Medieval European magic

During the Middle Ages, magic took on many forms. Instead of being able to identify one type of magic user, there were many who practiced several types of magic in these times, including monks, priests, physicians, surgeons, midwives, folk healers, and diviners.^[1] The practice of magic often consisted of using medicinal herbs for healing purposes. Classical medicine entailed magical elements. They would use charms or potions in hopes of driving out a sickness.^[2] People had strongly differing opinions as to what magic was,^[3] and because of this, it is important to understand all aspects of magic at this time.

A magic circle in a 15th-century manuscript

History

Further information: Sorcery (goetia)

Magic practices such as divination, interpretation of omens, sorcery, and use of charms had been specifically forbidden in Mosaic Law^[4] and condemned in Biblical histories of the kings.^[5] Many of these practices were spoken against in the New Testament as well.^[6][7] The model of the magician in Christian thought was provided by Simon Magus, (Simon the Magician), a figure who opposed Saint Peter in both the Acts of the Apostles and the apocryphal yet influential Acts of Peter.^[8]

The historian Michael D. Bailey stated that in medieval Europe, magic was a "relatively broad and encompassing category".^[9] Christian theologians believed that there were multiple different forms of magic, the majority of which were types of divination, for instance, Isidore of Seville produced a catalogue of things he regarded as magic in which he listed divination by the four elements i.e. geomancy, hydromancy, aeromancy, and pyromancy, as well as by observation of natural phenomena e.g. the flight of birds and astrology. He also mentioned enchantment and ligatures (the medical use of magical objects bound to the patient) as being magical.^[10] Medieval Europe also saw magic come to be associated with the Old Testament figure of Solomon; various grimoires, or books outlining magical practices, were written that claimed to have been written by Solomon, most notably the Key of Solomon.^[11]

In early medieval Europe, magia was a term of condemnation.^[12] In medieval Europe, Christians often suspected Muslims and Jews of engaging in magical practices;^[13] in certain cases, these perceived magical rites—including the alleged Jewish sacrifice of Christian children—resulted in Christians massacring these religious minorities.^[14] Christian groups often also accused other, rival Christian groups such as the Hussites—which they regarded as heretical—of engaging in magical activities.^[8][15] Medieval Europe also saw the term maleficium applied to forms of magic that were conducted with the intention of causing harm.^[9] The later Middle Ages saw words for these practitioners of harmful magical acts appear in various European languages: sorcière in French, Hexe in German, strega in Italian, and bruja in Spanish.^[16] The English term for malevolent practitioners of magic, witch, derived from the earlier Old English term wicce.^[16]

Magic is a major component and supporting contribution to the belief and practice of spiritual, and in many cases, physical healing throughout the Middle Ages. Emanating from many modern interpretations lies a trail of misconceptions about magic, one of the largest revolving around wickedness or the existence of nefarious beings who practice it. These misinterpretations stem from numerous acts or rituals that have been performed throughout antiquity, and due to their exoticism from the commoner's perspective, the rituals invoked uneasiness and an even stronger sense of dismissal.^[17][18]

 

An excerpt from Sefer Raziel HaMalakh, featuring various magical sigils (סגולות segulot in Hebrew)

In the Medieval Jewish view, the separation of the mystical and magical elements of Kabbalah, dividing it into speculative theological Kabbalah (Kabbalah Iyyunit) with its meditative traditions, and theurgic practical Kabbalah (Kabbalah Ma'asit), had occurred by the beginning of the 14th century.^[19]

Despite the many negative connotations which surround the term magic, there exist many elements that are seen in a divine or holy light.^[20] The divine right of kings in England was thought to be able to give them "sacred magic" power to heal thousands of their subjects from sicknesses.^[21]

Georgius Gemistus Pletho (c. 1355/1360 – 1452/1454), a Greek scholar,^[22] was one of the most renowned philosophers of the late Byzantine era.^[23] He was a chief pioneer of the revival of Greek scholarship in Western Europe.^[24] As revealed in his last literary work, the Nomoi or Book of Laws, which he only circulated among close friends, he rejected Christianity in favour of a return to the worship of the classical Hellenic Gods, mixed with ancient wisdom based on Zoroaster and the Magi.^[25] Pletho may also have been the source for Marsilio Ficino's Orphic system of natural magic.^[26]

Diversified instruments or rituals used in medieval magic include, but are not limited to: various amulets, talismans, potions, as well as specific chants, dances, and prayers. Along with these rituals are the adversely imbued notions of demonic participation which influence of them. The idea that magic was devised, taught, and worked by demons would have seemed reasonable to anyone who read the Greek magical papyri or the Sefer-ha-Razim and found that healing magic appeared alongside rituals for killing people, gaining wealth, or personal advantage, and coercing women into sexual submission.^[27] Archaeology is contributing to a fuller understanding of ritual practices performed in the home, on the body and in monastic and church settings.^[28][29]

in 1456, the seven artes prohibitae or artes magicae, arts prohibited by canon law, were expounded by Johannes Hartlieb, their sevenfold partition reflecting that of the artes liberales and artes mechanicae, were: nigromancy (black or demonic magic), geomancy, hydromancy, aeromancy, pyromancy, chiromancy, and scapulimancy.^[30]

Forms

Astrology

Astrology in its rudimentary form was categorized under spirituality. However, many of the subsections under medieval magic relied on the contextual information within astrology in order to be effective. People who practiced magic often relied on the influence of astrological power for their practices.^[31] The presence of astrology in the Middle Ages is recorded on the walls of the San Miniato al Monte basilica in Florence, Italy. The art on the walls of the basilica depict all of the zodiac symbols. Each of the zodiac during this era were connected with a specific part of the human body that it was deeply connected to.^[32] People who practice magic during this period could take the zodiac into consideration of the practices more precisely if it were directly related to body parts.

Divination

Divination in the Middle Ages can be used as a broad term to define practices used to understand or foresee one's fate and to connect with the entities that brought about said fate. There were multiple ways by which people could attempt divination. Tarot cards were present during the Middle Ages, but it is not clear how the cards were used and interpreted during this period. However, the general placement of the cards would have affected the interpretation of the message.^[33]

Charms

Prayers, blessings, and adjurations were all common forms of verbal formulas whose intentions were hard to distinguish between the magical and the religious. In the Christian context, prayers were typically requests directed to a holy figure such as God, a saint, Christ, or Mary. Blessings more often were addressed to patients, and came in the form of wishes for good fortune. Adjurations, which is defined as the process of making an oath, are also used as exorcisms were more directed to either a sickness, or the agent responsible such as a worm, ghost, demon, or fairy of a mischievous or malevolent nature. While these three verbal formulas may have had religious intentions, they often played a role in magical practices. Blessings were more often than not strictly religious as well, unless they were used alongside magic or in a magical context. However, adjurations required closer scrutiny, as their formulas were generally derived from folklore. Though people at this age were less concerned with whether or not these verbal formulas involved magic or not, but rather with the reality of if they were or were not successful, because they were used to heal.

In addition to the Christian base of charms, tangible items were incorporated into the magical practice. Such items included amulets, talismans, gemstones, as well as smaller items that were used to create the amulets. These items were convenient because they could be kept on one's person at all times, and they served many purposes. They could protect the user from multiple forms of danger, bring the user good fortune, or they could combine multiple blessings and protections depending on how the charm user interacted with them.^[34]

Medical magic

Medical care in the Middle Ages was extremely broad and took many different forms. Practices like therapy revolved around plants, animals, and minerals at this time.^[3] Medicinal practices in the Middle Ages were often regarded as herbalism.^[3] One example of a book that gave recipes and descriptions of plants, animals, and minerals was referred to as a “leechbook”, or a doctor-book that included Masses to be said to bless the healing herbs. There were over 400 herbs and plants recorded in different medical books produced during this time.^[35] For example, a procedure for curing skin disease first involves an ordinary herbal medicine followed by strict instructions to draw blood from the neck of the ill, pour it into running water, spit three times and recite a sort of spell to complete the cure. In addition to the leechbook, the Lacnunga included many prescriptions derived from the European folk culture. The Lacnunga prescribed a set of Christian prayers to be said over the ingredients used to make the medicine, and such ingredients were to be mixed by straws with the names “Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John” inscribed on them. In order for the cure to work, several charms had to be sung in Latin over the medicine. Books like the "leechbook" and the Lacnunga were essentially recipe books that contained details on what each recipe could be used for and it gave detailed descriptions of the plants that were used for healing. Each book contained different content, because popular belief was always changing.

Sorcery

Not only was it difficult to make the distinction between the magical and religious, but what was even more challenging was to distinguish between helpful (white) magic from harmful (black) magic. Medical magic and protective magic were regarded as helpful, and called ‘white’, while sorcery was considered evil and ‘black’. Distinguishing between black magic and white magic often relied on perspective, for example, if a healer attempted to cure a patient and failed, some would accuse the healer of intentionally harming the patient. In this era, magic was only punished if it was deemed to be ‘black’, meaning it was the practice of a sorcerer with harmful intention.

Opposition

Early opposition

Views on magic changed throughout the years and as time went on more controls were placed on magic, these controls varied from place to place and also depended on social status.^[36] The adoption of Christianity saw pre-Christian mythological creatures reinterpreted as devils, who are also referenced in the surviving charms.^[37] In late Anglo-Saxon England, nigromancy ('black magic', sometimes confused with necromancy) was among the practices condemned by Ælfric of Eynsham (c.955–c.1010):^[38][39][40]

Witches still go to cross-roads and to heathen burials with their delusive magic and call to the devil; and he comes to them in the likeness of the man that is buried there, as if he arises from death.^[41]

 

Merlin is said to have been born from the relationship of an incubus with a mortal (illumination from a 13th century French manuscript)

Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335 – c. 395) had said that demons had children with women called cambions, which added to the children they had between them, contributed to increase the number of demons. However, the first popular account of such a union and offspring does not occur in Western literature until around 1136, when Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote the story of Merlin in his pseudohistorical account of British history, Historia Regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain), in which he reported that Merlin's father was an incubus.^[42]

Anne Lawrence-Mathers writes that at that time "... views on demons and spirits were still relatively flexible. There was still a possibility that the daemons of classical tradition were different from the demons of the Bible."^[42] Accounts of sexual relations with demons in literature continues with The Life of Saint Bernard by Geoffrey of Auxerre (c. 1160) and the Life and Miracles of St. William of Norwich by Thomas of Monmouth (c. 1173). The theme of sexual relations with demons became a matter of increasing interest for late 12th-century writers.^[42]

Prophetiae Merlini (The Prophecies of Merlin), a Latin work of Geoffrey of Monmouth in circulation by 1135,^[43][44] perhaps as a libellus or short work,^[45] was the first work about the prophet Myrddin in a language other than Welsh. The Prophetiae was widely read — and believed — much as the prophecies of Nostradamus would be centuries later; John Jay Parry and Robert Caldwell note that the Prophetiae Merlini "were taken most seriously, even by the learned and worldly wise, in many nations", and list examples of this credulity as late as 1445.^[46]

It was only beginning in the 1150s that the Church turned its attention to defining the possible roles of spirits and demons, especially with respect to their sexuality and in connection with the various forms of magic which were then believed to exist.^[42] Christian demonologists eventually came to agree that sexual relationships between demons and humans happen, but they disagreed on why and how.^[42] A common point of view is that demons induce men and women to the sin of lust, and adultery is often considered as an associated sin.

Legal prohibitions

Legislation against magic could be one of two types, either by secular authorities or by the Church.^[36] The penalties assigned by secular law typically included execution, but were more severe based on the impact of the magic, as people were less concerned with the means of magic, and more concerned with its effects on others. The penalties by the Church often required penance for, what they viewed as the sin of magic, or in harsher cases could excommunicate the accused under the circumstances that the work of magic was a direct offense against God. The distinction between these punishments, secular versus the Church, were not absolute as many of the laws enacted by both parties were derived from the other.

The persecution of magic can be seen in law codes dating back to the 6th century, where the Germanic code of Visigoths condemned sorcerers who cursed the crops and animals of peasant's enemies. In terms of secular legislation, Charles the Great (Charlemagne) was arguably the strongest opposing force to magic. He declared that all who practiced sorcery or divination would become slaves to the Church, and all those who sacrificed to the Devil or Germanic gods would be executed.

Charlemagne's objection to magic carried over into later years, as many rulers built on his early prohibitions. King Roger II of Sicily punished the use of poisons by death, whether natural or magical. Additionally, he proclaimed that ‘love magic’ be punished regardless of if anyone was hurt or not. However, secular rulers were still more concerned with the actual damage of the magic rather than the means of its infliction.

Instructions issued in 800 at a synod in Freising provide general outlines for ecclesiastical hearings. The document states that those accused of some type of sorcery were to be examined by the archpriest of the diocese in hopes of prompting a confession. Torture was used if necessary, and the accused were often sentenced to prison until they resolved to do penance for their sins.

Prosecution in the Early Middle Ages

Important political figures were the most frequently known characters in trials against magic, whether defendants, accusers, or victims. This was because high-society trials were more likely to be recorded as opposed to trials involving ordinary townspeople or villagers. For example, Gregory of Tours recorded the accusations of magic at the royal court of 6th century Gaul. According to History of the Franks, two people were executed for supposedly bewitching emperor Arnulf and prompting the stroke that led to his death. Prosecution of magic was infrequent during this era because Christians were willing to adapt magic practices within the context of religion. For example, astrology was created by the Greeks, who were considered to be pagans by Medieval Christians. Astrology was condemned if it were used to control destiny because the Christian God is supposed to be the one who controls destiny. Early Christians were accommodating of astrology as long as it was connected to the physical realm as opposed to the spiritual.^[47]

Rise of witch trials

Further information: Witch-hunt and Witch trials in the early modern period

The rise of witch trials is brought about by changes in religion as well as changes to the political world in Europe showing once again how different topics had an influence on witchcraft.The fourteenth century already brought about an increase of sorcery trials, however the second and third quarters of the fifteenth century were known for the most dramatic uprising of trials involving witchcraft.^[48] The trials developed into catch-all prosecution, in which townspeople were encouraged to seek out as many suspects as possible. The goal was no longer to secure justice against a single offender but rather to purge the community of all transgressors.

Magic and Christianity

Witchcraft and magic has connections to many other topics in the Middle Ages, making it a very important and influential topic. It has a large connection to religion due to the fact that Christianity had a major impact on those who practiced magic. When Christianity became more strict it viewed witches as atheists, in turn prosecuting them for it.^[49] Christianity and Catholicism grew with movements like the Spanish Reconquista, which ended in 1492 when Spain conquered Granada. This movement was a crusade and those involved forced others to convert to Christianity.^[50]

See also

• Ceremonial magic – Variety of rituals of magic
• Magical Treatise of Solomon – grimoire influential on the Key of SolomonPages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
• Renaissance magic – Magical science during the Renaissance

References

1. Kieckhefer, Richard (2014). Magic in the Middle Ages (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-1-107-43182-9.
2. Medievalists.net (2021-09-04). "Everyday Magic in the Middle Ages". Medievalists.net. Retrieved 2022-02-24.
3. Maguire, Henry (1997). "Magic and Money in the Early Middle Ages". Speculum. 72 (4): 1037–1054. doi:10.2307/2865957. JSTOR 2865957. S2CID 162305252.
4. Deuteronomy 18:9–18:14
5. 2 Chronicles 33:1–33:9
6. Acts 13:6–13:12
7. Galatians 5:16–5:26
8. Bailey 2018, p. 99.
9. Bailey 2018, p. 21.
10. Kieckhefer 2000, pp. 10–11.
11. Davies 2012, p. 35.
12. Flint 1991, p. 5.
13. Davies 2012, p. 6; Bailey 2018, p. 88.
14. Davies 2012, p. 6.
15. Johnson, T.; Scribner, R.W. (1996). Popular Religion in Germany and Central Europe, 1400-1800. Themes in Focus. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-349-24836-0. Retrieved 2023-04-02.
16. Bailey 2018, p. 22.
17. Flint, Valerie I.J. (1990). The Rise of Magic in Early Medieval Europe (1st ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp. 4, 12, 406. ISBN 978-0691031651.
18. Kieckhefer, Richard (June 1994). "The Specific Rationality of Medieval Magic". The American Historical Review. 99 (3): 813–818. doi:10.2307/2167771. JSTOR 2167771. PMID 11639314.
19. Josephy, Marcia Reines (1975). Magic & Superstition in the Jewish Tradition: An Exhibition Organized by the Maurice Spertus Museum of Judaica. Spertus College of Judaica Press. p. 18. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
20. Lindberg, David C. (2007). The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, 600 B.C. to A.D. 1450 (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0226482057.
21. Schama, Simon (2003). A History of Britain 1: 3000 BC-AD 1603 At the Edge of the World? (Paperback 2003 ed.). London: BBC Worldwide. pp. 193–194. ISBN 978-0-563-48714-2.
22. Humphreys & Wagner (2013), p. 125.
23. Hanegraaff (2012), pp. 29–31.
24. Clogg (2005).
25. Hanegraaff (2012), p. 38.
26. Merry (2002).
27. Kieckhefer 1994, p. 818.
28. Gilchrist, Roberta (1 November 2008). "Magic for the Dead? The Archaeology of Magic in Later Medieval Burials" (PDF). Medieval Archaeology. 52 (1): 119–159. doi:10.1179/174581708x335468. ISSN 0076-6097. S2CID 162339681. (PDF) from the original on 2015-05-14.
29. Gilchrist, Roberta (2012). Medieval Life: Archaeology and the Life Course (Reprint ed.). Woodbridge: Boydell Press. p. xii. ISBN 9781843837220. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
30. Heiduk, Herbers & Lehner 2020, p. 834.
31. Aveni, Anthony F. (2002). Behind the crystal ball : magic, science, and the occult from antiquity through the New Age. Boulder, Colo.: University Press of Colorado. p. 101. ISBN 0-87081-671-3. OCLC 50091675.
32. Gettings, Fred (1987). The secret zodiac : the hidden art in mediaeval astrology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 24–25. ISBN 0-7102-1147-3. OCLC 15520872.
33. Aveni, Anthony (1996). Behind the Crystal Ball. University Press of Colorado. pp. 77–78. ISBN 9780870816710.
34. Jolly, Karen Louise (2002). The Middle Ages. Catharina Raudvere, Edward Peters, Bengt Ankarloo, Stuart Clark. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 43. ISBN 0-8122-3616-5. OCLC 49564409.
35. Stannard, Jerry (2013). "Medieval Herbalism and Post-Medieval Folk Medicine". Pharmacy in History. 55 (2–3): 47–54. PMID 25654900 – via JTSTOR.
36. Waite, Gary K. (2012). "Laura Stokes. Demons of Urban Reform: Early European Witch Trials and Criminal Justice, 1430–1530. Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. vii + 236 pp. $85. ISBN: 978–1–4039–8683–2". Renaissance Quarterly. 65 (1): 261–263. doi:10.1086/665886. ISSN 0034-4338. S2CID 164023962.
37. Storms (1948), p. 51.
38. Semple (2003).
39. Semple (1998).
40. Pope (1968), p. 796.
41. Meaney (1984).
42. Lawrence-Mathers (2020).
43. Fulton (2012), p. 98.
44. Harper-Bill & Van Houts (2007), pp. 200ff.
45. Barber (1999), p. 155.
46. Parry & Caldwell (1959), p. 79.
47. Aveni, Anthony F. (2002). Behind the crystal ball : magic, science, and the occult from antiquity through the New Age (Rev. ed.). Boulder, Colo.: University Press of Colorado. pp. 101–102. ISBN 0-87081-671-3. OCLC 50091675.
48. Bennett, Judith M. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Women & Gender In Medieval Europe. University Press. pp. 578–587.
49. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman (1980). "The European Witch Craze of the 14th to 17th Centuries: A Sociologist Perspective". American Journal of Sociology. 86 (1): 2–32. doi:10.1086/227200. JSTOR 2778849. S2CID 143650714 – via JSTOR.
50. Kroesen, Justin E.A. (2008). "From Mosques to Cathedrals: Converting Sacred Space During the Spanish Reconquest". Mediaevistik. 21: 113–137. doi:10.3726/83010_113. JSTOR 42586616 – via JSTOR.

Works cited

• Bailey, Michael D. (2006). "The Meanings of Magic". Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft. 1 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1353/mrw.0.0052.
• Bailey, Michael D. (2018). Magic: The Basics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-80961-1.
• Barber, Richard (1999). Arthurian Literature. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. ISBN 978-0-85991-163-4.
• Clogg, Richard (6 Jan 2005). "Woodhouse, Christopher Montague [Monty], fifth Baron Terrington (1917–2001), army officer, historian, and politician". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/75443. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. Retrieved 10 Dec 2021. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
• Davies, Owen (2012). Magic: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199588022.
• Flint, Valerie I. J. (1991). The Rise of Magic in Early Medieval Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691031651.
• Fulton, Helen (2012). A Companion to Arthurian Literature. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-67237-2.
• Hanegraaff, Wouter (2012). Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521196215.
• Harper-Bill, Christopher; Van Houts, Elisabeth (2007). A Companion to the Anglo-Norman World. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. ISBN 978-1-84383-341-3.
• Heiduk, Matthias; Herbers, Klaus; Lehner, Hans-Christian, eds. (2020). Prognostication in the Medieval World: A Handbook. De Gruyter. ISBN 978-3110499773.
• Humphreys, Sarah C.; Wagner, Rudolf G. (2013). Modernity's Classics. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-642-33071-1.
• Kieckhefer, Richard (2000). Magic in the Middle Ages (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521785761.
• Lawrence-Mathers, A. (2020) [2012]. "Chapter 6: A Demonic Heritage". The True History of Merlin the Magician. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300253085.
• Meaney, Audrey L. (December 1984). "Æfric and Idolatry". Journal of Religious History. 13 (2): 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9809.1984.tb00191.x.
• Merry, Bruce (2002). "George Gemistos Plethon (c. 1355/60–1452)". In Amoia, Alba; Knapp, Bettina L. (eds.). Multicultural Writers from Antiquity to 1945: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook. Greenwood Publishing Group.
• Otto, Berndt-Christian; Stausberg, Michael (2013). Defining Magic: A Reader. Durham: Equinox. ISBN 9781908049803.
• Parry, John Jay; Caldwell, Robert (1959). "Geoffrey of Monmouth". In Loomis, Roger S. (ed.). Arthurian Literature in the Middle Ages. Oxford University: Clarendon Press.
• Pope, J. C. (1968). Homilies of Aelfric: a supplementary collection. Early English Text Society 260. Vol. II. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Semple, Sarah (June 1998). "A fear of the past: The place of the prehistoric burial mound in the ideology of middle and later Anglo‐Saxon England". World Archaeology. 30 (1): 109–126. doi:10.1080/00438243.1998.9980400. JSTOR 125012.
• Semple, Sarah (December 2003). "Illustrations of damnation in late Anglo-Saxon manuscripts" (PDF). Anglo-Saxon England. 32: 231–245. doi:10.1017/S0263675103000115. S2CID 161982897.
• Storms, Godfrid (1948). Anglo-Saxon Magic. The Hague: Martinus.