Tiny-house movement

The tiny-house movement is an architectural and social movement that advocates for the downsizing and simplification of living spaces.^[1] According to the 2018 International Residential Code, Appendix Q Tiny Houses, a tiny house is classified as "a dwelling unit with a maximum of 37 square metres (400 square feet) of floor area, excluding lofts."^[2] The term "tiny house" is sometimes used interchangeably with "micro-house".^[3] While tiny housing primarily represents cheap, simple living, the movement also advertises itself as a potential eco-friendly solution to the existing housing industry, as well as a transitional option for the currently homeless.^[1]

Tiny homes in Detroit

A design for the exterior (top) and interior (bottom) of a street of tiny houses.

There are a variety of reasons for individuals' engagement with the tiny-house movement. Examples include, but are not limited to, a desire to seek new lifestyles and living experiences, an interest in minimising waste, and a desire to limit spending.^[4]

Background

 

Median size of new single family home built

  Contractor built

  Owner built

In the United States, the average size of newly constructed homes grew from 1,780 square feet (165 m²) in 1978 to 2,479 square feet (230.3 m²) in 2007, and further still to 2,662 square feet (247.3 m²) in 2013.^[5][6]

History

The precursor to the tiny house was the shotgun shack,^[7] a small, but slightly larger single-story building in use among urban Americans from the late 19th century until the Great Depression of the 1930s.^[8] Although few such houses contained more than two bedrooms, they provided accommodation for blue-collar families in Southern U.S. cities like New Orleans.^[9][10][11]

Henry David Thoreau and the publication of his book Walden are often quoted as an early inspiration of the tiny-house movement.^[12][13][14] The modern movement is considered to have started in the 1970s, with artists such as Allan Wexler investigating the ideas of contemporary compact living.^[15][16] Early pioneers include Lloyd Kahn, author of Shelter (1973), and Lester Walker, author of Tiny Houses (1987). Sarah Susanka started the "counter-movement" for smaller houses, something she details in her book The Not So Big House (1997):^[5]

Reconstruction of Thoreau's cabin

 

Interior

 

Exterior

 

Tiny houses on display in Portland, Oregon

Jay Shafer...built his first tiny house in Iowa in 1999, and lived in it for five years. It was a hundred and ten square feet [10 m²], with a steep gabled roof and a porch.^[17]

Tiny houses on wheels were popularized by Jay Shafer, who designed and resided in a 96-square-foot (8.9 m²) house for two months before going on to found the Tumbleweed Tiny House Company, and later the Four Lights Tiny House Company on September 6, 2012.^[18] In 2002, Shafer co-founded, along with Greg Johnson, Shay Salomon and Nigel Valdez, the Small House Society.^[19] Salomon and Valdez subsequently published their guide to the modern Small House Movement, Little House on a Small Planet (2006) and Johnson published his memoir, Put Your Life on a Diet (2008).

With the Great Recession affecting the economy of the United States from 2007 to 2009, the tiny-house movement gained more traction due to its perceived affordability and environmentalist nature.^[20] Despite this, tiny house purchases represented a minimal percentage of real estate transactions, with approximately 1% of total home buyers at the time acquiring houses qualified for the label of a tiny home.^[21] Small houses are also used as accessory dwelling units (or ADUs) to serve as additional on-property housing for aging relatives or returning children, as a home office, or as a guest house.^[21] Tiny houses typically costed about $20,000 to $50,000 as of 2012.^[21]

In 2013, the Tiny House Fair at Yestermorrow, Vermont was organized by Elaine Walker. An attendee at the event, Jay Shafer, suggested promoting ethical business practices and offering guidelines for the construction of tiny houses on wheels.^[22] Walker continued this effort in 2015, creating the non-profit organization American Tiny House Association.^[23]

Tiny houses have received considerable media coverage,^[24] with a television show on the movement, Tiny House Nation,^[25] airing in 2014, alongside a similar Tiny House Hunters.^[16]

Outside the United States

 

Tiny houses exposed at an alternative housing festival in Belgium

While the movement is most active in the United States, interest in tiny homes has been observed in other developed countries.

• In Australia, some interest was created through designers such as Fred Schultz^[26] and builders such as Designer Eco Tiny Homes. Designer Eco Tiny Homes is Australia's largest tiny home builder and has been at the forefront of the tiny home movement in Australia since 2016. Owned by Grant Emans and running out of 2 factories in Ulladulla on the south coast of NSW, Designer Eco Tiny Homes employs around 40 people and makes approximatrly 100 tiny homes annually. In 2022, Designer Eco Tiny Homes opened the world's first tiny home showroom and added a new tiny home model to its list, which is 9.6 metres long and is the most extended tiny home in Australia.
• In Canada, the legality of tiny homes depends on the location and whether the home is mobile or stationary.^[27] In Toronto, a tiny house requires a building permit and a connection to the power grid.^[27] In December 2019, Edmonton introduced by-laws permitting the construction of tiny homes on foundations, removing the former 5.5-metre minimum-width requirement.^[28] Some municipalities consider buildings which are not connected to city electricity and sewerage systems as violatory of their building codes.^[27] A possible explanation for this ruling is to avoid further incidents similar to the Leaky Condo Crisis in British Columbia, te result of which saw an overhaul in the province's building codes.^[29] Similarly, some mobile tiny homes have been rejected from spaces designed for RVs due to the property not meeting the same criteria the vehicles are held to.^[30] An "eco-village" of homes under 600 square feet (56 m²) in Okotoks known as the Homestead Project was proposed in 2017 but met opposition from Okotoks residents.^[31][32] In August 2019 the council voted not to consider the project further after deciding to honour a petition with 3,000 signatures opposed to the development.^[33]
• In France, September 2019, the “Ty Village” opened its doors 6 km from the nearby University of Saint Brieuc in the department of Bretagne.^[34]
• In Germany, the community of Vauban created 5000 households on an old military base in Freiburg. The planned density of the building in that area was 50 dwelling units per acre.^[35] Also in Germany, British architect Richard Horden and the Technical University of Munich developed the Micro Compact Home (M-CH), a high-end small^[5] (76 sq ft or 7.1 m²) cube, designed for 1–2 persons, with functional spaces for cooking, hygiene, dining/working, and sleeping.^[36]
• In New Zealand, company-built units are called mobile homes^[37] and tiny houses on wheels.^[38] As of 2021, it tends to be a grass-roots initiative.^[39] Bryce Langston, a film-maker with a passion for small space design, permaculture, and downsized, eco-friendly living has created short, documentary-style videos on small space living for the video sharing site YouTube via his channel and website 'Living Big in a Tiny House'.^[40]
• In Barcelona, Spain, Eva Prats and Ricardo Flores (Flores & Prats) presented the 300-square-foot (28 m²) House in a Suitcase.
• In Sweden, a chef couple launched a forest-to-table movement, named Stedsans in the Woods, out of tiny home cabins for rent in a Swedish forest. They have shared the blueprints for their A Frame cabins.^[41]
• In the United Kingdom, Tiny Eco Homes UK has developed several customisable tiny house models starting at £26,000. Dozens of the homes are being used as primary residences across the UK and mainland Europe. Abito created intelligent living spaces apartments of 353 square feet (32.8 m²) in Manchester. Tiny House Scotland has created the Nesthouse,^[42] a 23-square-metre (250 sq ft) modular movable small eco-house to explore the possibilities of sustainable small-scale living^[43] in a highly insulated timber-framed structure with some Passivhaus principles ensuring very low energy usage; the estimated cost for the Nesthouse is €55,000.^[44] Northern Ireland has also seen a small but growing community of tiny house owners, although the planning rules do not specifically accommodate tiny houses, with the result being that the planning process for a tiny house would need to be decided upon on a case-by-case basis.^[45]

 

The NestHouse tiny house designed and built by Jonathan Avery of Tiny House Scotland, Linlithgow UK

• In Brazil, Tiny Houses Brasil was the first mini-house factory in the country, operating out of a shed on a farm property in Porangaba, São Paulo. The company develops projects and builds mini houses on wheels. The tiny houses are customized and built by hand with values of R$90,000.^[46]

Issues

 

Interior of a tiny home in Portland

One of the biggest obstacles faced by the tiny-house movement is the difficulty of finding a region in which such a house could be constructed.^[47] Zoning regulations typically specify minimum square footage for new constructions on a foundation, and for tiny houses on wheels, parking on one's own land may be prohibited by local regulations against camping.^[48] While tiny houses have the protential to reduce building and living costs, they can still be costly as a result of the cost of the land they occupy.^[49]

In addition, RV parks do not always allow tiny houses unless they meet the criteria required for RVs.^[30] Tiny houses on wheels are considered RVs and are not suitable for permanent residence, according to the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association. From RV Business, "The RVIA will continue to shy away from allowing members who produce products that are referred to as "tiny houses" or "tiny homes". (However, the RVIA does allow "tiny home" builders to join as long as their units are built to RV or park-model RV standards.)" ^[50]

Lower court decisions in the US have struck down zoning laws related to size which posed an obstacle to tiny housing. One such case was League of South Jersey, Inc v.^[51] Township of Berlin, in which the court found that a zoning law related to the size of a home did not protect citizens, resulting of the law's repealment. This case, and other similar decisions, has assisted in allowing for the propagation of the tiny-house movement despite their infrequency.^[52]

In 2014, the first "tiny house friendly town" was declared in Spur, Texas; it was later clarified that a tiny house may not be on wheels, but rather must be secured to a foundation.^[53]

In July 2016, Washington County, Utah revised their zoning regulations to accommodate some types of tiny housing.^[54]

Increasingly, tiny houses have become larger, heavier, and more expensive.^[55] The ideal of minimal impact on the environment is not a priority for all home-owners, with tiny house construction businesses able capitalize on the popularity of tiny homes without needing involvement in the environmental aspect of the movement.

Tiny houses have been noted as impractical spaces to raise families in. Overcrowding and lack of space have been noted to be detrimental to both physical and mental health, with the potential to negatively affect academic performance in youth.^[56][49]

In New Zealand, some district councils have sought to classify mobile homes and tiny homes on wheels as buildings, subject to the Building Act 2004. This was backed by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) in a determination^[57] that was then challenged in District Court (Dall v MBIE^[58]). Judge Callaghan found in favor of Dall's argument that his home was not a building, ruling the council and MBIE to have erred in saying it was.^[59] Other cases have since been heard, but no further clarifications have been made by the New Zealand Government as of January 2021.

Housing for the homeless

 

A tiny, mobile house in a Portland, Oregon yard

The Great Recession fueled the growth of the tiny-house movement. In several cities, an entrenched homeless population formed around tent cities, encampments that evolved to become semi-permanent housing.^[60] Homelessness in these communities was driven by foreclosures and expensive mortgages as a result of the United States housing bubble.^[61]

Tiny houses became an affordable option for individuals who lost their homes as a result of financial hardship. With their low cost and relative ease of construction, tiny houses have been adopted as shelters for the homeless in Eugene, OR; Olympia, WA; Ithaca, NY; and other cities.^[62] Communities of tiny houses offer residents a transition towards self-sufficiency.^[63][64][65] Communities such as Othello Village in Seattle, WA originally lacked electricity and heat. In Seattle, non-profits have stepped in to help provide amenities.^[62]

Providing housing to the homeless reduces costs for municipalities.^[66] The long-term viability of tiny houses for homeless people is entirely dependent on the structure and sustainability of the model. Benefits of access to housing include privacy, storage, safety, restoration of dignity and stability.^[67] For cities such as Chicago, tiny houses are seen as an appealing option to close the gap in housing availability.^[68]

In Reno, Nevada, faith-based groups and community advocates have legislated new zoning for housing of homeless people in a tiny home community. Each tiny house would cost an estimated $3,800 to build, as well as an operating budget of $270,000 for case managers to help residents find more permanent housing and a project manager position.^[69] A village of 21 tiny homes is planned to open in 2023 for the chronically homeless in Worcester, Massachusetts.^[70]

One challenge besides zoning and funding has been a NIMBY response by communities, which may weigh concerns over collections of tiny homes devolving intoshantytowns or blighted neighborhoods which reduce the property values of the surrounding neighborhoods. Community planners have also voiced concerns in regards to the possibility of tiny house communities developing into shantytowns.^[71]

In California, the city of Richmond has engaged University of California, Berkeley students in the THIMBY (Tiny House In My Backyard) project with a pilot program aimed at developing a model of six transitional tiny homes to be placed in the city.^[72] THIMBY, with the support of Sustainable Housing at California, intends to foster an environment that allows homeowners and transitional housing residents to live as neighbors rather than in a landlord-tenant relationship. THIMBY acquires target locations for tiny housing development through surveying interested homeowners offering to rent out backyard space for the tiny housing unit. While Sustainable Housing at California has independently scouted out interested individuals for the initial pilot project, the organization also aims to work closely with the City of Richmond’s Tiny House on Wheels ordinance to bolster city-level efforts to provide affordable housing and shelter. This is in line with developing efforts in the San Francisco Bay Area to use micro-apartments and tiny houses in combating the housing crisis and homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area.^[73][74][75] Similar efforts of using tiny houses to house the homeless are also ongoing in Oakland through a partnership between the City of Oakland and Laney College. In 2021, the California based nonprofit organization Hope of the Valley funded and built 4 tiny home villages in Los Angeles, forming the first formal, legally uncontested tiny home project in the region.^[76][77] More informal efforts to build tiny homes for homeless communities had been made in the past by citizens in Los Angeles,^[78][79] but were ultimately seized by the city due to concerns over sanitation.^[80]

As of 2022, tiny homes have been gaining popularity as a temporary solution for homelessness across the West coast, and in the Bay Area.^[81] Homeless individuals or families are commonly allowed to live in tiny homes for six months while seeking permanent housing, often with help from caseworkers; if they cannot, they are evicted and then the tiny home is given to the next person or family on the waiting list.^[81] An analysis of data from several tiny home communities in Santa Clara and Alameda counties found that compared to dormitory-style homeless shelters, which led to permanent housing less than 15% of the time, tiny home communities led to permanent housing almost 50% of the time.^[81] Dormitory-style homeless shelters cost about $17,000 per bed per year; some tiny home communities like Oakland's Oak Street cost $22,500 per bed per year (with onsite portable toilets), with the inclusion of ensuite bathrooms as seen in certain San Jose shelters resulting in a cost increase to approximately $34,000 per bed per year.^[81] While the median studio apartment in San Jose rents for $29,000 per year as of 2022, tiny houses come equipped with support services to help homeless persons get jobs and permanent housing, resulting in higher overall costs.^[81]

In Edinburgh, UK the Social Enterprise Social Bite asked Jonathan Avery of Tiny House Scotland to design a two bedroom variation of his NestHouse tiny house for its Homeless Tiny House Village in the Granton area of Edinburgh.^[82] The village was opened on May 17, 2018 by Angela Constance, the Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Communities, Social Security and Equalities, and features eleven NestHouse Duo tiny houses and a community hub building all built by Carbon Dynamic.^[83][84]

Pros and cons

In the co-authored research article The Psychology of Home Environments, it's argued that the drive behind the tiny house movement is centered around desires of modesty and conservation, in addition to environmental consciousness, self-sufficiency, and wanting a life of adventure.^{[85][irrelevant citation]} In building tiny houses, there is often a misalignment between the needs of the occupant(s), and the expressed design from the creating team. This reality is used as a call for architects and design teams to work with psychologists to build tiny homes that are better suited towards the needs of the occupant(s). In understanding these considerations, it is important to note that not everyone is suited for a tiny house.^[86]

Smaller homes are less expensive than larger ones in terms of taxes and building, heating, maintenance, and repair costs. The lower cost of living may be advantageous to those with little savings, such as people aged 55 and older.^[87] In addition to costing less, small houses may encourage a less cluttered, simpler lifestyle, and reduce ecological impacts for their residents.^[88] The typical size of a small home seldom exceeds 500 square feet (46 m²).^[89] The typical tiny house on wheels is usually less than 8 by 20 ft (2.4 by 6.1 m), with livable space totaling 120 sq ft (11 m²) or less, for ease of towing and to exempt it from the need for a building permit.

Small houses may emphasize design over size,^[90] utilize dual purpose features and multi-functional furniture, and incorporate technological advances of space saving equipment and appliances.^[5] Vertical space optimization is also a common feature of small houses and apartments. An example of this is the use of loft spaces for sleeping and storage. Because of overall height restrictions related to the ability to easily tow a tiny house, it is common for lofts to be between 3.3 ft and 5.5 ft (1.0m and 1.7m) inside height. Therefore, for accessibility of elderly and disabled people, larger floor plans that keep essential elements like bed, bathroom and kitchen on the main floor are more typical.^[91]

The increased utilization of small houses as second homes or retirement houses may lead to development of more land.^[89] People interested in building a small home can encounter institutional “discrimination” when building codes require minimum size well above the size of a small home.^[48] Also, neighbors may be hostile because they fear negative impacts on their property values and have concerns about increased taxes.^{[92][93][94][95]}

More broadly, these sentiments of "othering" homeless and unhoused persons have culminated into a broader movement of NIMBY-ism, or "Not in My Backyard."

The advent of NIMBY-ism occupied much of community organizing and housing advocacy dialogue in the 1980s, so much that some coined it “the populist political philosophy of the 1980s.”^[96] In many ways, NIMBY philosophy functions through the “spatialization of stigma,” allowing residents and homeowners to reallocate and redefine neighborhoods and local communities and, consequently, which individuals should be allowed to occupy such an area. While modern U.S. society has statistically experienced a growing need for human services and welfare, researchers have acknowledged that “The stigmatization of persons and places are thus mutually constitutive of community rejection and organized resistance to human service facility sitting.” In effect, community resistance to housing advocacy and affordability measures further exacerbates the dwindling number of public resources and social services available to vulnerable and displaced homeless persons.^[96]

Concerns over the efficacy of tiny homes for homeless people persist. Some critics have argued that, similar to other forms of anti-homelessness legislation, tiny home villages are fundamentally carceral, designed to push its tenants into less public spaces near city outskirts in an effort to marginalize homeless people, rather than provide long-term stability.^[97]

By treating homelessness as a non-familiarized issue, residents and homeowners are effectively exempt from community obligations towards the well-being and sheltering of other community members experiencing homelessness. Despite the framing of housing as a fundamental rights-based issue, community perspectives have evolved towards a more economic, individualized form that correlates a person’s home-ownership and housing to their values and ethics, employ-ability, and general ability to provide for themselves and their families. As such, the inability of both private and public sectors to supplement the widening gap of affordable housing options and shelter is, in some ways, conveniently explained by an individual’s supposed inability to ensure living stability, maintain financial independence, and solidify their position within the society at large.

Electrical setup and grid impacts

Tiny homes threaten increased grid defection because of their inherently low energy demands as a result of their small size. Their customized builds and smaller energy demand often results in the ability to sustain a tiny house entirely on rooftop photovoltaics such as roof-mounted solar panels. This has become especially prominent due to the continuously decreasing price of solar panels and batteries, and tiny homes have become notable as an example of an existing and commercially available alternative off-grid option for housing.^{[98][99][100]}

Off-grid solar electrical system

Each space and house will have their own energy consumption profile and generation demand. Consequently, they must size their power equipment accordingly. The needed size of battery systems to store captured energy or grid-supplied energy that will be used during times without power production from the rooftop solar, such as when there is inadequate insolation, depend on the generation capacity (as to not under or oversize the battery bank), the type of batteries used, their individual capacity (A⋅h), the discharge rate allowable per cycle (%), the size of loads (W), how long they will be run, and how many days of storage are needed. Battery sizing calculators are available online to simplify this process. Additionally, battery balancers, sensors that can read and recalibrate the available capacity, or state of charge, between different battery cells, can be added to extend the life of a battery system to prohibit voltage offset or non-ideal current flow, potentially damaging or capacity reducing to batteries over time. Batteries are rated in terms of ampere-hours with their discharge rate and capacity set by the manufacturer at a specific current and total amount of time, as voltage differs with temperature and power will vary with rate of discharge.

To fully convert a tiny home for living capacities off-grid, other power electronic power equipment is necessary, such as a charge controller, an inverter to power AC loads or down-regulators for DC loads, and proper protection devices such as circuit breakers and fuses. Specific sine inverters may offer simultaneous grid power hookup, called 'grid-tie inverters' in case of insufficient energy generation locally. Grid-tie inverters are of academic interest and are being studied by utilities for their impacts and potential benefits to voltage regulation, infrastructure implications, protection schema requirements, economics, and optimum policy regarding integration for implementation into the electrical grid with the rise of distributed generation, namely residential supplied solar power.^[101]

 

Cabin-inspired tiny home built in the woods

Size of homes

Tiny homes typically range between 100 and 300 square feet (9.3 and 27.9 m²).^[102] Considering the small size of tiny homes in comparison to that of average-sized homes, energy costs are consistently smaller; moreover, tiny home power grids are typically sourced from solar panels, which decreases the amount of publicly produced energy necessary to sustain the home.^[103] More importantly, the price difference of using solar power on a tiny home in comparison to an average-sized home significantly decreases the homeowner's expenses, resulting in a significant difference between the energy emissions and cost necessary for output between a tiny home and average-sized home.^[102] While a tiny home is sustained to operate on 914 kilowatt hours a year, producing on average 1,144 pounds (0.519 t) of carbon dioxide, an average-sized house requires 12,733 kilowatt hours, which releases close to 16,000 pounds (7.3 t).^[102]

Consequently, tiny homes inevitably require the consumption of less energy to support the homeowner. As a result, people living in tiny homes typically limit their engagement with materialism.^[102] The limited space of a tiny home encourages owners to make sacrifices in regards to the accumulation of materialistic items. It further allows homeowners to re-evaluate their personal habits, which subsequently translates into awareness regarding environmental sourcing.^[104] The concept of a “tiny” home reflects all aspects of the chosen lifestyle; a minimized space necessitates minimal consumer spending while the limited amount of surface area provided decreases the rate and level of energy consumption.^[104]

Environmentally conscious design

 

Interior construction of a tiny house

Human beings have been the main contributors in recent environmental changes. One critical proponent of these changes relates to infrastructure; buildings affect both human beings and the environment. However the costs tend to effect the environment while the benefits are exclusive to humans.^[105] The intention of building new infrastructure is to guarantee its sustainability for a long period of time.^[105] As a result, the less environmentally intentional a facility is, the more it will depend on consumption of natural resources. “Part of the very definition of a tiny home is that it be constructed with environmentally conscious and renewable materials.”^[102] Most tiny homes are designed to receive their services in ways that are less environmentally exhaustible.^[102] Electrical grids and public utilities are a distinguishable way tiny homes receive various water, electric and plumbing services.^[102] This detail is critical for consideration when individuals move from average sized homes to tiny homes because it allows individuals to both save money while using less environmental resources.^[102] Another important environmentally conscious feature relates to toilets. Some tiny homes are equipped with incinerator toilets which get rid of waste by burning it rather than flushing.^[102] By eliminating toilet flushing, the amount of water used in a household significantly decreases. An alternative feature is a compost toilet which works by decomposing the waste using evaporation to remove it.^[102] Therefore, not only are tiny homes energy efficient, the makeup of these homes are also intended to be environmentally friendly.^[105] Subsequently, in order for new materials to be both utilized in construction and sustainable for long periods of time, the production of such materials are dependent on various chemicals; this added step removes additional resources from the environment.^[105] An alternative to this is the usage of recycled materials. The tiny homes designed by a group in Texas consciously avoid using new materials in their construction.^[105] Because 30–40% of energy consumption is expended by human beings, it has been argued that infrastructure is best fit to include the consumption of humans within its blueprints.^[105]

Individuals who live in tiny homes are directly connected to the environment primarily because of the close proximity between tiny homes and the surrounding ecosystems.^[104] Through constant contact, the homeowner is given the opportunity to better understand the functions of nature. Such an understanding allows for an increase in environmental awareness.^[104]

More so, the design of tiny homes are subject to individual modification; the style, level of sustainability, intricacy, materials used, and modifications are all determined by homeowner preferences.

Environment and homelessness

Homelessness is a critical issue in the United States. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, about 550,000 individuals were experiencing homelessness on a given night in 2018.^[106] Over half of those individuals were able to sleep in different types of shelters while roughly thirty-five percent were unable to reside in a sheltered area.^[106] Despite the little information provided on this issue in popular media, homelessness has the capacity to affect the environment dramatically. According to the Environmental Council of Sacramento, homelessness is a contributor to environmental deterioration.^[107] For example, waste [litter, drug paraphernalia, etc.] produced by the homeless accumulates around their living spaces which tend to be near waterways, sewage systems, or parks. This leads to the contamination of the surrounding ecosystem.^[108] The Environmental Council offers steps towards conserving the environment while simultaneously dealing with the issue of homelessness.^[107] These steps include the cleaning of various water systems and public spaces in order to provide both clean water and clean areas for all individuals of the community.^[107] One of these steps also includes governmental intervention in establishing sanitary and safe spaces for the homeless in order to prevent further environmental destruction.^[107] Luckily, systems for just that are beginning to form though the tiny house movement.

A critical form of combating chronic homelessness is the establishment of tiny house communities.^[109] Those behind such establishments aim to help individuals solve their housing problems and offer a space where individuals can connect with others who find themselves in similar circumstances.^[109] Creating these communities requires a variety of support, however the end goal is ultimately shared.^[109] The primary actors behind the building and funding of tiny homes for the homeless are non-profit organizations.^[110] Their goal is not only to give homeless people a place to live, but also offer them resources to help them in all aspects of their lives.^[110] Building communities of tiny homes for the homeless is a group effort involving the homeless, cities themselves, and housing patrons.^[109] Through their efforts, the issue of homelessness in itself, along with its effects on the environment, are being continuously combated and improved.

See also

• Affordable housing
• Alternative housing
• Beach hut
• Construction trailer
• Cottage
• Earthship
• FIRE movement
• Friggebod
• Fulltiming
• Homestead principle
• Housetrucker
• Laneway house
• Log cabin
• Mobile home
• Modular building
• Optibo
• Perpetual traveler
• Recreational vehicles
• Shepherd's hut
• Shipping container architecture
• Shotgun house
• Simple living
• Summer house
• Vandwelling
• Vardo (Romani wagon)
• Yurt

References

1. Ford, Jasmine, and Lilia Gomz-Lanier. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 2017, Are Tiny Homes Here to Stay? A Review of Literature on the Tiny House Movement.
2. “2018 International Residential Code: Appendix Q Tiny Houses.” ICC Digital Codes, International Code Council, 2020, codes.iccsafe.org/content/IRC2018/appendix-q-tiny-houses.
3. Jenkins, Hannah (November 18, 2020). . CNN Style. CNN. Archived from the original on February 1, 2021.
4. Compare: Kilman, Charlie (January 17, 2016). "Small House, Big Impact: The Effect of Tiny Houses on Community and Environment" (PDF). Undergraduate Journal of Humanistic Studies (Carleton College). (PDF) from the original on July 18, 2019. Retrieved November 10, 2018. By placing greater emphasis on quality living, personalization, an environmental ethic, and community values, the tiny house subverts the consumer-based mindset. Culturally, what the tiny house does is simple: it creates an opportunity outside the norms of society where people can understand that the value of the environment and human interaction is much greater than the value of material goods.
5. Carmela Ferraro (February 21, 2009). "Small but perfectly formed". Financial Times. from the original on April 13, 2009. Retrieved April 12, 2009.
6. "What would our homes look like if designed around how we use them? – TreeHugger". from the original on May 23, 2015. Retrieved May 25, 2015.
7. New generation of shotgun shack admirers
8. Country living shotgun shack and tiny house
9. Southern Living
10. Timeline
11. Gallery of tiny houses
12. Whitford, Blake. "Full History of The Tiny House Movement". Coze Living. from the original on March 6, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
13. Nonko, Emily (July 19, 2017). "A tiny house movement timeline". Curbed. from the original on February 2, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
14. "About Tiny Houses – TINY". from the original on May 25, 2015. Retrieved May 25, 2015.
15. Lasky, Julie (July 13, 2016). "The Surprising Origins of the Tiny House Phenomenon". Curbed. from the original on October 5, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
16. Chen, Karen (May 1, 2020). "The big idea behind the 'tiny house' movement". www.ft.com. from the original on June 8, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
17. Wilkinson, Alec (July 18, 2011). "Let's Get Small". The New Yorker. from the original on February 26, 2021. Retrieved March 2, 2021.
18. "Four Lights Tiny House Company". www.facebook.com. from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2017.
19. "About". February 26, 2011. from the original on April 20, 2017. Retrieved June 21, 2017.
20. The Economist (February 19, 2009). "Very little house on the prairie". The Economist. from the original on March 8, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2009.
21. Brenoff, Ann (October 22, 2012). "Downsizing: Could You Live In A Tiny Home In Retirement?". The Huffington Post. from the original on October 24, 2012. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
22. Walker, Elaine (June 18, 2013). . Tiny House Community. Archived from the original on February 1, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
23. "The Interesting History Of Tiny Houses: Timeline Explored". Super Tiny Homes. January 29, 2019. from the original on July 27, 2019. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
24. Fox News (February 11, 2014). "High Tech Meets Low Tech in Tiny House Movement". Fox News. from the original on March 3, 2014. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
25. Heather Dirubba (February 26, 2014). "Tiny A&E Network Unveils FYIs First Programming Slate and July 7 Launch Date". A&E Network. from the original on March 4, 2014. Retrieved March 1, 2014.
26. Speed, Alex (January 16, 2016). "Big dreams for tiny house movement". The Australian. from the original on June 8, 2017. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
27. Morris, Jenny (June 21, 2019). "A homebuyer's guide to living in a tiny house in Canada". livabl.com. from the original on July 28, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
28. "Canada Tiny Home News". Tiny Home Industry Association. July 16, 2019. from the original on November 17, 2019. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
29. Zeidler, Maryse (April 7, 2018). "20 years after B.C. inquiry into the leaky condo crisis, it's still buyer beware". cbc.ca. from the original on October 27, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
30. Brend, Yvette (June 24, 2017). "Tiny house on the run: Couple's journey to find a home for their home hits dead end". cbc.ca. from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
31. "High house costs have some Canadians considering tiny homes, but not all cities on board". Global News. from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
32. "Opposition grows against tiny-house village approved for Okotoks". Calgary Herald. from the original on October 16, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
33. Gilligan, Melissa (August 20, 2019). "Tiny homes ecovillage in Okotoks unlikely after Monday council vote". globalnews.ca. from the original on September 15, 2020. Retrieved July 28, 2020.
34. "The first student Tiny village has opened in Saint Brieuc, France". Tiny Simple Life. September 15, 2019. from the original on November 18, 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
35. Robertson, Margaret (2014). Sustainability: Principles and Practice. Routledge. pp. ppl: 208–222. ISBN 9780203768747.
36. Lloyd Alter (July 10, 2008). "Home Delivery: The Micro Compact Home Comes To America". Treehugger. from the original on March 5, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2009.
37. "Home". mobilehome.nz. from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
38. "NZ Tiny House Association". NZTHA. from the original on March 3, 2021. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
39. Evans, Kate (July–August 2018). "Tiny houses". New Zealand Geographic (152): 32–55. from the original on August 5, 2018. Retrieved August 5, 2018.
40. "Living Big in a Tiny House". Living Big In A Tiny House. from the original on January 5, 2019. Retrieved January 5, 2019.
41. Kloosterman, Karin (March 16, 2020). "Stedsans A Frame cabin blueprint to isolate now, possibly forever?". Green Prophet. from the original on March 17, 2020. Retrieved July 19, 2020.
42. Palongue, Pamela (June 3, 2016). "The House that Jonathan built". Tiny Living Magazine UK, www.tinylivingmagazine.co.uk. from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved June 7, 2016.
43. Mackenzie, Steven. "Tiny Solution to a Big Housing Crisis". bigissue.com. Big Issue. from the original on August 2, 2016. Retrieved August 2, 2016.
44. Steffen, Alex (2008). Worldchanging: a User's Guide for the 21st Century. New York: Abrams. pp. ppl: 152–154. ISBN 978-0810930957.
45. McNamee, Michael (July 20, 2019). "Northern Ireland's tiny house movement – a small move to the future?". BBC. from the original on July 27, 2019. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
46. "NOSSA VIDA EM UMA MINICASA: A história da família que trocou tudo para morar na primeira tiny house do Brasil, com 27 m²". www.uol.com.br (in Brazilian Portuguese). from the original on July 31, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
47. Walker, Elaine (January 27, 2015). "Where to Live in a Tiny House". Tiny House Community. from the original on January 30, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
48. Mitchell, Ryan (July 18, 2014). "Tiny House Building Codes". The Tiny Life. The Tiny Life. from the original on September 5, 2014. Retrieved August 20, 2014.
49. Foroudi, Layli (September 8, 2017). "Prefabs sprout to offer affordable housing". www.ft.com. from the original on May 4, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
50. "N.C. RV Park Offers Take On Tiny House Friction". RV Business. RV Business. August 6, 2015. from the original on August 14, 2015. Retrieved August 8, 2014.
51. "Home Builders League of So. Jersey, Inc. v. Twp. of Berlin". Justia Law. from the original on March 6, 2018. Retrieved March 5, 2018.
52. Vail, Kathrine M (2016). "Saving the American Dream: The Legalization of the Tiny House Movement". University of Louisville Law Review. Louisville, Ky. : Louis D. Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville: ppl: 357–379. ISSN 1942-9274.
53. Spur, TX (July 9, 2014). "Spur Freedom". from the original on July 27, 2016.
54. Applegate, J. (2016, July 21). Tiny house trend on the move in Southern Utah | St George News. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2016/07/21/jla-tiny-house-trend-on-the-move-in-southern-utah/#.V5opR4-cHDc 2016-07-23 at the Wayback Machine
55. Garfield, Leanna (July 6, 2016). "Most Expensive Tiny Homes in the US". Business Insider. from the original on April 15, 2018. Retrieved April 15, 2018.
56. "Teeny house, big lie: Why so many proponents of the tiny-house movement have decided to upsize". from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
57. "Archived copy" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on January 28, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
58. "Ref-Dall Appeal, mobilehome.nz". from the original on January 28, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
59. "Archived copy" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on January 28, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
60. "The world's largest architecture firm is creating a $2 million tiny home village for California's homeless". Business Insider. from the original on February 8, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.
61. Burkeman, Oliver (March 26, 2009). "US tent cities highlight new realities as recession wears on". the Guardian. from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.
62. Lewis, Paul (March 23, 2017). "Tiny houses: salvation for the homeless or a dead end?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. from the original on February 7, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.
63. Heben, Andrew (July 11, 2014). Tent City Urbanism. The Village Collaborative. ISBN 978-0692248058. from the original on February 5, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
64. "Tiny Houses for the Homeless". PBS. October 10, 2014. from the original on January 28, 2015. Retrieved January 27, 2015.
65. "Tiny homes with a view: Ithaca volunteers provide shelters for homeless men (video)". syracuse.com. December 15, 2014. from the original on October 17, 2015. Retrieved November 5, 2015.
66. Yglesias, Matthew (May 30, 2014). "Giving housing to the homeless is cheaper than leaving them on the streets". Vox. from the original on September 5, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
67. Mingoya, Catherine. "Building Together. Tiny House Villages for the Homeless: A Comparative Case Study" (PDF). Department of Urban Studies and Planning (MIT). (PDF) from the original on December 3, 2018. Retrieved February 22, 2018.
68. Isaacs, Deanna. "Are tiny houses a solution to homelessness in Chicago?". Chicago Reader. from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.
69. "Tiny houses aren't just for Millennials. They could help homeless". USA TODAY. from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.
70. "A Village Of Tiny Homes Will Offer Permanent Housing For Some Of Worcester's Homeless". News. July 18, 2021. from the original on July 20, 2021. Retrieved July 20, 2021.
71. "Can tiny houses solve the homeless problem?". from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2018.
72. "With laws changing, tiny homes may have a big effect on housing". Richmond Confidential. April 13, 2016. from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
73. "Tiny homes proposed for homeless in Richmond pilot project". KTVU FOX 2. July 18, 2017. from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
74. "Richmond Experiments With Tiny Houses for Homeless | Richmond Pulse". July 27, 2017. from the original on October 27, 2019. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
75. Martichoux, Alix (January 23, 2018). "Is tiny living working? Bay Area residents share challenges of micro homes and bus life". SFGATE. from the original on May 13, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
76. "History". Hope of The Valley. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
77. "LA opens its first tiny home village to ease homeless crisis". ABC News. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
78. "About | The Tiny House Project". Thetinyhouseproject. Retrieved April 24, 2022.
79. Karlamangla, Soumya (August 25, 2015). "Tiny houses for homeless at center of legal fight". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 24, 2022.
80. "'Tiny houses' for the homeless seen as health and safety problem". Los Angeles Times. February 27, 2016. Retrieved April 24, 2022.
81. Kendall, Marisa (September 25, 2022). "Do tiny homes really work as a solution to homelessness? Here's what the data shows". San Jose Mercury News. Santa Clara County's largest shelter, the Boccardo Reception Center, reported its guests go from there into permanent housing just 5% of the time. ... Oakland's bare-bones "community cabins," like the one Foster lives in on Northgate Avenue, moved people to permanent housing at a rate of 28% – far short of the county's goal of 50%, but still better than shelter outcomes. Add more amenities – specifically bathrooms – and that figure rises. "Bridge housing communities" like the one Henderson occupied in San Jose, where residents share flush toilets and showers onsite, move people to permanent housing at a rate of 46%. And San Jose's nicest tiny home model – which is more spacious and provides a full, private bathroom in each unit – has succeeded in transitioning people to permanent housing 54% of the time. ... At the low end of the spectrum, running Boccardo, the San Jose shelter, costs $17,155 per bed per year. Oakland's Oak Street cabin site costs a little more – $22,368 per bed per year. On the pricier side, the San Jose tiny homes with en suite bathrooms cost an average of $34,200 per bed per year. The median rent for a studio apartment in San Jose runs $28,644 per year, according to Zillow – but of course, that doesn't include case workers and other services.
82. "Social Bite's village for homeless people has launched". May 17, 2018. from the original on July 9, 2018. Retrieved January 1, 2019.
83. "Village for the homeless opens in Edinburgh". York Press. from the original on April 26, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
84. "Social Bite 'homeless village' house unveiled at Edinburgh Festival". The Big Issue. August 11, 2017. from the original on October 18, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
85. Graham, Lindsay T.; Gosling, Samuel D.; Travis, Christopher K. (May 18, 2015). "The Psychology of Home Environments: A Call for Research on Residential Space". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10 (3): 346–356. doi:10.1177/1745691615576761. PMID 25987512. S2CID 4782805. from the original on May 25, 2020. Retrieved September 16, 2020.
86. "The psychology behind the tiny house movement | Research UC Berkeley". vcresearch.berkeley.edu. from the original on May 12, 2018. Retrieved May 12, 2018.
87. Adams, C., & Williams, A. (2016, May). Square footage 2016-09-17 at the Wayback Machine. Business North Carolina, 36(5), 56.
88. Rami Lulu (March 18, 2016). . AskAvenue. Archived from the original on March 24, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016.
89. Bethany Lyttle (February 16, 2007). "Think Small". New York Times. from the original on February 14, 2017. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
90. Al Heavens (June 14, 2007). . Realty Times. Archived from the original on March 22, 2009. Retrieved March 7, 2009.
91. Randall, Stacy (2021). "Dimensions of Tiny Houses: Layouts & Guidelines (with Photos)". Upgraded Home. from the original on April 26, 2021. Retrieved April 25, 2021.
92. Carol Lloyd (April 27, 2007). "Small houses challenge our notions of need as well as minimum-size standards". SFGate. from the original on January 6, 2014. Retrieved November 7, 2013.
93. Josh Dehass (November 13, 2008). "Laneway housing pilot proceeds despite opposition". UBC Journalism News Service. from the original on March 5, 2012. Retrieved July 27, 2012.
94. Charlie Smith (April 10, 2008). "Anxiety grows over EcoDensity in Vancouver". straight.com. from the original on October 18, 2012. Retrieved July 27, 2012.
95. Ned Jacobs (June 8, 2010). "The Vancouver neighbourhoods backlash continues". www.francesbula.com. from the original on March 12, 2012. Retrieved July 27, 2012.
96. Takahashi, Lois M. (September 1, 1997). "The socio-spatial stigmatization of homelessness and HIV/AIDS: Toward an explanation of the NIMBY syndrome". Social Science & Medicine. 45 (6): 903–914. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00432-7. ISSN 0277-9536. PMID 9255923. from the original on May 15, 2021. Retrieved May 15, 2021.
97. Architecture, Failed. "A Cage by Another Name". Failed Architecture. Retrieved April 24, 2022.
98. "Battery Costs Drop Even Faster As Electric Car Sales Continue To Rise". IFLScience. from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2019.
99. Deign, Jason (December 14, 2018). "Why PV Costs Have Fallen So Far—and Will Fall Further". www.greentechmedia.com. from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2019.
100. Sell, Michael C. (2019). "Reaching sustainability goals through efficiency and off-grid living". Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science. 93 (2): 187–194. doi:10.5325/jpennacadscie.93.2.0187. ISSN 1044-6753. JSTOR 10.5325/jpennacadscie.93.2.0187. S2CID 213371147. from the original on February 4, 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2020.
101. Schauder, C. (March 1, 2014). "Advanced Inverter Technology for High Penetration Levels of PV Generation in Distribution Systems". doi:10.2172/1129274. OSTI 1129274. from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2019. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
102. Kaufmann, Carol. "The Tiny House Movement and Livable Communities". AARP. from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
103. "Tiny House, Big Impact: Getting Green by Building Less". Planet Forward. from the original on October 31, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
104. Kilman, Charlie (Winter 2016). "Small House, Big Impact: The Effect of Tiny Houses on Community and Environment" (PDF). Undergraduate Journal of Humanistic Studies. 2: 12. (PDF) from the original on July 18, 2019. Retrieved November 10, 2018 – via Carleton College.
105. Mutter, Amelia (2013). Growing Tiny Houses: Motivations and Opportunities for Expansion Through Niche Markets (Thesis). from the original on September 9, 2017. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
106. "2018 AHAR: Part 1 - PIT Estimates of Homelessness in the U.S." (PDF). (PDF) from the original on April 12, 2019. Retrieved April 9, 2019.
107. Alexandra Reagan (January 25, 2018). "Homelessness is an Environmental Issue". ECOS. from the original on March 28, 2019. Retrieved March 28, 2019.
108. "Archived copy". from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved April 9, 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
109. Alexander, Lisa (January 1, 2017). "Tiny Homes for the Homeless: A Return to Politically Engaged Community Economic Development Law?". Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law. 26 (1): 39–42. ProQuest 2058258047. from the original on July 3, 2020. Retrieved August 13, 2020.
110. Riker, Marina Starleaf (June 14, 2020). "First residents move into Promise Pointe tiny homes aimed at combating homelessness". The Victoria Advocate. from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved August 13, 2020.

Further reading

• Sarah Susanka, Kira Obolensky, The Not So Big House: A Blueprint for the Way We Really Live, Taunton (1998), ISBN 1-60085-047-2
• Lloyd Kahn and Bob Easton, Shelter, Shelter Publications (1973), ISBN 978-0394709918
• Ryan Mitchell, Tiny House Living: Ideas For Building and Living Well In Less than 400 Square Feet, Betterway (2014), ISBN 978-1440333163
• Andrew Heben, Tent City Urbanism, The Village Collaborative (2014), ISBN 978-0692248058
• Vail, K. (2016). "Saving the American Dream: The Legalization of the Tiny House Movement". University of Louisville Law Review, 54(2), 357–379.
• Ford, J., & Gomez-Lanier, L. (2017). "Are Tiny Homes Here to Stay? A Review of Literature on the Tiny House Movement". Family And Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 45(4), 394–405. doi:10.1111/fcsr.12205.
• Turner, C. (2017). "It Takes a Village: Designating 'Tiny House' Villages as Transitional Housing Campgrounds". University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 50(4), 931–954.

External links

 

Wikiquote has quotations related to Tiny-house movement.

•   Media related to Small houses at Wikimedia Commons