Mariculture

Mariculture, sometimes called marine farming or marine aquaculture,^[1] is a specialized branch of aquaculture (which includes freshwater aquaculture) involving the cultivation of marine organisms for food and other animal products, in enclosed sections of the open ocean (offshore mariculture), fish farms built on littoral waters (inshore mariculture), or in artificial tanks, ponds or raceways which are filled with seawater (onshore mariculture). An example of the latter is the farming of marine fish, including finfish and shellfish like prawns, or oysters and seaweed in saltwater ponds. Non-food products produced by mariculture include: fish meal, nutrient agar, jewellery (e.g. cultured pearls), and cosmetics.

Salmon pens off Vestmanna in the Faroe Islands

Fish cages containing salmon in Loch Ailort, Scotland.

Methods

 

Extensive aquaculture off the coast of Euboea island, Greece

Algae

Main article: Algaculture

Shellfish

Similar to algae cultivation, shellfish can be farmed in multiple ways: on ropes, in bags or cages, or directly on (or within) the intertidal substrate. Shellfish mariculture does not require feed or fertilizer inputs, nor insecticides or antibiotics, making shellfish aquaculture (or 'mariculture') a self-supporting system.^[2] Shellfish can also be used in multi-species cultivation techniques, where shellfish can utilize waste generated by higher trophic level organisms.

Artificial reefs

After trials in 2012,^[3] a commercial "sea ranch" was set up in Flinders Bay, Western Australia to raise abalone. The ranch is based on an artificial reef made up of 5000 (as of April 2016^[update]) separate concrete units called abitats (abalone habitats). The 900 kilograms (2,000 lb) abitats can host 400 abalone each. The reef is seeded with young abalone from an onshore hatchery.

The abalone feed on seaweed that has grown naturally on the habitats; with the ecosystem enrichment of the bay also resulting in growing numbers of dhufish, pink snapper, wrasse, Samson fish among other species.

Brad Adams, from the company, has emphasised the similarity to wild abalone and the difference from shore based aquaculture. "We're not aquaculture, we're ranching, because once they're in the water they look after themselves."^[4][5]

Sea ranching

One of the methods of mariculture that is used widely throughout the industry is sea ranching. Sea ranching gained popularity within the industry around 1974. When looking at the effectiveness of this method of fish production, it needs to be set up within the right environment. When sea ranching is done within the right environment for the species, it can prove itself to be a profitable method to produce the crop if the right growth conditions are met. Many species have been studied through the use of sea ranching, which include salmon, cod, scallops, certain species of prawn, European lobsters, abalone and sea cucumbers.^[6] Species that are grown within the methods of sea ranching do not have any additional artificial feed requirements because they are living off of the naturally occurring nutrients within the body of water that the sea pen is set up. Typical practice involving the use of sea ranching and sea pens calls for the juveniles of the crop species to be planted on the bottom of the body of water within the pen, and as they grow and develop, they start to utilize more of the water column within their sea pen.^[7]

Open ocean

Raising marine organisms under controlled conditions in exposed, high-energy ocean environments beyond significant coastal influence, is a relatively new^[when?] approach to mariculture. Some attention has been paid to how open ocean mariculture can combine with offshore energy installation systems, such as wind-farms, to enable a more effective use of ocean space.^[8] Open ocean aquaculture (OOA) uses cages, nets, or long-line arrays that are moored, towed or float freely. Research and commercial open ocean aquaculture facilities are in operation or under development in Panama, Australia, Chile, China, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, and Norway. As of 2004^[update], two commercial open ocean facilities were operating in U.S. waters, raising Threadfin near Hawaii and cobia near Puerto Rico. An operation targeting bigeye tuna recently received final approval. All U.S. commercial facilities are currently sited in waters under state or territorial jurisdiction. The largest deep water open ocean farm in the world is raising cobia 12 km off the northern coast of Panama in highly exposed sites.^[9][10]

There has been considerable discussion as to how mariculture of seaweeds can be conducted in the open ocean as a means to regenerate decimated fish populations by providing both habitat and the basis of a trophic pyramid for marine life.^[11] It has been proposed that natural seaweed ecosystems can be replicated in the open ocean by creating the conditions for their growth through artificial upwelling and through submerged tubing that provide substrate. Proponents and permaculture experts recognise that such approaches correspond to the core principles of permaculture and thereby constitute marine permaculture.^{[12][13][14][15][16]} The concept envisions using artificial upwelling and floating, submerged platforms as substrate to replicate natural seaweed ecosystems that provide habitat and the basis of a trophic pyramid for marine life.^[17] Following the principles of permaculture, seaweeds and fish from marine permaculture arrays can be sustainably harvested with the potential of also sequestering atmospheric carbon, should seaweeds be sunk below a depth of one kilometer. As of 2020, a number of successful trials have taken place in Hawaii, the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Tasmania.^[18][19][20] The idea has received substantial public attention, notably featuring as a key solution covered by Damon Gameau’s documentary 2040 and in the book Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming edited by Paul Hawken.

Enhanced stocking

Enhanced Stocking (also known as sea ranching) is a Japanese principle based on operant conditioning and the migratory nature of certain species. The fishermen raise hatchlings in a closely knitted net in a harbor, sounding an underwater horn before each feeding. When the fish are old enough they are freed from the net to mature in the open sea. During spawning season, about 80% of these fish return to their birthplace. The fishermen sound the horn and then net those fish that respond.^[21][22][23]

Seawater ponds

In seawater pond mariculture, fish are raised in ponds which receive water from the sea. This has the benefit that the nutrition (e.g. microorganisms) present in the seawater can be used. This is a great advantage over traditional fish farms (e.g. sweet water farms) for which the farmers buy feed (which is expensive). Other advantages are that water purification plants may be planted in the ponds to eliminate the buildup of nitrogen, from fecal and other contamination. Also, the ponds can be left unprotected from natural predators, providing another kind of filtering.^[24]

Environmental effects

Mariculture has rapidly expanded over the last two decades due to new technology, improvements in formulated feeds, greater biological understanding of farmed species, increased water quality within closed farm systems, greater demand for seafood products, site expansion and government interest.^[25][26][27] As a consequence, mariculture has been subject to some controversy regarding its social and environmental impacts.^[28][29] Commonly identified environmental impacts from marine farms are:

1. Wastes from cage cultures;
2. Farm escapees and invasives;
3. Genetic pollution and disease and parasite transfer;
4. Habitat modification.

As with most farming practices, the degree of environmental impact depends on the size of the farm, the cultured species, stock density, type of feed, hydrography of the site, and husbandry methods.^[30] The adjacent diagram connects these causes and effects.

Wastes from cage cultures

Mariculture of finfish can require a significant amount of fishmeal or other high protein food sources.^[29] Originally, a lot of fishmeal went to waste due to inefficient feeding regimes and poor digestibility of formulated feeds which resulted in poor feed conversion ratios.^[31]

In cage culture, several different methods are used for feeding farmed fish – from simple hand feeding to sophisticated computer-controlled systems with automated food dispensers coupled with in situ uptake sensors that detect consumption rates.^[32] In coastal fish farms, overfeeding primarily leads to increased disposition of detritus on the seafloor (potentially smothering seafloor dwelling invertebrates and altering the physical environment), while in hatcheries and land-based farms, excess food goes to waste and can potentially impact the surrounding catchment and local coastal environment.^[29] This impact is usually highly local, and depends significantly on the settling velocity of waste feed and the current velocity (which varies both spatially and temporally) and depth.^[29][32]

Farm escapees and invasives

The impact of escapees from aquaculture operations depends on whether or not there are wild conspecifics or close relatives in the receiving environment, and whether or not the escapee is reproductively capable.^[32] Several different mitigation/prevention strategies are currently employed, from the development of infertile triploids to land-based farms which are completely isolated from any marine environment.^{[33][34][35][36]} Escapees can adversely impact local ecosystems through hybridization and loss of genetic diversity in native stocks, increase negative interactions within an ecosystem (such as predation and competition), disease transmission and habitat changes (from trophic cascades and ecosystem shifts to varying sediment regimes and thus turbidity).

The accidental introduction of invasive species is also of concern. Aquaculture is one of the main vectors for invasives following accidental releases of farmed stocks into the wild.^[37] One example is the Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) which accidentally escaped from a fish farm into the Gironde Estuary (Southwest France) following a severe storm in December 1999 (5,000 individual fish escaped into the estuary which had never hosted this species before).^[38] Molluscan farming is another example whereby species can be introduced to new environments by ‘hitchhiking’ on farmed molluscs. Also, farmed molluscs themselves can become dominate predators and/or competitors, as well as potentially spread pathogens and parasites.^[37]

Genetic pollution, disease, and parasite transfer

One of the primary concerns with mariculture is the potential for disease and parasite transfer. Farmed stocks are often selectively bred to increase disease and parasite resistance, as well as improving growth rates and quality of products.^[29] As a consequence, the genetic diversity within reared stocks decreases with every generation – meaning they can potentially reduce the genetic diversity within wild populations if they escape into those wild populations.^[31] Such genetic pollution from escaped aquaculture stock can reduce the wild population's ability to adjust to the changing natural environment. Species grown by mariculture can also harbour diseases and parasites (e.g., lice) which can be introduced to wild populations upon their escape. An example of this is the parasitic sea lice on wild and farmed Atlantic salmon in Canada.^[39] Also, non-indigenous species which are farmed may have resistance to, or carry, particular diseases (which they picked up in their native habitats) which could be spread through wild populations if they escape into those wild populations. Such ‘new’ diseases would be devastating for those wild populations because they would have no immunity to them.^[40]

Habitat modification

With the exception of benthic habitats directly beneath marine farms, most mariculture causes minimal destruction to habitats. However, the destruction of mangrove forests from the farming of shrimps is of concern.^[29][32] Globally, shrimp farming activity is a small contributor to the destruction of mangrove forests; however, locally it can be devastating.^[29][32] Mangrove forests provide rich matrices which support a great deal of biodiversity – predominately juvenile fish and crustaceans.^[32][41] Furthermore, they act as buffering systems whereby they reduce coastal erosion, and improve water quality for in situ animals by processing material and ‘filtering’ sediments.^[32][41][42]

Others

In addition, nitrogen and phosphorus compounds from food and waste may lead to blooms of phytoplankton, whose subsequent degradation can drastically reduce oxygen levels. If the algae are toxic, fish are killed and shellfish contaminated.^[33][43][44] These algal blooms are sometimes referred to as harmful algal blooms, which are caused by a high influx of nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, into the water due to run-off from land based human operations.^[45]

Over the course of rearing various species, the sediment on bottom of the specific body of water becomes highly metallic with influx of copper, zinc and lead that is being introduced to the area. This influx of these heavy metals is likely due to the buildup of fish waste, uneaten fish feed, and the paint that comes off the boats and floats that are used in the mariculture operations.^[46]

Sustainability

Mariculture development may be sustained by basic and applied research and development in major fields such as nutrition, genetics, system management, product handling, and socioeconomics. One approach uses closed systems that have no direct interaction with the local environment.^[47] However, investment and operational cost are currently significantly higher than with open cages, limiting closed systems to their current role as hatcheries.^[33] Many studies have estimated that seafood will run out by 2048.^[48] Farmed fish will also become crucial to feeding the growing human population that will potentially reach 9.8 billion by 2050. ^[49]

Benefits

Sustainable mariculture promises economic and environmental benefits. Economies of scale imply that ranching can produce fish at lower cost than industrial fishing, leading to better human diets and the gradual elimination of unsustainable fisheries. Consistent supply and quality control has enabled integration in food market channels.^[33][43][49]

Species farmed

Fish

• European sea bass
• Bigeye tuna
• Cobia
• Grouper
• Snapper
• Pompano
• Salmon
• Pearlspot
• Yellowtail jack
• Mullet
• Pomfret
• Barramundi^[50]

Shellfish/Crustaceans

• Abalone
• Oysters
• Prawn
• Mussels

Plants

• Seaweeds^[9][51]

Scientific literature

Scientific literature on mariculture can be found in the following journals:

• Applied and Environmental Microbiology
• Aquaculture
• Aquaculture Research
• Journal of Marine Science
• Marine Resource Economics
• Ocean Shoreline Management
• Journal of Applied Phycology
• Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
• Journal of Phycology
• Journal of Shellfish Research
• Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
• Reviews in Fisheries Science

See also

• Aquaculture
• Fish farming
• Hydroponics
• Algaculture
• Oyster farming
• Aquaponics
• Copper alloys in aquaculture
• Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture
• Saltwater aquaponics
• Seaweed farming

References

1. Fisheries, NOAA (2022-12-29). "Understanding Marine Aquaculture | NOAA Fisheries". NOAA. Retrieved 2024-01-16.
2. McWilliams, James (2009). Food Only. New York: Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 978-0-316-03374-9.
3. (PDF). Ocean Grown Abalone. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2016. Retrieved 23 April 2016.
4. Fitzgerald, Bridget (28 August 2014). "First wild abalone farm in Australia built on artificial reef". Australian Broadcasting Corporation Rural. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 23 April 2016. It's the same as the wild core product except we've got the aquaculture advantage which is consistency of supply.
5. Murphy, Sean (23 April 2016). "Abalone grown in world-first sea ranch in WA 'as good as wild catch'". Australian Broadcasting Corporation News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 23 April 2016. So to drive future growth I really believe sea ranching is a great opportunity going forward for some of these coastal communities.
6. Mustafa, S.; Saad, S.; Rahman, R.A. (2003-06-01). "Species studies in sea ranching: an overview and economic perspectives". Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 13 (2): 165. doi:10.1023/B:RFBF.0000019478.17950.ab. ISSN 1573-5184. S2CID 36082235.
7. Fisheries, Agriculture and (2012-02-17). "Sea ranching systems". www.business.qld.gov.au. Retrieved 2020-12-11.
8. Aquaculture perspective of multi-use sites in the open ocean : the untapped potential for marine resources in the Anthropocene. Buck, Bela Hieronymus,, Langan, Richard, 1950-. Cham, Switzerland. 6 April 2017. ISBN 978-3-319-51159-7. OCLC 982656470.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
9. Borgatti, Rachel; Buck, Eugene H. (December 13, 2004). (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 23, 2009. Retrieved April 10, 2010.
10. McAvoy, Audrey (October 24, 2009). "Hawaii regulators approve first US tuna farm". The Associated Press. Retrieved April 9, 2010.
11. Flannery, Tim F. (Tim Fridtjof), 1956- (31 July 2017). Sunlight and seaweed : an argument for how to feed, power and clean up the world. Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-925498-68-4. OCLC 987462317.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
12. Drawdown : the most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. Hawken, Paul. New York, New York. 2017. ISBN 978-0-14-313044-4. OCLC 957139166.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
13. Gameau, Damon (Director) (May 23, 2019). 2040 (Motion picture). Australia: Good Things Productions.
14. Von Herzen, Brian (June 2019). "Reverse Climate Change with Marine Permaculture Strategies for Ocean Regeneration". Youtube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-11.
15. Powers, Matt. "Marine Permaculture with Brian Von Herzen Episode 113 A Regenerative Future". Youtube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-11.
16. "Marine Permaculture with Dr Brian von Herzen & Morag Gamble". Youtube. December 2019. Archived from the original on 2021-12-11.
17. "Climate Foundation: What is Marine Permaculture?". Climate Foundation. Retrieved 2020-07-05.
18. "Climate Foundation: Marine Permaculture". Climate Foundation. Retrieved 2020-07-05.
19. "Assessing the Potential for Restoration and Permaculture of Tasmania's Giant Kelp Forests - Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies". Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies - University of Tasmania, Australia. Retrieved 2020-07-05.
20. "Seaweed researchers plant kelp tolerant of warmer waters". www.abc.net.au. 2019-11-11. Retrieved 2020-07-05.
21. Arnason, Ragnar (2001) Ocean Ranching in Japan In: The Economics of Ocean Ranching: Experiences, Outlook and Theory, FAO, Rome. ISBN 92-5-104631-X.
22. Masuda R; Tsukamoto K (1998). "Stock Enhancement in Japan: Review and perspective". Bulletin of Marine Science. 62 (2): 337–358.
23. Lindell, Scott; Miner S; Goudey C; Kite-Powell H; Page S (2012). "Acoustic Conditioning and Ranching of Black Sea Bass Centropristis striata in Massachusetts USA" (PDF). Bull. Fish. Res. Agen. 35: 103–110.
24. Abend, Lisa (15 June 2009) . Time
25. DeVoe, M.R. (1994). "Aquaculture and the marine environment: policy and management issues and opportunities in the United States". Bull. Natl. Res. Inst. Aquacult. Supp. 1: 111–123.
26. Read, P.; Fernandes, T. (2003). "Management of environmental impacts of marine aquaculture in Europe". Aquaculture. 226 (1–4): 139–163. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00474-5.
27. Ross, A. (1997). Leaping in the Dark: A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Marine Salmon Farming in Scotland and Proposals for Change. Scottish Environment Link, Perth, Scotland.
28. Ervik, A.; Hansen, P. K.; Aure, J.; Stigebrandt, A.; Johannessen, P.; Jahnsen, T. (1997). "Regulating the local environmental impact of intensive marine fish farming I. The concept of the MOM system (Modelling-Ongrowing fish farms-Monitoring)". Aquaculture. 158 (1–2): 85–94. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00186-5.
29. Jennings, S., Kaiser, M.J., Reynolds, J.D. (2001). Marine Fisheries Ecology. Blackwell, Victoria.
30. Wu, R. S. S. (1995). "The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 31 (4–12): 159–166. Bibcode:1995MarPB..31..159W. doi:10.1016/0025-326X(95)00100-2.
31. Forrest B, Keeley N, Gillespie P, Hopkins G, Knight B, Govier D. (2007). Review of the ecological effects of marine finfish aquaculture: final report. Prepared for Ministry of Fisheries. Cawthron Report No. 1285.
32. Black, K. D. (2001). "Mariculture, Environmental, Economic and Social Impacts of". In Steele, John H.; Thorpe, Steve A.; Turekian, Karl K. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. Academic Press. pp. 1578–1584. doi:10.1006/rwos.2001.0487. ISBN 9780122274305.
33. Katavic, Ivan (1999). "Mariculture in the New Millennium" (PDF). Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. 64 (3): 223–229.
34. Nell, J.A. (2002). "Farming triploid oysters". Aquaculture. 210 (1–4): 69–88. doi:10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00861-4.
35. Pfeiffer, T. (2010). "Recirculation Technology: the future of aquaculture". Resource, Engineering & Technology for a Sustainable World. 17 (3): 7–9.
36. Troup, A. J.; Cairns, S. C.; Simpson, R. D. (2005). "Growth and mortality of sibling triploid and diploid Sydney rock oysters, Saccostrea glomerata (Gould), in the Camden Haven River". Aquaculture Research. 36 (11): 1093–1103. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2005.01326.x.
37. Naylor, R. L. (2001). "ECOLOGY: Aquaculture--A Gateway for Exotic Species". Science. 294 (5547): 1655–1656. doi:10.1126/science.1064875. PMID 11721035. S2CID 82810702.
38. Maury-Brachet, R; Rochard, E; Durrieu, G; Boudou, A (2008). "The 'storm of the century' (December 1999) and the accidental escape of Siberian sturgeons (Acipenser baerii) into the gironde estuary (southwest France). An original approach for metal contamination". Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 15 (1): 89–94. doi:10.1065/espr2007.12.469. PMID 18306893. S2CID 46148803.
39. Rosenberg, A. A. (2008). "Aquaculture: The price of lice". Nature. 451 (7174): 23–24. Bibcode:2008Natur.451...23R. doi:10.1038/451023a. PMID 18172486. S2CID 32766703.
40. "Wilderness Connect". wilderness.net. Retrieved 2020-11-12.
41. Kaiser, M.J., Attrill, M.J., Jennings, S., Thomas, D.N., Barnes, D.K.A., Brierley, A.S., Polunin, N.V.C., Raffaelli, D.G., Williams, P.J.le B. (2005). Marine Ecology: Processes, Systems and Impacts. Oxford University Press, New York.
42. Trujillo, A.P., Thurman, H.V. (2008) Essentials of Oceanography Ninth Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
43. Young, J. A.; Brugere, C.; Muir, J. F. (1999). "Green grow the fishes‐oh? Environmental attributes in marketing aquaculture products". Aquaculture Economics & Management. 3: 7–17. doi:10.1080/13657309909380229.
44. UNEP, World Fisheries Trust. (2002). THE EFFECTS OF MARICULTURE ON BIODIVERSITY"
45. US EPA, OW (2013-06-03). "Harmful Algal Blooms". US EPA. Retrieved 2020-11-12.
46. Liang, Peng; Wu, Sheng-Chun; Zhang, Jin; Cao, Yucheng; Yu, Shen; Wong, Ming-Hung (2016-04-01). "The effects of mariculture on heavy metal distribution in sediments and cultured fish around the Pearl River Delta region, south China". Chemosphere. 148: 171–177. Bibcode:2016Chmsp.148..171L. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.110. ISSN 0045-6535. PMID 26807936.
47. Schwermer, C. U.; Ferdelman, T. G.; Stief, P.; Gieseke, A.; Rezakhani, N.; Van Rijn, J.; De Beer, D.; Schramm, A. (2010). "Effect of nitrate on sulfur transformations in sulfidogenic sludge of a marine aquaculture biofilter". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 72 (3): 476–84. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00865.x. hdl:21.11116/0000-0001-CADE-2. PMID 20402774.
48. Stokstad, Erik (2006-11-03). "Global Loss of Biodiversity Harming Ocean Bounty". Science. 314 (5800): 745–745. doi:10.1126/science.314.5800.745. ISSN 0036-8075.
49. Costello, Christopher; Cao, Ling; Gelcich, Stefan; Cisneros-Mata, Miguel Á.; Free, Christopher M.; Froehlich, Halley E.; Golden, Christopher D.; Ishimura, Gakushi; Maier, Jason; Macadam-Somer, Ilan; Mangin, Tracey; Melnychuk, Michael C.; Miyahara, Masanori; de Moor, Carryn L.; Naylor, Rosamond (2020-12-03). "The future of food from the sea". Nature. 588 (7836): 95–100. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2616-y. hdl:11093/1616. ISSN 0028-0836.
50. Oatman, Maddie (Jan–Feb 2017). "The Bizarre and Inspiring Story of Iowa's Fish Farmers". Mother Jones. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
51. Ferreira, J. G.; Hawkins, A. J. S.; Bricker, S. B. (2007). "Management of productivity, environmental effects and profitability of shellfish aquaculture — the Farm Aquaculture Resource Management (FARM) model". Aquaculture. 264 (1–4): 160–174. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.017.

External links

• Longline Environment
• Web based aquaculture simulations for shellfish in estuaries and coastal systems: Simulation modelling for mussels, oysters and clams.
• Mariculture guidelines and best practices: A coastal management perspective on mariculture development by the University of Rhode Island Coastal Resources Center.
• Mariculture Marine Science. Retrieved 14 January 2010.
• Flotilla Online – Apocalyptic fiction novel about a mariculture enterprise in the near-future and hub for mariculture topics.