fbpx
Wikipedia

Tungusic languages

The Tungusic languages /tʊŋˈɡʊsɪk/ (also known as Manchu-Tungus and Tungus) form a language family spoken in Eastern Siberia and Manchuria by Tungusic peoples. Many Tungusic languages are endangered. There are approximately 75,000 native speakers of the dozen living languages of the Tungusic language family. The term "Tungusic" is from an exonym for the Evenk people (Ewenki) used by the Yakuts ("tongus").

Tungusic
EthnicityTungusic peoples
Geographic
distribution
Siberia, Manchuria
Linguistic classificationOne of the world's primary language families
Subdivisions
ISO 639-5tuw
Glottologtung1282
Geographic distribution of the Tungusic languages

Classification edit

Linguists working on Tungusic have proposed a number of different classifications based on different criteria, including morphological, lexical, and phonological characteristics. Some scholars have criticized the tree-based model of Tungusic classification and argue that the long history of contact among the Tungusic languages makes them better treated as a dialect continuum.[1]

 
Current geographic distribution of languages in the Tungusic family.

The main classification is into a northern branch and a southern branch (Georg 2004) although the two branches have no clear division, and the classification of intermediate groups is debatable.

Four mid-level subgroups are recognized by Hölzl (2018),[2] namely Ewenic, Udegheic, Nanaic, and Jurchenic.

Population distribution of total speakers of Tungusic languages, by speaker

  Xibe (55%)
  Evenki (28.97%)
  Even (10.45%)
  Others (5.58%)

Alexander Vovin[3] notes that Manchu and Jurchen are aberrant languages within South Tungusic but nevertheless still belong in it, and that this aberrancy is perhaps due to influences from the Para-Mongolic Khitan language, from Old Korean, and perhaps also from Chukotko-Kamchatkan and unknown languages of uncertain linguistic affiliation.

Southern Tungusic (Jurchenic-Nanaic)
Transitional Southern-Northern Tungus (Udegheic)
  • Udegheic (Oroch–Udege; strongly influenced by Southern Tungusic)
    • Oroch †?
      • Tumninsky dialect?
      • Khadinsky dialect?
      • Hungarisky dialect?
    • Udege / Udihe
Northern Tungusic (Ewenic)
  • Ewenic
    • Even (Lamut) (in eastern Siberia)
      • Arman
      • Indigirka
      • Kamchatka
      • Kolyma-Omolon
      • Okhotsk
      • Ola
      • Tompon
      • Upper Kolyma
      • Sakkyryr
      • Lamunkhin
    • Evenki
      • Evenki (obsolete: Tungus), spoken by Evenks in central Siberia and Manchuria
        • Solon (Solon Ewenki)
          • Hihue/Hoy (basis of the standard, but not identical)
          • Haila’er
          • Aoluguya (Olguya)
          • Chenba’erhu (Old Bargu)
          • Morigele (Mergel)
        • Siberian Ewenki / Ewenki of Siberia
          • Northern (spirant)
            • Ilimpeya (subdialects: Ilimpeya, Agata and Bol'shoi, Porog, Tura, Tutonchany, Dudinka/Khantai)
            • Yerbogachen (subdialects: Yerbogachen, Nakanno)
          • Southern (sibilant)
            • Hushing
              • Sym (subdialects: Tokma/Upper Nepa, Upper Lena/Kachug, Angara)
              • Northern Baikal (subdialects: Northern Baikal, Upper Lena)
            • Hissing
              • Stony Tunguska (subdialects: Vanavara, Kuyumba, Poligus, Surinda, Taimura/Chirinda, Uchami, Chemdal'sk)
              • Nepa (subdialects: Nepa, Kirensk)
              • Vitim-Nercha/Baunt-Talocha (subdialects: Baunt, Talocha, Tungukochan, Nercha)
          • Eastern (sibilant-spirant)
            • Vitim-Olyokma (subdialects: Barguzin, Vitim/Kalar, Olyokma, Tungir, Tokko)
            • Upper Aldan (subdialects: Aldan, Upper Amur, Amga, Dzheltulak, Timpton, Tommot, Khingan, Chul'man, Chul'man-Gilyui)
            • Uchur-Zeya (subdialects: Uchur, Zeya)
            • Selemdzha-Bureya-Urmi (subdialects: Selemdzha, Bureya, Urmi)
            • Ayan-Mai (subdialects: Ayan, Aim, Mai, Nel'kan, Totti)
            • Tugur-Chumikan (subdialects: Tugur, Chumikan)
            • Sakhalin (no subdialects)
      • Negidal
        • Lower Negidal
        • Upper Negidal
      • Oroqen
        • Gankui (basis of standard Oroqen but not identical)
        • Selpechen
        • Kumarchen
        • Selpechen
        • Orochen
      • Kili (previously thought to be a dialect of Nanai)

History edit

Proto-Tungusic edit

Some linguists estimate the divergence of the Tungusic languages from a common ancestor spoken somewhere in Eastern Manchuria around 500 BC to 500 AD. (Janhunen 2012, Pevnov 2012)[6] Other theories favor a homeland closer to Lake Baikal. (Menges 1968, Khelimskii 1985)[7] While the general form of the protolanguage is clear from the similarities in the daughter languages, there is no consensus on detailed reconstructions. As of 2012, scholars are still trying to establish a shared vocabulary to do such a reconstruction.[6] The Lake Khanka region was found to present the most likely homeland, based on linguistic and ancient genetic data.[8]

There are some proposed sound correspondences for Tungusic languages. For example, Norman (1977) supports a Proto-Tungusic *t > Manchu s when followed by *j in the same stem, with any exceptions arising from loanwords.[9] Some linguists believe there are connections between the vowel harmony of Proto-Tungusic and some of the neighboring non-Tungusic languages. For example, there are proposals for an areal or genetic correspondence between the vowel harmonies of Proto-Korean, Proto-Mongolian, and Proto-Tungusic based on an original RTR harmony.[10] This is one of several competing proposals, and on the other hand, some reconstruct Proto-Tungusic without RTR harmony.[10]

Some sources describe the Donghu people of 7th century BC to 2nd century BC Manchuria as Proto-Tungusic.[11] Other sources sharply criticize this as a random similarity in pronunciation with "Tungus" that has no real basis in fact.[12]

The historical records of the Korean kingdoms of Baekje and Silla note battles with the Mohe (Chinese: 靺鞨) in Manchuria during the 1st and 2nd centuries. Some scholars suggest these Mohe are closely connected to the later Jurchens, but this is controversial.

Alexander Vovin (2015)[13] notes that Northern Tungusic languages have Eskimo–Aleut loanwords that are not found in Southern Tungusic, implying that Eskimo–Aleut was once much more widely spoken in eastern Siberia. Vovin (2015) estimates that the Eskimo–Aleut loanwords in Northern Tungusic had been borrowed no more than 2,000 years ago, which was when Tungusic was spreading northwards from its homeland in the middle reaches of the Amur River.

Wang and Robbeets (2020)[14] place the Proto-Tungusic homeland in the Lake Khanka region.

Liu et al. (2020) [15] revealed that Haplogroup C-F5484 and its subclades are the genetic markers of Tungusic-speaking peoples. C-F5484 emerged 3,300 years ago and began to diverge 1,900 years ago, indicating the approximate age of differentiation of Tungusic languages.[citation needed]

Jurchen-Manchu language edit

The earliest written attestation of the language family is in the Jurchen language, which was spoken by the rulers of the Jin dynasty (1115–1234).[16] The Jurchens invented a Jurchen script to write their language based on the Khitan scripts. During this time, several stelae were put up in Manchuria and Korea. One of these, among the most important extant texts in Jurchen, is the inscription on the back of "the Jin Victory Memorial Stele" (Da Jin deshengtuo songbei), which was erected in 1185, during the Dading period (1161–1189). It is apparently an abbreviated translation of the Chinese text on the front of the stele.[17] The last known example of the Jurchen script was written in 1526.

The Tungusic languages appear in the historical record again after the unification of the Jurchen tribes under Nurhaci, who ruled 1616–1626. He commissioned a new Manchu alphabet based on the Mongolian alphabet, and his successors went on to found the Qing dynasty. In 1636, Emperor Hong Taiji decreed that the ethnonym "Manchu" would replace "Jurchen". Modern scholarship usually treats Jurchen and Manchu as different stages of the same language.

Currently, Manchu proper is a dying language spoken by a dozen or so elderly people in Qiqihar, China. However, the closely related Xibe language spoken in Xinjiang, which historically was treated as a divergent dialect of Jurchen-Manchu, maintains the literary tradition of the script, and has around 30,000 speakers. As the only language in the Tungusic family with a long written tradition, Jurchen-Manchu is a very important language for the reconstruction of Proto-Tungusic.

Other Tungusic languages edit

Other Tungusic languages have relatively short or no written traditions. Since around the 20th century, some of these other languages can be written in a Russian-based Cyrillic script, but the languages remain primarily spoken languages only.[citation needed]

Research edit

The earliest Western accounts of Tungusic languages came from the Dutch traveler Nicolaes Witsen, who published in the Dutch language a book, Noord en Oost Tartarye (literally 'North and East Tartary'). It described a variety of peoples in the Russian Far East and included some brief word lists for many languages. After his travel to Russia, his collected findings were published in three editions, 1692, 1705, and 1785.[18] The book includes some words and sentences from the Evenki language, then called "Tungus".

The German linguist Wilhelm Grube (1855–1908) published an early dictionary of the Nanai language (Gold language) in 1900, as well as deciphering the Jurchen language for modern audiences using a Chinese source.

Common characteristics edit

The Tungusic languages are of an agglutinative morphological type, and some of them have complex case systems and elaborate patterns of tense and aspect marking.

The normal word order for all of the languages is subject–object–verb.[19]

Phonology edit

Tungusic languages exhibit a complex pattern of vowel harmony, based on two parameters: vowel roundedness and vowel tenseness (in Evenki, the contrast is back and front). Tense and lax vowels do not occur in the same word; all vowels in a word, including suffixes, are either one or the other. Rounded vowels in the root of a word cause all the following vowels in the word to become rounded, but not those before the rounded vowel. Those rules are not absolute, and there are many individual exceptions.[19]

Vowel length is phonemic, with many words distinguished based on the distinction between short vowel and long vowel.[19]

Tungusic words have simple word codas, and usually have simple word onsets, with consonant clusters forbidden at the end of words and rare at the beginning.[19]

Below are Proto-Tungusic consonants as reconstructed by Tsintsius (1949) and the vowels according to Benzing (1955):[20]

Consonants
Labial Dental Palatal Velar
Stop voiceless p t k
voiced b d ɡ
Affricate voiceless t͡ʃ ⟨č⟩
voiced d͡ʒ ⟨ǯ⟩
Fricative s ʃ ⟨š⟩ x
Nasal m n ɲ ⟨ń⟩ ŋ
Lateral approximant l
Rhotic r
Glide w j
Vowels
front central back
high i y ⟨ü⟩ ɨ ⟨ï⟩ u
mid e ø ⟨ö⟩ o
low a

Relationships with other languages edit

Tungusic is today considered a primary language family. Especially in the past, some linguists have linked Tungusic with Turkic and Mongolic languages, among various others, in the Altaic language family or Transeurasian family.[21] However, a genetic, as opposed to an areal, link is rejected by most historical linguists.[22]

The language of the Avars in Europe which created the Avar Khaganate is believed by some scholars to be of Tungusic origin.[23]

See also edit

References edit

Citations edit

  1. ^ Lindsay J. Whaley, Lenore A. Grenoble and Fengxiang Li (June 1999). "Revisiting Tungusic Classification from the Bottom up: A Comparison of Evenki and Oroqen". Language. 75 (2): 286–321. doi:10.2307/417262. JSTOR 417262.
  2. ^ Hölzl, Andreas. 2018. The Tungusic language family through the ages: Interdisciplinary perspectives: Introduction. International Workshop at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). 29 August – 1st September 2018, Tallinn University, Estonia.
  3. ^ Vovin, Alexander. Why Manchu and Jurchen Look so Un-Tungusic?
  4. ^ a b c Mu, Yejun 穆晔骏. 1987: Balayu 巴拉语. Manyu yanjiu 满语研究 2. 2‒31, 128.
  5. ^ Hölzl, Andreas (2020). "Bala (China) – Language Snapshot". Language Documentation and Description. 19: 162–170.
  6. ^ a b Martine Robbeets. (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 25 Nov 2016.
  7. ^ Immanuel Ness (29 Aug 2014). The Global Prehistory of Human Migration. John Wiley & Sons. p. 200. ISBN 9781118970584.
  8. ^ Wang, Chuan-Chao; Robbeets, Martine (2020). "The homeland of Proto-Tungusic inferred from contemporary words and ancient genomes". Evolutionary Human Sciences. 2: e8. doi:10.1017/ehs.2020.8. ISSN 2513-843X. PMC 10427446. PMID 37588383. S2CID 218569747.
  9. ^ JERRY NORMAN (1977). "THE EVOLUTION OF PROTO-TUNGUSIC *t TO MANCHU s". Central Asiatic Journal. 21 (3/4): 229–233. JSTOR 41927199.
  10. ^ a b Seongyeon Ko, Andrew Joseph, John Whitman (2014). "Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond (Ch. 7)" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ Barbara A. West (19 May 2010). Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania. Infobase. p. 891. ISBN 9781438119137. Retrieved 26 Nov 2016.
  12. ^ The Chinese and Their Neighbors in Prehistoric and Early Historic China
  13. ^ Vovin, Alexander. 2015. Eskimo Loanwords in Northern Tungusic. Iran and the Caucasus 19 (2015), 87–95. Leiden: Brill.
  14. ^ Wang, Chuan-Chao; Robbeets, Martine (2020). "The homeland of Proto-Tungusic inferred from contemporary words and ancient genomes". Evolutionary Human Sciences. 2: e8. doi:10.1017/ehs.2020.8. ISSN 2513-843X. PMC 10427446. PMID 37588383. S2CID 218569747.
  15. ^ Liu, Bing‐Li; Ma, Peng‐Cheng; Wang, Chi‐Zao; Yan, Shi; Yao, Hong‐Bing; Li, Yong‐Lan; Xie, Yong‐Mei; Meng, Song‐Lin; Sun, Jin; Cai, Yan‐Huan; Sarengaowa, Sarengaowa (March 2021). "Paternal origin of Tungusic‐speaking populations: Insights from the updated phylogenetic tree of Y‐chromosome haplogroup C2a‐M86". American Journal of Human Biology. 33 (2): e23462. doi:10.1002/ajhb.23462. ISSN 1042-0533. PMID 32657006. S2CID 220501084.
  16. ^ Lindsay J. Whaley (18 Jun 2007). "Manchu-Tungus languages". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 25 Nov 2016.
  17. ^ Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland, and Stephen H. West. China Under Jurchen Rule: Essays on Chin Intellectual and Cultural History. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995, pp. 228–229. ISBN 0-7914-2274-7. Partial text on Google Books.
  18. ^ Nicolaas Witsen (1785). "Noord en oost Tartaryen".
  19. ^ a b c d The Tungusic Research Group at Dartmouth College. . Archived from the original on 30 January 2020. Retrieved 25 Nov 2016.
  20. ^ J. Benzing, "Die tungusischen Sprachen: Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik", Abhandlungen der Geistes und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse,vol. 11 (1955), pp. 949–1099.
  21. ^ Robbeets, Martine (January 2017). "Austronesian influence and Transeurasian ancestry in Japanese: A case of farming/language dispersal". Language Dynamics and Change. 7: 210–251. doi:10.1163/22105832-00702005. Retrieved 2019-03-26., Robbeets, Martine et al. 2021 Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages, Nature 599, 616–621
  22. ^ Tian, Zheng; Tao, Yuxin; Zhu, Kongyang; Jacques, Guillaume; Ryder, Robin J.; de la Fuente, José Andrés Alonso; Antonov, Anton; Xia, Ziyang; Zhang, Yuxuan; Ji, Xiaoyan; Ren, Xiaoying; He, Guanglin; Guo, Jianxin; Wang, Rui; Yang, Xiaomin; Zhao, Jing; Xu, Dan; Gray, Russell D.; Zhang, Menghan; Wen, Shaoqing; Wang, Chuan-Chao; Pellard, Thomas (2022-06-12), Triangulation fails when neither linguistic, genetic, nor archaeological data support the Transeurasian narrative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, doi:10.1101/2022.06.09.495471, S2CID 249649524
  23. ^ Helimski, E (2004). "Die Sprache(n) der Awaren: Die mandschu-tungusische Alternative". Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies, Vol. II: 59–72.

Sources edit

  • Kane, Daniel. The Sino-Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters. Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series, Volume 153. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, 1989. ISBN 0-933070-23-3.
  • Miller, Roy Andrew. Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1971.
  • Poppe, Nicholas. Vergleichende Grammatik der Altaischen Sprachen [A Comparative Grammar of the Altaic Languages]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1960.
  • Tsintsius, Vera I. Sravnitel'naya Fonetika Tunguso-Man'chzhurskikh Yazïkov [Comparative Phonetics of the Manchu-Tungus Languages]. Leningrad, 1949.
  • Stefan Georg. "Unreclassifying Tungusic", in: Carsten Naeher (ed.): Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu-Tungus Studies (Bonn, August 28 – September 1, 2000), Volume 2: Trends in Tungusic and Siberian Linguistics, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 45–57.
  • Hölzl, Andreas & Payne, Thomas E. (eds.). 2022. Tungusic languages: Past and present. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 32). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7025328 https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/355 Open Access.

Further reading edit

  • Aixinjueluo Yingsheng. 2014. Manyu kouyu yindian . Peking: Huayi chubanshe.
  • Apatóczky, Ákos Bertalan; Kempf, Béla (2017). Recent developments on the decipherment of the Khitan small script. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. 70(2). 109–133 (PDF). Vol. 70. pp. 109–133. doi:10.1556/062.2017.70.2.1. {{cite encyclopedia}}: |journal= ignored (help).
  • Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés. 2015. Tungusic historical linguistics and the Buyla (a.k.a. Nagyszentmiklós) inscription. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 20. 17–46.
  • Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés. 2017a. An Oroch word-list lost and rediscovered: A critical edition of Tronson's 1859 pseudo- Nivkh vocabulary. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 80(1). 97–117.
  • Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés. 2017b. From converb to classifier? On the etymology of Literary Manchu nofi. In Michał Né meth, Barbara Podolak & Mateusz Urban (eds.), Essays in the history of languages and linguistics. Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 57–80. Cracow: Księgarnia Akademicka.
  • Alonso de la Fuente, José Andrés. 2018. Past tenses, diminutives and expressive palatalization: Typology and the limits of internal reconstruction in Tungusic. In Bela Kempf, Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky & Christopher P. Atwood (eds.), Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, 112–137. Leiden: Brill.
  • Aralova, Natalia. 2015. Vowel harmony in two Even dialects: Production and perception. Utrecht: LOT.
  • Baek, Sangyub. 2014. Verbal suffix -du in Udihe. Altai Hakpo 24. 1–22.
  • Baek, Sangyub. 2016. Tungusic from the perspective of areal linguistics: Focusing on the Bikin dialect of Udihe. Sapporo:Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaidō University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
  • Baek, Sangyub. 2017. Grammatical peculiarities of Oroqen Evenki from the perspective of genetic and areal linguistics. Linguistic Typology of the North, vol. 4. 13–32.
  • Baek, Sangyub . 2018. Chiiki gengo-gaku-teki kanten kara mita tsungūsu shogo no hojo dōshi . Hoppō gengo kenkyū 8. 59–79.
  • Bogunov, Y. V., O. V. Maltseva, A. A. Bogunova & E. V. Balanovskaya 2015. The Nanai clan Samar: The structure of gene pool based on Y-chromosome markers. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 43(2). 146–152.
  • Bulatova, Nadezhda. 2014. Phonetic correspondences in the languages of the Ewenki of Russia and China. Altai Hakpo 24. 23–38.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2014a. Man tonggusiyuzu yuyan cihui bijiao . Peking: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2014a. Man tonggusiyuzu yuyan ciyuan yanjiu . Peking: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2014c. Xiboyu 366 ju huihuaju. Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2014d. Manyu 366 ju huihuaju. Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2016a. Ewenke yu jiaocheng . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2016b. Suolun ewenke yu jiben cihui . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. 2017. Ewenke zu san da fangyan cihui bijiao . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Kajia 2016a. Suolun ewenke yu huihua . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Kajia 2016b. Tonggusi ewenke yu huihua . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Kajia . 2017. Nehe ewenke yu jiben cihui . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Kalina . 2016. Ewenkezu yanyu . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Kalina . 2017. Arong ewenke yu . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Sirenbatu . 2016. Aoluguya ewenke yu huihua . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chaoke D. O. & Wang Lizhen . 2016. Ewenkezu minge geci . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Chao Youfeng & Meng Shuxian . 2014. Zhongguo elunchunyu fangyan yanjiu . Guoli minzuxue bowuguan diaocha baogao 116. 1–113.
  • Corff, Oliver et al. 2013. Auf kaiserlichen Befehl erstelltes Wörterbuch des Manjurischen in fünf Sprachen: „Fünfsprachenspiegel“. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Crossley, Pamela K. 2015. Questions about ni- and nikan. Central Asiatic Journal 58(1–2). 49–57.
  • Do, Jeong-up. 2015. A comparative study of Manchu sentences in Manwen Laodang and Manzhou Shilu. Altai Hakpo 25. 1–35.
  • Doerfer, Gerhard & Michael Knüppel. 2013. Armanisches Wörterbuch. Nordhausen: Verlag Traugott Bautz.
  • Dong Xingye . 2016. Hezheyu . Harbin: Heilongjiang renmin chubanshe.
  • Duggan, Ana T. 2013. Investigating the prehistory of Tungusic peoples of Siberia and the Amur-Ussuri region with complete mtDNA genome sequences and Y-chromosomal markers. PlosOne 8(12). e83570.
  • Duo Limei & Chaoke D. O. 2016. Tonggusi ewenke yu yanjiu . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Grenoble, Lenore A. 2013. The syntax and pragmatics of Tungusic revisited. In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson and Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency. In honor of Johanna Nichols, 357–382. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Grenoble, Lenore A. 2014. Spatial semantics, case and relator nouns in Evenki. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), On diversity and complexity of languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia,111–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Gusev, Valentin. 2016. Figura etymologica in Uilta. Hoppō jinbun kenkyū 9. 59–74.
  • Hasibate’er . 2016. Aoluguya fangyan yanjiu . Peking: Minzu chubanshe.
  • Hölzl, Andreas. 2017a. Kilen: Synchronic and diachronic profile of a mixed language[dead link]. Paper presented at the 24th LIPP Symposium, June 21–23, 2017, Munich.
  • Hölzl, Andreas. 2017b. New evidence on Para-Mongolic numerals. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 96. 97–113.
  • Hölzl, Andreas. 2018a. Constructionalization areas: The case of negation in Manchu. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson (eds.), Grammaticalization meets construction grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 21), 241–276. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Hölzl, Andreas. 2018b. Udi, Udihe, and the language(s) of the Kyakala. IJDL – International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 15. 111–146.
  • Hölzl, Andreas. 2018c. Das Mandschurische: Ein diachroner Überblick. Asien-Orient Institut, Universität Zürich, 16.03.2018.
  • Hölzl, Andreas. 2018d. A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 20). Berlin: Language Science Press.
  • Hölzl, Andreas & Yadi Hölzl. 2019. A wedding song of the Kyakala in China: Language and ritual. IJDL – International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics & Linguistic Reconstruction 16. 87–144.
  • Huang Xihui . 2016. Manwen zhuanzi chuangzhi shijian ji fenqi yanjiu . Altai Hakpo 26. 63- 84.
  • Jang Taeho & Tom Payne. 2018. The modern spoken Xibe verb system. IJDL – International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 15. 147–169.
  • Jang, Taeho, Kyungsook Lim Jang & Thomas E. Payne. forthcoming A typological grammar of Xibe.
  • Janhunen, Juha. 2005. Tungusic. An endangered language family in Northeast Asia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 173. 37–54.
  • Janhunen, Juha. 2015. Recent advances in Tungusic lexicography. Studia Orientalia Electronica 3. 17–20.
  • Janhunen, Juha 2016. Reconstructio externa linguae ghiliacorum. Studia Orientalia 117. 3–27.
  • Kane, Daniel. 2013. Introduction, Part 2: An update on deciphering the Kitan language and scripts. Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 43. 11–25.
  • Kang, Hijo, Jiwon Yun & Seongyeon Ko. 2017. Vowels of Beryozovka Ewen: An acoustic phonetic study. Altai Hakpo 27. 1–23.
  • Kazama Shinjirō , . 2015a. Dagūru-go no goi ni okeru tsungūsu shogo to no kyōtsū yōso ni tsuite . Hoppō jinbun kenkyū 8. 1–23.
  • Kazama Shinjirō , . 2015b. Euen-go buisutoraya hōgen no gaisetsu to tekisuto . Hoppō gengo kenkyū 5. 83–128.
  • Khabtagaeva, Bayarma. 2017. The Ewenki dialects of Buryatia and their relationship to Khamnigan Mongol. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Khabtagaeva, Bayarma. 2018. The role of Ewenki VgV in Mongolic Reconstructions. In Bela Kempf, Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky & Christopher P. Atwood (eds.), Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, 174–193. Leiden: Brill.
  • Kim, Alexander. 2013. Osteological studies of archaeological materials from Jurchen sites in Russia. Journal of Song-Yuan Studies 43. 335- 347.
  • Ko, Seongyeon, Andrew Joseph & John Whitman. 2014. In Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang (eds.), Paradigm change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond, 141–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Kuzmin, Yaroslav V. et al. 2012. The earliest surviving textiles in East Asia from Chertovy Vorota Cave, Primorye Province, Russian Far East 86(332). 325–337.
  • Li Linjing . 2016. Hojengo no kaiwa tekisuto (6) (6). Hoppō gengo kenkyū 6. 131–152.
  • Liu Xiaodong & Hao Qingyun . 2017. Bohaiguo lishi wenhua yanjiu . Harbin: Heilongjiang renmin chubanshe.
  • Liu Yang . 2018. Jin shangjingcheng yizhi faxian wenzi zhuan chuyi . Beifang wenwu 1. 60–61.
  • Miyake, Marc. 2017a. Jurchen language. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, 5 vols., 478–480. Leiden: Brill.
  • Miyake, Marc 2017b. Khitan language. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, 5 vols., 492‒495. Leiden: Brill.
  • Mu Yejun . 1985. Alechuka manyu yuyin jianlun . Manyu yanjiu 1. 5–15.
  • Mu, Yejun . 1986: Alechuka manyu de shuci yu gezhuci . Manyu yanjiu 2. 2‒17.
  • Mu, Yejun . 1987: Balayu . Manyu yanjiu 2. 2‒31, 128.
  • Moritae Satoe, . 2016. Uiruta-go kita hōgen tekisuto: `Fuyu, chichi ga watashi o tsuremodoshita‘  : . Hoppō jinbun kenkyū 9. 143–163.
  • Najia . 2017. Dula‘er ewenke yu yanjiu . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Norman, Jerry. 2013. A comprehensive Manchu-English dictionary. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.
  • Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2014. Paradigm copying in Tungusic: The Lamunkhin dialect of Ėven and beyond. In Martine Robbeets & Walter Bisang (eds), Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond, 287–310. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2015. A comparison of copied morphemes in Sakha (Yakut) and Ėven. In Francesco Gardani, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze (eds), Borrowed morphology, 157–187. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Pakendorf, Brigitte. 2017. Lamunkhin Even evaluative morphology in cross-linguistic comparison. Morphology 27. 123–158.
  • Pakendorf, Brigitte & Natalia Aralova, 2018. The endangered state of Negidal: A field report. Language Documentation and Conservation 12. 1–14.
  • Pakendorf, Brigitte & Ija V. Krivoshapkina. 2014. Ėven nominal evaluatives and the marking of definiteness. Linguistic Typology 18(2). 289–331.
  • Pakendorf, Brigitte & R. Kuz'mina. 2016. Evenskij jazyk. In V. Mixal'čenko (ed.), Jazyk i obščestvo. Enciklopedija, 583–587. Azbukovnik: Izdatel'skij Centr.
  • Pevnov, Alexander M. 2016. On the specific features of Orok as compared with the other Tungusic languages. Studia Orientalia 117. 47–63.
  • Pevnov, Alexander M. 2017. On the origin of Uilta (Orok) nōni 'he or she‘. Hoppō jibun kenkū 10. 71–77.
  • Robbeets, Martine. 2015. Diachrony of verb morphology. Japanese and the Transeurasian languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Robbeets, Martine & Remco Bouckaert. 2018. Bayesian phylolinguistics reveals the internal structure of the Transeurasian family. Journal of Language Evolution 2018. 145–162.
  • Róna-Tas, András 2016. Khitan studies I: The graphs of the Khitan small script. 1 General remarks, dotted graphs, numerals. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 69 (2): 117‒138.
  • Sebillaud, Pauline & Liu Xiaoxi. 2016. Une ville jurchen au temps des Ming (XIV e -XVII e siècle): Huifacheng, un carrefour économique et culturel. Arts Asiatiques 71. 55–76.
  • Shimunek, Andrew. 2016. Yöröö Khamnigan: A possibly recently extinct Tungusic language of northern Mongolia. Altai Hakpo 26. 13–28.
  • Shimunek, Andrew. 2017. Languages of ancient southern Mongolia and North China. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Shimunek, Andrew. 2018. Early Serbi-Mongolic–Tungusic Lexical Contact: Jurchen Numerals from the Shirwi (Shih-wei) in North China. In Bela Kempf, Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky & Christopher P. Atwood (eds.), Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, 331–346. Leiden: Brill.
  • Siska, Veronika et al. 2017. Genome-wide data from two early Neolithic East Asian individuals dating to 7700 years ago. Science Advances 3: e1601877.
  • Stary, Giovanni. 2015. Manchu-Chinese bilingual compositions and their verse-technique. Central Asiatic Journal 58(1–2). 1–5.
  • Stary, Giovanni. 2017. Neue Beiträge zum Sibe-Wortschatz. In Michał Németh, Barbara Podolak & Mateusz Urban (eds.), Essays in the history of languages and linguistics. Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 703–707. Cracow: Księgarnia Akademicka.
  • Sun Hao. 2014. A re-examination of the Jurchen Sanshi-bu (“thirty surnames”). Eurasian Studies 2. 84–121.
  • Tabarev, Andrei V. 2014. The later prehistory of the Russian Far East. In Colin Renfrew & Paul Bahn (eds.), The Cambridge world prehistory, 3 vols., 852–869. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tolskaya, Inna. 2014. Oroch vowel harmony. Lingua 138. 128–151.
  • Tolskaya, Maria. 2015. Udihe. In Nicola Grandi & Lívia Körtvélyessy (eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology, 333– 340. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Trachsel, Yves. 2018. Archery in primers. Debtelin 2 109–115.
  • Tsumagari, Toshiro. 2014. Remarks on the Uilta folktale text collected by B. Pilsudski. Hoppō jinbun kenkyū 7. 83- 94.
  • Tulisow, Jerzy. 2015. The wedding song of Shamaness Nisin: An unknown fragment of a well-known tale. Central Asiatic Journal 58(1–2). 155–168.
  • Vovin, Alexander. 2012. Did Wanyan Xiyin invent the Jurchen script? In Andrej Malchukov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 49–58. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Vovin, Alexander. 2013. From Koguryŏ to T’amna. Slowly riding to the South with speakers of Proto-Korean. Korean Linguistics 15(2). 222–240.
  • Vovin, Alexander. 2015a. Eskimo loanwords in northern Tungusic. Iran and the Caucasus 19. 87–95.
  • Vovin, Alexander. 2015b. Some notes on the Tuyuhun () language: In the footsteps of Paul Pelliot. Journal of Sino-Western Communications 7(2). 157‒166.
  • Vovin, Alexander. 2018. Four Tungusic etymologies. In Bela Kempf, Ákos Bertalan Apatóczky & Christopher P. Atwood (eds.), Philology of the Grasslands: Essays in Mongolic, Turkic, and Tungusic Studies, 366–368. Leiden: Brill.
  • Walravens, Hartmut. 2015. Christian literature in Manchu. Central Asiatic Journal 58(1–2). 197–224.
  • Walravens, Hartmut. 2017. A note on digitised Manchu texts. Central Asiatic Journal 60(1–2. 341–344.
  • Wang Qingfeng . 2005. Manyu yanjiu . Peking: Minzu chubanshe.
  • Weng Jianmin & Chaoke D. O. 2016. Aoluguya ewenke yu yanjiu . Peking: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  • Yamada Yoshiko, . 2015. Uirutago kita hōgen tekisuto: Hito kui obake no hanashi . Hoppō gengo kenkyū 5. 261–280.
  • Yamada Yoshiko, . 2016. Gishikutauda (marīya miheewa) no shōgai: Uiruta-go kita hōgen tekisuto  : . Hoppō gengo kenkyū 6. 179–201.
  • Yamada Yoshiko, . 2017. Uiruta-go kita hōgen no on'in-teki keitai-teki tokuchō: Minami hōgen to no sōi-ten o chūshin ni  : . Hoppō gengo kenkyū 10. 51–70.
  • Zgusta, Richard. 2015. The peoples of Northeast Asia through time. Precolonial ethnic and cultural processes along the coast between Hokkaido and the Bering Strait. Leiden: Brill.
  • Zhang Paiyu. 2013. The Kilen language of Manchuria. Grammar of a moribund Tungusic language. Hong Kong: Hongkong University Press. (Doctoral dissertation.)
  • Zhao Jie. 1989. Xiandai manyu yanjiu. Peking: Minzu chubanshe.
  • Zhu Zhenhua, Hongyan Zhang, Jianjun Zhao, Xiaoyi Guo, Zhengxiang Zhang, Yanling Ding & Tao Xiong. 2018. Using toponyms to analyze the endangered Manchu language in Northeast China. Sustainability 10(563). 1–17.
  • Zikmundová, Veronika. 2013. Spoken Sibe. Morphology of the inflected parts of speech. Prague: Karolinum. 37
  • Vovin, Alexander (2009) [2006]. "Tungusic Languages". In Keith Brown; Sarah Ogilvie (eds.). Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World (1st ed.). Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier. pp. 1103–1105. ISBN 978-0-08-087774-7. OCLC 264358379.

External links edit

tungusic, languages, also, known, manchu, tungus, tungus, form, language, family, spoken, eastern, siberia, manchuria, tungusic, peoples, many, endangered, there, approximately, native, speakers, dozen, living, languages, tungusic, language, family, term, tung. The Tungusic languages t ʊ ŋ ˈ ɡ ʊ s ɪ k also known as Manchu Tungus and Tungus form a language family spoken in Eastern Siberia and Manchuria by Tungusic peoples Many Tungusic languages are endangered There are approximately 75 000 native speakers of the dozen living languages of the Tungusic language family The term Tungusic is from an exonym for the Evenk people Ewenki used by the Yakuts tongus TungusicEthnicityTungusic peoplesGeographicdistributionSiberia ManchuriaLinguistic classificationOne of the world s primary language familiesSubdivisionsNorthern Ewenic Transitional Southern Northern Udegheic Southern Jurchenic Nanaic ISO 639 5tuwGlottologtung1282Geographic distribution of the Tungusic languages Contents 1 Classification 2 History 2 1 Proto Tungusic 2 2 Jurchen Manchu language 2 3 Other Tungusic languages 3 Research 4 Common characteristics 4 1 Phonology 5 Relationships with other languages 6 See also 7 References 7 1 Citations 7 2 Sources 8 Further reading 9 External linksClassification editLinguists working on Tungusic have proposed a number of different classifications based on different criteria including morphological lexical and phonological characteristics Some scholars have criticized the tree based model of Tungusic classification and argue that the long history of contact among the Tungusic languages makes them better treated as a dialect continuum 1 nbsp Current geographic distribution of languages in the Tungusic family Even Evenki Negidal Oroqen Kili Oroch Udihe Manchu Xibe Nanai Orok UlchThe main classification is into a northern branch and a southern branch Georg 2004 although the two branches have no clear division and the classification of intermediate groups is debatable Four mid level subgroups are recognized by Holzl 2018 2 namely Ewenic Udegheic Nanaic and Jurchenic Population distribution of total speakers of Tungusic languages by speaker Xibe 55 Evenki 28 97 Even 10 45 Others 5 58 Alexander Vovin 3 notes that Manchu and Jurchen are aberrant languages within South Tungusic but nevertheless still belong in it and that this aberrancy is perhaps due to influences from the Para Mongolic Khitan language from Old Korean and perhaps also from Chukotko Kamchatkan and unknown languages of uncertain linguistic affiliation Southern Tungusic Jurchenic Nanaic Jurchenic Southwestern Tungusic Manchu group Jurchen extinct developed into Manchu in the 17th century Manchu speakers originated from the Sungari Ula River area they founded the Jin and Qing or Manchu dynasties of China Xibe spoken in Qapqal Xibe Autonomous County Xinjiang Developed separately since 1764 from a Qing military garrison Chinese Kyakala 恰喀拉 4 Bala 巴拉 4 5 Alchuka 阿勒楚喀 4 Nanaic Southeastern Tungusic Nanai group Amur group Nanai Gold Goldi Hezhen Akani Birar Samagir Upper Amur Right bank Amur Sungari Bikin Ussuri Central Amur Sakachi Alyan Naykhin basis of standard Nanai but not identical Dzhuen Lower Amur Bolon Ekon Gorin Orok Uilta Northern East Sakhalin Southern South Sakhalin Poronaysky Ulch OlchaTransitional Southern Northern Tungus Udegheic Udegheic Oroch Udege strongly influenced by Southern Tungusic Oroch Tumninsky dialect Khadinsky dialect Hungarisky dialect Udege UdiheNorthern Tungusic Ewenic Ewenic Even Lamut in eastern Siberia Arman Indigirka Kamchatka Kolyma Omolon Okhotsk Ola Tompon Upper Kolyma Sakkyryr Lamunkhin Evenki Evenki obsolete Tungus spoken by Evenks in central Siberia and Manchuria Solon Solon Ewenki Hihue Hoy basis of the standard but not identical Haila er Aoluguya Olguya Chenba erhu Old Bargu Morigele Mergel Siberian Ewenki Ewenki of Siberia Northern spirant Ilimpeya subdialects Ilimpeya Agata and Bol shoi Porog Tura Tutonchany Dudinka Khantai Yerbogachen subdialects Yerbogachen Nakanno Southern sibilant Hushing Sym subdialects Tokma Upper Nepa Upper Lena Kachug Angara Northern Baikal subdialects Northern Baikal Upper Lena Hissing Stony Tunguska subdialects Vanavara Kuyumba Poligus Surinda Taimura Chirinda Uchami Chemdal sk Nepa subdialects Nepa Kirensk Vitim Nercha Baunt Talocha subdialects Baunt Talocha Tungukochan Nercha Eastern sibilant spirant Vitim Olyokma subdialects Barguzin Vitim Kalar Olyokma Tungir Tokko Upper Aldan subdialects Aldan Upper Amur Amga Dzheltulak Timpton Tommot Khingan Chul man Chul man Gilyui Uchur Zeya subdialects Uchur Zeya Selemdzha Bureya Urmi subdialects Selemdzha Bureya Urmi Ayan Mai subdialects Ayan Aim Mai Nel kan Totti Tugur Chumikan subdialects Tugur Chumikan Sakhalin no subdialects Negidal Lower Negidal Upper Negidal Oroqen Gankui basis of standard Oroqen but not identical Selpechen Kumarchen Selpechen Orochen Kili previously thought to be a dialect of Nanai History editProto Tungusic edit Some linguists estimate the divergence of the Tungusic languages from a common ancestor spoken somewhere in Eastern Manchuria around 500 BC to 500 AD Janhunen 2012 Pevnov 2012 6 Other theories favor a homeland closer to Lake Baikal Menges 1968 Khelimskii 1985 7 While the general form of the protolanguage is clear from the similarities in the daughter languages there is no consensus on detailed reconstructions As of 2012 scholars are still trying to establish a shared vocabulary to do such a reconstruction 6 The Lake Khanka region was found to present the most likely homeland based on linguistic and ancient genetic data 8 There are some proposed sound correspondences for Tungusic languages For example Norman 1977 supports a Proto Tungusic t gt Manchu s when followed by j in the same stem with any exceptions arising from loanwords 9 Some linguists believe there are connections between the vowel harmony of Proto Tungusic and some of the neighboring non Tungusic languages For example there are proposals for an areal or genetic correspondence between the vowel harmonies of Proto Korean Proto Mongolian and Proto Tungusic based on an original RTR harmony 10 This is one of several competing proposals and on the other hand some reconstruct Proto Tungusic without RTR harmony 10 Some sources describe the Donghu people of 7th century BC to 2nd century BC Manchuria as Proto Tungusic 11 Other sources sharply criticize this as a random similarity in pronunciation with Tungus that has no real basis in fact 12 The historical records of the Korean kingdoms of Baekje and Silla note battles with the Mohe Chinese 靺鞨 in Manchuria during the 1st and 2nd centuries Some scholars suggest these Mohe are closely connected to the later Jurchens but this is controversial Alexander Vovin 2015 13 notes that Northern Tungusic languages have Eskimo Aleut loanwords that are not found in Southern Tungusic implying that Eskimo Aleut was once much more widely spoken in eastern Siberia Vovin 2015 estimates that the Eskimo Aleut loanwords in Northern Tungusic had been borrowed no more than 2 000 years ago which was when Tungusic was spreading northwards from its homeland in the middle reaches of the Amur River Wang and Robbeets 2020 14 place the Proto Tungusic homeland in the Lake Khanka region Liu et al 2020 15 revealed that Haplogroup C F5484 and its subclades are the genetic markers of Tungusic speaking peoples C F5484 emerged 3 300 years ago and began to diverge 1 900 years ago indicating the approximate age of differentiation of Tungusic languages citation needed Jurchen Manchu language edit The earliest written attestation of the language family is in the Jurchen language which was spoken by the rulers of the Jin dynasty 1115 1234 16 The Jurchens invented a Jurchen script to write their language based on the Khitan scripts During this time several stelae were put up in Manchuria and Korea One of these among the most important extant texts in Jurchen is the inscription on the back of the Jin Victory Memorial Stele Da Jin deshengtuo songbei which was erected in 1185 during the Dading period 1161 1189 It is apparently an abbreviated translation of the Chinese text on the front of the stele 17 The last known example of the Jurchen script was written in 1526 The Tungusic languages appear in the historical record again after the unification of the Jurchen tribes under Nurhaci who ruled 1616 1626 He commissioned a new Manchu alphabet based on the Mongolian alphabet and his successors went on to found the Qing dynasty In 1636 Emperor Hong Taiji decreed that the ethnonym Manchu would replace Jurchen Modern scholarship usually treats Jurchen and Manchu as different stages of the same language Currently Manchu proper is a dying language spoken by a dozen or so elderly people in Qiqihar China However the closely related Xibe language spoken in Xinjiang which historically was treated as a divergent dialect of Jurchen Manchu maintains the literary tradition of the script and has around 30 000 speakers As the only language in the Tungusic family with a long written tradition Jurchen Manchu is a very important language for the reconstruction of Proto Tungusic Other Tungusic languages edit Other Tungusic languages have relatively short or no written traditions Since around the 20th century some of these other languages can be written in a Russian based Cyrillic script but the languages remain primarily spoken languages only citation needed Research editThe earliest Western accounts of Tungusic languages came from the Dutch traveler Nicolaes Witsen who published in the Dutch language a book Noord en Oost Tartarye literally North and East Tartary It described a variety of peoples in the Russian Far East and included some brief word lists for many languages After his travel to Russia his collected findings were published in three editions 1692 1705 and 1785 18 The book includes some words and sentences from the Evenki language then called Tungus The German linguist Wilhelm Grube 1855 1908 published an early dictionary of the Nanai language Gold language in 1900 as well as deciphering the Jurchen language for modern audiences using a Chinese source Common characteristics editThe Tungusic languages are of an agglutinative morphological type and some of them have complex case systems and elaborate patterns of tense and aspect marking The normal word order for all of the languages is subject object verb 19 Phonology edit Tungusic languages exhibit a complex pattern of vowel harmony based on two parameters vowel roundedness and vowel tenseness in Evenki the contrast is back and front Tense and lax vowels do not occur in the same word all vowels in a word including suffixes are either one or the other Rounded vowels in the root of a word cause all the following vowels in the word to become rounded but not those before the rounded vowel Those rules are not absolute and there are many individual exceptions 19 Vowel length is phonemic with many words distinguished based on the distinction between short vowel and long vowel 19 Tungusic words have simple word codas and usually have simple word onsets with consonant clusters forbidden at the end of words and rare at the beginning 19 Below are Proto Tungusic consonants as reconstructed by Tsintsius 1949 and the vowels according to Benzing 1955 20 Consonants Labial Dental Palatal VelarStop voiceless p t kvoiced b d ɡAffricate voiceless t ʃ c voiced d ʒ ǯ Fricative s ʃ s xNasal m n ɲ n ŋLateral approximant lRhotic rGlide w jVowels front central backhigh i y u ɨ i umid e o o olow aRelationships with other languages editTungusic is today considered a primary language family Especially in the past some linguists have linked Tungusic with Turkic and Mongolic languages among various others in the Altaic language family or Transeurasian family 21 However a genetic as opposed to an areal link is rejected by most historical linguists 22 The language of the Avars in Europe which created the Avar Khaganate is believed by some scholars to be of Tungusic origin 23 See also editLists of endangered languages Language deathReferences editCitations edit Lindsay J Whaley Lenore A Grenoble and Fengxiang Li June 1999 Revisiting Tungusic Classification from the Bottom up A Comparison of Evenki and Oroqen Language 75 2 286 321 doi 10 2307 417262 JSTOR 417262 Holzl Andreas 2018 The Tungusic language family through the ages Interdisciplinary perspectives Introduction International Workshop at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea SLE 29 August 1st September 2018 Tallinn University Estonia Vovin Alexander Why Manchu and Jurchen Look so Un Tungusic a b c Mu Yejun 穆晔骏 1987 Balayu 巴拉语 Manyu yanjiu 满语研究 2 2 31 128 Holzl Andreas 2020 Bala China Language Snapshot Language Documentation and Description 19 162 170 a b Martine Robbeets Book Reviews 161 Andrej L Malchukov and Lindsay J Whaley eds Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics Turcologica 89 Wiesbaden Harrassowitz 2012 vi 277 pages ISBN 978 3 447 06532 0 EUR 68 PDF Archived from the original PDF on 10 May 2017 Retrieved 25 Nov 2016 Immanuel Ness 29 Aug 2014 The Global Prehistory of Human Migration John Wiley amp Sons p 200 ISBN 9781118970584 Wang Chuan Chao Robbeets Martine 2020 The homeland of Proto Tungusic inferred from contemporary words and ancient genomes Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 e8 doi 10 1017 ehs 2020 8 ISSN 2513 843X PMC 10427446 PMID 37588383 S2CID 218569747 JERRY NORMAN 1977 THE EVOLUTION OF PROTO TUNGUSIC t TO MANCHU s Central Asiatic Journal 21 3 4 229 233 JSTOR 41927199 a b Seongyeon Ko Andrew Joseph John Whitman 2014 Paradigm Change In the Transeurasian languages and beyond Ch 7 PDF a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Barbara A West 19 May 2010 Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania Infobase p 891 ISBN 9781438119137 Retrieved 26 Nov 2016 The Chinese and Their Neighbors in Prehistoric and Early Historic China Vovin Alexander 2015 Eskimo Loanwords in Northern Tungusic Iran and the Caucasus 19 2015 87 95 Leiden Brill Wang Chuan Chao Robbeets Martine 2020 The homeland of Proto Tungusic inferred from contemporary words and ancient genomes Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 e8 doi 10 1017 ehs 2020 8 ISSN 2513 843X PMC 10427446 PMID 37588383 S2CID 218569747 Liu Bing Li Ma Peng Cheng Wang Chi Zao Yan Shi Yao Hong Bing Li Yong Lan Xie Yong Mei Meng Song Lin Sun Jin Cai Yan Huan Sarengaowa Sarengaowa March 2021 Paternal origin of Tungusic speaking populations Insights from the updated phylogenetic tree of Y chromosome haplogroup C2a M86 American Journal of Human Biology 33 2 e23462 doi 10 1002 ajhb 23462 ISSN 1042 0533 PMID 32657006 S2CID 220501084 Lindsay J Whaley 18 Jun 2007 Manchu Tungus languages Encyclopaedia Britannica Retrieved 25 Nov 2016 Tillman Hoyt Cleveland and Stephen H West China Under Jurchen Rule Essays on Chin Intellectual and Cultural History Albany State University of New York Press 1995 pp 228 229 ISBN 0 7914 2274 7 Partial text on Google Books Nicolaas Witsen 1785 Noord en oost Tartaryen a b c d The Tungusic Research Group at Dartmouth College Basic Typological Features of Tungusic Languages Archived from the original on 30 January 2020 Retrieved 25 Nov 2016 J Benzing Die tungusischen Sprachen Versuch einer vergleichenden Grammatik Abhandlungen der Geistes und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse vol 11 1955 pp 949 1099 Robbeets Martine January 2017 Austronesian influence and Transeurasian ancestry in Japanese A case of farming language dispersal Language Dynamics and Change 7 210 251 doi 10 1163 22105832 00702005 Retrieved 2019 03 26 Robbeets Martine et al 2021 Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages Nature 599 616 621 Tian Zheng Tao Yuxin Zhu Kongyang Jacques Guillaume Ryder Robin J de la Fuente Jose Andres Alonso Antonov Anton Xia Ziyang Zhang Yuxuan Ji Xiaoyan Ren Xiaoying He Guanglin Guo Jianxin Wang Rui Yang Xiaomin Zhao Jing Xu Dan Gray Russell D Zhang Menghan Wen Shaoqing Wang Chuan Chao Pellard Thomas 2022 06 12 Triangulation fails when neither linguistic genetic nor archaeological data support the Transeurasian narrative Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory doi 10 1101 2022 06 09 495471 S2CID 249649524 Helimski E 2004 Die Sprache n der Awaren Die mandschu tungusische Alternative Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu Tungus Studies Vol II 59 72 Sources edit Kane Daniel The Sino Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series Volume 153 Bloomington Indiana Indiana University Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies 1989 ISBN 0 933070 23 3 Miller Roy Andrew Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages Chicago IL The University of Chicago Press 1971 Poppe Nicholas Vergleichende Grammatik der Altaischen Sprachen A Comparative Grammar of the Altaic Languages Wiesbaden Otto Harrassowitz 1960 Tsintsius Vera I Sravnitel naya Fonetika Tunguso Man chzhurskikh Yazikov Comparative Phonetics of the Manchu Tungus Languages Leningrad 1949 Stefan Georg Unreclassifying Tungusic in Carsten Naeher ed Proceedings of the First International Conference on Manchu Tungus Studies Bonn August 28 September 1 2000 Volume 2 Trends in Tungusic and Siberian Linguistics Wiesbaden Harrassowitz 45 57 Holzl Andreas amp Payne Thomas E eds 2022 Tungusic languages Past and present Studies in Diversity Linguistics 32 Berlin Language Science Press DOI 10 5281 zenodo 7025328 https langsci press org catalog book 355 Open Access Further reading editAixinjueluo Yingsheng 2014 Manyu kouyu yindian Peking Huayi chubanshe Apatoczky Akos Bertalan Kempf Bela 2017 Recent developments on the decipherment of the Khitan small script Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung 70 2 109 133 PDF Vol 70 pp 109 133 doi 10 1556 062 2017 70 2 1 a href Template Cite encyclopedia html title Template Cite encyclopedia cite encyclopedia a journal ignored help Alonso de la Fuente Jose Andres 2015 Tungusic historical linguistics and the Buyla a k a Nagyszentmiklos inscription Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 20 17 46 Alonso de la Fuente Jose Andres 2017a An Oroch word list lost and rediscovered A critical edition of Tronson s 1859 pseudo Nivkh vocabulary Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 80 1 97 117 Alonso de la Fuente Jose Andres 2017b From converb to classifier On the etymology of Literary Manchu nofi In Michal Ne meth Barbara Podolak amp Mateusz Urban eds Essays in the history of languages and linguistics Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the occasion of his 60th birthday 57 80 Cracow Ksiegarnia Akademicka Alonso de la Fuente Jose Andres 2018 Past tenses diminutives and expressive palatalization Typology and the limits of internal reconstruction in Tungusic In Bela Kempf Akos Bertalan Apatoczky amp Christopher P Atwood eds Philology of the Grasslands Essays in Mongolic Turkic and Tungusic Studies 112 137 Leiden Brill Aralova Natalia 2015 Vowel harmony in two Even dialects Production and perception Utrecht LOT Baek Sangyub 2014 Verbal suffix du in Udihe Altai Hakpo 24 1 22 Baek Sangyub 2016 Tungusic from the perspective of areal linguistics Focusing on the Bikin dialect of Udihe Sapporo Graduate School of Letters Hokkaidō University Doctoral dissertation Baek Sangyub 2017 Grammatical peculiarities of Oroqen Evenki from the perspective of genetic and areal linguistics Linguistic Typology of the North vol 4 13 32 Baek Sangyub 2018 Chiiki gengo gaku teki kanten kara mita tsungusu shogo no hojo dōshi Hoppō gengo kenkyu 8 59 79 Bogunov Y V O V Maltseva A A Bogunova amp E V Balanovskaya 2015 The Nanai clan Samar The structure of gene pool based on Y chromosome markers Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia 43 2 146 152 Bulatova Nadezhda 2014 Phonetic correspondences in the languages of the Ewenki of Russia and China Altai Hakpo 24 23 38 Chaoke D O 2014a Man tonggusiyuzu yuyan cihui bijiao Peking Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe Chaoke D O 2014a Man tonggusiyuzu yuyan ciyuan yanjiu Peking Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe Chaoke D O 2014c Xiboyu 366 ju huihuaju Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O 2014d Manyu 366 ju huihuaju Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O 2016a Ewenke yu jiaocheng Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O 2016b Suolun ewenke yu jiben cihui Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O 2017 Ewenke zu san da fangyan cihui bijiao Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Kajia 2016a Suolun ewenke yu huihua Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Kajia 2016b Tonggusi ewenke yu huihua Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Kajia 2017 Nehe ewenke yu jiben cihui Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Kalina 2016 Ewenkezu yanyu Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Kalina 2017 Arong ewenke yu Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Sirenbatu 2016 Aoluguya ewenke yu huihua Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chaoke D O amp Wang Lizhen 2016 Ewenkezu minge geci Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Chao Youfeng amp Meng Shuxian 2014 Zhongguo elunchunyu fangyan yanjiu Guoli minzuxue bowuguan diaocha baogao 116 1 113 Corff Oliver et al 2013 Auf kaiserlichen Befehl erstelltes Worterbuch des Manjurischen in funf Sprachen Funfsprachenspiegel Wiesbaden Harrassowitz Crossley Pamela K 2015 Questions about ni and nikan Central Asiatic Journal 58 1 2 49 57 Do Jeong up 2015 A comparative study of Manchu sentences in Manwen Laodang and Manzhou Shilu Altai Hakpo 25 1 35 Doerfer Gerhard amp Michael Knuppel 2013 Armanisches Worterbuch Nordhausen Verlag Traugott Bautz Dong Xingye 2016 Hezheyu Harbin Heilongjiang renmin chubanshe Duggan Ana T 2013 Investigating the prehistory of Tungusic peoples of Siberia and the Amur Ussuri region with complete mtDNA genome sequences and Y chromosomal markers PlosOne 8 12 e83570 Duo Limei amp Chaoke D O 2016 Tonggusi ewenke yu yanjiu Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Grenoble Lenore A 2013 The syntax and pragmatics of Tungusic revisited In Balthasar Bickel Lenore A Grenoble David A Peterson and Alan Timberlake eds Language typology and historical contingency In honor of Johanna Nichols 357 382 Amsterdam Benjamins Grenoble Lenore A 2014 Spatial semantics case and relator nouns in Evenki In Pirkko Suihkonen amp Lindsay J Whaley eds On diversity and complexity of languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia 111 131 Amsterdam Benjamins Gusev Valentin 2016 Figura etymologica in Uilta Hoppō jinbun kenkyu 9 59 74 Hasibate er 2016 Aoluguya fangyan yanjiu Peking Minzu chubanshe Holzl Andreas 2017a Kilen Synchronic and diachronic profile of a mixed language dead link Paper presented at the 24th LIPP Symposium June 21 23 2017 Munich Holzl Andreas 2017b New evidence on Para Mongolic numerals Journal de la Societe Finno Ougrienne 96 97 113 Holzl Andreas 2018a Constructionalization areas The case of negation in Manchu In Evie Cousse Peter Andersson amp Joel Olofsson eds Grammaticalization meets construction grammar Constructional Approaches to Language 21 241 276 Amsterdam Benjamins Holzl Andreas 2018b Udi Udihe and the language s of the Kyakala IJDL International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 15 111 146 Holzl Andreas 2018c Das Mandschurische Ein diachroner Uberblick Asien Orient Institut Universitat Zurich 16 03 2018 Holzl Andreas 2018d A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond An ecological perspective Studies in Diversity Linguistics 20 Berlin Language Science Press Holzl Andreas amp Yadi Holzl 2019 A wedding song of the Kyakala in China Language and ritual IJDL International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics amp Linguistic Reconstruction 16 87 144 Huang Xihui 2016 Manwen zhuanzi chuangzhi shijian ji fenqi yanjiu Altai Hakpo 26 63 84 Jang Taeho amp Tom Payne 2018 The modern spoken Xibe verb system IJDL International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 15 147 169 Jang Taeho Kyungsook Lim Jang amp Thomas E Payne forthcoming A typological grammar of Xibe Janhunen Juha 2005 Tungusic An endangered language family in Northeast Asia International Journal of the Sociology of Language 173 37 54 Janhunen Juha 2015 Recent advances in Tungusic lexicography Studia Orientalia Electronica 3 17 20 Janhunen Juha 2016 Reconstructio externa linguae ghiliacorum Studia Orientalia 117 3 27 Kane Daniel 2013 Introduction Part 2 An update on deciphering the Kitan language and scripts Journal of Song Yuan Studies 43 11 25 Kang Hijo Jiwon Yun amp Seongyeon Ko 2017 Vowels of Beryozovka Ewen An acoustic phonetic study Altai Hakpo 27 1 23 Kazama Shinjirō 2015a Daguru go no goi ni okeru tsungusu shogo to no kyōtsu yōso ni tsuite Hoppō jinbun kenkyu 8 1 23 Kazama Shinjirō 2015b Euen go buisutoraya hōgen no gaisetsu to tekisuto Hoppō gengo kenkyu 5 83 128 Khabtagaeva Bayarma 2017 The Ewenki dialects of Buryatia and their relationship to Khamnigan Mongol Wiesbaden Harrassowitz Khabtagaeva Bayarma 2018 The role of Ewenki VgV in Mongolic Reconstructions In Bela Kempf Akos Bertalan Apatoczky amp Christopher P Atwood eds Philology of the Grasslands Essays in Mongolic Turkic and Tungusic Studies 174 193 Leiden Brill Kim Alexander 2013 Osteological studies of archaeological materials from Jurchen sites in Russia Journal of Song Yuan Studies 43 335 347 Ko Seongyeon Andrew Joseph amp John Whitman 2014 In Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang eds Paradigm change In the Transeurasian languages and beyond 141 176 Amsterdam Benjamins Kuzmin Yaroslav V et al 2012 The earliest surviving textiles in East Asia from Chertovy Vorota Cave Primorye Province Russian Far East 86 332 325 337 Li Linjing 2016 Hojengo no kaiwa tekisuto 6 6 Hoppō gengo kenkyu 6 131 152 Liu Xiaodong amp Hao Qingyun 2017 Bohaiguo lishi wenhua yanjiu Harbin Heilongjiang renmin chubanshe Liu Yang 2018 Jin shangjingcheng yizhi faxian wenzi zhuan chuyi Beifang wenwu 1 60 61 Miyake Marc 2017a Jurchen language In Rint Sybesma ed Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics 5 vols 478 480 Leiden Brill Miyake Marc 2017b Khitan language In Rint Sybesma ed Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics 5 vols 492 495 Leiden Brill Mu Yejun 1985 Alechuka manyu yuyin jianlun Manyu yanjiu 1 5 15 Mu Yejun 1986 Alechuka manyu de shuci yu gezhuci Manyu yanjiu 2 2 17 Mu Yejun 1987 Balayu Manyu yanjiu 2 2 31 128 Moritae Satoe 2016 Uiruta go kita hōgen tekisuto Fuyu chichi ga watashi o tsuremodoshita Hoppō jinbun kenkyu 9 143 163 Najia 2017 Dula er ewenke yu yanjiu Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Norman Jerry 2013 A comprehensive Manchu English dictionary Cambridge Harvard University Asia Center Pakendorf Brigitte 2014 Paradigm copying in Tungusic The Lamunkhin dialect of Ėven and beyond In Martine Robbeets amp Walter Bisang eds Paradigm Change In the Transeurasian languages and beyond 287 310 Amsterdam Benjamins Pakendorf Brigitte 2015 A comparison of copied morphemes in Sakha Yakut and Ėven In Francesco Gardani Peter Arkadiev amp Nino Amiridze eds Borrowed morphology 157 187 Berlin De Gruyter Mouton Pakendorf Brigitte 2017 Lamunkhin Even evaluative morphology in cross linguistic comparison Morphology 27 123 158 Pakendorf Brigitte amp Natalia Aralova 2018 The endangered state of Negidal A field report Language Documentation and Conservation 12 1 14 Pakendorf Brigitte amp Ija V Krivoshapkina 2014 Ėven nominal evaluatives and the marking of definiteness Linguistic Typology 18 2 289 331 Pakendorf Brigitte amp R Kuz mina 2016 Evenskij jazyk In V Mixal cenko ed Jazyk i obscestvo Enciklopedija 583 587 Azbukovnik Izdatel skij Centr Pevnov Alexander M 2016 On the specific features of Orok as compared with the other Tungusic languages Studia Orientalia 117 47 63 Pevnov Alexander M 2017 On the origin of Uilta Orok nōni he or she Hoppō jibun kenku 10 71 77 Robbeets Martine 2015 Diachrony of verb morphology Japanese and the Transeurasian languages Berlin De Gruyter Mouton Robbeets Martine amp Remco Bouckaert 2018 Bayesian phylolinguistics reveals the internal structure of the Transeurasian family Journal of Language Evolution 2018 145 162 Rona Tas Andras 2016 Khitan studies I The graphs of the Khitan small script 1 General remarks dotted graphs numerals Acta Orientalia Hungarica 69 2 117 138 Sebillaud Pauline amp Liu Xiaoxi 2016 Une ville jurchen au temps des Ming XIV e XVII e siecle Huifacheng un carrefour economique et culturel Arts Asiatiques 71 55 76 Shimunek Andrew 2016 Yoroo Khamnigan A possibly recently extinct Tungusic language of northern Mongolia Altai Hakpo 26 13 28 Shimunek Andrew 2017 Languages of ancient southern Mongolia and North China Wiesbaden Harrassowitz Shimunek Andrew 2018 Early Serbi Mongolic Tungusic Lexical Contact Jurchen Numerals from the Shirwi Shih wei in North China In Bela Kempf Akos Bertalan Apatoczky amp Christopher P Atwood eds Philology of the Grasslands Essays in Mongolic Turkic and Tungusic Studies 331 346 Leiden Brill Siska Veronika et al 2017 Genome wide data from two early Neolithic East Asian individuals dating to 7700 years ago Science Advances 3 e1601877 Stary Giovanni 2015 Manchu Chinese bilingual compositions and their verse technique Central Asiatic Journal 58 1 2 1 5 Stary Giovanni 2017 Neue Beitrage zum Sibe Wortschatz In Michal Nemeth Barbara Podolak amp Mateusz Urban eds Essays in the history of languages and linguistics Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the occasion of his 60th birthday 703 707 Cracow Ksiegarnia Akademicka Sun Hao 2014 A re examination of the Jurchen Sanshi bu thirty surnames Eurasian Studies 2 84 121 Tabarev Andrei V 2014 The later prehistory of the Russian Far East In Colin Renfrew amp Paul Bahn eds The Cambridge world prehistory 3 vols 852 869 Cambridge Cambridge University Press Tolskaya Inna 2014 Oroch vowel harmony Lingua 138 128 151 Tolskaya Maria 2015 Udihe In Nicola Grandi amp Livia Kortvelyessy eds Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology 333 340 Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press Trachsel Yves 2018 Archery in primers Debtelin 2 109 115 Tsumagari Toshiro 2014 Remarks on the Uilta folktale text collected by B Pilsudski Hoppō jinbun kenkyu 7 83 94 Tulisow Jerzy 2015 The wedding song of Shamaness Nisin An unknown fragment of a well known tale Central Asiatic Journal 58 1 2 155 168 Vovin Alexander 2012 Did Wanyan Xiyin invent the Jurchen script In Andrej Malchukov amp Lindsay J Whaley eds Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics 49 58 Wiesbaden Harrassowitz Vovin Alexander 2013 From Koguryŏ to T amna Slowly riding to the South with speakers of Proto Korean Korean Linguistics 15 2 222 240 Vovin Alexander 2015a Eskimo loanwords in northern Tungusic Iran and the Caucasus 19 87 95 Vovin Alexander 2015b Some notes on the Tuyuhun language In the footsteps of Paul Pelliot Journal of Sino Western Communications 7 2 157 166 Vovin Alexander 2018 Four Tungusic etymologies In Bela Kempf Akos Bertalan Apatoczky amp Christopher P Atwood eds Philology of the Grasslands Essays in Mongolic Turkic and Tungusic Studies 366 368 Leiden Brill Walravens Hartmut 2015 Christian literature in Manchu Central Asiatic Journal 58 1 2 197 224 Walravens Hartmut 2017 A note on digitised Manchu texts Central Asiatic Journal 60 1 2 341 344 Wang Qingfeng 2005 Manyu yanjiu Peking Minzu chubanshe Weng Jianmin amp Chaoke D O 2016 Aoluguya ewenke yu yanjiu Peking Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe Yamada Yoshiko 2015 Uirutago kita hōgen tekisuto Hito kui obake no hanashi Hoppō gengo kenkyu 5 261 280 Yamada Yoshiko 2016 Gishikutauda mariya miheewa no shōgai Uiruta go kita hōgen tekisuto Hoppō gengo kenkyu 6 179 201 Yamada Yoshiko 2017 Uiruta go kita hōgen no on in teki keitai teki tokuchō Minami hōgen to no sōi ten o chushin ni Hoppō gengo kenkyu 10 51 70 Zgusta Richard 2015 The peoples of Northeast Asia through time Precolonial ethnic and cultural processes along the coast between Hokkaido and the Bering Strait Leiden Brill Zhang Paiyu 2013 The Kilen language of Manchuria Grammar of a moribund Tungusic language Hong Kong Hongkong University Press Doctoral dissertation Zhao Jie 1989 Xiandai manyu yanjiu Peking Minzu chubanshe Zhu Zhenhua Hongyan Zhang Jianjun Zhao Xiaoyi Guo Zhengxiang Zhang Yanling Ding amp Tao Xiong 2018 Using toponyms to analyze the endangered Manchu language in Northeast China Sustainability 10 563 1 17 Zikmundova Veronika 2013 Spoken Sibe Morphology of the inflected parts of speech Prague Karolinum 37 Vovin Alexander 2009 2006 Tungusic Languages In Keith Brown Sarah Ogilvie eds Concise Encyclopedia of Languages of the World 1st ed Amsterdam and Boston Elsevier pp 1103 1105 ISBN 978 0 08 087774 7 OCLC 264358379 External links editTungusic Research Group Archived 2012 10 06 at the Wayback Machine at Dartmouth College in Spanish Tungusic languages Vergleich der Reziproken des Ewenischen mit verwandten Sprachen http www siberianlanguages surrey ac uk summary Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Tungusic languages amp oldid 1182578668, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.