fbpx
Wikipedia

Mixotrophic dinoflagellate

Dinoflagellates are eukaryotic plankton, existing in marine and freshwater environments. Previously, dinoflagellates had been grouped into two categories, phagotrophs and phototrophs.[4] Mixotrophs, however include a combination of phagotrophy and phototrophy.[5] Mixotrophic dinoflagellates are a sub-type of planktonic dinoflagellates and are part of the phylum Dinoflagellata.[5] They are flagellated eukaryotes that combine photoautotrophy when light is available, and heterotrophy via phagocytosis. Dinoflagellates are one of the most diverse and numerous species of phytoplankton, second to diatoms.

Dinoflagellata
Temporal range: 250–0 Ma Triassic or earlier–Present
Illustrations of various Dinoflagellata
Scientific classification
Domain:
(unranked):
(unranked):
Phylum:
Dinoflagellata

Bütschli 1885 [1880-1889] sensu Gomez 2012[1][2][3]
Classes
Synonyms
  • Cilioflagellata Claparède & Lachmann, 1868
  • Dinophyta Dillon, 1963
  • Dinophyceae sensu Pascher, 1914
  • Pyrrophyta Pascher 1914
  • Pyrrhophycophyta Papenfuss 1946
  • Arthrodelen Flagellaten Stein 1883
  • Dinomastigota Margulis & Sagan, 1985
  • Dinophyta Dillon, 1963

Dinoflagellates have long whip-like structures called flagella that allow them to move freely throughout the water column. They are mainly marine but can also be found in freshwater environments. Combinations of phototrophy and phagotrophy allow organisms to supplement their inorganic nutrient uptake[6] This means an increased trophic transfer to higher levels in food web compared to the traditional food web.[6]

Mixotrophic dinoflagellates have the ability to thrive in changing ocean environments, resulting in shifts in red tide phenomenon and paralytic shellfish poisoning.[6] It is unknown as to how many species of dinoflagellates have mixotrophic capabilities, as this is a relatively new feeding-mechanism discovery.

Species edit

Some dinoflagellates that live as parasites are probably mixotrophic.[7] Karenia, Karlodinium, and Lepidodinium are some of the dinoflagellate genera which are thought to contain peridinin, a carotenoid pigment necessary for photosynthesis in dinoflagellates;[8] however, chlorophyll b has been found in these genera as an accessory pigment.[8] This discovery has led scientists to assume that the pigment chlorophyll b actually came from prey which had been ingested by the dinoflagellates.[8] Some species of mixotrophic dinoflagellate are able to feed on toxic prey such as toxic algae and other toxic organisms. For example, Lingulodinium polyedra and Akashiwo sanguinea are two species of mixotrophic dinoflagellates that are known to feed on the toxic dinoflagellate, Alexandrium tamarense.[9] Certain species of mixotrophic dinoflagellates can be affected by light intensity and nutrient conditions . For example, ingestion rates of Fragilidium subglobosum, Gymnodinium gracilentum, and Karlodinium veneficum increase as light intensity increases up to 75 to 100 µmol photon m−2 s−1.[10] In contrast, other species are not affected by light intensity.[10] As well, ingestion rates of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Ceratium furca are affected by intracellular nutrient concentrations.[11]

Types of feeding edit

Marine dinoflagellate species undergo three major trophic modes: autotrophy, mixotrophy and heterotrophy.[12] Many species of dinoflagellates were previously assumed to be exclusively autotrophic; however, recent research has revealed that many dinoflagellates that were thought to be exclusively phototrophic are actually mixotrophic.[12] Mixotrophic dinoflagellates can undergo both photosynthesis and phagocytosis as methods of feeding.[7] Mixotrophic dinoflagellates with individual plastids that depend mostly on photosynthesis can prey on other cells as their secondary source of nutrients.[7] On the other hand, mixotrophic dinoflagellates with individual plastids that depend mainly on phagocytosis are also photosynthetic due to chloroplasts 'stolen' from their prey (kleptochloroplasts) or because of algal endosymbionts.[7] It was discovered that the mixotrophic dinoflagellates Gonyaulax polygramma and Scrippsiella spp. can engulf small-size prey using their apical horn while larger prey are engulfed via their sulcus, showing that dinoflagellates can have more than one mouth for feeding.[9] Moreover, mixotrophic dinoflagellates belonging to the species Karlodinium armiger, can capture small prey by direct engulfment or can use an extendable peduncle to capture larger prey.[13]

Implications for microbial food webs edit

Mixotroph dinoflagellates belonging to the species Gymnodinium sanguineum feed on nanociliate populations in Chesapeake Bay.[14] Predation on ciliates is advantageous for G. sanguineum as the ciliates provide a source of nitrogen which is limiting to the growth of purely photosynthetic dinoflagellates.[14] By preying on ciliates, these dinoflagellates reverse the normal flow of material from primary producer to consumer and influence the trophodynamics of the microbial food web in Chesapeake Bay[14]

Several established ecological models of marine microbial food webs have not included feeding by mixotrophic dinoflagellates.[12] These additions would include feeding by mixotrophic dinoflagellates on bacteria, phytoplankton, other mixotrophic dinoflagellates and nanoflagellates, and heterotrophic protists.[12] The impact of grazing by mixotrophic dinoflagellates will affect particular prey species and be influenced by the abundance of dinoflagellate predators and their ingestion rates.[12] Another consideration would be to include predator-prey relationships of mixotrophic dinoflagellates at a species level due to co-existence in offshore and oceanic waters.[12]

The diversity of mixotrophic dinoflagellate species and their interactions with other marine organisms contributes to their diverse roles in different niche environments.[12] For example, mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates may act as predators on a wide range of prey types due to their diverse feeding mechanisms.[12] Including mixotrophic dinoflagellates would better explain the control of prey population and cycling of limited materials as well as competition between other organisms for larger prey.[12]

Climate Change and Ocean Acidification edit

As CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere increase via anthropogenic causes, acidification of the ocean will increase as the result of increasing CO2 sequestration by the ocean; the ocean is a great sink for carbon, absorbing more as its concentration in the atmosphere increases.[15] As this occurs, there will be species and community composition shifts in marine plankton communities. Mixotrophic dinoflagellates will be favoured over photosynthetic dinoflagellates, as the oceans will become more nutrient limited and mixotrophs will not have to rely only on inorganic nutrients but will be able to take advantage of being able to consume particulate organic matter.[6]

With an increase in temperature, there is an increase in water column stability,[15] which leads to favourable conditions for mixotrophic growth. Mixotrophs can grow in low nutrient (more stable) environments and become dominant members of planktonic communities.[6] Harmful algal blooms (HABs) can be caused by increased stability or increases in nutrients due to acidification and climate change, as well. This can have large impacts on the food chain and pose harmful effects to humans and their food sources[6] through harmful blooms of dinoflagellates and other taxa, and lead to paralytic shellfish poisoning, for example.[16]

Influence on red tide and HABs edit

 
Algal bloom (akasio) by Noctiluca spp. in Nagasaki

Many mixotrophic and some heterotrophic dinoflagellates are known to cause red tides or harmful blooms that result in large-scale mortality of fish and shellfish.[12] Studies on red tides have been conducted to determine the mechanism of outbreak and the persistence of red tides caused by mixotrophic dinoflagellates such as Karenia brevis, Prorocentrum donghaiense and Prorocentrum minimum in low nutrient concentration waters. In the case of serial red tides, one mixotrophic dinoflagellate species is dominated by another mixotrophic species in rapid succession over a short span of days.[12] A possible explanation for the occurrence of different dominant mixotrophic dinoflagellates during serial red tides is the ability of mixotrophic dinoflagellates to feed on both heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria (such as Synecchococcus) spp., which provide limiting nutrients such as phosphorus, and nitrogen simultaneously.[12] It is proposed that during serial red tides, feeding by larger mixotrophic dinoflagellates on smaller species may be a driving force for the succession of dominant species.[12] Nitrogen and phosphorus is taken up by direct transfer of the materials and energy between the mixotrophic dinoflagellates; therefore, nutrient supply does not rely on the release of nitrogen and phosphorus by other organisms. Hence, mixotrophy can cause uncoupling between nutrient concentrations and the abundance of mixotrophic dinoflagellates in natural environments.[12]

Red tides are a type of harmful algal bloom (HABs); both are the result of massive proliferation of algae that result in very high concentrations of cells that visibly colour the water.[17] The very high levels of biomass in Red Tides or HABs can have direct toxic effects through the release of toxic compounds or indirect effects through oxygen depletion on mammals, fish, shellfish, and humans.[17] PSP (Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning) is one example of a toxin that is produced by dinoflagellates that can have lethal consequences if contaminated shellfish are ingested; the toxin is a neuro-inhibitor that is concentrated in the flesh of bivalves and molluscs that have fed on toxic algae[18] The toxin concentrations can cause harmful and even deadly effects on humans and marine mammal populations that feed on contaminated shellfish.[18]

Relationship to other organisms edit

Mixotrophic dinoflagellates can feed on various organisms including bacteria, picoeukaryotes, nanoflagellates, diatoms, protists, metazoans and other dinoflagellates, as well.[8] Feeding and digestion rates in mixotrophic dinoflagellates are lower than those in strictly heterotrophic dinoflagellates.[8] Mixotrophic dinoflagellates do not feed on blood, eggs, adult metazoans, and flesh, such as occurs in some heterotrophic dinoflagellates.

References edit

  1. ^ Gómez F (2012). "A checklist and classification of living dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata, Alveolata)". CICIMAR Oceánides. 27 (1): 65–140. doi:10.37543/oceanides.v27i1.111.
  2. ^ Ruggiero; et al. (2015), "Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms", PLOS ONE, 10 (4): e0119248, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119248, PMC 4418965, PMID 25923521
  3. ^ Silar, Philippe (2016), "Protistes Eucaryotes: Origine, Evolution et Biologie des Microbes Eucaryotes", HAL Archives-ouvertes: 1–462
  4. ^ Yoo, Yeong Du; Jeong, Hae Jin; Kang, Nam Seon; Song, Jae Yoon; Kim, Kwang Young; Lee, Gitack; Kim, Juhyoung (2010-03-01). "Feeding by the newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate Paragymnodinium shiwhaense: feeding mechanism, prey species, and effect of prey concentration". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 57 (2): 145–158. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00448.x. ISSN 1550-7408. PMID 20487129. S2CID 6312832.
  5. ^ a b Stoecker, Diane K. (1999-07-01). "Mixotrophy among Dinoflagellates1". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 46 (4): 397–401. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04619.x. ISSN 1550-7408. S2CID 83885629.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Mitra, A.; et al. (2014). "The role of mixotrophic protists in the biological carbon pump". Biogeosciences. 11 (4): 995–1005. doi:10.5194/bg-11-995-2014. hdl:10453/117781.
  7. ^ a b c d Stoecker, Diane K. (July 1999). "Mixotrophy among dinoflagellates". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 46 (4): 397–401. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04619.x. S2CID 83885629.
  8. ^ a b c d e Jeong, Hae Jin; Yoo, Yeong Du; Kim, Jae Seong; Seong, Kyeong Ah; Kang, Nam Seon; Kim, Tae Hoon (6 July 2010). "Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs". Ocean Science Journal. 45 (2): 65–91. doi:10.1007/s12601-010-0007-2.
  9. ^ a b Jeong, HJ; Yoo, YD; Park, JY; Song, JY; Kim, ST; Lee, SH; Kim, KY; Yih, WH (6 September 2005). "Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic". Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 40 (2): 133–150. doi:10.3354/ame040133. ISSN 0948-3055.
  10. ^ a b Skovgaard, Alf (14 December 2000). "A Phagotrophically Derivable Growth Factor in the Plastidic Dinoflagellate Gyrodinium Resplendens (Dinophyceae)". Journal of Phycology. 36 (6): 1069–1078. doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.00009.x. S2CID 83903548.
  11. ^ Smalley, GW; Coats, DW; Stoecker, DK (2003). "Feeding in the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Ceratium furca is influenced by intracellular nutrient concentrations". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 262: 137–151. doi:10.3354/meps262137.
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Jeong, Hae Jin; Yoo, Yeong Du; Kim, Jae Seong; Seong, Kyeong Ah; Kang, Nam Seon; Kim, Tae Hoon (2010-07-06). "Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs". Ocean Science Journal. 45 (2): 65–91. doi:10.1007/s12601-010-0007-2. ISSN 1738-5261.
  13. ^ Berge, T; Hansen, PJ; Moestrup, Ø (26 March 2008). "Feeding mechanism, prey specificity and growth in light and dark of the plastidic dinoflagellate Karlodinium armiger". Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 50: 279–288. doi:10.3354/ame01165.
  14. ^ a b c Bockstahler, K. R.; Coats, D. W. (1993). "Grazing of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium sanguineum on ciliate populations of Chesapeake Bay". Marine Biology. 116 (3): 477–487. doi:10.1007/BF00350065. ISSN 0025-3162. S2CID 84468485.
  15. ^ a b McNeil, Ben I.; Matear, Richard J. (2006-06-27). "Projected climate change impact on oceanic acidification". Carbon Balance and Management. 1 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/1750-0680-1-2. ISSN 1750-0680. PMC 1513135. PMID 16930458.
  16. ^ Hansen, Per Juel; Cembella, Allan D.; Moestrup, Øjvind (1992-10-01). "The Marine Dinoflagellate Alexandrium Ostenfeldii: Paralytic Shellfish Toxin Concentration, Composition, and Toxicity to a Tintinnid Ciliate1". Journal of Phycology. 28 (5): 597–603. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1992.00597.x. ISSN 1529-8817. S2CID 84540277.
  17. ^ a b Administration, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric. "Harmful Algal Blooms". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2017-03-23.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  18. ^ a b Hurley, William; Wolterstorff, Cameron; MacDonald, Ryan; Schultz, Debora (2017-03-23). "Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning: A Case Series". Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 15 (4): 378–381. doi:10.5811/westjem.2014.4.16279. ISSN 1936-900X. PMC 4100837. PMID 25035737.

External links edit

  Media related to Dinoflagellata at Wikimedia Commons

mixotrophic, dinoflagellate, dinoflagellates, eukaryotic, plankton, existing, marine, freshwater, environments, previously, dinoflagellates, been, grouped, into, categories, phagotrophs, phototrophs, mixotrophs, however, include, combination, phagotrophy, phot. Dinoflagellates are eukaryotic plankton existing in marine and freshwater environments Previously dinoflagellates had been grouped into two categories phagotrophs and phototrophs 4 Mixotrophs however include a combination of phagotrophy and phototrophy 5 Mixotrophic dinoflagellates are a sub type of planktonic dinoflagellates and are part of the phylum Dinoflagellata 5 They are flagellated eukaryotes that combine photoautotrophy when light is available and heterotrophy via phagocytosis Dinoflagellates are one of the most diverse and numerous species of phytoplankton second to diatoms DinoflagellataTemporal range 250 0 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Triassic or earlier Present Illustrations of various Dinoflagellata Scientific classification Domain Eukaryota unranked SAR unranked Alveolata Phylum DinoflagellataButschli 1885 1880 1889 sensu Gomez 2012 1 2 3 Classes Ellobiophyceae Psammosea Oxyrrhea Pronoctilucea Duboscquellea Syndiniophyceae Noctiluciphyceae Dinophyceae Synonyms Cilioflagellata Claparede amp Lachmann 1868 Dinophyta Dillon 1963 Dinophyceae sensu Pascher 1914 Pyrrophyta Pascher 1914 Pyrrhophycophyta Papenfuss 1946 Arthrodelen Flagellaten Stein 1883 Dinomastigota Margulis amp Sagan 1985 Dinophyta Dillon 1963 Dinoflagellates have long whip like structures called flagella that allow them to move freely throughout the water column They are mainly marine but can also be found in freshwater environments Combinations of phototrophy and phagotrophy allow organisms to supplement their inorganic nutrient uptake 6 This means an increased trophic transfer to higher levels in food web compared to the traditional food web 6 Mixotrophic dinoflagellates have the ability to thrive in changing ocean environments resulting in shifts in red tide phenomenon and paralytic shellfish poisoning 6 It is unknown as to how many species of dinoflagellates have mixotrophic capabilities as this is a relatively new feeding mechanism discovery Contents 1 Species 2 Types of feeding 3 Implications for microbial food webs 4 Climate Change and Ocean Acidification 5 Influence on red tide and HABs 6 Relationship to other organisms 7 References 8 External linksSpecies editSome dinoflagellates that live as parasites are probably mixotrophic 7 Karenia Karlodinium and Lepidodinium are some of the dinoflagellate genera which are thought to contain peridinin a carotenoid pigment necessary for photosynthesis in dinoflagellates 8 however chlorophyll b has been found in these genera as an accessory pigment 8 This discovery has led scientists to assume that the pigment chlorophyll b actually came from prey which had been ingested by the dinoflagellates 8 Some species of mixotrophic dinoflagellate are able to feed on toxic prey such as toxic algae and other toxic organisms For example Lingulodinium polyedra and Akashiwo sanguinea are two species of mixotrophic dinoflagellates that are known to feed on the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense 9 Certain species of mixotrophic dinoflagellates can be affected by light intensity and nutrient conditions For example ingestion rates of Fragilidium subglobosum Gymnodinium gracilentum and Karlodinium veneficum increase as light intensity increases up to 75 to 100 µmol photon m 2 s 1 10 In contrast other species are not affected by light intensity 10 As well ingestion rates of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Ceratium furca are affected by intracellular nutrient concentrations 11 Types of feeding editMarine dinoflagellate species undergo three major trophic modes autotrophy mixotrophy and heterotrophy 12 Many species of dinoflagellates were previously assumed to be exclusively autotrophic however recent research has revealed that many dinoflagellates that were thought to be exclusively phototrophic are actually mixotrophic 12 Mixotrophic dinoflagellates can undergo both photosynthesis and phagocytosis as methods of feeding 7 Mixotrophic dinoflagellates with individual plastids that depend mostly on photosynthesis can prey on other cells as their secondary source of nutrients 7 On the other hand mixotrophic dinoflagellates with individual plastids that depend mainly on phagocytosis are also photosynthetic due to chloroplasts stolen from their prey kleptochloroplasts or because of algal endosymbionts 7 It was discovered that the mixotrophic dinoflagellates Gonyaulax polygramma and Scrippsiella spp can engulf small size prey using their apical horn while larger prey are engulfed via their sulcus showing that dinoflagellates can have more than one mouth for feeding 9 Moreover mixotrophic dinoflagellates belonging to the species Karlodinium armiger can capture small prey by direct engulfment or can use an extendable peduncle to capture larger prey 13 Implications for microbial food webs editMixotroph dinoflagellates belonging to the species Gymnodinium sanguineum feed on nanociliate populations in Chesapeake Bay 14 Predation on ciliates is advantageous for G sanguineum as the ciliates provide a source of nitrogen which is limiting to the growth of purely photosynthetic dinoflagellates 14 By preying on ciliates these dinoflagellates reverse the normal flow of material from primary producer to consumer and influence the trophodynamics of the microbial food web in Chesapeake Bay 14 Several established ecological models of marine microbial food webs have not included feeding by mixotrophic dinoflagellates 12 These additions would include feeding by mixotrophic dinoflagellates on bacteria phytoplankton other mixotrophic dinoflagellates and nanoflagellates and heterotrophic protists 12 The impact of grazing by mixotrophic dinoflagellates will affect particular prey species and be influenced by the abundance of dinoflagellate predators and their ingestion rates 12 Another consideration would be to include predator prey relationships of mixotrophic dinoflagellates at a species level due to co existence in offshore and oceanic waters 12 The diversity of mixotrophic dinoflagellate species and their interactions with other marine organisms contributes to their diverse roles in different niche environments 12 For example mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates may act as predators on a wide range of prey types due to their diverse feeding mechanisms 12 Including mixotrophic dinoflagellates would better explain the control of prey population and cycling of limited materials as well as competition between other organisms for larger prey 12 Climate Change and Ocean Acidification editAs CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere increase via anthropogenic causes acidification of the ocean will increase as the result of increasing CO2 sequestration by the ocean the ocean is a great sink for carbon absorbing more as its concentration in the atmosphere increases 15 As this occurs there will be species and community composition shifts in marine plankton communities Mixotrophic dinoflagellates will be favoured over photosynthetic dinoflagellates as the oceans will become more nutrient limited and mixotrophs will not have to rely only on inorganic nutrients but will be able to take advantage of being able to consume particulate organic matter 6 With an increase in temperature there is an increase in water column stability 15 which leads to favourable conditions for mixotrophic growth Mixotrophs can grow in low nutrient more stable environments and become dominant members of planktonic communities 6 Harmful algal blooms HABs can be caused by increased stability or increases in nutrients due to acidification and climate change as well This can have large impacts on the food chain and pose harmful effects to humans and their food sources 6 through harmful blooms of dinoflagellates and other taxa and lead to paralytic shellfish poisoning for example 16 Influence on red tide and HABs edit nbsp Algal bloom akasio by Noctiluca spp in Nagasaki Many mixotrophic and some heterotrophic dinoflagellates are known to cause red tides or harmful blooms that result in large scale mortality of fish and shellfish 12 Studies on red tides have been conducted to determine the mechanism of outbreak and the persistence of red tides caused by mixotrophic dinoflagellates such as Karenia brevis Prorocentrum donghaiense and Prorocentrum minimum in low nutrient concentration waters In the case of serial red tides one mixotrophic dinoflagellate species is dominated by another mixotrophic species in rapid succession over a short span of days 12 A possible explanation for the occurrence of different dominant mixotrophic dinoflagellates during serial red tides is the ability of mixotrophic dinoflagellates to feed on both heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria such as Synecchococcus spp which provide limiting nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen simultaneously 12 It is proposed that during serial red tides feeding by larger mixotrophic dinoflagellates on smaller species may be a driving force for the succession of dominant species 12 Nitrogen and phosphorus is taken up by direct transfer of the materials and energy between the mixotrophic dinoflagellates therefore nutrient supply does not rely on the release of nitrogen and phosphorus by other organisms Hence mixotrophy can cause uncoupling between nutrient concentrations and the abundance of mixotrophic dinoflagellates in natural environments 12 Red tides are a type of harmful algal bloom HABs both are the result of massive proliferation of algae that result in very high concentrations of cells that visibly colour the water 17 The very high levels of biomass in Red Tides or HABs can have direct toxic effects through the release of toxic compounds or indirect effects through oxygen depletion on mammals fish shellfish and humans 17 PSP Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning is one example of a toxin that is produced by dinoflagellates that can have lethal consequences if contaminated shellfish are ingested the toxin is a neuro inhibitor that is concentrated in the flesh of bivalves and molluscs that have fed on toxic algae 18 The toxin concentrations can cause harmful and even deadly effects on humans and marine mammal populations that feed on contaminated shellfish 18 Relationship to other organisms editMixotrophic dinoflagellates can feed on various organisms including bacteria picoeukaryotes nanoflagellates diatoms protists metazoans and other dinoflagellates as well 8 Feeding and digestion rates in mixotrophic dinoflagellates are lower than those in strictly heterotrophic dinoflagellates 8 Mixotrophic dinoflagellates do not feed on blood eggs adult metazoans and flesh such as occurs in some heterotrophic dinoflagellates References edit Gomez F 2012 A checklist and classification of living dinoflagellates Dinoflagellata Alveolata CICIMAR Oceanides 27 1 65 140 doi 10 37543 oceanides v27i1 111 Ruggiero et al 2015 Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms PLOS ONE 10 4 e0119248 doi 10 1371 journal pone 0119248 PMC 4418965 PMID 25923521 Silar Philippe 2016 Protistes Eucaryotes Origine Evolution et Biologie des Microbes Eucaryotes HAL Archives ouvertes 1 462 Yoo Yeong Du Jeong Hae Jin Kang Nam Seon Song Jae Yoon Kim Kwang Young Lee Gitack Kim Juhyoung 2010 03 01 Feeding by the newly described mixotrophic dinoflagellate Paragymnodinium shiwhaense feeding mechanism prey species and effect of prey concentration The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 57 2 145 158 doi 10 1111 j 1550 7408 2009 00448 x ISSN 1550 7408 PMID 20487129 S2CID 6312832 a b Stoecker Diane K 1999 07 01 Mixotrophy among Dinoflagellates1 Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 46 4 397 401 doi 10 1111 j 1550 7408 1999 tb04619 x ISSN 1550 7408 S2CID 83885629 a b c d e f Mitra A et al 2014 The role of mixotrophic protists in the biological carbon pump Biogeosciences 11 4 995 1005 doi 10 5194 bg 11 995 2014 hdl 10453 117781 a b c d Stoecker Diane K July 1999 Mixotrophy among dinoflagellates The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 46 4 397 401 doi 10 1111 j 1550 7408 1999 tb04619 x S2CID 83885629 a b c d e Jeong Hae Jin Yoo Yeong Du Kim Jae Seong Seong Kyeong Ah Kang Nam Seon Kim Tae Hoon 6 July 2010 Growth feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs Ocean Science Journal 45 2 65 91 doi 10 1007 s12601 010 0007 2 a b Jeong HJ Yoo YD Park JY Song JY Kim ST Lee SH Kim KY Yih WH 6 September 2005 Feeding by phototrophic red tide dinoflagellates five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic Aquatic Microbial Ecology 40 2 133 150 doi 10 3354 ame040133 ISSN 0948 3055 a b Skovgaard Alf 14 December 2000 A Phagotrophically Derivable Growth Factor in the Plastidic Dinoflagellate Gyrodinium Resplendens Dinophyceae Journal of Phycology 36 6 1069 1078 doi 10 1046 j 1529 8817 2000 00009 x S2CID 83903548 Smalley GW Coats DW Stoecker DK 2003 Feeding in the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Ceratium furca is influenced by intracellular nutrient concentrations Marine Ecology Progress Series 262 137 151 doi 10 3354 meps262137 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Jeong Hae Jin Yoo Yeong Du Kim Jae Seong Seong Kyeong Ah Kang Nam Seon Kim Tae Hoon 2010 07 06 Growth feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs Ocean Science Journal 45 2 65 91 doi 10 1007 s12601 010 0007 2 ISSN 1738 5261 Berge T Hansen PJ Moestrup O 26 March 2008 Feeding mechanism prey specificity and growth in light and dark of the plastidic dinoflagellate Karlodinium armiger Aquatic Microbial Ecology 50 279 288 doi 10 3354 ame01165 a b c Bockstahler K R Coats D W 1993 Grazing of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium sanguineum on ciliate populations of Chesapeake Bay Marine Biology 116 3 477 487 doi 10 1007 BF00350065 ISSN 0025 3162 S2CID 84468485 a b McNeil Ben I Matear Richard J 2006 06 27 Projected climate change impact on oceanic acidification Carbon Balance and Management 1 1 2 doi 10 1186 1750 0680 1 2 ISSN 1750 0680 PMC 1513135 PMID 16930458 Hansen Per Juel Cembella Allan D Moestrup Ojvind 1992 10 01 The Marine Dinoflagellate Alexandrium Ostenfeldii Paralytic Shellfish Toxin Concentration Composition and Toxicity to a Tintinnid Ciliate1 Journal of Phycology 28 5 597 603 doi 10 1111 j 0022 3646 1992 00597 x ISSN 1529 8817 S2CID 84540277 a b Administration US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Harmful Algal Blooms oceanservice noaa gov Retrieved 2017 03 23 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link a b Hurley William Wolterstorff Cameron MacDonald Ryan Schultz Debora 2017 03 23 Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning A Case Series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 15 4 378 381 doi 10 5811 westjem 2014 4 16279 ISSN 1936 900X PMC 4100837 PMID 25035737 External links edit nbsp Media related to Dinoflagellata at Wikimedia Commons Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Mixotrophic dinoflagellate amp oldid 1193752619, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.