Betelgeuse

This article is about the star. For the 1988 film, see Beetlejuice. For other uses, see Betelgeuse (disambiguation).

Betelgeuse is a red supergiant star in the constellation of Orion. It is usually the tenth-brightest star in the night sky and, after Rigel, the second-brightest in its constellation. It is a distinctly reddish, semiregular variable star whose apparent magnitude, varying between +0.0 and +1.6, has the widest range displayed by any first-magnitude star. Betelgeuse is the brightest star in the night sky at near-infrared wavelengths. Its Bayer designation is α Orionis, Latinised to Alpha Orionis and abbreviated Alpha Ori or α Ori.

Betelgeuse

Location of Betelgeuse (circled)
Observation data Epoch J2000.0      Equinox J2000.0
Constellation	Orion
Pronunciation	/ˈbɛtəldʒuːz, ˈbiːt-, -dʒuːs/ BE(E)T-əl-jooz, -⁠jooss^[1]^[2]
Right ascension	05^h 55^m 10.30536^s^[3]
Declination	+07° 24′ 25.4304″^[3]
Apparent magnitude (V)	+0.50^[4] (0.0–1.6^[5])
Characteristics
Evolutionary stage	Red supergiant
Spectral type	M1–M2 Ia–ab^[6]
Apparent magnitude (J)	−3.00^[7]
Apparent magnitude (K)	−4.05^[7]
U−B color index	+2.06^[4]
B−V color index	+1.85^[4]
Variable type	SRc^[8]
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)	+21.91^[9] km/s
Proper motion (μ)	RA: 26.42±0.25^[10] mas/yr Dec.: 9.60±0.12^[10] mas/yr
Parallax (π)	5.95+0.58 −0.85 mas^[11]
Distance	408-548+90 −49 ly (125^[12]-168.1+27.5 −14.9^[11] pc)
Absolute magnitude (MV)	−5.85^[13]
Details
Mass	14^[12]-19^[11] M☉
Radius	764+116 −62^[11]–1,021^[14] R☉
Luminosity	~65000^[15] 87100+20500 −11200^[11] 126,000+83,000 −50,000^[16] (90,000–150,000)^[17] L☉
Surface gravity (log g)	−0.5^[18] cgs
Temperature	3,600±200^[11]-3800^[12] K
Metallicity [Fe/H]	+0.05^[19] dex
Rotation	36±8^[20] years
Rotational velocity (v sin i)	5.47±0.25^[20] km/s
Age	8.0^[16]–14^[12] Myr
Other designations
Betelgeuse, α Ori, 58 Ori, HR 2061, BD+7°1055, HD 39801, FK5 224, HIP 27989, SAO 113271, GC 7451, CCDM J05552+0724, AAVSO 0549+07
Database references
SIMBAD	data

With a radius around 760 times that of the Sun,^[11] if it were at the center of our Solar System, its surface would lie beyond the asteroid belt and it would engulf the orbits of Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. Calculations of Betelgeuse's mass range from slightly under ten to a little over twenty times that of the Sun. For various reasons, its distance has been quite difficult to measure; current best estimates are of the order of 400–600 light-years from the Sun – a comparatively wide uncertainty for a relatively nearby star. Its absolute magnitude is about −6. Less than 10 million years old, Betelgeuse has evolved rapidly because of its large mass and is expected to end its evolution with a supernova explosion, most likely within 100,000 years. When Betelgeuse explodes, it will shine as bright as the half-Moon for more than three months; life on Earth will be unharmed. Having been ejected from its birthplace in the Orion OB1 association – which includes the stars in Orion's Belt – this runaway star has been observed to be moving through the interstellar medium at a speed of 30 km/s, creating a bow shock over four light-years wide.

Betelgeuse became the first extrasolar star whose photosphere's angular size was measured in 1920, and subsequent studies have reported an angular diameter (i.e., apparent size) ranging from 0.042 to 0.056 arcseconds; that range of determinations is ascribed to non-sphericity, limb darkening, pulsations and varying appearance at different wavelengths. It is also surrounded by a complex, asymmetric envelope, roughly 250 times the size of the star, caused by mass loss from the star itself. The Earth-observed angular diameter of Betelgeuse is exceeded only by those of R Doradus and the Sun.

Starting in October 2019, Betelgeuse began to dim noticeably, and by mid-February 2020 its brightness had dropped by a factor of approximately 3, from magnitude 0.5 to 1.7. It then returned to a more normal brightness range, reaching a peak of 0.0 visual and 0.1 V-band magnitude in April 2023. Infrared observations found no significant change in luminosity over the last 50 years, suggesting that the dimming was due to a change in extinction around the star rather than a more fundamental change. A study using the Hubble Space Telescope suggests that occluding dust was created by a surface mass ejection; this material was cast millions of miles from the star, and then cooled to form the dust that caused the dimming.

Nomenclature

The star's designation is α Orionis (Latinised to Alpha Orionis), given by Johann Bayer in 1603.

The traditional name Betelgeuse was derived from the Arabic يد الجوزاء Yad al-Jawzā’ "the hand of al-Jawzā’ [i.e. Orion]".^[21][22] An error in the 13th-century reading of the Arabic initial yā’ (يـ) as bā’ (بـ) led to the European name.^[22][23] In English, there are four common pronunciations of this name, depending on whether the first e is pronounced short or long and whether the s is pronounced /s/ or /z/:^[1][2]

• /ˈbɛtəldʒuːz/ BET-əl-jooz;
• /ˈbiːtəldʒuːz/ BEE-təl-jooz;
• /ˈbɛtəldʒuːs/ BET-əl-jooss;
• /ˈbiːtəldʒuːs/ BEE-təl-jooss, popularized for sounding like "beetle juice".

In 2016, the International Astronomical Union organized a Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)^[24] to catalog and standardize proper names for stars. The WGSN's first bulletin, issued July 2016,^[25] included a table of the first two batches of names approved by the WGSN, which included Betelgeuse for this star. It is now so entered in the IAU Catalog of Star Names.^[26]

Observational history

Betelgeuse and its red coloration have been noted since antiquity; the classical astronomer Ptolemy described its color as ὑπόκιρρος (hypókirrhos = more or less orange-tawny), a term later described by a translator of Ulugh Beg's Zij-i Sultani as rubedo, Latin for "ruddiness".^[27][a] In the 19th century, before modern systems of stellar classification, Angelo Secchi included Betelgeuse as one of the prototypes for his Class III (orange to red) stars.^[28] Three centuries before Ptolemy, in contrast, Chinese astronomers observed Betelgeuse as yellow; Such an observation, if accurate, could suggest the star was in a yellow supergiant phase around this time,^[29][12] a credible possibility, given current research into these stars' complex circumstellar environment.^[30]

Nascent discoveries

Aboriginal groups in South Australia have shared oral tales of the variable brightness of Betelgeuse for at least 1,000 years.^[31][32]

 

Sir John Herschel in 1846

The variation in Betelgeuse's brightness was described in 1836 by Sir John Herschel in Outlines of Astronomy. From 1836 to 1840, he noticed significant changes in magnitude when Betelgeuse outshone Rigel in October 1837 and again in November 1839.^[33] A 10-year quiescent period followed; then in 1849, Herschel noted another short cycle of variability, which peaked in 1852. Later observers recorded unusually high maxima with an interval of years, but only small variations from 1957 to 1967. The records of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) show a maximum brightness of 0.2 in 1933 and 1942, and a minimum of 1.2, observed in 1927 and 1941.^[34][35] This variability in brightness may explain why Johann Bayer, with the publication of his Uranometria in 1603, designated the star alpha, as it probably rivaled the usually brighter Rigel (beta).^[36] From Arctic latitudes, Betelgeuse's red colour and higher location in the sky than Rigel meant the Inuit regarded it as brighter, and one local name was Ulluriajjuaq ("large star").^[37]

In 1920, Albert A. Michelson and Francis G. Pease mounted a six-meter interferometer on the front of the 2.5-meter telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory, helped by John August Anderson. The trio measured the angular diameter of Betelgeuse at 0.047″, a figure that resulted in a diameter of 3.84×10⁸ km (2.58 AU) based on the parallax value of 0.018″.^[38] But limb darkening and measurement errors resulted in uncertainty about the accuracy of these measurements.

The 1950s and 1960s saw two developments that affected stellar convection theory in red supergiants: the Stratoscope projects and the 1958 publication of Structure and Evolution of the Stars, principally the work of Martin Schwarzschild and his colleague at Princeton University, Richard Härm.^[39][40] This book disseminated ideas on how to apply computer technologies to create stellar models, while the Stratoscope projects, by taking balloon-borne telescopes above the Earth's turbulence, produced some of the finest images of solar granules and sunspots ever seen, thus confirming the existence of convection in the solar atmosphere.^[39]

Imaging breakthroughs

 

1998/9 UV HST images of Betelgeuse showing asymmetrical pulsations with corresponding spectral line profiles

Astronomers saw some major advances in astronomical imaging technology in the 1970s, beginning with Antoine Labeyrie's invention of speckle interferometry, a process that significantly reduced the blurring effect caused by astronomical seeing. It increased the optical resolution of ground-based telescopes, allowing for more precise measurements of Betelgeuse's photosphere.^[41][42] With improvements in infrared telescopy atop Mount Wilson, Mount Locke, and Mauna Kea in Hawaii, astrophysicists began peering into the complex circumstellar shells surrounding the supergiant,^[43][44][45] causing them to suspect the presence of huge gas bubbles resulting from convection.^[46] However, it was not until the late 1980s and early 1990s, when Betelgeuse became a regular target for aperture masking interferometry, that breakthroughs occurred in visible-light and infrared imaging. Pioneered by J.E. Baldwin and colleagues of the Cavendish Astrophysics Group, the new technique employed a small mask with several holes in the telescope pupil plane, converting the aperture into an ad hoc interferometric array.^[47] The technique contributed some of the most accurate measurements of Betelgeuse while revealing bright spots on the star's photosphere.^[48][49][50] These were the first optical and infrared images of a stellar disk other than the Sun, taken first from ground-based interferometers and later from higher-resolution observations of the COAST telescope. The "bright patches" or "hotspots" observed with these instruments appeared to corroborate a theory put forth by Schwarzschild decades earlier of massive convection cells dominating the stellar surface.^[51][52]

In 1995, the Hubble Space Telescope's Faint Object Camera captured an ultraviolet image with a resolution superior to that obtained by ground-based interferometers—the first conventional-telescope image (or "direct-image" in NASA terminology) of the disk of another star.^[53] Because ultraviolet light is absorbed by the Earth's atmosphere, observations at these wavelengths are best performed by space telescopes.^[54] This image, like earlier pictures, contained a bright patch indicating a region in the southwestern quadrant 2,000 K hotter than the stellar surface.^[55] Subsequent ultraviolet spectra taken with the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph suggested that the hot spot was one of Betelgeuse's poles of rotation. This would give the rotational axis an inclination of about 20° to the direction of Earth, and a position angle from celestial North of about 55°.^[56]

2000s studies

In a study published in December 2000, the star's diameter was measured with the Infrared Spatial Interferometer (ISI) at mid-infrared wavelengths producing a limb-darkened estimate of 55.2±0.5 mas – a figure entirely consistent with Michelson's findings eighty years earlier.^[38][57] At the time of its publication, the estimated parallax from the Hipparcos mission was 7.63±1.64 mas, yielding an estimated radius for Betelgeuse of 3.6 AU. However, an infrared interferometric study published in 2009 announced that the star had shrunk by 15% since 1993 at an increasing rate without a significant diminution in magnitude.^[58][59] Subsequent observations suggest that the apparent contraction may be due to shell activity in the star's extended atmosphere.^[60]

In addition to the star's diameter, questions have arisen about the complex dynamics of Betelgeuse's extended atmosphere. The mass that makes up galaxies is recycled as stars are formed and destroyed, and red supergiants are major contributors, yet the process by which mass is lost remains a mystery.^[61] With advances in interferometric methodologies, astronomers may be close to resolving this conundrum. Images released by the European Southern Observatory in July 2009, taken by the ground-based Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI), showed a vast plume of gas extending 30 AU from the star into the surrounding atmosphere.^[62] This mass ejection was equal to the distance between the Sun and Neptune and is one of multiple events occurring in Betelgeuse's surrounding atmosphere. Astronomers have identified at least six shells surrounding Betelgeuse. Solving the mystery of mass loss in the late stages of a star's evolution may reveal those factors that precipitate the explosive deaths of these stellar giants.^[58]

2019–2020 fading

 

AAVSO V-band magnitude of Betelgeuse, between September 2016 and August 2023

 

Comparison of SPHERE images of Betelgeuse taken in January 2019 and December 2019, showing the changes in brightness and shape

A pulsating semiregular variable star, Betelgeuse is subject to multiple cycles of increasing and decreasing brightness due to changes in its size and temperature.^[16] The astronomers who first noted the dimming of Betelgeuse, Villanova University astronomers Richard Wasatonic and Edward Guinan, and amateur Thomas Calderwood, theorize that a coincidence of a normal 5.9 year light-cycle minimum and a deeper-than-normal 425 day period are the driving factors.^[63] Other possible causes hypothesized by late 2019 were an eruption of gas or dust or fluctuations in the star's surface brightness.^[64]

By August 2020, long-term and extensive studies of Betelgeuse, primarily using ultraviolet observations by the Hubble Space Telescope, had suggested that the unexpected dimming was probably caused by an immense amount of superhot material ejected into space. The material cooled and formed a dust cloud that blocked the starlight coming from about a quarter of Betelgeuse's surface. Hubble captured signs of dense, heated material moving through the star's atmosphere in September, October and November before several telescopes observed the more marked dimming in December and the first few months of 2020.^[65][66][67]

By January 2020, Betelgeuse had dimmed by a factor of approximately 2.5 from magnitude 0.5 to 1.5 and was reported still fainter in February in The Astronomer's Telegram at a record minimum of +1.614, noting that the star is currently the "least luminous and coolest" in the 25 years of their studies and also calculating a decrease in radius.^[68] Astronomy magazine described it as a "bizarre dimming",^[69] and popular speculation inferred that this might indicate an imminent supernova.^[70][71] This dropped Betelgeuse from one of the top 10 brightest stars in the sky to outside the top 20,^[63] noticeably dimmer than its near neighbor Aldebaran.^[64] Mainstream media reports discussed speculation that Betelgeuse might be about to explode as a supernova,^{[72][73][74][75]} but astronomers note that the supernova is expected to occur within approximately the next 100,000 years and is thus unlikely to be imminent.^[72][74]

By 17 February 2020, Betelgeuse's brightness had remained constant for about 10 days, and the star showed signs of rebrightening.^[76] On 22 February 2020, Betelgeuse may have stopped dimming altogether, all but ending the dimming episode.^[77] On 24 February 2020, no significant change in the infrared over the last 50 years was detected; this seemed unrelated to the recent visual fading and suggested that an impending core collapse may be unlikely.^[78] Also on 24 February 2020, further studies suggested that occluding "large-grain circumstellar dust" may be the most likely explanation for the dimming of the star.^[79][80] A study that uses observations at submillimetre wavelengths rules out significant contributions from dust absorption. Instead, large starspots appear to be the cause for the dimming.^[81] Followup studies, reported on 31 March 2020 in The Astronomer's Telegram, found a rapid rise in the brightness of Betelgeuse.^[82]

Betelgeuse is almost unobservable from the ground between May and August because it is too close to the Sun. Before entering its 2020 conjunction with the Sun, Betelgeuse had reached a brightness of +0.4 . Observations with the STEREO-A spacecraft made in June and July 2020 showed that the star had dimmed by 0.5 since the last ground-based observation in April. This is surprising, because a maximum was expected for August/September 2020, and the next minimum should occur around April 2021. However Betelgeuse's brightness is known to vary irregularly, making predictions difficult. The fading could indicate that another dimming event might occur much earlier than expected.^[83] On 30 August 2020, astronomers reported the detection of a second dust cloud emitted from Betelgeuse, and associated with recent substantial dimming (a secondary minimum on 3 August) in luminosity of the star.^[84]

In June 2021, the dust was explained as possibly caused by a cool patch on its photosphere^{[85][86][87][88]} and in August a second independent group confirmed these results.^[89][90] The dust is thought to have resulted from the cooling of gas ejected from the star. An August 2022^[91][92][93] study using the Hubble Space Telescope confirmed previous research and suggested the dust could have been created by a surface mass ejection. It conjectured as well that the dimming could have come from a short-term minimum coinciding with a long-term minimum producing a grand minimum, a 416-day cycle and 2010 day cycle respectively, a mechanism first suggested by astronomer L. Goldberg.^[94] In April 2023, astronomers reported the star reached a peak of 0.0 visual and 0.1 V-band magnitude.^[95]

Observation

 

Image showing Betelgeuse (top left) and the dense nebulae of the Orion molecular cloud complex (Rogelio Bernal Andreo)

 

Orion as seen on midday mid-June from Dome C (75 degrees South, Antarctica). Screenshot from Stellarium

As a result of its distinctive orange-red color and position within Orion, Betelgeuse is easy to find with the naked eye. It is one of three stars that make up the Winter Triangle asterism, and it marks the center of the Winter Hexagon. It can be seen rising in the east at the beginning of January of each year, just after sunset. Between mid-September and mid-March (best in mid-December), it is visible to virtually every inhabited region of the globe, except in Antarctica at latitudes south of 82°. In May (moderate northern latitudes) or June (southern latitudes), the red supergiant can be seen briefly on the western horizon after sunset, reappearing again a few months later on the eastern horizon before sunrise. In the intermediate period (June–July, centered around mid June), it is invisible to the naked eye (visible only with a telescope in daylight), except around midday low in the north in Antarctic regions between 70° and 80° south latitude (during midday twilight in polar night, when the Sun is below the horizon).

Betelgeuse is a variable star whose visual magnitude ranges between 0.0 and +1.6 .^[5] There are periods during which it surpasses Rigel to become the sixth brightest star, and occasionally it will become even brighter than Capella. At its faintest, Betelgeuse can fall behind Deneb and Beta Crucis, themselves both slightly variable, to be the twentieth-brightest star.^[35]

Betelgeuse has a B–V color index of 1.85 – a figure which points to its pronounced "redness". The photosphere has an extended atmosphere, which displays strong lines of emission rather than absorption, a phenomenon that occurs when a star is surrounded by a thick gaseous envelope (rather than ionized). This extended gaseous atmosphere has been observed moving toward and away from Betelgeuse, depending on fluctuations in the photosphere. Betelgeuse is the brightest near-infrared source in the sky with a J band magnitude of −2.99;^[96] only about 13% of the star's radiant energy is emitted as visible light. If human eyes were sensitive to radiation at all wavelengths, Betelgeuse would appear as the brightest star in the night sky.^[35]

Catalogues list up to nine faint visual companions to Betelgeuse. They are at distances of about one to four arc-minutes and all are fainter than 10th magnitude.^[97][98]

Star system

Betelgeuse is generally considered to be a single isolated star and a runaway star, not currently associated with any cluster or star-forming region, although its birthplace is unclear.^[99]

Two spectroscopic companions to Betelgeuse have been proposed. Analysis of polarization data from 1968 through 1983 indicated a close companion with a periodic orbit of about 2.1 years, and by using speckle interferometry, the team concluded that the closer of the two companions was located at 0.06″±0.01″ (≈9 AU) from the main star with a position angle of 273°, an orbit that would potentially place it within the star's chromosphere. The more distant companion was at 0.51″±0.01″ (≈77 AU) with a position angle of 278°.^[100][101] Further studies have found no evidence for these companions or have actively refuted their existence,^[102] but the possibility of a close companion contributing to the overall flux has never been fully ruled out.^[103] High-resolution interferometry of Betelgeuse and its vicinity, far beyond the technology of the 1980s and 1990s, has not detected any companions.^[62][104]

Distance measurements

 

NRAO's Very Large Array used to derive Betelgeuse's 2008 distance estimate

Parallax is the apparent change of the position of an object, measured in seconds of arc, caused by the change of position of the observer of that object. As the Earth orbits the Sun, every star is seen to shift by a fraction of an arc second, which measure, combined with the baseline provided by the Earth's orbit gives the distance to that star. Since the first successful parallax measurement by Friedrich Bessel in 1838, astronomers have been puzzled by Betelgeuse's apparent distance. Knowledge of the star's distance improves the accuracy of other stellar parameters, such as luminosity that, when combined with an angular diameter, can be used to calculate the physical radius and effective temperature; luminosity and isotopic abundances can also be used to estimate the stellar age and mass.^[105]

When the first interferometric studies were performed on the star's diameter in 1920, the assumed parallax was 0.0180″. This equated to a distance of 56 pc or roughly 180 ly, producing not only an inaccurate radius for the star but every other stellar characteristic. Since then, there has been ongoing work to measure the distance of Betelgeuse, with proposed distances as high as 400 pc or about 1,300 ly.^[105]

Before the publication of the Hipparcos Catalogue (1997), there were two slightly conflicting parallax measurements for Betelgeuse. The first, in 1991, gave a parallax of 9.8±4.7 mas, yielding a distance of roughly 102 pc or 330 ly.^[106] The second was the Hipparcos Input Catalogue (1993) with a trigonometric parallax of 5±4 mas, a distance of 200 pc or 650 ly.^[107] Given this uncertainty, researchers were adopting a wide range of distance estimates, leading to significant variances in the calculation of the star's attributes.^[105]

The results from the Hipparcos mission were released in 1997. The measured parallax of Betelgeuse was 7.63±1.64 mas, which equated to a distance of roughly 131 pc or 427 ly, and had a smaller reported error than previous measurements.^[108] However, later evaluation of the Hipparcos parallax measurements for variable stars like Betelgeuse found that the uncertainty of these measurements had been underestimated.^[109] In 2007, an improved figure of 6.55±0.83 was calculated, hence a much tighter error factor yielding a distance of roughly 152±20 pc or 500±65 ly.^[3]

In 2008, measurements using the Very Large Array (VLA) produced a radio solution of 5.07±1.10 mas, equaling a distance of 197±45 pc or 643±146 ly.^[105] As the researcher, Harper, points out: "The revised Hipparcos parallax leads to a larger distance (152±20 pc) than the original; however, the astrometric solution still requires a significant cosmic noise of 2.4 mas. Given these results it is clear that the Hipparcos data still contain systematic errors of unknown origin." Although the radio data also have systematic errors, the Harper solution combines the datasets in the hope of mitigating such errors.^[105] An updated result from further observations with ALMA and e-Merlin gives a parallax of 4.51±0.8 mas and a distance of 222+34
−48 pc or 724+111
−156 ly.^[10]

In 2020, new observational data from the space-based Solar Mass Ejection Imager aboard the Coriolis satellite and three different modeling techniques produced a refined parallax of 5.95+0.58
−0.85 mas, a radius of 764+116
−62 R_☉, and a distance of 168.1+27.5
−14.4 pc or 548+90
−49 ly, which, if accurate, would mean Betelgeuse is nearly 25% smaller and 25% closer to Earth than previously thought.^[11]

Although the European Space Agency's current Gaia mission was not expected to produce good results for stars brighter than the approximately V=6 saturation limit of the mission's instruments,^[110] actual operation has shown good performance on objects to about magnitude +3. Forced observations of brighter stars mean that final results should be available for all bright stars and a parallax for Betelgeuse will be published an order of magnitude more accurate than currently available.^[111] There is no data on Betelgeuse in Gaia Data Release 2, which was released in 2018.^[112]

Variability

 

AAVSO V-band light curve of Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis) from Dec 1988 to Aug 2002.

 

Orion, with Betelgeuse at its usual magnitude (left) and during the unusually deep minimum in early 2020 (right)

Betelgeuse is classified as a semiregular variable star, indicating that some periodicity is noticeable in the brightness changes, but amplitudes may vary, cycles may have different lengths, and there may be standstills or periods of irregularity. It is placed in subgroup SRc; these are pulsating red supergiants with amplitudes around one magnitude and periods from tens to hundreds of days.^[8]

Betelgeuse typically shows only small brightness changes near to magnitude +0.5, although at its extremes it can become as bright as magnitude 0.0 or as faint as magnitude +1.6. Betelgeuse is listed in the General Catalogue of Variable Stars with a possible period of 2,335 days.^[8] More detailed analyses have shown a main period near 400 days, a short period of 185 days,^[11] and a longer secondary period around 2,100 days.^[104][113] The lowest reliably-recorded V-band magnitude of +1.614 was reported in February 2020.

Radial pulsations of red supergiants are well-modelled and show that periods of a few hundred days are typically due to fundamental and first overtone pulsation.^[114] Lines in the spectrum of Betelgeuse show doppler shifts indicating radial velocity changes corresponding, very roughly, to the brightness changes. This demonstrates the nature of the pulsations in size, although corresponding temperature and spectral variations are not clearly seen.^[115] Variations in the diameter of Betelgeuse have also been measured directly.^[60] First overtone pulsations of 185 days have been observed, and the ratio of the fundamental to overtone periods gives valuable information about the internal structure of the star and its age.^[11]

The source of the long secondary periods is unknown, but they cannot be explained by radial pulsations.^[113] Interferometric observations of Betelgeuse have shown hotspots that are thought to be created by massive convection cells, a significant fraction of the diameter of the star and each emitting 5–10% of the total light of the star.^[103][104] One theory to explain long secondary periods is that they are caused by the evolution of such cells combined with the rotation of the star.^[113] Other theories include close binary interactions, chromospheric magnetic activity influencing mass loss, or non-radial pulsations such as g-modes.^[116]

In addition to the discrete dominant periods, small-amplitude stochastic variations are seen. It is proposed that this is due to granulation, similar to the same effect on the sun but on a much larger scale.^[113]

Diameter

See also: List of largest known stars

 

Size comparison between Arcturus, Rigel, S Doradus, Antares, and Betelgeuse

 

Size comparison of Betelgeuse, Mu Cephei, KY Cygni, and V354 Cephei, according to Emily Levesque^{[citation needed]}

On 13 December 1920, Betelgeuse became the first star outside the Solar System to have the angular size of its photosphere measured.^[38] Although interferometry was still in its infancy, the experiment proved a success. The researchers, using a uniform disk model, determined that Betelgeuse had a diameter of 0.047″, although the stellar disk was likely 17% larger due to the limb darkening, resulting in an estimate for its angular diameter of about 0.055".^[38][59] Since then, other studies have produced angular diameters that range from 0.042 to 0.069″.^{[42][57][117]} Combining these data with historical distance estimates of 180 to 815 ly yields a projected radius of the stellar disk of anywhere from 1.2 to 8.9 AU. Using the Solar System for comparison, the orbit of Mars is about 1.5 AU, Ceres in the asteroid belt 2.7 AU, Jupiter 5.5 AU—so, assuming Betelgeuse occupying the place of the Sun, its photosphere might extend beyond the Jovian orbit, not quite reaching Saturn at 9.5 AU.

 

Radio image from 1998 showing the size of Betelgeuse's photosphere (circle) and the effect of convective forces on the star's atmosphere

The precise diameter has been hard to define for several reasons:

1. Betelgeuse is a pulsating star, so its diameter changes with time;
2. The star has no definable "edge" as limb darkening causes the optical emissions to vary in color and decrease the farther one extends out from the center;
3. Betelgeuse is surrounded by a circumstellar envelope composed of matter ejected from the star—matter which absorbs and emits light—making it difficult to define the photosphere of the star;^[58]
4. Measurements can be taken at varying wavelengths within the electromagnetic spectrum and the difference in reported diameters can be as much as 30–35%, yet comparing one finding with another is difficult as the star's apparent size differs depending on the wavelength used.^[58] Studies have shown that the measured angular diameter is considerably larger at ultraviolet wavelengths, decreases through the visible to a minimum in the near-infrared, and increase again in the mid-infrared spectrum;^{[53][118][119]}
5. Atmospheric twinkling limits the resolution obtainable from ground-based telescopes since turbulence degrades angular resolution.^[48]

The generally reported radii of large cool stars are Rosseland radii, defined as the radius of the photosphere at a specific optical depth of two-thirds. This corresponds to the radius calculated from the effective temperature and bolometric luminosity. The Rosseland radius differs from directly measured radii, with corrections for limb darkening and the observation wavelength.^[120] For example, a measured angular diameter of 55.6 mas would correspond to a Rosseland mean diameter of 56.2 mas, while further corrections for the existence of surrounding dust and gas shells would give a diameter of 41.9 mas.^[16]

To overcome these challenges, researchers have employed various solutions. Astronomical interferometry, first conceived by Hippolyte Fizeau in 1868, was the seminal concept that has enabled major improvements in modern telescopy and led to the creation of the Michelson interferometer in the 1880s, and the first successful measurement of Betelgeuse.^[121] Just as human depth perception increases when two eyes instead of one perceive an object, Fizeau proposed the observation of stars through two apertures instead of one to obtain interferences that would furnish information on the star's spatial intensity distribution. The science evolved quickly and multiple-aperture interferometers are now used to capture speckled images, which are synthesized using Fourier analysis to produce a portrait of high resolution.^[122] It was this methodology that identified the hotspots on Betelgeuse in the 1990s.^[123] Other technological breakthroughs include adaptive optics,^[124] space observatories like Hipparcos, Hubble and Spitzer,^[53][125] and the Astronomical Multi-BEam Recombiner (AMBER), which combines the beams of three telescopes simultaneously, allowing researchers to achieve milliarcsecond spatial resolution.^[126][127]

Observations in different regions of the electromagnetic spectrum—the visible, near-infrared (NIR), mid-infrared (MIR), or radio—produce very different angular measurements. In 1996, Betelgeuse was shown to have a uniform disk of 56.6±1.0 mas. In 2000, a Space Sciences Laboratory team measured a diameter of 54.7±0.3 mas, ignoring any possible contribution from hotspots, which are less noticeable in the mid-infrared.^[57] Also included was a theoretical allowance for limb darkening, yielding a diameter of 55.2±0.5 mas. The earlier estimate equates to a radius of roughly 5.6 AU or 1,200 R_☉, assuming the 2008 Harper distance of 197.0±45 pc,^[17] a figure roughly the size of the Jovian orbit of 5.5 AU.^[128][129]

In 2004, a team of astronomers working in the near-infrared announced that the more accurate photospheric measurement was 43.33±0.04 mas. The study also put forth an explanation as to why varying wavelengths from the visible to mid-infrared produce different diameters: the star is seen through a thick, warm extended atmosphere. At short wavelengths (the visible spectrum) the atmosphere scatters light, thus slightly increasing the star's diameter. At near-infrared wavelengths (K and L bands), the scattering is negligible, so the classical photosphere can be directly seen; in the mid-infrared the scattering increases once more, causing the thermal emission of the warm atmosphere to increase the apparent diameter.^[118]

 

Infrared image of Betelgeuse, Meissa and Bellatrix with surrounding nebulae

Studies with the IOTA and VLTI published in 2009 brought strong support to the idea of dust shells and a molecular shell (MOLsphere) around Betelgeuse, and yielded diameters ranging from 42.57 to 44.28 mas with comparatively insignificant margins of error.^[103][130] In 2011, a third estimate in the near-infrared corroborating the 2009 numbers, this time showing a limb-darkened disk diameter of 42.49±0.06 mas.^[131] The near-infrared photospheric diameter of 43.33 mas at the Hipparcos distance of 152±20 pc equates to about 3.4 AU or 730 R_☉.^[132] A 2014 paper derives an angular diameter of 42.28 mas (equivalent to a 41.01 mas uniform disc) using H and K band observations made with the VLTI AMBER instrument.^[133]

In 2009 it was announced that the radius of Betelgeuse had shrunk from 1993 to 2009 by 15%, with the 2008 angular measurement equal to 47.0 mas.^[59][134] Unlike most earlier papers, this study used measurements at one specific wavelength over 15 years. The diminution in Betelgeuse's apparent size equates to a range of values between 56.0±0.1 mas seen in 1993 to 47.0±0.1 mas seen in 2008—a contraction of almost 0.9 AU in 15 years.^[59] The observed contraction is generally believed to be a variation in just a portion of the extended atmosphere around Betelgeuse, and observations at other wavelengths have shown an increase in diameter over a similar period.^[133]

The latest models of Betelgeuse adopt a photospheric angular diameter of around 43 mas, with multiple shells out to 50-60 mas.^[20] Assuming a distance of 197 pc, this means a stellar diameter of 887±203 R_☉.^[16]

Once considered as having the largest angular diameter of any star in the sky after the Sun, Betelgeuse lost that distinction in 1997 when a group of astronomers measured R Doradus with a diameter of 57.0±0.5 mas, although R Doradus, being much closer to Earth at about 200 ly, has a linear diameter roughly one-third that of Betelgeuse.^[135]

Occultations

•  
  Predicted path using SOLEX

Betelgeuse is too far from the ecliptic to be occulted by the major planets, but those by some asteroids (which are more wide-ranging and much more numerous) occur frequently. A partial occultation by the 19th magnitude asteroid (147857) 2005 UW₃₈₁ occurred on 2 January 2012. It was partial because the angular diameter of the star was larger than that of the asteroid; the brightness of Betelgeuse dropped by only about 0.01 magnitudes.^[136][137]

The 14th magnitude asteroid 319 Leona was predicted to occult on 12 December 2023, 01:12 UTC.^[138] Totality was at first uncertain, and the occulation was projected to only last approximately twelve seconds (visible on a narrow path on Earth's surface, the exact width and location of which was initially uncertain due to lack of precise knowledge of the size and path of the asteroid).^[139] Projections were later refined as more data were analyzed for^[140] a totality ("ring of fire") of approximately five seconds and a 60 km wide path stretching from Tajikistan, Armenia, Turkey, Greece, Italy, Spain, the Atlantic Ocean, Miami, Florida and the Florida Keys to parts of Mexico.^[141] (The serendiptous event would also afford detailed observations of 319 Leona itself.)^[142] Among other programmes 80 amateur astronomers in Europe alone have been coordinated by astrophysicist Miguel Montargès, et al. of the Paris Observatory for the event.^[143]

Physical characteristics

 

(July 2008, outdated). Relative sizes of the planets in the Solar System and several stars, including Betelgeuse:

1. Mercury < Mars < Venus < Earth
2. Earth < Neptune < Uranus < Saturn < Jupiter
3. Jupiter < Wolf 359 < Sun < Sirius
4. Sirius < Pollux < Arcturus < Aldebaran
5. Aldebaran < Rigel < Antares < Betelgeuse
6. Betelgeuse < Mu Cephei < VV Cephei A < VY Canis Majoris

Betelgeuse is a very large, luminous but cool star classified as an M1-2 Ia-ab red supergiant. The letter "M" in this designation means that it is a red star belonging to the M spectral class and therefore has a relatively low photospheric temperature; the "Ia-ab" suffix luminosity class indicates that it is an intermediate-luminosity supergiant, with properties partway between a normal supergiant and a luminous supergiant. Since 1943, the spectrum of Betelgeuse has served as one of the stable anchor points by which other stars are classified.^[144]

Uncertainty in the star's surface temperature, diameter, and distance make it difficult to achieve a precise measurement of Betelgeuse's luminosity, but research from 2012 quotes a luminosity of around 126,000 L_☉, assuming a distance of 200 pc.^[145] Studies since 2001 report effective temperatures ranging from 3,250 to 3,690 K. Values outside this range have previously been reported, and much of the variation is believed to be real, due to pulsations in the atmosphere.^[16] The star is also a slow rotator and the most recent velocity recorded was 5.45 km/s^[20]—much slower than Antares which has a rotational velocity of 20 km/s.^[146] The rotation period depends on Betelgeuse's size and orientation to Earth, but it has been calculated to take 36 years to turn on its axis, inclined at an angle of around 60° to Earth.^[20]

In 2004, astronomers using computer simulations speculated that even if Betelgeuse is not rotating it might exhibit large-scale magnetic activity in its extended atmosphere, a factor where even moderately strong fields could have a meaningful influence over the star's dust, wind and mass-loss properties.^[147] A series of spectropolarimetric observations obtained in 2010 with the Bernard Lyot Telescope at Pic du Midi Observatory revealed the presence of a weak magnetic field at the surface of Betelgeuse, suggesting that the giant convective motions of supergiant stars are able to trigger the onset of a small-scale dynamo effect.^[148]

Mass

Betelgeuse has no known orbital companions, so its mass cannot be calculated by that direct method. Modern mass estimates from theoretical modelling have produced values of 9.5–21 M_☉,^[149] with values of 5 M_☉–30 M_☉ from older studies.^[150] It has been calculated that Betelgeuse began its life as a star of 15–20 M_☉, based on a solar luminosity of 90,000–150,000.^[17] A novel method of determining the supergiant's mass was proposed in 2011, arguing for a current stellar mass of 11.6 M_☉ with an upper limit of 16.6 and lower of 7.7 M_☉, based on observations of the star's intensity profile from narrow H-band interferometry and using a photospheric measurement of roughly 4.3 AU or 955±217 R_☉.^[149] Model fitting to evolutionary tracks give a current mass of 19.4–19.7 M_☉, from an initial mass of 20 M_☉.^[16]

Motion

 

Orion OB1 association

The kinematics of Betelgeuse are complex. The age of Class M supergiants with an initial mass of 20 M_☉ is roughly 10 million years.^[105][151] Starting from its present position and motion, a projection back in time would place Betelgeuse around 290 parsecs farther from the galactic plane—an implausible location, as there is no star formation region there. Moreover, Betelgeuse's projected pathway does not appear to intersect with the 25 Ori subassociation or the far younger Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC, also known as Ori OB1d), particularly since Very Long Baseline Array astrometry yields a distance from Betelgeuse to the ONC of between 389 and 414 parsecs. Consequently, it is likely that Betelgeuse has not always had its current motion through space but has changed course at one time or another, possibly the result of a nearby stellar explosion.^[105][152] An observation by the Herschel Space Observatory in January 2013 revealed that the star's winds are crashing against the surrounding interstellar medium.^[153]

The most likely star-formation scenario for Betelgeuse is that it is a runaway star from the Orion OB1 association. Originally a member of a high-mass multiple system within Ori OB1a, Betelgeuse was probably formed about 10–12 million years ago,^[154] but has evolved rapidly due to its high mass.^[105] H. Bouy and J. Alves suggested in 2015 that Betelgeuse may instead be a member of the newly discovered Taurion OB association.^[155]

Circumstellar dynamics

 

Image from ESO's Very Large Telescope showing the stellar disk and an extended atmosphere with a previously unknown plume of surrounding gas

In the late phase of stellar evolution, massive stars like Betelgeuse exhibit high rates of mass loss, possibly as much as one M_☉ every 10,000 years, resulting in a complex circumstellar environment that is constantly in flux. In a 2009 paper, stellar mass loss was cited as the "key to understanding the evolution of the universe from the earliest cosmological times to the current epoch, and of planet formation and the formation of life itself".^[156] However, the physical mechanism is not well understood.^[132] When Martin Schwarzschild first proposed his theory of huge convection cells, he argued it was the likely cause of mass loss in evolved supergiants like Betelgeuse.^[52] Recent work has corroborated this hypothesis, yet there are still uncertainties about the structure of their convection, the mechanism of their mass loss, the way dust forms in their extended atmosphere, and the conditions which precipitate their dramatic finale as a type II supernova.^[132] In 2001, Graham Harper estimated a stellar wind at 0.03 M_☉ every 10,000 years,^[157] but research since 2009 has provided evidence of episodic mass loss making any total figure for Betelgeuse uncertain.^[158] Current observations suggest that a star like Betelgeuse may spend a portion of its lifetime as a red supergiant, but then cross back across the H-R diagram, pass once again through a brief yellow supergiant phase and then explode as a blue supergiant or Wolf–Rayet star.^[30]

 

Artist's rendering from ESO showing Betelgeuse with a gigantic bubble boiling on its surface and a radiant plume of gas being ejected to six photospheric radii or roughly the orbit of Neptune

Astronomers may be close to solving this mystery. They noticed a large plume of gas extending at least six times its stellar radius indicating that Betelgeuse is not shedding matter evenly in all directions.^[62] The plume's presence implies that the spherical symmetry of the star's photosphere, often observed in the infrared, is not preserved in its close environment. Asymmetries on the stellar disk had been reported at different wavelengths. However, due to the refined capabilities of the NACO adaptive optics on the VLT, these asymmetries have come into focus. The two mechanisms that could cause such asymmetrical mass loss, were large-scale convection cells or polar mass loss, possibly due to rotation.^[62] Probing deeper with ESO's AMBER, gas in the supergiant's extended atmosphere has been observed vigorously moving up and down, creating bubbles as large as the supergiant itself, leading his team to conclude that such stellar upheaval is behind the massive plume ejection observed by Kervella.^[158]

Asymmetric shells

In addition to the photosphere, six other components of Betelgeuse's atmosphere have now been identified. They are a molecular environment otherwise known as the MOLsphere, a gaseous envelope, a chromosphere, a dust environment and two outer shells (S1 and S2) composed of carbon monoxide (CO). Some of these elements are known to be asymmetric while others overlap.^[103]

 

Exterior view of ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Paranal, Chile

At about 0.45 stellar radii (~2–3 AU) above the photosphere, there may lie a molecular layer known as the MOLsphere or molecular environment. Studies show it to be composed of water vapor and carbon monoxide with an effective temperature of about 1,500±500 K.^[103][159] Water vapor had been originally detected in the supergiant's spectrum in the 1960s with the two Stratoscope projects but had been ignored for decades. The MOLsphere may also contain SiO and Al₂O₃—molecules which could explain the formation of dust particles.

 

Interior view of one of the four 8.2-meter Unit Telescopes at ESO's VLT

Another cooler region, the asymmetric gaseous envelope, extends for several radii (~10–40 AU) from the photosphere. It is enriched in oxygen and especially in nitrogen relative to carbon. These composition anomalies are likely caused by contamination by CNO-processed material from the inside of Betelgeuse.^[103][160]

Radio-telescope images taken in 1998 confirm that Betelgeuse has a highly complex atmosphere,^[161] with a temperature of 3,450±850 K, similar to that recorded on the star's surface but much lower than surrounding gas in the same region.^[161][162] The VLA images also show this lower-temperature gas progressively cools as it extends outward. Although unexpected, it turns out to be the most abundant constituent of Betelgeuse's atmosphere. "This alters our basic understanding of red-supergiant star atmospheres", explained Jeremy Lim, the team's leader. "Instead of the star's atmosphere expanding uniformly due to gas heated to high temperatures near its surface, it now appears that several giant convection cells propel gas from the star's surface into its atmosphere."^[161] This is the same region in which Kervella's 2009 finding of a bright plume, possibly containing carbon and nitrogen and extending at least six photospheric radii in the southwest direction of the star, is believed to exist.^[103]

The chromosphere was directly imaged by the Faint Object Camera on board the Hubble Space Telescope in ultraviolet wavelengths. The images also revealed a bright area in the southwest quadrant of the disk.^[163] The average radius of the chromosphere in 1996 was about 2.2 times the optical disk (~10 AU) and was reported to have a temperature no higher than 5,500 K.^[103][164] However, in 2004 observations with the STIS, Hubble's high-precision spectrometer, pointed to the existence of warm chromospheric plasma at least one arcsecond away from the star. At a distance of 197 pc, the size of the chromosphere could be up to 200 AU.^[163] The observations have conclusively demonstrated that the warm chromospheric plasma spatially overlaps and co-exists with cool gas in Betelgeuse's gaseous envelope as well as with the dust in its circumstellar dust shells.^[103][163]

 

This infrared image from the ESO's VLT shows complex shells of gas and dust around Betelgeuse – the tiny red circle in the middle is the size of the photosphere.

The first claim of a dust shell surrounding Betelgeuse was put forth in 1977 when it was noted that dust shells around mature stars often emit large amounts of radiation in excess of the photospheric contribution. Using heterodyne interferometry, it was concluded that the red supergiant emits most of its excess radiation from positions beyond 12 stellar radii or roughly the distance of the Kuiper belt at 50 to 60 AU, which depends on the assumed stellar radius.^[43][103] Since then, there have been studies done of this dust envelope at varying wavelengths yielding decidedly different results. Studies from the 1990s have estimated the inner radius of the dust shell anywhere from 0.5 to 1.0 arcseconds, or 100 to 200 AU.^[165][166] These studies point out that the dust environment surrounding Betelgeuse is not static. In 1994, it was reported that Betelgeuse undergoes sporadic decades-long dust production, followed by inactivity. In 1997, significant changes in the dust shell's morphology in one year were noted, suggesting that the shell is asymmetrically illuminated by a stellar radiation field strongly affected by the existence of photospheric hotspots.^[165] The 1984 report of a giant asymmetric dust shell 1 pc (206,265 AU) has not been corroborated by recent studies, although another published the same year said that three dust shells were found extending four light-years from one side of the decaying star, suggesting that Betelgeuse sheds its outer layers as it moves.^[167][168]

Although the exact size of the two outer CO shells remains elusive, preliminary estimates suggest that one shell extends from about 1.5 to 4.0 arcseconds and the other expands as far as 7.0 arcseconds.^[169] Assuming the Jovian orbit of 5.5 AU as the star radius, the inner shell would extend roughly 50 to 150 stellar radii (~300 to 800 AU) with the outer one as far as 250 stellar radii (~1,400 AU). The Sun's heliopause is estimated at 100 AU, so the size of this outer shell would be almost fourteen times the size of the Solar System.

Supersonic bow shock

Betelgeuse is travelling supersonically through the interstellar medium at a speed of 30 km/s (i.e. ~6.3 AU/a) creating a bow shock.^[170][171] The shock is not created by the star, but by its powerful stellar wind as it ejects vast amounts of gas into the interstellar medium at a speed of 17 km/s, heating the material surrounding the star, thereby making it visible in infrared light.^[172] Because Betelgeuse is so bright, it was only in 1997 that the bow shock was first imaged. The cometary structure is estimated to be at least one parsec wide, assuming a distance of 643 light-years.^[173]

Hydrodynamic simulations of the bow shock made in 2012 indicate that it is very young—less than 30,000 years old—suggesting two possibilities: that Betelgeuse moved into a region of the interstellar medium with different properties only recently or that Betelgeuse has undergone a significant transformation producing a changed stellar wind.^[174] A 2012 paper, proposed that this phenomenon was caused by Betelgeuse transitioning from a blue supergiant (BSG) to a red supergiant (RSG). There is evidence that in the late evolutionary stage of a star like Betelgeuse, such stars "may undergo rapid transitions from red to blue and vice versa on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, with accompanying rapid changes to their stellar winds and bow shocks."^[170][175] Moreover, if future research bears out this hypothesis, Betelgeuse may prove to have traveled close to 200,000 AU as a red supergiant scattering as much as 3 M_☉ along its trajectory.

Life phases

Betelgeuse is a red supergiant that has evolved from an O-type main-sequence star. Its core will eventually collapse, producing a supernova explosion and leaving behind a compact remnant. The details depend on the exact initial mass and other physical properties of that main sequence star.

Main sequence

 

Hertzsprung–Russell diagram identifying supergiants like Betelgeuse that have moved off the main sequence

The initial mass of Betelgeuse can only be estimated by testing different stellar evolutionary models to match its current observed properties. The unknowns of both the models and the current properties mean that there is considerable uncertainty in Betelgeuse's initial appearance, but its mass is usually estimated to have been in the range of 10–25 M_☉, with modern models finding values of 15–20 M_☉. Its chemical makeup can be reasonably assumed to have been around 70% hydrogen, 28% helium, and 2.4% heavy elements, slightly more metal-rich than the Sun but otherwise similar. The initial rotation rate is more uncertain, but models with slow to moderate initial rotation rates produce the best matches to Betelgeuse's current properties.^{[16][99][176]} That main sequence version of Betelgeuse would have been a hot luminous star with a spectral type such as O9V.^[145]

A 15 M_☉ star would take between 11.5 and 15 million years to reach the red supergiant stage, with more rapidly-rotating stars taking the longest.^[176] Rapidly-rotating 20 M_☉ stars take 9.3 million years to reach the red supergiant stage, while 20 M_☉ stars with slow rotation take only 8.1 million years.^[99] These are the best estimates of Betelgeuse's current age, as the time since its zero age main sequence stage is estimated to be 8.0–8.5 million years as a 20 M_☉ star with no rotation.^[16]

After core hydrogen exhaustion

Betelgeuse's time spent as a red supergiant can be estimated by comparing mass loss rates to the observed circumstellar material, as well as the abundances of heavy elements at the surface. Estimates range from 20,000 years to a maximum of 140,000 years. Betelgeuse appears to undergo short periods of heavy mass loss and is a runaway star moving rapidly through space, so comparisons of its current mass loss to the total lost mass are difficult.^[16][99]

 

This is what Betelgeuse may have looked like up until about 1 million years ago, when it was a main-sequence star.

The surface of Betelgeuse shows enhancement of nitrogen, relatively low levels of carbon, and a high proportion of ¹³C relative to ¹²C, all indicative of a star that has experienced the first dredge-up. However, the first dredge-up occurs soon after a star reaches the red supergiant phase and so this only means that Betelgeuse has been a red supergiant for at least a few thousand years. The best prediction is that Betelgeuse has already spent around 40,000 years as a red supergiant,^[16] having left the main sequence perhaps one million years ago.^[176]

The current mass can be estimated from evolutionary models from the initial mass and the expected mass lost so far. For Betelgeuse, the total mass lost is predicted to be no more than about one M_☉, giving a current mass of 19.4–19.7 M_☉, considerably higher than estimated by other means such as pulsational properties or limb-darkening models.^[16]

Betelgeuse's mass can also be estimated based on its position on the color‑magnitude‑diagram (CMD). Betelgeuse's color may have changed from yellow (or possibly orange) to red in the last few thousand years, based on a 2022 review of historical records. This color change combined with CMD suggest a mass of 14 M_☉ and age of 14 Myr.^[12]

 

Celestia depiction of Orion as it might appear from Earth when Betelgeuse explodes as a supernova, which could be brighter than the supernova that exploded in 1006

All stars more massive than about 10 M_☉ are expected to end their lives when their cores collapse, typically producing a supernova explosion. Up to about 15 M_☉, a type II-P supernova is always produced from the red supergiant stage.^[176]

More massive stars can lose mass quickly enough that they evolve towards higher temperatures before their cores can collapse, particularly for rotating stars and models with especially high mass loss rates. These stars can produce type II-L or type IIb supernovae from yellow or blue supergiants, or type I b/c supernovae from Wolf-Rayet stars.^[177] Models of rotating 20 M_☉ stars predict a peculiar type II supernova similar to SN 1987A from a blue supergiant progenitor.^[176] On the other hand, non-rotating 20 M_☉ models predict a type II-P supernova from a red supergiant progenitor.^[16]

The time until Betelgeuse explodes depends on the predicted initial conditions and on the estimate of the time already spent as a red supergiant. The total lifetime from the start of the red supergiant phase to core collapse varies from about 300,000 years for a rotating 25 M_☉ star, 550,000 years for a rotating 20 M_☉ star, and up to a million years for a non-rotating 15 M_☉ star. Given the estimated time since Betelgeuse became a red supergiant, estimates of its remaining lifetime range from a "best guess" of under 100,000 years for a non-rotating 20 M_☉ model to far longer for rotating models or lower-mass stars.^[16][176] Betelgeuse's suspected birthplace in the Orion OB1 association is the location of several previous supernovae. It is believed that runaway stars may be caused by supernovae, and there is strong evidence that OB stars μ Columbae, AE Aurigae, and 53 Arietis all originated from such explosions in Ori OB1 2.2, 2.7, and 4.9 million years ago.^[152]

A typical type II-P supernova emits 2×10⁴⁶ J of neutrinos and produces an explosion with a kinetic energy of 2×10⁴⁴ J. As seen from Earth, Betelgeuse as a type IIP supernova would have a peak apparent magnitude somewhere in the range −8 to −12.^[178] This would be easily visible in daylight, with a possible brightness up to a significant fraction of the full moon, though likely not exceeding it. This type of supernova would remain at roughly constant brightness for 2–3 months before rapidly dimming. The visible light is produced mainly by the radioactive decay of cobalt, and sustains its brightness due to the increasing transparency of the cooling hydrogen ejected by the supernova.^[179]

Media reporting

Due to misunderstandings caused by the 2009 publication of the star's 15% contraction, apparently of its outer atmosphere,^[58][128] Betelgeuse has frequently been the subject of scare stories and rumors suggesting that it will explode within a year, and leading to exaggerated claims about the consequences of such an event.^[180][181] The timing and prevalence of these rumors have been linked to broader misconceptions of astronomy, particularly to doomsday predictions relating to the Mayan calendrical apocalypse.^[182][183] Betelgeuse is not likely to produce a gamma-ray burst and is not close enough for its X-rays, ultraviolet radiation, or ejected material to cause significant effects on Earth.^[16][184]

Following the dimming of Betelgeuse in December 2019,^[185][63] reports appeared in the science and mainstream media that again included speculation that the star might be about to explode as a supernova – even in the face of scientific research that a supernova is not expected for perhaps 100,000 years.^[186] Some outlets reported the magnitude as faint as +1.3 as an unusual and interesting phenomenon, like Astronomy magazine,^[69] the National Geographic,^[72] and the Smithsonian.^[187]

Some mainstream media, like The Washington Post,^[73] ABC News in Australia,^[74] and Popular Science,^[188] reported that a supernova was possible but unlikely, whilst other outlets falsely portrayed a supernova as an imminent realistic possibility. CNN, for example, chose the headline "A giant red star is acting weird and scientists think it may be about to explode",^[189] while the New York Post declared Betelgeuse as "due for explosive supernova".^[75]

Phil Plait, in his Bad Astronomy blog, noting that Betelgeuse's recent behaviour, "[w]hile unusual . . . isn't unprecedented," argued that the star is not likely to explode "for a long, long time."^[190] Dennis Overbye of The New York Times agreed that an explosion was not imminent but added that "astronomers are having fun thinking about it."^[191]

Following the eventual supernova, a small dense remnant will be left behind, either a neutron star or black hole. Betelgeuse does not seem to have a core massive enough for a black hole, so the remnant will probably be a neutron star of approximately 1.5 M_☉.^[16]

Ethnological attributes

Spelling and pronunciation

Betelgeuse has also been spelled Betelgeux^[1] and, in German, Beteigeuze^[b] (according to Bode).^[192][193] Betelgeux and Betelgeuze were used until the early 20th century, when the spelling Betelgeuse became universal.^[194] Consensus on its pronunciation is weak and is as varied as its spellings:

• /ˈbɛtəldʒuːz/ BET-əl-jooz – Oxford English Dictionary^[1] and Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
• /ˈbiːtəldʒuːz, -dʒɜːz/ BEET-əl-jooz, -⁠jurz – Oxford English Dictionary^[1]
• /ˈbiːtəldʒuːs/ BEET-əl-joos – (Canadian Oxford Dictionary, Webster's Collegiate Dictionary^[2])
• /bɛtəlˈɡɜːrz/ bet-əl-GURZ – (Martha Evans Martin, The Friendly Stars)^[195]

The -urz pronunciations are attempts to render the French eu sound; they only work in r-dropping accents.

Etymology

 

An illustration of Orion (horizontally reversed) in al-Sufi's Book of Fixed Stars. Betelgeuze is annotated as Yad al-Jauzā ("Hand of Orion"), one of the proposed etymological origins of its modern name, and also as Mankib al Jauzā' ("Shoulder of Orion").

Betelgeuse is often mistranslated as "armpit of the central one".^[196] In his 1899 work Star-Names and Their Meanings, American amateur naturalist Richard Hinckley Allen stated the derivation was from the ابط الجوزاء Ibṭ al-Jauzah, which he claimed degenerated into a number of forms, including Bed Elgueze, Beit Algueze, Bet El-gueze, and Beteigeuze, to the forms Betelgeuse, Betelguese, Betelgueze and Betelgeux. The star was named Beldengeuze in the Alfonsine Tables,^[197] and Italian Jesuit priest and astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli had called it Bectelgeuze or Bedalgeuze.^[27]

Paul Kunitzsch, Professor of Arabic Studies at the University of Munich, refuted Allen's derivation and instead proposed that the full name is a corruption of the Arabic يد الجوزاء Yad al-Jauzā', meaning "the Hand of al-Jauzā'"; i.e., Orion.^[198] European mistransliteration into medieval Latin led to the first character y (ﻴ, with two dots underneath) being misread as a b (ﺒ, with only one dot underneath). During the Renaissance, the star's name was written as بيت الجوزاء Bait al-Jauzā' ("house of Orion") or بط الجوزاء Baţ al-Jauzā', incorrectly thought to mean "armpit of Orion" (a true translation of "armpit" would be ابط, transliterated as Ibţ). This led to the modern rendering as Betelgeuse.^[199] Other writers have since accepted Kunitzsch's explanation.^[36]

The last part of the name, "-elgeuse", comes from the Arabic الجوزاء al-Jauzā', a historical Arabic name of the constellation Orion, a feminine name in old Arabian legend, and of uncertain meaning. Because جوز j-w-z, the root of jauzā', means "middle", al-Jauzā' roughly means "the Central One". The modern Arabic name for Orion is الجبار al-Jabbār ("the Giant"), although the use of الجوزاء al-Jauzā' in the star's name has continued.^[199] The 17th-century English translator Edmund Chilmead gave it the name Ied Algeuze ("Orion's Hand"), from Christmannus.^[27] Other Arabic names recorded include Al Yad al Yamnā ("the Right Hand"), Al Dhira ("the Arm"), and Al Mankib ("the Shoulder"), all of al-Jauzā, Orion,^[27] as منكب الجوزاء Mankib al Jauzā'.

 

Dunhuang Star Chart, circa AD 700, showing 参宿四 Shēnxiùsì (Betelgeuse), the Fourth Star of the constellation of Three Stars

Other names

Other names for Betelgeuse included the Persian Bašn "the Arm", and Coptic Klaria "an Armlet".^[27] Bahu was its Sanskrit name, as part of a Hindu understanding of the constellation as a running antelope or stag.^[27] In traditional Chinese astronomy, the name for Betelgeuse is 参宿四 (Shēnxiùsì, the Fourth Star of the constellation of Three Stars)^[200] as the Chinese constellation 参宿 originally referred to the three stars in Orion's Belt. This constellation was ultimately expanded to ten stars, but the earlier name stuck.^[201] In Japan, the Taira, or Heike, clan adopted Betelgeuse and its red color as its symbol, calling the star Heike-boshi, (平家星), while the Minamoto, or Genji, clan chose Rigel and its white color. The two powerful families fought a legendary war in Japanese history, the stars seen as facing each other off and only kept apart by the Belt.^[202][203]

In Tahitian lore, Betelgeuse was one of the pillars propping up the sky, known as Anâ-varu, the pillar to sit by. It was also called Ta'urua-nui-o-Mere "Great festivity in parental yearnings".^[204] A Hawaiian term for it was Kaulua-koko ("brilliant red star").^[205] The Lacandon people of Central America knew it as chäk tulix ("red butterfly").^[206]

Astronomy writer Robert Burnham Jr. proposed the term padparadaschah, which denotes a rare orange sapphire in India, for the star.^[194]

Mythology

With the history of astronomy intimately associated with mythology and astrology before the scientific revolution, the red star, like the planet Mars that derives its name from a Roman war god, has been closely associated with the martial archetype of conquest for millennia, and by extension, the motif of death and rebirth.^[27] Other cultures have produced different myths. Stephen R. Wilk has proposed the constellation of Orion could have represented the Greek mythological figure Pelops, who had an artificial shoulder of ivory made for him, with Betelgeuse as the shoulder, its color reminiscent of the reddish yellow sheen of ivory.^[33]

Aboriginal people from the Great Victoria Desert of South Australia incorporated Betelgeuse into their oral traditions as the club of Nyeeruna (Orion), which fills with fire-magic and dissipates before returning. This has been interpreted as showing that early Aboriginal observers were aware of the brightness variations of Betelgeuse.^[207][208] The Wardaman people of northern Australia knew the star as Ya-jungin ("Owl Eyes Flicking"), its variable light signifying its intermittent watching of ceremonies led by the Red Kangaroo Leader Rigel.^[209] In South African mythology, Betelgeuse was perceived as a lion casting a predatory gaze toward the three zebras represented by Orion's Belt.^[210]

In the Americas, Betelgeuse signifies a severed limb of a man-figure (Orion)—the Taulipang of Brazil know the constellation as Zililkawai, a hero whose leg was cut off by his wife, with the variable light of Betelgeuse linked to the severing of the limb. Similarly, the Lakota people of North America see it as a chief whose arm has been severed.^[33]

A Sanskrit name for Betelgeuse is ārdrā ("the moist one"), eponymous of the Ardra lunar mansion in Hindu astrology.^[211] The Rigvedic God of storms Rudra presided over the star; this association was linked by 19th-century star enthusiast Richard Hinckley Allen to Orion's stormy nature.^[27] The constellations in Macedonian folklore represented agricultural items and animals, reflecting their way of life. To them, Betelgeuse was Orach ("the ploughman"), alongside the rest of Orion, which depicted a plough with oxen. The rising of Betelgeuse at around 3 a.m. in late summer and autumn signified the time for village men to go to the fields and plough.^[212] To the Inuit, the appearance of Betelgeuse and Bellatrix high in the southern sky after sunset marked the beginning of spring and lengthening days in late February and early March. The two stars were known as Akuttujuuk ("those [two] placed far apart"), referring to the distance between them, mainly to people from North Baffin Island and Melville Peninsula.^[37]

The opposed locations of Orion and Scorpius, with their corresponding bright red variable stars Betelgeuse and Antares, were noted by ancient cultures around the world. The setting of Orion and rising of Scorpius signify the death of Orion by the scorpion. In China they signify brothers and rivals Shen and Shang.^[33] The Batak of Sumatra marked their New Year with the first new moon after the sinking of Orion's Belt below the horizon, at which point Betelgeuse remained "like the tail of a rooster". The positions of Betelgeuse and Antares at opposite ends of the celestial sky were considered significant, and their constellations were seen as a pair of scorpions. Scorpion days marked as nights that both constellations could be seen.^[213]

In popular culture

As one of the brightest and best-known stars, Betelgeuse has featured in many works of fiction. The star's unusual name inspired the title of the 1988 film Beetlejuice, referring to its titular antagonist, and script writer Michael McDowell was impressed by how many people made the connection.^[194] In the popular science fiction series The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, Ford Prefect was from "a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse."^[214]

Two American navy ships were named after the star, both of them World War II vessels, the USS Betelgeuse (AKA-11) launched in 1939 and USS Betelgeuse (AK-260) launched in 1944. In 1979, the French supertanker Betelgeuse was moored off Whiddy Island, discharging oil when it exploded, killing 50 people in one of the worst disasters in Ireland's history.^[215]

The Dave Matthews Band song "Black and Blue Bird" references the star.^[216] The Blur song "Far Out" from their 1994 album Parklife mentions Betelgeuse in its lyrics.^[217]

The Philip Larkin poem "The North Ship", found in the collection of the same name, references the star in the section "Above 80° N", which reads:

" 'A woman has ten claws,' /

Sang the drunken boatswain; / Farther than Betelgeuse, / More brilliant than Orion / Or the planets Venus and Mars, / The star flames on the ocean; / 'A woman has ten claws,' /

Sang the drunken boatswain."

Humbert Wolfe wrote a poem about Betelgeuse, which was set to music by Gustav Holst.^[218]

Table of angular diameter estimates

This table provides a non-exhaustive list of angular measurements conducted since 1920. Also included is a column providing a current range of radii for each study based on Betelgeuse's most recent distance estimate (Harper et al.) of 197±45 pc.

Article	Year^[c]	Telescope	#	Spectrum	λ (μm)	∅ (mas)^[d]	Radii^[e] @ 197±45 pc	Notes
Michelson^[38]	1920	Mt. Wilson	1	Visible	0.575	47.0±4.7	3.2–6.3 AU	Limb darkened +17% = 55.0
Bonneau^[42]	1972	Palomar	8	Visible	0.422–0.719	52.0–69.0	3.6–9.2 AU	Strong correlation of ∅ with λ
Balega^[117]	1978	ESO	3	Visible	0.405–0.715	45.0–67.0	3.1–8.6 AU	No correlation of ∅ with λ
	1979	SAO	4	Visible	0.575–0.773	50.0–62.0	3.5–8.0 AU
Buscher^[48]	1989	WHT	4	Visible	0.633–0.710	54.0–61.0	4.0–7.9 AU	Discovered asymmetries/hotspots
Wilson^[102]	1991	WHT	4	Visible	0.546–0.710	49.0–57.0	3.5–7.1 AU	Confirmation of hotspots
Tuthill^[51]	1993	WHT	8	Visible	0.633–0.710	43.5–54.2	3.2–7.0 AU	Study of hotspots on 3 stars
	1992	WHT	1	NIR	0.902	42.6±3.0	3.0–5.6 AU
Gilliland^[53]	1995	HST		UV	0.24–0.27	104–112	10.3–11.1	FWHM diameters
					0.265–0.295	92–100	9.1–9.8
Weiner^[57]	1999	ISI	2	MIR (N Band)	11.150	54.7±0.3	4.1–6.7 AU	Limb darkened = 55.2±0.5
Perrin^[118]	1997	IOTA	7	NIR (K band)	2.200	43.33±0.04	3.3–5.2 AU	K and L bands, 11.5 μm data contrast
Haubois^[103]	2005	IOTA	6	NIR (H band)	1.650	44.28±0.15	3.4–5.4 AU	Rosseland diameter 45.03±0.12
Hernandez^[130]	2006	VLTI	2	NIR (K band)	2.099–2.198	42.57±0.02	3.2–5.2 AU	High precision AMBER results.
Ohnaka^[158]	2008	VLTI	3	NIR (K band)	2.280–2.310	43.19±0.03	3.3–5.2 AU	Limb darkened 43.56±0.06
Townes^[59]	1993	ISI	17	MIR (N band)	11.150	56.00±1.00	4.2–6.8 AU	Systematic study involving 17 measurements at the same wavelength from 1993 to 2009
	2008	ISI		MIR (N band)	11.150	47.00±2.00	3.6–5.7 AU
	2009	ISI		MIR (N band)	11.150	48.00±1.00	3.6–5.8 AU
Ohnaka^[131]	2011	VLTI	3	NIR (K band)	2.280–2.310	42.05±0.05	3.2–5.2 AU	Limb darkened 42.49±0.06
Harper^[105]	2008	VLA		Also noteworthy, Harper et al. in the conclusion of their paper make the following remark: "In a sense, the derived distance of 200 pc is a balance between the 131 pc (425 ly) Hipparcos distance and the radio which tends towards 250 pc (815 ly)"—hence establishing ± 815 ly as the outside distance for the star.

See also

• List of stars in Orion
• List of stars that have unusual dimming periods
• Stellar evolution
• List of semiregular variable stars
• Red supergiant
• List of supernova candidates

Notes

1. Stella lucida in umero dextro, quae ad rubedinem vergit.^[27]
   "Bright star in right shoulder, which inclines to ruddiness."
2. Likely the result of mistaking the l for an i. Ultimately, this led to the modern "Betelgeuse".
3. The final year of observations, unless otherwise noted
4. Uniform disk measurement, unless otherwise noted
5. Radii calculations use the same methodology as outlined in Note No. 2 below ^‡Limb darkened measurement

References

1. Simpson, J.; Weiner, E., eds. (1989). "Betelgeuse". Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-19-861186-8.
2. "Merriam-Webster Dictionary: Betelgeuse". Retrieved 23 April 2018.
3. van Leeuwen, F (November 2007). "Hipparcos, the New Reduction". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 474 (2). VizieR: 653–664. arXiv:0708.1752. Bibcode:2007A&A...474..653V. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078357. S2CID 18759600.
4. Nicolet, B. (1978). "Catalogue of Homogeneous Data in the UBV Photoelectric Photometric System". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 34: 1–49. Bibcode:1978A&AS...34....1N.
5. "Alpha Orionis". Variable Star Index. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
6. Keenan, Philip C.; McNeil, Raymond C. (1989). "The Perkins catalog of revised MK types for the cooler stars". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 71: 245. Bibcode:1989ApJS...71..245K. doi:10.1086/191373. S2CID 123149047.
7. Ducati, J.R. (2002). "VizieR online data catalog: Catalogue of stellar photometry in Johnson's 11 color system". CDS/ADC Collection of Electronic Catalogues. 2237. Bibcode:2002yCat.2237....0D.
8. Samus, N.N.; Durlevich, O.V.; et al. (2009). "VizieR Online Data Catalog: General Catalogue of Variable Stars (Samus+ 2007-2013)". VizieR On-Line Data Catalog: B/GCVS. 1: B/gcvs. Bibcode:2009yCat....102025S. Originally published in Bibcode:2009yCat....102025S
9. Famaey, B.; Jorissen, A.; Luri, X.; Mayor, M.; Udry, S.; Dejonghe, H.; Turon, C. (2005). "Local kinematics of K and M giants from CORAVEL/Hipparcos/Tycho-2 data. Revisiting the concept of superclusters". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 430: 165–186. arXiv:stro-ph/0409579. Bibcode:2005A&A...430..165F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041272. S2CID 17804304.
10. Harper, G. M.; Brown, A.; Guinan, E. F.; O'Gorman, E.; Richards, A. M. S.; Kervella, P.; Decin, L. (2017). "An Updated 2017 Astrometric Solution for Betelgeuse". The Astronomical Journal. 154 (1): 11. arXiv:1706.06020. Bibcode:2017AJ....154...11H. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa6ff9. S2CID 59125676.
11. Joyce, Meridith; Leung, Shing-Chi; Molnár, László; Ireland, Michael; Kobayashi, Chiaki; Nomoto, Ken'Ichi (2020). "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: New Mass and Distance Estimates for Betelgeuse through Combined Evolutionary, Asteroseismic, and Hydrodynamic Simulations with MESA". The Astrophysical Journal. 902 (1): 63. arXiv:2006.09837. Bibcode:2020ApJ...902...63J. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb8db. S2CID 221507952.
12. Neuhäuser, R; Torres, G; Mugrauer, M; Neuhäuser, D L; Chapman, J; Luge, D; Cosci, M (October 2022). "Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 516 (1): 693–719. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1969. hdl:10278/5003332. ISSN 0035-8711.
13. Lambert, D.L.; Brown, J.A.; Hinkle, K.H.; Johnson, H.R. (September 1984). "Carbon, nitrogen and oxygem abundances in Betelgeuse". Astrophysical Journal. 284: 223–237. Bibcode:1984ApJ...284..223L. doi:10.1086/162401. ISSN 0004-637X.
14. Kravchenko, K.; Jorissen, A.; Van Eck, S.; Merle, T.; Chiavassa, A.; Paladini, C.; Freytag, B.; Plez, B.; Montargès, M.; Van Winckel, H. (1 April 2021). "Atmosphere of Betelgeuse before and during the Great Dimming event revealed by tomography". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2104: arXiv:2104.08105. arXiv:2104.08105. Bibcode:2021A&A...650L..17K. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039801. S2CID 233289746.
15. Mittag, M.; Schröder, K.-P.; Perdelwitz, V.; Jack, D.; Schmitt, J. H. M. M. (2023). "Chromospheric activity and photospheric variation of α Ori during the great dimming event in 2020". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 669: A9. arXiv:2211.04967. Bibcode:2023A&A...669A...9M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244924.
16. Dolan, Michelle M.; Mathews, Grant J.; Lam, Doan Duc; Lan, Nguyen Quynh; Herczeg, Gregory J.; Dearborn, David S.P. (2017). "Evolutionary Tracks for Betelgeuse". The Astrophysical Journal. 819 (1): 7. arXiv:1406.3143v2. Bibcode:2016ApJ...819....7D. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/7. S2CID 37913442.
17. Smith, Nathan; Hinkle, Kenneth H.; Ryde, Nils (March 2009). "Red Supergiants as Potential Type IIn Supernova Progenitors: Spatially Resolved 4.6 μm CO Emission Around VY CMa and Betelgeuse". The Astronomical Journal. 137 (3): 3558–3573. arXiv:0811.3037. Bibcode:2009AJ....137.3558S. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3558. S2CID 19019913.
18. Lobel, Alex; Dupree, Andrea K. (2000). "Modeling the variable chromosphere of α Orionis". The Astrophysical Journal. 545 (1): 454–74. Bibcode:2000ApJ...545..454L. doi:10.1086/317784.
19. Ramírez, Solange V.; Sellgren, K.; Carr, John S.; Balachandran, Suchitra C.; Blum, Robert; Terndrup, Donald M.; Steed, Adam (July 2000). "Stellar Iron Abundances at the Galactic Center". The Astrophysical Journal. 537 (1): 205–20. arXiv:astro-ph/0002062. Bibcode:2000ApJ...537..205R. doi:10.1086/309022. S2CID 14713550.
20. Kervella, Pierre; Decin, Leen; Richards, Anita M.S.; Harper, Graham M.; McDonald, Iain; O'Gorman, Eamon; Montargès, Miguel; Homan, Ward; Ohnaka, Keiichi (2018). "The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. V. Rotation velocity and molecular envelope properties from ALMA". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 609: A67. arXiv:1711.07983. Bibcode:2018A&A...609A..67K. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731761. S2CID 54670700.
21. Ridpath, Ian. "Orion: the meaning of Betelgeuse". Star Tales. Retrieved 9 September 2021.
22. "Definition of BETELGEUSE". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
23. Lebling, James (September–October 2010). "Arabic in the Sky". Aramco World. pp. 24–33.
24. "IAU Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)". International Astronomical Union (IAU). Retrieved 22 May 2016.
25. "Bulletin of the IAU Working Group on Star Names" (PDF). International Astronomical Union (IAU). Retrieved 28 July 2016 – via University of Rochester.
26. "IAU Catalog of Star Names". IAU Division C, Working Group on Star Names (WGSN). International Astronomical Union (IAU). Retrieved 28 July 2016 – via University of Rochester.
27. Allen, Richard Hinckley (1963) [1899]. Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning (rep. ed.). New York, NY: Dover Publications Inc. pp. 310–12. ISBN 978-0-486-21079-7.
28. Brück, H. A. (11–15 July 1978). "P. Angelo Secchi, S.J. 1818–1878". In McCarthy, M.F.; Philip, A.G.D.; Coyne, G.V. (eds.). Proceedings of the IAU Colloquium 47. Spectral Classification of the Future. Vatican City, IT (published 1979). pp. 7–20. Bibcode:1979RA......9....7B.
29. "Ancient Chinese suggest Betelgeuse is a young star". New Scientist. Vol. 92, no. 1276. 22 October 1981. p. 238. {{cite magazine}}: Unknown parameter |agency= ignored (help)^{[permanent dead link]}
30. Levesque, E. M. (June 2010). The Physical Properties of Red Supergiants. Hot and Cool: Bridging Gaps in Massive Star Evolution ASP Conference Series. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Vol. 425. p. 103. arXiv:0911.4720. Bibcode:2010ASPC..425..103L.
31. Boutsalis, Kelly (10 August 2020). "Teaching indigenous star stories". The Walrus. Retrieved 6 July 2021.
32. Hamacher, Duane W. (2018). "Observations of red-giant variable stars by Aboriginal Australians". The Australian Journal of Anthropology. 29: 89. arXiv:1709.04634. Bibcode:2018AuJAn..29...89H. doi:10.1111/taja.12257. S2CID 119453488.
33. Wilk, Stephen R. (1999). "Further Mythological Evidence for Ancient Knowledge of Variable Stars". The Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers. 27 (2): 171–74. Bibcode:1999JAVSO..27..171W.
34. Davis, Kate (December 2000). "Variable Star of the Month: Alpha Orionis". American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO). Retrieved 10 July 2010.
35. Burnham, Robert Jr. (1978). Burnham's Celestial Handbook: An observer's guide to the universe beyond the Solar system. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Courier Dover Publications. p. 1290. ISBN 978-0-486-23568-4.
36. Kaler, James B. (2002). The Hundred Greatest Stars. New York, NY: Copernicus Books. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-387-95436-3.
37. MacDonald, John (1998). The Arctic sky: Inuit astronomy, star lore, and legend. Toronto, Ontario / Iqaluit, NWT: Royal Ontario Museum / Nunavut Research Institute. pp. 52–54, 119. ISBN 978-0-88854-427-8.
38. Michelson, A.A.; Pease, F.G. (1921). "Measurement of the diameter of Alpha Orionis with the interferometer". Astrophysical Journal. 53 (5): 249–259. Bibcode:1921ApJ....53..249M. doi:10.1086/142603. PMC 1084808. PMID 16586823. S2CID 21969744. The 0.047 arcsecond measurement was for a uniform disk. In the article Michelson notes that limb darkening would increase the angular diameter by about 17%, hence 0.055 arcseconds.
39. Tenn, Joseph S. (June 2009). "Martin Schwarzschild 1965". The Bruce Medalists. Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP). Retrieved 28 September 2010.
40. Schwarzschild, M. (1958). Structure and Evolution of the Stars. Princeton University Press. Bibcode:1958ses..book.....S. ISBN 978-0-486-61479-3.
41. Labeyrie, A. (May 1970). "Attainment of diffraction-limited resolution in large telescopes by Fourier analysing speckle patterns in star images". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 6: 85. Bibcode:1970A&A.....6...85L.
42. Bonneau, D.; Labeyrie, A. (1973). "Speckle interferometry: Color-dependent limb darkening evidenced on Alpha Orionis and Omicron Ceti". Astrophysical Journal. 181: L1. Bibcode:1973ApJ...181L...1B. doi:10.1086/181171.
43. Sutton, E.C.; Storey, J.W.V.; Betz, A.L.; Townes, C.H.; Spears, D.L. (1977). "Spatial heterodyne tnterferometry of VY Canis Majoris, Alpha Orionis, Alpha Scorpii, and R Leonis at 11 microns". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 217: L97–L100. Bibcode:1977ApJ...217L..97S. doi:10.1086/182547.
44. Bernat, A.P.; Lambert, D.L. (November 1975). "Observations of the circumstellar gas shells around Betelgeuse and Antares". Astrophysical Journal. 201: L153–L156. Bibcode:1975ApJ...201L.153B. doi:10.1086/181964.
45. Dyck, H.M.; Simon, T. (February 1975). "Circumstellar dust shell models for Alpha Orionis". Astrophysical Journal. 195: 689–693. Bibcode:1975ApJ...195..689D. doi:10.1086/153369.
46. Boesgaard, A.M.; Magnan, C. (June 1975). "The circumstellar shell of alpha Orionis from a study of the Fe II emission lines". Astrophysical Journal. 198 (1): 369–371, 373–378. Bibcode:1975ApJ...198..369B. doi:10.1086/153612.
47. Bernat, David (2008). "Aperture masking interferometry". Ask an Astronomer. Astronomy department. Cornell University. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
48. Buscher, D.F.; Baldwin, J.E.; Warner, P.J.; Haniff, C.A. (1990). "Detection of a bright feature on the surface of Betelgeuse". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 245: 7. Bibcode:1990MNRAS.245P...7B.
49. Wilson, R.W.; Dhillon, V.S.; Haniff, C.A. (1997). "The changing face of Betelgeuse". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 291 (4): 819. Bibcode:1997MNRAS.291..819W. doi:10.1093/mnras/291.4.819.
50. Burns, D.; Baldwin, J.E.; Boysen, R.C.; Haniff, C.A.; Lawson, P.R.; MacKay, C.D.; et al. (September 1997). "The surface structure and limb-darkening profile of Betelgeuse". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 290 (1): L11–L16. Bibcode:1997MNRAS.290L..11B. doi:10.1093/mnras/290.1.l11.
51. Tuthill P.G.; Haniff, C.A.; Baldwin, J.E. (March 1997). "Hotspots on late-type supergiants". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 285 (3): 529–39. Bibcode:1997MNRAS.285..529T. doi:10.1093/mnras/285.3.529.
52. Schwarzschild, M. (1975). "On the scale of photospheric convection in red giants and supergiants". Astrophysical Journal. 195 (1): 137–44. Bibcode:1975ApJ...195..137S. doi:10.1086/153313.
53. Gilliland, Ronald L.; Dupree, Andrea K. (May 1996). "First image of the surface of a star with the Hubble Space Telescope". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 463 (1): L29. Bibcode:1996ApJ...463L..29G. doi:10.1086/310043. The yellow/red "image" or "photo" of Betelgeuse commonly seen is not a picture of the red supergiant, but a mathematically generated image based on the photograph. The photograph was of much lower resolution: The entire Betelgeuse image fit within a 10×10 pixel area on the Hubble Space Telescopes Faint Object Camera. The images were oversampled by a factor of 5 with bicubic spline interpolation, then deconvolved.
54. Cox, A.N., ed. (2000). Allen's Astrophysical Quantities. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-98746-0.
55. Petersen, Carolyn Collins; Brandt, John C. (1998) [1995]. Hubble Vision: Further adventures with the Hubble Space Telescope (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91–92. ISBN 978-0-521-59291-8.
56. Uitenbroek, Han; Dupree, Andrea K.; Gilliland, Ronald L. (1998). "Spatially Resolved Hubble Space Telescope Spectra of the Chromosphere of α Orionis". The Astronomical Journal. 116 (5): 2501–2512. Bibcode:1998AJ....116.2501U. doi:10.1086/300596. S2CID 117596395.
57. Weiner, J.; Danchi, W.C.; Hale, D.D.S.; McMahon, J.; Townes, C.H.; Monnier, J.D.; Tuthill, P.G. (December 2000). "Precision measurements of the diameters of α Orionis and ο Ceti at 11 microns". The Astrophysical Journal. 544 (2): 1097–1100. Bibcode:2000ApJ...544.1097W. doi:10.1086/317264.
58. Sanders, Robert (9 June 2009). "Red Giant Star Betelgeuse Mysteriously Shrinking". UC Berkeley News. UC Berkeley. Retrieved 18 April 2010.
59. Townes, C. H.; Wishnow, E. H.; Hale, D. D. S.; Walp, B. (2009). "A Systematic Change with Time in the Size of Betelgeuse". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 697 (2): L127–28. Bibcode:2009ApJ...697L.127T. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/L127.
60. Ravi, V.; Wishnow, E.; Lockwood, S.; Townes, C. (December 2011). "The many faces of Betelgeuse". Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 448: 1025. arXiv:1012.0377. Bibcode:2011ASPC..448.1025R.
61. Bernat, Andrew P. (1977). "The circumstellar shells and mass-loss rates of four M supergiants". Astrophysical Journal. 213: 756–66. Bibcode:1977ApJ...213..756B. doi:10.1086/155205. S2CID 121146305.
62. Kervella, P.; Verhoelst, T.; Ridgway, S.T.; Perrin, G.; Lacour, S.; Cami, J.; Haubois, X. (September 2009). "The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. Adaptive optics spectro-imaging in the near-IR with VLT/NACO". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 504 (1): 115–25. arXiv:0907.1843. Bibcode:2009A&A...504..115K. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912521. S2CID 14278046.
63. Guinan, Edward F.; Wasatonic, Richard J.; Calderwood, Thomas J. (23 December 2019). "Updates on the "fainting" of Betelgeuse". The Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13365. Retrieved 27 December 2019.
64. Byrd, Deborah (23 December 2019). "Betelgeuse is 'fainting' but (probably) not about to explode". Earth & Sky. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
65. Overbye, Dennis (14 August 2020). "This star looked like it would explode. Maybe it just sneezed". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 August 2020. The mysterious dimming of the red supergiant Betelgeuse is the result of a stellar exhalation, astronomers say.
66. "Hubble finds that Betegeuse's mysterious dimming is due to a traumatic outburst" (Press release). Hubble Space Telescope. 13 August 2020.
67. Dupree, Adrea K.; et al. (13 August 2020). "Spatially resolved ultraviolet spectroscopy of the great dimming of Betelgeuse". The Astrophysical Journal. 899 (1): 68. arXiv:2008.04945. Bibcode:2020ApJ...899...68D. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba516. S2CID 221103735.
68. Guinan, Edward F.; Wasatonic, Richard J. (1 February 2020). "Betelgeuse Updates – 1 February 2020; 23:20 UT". The Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13439. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
69. Carlson, Erika K. (27 December 2019). "Betelguese's bizarre dimming has astronomers scratching their heads". Astronomy. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
70. Griffin, Andrew (29 December 2019). "Betelgeuse: Star is behaving strangely and could be about to explode into a supernova, say astronomers". The Independent. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
71. Mack, Erick (27 December 2019). "Betelgeuse star acting like it's about to explode, even if the odds say it isn't". CNET. Retrieved 30 December 2019.
72. Drake, Nadia (26 December 2019). . National Geographic Society. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019. The red giant Betelgeuse is the dimmest seen in years, prompting some speculation that the star is about to explode. Here's what we know.
73. Kaplan, Sarah (27 December 2019). "Is Betelgeuse, one of the sky's brightest stars, on the brink of a supernova?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
74. Iorio, Kelsie (27 December 2019). "Is Betelgeuse, the red giant star in the constellation Orion, going to explode?". ABC News. Australia. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
75. Sparks, Hannah (26 December 2019). "Massive 'Betelgeuse' star in Orion constellation due for explosive supernova". New York Post. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
76. Bruce Dorminey (17 February 2020). "Betelgeuse Has Finally Stopped Dimming, Says Astronomer". Forbes. Retrieved 19 February 2020.
77. Guinan, Edward; Wasatonic, Richard; Calderwood, Thomas; Carona, Donald (22 February 2020). "The fall and rise in brightness of Betelgeuse". The Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13512. Retrieved 22 February 2020.
78. Gehrz, R.D.; et al. (24 February 2020). "Betelgeuse remains steadfast in the infrared". The Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13518. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
79. "Dimming Betelgeuse likely isn't cold, just dusty, new study shows". EurekAlert! (Press release). University of Washington. 6 March 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
80. Levesque, Emily M.; Massey, Philip (24 February 2020). "Betelgeuse just isn't that cool: Effective temperature alone cannot explain the recent dimming of Betelgeuse". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 891 (2): L37. arXiv:2002.10463. Bibcode:2020ApJ...891L..37L. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7935. S2CID 211296241.
81. Dharmawardena, Thavisha E.; Mairs, Steve; Scicluna, Peter; Bell, Graham; McDonald, Iain; Menten, Karl; Weiss, Axel; Zijlstra, Albert (29 June 2020). "Betelgeuse fainter in the submillimeter too: An analysis of JCMT and APEX monitoring during the recent optical minimum". The Astrophysical Journal. 897 (1): L9. arXiv:2006.09409. Bibcode:2020ApJ...897L...9D. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9ca6. ISSN 2041-8213. S2CID 219721417.
82. Sigismondi, Costantino (31 March 2020). "Rapid rising of Betelgeuse's luminosity". The Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13601. Retrieved 1 April 2020.
83. Dupree, Andrea; Guinan, Edward; Thompson, William T.; et al. (STEREO/SECCHI/HI consortium) (28 July 2020). "Photometry of Betelgeuse with the STEREO Mission while in the glare of the Sun from Earth". Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13901. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
84. Sigismondi, Costantino; et al. (30 August 2020). "Second dust cloud on Betelgeuse". The Astronomer's Telegram. ATel #13982. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
85. Montargès M, Cannon E, Lagadec E, et al. (16 June 2021). "A dusty veil shading Betelgeuse during its Great Dimming". Nature. 594 (7863): 365–368. arXiv:2201.10551. Bibcode:2021Natur.594..365M. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03546-8. PMID 34135524. S2CID 235460928.
86. Levesque, E. (16 June 2021). "Great dimming of Betelgeuse explained". Nature. 594 (7863): 343–344. Bibcode:2021Natur.594..343L. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01526-6. PMID 34135515. S2CID 235459976.
87. Montargès, M. (16 June 2021). "Imaging the great dimming of Betelgeuse". Nature.
88. Overbye, Dennis (17 June 2021). "Betelgeuse merely burped, astronomers conclude". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2021. The dramatic dimming of the red supergiant in 2019 was the product of dust, not a prelude to destruction, a new study has found.
89. Alexeeva, Sofya; Zhao, Gang; Gao, Dong-Yang; Du, Junju; Li, Aigen; Li, Kai; Hu, Shaoming (5 August 2021). "Spectroscopic evidence for a large spot on the dimming Betelgeuse". Nature Communications. 12 (1): 4719. arXiv:2108.03472. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.4719A. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25018-3. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 8342547. PMID 34354072.
90. Harris, Margaret (6 August 2021). "New evidence supports dark-spot theory for Betelgeuse's 'great dimming'". Physics World. Retrieved 7 August 2021.
91. Dupree, Andrea K.; Strassmeier, Klaus G.; Calderwood, Thomas; Granzer, Thomas; Weber, Michael; Kravchenko, Kateryna; et al. (2 August 2022). "The great dimming of Betelgeuse: A surface mass ejection and its consequences". The Astrophysical Journal. 936 (1): 18. arXiv:2208.01676. Bibcode:2022ApJ...936...18D. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7853. S2CID 251280168.
92. Garner, Rob (13 August 2020). "Hubble finds Betelgeuse's mysterious dimming due to traumatic outburst". NASA. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
93. "How Betelgeuse blew its top and lost its rhythm". Physics World. 22 August 2022. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
94. Goldberg, L. (May 1984). "The variability of alpha Orionis". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 96: 366. Bibcode:1984PASP...96..366G. doi:10.1086/131347. ISSN 0004-6280. S2CID 121926262.
95. Sigismondi, Constantino; et al. (22 April 2023). "Monitoring Betelgeuse at its brightest". The Astronomer's Telegram. Atel #16001. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
96. Cutri, R.; Skrutskie. M. (7 September 2009). "Very Bright Stars in the 2MASS Point Source Catalog (PSC)". The Two Micron All Sky Survey at IPAC. Retrieved 28 December 2011.
97. "CCDM (Catalog of Components of Double & Multiple stars (Dommanget+ 2002)". VizieR. Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 22 August 2010.
98. Mason, Brian D.; Wycoff, Gary L.; Hartkopf, William I.; Douglass, Geoffrey G.; Worley, Charles E. (2001). "The 2001 US Naval Observatory Double Star CD-ROM. I. The Washington Double Star Catalog". The Astronomical Journal. 122 (6): 3466. Bibcode:2001AJ....122.3466M. doi:10.1086/323920.
99. Van Loon, J. Th. (2013). Kervella, P. (ed.). "Betelgeuse and the Red Supergiants". Betelgeuse Workshop 2012. 60: 307–316. arXiv:1303.0321. Bibcode:2013EAS....60..307V. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.759.580. doi:10.1051/eas/1360036. S2CID 118626509.
100. Karovska, M.; Noyes, R.W.; Roddier, F.; Nisenson, P.; Stachnik, R.V. (1985). "On a possible close companion to α Ori". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 17: 598. Bibcode:1985BAAS...17..598K.
101. Karovska, M.; Nisenson, P.; Noyes, R. (1986). "On the alpha Orionis triple system". Astrophysical Journal. 308: 675–85. Bibcode:1986ApJ...308..260K. doi:10.1086/164497.
102. Wilson, R. W.; Baldwin, J. E.; Buscher, D. F.; Warner, P. J. (1992). "High-resolution imaging of Betelgeuse and Mira". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 257 (3): 369–76. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.257..369W. doi:10.1093/mnras/257.3.369.
103. Haubois, X.; Perrin, G.; Lacour, S.; Verhoelst, T.; Meimon, S.; et al. (2009). "Imaging the Spotty Surface of Betelgeuse in the H Band". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 508 (2): 923–32. arXiv:0910.4167. Bibcode:2009A&A...508..923H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912927. S2CID 118593802.
104. Montargès, M.; Kervella, P.; Perrin, G.; Chiavassa, A.; Le Bouquin, J.-B.; Aurière, M.; López Ariste, A.; Mathias, P.; Ridgway, S. T.; Lacour, S.; Haubois, X.; Berger, J.-P. (2016). "The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse. IV. VLTI/PIONIER interferometric monitoring of the photosphere". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 588: A130. arXiv:1602.05108. Bibcode:2016A&A...588A.130M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527028. S2CID 53404211.
105. Harper, Graham M.; Brown, Alexander; Guinan, Edward F. (April 2008). "A New VLA-Hipparcos Distance to Betelgeuse and its Implications". The Astronomical Journal. 135 (4): 1430–40. Bibcode:2008AJ....135.1430H. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1430.
106. van Altena, W. F.; Lee, J. T.; Hoffleit, D. (October 1995). "Yale Trigonometric Parallaxes Preliminary". Yale University Observatory (1991). 1174: 0. Bibcode:1995yCat.1174....0V.
107. "Hipparcos Input Catalogue, Version 2 (Turon+ 1993)". VizieR. Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. 1993. Retrieved 20 June 2010.
108. Perryman, M.A.C.; Lindegren, L.; Kovalevsky, J.; Hoeg, E.; Bastian, U.; Bernacca, P.L.; et al. (1997). "The Hipparcos Catalogue". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 323: L49–L52. Bibcode:1997A&A...323L..49P.
109. Eyer, L.; Grenon, M. (2000). "Problems encountered in the Hipparcos variable stars analysis". Delta Scuti and Related Stars – Reference Handbook and Proceedings of the 6th Vienna Workshop in Astrophysics. 6th Vienna Workshop in Astrophysics. ASP Conference Series. Vol. 210. Vienna, Austria: Astronomical Society of the Pacific. p. 482. arXiv:astro-ph/0002235. Bibcode:2000ASPC..210..482E. ISBN 978-1-58381-041-5.
110. "Science Performance". European Space Agency. 19 February 2013. Retrieved 1 March 2013.
111. T. Prusti; GAIA Collaboration (2016), "The Gaia mission" (PDF), Astronomy and Astrophysics (forthcoming article), 595: A1, arXiv:1609.04153, Bibcode:2016A&A...595A...1G, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272, hdl:2445/127856, S2CID 9271090, retrieved 21 September 2016
112. "Welcome to the Gaia Archive". European Space Agency. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
113. Kiss, L. L.; Szabó, Gy. M.; Bedding, T. R. (2006). "Variability in red supergiant stars: Pulsations, long secondary periods and convection noise". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 372 (4): 1721–1734. arXiv:astro-ph/0608438. Bibcode:2006MNRAS.372.1721K. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10973.x. S2CID 5203133.
114. Guo, J. H.; Li, Y. (2002). "Evolution and Pulsation of Red Supergiants at Different Metallicities". The Astrophysical Journal. 565 (1): 559–570. Bibcode:2002ApJ...565..559G. doi:10.1086/324295.
115. Goldberg, L. (1984). "The variability of alpha Orionis". Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 96: 366. Bibcode:1984PASP...96..366G. doi:10.1086/131347.
116. Wood, P. R.; Olivier, E. A.; Kawaler, S. D. (2004). "Long Secondary Periods in Pulsating Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: An Investigation of their Origin". The Astrophysical Journal. 604 (2): 800. Bibcode:2004ApJ...604..800W. doi:10.1086/382123.
117. Balega, Iu.; Blazit, A.; Bonneau, D.; Koechlin, L.; Labeyrie, A.; Foy, R.. (November 1982). "The angular diameter of Betelgeuse". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 115 (2): 253–56. Bibcode:1982A&A...115..253B.
118. Perrin, G.; Ridgway, S.T.; Coudé du Foresto, V.; Mennesson, B.; Traub, W.A.; Lacasse, M.G. (2004). "Interferometric Observations of the Supergiant Stars α Orionis and α Herculis with FLUOR at IOTA". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 418 (2): 675–685. arXiv:astro-ph/0402099. Bibcode:2004A&A...418..675P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040052. S2CID 119065851. Assuming a distance of 197±45 pc, an angular distance of 43.33±0.04 mas would equate to a radius of 4.3 AU or 920 R_☉
119. Young, John (24 November 2006). . University of Cambridge. Archived from the original on 14 June 2007. Retrieved 21 June 2007. Images of hotspots on the surface of Betelgeuse taken at visible and infra-red wavelengths using high resolution ground-based interferometers
120. Dyck, H.M.; Van Belle, G.T.; Thompson, R.R. (1998). "Radii and Effective Temperatures for K and M Giants and Supergiants. II". The Astronomical Journal. 116 (2): 981. Bibcode:1998AJ....116..981D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.24.1889. doi:10.1086/300453. S2CID 16674990.
121. Perrin, Guy; Malbet, Fabien (2003). "Observing with the VLTI". EAS Publications Series. 6: 3. Bibcode:2003EAS.....6D...3P. doi:10.1051/eas/20030601.
122. Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (21 April 2012). "3 ATs". Astronomy Picture of the Day. NASA. Retrieved 17 August 2012. Photograph showing three of the four enclosures which house 1.8 meter Auxiliary Telescopes (ATs) at the Paranal Observatory in the Atacama Desert region of Chile.
123. Worden, S. (1978). "Speckle Interferometry". New Scientist. 78: 238–40. Bibcode:1978NewSc..78..238W.
124. Roddier, F. (1999). "Ground-Based Interferometry with Adaptive Optics". Working on the Fringe: Optical and IR Interferometry from Ground and Space. Proceedings from ASP Conference. Vol. 194. p. 318. Bibcode:1999ASPC..194..318R. ISBN 978-1-58381-020-0. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
125. . NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. 4 May 2009. Archived from the original on 7 May 2009. Retrieved 28 August 2007.
126. Melnick, J.; Petrov R.; Malbet, F. (23 February 2007). "The Sky Through Three Giant Eyes, AMBER Instrument on VLT Delivers a Wealth of Results". European Southern Observatory. Retrieved 29 August 2007.
127. Wittkowski, M. (23 February 2007). (PDF). New Astronomy Reviews. 51 (8–9): 639–649. Bibcode:2007NewAR..51..639W. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2007.04.005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2007.
128. "Red Giant Star Betelgeuse in the Constellation Orion is Mysteriously Shrinking". Astronomy Magazine. 2009. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
129. Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (6 January 2010). "The Spotty Surface of Betelgeuse". Astronomy Picture of the Day. NASA. Retrieved 18 July 2010.
130. Hernandez Utrera, O.; Chelli, A (2009). "Accurate Diameter Measurement of Betelgeuse Using the VLTI/AMBER Instrument" (PDF). Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Serie de Conferencias. 37: 179–80. Bibcode:2009RMxAC..37..179H.
131. Ohnaka, K.; Weigelt, G.; Millour, F.; Hofmann, K.-H.; Driebe, T.; Schertl, D.; Chelli, A.; Massi, F.; Petrov, R.; Stee, Ph. (2011). "Imaging the dynamical atmosphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse in the CO first overtone lines with VLTI/AMBER". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 529: A163. arXiv:1104.0958. Bibcode:2011A&A...529A.163O. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016279. S2CID 56281923. We derive a uniform-disk diameter of 42.05±0.05 mas and a power-law-type limb-darkened disk diameter of 42.49±0.06 mas and a limb-darkening parameter of (9.7±0.5)×10⁻²
132. Kervella, P.; Perrin, G.; Chiavassa, A.; Ridgway, S. T.; Cami, J.; Haubois, X.; Verhoelst, T. (2011). "The close circumstellar environment of Betelgeuse". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 531: A117. arXiv:1106.5041. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116962. S2CID 119190969.
133. Montargès, M.; Kervella, P.; Perrin, G.; Ohnaka, K.; Chiavassa, A.; Ridgway, S. T.; Lacour, S. (2014). "Properties of the CO and H2O MOLsphere of the red supergiant Betelgeuse from VLTI/AMBER observations". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 572: id.A17. arXiv:1408.2994. Bibcode:2014A&A...572A..17M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423538. S2CID 118419296.
134. Cowen, Ron (10 June 2009). . Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 11 June 2009. The shrinkage corresponds to the star contracting by a distance equal to that between Venus and the Sun, researchers reported June 9 at an American Astronomical Society meeting and in the June 1 Astrophysical Journal Letters.
135. Bedding, T. R.; Zijlstra, A. A.; Von Der Luhe, O.; Robertson, J. G.; et al. (1997). "The Angular Diameter of R Doradus: a Nearby Mira-like Star". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 286 (4): 957–62. arXiv:astro-ph/9701021. Bibcode:1997MNRAS.286..957B. doi:10.1093/mnras/286.4.957. S2CID 15438522.
136. Denissenko, Denis (3 October 2004). . Archived from the original on 16 December 2012.
137. Hanslmeier, Arnold (2023). "State Variables of Stars". Introduction to Astronomy and Astrophysics. pp. 303–335. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-64637-3_8. ISBN 978-3-662-64636-6.
138. Sigismondi, Costantino (9 December 2023). "The occultation of Betelgeuse by Leona: recovering the stellar surface brightness of a red supergiant, with a diffuse telescope, on Dec 12 1:12 UT". The Astronomer's Telegram. Archived from the original on 12 December 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2023.
139. Sigismondi, Costantino (2020). "The partial asteroidal occultation of Betelgeuse on Jan 2, 2012". Gerbertvs. 13: 25. arXiv:1112.6398. Bibcode:2020Gerb...13...25S.
140. "IOTA-ES". www.iota-es.de. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
141. "Astronomers brace for rare eclipse as asteroid to pass in front of bright star". The Guardian. Associated Press. 8 December 2023.
142. Hernandez, Joe (10 December 2023). "A massive star called Betelgeuse will be briefly obscured by an asteroid Monday night". NPR.
143. Guenot, Marianne (7 December 2023). "Betelgeuse, one of the brightest stars in the sky, will almost disappear next week. Here's how to see it". MSN. from the original on 27 December 2023.
144. Garrison, R. F. (1993). . Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 25: 1319. Bibcode:1993AAS...183.1710G. Archived from the original on 25 June 2019. Retrieved 4 February 2012.
145. Le Bertre, T.; Matthews, L. D.; Gérard, E.; Libert, Y. (2012). "Discovery of a detached H I gas shell surrounding α Orionis". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 422 (4): 3433. arXiv:1203.0255. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.422.3433L. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20853.x. S2CID 54005037.
146. "Bright Star Catalogue, 5th Revised Ed. (Hoffleit+, 1991)". VizieR. Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 7 September 2012.
147. Dorch, S. B. F. (2004). "Magnetic Activity in Late-type Giant Stars: Numerical MHD Simulations of NOn-Linear Dynamo Action in Betelgeuse" (PDF). Astronomy & Astrophysics. 423 (3): 1101–07. arXiv:astro-ph/0403321. Bibcode:2004A&A...423.1101D. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040435. S2CID 16240922.
148. Aurière, M; Donati, J.-F.; Konstantinova-Antova, R.; Perrin, G.; Petit, P.; Roudier, T. (2010). "The Magnetic Field of Betelgeuse : a Local Dynamo from Giant Convection Cells?". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 516: L2. arXiv:1005.4845. Bibcode:2010A&A...516L...2A. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014925. S2CID 54943572.
149. Neilson, H. R.; Lester, J. B.; Haubois, X. (December 2011). Weighing Betelgeuse: Measuring the Mass of α Orionis from Stellar Limb-darkening. 9th Pacific Rim Conference on Stellar Astrophysics. Proceedings of a conference held at Lijiang, China in 14–20 April 2011. ASP Conference Series. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Vol. 451. p. 117. arXiv:1109.4562. Bibcode:2011ASPC..451..117N.
150. Posson-Brown, Jennifer; Kashyap, Vinay L.; Pease, Deron O.; Drake, Jeremy J. (2006). "Dark Supergiant: Chandra's Limits on X-rays from Betelgeuse". arXiv:astro-ph/0606387.
151. Maeder, André; Meynet, Georges (2003). "The Role of Rotation and Mass Loss in the Evolution of Massive Stars". Proceedings of IAU Symposium. 212: 267. Bibcode:2003IAUS..212..267M.
152. Reynolds, R.J.; Ogden, P.M. (1979). "Optical evidence for a very large, expanding shell associated with the I Orion OB association, Barnard's loop, and the high galactic latitude H-alpha filaments in Eridanus". The Astrophysical Journal. 229: 942. Bibcode:1979ApJ...229..942R. doi:10.1086/157028.
153. Decin, L.; Cox, N.L.J.; Royer, P.; Van Marle, A.J.; Vandenbussche, B.; Ladjal, D.; Kerschbaum, F.; Ottensamer, R.; Barlow, M.J.; Blommaert, J.A.D.L.; Gomez, H.L.; Groenewegen, M.A.T.; Lim, T.; Swinyard, B.M.; Waelkens, C.; Tielens, A.G.G.M. (2012). "The enigmatic nature of the circumstellar envelope and bow shock surrounding Betelgeuse as revealed by Herschel. I. Evidence of clumps, multiple arcs, and a linear bar-like structure". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 548: A113. arXiv:1212.4870. Bibcode:2012A&A...548A.113D. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219792. S2CID 53534124.
154. Nemiroff, R.; Bonnell, J., eds. (23 October 2010). "Orion: Head to Toe". Astronomy Picture of the Day. NASA. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
155. Bouy, H.; Alves, J. (December 2015). "Cosmography of OB stars in the solar neighbourhood". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 584: 13. Bibcode:2015A&A...584A..26B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527058. A26.
156. Ridgway, Stephen; Aufdenberg, Jason; Creech-Eakman, Michelle; Elias, Nicholas; et al. (2009). "Quantifying Stellar Mass Loss with High Angular Resolution Imaging". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 247: 247. arXiv:0902.3008. Bibcode:2009astro2010S.247R.
157. Harper, Graham M.; Brown, Alexander; Lim, Jeremy (April 2001). "A Spatially Resolved, Semiempirical Model for the Extended Atmosphere of α Orionis (M2 Iab)". The Astrophysical Journal. 551 (2): 1073–98. Bibcode:2001ApJ...551.1073H. doi:10.1086/320215. S2CID 120271858.
158. Ohnaka, K.; Hofmann, K.-H.; Benisty, M.; Chelli, A.; et al. (2009). "Spatially Resolving the Inhomogeneous Structure of the Dynamical Atmosphere of Betelgeuse with VLTI/AMBER". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 503 (1): 183–95. arXiv:0906.4792. Bibcode:2009A&A...503..183O. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912247. S2CID 17850433.
159. Tsuji, T. (2000). "Water on the Early M Supergiant Stars α Orionis and μ Cephei". The Astrophysical Journal. 538 (2): 801–07. Bibcode:2000ApJ...538..801T. doi:10.1086/309185.
160. Lambert, D. L.; Brown, J. A.; Hinkle, K. H.; Johnson, H. R. (1984). "Carbon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen Abundances in Betelgeuse". Astrophysical Journal. 284: 223–37. Bibcode:1984ApJ...284..223L. doi:10.1086/162401.
161. Dave Finley (8 April 1998). "VLA Shows "Boiling" in Atmosphere of Betelgeuse". National Radio Astronomy Observatory. Retrieved 7 September 2010.
162. Lim, Jeremy; Carilli, Chris L.; White, Stephen M.; Beasley, Anthony J.; Marson, Ralph G. (1998). "Large Convection Cells as the Source of Betelgeuse's Extended Atmosphere". Nature. 392 (6676): 575–77. Bibcode:1998Natur.392..575L. doi:10.1038/33352. S2CID 4431516.
163. Lobel, A.; Aufdenberg, J.; Dupree, A. K.; Kurucz, R. L.; Stefanik, R. P.; Torres, G. (2004). "Spatially Resolved STIS Spectroscopy of Betelgeuse's Outer Atmosphere". Proceedings of the 219th Symposium of the IAU. 219: 641. arXiv:astro-ph/0312076. Bibcode:2004IAUS..219..641L. doi:10.1017/s0074180900182671. S2CID 15868906. In the article, Lobel et al. equate 1 arcsecond to approximately 40 stellar radii, a calculation which in 2004 likely assumed a Hipparcos distance of 131 pc (430 ly) and a photospheric diameter of 0.0552" from Weiner et al.
164. Dupree, Andrea K.; Gilliland, Ronald L. (December 1995). "HST Direct Image of Betelgeuse". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 27: 1328. Bibcode:1995AAS...187.3201D. Such a major single feature is distinctly different from scattered smaller regions of activity typically found on the Sun although the strong ultraviolet flux enhancement is characteristic of stellar magnetic activity. This inhomogeneity may be caused by a large scale convection cell or result from global pulsations and shock structures that heat the chromosphere."
165. Skinner, C. J.; Dougherty, S. M.; Meixner, M.; Bode, M. F.; Davis, R. J.; et al. (1997). "Circumstellar Environments – V. The Asymmetric Chromosphere and Dust Shell of Alpha Orionis". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 288 (2): 295–306. Bibcode:1997MNRAS.288..295S. doi:10.1093/mnras/288.2.295.
166. Danchi, W. C.; Bester, M.; Degiacomi, C. G.; Greenhill, L. J.; Townes, C. H. (1994). "Characteristics of Dust Shells around 13 Late-type Stars". The Astronomical Journal. 107 (4): 1469–1513. Bibcode:1994AJ....107.1469D. doi:10.1086/116960.
167. Baud, B.; Waters, R.; De Vries, J.; Van Albada, G. D.; et al. (January 1984). "A Giant Asymmetric Dust Shell around Betelgeuse". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 16: 405. Bibcode:1984BAAS...16..405B.
168. David, L.; Dooling, D. (1984). "The Infrared Universe". Space World. 2: 4–7. Bibcode:1984SpWd....2....4D.
169. Harper, Graham M.; Carpenter, Kenneth G.; Ryde, Nils; Smith, Nathan; Brown, Joanna; et al. (2009). "UV, IR, and mm Studies of CO Surrounding the Red Supergiant α Orionis (M2 Iab)". AIP Conference Proceedings. 1094: 868–71. Bibcode:2009AIPC.1094..868H. doi:10.1063/1.3099254.
170. Mohamed, S.; Mackey, J.; Langer, N. (2012). "3D Simulations of Betelgeuse's Bow Shock". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 541: A1. arXiv:1109.1555. Bibcode:2012A&A...541A...1M. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118002. S2CID 118435586.
171. Lamers, Henny J. G. L. M. & Cassinelli, Joseph P. (June 1999). Introduction to Stellar Winds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Bibcode:1999isw..book.....L. ISBN 978-0-521-59565-0.
172. . European Space Agency. 19 November 2008. Archived from the original on 17 February 2011. Retrieved 25 June 2012.
173. Noriega-Crespo, Alberto; van Buren, Dave; Cao, Yu; Dgani, Ruth (1997). "A Parsec-Size Bow Shock around Betelgeuse". Astronomical Journal. 114: 837–40. Bibcode:1997AJ....114..837N. doi:10.1086/118517. Noriega in 1997 estimated the size to be 0.8 parsecs, having assumed the earlier distance estimate of 400 ly. With a current distance estimate of 643 ly, the bow shock would measure ~1.28 parsecs or over 4 ly
174. Newton, Elizabeth (26 April 2012). . Astrobites. Archived from the original on 30 April 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2012.
175. MacKey, Jonathan; Mohamed, Shazrene; Neilson, Hilding R.; Langer, Norbert; Meyer, Dominique M.-A. (2012). "Double Bow Shocks Around Young, Runaway Red Supergiants: Application to Betelgeuse". The Astrophysical Journal. 751 (1): L10. arXiv:1204.3925. Bibcode:2012ApJ...751L..10M. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/751/1/L10. S2CID 118433862.
176. Meynet, G.; Haemmerlé, L.; Ekström, S.; Georgy, C.; Groh, J.; Maeder, A. (2013). "The past and future evolution of a star like Betelgeuse". In P. Kervella (ed.). Betelgeuse Workshop 2012. Vol. 60. pp. 17–28. arXiv:1303.1339. Bibcode:2013EAS....60...17M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.759.5862. doi:10.1051/eas/1360002. S2CID 119111572.
177. Groh, Jose H.; Meynet, Georges; Georgy, Cyril; Ekstrom, Sylvia (2013). "Fundamental properties of core-collapse supernova and GRB progenitors: Predicting the look of massive stars before death". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 558: A131. arXiv:1308.4681. Bibcode:2013A&A...558A.131G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321906. S2CID 84177572.
178. Goldberg, Jared A.; Bauer, Evan B.; Howell, D. Andrew (2020). "Apparent magnitude of Betelgeuse as a type IIP supernova". Research Notes of the AAS. 4 (3): 35. Bibcode:2020RNAAS...4...35G. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab7c68. S2CID 216398511.
179. Wheeler, J. Craig (2007). Cosmic Catastrophes: Exploding stars, black holes, and mapping the universe (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 115–17. ISBN 978-0-521-85714-7.
180. Connelly, Claire (19 January 2011). . News.com.au. Archived from the original on 22 September 2012. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
181. Plait, Phil (1 June 2010). . Bad Astronomy. Discovery. Archived from the original on 21 April 2011. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
182. O'Neill, Ian (20 January 2011). . Discovery space news. Archived from the original on 23 January 2011. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
183. Plait, Phil (21 January 2011). . Bad Astronomy. Discovery. Archived from the original on 3 November 2012. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
184. Betz, Eric (14 February 2020). "When Betelgeuse goes supernova, what will it look like from Earth?". Astronomy Magazine. Retrieved 15 June 2023.
185. Guinan, Edward F.; Wasatonic, Richard J.; Calderwood, Thomas J. (8 December 2019). "ATel #13341 – The Fainting of the Nearby Red Supergiant Betelgeuse". The Astronomer's Telegram. Retrieved 27 December 2019.
186. Plait, Phil (8 September 2014). "When will Betelgeuse explode?". Slate. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
187. Wu, Katherine J. (26 December 2019). "A giant star is dimming, which could be a sign it is about to explode". Smithsonian. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
188. Feltman, Rachel (26 December 2019). "We really don't know when Betelgeuse is going to explode". Popular Science. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
189. Prior, Ryan (26 December 2019). "A giant red star is acting weird and scientists think it may be about to explode". CNN. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
190. Plait, Phil (24 December 2019). "Don't Panic! Betelgeuse is (almost certainly) not about to explode". Syfy Wire. Retrieved 28 December 2019.
191. Overbye, Dennis (9 January 2020). "Just a fainting spell? Or is Betelgeuse about to blow? – A familiar star in the constellation Orion has dimmed noticeably since October. Astronomers wonder if its explosive finale is imminent". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
192. Bode, Johann Elert, (ed.). (1782) Vorstellung der Gestirne: auf XXXIV Kupfertafeln nach der Parisier Ausgabe des Flamsteadschen Himmelsatlas, Gottlieb August Lange, Berlin / Stralsund, pl. XXIV.
193. Bode, Johann Elert, (ed.) (1801). Uranographia: sive Astrorum Descriptio, Fridericus de Harn, Berlin, pl. XII.
194. Schaaf, Fred (2008). "Betelgeuse". The Brightest Stars. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. pp. 174–82. ISBN 978-0-471-70410-2.
195. Martha Evans Martin (1907). The friendly stars. Harper & brothers. p. 19.
196. Ridpath, Ian (2006). The Monthly Sky Guide (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-521-68435-4.
197. Kunitzsch, Paul (1986). "The Star Catalogue Commonly Appended to the Alfonsine Tables". Journal for the History of Astronomy. 17 (49): 89–98. Bibcode:1986JHA....17...89K. doi:10.1177/002182868601700202. S2CID 118597258.
198. Kunitzsch, Paul (1959). Arabische Sternnamen in Europa. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
199. Kunitzsch, Paul; Smart, Tim (2006). A Dictionary of Modern star Names: A Short Guide to 254 Star Names and Their Derivations (2nd rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Sky Publishing Corporation. p. 45. ISBN 978-1-931559-44-7.
200. [Astronomy Education Information Network 25 May 2006]. aeea.nmns.edu.tw. AEEA (Activities of Exhibition and Education in Astronomy). 25 May 2006. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
201. Ridpath, Ian. "Orion: Chinese associations". Star Tales. Retrieved 24 June 2012.
202. Steve Renshaw & Saori Ihara. . Archived from the original on 4 June 2016. Retrieved 25 June 2012.

January 01, 1970