fbpx
Wikipedia

MIT Technology Review

January 13, 2023

MIT Technology Review is a bimonthly magazine wholly owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and editorially independent of the university.[4] It was founded in 1899 as The Technology Review,[5] and was re-launched without "The" in its name on April 23, 1998 under then publisher R. Bruce Journey. In September 2005, it was changed, under its then editor-in-chief and publisher, Jason Pontin, to a form resembling the historical magazine.

MIT Technology Review
Editor-in-ChiefMat Honan[1]
CategoriesScience, technology
FrequencyBimonthly
PublisherElizabeth Bramson-Boudreau
Total circulation
(2011)		161,529[2]
First issue1899; 124 years ago (1899)
CompanyMIT Technology Review[3]
CountryUnited States
Based inCambridge, Massachusetts
LanguageEnglish
Websitetechnologyreview.com
ISSN1099-274X

Before the 1998 re-launch, the editor stated that "nothing will be left of the old magazine except the name." It was therefore necessary to distinguish between the modern and the historical Technology Review.[5] The historical magazine had been published by the MIT Alumni Association, was more closely aligned with the interests of MIT alumni, and had a more intellectual tone and much smaller public circulation. The magazine, billed from 1998 to 2005 as "MIT's Magazine of Innovation", and from 2005 onwards as simply "published by MIT", focused on new technology and how it is commercialized; was sold to the public and targeted at senior executives, researchers, financiers, and policymakers, as well as MIT alumni.[5][6]

In 2011, Technology Review received an Utne Reader Independent Press Award for Best Science/Technology Coverage.[7]

History

Original magazine: 1899–1998

Technology Review was founded in 1899 under the name The Technology Review and relaunched in 1998 without "The" in its original name. It currently claims to be "the oldest technology magazine in the world."[8]

In 1899, The New York Times commented:[9]

We give a cordial welcome to No. 1 of Vol. I of The Technology Review, a Quarterly Magazine Relating to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published in Boston, and under charge of the Association of Class Secretaries. As far as make-up goes, cover, paper, typography and illustrations are in keeping with the strong characteristics of the Institution it represents. This magazine, as its editors announce, is intended to be "a clearing house of information and thought," and, as far as the Institute of Technology is concerned, "to increase its power, to minimize its waste, to insure [sic] among its countless friends the most perfect co-operation."

The career path of James Rhyne Killian illustrates the close ties between Technology Review and the Institute. In 1926, Killian graduated from college and got his first job as assistant managing editor of Technology Review; he rose to editor-in-chief; became executive assistant to then-president Karl Taylor Compton in 1939; vice-president of MIT in 1945; and succeeded Compton as president in 1949.

The May 4, 1929 issue contained an article by Dr. Norbert Wiener, then Assistant Professor of Mathematics, describing some deficiencies in a paper Albert Einstein had published earlier that year. Wiener also commented on a cardinal's critique of the Einstein theory saying:

The pretended incomprehensibility of the Einstein theory has been used as capital by professional anti-Einsteinians. Without prejudice to the cause of religion, I may remark that theological discussions have not at all times been distinguished by their character of lucidity.

The historical Technology Review often published articles that were controversial, or critical of certain technologies. A 1980 issue contained an article by Jerome Wiesner attacking the Reagan administration's nuclear defense strategy. The cover of a 1983 issue stated, "Even if the fusion program produces a reactor, no one will want it," and contained an article by Lawrence M. Lidsky,[10] associate director of MIT's Plasma Fusion Center, challenging the feasibility of fusion power (which at the time was often fancied to be just around the corner). The May 1984 issue contained an exposé about microchip manufacturing hazards.

In 1966, the magazine started using a puzzle column started in Tech Engineering News a few months earlier. Its author is Allan Gottlieb, who has now written the column for more than fifty years.[11]

As late as 1967, the New York Times described Technology Review as a "scientific journal." Of its writing style, writer George V. Higgins complained:

Technology Review, according to [then-editor] Stephen [sic] Marcus... [subjects] its scientific contributors to rewrite rigors that would give fainting spells to the most obstreperous cub reporter. Marcus believes this produces readable prose on arcane subjects. I don't agree.[12]

In 1984, Technology Review printed an article about a Russian scientist using ova from frozen mammoths to create a mammoth-elephant hybrid called a "mammontelephas".[13] Apart from being dated "April 1, 1984", there were no obvious giveaways in the story. The Chicago Tribune News Service picked it up as a real news item, and it was printed as fact in hundreds of newspapers.

The prank was presumably forgotten by 1994, when a survey of "opinion leaders" ranked Technology Review[5] No. 1 in the nation in the "most credible" category.[14]

Contributors to the magazine also included Thomas A. Edison, Winston Churchill, and Tim Berners-Lee.[15]

Relaunch: 1998–2005

A radical transition of the magazine occurred in 1996. At that time, according to the Boston Business Journal,[16] in 1996 Technology Review had lost $1.6 million over the previous seven years and was "facing the possibility of folding" due to "years of declining advertising revenue."

R. Bruce Journey was named publisher, the first full-time publisher in the magazine's history. According to previous publisher William J. Hecht, although Technology Review had "long been highly regarded for its editorial excellence," the purpose of appointing Journey was to enhance its "commercial potential" and "secure a prominent place for Technology Review in the competitive world of commercial publishing."[17] John Benditt replaced Steven J. Marcus as editor-in-chief, the entire editorial staff was fired, and the modern Technology Review was born.

Boston Globe columnist David Warsh[18] described the transition by saying that the magazine had been serving up "old 1960s views of things: humanist, populist, ruminative, suspicious of the unseen dimensions of new technologies" and had now been replaced with one that "takes innovation seriously and enthusiastically." Former editor Marcus characterized the magazine's new stance as "cheerleading for innovation."

Under Bruce Journey, Technology Review billed itself as "MIT's Magazine of Innovation". Since 2001, it has been published by Technology Review Inc., a nonprofit independent media company owned by MIT.[19]

Intending to appeal to business leaders, editor John Benditt said in 1999, "We're really about new technologies and how they get commercialized." Technology Review covers breakthroughs and current issues on fields such as biotechnology, nanotechnology, and computing. Articles are also devoted to more mature disciplines such as energy, telecommunications, transportation, and the military.

Since Journey, Technology Review has been distributed as a regular mass-market magazine and appears on newsstands. By 2003, circulation had more than tripled from 92,000 to 315,000, about half that of Scientific American, and included 220,000 paid subscribers and 95,000 sent free to MIT alumni. Additionally, in August 2003, a German edition of Technology Review was started in cooperation with the publishing house Heinz Heise (circulation of about 50,000 as of 2005). According to The New York Times,[20] as of 2004 the magazine was still "partly financed by M.I.T. (though it is expected to turn a profit eventually)."

Technology Review also functions as the MIT alumni magazine; the edition sent to alumni contains a separate section, "MIT News," containing items such as alumni class notes. This section is not included in the edition distributed to the general public.

The magazine is published by Technology Review, Inc, an independent media company owned by MIT. MIT's website lists it as an MIT publication,[21] and the MIT News Office states that "the magazine often uses MIT expertise for some of its content." In 1999 The Boston Globe noted that (apart from the alumni section) "few Technology Review articles actually concern events or research at MIT."[22] However, in the words of editor Jason Pontin:

Our job is not to promote MIT; but we analyse and explain emerging technologies,[23] and because we believe that new technologies are, generally speaking, a good thing, we do indirectly promote MIT's core activity: that is, the development of innovative technology.[24]

From 1997 to 2005, R. Bruce Journey held the title of "publisher"; Journey was also the president and CEO of Technology Review, Inc. Editors-in-chief have included John Benditt (1997), Robert Buderi (2002), and Jason Pontin (2004).

The magazine has won numerous Folio! awards, presented at the annual magazine publishing trade show conducted by Folio! magazine. In 2001, these included a "Silver Folio: Editorial Excellence Award" in the consumer science and technology magazine category and many awards for typography and design.[25] In 2006, Technology Review was named a finalist in the "general excellence" category of the annual National Magazine Awards, sponsored by the American Society of Magazine Editors.[26]

On June 6, 2001, Fortune and CNET Networks launched a publication entitled Fortune/CNET Technology Review.[27] MIT sued[28] Fortune's parent corporation, Time, Inc. for infringement of the Technology Review trademark.[29] The case was quickly settled. In August the MIT student newspaper reported that lawyers for MIT and Time were reluctant to discuss the case, citing a confidentiality agreement that both sides described as very restrictive. Jason Kravitz, a Boston attorney who represented MIT in the case, suggested that the magazine's change of name to Fortune/CNET Tech Review, a change that occurred in the middle of the case, may have been part of the settlement.[30]

Many publications covering specific technologies have used "technology review" as part of their names, such as Lawrence Livermore Labs's Energy & Technology Review,[31] AACE's Educational Technology Review,[32] and the International Atomic Energy Agency's Nuclear Technology Review.[33]

In 2005, Technology Review, along with Wired News and other technology publications, was embarrassed by the publication of a number of stories by freelancer Michelle Delio containing information which could not be corroborated. Editor-in-chief Pontin said, "Of the ten stories which were published, only three were entirely accurate. In two of the stories, I'm fairly confident that Michelle Delio either did not speak to the person she said she spoke to, or misrepresented her interview with him."[34] The stories were retracted.

Modern magazine: 2005–present

On August 30, 2005, Technology Review announced that R. Bruce Journey, publisher from 1996 to 2005, would be replaced by the then current Editor in Chief, Jason Pontin, and would reduce the print publication frequency from eleven to six issues per year while enhancing the publication's website.[34] The Boston Globe characterized the change as a "strategic overhaul." Editor and publisher Jason Pontin stated that he would "focus the print magazine on what print does best: present[ing] longer-format, investigative stories and colorful imagery." Technology Review's Web site, Pontin said, would henceforth publish original, daily news and analysis (whereas before it had merely republished the print magazine's stories). Finally, Pontin said that Technology Review's stories in print and online would identify and analyze emerging technologies.[35] This focus resembles that of the historical Technology Review. Pontin convinced copy editors to adopt the diaeresis mark for words like "coördinate", a rarity in native English usage, though failed to convince them to use logical punctuation.[36]

Without evident comment, the July/August, 2017, issue revealed a shift in top personnel, with Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau listed as Chief Executive Officer and Publisher, and David Rotman as Editor.[1] Gideon Lichfield was named editor-in-chief in November 2017.[37]

In 2020, the Brazilian version of MIT Technology Review, known as MIT Technology Review Brasil, was launched.[38]

Every year, the magazine publishes a list of the 10 technologies it considers the most influential.[39]

Annual lists

Each year, MIT Technology Review publishes three annual lists:

  • Innovators Under 35 (formerly TR35)
  • 10 Breakthrough Technologies
  • 50 Smartest Companies

Innovators Under 35

Main article: Innovators Under 35

MIT Technology Review has become well known for its annual Innovators Under 35. In 1999, and then in 2002—2004, MIT Technology Review produced the TR100, a list of "100 remarkable innovators under the age of 35." In 2005, this list was renamed the TR35 and shortened to 35 individuals under the age of 35. Notable recipients of the award include Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, PayPal co-founder Max Levchin, Geekcorps creator Ethan Zuckerman, Linux developer Linus Torvalds, BitTorrent developer Bram Cohen, MacArthur "genius" bioengineer Jim Collins, investors Micah Siegel and Steve Jurvetson, and Netscape co-founder Marc Andreessen.[40][41] The list was renamed Innovators Under 35 in 2013.

10 Breakthrough Technologies

2022

Source:[42]

  1. End of passwords
  2. COVID variant tracking
  3. Long-lasting grid battery
  4. AI for protein folding
  5. Malaria vaccine
  6. Proof of stake
  7. Pill for COVID
  8. Practical fusion reactors
  9. Synthetic data for AI
  10. Carbon removal factory
  11. Aging clocks (selected by readers)

2021

Source:[43]

  1. Messenger RNA vaccines
  2. GPT-3
  3. Data trusts
  4. Lithium-metal batteries
  5. Digital contact tracing
  6. Hyper-accurate positioning
  7. Remote everything
  8. Multi-skilled AI
  9. TikTok recommendation algorithms
  10. Green hydrogen

2020

Source:[44]

  1. Unhackable internet
  2. Hyper-personalized medicine
  3. Digital money
  4. Anti-aging drugs
  5. AI-discovered molecules
  6. Satellite mega-constellations
  7. Quantum supremacy
  8. Tiny AI
  9. Differential privacy
  10. Climate change attribution

2019

MIT Technology Review editors invited Bill Gates to choose the 2019 list.[45]

  1. Robot dexterity
  2. New-wave nuclear power
  3. Predicting preemies
  4. Gut probe in a pill
  5. Custom cancer vaccines
  6. The cow-free burger
  7. Carbon dioxide catcher
  8. An ECG on your wrist
  9. Sanitation without sewers
  10. Smooth-talking AI assistants

2018

Source:[46]

  1. 3-D metal printing
  2. Artificial embryos
  3. Sensing city
  4. AI for everybody
  5. Dueling neural networks
  6. Babel-fish earbuds
  7. Zero-carbon natural gas
  8. Perfect online privacy
  9. Genetic fortune-telling
  10. Materials' quantum leap

2017

Source:[47]

  1. Reversing paralysis
  2. Self-driving trucks
  3. Paying with your face
  4. Practical quantum computers
  5. The 360-degree selfie
  6. Hot solar cells
  7. Gene therapy 2.0
  8. The cell atlas
  9. Botnets of things
  10. Reinforcement learning

2016

Source:[48]

  1. Immune engineering
  2. Precise gene editing in plants
  3. Conversational interfaces
  4. Reusable rockets
  5. Robots that teach each other
  6. DNA app store
  7. SolarCity's Gigafactory
  8. Slack
  9. Tesla Autopilot
  10. Power from the air

2015

Source:[49]

  1. Magic leap
  2. Nano-architecture
  3. Car-to-car communication
  4. Project Loon
  5. Liquid biopsy
  6. Megascale desalination
  7. Apple Pay
  8. Brain organoids
  9. Supercharged photosynthesis
  10. Internet of DNA

2014

Source:[50]

  1. Agricultural drones
  2. Ultraprivate smartphones
  3. Brain mapping
  4. Neuromorphic chips
  5. Genome editing
  6. Microscale 3-D printing
  7. Mobile collaboration
  8. Oculus Rift
  9. Agile robots
  10. Smart wind and solar power

2013

Source:[51]

  1. Smart watches
  2. Ultra-efficient solar power
  3. Memory implants
  4. Prenatal DNA sequencing
  5. Deep learning
  6. Additive manufacturing
  7. Big data from cheap phones
  8. Temporary social media
  9. Supergrids
  10. Baxter: the blue-collar robot

2012

Source:[52]

  1. Egg stem cells
  2. Ultra-efficient solar
  3. Light-field photography
  4. Solar microgrids
  5. 3-D transistors
  6. A faster Fourier transform
  7. Nanopore sequencing
  8. Crowdfunding
  9. High-speed materials discovery
  10. Facebook's Timeline

2011

Source:[53]

  1. Social ondexing
  2. Smart transformers
  3. Gestural interfaces
  4. Cancer genomics
  5. Solid-state batteries
  6. Homomorphic encryption
  7. Cloud streaming
  8. Crash-proof code
  9. Separating chromosomes
  10. Synthetic cells

2010

Source:[54]

  1. Real-time search
  2. Mobile 3-D
  3. Engineered stem cells
  4. Solar fuel
  5. Light-trapping photovoltaics
  6. Social TV
  7. Green concrete
  8. Implantable electronics
  9. Dual-action antibodies
  10. Cloud programming

2009

Source:[55]

  1. Intelligent software assistant
  2. $100 genome
  3. Racetrack memory
  4. Biological machines
  5. Paper diagnostics
  6. Liquid battery
  7. Traveling-wave reactor
  8. Nanopiezoelectronics
  9. HashCache
  10. Software-defined networking

Recognition

In 2006, Technology Review was a finalist in the National Magazine Awards in the category of General Excellence.[56]

In 2010, Technology Review won the gold and silver prizes for best full issue of a technology magazine (for its November and June 2009 issues) and the gold, silver, and bronze prizes for best single article in a technology magazine (for “Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map” by David Rotman;[57] “Prescription: Networking” by David Talbot;[58] and “Chasing the Sun“ by David Rotman)[59] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[60]

In 2007, Technology Review won the bronze prizes in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards in the categories of best issue of a technology magazine and best single technology article.[61] That same year, technologyreview.com won third place in the MPA Digital Awards for best business or news Website and second place for best online video or video series.[62]

In 2008, Technology Review won the gold prize for the best issue of a technology magazine (for its May 2008 issue); the gold, silver, and bronze prizes for best single articles in a technology magazine (for The Price of Biofuels by David Rotman;[63] Brain Trauma in Iraq by Emily Singer;[64] and Una Laptop por Niño by David Talbot);[65] the gold prize for best online community; and the bronze prize for best online tool in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[66] That same year, Technology Review won third place in the Magazine Publishers of America (MPA) Digital Awards for best online videos.[67]

In 2009, Technology Review won the gold prize for Best Online News Coverage; the gold and silver prizes for best single articles in a technology magazine (for "How Obama Really Did It" by David Talbot)[68] and "Can Technology Save the Economy?" by David Rotman[69] and the silver prize for best online community in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[70]

In 2011, Technology Review won the silver prize for best full issue of a technology magazine (for its January 2011 issue) and the gold and silver prizes for best single article in a technology magazine (for “Moore's Outlaws” by David Talbot[71] and "Radical Opacity" by Julian Dibbell)[72] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[73] That same year, Technology Review was recognized for the best science and technology coverage in the Utne Reader Independent Press Awards.[74]

In 2012, MIT Technology Review won the gold and silver prizes for best full issue of a technology magazine (for its June and October 2012 issues), and the gold and bronze prizes for best single article in a technology magazine (for "People Power 2.0" by John Pollock[75] and "The Library of Utopia" by Nicholas Carr)[76] in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards.[77] That same year, MIT Technology Review won the gold prize for best feature design (for "The Library of Utopia" by Nicholas Carr)[76] in the Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards.[78]

See also

  • Citizen Science (The OED cites an article from the MIT Technology Review in January 1989[79] as the first use of the term 'citizen science'.)

References

  1. ^ a b "MIT Technology Review names Mat Honan its new editor in chief". MIT Technology Review (Press release). July 19, 2021. Retrieved February 7, 2022. Honan starts at MIT Technology Review on August 17.
  2. ^ "AAM: Total Circ for Consumer Magazines". Accessabc.com. Archived from the original on 2012-06-04. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  3. ^ "Terms of Service". MIT Technology Review. August 12, 2013. Retrieved February 7, 2022. MIT Technology Review is an independent media company owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
  4. ^ "Our coverage is independent of any influence, including our ownership by MIT". Retrieved 2018-11-10.
  5. ^ a b c d "Atechreview". Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  6. ^ "MIT Technology Review". Retrieved 2021-11-05.
  7. ^ . Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  8. ^ However, Scientific American has been published continuously since 1845, and Popular Science since 1872. In the personal communication cited above, Pontin says that the claim rests on the definition of a magazine as being perfect bound, Scientific American being in newspaper tabloid format in 1899.
  9. ^ The New York Times, January 21, 1899, page BR33.
  10. ^ Lidsky, Lawrence M. (October 1983). (PDF). MIT Technology Review. pp. 32–44. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-23. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  11. ^ Amanda Schaffer (December 22, 2015). "Puzzle Corner's Keeper". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved February 7, 2022. Allan Gottlieb ’67 has been serving up math challenges to alumni and friends for half a century.
  12. ^ The Boston Globe, July 17, 1982.
  13. ^ www.textfiles.com . Archived from the original on December 10, 2004. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  14. ^ Charles H. Ball, News Office (1 February 1995). "Technology Review rated 'most credible'". MIT News. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  15. ^ Crum, Rex (April 13, 1998). "MIT's 'TR' undergoes revamping". Bizjournals.com. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  16. ^ "MIT's 'TR' undergoes revamping". Boston Business Journal. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  17. ^ The Boston Globe, April 25, 1999 p. G1
  18. ^ The Boston Globe, April 21, 1998 p. C1 "Gloom, Doom and Boom at MIT." Warsh analogized the old TR with beloved departed Cambridge eateries like the F&T Deli.
  19. ^ [1] April 30, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ The New York Times, November 10, 2004, p. 8, "Glossy Alumni Magazines Seek More Than Graduates"
  21. ^ "MIT - offices+services". Mit.edu. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  22. ^ The Boston Globe, April 25, 1999 p. G1 "MIT Tech Magazine, On Plateau, Finds Killer App: Commercialism"
  23. ^ "Emerging Technologies Reviews".
  24. ^ Jason Pontin, personal email to Dpbsmith, August 27, 2005
  25. ^ David Rapp, Technology Review (28 November 2001). "Technology Review wins six awards". MIT News. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  26. ^ . searchpdffiles.com. Archived from the original on 11 February 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  27. ^ Wall Street Journal Staff (2001-01-22). "Fortune, Cnet Enter Pact For Issues of Tech Reviews". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 2021-03-11.
  28. ^ "MIT sues Time Inc. over magazine name". Boston Business Journal. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  29. ^ Trademark registration 0668713, registered October 21, 1958 to "Alumni Association of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology" and renewed in 1999.
  30. ^ "MIT Finishes Three Lawsuits, Initiates One During Summer". Mit.edu. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  31. ^ "Energy and Technology Review". Llnl.gov. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  32. ^ [2] October 17, 2005, at the Wayback Machine
  33. ^ "Nuclear Technology Review 2004" (PDF). Iaea.org. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  34. ^ a b The Boston Globe, April 22, 2005, p. C3 "More of Writer's Stories Faulted—MIT Says Just 3 of 10 were Accurate"
  35. ^ Jason Pontin (2005). "A Letter to MIT Alumni". Technology Review. Retrieved 2006-06-26.
  36. ^ "You Get No Gotten in the New Yorker". As for the diareses, it’s just something we do: it shows you that the second vowel is pronounced as a second syllable. The New Yorker does it in this country, and it’s not uncommon in the United Kingdom. There are a couple of other idiosyncratic style uses that I’ve been less successful in imposing on our copy desk. I’d love to insist on what’s called "logical punctuation" in the English style, but the moral weight of the company insists that 'MIT Technology Review is an American publication.' (original comment on [3] before comments were disabled)
  37. ^ . Technology Review. 2017. Archived from the original on 2018-11-10. Retrieved 2019-03-13.
  38. ^ https://mittechreview.com.br/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  39. ^ Review, MIT Technology. "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2006 - MIT Technology Review". Retrieved 20 September 2017.
  40. ^ . MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on December 2, 2008. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  41. ^ . MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on September 24, 2005. Retrieved 2015-03-30.
  42. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2022". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2022-05-22.
  43. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2021".
  44. ^ "2020".
  45. ^ "2019".
  46. ^ "2018".
  47. ^ "2017".
  48. ^ "2016".
  49. ^ "2015".
  50. ^ "2014".
  51. ^ "2013".
  52. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2012".
  53. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2011".
  54. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2010".
  55. ^ "10 Breakthrough Technologies 2009".
  56. ^ . Archived from the original on 2006-08-19. Retrieved 2006-07-27.
  57. ^ "Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map". MIT Technology Review.
  58. ^ "Prescription: Networking". MIT Technology Review.
  59. ^ "Chasing the Sun". MIT Technology Review.
  60. ^ "2010 Folio: Award Winners Announced". Folio. 2011-01-25.
  61. ^ "The 2007 Eddie & Ozzie Award Winners". Folio. November 2007.
  62. ^ . Archived from the original on 2007-03-10. Retrieved 2007-03-06.
  63. ^ "The Price of Biofuels". MIT Technology Review.
  64. ^ "Brain Trauma in Iraq". MIT Technology Review.
  65. ^ "Una Laptop por Niño". MIT Technology Review.
  66. ^ "2008 Eddie Awards Winners". Folio. 2008-09-23.
  67. ^ MPA Digital Awards 2008 2008-03-02 at the Wayback Machine
  68. ^ "How Obama Really Did It". MIT Technology Review.
  69. ^ "Can Technology Save the Economy?". MIT Technology Review.
  70. ^ "2009 Eddie Award Winners". Folio. December 2009.
  71. ^ "Moore's Outlaws". MIT Technology Review.
  72. ^ "Radical Opacity". MIT Technology Review.
  73. ^ "The 2011 Eddie and Ozzie Award Winners". Folio. 2011-12-08.
  74. ^ . Utne. Archived from the original on 2016-04-03. Retrieved 2011-06-08.
  75. ^ "People Power 2.0". MIT Technology Review.
  76. ^ a b "The Library of Utopia". MIT Technology Review.
  77. ^ "Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 2012" (PDF). technologyreview.com.
  78. ^ "Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards 2012" (PDF). creative.red7media.com.
  79. ^ R. Kerson (1989). "Lab for the Environment". MIT Technology Review. Vol. 92, no. 1. pp. 11–12.

External links

  • Official website  

January 13, 2023
technology, review, bimonthly, magazine, wholly, owned, massachusetts, institute, technology, editorially, independent, university, founded, 1899, technology, review, launched, without, name, april, 1998, under, then, publisher, bruce, journey, september, 2005. MIT Technology Review is a bimonthly magazine wholly owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and editorially independent of the university 4 It was founded in 1899 as The Technology Review 5 and was re launched without The in its name on April 23 1998 under then publisher R Bruce Journey In September 2005 it was changed under its then editor in chief and publisher Jason Pontin to a form resembling the historical magazine MIT Technology ReviewEditor in ChiefMat Honan 1 CategoriesScience technologyFrequencyBimonthlyPublisherElizabeth Bramson BoudreauTotal circulation 2011 161 529 2 First issue1899 124 years ago 1899 CompanyMIT Technology Review 3 CountryUnited StatesBased inCambridge MassachusettsLanguageEnglishWebsitetechnologyreview wbr comISSN1099 274XBefore the 1998 re launch the editor stated that nothing will be left of the old magazine except the name It was therefore necessary to distinguish between the modern and the historical Technology Review 5 The historical magazine had been published by the MIT Alumni Association was more closely aligned with the interests of MIT alumni and had a more intellectual tone and much smaller public circulation The magazine billed from 1998 to 2005 as MIT s Magazine of Innovation and from 2005 onwards as simply published by MIT focused on new technology and how it is commercialized was sold to the public and targeted at senior executives researchers financiers and policymakers as well as MIT alumni 5 6 In 2011 Technology Review received an Utne Reader Independent Press Award for Best Science Technology Coverage 7 Contents 1 History 1 1 Original magazine 1899 1998 1 2 Relaunch 1998 2005 1 3 Modern magazine 2005 present 2 Annual lists 2 1 Innovators Under 35 2 2 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2 2 1 2022 2 2 2 2021 2 2 3 2020 2 2 4 2019 2 2 5 2018 2 2 6 2017 2 2 7 2016 2 2 8 2015 2 2 9 2014 2 2 10 2013 2 2 11 2012 2 2 12 2011 2 2 13 2010 2 2 14 2009 3 Recognition 4 See also 5 References 6 External linksHistory EditOriginal magazine 1899 1998 Edit Technology Review was founded in 1899 under the name The Technology Review and relaunched in 1998 without The in its original name It currently claims to be the oldest technology magazine in the world 8 In 1899 The New York Times commented 9 We give a cordial welcome to No 1 of Vol I of The Technology Review a Quarterly Magazine Relating to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published in Boston and under charge of the Association of Class Secretaries As far as make up goes cover paper typography and illustrations are in keeping with the strong characteristics of the Institution it represents This magazine as its editors announce is intended to be a clearing house of information and thought and as far as the Institute of Technology is concerned to increase its power to minimize its waste to insure sic among its countless friends the most perfect co operation The career path of James Rhyne Killian illustrates the close ties between Technology Review and the Institute In 1926 Killian graduated from college and got his first job as assistant managing editor of Technology Review he rose to editor in chief became executive assistant to then president Karl Taylor Compton in 1939 vice president of MIT in 1945 and succeeded Compton as president in 1949 The May 4 1929 issue contained an article by Dr Norbert Wiener then Assistant Professor of Mathematics describing some deficiencies in a paper Albert Einstein had published earlier that year Wiener also commented on a cardinal s critique of the Einstein theory saying The pretended incomprehensibility of the Einstein theory has been used as capital by professional anti Einsteinians Without prejudice to the cause of religion I may remark that theological discussions have not at all times been distinguished by their character of lucidity The historical Technology Review often published articles that were controversial or critical of certain technologies A 1980 issue contained an article by Jerome Wiesner attacking the Reagan administration s nuclear defense strategy The cover of a 1983 issue stated Even if the fusion program produces a reactor no one will want it and contained an article by Lawrence M Lidsky 10 associate director of MIT s Plasma Fusion Center challenging the feasibility of fusion power which at the time was often fancied to be just around the corner The May 1984 issue contained an expose about microchip manufacturing hazards In 1966 the magazine started using a puzzle column started in Tech Engineering News a few months earlier Its author is Allan Gottlieb who has now written the column for more than fifty years 11 As late as 1967 the New York Times described Technology Review as a scientific journal Of its writing style writer George V Higgins complained Technology Review according to then editor Stephen sic Marcus subjects its scientific contributors to rewrite rigors that would give fainting spells to the most obstreperous cub reporter Marcus believes this produces readable prose on arcane subjects I don t agree 12 In 1984 Technology Review printed an article about a Russian scientist using ova from frozen mammoths to create a mammoth elephant hybrid called a mammontelephas 13 Apart from being dated April 1 1984 there were no obvious giveaways in the story The Chicago Tribune News Service picked it up as a real news item and it was printed as fact in hundreds of newspapers The prank was presumably forgotten by 1994 when a survey of opinion leaders ranked Technology Review 5 No 1 in the nation in the most credible category 14 Contributors to the magazine also included Thomas A Edison Winston Churchill and Tim Berners Lee 15 Relaunch 1998 2005 Edit A radical transition of the magazine occurred in 1996 At that time according to the Boston Business Journal 16 in 1996 Technology Review had lost 1 6 million over the previous seven years and was facing the possibility of folding due to years of declining advertising revenue R Bruce Journey was named publisher the first full time publisher in the magazine s history According to previous publisher William J Hecht although Technology Review had long been highly regarded for its editorial excellence the purpose of appointing Journey was to enhance its commercial potential and secure a prominent place for Technology Review in the competitive world of commercial publishing 17 John Benditt replaced Steven J Marcus as editor in chief the entire editorial staff was fired and the modern Technology Review was born Boston Globe columnist David Warsh 18 described the transition by saying that the magazine had been serving up old 1960s views of things humanist populist ruminative suspicious of the unseen dimensions of new technologies and had now been replaced with one that takes innovation seriously and enthusiastically Former editor Marcus characterized the magazine s new stance as cheerleading for innovation Under Bruce Journey Technology Review billed itself as MIT s Magazine of Innovation Since 2001 it has been published by Technology Review Inc a nonprofit independent media company owned by MIT 19 Intending to appeal to business leaders editor John Benditt said in 1999 We re really about new technologies and how they get commercialized Technology Review covers breakthroughs and current issues on fields such as biotechnology nanotechnology and computing Articles are also devoted to more mature disciplines such as energy telecommunications transportation and the military Since Journey Technology Review has been distributed as a regular mass market magazine and appears on newsstands By 2003 circulation had more than tripled from 92 000 to 315 000 about half that of Scientific American and included 220 000 paid subscribers and 95 000 sent free to MIT alumni Additionally in August 2003 a German edition of Technology Review was started in cooperation with the publishing house Heinz Heise circulation of about 50 000 as of 2005 According to The New York Times 20 as of 2004 the magazine was still partly financed by M I T though it is expected to turn a profit eventually Technology Review also functions as the MIT alumni magazine the edition sent to alumni contains a separate section MIT News containing items such as alumni class notes This section is not included in the edition distributed to the general public The magazine is published by Technology Review Inc an independent media company owned by MIT MIT s website lists it as an MIT publication 21 and the MIT News Office states that the magazine often uses MIT expertise for some of its content In 1999 The Boston Globe noted that apart from the alumni section few Technology Review articles actually concern events or research at MIT 22 However in the words of editor Jason Pontin Our job is not to promote MIT but we analyse and explain emerging technologies 23 and because we believe that new technologies are generally speaking a good thing we do indirectly promote MIT s core activity that is the development of innovative technology 24 From 1997 to 2005 R Bruce Journey held the title of publisher Journey was also the president and CEO of Technology Review Inc Editors in chief have included John Benditt 1997 Robert Buderi 2002 and Jason Pontin 2004 The magazine has won numerous Folio awards presented at the annual magazine publishing trade show conducted by Folio magazine In 2001 these included a Silver Folio Editorial Excellence Award in the consumer science and technology magazine category and many awards for typography and design 25 In 2006 Technology Review was named a finalist in the general excellence category of the annual National Magazine Awards sponsored by the American Society of Magazine Editors 26 On June 6 2001 Fortune and CNET Networks launched a publication entitled Fortune CNET Technology Review 27 MIT sued 28 Fortune s parent corporation Time Inc for infringement of the Technology Review trademark 29 The case was quickly settled In August the MIT student newspaper reported that lawyers for MIT and Time were reluctant to discuss the case citing a confidentiality agreement that both sides described as very restrictive Jason Kravitz a Boston attorney who represented MIT in the case suggested that the magazine s change of name to Fortune CNET Tech Review a change that occurred in the middle of the case may have been part of the settlement 30 Many publications covering specific technologies have used technology review as part of their names such as Lawrence Livermore Labs s Energy amp Technology Review 31 AACE s Educational Technology Review 32 and the International Atomic Energy Agency s Nuclear Technology Review 33 In 2005 Technology Review along with Wired News and other technology publications was embarrassed by the publication of a number of stories by freelancer Michelle Delio containing information which could not be corroborated Editor in chief Pontin said Of the ten stories which were published only three were entirely accurate In two of the stories I m fairly confident that Michelle Delio either did not speak to the person she said she spoke to or misrepresented her interview with him 34 The stories were retracted Modern magazine 2005 present Edit On August 30 2005 Technology Review announced that R Bruce Journey publisher from 1996 to 2005 would be replaced by the then current Editor in Chief Jason Pontin and would reduce the print publication frequency from eleven to six issues per year while enhancing the publication s website 34 The Boston Globe characterized the change as a strategic overhaul Editor and publisher Jason Pontin stated that he would focus the print magazine on what print does best present ing longer format investigative stories and colorful imagery Technology Review s Web site Pontin said would henceforth publish original daily news and analysis whereas before it had merely republished the print magazine s stories Finally Pontin said that Technology Review s stories in print and online would identify and analyze emerging technologies 35 This focus resembles that of the historical Technology Review Pontin convinced copy editors to adopt the diaeresis mark for words like coordinate a rarity in native English usage though failed to convince them to use logical punctuation 36 Without evident comment the July August 2017 issue revealed a shift in top personnel with Elizabeth Bramson Boudreau listed as Chief Executive Officer and Publisher and David Rotman as Editor 1 Gideon Lichfield was named editor in chief in November 2017 37 In 2020 the Brazilian version of MIT Technology Review known as MIT Technology Review Brasil was launched 38 Every year the magazine publishes a list of the 10 technologies it considers the most influential 39 Annual lists EditEach year MIT Technology Review publishes three annual lists Innovators Under 35 formerly TR35 10 Breakthrough Technologies 50 Smartest CompaniesInnovators Under 35 Edit Main article Innovators Under 35 MIT Technology Review has become well known for its annual Innovators Under 35 In 1999 and then in 2002 2004 MIT Technology Review produced the TR100 a list of 100 remarkable innovators under the age of 35 In 2005 this list was renamed the TR35 and shortened to 35 individuals under the age of 35 Notable recipients of the award include Google co founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin PayPal co founder Max Levchin Geekcorps creator Ethan Zuckerman Linux developer Linus Torvalds BitTorrent developer Bram Cohen MacArthur genius bioengineer Jim Collins investors Micah Siegel and Steve Jurvetson and Netscape co founder Marc Andreessen 40 41 The list was renamed Innovators Under 35 in 2013 10 Breakthrough Technologies Edit 2022 Edit Source 42 End of passwords COVID variant tracking Long lasting grid battery AI for protein folding Malaria vaccine Proof of stake Pill for COVID Practical fusion reactors Synthetic data for AI Carbon removal factory Aging clocks selected by readers 2021 Edit Source 43 Messenger RNA vaccines GPT 3 Data trusts Lithium metal batteries Digital contact tracing Hyper accurate positioning Remote everything Multi skilled AI TikTok recommendation algorithms Green hydrogen2020 Edit Source 44 Unhackable internet Hyper personalized medicine Digital money Anti aging drugs AI discovered molecules Satellite mega constellations Quantum supremacy Tiny AI Differential privacy Climate change attribution2019 Edit MIT Technology Review editors invited Bill Gates to choose the 2019 list 45 Robot dexterity New wave nuclear power Predicting preemies Gut probe in a pill Custom cancer vaccines The cow free burger Carbon dioxide catcher An ECG on your wrist Sanitation without sewers Smooth talking AI assistants2018 Edit Source 46 3 D metal printing Artificial embryos Sensing city AI for everybody Dueling neural networks Babel fish earbuds Zero carbon natural gas Perfect online privacy Genetic fortune telling Materials quantum leap2017 Edit Source 47 Reversing paralysis Self driving trucks Paying with your face Practical quantum computers The 360 degree selfie Hot solar cells Gene therapy 2 0 The cell atlas Botnets of things Reinforcement learning2016 Edit Source 48 Immune engineering Precise gene editing in plants Conversational interfaces Reusable rockets Robots that teach each other DNA app store SolarCity s Gigafactory Slack Tesla Autopilot Power from the air2015 Edit Source 49 Magic leap Nano architecture Car to car communication Project Loon Liquid biopsy Megascale desalination Apple Pay Brain organoids Supercharged photosynthesis Internet of DNA2014 Edit Source 50 Agricultural drones Ultraprivate smartphones Brain mapping Neuromorphic chips Genome editing Microscale 3 D printing Mobile collaboration Oculus Rift Agile robots Smart wind and solar power2013 Edit Source 51 Smart watches Ultra efficient solar power Memory implants Prenatal DNA sequencing Deep learning Additive manufacturing Big data from cheap phones Temporary social media Supergrids Baxter the blue collar robot2012 Edit Source 52 Egg stem cells Ultra efficient solar Light field photography Solar microgrids 3 D transistors A faster Fourier transform Nanopore sequencing Crowdfunding High speed materials discovery Facebook s Timeline2011 Edit Source 53 Social ondexing Smart transformers Gestural interfaces Cancer genomics Solid state batteries Homomorphic encryption Cloud streaming Crash proof code Separating chromosomes Synthetic cells2010 Edit Source 54 Real time search Mobile 3 D Engineered stem cells Solar fuel Light trapping photovoltaics Social TV Green concrete Implantable electronics Dual action antibodies Cloud programming2009 Edit Source 55 Intelligent software assistant 100 genome Racetrack memory Biological machines Paper diagnostics Liquid battery Traveling wave reactor Nanopiezoelectronics HashCache Software defined networkingRecognition EditThis section contains information of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article s subject matter Please help improve this section by clarifying or removing indiscriminate details If importance cannot be established the section is likely to be moved to another article pseudo redirected or removed Find sources MIT Technology Review news newspapers books scholar JSTOR November 2016 Learn how and when to remove this template message In 2006 Technology Review was a finalist in the National Magazine Awards in the category of General Excellence 56 In 2010 Technology Review won the gold and silver prizes for best full issue of a technology magazine for its November and June 2009 issues and the gold silver and bronze prizes for best single article in a technology magazine for Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map by David Rotman 57 Prescription Networking by David Talbot 58 and Chasing the Sun by David Rotman 59 in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 60 In 2007 Technology Review won the bronze prizes in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards in the categories of best issue of a technology magazine and best single technology article 61 That same year technologyreview com won third place in the MPA Digital Awards for best business or news Website and second place for best online video or video series 62 In 2008 Technology Review won the gold prize for the best issue of a technology magazine for its May 2008 issue the gold silver and bronze prizes for best single articles in a technology magazine for The Price of Biofuels by David Rotman 63 Brain Trauma in Iraq by Emily Singer 64 and Una Laptop por Nino by David Talbot 65 the gold prize for best online community and the bronze prize for best online tool in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 66 That same year Technology Review won third place in the Magazine Publishers of America MPA Digital Awards for best online videos 67 In 2009 Technology Review won the gold prize for Best Online News Coverage the gold and silver prizes for best single articles in a technology magazine for How Obama Really Did It by David Talbot 68 and Can Technology Save the Economy by David Rotman 69 and the silver prize for best online community in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 70 In 2011 Technology Review won the silver prize for best full issue of a technology magazine for its January 2011 issue and the gold and silver prizes for best single article in a technology magazine for Moore s Outlaws by David Talbot 71 and Radical Opacity by Julian Dibbell 72 in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 73 That same year Technology Review was recognized for the best science and technology coverage in the Utne Reader Independent Press Awards 74 In 2012 MIT Technology Review won the gold and silver prizes for best full issue of a technology magazine for its June and October 2012 issues and the gold and bronze prizes for best single article in a technology magazine for People Power 2 0 by John Pollock 75 and The Library of Utopia by Nicholas Carr 76 in the Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 77 That same year MIT Technology Review won the gold prize for best feature design for The Library of Utopia by Nicholas Carr 76 in the Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards 78 See also EditCitizen Science The OED cites an article from the MIT Technology Review in January 1989 79 as the first use of the term citizen science References Edit a b MIT Technology Review names Mat Honan its new editor in chief MIT Technology Review Press release July 19 2021 Retrieved February 7 2022 Honan starts at MIT Technology Review on August 17 AAM Total Circ for Consumer Magazines Accessabc com Archived from the original on 2012 06 04 Retrieved 2015 03 30 Terms of Service MIT Technology Review August 12 2013 Retrieved February 7 2022 MIT Technology Review is an independent media company owned by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT Our coverage is independent of any influence including our ownership by MIT Retrieved 2018 11 10 a b c d Atechreview Retrieved 2015 03 30 MIT Technology Review Retrieved 2021 11 05 Utne Independent Press Awards 2011 Winners Utne Archived from the original on 2016 04 03 Retrieved 2015 03 30 However Scientific American has been published continuously since 1845 and Popular Science since 1872 In the personal communication cited above Pontin says that the claim rests on the definition of a magazine as being perfect bound Scientific American being in newspaper tabloid format in 1899 The New York Times January 21 1899 page BR33 Lidsky Lawrence M October 1983 The Trouble with Fusion PDF MIT Technology Review pp 32 44 Archived from the original PDF on 2015 09 23 Retrieved 2015 03 30 Amanda Schaffer December 22 2015 Puzzle Corner s Keeper MIT Technology Review Retrieved February 7 2022 Allan Gottlieb 67 has been serving up math challenges to alumni and friends for half a century The Boston Globe July 17 1982 www textfiles com https web archive org web 20041210220920 http www textfiles com humor woolly m amm Archived from the original on December 10 2004 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a Missing or empty title help Charles H Ball News Office 1 February 1995 Technology Review rated most credible MIT News Retrieved 2015 03 30 Crum Rex April 13 1998 MIT s TR undergoes revamping Bizjournals com Retrieved 2015 03 30 MIT s TR undergoes revamping Boston Business Journal Retrieved 2015 03 30 The Boston Globe April 25 1999 p G1 The Boston Globe April 21 1998 p C1 Gloom Doom and Boom at MIT Warsh analogized the old TR with beloved departed Cambridge eateries like the F amp T Deli 1 Archived April 30 2013 at the Wayback Machine The New York Times November 10 2004 p 8 Glossy Alumni Magazines Seek More Than Graduates MIT offices services Mit edu Retrieved 2015 03 30 The Boston Globe April 25 1999 p G1 MIT Tech Magazine On Plateau Finds Killer App Commercialism Emerging Technologies Reviews Jason Pontin personal email to Dpbsmith August 27 2005 David Rapp Technology Review 28 November 2001 Technology Review wins six awards MIT News Retrieved 2015 03 30 Archived copy searchpdffiles com Archived from the original on 11 February 2016 Retrieved 15 January 2022 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint archived copy as title link Wall Street Journal Staff 2001 01 22 Fortune Cnet Enter Pact For Issues of Tech Reviews The Wall Street Journal ISSN 0099 9660 Retrieved 2021 03 11 MIT sues Time Inc over magazine name Boston Business Journal Retrieved 2015 03 30 Trademark registration 0668713 registered October 21 1958 to Alumni Association of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and renewed in 1999 MIT Finishes Three Lawsuits Initiates One During Summer Mit edu Retrieved 2015 03 30 Energy and Technology Review Llnl gov Retrieved 2015 03 30 2 Archived October 17 2005 at the Wayback Machine Nuclear Technology Review 2004 PDF Iaea org Retrieved 2015 03 30 a b The Boston Globe April 22 2005 p C3 More of Writer s Stories Faulted MIT Says Just 3 of 10 were Accurate Jason Pontin 2005 A Letter to MIT Alumni Technology Review Retrieved 2006 06 26 You Get No Gotten in the New Yorker As for the diareses it s just something we do it shows you that the second vowel is pronounced as a second syllable The New Yorker does it in this country and it s not uncommon in the United Kingdom There are a couple of other idiosyncratic style uses that I ve been less successful in imposing on our copy desk I d love to insist on what s called logical punctuation in the English style but the moral weight of the company insists that MIT Technology Review is an American publication original comment on 3 before comments were disabled MIT Technology Review Names Gideon Lichfield Editor in Chief Technology Review 2017 Archived from the original on 2018 11 10 Retrieved 2019 03 13 https mittechreview com br a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a Missing or empty title help Review MIT Technology 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2006 MIT Technology Review Retrieved 20 September 2017 TR 100 Computing MIT Technology Review Archived from the original on December 2 2008 Retrieved 2015 03 30 TR 35 MIT Technology Review Archived from the original on September 24 2005 Retrieved 2015 03 30 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2022 MIT Technology Review Retrieved 2022 05 22 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2012 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2011 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2010 10 Breakthrough Technologies 2009 National Magazine Award Finalists 2006 Archived from the original on 2006 08 19 Retrieved 2006 07 27 Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map MIT Technology Review Prescription Networking MIT Technology Review Chasing the Sun MIT Technology Review 2010 Folio Award Winners Announced Folio 2011 01 25 The 2007 Eddie amp Ozzie Award Winners Folio November 2007 MPA Press Releases Digital Awards Winners 2006 Archived from the original on 2007 03 10 Retrieved 2007 03 06 The Price of Biofuels MIT Technology Review Brain Trauma in Iraq MIT Technology Review Una Laptop por Nino MIT Technology Review 2008 Eddie Awards Winners Folio 2008 09 23 MPA Digital Awards 2008 Archived 2008 03 02 at the Wayback Machine How Obama Really Did It MIT Technology Review Can Technology Save the Economy MIT Technology Review 2009 Eddie Award Winners Folio December 2009 Moore s Outlaws MIT Technology Review Radical Opacity MIT Technology Review The 2011 Eddie and Ozzie Award Winners Folio 2011 12 08 Utne Independent Press Awards 2011 Winners Utne Archived from the original on 2016 04 03 Retrieved 2011 06 08 People Power 2 0 MIT Technology Review a b The Library of Utopia MIT Technology Review Folio Magazine Eddie Awards 2012 PDF technologyreview com Folio Magazine Ozzie Awards 2012 PDF creative red7media com R Kerson 1989 Lab for the Environment MIT Technology Review Vol 92 no 1 pp 11 12 External links EditOfficial website Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title MIT Technology Review amp oldid 1132434934, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.