Xirong (Chinese: 西戎; pinyin: Xīróng; Wade–Giles: Hsi-jung; lit. 'Western warlike people') or Rong were various people who lived primarily in and around the western extremities of ancient China (in modern Gansu and Qinghai). They were known as early as the Shang dynasty (1765–1122 BCE),[1] as one of the Four Barbarians that frequently (and often violently) interacted with the siniticHuaxia civilization. They typically resided to the west of Guanzhong Plains from the Zhou Dynasty (1046–221 BCE) onwards.[2][3] They were mentioned in some ancient Chinese texts as perhaps genetically and linguistically related to the people of the Chinese civilization.[4]
Anthropomorphic axe, bronze, excavated in the tomb of Heibo (潶伯), a military noble in charge of protecting the northern frontier, at Baicaopo, Lingtai County, Western Zhou period (1045–771 BCE). Gansu Museum. This is considered as a possible depiction of a Xianyun.[5]
The historian Li Feng says that during the Western Zhou period, since the term Rong "warlike foreigners" was "often used in bronze inscriptions to mean 'warfare', it is likely that when a people was called 'Rong', the Zhou considered them as political and military adversaries rather than as cultural and ethnic 'others'."[6] Paul R. Goldin also proposes that Rong was a "pseudo-ethnonym" meaning "bellicose".[7]
Saka-style Majiayuan culture tomb figurines (3rd-2nd century BCE).[8]Xirong gold belt plaques in animal style found in Majiayuan M4, Gansu, 3rd century BCE.[9]Xirong gold plate in the form of walking feline found in Majiayuan M3, Gansu.[10]Necklace decorated with granulation, unearthed in Majiayuan, Gansu Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology.[11]Xirong earrings, Majiayuan cemetery in Gansu, the Warring states Period, Gansu Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology.[11]
The Xirong together with the eastern Dongyi, northern Beidi, and southern Nanman were collectively called the Sìyí (四夷; 'Four Barbarians'). The Liji "Record of Rites" details ancient stereotypes about them.
The people of those five regions – the Middle states, and the [Rong], [Yi], (and other wild tribes round them) – had all their several natures, which they could not be made to alter. The tribes on the east were called [Yi]. They had their hair unbound, and tattooed their bodies. Some of them ate their food without its being cooked. Those on the south were called Man. They tattooed their foreheads, and had their feet turned in towards each other. Some of them (also) ate their food without its being cooked. Those on the west were called [Rong]. They had their hair unbound, and wore skins. Some of them did not eat grain-food. Those on the north were called [Di]. They wore skins of animals and birds, and dwelt in caves. Some of them also did not eat grain-food. The people of the Middle states, and of those [Yi], Man, [Rong], and [Di], all had their dwellings, where they lived at ease; their flavours which they preferred; the clothes suitable for them; their proper implements for use; and their vessels which they prepared in abundance. In those five regions, the languages of the people were not mutually intelligible, and their likings and desires were different. To make what was in their minds apprehended, and to communicate their likings and desires, (there were officers) – in the east, called transmitters; in the south, representationists; in the west, [Di-dis]; and in the north, interpreters.[12] [The term 狄鞮 didi (ti-ti) is identified as: "(anc.) Interpreter of the Di, barbarians of the west."[13] Translated and adapted from the French.]
According to Nicola Di Cosmo,[17] 'Rong' was a vague term for warlike foreigner. He places them from the upper Wei River valley and along the Fen River to the Taiyuan basin as far as the Taihang Mountains. This would be the northwestern edge of what was then China and also the transition zone between agricultural and steppe ways of life.
c. 964 BCE: King Mu of Zhou defeated the Quanrong and the following year attacked the Western Rong and Xurong.
827-782 BCE: King Xuan of Zhou sends the State of Qin to attack Western Rong who submit and cede territory, sends the State of Jin against the Northern Rong (probably 788); following year destroys the RongJiang clan.
During the Western Zhou various Rong groups are interspersed among the cities of the North China Plain. It seems that the Beidi were pressing the Rong from the north.
714 BCE: Northern (Bei) or Mountain (Shan) Rong attack the State of Zheng.
650 BCE: Beirong attacked by the States of Qi and Xu.
after 650 BCE the Rong are rarely mentioned. They seem to have been mostly absorbed by the States of Qi and Jin.[18]
314 BCE: Qin defeated the last hostile Rong tribe.[19] Threats from unified nomadic incursions would eventually reappear under the Xiongnu identity during the subsequent Qin and Han Dynasties.[20]
7th-century scholar Yan Shigu made these remarks about the Wusuns, one group included to the "western barbarians": "Among the barbarians (戎; Róng) in the Western Regions, the look of the Wusun is the most unusual. The present barbarians (胡人; húrén) who have green eyes and red hair, and look like macaque monkeys, are the offspring of this people";[24][25][26] the exonym 胡人Húrén "foreigners, barbarians",[24] was used from the 6th century to denote Iranian peoples, especially Sogdians, in Central Asia, besides other non-Chinese peoples.[27]
Genetic data on ancient Qiang remains associated with the Xirong were determined to display high genetic affinity with contemporary Sino-Tibetan peoples as well as with ancient 'Yellow River farmers' of the Yangshao culture.[28][29]
^Waugh, Daniel C: Professor. "Silk Road Texts". University of Washington. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
^. Archived from the original on July 28, 2011. Retrieved April 23, 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
^"Hun & Huns -- Political, Social, Cultural, Historical Analysis Of China -- Research Into Origins Of Huns, Uygurs, Mongols And Tibetans". www.imperialchina.org.
^Nicola Di Cosmo, Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History ,Cambridge University Press, 2004 pp. 108-112.
^"灵台白草坡 西周墓葬里的青铜王国". www.kaogu.net.cn. The Institute of Archaeology (CASS Chinese Academy of Social Sciences). There is research on the ethnic image of the northern nomadic people of the Altaic language family. It may be that this is the image of the Xianyun tribe that once posed a serious military threat to the northern border of the Zhou Dynasty was called "Ghost people" because it looked different from the Chinese. 有考证系阿尔泰语系的北方游牧民族人种形象。可能是曾经对周朝北方边境构成严重军事威胁的猃狁部族，因相貌异于华夏，被称作"鬼方"。
^Li, Feng (2006), Landscape And Power In Early China, Cambridge University Press, p. 286.
^Goldin, Paul R. "Steppe Nomads as a Philosophical Problem in Classical China" in Mapping Mongolia: Situating Mongolia in the World from Geologic Time to the Present. Penn Museum International Research Conferences, vol. 2. Ed. Paula L.W. Sabloff. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. 2011. p. 235
^See Linduff, Katheryn (2013). "A Contextual Explanation for "Foreign" or "Steppic" Factors Exhibited in Burials at the Majiayuan Cemetery and the Opening of the Tianshan Mountain Corridor". Asian Archaeology: 81, Figure 6 (Majiayuan Tomb 3).
^Liu, Yan; Li, Rui; Yang, Junchang; Liu, Ruiliang; Zhao, Guoxing; Tan, Panpan (26 April 2021). "China and the steppe: technological study of precious metalwork from Xigoupan Tomb 2 (4th–3rd c.BCE) in the Ordos region, Inner Mongolia". Heritage Science. 9 (1): 46. doi:10.1186/s40494-021-00520-5. ISSN 2050-7445.
^Liu, Yan; Li, Rui; Yang, Junchang; Liu, Ruiliang; Zhao, Guoxing; Tan, Panpan (26 April 2021). "China and the steppe: technological study of precious metalwork from Xigoupan Tomb 2 (4th–3rd c.BCE) in the Ordos region, Inner Mongolia". Heritage Science. 9 (1): 46. doi:10.1186/s40494-021-00520-5. ISSN 2050-7445.
^ abShi, Yong; Wen, Yadi; Li, Xiaojun; Liu, Zhaojian; Huang, Yumin; He, Bei (4 August 2022). "Transmission and innovation on gold granulation: the application of tin for soldering techniques in ancient China". Heritage Science. 10 (1): 122. doi:10.1186/s40494-022-00753-y. ISSN 2050-7445.
^Wangzhi chap., tr. James Legge (1879), The Li Ki, Clarendon Press, vol.1, pp. 229-230.
^Baxter, William H. and Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford University Press, ISBN978-0-19-994537-5.
^Jaroslav Průšek. Chinese Statelets and the Northern Barbarians in the period 1400-300 BC. New York, 1971. p.38
^Di Cosmo, Nicola (1999). "The northern frontier in pre-imperial China". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China. Cambridge University Press. p. 908 of pp. 885–966.
^Cambridge History of Ancient China (1999) Chapter 13
^Nicola Di Cosmo in Cambridge History of Ancient China, page 924
^Mark Edward Lewis in Cambridge History of Ancient China, page 635
^The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Xiongnu". britannica.com. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved August 2, 2016.
^Chapter 14 of Keightley,'The Origins of Chinese Civilization',1983
^"Fortress Village - The Ethnic Minorities of Southwest China". ethno.ihp.sinica.edu.tw.
^Mencius Li lou II. text: "孟子曰：「舜生於諸馮，遷於負夏，卒於鳴條，東夷之人也。文王生於岐周，卒於畢郢，西夷之人也。" D.C.Lau (1970:128)'s translation: "Mencius said, 'Shun was an Eastern barbarian; he was born in Chu Feng, moved to Fu Hsia, and died in Ming T'iao. King Wen was a Western barbarian; he was born in Ch'i Chou and died in Pi Ying."
^ abBook of Han, with commentary by Yan Shigu Original text: 烏孫於西域諸戎其形最異。今之胡人青眼、赤須，狀類彌猴者，本其種也。
^Yu, Taishan. A Study of Saka History, (1998) pp. 141-142. Sino-Platonic Papers, Number 80. University of Pennsylvania.
^Atwood, Christopher P. (2015). "The Qai, the Khongai, and the Names of the Xiōngnú". International Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2: p. 62 of 35–63.
^Song, Mengyuan; Wang, Zefei; Lyu, Qiang; Ying, Jun; Wu, Qian; Jiang, Lanrui; Wang, Fei; Zhou, Yuxiang; Song, Feng; Luo, Haibo; Hou, Yiping; Song, Xingbo; Ying, Binwu (2022-11-01). "Paternal genetic structure of the Qiang ethnic group in China revealed by high-resolution Y-chromosome STRs and SNPs". Forensic Science International: Genetics. 61: 102774. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102774. ISSN 1872-4973. PMID 36156385. S2CID 252254620. Furthermore, ancient DNA revealed genetic connections between early Di-Qiang (Di and Qiang were historically combined to be one group) and Han Chinese [5], [6].
^Li, Jiawei; Zeng, Wen; Zhang, Ye; Ko, Albert Min-Shan; Li, Chunxiang; Zhu, Hong; Fu, Qiaomei; Zhou, Hui (2017-12-04). "Ancient DNA reveals genetic connections between early Di-Qiang and Han Chinese". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17 (1): 239. Bibcode:2017BMCEE..17..239L. doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1082-0. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC5716020. PMID 29202706. We identified Mogou to be the earliest ~4000 yr. BP Di-Qiang population, and genetically related to Taojiazhai in sharing up to 100% paternal (O3a) and ~60% maternal (D4, M10, F, Z) haplogroups.
Sourcesedit
(in Chinese) "Exploring the roots of the Qin".
(in Chinese) Ming Dynasty Record of 1574. Zhonghua Publishing. 1993. ISBN7-101-00607-8.
Grand dictionnaire Ricci de la langue chinoise. 7 volumes. Instituts Ricci (Paris – Taipei). Desclée de Brouwer. 2001. Vol. III, p. 555.
A Hypothesis about the Source of the Sai Tribes. Taishan Yu. Sino-Platonic Papers No. 106. September, 2000. Dept. of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
December 15, 2023
xirong, chinese, 西戎, pinyin, xīróng, wade, giles, jung, western, warlike, people, rong, were, various, people, lived, primarily, around, western, extremities, ancient, china, modern, gansu, qinghai, they, were, known, early, shang, dynasty, 1765, 1122, four, b. Xirong Chinese 西戎 pinyin Xirong Wade Giles Hsi jung lit Western warlike people or Rong were various people who lived primarily in and around the western extremities of ancient China in modern Gansu and Qinghai They were known as early as the Shang dynasty 1765 1122 BCE 1 as one of the Four Barbarians that frequently and often violently interacted with the sinitic Huaxia civilization They typically resided to the west of Guanzhong Plains from the Zhou Dynasty 1046 221 BCE onwards 2 3 They were mentioned in some ancient Chinese texts as perhaps genetically and linguistically related to the people of the Chinese civilization 4 XirongZhou geography Huaxia surrounded by the Four Barbarians Dongyi in the east Nanman in the south Xirong in the west and Beidi in the north Chinese西戎Literal meaningWestern warlike peopleTranscriptionsStandard MandarinHanyu PinyinXirongWade GilesHsi jung Contents 1 Etymology 2 Timeline 3 Ethnicity 4 See also 5 References 5 1 Citations 5 2 SourcesEtymology edit nbsp Anthropomorphic axe bronze excavated in the tomb of Heibo 潶伯 a military noble in charge of protecting the northern frontier at Baicaopo Lingtai County Western Zhou period 1045 771 BCE Gansu Museum This is considered as a possible depiction of a Xianyun 5 The historian Li Feng says that during the Western Zhou period since the term Rong warlike foreigners was often used in bronze inscriptions to mean warfare it is likely that when a people was called Rong the Zhou considered them as political and military adversaries rather than as cultural and ethnic others 6 Paul R Goldin also proposes that Rong was a pseudo ethnonym meaning bellicose 7 nbsp Saka style Majiayuan culture tomb figurines 3rd 2nd century BCE 8 nbsp Xirong gold belt plaques in animal style found in Majiayuan M4 Gansu 3rd century BCE 9 nbsp Xirong gold plate in the form of walking feline found in Majiayuan M3 Gansu 10 nbsp Necklace decorated with granulation unearthed in Majiayuan Gansu Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology 11 nbsp Xirong earrings Majiayuan cemetery in Gansu the Warring states Period Gansu Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology 11 After the Zhou dynasty the term usually referred to various peoples in the west during early and late medieval times Xirong was also the name of a state during the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods of Chinese history citation needed The Xirong together with the eastern Dongyi northern Beidi and southern Nanman were collectively called the Siyi 四夷 Four Barbarians The Liji Record of Rites details ancient stereotypes about them The people of those five regions the Middle states and the Rong Yi and other wild tribes round them had all their several natures which they could not be made to alter The tribes on the east were called Yi They had their hair unbound and tattooed their bodies Some of them ate their food without its being cooked Those on the south were called Man They tattooed their foreheads and had their feet turned in towards each other Some of them also ate their food without its being cooked Those on the west were called Rong They had their hair unbound and wore skins Some of them did not eat grain food Those on the north were called Di They wore skins of animals and birds and dwelt in caves Some of them also did not eat grain food The people of the Middle states and of those Yi Man Rong and Di all had their dwellings where they lived at ease their flavours which they preferred the clothes suitable for them their proper implements for use and their vessels which they prepared in abundance In those five regions the languages of the people were not mutually intelligible and their likings and desires were different To make what was in their minds apprehended and to communicate their likings and desires there were officers in the east called transmitters in the south representationists in the west Di dis and in the north interpreters 12 The term 狄鞮 didi ti ti is identified as anc Interpreter of the Di barbarians of the west 13 Translated and adapted from the French Note middle states Chinese 中國 pinyin Zhōngguo in this quote refers to the Middle Kingdom i e China Spade foot three legged pottery vessels as well as one and two handled pots were primary cultural characteristics of the Xirong citation needed William H Baxter and Laurent Sagart 2014 14 reconstruct the Old Chinese name of Rong as 戎 OC nuŋ mod rong Today similar sounding self designated ethnonyms among modern day Tibeto Burman peoples in western China include Rgyalrong of Sichuan and Nung and Trung of northwestern Yunnan see also Rung languages Prusek suggests relations between the Rong during the Zhou dynasty and the Ren 人 lt OC ni ŋ tribes during Shang dynasty 15 however the Ren 人 dwelt in southern Shandong and northern Jiangsu thus east not west of the Shang 16 Timeline editAccording to Nicola Di Cosmo 17 Rong was a vague term for warlike foreigner He places them from the upper Wei River valley and along the Fen River to the Taiyuan basin as far as the Taihang Mountains This would be the northwestern edge of what was then China and also the transition zone between agricultural and steppe ways of life c 964 BCE King Mu of Zhou defeated the Quanrong and the following year attacked the Western Rong and Xurong 859 BCE King Yi of Zhou Ji Xie Zhou capital attacked by the Rong of Taiyuan 877 841 BCE King Li of Zhou Western Rong and Xianyun raid deep into Zhou territory 827 782 BCE King Xuan of Zhou sends the State of Qin to attack Western Rong who submit and cede territory sends the State of Jin against the Northern Rong probably 788 following year destroys the RongJiang clan 781 771 BCE King You of Zhou is killed by the Quanrong ending the Western Zhou During the Western Zhou various Rong groups are interspersed among the cities of the North China Plain It seems that the Beidi were pressing the Rong from the north 714 BCE Northern Bei or Mountain Shan Rong attack the State of Zheng 706 BCE The same group attacks Qi 693 662 BCE Duke Zhuang of Lu zh ruler of the State of Lu has many wars with the Rong 664 BCE Shan Rong attack the State of Yan 662 BCE Beidi drive the Rong out of Taiyuan 650 BCE Beirong attacked by the States of Qi and Xu after 650 BCE the Rong are rarely mentioned They seem to have been mostly absorbed by the States of Qi and Jin 18 314 BCE Qin defeated the last hostile Rong tribe 19 Threats from unified nomadic incursions would eventually reappear under the Xiongnu identity during the subsequent Qin and Han Dynasties 20 Ethnicity editIt is believed that the Quanrong during the Western Zhou Warring States period 1122 476 BC spoke a Tibeto Burman branch of the Sino Tibetan languages and united with the Jiang clan to rebel against the Zhou 21 22 Mencius mentioned that even King Wen of Zhou had ancestries from the western barbarians 西夷 23 7th century scholar Yan Shigu made these remarks about the Wusuns one group included to the western barbarians Among the barbarians 戎 Rong in the Western Regions the look of the Wusun is the most unusual The present barbarians 胡人 huren who have green eyes and red hair and look like macaque monkeys are the offspring of this people 24 25 26 the exonym 胡人 Huren foreigners barbarians 24 was used from the 6th century to denote Iranian peoples especially Sogdians in Central Asia besides other non Chinese peoples 27 Genetic data on ancient Qiang remains associated with the Xirong were determined to display high genetic affinity with contemporary Sino Tibetan peoples as well as with ancient Yellow River farmers of the Yangshao culture 28 29 See also editQiang people Gyalrong people Tangut people Guirong Hua Yi Distinction Ji Jili Qiang historical people SinocentrismReferences editCitations edit Waugh Daniel C Professor Silk Road Texts University of Washington Retrieved 20 April 2014 Archived copy Archived from the original on July 28 2011 Retrieved April 23 2011 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint archived copy as title link Hun amp Huns Political Social Cultural Historical Analysis Of China Research Into Origins Of Huns Uygurs Mongols And Tibetans www imperialchina org Nicola Di Cosmo Ancient China and Its Enemies The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History Cambridge University Press 2004 pp 108 112 灵台白草坡 西周墓葬里的青铜王国 www kaogu net cn The Institute of Archaeology CASS Chinese Academy of Social Sciences There is research on the ethnic image of the northern nomadic people of the Altaic language family It may be that this is the image of the Xianyun tribe that once posed a serious military threat to the northern border of the Zhou Dynasty was called Ghost people because it looked different from the Chinese 有考证系阿尔泰语系的北方游牧民族人种形象 可能是曾经对周朝北方边境构成严重军事威胁的猃狁部族 因相貌异于华夏 被称作 鬼方 Li Feng 2006 Landscape And Power In Early China Cambridge University Press p 286 Goldin Paul R Steppe Nomads as a Philosophical Problem in Classical China in Mapping Mongolia Situating Mongolia in the World from Geologic Time to the Present Penn Museum International Research Conferences vol 2 Ed Paula L W Sabloff Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania 2011 p 235 See Linduff Katheryn 2013 A Contextual Explanation for Foreign or Steppic Factors Exhibited in Burials at the Majiayuan Cemetery and the Opening of the Tianshan Mountain Corridor Asian Archaeology 81 Figure 6 Majiayuan Tomb 3 Liu Yan Li Rui Yang Junchang Liu Ruiliang Zhao Guoxing Tan Panpan 26 April 2021 China and the steppe technological study of precious metalwork from Xigoupan Tomb 2 4th 3rd c BCE in the Ordos region Inner Mongolia Heritage Science 9 1 46 doi 10 1186 s40494 021 00520 5 ISSN 2050 7445 Liu Yan Li Rui Yang Junchang Liu Ruiliang Zhao Guoxing Tan Panpan 26 April 2021 China and the steppe technological study of precious metalwork from Xigoupan Tomb 2 4th 3rd c BCE in the Ordos region Inner Mongolia Heritage Science 9 1 46 doi 10 1186 s40494 021 00520 5 ISSN 2050 7445 a b Shi Yong Wen Yadi Li Xiaojun Liu Zhaojian Huang Yumin He Bei 4 August 2022 Transmission and innovation on gold granulation the application of tin for soldering techniques in ancient China Heritage Science 10 1 122 doi 10 1186 s40494 022 00753 y ISSN 2050 7445 Wangzhi chap tr James Legge 1879 The Li Ki Clarendon Press vol 1 pp 229 230 Grand dictionnaire Ricci de la langue chinoise Vol V 2001 p 938 Baxter William H and Laurent Sagart 2014 Old Chinese A New Reconstruction Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 994537 5 Jaroslav Prusek Chinese Statelets and the Northern Barbarians in the period 1400 300 BC New York 1971 p 38 Di Cosmo Nicola 1999 The northern frontier in pre imperial China In Loewe Michael Shaughnessy Edward L eds The Cambridge History of Ancient China Cambridge University Press p 908 of pp 885 966 Cambridge History of Ancient China 1999 Chapter 13 Nicola Di Cosmo in Cambridge History of Ancient China page 924 Mark Edward Lewis in Cambridge History of Ancient China page 635 The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Xiongnu britannica com Encyclopaedia Britannica Online Retrieved August 2 2016 Chapter 14 of Keightley The Origins of Chinese Civilization 1983 Fortress Village The Ethnic Minorities of Southwest China ethno ihp sinica edu tw Mencius Li lou II text 孟子曰 舜生於諸馮 遷於負夏 卒於鳴條 東夷之人也 文王生於岐周 卒於畢郢 西夷之人也 D C Lau 1970 128 s translation Mencius said Shun was an Eastern barbarian he was born in Chu Feng moved to Fu Hsia and died in Ming T iao King Wen was a Western barbarian he was born in Ch i Chou and died in Pi Ying a b Book of Han with commentary by Yan Shigu Original text 烏孫於西域諸戎其形最異 今之胡人青眼 赤須 狀類彌猴者 本其種也 Yu Taishan A Study of Saka History 1998 pp 141 142 Sino Platonic Papers Number 80 University of Pennsylvania Book of Han vol 96b Archived March 17 2008 at the Wayback Machine Atwood Christopher P 2015 The Qai the Khongai and the Names of the Xiōngnu International Journal of Eurasian Studies 2 p 62 of 35 63 Song Mengyuan Wang Zefei Lyu Qiang Ying Jun Wu Qian Jiang Lanrui Wang Fei Zhou Yuxiang Song Feng Luo Haibo Hou Yiping Song Xingbo Ying Binwu 2022 11 01 Paternal genetic structure of the Qiang ethnic group in China revealed by high resolution Y chromosome STRs and SNPs Forensic Science International Genetics 61 102774 doi 10 1016 j fsigen 2022 102774 ISSN 1872 4973 PMID 36156385 S2CID 252254620 Furthermore ancient DNA revealed genetic connections between early Di Qiang Di and Qiang were historically combined to be one group and Han Chinese 5 6 Li Jiawei Zeng Wen Zhang Ye Ko Albert Min Shan Li Chunxiang Zhu Hong Fu Qiaomei Zhou Hui 2017 12 04 Ancient DNA reveals genetic connections between early Di Qiang and Han Chinese BMC Evolutionary Biology 17 1 239 Bibcode 2017BMCEE 17 239L doi 10 1186 s12862 017 1082 0 ISSN 1471 2148 PMC 5716020 PMID 29202706 We identified Mogou to be the earliest 4000 yr BP Di Qiang population and genetically related to Taojiazhai in sharing up to 100 paternal O3a and 60 maternal D4 M10 F Z haplogroups Sources edit in Chinese Exploring the roots of the Qin in Chinese Ming Dynasty Record of 1574 Zhonghua Publishing 1993 ISBN 7 101 00607 8 Grand dictionnaire Ricci de la langue chinoise 7 volumes Instituts Ricci Paris Taipei Desclee de Brouwer 2001 Vol III p 555 A Hypothesis about the Source of the Sai Tribes Taishan Yu Sino Platonic Papers No 106 September 2000 Dept of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies University of Pennsylvania Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Xirong amp oldid 1187158562, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
