fbpx
Wikipedia

Linnaean taxonomy

Linnaean taxonomy can mean either of two related concepts:

  1. The particular form of biological classification (taxonomy) set up by Carl Linnaeus, as set forth in his Systema Naturae (1735) and subsequent works. In the taxonomy of Linnaeus there are three kingdoms, divided into classes, and they, in turn, into lower ranks in a hierarchical order.
  2. A term for rank-based classification of organisms, in general. That is, taxonomy in the traditional sense of the word: rank-based scientific classification. This term is especially used as opposed to cladistic systematics, which groups organisms into clades. It is attributed to Linnaeus, although he neither invented the concept of ranked classification (it goes back to Plato and Aristotle) nor gave it its present form. In fact, it does not have an exact present form, as "Linnaean taxonomy" as such does not really exist: it is a collective (abstracting) term for what actually are several separate fields, which use similar approaches.
The title page of Systema Naturae, Leiden (1735)

Linnaean name also has two meanings, depending on the context: it may either refer to a formal name given by Linnaeus (personally), such as Giraffa camelopardalis Linnaeus, 1758; or a formal name in the accepted nomenclature (as opposed to a modernistic clade name).

The taxonomy of Linnaeus edit

In his Imperium Naturae, Linnaeus established three kingdoms, namely Regnum Animale, Regnum Vegetabile and Regnum Lapideum. This approach, the Animal, Vegetable and Mineral Kingdoms, survives today in the popular mind, notably in the form of the parlour game question: "Is it animal, vegetable or mineral?". The work of Linnaeus had a huge impact on science; it was indispensable as a foundation for biological nomenclature, now regulated by the nomenclature codes. Two of his works, the first edition of the Species Plantarum (1753) for plants and the tenth edition of the Systema Naturae (1758), are accepted as part of the starting points of nomenclature; his binomials (names for species) and generic names take priority over those of others.[1] However, the impact he had on science was not because of the value of his taxonomy.

Linnaeus' kingdoms were in turn divided into classes, and they, in turn, into orders, genera (singular: genus), and species (singular: species), with an additional rank lower than species, though these do not precisely correspond to the use of these terms in modern taxonomy.[2]

Classification of plants edit

In Systema Naturae (1735), his classes and orders of plants, according to his Systema Sexuale, were not intended to represent natural groups (as opposed to his ordines naturales in his Philosophia Botanica) but only for use in identification. However, in 1737 he published Genera Plantarum in which he claimed that his classification of genera was a natural system.[3] His botanical classification and sexual system were used well into the nineteenth century.[4] Within each class were several orders. This system is based on the number and arrangement of male (stamens) and female (pistils) organs.[5]

 
Key to the Sexual System (from the 10th, 1758, edition of the Systema Naturae)
 
Kalmia is classified according to Linnaeus' sexual system in class Decandria, order Monogyna, because it has 10 stamens and one pistil

The Linnaean classes for plants, in the Sexual System, were (page numbers refer to Species plantarum):

  • Classis 1. Monandria: flowers with 1 stamen
  • Classis 2. Diandria: flowers with 2 stamens
  • Classis 3. Triandria: flowers with 3 stamens
  • Classis 4. Tetrandria: flowers with 4 stamens
  • Classis 5. Pentandria: flowers with 5 stamens
  • Classis 6. Hexandria: flowers with 6 stamens
    • Hexandria monogynia pp. 285–352[6]
    • Hexandria polygynia pp. 342–343[7]
  • Classis 7. Heptandria: flowers with 7 stamens
  • Classis 8. Octandria: flowers with 8 stamens
  • Classis 9. Enneandria: flowers with 9 stamens
  • Classis 10. Decandria: flowers with 10 stamens
  • Classis 11. Dodecandria: flowers with 11 to 19 stamens
  • Classis 12. Icosandria: flowers with 20 (or more) stamens, perigynous
  • Classis 13. Polyandria: flowers with many stamens, inserted on the receptacle
  • Classis 14. Didynamia: flowers with 4 stamens, 2 long and 2 short
    • Gymnospermia[8]
    • Angiospermia[9]
  • Classis 15. Tetradynamia: flowers with 6 stamens, 4 long and 2 short[10]
  • Classis 16. Monadelphia; flowers with the anthers separate, but the filaments united, at least at the base
  • Classis 17. Diadelphia; flowers with the stamens united in two separate groups[14]
  • Classis 18. Polyadelphia; flowers with the stamens united in several separate groups[18]
  • Classis 19. Syngenesia; flowers with stamens united by their anthers[22]
    • Polygamia aequalis[23]
    • Polygamia superba[24]
    • Polygamia frustranea[25]
    • Polygamia necessaria[26]
    • Monogamia[27]
  • Classis 20. Gynandria; flowers with the stamens united to the pistils[28]
  • Classis 21. Monoecia: monoecious plants
  • Classis 22. Dioecia: dioecious plants
  • Classis 23. Polygamia: polygamodioecious plants
  • Classis 24. Cryptogamia: the "flowerless" plants, including ferns, fungi, algae, and bryophytes

The classes based on the number of stamens were then subdivided by the number of pistils, e.g. Hexandria monogynia with six stamens and one pistil.[29] Index to genera p. 1201[30]

By contrast his ordines naturales numbered 69, from Piperitae to Vagae.

Classification for animals edit

 
The 1735 classification of animals

Only in the Animal Kingdom is the higher taxonomy of Linnaeus still more or less recognizable and some of these names are still in use, but usually not quite for the same groups. He divided the Animal Kingdom into six classes. In the tenth edition, of 1758, these were:

Classification for minerals edit

His taxonomy of minerals has long since been dropped from use. In the tenth edition, 1758, of the Systema Naturae, the Linnaean classes were:

  • Classis 1. Petræ
  • Classis 2. Mineræ
  • Classis 3. Fossilia
  • Classis 4. Vitamentra

Rank-based scientific classification edit

This rank-based method of classifying living organisms was originally popularized by (and much later named for) Linnaeus, although it has changed considerably since his time. The greatest innovation of Linnaeus, and still the most important aspect of this system, is the general use of binomial nomenclature, the combination of a genus name and a second term, which together uniquely identify each species of organism within a kingdom. For example, the human species is uniquely identified within the animal kingdom by the name Homo sapiens. No other species of animal can have this same binomen (the technical term for a binomial in the case of animals). Prior to Linnaean taxonomy, animals were classified according to their mode of movement.

Linnaeus's use of binomial nomenclature was anticipated by the theory of definition used in Scholasticism. Scholastic logicians and philosophers of nature defined the species human, for example, as Animal rationalis, where animal was considered a genus and rationalis (Latin for "rational") the characteristic distinguishing humans from all other animals. Treating animal as the immediate genus of the species human, horse, etc. is of little practical use to the biological taxonomist, however. Accordingly, Linnaeus's classification treats animal as a class including many genera (subordinated to the animal "kingdom" via intermediary classes such as "orders"), and treats homo as the genus of a species Homo sapiens, with sapiens (Latin for "knowing" or "understanding") playing a differentiating role analogous to that played, in the Scholastic system, by rationalis (the word homo, Latin for "human being", was used by the Scholastics to denote a species, not a genus).

A strength of Linnaean taxonomy is that it can be used to organize the different kinds of living organisms, simply and practically. Every species can be given a unique (and, one hopes, stable) name, as compared with common names that are often neither unique nor consistent from place to place and language to language. This uniqueness and stability are, of course, a result of the acceptance by working systematists (biologists specializing in taxonomy), not merely of the binomial names themselves, but of the rules governing the use of these names, which are laid down in formal nomenclature codes.

Species can be placed in a ranked hierarchy, starting with either domains or kingdoms. Domains are divided into kingdoms. Kingdoms are divided into phyla (singular: phylum) — for animals; the term division, used for plants and fungi, is equivalent to the rank of phylum (and the current International Code of Botanical Nomenclature allows the use of either term). Phyla (or divisions) are divided into classes, and they, in turn, into orders, families, genera (singular: genus), and species (singular: species). There are ranks below species: in zoology, subspecies (but see form or morph); in botany, variety (varietas) and form (forma), etc.

Groups of organisms at any of these ranks are called taxa (singular: taxon) or taxonomic groups.

The Linnaean system has proven robust and it remains the only extant working classification system at present that enjoys universal scientific acceptance. However, although the number of ranks is unlimited, in practice any classification becomes more cumbersome the more ranks are added. Among the later subdivisions that have arisen are such entities as phyla, families, and tribes, as well as any number of ranks with prefixes (superfamilies, subfamilies, etc.). The use of newer taxonomic tools such as cladistics and phylogenetic nomenclature has led to a different way of looking at evolution (expressed in many nested clades) and this sometimes leads to a desire for more ranks. An example of such complexity is the scheme for mammals proposed by McKenna and Bell.

Alternatives edit

Over time, understanding of the relationships between living things has changed. Linnaeus could only base his scheme on the structural similarities of the different organisms. The greatest change was the widespread acceptance of evolution as the mechanism of biological diversity and species formation, following the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species. It then became generally understood that classifications ought to reflect the phylogeny of organisms, their descent by evolution. This led to evolutionary taxonomy, where the various extant and extinct are linked together to construct a phylogeny. This is largely what is meant by the term 'Linnaean taxonomy' when used in a modern context. In cladistics, originating in the work of Willi Hennig, 1950 onwards, each taxon is grouped so as to include the common ancestor of the group's members (and thus to avoid phylogeny). Such taxa may be either monophyletic (including all descendants) such as genus Homo, or paraphyletic (excluding some descendants), such as genus Australopithecus.

Originally, Linnaeus established three kingdoms in his scheme, namely for Plants, Animals and an additional group for minerals, which has long since been abandoned. Since then, various life forms have been moved into three new kingdoms: Monera, for prokaryotes (i.e., bacteria); Protista, for protozoans and most algae; and Fungi. This five kingdom scheme is still far from the phylogenetic ideal and has largely been supplanted in modern taxonomic work by a division into three domains: Bacteria and Archaea, which contain the prokaryotes, and Eukaryota, comprising the remaining forms. These arrangements should not be seen as definitive. They are based on the genomes of the organisms; as knowledge on this increases, classifications will change.[31]

Representing presumptive evolutionary relationships within the framework of Linnaean taxonomy is sometimes seen as problematic, especially given the wide acceptance of cladistic methodology and numerous molecular phylogenies that have challenged long-accepted classifications. Therefore, some systematists have proposed a PhyloCode to replace it.

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Polaszek 2010, p. 1.
  2. ^ Bihrmann 2021.
  3. ^ Müller-Wille, Staffan; Reeds, Karen (September 2007). "A translation of Carl Linnaeus's introduction to Genera plantarum (1737)". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 38 (3): 563–572. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.06.003. ISSN 1369-8486. PMID 17893065.
  4. ^ Comstock, J.L. (1837). An introduction to the study of botany: including a treatise on vegetable physiology, and descriptions of the most common plants in the middle and northern states. Robinson, Pratt & Co.
  5. ^ Bremer 2007.
  6. ^ Linnaeus 1753, Hexandria monogynia i pp. 285–352.
  7. ^ Linnaeus 1753, Hexandria polyynia i pp. 342–343.
  8. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 561–601.
  9. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 602–639.
  10. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 640–672.
  11. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 673–675.
  12. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 675–683.
  13. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 683–698.
  14. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 699–781.
  15. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 699–701.
  16. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 701–706.
  17. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 706–781.
  18. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 782–788.
  19. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii p. 782.
  20. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 782–783.
  21. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 783–788.
  22. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 789–938.
  23. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 789–845.
  24. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 845–904.
  25. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 904–919.
  26. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 919–927.
  27. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 928–938.
  28. ^ Linnaeus 1753, ii pp. 939–.
  29. ^ "Linnaeus Sexual System". CronkLab. Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
  30. ^ Linnaeus 1753, Index generum p. 1201.
  31. ^ Embley, T. A. & Martin, W. (2006). "Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges". Nature. 440 (7084): 623–630. doi:10.1038/nature04546. PMID 16572163. S2CID 4396543.

Bibliography edit

Books
Articles
  • Bremer, Birgitta (April 2007). "Linnaeus' sexual system and flowering plant phylogeny". Nordic Journal of Botany. 25 (1–2): 5–6. doi:10.1111/j.0107-055X.2007.00098_12.x.
  • George, Sam (June 2005). "'Not Strictly Proper For A Female Pen': Eighteenth-Century Poetry and the Sexuality of Botany". Comparative Critical Studies. 2 (2): 191–210. doi:10.3366/ccs.2005.2.2.191.
Websites
  • Bihrmann (2021). "Taxonomy, Carl Linnaeus' system 1753". Birhmann's Caudiciforms. Retrieved 29 October 2021.

External links edit

  • International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code), Electronic version
  • International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code, 2011), Electronic version
  • , for zoological nomenclature
  • , Electronic version
  • ZooBank: The World Register of Animal Names
  • International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes for bacteria
  • ICTVdB website, for virus nomenclature by the International Union of Microbiological Societies
  • Tree of Life

linnaean, taxonomy, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsourced, material, challenged, removed, find, sources, news, newspapers, books, scholar, jstor, january. This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Linnaean taxonomy news newspapers books scholar JSTOR January 2019 Learn how and when to remove this template message Linnaean taxonomy can mean either of two related concepts The particular form of biological classification taxonomy set up by Carl Linnaeus as set forth in his Systema Naturae 1735 and subsequent works In the taxonomy of Linnaeus there are three kingdoms divided into classes and they in turn into lower ranks in a hierarchical order A term for rank based classification of organisms in general That is taxonomy in the traditional sense of the word rank based scientific classification This term is especially used as opposed to cladistic systematics which groups organisms into clades It is attributed to Linnaeus although he neither invented the concept of ranked classification it goes back to Plato and Aristotle nor gave it its present form In fact it does not have an exact present form as Linnaean taxonomy as such does not really exist it is a collective abstracting term for what actually are several separate fields which use similar approaches The title page of Systema Naturae Leiden 1735 Linnaean name also has two meanings depending on the context it may either refer to a formal name given by Linnaeus personally such as Giraffa camelopardalis Linnaeus 1758 or a formal name in the accepted nomenclature as opposed to a modernistic clade name Contents 1 The taxonomy of Linnaeus 1 1 Classification of plants 1 2 Classification for animals 1 3 Classification for minerals 2 Rank based scientific classification 2 1 Alternatives 3 See also 4 References 5 Bibliography 6 External linksThe taxonomy of Linnaeus editIn his Imperium Naturae Linnaeus established three kingdoms namely Regnum Animale Regnum Vegetabile and Regnum Lapideum This approach the Animal Vegetable and Mineral Kingdoms survives today in the popular mind notably in the form of the parlour game question Is it animal vegetable or mineral The work of Linnaeus had a huge impact on science it was indispensable as a foundation for biological nomenclature now regulated by the nomenclature codes Two of his works the first edition of the Species Plantarum 1753 for plants and the tenth edition of the Systema Naturae 1758 are accepted as part of the starting points of nomenclature his binomials names for species and generic names take priority over those of others 1 However the impact he had on science was not because of the value of his taxonomy Linnaeus kingdoms were in turn divided into classes and they in turn into orders genera singular genus and species singular species with an additional rank lower than species though these do not precisely correspond to the use of these terms in modern taxonomy 2 Classification of plants edit In Systema Naturae 1735 his classes and orders of plants according to his Systema Sexuale were not intended to represent natural groups as opposed to his ordines naturales in his Philosophia Botanica but only for use in identification However in 1737 he published Genera Plantarum in which he claimed that his classification of genera was a natural system 3 His botanical classification and sexual system were used well into the nineteenth century 4 Within each class were several orders This system is based on the number and arrangement of male stamens and female pistils organs 5 nbsp Key to the Sexual System from the 10th 1758 edition of the Systema Naturae nbsp Kalmia is classified according to Linnaeus sexual system in class Decandria order Monogyna because it has 10 stamens and one pistilThe Linnaean classes for plants in the Sexual System were page numbers refer to Species plantarum Classis 1 Monandria flowers with 1 stamen Classis 2 Diandria flowers with 2 stamens Classis 3 Triandria flowers with 3 stamens Classis 4 Tetrandria flowers with 4 stamens Classis 5 Pentandria flowers with 5 stamens Classis 6 Hexandria flowers with 6 stamens Hexandria monogynia pp 285 352 6 Hexandria polygynia pp 342 343 7 Classis 7 Heptandria flowers with 7 stamens Classis 8 Octandria flowers with 8 stamens Classis 9 Enneandria flowers with 9 stamens Classis 10 Decandria flowers with 10 stamens Classis 11 Dodecandria flowers with 11 to 19 stamens Classis 12 Icosandria flowers with 20 or more stamens perigynous Classis 13 Polyandria flowers with many stamens inserted on the receptacle Classis 14 Didynamia flowers with 4 stamens 2 long and 2 short Gymnospermia 8 Angiospermia 9 Classis 15 Tetradynamia flowers with 6 stamens 4 long and 2 short 10 Classis 16 Monadelphia flowers with the anthers separate but the filaments united at least at the base Pentandria 11 Decandria 12 Polyandria 13 Classis 17 Diadelphia flowers with the stamens united in two separate groups 14 Hexandria 15 Octandria 16 Decandria 17 Classis 18 Polyadelphia flowers with the stamens united in several separate groups 18 Pentandria 19 Icosandria 20 Polyandria 21 Classis 19 Syngenesia flowers with stamens united by their anthers 22 Polygamia aequalis 23 Polygamia superba 24 Polygamia frustranea 25 Polygamia necessaria 26 Monogamia 27 Classis 20 Gynandria flowers with the stamens united to the pistils 28 Classis 21 Monoecia monoecious plants Classis 22 Dioecia dioecious plants Classis 23 Polygamia polygamodioecious plants Classis 24 Cryptogamia the flowerless plants including ferns fungi algae and bryophytesThe classes based on the number of stamens were then subdivided by the number of pistils e g Hexandria monogynia with six stamens and one pistil 29 Index to genera p 1201 30 By contrast his ordines naturales numbered 69 from Piperitae to Vagae Classification for animals edit nbsp The 1735 classification of animalsOnly in the Animal Kingdom is the higher taxonomy of Linnaeus still more or less recognizable and some of these names are still in use but usually not quite for the same groups He divided the Animal Kingdom into six classes In the tenth edition of 1758 these were Classis 1 Mammalia mammals Classis 2 Aves birds Classis 3 Amphibia amphibians Classis 4 Pisces fishes Classis 5 Insecta arthropods Classis 6 Vermes worms Classification for minerals edit His taxonomy of minerals has long since been dropped from use In the tenth edition 1758 of the Systema Naturae the Linnaean classes were Classis 1 Petrae Classis 2 Minerae Classis 3 Fossilia Classis 4 VitamentraRank based scientific classification editMain article Taxonomy biology This rank based method of classifying living organisms was originally popularized by and much later named for Linnaeus although it has changed considerably since his time The greatest innovation of Linnaeus and still the most important aspect of this system is the general use of binomial nomenclature the combination of a genus name and a second term which together uniquely identify each species of organism within a kingdom For example the human species is uniquely identified within the animal kingdom by the name Homo sapiens No other species of animal can have this same binomen the technical term for a binomial in the case of animals Prior to Linnaean taxonomy animals were classified according to their mode of movement Linnaeus s use of binomial nomenclature was anticipated by the theory of definition used in Scholasticism Scholastic logicians and philosophers of nature defined the species human for example as Animal rationalis where animal was considered a genus and rationalis Latin for rational the characteristic distinguishing humans from all other animals Treating animal as the immediate genus of the species human horse etc is of little practical use to the biological taxonomist however Accordingly Linnaeus s classification treats animal as a class including many genera subordinated to the animal kingdom via intermediary classes such as orders and treats homo as the genus of a species Homo sapiens with sapiens Latin for knowing or understanding playing a differentiating role analogous to that played in the Scholastic system by rationalis the word homo Latin for human being was used by the Scholastics to denote a species not a genus A strength of Linnaean taxonomy is that it can be used to organize the different kinds of living organisms simply and practically Every species can be given a unique and one hopes stable name as compared with common names that are often neither unique nor consistent from place to place and language to language This uniqueness and stability are of course a result of the acceptance by working systematists biologists specializing in taxonomy not merely of the binomial names themselves but of the rules governing the use of these names which are laid down in formal nomenclature codes Species can be placed in a ranked hierarchy starting with either domains or kingdoms Domains are divided into kingdoms Kingdoms are divided into phyla singular phylum for animals the term division used for plants and fungi is equivalent to the rank of phylum and the current International Code of Botanical Nomenclature allows the use of either term Phyla or divisions are divided into classes and they in turn into orders families genera singular genus and species singular species There are ranks below species in zoology subspecies but see form or morph in botany variety varietas and form forma etc Groups of organisms at any of these ranks are called taxa singular taxon or taxonomic groups The Linnaean system has proven robust and it remains the only extant working classification system at present that enjoys universal scientific acceptance However although the number of ranks is unlimited in practice any classification becomes more cumbersome the more ranks are added Among the later subdivisions that have arisen are such entities as phyla families and tribes as well as any number of ranks with prefixes superfamilies subfamilies etc The use of newer taxonomic tools such as cladistics and phylogenetic nomenclature has led to a different way of looking at evolution expressed in many nested clades and this sometimes leads to a desire for more ranks An example of such complexity is the scheme for mammals proposed by McKenna and Bell Alternatives edit Over time understanding of the relationships between living things has changed Linnaeus could only base his scheme on the structural similarities of the different organisms The greatest change was the widespread acceptance of evolution as the mechanism of biological diversity and species formation following the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin s On the Origin of Species It then became generally understood that classifications ought to reflect the phylogeny of organisms their descent by evolution This led to evolutionary taxonomy where the various extant and extinct are linked together to construct a phylogeny This is largely what is meant by the term Linnaean taxonomy when used in a modern context In cladistics originating in the work of Willi Hennig 1950 onwards each taxon is grouped so as to include the common ancestor of the group s members and thus to avoid phylogeny Such taxa may be either monophyletic including all descendants such as genus Homo or paraphyletic excluding some descendants such as genus Australopithecus Originally Linnaeus established three kingdoms in his scheme namely for Plants Animals and an additional group for minerals which has long since been abandoned Since then various life forms have been moved into three new kingdoms Monera for prokaryotes i e bacteria Protista for protozoans and most algae and Fungi This five kingdom scheme is still far from the phylogenetic ideal and has largely been supplanted in modern taxonomic work by a division into three domains Bacteria and Archaea which contain the prokaryotes and Eukaryota comprising the remaining forms These arrangements should not be seen as definitive They are based on the genomes of the organisms as knowledge on this increases classifications will change 31 Representing presumptive evolutionary relationships within the framework of Linnaean taxonomy is sometimes seen as problematic especially given the wide acceptance of cladistic methodology and numerous molecular phylogenies that have challenged long accepted classifications Therefore some systematists have proposed a PhyloCode to replace it See also editHistory of plant systematics Phylogenetic tree a way to express insights into evolutionary relationships Zoology mnemonic for a list of mnemonic sentences used to help people remember the list of Linnaean ranks References edit Polaszek 2010 p 1 Bihrmann 2021 Muller Wille Staffan Reeds Karen September 2007 A translation of Carl Linnaeus s introduction to Genera plantarum 1737 Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 3 563 572 doi 10 1016 j shpsc 2007 06 003 ISSN 1369 8486 PMID 17893065 Comstock J L 1837 An introduction to the study of botany including a treatise on vegetable physiology and descriptions of the most common plants in the middle and northern states Robinson Pratt amp Co Bremer 2007 Linnaeus 1753 Hexandria monogynia i pp 285 352 Linnaeus 1753 Hexandria polyynia i pp 342 343 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 561 601 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 602 639 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 640 672 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 673 675 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 675 683 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 683 698 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 699 781 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 699 701 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 701 706 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 706 781 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 782 788 Linnaeus 1753 ii p 782 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 782 783 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 783 788 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 789 938 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 789 845 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 845 904 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 904 919 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 919 927 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 928 938 Linnaeus 1753 ii pp 939 Linnaeus Sexual System CronkLab Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia Retrieved 26 January 2015 Linnaeus 1753 Index generum p 1201 Embley T A amp Martin W 2006 Eukaryotic evolution changes and challenges Nature 440 7084 623 630 doi 10 1038 nature04546 PMID 16572163 S2CID 4396543 Bibliography editBooksFara Patricia 2003 Sex Botany and Empire The Story of Carl Linnaeus and Joseph Banks Cambridge Icon Books ISBN 9781840464443 Frangsmyr Tore ed 1994 1983 University of California Press Linnaeus The Man and His Work revised ed Canton MA USA Science History Publications USA ISBN 978 0 88135 154 5 OCLC 30154266 Original edition available here at Internet Archive Linnaeus C 1753 Species Plantarum Stockholm Laurentii Salvii Polaszek Andrew 2010 Systema Naturae 250 The Linnaean Ark Boca Raton FL CRC Press ISBN 978 1 4200 9502 9 OCLC 237886102 Dawkins Richard 2004 The Ancestor s Tale A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life Boston Houghton Mifflin ISBN 0 618 00583 8 Ereshefsky Marc 2000 The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy Cambridge Cambridge University Press Gould Stephen Jay 1989 Wonderful Life The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History W W Norton amp Co ISBN 0 393 02705 8 Pavord Anna The Naming of Names The Search for Order in the World of Plants Bloomsbury ISBN 0 7475 7952 0ArticlesBremer Birgitta April 2007 Linnaeus sexual system and flowering plant phylogeny Nordic Journal of Botany 25 1 2 5 6 doi 10 1111 j 0107 055X 2007 00098 12 x George Sam June 2005 Not Strictly Proper For A Female Pen Eighteenth Century Poetry and the Sexuality of Botany Comparative Critical Studies 2 2 191 210 doi 10 3366 ccs 2005 2 2 191 WebsitesBihrmann 2021 Taxonomy Carl Linnaeus system 1753 Birhmann s Caudiciforms Retrieved 29 October 2021 External links editInternational Code of Botanical Nomenclature Saint Louis Code Electronic version International Code of Nomenclature for algae fungi and plants Melbourne Code 2011 Electronic version ICZN website for zoological nomenclature Text of the ICZN Electronic version ZooBank The World Register of Animal Names International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes for bacteria International Code of Zoological Nomenclature 4th Edition By the International Union of Biological Sciences ICTVdB website for virus nomenclature by the International Union of Microbiological Societies Tree of Life European Species Names in Linnaean Czech English German and French Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Linnaean taxonomy amp oldid 1194391511, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.