Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom

The overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom was a coup d'état against Queen Liliʻuokalani, which took place on January 17, 1893, on the island of Oʻahu and led by the Committee of Safety, composed of seven foreign residents and six Hawaiian Kingdom subjects of American descent in Honolulu.^[5][6] The Committee prevailed upon American minister John L. Stevens to call in the U.S. Marines to protect the national interest of the United States of America. The insurgents established the Republic of Hawaii, but their ultimate goal was the annexation of the islands to the United States, which occurred in 1898.

The Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom
Part of the Hawaiian Rebellions (1887–95)
The USS Boston's landing force on duty at the Arlington Hotel, Honolulu, at the time of the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy, January 1893. Lieutenant Lucien Young, USN, commanded the detachment, and is presumably the officer at right.^[1]
Date January 17, 1893; 131 years ago (1893-01-17) Location Honolulu, Hawaii Result Hawaiian League / United States victory Surrender of the Hawaiian Kingdom Queen Liliʻuokalani relinquishes power Provisional Government, later renamed a Republic, established Hawaii organized into a territory, then a state of the United States
Belligerents
Committee of Safety  United States	Hawaiian Kingdom
Commanders and leaders
Lorrin A. Thurston John L. Stevens	Queen Liliʻuokalani Samuel Nowlein Charles B. Wilson
Strength
United States 1 cruiser, USS Boston 162 US Navy and USMC personnel	496 troops^[2] (several) Volunteers 85–110 Police 322–337 Royal Guard 50–65 at ʻIolani Palace 272 at ʻIolani Barracks^[3] 8–14 artillery pieces 1 Gatling gun
Casualties and losses
None	1 wounded

The 1993 Apology Resolution by the U.S. Congress concedes that "the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii occurred with the active participation of agents and citizens of the United States and [...] the Native Hawaiian people never directly relinquished to the United States their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people over their national lands, either through the Kingdom of Hawaii or through a plebiscite or referendum". Debates regarding the event play an important role in the Hawaiian sovereignty movement.

Background

The Kamehameha Dynasty was the reigning monarchy of the Hawaiian Kingdom, beginning with its founding by Kamehameha I in 1795, until the death of Kamehameha V in 1872 and Lunalilo in 1874.^[7] On July 6, 1846, U.S. Secretary of State John C. Calhoun, on behalf of President Tyler, formally recognized Hawaii's independence under the reign of Kamehameha III.^[8] As a result of the recognition of Hawaiian independence, the Hawaiian Kingdom entered into treaties with the major nations of the world^[9] and established over ninety legations and consulates in multiple seaports and cities.^[10] The kingdom would continue for another 21 years until its overthrow in 1893 with the fall of the House of Kalākaua.^[11]

Sugar reciprocity

Further information: Sugar plantations in Hawaii

Sugar had been a major export from Hawaii since Captain James Cook arrived in 1778.^[12] The first permanent plantation in the islands was on Kauai in 1835. William Hooper leased 980 acres (4 km²) of land from Kamehameha III and began growing sugar cane. Within thirty years there would be plantations on four of the main islands. Sugar had completely altered Hawaii's economy.^[13]

The influence of the United States in Hawaiian government began with American-born plantation owners advocating for fair representation in the Kingdom's politics, owing to the significant tax contributions made from the plantations to both the Royal family and national economy. This was driven by missionary religion and the economics of the sugar industry. Pressure from these foreign-born politicians was being felt by the King and chiefs with demands of land tenure. The 1839 Hawaiian Bill of Rights, also known as the 1839 Constitution of Hawaii, was an attempt by Kamehameha III and his chiefs to guarantee that the Hawaiian people would not lose their tenured land, and provided the groundwork for a free enterprise system.^[14] After a five-month occupation by George Paulet in 1843, Kamehameha III relented to the foreign advisors to private land demands with the Great Māhele, distributing the lands as pushed on heavily by the missionaries, including Gerrit P. Judd.^[15] During the 1850s, the U.S. import tariff on sugar from Hawaii was much higher than the import tariffs Hawaiians were charging the U.S., and Kamehameha III sought reciprocity.^[16] The monarch wished to lower the tariffs being paid out to the U.S. while still maintaining the Kingdom's sovereignty and making Hawaiian sugar competitive with other foreign markets. In 1854 Kamehameha III proposed a policy of reciprocity between the countries but the proposal died in the U.S. Senate.^[17]

 

Charles Reed Bishop, Minister of Foreign Affairs (Hawaii)

As early as 1873, a United States military commission recommended attempting to obtain Ford Island in exchange for the tax-free importation of sugar to the U.S.^[18] Major General John Schofield, U.S. commander of the military division of the Pacific, and Brevet Brigadier General Burton S. Alexander arrived in Hawaii to ascertain its defensive capabilities. United States control of Hawaii was considered vital for the defense of the west coast of the United States, and they were especially interested in Pu'uloa, Pearl Harbor.^[19] The sale of one of Hawaii's harbors was proposed by Charles Reed Bishop, a foreigner who had married into the Kamehameha family, had risen in the government to be Hawaiian Minister of Foreign Affairs, and owned a country home near Pu'uloa. He showed the two U.S. officers around the lochs, although his wife, Bernice Pauahi Bishop, privately disapproved of selling Hawaiian lands. As monarch, William Charles Lunalilo, was content to let Bishop run almost all business affairs but the ceding of lands would become unpopular with the native Hawaiians. Many islanders thought that all the islands, rather than just Pearl Harbor, might be lost and opposed any cession of land. By November 1873, Lunalilo canceled negotiations and returned to drinking, against his doctor's advice; his health declined swiftly, and he died on February 3, 1874.^[19]

Lunalilo left no heirs. The legislature was empowered by the constitution to elect the monarch in these instances^[20] and chose David Kalākaua as the next monarch.^[21] The new ruler was pressured by the U.S. government to surrender Pearl Harbor to the Navy.^[21] Kalākaua was concerned that this would lead to annexation by the U.S. and to the contravention of the traditions of the Hawaiian people, who believed that the land ('Āina) was fertile, sacred, and not for sale to anyone.^[21] In 1874 through 1875, Kalākaua traveled to the United States for a state visit to Washington, DC to help gain support for a new treaty.^[22][23] Congress agreed to the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 for seven years in exchange for Ford Island.^[24] After the treaty, sugar production expanded from 12,000 acres (49 km²) of farm land to 125,000 acres (510 km²) in 1891.^[25] At the end of the seven-year reciprocity agreement, the United States showed little interest in renewal.^[16]

Rebellion of 1887 and the Bayonet Constitution

Main articles: Hawaiian rebellions (1887–1895) and 1887 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom

 

Lorrin Thurston, Minister of the Interior (Hawaii)

On January 20, 1887, the United States began leasing Pearl Harbor.^[26] Shortly afterwards, a group of mostly non-Hawaiians calling themselves the Hawaiian Patriotic League began the Rebellion of 1887.^[27] They drafted their own constitution on July 6, 1887.^[28] The new constitution was written by Lorrin Thurston, the Hawaiian Minister of the Interior who used the Hawaiian militia as threat against Kalākaua.^[26] Kalākaua was forced under threat of assassination^[29] to dismiss his cabinet ministers and sign a new constitution which greatly lessened his power.^[21] It would become known as the "Bayonet Constitution" because of the threat of force used.^[26]

The Bayonet Constitution allowed the monarch to appoint cabinet ministers, but had stripped him of the power to dismiss them without approval from the Legislature.^[30] Eligibility to vote for the House of Nobles was also altered, stipulating that both candidates and voters were now required to own property valuing at least three thousand dollars, or have an annual income of no less than six hundred dollars.^[31] This resulted in disenfranchising two-thirds of the native Hawaiians as well as other ethnic groups who had previously held the right to vote but were no longer able to meet the new voting requirements.^[32] This new constitution benefited the white, foreign plantation owners.^[33] With the legislature now responsible for naturalizing citizens, Americans and Europeans could retain their home country citizenship and vote as citizens of the kingdom.^[34] Along with voting privileges, Americans could now run for office and still retain their United States citizenship, something not afforded in any other nation of the world^[35] and even allowed Americans to vote without becoming naturalized.^[36] Asian immigrants were completely shut out and were no longer able to acquire citizenship or vote at all.^[37]

At the time of the Bayonet Constitution Grover Cleveland was president, and his secretary of state Thomas F. Bayard sent written instructions to the American minister George W. Merrill that in the event of another revolution in Hawaii, it was a priority to protect American commerce, lives and property. Bayard specified, "the assistance of the officers of our Government vessels, if found necessary, will therefore be promptly afforded to promote the reign of law and respect for orderly government in Hawaii." In July 1889, there was a small scale rebellion, and Minister Merrill landed Marines to protect Americans; the State Department explicitly approved his action. Merrill's replacement, minister John L. Stevens, read those official instructions, and followed them in his controversial actions of 1893.^[38]

Wilcox Rebellion of 1888

 

ʻIolani Barracks, 2007

Main articles: Wilcox Rebellion of 1888 and Wilcox Rebellion of 1889

The Wilcox Rebellion of 1888 was a plot to overthrow King David Kalākaua, king of Hawaii, and replace him with his sister in a coup d'état in response to increased political tension between the legislature and the king after the 1887 constitution. Kalākaua's sister, Princess Liliʻuokalani and his wife, Queen Kapiolani, returned from Queen Victoria's Golden Jubilee immediately after news reached them in Great Britain.^[39]

In October 1887, Robert William Wilcox, a native Hawaiian officer and veteran of the Italian military, returned to Hawaii.^[40] The funding had stopped for his study program when the new constitution was signed. They had 300 Hawaiian conspirators hidden in ʻIolani Barracks and an alliance with the Royal Guard, but the plot was accidentally discovered in January 1888, less than 48 hours before the revolt would have been initiated.^[41] No one was prosecuted but Wilcox was exiled. So on February 11, 1888, Wilcox left Hawaii for San Francisco, intending to return to Italy with his wife.

Princess Liliʻuokalani was offered the throne several times by the Missionary Party who had forced the Bayonet Constitution on her brother, but she believed she would become a powerless figurehead like her brother and rejected the offers outright.^[42]

Liliʻuokalani attempts to re-write Constitution

 

Queen Liliʻuokalani

Main article: Proposed 1893 Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom

In November 1889, Kalākaua traveled to San Francisco for his health, staying at the Palace Hotel. He died there on January 20, 1891.^[43] His sister Liliʻuokalani assumed the throne in the middle of an economic crisis. The McKinley Act had crippled the Hawaiian sugar industry by removing the duties on sugar imports from other countries into the US, eliminating the previous Hawaiian advantage gained via the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875.^[44] Many Hawaii businesses and citizens felt pressure from the loss of revenue; in response Liliʻuokalani proposed a lottery system to raise money for her government. Also proposed was a controversial opium licensing bill.^[45] Her ministers, and closest friends, were all opposed to this plan; they unsuccessfully tried to dissuade her from pursuing these initiatives, both of which came to be used against her in the brewing constitutional crisis.^[46]

Liliʻuokalani's chief desire was to restore power to the monarch by abrogating the 1887 Bayonet Constitution and promulgating a new one, an idea that seems to have been broadly supported by the Hawaiian population.^[47] The 1893 Constitution would have increased suffrage by reducing some property requirements, and eliminated the voting privileges extended to European and American residents. It would have disenfranchised many resident European and American businessmen who were not citizens of Hawaii. The Queen toured several of the islands on horseback, talking to the people about her ideas and receiving overwhelming support, including a lengthy petition in support of a new constitution. However, when the Queen informed her cabinet of her plans, they withheld their support due to an understanding of what her opponents' likely response to these plans would be.^[48] Though there were threats to Hawaii's sovereignty throughout the Kingdom's history, it was not until the signing of the Bayonet Constitution in 1887 that this threat began to be realized. The precipitating event^[49] leading to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom on January 17, 1893, was the attempt by Queen Liliʻuokalani to promulgate a new constitution that would have strengthened the power of the monarch relative to the legislature, where Euro-American business elites held disproportionate power. The stated goals of the conspirators, who were non-native Hawaiian Kingdom subjects (five United States nationals, one English national, and one German national)^[50] were to depose the queen, overthrow the monarchy, and seek Hawaii's annexation to the United States.^[51][52][53]

1893 Hawaiian coup d'état and overthrow of the kingdom

The overthrow of the monarchy was started by newspaper publisher Lorrin Thurston, a Hawaiian subject and former Minister of the Interior who was the grandson of American missionaries,^[54] and formally led by the Chairman of the Committee of Safety, Henry E. Cooper, an American lawyer. They derived their support primarily from the American and European business class residing in Hawaii and other supporters of the Reform Party of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Most of the leaders of the Committee of Safety that deposed the queen were United States and European citizens who were also Kingdom subjects.^[55][56][57] They included legislators, government officers, and a Supreme Court Justice of the Hawaiian Kingdom.^[58]

On January 16, the Marshal of the Kingdom, Charles B. Wilson, was tipped off by detectives to the imminent planned overthrow. Wilson requested warrants to arrest the 13-member council of the Committee of Safety, and put the Kingdom under martial law. Because the members had strong political ties with United States Government Minister John L. Stevens, the requests were repeatedly denied by Attorney General Arthur P. Peterson and the Queen's cabinet, fearing if approved, the arrests would escalate the situation. After a failed negotiation with Thurston,^[59] Wilson began to collect his men for the confrontation. Wilson and Captain of the Royal Household Guard, Samuel Nowlein, had rallied a force of 496 men who were kept at hand to protect the Queen.^[2]

 

Leialoha, a native policeman who tried to stop a wagon taking weapons to the Committee of Safety

The events began on January 17, 1893, when John Good, a revolutionist, shot Leialoha, a native policeman who was trying to stop a wagon carrying weapons to the Committee of Safety led by Lorrin Thurston.^[60] The Committee of Safety feared the shooting would bring government forces to rout out the conspirators and stop the overthrow before it could begin. The Committee of Safety initiated the overthrow by organizing armed non-native men, under their leadership, intending to depose Queen Liliʻuokalani. The forces garrisoned Ali'iolani Hale across the street from ʻIolani Palace and waited for the Queen's response.^[53]

As these events were unfolding, the Committee of Safety expressed concern for the safety and property of American residents in Honolulu.^[61]

On January 17, 1893, the Chairman of the Committee of Safety, Henry E. Cooper, addressed a crowd assembled in front of ʻIolani Palace (the official royal residence) and read aloud a proclamation that formally deposed Queen Liliʻuokalani, abolished the Hawaiian monarchy, and established a Provisional Government of Hawaii under President Sanford B. Dole.

United States involvement

 

John L. Stevens, a United States diplomat, supported the new government in Hawaii with a small Marine detachment.

 

USS Boston

President Harrison's Secretary of State John W. Foster from June 1892 to February 1893 actively worked for the annexation of the independent Republic of Hawaii. Pro-American business interests had overthrown the Queen when she rejected constitutional limits on her powers. The new government realized that Hawaii was too small and militarily weak to survive in a world of aggressive imperialism, especially on the part of Japan. It was eager for American annexation. Foster believed Hawaii was vital to American interests in the Pacific.^[62]

The annexation program was coordinated by the chief American diplomat on the scene, John L. Stevens. He decided to send in a U.S. military detachment after the Queen was deposed to support the new government and prevent a vacuum that might open the way for Japan.^[63] Advised about supposed threats to non-combatant American lives and property by the Committee of Safety,^[64] Stevens obliged their request and summoned 162 U.S. sailors and Marines from the USS Boston to land on Oahu under orders of neutrality and take up positions at the U.S. Legation, Consulate, and Arion Hall on the afternoon of January 16, 1893.^[65]

The deposed Queen was kept in ʻIolani Palace under house arrest. The American sailors and Marines did not enter the Palace grounds or take over any buildings, and never fired a shot, but their presence served effectively. The Queen never had an army, the local police did not support her, and no one mobilized any pro-royalist forces. Historian William Russ states, "the injunction to prevent fighting of any kind made it impossible for the monarchy to protect itself."^[66] Due to the Queen's desire "to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life" for her subjects and after some deliberation, at the urging of advisers and friends, the Queen ordered her forces to surrender. The Honolulu Rifles took over government buildings, disarmed the Royal Guard, and declared a provisional government.^[53]

According to the Queen's Book, her friend and minister J.S. Walker "came and told me that he had come on a painful duty, that the opposition party had requested that I should abdicate." After consulting with her ministers, including Walker, the Queen concluded that "since the troops of the United States had been landed to support the revolutionists, by the order of the American minister, it would be impossible for us to make any resistance."^[67] Despite repeated claims that the overthrow was "bloodless", the Queen's Book notes that Liliʻuokalani received "friends [who] expressed their sympathy in person; amongst these Mrs. J. S. Walker, who had lost her husband by the treatment he received from the hands of the insurgents. He was one of many who from persecution had succumbed to death."^[68]

Immediate annexation was prevented by President Grover Cleveland who told Congress:

... the military demonstration upon the soil of Honolulu was of itself an act of war; unless made either with the consent of the government of Hawaii or for the bona fide purpose of protecting the imperiled lives and property of citizens of the United States. But there is no pretense of any such consent on the part of the government of the queen ... the existing government, instead of requesting the presence of an armed force, protested against it. There is as little basis for the pretense that forces were landed for the security of American life and property. If so, they would have been stationed in the vicinity of such property and so as to protect it, instead of at a distance and so as to command the Hawaiian Government Building and palace ... When these armed men were landed, the city of Honolulu was in its customary orderly and peaceful condition ...^[69]

The Republic of Hawaii was nonetheless declared in 1894 by the same parties which had established the provisional government. Among them was Lorrin A. Thurston, a drafter of the Bayonet Constitution. The Committee of Safety asked Sanford Dole to become President of the forcibly instated Republic.^[70] He agreed, and became president on July 4, 1894.

Aftermath

See also: Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom

 

December 19, 1898 letter

A provisional government was set up with the strong support of the Honolulu Rifles, a militia group which had defended the system of government promulgated by the Bayonet Constitution against the Wilcox rebellion of 1889.^[53]

The Queen's statement yielding authority, on January 17, 1893, protested against the overthrow:

I Liliʻuokalani, by the Grace of God and under the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the Constitutional Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to have established a Provisional Government of and for this Kingdom.

That I yield to the superior force of the United States of America whose Minister Plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the Provisional Government.

Now to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life, I do this under protest and impelled by said force yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the Constitutional Sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.^[71]

On December 19, 1898, the queen would amend the declaration with the "Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii", further protesting the overthrow and loss of property.^[72]

Response

United States

Newly inaugurated President Grover Cleveland called for an investigation into the overthrow. This investigation was conducted by former Congressman James Henderson Blount. Blount concluded in his report on July 17, 1893, "United States diplomatic and military representatives had abused their authority and were responsible for the change in government."^[73] Minister Stevens was recalled, and the military commander of forces in Hawaiʻi was forced to resign his commission.^[73] President Cleveland stated, "Substantial wrong has thus been done which a due regard for our national character as well as the rights of the injured people requires we should endeavor to repair the monarchy." Cleveland further stated in his 1893 State of the Union Address that, "Upon the facts developed it seemed to me the only honorable course for our Government to pursue was to undo the wrong that had been done by those representing us and to restore as far as practicable the status existing at the time of our forcible intervention."^[74] The matter was referred by Cleveland to Congress on December 18, 1893, after the Queen refused to accept amnesty for the traitors as a condition of reinstatement.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Senator John Tyler Morgan (D-Alabama) and composed mostly of senators in favor of annexation, initiated their own investigation to discredit Blount's earlier report, using pro-annexationist affidavits from Hawaii, and testimony provided to the U.S. Senate in Washington, D.C. The Morgan Report contradicted the Blount Report, and exonerated Minister Stevens and the U.S. military troops finding them "not guilty" of involvement in the overthrow. Cleveland became stalled with his earlier efforts to restore the queen and adopted a position of recognition of the so-called Provisional Government and the Republic of Hawaii which followed.^[75][76]

The Native Hawaiian Study Commission of the United States Congress in its 1983 final report found no historical, legal, or moral obligation for the U.S. government to provide reparations, assistance, or group rights to Native Hawaiians.^[77]

In 1993, the 100th anniversary of the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Congress passed a resolution, which President Bill Clinton signed into law, offering an apology to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the United States for its involvement in the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. The law is known as the Apology Resolution, and represents one of the few times that the United States government has formally apologized for its actions.^[78]

International

Every government with a diplomatic presence in Hawaii, except for the United Kingdom, recognized the Provisional Government within 48 hours of the overthrow via their consulates. Countries recognizing the new Provisional Government included Chile, Austria-Hungary, Mexico, Russia, the Netherlands, Imperial Germany, Sweden, Spain, Imperial Japan,^[a] Italy, Portugal, Denmark, Belgium, China, Peru, and France.^[79] When the Republic of Hawaii was declared on July 4, 1894, immediate de facto recognition was given by every nation with diplomatic relations with Hawaii, except for Britain, whose response came in November 1894.^[80]

Hawaiian counter-revolution

Main article: 1895 Wilcox rebellion

A four-day uprising between January 6–9, 1895, began with an attempted coup d'état to restore the monarchy, and included battles between royalists and the republican rebels. Later, after a weapons cache was found on the palace grounds after the attempted rebellion in 1895, Queen Lili'uokalani was placed under arrest, tried by a military tribunal of the Republic of Hawaiʻi, convicted of misprision of treason and imprisoned in her own home. On January 24, Lili'uokalani abdicated, formally ending the Hawaiian monarchy.^[81]

Republic, United States annexation, United States Territory

Main articles: Provisional Government of Hawaii, Republic of Hawaii, and Territory of Hawaii

 

The Kūʻē Petitions. Several pro-royalist groups submitted petitions against annexation in 1897. In 1900 those groups disbanded and formed the Hawaiian Independent Party, under the leadership of Robert Wilcox, the first congressional representative from the Territory of Hawaii

The Committee of Safety declared Sanford Dole President of the new Provisional Government of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi on January 17, 1893, only removing the queen, her cabinet, and her marshal from office.^[82] On July 4, 1894, the Republic of Hawaiʻi was proclaimed. Dole was president of both governments. As a republic, it was the government's intention to campaign for Hawaii's annexation to the United States. The rationale behind the annexation of Hawaii included a strong economic component—Hawaiian goods and services which were exported to the mainland would not be subjected to United States tariffs, and the United States and Hawaii would both benefit from each other's domestic bounties, if Hawaii was part of the United States.^[83]

In 1897, William McKinley succeeded Cleveland as United States president. In his first year in office, the U.S. Senate failed twice to ratify a Treaty to Annex the Hawaiian Islands. A year later, he signed the Newlands Resolution, which stated that the annexation of Hawaii would occur on July 7, 1898. The formal ceremony which marked the annexation of Hawaii to the United States was held at the Iolani Palace on August 12, 1898. Almost no Native Hawaiians attended the annexation ceremony, and those few Hawaiians who were on the streets wore royalist ilima blossoms in their hats or hair, and on their breasts, they wore Hawaiian flags which were emblazoned with the motto: Kuu Hae Aloha ('my beloved flag').^[84] Most of the 40,000 Native Hawaiians, including Lili'uokalani and the Hawaiian royal family, protested against the action by shuttering themselves in their homes. "When the news of the Annexation came, it was bitterer than death to me", Lili'uokalani's niece, Princess Kaʻiulani, told the San Francisco Chronicle. "It was bad enough to lose the throne, but it was infinitely worse to have the flag go down."^[85] The Hawaiian flag was lowered for the last time while the Royal Hawaiian Band played the Hawaiian national anthem, Hawaiʻi Ponoʻī.

The Hawaiian Islands, together with the distant Palmyra Island and the Stewart Islands, became the Territory of Hawaii, a United States organized incorporated territory, with a new government which was established on February 22, 1900. Sanford Dole was appointed the territory's first governor.^[86] The Iolani Palace served as the capitol building of the Hawaiian government until 1969.

See also

• Aliʻi
• Democratic Revolution of 1954
• Hawaii – historical novel by James Michener has fictionalized account of the Overthrow in Chapter IV "From the Starving Village"
• Hawaiian home land
• Hawaiian sovereignty movement
• Hawaiian Kingdom–United States relations
• Kalākaua Dynasty
• Legal Status of Hawaii
• List of bilateral treaties signed by the Hawaiian Kingdom
• Paulet Affair
• Unfamiliar Fishes by Sarah Vowell
• United States involvement in regime change

Notes

1. During the overthrow, the Japanese Imperial Navy gunboat Naniwa was docked at Pearl Harbor. The gunboat's commander, Heihachiro Togo, who later commanded the Japanese battleship fleet at Tsushima, refused to accede to the Provisional Government's demands that he strike the colors of the Kingdom, but later lowered the colors on order of the Japanese Government. Along with every other international legations in Honolulu, the Japanese Consulate-General, Suburo Fujii, quickly recognized the Provisional Government as the "de facto" legitimate successor to the monarchy.

References

1. U.S. Navy History site. History.navy.mil (March 22, 2005). Retrieved on July 6, 2011.
2. Young, Lucien (1899). The Real Hawaii. Doubleday & McClure company. p. 252.
3. Kuykendall 1967, p. 605.
4. Spencer, Thomas P. (1895). Kaua Kuloko 1895. Honolulu: Papapai Mahu Press Publishing Company. OCLC 19662315.
5. Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1894. WHO WERE THE PARTIES THAT ASKED FOR AMERICAN AID. Six of them were Hawaiians, one English, and one German; five were Americans, but residents of Honolulu; a majority alien to us.
6. Kam, Ralph Thomas; Lyons, Jeffrey K. (2019). "Remembering the Committee of Safety: Identifying the Citizenship, Descent, and Occupations of the Men Who Overthrew the Monarchy". The Hawaiian Journal of History. Honolulu: Hawaiian Historical Society. 53: 31–54. doi:10.1353/hjh.2019.0002. ISSN 2169-7639. OCLC 60626541. S2CID 212795443.
7. MargHomans; Adrienne Munich (October 2, 1997). Remaking Queen Victoria. Cambridge University Press. pp. 147–. ISBN 978-0-521-57485-3.
8. United States. Dept. of State (1895). Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 12.
9. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity (1977). Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Amendments of 1977: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 7577... U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 92.
10. "Historical Collections of The Hawaiian Islands – Treaties, Conventions, and International Agreements of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi". usgwarchives.net. Retrieved December 30, 2014.
11. Siler, Julia Flynn (2012). "Crime of the Century, 1893". Lost Kingdom: Hawaii's Last Queen, the Sugar Kings and America's First Imperial Adventure. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press. p. 220. ISBN 978-0-8021-2001-4. OCLC 881683650 – via Internet Archive.
12. Deerr, Noel (1949). The History of Sugar. Vol. 1. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd. p. ^{[page needed]}. OCLC 833266489.
13. Doak, Robin Santos (2003). Hawaii, the Aloha State. Milwaukee: World Almanac Library. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-8368-5149-6. OCLC 50808988 – via Internet Archive.
14. "Kingdom of Hawaii Constitution of 1839". The Morgan Report. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
    "1839 Hawaiian Bill of Rights". Free Hawaii. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
15. Trask, Haunani-Kay (1999). "Introduction". From a Native Daughter: Colonialism and Sovereignty in Hawaiʻi. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. p. 6. doi:10.1515/9780824847029. ISBN 978-0-585-25766-2. OCLC 45733146, 45733146.
16. Pratt, Helen Gay (1939). "A Treaty Ends Hawaii's Pioneer Period". In Hawaii a Hundred Years. New York: C. Scribner's Sons. pp. 260–261. OCLC 612976141 – via Internet Archive.
17. Slocum, Frederick; Lee, Yueh-Ting (2004). "Racism, Racial Stereotypes, and American Politics". In Chin, Jean Lau (ed.). The Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination. Vol. 1. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-275-98234-8. OCLC 1046073512, 624303230.
18. . hawaii.gov. Archived from the original on November 19, 2014.
19. Dye, Bob (1997). Merchant prince of the Sandalwood Mountains: Afong and the Chinese in Hawaiʻi. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaiʻi Press. p. 115–116. ISBN 0-8248-1772-9. OCLC 34798241.
20. Mayer, Eve (2012). "Hawaii". In Murphree, Daniel S. (ed.). Native America: A State-by-State Historical Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, California. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-313-38127-0. OCLC 781709957.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
21. Laurent, John (1994). "Varieties of Social Dawinism in Australia, Japan, and Hawaii, 1883–1921". In MacLeod, Roy M.; Rehbock, Philip F. (eds.). Darwin's Laboratory: Evolutionary Theory and Natural History in the Pacific. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. p. 494. ISBN 0-8248-1613-7. OCLC 1200290353 – via Internet Archive.
22. Johnson, Donald Dalton; Best, Gary Dean (1995). "Americans in Hawaiʻi II". The United States in the Pacific: Private Interests and Public Policies, 1784-1899. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-275-95055-2. OCLC 31519153.
23. Van Dyke 2008, p. 118.
24. Curtis, Catherine (1966). Builders of Hawaii. Honolulu: The Kamehameha Schools Press. p. 218. OCLC 12372595.
25. Calhoun, Charles W. (2006). The Gilded Age: Perspectives on the Origins of Modern America. Lanham. p. 316. ISBN 978-0-7425-8168-5. OCLC 856869502.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
26. Mirza, Rocky M. (2010). American Invasions: Canada To Afghanistan, 1775 To 2010. Trafford Publishing. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-4669-5688-9. OCLC 1152227568.
27. Lee, Anne Feder (2011). The Hawaii State Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-19-987796-6. OCLC 871177090.
28. Van Dyke 2008, p. 123.
29. Kamaka'eha, Lydia-Lili'uokalani (1898). "Chapter 29: 'The Bayonet Constitution'". Hawaiʻi's Story by Hawaiʻi's Queen. Boston: Lee and Shepard. ISBN 978-88-228-5368-4. OCLC 966288973, 903366051, 2387226. Retrieved October 27, 2017.
30. Van Dyke 2008, p. 152.
31. Vowell, Sarah (March 22, 2011). Unfamiliar Fishes. Penguin Group US. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-101-48645-0. OCLC 773612582.
32. Chambers, John H. (2006). "Coup d'Etat and Annexation to United States". Hawaii. Northampton, Mass.: Interlink Books. pp. 184–185. ISBN 1-56656-615-0. OCLC 1244785776 – via Internet Archive.
33. Liu, William Ming; Concepcion, William R. (2010). "Redifining Asian American Identity and Masculinity". In Liu, William Ming; Iwamoto, Derek Kenji; Chae, Mark H. (eds.). Culturally Responsive Counseling with Asian American Men. New York: Routledge. p. 133. doi:10.4324/9780203879870. ISBN 978-1-135-96833-5. OCLC 709751321.
34. Morgan, William Michael (2011). Pacific Gibraltar: U.S.-Japanese rivalry over the annexation of Hawaiʻi, 1885-1898. Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-1-61251-042-2. OCLC 741492542.
35. Bradley, James (2009). "Haoles". The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Co. p. 153. ISBN 978-0-316-03966-6. OCLC 471877443 – via Internet Archive.
36. Silva, Noenoe K. (2004). "The Antiannexation Struggle". Aloha Betrayed: Native Hawaiian Resistance to American Colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 126. doi:10.1215/9780822386223. ISBN 978-0-8223-8622-3. JSTOR j.ctv11smzsz. OCLC 191222123. S2CID 152600538.
37. Kauanui, J. Kēhaulani (October 6, 2020). Mallon, Florencia E. (ed.). Decolonizing Native Histories. Duke University Press. p. 31. doi:10.1515/9780822394853. ISBN 978-0-8223-9485-3. OCLC 774855321. S2CID 164938436.
38. Campbell, Charles S. (1976). "The Hawaiian revolution of 1893 and its aftermath". The Transformation of American Foreign Relations, 1865-1900. New York: Harper & Row. pp. 178–179. ISBN 978-0-06-010618-8. OCLC 2120977.
39. Liliuokalani 1898, p. 174.
40. Liliuokalani 1898, p. 195.
41. "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1894. Appendix 2: Affairs in Hawaii". Washington: Government Printing Office. 1895. p. 670. OCLC 907512128, 907536936 – via The Library of Congress.
42. Liliuokalani 1898, p. 186.
43. Harned, Richard (2009). The Palace Hotel. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-4396-3655-8. OCLC 905345059.
44. Spickard, Paul R.; Rondilla, Joanne L.; Hippolite Wright, Debbie (2002). Pacific Diaspora: Island Peoples in the United States and Across the Pacific. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press. p. 316. ISBN 0-8248-2562-4. OCLC 49403695.
45. Love, Eric Tyrone Lowery (2004). "The Policy of Last Resort". Race Over Empire: Racism and U.S. Imperialism, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill: Univ of North Carolina Press. p. 107. ISBN 0-8078-7591-0. OCLC 62149408 – via Internet Archive.
46. United States. Department of State (1895). Foreign Relations of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 496.
47. Russ 1992, p. 67: "She ... defended her act[ions] by showing that, out of a possible 9,500 native voters in 1892, 6,500 asked for a new Constitution."
48. Daws, Gavan (1974). Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Islands. University of Hawaii Press. p. 271. [The Queen's new cabinet] had been in office less than a week, and whatever they thought about the need for a new constitution... they knew enough about the temper of the queen's opponents to realize that they would endure the chance to challenge her, and no minister of the crown could look forward... to that confrontation.
49. Kuykendall 1967, p. 582.
50. Library, University of Hawaii at Manoa Hamilton. "Annexation of Hawaii – University of Hawaii at Manoa Library". libweb.hawaii.edu.
51. Kuykendall 1967, p. 530.
52. Kuykendall 1967, p. 587–588: "W.D. Alexander (History of Later Years of the Hawaiian Monarchy and the Revolution of 1893, p. 37) gives the following as the wording of Thurston's motion [to launch the coup]: 'That preliminary steps be taken at once to form and declare a Provisional Government with a view to annexation to the United States.' Thurston later wrote that his motion was 'substantially as follows: "I move that it is the sense of this meeting that the solution of the present situation is annexation to the United States."'(Memoirs, p. 250) Lt. Lucien Young (The Boston at Hawaii, p. 175) gives the following version of the motion: 'Resolved, That it is the sense of this committee that in view of the present unsatisfactory state of affairs, the proper course to pursue is to abolish the monarchy and apply for annexation to the United States.'"
53. Russ 1992, p. 90.
54. Roark, James L.; Johnson, Michael P.; Cohen, Patricia Cline; Stage, Sarah; Hartmann, Susan M. (January 9, 2012). The American Promise, Combined Volume: A History of the United States. Bedford/St. Martin's. p. 660. ISBN 978-0-312-66312-4.
55. Vernon M. Briggs (January 1, 2003). Mass Immigration and the National Interest: Policy Directions for the New Century. M.E. Sharpe. p. 72. ISBN 978-0-7656-0934-2.
56. Vernon M. Briggs (2001). Immigration and American Unionism. Cornell University Press. p. 58. ISBN 0-8014-8710-2.
57. Tom Ginsburg; Rosalind Dixon (January 1, 2011). Comparative Constitutional Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-85793-121-4.
58. Andrade Jr., Ernest (1996). Unconquerable Rebel: Robert W. Wilcox and Hawaiian Politics, 1880–1903. University Press of Colorado. p. 130. ISBN 0-87081-417-6.
59. Twombly, Alexander (1900). Hawaii and its people. Silver, Burdett and company. p. 333.
60. "An Officer Shot – He Suspected There Was Ammunition on the Wagon". The Daily Bulletin. Vol. V, no. 626. Honolulu: J. W. Robertson. January 17, 1893. p. 3. Retrieved July 27, 2016.
61. The Morgan Report, p808–809, "At the request of many citizens, whose wives and families were helpless and in terror of an expected uprising of the mob, which would burn and destroy, a request was made and signed by all of the committee, addressed to Minister Stevens, that troops might be landed to protect houses and private property.
62. Devine, Michael J. (February 1, 1977). "John W. Foster and the Struggle for the Annexation of Hawaii". Pacific Historical Review. University of California Press. 46 (1): 29–50. doi:10.2307/3637401. ISSN 0030-8684. JSTOR 3637401.
63. Morgan, William Michael (September 1982). "The Anti-Japanese Origins of the Hawaiian Annexation Treaty of 1897". Diplomatic History. Oxford University Press (OUP). 6 (4): 23–44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.1982.tb00790.x. ISSN 0145-2096. JSTOR 24911300.
64. Kinzer, Stephen (2006). "A Hell of a Time up at the Palace". Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq. New York. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-8050-7861-9. OCLC 61879837 – via Internet Archive. He (Minister Stevens) certainly overstepped his authority when he brought troops ashore, especially since he knew that the 'general alarm and terror' of which the Committee of Safety had complained was a fiction.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
65. Burr, Lawrence; Palmer, Ian; White, John (2011). US Cruisers 1883–1904: The birth of the steel navy. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-84603-858-7. OCLC 1021805683.
66. Russ 1992, p. 350.
67. Liliuokalani 1898, p. 387.
68. Liliuokalani 1898, p. 296.
69. Cleveland, Grover (December 18, 1893). "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1894, Appendix II, Affairs in Hawaii".
70. Kuykendall 1967, p. 596.
71. "Liliuokalani, 1893 to Sanford B. Dole". University of Hawaii. Retrieved January 15, 2018.
72. Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii, 12/19/1898. File Unit: Petitions and Memorials Referred to the Committee on the Territiories of the 55th Congress Regarding Hawaii, 1825 - 1946. The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. December 19, 1898. Retrieved January 4, 2015.
73. Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 103–150
74. Cleveland, Grover (December 3, 1894). Sixth State of the Union Address . Washington, DC – via Wikisource.{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
75. The Blount Report, p1342, "In reply to the direct question from Mr. Parker as to whether this was the final decision of the Senate, I said that in my opinion it was final."
76. Grover Cleveland's 2nd Annual Message, December 3, 1894 – "Since communicating the voluminous correspondence in regard to Hawaii and the action taken by the Senate and House of Representatives on certain questions submitted to the judgment and wider discretion of Congress the organization of a government in place of the provisional arrangement which followed the deposition of the Queen has been announced, with evidence of its effective operation. The recognition usual in such cases has been accorded the new Government."
77. Native Hawaiian Study Commission: See Conclusions and Recommendations p.27 and also Existing Law, Native Hawaiians, and Compensation, pgs 333–339 and pgs 341–345 July 8, 2012, at the Wayback Machine. Wiki.grassrootinstitute.org. Retrieved on July 6, 2011.
78. Lewis, Danny. "Five Times the United States Officially Apologized". Smithsonian. Retrieved November 14, 2018.
79. The Morgan Report, p 1103–1111. Morganreport.org (February 11, 2006). Retrieved on July 6, 2011.
80. Andrade, Ernest (1996). The Unconquerable Rebel. The University Press of Colorado. p. 147. ISBN 0-87081-417-6. The provisional government, with all its faults, had major difficulties in obtaining recognition, especially from Cleveland, and it was not considered likely that the republic would have any foreign problems. Recognition albeit de facto came about even more quickly than it had in 1893, for at least there was no question of a overthrow having taken place or of the government's control of the domestic situation.
81. "Abdication of Queen Liliuokalani: Safety at the Price of a Kingdom, of Little Moment Now for the Cause of the Royalists is a Lost Cause". The Morning Call. San Francisco. February 7, 1895. Retrieved July 19, 2010.
82. Kuykendall 1967, p. 581–587.
83. Kuykendall 1967, p. 649–650.
84. Robert W. Brockway. "Hawaiʻi: America's Ally". The Spanish American War Centennial web site. Retrieved April 30, 2010.
85. Michael Tighe (August 9, 1998). "Hawaii's Own: A look at a century of annexation". Associated Press. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
86. Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law (United States) 56–339

Sources

• Kuykendall, Ralph Simpson (1967). The Hawaiian Kingdom. Vol. 3: The Kalakaua Dynasty, 1874–1893. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. doi:10.1515/9780824847357. ISBN 978-0-8248-4735-7. OCLC 1154960804 – via Nā Puke Ulukau.
• Liliuokalani (1898). Hawaii's Story by Hawaii's Queen, Liliuokalani. Boston: Lee and Shepard. OCLC 176107740 – via Internet Archive.
• Russ, William Adam Jr. (1992). The Hawaiian Revolution (1893-94). Selinsgrove, PA, US: Susquehanna University Press. ISBN 0-945636-43-1. OCLC 24846595.
• Van Dyke, Jon M. (2008). Who owns the Crown lands of Hawaii?. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-1-4356-6678-8. OCLC 257449971.

External links

 

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii.

• morganreport.org Online images and transcriptions of the entire 1894 Morgan Report
• "Blount Report: Affairs in Hawaii (1893)". University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa Library.
• "The Annexation Of Hawaii: A Collection Of Documents". Hawaiian Digital Collection. University of Hawaiʻi at Manoa Library.
• Conklin, Kenneth R. (August 2009). "Hawaii Statehood – straightening out the history-twisters. A historical narrative defending the legitimacy of the revolution of 1893, the annexation of 1898, and the statehood vote of 1959. FULL VERSION". Hawaiian Sovereignty: Thinking Carefully About It.