fbpx
Wikipedia

Spherical harmonics

In mathematics and physical science, spherical harmonics are special functions defined on the surface of a sphere. They are often employed in solving partial differential equations in many scientific fields.

Visual representations of the first few real spherical harmonics. Blue portions represent regions where the function is positive, and yellow portions represent where it is negative. The distance of the surface from the origin indicates the absolute value of in angular direction .

Since the spherical harmonics form a complete set of orthogonal functions and thus an orthonormal basis, each function defined on the surface of a sphere can be written as a sum of these spherical harmonics. This is similar to periodic functions defined on a circle that can be expressed as a sum of circular functions (sines and cosines) via Fourier series. Like the sines and cosines in Fourier series, the spherical harmonics may be organized by (spatial) angular frequency, as seen in the rows of functions in the illustration on the right. Further, spherical harmonics are basis functions for irreducible representations of SO(3), the group of rotations in three dimensions, and thus play a central role in the group theoretic discussion of SO(3).

Spherical harmonics originate from solving Laplace's equation in the spherical domains. Functions that are solutions to Laplace's equation are called harmonics. Despite their name, spherical harmonics take their simplest form in Cartesian coordinates, where they can be defined as homogeneous polynomials of degree in that obey Laplace's equation. The connection with spherical coordinates arises immediately if one uses the homogeneity to extract a factor of radial dependence from the above-mentioned polynomial of degree ; the remaining factor can be regarded as a function of the spherical angular coordinates and only, or equivalently of the orientational unit vector specified by these angles. In this setting, they may be viewed as the angular portion of a set of solutions to Laplace's equation in three dimensions, and this viewpoint is often taken as an alternative definition. Notice, however, that spherical harmonics are not functions on the sphere which are harmonic with respect to the Laplace-Beltrami operator for the standard round metric on the sphere: the only harmonic functions in this sense on the sphere are the constants, since harmonic functions satisfy the Maximum principle. Spherical harmonics, as functions on the sphere, are eigenfunctions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator (see the section Higher dimensions below).

A specific set of spherical harmonics, denoted or , are known as Laplace's spherical harmonics, as they were first introduced by Pierre Simon de Laplace in 1782.[1] These functions form an orthogonal system, and are thus basic to the expansion of a general function on the sphere as alluded to above.

Spherical harmonics are important in many theoretical and practical applications, including the representation of multipole electrostatic and electromagnetic fields, electron configurations, gravitational fields, geoids, the magnetic fields of planetary bodies and stars, and the cosmic microwave background radiation. In 3D computer graphics, spherical harmonics play a role in a wide variety of topics including indirect lighting (ambient occlusion, global illumination, precomputed radiance transfer, etc.) and modelling of 3D shapes.

History

 

Spherical harmonics were first investigated in connection with the Newtonian potential of Newton's law of universal gravitation in three dimensions. In 1782, Pierre-Simon de Laplace had, in his Mécanique Céleste, determined that the gravitational potential   at a point x associated with a set of point masses mi located at points xi was given by

 

Each term in the above summation is an individual Newtonian potential for a point mass. Just prior to that time, Adrien-Marie Legendre had investigated the expansion of the Newtonian potential in powers of r = |x| and r1 = |x1|. He discovered that if rr1 then

 

where γ is the angle between the vectors x and x1. The functions   are the Legendre polynomials, and they can be derived as a special case of spherical harmonics. Subsequently, in his 1782 memoir, Laplace investigated these coefficients using spherical coordinates to represent the angle γ between x1 and x. (See Applications of Legendre polynomials in physics for a more detailed analysis.)

In 1867, William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and Peter Guthrie Tait introduced the solid spherical harmonics in their Treatise on Natural Philosophy, and also first introduced the name of "spherical harmonics" for these functions. The solid harmonics were homogeneous polynomial solutions   of Laplace's equation

 
By examining Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates, Thomson and Tait recovered Laplace's spherical harmonics. (See the section below, "Harmonic polynomial representation".) The term "Laplace's coefficients" was employed by William Whewell to describe the particular system of solutions introduced along these lines, whereas others reserved this designation for the zonal spherical harmonics that had properly been introduced by Laplace and Legendre.

The 19th century development of Fourier series made possible the solution of a wide variety of physical problems in rectangular domains, such as the solution of the heat equation and wave equation. This could be achieved by expansion of functions in series of trigonometric functions. Whereas the trigonometric functions in a Fourier series represent the fundamental modes of vibration in a string, the spherical harmonics represent the fundamental modes of vibration of a sphere in much the same way. Many aspects of the theory of Fourier series could be generalized by taking expansions in spherical harmonics rather than trigonometric functions. Moreover, analogous to how trigonometric functions can equivalently be written as complex exponentials, spherical harmonics also possessed an equivalent form as complex-valued functions. This was a boon for problems possessing spherical symmetry, such as those of celestial mechanics originally studied by Laplace and Legendre.

The prevalence of spherical harmonics already in physics set the stage for their later importance in the 20th century birth of quantum mechanics. The (complex-valued) spherical harmonics   are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum operator

 
and therefore they represent the different quantized configurations of atomic orbitals.

Laplace's spherical harmonics

 
Real (Laplace) spherical harmonics   for   (top to bottom) and   (left to right). Zonal, sectoral, and tesseral harmonics are depicted along the left-most column, the main diagonal, and elsewhere, respectively. (The negative order harmonics   would be shown rotated about the z axis by   with respect to the positive order ones.)
 
Alternative picture for the real spherical harmonics  .

Laplace's equation imposes that the Laplacian of a scalar field f is zero. (Here the scalar field is understood to be complex, i.e. to correspond to a (smooth) function  .) In spherical coordinates this is:[2]

 

Consider the problem of finding solutions of the form f(r, θ, φ) = R(r) Y(θ, φ). By separation of variables, two differential equations result by imposing Laplace's equation:

 
The second equation can be simplified under the assumption that Y has the form Y(θ, φ) = Θ(θ) Φ(φ). Applying separation of variables again to the second equation gives way to the pair of differential equations
 
 

for some number m. A priori, m is a complex constant, but because Φ must be a periodic function whose period evenly divides 2π, m is necessarily an integer and Φ is a linear combination of the complex exponentials e± imφ. The solution function Y(θ, φ) is regular at the poles of the sphere, where θ = 0, π. Imposing this regularity in the solution Θ of the second equation at the boundary points of the domain is a Sturm–Liouville problem that forces the parameter λ to be of the form λ = ( + 1) for some non-negative integer with ≥ |m|; this is also explained below in terms of the orbital angular momentum. Furthermore, a change of variables t = cos θ transforms this equation into the Legendre equation, whose solution is a multiple of the associated Legendre polynomial Pm
(cos θ)
. Finally, the equation for R has solutions of the form R(r) = A r + B r − 1; requiring the solution to be regular throughout R3 forces B = 0.[3]

Here the solution was assumed to have the special form Y(θ, φ) = Θ(θ) Φ(φ). For a given value of , there are 2 + 1 independent solutions of this form, one for each integer m with m. These angular solutions   are a product of trigonometric functions, here represented as a complex exponential, and associated Legendre polynomials:

 

which fulfill

 

Here   is called a spherical harmonic function of degree and order m,   is an associated Legendre polynomial, N is a normalization constant, and θ and φ represent colatitude and longitude, respectively. In particular, the colatitude θ, or polar angle, ranges from 0 at the North Pole, to π/2 at the Equator, to π at the South Pole, and the longitude φ, or azimuth, may assume all values with 0 ≤ φ < 2π. For a fixed integer , every solution Y(θ, φ),  , of the eigenvalue problem

 
is a linear combination of  . In fact, for any such solution, r Y(θ, φ) is the expression in spherical coordinates of a homogeneous polynomial   that is harmonic (see below), and so counting dimensions shows that there are 2 + 1 linearly independent such polynomials.

The general solution   to Laplace's equation   in a ball centered at the origin is a linear combination of the spherical harmonic functions multiplied by the appropriate scale factor r,

 

where the   are constants and the factors r Ym are known as (regular) solid harmonics  . Such an expansion is valid in the ball

 

For  , the solid harmonics with negative powers of   (the irregular solid harmonics  ) are chosen instead. In that case, one needs to expand the solution of known regions in Laurent series (about  ), instead of the Taylor series (about  ) used above, to match the terms and find series expansion coefficients  .

Orbital angular momentum

In quantum mechanics, Laplace's spherical harmonics are understood in terms of the orbital angular momentum[4]

 
The ħ is conventional in quantum mechanics; it is convenient to work in units in which ħ = 1. The spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum
 
Laplace's spherical harmonics are the joint eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum and the generator of rotations about the azimuthal axis:
 

These operators commute, and are densely defined self-adjoint operators on the weighted Hilbert space of functions f square-integrable with respect to the normal distribution as the weight function on R3:

 
Furthermore, L2 is a positive operator.

If Y is a joint eigenfunction of L2 and Lz, then by definition

 
for some real numbers m and λ. Here m must in fact be an integer, for Y must be periodic in the coordinate φ with period a number that evenly divides 2π. Furthermore, since
 
and each of Lx, Ly, Lz are self-adjoint, it follows that λm2.

Denote this joint eigenspace by Eλ,m, and define the raising and lowering operators by

 
Then L+ and L commute with L2, and the Lie algebra generated by L+, L, Lz is the special linear Lie algebra of order 2,  , with commutation relations
 
Thus L+ : Eλ,mEλ,m+1 (it is a "raising operator") and L : Eλ,mEλ,m−1 (it is a "lowering operator"). In particular, Lk
+
 : Eλ,mEλ,m+k
must be zero for k sufficiently large, because the inequality λm2 must hold in each of the nontrivial joint eigenspaces. Let YEλ,m be a nonzero joint eigenfunction, and let k be the least integer such that
 
Then, since
 
it follows that
 
Thus λ = ( + 1) for the positive integer = m + k.

The foregoing has been all worked out in the spherical coordinate representation,   but may be expressed more abstractly in the complete, orthonormal spherical ket basis.

Harmonic polynomial representation

The spherical harmonics can be expressed as the restriction to the unit sphere of certain polynomial functions  . Specifically, we say that a (complex-valued) polynomial function   is homogeneous of degree   if

 
for all real numbers   and all  . We say that   is harmonic if
 
where   is the Laplacian. Then for each  , we define
 

For example, when  ,   is just the 3-dimensional space of all linear functions  , since any such function is automatically harmonic. Meanwhile, when  , we have a 5-dimensional space:

 

For any  , the space   of spherical harmonics of degree   is just the space of restrictions to the sphere   of the elements of  .[5] As suggested in the introduction, this perspective is presumably the origin of the term “spherical harmonic” (i.e., the restriction to the sphere of a harmonic function).

For example, for any   the formula

 
defines a homogeneous polynomial of degree   with domain and codomain  , which happens to be independent of  . This polynomial is easily seen to be harmonic. If we write   in spherical coordinates   and then restrict to  , we obtain
 
which can be rewritten as
 
After using the formula for the associated Legendre polynomial  , we may recognize this as the formula for the spherical harmonic  [6] (See the section below on special cases of the spherical harmonics.)

Conventions

Orthogonality and normalization

Several different normalizations are in common use for the Laplace spherical harmonic functions  . Throughout the section, we use the standard convention that for   (see associated Legendre polynomials)

 
which is the natural normalization given by Rodrigues' formula.
 
Plot of the spherical harmonic   with   and   and   in the complex plane from   to   with colors created with Mathematica 13.1 function ComplexPlot3D

In acoustics,[7] the Laplace spherical harmonics are generally defined as (this is the convention used in this article)

 
while in quantum mechanics:[8][9]
 

where   are associated Legendre polynomials without the Condon–Shortley phase (to avoid counting the phase twice).

In both definitions, the spherical harmonics are orthonormal

 
where δij is the Kronecker delta and dΩ = sin(θ) . This normalization is used in quantum mechanics because it ensures that probability is normalized, i.e.,
 

The disciplines of geodesy[10] and spectral analysis use

 

which possess unit power

 

The magnetics[10] community, in contrast, uses Schmidt semi-normalized harmonics

 

which have the normalization

 

In quantum mechanics this normalization is sometimes used as well, and is named Racah's normalization after Giulio Racah.

It can be shown that all of the above normalized spherical harmonic functions satisfy

 

where the superscript * denotes complex conjugation. Alternatively, this equation follows from the relation of the spherical harmonic functions with the Wigner D-matrix.

Condon–Shortley phase

One source of confusion with the definition of the spherical harmonic functions concerns a phase factor of  , commonly referred to as the Condon–Shortley phase in the quantum mechanical literature. In the quantum mechanics community, it is common practice to either include this phase factor in the definition of the associated Legendre polynomials, or to append it to the definition of the spherical harmonic functions. There is no requirement to use the Condon–Shortley phase in the definition of the spherical harmonic functions, but including it can simplify some quantum mechanical operations, especially the application of raising and lowering operators. The geodesy[11] and magnetics communities never include the Condon–Shortley phase factor in their definitions of the spherical harmonic functions nor in the ones of the associated Legendre polynomials.[12]

Real form

A real basis of spherical harmonics   can be defined in terms of their complex analogues   by setting

 
The Condon–Shortley phase convention is used here for consistency. The corresponding inverse equations defining the complex spherical harmonics   in terms of the real spherical harmonics   are
 

The real spherical harmonics   are sometimes known as tesseral spherical harmonics.[13] These functions have the same orthonormality properties as the complex ones   above. The real spherical harmonics   with m > 0 are said to be of cosine type, and those with m < 0 of sine type. The reason for this can be seen by writing the functions in terms of the Legendre polynomials as

 

The same sine and cosine factors can be also seen in the following subsection that deals with the Cartesian representation.

See here for a list of real spherical harmonics up to and including  , which can be seen to be consistent with the output of the equations above.

Use in quantum chemistry

As is known from the analytic solutions for the hydrogen atom, the eigenfunctions of the angular part of the wave function are spherical harmonics. However, the solutions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation without magnetic terms can be made real. This is why the real forms are extensively used in basis functions for quantum chemistry, as the programs don't then need to use complex algebra. Here, it is important to note that the real functions span the same space as the complex ones would.

For example, as can be seen from the table of spherical harmonics, the usual p functions ( ) are complex and mix axis directions, but the real versions are essentially just x, y, and z.

Spherical harmonics in Cartesian form

The complex spherical harmonics   give rise to the solid harmonics by extending from   to all of   as a homogeneous function of degree  , i.e. setting

 
It turns out that   is basis of the space of harmonic and homogeneous polynomials of degree  . More specifically, it is the (unique up to normalization) Gelfand-Tsetlin-basis of this representation of the rotational group   and an explicit formula for   in cartesian coordinates can be derived from that fact.

The Herglotz generating function

If the quantum mechanical convention is adopted for the  , then

 
Here,   is the vector with components  ,  , and
 
  is a vector with complex coordinates:

 

The essential property of   is that it is null:

 

It suffices to take   and   as real parameters. In naming this generating function after Herglotz, we follow Courant & Hilbert 1962, §VII.7, who credit unpublished notes by him for its discovery.

Essentially all the properties of the spherical harmonics can be derived from this generating function.[14] An immediate benefit of this definition is that if the vector   is replaced by the quantum mechanical spin vector operator  , such that   is the operator analogue of the solid harmonic  ,[15] one obtains a generating function for a standardized set of spherical tensor operators,  :

 

The parallelism of the two definitions ensures that the  's transform under rotations (see below) in the same way as the  's, which in turn guarantees that they are spherical tensor operators,  , with   and  , obeying all the properties of such operators, such as the Clebsch-Gordan composition theorem, and the Wigner-Eckart theorem. They are, moreover, a standardized set with a fixed scale or normalization.

Separated Cartesian form

The Herglotzian definition yields polynomials which may, if one wishes, be further factorized into a polynomial of   and another of   and  , as follows (Condon–Shortley phase):

 
and for m = 0:
 
Here
 
 
and
 
For   this reduces to
 

The factor   is essentially the associated Legendre polynomial  , and the factors   are essentially  .

Examples

Using the expressions for  ,  , and   listed explicitly above we obtain:

 
 
It may be verified that this agrees with the function listed here and here.

Real forms

Using the equations above to form the real spherical harmonics, it is seen that for   only the   terms (cosines) are included, and for   only the   terms (sines) are included:

 
and for m = 0:
 

Special cases and values

  1. When  , the spherical harmonics   reduce to the ordinary Legendre polynomials:
     
  2. When  ,
     
    or more simply in Cartesian coordinates,
     
  3. At the north pole, where  , and   is undefined, all spherical harmonics except those with   vanish:
     

Symmetry properties

The spherical harmonics have deep and consequential properties under the operations of spatial inversion (parity) and rotation.

Parity

The spherical harmonics have definite parity. That is, they are either even or odd with respect to inversion about the origin. Inversion is represented by the operator  . Then, as can be seen in many ways (perhaps most simply from the Herglotz generating function), with   being a unit vector,

 

In terms of the spherical angles, parity transforms a point with coordinates   to  . The statement of the parity of spherical harmonics is then

 
(This can be seen as follows: The associated Legendre polynomials gives (−1)+m and from the exponential function we have (−1)m, giving together for the spherical harmonics a parity of (−1).)

Parity continues to hold for real spherical harmonics, and for spherical harmonics in higher dimensions: applying a point reflection to a spherical harmonic of degree changes the sign by a factor of (−1).

Rotations

 
The rotation of a real spherical function with m = 0 and = 3. The coefficients are not equal to the Wigner D-matrices, since real functions are shown, but can be obtained by re-decomposing the complex functions

Consider a rotation   about the origin that sends the unit vector   to  . Under this operation, a spherical harmonic of degree   and order   transforms into a linear combination of spherical harmonics of the same degree. That is,

 
where   is a matrix of order   that depends on the rotation  . However, this is not the standard way of expressing this property. In the standard way one writes,
 
where   is the complex conjugate of an element of the Wigner D-matrix. In particular when   is a   rotation of the azimuth we get the identity,
 

The rotational behavior of the spherical harmonics is perhaps their quintessential feature from the viewpoint of group theory. The  's of degree   provide a basis set of functions for the irreducible representation of the group SO(3) of dimension  . Many facts about spherical harmonics (such as the addition theorem) that are proved laboriously using the methods of analysis acquire simpler proofs and deeper significance using the methods of symmetry.

Spherical harmonics expansion

The Laplace spherical harmonics   form a complete set of orthonormal functions and thus form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions  . On the unit sphere  , any square-integrable function   can thus be expanded as a linear combination of these:

 

This expansion holds in the sense of mean-square convergence — convergence in L2 of the sphere — which is to say that

 

The expansion coefficients are the analogs of Fourier coefficients, and can be obtained by multiplying the above equation by the complex conjugate of a spherical harmonic, integrating over the solid angle Ω, and utilizing the above orthogonality relationships. This is justified rigorously by basic Hilbert space theory. For the case of orthonormalized harmonics, this gives:

 

If the coefficients decay in sufficiently rapidly — for instance, exponentially — then the series also converges uniformly to f.

A square-integrable function   can also be expanded in terms of the real harmonics   above as a sum

 

The convergence of the series holds again in the same sense, namely the real spherical harmonics   form a complete set of orthonormal functions and thus form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of square-integrable functions  . The benefit of the expansion in terms of the real harmonic functions   is that for real functions   the expansion coefficients   are guaranteed to be real, whereas their coefficients   in their expansion in terms of the   (considering them as functions  ) do not have that property.

Spectrum analysis

Power spectrum in signal processing

The total power of a function f is defined in the signal processing literature as the integral of the function squared, divided by the area of its domain. Using the orthonormality properties of the real unit-power spherical harmonic functions, it is straightforward to verify that the total power of a function defined on the unit sphere is related to its spectral coefficients by a generalization of Parseval's theorem (here, the theorem is stated for Schmidt semi-normalized harmonics, the relationship is slightly different for orthonormal harmonics):

 
where
 

is defined as the angular power spectrum (for Schmidt semi-normalized harmonics). In a similar manner, one can define the cross-power of two functions as

 
where
spherical, harmonics, redirects, here, other, uses, disambiguation, mathematics, physical, science, spherical, harmonics, special, functions, defined, surface, sphere, they, often, employed, solving, partial, differential, equations, many, scientific, fields, . Ylm redirects here For other uses see YLM disambiguation In mathematics and physical science spherical harmonics are special functions defined on the surface of a sphere They are often employed in solving partial differential equations in many scientific fields Visual representations of the first few real spherical harmonics Blue portions represent regions where the function is positive and yellow portions represent where it is negative The distance of the surface from the origin indicates the absolute value of Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi in angular direction 8 f displaystyle theta varphi Since the spherical harmonics form a complete set of orthogonal functions and thus an orthonormal basis each function defined on the surface of a sphere can be written as a sum of these spherical harmonics This is similar to periodic functions defined on a circle that can be expressed as a sum of circular functions sines and cosines via Fourier series Like the sines and cosines in Fourier series the spherical harmonics may be organized by spatial angular frequency as seen in the rows of functions in the illustration on the right Further spherical harmonics are basis functions for irreducible representations of SO 3 the group of rotations in three dimensions and thus play a central role in the group theoretic discussion of SO 3 Spherical harmonics originate from solving Laplace s equation in the spherical domains Functions that are solutions to Laplace s equation are called harmonics Despite their name spherical harmonics take their simplest form in Cartesian coordinates where they can be defined as homogeneous polynomials of degree ℓ displaystyle ell in x y z displaystyle x y z that obey Laplace s equation The connection with spherical coordinates arises immediately if one uses the homogeneity to extract a factor of radial dependence r ℓ displaystyle r ell from the above mentioned polynomial of degree ℓ displaystyle ell the remaining factor can be regarded as a function of the spherical angular coordinates 8 displaystyle theta and f displaystyle varphi only or equivalently of the orientational unit vector r displaystyle mathbf r specified by these angles In this setting they may be viewed as the angular portion of a set of solutions to Laplace s equation in three dimensions and this viewpoint is often taken as an alternative definition Notice however that spherical harmonics are not functions on the sphere which are harmonic with respect to the Laplace Beltrami operator for the standard round metric on the sphere the only harmonic functions in this sense on the sphere are the constants since harmonic functions satisfy the Maximum principle Spherical harmonics as functions on the sphere are eigenfunctions of the Laplace Beltrami operator see the section Higher dimensions below A specific set of spherical harmonics denoted Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi or Y ℓ m r displaystyle Y ell m mathbf r are known as Laplace s spherical harmonics as they were first introduced by Pierre Simon de Laplace in 1782 1 These functions form an orthogonal system and are thus basic to the expansion of a general function on the sphere as alluded to above Spherical harmonics are important in many theoretical and practical applications including the representation of multipole electrostatic and electromagnetic fields electron configurations gravitational fields geoids the magnetic fields of planetary bodies and stars and the cosmic microwave background radiation In 3D computer graphics spherical harmonics play a role in a wide variety of topics including indirect lighting ambient occlusion global illumination precomputed radiance transfer etc and modelling of 3D shapes Contents 1 History 2 Laplace s spherical harmonics 2 1 Orbital angular momentum 3 Harmonic polynomial representation 4 Conventions 4 1 Orthogonality and normalization 4 2 Condon Shortley phase 4 3 Real form 4 3 1 Use in quantum chemistry 5 Spherical harmonics in Cartesian form 5 1 The Herglotz generating function 5 2 Separated Cartesian form 5 2 1 Examples 5 2 2 Real forms 6 Special cases and values 7 Symmetry properties 7 1 Parity 7 2 Rotations 8 Spherical harmonics expansion 9 Spectrum analysis 9 1 Power spectrum in signal processing 9 2 Differentiability properties 10 Algebraic properties 10 1 Addition theorem 10 2 Contraction rule 10 3 Clebsch Gordan coefficients 11 Visualization of the spherical harmonics 12 List of spherical harmonics 13 Higher dimensions 14 Connection with representation theory 15 Connection with hemispherical harmonics 15 1 Generalizations 16 See also 17 Notes 18 References 18 1 Cited references 18 2 General references 19 External linksHistory Edit Pierre Simon Laplace 1749 1827 Spherical harmonics were first investigated in connection with the Newtonian potential of Newton s law of universal gravitation in three dimensions In 1782 Pierre Simon de Laplace had in his Mecanique Celeste determined that the gravitational potential R 3 R displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb R at a point x associated with a set of point masses mi located at points xi was given byV x i m i x i x displaystyle V mathbf x sum i frac m i mathbf x i mathbf x Each term in the above summation is an individual Newtonian potential for a point mass Just prior to that time Adrien Marie Legendre had investigated the expansion of the Newtonian potential in powers of r x and r1 x1 He discovered that if r r1 then1 x 1 x P 0 cos g 1 r 1 P 1 cos g r r 1 2 P 2 cos g r 2 r 1 3 displaystyle frac 1 mathbf x 1 mathbf x P 0 cos gamma frac 1 r 1 P 1 cos gamma frac r r 1 2 P 2 cos gamma frac r 2 r 1 3 cdots where g is the angle between the vectors x and x1 The functions P i 1 1 R displaystyle P i 1 1 to mathbb R are the Legendre polynomials and they can be derived as a special case of spherical harmonics Subsequently in his 1782 memoir Laplace investigated these coefficients using spherical coordinates to represent the angle g between x1 and x See Applications of Legendre polynomials in physics for a more detailed analysis In 1867 William Thomson Lord Kelvin and Peter Guthrie Tait introduced the solid spherical harmonics in their Treatise on Natural Philosophy and also first introduced the name of spherical harmonics for these functions The solid harmonics were homogeneous polynomial solutions R 3 R displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb R of Laplace s equation 2 u x 2 2 u y 2 2 u z 2 0 displaystyle frac partial 2 u partial x 2 frac partial 2 u partial y 2 frac partial 2 u partial z 2 0 By examining Laplace s equation in spherical coordinates Thomson and Tait recovered Laplace s spherical harmonics See the section below Harmonic polynomial representation The term Laplace s coefficients was employed by William Whewell to describe the particular system of solutions introduced along these lines whereas others reserved this designation for the zonal spherical harmonics that had properly been introduced by Laplace and Legendre The 19th century development of Fourier series made possible the solution of a wide variety of physical problems in rectangular domains such as the solution of the heat equation and wave equation This could be achieved by expansion of functions in series of trigonometric functions Whereas the trigonometric functions in a Fourier series represent the fundamental modes of vibration in a string the spherical harmonics represent the fundamental modes of vibration of a sphere in much the same way Many aspects of the theory of Fourier series could be generalized by taking expansions in spherical harmonics rather than trigonometric functions Moreover analogous to how trigonometric functions can equivalently be written as complex exponentials spherical harmonics also possessed an equivalent form as complex valued functions This was a boon for problems possessing spherical symmetry such as those of celestial mechanics originally studied by Laplace and Legendre The prevalence of spherical harmonics already in physics set the stage for their later importance in the 20th century birth of quantum mechanics The complex valued spherical harmonics S 2 C displaystyle S 2 to mathbb C are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum operator i ℏ r displaystyle i hbar mathbf r times nabla and therefore they represent the different quantized configurations of atomic orbitals Laplace s spherical harmonics Edit Real Laplace spherical harmonics Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m for ℓ 0 4 displaystyle ell 0 dots 4 top to bottom and m 0 ℓ displaystyle m 0 dots ell left to right Zonal sectoral and tesseral harmonics are depicted along the left most column the main diagonal and elsewhere respectively The negative order harmonics Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m would be shown rotated about the z axis by 90 m displaystyle 90 circ m with respect to the positive order ones Alternative picture for the real spherical harmonics Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m Laplace s equation imposes that the Laplacian of a scalar field f is zero Here the scalar field is understood to be complex i e to correspond to a smooth function f R 3 C displaystyle f mathbb R 3 to mathbb C In spherical coordinates this is 2 2 f 1 r 2 r r 2 f r 1 r 2 sin 8 8 sin 8 f 8 1 r 2 sin 2 8 2 f f 2 0 displaystyle nabla 2 f frac 1 r 2 frac partial partial r left r 2 frac partial f partial r right frac 1 r 2 sin theta frac partial partial theta left sin theta frac partial f partial theta right frac 1 r 2 sin 2 theta frac partial 2 f partial varphi 2 0 Consider the problem of finding solutions of the form f r 8 f R r Y 8 f By separation of variables two differential equations result by imposing Laplace s equation 1 R d d r r 2 d R d r l 1 Y 1 sin 8 8 sin 8 Y 8 1 Y 1 sin 2 8 2 Y f 2 l displaystyle frac 1 R frac d dr left r 2 frac dR dr right lambda qquad frac 1 Y frac 1 sin theta frac partial partial theta left sin theta frac partial Y partial theta right frac 1 Y frac 1 sin 2 theta frac partial 2 Y partial varphi 2 lambda The second equation can be simplified under the assumption that Y has the form Y 8 f 8 8 F f Applying separation of variables again to the second equation gives way to the pair of differential equations 1 F d 2 F d f 2 m 2 displaystyle frac 1 Phi frac d 2 Phi d varphi 2 m 2 l sin 2 8 sin 8 8 d d 8 sin 8 d 8 d 8 m 2 displaystyle lambda sin 2 theta frac sin theta Theta frac d d theta left sin theta frac d Theta d theta right m 2 for some number m A priori m is a complex constant but because F must be a periodic function whose period evenly divides 2p m is necessarily an integer and F is a linear combination of the complex exponentials e imf The solution function Y 8 f is regular at the poles of the sphere where 8 0 p Imposing this regularity in the solution 8 of the second equation at the boundary points of the domain is a Sturm Liouville problem that forces the parameter l to be of the form l ℓ ℓ 1 for some non negative integer with ℓ m this is also explained below in terms of the orbital angular momentum Furthermore a change of variables t cos 8 transforms this equation into the Legendre equation whose solution is a multiple of the associated Legendre polynomial Pmℓ cos 8 Finally the equation for R has solutions of the form R r A rℓ B r ℓ 1 requiring the solution to be regular throughout R3 forces B 0 3 Here the solution was assumed to have the special form Y 8 f 8 8 F f For a given value of ℓ there are 2ℓ 1 independent solutions of this form one for each integer m with ℓ m ℓ These angular solutions Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C are a product of trigonometric functions here represented as a complex exponential and associated Legendre polynomials Y ℓ m 8 f N e i m f P ℓ m cos 8 displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi Ne im varphi P ell m cos theta which fulfillr 2 2 Y ℓ m 8 f ℓ ℓ 1 Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle r 2 nabla 2 Y ell m theta varphi ell ell 1 Y ell m theta varphi Here Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C is called a spherical harmonic function of degree ℓ and order m P ℓ m 1 1 R displaystyle P ell m 1 1 to mathbb R is an associated Legendre polynomial N is a normalization constant and 8 and f represent colatitude and longitude respectively In particular the colatitude 8 or polar angle ranges from 0 at the North Pole to p 2 at the Equator to p at the South Pole and the longitude f or azimuth may assume all values with 0 f lt 2p For a fixed integer ℓ every solution Y 8 f Y S 2 C displaystyle Y S 2 to mathbb C of the eigenvalue problemr 2 2 Y ℓ ℓ 1 Y displaystyle r 2 nabla 2 Y ell ell 1 Y is a linear combination of Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C In fact for any such solution rℓ Y 8 f is the expression in spherical coordinates of a homogeneous polynomial R 3 C displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb C that is harmonic see below and so counting dimensions shows that there are 2ℓ 1 linearly independent such polynomials The general solution f R 3 C displaystyle f mathbb R 3 to mathbb C to Laplace s equation D f 0 displaystyle Delta f 0 in a ball centered at the origin is a linear combination of the spherical harmonic functions multiplied by the appropriate scale factor rℓ f r 8 f ℓ 0 m ℓ ℓ f ℓ m r ℓ Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle f r theta varphi sum ell 0 infty sum m ell ell f ell m r ell Y ell m theta varphi where the f ℓ m C displaystyle f ell m in mathbb C are constants and the factors rℓ Yℓm are known as regular solid harmonics R 3 C displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb C Such an expansion is valid in the ballr lt R 1 lim sup ℓ f ℓ m 1 ℓ displaystyle r lt R frac 1 limsup ell to infty f ell m 1 ell For r gt R displaystyle r gt R the solid harmonics with negative powers of r displaystyle r the irregular solid harmonics R 3 0 C displaystyle mathbb R 3 setminus mathbf 0 to mathbb C are chosen instead In that case one needs to expand the solution of known regions in Laurent series about r displaystyle r infty instead of the Taylor series about r 0 displaystyle r 0 used above to match the terms and find series expansion coefficients f ℓ m C displaystyle f ell m in mathbb C Orbital angular momentum Edit In quantum mechanics Laplace s spherical harmonics are understood in terms of the orbital angular momentum 4 L i ℏ x L x i L y j L z k displaystyle mathbf L i hbar mathbf x times mathbf nabla L x mathbf i L y mathbf j L z mathbf k The ħ is conventional in quantum mechanics it is convenient to work in units in which ħ 1 The spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum L 2 r 2 2 r r 1 r r 1 sin 8 8 sin 8 8 1 sin 2 8 2 f 2 displaystyle begin aligned mathbf L 2 amp r 2 nabla 2 left r frac partial partial r 1 right r frac partial partial r amp frac 1 sin theta frac partial partial theta sin theta frac partial partial theta frac 1 sin 2 theta frac partial 2 partial varphi 2 end aligned Laplace s spherical harmonics are the joint eigenfunctions of the square of the orbital angular momentum and the generator of rotations about the azimuthal axis L z i x y y x i f displaystyle begin aligned L z amp i left x frac partial partial y y frac partial partial x right amp i frac partial partial varphi end aligned These operators commute and are densely defined self adjoint operators on the weighted Hilbert space of functions f square integrable with respect to the normal distribution as the weight function on R3 1 2 p 3 2 R 3 f x 2 e x 2 2 d x lt displaystyle frac 1 2 pi 3 2 int mathbb R 3 f x 2 e x 2 2 dx lt infty Furthermore L2 is a positive operator If Y is a joint eigenfunction of L2 and Lz then by definitionL 2 Y l Y L z Y m Y displaystyle begin aligned mathbf L 2 Y amp lambda Y L z Y amp mY end aligned for some real numbers m and l Here m must in fact be an integer for Y must be periodic in the coordinate f with period a number that evenly divides 2p Furthermore since L 2 L x 2 L y 2 L z 2 displaystyle mathbf L 2 L x 2 L y 2 L z 2 and each of Lx Ly Lz are self adjoint it follows that l m2 Denote this joint eigenspace by El m and define the raising and lowering operators byL L x i L y L L x i L y displaystyle begin aligned L amp L x iL y L amp L x iL y end aligned Then L and L commute with L2 and the Lie algebra generated by L L Lz is the special linear Lie algebra of order 2 s l 2 C displaystyle mathfrak sl 2 mathbb C with commutation relations L z L L L z L L L L 2 L z displaystyle L z L L quad L z L L quad L L 2L z Thus L El m El m 1 it is a raising operator and L El m El m 1 it is a lowering operator In particular Lk El m El m k must be zero for k sufficiently large because the inequality l m2 must hold in each of the nontrivial joint eigenspaces Let Y El m be a nonzero joint eigenfunction and let k be the least integer such that L k Y 0 displaystyle L k Y 0 Then since L L L 2 L z 2 L z displaystyle L L mathbf L 2 L z 2 L z it follows that 0 L L k Y l m k 2 m k Y displaystyle 0 L L k Y lambda m k 2 m k Y Thus l ℓ ℓ 1 for the positive integer ℓ m k The foregoing has been all worked out in the spherical coordinate representation 8 f l m Y l m 8 f displaystyle langle theta varphi lm rangle Y l m theta varphi but may be expressed more abstractly in the complete orthonormal spherical ket basis Harmonic polynomial representation EditSee also Higher dimensions The spherical harmonics can be expressed as the restriction to the unit sphere of certain polynomial functions R 3 C displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb C Specifically we say that a complex valued polynomial function p R 3 C displaystyle p mathbb R 3 to mathbb C is homogeneous of degree ℓ displaystyle ell ifp l x l ℓ p x displaystyle p lambda mathbf x lambda ell p mathbf x for all real numbers l R displaystyle lambda in mathbb R and all x R 3 displaystyle x in mathbb R 3 We say that p displaystyle p is harmonic if D p 0 displaystyle Delta p 0 where D displaystyle Delta is the Laplacian Then for each ℓ displaystyle ell we define A ℓ harmonic polynomials R 3 C that are homogeneous of degree ℓ displaystyle mathbf A ell left text harmonic polynomials mathbb R 3 to mathbb C text that are homogeneous of degree ell right For example when ℓ 1 displaystyle ell 1 A 1 displaystyle mathbf A 1 is just the 3 dimensional space of all linear functions R 3 C displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb C since any such function is automatically harmonic Meanwhile when ℓ 2 displaystyle ell 2 we have a 5 dimensional space A 2 span C x 1 x 2 x 1 x 3 x 2 x 3 x 1 2 x 2 2 x 1 2 x 3 2 displaystyle mathbf A 2 operatorname span mathbb C x 1 x 2 x 1 x 3 x 2 x 3 x 1 2 x 2 2 x 1 2 x 3 2 For any ℓ displaystyle ell the space H ℓ displaystyle mathbf H ell of spherical harmonics of degree ℓ displaystyle ell is just the space of restrictions to the sphere S 2 displaystyle S 2 of the elements of A ℓ displaystyle mathbf A ell 5 As suggested in the introduction this perspective is presumably the origin of the term spherical harmonic i e the restriction to the sphere of a harmonic function For example for any c C displaystyle c in mathbb C the formulap x 1 x 2 x 3 c x 1 i x 2 ℓ displaystyle p x 1 x 2 x 3 c x 1 ix 2 ell defines a homogeneous polynomial of degree ℓ displaystyle ell with domain and codomain R 3 C displaystyle mathbb R 3 to mathbb C which happens to be independent of x 3 displaystyle x 3 This polynomial is easily seen to be harmonic If we write p displaystyle p in spherical coordinates r 8 f displaystyle r theta varphi and then restrict to r 1 displaystyle r 1 we obtain p 8 f c sin 8 ℓ cos f i sin f ℓ displaystyle p theta varphi c sin theta ell cos varphi i sin varphi ell which can be rewritten as p 8 f c 1 cos 2 8 ℓ e i ℓ f displaystyle p theta varphi c left sqrt 1 cos 2 theta right ell e i ell varphi After using the formula for the associated Legendre polynomial P ℓ ℓ displaystyle P ell ell we may recognize this as the formula for the spherical harmonic Y ℓ ℓ 8 f displaystyle Y ell ell theta varphi 6 See the section below on special cases of the spherical harmonics Conventions EditOrthogonality and normalization Edit This section s factual accuracy is disputed Relevant discussion may be found on Talk Spherical harmonics Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced December 2017 Learn how and when to remove this template message Several different normalizations are in common use for the Laplace spherical harmonic functions S 2 C displaystyle S 2 to mathbb C Throughout the section we use the standard convention that for m gt 0 displaystyle m gt 0 see associated Legendre polynomials P ℓ m 1 m ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m displaystyle P ell m 1 m frac ell m ell m P ell m which is the natural normalization given by Rodrigues formula Plot of the spherical harmonic Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi with ℓ 2 displaystyle ell 2 and m 1 displaystyle m 1 and f p displaystyle varphi pi in the complex plane from 2 2 i displaystyle 2 2i to 2 2 i displaystyle 2 2i with colors created with Mathematica 13 1 function ComplexPlot3D In acoustics 7 the Laplace spherical harmonics are generally defined as this is the convention used in this article Y ℓ m 8 f 2 ℓ 1 4 p ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m cos 8 e i m f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi frac ell m ell m P ell m cos theta e im varphi while in quantum mechanics 8 9 Y ℓ m 8 f 1 m 2 ℓ 1 4 p ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m cos 8 e i m f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi 1 m sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi frac ell m ell m P ell m cos theta e im varphi where P ℓ m displaystyle P ell m are associated Legendre polynomials without the Condon Shortley phase to avoid counting the phase twice In both definitions the spherical harmonics are orthonormal 8 0 p f 0 2 p Y ℓ m Y ℓ m d W d ℓ ℓ d m m displaystyle int theta 0 pi int varphi 0 2 pi Y ell m Y ell m d Omega delta ell ell delta mm where dij is the Kronecker delta and dW sin 8 df d8 This normalization is used in quantum mechanics because it ensures that probability is normalized i e Y ℓ m 2 d W 1 displaystyle int Y ell m 2 d Omega 1 The disciplines of geodesy 10 and spectral analysis useY ℓ m 8 f 2 ℓ 1 ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m cos 8 e i m f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi sqrt 2 ell 1 frac ell m ell m P ell m cos theta e im varphi which possess unit power1 4 p 8 0 p f 0 2 p Y ℓ m Y ℓ m d W d ℓ ℓ d m m displaystyle frac 1 4 pi int theta 0 pi int varphi 0 2 pi Y ell m Y ell m d Omega delta ell ell delta mm The magnetics 10 community in contrast uses Schmidt semi normalized harmonicsY ℓ m 8 f ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m cos 8 e i m f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi sqrt frac ell m ell m P ell m cos theta e im varphi which have the normalization 8 0 p f 0 2 p Y ℓ m Y ℓ m d W 4 p 2 ℓ 1 d ℓ ℓ d m m displaystyle int theta 0 pi int varphi 0 2 pi Y ell m Y ell m d Omega frac 4 pi 2 ell 1 delta ell ell delta mm In quantum mechanics this normalization is sometimes used as well and is named Racah s normalization after Giulio Racah It can be shown that all of the above normalized spherical harmonic functions satisfyY ℓ m 8 f 1 m Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi 1 m Y ell m theta varphi where the superscript denotes complex conjugation Alternatively this equation follows from the relation of the spherical harmonic functions with the Wigner D matrix Condon Shortley phase Edit One source of confusion with the definition of the spherical harmonic functions concerns a phase factor of 1 m displaystyle 1 m commonly referred to as the Condon Shortley phase in the quantum mechanical literature In the quantum mechanics community it is common practice to either include this phase factor in the definition of the associated Legendre polynomials or to append it to the definition of the spherical harmonic functions There is no requirement to use the Condon Shortley phase in the definition of the spherical harmonic functions but including it can simplify some quantum mechanical operations especially the application of raising and lowering operators The geodesy 11 and magnetics communities never include the Condon Shortley phase factor in their definitions of the spherical harmonic functions nor in the ones of the associated Legendre polynomials 12 Real form Edit A real basis of spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 R displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb R can be defined in terms of their complex analogues Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C by settingY ℓ m i 2 Y ℓ m 1 m Y ℓ m if m lt 0 Y ℓ 0 if m 0 1 2 Y ℓ m 1 m Y ℓ m if m gt 0 i 2 Y ℓ m 1 m Y ℓ m if m lt 0 Y ℓ 0 if m 0 1 2 Y ℓ m 1 m Y ℓ m if m gt 0 2 1 m ℑ Y ℓ m if m lt 0 Y ℓ 0 if m 0 2 1 m ℜ Y ℓ m if m gt 0 displaystyle begin aligned Y ell m amp begin cases dfrac i sqrt 2 left Y ell m 1 m Y ell m right amp text if m lt 0 Y ell 0 amp text if m 0 dfrac 1 sqrt 2 left Y ell m 1 m Y ell m right amp text if m gt 0 end cases amp begin cases dfrac i sqrt 2 left Y ell m 1 m Y ell m right amp text if m lt 0 Y ell 0 amp text if m 0 dfrac 1 sqrt 2 left Y ell m 1 m Y ell m right amp text if m gt 0 end cases amp begin cases sqrt 2 1 m Im Y ell m amp text if m lt 0 Y ell 0 amp text if m 0 sqrt 2 1 m Re Y ell m amp text if m gt 0 end cases end aligned The Condon Shortley phase convention is used here for consistency The corresponding inverse equations defining the complex spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C in terms of the real spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 R displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb R are Y ℓ m 1 2 Y ℓ m i Y ℓ m if m lt 0 Y ℓ 0 if m 0 1 m 2 Y ℓ m i Y ℓ m if m gt 0 displaystyle Y ell m begin cases dfrac 1 sqrt 2 left Y ell m iY ell m right amp text if m lt 0 4pt Y ell 0 amp text if m 0 4pt dfrac 1 m sqrt 2 left Y ell m iY ell m right amp text if m gt 0 end cases The real spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 R displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb R are sometimes known as tesseral spherical harmonics 13 These functions have the same orthonormality properties as the complex ones Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C above The real spherical harmonics Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m with m gt 0 are said to be of cosine type and those with m lt 0 of sine type The reason for this can be seen by writing the functions in terms of the Legendre polynomials asY ℓ m 1 m 2 2 ℓ 1 4 p ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m cos 8 sin m f if m lt 0 2 ℓ 1 4 p P ℓ m cos 8 if m 0 1 m 2 2 ℓ 1 4 p ℓ m ℓ m P ℓ m cos 8 cos m f if m gt 0 displaystyle Y ell m begin cases left 1 right m sqrt 2 sqrt dfrac 2 ell 1 4 pi dfrac ell m ell m P ell m cos theta sin m varphi amp text if m lt 0 4pt sqrt dfrac 2 ell 1 4 pi P ell m cos theta amp text if m 0 4pt left 1 right m sqrt 2 sqrt dfrac 2 ell 1 4 pi dfrac ell m ell m P ell m cos theta cos m varphi amp text if m gt 0 end cases The same sine and cosine factors can be also seen in the following subsection that deals with the Cartesian representation See here for a list of real spherical harmonics up to and including ℓ 4 displaystyle ell 4 which can be seen to be consistent with the output of the equations above Use in quantum chemistry Edit As is known from the analytic solutions for the hydrogen atom the eigenfunctions of the angular part of the wave function are spherical harmonics However the solutions of the non relativistic Schrodinger equation without magnetic terms can be made real This is why the real forms are extensively used in basis functions for quantum chemistry as the programs don t then need to use complex algebra Here it is important to note that the real functions span the same space as the complex ones would For example as can be seen from the table of spherical harmonics the usual p functions ℓ 1 displaystyle ell 1 are complex and mix axis directions but the real versions are essentially just x y and z Spherical harmonics in Cartesian form EditThe complex spherical harmonics Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m give rise to the solid harmonics by extending from S 2 displaystyle S 2 to all of R 3 displaystyle mathbb R 3 as a homogeneous function of degree ℓ displaystyle ell i e settingR ℓ m v v ℓ Y ℓ m v v displaystyle R ell m v v ell Y ell m left frac v v right It turns out that R ℓ m displaystyle R ell m is basis of the space of harmonic and homogeneous polynomials of degree ℓ displaystyle ell More specifically it is the unique up to normalization Gelfand Tsetlin basis of this representation of the rotational group S O 3 displaystyle SO 3 and an explicit formula for R ℓ m displaystyle R ell m in cartesian coordinates can be derived from that fact The Herglotz generating function Edit If the quantum mechanical convention is adopted for the Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C thene v a r ℓ 0 m ℓ ℓ 4 p 2 ℓ 1 r ℓ v ℓ l m ℓ m ℓ m Y ℓ m r r displaystyle e v mathbf a cdot mathbf r sum ell 0 infty sum m ell ell sqrt frac 4 pi 2 ell 1 frac r ell v ell lambda m sqrt ell m ell m Y ell m mathbf r r Here r displaystyle mathbf r is the vector with components x y z R 3 displaystyle x y z in mathbb R 3 r r displaystyle r mathbf r and a z l 2 x i y 1 2 l x i y displaystyle mathbf a mathbf hat z frac lambda 2 left mathbf hat x i mathbf hat y right frac 1 2 lambda left mathbf hat x i mathbf hat y right a displaystyle mathbf a is a vector with complex coordinates a 1 2 1 l l i 2 1 l l 1 displaystyle mathbf a frac 1 2 frac 1 lambda lambda frac i 2 frac 1 lambda lambda 1 The essential property of a displaystyle mathbf a is that it is null a a 0 displaystyle mathbf a cdot mathbf a 0 It suffices to take v displaystyle v and l displaystyle lambda as real parameters In naming this generating function after Herglotz we follow Courant amp Hilbert 1962 VII 7 who credit unpublished notes by him for its discovery Essentially all the properties of the spherical harmonics can be derived from this generating function 14 An immediate benefit of this definition is that if the vector r displaystyle mathbf r is replaced by the quantum mechanical spin vector operator J displaystyle mathbf J such that Y ℓ m J displaystyle mathcal Y ell m mathbf J is the operator analogue of the solid harmonic r ℓ Y ℓ m r r displaystyle r ell Y ell m mathbf r r 15 one obtains a generating function for a standardized set of spherical tensor operators Y ℓ m J displaystyle mathcal Y ell m mathbf J e v a J ℓ 0 m ℓ ℓ 4 p 2 ℓ 1 v ℓ l m ℓ m ℓ m Y ℓ m J displaystyle e v mathbf a cdot mathbf J sum ell 0 infty sum m ell ell sqrt frac 4 pi 2 ell 1 frac v ell lambda m sqrt ell m ell m mathcal Y ell m mathbf J The parallelism of the two definitions ensures that the Y ℓ m displaystyle mathcal Y ell m s transform under rotations see below in the same way as the Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m s which in turn guarantees that they are spherical tensor operators T q k displaystyle T q k with k ℓ displaystyle k ell and q m displaystyle q m obeying all the properties of such operators such as the Clebsch Gordan composition theorem and the Wigner Eckart theorem They are moreover a standardized set with a fixed scale or normalization See also Spherical basis Separated Cartesian form Edit The Herglotzian definition yields polynomials which may if one wishes be further factorized into a polynomial of z displaystyle z and another of x displaystyle x and y displaystyle y as follows Condon Shortley phase r ℓ Y ℓ m Y ℓ m 2 ℓ 1 4 p 1 2 P ℓ m z 1 m A m i B m A m i B m m gt 0 displaystyle r ell begin pmatrix Y ell m Y ell m end pmatrix left frac 2 ell 1 4 pi right 1 2 bar Pi ell m z begin pmatrix left 1 right m A m iB m A m iB m end pmatrix qquad m gt 0 and for m 0 r ℓ Y ℓ 0 2 ℓ 1 4 p P ℓ 0 displaystyle r ell Y ell 0 equiv sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi bar Pi ell 0 Here A m x y p 0 m m p x p y m p cos m p p 2 displaystyle A m x y sum p 0 m binom m p x p y m p cos left m p frac pi 2 right B m x y p 0 m m p x p y m p sin m p p 2 displaystyle B m x y sum p 0 m binom m p x p y m p sin left m p frac pi 2 right and P ℓ m z ℓ m ℓ m 1 2 k 0 ℓ m 2 1 k 2 ℓ ℓ k 2 ℓ 2 k ℓ ℓ 2 k ℓ 2 k m r 2 k z ℓ 2 k m displaystyle bar Pi ell m z left frac ell m ell m right 1 2 sum k 0 left lfloor ell m 2 right rfloor 1 k 2 ell binom ell k binom 2 ell 2k ell frac ell 2k ell 2k m r 2k z ell 2k m For m 0 displaystyle m 0 this reduces to P ℓ 0 z k 0 ℓ 2 1 k 2 ℓ ℓ k 2 ℓ 2 k ℓ r 2 k z ℓ 2 k displaystyle bar Pi ell 0 z sum k 0 left lfloor ell 2 right rfloor 1 k 2 ell binom ell k binom 2 ell 2k ell r 2k z ell 2k The factor P ℓ m z displaystyle bar Pi ell m z is essentially the associated Legendre polynomial P ℓ m cos 8 displaystyle P ell m cos theta and the factors A m i B m displaystyle A m pm iB m are essentially e i m f displaystyle e pm im varphi Examples Edit Using the expressions for P ℓ m z displaystyle bar Pi ell m z A m x y displaystyle A m x y and B m x y displaystyle B m x y listed explicitly above we obtain Y 3 1 1 r 3 7 4 p 3 16 1 2 5 z 2 r 2 x i y 7 4 p 3 16 1 2 5 cos 2 8 1 sin 8 e i f displaystyle Y 3 1 frac 1 r 3 left tfrac 7 4 pi cdot tfrac 3 16 right 1 2 left 5z 2 r 2 right left x iy right left tfrac 7 4 pi cdot tfrac 3 16 right 1 2 left 5 cos 2 theta 1 right left sin theta e i varphi right Y 4 2 1 r 4 9 4 p 5 32 1 2 7 z 2 r 2 x i y 2 9 4 p 5 32 1 2 7 cos 2 8 1 sin 2 8 e 2 i f displaystyle Y 4 2 frac 1 r 4 left tfrac 9 4 pi cdot tfrac 5 32 right 1 2 left 7z 2 r 2 right left x iy right 2 left tfrac 9 4 pi cdot tfrac 5 32 right 1 2 left 7 cos 2 theta 1 right left sin 2 theta e 2i varphi right It may be verified that this agrees with the function listed here and here Real forms Edit Using the equations above to form the real spherical harmonics it is seen that for m gt 0 displaystyle m gt 0 only the A m displaystyle A m terms cosines are included and for m lt 0 displaystyle m lt 0 only the B m displaystyle B m terms sines are included r ℓ Y ℓ m Y ℓ m 2 ℓ 1 2 p P ℓ m z A m B m m gt 0 displaystyle r ell begin pmatrix Y ell m Y ell m end pmatrix sqrt frac 2 ell 1 2 pi bar Pi ell m z begin pmatrix A m B m end pmatrix qquad m gt 0 and for m 0 r ℓ Y ℓ 0 2 ℓ 1 4 p P ℓ 0 displaystyle r ell Y ell 0 equiv sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi bar Pi ell 0 Special cases and values EditWhen m 0 displaystyle m 0 the spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C reduce to the ordinary Legendre polynomials Y ℓ 0 8 f 2 ℓ 1 4 p P ℓ cos 8 displaystyle Y ell 0 theta varphi sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi P ell cos theta When m ℓ displaystyle m pm ell Y ℓ ℓ 8 f 1 ℓ 2 ℓ ℓ 2 ℓ 1 4 p sin ℓ 8 e i ℓ f displaystyle Y ell pm ell theta varphi frac mp 1 ell 2 ell ell sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi sin ell theta e pm i ell varphi or more simply in Cartesian coordinates r ℓ Y ℓ ℓ r 1 ℓ 2 ℓ ℓ 2 ℓ 1 4 p x i y ℓ displaystyle r ell Y ell pm ell mathbf r frac mp 1 ell 2 ell ell sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi x pm iy ell At the north pole where 8 0 displaystyle theta 0 and f displaystyle varphi is undefined all spherical harmonics except those with m 0 displaystyle m 0 vanish Y ℓ m 0 f Y ℓ m z 2 ℓ 1 4 p d m 0 displaystyle Y ell m 0 varphi Y ell m mathbf z sqrt frac 2 ell 1 4 pi delta m0 Symmetry properties EditThe spherical harmonics have deep and consequential properties under the operations of spatial inversion parity and rotation Parity Edit Main article Parity physics The spherical harmonics have definite parity That is they are either even or odd with respect to inversion about the origin Inversion is represented by the operator P PS r PS r displaystyle P Psi mathbf r Psi mathbf r Then as can be seen in many ways perhaps most simply from the Herglotz generating function with r displaystyle mathbf r being a unit vector Y ℓ m r 1 ℓ Y ℓ m r displaystyle Y ell m mathbf r 1 ell Y ell m mathbf r In terms of the spherical angles parity transforms a point with coordinates 8 f displaystyle theta varphi to p 8 p f displaystyle pi theta pi varphi The statement of the parity of spherical harmonics is thenY ℓ m 8 f Y ℓ m p 8 p f 1 ℓ Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle Y ell m theta varphi to Y ell m pi theta pi varphi 1 ell Y ell m theta varphi This can be seen as follows The associated Legendre polynomials gives 1 ℓ m and from the exponential function we have 1 m giving together for the spherical harmonics a parity of 1 ℓ Parity continues to hold for real spherical harmonics and for spherical harmonics in higher dimensions applying a point reflection to a spherical harmonic of degree ℓ changes the sign by a factor of 1 ℓ Rotations Edit The rotation of a real spherical function with m 0 and ℓ 3 The coefficients are not equal to the Wigner D matrices since real functions are shown but can be obtained by re decomposing the complex functions Consider a rotation R displaystyle mathcal R about the origin that sends the unit vector r displaystyle mathbf r to r displaystyle mathbf r Under this operation a spherical harmonic of degree ℓ displaystyle ell and order m displaystyle m transforms into a linear combination of spherical harmonics of the same degree That is Y ℓ m r m ℓ ℓ A m m Y ℓ m r displaystyle Y ell m mathbf r sum m ell ell A mm Y ell m mathbf r where A m m displaystyle A mm is a matrix of order 2 ℓ 1 displaystyle 2 ell 1 that depends on the rotation R displaystyle mathcal R However this is not the standard way of expressing this property In the standard way one writes Y ℓ m r m ℓ ℓ D m m ℓ R Y ℓ m r displaystyle Y ell m mathbf r sum m ell ell D mm ell mathcal R Y ell m mathbf r where D m m ℓ R displaystyle D mm ell mathcal R is the complex conjugate of an element of the Wigner D matrix In particular when r displaystyle mathbf r is a ϕ 0 displaystyle phi 0 rotation of the azimuth we get the identity Y ℓ m r Y ℓ m r e i m ϕ 0 displaystyle Y ell m mathbf r Y ell m mathbf r e im phi 0 The rotational behavior of the spherical harmonics is perhaps their quintessential feature from the viewpoint of group theory The Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m s of degree ℓ displaystyle ell provide a basis set of functions for the irreducible representation of the group SO 3 of dimension 2 ℓ 1 displaystyle 2 ell 1 Many facts about spherical harmonics such as the addition theorem that are proved laboriously using the methods of analysis acquire simpler proofs and deeper significance using the methods of symmetry Spherical harmonics expansion EditThe Laplace spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 C displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb C form a complete set of orthonormal functions and thus form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of square integrable functions L C 2 S 2 displaystyle L mathbb C 2 S 2 On the unit sphere S 2 displaystyle S 2 any square integrable function f S 2 C displaystyle f S 2 to mathbb C can thus be expanded as a linear combination of these f 8 f ℓ 0 m ℓ ℓ f ℓ m Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle f theta varphi sum ell 0 infty sum m ell ell f ell m Y ell m theta varphi This expansion holds in the sense of mean square convergence convergence in L2 of the sphere which is to say thatlim N 0 2 p 0 p f 8 f ℓ 0 N m ℓ ℓ f ℓ m Y ℓ m 8 f 2 sin 8 d 8 d f 0 displaystyle lim N to infty int 0 2 pi int 0 pi left f theta varphi sum ell 0 N sum m ell ell f ell m Y ell m theta varphi right 2 sin theta d theta d varphi 0 The expansion coefficients are the analogs of Fourier coefficients and can be obtained by multiplying the above equation by the complex conjugate of a spherical harmonic integrating over the solid angle W and utilizing the above orthogonality relationships This is justified rigorously by basic Hilbert space theory For the case of orthonormalized harmonics this gives f ℓ m W f 8 f Y ℓ m 8 f d W 0 2 p d f 0 p d 8 sin 8 f 8 f Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle f ell m int Omega f theta varphi Y ell m theta varphi d Omega int 0 2 pi d varphi int 0 pi d theta sin theta f theta varphi Y ell m theta varphi If the coefficients decay in ℓ sufficiently rapidly for instance exponentially then the series also converges uniformly to f A square integrable function f S 2 R displaystyle f S 2 to mathbb R can also be expanded in terms of the real harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 R displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb R above as a sumf 8 f ℓ 0 m ℓ ℓ f ℓ m Y ℓ m 8 f displaystyle f theta varphi sum ell 0 infty sum m ell ell f ell m Y ell m theta varphi The convergence of the series holds again in the same sense namely the real spherical harmonics Y ℓ m S 2 R displaystyle Y ell m S 2 to mathbb R form a complete set of orthonormal functions and thus form an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space of square integrable functions L R 2 S 2 displaystyle L mathbb R 2 S 2 The benefit of the expansion in terms of the real harmonic functions Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m is that for real functions f S 2 R displaystyle f S 2 to mathbb R the expansion coefficients f ℓ m displaystyle f ell m are guaranteed to be real whereas their coefficients f ℓ m displaystyle f ell m in their expansion in terms of the Y ℓ m displaystyle Y ell m considering them as functions f S 2 C R displaystyle f S 2 to mathbb C supset mathbb R do not have that property Spectrum analysis EditThis section needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section Unsourced material may be challenged and removed July 2020 Learn how and when to remove this template message Power spectrum in signal processing Edit The total power of a function f is defined in the signal processing literature as the integral of the function squared divided by the area of its domain Using the orthonormality properties of the real unit power spherical harmonic functions it is straightforward to verify that the total power of a function defined on the unit sphere is related to its spectral coefficients by a generalization of Parseval s theorem here the theorem is stated for Schmidt semi normalized harmonics the relationship is slightly different for orthonormal harmonics 1 4 p W f W 2 d W ℓ 0 S f f ℓ displaystyle frac 1 4 pi int Omega f Omega 2 d Omega sum ell 0 infty S f f ell where S f f ℓ 1 2 ℓ 1 m ℓ ℓ f ℓ m 2 displaystyle S f f ell frac 1 2 ell 1 sum m ell ell f ell m 2 is defined as the angular power spectrum for Schmidt semi normalized harmonics In a similar manner one can define the cross power of two functions as1 4 p W f W g W d W ℓ 0 S f g ℓ displaystyle frac 1 4 pi int Omega f Omega g ast Omega d Omega sum ell 0 infty S fg ell where S f g m, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.