fbpx
Wikipedia

Cohabitation

April 12, 2024

This article is about a living arrangement. For the situation in governmental politics, see Cohabitation (government). For a non-marital romantic relationship, see Free union.

Cohabitation is an arrangement where people who are not married, usually couples, live together. They are often involved in a romantic or sexually intimate relationship on a long-term or permanent basis. Such arrangements have become increasingly common in Western countries since the late 20th century, being led by changing social views, especially regarding marriage, gender roles and religion.

More broadly, the term cohabitation can mean any number of people living together. To "cohabit", in a broad sense, means to "coexist".[1] The origin of the term comes from the mid 16th century, from the Latin cohabitare, from co- 'together' + habitare 'dwell'.[1]

Social changes leading to increase edit

 
Percentage of births to unmarried women, selected countries, 1980 and 2007[2]

Today, cohabitation is a common pattern among people in the Western world.

In Europe, the Scandinavian countries have been the first to start this leading trend, although many countries have since followed.[3] Mediterranean Europe has traditionally been very conservative, with religion playing a strong role. Until the mid-1990s, cohabitation levels remained low in this region, but have since increased;[4] for example, in Portugal, the majority of children have been born of unwed parents since 2015, constituting 60% of the total in 2021.[5]

In the United States, during the past few decades, there has been an increase in unmarried couples cohabiting.[6] Historically, many Western countries have been influenced by Christian doctrines on sex, which opposes unmarried cohabitation. As social norms have changed, such beliefs have become less widely held by the population and some Christian denominations today view cohabitation as a precursor to marriage.[7] Pope Francis has married a cohabiting couple who had children,[8] while former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams[9] and the Archbishop of York John Sentamu have expressed tolerance of cohabitation.[10]

In recent decades, high rates of participation of women in the workforce and the widespread availability of highly effective long acting reversible contraceptives[11] has led to women making individual choices over their reproduction with decreased reliance on male partners for financial stability. All these changes favored living arrangement alternatives to marriage.[12]

In Central and Eastern Europe, during the late 1980s and early 1990s, there were major political changes, such as the fall of Communist governments. These societies entered a new era of increased social freedom, less rigid rules, and less authoritarian governments. They interacted with Western Europe and some became members of the European Union. As a result, the patterns of family life have started to change: marriage rates have declined, and marriage was postponed to a later age. Cohabitation and births to unmarried mothers increased, and in some countries the increase was very quick.[13]

The deinstitutionalization of marriage refers to the weakening of the social and legal norms that regulate peoples' behavior in regard to marriage.[14] The rise in cohabitation is part of other major social changes such as: higher divorce rate, older age at first marriage and childbearing, and more births outside marriage. Factors such as secularization, increased participation of women in the labor force, changing in the meaning of marriage, risk reduction, individualism, and changing views on sexuality have been cited as contributing to these social changes.[15] There has also been a change in modern sexual ethics, with a focus on consent, rather than marital status (i.e. decriminalization of adultery and fornication; criminalization of marital rape), reflecting new concepts about the role and purpose of sexual interaction, and new conceptualizations of female sexuality and of self-determination.[16] There have been objections against the legal and social regulation of female sexuality; with such regulations being often seen as violations of women's rights.[a] In addition, some individuals may feel that marriage is unnecessary or outdated, leading to couples not formalizing their relation.[18] For instance, in the European Values Study (EVS) of 2008, the percentage of respondents who agreed with the assertion that "Marriage is an outdated institution" was 37.5% in Luxembourg, 35.4% in France, 34.3% in Belgium, 31.2% in Spain, 30.5% in Austria, 29.2% in Germany, 27.7% in Switzerland, 27.2% in Bulgaria, 27.0% in the Netherlands, 25.0% in Slovenia.[19]

The fact that many couples choose to live together without formalizing their relation is also recognized by the European Union. A 2004 directive forbids EU members from denying entry or residence of partners "with whom the Union citizen has a durable relationship, duly attested."[20]

Reasons for cohabitation in the United States edit

Main article: Cohabitation in the United States

Today, cohabitation in the United States is often a part of the dating process.[21] In fact, "cohabitation is increasingly becoming the first coresidential union formed among young adults".[22] In 1996, more than two-thirds of married couples in the US said that they lived together before getting married.[23] "In 1994, there were 3.7 million cohabiting couples in the United States."[24] This is a major increase from a few decades ago. According to Dr. Galena Rhoades, "Before 1970, living together outside marriage was uncommon, but by the late 1990s at least 50% to 60% of couples lived together premaritally."[25]

People may live together for a number of reasons. Cohabitants could live together to save money, because of the convenience of living with another, or a need to find housing.[21] Lower income individuals facing financial uncertainty may delay or avoid marriage, not only because of the difficulty of paying for a wedding[26] but also because of fear of financial hardship if a marriage were to end in divorce.[27]

When given a survey of the reasons why they cohabit, most couples listed reasons such as spending more time together, convenience-based reasons, and testing their relationships, while few gave the reason that they do not believe in marriage.[28] The extremely high costs of housing and tight budgets of today's economy are also factors that can lead a couple to cohabitation.[23]

Today sixty percent of all marriages are preceded by a period of cohabitation.[29] Researchers suggest that couples live together as a way of trying out marriage to test compatibility with their partners, while still having the option of ending the relationship without legal implications.[30] In 1996, "More than three-quarters of all cohabitors report[ed] plans to marry their partners, which implies that most of them viewed cohabitation as a prelude to marriage."[24] Cohabitation shares many qualities with marriage, often couples who are cohabiting share a residence, personal resources, exclude intimate relations with others and, in more than 10% of cohabiting couples, have children.[24] "Many young adults believe cohabitation is a good way to test their relationships prior to marriage."[28] Couples who have plans to marry before moving in together or who are engaged before cohabiting typically marry within two years of living together.[31] The state of cohabitation of a couple often ends either in marriage or in break-up; according to a 1996 study about 10% of cohabiting unions remained in this state more than five years.[24] According to a survey done by The National Center for Health Statistics, "over half of marriages from 1990-1994 among women began as cohabitation."[22]

Cohabitation can be an alternative to marriage in situations where marriage is not possible for legal or religious reasons (such as same-sex, interracial or interreligious marriages).[31]

Cohabitation, sometimes called de facto marriage, is becoming more commonly known as a substitute for conventional marriage.[citation needed] Common-law marriage in the United States can still be contracted in nine US states, and in two others under restriction.[b] This helps provide the surviving partner a legal basis for inheriting the decedent's belongings in the event of the death of their cohabiting partner. In today's cohabiting relationships, forty percent of households include children, giving an idea of how cohabitation could be considered a new normative type of family dynamic.[29] In 2012, 41% of all births in the US were to unmarried women.[35] In three states (Mississippi – 55%, Louisiana – 53%, and New Mexico – 52%) births outside marriage were in the majority; the lowest percentage of births outside marriage was in Utah, at 19%.[36] During the period 2006–2010, 58% of births outside marriage were to cohabiting parents.[37]

Contemporary objections to cohabitation edit

Contemporary objections to cohabiting couples include religious opposition to non-marital unions, social pressure for couples to get married, and potential effects of cohabitation on a child's development.

The rise in the number of cohabiting couples and children born out of wedlock in the Western world has made cohabitation a strong focus of sociological research.[38] The rise in cohabiting couples in the United States, from around 450,000 in 1960 to 7.5 million in 2011[39] has been accompanied by US research performed on child development within cohabiting households.[40] Opponents of cohabitation say non-marital parenting is an unsuitable environment for a child's development. One study from 2002 correlated lower numeracy skills and higher delinquency to children of cohabiting couples;[40] however, recent studies that control for factors including poverty, the educational level of parents and violence in the home show children of cohabiting couples are developmentally similar to peers of comparable married couples.[41]

Effect on children edit

In 2001, researchers compared teenage children in the United States living in a cohabiting household (a single mother and her boyfriend who was not related to the teenager) against peers in single-parent households. The results showed white and Hispanic teenagers had lower performance in school, greater risk of suspension or expulsion than peers from single-parent households, and the same rate of behavioral and emotional problems.[42]

A study on the 1995 and 2002 National Survey of Family Growth found increases in both the prevalence and duration of unmarried cohabitation.[43] The study found that 40% of children in the United States would live in a cohabiting household by age 12, and children born to single mothers were more likely than those born to married mothers to live in a cohabiting household. The percentage of women ages 19–44 who had ever cohabited increased from 45% in 1995 to 54% in 2002.[43]

In 2002, 63% of women who graduate from high school were found to spend some time cohabiting, compared to only 45% of women with a four-year college degree.[43] Cohabiting couples who have children often get married. One study found that children born of parents who cohabit are 90% more likely to end up living in households with married parents than children born to single mothers. 67% of unmarried Hispanic mothers are expected to marry, while 40% of African American mothers are expected to marry.[43]

Religious views edit

Main article: Fornication
See also: Marriage § Marriage and religion, and Extramarital sex § Religions

Studies have found that religious affiliation correlates with cohabitation and marriage entry.[44] People frequently cite religious reasons for their opposition to cohabitation. The Roman Catholic Church and nearly all mainstream Protestant denominations around the world oppose cohabitation and consider it to be the sin of fornication.[45][46][47] However, others, such as the Church of England "welcome cohabiting couples in the Church and encourage them to regard cohabitation as a prelude to Christian marriage."[48]

Religion can also lead to societal pressures against cohabitation especially within highly religious communities.[49] Some couples may refrain from cohabitation because one or both partners fear disappointing or alienating conservative family members.[44] Young adults who grew up in families that oppose cohabitation have lower rates than their peers.[50]

The increase in cohabitation in the United States and other developed nations has been linked to the secularization of those countries.[51] Researchers have noted that changes in the religious demographics of a society have accompanied the rise in cohabitation.[49]

Non-marital and same-sex relationships are forbidden by the Islamic law of Zina,[45] and cohabitation is against the law in many Muslim majority countries including Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan,[52][53] Iran,[53] Kuwait,[54] Maldives,[55] Morocco,[56] Oman,[57] Mauritania,[58] United Arab Emirates,[59][60][61] Sudan,[62] and Yemen.[63]

Effects on marriage and family life edit

Likelihood of split edit

Conflicting studies on the effect of cohabitation on subsequent marriage have been published. In countries where the majority of people disapprove of unmarried individuals living together, or a minority of the population cohabits before marriage, marriages resulting from cohabitation are more prone to divorce. But in a study on European countries, those where around half of the population cohabits before marriage, cohabitation is not selective of divorce-prone individuals, and no difference in couples that have cohabited before and after marriage is observed.[64][65] In countries such as Italy, the increased risk of marital disruption for people who experienced premarital cohabitation can be entirely attributed to the selection of the most divorce-prone into cohabitation.[66]

In 2002, the CDC found that for married couples the likelihood percentage of the relationship ending after five years is 20%, for unmarried cohabitators the likelihood percentage is 49%. After 10 years the likelihood percentage for the relationship to end is 33% for married couples and 62% for unmarried cohabitators.[67][68] One German study found that in regions with high rates of childbirth to cohabitating parents, no negative effect is observed in cohabitation. The study states "union stability of cohabiting mothers is positively related to their prevalence".[38]

A 2004 study of 136 couples (272 individuals) from researchers at the University of Denver found differences among couples that cohabited before engagement, after engagement, or not until marriage. The longitudinal study collected survey data before marriage and 10 months into marriage, with findings suggesting those who cohabit before engagement are at greater risk for poor marital outcomes than those who cohabit only after engagement or at marriage.[69] A follow-up survey by the researches of over 1,000 married men and women married in the past 10 years found those who moved in with a lover before engagement or marriage reported significantly lower quality marriages and a greater possibility of a separation than other couples.[70] About 20% of those who cohabited before getting engaged had since suggested splitting – compared with only 12% of those who only moved in together after getting engaged and 10% who did not cohabit prior to marriage.[71]

Another 2004 study of 92 couples linked communication to cohabitation and instability. They found that married couples who cohabited before they were married had more negative problem-solving and communication skills. They also found that those who had cohabited expressed more (verbal) aggression throughout their conversations. This negative communication could be contributing to the cohabitation effect and causing a larger amount of marital instability.[72]

The researchers from Denver suggest that relationships with pre-engagement cohabitation "may wind up sliding into marriage",[71] whereas those that only cohabit post engagement or marriage make a more clear decision. This could explain their 2006 study of 197 heterosexual couples finding that men who cohabited with their spouse before engagement were less dedicated than men who cohabited only after engagement or not at all before marriage.[73] In some heterosexual couples, women are more likely to understand cohabitation as an intermediary step preceding marriage, and men more likely to perceive it without an explicit connection to marriage.[23][74][75]

An analysis of data from the CDC's National Survey of Family Growth data from 1988, 1995, and 2002 suggests that the positive relationship between premarital cohabitation and marital instability has weakened for more recent birth and marriage cohorts, as the total number of couples cohabiting before marriage has increased.[76]

Later CDC work found that between 2002 and 2006-2010, the number of couples in opposite-sex cohabiting relationships increased from 9.0% to 11.2% for women, and from 9.2% to 12.2% for men.[77] Drawing on the 2006–2008 data, Princeton University researchers examined whether and to what extent variation in premarital cohabitation experiences influence marital stability. They found that the relationship between cohabitation and marital instability is complex and depends in part on marriage cohort, race/ethnicity, and marriage plans. Their analyses reveal that a 'cohabitation effect' exists only for women married prior to 1996, and that, until marriage plans are considered, there is no cohabitation effect among women married since 1996.[78]

Recent research from 2011 by the Pew Research Center has found that the number of couples that cohabit before marriage has increased. 44% of adults (and more than half of 30- to 49-year-olds) say they have cohabited at some point. Nearly two-thirds of adults who ever cohabited (64%) say they thought about it as a step toward marriage. The report also notes a trend toward rising public acceptance of cohabiting couples over the years. Most Americans now say the rise in unmarried couples living together either makes no difference to society (46%) or is good for society (9%).[79]

A 2012 study found that, among cohabiting individuals, those who were engaged prior to cohabitation or had "definite plans for marriage" were linked to lower risks of marital instability among women, but the relationship was not observed with men.[80]

One study on low to moderate income couples living with minor children found that respondents who became sexually involved within the first month of their relationship were correlated to lower scores of relationship quality among women.[81] Another study found respondents to a mail-in survey self-reported higher levels of commitment in the cohabiting group, as well as lower relationship satisfaction and more negative communication.[82]

A 2018 study found that cohabiting before marriage was linked to a lower risk of divorce during the first year of marriage, but a greater risk of divorce in the long run.[83] However, a report published by the Council on Contemporary Families that same year found that couples who cohabited before marriage were less likely to divorce than couples who did not.[84]

Abuse and infidelity edit

University of Chicago sociologist Linda Waite[85] found that "16 percent of cohabiting women reported that arguments with their partners became physical during the past year, while only 5 percent of married women had similar experiences." Most cohabiting couples have a faithful relationship, but Waite's surveys also demonstrated that 20% of cohabiting women reported having secondary sex partners, compared to only 4% of married women.[86]

According to an article by Judith Treas and Deirdre Giesen, cohabiting couples are twice as likely to experience infidelity within the relationship than married couples.[87]

Fertility edit

Regarding cohabitation as a fertility factor, a large survey in the United States came to the result that married women had an average of 1.9 children, compared to 1.3 among those cohabiting. The corresponding numbers for men were 1.7 and 1.1, respectively. The difference of 0.6 children for both sexes was expected to decrease to between 0.2 and 0.3 over the lifetime when correcting for the confounder that married people have their children earlier in life.[88]

A study of the United States and multiple countries in Europe came to the result that women who continue to cohabit after birth have significantly lower probability of having a second child than married women in all countries except those in Eastern Europe.[89] Another study, on the contrary, came to the result that cohabiting couples in France have equal fertility as married ones.[90] Also, Russians have a higher fertility within cohabitation, while Romanians rather tend to have childless marriages.[91]

Survey data from 2003 in Romania came to the result that marriage equalized the total fertility rate among both highly educated and low educated people to approximately 1.4. Among those cohabiting, on the other hand, lower level of education increased fertility rate to 1.7, and a higher level of education decreased it to 0.7.[92] On the other hand, another study came to the result that Romanian women with little education have about equal fertility in marital and cohabiting partnerships.[93]

Financial effects edit

In the United States, married couples that submit a combined tax return may face a marriage penalty, where tax credits for low-income single earners are not applied to the combined income. In October 1998, Senate GOP leader Trent Lott decided to pull a bill to abolish "the marriage penalty, which in the tax code reflects the fact that married couples who both work for wages frequently pay more in taxes than if they earned the same amount of income but weren't married. And the more equal the incomes of the couple, the steeper the marriage tax penalty."[94] The earned income tax credit (EITC) is cash welfare for low-income workers, but the problem is the EITC is not for married couples because they have to combine their wages, which again leads to "the marriage penalty". If couples do not get married then their wages do not have to combine and the EITC in a way is "paying for" low-income couples not to marry. Opponents of cohabitation believe that some cohabiting couples choose not to marry because they would suffer a tax penalty.[94]

Despite the perceived disincentive to marry that the EITC provides, cohabiting couples suffer many financial losses as their unions are not recognized with the same legal and financial benefits as those who are legally married. These financial penalties can include the costs of separate insurance policies and the costs of setting up legal protections similar to those that are automatically granted by the state upon marriage.[95]

No effect edit

A conflicting study, published by the National Center for Health Statistics, with a sample of 12,571 people, concludes that "those who live together after making plans to marry or getting engaged have about the same chances of divorcing as couples who never cohabited before marriage".[96]

Additionally, William Doherty, a professor in the Department of Family Social Science at the University of Minnesota has remarked that in his research he has found that "committed cohabiting relationships seem to confer many of the benefits of marriage".[97]

A 2003 study by the Australian Institute of Family Studies found that "The differences in measured outcomes for those from direct and indirect marriages appear to be entirely attributable to other factors."[98] The study concluded that the evidence suggests that premarital cohabitation has "little impact one way or the other" on the chances of any subsequent marriage surviving.

By region edit

Americas edit

Canada edit

 
Cohabitation is very common in Quebec. From 1995, the majority of births in Quebec are from unmarried couples.[99]

Canadian laws on the recognition of unmarried cohabitation for legal purposes vary significantly by province/territory; and in addition to this, federal regulations also have an impact across the country (see Common-law marriage#Canada).[100][101] Family formation has undergone significant changes in Canada during the last decades of the 20th century, but the patterns vary widely across the country, suggesting differing cultural norms in different regions. From 1995, births to cohabiting parents have increased, particularly in Quebec.[102] In Canada, it is difficult to obtain exact data on the percentage of births outside marriage, because data on the marital status of mothers is collected differently across the provinces and territories of Canada, and in some (such as Alberta) it is not broken down in detail in regard to whether the mother was legally married or not at the birth of her child.[c] As of 2012, the statistical category of "single mothers" (defined as never married at the time of the birth) encompassed 28.3% of mothers, the category "divorced" (i.e. mothers who were unmarried at the time of birth, but had been previously married during their lives) encompassed 1%, while for 10% of mothers the marital status was unknown ("not stated").[104] There are, however, very significant differences by province/territory; for example in 2012, 77.8% of births in Nunavut were listed to "single mothers", by contrast, less than 20% of mothers in Ontario were listed in this category.[104] Latest data from the Quebec Statistical Institute shows that as of 2015, in Quebec, 63% of children were born to unmarried women.[99] In Canada, legal issues regarding cohabitation are very complicated by the fact that family law in this regard differs by province/territory, which is very confusing to the public,[105] especially as this contrasts to criminal law which is the same across Canada, as well as to marriage and divorce law, which is also the same across the country, under the 1986 Divorce Act (Canada) (although provinces/territories have jurisdiction over some marital issues, including the solemnization of marriage, spousal and child support, and property division).[106] The marital status of Canadians also varies by province/territory: in 2011, 46.4% of the population aged 15 and over was legally married; ranging from the lowest percentage of married people being in Nunavut (29.7%), Northwest Territories (35.0%), Quebec (35.4%), and Yukon (37.6%); to highest being in Newfoundland and Labrador (52.9%), Prince Edward Island (51.7%), Ontario (50.3%) and Alberta (50.2%).[107] While today Quebec is known for liberal family formation and cohabitation, this is a recent development: during the first half of the 20th century, family life in the province was conservative and strongly dominated by Roman Catholicism; before 1968, there was no provincial divorce legislation in Quebec, and spouses could only end their marriage if they obtained a private Act of Parliament.[108] One of the explanations of the current high rates of cohabitation in Quebec is that the traditionally strong social control of the church and the Catholic doctrine over people's private relations and sexual morality has led the population to rebel against traditional and conservative social values.[109] While some provinces were early to modernize family law, in others this only happened in the 1990s and the 21st century, such as in Alberta, through the Family Law Act (Alberta) which came into force in 2005. This Act overhauled family legislation, replacing the Domestic Relations Act, the Maintenance Order Act, the Parentage and Maintenance Act, and parts of the Provincial Court Act and the Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, which were seen as outdated. Also, the Adult Interdependent Relationships Act (S.A. 2002, c. A-4.5) amended 69 Alberta laws.[110] The Canadian Prairies provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan have strong common-law spouses regulations, imposing rights and obligations on common-law couples.[111] Nova Scotia has also been very slow to advance family law – it was only in 1999 that this province abolished discrimination against "illegitimate" children with regard to inheritance (through section 16 of NS Intestate Succession Act amended in 1999).[112] In general, today, provinces in Western Canada give more rights to common-law spouses than those in Atlantic Canada and in Quebec. This may seem quite paradoxical, because it is the eastern provinces which have the strongest tradition of cohabitation; according to a study "unmarried cohabitation seems to be more common in Eastern Canada than in Western Canada, which might be related to internal and international migration".[113] (as of 2012, 48% of births in New Brunswick, 47.1% in Newfoundland and Labrador, and 45.2% in Nova Scotia, were listed to "single mothers", way above the national average).[104] In British Columbia, the Family Law Act came into force in 2013.[114]

United States edit

 
Public approval in the United States for cohabiting couples has risen since 1994.[115]
  Agree
  Neither agree nor disagree
  Disagree

Cohabitation in the United States became common in the late 20th century. As of 2005, 4.85 million unmarried couples were living together, and as of 2002, about half of all women aged 15 to 44 had lived unmarried with a partner. In 2007, it is estimated that 6.4 million households were maintained by two opposite sex persons who said they were unmarried.[116] In 2012, the General Social Survey found that public disapproval of cohabitation had dropped to 20% of the population.[115]

Researchers at the National Center for Family and Marriage Research estimated in 2011 that 66% of first marriages are entered after a period of cohabitation.[117] According to the 2009 American Community Survey conducted by the Census Bureau, the proportion of 30- to 44-year-olds living together has almost doubled since 1999, from 4% to 7%. Fifty-eight percent of women aged 19 to 44 had ever cohabited in data collected in 2006–08, while in 1987 only 33% had. Cohabitation is more prevalent among those with less education. "Among women ages 19 to 44, 73% of those without a high school education have ever cohabited, compared with about half of women with some college (52%) or a college degree (47%)," note the Pew study's authors, Richard Fry and D'Vera Cohn.[118]

Before the mid-20th century, laws against cohabitation, fornication, adultery and other such behaviors were common in the US (especially in Southern and Northeastern states), but these laws have been gradually abolished or struck down by courts as unconstitutional.[119][120][121]

Cohabitation was almost impossible in the United States prior to the 1960s. Laws prevented unmarried couples from registering in hotels and it was very difficult for an unmarried couple to obtain a home mortgage. From 1960 to 1998, cohabitation moved from disreputable and difficult to normal and convenient.

— "The First Measured Century: Social disruptions". PBS.

As of December 2023, cohabitation of unmarried couples remains illegal in two states (Mississippi and North Carolina),[122] while as of 2023 fornication remains illegal in two states (Georgia[123] and South Carolina[124]). These laws are almost never enforced and are now believed to be unconstitutional since the legal decision Lawrence v. Texas in 2003.[125] However, these laws may have indirect effects. For example, one consequence may be that one may not claim their partner as a dependent (for a tax exemption), whereas in the other states it may be possible to do so after meeting four criteria: residency, income, support and status.[126]

In 2006, in North Carolina, Pender County Superior Court judge Benjamin G. Alford ruled that North Carolina's cohabitation law is unconstitutional.[127] However, the Supreme Court of North Carolina has never had the opportunity to rule on it, so the law's statewide constitutionality remains unclear.

On 13 December 2013, US Federal Judge Clark Waddoups ruled in Brown v. Buhman that the portions of Utah's anti-polygamy laws which prohibit multiple cohabitation were unconstitutional, but also allowed Utah to maintain its ban on multiple marriage licenses.[128][129][130] This decision was overturned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, thus effectively recriminalizing polygamy as a felony.[131] In 2020, Utah voted to downgrade polygamy from a felony to an infraction, but it remains a felony if force, threats or other abuses are involved.[132] Unlawful cohabitation, where prosecutors did not need to prove that a marriage ceremony had taken place (only that a couple had lived together), had been a major tool used to prosecute polygamy in Utah since the 1882 Edmunds Act.[133]

Latin America edit

Cohabitation in Latin America is becoming more common. Indeed, although this is a largely Roman Catholic region, it has the highest rates of non-marital childbearing in the world (55–74% of all children in this region are born to unmarried parents).[134] In Mexico, 18.7% of all couples were cohabiting as of 2005. Among young people, the figures are much higher.[135]

As of 2000, in Argentina 58% of births were to unmarried women.[134][d] The percentage of births outside marriage has increased throughout Latin America during the past decades, and there is also a relation to place of residence: women living in the capital city are more likely to have children outside marriage than those living in other parts of the country.[136] Recent data shows figures for non-marital childbearing to be 74% for Colombia, 69% for Peru, 68% for Chile, 66% for Brazil and 55% for Mexico.[134][137]

Asia edit

Nepal edit

In Nepal, living together is socially acceptable only after marriage.[138] However, cohabitation is an emerging trend in urban areas of Nepal. Reports have shown that there may be significant number of unmarried couples cohabiting in cities, especially in the capital, Kathmandu. Even when unmarried couples cohabit they either prefer to remain anonymous or pose themselves as a married couple.[139] Cohabitation is not recognized by the law of Nepal and there is no special provision to secure the right of cohabitants in Nepalese law.

Bangladesh edit

In Bangladesh, there are no laws prohibiting cohabitation but it is still socially unacceptable. However, cohabitation is becoming more common in urban areas due to western influence.[140] An unmarried couple may feel immense pressure to marry by their family, and will probably choose to live as if they were married and, if exposed, can be expelled from housing or university. Cohabitation has become tolerant in recent years, especially among youths.[141]

China edit

In China, cohabitation has become popular among young adults. One study shows that the cohabitation rate before first marriage was over 20% for those born after 1977.[142] Another recent study shows that cohabitation increases the divorce likelihood for those married in the early-reform period, but premarital cohabitation has no effect on divorce for those married in the late-reform period in China.[143]

India edit

Cohabitation in India had been taboo in traditional Hindu and Muslim societies. However, this is more acceptable between upper classes in large cities, but is not often found in rural areas and smaller towns which are more social conservative. Live-in relationships are legal in India. Recent Indian court rulings have ascribed some rights to long-term cohabiting partners. Female live-in partners have economic rights under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 subject to following conditions as laid by Honourable Supreme Court of India in case of D. Velusamy v D. Patchaiammal:

  1. The couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses.
  2. They must be of legal age to marry.
  3. They must be otherwise qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried.
  4. They must have voluntarily cohabited and held themselves out to the world as being akin to spouses for a significant period of time.

On 12 June 2020, the Uttarakhand High Court stated in the case of Madhu Bala v. State of Uttarakhand and others (Habeas Corpus Petition No. 8 of 2020) that consensual cohabitation between two adults of the same-sex is legal.[144]

Indonesia edit

In Indonesia, an Islamic penal code proposed in 2005 would have made cohabitation punishable by up to two years in prison, but failed to pass.[145] The practice is still frowned upon, and many low-end hotels and boarding houses have been raided by police for allowing unmarried couples to share a room.

Japan edit

In Japan, according to M. Iwasawa at the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, less than 3% of females between 25–29 are currently cohabiting, but more than one in five have had some experience of an unmarried partnership, including cohabitation. A more recent Iwasawa study has shown that there has been a recent emergence of non-marital cohabitation. Couples born in the 1950s cohort showed an incidence of cohabitation of 11.8%, where the 1960s and 1970s cohorts showed cohabitation rates of 30%, and 53.9% respectively. The split between urban and rural residence for people who had cohabited is indicates 68.8% were urban and 31.2% were rural.[146]

Philippines edit

In the Philippines, around 2.4 million Filipinos were cohabiting as of 2004. The 2000 census placed the percentage of cohabiting couples at 19%. The majority of individuals are between the ages of 20–24. Poverty was often the main factor in decision to cohabit.[147]

Iran edit

In Iran, the cohabitation of two people is known as 'white marriage'. According to researchers, the number of white marriages in Iranian metropolises is increasing.[148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155]

Under Iranian law, which is based on Islamic Sharia law, the cohabitation of a man and a woman outside the framework of official marriage is a crime.[150][151][156]

It is estimated that the duration of a cohabitation in Iran is between one and three years.[150][157][158]

Cohabitation has no place in Iran from traditional social, legal and religious points of view.[151][156][159][160][161] However, cohabitation in Iran can be explained by considering recent cultural changes in Iranian society, including the growth of individualism, modernity, and fluid relationships, and the gaps and conflicts between values.[149][154][162][163][164][165][166]

Various factors such as economic crises and cultural and social changes in cities are reasons for the increase in the number of cohabitation in Iran. In other words, the emergence of capitalism, the increase of job insecurity, the emergence of moral liberalism, the revision of cultural traditions, the anonymity of people in cities, the elimination of the concepts and functions of neighborhoods, changes in family structures and the emergence of temporary relationships are among the major reasons for white marriage in Iran.[148][149][152][157][158][167][168][169][170]

New research published by social anthropologist Kameel Ahmady and his team under the title House with Open Door: A Comprehensive Research Study on White Marriage (Cohabitation) in Iran reveals the previously concealed and multi-dimensional aspects of this phenomenon at the macro level, focusing on the Tehran, Mashhad and Isfahan metropolitan areas. The research pieces argues that this phenomenon is more prevalent among educated and post-graduate young people who have migrated to metropolitan areas for work and education.[148][149][157][171][172]

Europe edit

In the European Union, cohabitation is very common. In 2014, 42% of all births in the 28 EU countries were nonmarital.[173] In the following European countries the majority of births occur outside marriage: Iceland (69.9% in 2016[173]), France (59.7% in 2016[174]), Bulgaria (58.6% in 2016[173]), Slovenia (58.6% in 2016[175]), Norway (56.2% in 2016[173]), Estonia (56.1% in 2016[173]), Sweden (54.9% in 2016[173]), Denmark (54% in 2016[173]), Portugal (52.8% in 2016[176]), and the Netherlands (50.4% in 2016[173]).

While couples of all ages cohabit, the phenomenon is much more common among younger people. In late 2005, 21% of families in Finland consisted of cohabiting couples (all age groups).[177] Of couples with children, 18% were cohabiting.[citation needed] Of ages 18 and above in 2003, 13.4% were cohabiting.[178] Generally, cohabitation amongst Finns is most common for people under 30. Legal obstacles for cohabitation were removed in 1926 in a reform of the Criminal Code, while the phenomenon was socially accepted much later on. In France, 17.5% of couples were cohabiting as of 1999.[135]

Britain edit

Main article: Cohabitation in the United Kingdom

In Britain today, nearly half of babies are born to people who are not married (in the United Kingdom 47.3% in 2011;[173] in Scotland in 2012 the proportion was 51.3%[179]). It is estimated that by 2016, the majority of births in the UK will be to unmarried parents.[180][needs update]

The Victorian era of the late 19th century is famous for the Victorian standards of personal morality. Historians generally agree that the middle classes held high personal moral standards and rejected cohabitation. They have debated whether the working classes followed suit. Moralists in the late 19th century such as Henry Mayhew decried high levels of cohabitation without marriage and illegitimate births in London slums. However new research using computerized matching of data files shows that the rates of cohabitation were quite low—under 5% – for the working class and the urban poor.[181][182]

Falling marriage rates and increased births outside marriage have become a political issue, with questions of whether the government should promote marriage or focus on the status of a parent rather than a spouse; the Conservative Party support the former whilst Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats support the latter.[183] There are also differences between England and Wales and Scotland, with the latter being more accepting of cohabitation.[184][185]

Bulgaria edit

In Bulgaria, there has been a rapid increase in cohabitation after the fall of Communism. The transition from communism to market economy had a great impact on the demographic behavior of the population. After the fall of Communism, the legal and social pressure to get married has declined, and the population has started to experience new life styles.[18] As of 2014, 58.8% of children were born to unmarried mothers.[186]

Czech Republic edit

The marriage rates in Czech Republic have fallen dramatically during the past decades. In the 1970s to 1980s, about 96–97% of women married; in 2000 it was estimated that only 75% of women would ever marry.[187] The age at first marriage for women has increased from being in the range of 21.4–21.8 years in the 1970s and 1980s,[187] to being 29.6 in 2011.[188] In the early 1990s, predictions were made by some Czech demographers that cohabitation would increase during the next decades; and indeed, there has been a marked increase in the number of people who live in non-marital couple relations.[189] In 2016, 48.6% of births were to unmarried women.[173]

Germany edit

Until the 1980s, it was illegal for unmarried couples to cohabitate, which made it impossible for many same-sex couples to live together. At this point the Bundesgerichtshof ruled that cohabitation could not be banned as it was protected by the Basic Law.[190] As in other western societies, patterns of family life have been changing in Germany during the past decades. This has not created a moral panic, but has been seen more as an ongoing social evolution.[191] Cohabitation, divorce rates, lone parents, and people's reluctance to marry or to have children have increased.[191] However, with regards to family formation and long term cohabitation instead of marriage, there are very strong differences between the regions of former West Germany and East Germany (which was formally Communist). Significantly more children are born out of wedlock in eastern Germany than in western Germany. In 2012, in eastern Germany 61.6% of births were to unmarried women, while in western Germany only 28.4% were.[192] A longitudinal survey found that union stability was significantly higher for cohabiting mothers in eastern Germany than western Germany, due to differences in German society.[38]

Greece edit

In Greece, family dynamics remain conservative. The principal form of partnership is marriage, and extramarital childbearing and long term cohabitation are not widespread. For instance, in 2016 only 9.4% of births were outside marriage, which is the lowest percentage among the European Union member states.[173] Religion in Greece plays a very important role in society; it was only in 1983 that civil marriage was introduced in the country. The new laws modernized family law, abolished dowry, and provided for equal rights for "illegitimate" children.[193][194][195] According to a 2008 study: "Greek society still remains conservative and birthing outside marriage, although protected by law, remains in many ways socially unacceptable."[196] Despite this, there have been further legal changes providing for a modern "western" outlook on family life, including Law 3719/2008 dealing with family issues, including Article 14 of the law, which reduced the separation period (necessary before a divorce in certain circumstances) from four years to two years.[197]

Hungary edit

The literature on second demographic transition argues as well that highly educated women are more prone to engage in cohabitation, although the reasons are different: they are less concerned with respecting the societal norms.[198] Some scholars argued that cohabitation is very similar to being single in the sense of not giving up independence and personal autonomy.[199]

In Hungary, cohabitation was an uncommon phenomenon until the late 1980s and it was largely confined to the divorced or widowed individuals.[200] Among the ethnic groups, Gypsy/Roma tended to have higher rates of cohabitation, mainly due to their reluctance to register their marriages officially.[201] Since the 1980s, cohabitation became much more frequent among all ethnic groups and it has been argued to have strongly influenced the decline in fertility.[202] In 2015, 47.9% of births were to unmarried women.[173]

Ireland edit

 
Irish Magdalene Laundry, c. early 1900s. Women who had sexual relations outside marriage were often sent to Magdalene laundries until the mid-20th century

Cohabitation in Ireland has increased in recent years, and 36.6% of births were to unmarried women in 2016.[173] Until a few decades ago, women who had children outside marriage were severely stigmatized and often detained in Magdalene laundries. The Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010 gives some rights to unmarried cohabitants (under this act same-sex couples can enter into civil partnerships, while long term unmarried couples – both heterosexual and same sex – who have not registered their relation have some limited rights and obligations).

Italy edit

In Italy, where Roman Catholicism had a historically strong presence, cohabitation is not as common as in other countries of Europe, yet it has increased in recent years. There are significant regional differences, with non-marital unions being more common in the North of the country than in Southern Italy. A study published in 2006 found that long term cohabitation was still novel to Italy, though more common among young people.[203] As of 2015, the share of births outside marriage was 28.7%, but this varied by statistical regions as follows: Central Italy (33.8%), Northeast Italy (33.1%), Northwest Italy (31.3%), Insular Italy (24.2%), and South Italy (20.3%).[204]

The Netherlands edit

Dutch researchers have found that research participants see cohabitation as a risk-reduction strategy in a country with high relationship instability.[205] As of 2016, 50.4% births were to unmarried women.[173]

Norway edit

Cohabitation is a common type of partnership in Norway. Cohabitants have some rights if they have joint children, or if they have lived together for five years. Cohabitants can also regulate their relationship through a cohabitation agreement.[206] In Norway, in 2016, 56.2% of children were born outside marriage.[173]

Poland edit

In Poland, after the fall of Communism, the influence of religion has increased. Indeed, Poland has one of the most religious populations in Europe (see religion in Europe). Cohabitation in Poland has traditionally been associated with the lower social classes, but in recent years an increase has been seen among the more educated. Family structure in Poland remains traditional: Marriages are contracted at relatively young ages, and the incidence of divorce is relatively low (by European standards). The exact incidence of cohabitation is not well established, but it is quite low compared to other Western countries. However, Poland is not completely 'immune' to Western influence and, in 2016, 25% of children were born outside marriage.[173][207]

Slovakia edit

Slovakia is more conservative and religious than neighboring Czech Republic. The principal form of partnership is marriage, but extramarital childbearing and cohabitation are slowly spreading, yet this trend is not without criticism; and some view these phenomena as a threat to traditional values.[208][209] In 2016, 40.2% of births were to unmarried women.[173] Fertility in Slovakia has been described in a 2008 study as "between tradition and modernity".[208]

Switzerland edit

Switzerland has a tradition of strong conservatism; which can be seen in its legal and social history: in Europe, Switzerland was one of the last countries to establish gender equality in marriage: married women's rights were severely restricted until 1988, when legal reforms providing gender equality in marriage, abolishing the legal authority of the husband, come into force (these reforms had been approved in 1985 by voters in a referendum, who narrowly voted in favor with 54.7% of voters approving).[210][211][212][213] Adultery was decriminalized in 1989.[214] Until the late 20th century, most cantons had regulations banning unmarried cohabitation of couples; the last canton to end such prohibition was Valais, in 1995.[215][216] As of 2015, 22.5% of births were to unmarried women.[217] Births outside marriage are most common in the French speaking part (highest percentage in the cantons of Vaud, Neuchâtel, Geneva, Jura) and least common in the eastern German speaking cantons (lowest percentage in the cantons of St. Gallen, Zug, Appenzell Innerrhoden, Appenzell Ausserrhoden).[218]

Spain edit

Spanish society has undergone major changes since the fall of the Franco regime. Important legal changes which have occurred throughout the 1970s and 1980s include legalization of divorce, decriminalization of adultery, gender equality in family law, and removing the ban on contraception.[219] The liberalization of the political climate has allowed for alternative family formation. In the mid-1990s, cohabitation in Spain was still described as a "marginal" phenomenon, but since the 1990s, cohabitation has increased dramatically in Spain.[220] In Spain, in 2016, 45.9% of births were outside marriage.[173] As in other countries, there are regional differences: in 2011, in Catalonia the figure was 42% – highest in mainland Spain in that year (Canary Islands 59% and Balearic Islands 43.5% were highest) while in Murcia it was only 30.7% (lowest).[221]

Russia edit

In Russia, many couples express a desire to cohabit before marriage, then register a civil marriage, and then at a later stage have a large church wedding.[222]

Middle East edit

The cohabitation rate in West Asian countries is much lower than in European countries. In some parts of the continent it is however becoming more common for young people. As of 1994, the rate of premarital cohabitation in Israel was 25%.[223]

Cohabitation is illegal according to Sunni sharia law.[224][225] Cohabitation, Bi'ah, is a legal status, "Yadua BetTzibbur", by the Jews Halakha (Halacha) religious Law.[226][227]

Kuwait edit

Some legal recognition is extended to former common-law unions in Kuwait. Kuwaiti Family law applies the law of the father's, husband's or male partner's country in case of expatriate familial disputes. Hence, if the father's country of nationality recognises common-law marriages (like the United Kingdom), matters such as child support dues and maintenance can be considered in a Kuwaiti court.[228] However, out-of-marriage sexual intercourse is an offence punishable in Kuwait with a prison sentence between 6 months and 6 years if caught in action by an official or an administrative deportation order. This meaning that common-law marriage recognition can only be practically seen in exceptional cases like where the illegitimate child was born aboard and/or former couples who have since expatriated to Kuwait.[229] Single expat parents including expat mothers can legally sponsor their children for residency permits.[230] Couples where one or both parties are Kuwaiti are covered by local family law and hence do not have recourse to the limited recognition of common-law marriage.[228]

United Arab Emirates edit

Children born out-of-wedlock are given partial recognition. Their single expat mother or single expat father can sponsor them for residency. However, sexual relations outside of marriage were illegal in the UAE until November 2020, when restrictions were eased.[231]

Oceania edit

Australia edit

In Australia, 22% of couples were cohabiting as of 2005. 78% of couples who marry have lived together beforehand in 2008, rising from 16% in 1975.[232] In 2013, 34% of all births were to unmarried women.[233] Australia recognizes de facto relationships. The proportion of births outside marriage varies by state/territory, being, in 2009, lowest in Victoria (at 28%), Australian Capital Territory (at 29%), and New South Wales (at 30%); and highest in Northern Territory (at 63%) and Tasmania (at 51%).[234]

New Zealand edit

In New Zealand according to the 2001 census, 20.5% of couples were in de facto relationships.[235] In New Zealand, 23.7% of couples were cohabiting as of 2006.[citation needed] In 2010, 48% of births were outside marriage.[236] Like Australia, New Zealand recognizes de facto relationships.[237]

Africa edit

South Africa edit

In South Africa, the 2011 census revealed that of South Africans aged 20 or older, 43.7% had never been married, 36.7% were married at the time of the census, 11.0% were living together like married partners. Civil marriages fell by 22,5% between 2011 and 2019 and declined by a further 31,1% in 2020.[238]

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has called for full respect and recognition of women's autonomy and sexual and reproductive health rights, stating: "Violations of women's human rights are often linked to their sexuality and reproductive role. Women are frequently treated as property, they are sold into marriage, into trafficking, into sexual slavery. (...) In many countries, married women may not refuse to have sexual relations with their husbands, and often have no say in whether they use contraception. (...) Ensuring that women have full autonomy over their bodies is the first crucial step towards achieving substantive equality between women and men. Personal issues – such as when, how and with whom they choose to have sex, and when, how and with whom they choose to have children – are at the heart of living a life in dignity."[17]
  2. ^ "Eleven states recognize common-law marriages currently being established within their borders. They are Alabama, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas and Utah."[32] However, in New Hampshire, common law marriage is recognized only posthumously, for purposes of probate only,[33] and Utah recognizes common-law marriages only if they have been validated by a court or administrative order.[34]
  3. ^ In 2003, "Alberta Registries amended their Registration of Birth form in such a way that Statistics Canada can no longer determine the legal marital status of those persons in common-law marriages".[103]
  4. ^ The most recent data for Argentina are from 2000 because after 2000, Argentina's Ministry of Health changed to publishing births as mother living with a partner or not (including married or cohabiting) rather than as marital and nonmarital.

References edit

  1. ^ a b . oxforddictionaries.com. Archived from the original on 9 August 2014.
  2. ^ "Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States". CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. 13 May 2009. Retrieved 24 September 2011.
  3. ^ Turid Noack; Eva Bernhardt; Kenneth Aarskaug Wiik; Torkild Hovde Lyngstad. . Princeton University. Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  4. ^ Teresa Castro Martin (January 2013). "Cohabitation in Spain: No longer a marginal path to family formation". Journal of Marriage and Family. 75 (2): 422–437. doi:10.1111/jomf.12013. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  5. ^ "60% dos bebés em Portugal são filhos de pais não casados" [60% of babies in Portugal are children of unmarried parents]. Correio da Manhã (in Portuguese). 28 April 2022. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
  6. ^ Larry L. Bumpass; James A. Sweet (1 November 1989). "National Estimates of Cohabitation". Demography. 26 (4): 615–625. doi:10.2307/2061261. JSTOR 2061261. PMID 2583320. S2CID 46118819.
  7. ^ Taylor, Ina (2005). Religion and Life with Christianity. Heinemann. p. 45. ISBN 9780435302283. Some Protestant groups, although preferring sex to exist exclusively in a married relationship, understand times have changed. These Christians are prepared to accept cohabitation if it is a prelude to marriage.
  8. ^ "Pope Francis breaks taboo by marrying cohabiting couples, conducts mass wedding ceremony". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 15 September 2014.
  9. ^ "The no-sex 'myth'". BBC News. 3 October 2002. Retrieved 11 February 2019. An absolute declaration that every sexual partnership must conform to the pattern of commitment or else have the nature of sin and nothing else is unreal and silly.
  10. ^ Ross, Tim; Wynne-Jones, Jonathan; Rayner, Gordon (29 April 2011). "Royal wedding: Archbishop backs William and Kate's decision to live together before marriage". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 3 August 2013.
  11. ^ Megan M. Sweeney; Teresa Castro-Martin; Melinda Mills (2015). "The reproductive context of cohabitation in comparative perspective: Contraceptive use in the United States, Spain, and France" (PDF). Demographic Research. 32: 147–182. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.5.
  12. ^ Christin Löffler (31 March 2009). Non-Marital Cohabitation in Italy (PDF) (doctor rerum politicarum). University of Rostock.
  13. ^ Thornton A, Philipov D (2009). "Sweeping Changes in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New Insights from the Developmental Idealism Framework". European Journal of Population. 25 (2): 123–156. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9181-2. PMC 2690230. PMID 19498956.
  14. ^ Cherlin, Andrew J. (2004). "The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage". Journal of Marriage and Family. 66 (4): 848–861. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x. JSTOR 3600162.
  15. ^ Ernestina Coast. . Princeton University. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  16. ^ Friedman, Jaclyn; Jessica Valenti (2008). Yes Means Yes! Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape. Seal Press. ISBN 978-1-58005-257-3.
  17. ^ Navi Pillay (15 May 2012). (PDF). Helen Kanzira Lecture (Lecture). Pretoria: University of Pretoria - Centre for Human Rights. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 March 2017.
  18. ^ a b Elena von der Lippe (Koytcheva) (18–23 July 2005). Contemporary union formation in Bulgaria: the emergence of cohabitation. XXV International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of the Population. Tours, France. Retrieved 22 August 2015 – via ResearchGate. DRAFT VERSION: Do not cite or quote.
  19. ^ . Archived from the original on 18 February 2020. See for each country: Variable Description – Family – Q 45.[better source needed]
  20. ^ "Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States". Official Journal of the European Union. 30 April 2004. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  21. ^ a b Kramer, Elise (September–October 2004). "Cohabitation: Just a Phase?". Psychology Today. 37: 28.
  22. ^ a b Goodwin PY, Mosher WD, Chandra A (2010). "Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth (National Center for Health Statistics)". Vital Health Statistics. 23: 1–55.
  23. ^ a b c Sharon Jayson (18 July 2005). "Cohabitation is Replacing Dating". USA Today.
  24. ^ a b c d Brown, S.L.; Booth, A. (1996). "Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality". Journal of Marriage and the Family. 58 (3): 668–678. doi:10.2307/353727. JSTOR 353727.
  25. ^ Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ (2012). "A longitudinal investigation of commitment dynamics in cohabiting relationships". Journal of Family Issues. 33 (3): 369–390. doi:10.1177/0192513x11420940. PMC 3377181. PMID 22736881.
  26. ^ Pamela J. Smock; Wendy D. Manning; Meredith Porter (2005). (PDF). Journal of Marriage and Family. 67 (3): 680–696. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 April 2013. Retrieved 29 November 2012.
  27. ^ Miller AJ, Sassler S, Kusi-Appouh D (2011). "The Specter of Divorce: Views From Working- and Middle-Class Cohabitors". Fam Relat. 60 (5): 602–616. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00671.x. PMC 3399247. PMID 22822285.
  28. ^ a b Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ (2009a). "Couples' reasons for cohabitation: Association with individual well-being and relationship quality". Journal of Family Issues. 30 (2): 233–258. doi:10.1177/0192513x08324388. PMC 2743430. PMID 19756225.
  29. ^ a b "Cohabitation". For Your Marriage. Retrieved 16 March 2012.
  30. ^ Wendy D. Manning; P. J. Smock (2009). Divorce-proofing marriage: Young adults' views on the connection between cohabitation and marital longevity (Report). National Council on Family Relations. NCFR Report 54.
  31. ^ a b Murrow, Carrie; Lin Shi (2010). "The Influence of Cohabitation Purposes on Relationship Quality: An Examination in Dimensions". The American Journal of Family Therapy. 38 (5): 397–412. doi:10.1080/01926187.2010.513916. S2CID 144241396.
  32. ^ Common-Law Marriage Handbook (PDF). U.S. Department of Labor. June 2016. p. 13.
  33. ^ "Title XLIII: Domestic Relations — Chapter 457: Marriages, Proof of Marriage — Section 457:39". gencourt.state.nh.us. from the original on 14 October 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  34. ^ . Utah State Legislature. Archived from the original on 16 December 2014. Retrieved 16 December 2014.
  35. ^ "Births to unmarried women (for the nation, 2012)". Kids Count Data Center. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  36. ^ "Births to unmarried women (by state, 2012)". Kids Count Data Center. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  37. ^ Joan Raymond (13 August 2014). "More Unmarried Moms Are Living With Partners". NBC News. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  38. ^ a b c Schnor C (2014). "The Effect of Union Status at First Childbirth on Union Stability: Evidence from Eastern and Western Germany". Eur J Popul. 30 (2): 129–160. doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9304-7. PMC 4037585. PMID 24882913.
  39. ^ Jay, M (15 April 2012). "The Downside of Cohabitation Before Marriage". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
  40. ^ a b Dunifon, R; Kowaleski-Jones, L (2002). "Who's in the house? race differences in cohabitation, single-parenthood, and child development". Child Development. 73 (4): 1249–1264. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00470. PMID 12146746. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
  41. ^ Coontz, S. (30 August 2011). "Cohabitation Doesn't Cause Bad Parenting". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
  42. ^ Nelson, Sandi; Rebecca L. Clark; Gregory Acs (May 2001). . Urban Institute. New Federalism: National Survey of America's Families (B-31). Archived from the original on 16 July 2012. Retrieved 20 April 2012.
  43. ^ a b c d Kennedy, Sheela; Larry Bumpass (19 September 2008). "Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States". Demographic Research. 19 (47): 1663–1692. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47. PMC 2612998. PMID 19119426.
  44. ^ a b Manning WD, Cohen JA, Smock PJ (January 2011). "The Role of Romantic Partners, Family and Peer Networks in Dating Couples' Views about Cohabitation". J Adolesc Res. 26 (1): 115–149. doi:10.1177/0743558410376833. PMC 3476461. PMID 23087542.
  45. ^ a b Halstead, J (1997). "Muslims and Sex Education". Journal of Moral Education. 26 (3): 317–331. doi:10.1080/0305724970260306.
  46. ^ . United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. United States Catholic Conference Inc. 1999. Archived from the original on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
  47. ^ Prager, D. . Orthodoxy Today. Archived from the original on 27 January 2019. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
  48. ^ Taylor, Ina (2005). Religion and Life with Christianity. Heinemann. p. 45. ISBN 9780435302283.
  49. ^ a b Thorton A, Axinn W (November 1992). "Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage". American Journal of Sociology. 98 (3): 628–651. doi:10.1086/230051. JSTOR 2781460. S2CID 143924400.
  50. ^ Newman, B. (2011). Development Through Life: A Psychosocial Approach. Wadsworth. ISBN 978-1-111-34466-5.
  51. ^ Impicciatore R, Billari FC (May 2012). "Secularization, Union Formation Practices, and Marital Stability: Evidence from Italy". Eur J Popul. 28 (2): 119–138. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9255-4. PMC 3371187. PMID 22707812.
  52. ^ "New Sorrow for Afghanistan: AIDS Joins List". AIDSPortal. Archived from the original on 26 October 2008.
  53. ^ a b . Travel.state.gov. Archived from the original on 1 August 2013.
  54. ^ . Convention on the Rights of the Child. Palais des Nations, Geneva: United Nations. 28 September 1998. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  55. ^ "Culture of Maldives". Everyculture.com.
  56. ^ Fakim, Nora (9 August 2012). "Morocco: Should pre-marital sex be legal?". BBC News.
  57. ^ (PDF). Interpol. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2011. Retrieved 22 July 2014.
  58. ^ "Mauritania". 2010 Human Rights Report. 8 April 2011 – via State.gov.
  59. ^ Dubai FAQs. "Education in Dubai". Dubaifaqs.com.
  60. ^ . mate.ae. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  61. ^ Judd, Terri; Sajn, Nikolina (10 July 2008). "Briton faces jail for sex on Dubai beach". The Independent.
  62. ^ . Reuters. 28 June 2007. Archived from the original on 15 June 2013. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  63. ^ Amal Basha; Rana Ghanem; Nabil Abdulhafid. "Women's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa – Yemen". Freedom House – via Refworld.
  64. ^ Liefbroer AC, Dourleijn E (2006). "Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries". Demography. 43 (2): 203–221. doi:10.1353/dem.2006.0018. PMID 16889125. S2CID 13210179.
  65. ^ Svarer, Michael (2004). "Is Your Love in Vain? Another Look at Premarital Cohabitation and Divorce". Journal of Human Resources. 39 (2): 523–535. doi:10.2307/3559025. JSTOR 3559025.
  66. ^ Impicciatore R, Billari FC (2012). "Secularization, Union Formation Practices, and Marital Stability: Evidence from Italy". Eur J Popul. 28 (2): 119–138. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9255-4. PMC 3371187. PMID 22707812.
  67. ^ "Cohabitating and Domestic Partnership". PsychPage. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  68. ^ "New Report Sheds Light on Trends and Patterns in Marriage, Divorce, and Cohabitation". National Center for Health Statistics. Centers for Disease Control. 24 July 2002.
  69. ^ Galena H. Kline; Scott M. Stanley (2004). (PDF). Journal of Family Psychology. 18 (2). American Psychological Association: 311–318. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.311. PMID 15222838. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2012.
  70. ^ Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ (2009). "The pre-engagement cohabitation effect: a replication and extension of previous findings". J Fam Psychol. 23 (1): 107–111. doi:10.1037/a0014358. PMC 5956907. PMID 19203165.
  71. ^ a b "Couples who live together before marriage more likely to get divorced". The Daily Telegraph. 16 July 2009. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
  72. ^ Cohan, Catherine L.; Kleinbaum, Stacey (February 2002). "Toward a Greater Understanding of the Cohabitation Effect: Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Communication". Journal of Marriage and Family. 64 (1): 180–192. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00180.x. ISSN 0022-2445.
  73. ^ Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ (2006). "Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment". J Fam Psychol. 20 (4): 553–560. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.553. PMID 17176189. S2CID 24707669.
  74. ^ Huang PM, Smock PJ, Manning WD, Bergstrom-Lynch CA (2011). "He Says, She Says: Gender and Cohabitation". J Fam Issues. 32 (7): 876–905. doi:10.1177/0192513X10397601. PMC 3106995. PMID 21643456.
  75. ^ Meg Jay (14 April 2012). "The Downside of Cohabiting Before Marriage". The New York Times.
  76. ^ Reinhold S (2010). "Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability". Demography. 47 (3): 719–733. doi:10.1353/dem.0.0122. PMC 3000053. PMID 20879685.
  77. ^ "Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth". National Survey of Family Growth. Centers for Disease Control.
  78. ^ Wendy D. Manning; Jessica A. Cohen. . Princeton University. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  79. ^ D'Vera Cohn (8 April 2011). . Pew Research Center Publications. Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 16 October 2012. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
  80. ^ Wendy Manning; Jessica Cohen (April 2012). "Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution: An examination of recent marriages". Journal of Marriage and Family. 74 (2): 377–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.x. PMC 3487709. PMID 23129875.
  81. ^ Sassler S, Addo FR, Lichter OT (2012). "The tempo of sexual activity and later relationship quality". Journal of Marriage and Family. 74 (4): 708–725. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00996.x.
  82. ^ Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ (June 2012). "The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings". Journal of Family Psychology. 26 (3): 348–358. doi:10.1037/a0028316. PMC 5956859. PMID 22545935.
  83. ^ Michael J. Rosenfeld; Katharina Roesler (24 September 2018). "Cohabitation Experience and Cohabitation's Association With Marital Dissolution". Journal of Marriage and Family. 81 (1): 42–58. doi:10.1111/jomf.12530. S2CID 150211124.
  84. ^ Fetters, Ashley (24 October 2018). "So Is Living Together Before Marriage Linked to Divorce or What?". The Atlantic. Retrieved 14 March 2021.
  85. ^ Harms W (2000). "The University of Chicago Chronicle". Research Looks at Cohabitation's Negative Effects. 19 (11).
  86. ^ Margolin L (1992). "Child abuse by mothers' boyfriends: why the overrepresentation?". Child Abuse Negl. 16 (4): 541–551. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(92)90070-8. PMID 1393717.
  87. ^ Judith Treas; Deirdre Giesen (February 2000). "Sexual Infidelity Among Married and Cohabiting Americans". Journal of Marriage and Family. 62 (1): 48–60. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00048.x.
  88. ^ Gladys Martinez; Kimberly Daniels; Anjani Chandra (2012). "Fertility of Men and Women Aged 15–44 Years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–2010" (PDF). Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics.
  89. ^ Brienna Perelli-Harris (2014). "How Similar are Cohabiting and Married Parents? Second Conception Risks by Union Type in the United States and Across Europe". European Journal of Population. 30 (4): 437–464. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9320-2. PMC 4221046. PMID 25395696.
  90. ^ Nicoletta Balbo; Francesco C. Billari; Melinda Mills (2013). "Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research". European Journal of Population. 29 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y. PMC 3576563. PMID 23440941.
  91. ^ Potarca, Mills, Lesnard (2013). "Family Formation Trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the Second Demographic Transition?". European Journal of Population. 29: 69–101. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9279-9. S2CID 3270388.
  92. ^ Jan M. Hoem; Cornelia Mureşan; Mihaela Hărăguş (2013). "Recent Features of Cohabitational and Marital Fertility in Romania" (PDF). Population English Edition.
  93. ^ Hoem, Jan M.; Muresan, Cornelia (2011). . Stockholm Research Reports in Demography. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
  94. ^ a b Wade Horn (20 October 1998). . The Washington Times. Archived from the original on 3 August 2011. Retrieved 20 March 2012 – via Institute for American Values.
  95. ^ "Why Marriage Makes Financial Sense". Investopedia. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  96. ^ Jayson, Sharon (14 October 2010). "Report: Cohabiting has little effect on marriage success". USA Today.
  97. ^ . Unmarried.org. Alternatives to Marriage Project. Archived from the original on 7 February 2013. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  98. ^ David de Vaus; Lixia Qu; Ruth Weston (Winter 2003). (PDF). Family Matters (65). Australian Institute of Family Studies: 34–39. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2005.
  99. ^ a b . www.stat.gouv.qc.ca. Institut de la Statistique du Québec. Archived from the original on 5 December 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  100. ^ . Common Law Relationships. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  101. ^ . Help Centre. Government of Canada. Archived from the original on 21 August 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  102. ^ Benoît Laplante; Ana Laura Fostik (12 February 2015). "Two period measures for comparing the fertility of marriage and cohabitation" (PDF). Demographic Research. 32: 421–442. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.14.
  103. ^ "Table 6-1: Live births, Canada — Age and marital status of mother". Statistics Canada. Government of Canada. 27 November 2015. Note 3.
  104. ^ a b c . Statistics Canada. Government of Canada. Archived from the original on 17 July 2015. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
  105. ^ Alexandra Kazia (20 March 2013). "4 myths about common-law relationships". CBC News. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  106. ^ "Provincial and Territorial Government Web Sites". Department of Justice Canada – Family Law. Government of Canada. 29 March 2002. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  107. ^ Anne Milan (9 July 2013). "Marital Status: Overview, 2011". Statistics Canada. Government of Canada. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  108. ^ Kristen Douglas (30 September 2008) [October 1996]. . Parliament of Canada. Current Issue Review 96-3E. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  109. ^ Laplante, Benoît (2006). "The Rise of Cohabitation in Quebec: Power of Religion and Power over Religion". The Canadian Journal of Sociology. 31 (1): 1–24. doi:10.2307/20058678. JSTOR 20058678.
  110. ^ "Adult Interdependent Relationships". Canadian Legal FAQs. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  111. ^ "Quebec case puts spotlight on economic rights of common-law partners". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  112. ^ . Office of the Legislative Counsel, Nova Scotia House of Assembly. 18 December 2001. Archived from the original on 15 August 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  113. ^ Benoît Laplante; Ana Laura Fostik. . Population Association of America 2015 Annual Meeting, San Diego, 26 April–2 May 2015. Session 259 Marriage and Family in a Legal Context. Archived from the original on 23 June 2015. Retrieved 23 June 2015.
  114. ^ . British Columbia Ministry of Justice. Archived from the original on 14 August 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  115. ^ a b Paul Herrnson; Kathleen Weldon (6 October 2014). "Love, Marriage, and the Vatican". Center for Public Opinion Research. just 20 percent in the 2012 General Social Survey disagreed with the assertion that it was all right for a couple to live together
  116. ^ Cherlin, Andrew (2010). Public and Private Families. New York: McGraw Hill. p. 227. ISBN 978-0-07-340435-6.
  117. ^ "Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation". Population Association of America. 12 April 2013.
  118. ^ Luscombe, B. (June 2011). "More Americans Are Cohabiting, But the Benefits of Living Together Apply Mainly to the Wealthier, More Educated". Retrieved 21 March 2012
  119. ^ . CBS News. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2013.
  120. ^ . CNN. 25 January 2005. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012.
  121. ^ "Judge rules state adultery law unconstitutional". Bismarck Tribune. Associated Press. 28 February 2005. from the original on 26 May 2016. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  122. ^ "After 148 years, Florida makes it legal to shack up". CBS News. 6 April 2016.
  123. ^ "2022 Georgia Code :: Title 16 - Crimes and Offenses :: Chapter 6 - Sexual Offenses :: § 16-6-18. Fornication". Justia Law. Retrieved 31 December 2023.
  124. ^ "Code of Laws - Title 16 - Chapter 15 - Offenses Against Morality And Decency". www.scstatehouse.gov. Retrieved 31 December 2023.
  125. ^ Robin Fields (20 August 2001). "Virginia and Six Other States Still Classify Cohabitation as Illegal". sullivan-county.com. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  126. ^ "Can I Claim a Boyfriend/Girlfriend As a Dependent on Income Taxes?". INTUIT TurboTax. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  127. ^ "N.C. Cohabitation Law Struck Down". CBS News. 14 September 2006. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  128. ^ Schwartz, John (14 September 2013). "A Law Prohibiting Polygamy is Weakened". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 January 2014.
  129. ^ Mears, Bill (14 December 2013). "'Sister Wives' case: Judge strikes down part of Utah polygamy law". CNN.com. CNN. Retrieved 13 January 2014.
  130. ^ Stack, Peggy Fletcher (14 December 2013). "Laws on Mormon polygamists lead to win for plural marriage". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 13 January 2014.
  131. ^ "Appeals court restores Utah's polygamy law in 'Sister Wives' case". Reuters. 11 April 2016.
  132. ^ Hauser, Christine (13 May 2020). "Utah Lowers Penalty for Polygamy, No Longer a Felony". The New York Times.
  133. ^ Embry, Jessie L. (1994). . In Powell, Allan Kent (ed.). Utah History Encyclopedia. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press. ISBN 978-0874804256. OCLC 30473917. Archived from the original on 17 April 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2014.
  134. ^ a b c "Global Children's Trends". The Sustainable Demographic Dividend. Retrieved 10 November 2012.
  135. ^ a b Anne-Marie Ambert (17 September 2005). "Cohabitation and Marriage: How Are They Related?". The Vanier Institute of the Family – via CatholicCulture.org.
  136. ^ Teresa Castro Martín; Clara Cortina; Teresa Martín García; Ignacio Pardo. [Non-marital fertility in Latin America: indicators and comparative analyzes based on census data] (PDF). IX Jornadas de Investigación de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, UdelaR, Montevideo, 13-15 de setiembre de 2010 [IX Research Conference of the Faculty of Sciences Sociales, UdelaR, Montevideo, September 13-15, 2010] (in Spanish). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
  137. ^ Vieira, Joice Melo (2013). . Population Association of America: 2013 Annual Meeting Program. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 1 August 2022.
  138. ^ Marcantonio Caltabiano; Maria Castiglioni (March 2008). "Changing Family Formation in Nepal: Marriage, Cohabitation and First Sexual Intercourse". International Family Planning Perspectives. 34 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1363/3403008. PMID 18440915.
  139. ^ "Living Together Without Marriage – New Trend in Nepali Society". Nepali Movies, Nepali Films. 27 June 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  140. ^ Ishrat Hasan (10 August 2017). . The Daily Observer. Archived from the original on 10 March 2023. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
  141. ^ "Research Response Number BGD32882". Refugee Review Tribunal (Australia). 12 February 2008. Retrieved 27 June 2023 – via refworld.
  142. ^ Yu Jia; Yu Xie (December 2015). (PDF). Population and Development Review. 41 (4): 607–628. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00087.x. PMC 6226097. PMID 30416225. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 March 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
  143. ^ Yongjun Zhang (2017). "Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Dissolution in Postreform China". Journal of Marriage and Family. 79 (5): 1435–1449. doi:10.1111/jomf.12419.
  144. ^ "Indian High Court Reaffirms Same-sex Couples' Right to Cohabitation". Human Rights Pulse. 9 August 2020. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  145. ^ "Indonesia plans new morality laws". BBC News. 6 February 2005. Retrieved 28 March 2010.
  146. ^ Miho Iwasawa; James M. Raymo; Larry Bumpass (23 September 2005). . Archived from the original on 1 September 2006. Retrieved 26 August 2008.
  147. ^ Clarissa V. Militante (c. 2007). . GMANews.TV. Archived from the original on 11 June 2007. Retrieved 18 July 2007.
  148. ^ a b c Ahmady, Kameel; et al. (2021). House with Open Door A comprehensive research study on white marriage (cohabitation) in Iran. London, UK: Mehri Publication.
  149. ^ a b c d Ahmady, Kameel (6 April 2021). "Changing the Attitude of Young People Towards Marriage with a Focus on Law and Environmental Conditions such as Religion and Custom". Psychology and Education Journal. 58 (4): 5233–5244. ISSN 1553-6939. PDF
     • Ahmady, Kameel (October 2022). Changing the Attitude of Young People Towards Marriage with a Focus on Law and Environmental Conditions such as Religion and Custom. 8th International Conferences on Economics and Social Sciences hosted by Cyprus Science University, Antalya, TURKEY. pp. 314–328.
  150. ^ a b c "Can Iran 'control' its cohabiting couples?". BBC News. 10 December 2014. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  151. ^ a b c "Iranian Couples Increasingly Living Together Outside of Marriage". Center for Human Rights in Iran. 5 February 2016. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  152. ^ a b Ramin Mostaghim; Sarah Parvini (29 May 2015). "'White marriage' a growing trend for young couples in Iran". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  153. ^ Mehrnaz Samimi (6 January 2014). "More unmarried couples living together in Iran". Al-Monitor. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  154. ^ a b [Tehran metropolis and the emergence of signs of a new model of male-female relations; A study of contexts, processes, and consequences of domestication]. پرتال جامع علوم انسانی [Comprehensive humanities portal] (in Persian). Archived from the original on 4 February 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  155. ^ "ازدواج سفید در ایران، جایگزین ازدواج سنتی و روش مبارزه با قوانین اسلامی" [White marriage in Iran, an alternative to traditional marriage and a method of fighting against Islamic laws]. ایندیپندنت فارسی [Farsi Independent] (in Persian). 2 May 2021. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  156. ^ a b "Iran bans magazine for encouraging cohabitation over wedlock - report". Reuters. 27 April 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
     • "Iran bans magazine after 'white marriage' special". The Guardian. Reuters. 27 April 2015. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  157. ^ a b c "ازدواج سفید: تغییر سبک زندگی در ایران یا معضل اجتماعی؟ – DW – ۱۳۹۷/۶/۲" [White marriage: lifestyle change in Iran or a social problem? - DW - 6/2/1397]. dw.com (in Persian). Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  158. ^ a b Relations outside of marriage in Iran and marriages without the accept of the family (PDF) (Report). Copenhagen: Danish Immigration Service. February 2018.
  159. ^ Ahmady, Kameel (Summer 2019). ""زیر پوست شهر": تحلیل پدیده ازدواج سفید در کلان شهرهای ایران،" ["Under the Skin of the City": Analysis of the White Marriage Phenomenon in Iran's Big Cities]. نشریه علمی مطالعات پژوهشی در علوم انسانی و علوم اجتماعی [Journal of Research Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences] (in Persian). 63: 94–108.
  160. ^ Esfandiari, Golnaz (6 December 2014). "Rise In Cohabitation Has Iran Officials Railing Against 'White Marriage'". RadioFreeEurope / RadioLiberty. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  161. ^ Rodziewicz, Magdalena (Summer 2020). "The Legal Debate on the Phenomenon of 'White Marriages' in Contemporary Iran". Anthropology of the Middle East. 15 (1): 50–63. doi:10.3167/ame.2020.150105. ISSN 1746-0719. S2CID 218967303.
  162. ^ [Phenomenological analysis (white marriage), case study: Tehran youth]. پرتال جامع علوم انسانی [Comprehensive humanities portal] (in Persian). Archived from the original on 4 February 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  163. ^ Nian Abdi; Afroz Saz; Alamet Betul (11 April 2018). "های پیامد و سفید ازدواج آن در ایران کشور" [The consequences and whiteness of its marriage in Iran] (PDF). مجله دستاوردهای نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی [Journal of new achievements in humanities studies] (in Persian). (PDF) from the original on 4 February 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  164. ^ "Cohabitation: Iran's Common but Unrecognized Phenomenon". Iran Open Data. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  165. ^ Ahmady, Kameel (2021). "The Role of Temporary Marriage (TM) in Promoting Early Child Marriage (ECM) in Iran". In Hosseini, S. Behnaz (ed.). Temporary and Child Marriages in Iran and Afghanistan. Singapore: Springer. pp. 47–66. doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4469-3_3. ISBN 978-981-334-469-3. S2CID 234317299. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  166. ^ "آپارات - سرویس اشتراک ویدیو" [Aparat - video sharing service]. آپارات - سرویس اشتراک ویدیو [Aparat - video sharing service] (in Persian). Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  167. ^ [The social construction of white marriage]. پرتال جامع علوم انسانی [Comprehensive humanities portal] (in Persian). Archived from the original on 4 February 2023. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  168. ^ Omidvar, Pouran; Danesh, Parvaneh; Javaheri, Fatemeh; Zahedi Mazandarani, Mohammad javad (10 March 2019). "Studying the cohabitation subculture in metropolis Tehran (backgrounds and consequents)". Social Welfare Quarterly. 18 (71): 279–320. doi:10.29252/refahj.18.71.8. S2CID 200062397.
  169. ^ "Beyond the Shari'a: "White Marriages" in the Islamic Republic of Iran". associationforiranianstudies.org. Association for Iranian Studies (AIS) | انجمن ایران‌ پژوهی. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  170. ^ ""ازدواج سفید شبه قانونی" بدیلی در برابر ازدواج سنتی؟ – DW – ۱۳۹۶/۸/۱۱" ["White quasi-legal marriage" an alternative to traditional marriage? - DW - 8/11/1396]. dw.com (in Persian). Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  171. ^ Niloufar Rostami (14 August 2019). "IranWire Speaks to Wife of Jailed Iranian-British Anthropologist". IranWire. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  172. ^ "Kameel Ahmady". The Human Trafficking & Modern Slavery Expert Directory. Retrieved 4 February 2023.
  173. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r . Eurostat. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 9 September 2019. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  174. ^ "Naissances hors mariage en 2018". www.insee.fr.
  175. ^ "Births, Slovenia, 2016". www.stat.si.
  176. ^ "Live births outside of marriage, with parents co-habiting or not (%) in Portugal". Pordata.pt. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2017.
  177. ^ "The Finnish population structure of 2005". Statistics Finland (in Finnish). 1 June 2006.
  178. ^ "Elected MPs and candidates by family type in 2003". Statistics Finland.
  179. ^ (PDF). www.gro-scotland.gov.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 June 2013. Retrieved 17 April 2013.
  180. ^ "Most babies born out of marriage by 2016, trend suggests". BBC News. 11 July 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  181. ^ Rebecca Probert (September 2012). "Living in Sin". BBC History Magazine.
  182. ^ G. Frost (2008). Living in Sin: Cohabiting as Husband and Wife in Nineteenth-Century England. Manchester University Press.
  183. ^ "Marriage and cohabitation: key issues for the 2010 Parliament". UK Parliament. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  184. ^ . Scottish Government. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  185. ^ . Family Law Week. Archived from the original on 10 March 2023. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  186. ^ "Population and Demographic Processes in 2014 (Final Data)" (PDF). Republic of Bulgaria: National Statistical Institute. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  187. ^ a b Kantorova, Vladimira. . princeton.edu. Archived from the original on 7 August 2022. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  188. ^ "FirstMariages by Age, Sex, Measurement, Country and Year". UNECE Statistical Database. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Retrieved 26 June 2023.[failed verification]
  189. ^ Hamplová, Dana (5 June 2002). "Marriage and Cohabitation: Qualitative Differences in Partnership Arrangements" (PDF). Sociologický časopis [Czech Sociological Review]. 38 (6): 771–788. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  190. ^ "Von 1933 bis heute: Lesben und Schwule in Deutschland und der DDR". www.lsvd.de (in German). Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  191. ^ a b "Cohabitation in Germany – rules, reality and public discourses". oxfordjournals.org. Archived from the original on 19 January 2015. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
  192. ^ Klärner, Andreas (22 July 2015). "The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany – social norms and the role of peoples' perceptions of the past" (PDF). Demographic Research. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  193. ^ Marcos, Anastasios C.; Bahr, Stephen J. (2001). "Hellenic (Greek) Gender Attitudes". Gender Issues. 19 (3): 21–40. doi:10.1007/s12147-001-0009-6. S2CID 143989412.
  194. ^ "AROUND THE WORLD; Greece Approves Family Law Changes". The New York Times. Reuters. 26 January 1983.
  195. ^ Demos, Vasilikie (11 August 2007). The Intersection of Gender, Class and Nationality and the Agency of Kytherian Greek Women. Aannual meeting of the American Sociological Association.
  196. ^ "Greek mothers' perceptions of their cooperation with the obstetrician and the midwife in the delivery room" (PDF).
  197. ^ "Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women" (PDF). Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.
  198. ^ Lesthaeghe R (1983). "A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe: an Exploration of Underlying Dimensions". Population and Development Review. 9 (3): 411–435. doi:10.2307/1973316. JSTOR 1973316.
  199. ^ Rindfuss RR, van del Heuve A (1990). "Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single?". Population and Development Review. 16 (4): 703–726. doi:10.2307/1972963. JSTOR 1972963.
  200. ^ Carlson E, Klinger A (1987). "Partners in life: Unmarried couples in Hungary". European Journal of Population. 3 (1): 85–99. doi:10.1007/bf01797093. PMID 12280732. S2CID 3691282.
  201. ^ Barany, Zoltan (2002). The East European Gypsies. Regime Change. Marginality, and Ethnopolitics. Cambridge University Press.
  202. ^ Speder, Zsolt (July 2001). Turning Points of the Life Course (PDF) (Report). Budapest: Demographic Research Institute. (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  203. ^ Schröder, Christin (2006). "Cohabitation in Italy: do parents matter?". Genus. 62 (3/4): 53–85. JSTOR 29789325.
  204. ^ "NATALITÀ E FECONDITÀ DELLA POPOLAZIONE RESIDENTE" (PDF). 28 November 2016. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  205. ^ Nicole Hiekel; Renske Keizer (3 February 2015). "Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment? Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage" (PDF). Demographic Research. 32: 311–340. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.10.
  206. ^ . Archived from the original on 22 July 2015. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  207. ^ Matysiak, Anna (18 August 2009). "Is Poland really 'immune' to the spread of cohabitation?" (PDF). Demographic Research. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  208. ^ a b Potancokova, Michaela; Vano, Boris; Pilinská, Viera; Jurcová, Danuša (2008). "Slovakia: Fertility between tradition and modernity" (PDF). Demographic Research. 19. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research: 973–1018. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.25.
  209. ^ Michaela Potančoková. (PDF). Bratislava, Slovakia: Demographic Research Centre. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2014. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
  210. ^ "Swiss Grant Women Equal Marriage Rights". The New York Times. 23 September 1985.
  211. ^ "Switzerland profile – Timeline". BBC News. 28 December 2016.
  212. ^ Switzerland, Markus G. Jud, Lucerne. "The Long Way to Women's Right to Vote in Switzerland: a Chronology". history-switzerland.geschichte-schweiz.ch.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  213. ^ Sally Shreir; F. John Harper (1988). Women's movements of the world: an international directory and reference guide. Longman. p. 254. ISBN 9780897745086. OCLC 17353816.
  214. ^ Head-König, Anne-Lise. "Adultère". HLS-DHS-DSS.CH.
  215. ^ . www.socialinfo.ch. Archived from the original on 17 February 2016. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  216. ^ Keller, Tomie. "NATIONAL REPORT: SWITZERLAND" (PDF). ceflonline.net. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  217. ^ [Births and fertility]. Statistique suisse (in French). Archived from the original on 28 May 2016. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  218. ^ [Proportion of live births outside marriage]. Statistique suisse (in French). Archived from the original on 11 April 2016. Retrieved 8 April 2016.
  219. ^ Eric Solsten; Sandra W. Meditz, eds. (1988). "SOCIAL VALUES AND ATTITUDES". Spain: A Country Study. Washington, D.C.: GPO for the Library of Congress. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  220. ^ Sweeney, Megan M.; Castro-Martin, Teresa; Mills, Melinda (13 January 2015). "The reproductive context of cohabitation in comparative perspective: Contraceptive use in the United States, Spain, and France" (PDF). Demographic Research. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  221. ^ . Republica.com. 16 January 2013. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  222. ^ Olga Isupova (3 February 2015). "Trust, responsibility, and freedom: Focus-group research on contemporary patterns of union formation in Russia" (PDF). Demographic Research. 32: 341–368. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.11.
  223. ^ Kaplan, Amit. 2002. The roads of freedom: cohabitation patterns in Israel. M. A. Thesis, Tel-Aviv University (in Hebrew)
  224. ^ See commentary on verses 23:1-6: Vol. 3, notes 7–1, p. 241; 2000, Islamic Publications.[full citation needed]
  225. ^ Tafsir Ibn Kathir 4:24
  226. ^ Maurice Lamm. "Non-Jewish Wedding Ceremonies for Jews". Chabad.org.
  227. ^ C. G. Montefiore; H. M. J. Loewe (12 July 2012). A Rabbinic Anthology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76–. ISBN 978-1-108-04812-5.
  228. ^ a b "Expat divorce in Kuwait". Expatriate Law. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  229. ^ Ahmed, Fajer (28 August 2013). . 248am.com. Archived from the original on 29 June 2019. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  230. ^ Yasmena Al Mulla (24 August 2020). "Kuwait allows expat mothers to sponsor children". Gulf News. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  231. ^ . The United Arab Emirates' Government portal. n.d. [Updated on 3 February 2020]. Archived from the original on 17 May 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2020.
  232. ^ . Family Facts & Figures. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Archived from the original on 23 July 2013.
  233. ^ "3301.0 – Births, Australia, 2013". Australian Bureau of Statistics. 23 October 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2023.
  234. ^ "3301.0 – Births, Australia, 2009". Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3 November 2010. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  235. ^ Atkin, Bill (2003). "The Challenge of Unmarried Cohabitation—The New Zealand Response". Family Law Quarterly. 37 (2): 303–325. ISSN 0014-729X. JSTOR 25740421.
  236. ^ (PDF) (Report). Families Commission. July 2013. ISBN 978-0-478-36937-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 January 2015. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  237. ^ "Property (Relationships) Act 1976". New Zealand Legislation. New Zealand Government. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
  238. ^ "Is marriage an old-fashioned institution?". Statistics South Africa. 24 March 2022. Retrieved 17 January 2023.

External links edit

April 12, 2024
cohabitation, this, article, about, living, arrangement, situation, governmental, politics, government, marital, romantic, relationship, free, union, arrangement, where, people, married, usually, couples, live, together, they, often, involved, romantic, sexual. This article is about a living arrangement For the situation in governmental politics see Cohabitation government For a non marital romantic relationship see Free union Cohabitation is an arrangement where people who are not married usually couples live together They are often involved in a romantic or sexually intimate relationship on a long term or permanent basis Such arrangements have become increasingly common in Western countries since the late 20th century being led by changing social views especially regarding marriage gender roles and religion More broadly the term cohabitation can mean any number of people living together To cohabit in a broad sense means to coexist 1 The origin of the term comes from the mid 16th century from the Latin cohabitare from co together habitare dwell 1 Contents 1 Social changes leading to increase 2 Reasons for cohabitation in the United States 3 Contemporary objections to cohabitation 3 1 Effect on children 3 2 Religious views 4 Effects on marriage and family life 4 1 Likelihood of split 4 2 Abuse and infidelity 4 3 Fertility 4 4 Financial effects 4 5 No effect 5 By region 5 1 Americas 5 1 1 Canada 5 1 2 United States 5 1 3 Latin America 5 2 Asia 5 2 1 Nepal 5 2 2 Bangladesh 5 2 3 China 5 2 4 India 5 2 5 Indonesia 5 2 6 Japan 5 2 7 Philippines 5 2 8 Iran 5 3 Europe 5 3 1 Britain 5 3 2 Bulgaria 5 3 3 Czech Republic 5 3 4 Germany 5 3 5 Greece 5 3 6 Hungary 5 3 7 Ireland 5 3 8 Italy 5 3 9 The Netherlands 5 3 10 Norway 5 3 11 Poland 5 3 12 Slovakia 5 3 13 Switzerland 5 3 14 Spain 5 3 15 Russia 5 4 Middle East 5 4 1 Kuwait 5 4 2 United Arab Emirates 5 5 Oceania 5 5 1 Australia 5 5 2 New Zealand 5 6 Africa 5 6 1 South Africa 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External linksSocial changes leading to increase edit nbsp Percentage of births to unmarried women selected countries 1980 and 2007 2 Today cohabitation is a common pattern among people in the Western world In Europe the Scandinavian countries have been the first to start this leading trend although many countries have since followed 3 Mediterranean Europe has traditionally been very conservative with religion playing a strong role Until the mid 1990s cohabitation levels remained low in this region but have since increased 4 for example in Portugal the majority of children have been born of unwed parents since 2015 constituting 60 of the total in 2021 5 In the United States during the past few decades there has been an increase in unmarried couples cohabiting 6 Historically many Western countries have been influenced by Christian doctrines on sex which opposes unmarried cohabitation As social norms have changed such beliefs have become less widely held by the population and some Christian denominations today view cohabitation as a precursor to marriage 7 Pope Francis has married a cohabiting couple who had children 8 while former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams 9 and the Archbishop of York John Sentamu have expressed tolerance of cohabitation 10 In recent decades high rates of participation of women in the workforce and the widespread availability of highly effective long acting reversible contraceptives 11 has led to women making individual choices over their reproduction with decreased reliance on male partners for financial stability All these changes favored living arrangement alternatives to marriage 12 In Central and Eastern Europe during the late 1980s and early 1990s there were major political changes such as the fall of Communist governments These societies entered a new era of increased social freedom less rigid rules and less authoritarian governments They interacted with Western Europe and some became members of the European Union As a result the patterns of family life have started to change marriage rates have declined and marriage was postponed to a later age Cohabitation and births to unmarried mothers increased and in some countries the increase was very quick 13 The deinstitutionalization of marriage refers to the weakening of the social and legal norms that regulate peoples behavior in regard to marriage 14 The rise in cohabitation is part of other major social changes such as higher divorce rate older age at first marriage and childbearing and more births outside marriage Factors such as secularization increased participation of women in the labor force changing in the meaning of marriage risk reduction individualism and changing views on sexuality have been cited as contributing to these social changes 15 There has also been a change in modern sexual ethics with a focus on consent rather than marital status i e decriminalization of adultery and fornication criminalization of marital rape reflecting new concepts about the role and purpose of sexual interaction and new conceptualizations of female sexuality and of self determination 16 There have been objections against the legal and social regulation of female sexuality with such regulations being often seen as violations of women s rights a In addition some individuals may feel that marriage is unnecessary or outdated leading to couples not formalizing their relation 18 For instance in the European Values Study EVS of 2008 the percentage of respondents who agreed with the assertion that Marriage is an outdated institution was 37 5 in Luxembourg 35 4 in France 34 3 in Belgium 31 2 in Spain 30 5 in Austria 29 2 in Germany 27 7 in Switzerland 27 2 in Bulgaria 27 0 in the Netherlands 25 0 in Slovenia 19 The fact that many couples choose to live together without formalizing their relation is also recognized by the European Union A 2004 directive forbids EU members from denying entry or residence of partners with whom the Union citizen has a durable relationship duly attested 20 Reasons for cohabitation in the United States editMain article Cohabitation in the United States Today cohabitation in the United States is often a part of the dating process 21 In fact cohabitation is increasingly becoming the first coresidential union formed among young adults 22 In 1996 more than two thirds of married couples in the US said that they lived together before getting married 23 In 1994 there were 3 7 million cohabiting couples in the United States 24 This is a major increase from a few decades ago According to Dr Galena Rhoades Before 1970 living together outside marriage was uncommon but by the late 1990s at least 50 to 60 of couples lived together premaritally 25 People may live together for a number of reasons Cohabitants could live together to save money because of the convenience of living with another or a need to find housing 21 Lower income individuals facing financial uncertainty may delay or avoid marriage not only because of the difficulty of paying for a wedding 26 but also because of fear of financial hardship if a marriage were to end in divorce 27 When given a survey of the reasons why they cohabit most couples listed reasons such as spending more time together convenience based reasons and testing their relationships while few gave the reason that they do not believe in marriage 28 The extremely high costs of housing and tight budgets of today s economy are also factors that can lead a couple to cohabitation 23 Today sixty percent of all marriages are preceded by a period of cohabitation 29 Researchers suggest that couples live together as a way of trying out marriage to test compatibility with their partners while still having the option of ending the relationship without legal implications 30 In 1996 More than three quarters of all cohabitors report ed plans to marry their partners which implies that most of them viewed cohabitation as a prelude to marriage 24 Cohabitation shares many qualities with marriage often couples who are cohabiting share a residence personal resources exclude intimate relations with others and in more than 10 of cohabiting couples have children 24 Many young adults believe cohabitation is a good way to test their relationships prior to marriage 28 Couples who have plans to marry before moving in together or who are engaged before cohabiting typically marry within two years of living together 31 The state of cohabitation of a couple often ends either in marriage or in break up according to a 1996 study about 10 of cohabiting unions remained in this state more than five years 24 According to a survey done by The National Center for Health Statistics over half of marriages from 1990 1994 among women began as cohabitation 22 Cohabitation can be an alternative to marriage in situations where marriage is not possible for legal or religious reasons such as same sex interracial or interreligious marriages 31 Cohabitation sometimes called de facto marriage is becoming more commonly known as a substitute for conventional marriage citation needed Common law marriage in the United States can still be contracted in nine US states and in two others under restriction b This helps provide the surviving partner a legal basis for inheriting the decedent s belongings in the event of the death of their cohabiting partner In today s cohabiting relationships forty percent of households include children giving an idea of how cohabitation could be considered a new normative type of family dynamic 29 In 2012 41 of all births in the US were to unmarried women 35 In three states Mississippi 55 Louisiana 53 and New Mexico 52 births outside marriage were in the majority the lowest percentage of births outside marriage was in Utah at 19 36 During the period 2006 2010 58 of births outside marriage were to cohabiting parents 37 Contemporary objections to cohabitation editContemporary objections to cohabiting couples include religious opposition to non marital unions social pressure for couples to get married and potential effects of cohabitation on a child s development The rise in the number of cohabiting couples and children born out of wedlock in the Western world has made cohabitation a strong focus of sociological research 38 The rise in cohabiting couples in the United States from around 450 000 in 1960 to 7 5 million in 2011 39 has been accompanied by US research performed on child development within cohabiting households 40 Opponents of cohabitation say non marital parenting is an unsuitable environment for a child s development One study from 2002 correlated lower numeracy skills and higher delinquency to children of cohabiting couples 40 however recent studies that control for factors including poverty the educational level of parents and violence in the home show children of cohabiting couples are developmentally similar to peers of comparable married couples 41 Effect on children edit In 2001 researchers compared teenage children in the United States living in a cohabiting household a single mother and her boyfriend who was not related to the teenager against peers in single parent households The results showed white and Hispanic teenagers had lower performance in school greater risk of suspension or expulsion than peers from single parent households and the same rate of behavioral and emotional problems 42 A study on the 1995 and 2002 National Survey of Family Growth found increases in both the prevalence and duration of unmarried cohabitation 43 The study found that 40 of children in the United States would live in a cohabiting household by age 12 and children born to single mothers were more likely than those born to married mothers to live in a cohabiting household The percentage of women ages 19 44 who had ever cohabited increased from 45 in 1995 to 54 in 2002 43 In 2002 63 of women who graduate from high school were found to spend some time cohabiting compared to only 45 of women with a four year college degree 43 Cohabiting couples who have children often get married One study found that children born of parents who cohabit are 90 more likely to end up living in households with married parents than children born to single mothers 67 of unmarried Hispanic mothers are expected to marry while 40 of African American mothers are expected to marry 43 Religious views edit Main article Fornication See also Marriage Marriage and religion and Extramarital sex Religions Studies have found that religious affiliation correlates with cohabitation and marriage entry 44 People frequently cite religious reasons for their opposition to cohabitation The Roman Catholic Church and nearly all mainstream Protestant denominations around the world oppose cohabitation and consider it to be the sin of fornication 45 46 47 However others such as the Church of England welcome cohabiting couples in the Church and encourage them to regard cohabitation as a prelude to Christian marriage 48 Religion can also lead to societal pressures against cohabitation especially within highly religious communities 49 Some couples may refrain from cohabitation because one or both partners fear disappointing or alienating conservative family members 44 Young adults who grew up in families that oppose cohabitation have lower rates than their peers 50 The increase in cohabitation in the United States and other developed nations has been linked to the secularization of those countries 51 Researchers have noted that changes in the religious demographics of a society have accompanied the rise in cohabitation 49 Non marital and same sex relationships are forbidden by the Islamic law of Zina 45 and cohabitation is against the law in many Muslim majority countries including Saudi Arabia Pakistan Afghanistan 52 53 Iran 53 Kuwait 54 Maldives 55 Morocco 56 Oman 57 Mauritania 58 United Arab Emirates 59 60 61 Sudan 62 and Yemen 63 Effects on marriage and family life editLikelihood of split edit Conflicting studies on the effect of cohabitation on subsequent marriage have been published In countries where the majority of people disapprove of unmarried individuals living together or a minority of the population cohabits before marriage marriages resulting from cohabitation are more prone to divorce But in a study on European countries those where around half of the population cohabits before marriage cohabitation is not selective of divorce prone individuals and no difference in couples that have cohabited before and after marriage is observed 64 65 In countries such as Italy the increased risk of marital disruption for people who experienced premarital cohabitation can be entirely attributed to the selection of the most divorce prone into cohabitation 66 In 2002 the CDC found that for married couples the likelihood percentage of the relationship ending after five years is 20 for unmarried cohabitators the likelihood percentage is 49 After 10 years the likelihood percentage for the relationship to end is 33 for married couples and 62 for unmarried cohabitators 67 68 One German study found that in regions with high rates of childbirth to cohabitating parents no negative effect is observed in cohabitation The study states union stability of cohabiting mothers is positively related to their prevalence 38 A 2004 study of 136 couples 272 individuals from researchers at the University of Denver found differences among couples that cohabited before engagement after engagement or not until marriage The longitudinal study collected survey data before marriage and 10 months into marriage with findings suggesting those who cohabit before engagement are at greater risk for poor marital outcomes than those who cohabit only after engagement or at marriage 69 A follow up survey by the researches of over 1 000 married men and women married in the past 10 years found those who moved in with a lover before engagement or marriage reported significantly lower quality marriages and a greater possibility of a separation than other couples 70 About 20 of those who cohabited before getting engaged had since suggested splitting compared with only 12 of those who only moved in together after getting engaged and 10 who did not cohabit prior to marriage 71 Another 2004 study of 92 couples linked communication to cohabitation and instability They found that married couples who cohabited before they were married had more negative problem solving and communication skills They also found that those who had cohabited expressed more verbal aggression throughout their conversations This negative communication could be contributing to the cohabitation effect and causing a larger amount of marital instability 72 The researchers from Denver suggest that relationships with pre engagement cohabitation may wind up sliding into marriage 71 whereas those that only cohabit post engagement or marriage make a more clear decision This could explain their 2006 study of 197 heterosexual couples finding that men who cohabited with their spouse before engagement were less dedicated than men who cohabited only after engagement or not at all before marriage 73 In some heterosexual couples women are more likely to understand cohabitation as an intermediary step preceding marriage and men more likely to perceive it without an explicit connection to marriage 23 74 75 An analysis of data from the CDC s National Survey of Family Growth data from 1988 1995 and 2002 suggests that the positive relationship between premarital cohabitation and marital instability has weakened for more recent birth and marriage cohorts as the total number of couples cohabiting before marriage has increased 76 Later CDC work found that between 2002 and 2006 2010 the number of couples in opposite sex cohabiting relationships increased from 9 0 to 11 2 for women and from 9 2 to 12 2 for men 77 Drawing on the 2006 2008 data Princeton University researchers examined whether and to what extent variation in premarital cohabitation experiences influence marital stability They found that the relationship between cohabitation and marital instability is complex and depends in part on marriage cohort race ethnicity and marriage plans Their analyses reveal that a cohabitation effect exists only for women married prior to 1996 and that until marriage plans are considered there is no cohabitation effect among women married since 1996 78 Recent research from 2011 by the Pew Research Center has found that the number of couples that cohabit before marriage has increased 44 of adults and more than half of 30 to 49 year olds say they have cohabited at some point Nearly two thirds of adults who ever cohabited 64 say they thought about it as a step toward marriage The report also notes a trend toward rising public acceptance of cohabiting couples over the years Most Americans now say the rise in unmarried couples living together either makes no difference to society 46 or is good for society 9 79 A 2012 study found that among cohabiting individuals those who were engaged prior to cohabitation or had definite plans for marriage were linked to lower risks of marital instability among women but the relationship was not observed with men 80 One study on low to moderate income couples living with minor children found that respondents who became sexually involved within the first month of their relationship were correlated to lower scores of relationship quality among women 81 Another study found respondents to a mail in survey self reported higher levels of commitment in the cohabiting group as well as lower relationship satisfaction and more negative communication 82 A 2018 study found that cohabiting before marriage was linked to a lower risk of divorce during the first year of marriage but a greater risk of divorce in the long run 83 However a report published by the Council on Contemporary Families that same year found that couples who cohabited before marriage were less likely to divorce than couples who did not 84 Abuse and infidelity edit University of Chicago sociologist Linda Waite 85 found that 16 percent of cohabiting women reported that arguments with their partners became physical during the past year while only 5 percent of married women had similar experiences Most cohabiting couples have a faithful relationship but Waite s surveys also demonstrated that 20 of cohabiting women reported having secondary sex partners compared to only 4 of married women 86 According to an article by Judith Treas and Deirdre Giesen cohabiting couples are twice as likely to experience infidelity within the relationship than married couples 87 Fertility edit Regarding cohabitation as a fertility factor a large survey in the United States came to the result that married women had an average of 1 9 children compared to 1 3 among those cohabiting The corresponding numbers for men were 1 7 and 1 1 respectively The difference of 0 6 children for both sexes was expected to decrease to between 0 2 and 0 3 over the lifetime when correcting for the confounder that married people have their children earlier in life 88 A study of the United States and multiple countries in Europe came to the result that women who continue to cohabit after birth have significantly lower probability of having a second child than married women in all countries except those in Eastern Europe 89 Another study on the contrary came to the result that cohabiting couples in France have equal fertility as married ones 90 Also Russians have a higher fertility within cohabitation while Romanians rather tend to have childless marriages 91 Survey data from 2003 in Romania came to the result that marriage equalized the total fertility rate among both highly educated and low educated people to approximately 1 4 Among those cohabiting on the other hand lower level of education increased fertility rate to 1 7 and a higher level of education decreased it to 0 7 92 On the other hand another study came to the result that Romanian women with little education have about equal fertility in marital and cohabiting partnerships 93 Financial effects edit In the United States married couples that submit a combined tax return may face a marriage penalty where tax credits for low income single earners are not applied to the combined income In October 1998 Senate GOP leader Trent Lott decided to pull a bill to abolish the marriage penalty which in the tax code reflects the fact that married couples who both work for wages frequently pay more in taxes than if they earned the same amount of income but weren t married And the more equal the incomes of the couple the steeper the marriage tax penalty 94 The earned income tax credit EITC is cash welfare for low income workers but the problem is the EITC is not for married couples because they have to combine their wages which again leads to the marriage penalty If couples do not get married then their wages do not have to combine and the EITC in a way is paying for low income couples not to marry Opponents of cohabitation believe that some cohabiting couples choose not to marry because they would suffer a tax penalty 94 Despite the perceived disincentive to marry that the EITC provides cohabiting couples suffer many financial losses as their unions are not recognized with the same legal and financial benefits as those who are legally married These financial penalties can include the costs of separate insurance policies and the costs of setting up legal protections similar to those that are automatically granted by the state upon marriage 95 No effect edit A conflicting study published by the National Center for Health Statistics with a sample of 12 571 people concludes that those who live together after making plans to marry or getting engaged have about the same chances of divorcing as couples who never cohabited before marriage 96 Additionally William Doherty a professor in the Department of Family Social Science at the University of Minnesota has remarked that in his research he has found that committed cohabiting relationships seem to confer many of the benefits of marriage 97 A 2003 study by the Australian Institute of Family Studies found that The differences in measured outcomes for those from direct and indirect marriages appear to be entirely attributable to other factors 98 The study concluded that the evidence suggests that premarital cohabitation has little impact one way or the other on the chances of any subsequent marriage surviving By region editAmericas edit Canada edit nbsp Cohabitation is very common in Quebec From 1995 the majority of births in Quebec are from unmarried couples 99 Canadian laws on the recognition of unmarried cohabitation for legal purposes vary significantly by province territory and in addition to this federal regulations also have an impact across the country see Common law marriage Canada 100 101 Family formation has undergone significant changes in Canada during the last decades of the 20th century but the patterns vary widely across the country suggesting differing cultural norms in different regions From 1995 births to cohabiting parents have increased particularly in Quebec 102 In Canada it is difficult to obtain exact data on the percentage of births outside marriage because data on the marital status of mothers is collected differently across the provinces and territories of Canada and in some such as Alberta it is not broken down in detail in regard to whether the mother was legally married or not at the birth of her child c As of 2012 the statistical category of single mothers defined as never married at the time of the birth encompassed 28 3 of mothers the category divorced i e mothers who were unmarried at the time of birth but had been previously married during their lives encompassed 1 while for 10 of mothers the marital status was unknown not stated 104 There are however very significant differences by province territory for example in 2012 77 8 of births in Nunavut were listed to single mothers by contrast less than 20 of mothers in Ontario were listed in this category 104 Latest data from the Quebec Statistical Institute shows that as of 2015 in Quebec 63 of children were born to unmarried women 99 In Canada legal issues regarding cohabitation are very complicated by the fact that family law in this regard differs by province territory which is very confusing to the public 105 especially as this contrasts to criminal law which is the same across Canada as well as to marriage and divorce law which is also the same across the country under the 1986 Divorce Act Canada although provinces territories have jurisdiction over some marital issues including the solemnization of marriage spousal and child support and property division 106 The marital status of Canadians also varies by province territory in 2011 46 4 of the population aged 15 and over was legally married ranging from the lowest percentage of married people being in Nunavut 29 7 Northwest Territories 35 0 Quebec 35 4 and Yukon 37 6 to highest being in Newfoundland and Labrador 52 9 Prince Edward Island 51 7 Ontario 50 3 and Alberta 50 2 107 While today Quebec is known for liberal family formation and cohabitation this is a recent development during the first half of the 20th century family life in the province was conservative and strongly dominated by Roman Catholicism before 1968 there was no provincial divorce legislation in Quebec and spouses could only end their marriage if they obtained a private Act of Parliament 108 One of the explanations of the current high rates of cohabitation in Quebec is that the traditionally strong social control of the church and the Catholic doctrine over people s private relations and sexual morality has led the population to rebel against traditional and conservative social values 109 While some provinces were early to modernize family law in others this only happened in the 1990s and the 21st century such as in Alberta through the Family Law Act Alberta which came into force in 2005 This Act overhauled family legislation replacing the Domestic Relations Act the Maintenance Order Act the Parentage and Maintenance Act and parts of the Provincial Court Act and the Child Youth and Family Enhancement Act which were seen as outdated Also the Adult Interdependent Relationships Act S A 2002 c A 4 5 amended 69 Alberta laws 110 The Canadian Prairies provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan have strong common law spouses regulations imposing rights and obligations on common law couples 111 Nova Scotia has also been very slow to advance family law it was only in 1999 that this province abolished discrimination against illegitimate children with regard to inheritance through section 16 of NS Intestate Succession Act amended in 1999 112 In general today provinces in Western Canada give more rights to common law spouses than those in Atlantic Canada and in Quebec This may seem quite paradoxical because it is the eastern provinces which have the strongest tradition of cohabitation according to a study unmarried cohabitation seems to be more common in Eastern Canada than in Western Canada which might be related to internal and international migration 113 as of 2012 48 of births in New Brunswick 47 1 in Newfoundland and Labrador and 45 2 in Nova Scotia were listed to single mothers way above the national average 104 In British Columbia the Family Law Act came into force in 2013 114 United States edit nbsp Public approval in the United States for cohabiting couples has risen since 1994 115 Agree Neither agree nor disagree DisagreeCohabitation in the United States became common in the late 20th century As of 2005 update 4 85 million unmarried couples were living together and as of 2002 update about half of all women aged 15 to 44 had lived unmarried with a partner In 2007 it is estimated that 6 4 million households were maintained by two opposite sex persons who said they were unmarried 116 In 2012 the General Social Survey found that public disapproval of cohabitation had dropped to 20 of the population 115 Researchers at the National Center for Family and Marriage Research estimated in 2011 that 66 of first marriages are entered after a period of cohabitation 117 According to the 2009 American Community Survey conducted by the Census Bureau the proportion of 30 to 44 year olds living together has almost doubled since 1999 from 4 to 7 Fifty eight percent of women aged 19 to 44 had ever cohabited in data collected in 2006 08 while in 1987 only 33 had Cohabitation is more prevalent among those with less education Among women ages 19 to 44 73 of those without a high school education have ever cohabited compared with about half of women with some college 52 or a college degree 47 note the Pew study s authors Richard Fry and D Vera Cohn 118 Before the mid 20th century laws against cohabitation fornication adultery and other such behaviors were common in the US especially in Southern and Northeastern states but these laws have been gradually abolished or struck down by courts as unconstitutional 119 120 121 Cohabitation was almost impossible in the United States prior to the 1960s Laws prevented unmarried couples from registering in hotels and it was very difficult for an unmarried couple to obtain a home mortgage From 1960 to 1998 cohabitation moved from disreputable and difficult to normal and convenient The First Measured Century Social disruptions PBS As of December 2023 cohabitation of unmarried couples remains illegal in two states Mississippi and North Carolina 122 while as of 2023 fornication remains illegal in two states Georgia 123 and South Carolina 124 These laws are almost never enforced and are now believed to be unconstitutional since the legal decision Lawrence v Texas in 2003 125 However these laws may have indirect effects For example one consequence may be that one may not claim their partner as a dependent for a tax exemption whereas in the other states it may be possible to do so after meeting four criteria residency income support and status 126 In 2006 in North Carolina Pender County Superior Court judge Benjamin G Alford ruled that North Carolina s cohabitation law is unconstitutional 127 However the Supreme Court of North Carolina has never had the opportunity to rule on it so the law s statewide constitutionality remains unclear On 13 December 2013 US Federal Judge Clark Waddoups ruled in Brown v Buhman that the portions of Utah s anti polygamy laws which prohibit multiple cohabitation were unconstitutional but also allowed Utah to maintain its ban on multiple marriage licenses 128 129 130 This decision was overturned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit thus effectively recriminalizing polygamy as a felony 131 In 2020 Utah voted to downgrade polygamy from a felony to an infraction but it remains a felony if force threats or other abuses are involved 132 Unlawful cohabitation where prosecutors did not need to prove that a marriage ceremony had taken place only that a couple had lived together had been a major tool used to prosecute polygamy in Utah since the 1882 Edmunds Act 133 Latin America edit Cohabitation in Latin America is becoming more common Indeed although this is a largely Roman Catholic region it has the highest rates of non marital childbearing in the world 55 74 of all children in this region are born to unmarried parents 134 In Mexico 18 7 of all couples were cohabiting as of 2005 update Among young people the figures are much higher 135 As of 2000 in Argentina 58 of births were to unmarried women 134 d The percentage of births outside marriage has increased throughout Latin America during the past decades and there is also a relation to place of residence women living in the capital city are more likely to have children outside marriage than those living in other parts of the country 136 Recent data shows figures for non marital childbearing to be 74 for Colombia 69 for Peru 68 for Chile 66 for Brazil and 55 for Mexico 134 137 Asia edit Nepal edit In Nepal living together is socially acceptable only after marriage 138 However cohabitation is an emerging trend in urban areas of Nepal Reports have shown that there may be significant number of unmarried couples cohabiting in cities especially in the capital Kathmandu Even when unmarried couples cohabit they either prefer to remain anonymous or pose themselves as a married couple 139 Cohabitation is not recognized by the law of Nepal and there is no special provision to secure the right of cohabitants in Nepalese law Bangladesh edit In Bangladesh there are no laws prohibiting cohabitation but it is still socially unacceptable However cohabitation is becoming more common in urban areas due to western influence 140 An unmarried couple may feel immense pressure to marry by their family and will probably choose to live as if they were married and if exposed can be expelled from housing or university Cohabitation has become tolerant in recent years especially among youths 141 China edit In China cohabitation has become popular among young adults One study shows that the cohabitation rate before first marriage was over 20 for those born after 1977 142 Another recent study shows that cohabitation increases the divorce likelihood for those married in the early reform period but premarital cohabitation has no effect on divorce for those married in the late reform period in China 143 India edit Cohabitation in India had been taboo in traditional Hindu and Muslim societies However this is more acceptable between upper classes in large cities but is not often found in rural areas and smaller towns which are more social conservative Live in relationships are legal in India Recent Indian court rulings have ascribed some rights to long term cohabiting partners Female live in partners have economic rights under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 subject to following conditions as laid by Honourable Supreme Court of India in case of D Velusamy v D Patchaiammal The couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses They must be of legal age to marry They must be otherwise qualified to enter into a legal marriage including being unmarried They must have voluntarily cohabited and held themselves out to the world as being akin to spouses for a significant period of time On 12 June 2020 the Uttarakhand High Court stated in the case of Madhu Bala v State of Uttarakhand and others Habeas Corpus Petition No 8 of 2020 that consensual cohabitation between two adults of the same sex is legal 144 Indonesia edit In Indonesia an Islamic penal code proposed in 2005 would have made cohabitation punishable by up to two years in prison but failed to pass 145 The practice is still frowned upon and many low end hotels and boarding houses have been raided by police for allowing unmarried couples to share a room Japan edit In Japan according to M Iwasawa at the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research less than 3 of females between 25 29 are currently cohabiting but more than one in five have had some experience of an unmarried partnership including cohabitation A more recent Iwasawa study has shown that there has been a recent emergence of non marital cohabitation Couples born in the 1950s cohort showed an incidence of cohabitation of 11 8 where the 1960s and 1970s cohorts showed cohabitation rates of 30 and 53 9 respectively The split between urban and rural residence for people who had cohabited is indicates 68 8 were urban and 31 2 were rural 146 Philippines edit In the Philippines around 2 4 million Filipinos were cohabiting as of 2004 update The 2000 census placed the percentage of cohabiting couples at 19 The majority of individuals are between the ages of 20 24 Poverty was often the main factor in decision to cohabit 147 Iran edit In Iran the cohabitation of two people is known as white marriage According to researchers the number of white marriages in Iranian metropolises is increasing 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 Under Iranian law which is based on Islamic Sharia law the cohabitation of a man and a woman outside the framework of official marriage is a crime 150 151 156 It is estimated that the duration of a cohabitation in Iran is between one and three years 150 157 158 Cohabitation has no place in Iran from traditional social legal and religious points of view 151 156 159 160 161 However cohabitation in Iran can be explained by considering recent cultural changes in Iranian society including the growth of individualism modernity and fluid relationships and the gaps and conflicts between values 149 154 162 163 164 165 166 Various factors such as economic crises and cultural and social changes in cities are reasons for the increase in the number of cohabitation in Iran In other words the emergence of capitalism the increase of job insecurity the emergence of moral liberalism the revision of cultural traditions the anonymity of people in cities the elimination of the concepts and functions of neighborhoods changes in family structures and the emergence of temporary relationships are among the major reasons for white marriage in Iran 148 149 152 157 158 167 168 169 170 New research published by social anthropologist Kameel Ahmady and his team under the title House with Open Door A Comprehensive Research Study on White Marriage Cohabitation in Iran reveals the previously concealed and multi dimensional aspects of this phenomenon at the macro level focusing on the Tehran Mashhad and Isfahan metropolitan areas The research pieces argues that this phenomenon is more prevalent among educated and post graduate young people who have migrated to metropolitan areas for work and education 148 149 157 171 172 Europe edit In the European Union cohabitation is very common In 2014 42 of all births in the 28 EU countries were nonmarital 173 In the following European countries the majority of births occur outside marriage Iceland 69 9 in 2016 173 France 59 7 in 2016 174 Bulgaria 58 6 in 2016 173 Slovenia 58 6 in 2016 175 Norway 56 2 in 2016 173 Estonia 56 1 in 2016 173 Sweden 54 9 in 2016 173 Denmark 54 in 2016 173 Portugal 52 8 in 2016 176 and the Netherlands 50 4 in 2016 173 While couples of all ages cohabit the phenomenon is much more common among younger people In late 2005 21 of families in Finland consisted of cohabiting couples all age groups 177 Of couples with children 18 were cohabiting citation needed Of ages 18 and above in 2003 13 4 were cohabiting 178 Generally cohabitation amongst Finns is most common for people under 30 Legal obstacles for cohabitation were removed in 1926 in a reform of the Criminal Code while the phenomenon was socially accepted much later on In France 17 5 of couples were cohabiting as of 1999 135 Britain edit Main article Cohabitation in the United Kingdom In Britain today nearly half of babies are born to people who are not married in the United Kingdom 47 3 in 2011 173 in Scotland in 2012 the proportion was 51 3 179 It is estimated that by 2016 the majority of births in the UK will be to unmarried parents 180 needs update The Victorian era of the late 19th century is famous for the Victorian standards of personal morality Historians generally agree that the middle classes held high personal moral standards and rejected cohabitation They have debated whether the working classes followed suit Moralists in the late 19th century such as Henry Mayhew decried high levels of cohabitation without marriage and illegitimate births in London slums However new research using computerized matching of data files shows that the rates of cohabitation were quite low under 5 for the working class and the urban poor 181 182 Falling marriage rates and increased births outside marriage have become a political issue with questions of whether the government should promote marriage or focus on the status of a parent rather than a spouse the Conservative Party support the former whilst Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats support the latter 183 There are also differences between England and Wales and Scotland with the latter being more accepting of cohabitation 184 185 Bulgaria edit In Bulgaria there has been a rapid increase in cohabitation after the fall of Communism The transition from communism to market economy had a great impact on the demographic behavior of the population After the fall of Communism the legal and social pressure to get married has declined and the population has started to experience new life styles 18 As of 2014 58 8 of children were born to unmarried mothers 186 Czech Republic edit The marriage rates in Czech Republic have fallen dramatically during the past decades In the 1970s to 1980s about 96 97 of women married in 2000 it was estimated that only 75 of women would ever marry 187 The age at first marriage for women has increased from being in the range of 21 4 21 8 years in the 1970s and 1980s 187 to being 29 6 in 2011 188 In the early 1990s predictions were made by some Czech demographers that cohabitation would increase during the next decades and indeed there has been a marked increase in the number of people who live in non marital couple relations 189 In 2016 48 6 of births were to unmarried women 173 Germany edit Until the 1980s it was illegal for unmarried couples to cohabitate which made it impossible for many same sex couples to live together At this point the Bundesgerichtshof ruled that cohabitation could not be banned as it was protected by the Basic Law 190 As in other western societies patterns of family life have been changing in Germany during the past decades This has not created a moral panic but has been seen more as an ongoing social evolution 191 Cohabitation divorce rates lone parents and people s reluctance to marry or to have children have increased 191 However with regards to family formation and long term cohabitation instead of marriage there are very strong differences between the regions of former West Germany and East Germany which was formally Communist Significantly more children are born out of wedlock in eastern Germany than in western Germany In 2012 in eastern Germany 61 6 of births were to unmarried women while in western Germany only 28 4 were 192 A longitudinal survey found that union stability was significantly higher for cohabiting mothers in eastern Germany than western Germany due to differences in German society 38 Greece edit In Greece family dynamics remain conservative The principal form of partnership is marriage and extramarital childbearing and long term cohabitation are not widespread For instance in 2016 only 9 4 of births were outside marriage which is the lowest percentage among the European Union member states 173 Religion in Greece plays a very important role in society it was only in 1983 that civil marriage was introduced in the country The new laws modernized family law abolished dowry and provided for equal rights for illegitimate children 193 194 195 According to a 2008 study Greek society still remains conservative and birthing outside marriage although protected by law remains in many ways socially unacceptable 196 Despite this there have been further legal changes providing for a modern western outlook on family life including Law 3719 2008 dealing with family issues including Article 14 of the law which reduced the separation period necessary before a divorce in certain circumstances from four years to two years 197 Hungary edit The literature on second demographic transition argues as well that highly educated women are more prone to engage in cohabitation although the reasons are different they are less concerned with respecting the societal norms 198 Some scholars argued that cohabitation is very similar to being single in the sense of not giving up independence and personal autonomy 199 In Hungary cohabitation was an uncommon phenomenon until the late 1980s and it was largely confined to the divorced or widowed individuals 200 Among the ethnic groups Gypsy Roma tended to have higher rates of cohabitation mainly due to their reluctance to register their marriages officially 201 Since the 1980s cohabitation became much more frequent among all ethnic groups and it has been argued to have strongly influenced the decline in fertility 202 In 2015 47 9 of births were to unmarried women 173 Ireland edit nbsp Irish Magdalene Laundry c early 1900s Women who had sexual relations outside marriage were often sent to Magdalene laundries until the mid 20th centuryCohabitation in Ireland has increased in recent years and 36 6 of births were to unmarried women in 2016 173 Until a few decades ago women who had children outside marriage were severely stigmatized and often detained in Magdalene laundries The Civil Partnership and Certain Rights and Obligations of Cohabitants Act 2010 gives some rights to unmarried cohabitants under this act same sex couples can enter into civil partnerships while long term unmarried couples both heterosexual and same sex who have not registered their relation have some limited rights and obligations Italy edit In Italy where Roman Catholicism had a historically strong presence cohabitation is not as common as in other countries of Europe yet it has increased in recent years There are significant regional differences with non marital unions being more common in the North of the country than in Southern Italy A study published in 2006 found that long term cohabitation was still novel to Italy though more common among young people 203 As of 2015 the share of births outside marriage was 28 7 but this varied by statistical regions as follows Central Italy 33 8 Northeast Italy 33 1 Northwest Italy 31 3 Insular Italy 24 2 and South Italy 20 3 204 The Netherlands edit Dutch researchers have found that research participants see cohabitation as a risk reduction strategy in a country with high relationship instability 205 As of 2016 50 4 births were to unmarried women 173 Norway edit Cohabitation is a common type of partnership in Norway Cohabitants have some rights if they have joint children or if they have lived together for five years Cohabitants can also regulate their relationship through a cohabitation agreement 206 In Norway in 2016 56 2 of children were born outside marriage 173 Poland edit In Poland after the fall of Communism the influence of religion has increased Indeed Poland has one of the most religious populations in Europe see religion in Europe Cohabitation in Poland has traditionally been associated with the lower social classes but in recent years an increase has been seen among the more educated Family structure in Poland remains traditional Marriages are contracted at relatively young ages and the incidence of divorce is relatively low by European standards The exact incidence of cohabitation is not well established but it is quite low compared to other Western countries However Poland is not completely immune to Western influence and in 2016 25 of children were born outside marriage 173 207 Slovakia edit Slovakia is more conservative and religious than neighboring Czech Republic The principal form of partnership is marriage but extramarital childbearing and cohabitation are slowly spreading yet this trend is not without criticism and some view these phenomena as a threat to traditional values 208 209 In 2016 40 2 of births were to unmarried women 173 Fertility in Slovakia has been described in a 2008 study as between tradition and modernity 208 Switzerland edit Switzerland has a tradition of strong conservatism which can be seen in its legal and social history in Europe Switzerland was one of the last countries to establish gender equality in marriage married women s rights were severely restricted until 1988 when legal reforms providing gender equality in marriage abolishing the legal authority of the husband come into force these reforms had been approved in 1985 by voters in a referendum who narrowly voted in favor with 54 7 of voters approving 210 211 212 213 Adultery was decriminalized in 1989 214 Until the late 20th century most cantons had regulations banning unmarried cohabitation of couples the last canton to end such prohibition was Valais in 1995 215 216 As of 2015 22 5 of births were to unmarried women 217 Births outside marriage are most common in the French speaking part highest percentage in the cantons of Vaud Neuchatel Geneva Jura and least common in the eastern German speaking cantons lowest percentage in the cantons of St Gallen Zug Appenzell Innerrhoden Appenzell Ausserrhoden 218 Spain edit Spanish society has undergone major changes since the fall of the Franco regime Important legal changes which have occurred throughout the 1970s and 1980s include legalization of divorce decriminalization of adultery gender equality in family law and removing the ban on contraception 219 The liberalization of the political climate has allowed for alternative family formation In the mid 1990s cohabitation in Spain was still described as a marginal phenomenon but since the 1990s cohabitation has increased dramatically in Spain 220 In Spain in 2016 45 9 of births were outside marriage 173 As in other countries there are regional differences in 2011 in Catalonia the figure was 42 highest in mainland Spain in that year Canary Islands 59 and Balearic Islands 43 5 were highest while in Murcia it was only 30 7 lowest 221 Russia edit In Russia many couples express a desire to cohabit before marriage then register a civil marriage and then at a later stage have a large church wedding 222 Middle East edit The cohabitation rate in West Asian countries is much lower than in European countries In some parts of the continent it is however becoming more common for young people As of 1994 the rate of premarital cohabitation in Israel was 25 223 Cohabitation is illegal according to Sunni sharia law 224 225 Cohabitation Bi ah is a legal status Yadua BetTzibbur by the Jews Halakha Halacha religious Law 226 227 Kuwait edit Some legal recognition is extended to former common law unions in Kuwait Kuwaiti Family law applies the law of the father s husband s or male partner s country in case of expatriate familial disputes Hence if the father s country of nationality recognises common law marriages like the United Kingdom matters such as child support dues and maintenance can be considered in a Kuwaiti court 228 However out of marriage sexual intercourse is an offence punishable in Kuwait with a prison sentence between 6 months and 6 years if caught in action by an official or an administrative deportation order This meaning that common law marriage recognition can only be practically seen in exceptional cases like where the illegitimate child was born aboard and or former couples who have since expatriated to Kuwait 229 Single expat parents including expat mothers can legally sponsor their children for residency permits 230 Couples where one or both parties are Kuwaiti are covered by local family law and hence do not have recourse to the limited recognition of common law marriage 228 United Arab Emirates edit Children born out of wedlock are given partial recognition Their single expat mother or single expat father can sponsor them for residency However sexual relations outside of marriage were illegal in the UAE until November 2020 when restrictions were eased 231 Oceania edit Australia edit In Australia 22 of couples were cohabiting as of 2005 update 78 of couples who marry have lived together beforehand in 2008 rising from 16 in 1975 232 In 2013 34 of all births were to unmarried women 233 Australia recognizes de facto relationships The proportion of births outside marriage varies by state territory being in 2009 lowest in Victoria at 28 Australian Capital Territory at 29 and New South Wales at 30 and highest in Northern Territory at 63 and Tasmania at 51 234 New Zealand edit In New Zealand according to the 2001 census 20 5 of couples were in de facto relationships 235 In New Zealand 23 7 of couples were cohabiting as of 2006 citation needed In 2010 48 of births were outside marriage 236 Like Australia New Zealand recognizes de facto relationships 237 Africa edit South Africa edit In South Africa the 2011 census revealed that of South Africans aged 20 or older 43 7 had never been married 36 7 were married at the time of the census 11 0 were living together like married partners Civil marriages fell by 22 5 between 2011 and 2019 and declined by a further 31 1 in 2020 238 See also editAlimony Coparenting Family law Fornication Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study Interpersonal relationship and Intimate relationship Domestic partnership Free union Pilegesh Samenlevingscontract Living apart together Marriage gap POSSLQNotes edit High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has called for full respect and recognition of women s autonomy and sexual and reproductive health rights stating Violations of women s human rights are often linked to their sexuality and reproductive role Women are frequently treated as property they are sold into marriage into trafficking into sexual slavery In many countries married women may not refuse to have sexual relations with their husbands and often have no say in whether they use contraception Ensuring that women have full autonomy over their bodies is the first crucial step towards achieving substantive equality between women and men Personal issues such as when how and with whom they choose to have sex and when how and with whom they choose to have children are at the heart of living a life in dignity 17 Eleven states recognize common law marriages currently being established within their borders They are Alabama Colorado Iowa Kansas Montana New Hampshire Oklahoma Rhode Island South Carolina Texas and Utah 32 However in New Hampshire common law marriage is recognized only posthumously for purposes of probate only 33 and Utah recognizes common law marriages only if they have been validated by a court or administrative order 34 In 2003 Alberta Registries amended their Registration of Birth form in such a way that Statistics Canada can no longer determine the legal marital status of those persons in common law marriages 103 The most recent data for Argentina are from 2000 because after 2000 Argentina s Ministry of Health changed to publishing births as mother living with a partner or not including married or cohabiting rather than as marital and nonmarital References edit a b Definition of cohabit oxforddictionaries com Archived from the original on 9 August 2014 Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States CDC National Center for Health Statistics 13 May 2009 Retrieved 24 September 2011 Turid Noack Eva Bernhardt Kenneth Aarskaug Wiik Torkild Hovde Lyngstad The realization of marriage plans among cohabiting couples in Scandinavia Princeton University Archived from the original on 22 September 2020 Retrieved 11 February 2019 Teresa Castro Martin January 2013 Cohabitation in Spain No longer a marginal path to family formation Journal of Marriage and Family 75 2 422 437 doi 10 1111 jomf 12013 Retrieved 22 August 2015 60 dos bebes em Portugal sao filhos de pais nao casados 60 of babies in Portugal are children of unmarried parents Correio da Manha in Portuguese 28 April 2022 Retrieved 16 June 2023 Larry L Bumpass James A Sweet 1 November 1989 National Estimates of Cohabitation Demography 26 4 615 625 doi 10 2307 2061261 JSTOR 2061261 PMID 2583320 S2CID 46118819 Taylor Ina 2005 Religion and Life with Christianity Heinemann p 45 ISBN 9780435302283 Some Protestant groups although preferring sex to exist exclusively in a married relationship understand times have changed These Christians are prepared to accept cohabitation if it is a prelude to marriage Pope Francis breaks taboo by marrying cohabiting couples conducts mass wedding ceremony ABC News Australian Broadcasting Corporation 15 September 2014 The no sex myth BBC News 3 October 2002 Retrieved 11 February 2019 An absolute declaration that every sexual partnership must conform to the pattern of commitment or else have the nature of sin and nothing else is unreal and silly Ross Tim Wynne Jones Jonathan Rayner Gordon 29 April 2011 Royal wedding Archbishop backs William and Kate s decision to live together before marriage The Telegraph London Archived from the original on 12 January 2022 Retrieved 3 August 2013 Megan M Sweeney Teresa Castro Martin Melinda Mills 2015 The reproductive context of cohabitation in comparative perspective Contraceptive use in the United States Spain and France PDF Demographic Research 32 147 182 doi 10 4054 DemRes 2015 32 5 Christin Loffler 31 March 2009 Non Marital Cohabitation in Italy PDF doctor rerum politicarum University of Rostock Thornton A Philipov D 2009 Sweeping Changes in Marriage Cohabitation and Childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe New Insights from the Developmental Idealism Framework European Journal of Population 25 2 123 156 doi 10 1007 s10680 009 9181 2 PMC 2690230 PMID 19498956 Cherlin Andrew J 2004 The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage Journal of Marriage and Family 66 4 848 861 doi 10 1111 j 0022 2445 2004 00058 x JSTOR 3600162 Ernestina Coast Currently cohabiting relationship expectations and outcomes in the British Household Panel Survey BHPS Princeton University Archived from the original on 13 December 2013 Retrieved 11 February 2019 Friedman Jaclyn Jessica Valenti 2008 Yes Means Yes Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape Seal Press ISBN 978 1 58005 257 3 Navi Pillay 15 May 2012 Valuing Women as Autonomous Beings Women s Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights PDF Helen Kanzira Lecture Lecture Pretoria University of Pretoria Centre for Human Rights Archived from the original PDF on 13 March 2017 a b Elena von der Lippe Koytcheva 18 23 July 2005 Contemporary union formation in Bulgaria the emergence of cohabitation XXV International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of the Population Tours France Retrieved 22 August 2015 via ResearchGate DRAFT VERSION Do not cite or quote Variable v238 do you justify adultery Q68F Archived from the original on 18 February 2020 See for each country Variable Description Family Q 45 better source needed Directive 2004 38 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States Official Journal of the European Union 30 April 2004 Retrieved 7 August 2022 a b Kramer Elise September October 2004 Cohabitation Just a Phase Psychology Today 37 28 a b Goodwin PY Mosher WD Chandra A 2010 Marriage and cohabitation in the United States A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 2002 of the National Survey of Family Growth National Center for Health Statistics Vital Health Statistics 23 1 55 a b c Sharon Jayson 18 July 2005 Cohabitation is Replacing Dating USA Today a b c d Brown S L Booth A 1996 Cohabitation versus marriage A comparison of relationship quality Journal of Marriage and the Family 58 3 668 678 doi 10 2307 353727 JSTOR 353727 Rhoades GK Stanley SM Markman HJ 2012 A longitudinal investigation of commitment dynamics in cohabiting relationships Journal of Family Issues 33 3 369 390 doi 10 1177 0192513x11420940 PMC 3377181 PMID 22736881 Pamela J Smock Wendy D Manning Meredith Porter 2005 Everything s There Except Money How Money Shapes Decisions to Marry Among Cohabitors PDF Journal of Marriage and Family 67 3 680 696 doi 10 1111 j 1741 3737 2005 00162 x Archived from the original PDF on 5 April 2013 Retrieved 29 November 2012 Miller AJ Sassler S Kusi Appouh D 2011 The Specter of Divorce Views From Working and Middle Class Cohabitors Fam Relat 60 5 602 616 doi 10 1111 j 1741 3729 2011 00671 x PMC 3399247 PMID 22822285 a b Rhoades GK Stanley SM Markman HJ 2009a Couples reasons for cohabitation Association with individual well being and relationship quality Journal of Family Issues 30 2 233 258 doi 10 1177 0192513x08324388 PMC 2743430 PMID 19756225 a b Cohabitation For Your Marriage Retrieved 16 March 2012 Wendy D Manning P J Smock 2009 Divorce proofing marriage Young adults views on the connection between cohabitation and marital longevity Report National Council on Family Relations NCFR Report 54 a b Murrow Carrie Lin Shi 2010 The Influence of Cohabitation Purposes on Relationship Quality An Examination in Dimensions The American Journal of Family Therapy 38 5 397 412 doi 10 1080 01926187 2010 513916 S2CID 144241396 Common Law Marriage Handbook PDF U S Department of Labor June 2016 p 13 Title XLIII Domestic Relations Chapter 457 Marriages Proof of Marriage Section 457 39 gencourt state nh us Archived from the original on 14 October 2007 Retrieved 25 June 2023 Title 30 Chapter 1 Section 4 5 Utah State Legislature Archived from the original on 16 December 2014 Retrieved 16 December 2014 Births to unmarried women for the nation 2012 Kids Count Data Center The Annie E Casey Foundation Retrieved 22 August 2015 Births to unmarried women by state 2012 Kids Count Data Center The Annie E Casey Foundation Retrieved 22 August 2015 Joan Raymond 13 August 2014 More Unmarried Moms Are Living With Partners NBC News Retrieved 22 August 2015 a b c Schnor C 2014 The Effect of Union Status at First Childbirth on Union Stability Evidence from Eastern and Western Germany Eur J Popul 30 2 129 160 doi 10 1007 s10680 013 9304 7 PMC 4037585 PMID 24882913 Jay M 15 April 2012 The Downside of Cohabitation Before Marriage The New York Times Retrieved 22 April 2012 a b Dunifon R Kowaleski Jones L 2002 Who s in the house race differences in cohabitation single parenthood and child development Child Development 73 4 1249 1264 doi 10 1111 1467 8624 00470 PMID 12146746 Retrieved 22 April 2012 Coontz S 30 August 2011 Cohabitation Doesn t Cause Bad Parenting The New York Times Retrieved 22 April 2012 Nelson Sandi Rebecca L Clark Gregory Acs May 2001 Beyond the Two Parent Family How Teenagers Fare in Cohabitating Couple and Blended Families Urban Institute New Federalism National Survey of America s Families B 31 Archived from the original on 16 July 2012 Retrieved 20 April 2012 a b c d Kennedy Sheela Larry Bumpass 19 September 2008 Cohabitation and children s living arrangements New estimates from the United States Demographic Research 19 47 1663 1692 doi 10 4054 DemRes 2008 19 47 PMC 2612998 PMID 19119426 a b Manning WD Cohen JA Smock PJ January 2011 The Role of Romantic Partners Family and Peer Networks in Dating Couples Views about Cohabitation J Adolesc Res 26 1 115 149 doi 10 1177 0743558410376833 PMC 3476461 PMID 23087542 a b Halstead J 1997 Muslims and Sex Education Journal of Moral Education 26 3 317 331 doi 10 1080 0305724970260306 Marriage Preparation and Cohabitating Couples United States Conference of Catholic Bishops United States Catholic Conference Inc 1999 Archived from the original on 13 July 2019 Retrieved 22 April 2012 Prager D Judaism s sexual revolution Why Judaism and then Christianity rejected homosexuality Orthodoxy Today Archived from the original on 27 January 2019 Retrieved 22 April 2012 Taylor Ina 2005 Religion and Life with Christianity Heinemann p 45 ISBN 9780435302283 a b Thorton A Axinn W November 1992 Reciprocal effects of religiosity cohabitation and marriage American Journal of Sociology 98 3 628 651 doi 10 1086 230051 JSTOR 2781460 S2CID 143924400 Newman B 2011 Development Through Life A Psychosocial Approach Wadsworth ISBN 978 1 111 34466 5 Impicciatore R Billari FC May 2012 Secularization Union Formation Practices and Marital Stability Evidence from Italy Eur J Popul 28 2 119 138 doi 10 1007 s10680 012 9255 4 PMC 3371187 PMID 22707812 New Sorrow for Afghanistan AIDS Joins List AIDSPortal Archived from the original on 26 October 2008 a b Iran Travel state gov Archived from the original on 1 August 2013 Summary record of the 488th meeting Kuwait 04 14 1999 CRC C SR 488 Summary Record Convention on the Rights of the Child Palais des Nations Geneva United Nations 28 September 1998 Archived from the original on 4 June 2011 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint unfit URL link Culture of Maldives Everyculture com Fakim Nora 9 August 2012 Morocco Should pre marital sex be legal BBC News Legislation of Interpol member states on sexual offences against children Oman PDF Interpol Archived from the original PDF on 16 June 2011 Retrieved 22 July 2014 Mauritania 2010 Human Rights Report 8 April 2011 via State gov Dubai FAQs Education in Dubai Dubaifaqs com Dubai Room Sharing Guide mate ae Archived from the original on 28 March 2019 Retrieved 5 December 2018 Judd Terri Sajn Nikolina 10 July 2008 Briton faces jail for sex on Dubai beach The Independent Sudan must rewrite rape laws to protect victims Reuters 28 June 2007 Archived from the original on 15 June 2013 Retrieved 30 June 2017 Amal Basha Rana Ghanem Nabil Abdulhafid Women s Rights in the Middle East and North Africa Yemen Freedom House via Refworld Liefbroer AC Dourleijn E 2006 Unmarried cohabitation and union stability testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries Demography 43 2 203 221 doi 10 1353 dem 2006 0018 PMID 16889125 S2CID 13210179 Svarer Michael 2004 Is Your Love in Vain Another Look at Premarital Cohabitation and Divorce Journal of Human Resources 39 2 523 535 doi 10 2307 3559025 JSTOR 3559025 Impicciatore R Billari FC 2012 Secularization Union Formation Practices and Marital Stability Evidence from Italy Eur J Popul 28 2 119 138 doi 10 1007 s10680 012 9255 4 PMC 3371187 PMID 22707812 Cohabitating and Domestic Partnership PsychPage Retrieved 25 June 2023 New Report Sheds Light on Trends and Patterns in Marriage Divorce and Cohabitation National Center for Health Statistics Centers for Disease Control 24 July 2002 Galena H Kline Scott M Stanley 2004 Timing Is Everything Pre Engagement Cohabitation and Increased Risk for Poor Marital Outcomes PDF Journal of Family Psychology 18 2 American Psychological Association 311 318 doi 10 1037 0893 3200 18 2 311 PMID 15222838 Archived from the original PDF on 13 August 2012 Rhoades GK Stanley SM Markman HJ 2009 The pre engagement cohabitation effect a replication and extension of previous findings J Fam Psychol 23 1 107 111 doi 10 1037 a0014358 PMC 5956907 PMID 19203165 a b Couples who live together before marriage more likely to get divorced The Daily Telegraph 16 July 2009 Archived from the original on 12 January 2022 Cohan Catherine L Kleinbaum Stacey February 2002 Toward a Greater Understanding of the Cohabitation Effect Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Communication Journal of Marriage and Family 64 1 180 192 doi 10 1111 j 1741 3737 2002 00180 x ISSN 0022 2445 Rhoades GK Stanley SM Markman HJ 2006 Pre engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment J Fam Psychol 20 4 553 560 doi 10 1037 0893 3200 20 4 553 PMID 17176189 S2CID 24707669 Huang PM Smock PJ Manning WD Bergstrom Lynch CA 2011 He Says She Says Gender and Cohabitation J Fam Issues 32 7 876 905 doi 10 1177 0192513X10397601 PMC 3106995 PMID 21643456 Meg Jay 14 April 2012 The Downside of Cohabiting Before Marriage The New York Times Reinhold S 2010 Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability Demography 47 3 719 733 doi 10 1353 dem 0 0122 PMC 3000053 PMID 20879685 Key Statistics from the National Survey of Family Growth National Survey of Family Growth Centers for Disease Control Wendy D Manning Jessica A Cohen Cohabitation and Marital Dissolution The Significance of Marriage Cohort Princeton University Archived from the original on 15 April 2021 Retrieved 22 November 2012 D Vera Cohn 8 April 2011 New Facts About Families Recent Findings on Family Meals Cohabitation and Divorce Pew Research Center Publications Pew Research Center Archived from the original on 16 October 2012 Retrieved 22 November 2012 Wendy Manning Jessica Cohen April 2012 Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution An examination of recent marriages Journal of Marriage and Family 74 2 377 387 doi 10 1111 j 1741 3737 2012 00960 x PMC 3487709 PMID 23129875 Sassler S Addo FR Lichter OT 2012 The tempo of sexual activity and later relationship quality Journal of Marriage and Family 74 4 708 725 doi 10 1111 j 1741 3737 2012 00996 x Rhoades GK Stanley SM Markman HJ June 2012 The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning Cross sectional and longitudinal findings Journal of Family Psychology 26 3 348 358 doi 10 1037 a0028316 PMC 5956859 PMID 22545935 Michael J Rosenfeld Katharina Roesler 24 September 2018 Cohabitation Experience and Cohabitation s Association With Marital Dissolution Journal of Marriage and Family 81 1 42 58 doi 10 1111 jomf 12530 S2CID 150211124 Fetters Ashley 24 October 2018 So Is Living Together Before Marriage Linked to Divorce or What The Atlantic Retrieved 14 March 2021 Harms W 2000 The University of Chicago Chronicle Research Looks at Cohabitation s Negative Effects 19 11 Margolin L 1992 Child abuse by mothers boyfriends why the overrepresentation Child Abuse Negl 16 4 541 551 doi 10 1016 0145 2134 92 90070 8 PMID 1393717 Judith Treas Deirdre Giesen February 2000 Sexual Infidelity Among Married and Cohabiting Americans Journal of Marriage and Family 62 1 48 60 doi 10 1111 j 1741 3737 2000 00048 x Gladys Martinez Kimberly Daniels Anjani Chandra 2012 Fertility of Men and Women Aged 15 44 Years in the United States National Survey of Family Growth 2006 2010 PDF Division of Vital Statistics National Center for Health Statistics Brienna Perelli Harris 2014 How Similar are Cohabiting and Married Parents Second Conception Risks by Union Type in the United States and Across Europe European Journal of Population 30 4 437 464 doi 10 1007 s10680 014 9320 2 PMC 4221046 PMID 25395696 Nicoletta Balbo Francesco C Billari Melinda Mills 2013 Fertility in Advanced Societies A Review of Research European Journal of Population 29 1 1 38 doi 10 1007 s10680 012 9277 y PMC 3576563 PMID 23440941 Potarca Mills Lesnard 2013 Family Formation Trajectories in Romania the Russian Federation and France Towards the Second Demographic Transition European Journal of Population 29 69 101 doi 10 1007 s10680 012 9279 9 S2CID 3270388 Jan M Hoem Cornelia Muresan Mihaela Hărăgus 2013 Recent Features of Cohabitational and Marital Fertility in Romania PDF Population English Edition Hoem Jan M Muresan Cornelia 2011 The Role of Consensual Unions in Romanian Total Fertility Stockholm Research Reports in Demography Archived from the original on 3 March 2016 Retrieved 20 February 2016 a b Wade Horn 20 October 1998 Government Punishes Marriage Pushes Cohabitation The Washington Times Archived from the original on 3 August 2011 Retrieved 20 March 2012 via Institute for American Values Why Marriage Makes Financial Sense Investopedia Retrieved 7 August 2022 Jayson Sharon 14 October 2010 Report Cohabiting has little effect on marriage success USA Today The Experts Speak Unmarried org Alternatives to Marriage Project Archived from the original on 7 February 2013 Retrieved 10 November 2012 David de Vaus Lixia Qu Ruth Weston Winter 2003 Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability PDF Family Matters 65 Australian Institute of Family Studies 34 39 Archived from the original PDF on 9 May 2005 a b Proportion de naissances hors mariage selon le rang de naissance Quebec 1976 2017 www stat gouv qc ca Institut de la Statistique du Quebec Archived from the original on 5 December 2018 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Home Common Law Relationships Archived from the original on 2 July 2015 Retrieved 22 August 2015 What does the Government of Canada consider to be a common law relationship Help Centre Government of Canada Archived from the original on 21 August 2015 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Benoit Laplante Ana Laura Fostik 12 February 2015 Two period measures for comparing the fertility of marriage and cohabitation PDF Demographic Research 32 421 442 doi 10 4054 DemRes 2015 32 14 Table 6 1 Live births Canada Age and marital status of mother Statistics Canada Government of Canada 27 November 2015 Note 3 a b c ERROR Statistics Canada Government of Canada Archived from the original on 17 July 2015 Retrieved 23 June 2015 Alexandra Kazia 20 March 2013 4 myths about common law relationships CBC News Retrieved 22 August 2015 Provincial and Territorial Government Web Sites Department of Justice Canada Family Law Government of Canada 29 March 2002 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Anne Milan 9 July 2013 Marital Status Overview 2011 Statistics Canada Government of Canada Retrieved 22 August 2015 Kristen Douglas 30 September 2008 October 1996 Divorce Law in Canada Parliament of Canada Current Issue Review 96 3E Archived from the original on 8 September 2012 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Laplante Benoit 2006 The Rise of Cohabitation in Quebec Power of Religion and Power over Religion The Canadian Journal of Sociology 31 1 1 24 doi 10 2307 20058678 JSTOR 20058678 Adult Interdependent Relationships Canadian Legal FAQs Retrieved 22 August 2015 Quebec case puts spotlight on economic rights of common law partners The Globe and Mail Retrieved 22 August 2015 Intestate Succession Act Office of the Legislative Counsel Nova Scotia House of Assembly 18 December 2001 Archived from the original on 15 August 2015 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Benoit Laplante Ana Laura Fostik Cohabitation and Marriage in Canada The Geography Law and Politics of Competing Views on Gender Equality Population Association of America 2015 Annual Meeting San Diego 26 April 2 May 2015 Session 259 Marriage and Family in a Legal Context Archived from the original on 23 June 2015 Retrieved 23 June 2015 Family Law Act British Columbia Ministry of Justice Archived from the original on 14 August 2015 Retrieved 22 August 2015 a b Paul Herrnson Kathleen Weldon 6 October 2014 Love Marriage and the Vatican Center for Public Opinion Research just 20 percent in the 2012 General Social Survey disagreed with the assertion that it was all right for a couple to live together Cherlin Andrew 2010 Public and Private Families New York McGraw Hill p 227 ISBN 978 0 07 340435 6 Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation Population Association of America 12 April 2013 Luscombe B June 2011 More Americans Are Cohabiting But the Benefits of Living Together Apply Mainly to the Wealthier More Educated Retrieved 21 March 2012 N C Cohabitation Law Struck Down CBS News Archived from the original on 2 October 2013 Retrieved 28 June 2013 Virginia strikes down state fornication law CNN 25 January 2005 Archived from the original on 10 December 2012 Judge rules state adultery law unconstitutional Bismarck Tribune Associated Press 28 February 2005 Archived from the original on 26 May 2016 Retrieved 22 August 2015 After 148 years Florida makes it legal to shack up CBS News 6 April 2016 2022 Georgia Code Title 16 Crimes and Offenses Chapter 6 Sexual Offenses 16 6 18 Fornication Justia Law Retrieved 31 December 2023 Code of Laws Title 16 Chapter 15 Offenses Against Morality And Decency www scstatehouse gov Retrieved 31 December 2023 Robin Fields 20 August 2001 Virginia and Six Other States Still Classify Cohabitation as Illegal sullivan county com Retrieved 10 November 2012 Can I Claim a Boyfriend Girlfriend As a Dependent on Income Taxes INTUIT TurboTax Retrieved 22 August 2015 N C Cohabitation Law Struck Down CBS News 14 September 2006 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Schwartz John 14 September 2013 A Law Prohibiting Polygamy is Weakened The New York Times Retrieved 13 January 2014 Mears Bill 14 December 2013 Sister Wives case Judge strikes down part of Utah polygamy law CNN com CNN Retrieved 13 January 2014 Stack Peggy Fletcher 14 December 2013 Laws on Mormon polygamists lead to win for plural marriage The Salt Lake Tribune Retrieved 13 January 2014 Appeals court restores Utah s polygamy law in Sister Wives case Reuters 11 April 2016 Hauser Christine 13 May 2020 Utah Lowers Penalty for Polygamy No Longer a Felony The New York Times Embry Jessie L 1994 Polygamy In Powell Allan Kent ed Utah History Encyclopedia Salt Lake City Utah University of Utah Press ISBN 978 0874804256 OCLC 30473917 Archived from the original on 17 April 2017 Retrieved 13 January 2014 a b c Global Children s Trends The Sustainable Demographic Dividend Retrieved 10 November 2012 a b Anne Marie Ambert 17 September 2005 Cohabitation and Marriage How Are They Related The Vanier Institute of the Family via CatholicCulture org Teresa Castro Martin Clara Cortina Teresa Martin Garcia Ignacio Pardo La fecundidad no matrimonial en America Latina indicadores y analisis comparativos a partir de datos censales Non marital fertility in Latin America indicators and comparative analyzes based on census data PDF IX Jornadas de Investigacion de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales UdelaR Montevideo 13 15 de setiembre de 2010 IX Research Conference of the Faculty of Sciences Sociales UdelaR Montevideo September 13 15 2010 in Spanish Archived from the original PDF on 2 April 2015 Retrieved 14 June 2015 Vieira Joice Melo 2013 The Evolution of Births Outside of Marriage Paternal Recognition and Children s Rights in Brazil Population Association of America 2013 Annual Meeting Program Archived from the original PDF on 4 March 2016 Retrieved 1 August 2022 Marcantonio Caltabiano Maria Castiglioni March 2008 Changing Family Formation in Nepal Marriage Cohabitation and First Sexual Intercourse International Family Planning Perspectives 34 1 30 39 doi 10 1363 3403008 PMID 18440915 Living Together Without Marriage New Trend in Nepali Society Nepali Movies Nepali Films 27 June 2010 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Ishrat Hasan 10 August 2017 Your Legal Advisor The Daily Observer Archived from the original on 10 March 2023 Retrieved 23 August 2020 Research Response Number BGD32882 Refugee Review Tribunal Australia 12 February 2008 Retrieved 27 June 2023 via refworld Yu Jia Yu Xie December 2015 Cohabitation in China Trends and Determinants PDF Population and Development Review 41 4 607 628 doi 10 1111 j 1728 4457 2015 00087 x PMC 6226097 PMID 30416225 Archived from the original PDF on 10 March 2023 Retrieved 22 April 2019 Yongjun Zhang 2017 Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Dissolution in Postreform China Journal of Marriage and Family 79 5 1435 1449 doi 10 1111 jomf 12419 Indian High Court Reaffirms Same sex Couples Right to Cohabitation Human Rights Pulse 9 August 2020 Retrieved 7 August 2022 Indonesia plans new morality laws BBC News 6 February 2005 Retrieved 28 March 2010 Miho Iwasawa James M Raymo Larry Bumpass 23 September 2005 Unmarried Cohabitation and Family Formation in Japan Archived from the original on 1 September 2006 Retrieved 26 August 2008 Clarissa V Militante c 2007 tomarryornot GMANews TV Archived from the original on 11 June 2007 Retrieved 18 July 2007 a b c Ahmady Kameel et al 2021 House with Open Door A comprehensive research study on white marriage cohabitation in Iran London UK Mehri Publication a b c d Ahmady Kameel 6 April 2021 Changing the Attitude of Young People Towards Marriage with a Focus on Law and Environmental Conditions such as Religion and Custom Psychology and Education Journal 58 4 5233 5244 ISSN 1553 6939 PDF Ahmady Kameel October 2022 Changing the Attitude of Young People Towards Marriage with a Focus on Law and Environmental Conditions such as Religion and Custom 8th International Conferences on Economics and Social Sciences hosted by Cyprus Science University Antalya TURKEY pp 314 328 a b c Can Iran control its cohabiting couples BBC News 10 December 2014 Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b c Iranian Couples Increasingly Living Together Outside of Marriage Center for Human Rights in Iran 5 February 2016 Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b Ramin Mostaghim Sarah Parvini 29 May 2015 White marriage a growing trend for young couples in Iran Los Angeles Times Retrieved 4 February 2023 Mehrnaz Samimi 6 January 2014 More unmarried couples living together in Iran Al Monitor Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b کلان شهر تهران و ظهور نشانه های الگوی تازه ای از روابط زن و مرد مطالعه زمینه ها فرایند و پیامدهای هم خانگی Tehran metropolis and the emergence of signs of a new model of male female relations A study of contexts processes and consequences of domestication پرتال جامع علوم انسانی Comprehensive humanities portal in Persian Archived from the original on 4 February 2023 Retrieved 4 February 2023 ازدواج سفید در ایران جایگزین ازدواج سنتی و روش مبارزه با قوانین اسلامی White marriage in Iran an alternative to traditional marriage and a method of fighting against Islamic laws ایندیپندنت فارسی Farsi Independent in Persian 2 May 2021 Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b Iran bans magazine for encouraging cohabitation over wedlock report Reuters 27 April 2015 Retrieved 4 February 2023 Iran bans magazine after white marriage special The Guardian Reuters 27 April 2015 ISSN 0261 3077 Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b c ازدواج سفید تغییر سبک زندگی در ایران یا معضل اجتماعی DW ۱۳۹۷ ۶ ۲ White marriage lifestyle change in Iran or a social problem DW 6 2 1397 dw com in Persian Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b Relations outside of marriage in Iran and marriages without the accept of the family PDF Report Copenhagen Danish Immigration Service February 2018 Ahmady Kameel Summer 2019 زیر پوست شهر تحلیل پدیده ازدواج سفید در کلان شهرهای ایران Under the Skin of the City Analysis of the White Marriage Phenomenon in Iran s Big Cities نشریه علمی مطالعات پژوهشی در علوم انسانی و علوم اجتماعی Journal of Research Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences in Persian 63 94 108 Esfandiari Golnaz 6 December 2014 Rise In Cohabitation Has Iran Officials Railing Against White Marriage RadioFreeEurope RadioLiberty Retrieved 4 February 2023 Rodziewicz Magdalena Summer 2020 The Legal Debate on the Phenomenon of White Marriages in Contemporary Iran Anthropology of the Middle East 15 1 50 63 doi 10 3167 ame 2020 150105 ISSN 1746 0719 S2CID 218967303 واکاوی پدیدارشناسانه ازدواج سفید مورد مطالعه جوانان شهر تهران Phenomenological analysis white marriage case study Tehran youth پرتال جامع علوم انسانی Comprehensive humanities portal in Persian Archived from the original on 4 February 2023 Retrieved 4 February 2023 Nian Abdi Afroz Saz Alamet Betul 11 April 2018 های پیامد و سفید ازدواج آن در ایران کشور The consequences and whiteness of its marriage in Iran PDF مجله دستاوردهای نوین در مطالعات علوم انسانی Journal of new achievements in humanities studies in Persian Archived PDF from the original on 4 February 2023 Retrieved 4 February 2023 Cohabitation Iran s Common but Unrecognized Phenomenon Iran Open Data Retrieved 4 February 2023 Ahmady Kameel 2021 The Role of Temporary Marriage TM in Promoting Early Child Marriage ECM in Iran In Hosseini S Behnaz ed Temporary and Child Marriages in Iran and Afghanistan Singapore Springer pp 47 66 doi 10 1007 978 981 33 4469 3 3 ISBN 978 981 334 469 3 S2CID 234317299 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a work ignored help آپارات سرویس اشتراک ویدیو Aparat video sharing service آپارات سرویس اشتراک ویدیو Aparat video sharing service in Persian Retrieved 4 February 2023 برساخت اجتماعی ازدواج سفید The social construction of white marriage پرتال جامع علوم انسانی Comprehensive humanities portal in Persian Archived from the original on 4 February 2023 Retrieved 4 February 2023 Omidvar Pouran Danesh Parvaneh Javaheri Fatemeh Zahedi Mazandarani Mohammad javad 10 March 2019 Studying the cohabitation subculture in metropolis Tehran backgrounds and consequents Social Welfare Quarterly 18 71 279 320 doi 10 29252 refahj 18 71 8 S2CID 200062397 Beyond the Shari a White Marriages in the Islamic Republic of Iran associationforiranianstudies org Association for Iranian Studies AIS انجمن ایران پژوهی Retrieved 4 February 2023 ازدواج سفید شبه قانونی بدیلی در برابر ازدواج سنتی DW ۱۳۹۶ ۸ ۱۱ White quasi legal marriage an alternative to traditional marriage DW 8 11 1396 dw com in Persian Retrieved 4 February 2023 Niloufar Rostami 14 August 2019 IranWire Speaks to Wife of Jailed Iranian British Anthropologist IranWire Retrieved 4 February 2023 Kameel Ahmady The Human Trafficking amp Modern Slavery Expert Directory Retrieved 4 February 2023 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Tables Graphs and Maps Interface TGM table Eurostat 11 August 2016 Archived from the original on 9 September 2019 Retrieved 11 February 2019 Naissances hors mariage en 2018 www insee fr Births Slovenia 2016 www stat si Live births outside of marriage with parents co habiting or not in Portugal Pordata pt 28 April 2016 Retrieved 26 March 2017 The Finnish population structure of 2005 Statistics Finland in Finnish 1 June 2006 Elected MPs and candidates by family type in 2003 Statistics Finland Table Q1 Births stillbirths deaths marriages and civil partnerships numbers and rates Scotland quarterly 2002 to 2012 PDF www gro scotland gov uk Archived from the original PDF on 17 June 2013 Retrieved 17 April 2013 Most babies born out of marriage by 2016 trend suggests BBC News 11 July 2013 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Rebecca Probert September 2012 Living in Sin BBC History Magazine G Frost 2008 Living in Sin Cohabiting as Husband and Wife in Nineteenth Century England Manchester University Press Marriage and cohabitation key issues for the 2010 Parliament UK Parliament Retrieved 22 August 2015 Family Matters Cohabitation Scottish Government Archived from the original on 24 September 2015 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Lessons to be learned for cohabitation cases in England says Lady Hale in Supreme Court Scottish case Family Law Week Archived from the original on 10 March 2023 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Population and Demographic Processes in 2014 Final Data PDF Republic of Bulgaria National Statistical Institute Retrieved 7 August 2022 a b Kantorova Vladimira Marriage or cohabitation First union formation in the Czech Republic princeton edu Archived from the original on 7 August 2022 Retrieved 7 August 2022 FirstMariages by Age Sex Measurement Country and Year UNECE Statistical Database United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Retrieved 26 June 2023 failed verification Hamplova Dana 5 June 2002 Marriage and Cohabitation Qualitative Differences in Partnership Arrangements PDF Sociologicky casopis Czech Sociological Review 38 6 771 788 Retrieved 7 August 2022 Von 1933 bis heute Lesben und Schwule in Deutschland und der DDR www lsvd de in German Retrieved 1 November 2021 a b Cohabitation in Germany rules reality and public discourses oxfordjournals org Archived from the original on 19 January 2015 Retrieved 13 January 2016 Klarner Andreas 22 July 2015 The low importance of marriage in eastern Germany social norms and the role of peoples perceptions of the past PDF Demographic Research Retrieved 7 August 2022 Marcos Anastasios C Bahr Stephen J 2001 Hellenic Greek Gender Attitudes Gender Issues 19 3 21 40 doi 10 1007 s12147 001 0009 6 S2CID 143989412 AROUND THE WORLD Greece Approves Family Law Changes The New York Times Reuters 26 January 1983 Demos Vasilikie 11 August 2007 The Intersection of Gender Class and Nationality and the Agency of Kytherian Greek Women Aannual meeting of the American Sociological Association Greek mothers perceptions of their cooperation with the obstetrician and the midwife in the delivery room PDF Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women PDF Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Lesthaeghe R 1983 A Century of Demographic and Cultural Change in Western Europe an Exploration of Underlying Dimensions Population and Development Review 9 3 411 435 doi 10 2307 1973316 JSTOR 1973316 Rindfuss RR van del Heuve A 1990 Cohabitation A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single Population and Development Review 16 4 703 726 doi 10 2307 1972963 JSTOR 1972963 Carlson E Klinger A 1987 Partners in life Unmarried couples in Hungary European Journal of Population 3 1 85 99 doi 10 1007 bf01797093 PMID 12280732 S2CID 3691282 Barany Zoltan 2002 The East European Gypsies Regime Change Marginality and Ethnopolitics Cambridge University Press Speder Zsolt July 2001 Turning Points of the Life Course PDF Report Budapest Demographic Research Institute Archived PDF from the original on 26 June 2023 Retrieved 26 June 2023 Schroder Christin 2006 Cohabitation in Italy do parents matter Genus 62 3 4 53 85 JSTOR 29789325 NATALITA E FECONDITA DELLA POPOLAZIONE RESIDENTE PDF 28 November 2016 Retrieved 7 August 2022 Nicole Hiekel Renske Keizer 3 February 2015 Risk avoidance or utmost commitment Dutch focus group research on cohabitation and marriage PDF Demographic Research 32 311 340 doi 10 4054 DemRes 2015 32 10 Cohabitation Archived from the original on 22 July 2015 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Matysiak Anna 18 August 2009 Is Poland really immune to the spread of cohabitation PDF Demographic Research Retrieved 7 August 2022 a b Potancokova Michaela Vano Boris Pilinska Viera Jurcova Danusa 2008 Slovakia Fertility between tradition and modernity PDF Demographic Research 19 Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 973 1018 doi 10 4054 DemRes 2008 19 25 Michaela Potancokova The Meaning of Cohabitation and Marriage in Slovakia Comparing Generation PDF Bratislava Slovakia Demographic Research Centre Archived from the original PDF on 26 July 2014 Retrieved 17 July 2014 Swiss Grant Women Equal Marriage Rights The New York Times 23 September 1985 Switzerland profile Timeline BBC News 28 December 2016 Switzerland Markus G Jud Lucerne The Long Way to Women s Right to Vote in Switzerland a Chronology history switzerland geschichte schweiz ch a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Sally Shreir F John Harper 1988 Women s movements of the world an international directory and reference guide Longman p 254 ISBN 9780897745086 OCLC 17353816 Head Konig Anne Lise Adultere HLS DHS DSS CH Dictionnaire Suisse de politique sociale Union libre www socialinfo ch Archived from the original on 17 February 2016 Retrieved 8 April 2016 Keller Tomie NATIONAL REPORT SWITZERLAND PDF ceflonline net Retrieved 7 August 2022 Naissances et fecondite Births and fertility Statistique suisse in French Archived from the original on 28 May 2016 Retrieved 17 June 2016 Proportion de naissances vivantes hors mariage Proportion of live births outside marriage Statistique suisse in French Archived from the original on 11 April 2016 Retrieved 8 April 2016 Eric Solsten Sandra W Meditz eds 1988 SOCIAL VALUES AND ATTITUDES Spain A Country Study Washington D C GPO for the Library of Congress Retrieved 22 August 2015 Sweeney Megan M Castro Martin Teresa Mills Melinda 13 January 2015 The reproductive context of cohabitation in comparative perspective Contraceptive use in the United States Spain and France PDF Demographic Research Retrieved 7 August 2022 Mas de un tercio de los nacimientos en Espana fuera del matrimonio Republica com 16 January 2013 Archived from the original on 1 March 2021 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Olga Isupova 3 February 2015 Trust responsibility and freedom Focus group research on contemporary patterns of union formation in Russia PDF Demographic Research 32 341 368 doi 10 4054 DemRes 2015 32 11 Kaplan Amit 2002 The roads of freedom cohabitation patterns in Israel M A Thesis Tel Aviv University in Hebrew See commentary on verses 23 1 6 Vol 3 notes 7 1 p 241 2000 Islamic Publications full citation needed Tafsir Ibn Kathir 4 24 Maurice Lamm Non Jewish Wedding Ceremonies for Jews Chabad org C G Montefiore H M J Loewe 12 July 2012 A Rabbinic Anthology Cambridge University Press pp 76 ISBN 978 1 108 04812 5 a b Expat divorce in Kuwait Expatriate Law Retrieved 11 October 2020 Ahmed Fajer 28 August 2013 Kuwait Law Sexual Crimes 248am com Archived from the original on 29 June 2019 Retrieved 11 October 2020 Yasmena Al Mulla 24 August 2020 Kuwait allows expat mothers to sponsor children Gulf News Retrieved 11 October 2020 Sponsoring family residency visa by expatriates The United Arab Emirates Government portal n d Updated on 3 February 2020 Archived from the original on 17 May 2020 Retrieved 11 October 2020 Percentage of marriages preceded by cohabitation 1975 2008 Family Facts amp Figures Australian Institute of Family Studies Archived from the original on 23 July 2013 3301 0 Births Australia 2013 Australian Bureau of Statistics 23 October 2014 Retrieved 25 June 2023 3301 0 Births Australia 2009 Australian Bureau of Statistics 3 November 2010 Retrieved 22 August 2015 Atkin Bill 2003 The Challenge of Unmarried Cohabitation The New Zealand Response Family Law Quarterly 37 2 303 325 ISSN 0014 729X JSTOR 25740421 New Zealand Families Today PDF Report Families Commission July 2013 ISBN 978 0 478 36937 3 Archived from the original PDF on 15 January 2015 Retrieved 4 June 2015 Property Relationships Act 1976 New Zealand Legislation New Zealand Government Retrieved 22 August 2015 Is marriage an old fashioned institution Statistics South Africa 24 March 2022 Retrieved 17 January 2023 External links edit Cohabitation Encyclopedia Americana 1920 nbsp Media related to Cohabitation at Wikimedia Commons Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Cohabitation amp oldid 1217234984, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.