Powered exoskeleton

"Battlesuit" redirects here. For the board game, see Battlesuit (game).

"Mobile suit" redirects here. For the fictional mecha robots, see Gundam (fictional robot).

"Exosuit" redirects here. For a brand of atmospheric diving suit, see Atmospheric diving suit.

A powered exoskeleton (also known as power armor, powered armor, powered suit, cybernetic suit, robot armor, robot suit, high-tech armor, robotic armor, robot armor suit, cybernetic armor, exosuit, hardsuit, exoframe or augmented mobility^[1]) is a mobile machine that is wearable over all or part of the human body, providing ergonomic structural support and powered by a system of electric motors, pneumatics, levers, hydraulics or a combination of cybernetic technologies, while allowing for sufficient limb movement with increased strength and endurance.^[2] The exoskeleton is designed to provide better mechanical load tolerance, and its control system aims to sense and synchronize with the user's intended motion and relay the signal to motors which manage the gears. The exoskeleton also protects the user's shoulder, waist, back and thigh against overload, and stabilizes movements when lifting and holding heavy items.^[3]

An exhibit of the "Future Soldier" designed by the United States Army

A powered exoskeleton differs from a passive exoskeleton, as the latter has no intrinsic actuator and relies completely on the user's own muscles for movements, adding more stress and making the user more prone to fatigue, although it does provide mechanical benefits and protection to the user.^[4][5] This also explains the difference of an exoskeleton to orthotics, as orthosis mainly aims to promote progressively increased muscle work and, in the best case, regain and improve existing muscle functions. Currently, there are products that can help humans reduce their energy consumption by as much as 60 percent while carrying things.^[6]

History

The earliest-known exoskeleton-like device was an apparatus for assisting movement developed in 1890 by Russian engineer Nicholas Yagn. It used energy stored in compressed gas bags to assist in movement, although it was passive and required human power.^[7] In 1917, United States inventor Leslie C. Kelley developed what he called a pedomotor, which operated on steam power with artificial ligaments acting in parallel to the wearer's movements.^[8] This system was able to supplement human power with external power.

In the 1960s, the first true 'mobile machines' integrated with human movements began to appear. A suit called Hardiman was co-developed by General Electric and the US Armed Forces. The suit was powered by hydraulics and electricity and amplified the wearer's strength by a factor of 25, so that lifting 110 kilograms (240 lb) would feel like lifting 4.5 kilograms (10 lb). A feature called force feedback enabled the wearer to feel the forces and objects being manipulated.

The Hardiman had major limitations, including its 680-kilogram (1,500 lb) weight.^[9] It was also designed as a master-slave system: the operator was in a master suit surrounded by the exterior slave suit, which performed work in response to the operator's movements. The response time for the slave suit was slow compared to a suit constructed of a single layer, and bugs caused "violent and uncontrollable motion by the machine" when moving both legs simultaneously.^[10] Hardiman's slow walking speed of 0.76 metres per second (2.5 ft/s) further limited practical uses, and the project was not successful.^[11]

At about the same time, early active exoskeletons and humanoid robots were developed at the Mihajlo Pupin Institute in Yugoslavia by a team led by Prof. Miomir Vukobratović.^[12] Legged locomotion systems were developed first, with the goal of assisting in the rehabilitation of paraplegics. In the course of developing active exoskeletons, the Institute also developed theory to aid in the analysis and control of the human gait. Some of this work informed the development of modern high-performance humanoid robots.^[13] In 1972, an active exoskeleton for rehabilitation of paraplegics that was pneumatically powered and electronically programmed was tested at Belgrade Orthopedic Clinic.^[13]

In 1985, an engineer at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) proposed an exoskeleton called Pitman, a powered suit of armor for infantrymen.^[14] The design included brain-scanning sensors in the helmet and was considered too futuristic; it was never built.^[15]

In 1986, an exoskeleton called the Lifesuit was designed by Monty Reed, a US Army Ranger who had broken his back in a parachute accident.^[16] While recovering in the hospital, he read Robert Heinlein's science fiction novel Starship Troopers, and Heinlein's description of mobile infantry power suits inspired Reed to design a supportive exoskeleton. In 2001, Reed began working full-time on the project, and in 2005 he wore the 12th prototype in the Saint Patrick's Day Dash foot race in Seattle, Washington.^[17] Reed claims to have set the speed record for walking in robot suits by completing the 4.8-kilometre (3 mi) race at an average speed of 4 kilometres per hour (2.5 mph).^[18] The Lifesuit prototype 14 can walk 1.6 km (1 mi) on a full charge and lift 92 kg (203 lb) for the wearer.^[19]

• Some exoskeleton models
•  
•  
•  

Classification

 

General model to classify the exoskeletons^[20]

The general categorization suggests several feasible exoskeleton categories. Such categories have general classes, due to the wide quantity of exoskeletons in existence, and are the structure, the body part focused on, the action, the power technology, the purpose, and the application area varying from one to another.^[20]

Exoskeletons are not only designed for specific body parts; the exoskeletons may be designed more generally for only one hand, a leg, or even the complete body. Thus, the separation of the classes demonstrates the most common body parts exoskeletons can be built for. The full-body class refers to the exoskeletons made to assist all the limbs, or most of the body. The upper body refers to the exoskeletons made for the upper limbs, and involving the chest, head, back, and/or shoulders. The lower body category refers to the exoskeletons made for the lower limbs: thighs, lower legs, and/or hips. Moreover, there are classes for specific limbs and specific joints. These classes include exoskeletons designed for the knee, ankle, hand, arm, foot, etc. Additionally, there is a special class for any other exoskeleton that is not included in the previous classes.^[20]

Rigid exoskeletons are those whose structural components attached to the user’s body are made with hard materials. Such materials include metals, plastics, fibers, etc. Soft exoskeletons, also called exo-suits, are instead made with materials that allow free movement of the structural components. Exo-suits are often made with, yet not restricted to, textiles.^[20]

The action category describes the type of help the exoskeleton gives the user, dividing exoskeletons into active and passive action. The active class comprises exoskeletons that give “active” aid to the user; in other words, these exoskeletons perform the movements without the need for the user to apply energy. The energy needed to perform the movement is supplied by an external source. On the other hand, the passive class comprises exoskeletons that need the user to perform the movement to work; these exoskeletons do not have power sources. Thus, the user has to perform the movement, and while doing it, the exoskeleton facilitates the movement.^[20]

The powered technologies are separated into four main classes, with one specific class for hybrid and one for any other non-common power technology. The four main classes comprise the electric, hydraulic, and pneumatic actuators as the active action, and the mechanical systems as the passive action.^[20]

The exoskeleton’s purpose defines what the exoskeleton will be used for. This category has only two classes: recovery and performance. The recovery exoskeletons are used for rehabilitation; the performance exoskeletons are used for assistance.^[20]

The last category comprises the application area for which the exoskeleton was made. Each exoskeleton may belong to one or more class. The military class comprises any exoskeleton used for any activity involving an army, navy, airforce, or any other military branch. The medical class comprises the exoskeletons involved in clinical activities, or in general, used in any hospital/clinic. Additionally, the recovery exoskeletons are normally classified in the medical class. Furthermore, the research class comprises the exoskeletons that are nowadays in their research development phase. The industrial class, as its name suggests, encompasses those exoskeletons made specifically for industrial activities. These exoskeletons are characterized for being used by people without any pathology seeking the avoidance of long-term physical damages. This description also applies to military exoskeletons. The civilian class is for the recovery or performance exoskeletons made for people to use in their homes or public spaces, aiding in tasks that people cannot perform as easily alone. Finally, there is a class for exoskeletons in which the applications do not fit into any of the previous classes.^[20]

Applications

 

Steve Jurvetson with a Hybrid Assistive Limb powered exoskeleton suit, commercially available in Japan

Medical

In medical application, e.g. with complete paraplegia after spinal cord injury, an exoskeleton can be an additional option for the supply of aids if the structural and functional properties of the neuromuscular and skeletal system are too limited to be able to achieve mobilization with an orthosis. In patients with complete paraplegia (ASIA A), exoskeletons are interesting as an alternative to an orthosis under this criterion for lesion heights above the thoracic vertebra (T12). In patients with incomplete paraplegia (ASIA B-D), orthotics are even suitable for lesion heights above T12 in order to promote the patient's own activity to such an extent that the therapeutical mobilization can be successful.^[21][22][23] In contrast to an orthosis, an exoskeleton takes over a large part of the active muscle work, while an orthosis is intended to activate the recovery of muscle work. In addition powered exoskeletons can improve the quality of life of individuals who have lost the use of their legs by enabling system-assisted walking.^[24] Exoskeletons—that may be called "step rehabilitation robots"—may also help with the rehabilitation from stroke, spinal cord injury or during aging.^[25] Several prototype exoskeletons are under development.^[26][27] The Ekso GT, made by Ekso Bionics, is the first exoskeleton to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for stroke patients.^[28] The German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence has developed two general purpose powered exoskeletons, CAPIO^[29][30] and VI-Bot.^[31] These are primarily being used for teleoperation. Exoskeleton technology is also being developed to enhance precision during surgery,^[32] and to help nurses move and carry heavy patients.^[33]

Military

 

Exoskeleton being developed by DARPA

Developing a full-body suit that meets the needs of soldiers has proven challenging. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) launched the Warrior Web program^[34] in September 2011^[35] and has developed and funded several prototypes, including a "soft exosuit" developed by Harvard University's Wyss Institute.^[36] In the early 2000s, DARPA funded the first Sarcos full-body, powered exoskeleton prototype, which was hydraulically actuated and consumed 6,800 watts of power.^[37] By 2010, DARPA and Sarcos had more than halved that, to 3,000 watts, but still required the exoskeleton to be tethered to the power source. Nowadays, the Sarcos Guardian XO is powered by lithium ion batteries and is applicable for military logistics applications.^[37] In 2019, the US Army's TALOS exoskeleton project was put on hold.^[38] A variety of "slimmed-down" exoskeletons have been developed for use on the battlefield, aimed at decreasing fatigue and increasing productivity.^[39] For example, Lockheed Martin's ONYX suit aims to support soldiers in performing tasks that are "knee-intensive", such as crossing difficult terrain.^[40] Leia Stirling's group has identified that exoskeletons can reduce a soldier's response times.^[41]

Civilian

Exoskeletons are being developed to help firefighters and other rescue workers to climb stairs while carrying heavy equipment.^[42]

Industry

Passive exoskeleton technology is increasingly being used in the automotive industry, with the goal of reducing worker injury (especially in the shoulders and spine) and reducing errors due to fatigue.^[43][44] They are also being examined for use in logistics.^[45]

These systems can be divided into two categories:^[46]

• exoskeletons for upper-limb for assisting shoulder flexion-extension movements;
• exoskeletons for lumbar support for assisting manual lifting tasks.

For broadest application, industrial exoskeletons must be lightweight, comfortable, safe, and minimally disruptive to the environment.^[47] For some applications, single-joint exoskeletons (i.e. intended to assist only the limb involved in specific tasks) are more appropriate than full-body powered suits.^[47] Full-body powered exoskeletons have been developed to assist with heavy loads in the industrial setting,^[48][49] and for specialized applications such as nuclear power plant maintenance.^[50]

The biomechanical efficacy of exoskeletons in industrial applications is however still largely unknown. Companies have to conduct a risk assessment for workplaces at which exoskeletons are to be used. The Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance has developed a draft risk assessment for exoskeletons and their use. The safety assessment is based on diverse experience including machine safety, personal protective equipment and risk analysis of physical stresses at work. The exoskeletons available on the market often fail to give adequate consideration to safety aspects, in some cases despite claims to the contrary by their manufacturers.^[51]

Products

• Japet Exoskeleton is a powered lower-back exoskeleton for work and industry based on established passive braces. It is intended to reduce lumbar pressure.^[52]
• Parker Hannifin's Indego Exoskeleton is an FDA-Cleared, electrically powered support system for legs that helps spinal cord injury patients and stroke patients walk.^[53][54]
• ReWalk features powered hip and knee motion to enable those with lower limb disabilities, including paraplegia as a result of spinal cord injury (SCI), to perform self-initiated standing, walking, and stair ascending and descending.^[55] ReStore, a simpler system by the same manufacturer, attaches to a single leg to assist with gait retraining, and was approved by the FDA in 2019.^[55]
• Ekso Bionics's EskoGT is a hydraulically powered exoskeleton system allowing paraplegics to stand and walk with crutches or a walker.^[56] It was approved by the FDA in 2019.^[28]
• SuitX's Phoenix is a modular, light and cheap exoskeleton, powered by a battery backpack that allows paraplegics to walk at up to 1.8 kilometres per hour (1.1 mph).^[57]
• Cyberdyne's HAL is a wearable robot that comes in multiple configurations.^[58] HAL is currently in use in Japanese and US hospitals and was given global safety certification in 2013.^[27][59]
• Honda's Walking Assist Device is a partial exoskeleton to help those with difficulties walking unsupported. It was given pre-market notification by the FDA in 2019.^[60]
• The European Space Agency has developed a series of ergonomic exoskeletons for robotic teleoperation, including the EXARM, X-Arm-2 and SAM exoskeletons. The target application is telemanipulation of astronaut-like robots, operating in a remote harsh environment.^[61]
• In 2018, Spanish exoskeleton provider Gogoa Mobility was the first European company to get a CE approval for their powered lower body HANK exoskeleton for medical use.^[62] The CE approval covered the use of HANK for rehabilitation due to Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Acquired Brain Damage (ABD) & Neurodegenerative Illnesses. In Feb 2020, their knee specific exoskeleton called Belk also received a CE approval.
• Roam Robotics produces a soft exoskeleton for skiers and snowboarders.^[63]
• Wandercraft produces Atalante, the first powered exoskeleton to allow users to walk hands-free, unlike most powered medical exoskeleton that require the simultaneous use of crutches.^[64]
• Sarcos has unveiled a full-body, powered exoskeleton, the Guardian XO, which can lift up to 200 pounds (91 kg).^[65][66] Their "Alpha" version was demonstrated at the 2020 Consumer Electronics Show with Delta Air Lines.^[67]
• ExoMed's ExoHeaver is electrically powered exoskeleton, designed for Russian nickel and palladium mining and smelting company in 2018. Designed for lifting and holding loads weighing up to 60 kg (130 lb) and collecting information about the environment using sensors. More than 20 exoskeletons have been tested and are used at the enterprise.^[68]
• Comau introduced a passive spring-loaded exoskeleton called the Comau MATE which provides antigravitational support to the user. The exosuit supports the upper arms and spine to help facilitate work and reduce physical fatigue. MATE’s spring-loaded actuation box stores energy through an advanced mechanism during the extension phase, and then returns it to the user during the flexion phase.^[69]

Projects on hold/abandoned

• Lockheed Martin's Human Universal Load Carrier (HULC) was abandoned after tests showed that wearing the suit caused users to expend significantly more energy during controlled treadmill walks.^[70]
• The Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX) consisted of mechanical metal leg braces, a power unit, and a backpack-like frame to carry a heavy load.^[71] The technology developed for BLEEX led to SuitX's Phoenix.^[72]
• A project from Ghent University, WALL-X was shown in 2013 to reduce the metabolic cost of normal walking. This result was achieved by optimizing the controls based on the study of the biomechanics of the human-exoskeleton interaction.^[73]

Limitations and design issues

Mobility aids are frequently abandoned for lack of usability.^[74] Major measures of usability include whether the device reduces the energy consumed during motion, and whether it is safe to use. Some design issues faced by engineers are listed below.

Power supply

One of the biggest problems facing engineers and designers of powered exoskeletons is the power supply.^[75] This is a particular issue if the exoskeleton is intended to be worn "in the field", i.e. outside a context in which the exoskeleton can be tethered to external power sources via power cables, thus having to rely solely on onboard power supply. Battery packs would require frequent replacement or recharging,^[75] and may risk explosion due to thermal runaway.^[76] According to Sarcos, the company has solved some of these issues related to battery technology, particularly consumption, reducing the amount of power required to operate its Guardian XO to under 500 watts (0.67 hp) and enabling its batteries to be “hot-swapped” without powering down the unit.^[37] Internal combustion engine offer high energy output, but problems include exhaust fumes, waste heat and inability to modulate power smoothly,^[77] as well as the periodic need to replenish volatile fuels. Hydrogen cells have been used in some prototypes^[78] but also suffer from several safety problems.^[79]

Skeleton

Early exoskeletons used inexpensive and easy-to-mold materials such as steel and aluminium alloy. However, steel is heavy and the powered exoskeleton must work harder to overcome its own weight, reducing efficiency. Aluminium alloys are lightweight, but fail through fatigue quickly.^[80] Fiberglass, carbon fiber and carbon nanotubes have considerably higher strength per weight.^[81] "Soft" exoskeletons that attach motors and control devices to flexible clothing are also under development.^[82]

Actuators

 

Pneumatic air muscle

Joint actuators also face the challenge of being lightweight, yet powerful. Technologies used include pneumatic activators,^[63] hydraulic cylinders,^[83] and electronic servomotors.^[84] Elastic actuators are being investigated to simulate control of stiffness in human limbs and provide touch perception.^[85] The air muscle, a.k.a. braided pneumatic actuator or McKibben air muscle, is also used to enhance tactile feedback.^[86]

Joint flexibility

The flexibility of human anatomy is a design issue for traditional "hard" robots. Several human joints such as the hips and shoulders are ball and socket joints, with the center of rotation inside the body. Since no two individuals are exactly alike, fully mimicking the degrees of freedom of a joint movement is not possible. Instead, the exoskeleton joint is commonly modeled as a series of hinges with one degree of freedom for each axis of rotations.^[74]

Spinal flexibility is another challenge since the spine is effectively a stack of limited-motion ball joints. There is no simple combination of external single-axis hinges that can easily match the full range of motion of the human spine. Because accurate alignment is challenging, devices often include the ability to compensate for misalignment with additional degrees of freedom.^[87]

Soft exoskeletons bend with the body and address some of these issues.^[88]

Power control and modulation

A successful exoskeleton should assist its user, for example by reducing the energy required to perform a task.^[74] Individual variations in the nature, range and force of movements make it difficult for a standardized device to provide the appropriate amount of assistance at the right time. Algorithms to tune control parameters to automatically optimize the energy cost of walking are under development.^[89][90] Direct feedback between the human nervous system and motorized prosthetics ("neuro-embodied design") has also been implemented in a few high-profile cases.^[91]

Adaptation to user size variations

Humans exhibit a wide range of physical size differences in both skeletal lengths and limb and torso girth, so exoskeletons must either be adaptable or fitted to individual users. In military applications, it may be possible to address this by requiring the user to be of an approved physical size in order to be issued an exoskeleton. Physical body size restrictions already occur in the military for jobs such as aircraft pilots, due to the problems of fitting seats and controls to very large and very small people.^[92] For soft exoskeletons, this is less of a problem.^[88]

Health and safety

While exoskeletons can reduce the stress of manual labor, they may also pose dangers.^[1] The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has called for research to address the potential dangers and benefits of the technology, noting potential new risk factors for workers such as lack of mobility to avoid a falling object, and potential falls due to a shift in center of gravity.^[93]

As of 2018, the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration was not preparing any safety standards for exoskeletons. The International Organization for Standardization published a safety standard in 2014, and ASTM International was working on standards to be released beginning in 2019.^[1]

Major events

• Cybathlon: an international competition in which people with physical disabilities compete against each other to complete everyday tasks using state-of-the-art technical assistance systems.^[94]

Fictional depictions

Main article: List of films featuring powered exoskeletons

Powered exoskeletons are featured in science fiction books and media as the standard equipment for space marines, miners, astronauts and colonists. The science fiction novel Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein (1959) is credited with introducing the concept of futuristic military armor. Other examples include Tony Stark's Iron Man suit, the robot exoskeleton used by Ellen Ripley to fight the Xenomorph queen in Aliens, the Power Armor used in the Fallout video game franchise and the Exoskeleton from S.T.A.L.K.E.R.^{[95][96][97][98]}

See also

• Affusto d'assalto/bari mount
• Atmospheric diving suit
• Back brace: somewhat similar devices as passive exoskeletons
• Bionics
• Future Force Warrior
• List of emerging technologies
• Mecha
• Steadicam
• TAWIS
• Walking truck, also known as the "cybernetic anthropomorphous machine"

References

1. Ferguson, Alan (September 23, 2018). "Exoskeletons and injury prevention". Safety+Health Magazine. Retrieved October 19, 2018.
2. Blake McGowan (2019-10-01). "Industrial Exoskeletons: What You're Not Hearing". Occupational Health & Safety. Retrieved 2018-10-10.
3. Li, R.M.; Ng, P.L. (2018). "Wearable Robotics, Industrial Robots and Construction Worker's Safety and Health". Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 595. pp. 31–36. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60384-1_4. ISBN 9783319603834.
4. Koopman, Axel S.; Kingma, Idsart; Faber, Gert S.; de Looze, Michiel P.; van Dieën, Jaap H. (23 January 2019). "Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks" (PDF). Journal of Biomechanics. 83: 97–103. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.033. ISSN 0021-9290. PMID 30514627. S2CID 54484633.
5. Bosch, Tim; van Eck, Jennifer; Knitel, Karlijn; de Looze, Michiel (1 May 2016). "The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work". Applied Ergonomics. 54: 212–217. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003. ISSN 0003-6870. PMID 26851481.
6. Bogue, Robert (2022-06-30). "Exoskeletons: a review of recent progress". Industrial Robot. 49 (5): 813–818. doi:10.1108/IR-04-2022-0105. ISSN 0143-991X. S2CID 248640941.
7. Yagin, Nicholas. "Apparatus for Facilitating Walking". U.S. patent 440,684 filed February 11, 1890 and issued November 18, 1890.
8. Kelley, C. Leslie. "Pedomotor". U.S. patent 1,308,675 filed April 24, 1917 and issued July 1, 1919.
9. (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center. August 30, 1971. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 6, 2019. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
10. Keller, Mike (August 25, 2016). "Do You Even Lift, Bro? Hardiman Was GE's Muscular Take On The Human-Machine Interface". GE Reports. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
11. Bellis, Mary. "Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation". ThoughtCo. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
12. Baldovino, Renann; Jamisola, Rodrigo Jr. (2017). "A survey in the different designs and control systems of powered-exoskeleton for lower extremities" (PDF). Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Biomechanics, Rational Publication. 1 (4): 103–115. doi:10.24243/JMEB/1.4.192.
13. Vukobratovic, Miomir K. (February 7, 2017). "When Were Active Exoskeletons Actually Born?" (PDF). Robotics Laboratory. Retrieved June 8, 2019.
14. Hecht, Jeff (1986-09-25). Armour-suited warriors of the future. Issue 1527: New Scientist. p. 31.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
15. Pope, Gregory T. (December 1, 1992). "Power Suits". Discover Magazine. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
16. "Giving the Gift of Walking – a 501 C3 nonprofit". They Shall Walk. 2013-01-24. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
17. Richman, Dan (March 11, 2005). "Man's dream is that Lifesuit will help paralyzed walk again". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
18. Reed, Monty K. (January 21, 2011). "Paralyzed Man Walks Again: Thanks to LIFESUIT prototype". They Shall Walk. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
19. Monty K Reed (October 10, 2014). "LIFESUIT Exoskeleton Gives the Gift of Walking so They Shall Walk". IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014). IEEE. pp. 382–385. doi:10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970309. ISBN 9781479971930. S2CID 35922757.
20. de la Tejera, Javier A.; Bustamante-Bello, Rogelio; Ramirez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.; Izquierdo-Reyes, Javier (24 December 2020). "Systematic Review of Exoskeletons towards a General Categorization Model Proposal". Applied Sciences. 11 (1): 76. doi:10.3390/app11010076.   Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
21. James W. Rowland, Gregory W. J. Hawryluk. "Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon". JNS Journal of Neurosurgery. 25: 2, 6.^{[dead link]}
22. Burns, Anthony S.; Ditunno, John F. (15 December 2001). "Establishing Prognosis and Maximizing Functional Outcomes After Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of Current and Future Directions in Rehabilitation Management". Spine. 26 (24S): S137-45. doi:10.1097/00007632-200112151-00023. ISSN 0362-2436. PMID 11805621. S2CID 30220082.
23. Kirshblum, Steven C.; Priebe, Michael M. (March 2007). "Spinal Cord Injury Medicine. 3. Rehabilitation Phase After Acute Sinap CordInjury". Spinal Cord Injury Medicine. 88. Retrieved 6 August 2021.
24. Ashley, Steven (February 21, 2017). "Robotic exoskeletons are changing lives in surprising ways". NBC News. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
25. "One step at a time: Rehabilitation robots that will keep 'elderly' mobile". The Express Tribune. Reuters. April 12, 2017. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
26. Moore, Elizabeth Armstrong (March 15, 2011). "HAL-5: The exoskeleton robot 'to suit you'". CNET. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
27. Osbun, Ashley (February 8, 2019). "Patients Walk Again with the HAL Exoskeleton". Electronic Component News. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
28. Strickland, Eliza (September 30, 2016). "Demo: The Ekso GT Robotic Exoskeleton for Paraplegics and Stroke Patients". IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
29. Dormehli, Luke (November 15, 2016). "Wearable exoskeleton lets researchers in Russia control a robot in Germany". Digital Trends. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
30. "Capio". Robotics Innovation Center—DFKI. 2013-12-31. Retrieved 2016-02-08.
31. "VI-Bot". Robotics Innovation Center—DFKI. 2010-12-31. Retrieved 2016-02-08.
32. Franco, Michael (March 15, 2017). "Hand-mounted exoskeleton system helps surgeons get a grip". New Atlas. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
33. Gilhooly, Rob (17 June 2012). "Exoskeletons await in work/care closet". The Japan Times Online. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
34. "Warrior Web". Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
35. RBR Staff (2015-02-21). "Ekso Selected to Participate in Warrior Web Task B". Robotics Business Review. Retrieved 2018-09-04.
36. Kusek, Kristen (September 11, 2014). "The $3 million suit". Harvard Gazette. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
37. Freedberg, Sydney J Jr. (March 18, 2019). "SOCOM Tests Sarcos Exoskeleton (No, It Isn't 'Iron Man')". Breaking Defense. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
38. Egozi, Arie (May 24, 2019). "SOCOM's Iron Man Must Die, So Iron Man Spinoffs Might Live". Breaking Defense. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
39. Adams, Eric (June 28, 2018). "Power-multiplying exoskeletons are slimming down for use on the battlefield". Popular Science. Retrieved July 4, 2017.
40. Santana, Marco (January 4, 2019). "Lockheed Martin shows off Orlando-built exoskeleton tech for U.S. Army". Orlando Sentinel. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
41. "Leia Stirling leads study on exoskeletons and decision making". Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology. October 4, 2018. Retrieved July 24, 2019.
42. Ridden, Paul (April 18, 2018). "Auberon exoskeleton takes the strain out of firefighting in towering infernos". New Atlas. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
43. Marinov, Borislav (May 15, 2019). "Passive Exoskeletons Establish A Foothold In Automotive Manufacturing". Forbes. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
44. Stuart, S. C. (June 18, 2018). "Checking Out Ford's Factory Floor Exoskeletons". PC Magazine. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
45. "Exoskeletons for Logistics". VIL. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
46. Spada, Stefania; Ghibaudo, Lidia; Gilotta, Silvia; Gastaldi, Laura; Cavatorta, Maria Pia (1 July 2018). "Analysis of Exoskeleton Introduction in Industrial Reality: Main Issues and EAWS Risk Assessment". Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 602. pp. 236–244. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60825-9_26. ISBN 9783319608242. ISSN 2194-5357.
47. Voilqué, Anthony; Masood, Jawad; Fauroux, J.C.; Sabourin, Laurent; Guezet, Olivier (March 25, 2019). "Industrial Exoskeleton Technology: Classification, Structural Analysis, and Structural Complexity Indicator". 2019 Wearable Robotics Association Conference (WearRAcon). pp. 13–20. doi:10.1109/WEARRACON.2019.8719395. ISBN 97815386-80568. S2CID 169037039.
48. Looze, Michiel P. de; Bosch, Tim; Krause, Frank; Stadler, Konrad S.; O’Sullivan, Leonard W. (May 3, 2016). "Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load". Ergonomics. 59 (5): 671–681. doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988. hdl:10344/5646. ISSN 0014-0139. PMID 26444053. S2CID 1135619.
49. Haridy, Rich (January 3, 2019). "Battery-powered, full-body exoskeleton lets users lift 200 pounds". New Atlas. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
50. Hornyak, Tim (June 2, 2014). "Panasonic's robotic exoskeletons could help nuclear plant workers". Computerworld. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
51. "Exoskeletons". IFA. Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
52. Moulart, Mélissa; Olivier, Nicolas; Giovanelli, Yonnel; Marin, Frédéric (1 November 2022). "Subjective assessment of a lumbar exoskeleton's impact on lower back pain in a real work situation". Heliyon. 8 (11): e11420. Bibcode:2022Heliy...811420M. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11420. ISSN 2405-8440. PMC 9678677. PMID 36425419. S2CID 253449651.
53. Alexander, Dan (15 April 2015). "Innovation Factory: How Parker Hannifin Pumps Out Breakthrough Products". Forbes. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
54. Freeman, Danny (July 1, 2019). "Exoskeleton Device Donated to San Diego VA Will Help Rehabbing Vets". NBC 7 San Diego. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
55. Fanning, Paul (October 11, 2012). "Bionic exoskeleton could transform lives of paraplegics". Eureka!. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
56. Jacobs, Melissa (May 2019). "Through the Help of a Robotic Exoskeleton, a Collegeville Man Gets a Chance to Walk Again". Main Line Today. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
57. Brewster, Signe (February 1, 2016). "This $40,000 Robotic Exoskeleton Lets the Paralyzed Walk". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
58. Maloney, Dan (January 28, 2019). "The Cyborgs Among Us: Exoskeletons Go Mainstream". Hackaday. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
59. "Japan's Robot Suit Gets Global Safety Certificate". IndustryWeek. Agence France-Presse. 27 February 2013. Retrieved 25 October 2017.
60. Davies, Chris (January 10, 2019). "Honda's exoskeleton is one (assisted) step closer to launch". SlashGear. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
61. "The ESA Exoskeleton". European Space Agency. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
62. "Gogoa Mobility Robots announces CE Mark Approval for HANK Exoskeleton". Business Insider. 22 October 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
63. Ackerman, Evan (March 6, 2018). "Roam Robotics Announces $2500 Soft Exoskeleton For Skiers and Snowboarders". IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
64. Dent, Steve (27 September 2017). "Wandercraft's exoskeleton was made to help paraplegics walk". Engadget. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
65. Salter, Jim (22 January 2020). "Sarcos offers fully mobile, insanely strong industrial exoskeletons". Ars Technica. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
66. Maronov, Bobby (10 December 2019). "Guardian XO Alpha: Up Close and Personal with the Sarcos Robotics Full-Body Powered Exoskeleton". Exoskeleton Report. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
67. German, Kent; Collins, Katie (7 January 2020). "Delta reveals exoskeletons, free Wi-Fi and a binge button at CES 2020". CNET. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
68. "«Норникель» выпустит интеллектуальную версию экзоскелета - Норникель". www.nornickel.ru. Retrieved 2022-10-06.
69. "Comau MATE". Comau. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
70. Cornwall, Warren (October 15, 2015). "Feature: Can we build an 'Iron Man' suit that gives soldiers a robotic boost?". American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
71. Yang, Sarah (March 3, 2004). "UC Berkeley researchers developing robotic exoskeleton that can enhance human strength and endurance". University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved July 4, 2019.
72. Affairs, Public; Berkeley, U. C. (February 4, 2016). "UC Berkeley exoskeleton helps the paralyzed to walk". University of California. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
73. Malcolm, Philippe; Derave, Wim; Galle, Samuel; De Clercq, Dirk; Aegerter, Christof Markus (13 February 2013). "A Simple Exoskeleton That Assists Plantarflexion Can Reduce the Metabolic Cost of Human Walking". PLOS ONE. 8 (2): e56137. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...856137M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056137. PMC 3571952. PMID 23418524.
74. Näf, Matthias B.; Junius, Karen; Rossini, Marco; Rodriguez-Guerrero, Carlos; Vanderborght, Bram; Lefeber, Dirk (September 1, 2018). "Misalignment Compensation for Full Human-Exoskeleton Kinematic Compatibility: State of the Art and Evaluation". Applied Mechanics Reviews. 70 (5): 050802. Bibcode:2018ApMRv..70e0802N. doi:10.1115/1.4042523. ISSN 0003-6900.
75. Meeting the Energy Needs of Future Warriors. National Academies Press. 31 August 2004. p. 40. ISBN 9780309165761. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
76. Liebscher, Alysha; Gayman, Gary (December 26, 2018). "Preventing Thermal Runaway in Electric Vehicle Batteries". Machine Design. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
77. Yellow Magpie (May 1, 2013). "Exoskeleton Suit Problems That Need To Be Overcome". Yellow Magpie. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
78. Kantola, Kevin (January 26, 2010). "HULC Robotic Exoskeleton Powered by Hydrogen Fuel Cell". Hydrogen Cars Now. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
79. "Hydrogen Storage Challenges". Energy.gov. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
80. Frumento, Christopher; Messier, Ethan; Montero, Victor (2010-03-02). "History and Future of Rehabilitation Robotics" (PDF). Worchetser Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
81. Kerns, Jeff (January 8, 2015). "The Rise of the Exoskeletons". Machine Design. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
82. Heater, Brian (July 18, 2017). "ReWalk Robotics shows off a soft exosuit designed to bring mobility to stroke patients". TechCrunch. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
83. "Military exoskeletons uncovered: Ironman suits a concrete possibility". Army Technology. January 29, 2012. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
84. Ferris, Daniel P.; Schlink, Bryan R.; Young, Aaron J. (2019-01-01), "Robotics: Exoskeletons", in Narayan, Roger (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, Elsevier, pp. 645–651, ISBN 9780128051443
85. Siegel, R. P. (April 8, 2019). "Robotic Fingers Are Learning How to Feel". Design News. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
86. "Glove powered by soft robotics to interact with virtual reality environments". ScienceDaily. May 30, 2017. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
87. Näf, Matthias B.; Koopman, Axel S.; Baltrusch, Saskia; Rodriguez-Guerrero, Carlos; Vanderborght, Bram; Lefeber, Dirk (June 21, 2018). "Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams". Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 5: 72. doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00072. ISSN 2296-9144. PMC 7805753. PMID 33500951.
88. Davis, Steve (June 26, 2016). "Forget Iron Man: skintight suits are the future of robotic exoskeletons". The Conversation. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
89. Collins, Steve (June 22, 2017). "Exoskeletons Don't Come One-Size-Fits-All ... Yet". Wired. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
90. Arbor, Ann (June 5, 2019). "Open-source bionic leg: First-of-its-kind platform aims to rapidly advance prosthetics". University of Michigan News. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
91. Wakefield, Jane (July 8, 2018). "Exoskeletons promise superhuman powers". BBC. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
92. Cote, David O.; Schopper, Aaron W. (1984-07-01). "Anthropometric Cockpit Compatibility Assessment of US Army Aircraft for Large and Small Personnel Wearing a Cold Weather, Armored Vest, Chemical Defense Protective Clothing Configuration" (PDF). Defense Technical Information Center. (PDF) from the original on March 2, 2016. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
93. Zingman, Alissa; Earnest, G. Scott; Lowe, Brian D.; Branche, Christine M. (June 15, 2017). "Exoskeletons in Construction: Will they reduce or create hazards?". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved July 8, 2017.
94. "About CYBATHLON". CYBATHLON. Retrieved 1 September 2020.
95. Liptak, Andrew (December 10, 2017). "18 suits of power armor from science fiction you don't want to meet on the battlefield". The Verge.
96. Matulef, Jeffrey (2016-01-23). "Fallout 4 14.5 inch power armour figurine costs £279". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
97. Machkovech, Sam (2018-11-13). "We unbox the $200 'power armor' Fallout 76 version so you don't have to". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
98. Gonzalez, Oscar (2019-09-25). "Fallout Power Armor helmet recalled due to mold". CNET. Retrieved 2020-10-30.

External links

•   Media related to Powered exoskeletons at Wikimedia Commons
• Video, images and articles about the Bleex exoskeleton project
• University of California Los Angeles (UCLA)—Exo Arm Project
• Wired Issue 13.01, January 2005—Ironmen, the world's first exoskeleton weight-lifting competition
• Video and abstract about the GAIT Robotic Orthosis (via IEEE Xplore)
• SARCOS Military Humanoid Exoskeleton (YouTube)