fbpx
Wikipedia

Hyksos

Hyksos (/ˈhɪksɒs/; Egyptian ḥqꜣ(w)-ḫꜣswt, Egyptological pronunciation: hekau khasut,[4] "ruler(s) of foreign lands") is a term which, in modern Egyptology, designates the kings of the Fifteenth Dynasty of Egypt[5] (fl. c. 1650–1550 BC).[a] The seat of power of these kings was the city of Avaris in the Nile delta, from where they ruled over Lower and Middle Egypt up to Cusae. In the Aegyptiaca, a history of Egypt written by the Greco-Egyptian priest and historian Manetho in the 3rd century BC, the term Hyksos is used ethnically to designate people of probable West Semitic, Levantine origin.[1][9] While Manetho portrayed the Hyksos as invaders and oppressors, this interpretation is questioned in modern Egyptology.[10] Instead, Hyksos rule might have been preceded by groups of Canaanite peoples who gradually settled in the Nile delta from the end of the Twelfth Dynasty onwards and who may have seceded from the crumbling and unstable Egyptian control at some point during the Thirteenth Dynasty.[11]

Hyksos
A man described as "Abisha the Hyksos"
(𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt, Heqa-kasut for "Hyksos"), leading a group of Aamu.
Tomb of Khnumhotep II (circa 1900 BC).[1][2]
This is one of the earliest known uses of the term "Hyksos".[3]

The Hyksos period marks the first in which Egypt was ruled by foreign rulers.[12] Many details of their rule, such as the true extent of their kingdom and even the names and order of their kings, remain uncertain. The Hyksos practiced many Levantine or Canaanite customs as well as many Egyptian customs.[13] They have been credited with introducing several technological innovations to Egypt, such as the horse and chariot, as well as the sickle sword and the composite bow, a theory which is disputed.[14]

The Hyksos did not control all of Egypt. Instead, they coexisted with the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Dynasties, which were based in Thebes.[15] Warfare between the Hyksos and the pharaohs of the late Seventeenth Dynasty eventually culminated in the defeat of the Hyksos by Ahmose I, who founded the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt.[16] In the following centuries, the Egyptians would portray the Hyksos as bloodthirsty and oppressive foreign rulers.

Name

Etymology

Hyksos in hieroglyphs

 



ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣsw / ḥḳꜣw-ḫꜣswt,[17][18]
"hekau khasut"[4][b]
"Hyksos"
Ruler(s) of the foreign countries[17]
GreekHyksos (Ὑκσώς)
Hykussos (Ὑκουσσώς)[21]
 
Standard characters for "Hyksos" in the label for "Abisha the Hyksos" in the tomb of Khnumhotep II, c. 1900 BC.[22] The crook (𓋾, ḥḳꜣ) means "ruler", the hill (𓈎) is a phonetic compkement q/ḳ to 𓋾 while 𓈉 stands for (foreign) "country", pronounced ḫꜣst, plural ḫꜣswt.
The sign 𓏥 marks the plural.[22]

The term "Hyksos" is derived, via the Greek Ὑκσώς (Hyksôs), from the Egyptian expression 𓋾𓈎𓈉 (ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt or ḥḳꜣw-ḫꜣswt, "hekau khasut"), meaning "rulers [of] foreign lands".[17][18] The Greek form is likely a textual corruption of an earlier Ὑκουσσώς (Hykoussôs).[21]

The first century AD Jewish historian Josephus gives the name as meaning "shepherd kings" or "captive kings" in his Contra Apion (Against Apion), where he describes the Hyksos as Jews as they appeared in the Hellenistic Egyptian historian Manetho.[23]

This whole nation was styled Hycsos, that is, Shepherd-kings: for the first syllable Hyc, according to the sacred dialect, denotes a king, as is Sos a shepherd. But this according to the ordinary dialect, and of these is compounded Hycsos; but some say that these people were Arabians.[24]

Josephus's rendition may arise from a later Egyptian pronunciation of ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt as ḥḳꜣ-šꜣsw, which was then understood to mean "lord of shepherds."[25] It is unclear if this translation was found in Manetho; an Armenian translation of an epitome of Manetho given by the late antique historian Eusebius gives the correct translation of "foreign kings".[26]

Use

"It is now commonly accepted in academic publications that the term Ḥḳꜣ-Ḫꜣswt refers only to the individual foreign rulers of the late Second Intermediate Period,"[27] especially of the Fifteenth Dynasty, rather than a people. However, it was used as an ethnic term by Josephus.[c] Its use to refer to the population still persists in some academic papers.[30]

In Ancient Egypt, the term "Hyksos " (ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt) was also used to refer to various Nubian and especially Asiatic rulers both before and after the Fifteenth Dynasty.[4][31][32] It was used at least since the Sixth Dynasty of Egypt (c. 2345–2181 BC) to designate chieftains from the Syro-Palestine area.[22] One of its earliest recorded uses is found c. 1900 BC in the tomb of Khnumhotep II of the Twelfth Dynasty to label a nomad or Canaanite ruler named "Abisha the Hyksos" (using the standard 𓋾𓈎𓈉, ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt, "Heqa-kasut" for "Hyksos").[3][33]

Scarabs of Hyksos kings
 
"Semqen the Hyksos"
 
"Khyan the Hyksos"
Scarabs of Hyksos kings, with "Hyksos" highlighted.[34]

Based on the use of the name in a Hyksos inscription of Sakir-Har from Avaris, the name was used by the Hyksos as a title for themselves.[35] However, Kim Ryholt, argues that "Hyksos" was not an official title of the rulers of the Fifteenth Dynasty, and is never encountered together with royal titulary, only appearing as the title in the case of Sakir-Har. According to Ryholt, "Hyksos" was rather a generic term which is encountered separately from royal titulary, and in regnal lists after the end of the Fifteenth Dynasty itself.[36] However, Vera Müller writes: "Considering that S-k-r-h-r is also mentioned with three names of the traditional Egyptian titulary (Horus name, Golden Falcon name and Two Ladies name) on the same monument, this argument is somehow strange."[37] Danielle Candelora and Manfred Bietak also argue that the Hyksos used the title officially.[6][38] All other texts in the Ancient Egyptian language do not call the Hyksos by this name, instead referring to them as Asiatics (ꜥꜣmw), with the possible exception of the Turin King List in a hypothetical reconstruction from a fragment.[39] The title is not attested for the Hyksos king Apepi, possibly indicating an "increased adoption of Egyptian decorum".[40]

Scarabs also attest the use of this title for pharaohs usually assigned to the Fourteenth or Sixteenth Dynasty of Egypt, who are sometimes called "'lesser' Hyksos."[37] The Theban Seventeenth Dynasty of Egypt is also given the title in some versions of Manetho, a fact which Bietak attributes to textual corruption.[40] In the Twenty-fifth Dynasty of Egypt and during the Ptolemaic Period, the term Hyksos was adopted as a personal title and epithet by a number of pharaohs or high Egyptian officials, including the Theban official Mentuemhat, Philip III of Macedon,[41][42] and Ptolemy XIII.[42] It was also used on the tomb of Egyptian grand priest Petosiris at Tuna el-Gebel in 300 BC to designate the Persian ruler Artaxerxes III, although it is unknown if Artaxerxes adopted this title for himself.[42]

Origins

Ancient historians

 
Blue glazed steatite scarab in a gold mount, with the cartouche of Hyksos ruler Khyan:



- "Son of Ra, Khyan, living forever!"

In his epitome of Manetho, Josephus connected the Hyksos with the Jews,[43] but he also calls them Arabs.[23] In their own epitomes of Manetho, the Late antique historians Sextus Julius Africanus and Eusebius say that the Hyksos came from Phoenicia.[23] Until the excavation and discovery of Tell El-Dab'a (the site of the Hyksos capital Avaris) in 1966, historians relied on these accounts for the Hyksos period.[9][44]

Modern historians

Material finds at Tell El-Dab'a indicate that the Hyksos originated in the Levant.[9] The Hyksos' personal names indicate that they spoke a Western Semitic language and "may be called for convenience sake Canaanites."[45]

 
A Retjenu, associated to the Hyksos in some Egyptian inscriptions.[46]

Kamose, the last king of the Theban Seventeenth Dynasty, refers to Apepi as a "Chieftain of Retjenu" in a stela that implies a Levantine background for this Hyksos king.[46] According to Anna-Latifa Mourad, the Egyptian application of the term ꜥꜣmw to the Hyksos could indicate a range of backgrounds, including newly arrived Levantines or people of mixed Levantine-Egyptian origin.[47]

Due to the work of Manfred Bietak, which found similarities in architecture, ceramics, and burial practices, scholars currently favor a northern Levantine origin of the Hyksos.[48] Based particularly on temple architecture, Bietak argues for strong parallels between the religious practices of the Hyksos at Avaris with those of the area around Byblos, Ugarit, Alalakh, and Tell Brak, defining the "spiritual home" of the Hyksos as "in northernmost Syria and northern Mesopotamia".[49] The connection of the Hyksos to Retjenu also suggests a northern Levantine origin: "Theoretically, it is feasible to deduce that the early Hyksos, as the later Apophis, were of elite ancestry from Rṯnw, a toponym [...] cautiously linked with the Northern Levant and the northern region of the Southern Levant."[47]

Earlier arguments that the Hyksos names might be Hurrian have been rejected,[50] while early-twentieth-century proposals that the Hyksos were Indo-Europeans "fitted European dreams of Indo-European supremacy, now discredited."[51]

A study of dental traits by Nina Maaranen and Sonia Zakrzewski in 2021 on 90 people of Avaris indicated that individuals defined as locals and non-locals were not ancestrally different from one another. The results were said to be in line with the archaeological evidence, suggesting Avaris was an important hub in the Middle Bronze Age eastern Mediterranean trade network, welcoming people from beyond its borders.[52]

History

Early contacts between Egypt and the Levant

Procession of the Aamu
 
 
A group of West Asiatic foreigners, possibly Canaanites, labelled as Aamu (ꜥꜣmw), including the leading man with a Nubian ibex labelled as Abisha the Hyksos (𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣsw, Heqa-kasut for "Hyksos"). Tomb of 12th-dynasty official Khnumhotep II, at Beni Hasan (c. 1890 BC).[1][2][22][33]

Historical records suggest that Semitic people and Egyptians had contacts at all periods of Egypt's history.[53] The MacGregor plaque, an early Egyptian tablet dating to 3000 BC records "The first occasion of striking the East", with the picture of Pharaoh Den smiting a Western Asiatic enemy.[54]

During the reign of Senusret II, c. 1890 BC, parties of Western Asiatic foreigners visiting the Pharaoh with gifts are recorded, as in the tomb paintings of 12th-dynasty official Khnumhotep II. These foreigners, possibly Canaanites or nomads, are labelled as Aamu (ꜥꜣmw), including the leading man with a Nubian ibex labelled as Abisha the Hyksos (𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣsw, Heqa-kasut for "Hyksos"), the first known instance of the name "Hyksos".[1][2][22][33]

Soon after, the Sebek-khu Stele, dated to the reign of Senusret III (reign: 1878–1839 BC), records the earliest known Egyptian military campaign in the Levant. The text reads "His Majesty proceeded northward to overthrow the Asiatics. His Majesty reached a foreign country of which the name was Sekmem (...) Then Sekmem fell, together with the wretched Retenu", where Sekmem (s-k-m-m) is thought to be Shechem and "Retenu" or "Retjenu" are associated with ancient Syria.[55][56]

Background and arrival in Egypt

The only ancient account of the whole Hyksos period is by the Hellenistic Egyptian historian Manetho, who, however, exists only as quoted by others.[57] As recorded by Josephus, Manetho describes the beginning of Hyksos rule thusly:

A people of ignoble origin from the east, whose coming was unforeseen, had the audacity to invade the country, which they mastered by main force without difficulty or even battle. Having overpowered the chiefs, they then savagely burnt the cities, razed the temples of the gods to the ground, and treated the whole native population with the utmost cruelty, massacring some, and carrying off the wives and children of others into slavery (Contra Apion I.75-77).[58]

 
Electrum dagger handle of a soldier of Hyksos pharaoh Apepi, illustrating the soldier hunting with a short bow and sword. Inscriptions: "The perfect god, the lord of the two lands, Nebkhepeshre Apepi" and "Follower of his lord Nehemen", found at a burial at Saqqara.[59] Now at the Luxor Museum.[60][61]

Manetho's invasion narrative is "nowadays rejected by most scholars."[10] It is likely that he was influenced by more recent foreign invasions of Egypt.[6] Instead, it appears that the establishment of Hyksos rule was mostly peaceful and did not involve an invasion of an entirely foreign population.[62] Archaeology shows a continuous Asiatic presence at Avaris for over 150 years before the beginning of Hyksos rule,[63] with gradual Canaanite settlement beginning there c. 1800 BC during the Twelfth Dynasty.[18] Strontium isotope analysis of the inhabitants of Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period Avaris also dismissed the invasion model in favor of a migration one. Contrary to the model of a foreign invasion, the study didn't find more males moving into the region, but instead found a sex bias towards females. with a high proportion of 77% of females being non-locals.[64][65]

Manfred Bietak argues that Hyksos "should be understood within a repetitive pattern of the attraction of Egypt for western Asiatic population groups that came in search of a living in the country, especially the Delta, since prehistoric times."[63] He notes that Egypt had long depended on the Levant for expertise in areas of shipbuilding and seafaring, with possible depictions of Asiatic shipbuilders being found from reliefs from the Sixth Dynasty ruler Sahure. The Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt is known to have had many Asiatic immigrants serving as soldiers, household or temple serfs, and various other jobs. Avaris in the Nile Delta attracted many Asiatic immigrants in its role as a hub of international trade and seafaring.[66]

The final powerful pharaoh of the Egyptian Thirteenth Dynasty was Sobekhotep IV, who died around 1725 BC, after which Egypt appears to have splintered into various kingdoms, including one based at Avaris ruled by the Fourteenth Dynasty.[11] Based on their names, this dynasty was already primarily of West Asian origin.[67] After an event in which their palace was burned,[67] the Fourteenth Dynasty would be replaced by the Hyksos Fifteenth Dynasty, which would establish "loose control over northern Egypt by intimidation or force,"[68] thus greatly expanding the area under Avaris's control.[69]

Kim Ryholt argues that the Fifteenth Dynasty invaded and displaced the Fourteenth, however Alexander Ilin-Tomich argues that this is "not sufficiently substantiated."[50] Bietak interprets a stela of Neferhotep III to indicate that Egypt was overrun by roving mercenaries around the time of the Hyksos ascension to power.[70]

Kingdom

 
Tell el‑Yahudiyeh
 
Tell Farasha
 
Tell el‑Maskhuta
 
Tell er‑Retabeh
 
Tell es‑Sahaba
class=notpageimage|
Key Sites of the Second Intermediate Period, in Northern Egypt. West Semitic in red; Egyptian in blue.[citation needed]

The length of time the Hyksos ruled is unclear. The fragmentary Turin King List says that there were six Hyksos kings who collectively ruled 108 years,[71] however in 2018 Kim Ryholt proposed a new reading of as many as 149 years, while Thomas Schneider proposed a length between 160 and 180 years.[72] The rule of the Hyksos overlaps with that of the native Egyptian pharaohs of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Dynasties, better known as the Second Intermediate Period.

The area under direct control of the Hyksos was probably limited to the eastern Nile delta.[15] Their capital city was Avaris at a fork on the now-dry Pelusiac branch of the Nile. Memphis may have also been an important administrative center,[73] although the nature of any Hyksos presence there remains unclear.[15]

According to Anna-Latifa Mourad, other sites with likely Levantine populations or strong Levantine connections in the Delta include Tell Farasha and Tell el-Maghud, located between Tell Basta and Avaris,[74] El-Khata'na, southwest of Avaris, and Inshas.[75] The increased prosperity of Avaris may have attracted more Levantines to settle in the eastern Delta.[62] Kom el-Hisn at the edge of the Western Delta, shows Near-Eastern goods but individuals mostly buried in an Egyptian style, which Mourad takes to mean that they were most likely Egyptians heavily influenced by Levantine traditions or, more likely, Egyptianized Levantines.[76] The site of Tell Basta (Bubastis), at the confluence of the Pelusiac and Tanitic branches of the Nile, contains monuments to the Hyksos kings Khyan and Apepi, but little other evidence of Levantine habitation.[77] Tell el-Habwa (Tjaru), located on a branch of the Nile near the Sinai, also shows evidence of non-Egyptian presence, however the majority of the population appears to have been Egyptian or Egyptianized Levantines.[78] Tell El-Habwa would have provided Avaris with grain and trade goods.[79]

 
Near-eastern inspired diadem with heads of gazelles and a stag between stars or flowers, belonging to an elite lady discovered at a tomb at Tell el-Dab'a (Avaris) dating from the late Hyksos period (1648–1540 BC).[80][81] Now at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.[82]

In the Wadi Tumilat, Tell el-Maskhuta shows a great deal of Levantine pottery and an occupation history closely correlated to the Fifteenth Dynasty,[83] nearby Tell el-Rataba and Tell el-Sahaba show possible Hyksos-style burials and occupation,[84] Tell el-Yahudiyah, located between Memphis and the Wadi Tumilat, contains a large earthwork that may have been built by the Hyksos, as well as evidence of Levantine burials from as early as the Thirteenth Dynasty.[85] The Hyksos settlements in the Wadi Tumilat would have provided access to Sinai, the southern Levant, and possibly the Red Sea.[62]

The sites Tell el-Kabir, Tell Yehud, Tell Fawziya, and Tell Geziret el-Faras are noted by scholars other than Mourad to contain "elements of 'Hyksos culture'", but there is no published archaeological material for them.[86]

The Hyksos claimed to be rulers of both Lower and Upper Egypt; however, their southern border was marked at Hermopolis and Cusae.[13] Some objects might suggest a Hyksos presence in Upper Egypt, but they may have been Theban war booty or attest simply to short term raids, trade, or diplomatic contact.[87] The nature of Hyksos control over the region of Thebes remains unclear.[15] Most likely Hyksos rule covered the area from Middle Egypt to southern Palestine.[88] Older scholarship believed, due to the distribution of Hyksos goods with the names of Hyksos rulers in places such as Baghdad and Knossos, that Hyksos had ruled a vast empire, but it seems more likely to have been the result of diplomatic gift exchange and far-flung trade networks.[89][15]

Wars with the Seventeenth Dynasty

The conflict between Thebes and the Hyksos is known exclusively from pro-Theban sources, and it is difficult to construct a chronology.[16] These sources propagandistically portray the conflict as a war of national liberation. This perspective was formerly taken by scholars as well but is no longer thought to be accurate.[90][91]

Hostilities between the Hyksos and the Theban Seventeenth Dynasty appear to have begun during the reign of Theban king Seqenenra Taa. Seqenenra Taa's mummy shows that he was killed by several blows of an axe to the head, apparently in battle with the Hyksos.[92] It is unclear why hostilities may have started, but the much later fragmentary New Kingdom tale The Quarrel of Apophis and Seqenenre blames the Hyksos ruler Apepi/Apophis for initiating the conflict by demanding that Seqenenra Taa remove a pool of hippopotamuses near Thebes.[93] However, this is a satire on the Egyptian story-telling genre of the "king's novel" rather than a historical text.[92] A contemporary inscription at Wadi el Hôl may also refer to hostilities between Seqenenra and Apepi.[70]

 
Mummified head of Seqenenra Taa, bearing axe wounds. The common theory is that he died in a battle against the Hyksos.[93]

Three years later, c. 1542 BC,[94] Seqenenra Taa's successor Kamose initiated a campaign against several cities loyal to the Hyksos, the account of which is preserved on three monumental stelae set up at Karnak.[95][70][96] The first of the three, Carnarvon Tablet includes a complaint by Kamose about the divided and occupied state of Egypt:

To what effect do I perceive it, my might, while a ruler is in Avaris and another in Kush, I sitting joined with an Asiatic and a Nubian, each man having his (own) portion of this Egypt, sharing the land with me. There is no passing him as far as Memphis, the water of Egypt. He has possession of Hermopolis, and no man can rest, being deprived by the levies of the Setiu. I shall engage in battle with him and I shall slit his body, for my intention is to save Egypt, striking the Asiatics.[97]

Following a common literary device, Kamose's advisors are portrayed as trying to dissuade the king, but the king attacks anyway.[95] He recounts his destruction of the city of Nefrusy as well as several other cities loyal to the Hyksos. On a second stele, Kamose claims to have captured Avaris, but returned to Thebes after capturing a messenger between Apepi and the king of Kush.[92] Kamose appears to have died soon afterward (c. 1540 BC).[94]

Ahmose I continued the war against the Hyksos, most likely conquering Memphis, Tjaru and Heliopolis early in his reign, the latter two of which are mentioned in an entry of the Rhind mathematical papyrus.[92] Knowledge of Ahmose I's campaigns against the Hyksos mostly comes from the tomb of Ahmose, son of Ebana, who gives a first person account claiming that Ahmose I sacked Avaris:[98]

Then there was fighting in Egypt to the south of this town [Avaris], and I carried off a man as a living captive. I went down into the water—for he was captured on the city side—and crossed the water carrying him. [...] Then Avaris was despoiled, and I brought spoil from there.[99]

 
 
Pharaoh Ahmose I (ruled c. 1549–1524 BC) slaying a probable Hyksos. Detail of a ceremonial axe in the name of Ahmose I, treasure of Queen Ahhotep II. Inscription "Ahmose, beloved of (the War God) Montu". Luxor Museum[100][101][102][103]

Thomas Schneider places the conquest in year 18 of Ahmose's reign.[104] However, excavations of Tell El-Dab'a (Avaris) show no widespread destruction of the city, which instead seems to have been abandoned by the Hyksos.[92] Manetho, as recorded in Josephus, states that the Hyksos were allowed to leave after concluding a treaty:[105]

Thoumosis ... invested the walls [of Avaris] with an army of 480,000 men, and endeavoured to reduce [the Hyksos] to submission by siege. Despairing of achieving his object, he concluded a treaty, under which [the Hyksos] were all to evacuate Egypt and go whither they would unmolested. Upon these terms no fewer than two hundred and forty thousand, entire households with their possessions, left Egypt and traversed the desert to Syria. (Contra Apion I.88-89)[106]

Although Manetho indicates that the Hyksos population was expelled to the Levant, there is no archaeological evidence for this, and Manfred Bietak argues on the basis of archaeological finds throughout Egypt that it is likely that numerous Asiatics were resettled in other locations in Egypt as artisans and craftsmen.[107] Many may have remained at Avaris, as pottery and scarabs with typical "Hyksos" forms continued to be produced uninterrupted throughout the Eastern Delta.[70] Canaanite cults also continued to be worshiped at Avaris.[108]

Following the capture of Avaris, Ahmose, son of Ebana records that Ahmose I captured Sharuhen (possibly Tell el-Ajjul), which some scholars argue was a city in Canaan under Hyksos control.[109]

Rule and administration

 
An official wearing the "mushroom-headed" hairstyle also seen in contemporary paintings of Western Asiatic foreigners such as in the tomb of Khnumhotep II, at Beni Hasan. Excavated in Avaris, the Hyksos capital. Dated to 1802–1640 BC. Staatliche Sammlung für Ägyptische Kunst.[110][111][112][113]

Administration

The Hyksos show a mix of Egyptian and Levantine cultural traits.[13] Their rulers adopted the full Ancient Egyptian royal titulary and employed Egyptian scribes and officials.[114] They also used Near-Eastern forms of administration, such as employing a chancellor (imy-r khetemet) as the head of their administration.[115]

Rulers

The names, the order, length of rule, and even the total number of the Fifteenth Dynasty rulers are not known with full certainty. After the end of their rule, the Hyksos kings were not considered to have been legitimate rulers of Egypt and were therefore omitted from most king lists.[116] The fragmentary Turin King List included six Hyksos kings, however only the name of the last, Khamudi, is preserved.[117] Six names are also preserved in the various epitomes of Manetho, however, it is difficult to reconcile the Turin King List and other sources with names known from Manetho,[118] largely due to the "corrupted name forms" in Manetho.[6] The name Apepi/Apophis appears in multiple sources, however.[119]

Various other archaeological sources also provide names of rulers with the Hyksos title,[120] however, the majority of kings from the second intermediate period are attested once on a single object, with only three exceptions.[121] Ryholt associates two other rulers known from inscriptions with the dynasty, Khyan and Sakir-Har.[122] The name of Khyan's son, Yanassi, is also preserved from Tell El-Dab'a.[69] The two best attested kings are Khyan and Apepi.[123] Scholars generally agree that Apepi and Khamudi are the last two kings of the dynasty,[124] and Apepi is attested as a contemporary of Seventeenth-Dynasty pharaohs Kamose and Ahmose I.[125] Ryholt has proposed that Yanassi did not rule and that Khyan directly preceded Apepi,[126] but most scholars agree that the order of kings is: Khyan, Yanassi, Apepi, Khamudi.[127] There is less agreement on the early rulers. Sakir-Har is proposed by Schneider, Ryholt, and Bietak to have been the first king.[66][128][129]

Recently, archaeological finds have suggested that Khyan may actually have been a contemporary of Thirteenth-Dynasty pharaoh Sobekhotep IV, potentially making him an early rather than a late Hyksos ruler.[130] This has prompted attempts to reconsider the entire chronology of the Hyksos period, which as of 2018 had not yet reached any consensus.[131]

Some kings are attested from either fragments of the Turin King List or from other sources who may have been Hyksos rulers. According to Ryholt, kings Semqen and Aperanat, known from the Turin King List, may have been early Hyksos rulers,[132] however Jürgen von Beckerath assigns these kings to the Sixteenth Dynasty of Egypt.[133] Another king known from scarabs, Sheshi,[118] is believed by many scholars to be a Hyksos king,[134] however Ryholt assigns this king to the Fourteenth Dynasty of Egypt.[135] Manfred Bietak proposes that a king recorded as Yaqub-Har may also have been a Hyksos king of the Fifteenth Dynasty.[40] Bietak suggests that many of the other kings attested on scarabs may have been vassal kings of the Hyksos.[136]

Hyksos rulers in various sources[66][128][137]
Manetho[138] Turin King List Genealogy of Ankhefensekhmet Identification by Redford (1992)[139] Identification by Ryholt (1997)[140] Identification by Bietak (2012)[66] Identification by Schneider (2006) (Reconstructed Semitic name in Parentheses)[137][141][d]
Salitis/Saites (19 years) X 15 Schalek[e] Sheshi ?Semqen (Šamuqēnu)? ?Sakir-Har? ? (Šarā-Dagan [Šȝrk[n]])
Bnon (44 years) X 16.... 3 years Yaqub-Har ?Aper-Anat ('Aper-'Anati)? ?Meruserre Yaqub-Har? ? (*Bin-ʿAnu)
Apachnan/Pachnan (36/61 years) X 17... 8 years 3 months Khyan Sakir-Har Seuserenre Khyan Khyan ([ʿApaq-]Hajran)
Iannas/Staan (50 years) X 18... 10 (20, 30) years Yanassi (Yansas-X) Khyan Yanassi (Yansas-idn) Yanassi (Jinaśśi’-Ad)
Apophis (61/14 years) X 19... 40 + x years Apepi (?'A-ken?)[f] Apepi Apepi A-user-Re Apepi Apepi (Apapi)
Archles/Assis (40/30 years)[g] identifies with ?Khamudi? identifies with Khamudi Identifies with Khamudi Sakir-Har (Sikru-Haddu)
X 20 Khamudi ?Khamudi?[h] Khamudi Khamudi not in Manetho (Halmu'di)
Sum: 259 years[i] Sum: 108 years[j]

None of the proposed identifications besides of Apepi and Apophis is considered certain.[144]

In Sextus Julius Africanus's epitome of Manetho, the rulers of Sixteenth Dynasty are also identified as "shepherds" (i.e. Hyksos) rulers.[120] Following the work of Ryholt in 1997, most but not all scholars now identify the Sixteenth Dynasty as a native Egyptian dynasty based in Thebes, following Eusebius's epitome of Manetho; this dynasty would be contemporary to the Hyksos.[145]

Diplomacy

 
Lion inscribed with the name of the Hyksos ruler Khyan, found in Baghdad, suggesting relations with Babylon. The prenomen of Khyan and epithet appear on the breast. British Museum, EA 987.[146][147]

The Hyksos engagement in long-distance diplomacy is confirmed by a cuneiform letter discovered in the ruins of Avaris. Hyksos diplomacy with Crete and ancient Near East is also confirmed by the presence of gifts from the Hyksos court in those places.[66] Khyan, one of the Hyksos rulers, is known for his wide-ranging contacts, as objects in his name have been found at Knossos and Hattusha indicating diplomatic contacts with Crete and the Hittites, and a sphinx with his name was bought on the art market at Baghdad and might demonstrate diplomatic contacts with Babylon, possibly with the first Kassites ruler Gandash.[146][147]

The Theban rulers of the Seventeenth Dynasty are known to have imitated the Hyksos both in their architecture and regnal names.[148] There is evidence of friendly relations between the Hyksos and Thebes, including possibly a marriage alliance, prior to the reign of the Theban pharaoh Seqenenra Taa.[93]

An intercepted letter between Apepi and the Nubian King of Kerma (also called Kush) to the south of Egypt recorded on the Carnarvon Tablet has been interpreted as evidence of an alliance between the Hyksos and Kermans.[109] Intensive contacts between Kerma and the Hyksos are further attested by seals with the names of Asiatic rulers or with designs known from Avaris at Kerma.[149] The troops of Kerma are known to have raided as far north as Elkab according to an inscription of Sobeknakht II.[92] According to his second stele, Kamose was effectively caught between the campaign for the siege of Avaris in the north and the offensive of Kerma in the south; it is unknown whether or not the Kermans and Hyksos were able to combine forces against him.[95] Kamose reports returning "in triumph" to Thebes, but Lutz Popko suggests that this "was perhaps a mere tactical retreat to prevent a war on two fronts".[92] Ahmose I was also forced to confront a threat from the Nubians during his own siege of Avaris: he was able to stop the forces of Kerma by sending a strong fleet, killing their ruler named A'ata.[150][151] Ahmose I boasts about these successes on his tomb at Thebes.[150] The Kermans also appear to have provided mercenaries to the Hyksos.[66]

Vassalage

Many scholars have described the Egyptian dynasties contemporary to the Hyksos as "vassal" dynasties, an idea partially derived from the Nineteenth-Dynasty literary text The Quarrel of Apophis and Seqenenre,[152] in which it is said "the entire land paid tribute to him [Apepi], delivering their taxes in full as well as bringing all good produce of Egypt."[153] The belief in Hyksos vassalage was challenged by Ryholt as "a baseless assumption."[154] Roxana Flammini suggests instead that Hyksos exerted influence through (sometimes imposed) personal relationships and gift-giving.[155] Manfred Bietak continues to refer to Hyksos vassals, including minor dynasties of West Semitic rulers in Egypt.[156]

Society and culture

Royal construction and patronage

The so-called "Hyksos Sphinxes"
 
 
The so-called "Hyksos Sphinxes" are peculiar sphinxes of Amenemhat III which were reinscribed by several Hyksos rulers, including Apepi. Earlier Egyptologists thought these were the faces of actual Hyksos rulers.[157]
 
Remains of a statue of the Twelfth Dynasty reappropriated by Hyksos ruler "Khyan", with his name inscribed on the sides over an erasure.[158]

The Hyksos do not appear to have produced any court art,[159] instead appropriating monuments from earlier dynasties by writing their names on them. Many of these are inscribed with the name of King Khyan.[160] A large palace at Avaris has been uncovered, built in the Levantine rather than the Egyptian style, most likely by Khyan.[161] King Apepi is known to have patronized Egyptian scribal culture, commissioning the copying of the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus.[162] The stories preserved in the Westcar Papyrus may also date from his reign.[163]

The so-called "Hyksos sphinxes" or "Tanite sphinxes" are a group of royal sphinxes depicting the earlier pharaoh Amenemhat III (Twelfth Dynasty) with some unusual traits compared to conventional statuary, for example prominent cheekbones and the thick mane of a lion, instead of the traditional nemes headcloth. The name "Hyksos sphinxes" was given due to the fact that these were later reinscribed by several of the Hyksos kings, and were initially thought to represent the Hyksos kings themselves. Nineteenth-century scholars attempted to use the statues' features to assign a racial origin to the Hyksos.[164] These Sphinxes were seized by the Hyksos from cities of the Middle Kingdom and then transported to their capital Avaris where they were reinscribed with the names of their new owners and adorned their palace.[157] Seven of those sphinxes are known, all from Tanis, and now mostly located in the Cairo Museum.[157][165] Other statues of Amenehat III were found in Tanis and are associated with the Hyksos in the same manner.

Burial practices

Evidence for distinct Hyksos burial practices in the archaeological record include burying their dead within settlements rather than outside them like the Egyptians.[166] While some of the tombs include Egyptian-style chapels, they also include burials of young females, probably sacrifices, placed in front of the tomb chamber.[161] There are also no surviving Hyksos funeral monuments in the desert in the Egyptian style, though these may have been destroyed.[73] The Hyksos also interred infants who died in imported Canaanite amphorae.[167] The Hyksos also practiced the burial of horses and other equids, likely a composite custom of the Egyptian association of the god Set with the donkey and near-eastern notions of equids as representing status.[168]

Technology

 
The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus was copied for the Hyksos king Apepi.

The Hyksos use of horse burials suggest that the Hyksos introduced both the horse and the chariot to Egypt,[169] however no archaeological, pictorial, or textual evidence exists that the Hyksos possessed chariots, which are first mentioned as ridden by the Egyptians in warfare against them by Ahmose, son of Ebana, at the close of Hyksos rule.[170] In any case, it does not appear that chariots played any large role in the Hyksos rise to power or their expulsion.[171] Josef Wegner further argues that horse-riding may have been present in Egypt as early as the late Middle Kingdom, prior to the adoption of chariot technology.[172]

Traditionally, the Hyksos have also been credited with introducing a number of other military innovations, such as the sickle-sword and composite bow; however, "[t]o what extent the kingdom of Avaris should be credited for these innovations is debatable," with scholarly opinion currently divided.[14] It is also possible that the Hyksos introduced more advanced bronze working techniques, though this is inconclusive. They may have worn full-body armor,[173] whereas the Egyptians did not wear armor or helmets until the New Kingdom.[174]

The Hyksos also introduced better weaving techniques and new musical instruments to Egypt.[173] They introduced improvements in viniculture as well.[70]

Trade and economy

 
An example of Egyptian Tell el-Yahudiyeh Ware, a Levantine-influenced style.

The early period of Hyksos period established their capital of Avaris "as the commercial capital of the Delta".[177] The trading relations of the Hyksos were mainly with Canaan and Cyprus.[13][178] Trade with Canaan is said to have been "intensive", especially with many imports of Canaanite wares, and may have reflected the Canaanite origins of the dynasty.[179] Trade was mostly with the cities of the northern Levant, but connections with the southern Levant also developed.[47] Additionally, trade was conducted with Faiyum, Memphis, oases in Egypt, Nubia, and Mesopotamia.[177] Trade relations with Cyprus were also very important, particularly at the end of the Hyksos period.[13][180] Aaron Burke has interpreted the equid burials in Avaris of evidence that the people buried with them were involved in the caravan trade.[181] Anna-Latifa Mourad argues that "Hyksos were particularly interested in opening new avenues of trade, securing strategic posts in the eastern Delta that could give access to land-based and sea-based trade routes."[177] These include the apparent Hyksos settlements of Tell el-Habwa I and Tell el-Maskhuta in the eastern Delta.[79]

According to the Kamose stelae, the Hyksos imported "chariots and horses, ships, timber, gold, lapis lazuli, silver, turquoise, bronze, axes without number, oil, incense, fat and honey".[13] The Hyksos also exported large quantities of material looted from southern Egypt, especially Egyptian sculptures, to the areas of Canaan and Syria.[179] These transfers of Egyptian artifacts to the Near East may especially be attributed to king Apepi.[179] The Hyksos also produced local, Levantine-influenced industries, such as Tell el-Yahudiyeh Ware.[177]

There is little evidence of trade between Upper and Lower Egypt during the Hyksos period, and Manfred Bietak proposes that there was "a mutual trade boycott". Bietak proposes that this decreased the Hyksos ability to trade with the Mediterranean and weakened their economy.[70]

Religion

 
Drawing of a Hyksos-era scarab found at Tell el-Dab'a depicting the pharaoh as the Near-Eastern weather god (Baal) or vice versa.[182] The aim appears to be to present the Hyksos ruler as a divine figure.[12] Original privately owned, kept at the University of Fribourg.[183]

Temples in Avaris existed both in Egyptian and Levantine style, the latter presumably for Levantine gods.[184] The Hyksos are known to have worshiped the Canaanite storm god Baal, who was associated with the Egyptian god Set.[185] Set appears to have been the patron god of Avaris as early as the Fourteenth Dynasty.[186] Hyksos iconography of their kings on some scarabs shows a mixture of Egyptian pharaonic dress with a raised club, the iconography of Baal.[12] Despite later sources claiming the Hyksos were opposed to the worship of other gods, votive objects given by Hyksos rulers to gods such as Ra, Hathor, Sobek, and Wadjet have also survived.[187]

Potential biblical connections

In the Manethonian-Josephus tradition

Josephus, and most of the writers of antiquity, associated the Hyksos with the Jews.[188] Quoting from Manetho's Aegyptiaca, Josephus states that when the Hyksos were expelled from Egypt, they founded Jerusalem (Contra Apion I.90).[189] It is unclear if this is original to Manetho or Josephus's own addition, as Manetho does not mention "Jews" or "Hebrews" in his preserved account of the expulsion.[190] Josephus's account of Manetho connects the expulsion of the Hyksos to another event two hundred years later, in which a group of lepers led by the priest Osarseph were expelled from Egypt to the abandoned Avaris. There they ally with the Hyksos and rule over Egypt for thirteen years before being driven out, during which time they oppress the Egyptians and destroy their temples. After the expulsion, Osarseph changes his name to Moses (Contra Apion I.227-250).[191] Assmann argues that this second account is largely a mixture of the experiences of the later Amarna period with the Hyksos invasion, with Osarseph likely standing in for Akhenaten.[192][193] The final mention of Osarseph, in which he changes his name to Moses, may be a later interpolation.[194] The second account is sometimes held not to have been written by Manetho at all.[195]

In modern scholarship

 
Semitic visitors to Egypt, in the Tomb of Khnumhotep II, c. 1900 BC

Over the years, especially in the early to mid 20th century, some scholars have suggested that seemingly authentic Egyptian elements in the Bible indicate the historical plausibility of the story of the Egyptian sojourn and exodus of the Israelites, including the story of Joseph, great grandson of Abraham.[196] John Bright states that Egyptian and Biblical records both suggest that Semitic people maintained access to Egypt at all periods of Egypt's history, and he suggested that it is tempting to suppose that Joseph who, according to the Old Testament (Genesis 39:50), was in favour at the Egyptian court and held high administrative positions next to the ruler of the land, was associated to the Hyksos rule in Egypt during the Fifteenth Dynasty. Such a connection might have been facilitated by their shared Semitic ethnicity. He also wrote that there is no proof for these events.[53] Howard Vos has suggested that the "coat of many colors" said to have been worn by Joseph could be similar to the colorful garments seen in the painting of foreigners in the tomb of Khnumhotep II.[197]

Ronald B. Geobey notes a number of problems with identifying the narrative of Joseph with events either prior to or during the Hyksos' rule, such as the detail that the Egyptians abhorred Joseph's people ("shepherds"; Gen. 46:31) and numerous anachronisms.[198] Manfred Bietak suggests that the story fits better with the ambience of the later Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt, in particular with the xenophobic policy of pharaoh Setnakhte (1189–1186 BC).[199] And Donald Redford argues that "to read [the Joseph story] as history is quite wrongheaded,"[200] while Megan Bishop Moore and Brad E. Kelle note the lack of any extra-biblical evidence for the events of Genesis, including the Joseph story, or Exodus.[201]

Scholars such as Jan Assmann and Redford have supported the notion that the story of the biblical exodus may have been wholly or partially inspired by the expulsion of the Hyksos.[202][203][204] An identification with the Hyksos would only depart minimally from accepted biblical chronology, and their expulsion is the only known large-scale expulsion of Asiatics from Egypt.[205] However, Bietak writes:

[T]he population under Hyksos rule was an urban society allied to trade and seafaring and, for a certain period, ruled Egypt (c. 1640–1530 BC). They experienced the glory of controlling the Delta and a part of the Nile valley for over 100 years. However, this is in no way in keeping with the tradition of the Israelites and their experience of oppression in Egypt. That is why an association of the Hyksos and their people with the Proto-Israelites should be dismissed.[206]

Archaeological evidence suggests that the Israelites primarily emerged natively from Canaan.[207] A number of scholars do not believe that the exodus has any historical basis at all, while only those on the fundamentalist fringes accept the entire biblical account "unless [it] can be absolutely disproved".[208] The current consensus among archaeologists is that, if an Israelite exodus from Egypt occurred, it must have happened instead in the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt (13th century BC), given the first appearance of a distinctive Israelite culture in the archaeological record.[209] The potential connection of the Hyksos to the exodus is no longer a central focus of scholarly study of the Hyksos,[44] but this supposed connection to the Exodus has continued to inspire popular interest.[51]

Legacy

 
"Four Foreign Chieftains" from tomb TT39 (Metropolitan Museum of Art, MET DT10871). Ca. 1479–1458 BC
 
Egyptian relief depicting a battle against West Asiatics. Reign of Amenhotep II, Eighteenth Dynasty, c. 1427–1400 BC.

The Hyksos' rule continued to be condemned by New Kingdom pharaohs such as Hatshepsut, who, 80 years after their defeat, claimed to rebuild many shrines and temples which they had neglected.[159]

Ramses II moved Egypt's capital to the Delta, building Pi-Ramesses on the site of Avaris,[210] where he set up a stela marking the 400th anniversary of the cult of Set. Scholars used to suggest that this marked 400 years since the Hyksos had established their rule, however the lists of Ramesses' ancestors continued to omit the Hyksos and there is no evidence that they were honored during his reign.[211] The Turin King List, which includes the Hyksos and all other disputed or disgraced former rulers of Egypt, appears to date from the reign of Ramesses or one of his successors.[212] The Hyksos are marked as foreign kings via a throw-stick determinative rather than a divine determinative after their names, and the use of the title ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt rather than the usual royal title.[213] Kim Ryholt notes that these measures are unique to the Hyksos rulers and "may therefore have been a direct result of what seems to have been deliberate attempt to obliterate the memory of their kingship after their defeat."[214]

Egyptian presence in the Levant

It is "often accepted" that Egypt established an empire in Canaan at the end of the wars against the Hyksos.[215] Campaigns against locations in Canaan and Syria were conducted by Ahmose I and Thutmose I at the beginning of the Eighteenth Dynasty, as recorded in the tombs of Ahmose, son of Ebana and Ahmose pen-Nekhebet; Thutmose I is also mentioned as having hunted elephants in Syria in inscriptions at the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari.[216] Thutmose III is known to have campaigned widely, conquering the "Shasu" Bedouins of northern Canaan, and the land of Retjenu, as far as Syria and Mittani in numerous military campaigns circa 1450 BC.[217][218] However, Felix Höflmayer argues that there is little evidence of other campaigns and that "there is no evidence that would suggest such a scenario" as an Egyptian empire during the Eighteenth Dynasty.[219] As regards claims that the campaigns in the Near East were spurred on by Hyksos rule, Thomas Schneider argues that "the empire building started with a delay of two generations and seeing a direct nexus may be as much a historical fallacy as it would be to link the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989 to the end of the Second World War in 1945, two generations earlier."[220]

 
 
"Retjenu" Syrians bringing tribute to Tuthmosis III, in the tomb of Rekhmire, c. 1450 BC (actual painting and interpretive drawing). They are labeled "Chiefs of Retjenu".[221][222]

Later accounts

 
A relief of Ramses II from Memphis showing him capturing enemies: a Nubian, a Libyan and a Syrian, c. 1250 BC. Cairo Museum.[223]

The Nineteenth-Dynasty story The Quarrel of Apophis and Seqenenre claimed that the Hyksos worshiped no god but Set, making the conflict into one between Ra, the patron of Thebes, and Set as patron of Avaris.[224] Furthermore, the battle with the Hyksos was interpreted in light of the mythical battle between the gods Horus and Set, transforming Set into an Asiatic deity while also allowing for the integration of Asiatics into Egyptian society.[225]

Manetho's portrayal of the Hyksos, written nearly 1300 years after the end of Hyksos rule and found in Josephus, is even more negative than the New Kingdom sources.[159] This account portrayed the Hyksos "as violent conquerors and oppressors of Egypt" has been highly influential for perceptions of the Hyksos until modern times.[226] Marc van de Mieroop argues that Josephus's portrayal of the initial Hyksos invasion is no more trustworthy than his later claims that they were related to the Exodus, supposedly portrayed in Manetho as performed by a band of lepers.[227]

Early modern depictions

The discovery of the Hyksos in the 19th century, and their study following the decipherment of ancient Egyptian scripts, led to various theories about their history, origin, ethnicity and appearance, often illustrated with picturesque and imaginative details.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Approximate dates vary by source. Bietak gives c. 1640–1532 BC,[6] Schneider gives c. 1639–1521 BC,[7] and Stiebing gives c. 1630–1530 BC.[8]
  2. ^ Spelling of the hieroglyphs in sources describing the archaeological record of the historical Hyksos: first set of characters is the singular, as appearing in Abisha the Hyksos in the tomb of Khnumhotep II, c.1900 BC.[19] The second set is in the plural, as appears in the inscriptions of known Hyksos rulers Sakir-Har, Semqen, Khyan and Aperanat.[20]
  3. ^ "Two separate misconceptions persist, both in the scholarship and more popular works, surrounding the word "Hyksos." The first is that this term is the name of a defined and relatively large population group (see below), when in fact it is only a royal title held exclusively by individual rulers. Any standalone use of the word "Hyksos" in the following article refers specifically to the foreign kings of the 15th Dynasty."[28] "[Josephus] also misrepresents the Hyksos as a population group (ethnos) as opposed to a dynasty."[6] "Flavius Josephus used the designation "Hyksos" incorrectly as a kind of ethnic term for people of foreign origin who seized power in Egypt for a certain period. In this sense, for the sake of convenience, it is also used in the title and section headings of the present article. One should never forget, however, that, strictly spoken, the "Hyksos" were only the kings of the Fifteenth Dynasty, and of simultaneous minor dynasties, who took the title ḥḳꜣw-ḫꜣswt."[29]
  4. ^ While Schneider identifies each of the names in Menatho with a pharaoh, he does not hold to Manetho's order of the reigns. So, for instance, he identifies Sakir-Har with Archles/Assis, the sixth king in Manetho, but proposes he reigned first.[142]
  5. ^ Identified with Salitis by Bietak.[66]
  6. ^ This name appears as a separate individual preceding Apepi, but it appears to mean "brave ass" and may be a disparaging reference to Apepi.[143]
  7. ^ In Eusebius and Africanus's epitomes of Manetho, "Apopis" appears in final position, while Archles appears as the fifth ruler. In Josephus, Assis is the final ruler and Apophis the fifth ruler. The association of the names Archles and Assis with one another is a modern reconstruction.[138]
  8. ^ Redford argues that the name "suits neither Assis nor Apophis".[143]
  9. ^ In the epitome of Manetho by Eusebius, the total instead comes to 284 years.[128]
  10. ^ This reading is based on a partially damaged section of the papyrus. Reconstructions of the damaged Turin King List proposed in 2018 would change the reading of years to up to 149 years (Ryholt) or between 160 and 180 years (Schneider).[72]

Citations

  1. ^ a b c d Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 131.
  2. ^ a b c Bard 2015, p. 188.
  3. ^ a b Willems 2010, p. 96.
  4. ^ a b c Bourriau 2000, p. 174.
  5. ^ Bietak 2001, p. 136.
  6. ^ a b c d e Bietak 2012, p. 1.
  7. ^ Schneider 2006, p. 196.
  8. ^ Stiebing 2009, p. 197.
  9. ^ a b c Mourad 2015, p. 10.
  10. ^ a b Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 5.
  11. ^ a b Bourriau 2000, pp. 177–178.
  12. ^ a b c Morenz & Popko 2010, p. 104.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Bourriau 2000, p. 182.
  14. ^ a b Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 12.
  15. ^ a b c d e Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 7.
  16. ^ a b Morenz & Popko 2010, pp. 108–109.
  17. ^ a b c Flammini 2015, p. 240.
  18. ^ a b c Ben-Tor 2007, p. 1.
  19. ^ Kamrin 2009.
  20. ^ "The Sakir-Har door jamb inscription (slide 12)" (PDF). The Second Intermediate Period: The Hyksos.
  21. ^ a b Schneider 2008, p. 305.
  22. ^ a b c d e Kamrin 2009, p. 25.
  23. ^ a b c Mourad 2015, p. 9.
  24. ^ Against Apion, Flavius Josephus, 14.
  25. ^ Morenz & Popko 2010, pp. 103–104.
  26. ^ Verbrugghe & Wickersham 1996, p. 99.
  27. ^ Candelora 2018, p. 53.
  28. ^ Candelora 2018, pp. 46–47.
  29. ^ Bietak 2010, p. 139.
  30. ^ Candelora 2018, p. 65.
  31. ^ Candelora 2017, pp. 208–209.
  32. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 123–124.
  33. ^ a b c Curry 2018.
  34. ^ Candelora 2017, p. 211.
  35. ^ Candelora 2017, p. 204.
  36. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 123–125.
  37. ^ a b Müller 2018, p. 211.
  38. ^ Candelora 2017, p. 216.
  39. ^ Candelora 2017, pp. 206–208.
  40. ^ a b c Bietak 2012, p. 2.
  41. ^ Hölbl 2001, p. 79.
  42. ^ a b c Candelora 2017, p. 209.
  43. ^ Assmann 2003, p. 198.
  44. ^ a b Flammini 2015, p. 236.
  45. ^ Bietak 2016, pp. 267–268.
  46. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, p. 128.
  47. ^ a b c Mourad 2015, p. 216.
  48. ^ Mourad 2015, p. 11.
  49. ^ Bietak 2019, p. 61.
  50. ^ a b Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 6.
  51. ^ a b Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 166.
  52. ^ Stantis, Chris; Maaranen, Nina (1 January 2021). "The people of Avaris: Intra-regional biodistance analysis using dental non-metric traits". Bioarchaeology of the Near East.
  53. ^ a b Bright 2000, p. 97.
  54. ^ Russmann & James 2001, pp. 67–68.
  55. ^ Pritchard 2016, p. 230.
  56. ^ Steiner & Killebrew 2014, p. 73.
  57. ^ Raspe 1998, p. 126–128.
  58. ^ Josephus 1926, p. 196.
  59. ^ O'Connor 2009, pp. 116–117.
  60. ^ Wilkinson 2013a, p. 96.
  61. ^ Daressy 1906, pp. 115–120.
  62. ^ a b c Mourad 2015, p. 130.
  63. ^ a b Bietak 2006, p. 285.
  64. ^ Stantis, Chris; Kharobi, Arwa; Maaranen, Nina; Nowell, Geoff M.; Bietak, Manfred; Prell, Silvia; Schutkowski, Holger (15 July 2020). "Who were the Hyksos? Challenging traditional narratives using strontium isotope (87Sr/86Sr) analysis of human remains from ancient Egypt". PLOS ONE. 15 (7): e0235414. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1535414S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235414. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 7363063. PMID 32667937.
  65. ^ Stantis, Chris; Kharobi, Arwa; Maaranen, Nina; Macpherson, Colin; Bietak, Manfred; Prell, Silvia; Schutkowski, Holger (1 June 2021). "Multi-isotopic study of diet and mobility in the northeastern Nile Delta". Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 13 (6): 105. doi:10.1007/s12520-021-01344-x. ISSN 1866-9565. S2CID 235271929.
  66. ^ a b c d e f g Bietak 2012, p. 4.
  67. ^ a b Bietak 2019, p. 47.
  68. ^ Bietak 1999, p. 377.
  69. ^ a b Bourriau 2000, p. 180.
  70. ^ a b c d e f Bietak 2012, p. 5.
  71. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 186.
  72. ^ a b Aston 2018, pp. 31–32.
  73. ^ a b Bourriau 2000, p. 183.
  74. ^ Mourad 2015, pp. 43–44.
  75. ^ Mourad 2015, p. 48.
  76. ^ Mourad 2015, p. 49–50.
  77. ^ Mourad 2015, p. 21.
  78. ^ Mourad 2015, pp. 44–48.
  79. ^ a b Mourad 2015, pp. 129–130.
  80. ^ O'Connor 2009, pp. 115–116.
  81. ^ Kopetzky & Bietak 2016, p. 362.
  82. ^ "Hyksos headband". www.metmuseum.org.
  83. ^ Mourad 2015, pp. 51–55.
  84. ^ Mourad 2015, pp. 56–57.
  85. ^ Mourad 2015, pp. 57–61.
  86. ^ Mourad 2015, p. 19.
  87. ^ Popko 2013, p. 3.
  88. ^ Popko 2013, p. 2.
  89. ^ Morenz & Popko 2010, p. 105.
  90. ^ Morenz & Popko 2010, p. 109.
  91. ^ Popko 2013, pp. 1–2.
  92. ^ a b c d e f g Popko 2013, p. 4.
  93. ^ a b c Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 160.
  94. ^ a b Stiebing 2009, p. 200.
  95. ^ a b c Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 161.
  96. ^ Wilkinson 2013, p. 547.
  97. ^ Ritner et al. 2003, p. 346.
  98. ^ Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 177.
  99. ^ Lichthelm 2019, p. 321.
  100. ^ Daressy 1906, p. 117.
  101. ^ Montet 1968, p. 80. "Others were later added to them, things which came from the pharaoh Ahmose, like the axe decorated with a griffin and a likeness of the king slaying a Hyksos, with other axes and daggers."
  102. ^ Morgan 2010, p. 308. A color photograph.
  103. ^ Baker & Baker 2001, p. 86.
  104. ^ Schneider 2006, p. 195.
  105. ^ Bourriau 2000, pp. 201–202.
  106. ^ Josephus 1926, pp. 197–199.
  107. ^ Bietak 2010, pp. 170–171.
  108. ^ Bietak 2012, p. 6.
  109. ^ a b Stiebing 2009, p. 168.
  110. ^ Candelora, Danielle. "The Hyksos". www.arce.org. American Research Center in Egypt.
  111. ^ Roy 2011, pp. 291–292.
  112. ^ Curry 2018, p. 3. "A head from a statue of an official dating to the 12th or 13th Dynasty (1802–1640 B.C.) sports the mushroom-shaped hairstyle commonly worn by non-Egyptian immigrants from western Asia such as the Hyksos."
  113. ^ Potts 2012, p. 841.
  114. ^ Bietak 2012, p. 3.
  115. ^ Bietak 2012, pp. 3–4.
  116. ^ Ben-Tor 2007, p. 2.
  117. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 118.
  118. ^ a b Bietak 1999, p. 378.
  119. ^ Ilin-Tomich 2016, pp. 7–8.
  120. ^ a b Bourriau 2000, p. 179.
  121. ^ Ryholt 2018, p. 235.
  122. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 119–120.
  123. ^ Aston 2018, p. 18.
  124. ^ Ilin-Tomich 2016, pp. 6–7.
  125. ^ Aston 2018, p. 16.
  126. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 256.
  127. ^ Aston 2018, pp. 15–17.
  128. ^ a b c Schneider 2006, p. 194.
  129. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 201.
  130. ^ Aston 2018, p. 15.
  131. ^ Polz 2018, p. 217.
  132. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 121–122.
  133. ^ von Beckerath 1999, pp. 120–121.
  134. ^ Müller 2018, p. 210.
  135. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 409.
  136. ^ Bietak 2012, pp. 2–3.
  137. ^ a b Aston 2018, p. 17.
  138. ^ a b Redford 1992, p. 107.
  139. ^ Redford 1992, p. 110.
  140. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 125.
  141. ^ Schneider 2006, pp. 193–194.
  142. ^ Schneider 2006, p. –194.
  143. ^ a b Redford 1992, p. 108.
  144. ^ Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 11.
  145. ^ Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 3.
  146. ^ a b Weigall 2016, p. 188.
  147. ^ a b "Statue". The British Museum. EA987.
  148. ^ Morenz & Popko 2010, p. 108.
  149. ^ Ilin-Tomich 2016, p. 9.
  150. ^ a b Bunson 2014, pp. 2–3.
  151. ^ Bunson 2014, p. 197.
  152. ^ Flammini 2015, pp. 236–237.
  153. ^ Ritner et al. 2003, p. 70.
  154. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 323.
  155. ^ Flammini 2015, pp. 239–243.
  156. ^ Bietak 2012, pp. 1–4.
  157. ^ a b c el-Shahawy 2005, p. 160.
  158. ^ Griffith 1891, p. 28. "The name of Khyan on the statue from Bubastis is written over an erasure, that the statue is of the XIIth Dynasty, and that Khyan was a Hyksôs king."
  159. ^ a b c Bietak 1999, p. 379.
  160. ^ Müller 2018, p. 212.
  161. ^ a b Bard 2015, p. 213.
  162. ^ Van de Mieroop 2011, pp. 151–153.
  163. ^ Redford 1992, p. 122.
  164. ^ Candelora 2018, p. 54.
  165. ^ Sayce 1895, p. 17.
  166. ^ Bietak 2016, p. 268.
  167. ^ Wilkinson 2013, p. 191.
  168. ^ Mourad 2015, p. 15.
  169. ^ a b Hernández 2014, p. 112.
  170. ^ Herslund 2018, p. 151.
  171. ^ Stiebing 2009, p. 166.
  172. ^ Wegner 2015, p. 76.
  173. ^ a b Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 149.
  174. ^ a b "Hyksos axe". www.metmuseum.org.
  175. ^ "Spearhead". www.metmuseum.org.
  176. ^ "Whip handle". www.metmuseum.org.
  177. ^ a b c d Mourad 2015, p. 129.
  178. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 138–139, 142.
  179. ^ a b c Ryholt 1997, pp. 138–139.
  180. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 141.
  181. ^ Burke 2019, p. 80.
  182. ^ Keel 1996, pp. 125–126.
  183. ^ Keel 1996, p. 126.
  184. ^ O'Connor 2009, p. 109.
  185. ^ Bietak 1999, pp. 377–378.
  186. ^ Bourriau 2000, p. 177.
  187. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 148–149.
  188. ^ Assmann 2003, p. 197.
  189. ^ Josephus 1926, p. 199.
  190. ^ Assmann 2018, p. 39.
  191. ^ Josephus 1926, pp. 255–265.
  192. ^ Assmann 2003, pp. 227–228.
  193. ^ Assmann 2018, p. 40.
  194. ^ Raspe 1998, p. 132.
  195. ^ Gruen 2016, p. 214.
  196. ^ Moore & Kelle 2011, pp. 92–93.
  197. ^ Vos 1999, p. 75.
  198. ^ Geobey 2017, pp. 27–30. Notes that the Hebrew word is completely unrelated to the term "Hyksos."
  199. ^ Bietak 2015, p. 20.
  200. ^ Redford 1992, p. 429.
  201. ^ Moore & Kelle 2011, p. 93.
  202. ^ Redford 1992, p. 412–413.
  203. ^ Assmann 2014, pp. 26–27.
  204. ^ Faust 2015, p. 477.
  205. ^ Redmount 2001, p. 78.
  206. ^ Bietak 2015, p. 32.
  207. ^ Shaw 2002, p. 313.
  208. ^ Grabbe 2017, p. 36.
  209. ^ Geraty 2015, p. 58.
  210. ^ Morenz & Popko 2010, p. 102.
  211. ^ Van de Mieroop 2011, pp. 162–163.
  212. ^ Ryholt 2004, p. 138.
  213. ^ Ryholt 2004, pp. 142–143.
  214. ^ Ryholt 2004, p. 143.
  215. ^ Höflmayer 2015, p. 191.
  216. ^ Höflmayer 2015, pp. 195–196.
  217. ^ Gabriel 2009, p. 204.
  218. ^ Allen 2000, p. 299.
  219. ^ Höflmayer 2015, p. 202.
  220. ^ Schneider 2018, p. 78.
  221. ^ Hawass & Vannini 2009, p. 120. "The foreigners of the fourth register, with long hairstyles and calf-length fringed robes, are labeled Chiefs of Retjenu, the ancient name tor the Syrian region. Like the Nubians, they come with animals, in this case horses, an elephant, and a bear; they also offer weapons and vessels most likely filled with precious substance."
  222. ^ Zakrzewski, Shortland & Rowland 2015, p. 268.
  223. ^ Richardson 2013, p. 14.
  224. ^ Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 163.
  225. ^ Assmann 2003, pp. 199–200.
  226. ^ Van de Mieroop 2011, p. 164.
  227. ^ Van de Mieroop 2011, pp. 164–165.

References

  • Allen, James P. (2000). Middle Egyptian: An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-77483-3.
  • Assmann, Jan (2003). The mind of Egypt: history and meaning in the time of the Pharaohs. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674012110.
  • Assmann, Jan (2014). From Akhenaten to Moses: Ancient Egypt and Religious Change. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-977-416-631-0.
  • Assmann, Jan (2018). The Invention of Religion: Faith and Covenant in the Book of Exodus. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400889235.
  • Aston, David A. "How Early (and How Late) Can Khyan Really Be: An Essay Based on ›Conventional Archaeological Methods<". In Forstner-Müller & Moeller (2018), pp. 15–56.
  • Baker, Rosalie F.; Baker, Charles F. (2001). Ancient Egyptians: People of the Pyramids. USA: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512221-3.
  • Bard, Kathryn A. (2015). An Introduction to the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9780470673362.
  • von Beckerath, Jürgen (1999). Handbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen. von Zabern. ISBN 3-8053-2591-6.
  • Ben-Tor, Daphne (2007). Scarabs, Chronology, and Connections: Egypt and Palestine in the Second Intermediate Period (PDF). Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2019). "The Spiritual Roots of the Hyksos Elite: An Analysis of Their Sacred Architecture, Part I". In Bietak, Manfred; Prell, Silvia (eds.). The Enigma of the Hyksos. Harrassowitz. pp. 47–67. ISBN 9783447113328.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2015). "On the Historicity of the Exodus: What Egyptology Today Can Contribute to Assessing the Biblical Account of the Sojourn in Egypt". In Thomas E. Levy; Thomas Schneider; William H.C. Propp (eds.). Israel's Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective: Text, Archaeology, Culture, and Geoscience. Springer. pp. 17–37. ISBN 978-3-319-04768-3.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2001). "Hyksos". In Redford, Donald B. (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 136–143. ISBN 978-0-19-510234-5.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2012). "Hyksos". In Bagnell, Roger S.; et al. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah15207. ISBN 9781444338386.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2016). "The Egyptian community in Avaris during the Hyksos period". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 26: 263–274. doi:10.1553/AEundL26s263. JSTOR 44243953.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2010). "FROM WHERE CAME THE HYKSOS AND WHERE DID THEY GO?". In Maréee, Marcel (ed.). THE SECOND INTERMEDIATE PERIOD (THIRTEENTH–SEVENTEENTH DYNASTIES): Current Research, Future Prospects. Peeters. pp. 139–181.
  • Bietak, Manfred (2006). "The predecessors of the Hyksos". In Gitin, Seymour; Wright, Edward J.; Dessel, J. P. (eds.). Confronting the Past: Archaeological and Historical Essays on Ancient Israel in Honor of William G. Dever. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 9781575061177.
  • Bietak, Manfred (1999). "Hyksos". In Bard, Kathryn A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt. Routledge. pp. 377–379.
  • Bourriau, Janine (2000). "The Second Intermediate Period (c. 1650-1550 BC)". In Shaw, Ian (ed.). The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280458-7.
  • Bright, John (2000). A History of Israel (4th ed.). Westminster John Knox Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-664-22068-6.
  • Bunson, Margaret (2014). Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-0997-8.
  • Burke, Aaron A. (2019). "Amorites in the Eastern Nile Delta: The Identity of Asiatics at Avaris during the Early Middle Kingdom". In Bietak, Manfred; Prell, Silvia (eds.). The Enigma of the Hyksos. Harrassowitz. pp. 67–91. ISBN 9783447113328.
  • Candelora, Danielle (2018). "Entangled in Orientalism: How the Hyksos Became a Race". Journal of Egyptian History. 11 (1–2): 45–72. doi:10.1163/18741665-12340042. S2CID 216703371.
  • Candelora, Danielle (2017). "Defining the Hyksos: A Reevaluation of the Title ḥḳꜣ-ḫꜣswt and Its Implications for Hyksos Identity". Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 53: 203–221. doi:10.5913/jarce.53.2017.a010.
  • Curry, Andrew (September–October 2018). "The Rulers of Foreign Lands". Archaeology Magazine.
  • Daressy, Georges (1906). "Un poignard du temps des Rois Pasteurs". Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte. 7: 115–120.
  • el-Shahawy, Abeer (2005). The Egyptian Museum in Cairo: A Walk Through the Alleys of Ancient Egypt. Farid Atiya Press. ISBN 977-17-2183-6.
  • Flammini, Roxana (2015). "Building the Hyksos' Vassals: Some Thoughts on the Definition of the Hyksos Subordination Practices". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 25: 233–245. doi:10.1553/AEundL25s233. JSTOR 43795213.
  • Faust, Avraham (2015). "The Emergence of Iron Age Israel: On Origins and Habitus". In Thomas E. Levy; Thomas Schneider; William H.C. Propp (eds.). Israel's Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective: Text, Archaeology, Culture, and Geoscience. Springer. pp. 467–482. ISBN 978-3-319-04768-3.
  • Forstner-Müller, Irene; Moeller, Nadine, eds. (2018). THE HYKSOS RULER KHYAN AND THE EARLY SECOND INTERMEDIATE PERIOD IN EGYPT: PROBLEMS AND PRIORITIES OF CURRENT RESEARCH. Proceedings of the Workshop of the Austrian Archaeological Institute and the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Vienna, July 4 – 5, 2014. Holzhausen. ISBN 978-3-902976-83-3.
  • Gabriel, Richard A. (2009). Thutmose III: The Military Biography of Egypt's Greatest Warrior King. Potomac Books. ISBN 978-1-59797-373-1.
  • Geobey, Ronald A. (2017). "Joseph the Infiltrator, Jacob the Conqueror?: Reexamining the Hyksos–Hebrew Correlation". Journal of Biblical Literature. 136 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1353/jbl.2017.0001. S2CID 164637479.
  • Geraty, L. T. (2015). "Exodus Dates and Theories". In Thomas E. Levy; Thomas Schneider; William H.C. Propp (eds.). Israel's Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective: Text, Archaeology, Culture, and Geoscience. Springer. pp. 55–64. ISBN 978-3-319-04768-3.
  • Grabbe, Lester (2017). Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It?. Bloomsbury. ISBN 9780567670434.
  • Griffith, F. Ll (1891). Archaeological Report 1890/91 - 1911/12: Comprising the Recent Work of the Egypt Exploration Fund and the Progress of Egyptology During the Year 1890/91-1911/12. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
  • Gruen, Erich S. (2016). "The Use and Abuse of the Exodus Story". The Construct of Identity in Hellenistic Judaism: Essays on Early Jewish Literature and History. de Gruyter. pp. 197–228. JSTOR j.ctvbkjxph.14.
  • Hawass, Zahi A.; Vannini, Sandro (2009). The lost tombs of Thebes: life in paradise. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 9780500051597.
  • Hernández, Roberto A. Díaz (2014). "The Role of the War Chariot in the Formation of the Egyptian Empire in the Early 18th Dynasty". Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur. 43: 109–122. JSTOR 44160271.
  • Herslund, Ole (2018). "Chronicling Chariots: Texts, Writing and Language of New Kingdom Egypt". In Veldmeijer, André J; Ikram, Salima (eds.). Chariots in Ancient Egypt: The Tano Chariot, A Case Study. Sidestone Press. ISBN 9789088904684.
  • Höflmayer, Felix (2015). "Egypt's "Empire" in the Southern Levant during the Early 18th Dynasty". In Eder, Birgitta; Pruzsinszky, Regine (eds.). Policies of Exchange Political Systems and Modes of Interaction in the Aegean and the Near East in the 2nd Millenium B.C.E: Proceedings of the International Symposium at the University of Freiburg Institute for Archaeological Studies, 30th May - 2nd June 2012. Vol. 2. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. pp. 191–206. ISBN 9783700176619. JSTOR j.ctt1bkm4rg.15.
  • Hölbl, Günther (2001). A History of the Ptolemaic Empire. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-415-23489-4.
  • Ilin-Tomich, Alexander (2016). "Second Intermediate Period". In Wendrich, Willeke; et al. (eds.). UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology.
  • Josephus, Flavius (1926). Josephus in Eight Volumes, 1: The Life; Against Apion. Translated by Thackeray, H. St. J.
  • Kamrin, Janice (2009). "The Aamu of Shu in the Tomb of Khnumhotep II at Beni Hassan" (PDF). Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections. 1: 22–36. S2CID 199601200.
  • Keel, Othmar (1996). "Ein weiterer Skarabäus mit einer Nilpferdjagd, die Ikonographie der sogenannten Beamtenskarabäen und der ägyptische König auf Skarabäen vor dem Neuen Reich". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 6: 119–136. JSTOR 23788869.
  • Kopetzky, Karin; Bietak, Manfred (2016). "A Seal Impression of the Green Jasper Workshop from Tell El-Dabʿa". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 26: 357–375. doi:10.1553/AEundL26s357. JSTOR 44243958.
  • Lichthelm, Miriam, ed. (2019). Ancient Egyptian Literature. University of California Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvqc6j1s. ISBN 9780520973619. JSTOR j.ctvqc6j1s. S2CID 63441582.
  • Montet, Pierre (1968). Lives of the pharaohs. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  • Moore, Megan Bishop; Kelle, Brad E (2011). Biblical History and Israel's Past: The Changing Study of the Bible and History. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8028-6260-0.
  • Morenz, Ludwig D.; Popko, Lutz (2010). "The Second Intermediate Period and the New Kingdom". In Lloyd, Alan B. (ed.). A Companion to Ancient Egypt. Vol. 1. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 101–119. ISBN 9781444320060.
  • Morgan, Lyvia (2010). "An Aegean Griffin in Egypt: The Hunt Frieze at TELL EL-DABcA". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 20: 303–323. doi:10.1553/AEundL20s303. JSTOR 23789943.
  • Mourad, Anna-Latifa (2015). Rise of the Hyksos: Egypt and the Levant from the Middle Kingdom to the early Second Intermediate Period. Oxford Archaeopress. doi:10.2307/j.ctvr43jbk. ISBN 9781784911348. JSTOR j.ctvr43jbk.
  • Müller, Vera. "Chronological Concepts for the Second Intermediate Period and Their Implications for the Evaluation of Its Material Culture". In Forstner-Müller & Moeller (2018), pp. 199–216.
  • O'Connor, David (2009). "Egypt, the Levant, and the Aegean: From the Hyksos Period to the Rise of the New Kingdom". In Aruz, Joan; Benzel, Kim; Evans, Jean M. (eds.). Beyond Babylon: art, trade, and diplomacy in the second millennium B.C. Yale University Press. pp. 108–122. ISBN 9780300141436.
  • Polz, Daniel. "The Territorial Claim and the Political Role of the Theban State at the End of the Second Intermediate Period: A Case Study". In Forstner-Müller & Moeller (2018), pp. 217–233.
  • Popko, Lutz (2013). "Late Second Intermediate Period". In Wendrich, Willeke; et al. (eds.). Late Second Intermediate Period to Early New Kingdom. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology.
  • Potts, Daniel T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-6077-6.
  • Pritchard, James B. (2016). Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament with Supplement. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-8276-2.
  • Raspe, Lucia (1998). "Manetho on the Exodus: A Reappraisal". Jewish Studies Quarterly. 5 (2): 124–155. JSTOR 40753208.
  • Redford, Donald B. (1992). Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-03606-9.
  • Redmount, Carol A. (2001) [1998]. "Bitter Lives: Israel In And Out of Egypt". In Coogan, Michael D. (ed.). The Oxford History of the Biblical World. Oxford University Press. pp. 58–89. ISBN 9780199881482.
  • Richardson, Dan (2013). Cairo and the Pyramids (Rough Guides Snapshot Egypt). Rough Guides UK. ISBN 978-1-4093-3544-3.
  • Ritner, Robert K.; Simpson, William Kelly; Tobin, Vincent A.; Wente, Edward F. (2003). Simpson, William Kelly (ed.). The Literature of Ancient Egypt: An Anthology of Stories, Instructions, and Poetry. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300099201. JSTOR j.ctt5vm2m5.
  • Roy, Jane (2011). The Politics of Trade: Egypt and Lower Nubia in the 4th Millennium BC. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-19610-0.
  • Russmann, Edna R.; James, Thomas Garnet Henry (2001). Eternal Egypt: Masterworks of Ancient Art from the British Museum. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-23086-6.
  • Ryholt, Kim. "Seals and History of the 14th and 15th Dynasties". In Forstner-Müller & Moeller (2018), pp. 235–276.
  • Ryholt, Kim (2004). "The Turin King-List". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 14: 135–155. JSTOR 23788139.
  • Ryholt, Kim (1997). The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period c.1800-1550 B.C. Museum Tuscalanum Press. ISBN 9788772894218.
  • Sayce, A. H. (1895). The Egypt of the Hebrews and Herodotos. ISBN 978-3-7347-3964-4.
  • Schneider, Thomas (2006). "The Relative Chronology of the Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos Period". In Hornung, Erik; Krauss, Rolf; Warburton, David A. (eds.). Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Brill. pp. 168–196. ISBN 9004113851.
  • Schneider, Thomas (2008). "Das Ende der Kurzen Chronologie: Eine Kritische Bilanz der Debatte zur Absoluten Datierung des Mittleren Reiches und der Zweiten Zwischenzeit". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 18: 275–313. doi:10.1553/AEundL18s275. JSTOR 23788616.
  • Schneider, Thomas (2018). "Hyksos Research in Egyptology and Egypt's Public Imagination: A Brief Assessment of Fifty Years of Assessments". Journal of Egyptian History. 11 (1–2): 73–86. doi:10.1163/18741665-12340043. S2CID 240039656.
  • Shaw, Ian (2002). "Israel, Israelites". In Shaw, Ian; Jameson, Robert (eds.). A Dictionary of Archaeology. Wiley Blackwell. p. 313. ISBN 9780631235835.
  • Steiner, Margreet L.; Killebrew, Ann E. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000-332 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-166254-6.
  • Stiebing, William H. Jr. (2009). Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0-321-42297-2.
  • Van de Mieroop, Marc (2011). A History of Ancient Egypt. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9781405160704.
  • Verbrugghe, Gerald P.; Wickersham, John M. (1996). Berossos and Manetho, introduced and translated: native traditions in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0472107224.
  • Vos, Howard (1999). Nelson's New Illustrated Bible Manners and Customs: How the People of the Bible Really Lived. Thomas Nelson. ISBN 978-1-4185-8569-3.
  • Wegner, Josef (2015). "A ROYAL NECROPOLIS AT SOUTH ABYDOS: New Light on Egypt's Second Intermediate Period". Near Eastern Archaeology. 78 (2): 68–78. doi:10.5615/neareastarch.78.2.0068. JSTOR 10.5615/neareastarch.78.2.0068. S2CID 163519900.
  • Weigall, Arthur E. P. Brome (2016). A History of the Pharaohs. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-08291-4.
  • Wilkinson, Toby (2013). The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt. Random House. ISBN 9780553384901.
  • Wilkinson, Toby (2013a). Lives of the Ancient Egyptians. Thames and Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-77162-4.
  • Willems, Harco (2010). "The First Intermediate Period and the Middle Kingdom". In Lloyd, Alan B. (ed.). A Companion to Ancient Egypt. Vol. 1. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 81–100.
  • Zakrzewski, Sonia; Shortland, Andrew; Rowland, Joanne (2015). Science in the Study of Ancient Egypt. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-39195-1.

External links

hyksos, egyptian, ḥqꜣ, ḫꜣswt, egyptological, pronunciation, hekau, khasut, ruler, foreign, lands, term, which, modern, egyptology, designates, kings, fifteenth, dynasty, egypt, 1650, 1550, seat, power, these, kings, city, avaris, nile, delta, from, where, they. Hyksos ˈ h ɪ k s ɒ s Egyptian ḥqꜣ w ḫꜣswt Egyptological pronunciation hekau khasut 4 ruler s of foreign lands is a term which in modern Egyptology designates the kings of the Fifteenth Dynasty of Egypt 5 fl c 1650 1550 BC a The seat of power of these kings was the city of Avaris in the Nile delta from where they ruled over Lower and Middle Egypt up to Cusae In the Aegyptiaca a history of Egypt written by the Greco Egyptian priest and historian Manetho in the 3rd century BC the term Hyksos is used ethnically to designate people of probable West Semitic Levantine origin 1 9 While Manetho portrayed the Hyksos as invaders and oppressors this interpretation is questioned in modern Egyptology 10 Instead Hyksos rule might have been preceded by groups of Canaanite peoples who gradually settled in the Nile delta from the end of the Twelfth Dynasty onwards and who may have seceded from the crumbling and unstable Egyptian control at some point during the Thirteenth Dynasty 11 HyksosA man described as Abisha the Hyksos 𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt Heqa kasut for Hyksos leading a group of Aamu Tomb of Khnumhotep II circa 1900 BC 1 2 This is one of the earliest known uses of the term Hyksos 3 The Hyksos period marks the first in which Egypt was ruled by foreign rulers 12 Many details of their rule such as the true extent of their kingdom and even the names and order of their kings remain uncertain The Hyksos practiced many Levantine or Canaanite customs as well as many Egyptian customs 13 They have been credited with introducing several technological innovations to Egypt such as the horse and chariot as well as the sickle sword and the composite bow a theory which is disputed 14 The Hyksos did not control all of Egypt Instead they coexisted with the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Dynasties which were based in Thebes 15 Warfare between the Hyksos and the pharaohs of the late Seventeenth Dynasty eventually culminated in the defeat of the Hyksos by Ahmose I who founded the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt 16 In the following centuries the Egyptians would portray the Hyksos as bloodthirsty and oppressive foreign rulers Contents 1 Name 1 1 Etymology 1 2 Use 2 Origins 2 1 Ancient historians 2 2 Modern historians 3 History 3 1 Early contacts between Egypt and the Levant 3 2 Background and arrival in Egypt 3 3 Kingdom 3 4 Wars with the Seventeenth Dynasty 4 Rule and administration 4 1 Administration 4 2 Rulers 4 3 Diplomacy 4 4 Vassalage 5 Society and culture 5 1 Royal construction and patronage 5 2 Burial practices 5 3 Technology 5 4 Trade and economy 5 5 Religion 6 Potential biblical connections 6 1 In the Manethonian Josephus tradition 6 2 In modern scholarship 7 Legacy 7 1 Egyptian presence in the Levant 7 2 Later accounts 7 3 Early modern depictions 8 See also 9 Notes 10 Citations 11 References 12 External linksName EditEtymology Edit Hyksos in hieroglyphs ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣsw ḥḳꜣw ḫꜣswt 17 18 hekau khasut 4 b Hyksos Ruler s of the foreign countries 17 GreekHyksos Ὑksws Hykussos Ὑkoyssws 21 Standard characters for Hyksos in the label for Abisha the Hyksos in the tomb of Khnumhotep II c 1900 BC 22 The crook 𓋾 ḥḳꜣ means ruler the hill 𓈎 is a phonetic compkement q ḳ to 𓋾 while 𓈉 stands for foreign country pronounced ḫꜣst plural ḫꜣswt The sign 𓏥 marks the plural 22 The term Hyksos is derived via the Greek Ὑksws Hyksos from the Egyptian expression 𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt or ḥḳꜣw ḫꜣswt hekau khasut meaning rulers of foreign lands 17 18 The Greek form is likely a textual corruption of an earlier Ὑkoyssws Hykoussos 21 The first century AD Jewish historian Josephus gives the name as meaning shepherd kings or captive kings in his Contra Apion Against Apion where he describes the Hyksos as Jews as they appeared in the Hellenistic Egyptian historian Manetho 23 This whole nation was styled Hycsos that is Shepherd kings for the first syllable Hyc according to the sacred dialect denotes a king as is Sos a shepherd But this according to the ordinary dialect and of these is compounded Hycsos but some say that these people were Arabians 24 Josephus s rendition may arise from a later Egyptian pronunciation of ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt as ḥḳꜣ sꜣsw which was then understood to mean lord of shepherds 25 It is unclear if this translation was found in Manetho an Armenian translation of an epitome of Manetho given by the late antique historian Eusebius gives the correct translation of foreign kings 26 Use Edit It is now commonly accepted in academic publications that the term Ḥḳꜣ Ḫꜣswt refers only to the individual foreign rulers of the late Second Intermediate Period 27 especially of the Fifteenth Dynasty rather than a people However it was used as an ethnic term by Josephus c Its use to refer to the population still persists in some academic papers 30 In Ancient Egypt the term Hyksos ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt was also used to refer to various Nubian and especially Asiatic rulers both before and after the Fifteenth Dynasty 4 31 32 It was used at least since the Sixth Dynasty of Egypt c 2345 2181 BC to designate chieftains from the Syro Palestine area 22 One of its earliest recorded uses is found c 1900 BC in the tomb of Khnumhotep II of the Twelfth Dynasty to label a nomad or Canaanite ruler named Abisha the Hyksos using the standard 𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt Heqa kasut for Hyksos 3 33 Scarabs of Hyksos kings Semqen the Hyksos Khyan the Hyksos Scarabs of Hyksos kings with Hyksos highlighted 34 Based on the use of the name in a Hyksos inscription of Sakir Har from Avaris the name was used by the Hyksos as a title for themselves 35 However Kim Ryholt argues that Hyksos was not an official title of the rulers of the Fifteenth Dynasty and is never encountered together with royal titulary only appearing as the title in the case of Sakir Har According to Ryholt Hyksos was rather a generic term which is encountered separately from royal titulary and in regnal lists after the end of the Fifteenth Dynasty itself 36 However Vera Muller writes Considering that S k r h r is also mentioned with three names of the traditional Egyptian titulary Horus name Golden Falcon name and Two Ladies name on the same monument this argument is somehow strange 37 Danielle Candelora and Manfred Bietak also argue that the Hyksos used the title officially 6 38 All other texts in the Ancient Egyptian language do not call the Hyksos by this name instead referring to them as Asiatics ꜥꜣmw with the possible exception of the Turin King List in a hypothetical reconstruction from a fragment 39 The title is not attested for the Hyksos king Apepi possibly indicating an increased adoption of Egyptian decorum 40 Scarabs also attest the use of this title for pharaohs usually assigned to the Fourteenth or Sixteenth Dynasty of Egypt who are sometimes called lesser Hyksos 37 The Theban Seventeenth Dynasty of Egypt is also given the title in some versions of Manetho a fact which Bietak attributes to textual corruption 40 In the Twenty fifth Dynasty of Egypt and during the Ptolemaic Period the term Hyksos was adopted as a personal title and epithet by a number of pharaohs or high Egyptian officials including the Theban official Mentuemhat Philip III of Macedon 41 42 and Ptolemy XIII 42 It was also used on the tomb of Egyptian grand priest Petosiris at Tuna el Gebel in 300 BC to designate the Persian ruler Artaxerxes III although it is unknown if Artaxerxes adopted this title for himself 42 Origins EditAncient historians Edit Blue glazed steatite scarab in a gold mount with the cartouche of Hyksos ruler Khyan Son of Ra Khyan living forever In his epitome of Manetho Josephus connected the Hyksos with the Jews 43 but he also calls them Arabs 23 In their own epitomes of Manetho the Late antique historians Sextus Julius Africanus and Eusebius say that the Hyksos came from Phoenicia 23 Until the excavation and discovery of Tell El Dab a the site of the Hyksos capital Avaris in 1966 historians relied on these accounts for the Hyksos period 9 44 Modern historians Edit Material finds at Tell El Dab a indicate that the Hyksos originated in the Levant 9 The Hyksos personal names indicate that they spoke a Western Semitic language and may be called for convenience sake Canaanites 45 A Retjenu associated to the Hyksos in some Egyptian inscriptions 46 Kamose the last king of the Theban Seventeenth Dynasty refers to Apepi as a Chieftain of Retjenu in a stela that implies a Levantine background for this Hyksos king 46 According to Anna Latifa Mourad the Egyptian application of the term ꜥꜣmw to the Hyksos could indicate a range of backgrounds including newly arrived Levantines or people of mixed Levantine Egyptian origin 47 Due to the work of Manfred Bietak which found similarities in architecture ceramics and burial practices scholars currently favor a northern Levantine origin of the Hyksos 48 Based particularly on temple architecture Bietak argues for strong parallels between the religious practices of the Hyksos at Avaris with those of the area around Byblos Ugarit Alalakh and Tell Brak defining the spiritual home of the Hyksos as in northernmost Syria and northern Mesopotamia 49 The connection of the Hyksos to Retjenu also suggests a northern Levantine origin Theoretically it is feasible to deduce that the early Hyksos as the later Apophis were of elite ancestry from Rṯnw a toponym cautiously linked with the Northern Levant and the northern region of the Southern Levant 47 Earlier arguments that the Hyksos names might be Hurrian have been rejected 50 while early twentieth century proposals that the Hyksos were Indo Europeans fitted European dreams of Indo European supremacy now discredited 51 A study of dental traits by Nina Maaranen and Sonia Zakrzewski in 2021 on 90 people of Avaris indicated that individuals defined as locals and non locals were not ancestrally different from one another The results were said to be in line with the archaeological evidence suggesting Avaris was an important hub in the Middle Bronze Age eastern Mediterranean trade network welcoming people from beyond its borders 52 History EditEarly contacts between Egypt and the Levant Edit Procession of the Aamu A group of West Asiatic foreigners possibly Canaanites labelled as Aamu ꜥꜣmw including the leading man with a Nubian ibex labelled as Abisha the Hyksos 𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣsw Heqa kasut for Hyksos Tomb of 12th dynasty official Khnumhotep II at Beni Hasan c 1890 BC 1 2 22 33 Historical records suggest that Semitic people and Egyptians had contacts at all periods of Egypt s history 53 The MacGregor plaque an early Egyptian tablet dating to 3000 BC records The first occasion of striking the East with the picture of Pharaoh Den smiting a Western Asiatic enemy 54 During the reign of Senusret II c 1890 BC parties of Western Asiatic foreigners visiting the Pharaoh with gifts are recorded as in the tomb paintings of 12th dynasty official Khnumhotep II These foreigners possibly Canaanites or nomads are labelled as Aamu ꜥꜣmw including the leading man with a Nubian ibex labelled as Abisha the Hyksos 𓋾𓈎𓈉 ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣsw Heqa kasut for Hyksos the first known instance of the name Hyksos 1 2 22 33 Soon after the Sebek khu Stele dated to the reign of Senusret III reign 1878 1839 BC records the earliest known Egyptian military campaign in the Levant The text reads His Majesty proceeded northward to overthrow the Asiatics His Majesty reached a foreign country of which the name was Sekmem Then Sekmem fell together with the wretched Retenu where Sekmem s k m m is thought to be Shechem and Retenu or Retjenu are associated with ancient Syria 55 56 Background and arrival in Egypt Edit The only ancient account of the whole Hyksos period is by the Hellenistic Egyptian historian Manetho who however exists only as quoted by others 57 As recorded by Josephus Manetho describes the beginning of Hyksos rule thusly A people of ignoble origin from the east whose coming was unforeseen had the audacity to invade the country which they mastered by main force without difficulty or even battle Having overpowered the chiefs they then savagely burnt the cities razed the temples of the gods to the ground and treated the whole native population with the utmost cruelty massacring some and carrying off the wives and children of others into slavery Contra Apion I 75 77 58 Electrum dagger handle of a soldier of Hyksos pharaoh Apepi illustrating the soldier hunting with a short bow and sword Inscriptions The perfect god the lord of the two lands Nebkhepeshre Apepi and Follower of his lord Nehemen found at a burial at Saqqara 59 Now at the Luxor Museum 60 61 Manetho s invasion narrative is nowadays rejected by most scholars 10 It is likely that he was influenced by more recent foreign invasions of Egypt 6 Instead it appears that the establishment of Hyksos rule was mostly peaceful and did not involve an invasion of an entirely foreign population 62 Archaeology shows a continuous Asiatic presence at Avaris for over 150 years before the beginning of Hyksos rule 63 with gradual Canaanite settlement beginning there c 1800 BC during the Twelfth Dynasty 18 Strontium isotope analysis of the inhabitants of Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period Avaris also dismissed the invasion model in favor of a migration one Contrary to the model of a foreign invasion the study didn t find more males moving into the region but instead found a sex bias towards females with a high proportion of 77 of females being non locals 64 65 Manfred Bietak argues that Hyksos should be understood within a repetitive pattern of the attraction of Egypt for western Asiatic population groups that came in search of a living in the country especially the Delta since prehistoric times 63 He notes that Egypt had long depended on the Levant for expertise in areas of shipbuilding and seafaring with possible depictions of Asiatic shipbuilders being found from reliefs from the Sixth Dynasty ruler Sahure The Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt is known to have had many Asiatic immigrants serving as soldiers household or temple serfs and various other jobs Avaris in the Nile Delta attracted many Asiatic immigrants in its role as a hub of international trade and seafaring 66 The final powerful pharaoh of the Egyptian Thirteenth Dynasty was Sobekhotep IV who died around 1725 BC after which Egypt appears to have splintered into various kingdoms including one based at Avaris ruled by the Fourteenth Dynasty 11 Based on their names this dynasty was already primarily of West Asian origin 67 After an event in which their palace was burned 67 the Fourteenth Dynasty would be replaced by the Hyksos Fifteenth Dynasty which would establish loose control over northern Egypt by intimidation or force 68 thus greatly expanding the area under Avaris s control 69 Kim Ryholt argues that the Fifteenth Dynasty invaded and displaced the Fourteenth however Alexander Ilin Tomich argues that this is not sufficiently substantiated 50 Bietak interprets a stela of Neferhotep III to indicate that Egypt was overrun by roving mercenaries around the time of the Hyksos ascension to power 70 Kingdom Edit Main article Fifteenth Dynasty of Egypt Avaris Tjaru Tell el Yahudiyeh Heliopolis Tell Basta Tell Farasha Inshas Tell el Maskhuta Tell er Retabeh Tell es Sahaba Memphis Lisht Dahshur Beni Hasanclass notpageimage Key Sites of the Second Intermediate Period in Northern Egypt West Semitic in red Egyptian in blue citation needed The length of time the Hyksos ruled is unclear The fragmentary Turin King List says that there were six Hyksos kings who collectively ruled 108 years 71 however in 2018 Kim Ryholt proposed a new reading of as many as 149 years while Thomas Schneider proposed a length between 160 and 180 years 72 The rule of the Hyksos overlaps with that of the native Egyptian pharaohs of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Dynasties better known as the Second Intermediate Period The area under direct control of the Hyksos was probably limited to the eastern Nile delta 15 Their capital city was Avaris at a fork on the now dry Pelusiac branch of the Nile Memphis may have also been an important administrative center 73 although the nature of any Hyksos presence there remains unclear 15 According to Anna Latifa Mourad other sites with likely Levantine populations or strong Levantine connections in the Delta include Tell Farasha and Tell el Maghud located between Tell Basta and Avaris 74 El Khata na southwest of Avaris and Inshas 75 The increased prosperity of Avaris may have attracted more Levantines to settle in the eastern Delta 62 Kom el Hisn at the edge of the Western Delta shows Near Eastern goods but individuals mostly buried in an Egyptian style which Mourad takes to mean that they were most likely Egyptians heavily influenced by Levantine traditions or more likely Egyptianized Levantines 76 The site of Tell Basta Bubastis at the confluence of the Pelusiac and Tanitic branches of the Nile contains monuments to the Hyksos kings Khyan and Apepi but little other evidence of Levantine habitation 77 Tell el Habwa Tjaru located on a branch of the Nile near the Sinai also shows evidence of non Egyptian presence however the majority of the population appears to have been Egyptian or Egyptianized Levantines 78 Tell El Habwa would have provided Avaris with grain and trade goods 79 Near eastern inspired diadem with heads of gazelles and a stag between stars or flowers belonging to an elite lady discovered at a tomb at Tell el Dab a Avaris dating from the late Hyksos period 1648 1540 BC 80 81 Now at the Metropolitan Museum of Art 82 In the Wadi Tumilat Tell el Maskhuta shows a great deal of Levantine pottery and an occupation history closely correlated to the Fifteenth Dynasty 83 nearby Tell el Rataba and Tell el Sahaba show possible Hyksos style burials and occupation 84 Tell el Yahudiyah located between Memphis and the Wadi Tumilat contains a large earthwork that may have been built by the Hyksos as well as evidence of Levantine burials from as early as the Thirteenth Dynasty 85 The Hyksos settlements in the Wadi Tumilat would have provided access to Sinai the southern Levant and possibly the Red Sea 62 The sites Tell el Kabir Tell Yehud Tell Fawziya and Tell Geziret el Faras are noted by scholars other than Mourad to contain elements of Hyksos culture but there is no published archaeological material for them 86 The Hyksos claimed to be rulers of both Lower and Upper Egypt however their southern border was marked at Hermopolis and Cusae 13 Some objects might suggest a Hyksos presence in Upper Egypt but they may have been Theban war booty or attest simply to short term raids trade or diplomatic contact 87 The nature of Hyksos control over the region of Thebes remains unclear 15 Most likely Hyksos rule covered the area from Middle Egypt to southern Palestine 88 Older scholarship believed due to the distribution of Hyksos goods with the names of Hyksos rulers in places such as Baghdad and Knossos that Hyksos had ruled a vast empire but it seems more likely to have been the result of diplomatic gift exchange and far flung trade networks 89 15 Wars with the Seventeenth Dynasty Edit The conflict between Thebes and the Hyksos is known exclusively from pro Theban sources and it is difficult to construct a chronology 16 These sources propagandistically portray the conflict as a war of national liberation This perspective was formerly taken by scholars as well but is no longer thought to be accurate 90 91 Hostilities between the Hyksos and the Theban Seventeenth Dynasty appear to have begun during the reign of Theban king Seqenenra Taa Seqenenra Taa s mummy shows that he was killed by several blows of an axe to the head apparently in battle with the Hyksos 92 It is unclear why hostilities may have started but the much later fragmentary New Kingdom tale The Quarrel of Apophis and Seqenenre blames the Hyksos ruler Apepi Apophis for initiating the conflict by demanding that Seqenenra Taa remove a pool of hippopotamuses near Thebes 93 However this is a satire on the Egyptian story telling genre of the king s novel rather than a historical text 92 A contemporary inscription at Wadi el Hol may also refer to hostilities between Seqenenra and Apepi 70 Mummified head of Seqenenra Taa bearing axe wounds The common theory is that he died in a battle against the Hyksos 93 Three years later c 1542 BC 94 Seqenenra Taa s successor Kamose initiated a campaign against several cities loyal to the Hyksos the account of which is preserved on three monumental stelae set up at Karnak 95 70 96 The first of the three Carnarvon Tablet includes a complaint by Kamose about the divided and occupied state of Egypt To what effect do I perceive it my might while a ruler is in Avaris and another in Kush I sitting joined with an Asiatic and a Nubian each man having his own portion of this Egypt sharing the land with me There is no passing him as far as Memphis the water of Egypt He has possession of Hermopolis and no man can rest being deprived by the levies of the Setiu I shall engage in battle with him and I shall slit his body for my intention is to save Egypt striking the Asiatics 97 Following a common literary device Kamose s advisors are portrayed as trying to dissuade the king but the king attacks anyway 95 He recounts his destruction of the city of Nefrusy as well as several other cities loyal to the Hyksos On a second stele Kamose claims to have captured Avaris but returned to Thebes after capturing a messenger between Apepi and the king of Kush 92 Kamose appears to have died soon afterward c 1540 BC 94 Ahmose I continued the war against the Hyksos most likely conquering Memphis Tjaru and Heliopolis early in his reign the latter two of which are mentioned in an entry of the Rhind mathematical papyrus 92 Knowledge of Ahmose I s campaigns against the Hyksos mostly comes from the tomb of Ahmose son of Ebana who gives a first person account claiming that Ahmose I sacked Avaris 98 Then there was fighting in Egypt to the south of this town Avaris and I carried off a man as a living captive I went down into the water for he was captured on the city side and crossed the water carrying him Then Avaris was despoiled and I brought spoil from there 99 Pharaoh Ahmose I ruled c 1549 1524 BC slaying a probable Hyksos Detail of a ceremonial axe in the name of Ahmose I treasure of Queen Ahhotep II Inscription Ahmose beloved of the War God Montu Luxor Museum 100 101 102 103 Thomas Schneider places the conquest in year 18 of Ahmose s reign 104 However excavations of Tell El Dab a Avaris show no widespread destruction of the city which instead seems to have been abandoned by the Hyksos 92 Manetho as recorded in Josephus states that the Hyksos were allowed to leave after concluding a treaty 105 Thoumosis invested the walls of Avaris with an army of 480 000 men and endeavoured to reduce the Hyksos to submission by siege Despairing of achieving his object he concluded a treaty under which the Hyksos were all to evacuate Egypt and go whither they would unmolested Upon these terms no fewer than two hundred and forty thousand entire households with their possessions left Egypt and traversed the desert to Syria Contra Apion I 88 89 106 Although Manetho indicates that the Hyksos population was expelled to the Levant there is no archaeological evidence for this and Manfred Bietak argues on the basis of archaeological finds throughout Egypt that it is likely that numerous Asiatics were resettled in other locations in Egypt as artisans and craftsmen 107 Many may have remained at Avaris as pottery and scarabs with typical Hyksos forms continued to be produced uninterrupted throughout the Eastern Delta 70 Canaanite cults also continued to be worshiped at Avaris 108 Following the capture of Avaris Ahmose son of Ebana records that Ahmose I captured Sharuhen possibly Tell el Ajjul which some scholars argue was a city in Canaan under Hyksos control 109 Rule and administration Edit An official wearing the mushroom headed hairstyle also seen in contemporary paintings of Western Asiatic foreigners such as in the tomb of Khnumhotep II at Beni Hasan Excavated in Avaris the Hyksos capital Dated to 1802 1640 BC Staatliche Sammlung fur Agyptische Kunst 110 111 112 113 Administration Edit The Hyksos show a mix of Egyptian and Levantine cultural traits 13 Their rulers adopted the full Ancient Egyptian royal titulary and employed Egyptian scribes and officials 114 They also used Near Eastern forms of administration such as employing a chancellor imy r khetemet as the head of their administration 115 Rulers Edit The names the order length of rule and even the total number of the Fifteenth Dynasty rulers are not known with full certainty After the end of their rule the Hyksos kings were not considered to have been legitimate rulers of Egypt and were therefore omitted from most king lists 116 The fragmentary Turin King List included six Hyksos kings however only the name of the last Khamudi is preserved 117 Six names are also preserved in the various epitomes of Manetho however it is difficult to reconcile the Turin King List and other sources with names known from Manetho 118 largely due to the corrupted name forms in Manetho 6 The name Apepi Apophis appears in multiple sources however 119 Various other archaeological sources also provide names of rulers with the Hyksos title 120 however the majority of kings from the second intermediate period are attested once on a single object with only three exceptions 121 Ryholt associates two other rulers known from inscriptions with the dynasty Khyan and Sakir Har 122 The name of Khyan s son Yanassi is also preserved from Tell El Dab a 69 The two best attested kings are Khyan and Apepi 123 Scholars generally agree that Apepi and Khamudi are the last two kings of the dynasty 124 and Apepi is attested as a contemporary of Seventeenth Dynasty pharaohs Kamose and Ahmose I 125 Ryholt has proposed that Yanassi did not rule and that Khyan directly preceded Apepi 126 but most scholars agree that the order of kings is Khyan Yanassi Apepi Khamudi 127 There is less agreement on the early rulers Sakir Har is proposed by Schneider Ryholt and Bietak to have been the first king 66 128 129 Recently archaeological finds have suggested that Khyan may actually have been a contemporary of Thirteenth Dynasty pharaoh Sobekhotep IV potentially making him an early rather than a late Hyksos ruler 130 This has prompted attempts to reconsider the entire chronology of the Hyksos period which as of 2018 had not yet reached any consensus 131 Some kings are attested from either fragments of the Turin King List or from other sources who may have been Hyksos rulers According to Ryholt kings Semqen and Aperanat known from the Turin King List may have been early Hyksos rulers 132 however Jurgen von Beckerath assigns these kings to the Sixteenth Dynasty of Egypt 133 Another king known from scarabs Sheshi 118 is believed by many scholars to be a Hyksos king 134 however Ryholt assigns this king to the Fourteenth Dynasty of Egypt 135 Manfred Bietak proposes that a king recorded as Yaqub Har may also have been a Hyksos king of the Fifteenth Dynasty 40 Bietak suggests that many of the other kings attested on scarabs may have been vassal kings of the Hyksos 136 Hyksos rulers in various sources 66 128 137 Manetho 138 Turin King List Genealogy of Ankhefensekhmet Identification by Redford 1992 139 Identification by Ryholt 1997 140 Identification by Bietak 2012 66 Identification by Schneider 2006 Reconstructed Semitic name in Parentheses 137 141 d Salitis Saites 19 years X 15 Schalek e Sheshi Semqen Samuqenu Sakir Har Sara Dagan Sȝrk n Bnon 44 years X 16 3 years Yaqub Har Aper Anat Aper Anati Meruserre Yaqub Har Bin ʿAnu Apachnan Pachnan 36 61 years X 17 8 years 3 months Khyan Sakir Har Seuserenre Khyan Khyan ʿApaq Hajran Iannas Staan 50 years X 18 10 20 30 years Yanassi Yansas X Khyan Yanassi Yansas idn Yanassi Jinassi Ad Apophis 61 14 years X 19 40 x years Apepi A ken f Apepi Apepi A user Re Apepi Apepi Apapi Archles Assis 40 30 years g identifies with Khamudi identifies with Khamudi Identifies with Khamudi Sakir Har Sikru Haddu X 20 Khamudi Khamudi h Khamudi Khamudi not in Manetho Halmu di Sum 259 years i Sum 108 years j None of the proposed identifications besides of Apepi and Apophis is considered certain 144 In Sextus Julius Africanus s epitome of Manetho the rulers of Sixteenth Dynasty are also identified as shepherds i e Hyksos rulers 120 Following the work of Ryholt in 1997 most but not all scholars now identify the Sixteenth Dynasty as a native Egyptian dynasty based in Thebes following Eusebius s epitome of Manetho this dynasty would be contemporary to the Hyksos 145 Diplomacy Edit Lion inscribed with the name of the Hyksos ruler Khyan found in Baghdad suggesting relations with Babylon The prenomen of Khyan and epithet appear on the breast British Museum EA 987 146 147 The Hyksos engagement in long distance diplomacy is confirmed by a cuneiform letter discovered in the ruins of Avaris Hyksos diplomacy with Crete and ancient Near East is also confirmed by the presence of gifts from the Hyksos court in those places 66 Khyan one of the Hyksos rulers is known for his wide ranging contacts as objects in his name have been found at Knossos and Hattusha indicating diplomatic contacts with Crete and the Hittites and a sphinx with his name was bought on the art market at Baghdad and might demonstrate diplomatic contacts with Babylon possibly with the first Kassites ruler Gandash 146 147 The Theban rulers of the Seventeenth Dynasty are known to have imitated the Hyksos both in their architecture and regnal names 148 There is evidence of friendly relations between the Hyksos and Thebes including possibly a marriage alliance prior to the reign of the Theban pharaoh Seqenenra Taa 93 An intercepted letter between Apepi and the Nubian King of Kerma also called Kush to the south of Egypt recorded on the Carnarvon Tablet has been interpreted as evidence of an alliance between the Hyksos and Kermans 109 Intensive contacts between Kerma and the Hyksos are further attested by seals with the names of Asiatic rulers or with designs known from Avaris at Kerma 149 The troops of Kerma are known to have raided as far north as Elkab according to an inscription of Sobeknakht II 92 According to his second stele Kamose was effectively caught between the campaign for the siege of Avaris in the north and the offensive of Kerma in the south it is unknown whether or not the Kermans and Hyksos were able to combine forces against him 95 Kamose reports returning in triumph to Thebes but Lutz Popko suggests that this was perhaps a mere tactical retreat to prevent a war on two fronts 92 Ahmose I was also forced to confront a threat from the Nubians during his own siege of Avaris he was able to stop the forces of Kerma by sending a strong fleet killing their ruler named A ata 150 151 Ahmose I boasts about these successes on his tomb at Thebes 150 The Kermans also appear to have provided mercenaries to the Hyksos 66 Vassalage Edit Many scholars have described the Egyptian dynasties contemporary to the Hyksos as vassal dynasties an idea partially derived from the Nineteenth Dynasty literary text The Quarrel of Apophis and Seqenenre 152 in which it is said the entire land paid tribute to him Apepi delivering their taxes in full as well as bringing all good produce of Egypt 153 The belief in Hyksos vassalage was challenged by Ryholt as a baseless assumption 154 Roxana Flammini suggests instead that Hyksos exerted influence through sometimes imposed personal relationships and gift giving 155 Manfred Bietak continues to refer to Hyksos vassals including minor dynasties of West Semitic rulers in Egypt 156 Society and culture EditRoyal construction and patronage Edit The so called Hyksos Sphinxes The so called Hyksos Sphinxes are peculiar sphinxes of Amenemhat III which were reinscribed by several Hyksos rulers including Apepi Earlier Egyptologists thought these were the faces of actual Hyksos rulers 157 Remains of a statue of the Twelfth Dynasty reappropriated by Hyksos ruler Khyan with his name inscribed on the sides over an erasure 158 The Hyksos do not appear to have produced any court art 159 instead appropriating monuments from earlier dynasties by writing their names on them Many of these are inscribed with the name of King Khyan 160 A large palace at Avaris has been uncovered built in the Levantine rather than the Egyptian style most likely by Khyan 161 King Apepi is known to have patronized Egyptian scribal culture commissioning the copying of the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus 162 The stories preserved in the Westcar Papyrus may also date from his reign 163 The so called Hyksos sphinxes or Tanite sphinxes are a group of royal sphinxes depicting the earlier pharaoh Amenemhat III Twelfth Dynasty with some unusual traits compared to conventional statuary for example prominent cheekbones and the thick mane of a lion instead of the traditional nemes headcloth The name Hyksos sphinxes was given due to the fact that these were later reinscribed by several of the Hyksos kings and were initially thought to represent the Hyksos kings themselves Nineteenth century scholars attempted to use the statues features to assign a racial origin to the Hyksos 164 These Sphinxes were seized by the Hyksos from cities of the Middle Kingdom and then transported to their capital Avaris where they were reinscribed with the names of their new owners and adorned their palace 157 Seven of those sphinxes are known all from Tanis and now mostly located in the Cairo Museum 157 165 Other statues of Amenehat III were found in Tanis and are associated with the Hyksos in the same manner Burial practices Edit Evidence for distinct Hyksos burial practices in the archaeological record include burying their dead within settlements rather than outside them like the Egyptians 166 While some of the tombs include Egyptian style chapels they also include burials of young females probably sacrifices placed in front of the tomb chamber 161 There are also no surviving Hyksos funeral monuments in the desert in the Egyptian style though these may have been destroyed 73 The Hyksos also interred infants who died in imported Canaanite amphorae 167 The Hyksos also practiced the burial of horses and other equids likely a composite custom of the Egyptian association of the god Set with the donkey and near eastern notions of equids as representing status 168 Technology Edit The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus was copied for the Hyksos king Apepi The Hyksos use of horse burials suggest that the Hyksos introduced both the horse and the chariot to Egypt 169 however no archaeological pictorial or textual evidence exists that the Hyksos possessed chariots which are first mentioned as ridden by the Egyptians in warfare against them by Ahmose son of Ebana at the close of Hyksos rule 170 In any case it does not appear that chariots played any large role in the Hyksos rise to power or their expulsion 171 Josef Wegner further argues that horse riding may have been present in Egypt as early as the late Middle Kingdom prior to the adoption of chariot technology 172 Traditionally the Hyksos have also been credited with introducing a number of other military innovations such as the sickle sword and composite bow however t o what extent the kingdom of Avaris should be credited for these innovations is debatable with scholarly opinion currently divided 14 It is also possible that the Hyksos introduced more advanced bronze working techniques though this is inconclusive They may have worn full body armor 173 whereas the Egyptians did not wear armor or helmets until the New Kingdom 174 The Hyksos also introduced better weaving techniques and new musical instruments to Egypt 173 They introduced improvements in viniculture as well 70 Egyptian duckbill shaped axe blade of Syro Palestinian type a lethal technology probably introduced by the Hyksos 1981 1550 BC 174 A bronze Hyksos period spearhead found in Lachish 1780 1580 BC 175 The horse was probably introduced to Egypt by the Hyksos and became a favourite subject of Egyptian art as in this whip handle from the reign of Amenhotep III 1390 1353 BC 176 The two wheeled horse chariot here found in the tomb of Tutankhamun may have been introduced to Egypt by the Hyksos 169 Trade and economy Edit An example of Egyptian Tell el Yahudiyeh Ware a Levantine influenced style The early period of Hyksos period established their capital of Avaris as the commercial capital of the Delta 177 The trading relations of the Hyksos were mainly with Canaan and Cyprus 13 178 Trade with Canaan is said to have been intensive especially with many imports of Canaanite wares and may have reflected the Canaanite origins of the dynasty 179 Trade was mostly with the cities of the northern Levant but connections with the southern Levant also developed 47 Additionally trade was conducted with Faiyum Memphis oases in Egypt Nubia and Mesopotamia 177 Trade relations with Cyprus were also very important particularly at the end of the Hyksos period 13 180 Aaron Burke has interpreted the equid burials in Avaris of evidence that the people buried with them were involved in the caravan trade 181 Anna Latifa Mourad argues that Hyksos were particularly interested in opening new avenues of trade securing strategic posts in the eastern Delta that could give access to land based and sea based trade routes 177 These include the apparent Hyksos settlements of Tell el Habwa I and Tell el Maskhuta in the eastern Delta 79 According to the Kamose stelae the Hyksos imported chariots and horses ships timber gold lapis lazuli silver turquoise bronze axes without number oil incense fat and honey 13 The Hyksos also exported large quantities of material looted from southern Egypt especially Egyptian sculptures to the areas of Canaan and Syria 179 These transfers of Egyptian artifacts to the Near East may especially be attributed to king Apepi 179 The Hyksos also produced local Levantine influenced industries such as Tell el Yahudiyeh Ware 177 There is little evidence of trade between Upper and Lower Egypt during the Hyksos period and Manfred Bietak proposes that there was a mutual trade boycott Bietak proposes that this decreased the Hyksos ability to trade with the Mediterranean and weakened their economy 70 Religion Edit Drawing of a Hyksos era scarab found at Tell el Dab a depicting the pharaoh as the Near Eastern weather god Baal or vice versa 182 The aim appears to be to present the Hyksos ruler as a divine figure 12 Original privately owned kept at the University of Fribourg 183 Temples in Avaris existed both in Egyptian and Levantine style the latter presumably for Levantine gods 184 The Hyksos are known to have worshiped the Canaanite storm god Baal who was associated with the Egyptian god Set 185 Set appears to have been the patron god of Avaris as early as the Fourteenth Dynasty 186 Hyksos iconography of their kings on some scarabs shows a mixture of Egyptian pharaonic dress with a raised club the iconography of Baal 12 Despite later sources claiming the Hyksos were opposed to the worship of other gods votive objects given by Hyksos rulers to gods such as Ra Hathor Sobek and Wadjet have also survived 187 Potential biblical connections EditIn the Manethonian Josephus tradition Edit Josephus and most of the writers of antiquity associated the Hyksos with the Jews 188 Quoting from Manetho s Aegyptiaca Josephus states that when the Hyksos were expelled from Egypt they founded Jerusalem Contra Apion I 90 189 It is unclear if this is original to Manetho or Josephus s own addition as Manetho does not mention Jews or Hebrews in his preserved account of the expulsion 190 Josephus s account of Manetho connects the expulsion of the Hyksos to another event two hundred years later in which a group of lepers led by the priest Osarseph were expelled from Egypt to the abandoned Avaris There they ally with the Hyksos and rule over Egypt for thirteen years before being driven out during which time they oppress the Egyptians and destroy their temples After the expulsion Osarseph changes his name to Moses Contra Apion I 227 250 191 Assmann argues that this second account is largely a mixture of the experiences of the later Amarna period with the Hyksos invasion with Osarseph likely standing in for Akhenaten 192 193 The final mention of Osarseph in which he changes his name to Moses may be a later interpolation 194 The second account is sometimes held not to have been written by Manetho at all 195 In modern scholarship Edit See also The Exodus and Sources and parallels of the Exodus Semitic visitors to Egypt in the Tomb of Khnumhotep II c 1900 BC Over the years especially in the early to mid 20th century some scholars have suggested that seemingly authentic Egyptian elements in the Bible indicate the historical plausibility of the story of the Egyptian sojourn and exodus of the Israelites including the story of Joseph great grandson of Abraham 196 John Bright states that Egyptian and Biblical records both suggest that Semitic people maintained access to Egypt at all periods of Egypt s history and he suggested that it is tempting to suppose that Joseph who according to the Old Testament Genesis 39 50 was in favour at the Egyptian court and held high administrative positions next to the ruler of the land was associated to the Hyksos rule in Egypt during the Fifteenth Dynasty Such a connection might have been facilitated by their shared Semitic ethnicity He also wrote that there is no proof for these events 53 Howard Vos has suggested that the coat of many colors said to have been worn by Joseph could be similar to the colorful garments seen in the painting of foreigners in the tomb of Khnumhotep II 197 Ronald B Geobey notes a number of problems with identifying the narrative of Joseph with events either prior to or during the Hyksos rule such as the detail that the Egyptians abhorred Joseph s people shepherds Gen 46 31 and numerous anachronisms 198 Manfred Bietak suggests that the story fits better with the ambience of the later Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt in particular with the xenophobic policy of pharaoh Setnakhte 1189 1186 BC 199 And Donald Redford argues that to read the Joseph story as history is quite wrongheaded 200 while Megan Bishop Moore and Brad E Kelle note the lack of any extra biblical evidence for the events of Genesis including the Joseph story or Exodus 201 Scholars such as Jan Assmann and Redford have supported the notion that the story of the biblical exodus may have been wholly or partially inspired by the expulsion of the Hyksos 202 203 204 An identification with the Hyksos would only depart minimally from accepted biblical chronology and their expulsion is the only known large scale expulsion of Asiatics from Egypt 205 However Bietak writes T he population under Hyksos rule was an urban society allied to trade and seafaring and for a certain period ruled Egypt c 1640 1530 BC They experienced the glory of controlling the Delta and a part of the Nile valley for over 100 years However this is in no way in keeping with the tradition of the Israelites and their experience of oppression in Egypt That is why an association of the Hyksos and their people with the Proto Israelites should be dismissed 206 Archaeological evidence suggests that the Israelites primarily emerged natively from Canaan 207 A number of scholars do not believe that the exodus has any historical basis at all while only those on the fundamentalist fringes accept the entire biblical account unless it can be absolutely disproved 208 The current consensus among archaeologists is that if an Israelite exodus from Egypt occurred it must have happened instead in the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt 13th century BC given the first appearance of a distinctive Israelite culture in the archaeological record 209 The potential connection of the Hyksos to the exodus is no longer a central focus of scholarly study of the Hyksos 44 but this supposed connection to the Exodus has continued to inspire popular interest 51 Legacy Edit Four Foreign Chieftains from tomb TT39 Metropolitan Museum of Art MET DT10871 Ca 1479 1458 BC Egyptian relief depicting a battle against West Asiatics Reign of Amenhotep II Eighteenth Dynasty c 1427 1400 BC The Hyksos rule continued to be condemned by New Kingdom pharaohs such as Hatshepsut who 80 years after their defeat claimed to rebuild many shrines and temples which they had neglected 159 Ramses II moved Egypt s capital to the Delta building Pi Ramesses on the site of Avaris 210 where he set up a stela marking the 400th anniversary of the cult of Set Scholars used to suggest that this marked 400 years since the Hyksos had established their rule however the lists of Ramesses ancestors continued to omit the Hyksos and there is no evidence that they were honored during his reign 211 The Turin King List which includes the Hyksos and all other disputed or disgraced former rulers of Egypt appears to date from the reign of Ramesses or one of his successors 212 The Hyksos are marked as foreign kings via a throw stick determinative rather than a divine determinative after their names and the use of the title ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt rather than the usual royal title 213 Kim Ryholt notes that these measures are unique to the Hyksos rulers and may therefore have been a direct result of what seems to have been deliberate attempt to obliterate the memory of their kingship after their defeat 214 Egyptian presence in the Levant Edit It is often accepted that Egypt established an empire in Canaan at the end of the wars against the Hyksos 215 Campaigns against locations in Canaan and Syria were conducted by Ahmose I and Thutmose I at the beginning of the Eighteenth Dynasty as recorded in the tombs of Ahmose son of Ebana and Ahmose pen Nekhebet Thutmose I is also mentioned as having hunted elephants in Syria in inscriptions at the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el Bahari 216 Thutmose III is known to have campaigned widely conquering the Shasu Bedouins of northern Canaan and the land of Retjenu as far as Syria and Mittani in numerous military campaigns circa 1450 BC 217 218 However Felix Hoflmayer argues that there is little evidence of other campaigns and that there is no evidence that would suggest such a scenario as an Egyptian empire during the Eighteenth Dynasty 219 As regards claims that the campaigns in the Near East were spurred on by Hyksos rule Thomas Schneider argues that the empire building started with a delay of two generations and seeing a direct nexus may be as much a historical fallacy as it would be to link the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989 to the end of the Second World War in 1945 two generations earlier 220 Retjenu Syrians bringing tribute to Tuthmosis III in the tomb of Rekhmire c 1450 BC actual painting and interpretive drawing They are labeled Chiefs of Retjenu 221 222 Later accounts Edit A relief of Ramses II from Memphis showing him capturing enemies a Nubian a Libyan and a Syrian c 1250 BC Cairo Museum 223 The Nineteenth Dynasty story The Quarrel of Apophis and Seqenenre claimed that the Hyksos worshiped no god but Set making the conflict into one between Ra the patron of Thebes and Set as patron of Avaris 224 Furthermore the battle with the Hyksos was interpreted in light of the mythical battle between the gods Horus and Set transforming Set into an Asiatic deity while also allowing for the integration of Asiatics into Egyptian society 225 Manetho s portrayal of the Hyksos written nearly 1300 years after the end of Hyksos rule and found in Josephus is even more negative than the New Kingdom sources 159 This account portrayed the Hyksos as violent conquerors and oppressors of Egypt has been highly influential for perceptions of the Hyksos until modern times 226 Marc van de Mieroop argues that Josephus s portrayal of the initial Hyksos invasion is no more trustworthy than his later claims that they were related to the Exodus supposedly portrayed in Manetho as performed by a band of lepers 227 Early modern depictions Edit The discovery of the Hyksos in the 19th century and their study following the decipherment of ancient Egyptian scripts led to various theories about their history origin ethnicity and appearance often illustrated with picturesque and imaginative details Hyksos invasion as imagined in the 19th century by Hermann Vogel 19th century The Expulsion of the Hyksos 1906 See also Edit Asia portalMitanni Kassites Sea peoples Philistines Maryannu Sino Babylonianism Anra scarab artifact Notes Edit Approximate dates vary by source Bietak gives c 1640 1532 BC 6 Schneider gives c 1639 1521 BC 7 and Stiebing gives c 1630 1530 BC 8 Spelling of the hieroglyphs in sources describing the archaeological record of the historical Hyksos first set of characters is the singular as appearing in Abisha the Hyksos in the tomb of Khnumhotep II c 1900 BC 19 The second set is in the plural as appears in the inscriptions of known Hyksos rulers Sakir Har Semqen Khyan and Aperanat 20 Two separate misconceptions persist both in the scholarship and more popular works surrounding the word Hyksos The first is that this term is the name of a defined and relatively large population group see below when in fact it is only a royal title held exclusively by individual rulers Any standalone use of the word Hyksos in the following article refers specifically to the foreign kings of the 15th Dynasty 28 Josephus also misrepresents the Hyksos as a population group ethnos as opposed to a dynasty 6 Flavius Josephus used the designation Hyksos incorrectly as a kind of ethnic term for people of foreign origin who seized power in Egypt for a certain period In this sense for the sake of convenience it is also used in the title and section headings of the present article One should never forget however that strictly spoken the Hyksos were only the kings of the Fifteenth Dynasty and of simultaneous minor dynasties who took the title ḥḳꜣw ḫꜣswt 29 While Schneider identifies each of the names in Menatho with a pharaoh he does not hold to Manetho s order of the reigns So for instance he identifies Sakir Har with Archles Assis the sixth king in Manetho but proposes he reigned first 142 Identified with Salitis by Bietak 66 This name appears as a separate individual preceding Apepi but it appears to mean brave ass and may be a disparaging reference to Apepi 143 In Eusebius and Africanus s epitomes of Manetho Apopis appears in final position while Archles appears as the fifth ruler In Josephus Assis is the final ruler and Apophis the fifth ruler The association of the names Archles and Assis with one another is a modern reconstruction 138 Redford argues that the name suits neither Assis nor Apophis 143 In the epitome of Manetho by Eusebius the total instead comes to 284 years 128 This reading is based on a partially damaged section of the papyrus Reconstructions of the damaged Turin King List proposed in 2018 would change the reading of years to up to 149 years Ryholt or between 160 and 180 years Schneider 72 Citations Edit a b c d Van de Mieroop 2011 p 131 a b c Bard 2015 p 188 a b Willems 2010 p 96 a b c Bourriau 2000 p 174 Bietak 2001 p 136 a b c d e Bietak 2012 p 1 Schneider 2006 p 196 Stiebing 2009 p 197 a b c Mourad 2015 p 10 a b Ilin Tomich 2016 p 5 a b Bourriau 2000 pp 177 178 a b c Morenz amp Popko 2010 p 104 a b c d e f Bourriau 2000 p 182 a b Ilin Tomich 2016 p 12 a b c d e Ilin Tomich 2016 p 7 a b Morenz amp Popko 2010 pp 108 109 a b c Flammini 2015 p 240 a b c Ben Tor 2007 p 1 Kamrin 2009 The Sakir Har door jamb inscription slide 12 PDF The Second Intermediate Period The Hyksos a b Schneider 2008 p 305 a b c d e Kamrin 2009 p 25 a b c Mourad 2015 p 9 Against Apion Flavius Josephus 14 Morenz amp Popko 2010 pp 103 104 Verbrugghe amp Wickersham 1996 p 99 Candelora 2018 p 53 Candelora 2018 pp 46 47 Bietak 2010 p 139 Candelora 2018 p 65 Candelora 2017 pp 208 209 Ryholt 1997 pp 123 124 a b c Curry 2018 Candelora 2017 p 211 Candelora 2017 p 204 Ryholt 1997 p 123 125 a b Muller 2018 p 211 Candelora 2017 p 216 Candelora 2017 pp 206 208 a b c Bietak 2012 p 2 Holbl 2001 p 79 a b c Candelora 2017 p 209 Assmann 2003 p 198 a b Flammini 2015 p 236 Bietak 2016 pp 267 268 a b Ryholt 1997 p 128 a b c Mourad 2015 p 216 Mourad 2015 p 11 Bietak 2019 p 61 a b Ilin Tomich 2016 p 6 a b Van de Mieroop 2011 p 166 Stantis Chris Maaranen Nina 1 January 2021 The people of Avaris Intra regional biodistance analysis using dental non metric traits Bioarchaeology of the Near East a b Bright 2000 p 97 Russmann amp James 2001 pp 67 68 Pritchard 2016 p 230 Steiner amp Killebrew 2014 p 73 Raspe 1998 p 126 128 Josephus 1926 p 196 O Connor 2009 pp 116 117 Wilkinson 2013a p 96 Daressy 1906 pp 115 120 a b c Mourad 2015 p 130 a b Bietak 2006 p 285 Stantis Chris Kharobi Arwa Maaranen Nina Nowell Geoff M Bietak Manfred Prell Silvia Schutkowski Holger 15 July 2020 Who were the Hyksos Challenging traditional narratives using strontium isotope 87Sr 86Sr analysis of human remains from ancient Egypt PLOS ONE 15 7 e0235414 Bibcode 2020PLoSO 1535414S doi 10 1371 journal pone 0235414 ISSN 1932 6203 PMC 7363063 PMID 32667937 Stantis Chris Kharobi Arwa Maaranen Nina Macpherson Colin Bietak Manfred Prell Silvia Schutkowski Holger 1 June 2021 Multi isotopic study of diet and mobility in the northeastern Nile Delta Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 13 6 105 doi 10 1007 s12520 021 01344 x ISSN 1866 9565 S2CID 235271929 a b c d e f g Bietak 2012 p 4 a b Bietak 2019 p 47 Bietak 1999 p 377 a b Bourriau 2000 p 180 a b c d e f Bietak 2012 p 5 Ryholt 1997 p 186 a b Aston 2018 pp 31 32 a b Bourriau 2000 p 183 Mourad 2015 pp 43 44 Mourad 2015 p 48 Mourad 2015 p 49 50 Mourad 2015 p 21 Mourad 2015 pp 44 48 a b Mourad 2015 pp 129 130 O Connor 2009 pp 115 116 Kopetzky amp Bietak 2016 p 362 Hyksos headband www metmuseum org Mourad 2015 pp 51 55 Mourad 2015 pp 56 57 Mourad 2015 pp 57 61 Mourad 2015 p 19 Popko 2013 p 3 Popko 2013 p 2 Morenz amp Popko 2010 p 105 Morenz amp Popko 2010 p 109 Popko 2013 pp 1 2 a b c d e f g Popko 2013 p 4 a b c Van de Mieroop 2011 p 160 a b Stiebing 2009 p 200 a b c Van de Mieroop 2011 p 161 Wilkinson 2013 p 547 Ritner et al 2003 p 346 Van de Mieroop 2011 p 177 Lichthelm 2019 p 321 Daressy 1906 p 117 Montet 1968 p 80 Others were later added to them things which came from the pharaoh Ahmose like the axe decorated with a griffin and a likeness of the king slaying a Hyksos with other axes and daggers Morgan 2010 p 308 A color photograph Baker amp Baker 2001 p 86 Schneider 2006 p 195 Bourriau 2000 pp 201 202 Josephus 1926 pp 197 199 Bietak 2010 pp 170 171 Bietak 2012 p 6 a b Stiebing 2009 p 168 Candelora Danielle The Hyksos www arce org American Research Center in Egypt Roy 2011 pp 291 292 Curry 2018 p 3 A head from a statue of an official dating to the 12th or 13th Dynasty 1802 1640 B C sports the mushroom shaped hairstyle commonly worn by non Egyptian immigrants from western Asia such as the Hyksos Potts 2012 p 841 Bietak 2012 p 3 Bietak 2012 pp 3 4 Ben Tor 2007 p 2 Ryholt 1997 p 118 a b Bietak 1999 p 378 Ilin Tomich 2016 pp 7 8 a b Bourriau 2000 p 179 Ryholt 2018 p 235 Ryholt 1997 pp 119 120 Aston 2018 p 18 Ilin Tomich 2016 pp 6 7 Aston 2018 p 16 Ryholt 1997 p 256 Aston 2018 pp 15 17 a b c Schneider 2006 p 194 Ryholt 1997 p 201 Aston 2018 p 15 Polz 2018 p 217 Ryholt 1997 pp 121 122 von Beckerath 1999 pp 120 121 Muller 2018 p 210 Ryholt 1997 p 409 Bietak 2012 pp 2 3 a b Aston 2018 p 17 a b Redford 1992 p 107 Redford 1992 p 110 Ryholt 1997 p 125 Schneider 2006 pp 193 194 Schneider 2006 p 194 a b Redford 1992 p 108 Ilin Tomich 2016 p 11 Ilin Tomich 2016 p 3 a b Weigall 2016 p 188 a b Statue The British Museum EA987 Morenz amp Popko 2010 p 108 Ilin Tomich 2016 p 9 a b Bunson 2014 pp 2 3 Bunson 2014 p 197 Flammini 2015 pp 236 237 Ritner et al 2003 p 70 Ryholt 1997 p 323 Flammini 2015 pp 239 243 Bietak 2012 pp 1 4 a b c el Shahawy 2005 p 160 Griffith 1891 p 28 The name of Khyan on the statue from Bubastis is written over an erasure that the statue is of the XIIth Dynasty and that Khyan was a Hyksos king a b c Bietak 1999 p 379 Muller 2018 p 212 a b Bard 2015 p 213 Van de Mieroop 2011 pp 151 153 Redford 1992 p 122 Candelora 2018 p 54 Sayce 1895 p 17 Bietak 2016 p 268 Wilkinson 2013 p 191 Mourad 2015 p 15 a b Hernandez 2014 p 112 Herslund 2018 p 151 Stiebing 2009 p 166 Wegner 2015 p 76 a b Van de Mieroop 2011 p 149 a b Hyksos axe www metmuseum org Spearhead www metmuseum org Whip handle www metmuseum org a b c d Mourad 2015 p 129 Ryholt 1997 pp 138 139 142 a b c Ryholt 1997 pp 138 139 Ryholt 1997 p 141 Burke 2019 p 80 Keel 1996 pp 125 126 Keel 1996 p 126 O Connor 2009 p 109 Bietak 1999 pp 377 378 Bourriau 2000 p 177 Ryholt 1997 pp 148 149 Assmann 2003 p 197 Josephus 1926 p 199 Assmann 2018 p 39 Josephus 1926 pp 255 265 Assmann 2003 pp 227 228 Assmann 2018 p 40 Raspe 1998 p 132 Gruen 2016 p 214 Moore amp Kelle 2011 pp 92 93 Vos 1999 p 75 Geobey 2017 pp 27 30 Notes that the Hebrew word is completely unrelated to the term Hyksos Bietak 2015 p 20 Redford 1992 p 429 Moore amp Kelle 2011 p 93 Redford 1992 p 412 413 Assmann 2014 pp 26 27 Faust 2015 p 477 Redmount 2001 p 78 Bietak 2015 p 32 Shaw 2002 p 313 Grabbe 2017 p 36 Geraty 2015 p 58 Morenz amp Popko 2010 p 102 Van de Mieroop 2011 pp 162 163 Ryholt 2004 p 138 Ryholt 2004 pp 142 143 Ryholt 2004 p 143 Hoflmayer 2015 p 191 Hoflmayer 2015 pp 195 196 Gabriel 2009 p 204 Allen 2000 p 299 Hoflmayer 2015 p 202 Schneider 2018 p 78 Hawass amp Vannini 2009 p 120 The foreigners of the fourth register with long hairstyles and calf length fringed robes are labeled Chiefs of Retjenu the ancient name tor the Syrian region Like the Nubians they come with animals in this case horses an elephant and a bear they also offer weapons and vessels most likely filled with precious substance Zakrzewski Shortland amp Rowland 2015 p 268 Richardson 2013 p 14 Van de Mieroop 2011 p 163 Assmann 2003 pp 199 200 Van de Mieroop 2011 p 164 Van de Mieroop 2011 pp 164 165 References EditAllen James P 2000 Middle Egyptian An Introduction to the Language and Culture of Hieroglyphs Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 0 521 77483 3 Assmann Jan 2003 The mind of Egypt history and meaning in the time of the Pharaohs Harvard University Press ISBN 9780674012110 Assmann Jan 2014 From Akhenaten to Moses Ancient Egypt and Religious Change Oxford University Press ISBN 978 977 416 631 0 Assmann Jan 2018 The Invention of Religion Faith and Covenant in the Book of Exodus Princeton University Press ISBN 9781400889235 Aston David A How Early and How Late Can Khyan Really Be An Essay Based on Conventional Archaeological Methods lt In Forstner Muller amp Moeller 2018 pp 15 56 Baker Rosalie F Baker Charles F 2001 Ancient Egyptians People of the Pyramids USA Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 512221 3 Bard Kathryn A 2015 An Introduction to the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt 2nd ed Wiley Blackwell ISBN 9780470673362 von Beckerath Jurgen 1999 Handbuch der agyptischen Konigsnamen von Zabern ISBN 3 8053 2591 6 Ben Tor Daphne 2007 Scarabs Chronology and Connections Egypt and Palestine in the Second Intermediate Period PDF Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht Bietak Manfred 2019 The Spiritual Roots of the Hyksos Elite An Analysis of Their Sacred Architecture Part I In Bietak Manfred Prell Silvia eds The Enigma of the Hyksos Harrassowitz pp 47 67 ISBN 9783447113328 Bietak Manfred 2015 On the Historicity of the Exodus What Egyptology Today Can Contribute to Assessing the Biblical Account of the Sojourn in Egypt In Thomas E Levy Thomas Schneider William H C Propp eds Israel s Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective Text Archaeology Culture and Geoscience Springer pp 17 37 ISBN 978 3 319 04768 3 Bietak Manfred 2001 Hyksos In Redford Donald B ed The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt Volume 2 Oxford Oxford University Press pp 136 143 ISBN 978 0 19 510234 5 Bietak Manfred 2012 Hyksos In Bagnell Roger S et al eds The Encyclopedia of Ancient History John Wiley amp Sons doi 10 1002 9781444338386 wbeah15207 ISBN 9781444338386 Bietak Manfred 2016 The Egyptian community in Avaris during the Hyksos period Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 26 263 274 doi 10 1553 AEundL26s263 JSTOR 44243953 Bietak Manfred 2010 FROM WHERE CAME THE HYKSOS AND WHERE DID THEY GO In Mareee Marcel ed THE SECOND INTERMEDIATE PERIOD THIRTEENTH SEVENTEENTH DYNASTIES Current Research Future Prospects Peeters pp 139 181 Bietak Manfred 2006 The predecessors of the Hyksos In Gitin Seymour Wright Edward J Dessel J P eds Confronting the Past Archaeological and Historical Essays on Ancient Israel in Honor of William G Dever Eisenbrauns ISBN 9781575061177 Bietak Manfred 1999 Hyksos In Bard Kathryn A ed Encyclopedia of the Archaeology of Ancient Egypt Routledge pp 377 379 Bourriau Janine 2000 The Second Intermediate Period c 1650 1550 BC In Shaw Ian ed The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 280458 7 Bright John 2000 A History of Israel 4th ed Westminster John Knox Press p 97 ISBN 978 0 664 22068 6 Bunson Margaret 2014 Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt Infobase Publishing ISBN 978 1 4381 0997 8 Burke Aaron A 2019 Amorites in the Eastern Nile Delta The Identity of Asiatics at Avaris during the Early Middle Kingdom In Bietak Manfred Prell Silvia eds The Enigma of the Hyksos Harrassowitz pp 67 91 ISBN 9783447113328 Candelora Danielle 2018 Entangled in Orientalism How the Hyksos Became a Race Journal of Egyptian History 11 1 2 45 72 doi 10 1163 18741665 12340042 S2CID 216703371 Candelora Danielle 2017 Defining the Hyksos A Reevaluation of the Title ḥḳꜣ ḫꜣswt and Its Implications for Hyksos Identity Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 53 203 221 doi 10 5913 jarce 53 2017 a010 Curry Andrew September October 2018 The Rulers of Foreign Lands Archaeology Magazine Daressy Georges 1906 Un poignard du temps des Rois Pasteurs Annales du Service des Antiquites de l Egypte 7 115 120 el Shahawy Abeer 2005 The Egyptian Museum in Cairo A Walk Through the Alleys of Ancient Egypt Farid Atiya Press ISBN 977 17 2183 6 Flammini Roxana 2015 Building the Hyksos Vassals Some Thoughts on the Definition of the Hyksos Subordination Practices Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 25 233 245 doi 10 1553 AEundL25s233 JSTOR 43795213 Faust Avraham 2015 The Emergence of Iron Age Israel On Origins and Habitus In Thomas E Levy Thomas Schneider William H C Propp eds Israel s Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective Text Archaeology Culture and Geoscience Springer pp 467 482 ISBN 978 3 319 04768 3 Forstner Muller Irene Moeller Nadine eds 2018 THE HYKSOS RULER KHYAN AND THE EARLY SECOND INTERMEDIATE PERIOD IN EGYPT PROBLEMS AND PRIORITIES OF CURRENT RESEARCH Proceedings of the Workshop of the Austrian Archaeological Institute and the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago Vienna July 4 5 2014 Holzhausen ISBN 978 3 902976 83 3 Gabriel Richard A 2009 Thutmose III The Military Biography of Egypt s Greatest Warrior King Potomac Books ISBN 978 1 59797 373 1 Geobey Ronald A 2017 Joseph the Infiltrator Jacob the Conqueror Reexamining the Hyksos Hebrew Correlation Journal of Biblical Literature 136 1 23 37 doi 10 1353 jbl 2017 0001 S2CID 164637479 Geraty L T 2015 Exodus Dates and Theories In Thomas E Levy Thomas Schneider William H C Propp eds Israel s Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective Text Archaeology Culture and Geoscience Springer pp 55 64 ISBN 978 3 319 04768 3 Grabbe Lester 2017 Ancient Israel What Do We Know and How Do We Know It Bloomsbury ISBN 9780567670434 Griffith F Ll 1891 Archaeological Report 1890 91 1911 12 Comprising the Recent Work of the Egypt Exploration Fund and the Progress of Egyptology During the Year 1890 91 1911 12 Kegan Paul Trench Trubner Gruen Erich S 2016 The Use and Abuse of the Exodus Story The Construct of Identity in Hellenistic Judaism Essays on Early Jewish Literature and History de Gruyter pp 197 228 JSTOR j ctvbkjxph 14 Hawass Zahi A Vannini Sandro 2009 The lost tombs of Thebes life in paradise Thames amp Hudson ISBN 9780500051597 Hernandez Roberto A Diaz 2014 The Role of the War Chariot in the Formation of the Egyptian Empire in the Early 18th Dynasty Studien zur Altagyptischen Kultur 43 109 122 JSTOR 44160271 Herslund Ole 2018 Chronicling Chariots Texts Writing and Language of New Kingdom Egypt In Veldmeijer Andre J Ikram Salima eds Chariots in Ancient Egypt The Tano Chariot A Case Study Sidestone Press ISBN 9789088904684 Hoflmayer Felix 2015 Egypt s Empire in the Southern Levant during the Early 18th Dynasty In Eder Birgitta Pruzsinszky Regine eds Policies of Exchange Political Systems and Modes of Interaction in the Aegean and the Near East in the 2nd Millenium B C E Proceedings of the International Symposium at the University of Freiburg Institute for Archaeological Studies 30th May 2nd June 2012 Vol 2 Austrian Academy of Sciences Press pp 191 206 ISBN 9783700176619 JSTOR j ctt1bkm4rg 15 Holbl Gunther 2001 A History of the Ptolemaic Empire Psychology Press ISBN 978 0 415 23489 4 Ilin Tomich Alexander 2016 Second Intermediate Period In Wendrich Willeke et al eds UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Josephus Flavius 1926 Josephus in Eight Volumes 1 The Life Against Apion Translated by Thackeray H St J Kamrin Janice 2009 The Aamu of Shu in the Tomb of Khnumhotep II at Beni Hassan PDF Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections 1 22 36 S2CID 199601200 Keel Othmar 1996 Ein weiterer Skarabaus mit einer Nilpferdjagd die Ikonographie der sogenannten Beamtenskarabaen und der agyptische Konig auf Skarabaen vor dem Neuen Reich Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 6 119 136 JSTOR 23788869 Kopetzky Karin Bietak Manfred 2016 A Seal Impression of the Green Jasper Workshop from Tell El Dabʿa Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 26 357 375 doi 10 1553 AEundL26s357 JSTOR 44243958 Lichthelm Miriam ed 2019 Ancient Egyptian Literature University of California Press doi 10 2307 j ctvqc6j1s ISBN 9780520973619 JSTOR j ctvqc6j1s S2CID 63441582 Montet Pierre 1968 Lives of the pharaohs Weidenfeld and Nicolson Moore Megan Bishop Kelle Brad E 2011 Biblical History and Israel s Past The Changing Study of the Bible and History Wm B Eerdmans Publishing ISBN 978 0 8028 6260 0 Morenz Ludwig D Popko Lutz 2010 The Second Intermediate Period and the New Kingdom In Lloyd Alan B ed A Companion to Ancient Egypt Vol 1 Wiley Blackwell pp 101 119 ISBN 9781444320060 Morgan Lyvia 2010 An Aegean Griffin in Egypt The Hunt Frieze at TELL EL DABcA Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 20 303 323 doi 10 1553 AEundL20s303 JSTOR 23789943 Mourad Anna Latifa 2015 Rise of the Hyksos Egypt and the Levant from the Middle Kingdom to the early Second Intermediate Period Oxford Archaeopress doi 10 2307 j ctvr43jbk ISBN 9781784911348 JSTOR j ctvr43jbk Muller Vera Chronological Concepts for the Second Intermediate Period and Their Implications for the Evaluation of Its Material Culture In Forstner Muller amp Moeller 2018 pp 199 216 O Connor David 2009 Egypt the Levant and the Aegean From the Hyksos Period to the Rise of the New Kingdom In Aruz Joan Benzel Kim Evans Jean M eds Beyond Babylon art trade and diplomacy in the second millennium B C Yale University Press pp 108 122 ISBN 9780300141436 Polz Daniel The Territorial Claim and the Political Role of the Theban State at the End of the Second Intermediate Period A Case Study In Forstner Muller amp Moeller 2018 pp 217 233 Popko Lutz 2013 Late Second Intermediate Period In Wendrich Willeke et al eds Late Second Intermediate Period to Early New Kingdom UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Potts Daniel T 2012 A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East John Wiley amp Sons ISBN 978 1 4443 6077 6 Pritchard James B 2016 Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament with Supplement Princeton University Press ISBN 978 1 4008 8276 2 Raspe Lucia 1998 Manetho on the Exodus A Reappraisal Jewish Studies Quarterly 5 2 124 155 JSTOR 40753208 Redford Donald B 1992 Egypt Canaan and Israel in Ancient Times Princeton University Press ISBN 978 0 691 03606 9 Redmount Carol A 2001 1998 Bitter Lives Israel In And Out of Egypt In Coogan Michael D ed The Oxford History of the Biblical World Oxford University Press pp 58 89 ISBN 9780199881482 Richardson Dan 2013 Cairo and the Pyramids Rough Guides Snapshot Egypt Rough Guides UK ISBN 978 1 4093 3544 3 Ritner Robert K Simpson William Kelly Tobin Vincent A Wente Edward F 2003 Simpson William Kelly ed The Literature of Ancient Egypt An Anthology of Stories Instructions and Poetry Yale University Press ISBN 9780300099201 JSTOR j ctt5vm2m5 Roy Jane 2011 The Politics of Trade Egypt and Lower Nubia in the 4th Millennium BC Brill ISBN 978 90 04 19610 0 Russmann Edna R James Thomas Garnet Henry 2001 Eternal Egypt Masterworks of Ancient Art from the British Museum University of California Press ISBN 978 0 520 23086 6 Ryholt Kim Seals and History of the 14th and 15th Dynasties In Forstner Muller amp Moeller 2018 pp 235 276 Ryholt Kim 2004 The Turin King List Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 14 135 155 JSTOR 23788139 Ryholt Kim 1997 The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period c 1800 1550 B C Museum Tuscalanum Press ISBN 9788772894218 Sayce A H 1895 The Egypt of the Hebrews and Herodotos ISBN 978 3 7347 3964 4 Schneider Thomas 2006 The Relative Chronology of the Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos Period In Hornung Erik Krauss Rolf Warburton David A eds Ancient Egyptian Chronology Brill pp 168 196 ISBN 9004113851 Schneider Thomas 2008 Das Ende der Kurzen Chronologie Eine Kritische Bilanz der Debatte zur Absoluten Datierung des Mittleren Reiches und der Zweiten Zwischenzeit Agypten und Levante Egypt and the Levant 18 275 313 doi 10 1553 AEundL18s275 JSTOR 23788616 Schneider Thomas 2018 Hyksos Research in Egyptology and Egypt s Public Imagination A Brief Assessment of Fifty Years of Assessments Journal of Egyptian History 11 1 2 73 86 doi 10 1163 18741665 12340043 S2CID 240039656 Shaw Ian 2002 Israel Israelites In Shaw Ian Jameson Robert eds A Dictionary of Archaeology Wiley Blackwell p 313 ISBN 9780631235835 Steiner Margreet L Killebrew Ann E 2014 The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant c 8000 332 BCE Oxford Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 166254 6 Stiebing William H Jr 2009 Ancient Near Eastern History and Culture 2nd ed Routledge ISBN 978 0 321 42297 2 Van de Mieroop Marc 2011 A History of Ancient Egypt Wiley Blackwell ISBN 9781405160704 Verbrugghe Gerald P Wickersham John M 1996 Berossos and Manetho introduced and translated native traditions in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt University of Michigan Press ISBN 0472107224 Vos Howard 1999 Nelson s New Illustrated Bible Manners and Customs How the People of the Bible Really Lived Thomas Nelson ISBN 978 1 4185 8569 3 Wegner Josef 2015 A ROYAL NECROPOLIS AT SOUTH ABYDOS New Light on Egypt s Second Intermediate Period Near Eastern Archaeology 78 2 68 78 doi 10 5615 neareastarch 78 2 0068 JSTOR 10 5615 neareastarch 78 2 0068 S2CID 163519900 Weigall Arthur E P Brome 2016 A History of the Pharaohs Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 1 108 08291 4 Wilkinson Toby 2013 The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt Random House ISBN 9780553384901 Wilkinson Toby 2013a Lives of the Ancient Egyptians Thames and Hudson ISBN 978 0 500 77162 4 Willems Harco 2010 The First Intermediate Period and the Middle Kingdom In Lloyd Alan B ed A Companion to Ancient Egypt Vol 1 Wiley Blackwell pp 81 100 Zakrzewski Sonia Shortland Andrew Rowland Joanne 2015 Science in the Study of Ancient Egypt Routledge ISBN 978 1 317 39195 1 External links Edit Wikimedia Commons has media related to Hyksos Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Hyksos amp oldid 1136262874, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.