Energy medicine

"Spiritual Healing" redirects here. For the album by Death, see Spiritual Healing (album).

Energy medicine is a branch of alternative medicine based on a pseudo-scientific belief that healers can channel "healing energy" into a patient and effect positive results. The field is defined by shared beliefs and practices relating to mysticism and esotericism in the wider alternative medicine sphere rather than any sort of unified terminology, leading to terms such as energy healing or vibrational medicine being used as synonymous or alternative names. In most cases there is no empirically measurable energy involved: the term refers instead to so-called subtle energy. Practitioners may classify the practice as hands-on,^[1] hands-off,^[1] and distant^[1] (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations. Many schools of energy healing exist using many names: for example, biofield energy healing,^[2][3] spiritual healing,^[4] contact healing, distant healing, therapeutic touch,^[5] Reiki^[6] or Qigong.^[2]

Reviews of the scientific literature on energy healing have concluded that there is no evidence supporting clinical efficacy.^{[7][8][9][10][11][12]} The theoretical basis of healing has been criticised as implausible;^{[13][14][15][16]} research and reviews supportive of energy medicine have been faulted for containing methodological flaws^[17][18][19] and selection bias,^[17][18] and positive therapeutic results have been determined to result from known psychological mechanisms.^[17][18] Some claims of those purveying "energy medicine" devices are known to be fraudulent^[20] and their marketing practices have drawn law-enforcement action in the US.^[20]

History

History records the repeated association or exploitation of scientific inventions by individuals claiming that newly discovered science could help people to heal. In the 19th century, electricity and magnetism were in the "borderlands" of science and electrical quackery became rife.^[21] These concepts continue to inspire writers in the New Age movement.^[22] In the early 20th century health claims for radio-active materials put lives at risk,^[23] and recently quantum mechanics and grand unification theory have provided similar opportunities for commercial exploitation.^[24] Thousands of devices claiming to heal via putative or veritable energy are used worldwide. Many of them are illegal or dangerous and are marketed with false or unproven claims.^[20][25] Several of these devices have been banned.^{[26][failed verification][27][failed verification]} Reliance on spiritual and energetic healing is associated with serious harm or death when patients delay or forego medical treatment.^[28]

Classification

The term "energy medicine" has been in general use since the founding of the non-profit International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine in the 1980s. Guides are available for practitioners, and other books aim to provide a theoretical basis and evidence for the practice. Energy medicine often proposes that imbalances in the body's "energy field" result in illness, and that by re-balancing the body's energy-field health can be restored.^[29] Some modalities describe treatments as ridding the body of negative energies or blockages in 'mind'; illness or episodes of ill health after a treatment are referred to as a 'release' or letting go of a 'contraction' in the body-mind. Usually, a practitioner will then recommend further treatments for complete healing.

The US-based National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) distinguishes between health care involving scientifically observable energy, which it calls "Veritable Energy Medicine", and health care methods that invoke physically undetectable or unverifiable "energies", which it calls "Putative Energy Medicine":^[29]

• Types of "veritable energy medicine" include magnet therapy, colorpuncture, and light therapy. Medical techniques involving the use of electromagnetic radiation (e.g. radiation therapy or magnetic resonance imaging) are not considered "energy medicine" in the terms of alternative medicine.
• Types of "putative energy medicine" include biofield energy healing therapies that are claimed to direct or modulate "energies" to allow healing in the patient.^{[30][verification needed]} This includes spiritual healing, psychic healing, Therapeutic touch, Healing Touch, Hands of light, Esoteric healing, Magnetic healing (now a historical term not to be confused with magnet therapy), Qigong healing, Reiki, crystal healing, distant healing, intercessory prayer, and similar modalities.^[31][32] Concepts such as Qi (Chi), Prana, Innate Intelligence, Mana, Pneuma, vital fluid, Odic force, and orgone are among the many terms that have been used to describe these putative energy fields.^[31] This category does not include Acupuncture, Ayurvedic medicine, Chiropractic, Moxibustion and other modalities where a physical intervention is used to manipulate a putative energy.

Polarity therapy founded by Randolph Stone is a kind of energy medicine^[33] based on the belief that a person's health is subject to positive and negative charges in their electromagnetic field.^[34] It has been promoted as capable of curing a number of human ailments ranging from muscular tightness to cancer; however, according to the American Cancer Society "available scientific evidence does not support claims that polarity therapy is effective in treating cancer or any other disease".^[34]

Beliefs

 

A Reiki practitioner

There are various schools of energy healing, including biofield energy healing,^[2][3] spiritual healing,^[4] contact healing, distant healing, Pranic Healing, therapeutic touch,^[5] Reiki,^[6] and Qigong among others.^[2]

Spiritual healing occurs largely among practitioners who do not see traditional religious faith as a prerequisite for effecting cures. Faith healing by contrast takes place within a traditional or non-denominational religious context such as with some televangelists. The Buddha is often quoted by practitioners of energy medicine, but he did not practise "hands on or off" healing.^{[citation needed]}

Energy healing techniques such as Therapeutic touch have found recognition in the nursing profession. In 2005–2006, the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association approved the diagnosis of "energy field disturbance" in patients, reflective of what has been variously called a "postmodern" or "anti-scientific" approach to nursing care. This approach has been strongly criticised.^[35][36][37]

Believers in these techniques have proposed quantum mystical invocations of non-locality to try to explain distant healing.^[14] They have also proposed that healers act as a channel passing on a kind of bioelectromagnetism which shares similarities to vitalistic pseudosciences such as orgone or qi.^[15][16] Writing in the Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, James Oschman^[38] introduced the concept of healer-sourced electromagnetic fields which change in frequency. Oschman believes that "healing energy" derives from electromagnetic frequencies generated by a medical device, projected from the hands of the healer, or by electrons acting as antioxidants.^[39] Beverly Rubik, in an article in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, justified her belief with references to biophysical systems theory, bioelectromagnetics, and chaos theory that provide her with a "...scientific foundation for the biofield..."^[40] Drew Leder remarked in a paper in the same journal that such ideas were attempts to "make sense of, interpret, and explore 'psi' and distant healing." and that "such physics-based models are not presented as explanatory but rather as suggestive."^[41]

Physicists and sceptics criticise these explanations as pseudophysics – a branch of pseudoscience which explains magical thinking by using irrelevant jargon from modern physics to exploit scientific illiteracy and to impress the unsophisticated.^[13] Indeed, even enthusiastic supporters of energy healing say that "there are only very tenuous theoretical foundations underlying [spiritual] healing".^[32]

Scientific investigations

Distant healing

A systematic review of 23 trials of distant healing published in 2000 did not draw definitive conclusions because of the methodological limitations among the studies.^[42] In 2001 the lead author of that study, Edzard Ernst, published a primer on complementary therapies in cancer care in which he explained that though "about half of these trials suggested that healing is effective", the evidence was "highly conflicting" and that "methodological shortcomings prevented firm conclusions." He concluded that "as long as it is not used as an alternative to effective therapies, spiritual healing should be virtually devoid of risks."^[4] A 2001 randomised clinical trial by the same group found no statistically significant difference on chronic pain between distance healers and "simulated healers".^[8] A 2003 review by Ernst updating previous work concluded that the weight of evidence had shifted against the use of distant healing, and that it can be associated with adverse effects."^[43]

Contact healing

A 2001 randomised clinical trial randomly assigned 120 patients with chronic pain to either healers or "simulated healers", but could not demonstrate efficacy for either distance or face-to-face healing.^[8] A systematic review in 2008 concluded that the evidence for a specific effect of spiritual healing on relieving neuropathic or neuralgic pain was not convincing.^[11] In their 2008 book Trick or Treatment, Simon Singh and Edzard Ernst concluded that "spiritual healing is biologically implausible and its effects rely on a placebo response. At best it may offer comfort; at worst it can result in charlatans taking money from patients with serious conditions who require urgent conventional medicine."^[12]

Evidence base

Alternative medicine researcher Edzard Ernst has said that although an initial review of pre-1999 distant healing trials^[42] had highlighted 57% of trials as showing positive results.^[4] Later reviews of non-randomised and randomised clinical trials conducted between 2000 and 2002^[43] led to the conclusion that "the majority of the rigorous trials do not support the hypothesis that distant healing has specific therapeutic effects." Ernst described the evidence base for healing practices to be "increasingly negative".^[10] Many of the reviews were also under suspicion for fabricated data, lack of transparency, and scientific misconduct. He concluded that "[s]piritual healing continues to be promoted despite the absence of biological plausibility or convincing clinical evidence ... that these methods work therapeutically and plenty to demonstrate that they do not."^[10] A 2014 study of energy healing for colorectal cancer patients showed no improvement in quality of life, depressive symptoms, mood, or sleep quality.^[44]

Earthing

The Earthing Institute gathers researchers and therapists who believe that to maintain or regain good health it is necessary to restore direct contact with Earth by removing floors, carpets and especially shoes.^[45] Walking barefoot and sleeping on the ground are conceived as useful tools for achieving the "earthing" (or "grounding") of our bodies. It is claimed that thanks to earthing one would benefit from the "extraordinary healing power" of Nature by means of the transferral of electrons from the Earth's surface to the body: "a primordial and naturally stabilized electric reference point for all body biological circuits is created."^[46] According to its practitioners, Earthing has preventive and curative effects on chronic inflammation, aging-related disorders, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, arthritis, autoimmune disorders, cancer, and even depression and autism.^[46]

The concept of earthing has been criticized as pseudoscience by skeptics and the medical community.^[47][45][48] A review of the available literature^[49] on the subject was written by several people that are financially tied to the company espousing the practice of earthing. Steven Novella referred to the work as "typical of the kind of worthless studies designed to generate false positives—the kind of in-house studies that companies sometimes use so that they can claim their products are clinically proven."^[47]

Bioresonance therapy

Bioresonance therapy (including MORA therapy and BICOM^[50]) is a pseudoscientific medical practice in which it is proposed that electromagnetic waves can be used to diagnose and treat human illness.^[51]

History and method

Bioresonance therapy was invented (in Germany) in 1977 by Franz Morell and his son-in-law, engineer Erich Rasche. Initially they marketed it as "MORA-Therapie", for MOrell and RAsche. Some of the machines contain an electronic circuit measuring skin-resistance, akin to the E-meter used by Scientology, which the bioresonance creators sought to improve; Franz Morell had links with Scientology.^{[52][53][unreliable source?]}

Practitioners claim to be able to detect a variety of diseases and addictions. Some practitioners also claim they can treat diseases using this therapy without drugs, by stimulating a change of "bioresonance" in the cells, and reversing the change caused by the disease. The devices would need to be able to isolate and pinpoint pathogens' responses from the mixture of responses the device receives via the electrodes.^[54] Transmitting these transformed signals over the same electrodes is claimed by practitioners to generate healing signals that have the curative effect.^[55]

Scientific evaluation

Lacking any scientific explanation of how bioresonance therapy might work, researchers have classified bioresonance therapy as pseudoscience.^[56] Some studies did not show effects above that of the placebo effect.^[57][58] WebMD states: "There is no reliable scientific evidence that bioresonance is an accurate indicator of medical conditions or disease or an effective treatment for any condition."^[59]

Proven cases of online fraud have occurred,^[60] with a practitioner making false claims that he had the ability to cure cancer, and that his clients did not need to follow the chemotherapy or surgery recommended by medical doctors, which can be life-saving. Ben Goldacre ridiculed the BBC when it reported as fact a clinic's claim that the treatment had the ability to stop 70% of clients smoking, a better result than any conventional therapy.^[61]

In the United States of America the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies "devices that use resistance measurements to diagnose and treat various diseases" as Class III devices, which require FDA approval prior to marketing. The FDA has banned some of these devices from the US market,^[62] and has prosecuted many sellers of electrical devices for making false claims of health benefits.^[63]

According to Quackwatch, the therapy is completely nonsensical and the proposed mechanism of action impossible.^[55]

Explanations for positive reports

There are several, primarily psychological, explanations for positive reports after energy therapy, including placebo effects, spontaneous remission, and cognitive dissonance. A 2009 review found that the "small successes" reported for two therapies collectively marketed as "energy psychology" (Emotional Freedom Techniques and Tapas Acupressure Technique) "are potentially attributable to well-known cognitive and behavioral techniques that are included with the energy manipulation." The report concluded that "[p]sychologists and researchers should be wary of using such techniques, and make efforts to inform the public about the ill effects of therapies that advertise miraculous claims."^[17]

There are primarily two explanations for anecdotes of cures or improvements, relieving any need to appeal to the supernatural.^[64] The first is post hoc ergo propter hoc, meaning that a genuine improvement or spontaneous remission may have been experienced coincidental with but independent from anything the healer or patient did or said. These patients would have improved just as well even had they done nothing. The second is the placebo effect, through which a person may experience genuine pain relief and other symptomatic alleviation. In this case, the patient genuinely has been helped by the healer – not through any mysterious or numinous function, but by the power of their own belief that they would be healed.^[65][66] In both cases the patient may experience a real reduction in symptoms, though in neither case has anything miraculous or inexplicable occurred. Both cases are strictly limited to the body's natural abilities.

Positive findings from research studies can also result from such psychological mechanisms, or as a result of experimenter bias, methodological flaws such as lack of blinding,^[17] or publication bias; positive reviews of the scientific literature may show selection bias, in that they omit key studies that do not agree with the author's position.^[17][18] All of these factors must be considered when evaluating claims.

See also

• Albert Abrams
• Electromagnetic therapy (alternative medicine)
• Electrotherapy
• Energy field disturbance
• Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951
• Hologram bracelet
• Magnetic resonance therapy
• Prayer
• Psychokinesis
• Radionics
• Royal Commission on Animal Magnetism
• The Sunflower Jam
• Witchcraft Acts
• Zero Balancing
• List of branches of alternative medicine
• List of ineffective cancer treatments
• List of unproven and disproven cancer treatments

References

1. Jules Evans (July 14, 2008). . The Times. London. Archived from the original on May 14, 2009.
2. Network newsletter; MD Anderson Cancer Center (2007). . Archived from the original on November 25, 2010. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
3. Jain, Shamini; Mills, Paul J. (October 2007). "Biofield Therapies: Helpful or Full of Hype?". International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 17 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1007/s12529-009-9062-4. PMC 2816237. PMID 19856109.
4. Ernst, Edzard (2001). "A primer of complementary and alternative medicine commonly used by cancer patients". Medical Journal of Australia. 174 (2): 88–92. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143161.x. PMID 11245510. S2CID 45055625. from the original on January 29, 2012. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
5. "Therapeutic Touch". Cancer.org. June 2, 2008. from the original on May 6, 2015. Retrieved September 20, 2010.
6. "Reiki Practice". Nccih.nih.gov. from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved September 20, 2010.
7. Hall, Harriet (January 26, 2010). "Faith Healing". sciencebasedmedicine.org. from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved February 29, 2020. ...When faith healings have been diligently investigated by qualified doctors, they have found no evidence that the patients were actually helped in any objective sense. Even at Lourdes, the Catholic Church has only recognized 4 cures since 1978, out of 5 million people who seek healing there every year. There simply is no evidence that faith healing heals. Not what science considers evidence. And the true believers don't value evidence or the scientific method: for them, belief is enough.
8. Abbot, NC; Harkness, EF; Stevinson, C; Marshall, FP; Conn, DA; Ernst, E. (2001). "Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized, clinical trial". Pain. 91 (1–2): 79–89. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00421-8. PMID 11240080. S2CID 29383311.
9. Ernst E. (April 30, 2003). "Distant healing—an update of a systematic review". Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 115 (7–8): 241–245. doi:10.1007/BF03040322. PMID 12778776. S2CID 28737150. Since the publication of our previous systematic review in 2000, several rigorous new studies have emerged. Collectively they shift the weight of the evidence against the notion that distant healing is more than a placebo.
10. Ernst E. (November 2006). "Spiritual healing: more than meets the eye". J Pain Symptom Manage. 32 (5): 393–5. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.07.010. PMID 17085260. from the original on May 12, 2020. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
11. Pittler, MH; Ernst, E. (2008). "Complementary Therapies for Neuropathic and Neuralgic Pain: Systematic Review". Clinical Journal of Pain. 24 (8): 731–733. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181759231. PMID 18806539. S2CID 11070739.
12. Singh, S; Ernst, E. (2008). Trick or Treatment. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 324.
13. Richard Gist; Bernard Lubin (1999). Response to disaster: psychosocial, community, and ecological approaches in clinical and community psychology. Psychology Press. p. 291. ISBN 978-0-87630-998-8.
14. Stephen Barrett (April 11, 2007). "Some Notes on the American Academy of Quantum Medicine (AAQM)". from the original on October 27, 2018. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
15. Stenger, Victor J. (1999). . The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. 3 (1): 16–21. Archived from the original on May 8, 2016.
16. Eduard Kruglyakov (September 30, 2004). "What threat does pseudoscience pose to society?". Social Sciences. 3 (3): 74–88. from the original on December 14, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
17. McCaslin DL (June 2009). "A review of efficacy claims in energy psychology". Psychotherapy. 46 (2): 249–56. doi:10.1037/a0016025. PMID 22122622.
18. Pignotti, M.; Thyer, B. (2009). "Some comments on "Energy psychology: A review of the evidence": Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence?". Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 46 (2): 257–261. doi:10.1037/a0016027. PMID 22122623. S2CID 20690978.
19. Agdal, R; von b Hjelmborg, J; Johannessen, H (2011). "Energy healing for cancer: A critical review". Forschende Komplementärmedizin. 18 (3): 146–54. doi:10.1159/000329316. PMID 21701183. S2CID 23616760.
20. Michael J. Berens; Christine Willmsen. . Seattle Times. Archived from the original on November 20, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007.
21. Jonas, WB; Crawford, CC (March–April 2003). "Science and spiritual healing: a critical review of spiritual healing, "energy" medicine, and intentionality". Altern Ther Health Med. 9 (2): 56–61. PMID 12652884.
22. Bruce Clarke (November 8, 2001). Energy Forms: Allegory and Science in the Era of Classical Thermodynamics. University of Michigan Press. p. Clarke, Bruce. ISBN 978-0-472-11174-9.
23. Gray, Theodore (August 2004). "For That Healthy Glow, Drink Radiation!". Popular Science. 265 (2): 28. ISSN 0161-7370.
24. Athearn, D. (1994). Scientific Nihilism: On the Loss and Recovery of Physical Explanation (SUNY Series in Philosophy). Albany, New York: State University Of New York Press.
25. . CBC News: Marketplace. Archived from the original on February 9, 2010. The EPFX -- which stands for Electro Physiological Feedback Xrroid -- claims to help everything from stress to Alzheimer's. [...] Even though the device is only licensed for use in Canada by Health Canada as a biofeedback device for stress reduction, people are turning to the EPFX for help with AIDS and even cancer.
26. Michael J. Berens; Christine Willmsen (January 30, 2008). "Fraudulent medical devices targeted". Seattle Times. from the original on May 5, 2022. Retrieved January 30, 2008.
27. CBC Marketplace. "Is the EPFX still allowed to be sold in Canada?". CBC. from the original on March 23, 2009. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
28. "What_is_this_site?". from the original on August 3, 2020. Retrieved May 14, 2013.
29. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2005). "Energy Medicine: An Overview". Archived from the original on May 22, 2016. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
30. Warber, S. L.; Straughn, J.; Kile, G. (December 2004). "Biofield Energy Healing from the Inside". The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 10 (6): 1107–1113. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.580.5798. doi:10.1089/acm.2004.10.1107. hdl:2027.42/63331. PMID 15674009. from the original on April 3, 2015. Retrieved September 9, 2017.
31. Nicaise, Alexander (July 28, 2011). "NCCAM Studies of "Energy Medicine" Are a Waste of Money | Quackwatch". from the original on May 1, 2021. Retrieved March 19, 2021.
32. Hodges, RD; Scofield, AM (1995). "Is spiritual healing a valid and effective therapy?". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 88 (4): 203–207. PMC 1295164. PMID 7745566.
33. "Polarity Therapy". Wellness Institute. from the original on October 3, 2016. Retrieved October 19, 2016.
34. Russell J, Rovere A, eds. (2009). "Polarity Therapy". American Cancer Society Complete Guide to Complementary and Alternative Cancer Therapies (2nd ed.). American Cancer Society. pp. 235–237. ISBN 9780944235713.
35. Sarah Glazer (2000). "Postmodern nursing". National Affairs. from the original on September 26, 2020. Retrieved April 12, 2011.
36. Hammer, Owen; James Underdown (November–December 2009). "State-Sponsored Quackery: Feng Shui and Snake Oil for California Nurses". Skeptical Inquirer. Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. 33 (6): 53–56. from the original on October 29, 2017. Retrieved June 28, 2011.
37. Junkfood Science Special: Trusting nurses with our lives April 15, 2023, at the Wayback Machine by Sandy Szwarc, BSN, RN, CCP. July 6, 2007.
38. Oschman, James L. (1997). "What is healing energy? Part 3: silent pulses". Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 1 (3): 179–189. doi:10.1016/S1360-8592(97)80038-1. from the original on April 20, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2010.
39. Oschman, James (November 9, 2007). "Can Electrons Act as Antioxidants? A Review and Commentary". The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 13 (9): 955–967. doi:10.1089/acm.2007.7048. PMID 18047442.
40. Rubik, Beverly (2002). "The Biofield Hypothesis: Its Biophysical Basis and Role in Medicine". Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 8 (6): 703–17. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.477.480. doi:10.1089/10755530260511711. PMID 12614524.
41. Leder, D (2005). ""Spooky actions at a distance": physics, psi, and distant healing". Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 11 (5): 923–30. doi:10.1089/acm.2005.11.923. PMID 16296928.
42. Astin, J.; et al. (2000). "The Efficacy of "Distant Healing: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials". Annals of Internal Medicine. 132 (11): 903–910. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-132-11-200006060-00009. PMID 10836918. S2CID 53089000.
43. Ernst E. (2003). "Distant healing—an update of a systematic review". Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 115 (7–8): 241–245. doi:10.1007/BF03040322. PMID 12778776. S2CID 28737150.
44. CG Pedersen; H Johannessen; JV Hjelmborg; R Zachariae (June 2014). "Effectiveness of energy healing on Quality of Life: a pragmatic intervention trial in colorectal cancer patients". Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 22 (3): 463–72. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2014.04.003. PMID 24906586.
45. Hall, H. (June 21, 2016). "Barefoot in Sedona: Bogus Claims About Grounding Your Feet to Earth Promote Medical Pseudoscience". Skeptic.com. from the original on August 4, 2021. Retrieved May 4, 2018.
46. "What is Earthing". The Earthing Institute. May 14, 2016. from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved September 10, 2021.
47. Novella, S. (May 2012). "Earthing". theness.com. from the original on September 16, 2021. Retrieved May 4, 2018.
48. Dunning, B. "ARE YOU A GROUNDED PERSON?". skepticblog.org. from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved May 4, 2018.
49. Chevalier, G.; Sinatra, S. T.; Oschman, J. L.; Sokal, K.; Sokal, P. (October 4, 2011). "Earthing: Health Implications of Reconnecting the Human Body to the Earth's Surface Electrons". Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2012: 291541. doi:10.1155/2012/291541. PMC 3265077. PMID 22291721.
50. "Bioresonance therapy. MORA therapy. BICOM (Biocommunication)". Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski: Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego. 1 (4): 294–298. 1996. PMID 9156952.
51. Ernst E. (June 2004). "Bioresonance, a study of pseudo-scientific language". Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd. 11 (3): 171–173. doi:10.1159/000079446. PMID 15249751. S2CID 9442559.
52. "FAQ". www.bioenergeticmedicine.org. from the original on May 29, 2015. Retrieved November 27, 2016.
53. "Scientology und die Bioresonanztherapie" [Scientology and the theory of bioresonance] (PDF). ABI INFO (in German). Stuttgart: Aktion Bildungsinformation e.V. November 14, 2003. p. 1. (PDF) from the original on March 17, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2010. Die Bioresonanztherapie geht auf eine angebliche Entdeckung des im Jahr 1990 verstorbenen Frankfurter Arztes und hochrangigen Scientologen Dr. Franz Morell zurück. [Translation: Bioresonance therapy dates from the alleged discovery made by the Frankfurt doctor and high-rank Scientologist Dr Franz Morell, who died in 1990.]
54. "Efficacy Study into Bioresonance Therapy". Bioresonance.com. November 26, 2016. from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved November 27, 2016.
55. Stephen Barrett, M.D. (November 6, 2004). "BioResonance Tumor Therapy". Quackwatch. from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved August 10, 2013.
56. Galle M (October 2004). "[Bioresonance, a study of pseudo-scientific language]". Forsch Komplementärmed Klass Naturheilkd (in German). 11 (5): 306, author reply 306. doi:10.1159/000082152. PMID 15580708.
57. Wüthrich B (2005). (PDF). J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 15 (2): 86–90. PMID 16047707. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 12, 2013.
58. Schöni MH, Nikolaizik WH, Schöni-Affolter F (March 1997). "Efficacy trial of bioresonance in children with atopic dermatitis". Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 112 (3): 238–46. doi:10.1159/000237460. PMID 9066509.
59. "BIORESONANCE Overview Information". WeMD. WebMD, LLC. 2014. from the original on February 6, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2017. There is no reliable scientific evidence that bioresonance is an accurate indicator of medical conditions or disease or an effective treatment for any condition.
60. ""BioResonance" Promoter Settles Charges". October 28, 2002. from the original on February 6, 2018. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
61. Goldacre, Ben (November 12, 2005). "Who's holding a smoking gun to bioresonance?". The Guardian. from the original on February 5, 2018. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
62. Alan E. Smith (2007). "Bioresonance Therapy (BRT)". UnBreak Your Health: The Complete Guide to Complementary & Alternative Therapies. Loving Healing Press. pp. 29. ISBN 978-1-932690-36-1.
63. "BioResonance Therapy". Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. May 29, 2012. from the original on October 2, 2012. Retrieved August 10, 2013.
64. "Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Cancer Patients: Faith Healing". Moores UCSD Cancer Center. from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved January 17, 2008. "Benefits may result because of the natural progression of the illness, rarely but regularly occurring spontaneous remission or through the placebo effect."
65. Park, Robert L. (2000). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. New York City: Oxford University Press. pp. 50–51. ISBN 978-0-19-513515-2.
66. "Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Cancer Patients: Faith Healing". Moores UCSD Cancer Center. from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved January 17, 2008. "Patients who seek the assistance of a faith healer must believe strongly in the healer's divine gifts and ability to focus them on the ill."

Further reading

Bioresonance therapy

• "Your Friday Dose of Woo: MORA the same ol' same ol' woo". ScienceBlogs. May 16, 2008. Retrieved February 22, 2014.
• Wandtke F, Biorensonanz-Allergietest versus pricktest und RAST, Allergologie 1993, 16, p. 144
• Wille A, Bioresonance therapy (biophysical information therapy) in stuttering children, Forsch Komplementärmed, 1999 Feb; 6 Suppl 1:50-2
• Hörner M, Bioresonanz: Anspruch einer Methode und Ergebnis einer technischen Überprüfung, Allergologie, 1995, 18 S. 302
• Kofler H, Bioresonanz bei Pollinose. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung zur diagnostischen und therapeutischen Wertigkeit, Allergologie 1996, 19, p. 114
• Niggemann B, Unkonventionelle Verfahren in der Allergologie. Kontroverse oder Alternative? Allergologie 2002, 25, p. 34
• Schultze-Werninghaus, paramedizinische Verfahren: Bioresonanzdiagnostik und -Therapie, Allergo J, 1993, 2, pp. 40–2

External links

 

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Energy medicine.

• NIH Energy medicine: overview.
• : a Seattle Times series on fraudulent energy medicine devices
• What Is Complementary and Alternative Medicine? Other CAM Practices^{[permanent dead link]} "biofield".
• An overview of the pseudoscience behind "bioresonance therapy": "Electrodiagnostic" Devices