fbpx
Wikipedia

Proboscidea

Proboscidea (/ˌprɒbəˈsɪdiə/; from Latin proboscis, from Ancient Greek προβοσκίς (proboskís) 'elephant's trunk') is a taxonomic order of afrotherian mammals containing one living family (Elephantidae) and several extinct families. First described by J. Illiger in 1811, it encompasses the elephants and their close relatives.[1] Proboscideans include some of the largest known land mammals. The largest land mammal of all time may have been a proboscidean; the elephant Palaeoloxodon namadicus has been estimated to be up to 5.2 m (17.1 ft) at the shoulder and may have weighed up to 22 t (24.3 short tons), surpassing the paraceratheres, the otherwise largest known land mammals, though this estimate was made based on a single fragmentary femur and is speculative.[2] The largest extant proboscidean is the African bush elephant, with a record of size of 4 m (13.1 ft) at the shoulder and 10.4 t (11.5 short tons).[2] In addition to their enormous size, later proboscideans are distinguished by tusks and long, muscular trunks, which were less developed or absent in early proboscideans.

Three species of elephant are currently recognised: the African bush elephant, the African forest elephant, and the Asian elephant. Elephantidae is the only surviving family of the order Proboscidea; extinct members include the mastodons, gomphotheres and stegodonts. The family Elephantidae also contains several extinct groups, including the mammoths and straight-tusked elephants. The distinctive features of proboscideans include a trunk, tusks, and massive legs. Large ear flaps are present in some proboscideans, including elephants. Some also have tough but sensitive skin; others, like the woolly mammoth, have a coat. The trunk is used for breathing, bringing food and water to the mouth, and grasping objects. Tusks, which are derived from the incisor teeth, serve both as weapons and as tools for moving objects and digging. The large ear flaps assist in maintaining a constant body temperature as well as in communication. The pillar-like legs carry their great weight.

Evolution edit

Over 180 extinct members of Proboscidea have been described.[3] The earliest proboscideans, Eritherium and Phosphatherium are known from the late Paleocene of Africa.[4] The Eocene included Numidotherium, Moeritherium and Barytherium from Africa. These animals were relatively small and some, like Moeritherium and Barytherium were probably amphibious.[5][6] Later on, genera such as Phiomia and Palaeomastodon arose; the latter likely inhabited more forested areas. Proboscidean diversification changed little during the Oligocene.[5]

A major event in proboscidean evolution was the collision of Afro-Arabia with Eurasia, during the Early Miocene, around 18-19 million years ago allowing proboscideans to disperse from their African homeland across Eurasia, and later, around 16-15 million years ago into North America across the Bering Land Bridge. Proboscidean groups prominent during the Miocene include the deinotheres, along with the more advanced elephantimorphs, including mammutids (mastodons), gomphotheres, amebelodontids (which includes the "shovel tuskers" like Platybelodon), choerolophodontids and stegodontids.[7] Around 10 million years ago, the earliest members of the family Elephantidae emerged in Africa, having originated from gomphotheres.[8] The Late Miocene saw major climatic changes, which resulted in the decline and extinction of many proboscidean groups such as amebelodontids and choerolophodontids.[7] The earliest members of modern genera of Elephantidae appeared during the latest Miocene-early Pliocene around 5 million years ago. The elephantid genera Elephas (which includes the living Asian elephant) and Mammuthus (mammoths) migrated out of Africa during the late Pliocene, around 3.6 to 3.2 million years ago.[9]

Over the course of the Early Pleistocene, all non-elephantid probobscideans outside of the Americas became extinct (including mammutids, gomphotheres and deinotheres), with the exception of Stegodon.[7] Gomphotheres dispersed into South America during this era as part of the Great American interchange,[10] and mammoths migrating into North America around 1.5 million years ago.[11] At the end of the Early Pleistocene, around 800,000 years ago the elephantid genus Palaeoloxodon dispersed outside of Africa, becoming widely distributed in Eurasia.[12] By the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, proboscideans were represented by around 23 species. Proboscideans underwent a dramatic decline during the Late Pleistocene as part of the Late Pleistocene extinctions, with all remaining non-elephantid proboscideans (including Stegodon, mastodons, and the American gomphotheres Cuvieronius and Notiomastodon) and Palaeoloxodon becoming extinct, with mammoths only surviving in relict populations on islands around the Bering Strait into the Holocene, with their latest survival being on Wrangel Island around 4,000 years ago.[7][13]

The following cladogram is based on endocasts[14]

Morphology edit

Proboscideans experienced several evolutionary trends, such as an increase in size, which led to many giant species that stood over 4 m (13 ft 1 in) tall, and body masses of over 10 tonnes.[15] As with other megaherbivores, including the extinct sauropod dinosaurs, the large size of proboscideans likely developed to allow them to survive on vegetation with low nutritional value.[16] Their limbs grew longer and the feet shorter and broader.[17] The feet were originally plantigrade and developed into a digitigrade stance with cushion pads and the sesamoid bone providing support, with this change developing around the common ancestor of Deinotheriidae and Elephantiformes.[18]

The skull grew larger, especially the cranium, while the neck shortened to provide better support for the skull. The increase in size led to the development and elongation of the mobile trunk to provide reach. The number of premolars, incisors and canines decreased. The cheek teeth (molars and premolars) became larger and more specialised.[17] In Elephantiformes, the second upper incisor and lower incisor were transformed into ever growing tusks.[19][20] The tusks are proportionally heavy for their size, being primarily composed of dentine. In primitive proboscideans, a band of enamel covers part of the tusk surface, though in many later groups including modern elephants the band is lost, with elephants only having enamel on the tusk tips of juveniles. The upper tusks were initially modest in size, but from the Late Miocene onwards proboscideans developed increasingly large tusks, with the longest ever recorded tusk being 5.02 metres (16.5 ft) long belonging to "Mammut" borsoni found in Greece, with some mammoth tusks likely weighing over 200 kilograms (440 lb). The lower tusks are generally smaller than the upper tusks, but could grow to large sizes in some species, like in Deinotherium (which lacks upper tusks), where they could grow over 1.5 metres (4.9 ft) long, the amebelodontid Konobelodon has lower tusks 1.61 metres (5.3 ft) long, with the longest lower tusks ever recorded being from the primitive elephantid Stegotetrabelodon which are around 2.2 metres (7.2 ft) long.[21]

The molar teeth changed from being replaced vertically as in other mammals to being replaced horizontally in the clade Elephantimorpha.[22] While early Elephantimorpha generally had lower jaws with an elongated mandibular symphysis at the front of the jaw with well developed lower tusks/incisors, from the Late Miocene onwards, many groups convergently developed brevirostrine (shortened) lower jaws with vestigial or no lower tusks.[23][24] Elephantids are distinguished from earlier proboscideans by a major shift in the molar morphology to parallel lophs rather than the cusps of earlier proboscideans, allowing them to become higher crowned (hypsodont) and more efficient in consuming grass.[25]

Dwarfism edit

 
Skeleton of Palaeoloxodon falconeri, one of the smallest known dwarf elephants, with an adult shoulder height less than 1 metre (3.3 ft)

Several species of proboscideans lived on islands and experienced insular dwarfism. This occurred primarily during the Pleistocene, when some elephant populations became isolated by fluctuating sea levels, although dwarf elephants did exist earlier in the Pliocene. These elephants likely grew smaller on islands due to a lack of large or viable predator populations and limited resources. By contrast, small mammals such as rodents develop gigantism in these conditions. Dwarf proboscideans are known to have lived in Indonesia, the Channel Islands of California, and several islands of the Mediterranean.[26]

Elephas celebensis of Sulawesi is believed to have descended from Elephas planifrons. Elephas falconeri of Malta and Sicily was only 1 m (3 ft), and had probably evolved from the straight-tusked elephant. Other descendants of the straight-tusked elephant existed in Cyprus. Dwarf elephants of uncertain descent lived in Crete, Cyclades and Dodecanese, while dwarf mammoths are known to have lived in Sardinia.[26] The Columbian mammoth colonised the Channel Islands and evolved into the pygmy mammoth. This species reached a height of 1.2–1.8 m (4–6 ft) and weighed 200–2,000 kg (440–4,410 lb). A population of small woolly mammoths survived on Wrangel Island as recently as 4,000 years ago.[26] After their discovery in 1993, they were considered dwarf mammoths.[27] This classification has been re-evaluated and since the Second International Mammoth Conference in 1999, these animals are no longer considered to be true "dwarf mammoths".[28]

Classification edit

Below is an unranked taxonomy of proboscidean genera as of 2019.[29][30][31][32]

References edit

  1. ^ Illiger, Johann Karl Wilhelm (1811). Prodromus Systematis Mammalium et Avium: Additis Terminis Zoographicis Utriusque Classis, Eorumque Versione Germanica. Berolini: Sumptibus C. Salfeld. p. 62.
  2. ^ a b Larramendi, A. (2016). "Shoulder height, body mass and shape of proboscideans" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 61. doi:10.4202/app.00136.2014. S2CID 2092950.
  3. ^ Kingdon, Jonathan (2013). Mammals of Africa. Bloomsbury. p. 173. ISBN 9781408189962. from the original on 21 March 2023. Retrieved 6 June 2020.
  4. ^ Gheerbrant, E. (2009). "Paleocene emergence of elephant relatives and the rapid radiation of African ungulates". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (26): 10717–10721. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10610717G. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900251106. PMC 2705600. PMID 19549873.
  5. ^ a b Sukumar, pp. 13–16.
  6. ^ Liu, Alexander G. S. C.; Seiffert, Erik R.; Simons, Elwyn L. (15 April 2008). "Stable isotope evidence for an amphibious phase in early proboscidean evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105 (15): 5786–5791. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.5786L. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800884105. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2311368. PMID 18413605.
  7. ^ a b c d Cantalapiedra, Juan L.; Sanisidro, Óscar; Zhang, Hanwen; Alberdi, María T.; Prado, José L.; Blanco, Fernando; Saarinen, Juha (1 July 2021). "The rise and fall of proboscidean ecological diversity". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5 (9): 1266–1272. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01498-w. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 34211141. S2CID 235712060.
  8. ^ H. Saegusa, H. Nakaya, Y. Kunimatsu, M. Nakatsukasa, H. Tsujikawa, Y. Sawada, M. Saneyoshi, T. Sakai Earliest elephantid remains from the late Miocene locality, Nakali, Kenya Scientific Annals, School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece VIth International Conference on Mammoths and Their Relatives, vol. 102, Grevena -Siatista, special volume (2014), p. 175
  9. ^ Iannucci, Alessio; Sardella, Raffaele (28 February 2023). "What Does the "Elephant-Equus" Event Mean Today? Reflections on Mammal Dispersal Events around the Pliocene-Pleistocene Boundary and the Flexible Ambiguity of Biochronology". Quaternary. 6 (1): 16. doi:10.3390/quat6010016. hdl:11573/1680082. ISSN 2571-550X.
  10. ^ Mothé, Dimila; dos Santos Avilla, Leonardo; Asevedo, Lidiane; Borges-Silva, Leon; Rosas, Mariane; Labarca-Encina, Rafael; Souberlich, Ricardo; Soibelzon, Esteban; Roman-Carrion, José Luis; Ríos, Sergio D.; Rincon, Ascanio D.; Cardoso de Oliveira, Gina; Pereira Lopes, Renato (30 September 2016). "Sixty years after 'The mastodonts of Brazil': The state of the art of South American proboscideans (Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae)" (PDF). Quaternary International. 443: 52–64. Bibcode:2017QuInt.443...52M. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.028.
  11. ^ Lister, A. M.; Sher, A. V. (13 November 2015). "Evolution and dispersal of mammoths across the Northern Hemisphere". Science. 350 (6262): 805–809. Bibcode:2015Sci...350..805L. doi:10.1126/science.aac5660. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 26564853. S2CID 206639522.
  12. ^ Lister, Adrian M. (2004), "Ecological Interactions of Elephantids in Pleistocene Eurasia", Human Paleoecology in the Levantine Corridor, Oxbow Books, pp. 53–60, ISBN 978-1-78570-965-4, retrieved 14 April 2020
  13. ^ Rogers, Rebekah L.; Slatkin, Montgomery (2 March 2017). Barsh, Gregory S. (ed.). "Excess of genomic defects in a woolly mammoth on Wrangel island". PLOS Genetics. 13 (3): e1006601. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006601. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 5333797. PMID 28253255.
  14. ^ Benoit, Julien; Lyras, George A.; Schmitt, Arnaud; Nxumalo, Mpilo; Tabuce, Rodolphe; Obada, Teodor; Mararsecul, Vladislav; Manger, Paul (2023), Dozo, María Teresa; Paulina-Carabajal, Ariana; Macrini, Thomas E.; Walsh, Stig (eds.), "Paleoneurology of the Proboscidea (Mammalia, Afrotheria): Insights from Their Brain Endocast and Labyrinth", Paleoneurology of Amniotes, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 579–644, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13983-3_15, ISBN 978-3-031-13982-6, retrieved 22 May 2023
  15. ^ Larramendi A (2015). "Shoulder height, body mass and shape of proboscideans". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. doi:10.4202/app.00136.2014.
  16. ^ Carpenter, K. (2006). "Biggest of the big: a critical re-evaluation of the mega-sauropod Amphicoelias fragillimus Cope, 1878". In Foster, J.R.; Lucas, S.G. (eds.). Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. Vol. 36. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science. pp. 131–138.
  17. ^ a b Shoshani, J. (1998). "Understanding proboscidean evolution: a formidable task". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 13 (12): 480–87. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01491-8. PMID 21238404.
  18. ^ Hutchinson, J. R.; Delmer, C.; Miller, C. E.; Hildebrandt, T.; Pitsillides, A. A.; Boyde, A. (2011). "From flat foot to fat foot: structure, ontogeny, function, and evolution of elephant 'sixth toes'" (PDF). Science. 334 (6063): 1699–1703. Bibcode:2011Sci...334R1699H. doi:10.1126/science.1211437. PMID 22194576. S2CID 206536505. from the original on 21 March 2023. Retrieved 3 January 2023.
  19. ^ Ferretti, Marco P. (March 2008). "Enamel Structure of Cuvieronius hyodon (Proboscidea, Gomphotheriidae) with a Discussion on Enamel Evolution in Elephantoids". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 15 (1): 37–58. doi:10.1007/s10914-007-9057-3. ISSN 1064-7554. S2CID 21216371.
  20. ^ Delmer, Cyrille (December 2009). "Reassessment of the Generic Attribution of Numidotherium savagei and the Homologies of Lower Incisors in Proboscideans". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 54 (4): 561–580. doi:10.4202/app.2007.0036. ISSN 0567-7920. S2CID 55095894.
  21. ^ Larramendi, Asier (10 December 2023). "Estimating tusk masses in proboscideans: a comprehensive analysis and predictive model". Historical Biology: 1–14. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2286272. ISSN 0891-2963.
  22. ^ Sanders, William J. (17 February 2018). "Horizontal tooth displacement and premolar occurrence in elephants and other elephantiform proboscideans". Historical Biology. 30 (1–2): 137–156. Bibcode:2018HBio...30..137S. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1297436. ISSN 0891-2963. S2CID 89904463.
  23. ^ Mothé, Dimila; Ferretti, Marco P.; Avilla, Leonardo S. (12 January 2016). "The Dance of Tusks: Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan-American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in Elephantimorpha". PLOS ONE. 11 (1): e0147009. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1147009M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147009. PMC 4710528. PMID 26756209.
  24. ^ Li, Chunxiao; Deng, Tao; Wang, Yang; Sun, Fajun; Wolff, Burt; Jiangzuo, Qigao; Ma, Jiao; Xing, Luda; Fu, Jiao (16 August 2023). Longer mandible or nose? Co-evolution of feeding organs in early elephantiforms (Report). Paleontology. doi:10.1101/2023.08.15.553347.
  25. ^ Lister, Adrian M. (26 June 2013). "The role of behaviour in adaptive morphological evolution of African proboscideans". Nature. 500 (7462): 331–334. Bibcode:2013Natur.500..331L. doi:10.1038/nature12275. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 23803767. S2CID 883007.
  26. ^ a b c Sukumar, pp. 31–33.
  27. ^ Vartanyan, S. L., Garutt, V. E., Sher, A. V. (1993). "Holocene dwarf mammoths from Wrangel Island in the Siberian Arctic". Nature. 362 (6418): 337–40. Bibcode:1993Natur.362..337V. doi:10.1038/362337a0. PMID 29633990. S2CID 4249191.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ Tikhonov, A.; Agenbroad, L.; Vartanyan, S. (2003). "Comparative analysis of the mammoth populations on Wrangel Island and the Channel Islands". Deinsea. 9: 415–20. ISSN 0923-9308.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ^ Shoshani, Jeheskel; Pascal Tassy (2005). "Advances in proboscidean taxonomy & classification, anatomy & physiology, and ecology & behavior". Quaternary International. 126–128: 5–20. Bibcode:2005QuInt.126....5S. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.011.
  30. ^ Wang, Shi-Qi; Deng, Tao; Ye, Jie; He, Wen; Chen, Shan-Qin (2017). "Morphological and ecological diversity of Amebelodontidae (Proboscidea, Mammalia) revealed by a Miocene fossil accumulation of an upper-tuskless proboscidean". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 15 (8): 601–615. Bibcode:2017JSPal..15..601W. doi:10.1080/14772019.2016.1208687. S2CID 89063787.
  31. ^ Mothé, Dimila; Ferretti, Marco P.; Avilla, Leonardo S. (12 January 2016). "The Dance of Tusks: Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan-American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in Elephantimorpha". PLOS ONE. 11 (1): e0147009. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1147009M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147009. PMC 4710528. PMID 26756209.
  32. ^ Tabuce, Rodolphe; Sarr, Raphaël; Adnet, Sylvain; Lebrun, Renaud; Lihoreau, Fabrice; Martin, Jeremy; Sambou, Bernard; Thiam, Mustapha; Hautier, Lionel (2019). "Filling a gap in the proboscidean fossil record: a new genus from the Lutetian of Senegal" (PDF). Journal of Paleontology. 94 (3): 580–588. doi:10.1017/jpa.2019.98. S2CID 213978026.

Bibliography edit

  • Nowak, Ronald M. (1999), Walker's Mammals of the World (6th ed.), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 978-0-8018-5789-8, LCCN 98023686
  • Haynes, Gary (1993), Mammoths, Mastodonts, and Elephants: Biology, Behavior and the Fossil Record (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521456913
  • Sukumar, R. (11 September 2003). The Living Elephants: Evolutionary Ecology, Behaviour, and Conservation. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-510778-4. OCLC 935260783.

proboscidea, plant, genus, plant, from, latin, proboscis, from, ancient, greek, προβοσκίς, proboskís, elephant, trunk, taxonomic, order, afrotherian, mammals, containing, living, family, elephantidae, several, extinct, families, first, described, illiger, 1811. For the plant genus see Proboscidea plant Proboscidea ˌ p r ɒ b e ˈ s ɪ d i e from Latin proboscis from Ancient Greek proboskis proboskis elephant s trunk is a taxonomic order of afrotherian mammals containing one living family Elephantidae and several extinct families First described by J Illiger in 1811 it encompasses the elephants and their close relatives 1 Proboscideans include some of the largest known land mammals The largest land mammal of all time may have been a proboscidean the elephant Palaeoloxodon namadicus has been estimated to be up to 5 2 m 17 1 ft at the shoulder and may have weighed up to 22 t 24 3 short tons surpassing the paraceratheres the otherwise largest known land mammals though this estimate was made based on a single fragmentary femur and is speculative 2 The largest extant proboscidean is the African bush elephant with a record of size of 4 m 13 1 ft at the shoulder and 10 4 t 11 5 short tons 2 In addition to their enormous size later proboscideans are distinguished by tusks and long muscular trunks which were less developed or absent in early proboscideans ProboscideaTemporal range Middle Paleocene Holocene 60 0 0 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg NProboscidean diversity Indian elephant Elephas maximus indicus African bush elephant Loxodonta africana and African forest elephant Loxodonta cyclotisSkeleton of MoeritheriumScientific classificationDomain EukaryotaKingdom AnimaliaPhylum ChordataClass MammaliaMirorder TethytheriaOrder ProboscideaIlliger 1811Subclades Eritherium Moeritherium Saloumia Numidotheriidae Barytheriidae Deinotheriidae ElephantiformesThree species of elephant are currently recognised the African bush elephant the African forest elephant and the Asian elephant Elephantidae is the only surviving family of the order Proboscidea extinct members include the mastodons gomphotheres and stegodonts The family Elephantidae also contains several extinct groups including the mammoths and straight tusked elephants The distinctive features of proboscideans include a trunk tusks and massive legs Large ear flaps are present in some proboscideans including elephants Some also have tough but sensitive skin others like the woolly mammoth have a coat The trunk is used for breathing bringing food and water to the mouth and grasping objects Tusks which are derived from the incisor teeth serve both as weapons and as tools for moving objects and digging The large ear flaps assist in maintaining a constant body temperature as well as in communication The pillar like legs carry their great weight Contents 1 Evolution 2 Morphology 2 1 Dwarfism 3 Classification 4 References 5 BibliographyEvolution editOver 180 extinct members of Proboscidea have been described 3 The earliest proboscideans Eritherium and Phosphatherium are known from the late Paleocene of Africa 4 The Eocene included Numidotherium Moeritherium and Barytherium from Africa These animals were relatively small and some like Moeritherium and Barytherium were probably amphibious 5 6 Later on genera such as Phiomia and Palaeomastodon arose the latter likely inhabited more forested areas Proboscidean diversification changed little during the Oligocene 5 A major event in proboscidean evolution was the collision of Afro Arabia with Eurasia during the Early Miocene around 18 19 million years ago allowing proboscideans to disperse from their African homeland across Eurasia and later around 16 15 million years ago into North America across the Bering Land Bridge Proboscidean groups prominent during the Miocene include the deinotheres along with the more advanced elephantimorphs including mammutids mastodons gomphotheres amebelodontids which includes the shovel tuskers like Platybelodon choerolophodontids and stegodontids 7 Around 10 million years ago the earliest members of the family Elephantidae emerged in Africa having originated from gomphotheres 8 The Late Miocene saw major climatic changes which resulted in the decline and extinction of many proboscidean groups such as amebelodontids and choerolophodontids 7 The earliest members of modern genera of Elephantidae appeared during the latest Miocene early Pliocene around 5 million years ago The elephantid genera Elephas which includes the living Asian elephant and Mammuthus mammoths migrated out of Africa during the late Pliocene around 3 6 to 3 2 million years ago 9 Over the course of the Early Pleistocene all non elephantid probobscideans outside of the Americas became extinct including mammutids gomphotheres and deinotheres with the exception of Stegodon 7 Gomphotheres dispersed into South America during this era as part of the Great American interchange 10 and mammoths migrating into North America around 1 5 million years ago 11 At the end of the Early Pleistocene around 800 000 years ago the elephantid genus Palaeoloxodon dispersed outside of Africa becoming widely distributed in Eurasia 12 By the beginning of the Late Pleistocene proboscideans were represented by around 23 species Proboscideans underwent a dramatic decline during the Late Pleistocene as part of the Late Pleistocene extinctions with all remaining non elephantid proboscideans including Stegodon mastodons and the American gomphotheres Cuvieronius and Notiomastodon and Palaeoloxodon becoming extinct with mammoths only surviving in relict populations on islands around the Bering Strait into the Holocene with their latest survival being on Wrangel Island around 4 000 years ago 7 13 The following cladogram is based on endocasts 14 Proboscidea Phosphatherium esculliei nbsp Numidotherium koholense nbsp Moeritherium lyonsi nbsp Deinotheriidae nbsp Elephantiformes Palaeomastodon beadnelli nbsp Elephantimorpha Mammutida Mammut americanum nbsp Zygolophodon borsoni nbsp Choerolophodon penteliciGomphotherium augustidens nbsp Cuvieronius andium nbsp Stegomastodon humboldti nbsp Elephantoidea Stegodon insignis nbsp Elephantidae Mammuthus meridionalis nbsp Mammuthus primigenius nbsp Mammuthus columbi nbsp Elephas maximus nbsp Loxodonta africana nbsp Palaeoloxodon Palaeoloxodon antiquus nbsp Palaeoloxodon falconeri nbsp plesielephantiforms mastodonts Morphology editProboscideans experienced several evolutionary trends such as an increase in size which led to many giant species that stood over 4 m 13 ft 1 in tall and body masses of over 10 tonnes 15 As with other megaherbivores including the extinct sauropod dinosaurs the large size of proboscideans likely developed to allow them to survive on vegetation with low nutritional value 16 Their limbs grew longer and the feet shorter and broader 17 The feet were originally plantigrade and developed into a digitigrade stance with cushion pads and the sesamoid bone providing support with this change developing around the common ancestor of Deinotheriidae and Elephantiformes 18 The skull grew larger especially the cranium while the neck shortened to provide better support for the skull The increase in size led to the development and elongation of the mobile trunk to provide reach The number of premolars incisors and canines decreased The cheek teeth molars and premolars became larger and more specialised 17 In Elephantiformes the second upper incisor and lower incisor were transformed into ever growing tusks 19 20 The tusks are proportionally heavy for their size being primarily composed of dentine In primitive proboscideans a band of enamel covers part of the tusk surface though in many later groups including modern elephants the band is lost with elephants only having enamel on the tusk tips of juveniles The upper tusks were initially modest in size but from the Late Miocene onwards proboscideans developed increasingly large tusks with the longest ever recorded tusk being 5 02 metres 16 5 ft long belonging to Mammut borsoni found in Greece with some mammoth tusks likely weighing over 200 kilograms 440 lb The lower tusks are generally smaller than the upper tusks but could grow to large sizes in some species like in Deinotherium which lacks upper tusks where they could grow over 1 5 metres 4 9 ft long the amebelodontid Konobelodon has lower tusks 1 61 metres 5 3 ft long with the longest lower tusks ever recorded being from the primitive elephantid Stegotetrabelodon which are around 2 2 metres 7 2 ft long 21 The molar teeth changed from being replaced vertically as in other mammals to being replaced horizontally in the clade Elephantimorpha 22 While early Elephantimorpha generally had lower jaws with an elongated mandibular symphysis at the front of the jaw with well developed lower tusks incisors from the Late Miocene onwards many groups convergently developed brevirostrine shortened lower jaws with vestigial or no lower tusks 23 24 Elephantids are distinguished from earlier proboscideans by a major shift in the molar morphology to parallel lophs rather than the cusps of earlier proboscideans allowing them to become higher crowned hypsodont and more efficient in consuming grass 25 Dwarfism edit Main article Dwarf elephant nbsp Skeleton of Palaeoloxodon falconeri one of the smallest known dwarf elephants with an adult shoulder height less than 1 metre 3 3 ft Several species of proboscideans lived on islands and experienced insular dwarfism This occurred primarily during the Pleistocene when some elephant populations became isolated by fluctuating sea levels although dwarf elephants did exist earlier in the Pliocene These elephants likely grew smaller on islands due to a lack of large or viable predator populations and limited resources By contrast small mammals such as rodents develop gigantism in these conditions Dwarf proboscideans are known to have lived in Indonesia the Channel Islands of California and several islands of the Mediterranean 26 Elephas celebensis of Sulawesi is believed to have descended from Elephas planifrons Elephas falconeri of Malta and Sicily was only 1 m 3 ft and had probably evolved from the straight tusked elephant Other descendants of the straight tusked elephant existed in Cyprus Dwarf elephants of uncertain descent lived in Crete Cyclades and Dodecanese while dwarf mammoths are known to have lived in Sardinia 26 The Columbian mammoth colonised the Channel Islands and evolved into the pygmy mammoth This species reached a height of 1 2 1 8 m 4 6 ft and weighed 200 2 000 kg 440 4 410 lb A population of small woolly mammoths survived on Wrangel Island as recently as 4 000 years ago 26 After their discovery in 1993 they were considered dwarf mammoths 27 This classification has been re evaluated and since the Second International Mammoth Conference in 1999 these animals are no longer considered to be true dwarf mammoths 28 Classification editBelow is an unranked taxonomy of proboscidean genera as of 2019 29 30 31 32 Order Proboscidea Illiger 1811 Eritherium Gheerbrant 2009 Moeritherium Andrews 1901 Saloumia Tabuce et al 2019 Suborder Plesielephantiformes Shoshani et al 2001 Family Numidotheriidae Shoshani amp Tassy 1992 Phosphatherium Gheerbrant et al 1996 Arcanotherium Delmer 2009 Daouitherium Gheerbrant amp Sudre 2002 Numidotherium Mahboubi et al 1986 Family Barytheriidae Andrews 1906 Omanitherium Seiffert et al 2012 Barytherium Andrews 1901 Family Deinotheriidae Bonaparte 1845 Chilgatherium Sanders et al 2004 Prodeinotherium Ehik 1930 Deinotherium Kaup 1829 Suborder Elephantiformes Tassy 1988 Eritreum Shoshani et al 2006 Hemimastodon Pilgrim 1912 Palaeomastodon Andrews 1901 Phiomia Andrews amp Beadnell 1902 Infraorder Elephantimorpha Tassy amp Shoshani 1997 Family Mammutidae Hay 1922 Losodokodon Rasmussen amp Gutierrez 2009 Eozygodon Tassy amp Pickford 1983 Zygolophodon Vacek 1877 Sinomammut Mothe et al 2016 Mammut Blumenbach 1799 Parvorder Elephantida Tassy amp Shoshani 1997 Family Choerolophodontidae Gaziry 1976 Afrochoerodon Pickford 2001 Choerolophodon Schlesinger 1917 Family Amebelodontidae Barbour 1927 Afromastodon Pickford 2003 Progomphotherium Pickford 2003 Eurybelodon Lambert 2016 Serbelodon Frick 1933 Archaeobelodon Tassy 1984 Protanancus Arambourg 1945 Amebelodon Barbour 1927 Konobelodon Lambert 1990 Torynobelodon Barbour 1929 Aphanobelodon Wang et al 2016 Platybelodon Borissiak 1928 Family Gomphotheriidae Hay 1922 paraphyletic trilophodont gomphotheres Gomphotherium Burmeister 1837 Blancotherium May 2019 Gnathabelodon Barbour amp Sternberg 1935 Eubelodon Barbour 1914 Stegomastodon Pohlig 1912 Sinomastodon Tobien et al 1986 Notiomastodon Cabrera 1929 Rhynchotherium Falconer 1868 Cuvieronius Osborn 1923 tetralophodont gomphotheres Anancus Aymard 1855 Paratetralophodon Tassy 1983 Pediolophodon Lambert 2007 Tetralophodon Falconer 1857 Superfamily Elephantoidea Gray 1821 Family Stegodontidae Osborn 1918 Stegolophodon Schlesinger 1917 Stegodon Falconer 1857 Family Elephantidae Gray 1821 Subfamily Stegotetrabelodontinae Aguirre 1969 Stegodibelodon Coppens 1972 Stegotetrabelodon Petrocchi 1941 Selenotherium Mackaye Brunet amp Tassy 2005 Subfamily Elephantinae Gray 1821 Primelephas Maglio 1970 Loxodonta Anonymous 1827 Palaeoloxodon Matsumoto 1924 Mammuthus Brookes 1828 Elephas Linnaeus 1758References edit Illiger Johann Karl Wilhelm 1811 Prodromus Systematis Mammalium et Avium Additis Terminis Zoographicis Utriusque Classis Eorumque Versione Germanica Berolini Sumptibus C Salfeld p 62 a b Larramendi A 2016 Shoulder height body mass and shape of proboscideans PDF Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61 doi 10 4202 app 00136 2014 S2CID 2092950 Kingdon Jonathan 2013 Mammals of Africa Bloomsbury p 173 ISBN 9781408189962 Archived from the original on 21 March 2023 Retrieved 6 June 2020 Gheerbrant E 2009 Paleocene emergence of elephant relatives and the rapid radiation of African ungulates Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 26 10717 10721 Bibcode 2009PNAS 10610717G doi 10 1073 pnas 0900251106 PMC 2705600 PMID 19549873 a b Sukumar pp 13 16 Liu Alexander G S C Seiffert Erik R Simons Elwyn L 15 April 2008 Stable isotope evidence for an amphibious phase in early proboscidean evolution Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 15 5786 5791 Bibcode 2008PNAS 105 5786L doi 10 1073 pnas 0800884105 ISSN 0027 8424 PMC 2311368 PMID 18413605 a b c d Cantalapiedra Juan L Sanisidro oscar Zhang Hanwen Alberdi Maria T Prado Jose L Blanco Fernando Saarinen Juha 1 July 2021 The rise and fall of proboscidean ecological diversity Nature Ecology amp Evolution 5 9 1266 1272 doi 10 1038 s41559 021 01498 w ISSN 2397 334X PMID 34211141 S2CID 235712060 H Saegusa H Nakaya Y Kunimatsu M Nakatsukasa H Tsujikawa Y Sawada M Saneyoshi T Sakai Earliest elephantid remains from the late Miocene locality Nakali Kenya Scientific Annals School of Geology Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Greece VIth International Conference on Mammoths and Their Relatives vol 102 Grevena Siatista special volume 2014 p 175 Iannucci Alessio Sardella Raffaele 28 February 2023 What Does the Elephant Equus Event Mean Today Reflections on Mammal Dispersal Events around the Pliocene Pleistocene Boundary and the Flexible Ambiguity of Biochronology Quaternary 6 1 16 doi 10 3390 quat6010016 hdl 11573 1680082 ISSN 2571 550X Mothe Dimila dos Santos Avilla Leonardo Asevedo Lidiane Borges Silva Leon Rosas Mariane Labarca Encina Rafael Souberlich Ricardo Soibelzon Esteban Roman Carrion Jose Luis Rios Sergio D Rincon Ascanio D Cardoso de Oliveira Gina Pereira Lopes Renato 30 September 2016 Sixty years after The mastodonts of Brazil The state of the art of South American proboscideans Proboscidea Gomphotheriidae PDF Quaternary International 443 52 64 Bibcode 2017QuInt 443 52M doi 10 1016 j quaint 2016 08 028 Lister A M Sher A V 13 November 2015 Evolution and dispersal of mammoths across the Northern Hemisphere Science 350 6262 805 809 Bibcode 2015Sci 350 805L doi 10 1126 science aac5660 ISSN 0036 8075 PMID 26564853 S2CID 206639522 Lister Adrian M 2004 Ecological Interactions of Elephantids in Pleistocene Eurasia Human Paleoecology in the Levantine Corridor Oxbow Books pp 53 60 ISBN 978 1 78570 965 4 retrieved 14 April 2020 Rogers Rebekah L Slatkin Montgomery 2 March 2017 Barsh Gregory S ed Excess of genomic defects in a woolly mammoth on Wrangel island PLOS Genetics 13 3 e1006601 doi 10 1371 journal pgen 1006601 ISSN 1553 7404 PMC 5333797 PMID 28253255 Benoit Julien Lyras George A Schmitt Arnaud Nxumalo Mpilo Tabuce Rodolphe Obada Teodor Mararsecul Vladislav Manger Paul 2023 Dozo Maria Teresa Paulina Carabajal Ariana Macrini Thomas E Walsh Stig eds Paleoneurology of the Proboscidea Mammalia Afrotheria Insights from Their Brain Endocast and Labyrinth Paleoneurology of Amniotes Cham Springer International Publishing pp 579 644 doi 10 1007 978 3 031 13983 3 15 ISBN 978 3 031 13982 6 retrieved 22 May 2023 Larramendi A 2015 Shoulder height body mass and shape of proboscideans Acta Palaeontologica Polonica doi 10 4202 app 00136 2014 Carpenter K 2006 Biggest of the big a critical re evaluation of the mega sauropod Amphicoelias fragillimus Cope 1878 In Foster J R Lucas S G eds Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin Vol 36 New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science pp 131 138 a b Shoshani J 1998 Understanding proboscidean evolution a formidable task Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13 12 480 87 doi 10 1016 S0169 5347 98 01491 8 PMID 21238404 Hutchinson J R Delmer C Miller C E Hildebrandt T Pitsillides A A Boyde A 2011 From flat foot to fat foot structure ontogeny function and evolution of elephant sixth toes PDF Science 334 6063 1699 1703 Bibcode 2011Sci 334R1699H doi 10 1126 science 1211437 PMID 22194576 S2CID 206536505 Archived from the original on 21 March 2023 Retrieved 3 January 2023 Ferretti Marco P March 2008 Enamel Structure of Cuvieronius hyodon Proboscidea Gomphotheriidae with a Discussion on Enamel Evolution in Elephantoids Journal of Mammalian Evolution 15 1 37 58 doi 10 1007 s10914 007 9057 3 ISSN 1064 7554 S2CID 21216371 Delmer Cyrille December 2009 Reassessment of the Generic Attribution of Numidotherium savagei and the Homologies of Lower Incisors in Proboscideans Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 4 561 580 doi 10 4202 app 2007 0036 ISSN 0567 7920 S2CID 55095894 Larramendi Asier 10 December 2023 Estimating tusk masses in proboscideans a comprehensive analysis and predictive model Historical Biology 1 14 doi 10 1080 08912963 2023 2286272 ISSN 0891 2963 Sanders William J 17 February 2018 Horizontal tooth displacement and premolar occurrence in elephants and other elephantiform proboscideans Historical Biology 30 1 2 137 156 Bibcode 2018HBio 30 137S doi 10 1080 08912963 2017 1297436 ISSN 0891 2963 S2CID 89904463 Mothe Dimila Ferretti Marco P Avilla Leonardo S 12 January 2016 The Dance of Tusks Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in Elephantimorpha PLOS ONE 11 1 e0147009 Bibcode 2016PLoSO 1147009M doi 10 1371 journal pone 0147009 PMC 4710528 PMID 26756209 Li Chunxiao Deng Tao Wang Yang Sun Fajun Wolff Burt Jiangzuo Qigao Ma Jiao Xing Luda Fu Jiao 16 August 2023 Longer mandible or nose Co evolution of feeding organs in early elephantiforms Report Paleontology doi 10 1101 2023 08 15 553347 Lister Adrian M 26 June 2013 The role of behaviour in adaptive morphological evolution of African proboscideans Nature 500 7462 331 334 Bibcode 2013Natur 500 331L doi 10 1038 nature12275 ISSN 0028 0836 PMID 23803767 S2CID 883007 a b c Sukumar pp 31 33 Vartanyan S L Garutt V E Sher A V 1993 Holocene dwarf mammoths from Wrangel Island in the Siberian Arctic Nature 362 6418 337 40 Bibcode 1993Natur 362 337V doi 10 1038 362337a0 PMID 29633990 S2CID 4249191 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Tikhonov A Agenbroad L Vartanyan S 2003 Comparative analysis of the mammoth populations on Wrangel Island and the Channel Islands Deinsea 9 415 20 ISSN 0923 9308 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Shoshani Jeheskel Pascal Tassy 2005 Advances in proboscidean taxonomy amp classification anatomy amp physiology and ecology amp behavior Quaternary International 126 128 5 20 Bibcode 2005QuInt 126 5S doi 10 1016 j quaint 2004 04 011 Wang Shi Qi Deng Tao Ye Jie He Wen Chen Shan Qin 2017 Morphological and ecological diversity of Amebelodontidae Proboscidea Mammalia revealed by a Miocene fossil accumulation of an upper tuskless proboscidean Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 15 8 601 615 Bibcode 2017JSPal 15 601W doi 10 1080 14772019 2016 1208687 S2CID 89063787 Mothe Dimila Ferretti Marco P Avilla Leonardo S 12 January 2016 The Dance of Tusks Rediscovery of Lower Incisors in the Pan American Proboscidean Cuvieronius hyodon Revises Incisor Evolution in Elephantimorpha PLOS ONE 11 1 e0147009 Bibcode 2016PLoSO 1147009M doi 10 1371 journal pone 0147009 PMC 4710528 PMID 26756209 Tabuce Rodolphe Sarr Raphael Adnet Sylvain Lebrun Renaud Lihoreau Fabrice Martin Jeremy Sambou Bernard Thiam Mustapha Hautier Lionel 2019 Filling a gap in the proboscidean fossil record a new genus from the Lutetian of Senegal PDF Journal of Paleontology 94 3 580 588 doi 10 1017 jpa 2019 98 S2CID 213978026 Bibliography editNowak Ronald M 1999 Walker s Mammals of the World 6th ed Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press ISBN 978 0 8018 5789 8 LCCN 98023686 Haynes Gary 1993 Mammoths Mastodonts and Elephants Biology Behavior and the Fossil Record 2nd ed Cambridge University Press ISBN 9780521456913Sukumar R 11 September 2003 The Living Elephants Evolutionary Ecology Behaviour and Conservation Oxford University Press USA ISBN 978 0 19 510778 4 OCLC 935260783 nbsp Wikispecies has information related to Proboscidea nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to Proboscidea nbsp The Wikibook Dichotomous Key has a page on the topic of Proboscidea nbsp Look up Proboscidea in Wiktionary the free dictionary Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Proboscidea amp oldid 1203532707, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.