fbpx
Wikipedia

Ob-Ugric languages

The Ob-Ugric languages are a commonly proposed branch of the Uralic languages, grouping together the Khanty (Ostyak) and Mansi (Vogul) languages. Both languages are split in numerous and highly divergent dialects. They, along with Hungarian, are often thought to comprise the Ugric branch of the Uralic languages, though the acceptance of Ugric is less frequent than acceptance of Ob-Ugric.[clarification needed]

Ob-Ugric
(controversial)
EthnicityOb-Ugrians[1]
Geographic
distribution
Western Siberia
Linguistic classificationUralic
Subdivisions
GlottologNone
Ob-Ugric languages at the beginning of the 20th century

The languages are spoken in the region between the Urals and the Ob River and the Irtysh in central Russia. The forests and forest steppes of the southern Urals are thought to be the original homeland of the Ugric branch. Beginning some 500 years ago the arrival of the Russians pushed the speakers eastward to the Ob and Irtysh. Some Mansi speakers remained west of the Urals until as late as the early 20th century. Hungarian split off during the 11th century BC.[2][3] The Ob-Ugric languages have also been strongly influenced by nearby Turkic languages, especially Tatar.[4]

Mansi has about 1,000 speakers while Khanty has about 10,000 speakers, all within Russia. Until 1930, these languages had no written or literary traditions, but since 1937 have used a modified Cyrillic alphabet. However, no significant texts have been created in these languages and they have few official usages.[5]

The term Ob-Ugric was introduced by the Finnish linguist August Ahlqvist who made expeditions to Western Siberia in 1858 and 1877 to study the Khanty and Mansi languages.[6][7][8]

Nature of the relationship edit

The status of the Ob-Ugric languages as a close areal grouping is clear, with adjacent varieties regularly sharing isoglosses and having loaned vocabulary back and forth (as well as from common external sources, e.g. from eastern dialects of Komi into northern dialects of Mansi and Khanty). This effect is particularly clear between the more eastern and northern varieties of Mansi, and the more western varieties of Khanty. Modern-day Northern Mansi and Northern Khanty continue to affect each other's evolution. Some areal similarities are also shared with their eastern Samoyedic relatives, in particular between Khanty and Selkup, but also Forest Nenets.[9] The relationship to Hungarian is looser: in their current state, the Ob-Ugric languages are radically different from Hungarian in phonology, syntax, and vocabulary.

The existence of a common Ob-Ugric period after the separation from Hungarian and the rest of Uralic is not universally accepted: some linguists treat all common features of Mansi and Khanty as either later convergence under mutual influence, or retentions from the common Ugric and earlier periods. Most Uralic classifications group Khanty and Mansi together even if they reject Ugric, but Salminen (2007)[10] and Janhunen (2009)[11] reject Ob-Ugric as well. (Janhunen classifies Hungarian and Mansi together, omitting Khanty.) Glottolog and Ethnologue take the agnostic approach of Salminen.

Typological features distinguishing the Ob-Ugric languages include:[12]

  • The lack of a systematic voicing contrast. /ɣ/, however, is a frequent consonant word-medially.
  • Retention of Proto-Uralic word-initial *w as /w/. (Also a feature of Nenets.)
  • Vowel harmony is found in the most archaic varieties, southern Mansi and eastern Khanty.
  • Ablaut of vowels, particularly in eastern Khanty
  • In the northern dialects: a change *k → /x/ before back vowels. (A similar change also occurred in Hungarian.)
  • Retention of subject–object–verb (SOV) word order
  • Retention of dual number
  • Partial or full replacement of the original 2nd person pronominal and suffixal elements; marked by the consonant /t/ in most Uralic languages but for the most part /n/ in Ob-Ugric.
  • A smaller case system than in other Uralic languages, including a lack of the genitive case.

References edit

  1. ^ Hajdú, Péter (1975). Finno-Ugrian Languages and Peoples. London: Deutsch. p. 119. ISBN 978-0-233-96552-9.
  2. ^ Hajdú, Péter (1981). Az uráli nyelvészet alapkérdései. Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest. ISBN 963-17-4219-9.
  3. ^ Jászó, Anna (1994). A magyar nyelv könyve. Trezor Kiadó, Budapest. ISBN 963-7685-42-1.
  4. ^ Greller, Wolfgang (2000-04-01). Encyclopedia of the Languages of Europe. Blackwell Publishing. p. 478. ISBN 0-631-22039-9.
  5. ^ "Ob-Ugric languages". Britannica. Retrieved 2024-02-06.
  6. ^ Ahlqvist, August (1882). Tutkimus sivistyssanoista obilais-ugrilaisten kansojen kielissä (in Finnish). Frenckell. The German translation Über die Kulturwörter der obisch-ugrischen Sprachen was published posthumously in 1890.
  7. ^ Ahlqvist, August (1880). "Vorwort". Ueber die Sprache der Nord-Ostjaken; Sprachtexte, Wörtersammlung und Grammatik. Abth. 1 (in German). Oxford University. Helsingfors.
  8. ^ Hajdú, Péter (1998). "A magyar–ugor vs. altaji összehasonlítótól az uráli nyelvészetig (via finnugor)" [From the Hungarian-Ugric vs. Altaic comparative study to Uralic linguistics (via Finno-Ugric)]. In Domokos, Péter; Csepregi, Márta (eds.). 125 éves a Budapesti Finnugor Tanszék: jubileumi kötet. Urálisztikai tanulmányok (in Hungarian). Budapest: ELTE, BFT. p. 60. ISBN 978-963-463-213-9.
  9. ^ Helimski, Eugene (2003). "Areal groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the borders of the Uralic language family: A survey" (PDF). Nyelvtudományi Közlemények: 160–163. ISSN 0029-6791. Retrieved 2014-10-31.
  10. ^ Salminen, Tapani (2007). "Europe and North Asia". In Christopher Moseley (ed.). Encyclopedia of the world's endangered languages. London: Routlegde. pp. 211–280.
  11. ^ Janhunen, Juha (2009). "Proto-Uralic—what, where and when?" (PDF). In Jussi Ylikoski (ed.). The Quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 258. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne. ISBN 978-952-5667-11-0. ISSN 0355-0230.
  12. ^ Kálmán, Bela (1988). "The History of the Ob-Ugric Languages". In Sinor, Denis (ed.). The Uralic Languages. Leiden: Brill.

External links edit

  • "Ob-Ugric Languages and Ob-Ugric Database". Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Retrieved 2024-02-06.

ugric, languages, commonly, proposed, branch, uralic, languages, grouping, together, khanty, ostyak, mansi, vogul, languages, both, languages, split, numerous, highly, divergent, dialects, they, along, with, hungarian, often, thought, comprise, ugric, branch, . The Ob Ugric languages are a commonly proposed branch of the Uralic languages grouping together the Khanty Ostyak and Mansi Vogul languages Both languages are split in numerous and highly divergent dialects They along with Hungarian are often thought to comprise the Ugric branch of the Uralic languages though the acceptance of Ugric is less frequent than acceptance of Ob Ugric clarification needed Ob Ugric controversial EthnicityOb Ugrians 1 GeographicdistributionWestern SiberiaLinguistic classificationUralicFinno Ugric Ugric Ob UgricSubdivisionsKhanty Ostyak Mansi Vogul GlottologNoneOb Ugric languages at the beginning of the 20th century The languages are spoken in the region between the Urals and the Ob River and the Irtysh in central Russia The forests and forest steppes of the southern Urals are thought to be the original homeland of the Ugric branch Beginning some 500 years ago the arrival of the Russians pushed the speakers eastward to the Ob and Irtysh Some Mansi speakers remained west of the Urals until as late as the early 20th century Hungarian split off during the 11th century BC 2 3 The Ob Ugric languages have also been strongly influenced by nearby Turkic languages especially Tatar 4 Mansi has about 1 000 speakers while Khanty has about 10 000 speakers all within Russia Until 1930 these languages had no written or literary traditions but since 1937 have used a modified Cyrillic alphabet However no significant texts have been created in these languages and they have few official usages 5 The term Ob Ugric was introduced by the Finnish linguist August Ahlqvist who made expeditions to Western Siberia in 1858 and 1877 to study the Khanty and Mansi languages 6 7 8 Nature of the relationship editThe status of the Ob Ugric languages as a close areal grouping is clear with adjacent varieties regularly sharing isoglosses and having loaned vocabulary back and forth as well as from common external sources e g from eastern dialects of Komi into northern dialects of Mansi and Khanty This effect is particularly clear between the more eastern and northern varieties of Mansi and the more western varieties of Khanty Modern day Northern Mansi and Northern Khanty continue to affect each other s evolution Some areal similarities are also shared with their eastern Samoyedic relatives in particular between Khanty and Selkup but also Forest Nenets 9 The relationship to Hungarian is looser in their current state the Ob Ugric languages are radically different from Hungarian in phonology syntax and vocabulary The existence of a common Ob Ugric period after the separation from Hungarian and the rest of Uralic is not universally accepted some linguists treat all common features of Mansi and Khanty as either later convergence under mutual influence or retentions from the common Ugric and earlier periods Most Uralic classifications group Khanty and Mansi together even if they reject Ugric but Salminen 2007 10 and Janhunen 2009 11 reject Ob Ugric as well Janhunen classifies Hungarian and Mansi together omitting Khanty Glottolog and Ethnologue take the agnostic approach of Salminen Typological features distinguishing the Ob Ugric languages include 12 The lack of a systematic voicing contrast ɣ however is a frequent consonant word medially Retention of Proto Uralic word initial w as w Also a feature of Nenets Vowel harmony is found in the most archaic varieties southern Mansi and eastern Khanty Ablaut of vowels particularly in eastern Khanty In the northern dialects a change k x before back vowels A similar change also occurred in Hungarian Retention of subject object verb SOV word order Retention of dual number Partial or full replacement of the original 2nd person pronominal and suffixal elements marked by the consonant t in most Uralic languages but for the most part n in Ob Ugric A smaller case system than in other Uralic languages including a lack of the genitive case References edit Hajdu Peter 1975 Finno Ugrian Languages and Peoples London Deutsch p 119 ISBN 978 0 233 96552 9 Hajdu Peter 1981 Az urali nyelveszet alapkerdesei Tankonyvkiado Budapest ISBN 963 17 4219 9 Jaszo Anna 1994 A magyar nyelv konyve Trezor Kiado Budapest ISBN 963 7685 42 1 Greller Wolfgang 2000 04 01 Encyclopedia of the Languages of Europe Blackwell Publishing p 478 ISBN 0 631 22039 9 Ob Ugric languages Britannica Retrieved 2024 02 06 Ahlqvist August 1882 Tutkimus sivistyssanoista obilais ugrilaisten kansojen kielissa in Finnish Frenckell The German translation Uber die Kulturworter der obisch ugrischen Sprachen was published posthumously in 1890 Ahlqvist August 1880 Vorwort Ueber die Sprache der Nord Ostjaken Sprachtexte Wortersammlung und Grammatik Abth 1 in German Oxford University Helsingfors Hajdu Peter 1998 A magyar ugor vs altaji osszehasonlitotol az urali nyelveszetig via finnugor From the Hungarian Ugric vs Altaic comparative study to Uralic linguistics via Finno Ugric In Domokos Peter Csepregi Marta eds 125 eves a Budapesti Finnugor Tanszek jubileumi kotet Uralisztikai tanulmanyok in Hungarian Budapest ELTE BFT p 60 ISBN 978 963 463 213 9 Helimski Eugene 2003 Areal groupings Sprachbunde within and across the borders of the Uralic language family A survey PDF Nyelvtudomanyi Kozlemenyek 160 163 ISSN 0029 6791 Retrieved 2014 10 31 Salminen Tapani 2007 Europe and North Asia In Christopher Moseley ed Encyclopedia of the world s endangered languages London Routlegde pp 211 280 Janhunen Juha 2009 Proto Uralic what where and when PDF In Jussi Ylikoski ed The Quasquicentennial of the Finno Ugrian Society Suomalais Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 258 Helsinki Societe Finno Ougrienne ISBN 978 952 5667 11 0 ISSN 0355 0230 Kalman Bela 1988 The History of the Ob Ugric Languages In Sinor Denis ed The Uralic Languages Leiden Brill External links edit Ob Ugric Languages and Ob Ugric Database Ludwig Maximilians Universitat Munchen Retrieved 2024 02 06 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Ob Ugric languages amp oldid 1218009295, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.