar, Komi Republic Interface in Russian and English, texts in Mari, Komi, Udmurt, Erzya and Moksha languages.
• The Finno-Ugrics: The dying fish swims in water The Economist, 20 December 2005
• "Ethnic origins of Finno-Ugric nations and modern Finno-Ugric nationalism in the Russian Federation" by Konstantin Zamyatin