fbpx
Wikipedia

Hermite polynomials

In mathematics, the Hermite polynomials are a classical orthogonal polynomial sequence.

The polynomials arise in:

Hermite polynomials were defined by Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1810,[1][2] though in scarcely recognizable form, and studied in detail by Pafnuty Chebyshev in 1859.[3] Chebyshev's work was overlooked, and they were named later after Charles Hermite, who wrote on the polynomials in 1864, describing them as new.[4] They were consequently not new, although Hermite was the first to define the multidimensional polynomials.

Definition edit

Like the other classical orthogonal polynomials, the Hermite polynomials can be defined from several different starting points. Noting from the outset that there are two different standardizations in common use, one convenient method is as follows:

  • The "probabilist's Hermite polynomials" are given by
     
  • while the "physicist's Hermite polynomials" are given by
     

These equations have the form of a Rodrigues' formula and can also be written as,

 

The two definitions are not exactly identical; each is a rescaling of the other:

 

These are Hermite polynomial sequences of different variances; see the material on variances below.

The notation He and H is that used in the standard references.[5] The polynomials Hen are sometimes denoted by Hn, especially in probability theory, because

 
is the probability density function for the normal distribution with expected value 0 and standard deviation 1.
 
The first six probabilist's Hermite polynomials Hen(x)
 
The first six (physicist's) Hermite polynomials Hn(x)
  • The first eleven probabilist's Hermite polynomials are:
     
  • The first eleven physicist's Hermite polynomials are:
     

Properties edit

The nth-order Hermite polynomial is a polynomial of degree n. The probabilist's version Hen has leading coefficient 1, while the physicist's version Hn has leading coefficient 2n.

Symmetry edit

From the Rodrigues formulae given above, we can see that Hn(x) and Hen(x) are even or odd functions depending on n:

 

Orthogonality edit

Hn(x) and Hen(x) are nth-degree polynomials for n = 0, 1, 2, 3,.... These polynomials are orthogonal with respect to the weight function (measure)

 
or
 
i.e., we have
 

Furthermore,

 
and
 
where   is the Kronecker delta.

The probabilist polynomials are thus orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability density function.

Completeness edit

The Hermite polynomials (probabilist's or physicist's) form an orthogonal basis of the Hilbert space of functions satisfying

 
in which the inner product is given by the integral
 
including the Gaussian weight function w(x) defined in the preceding section

An orthogonal basis for L2(R, w(x) dx) is a complete orthogonal system. For an orthogonal system, completeness is equivalent to the fact that the 0 function is the only function fL2(R, w(x) dx) orthogonal to all functions in the system.

Since the linear span of Hermite polynomials is the space of all polynomials, one has to show (in physicist case) that if f satisfies

 
for every n ≥ 0, then f = 0.

One possible way to do this is to appreciate that the entire function

 
vanishes identically. The fact then that F(it) = 0 for every real t means that the Fourier transform of f(x)ex2 is 0, hence f is 0 almost everywhere. Variants of the above completeness proof apply to other weights with exponential decay.

In the Hermite case, it is also possible to prove an explicit identity that implies completeness (see section on the Completeness relation below).

An equivalent formulation of the fact that Hermite polynomials are an orthogonal basis for L2(R, w(x) dx) consists in introducing Hermite functions (see below), and in saying that the Hermite functions are an orthonormal basis for L2(R).

Hermite's differential equation edit

The probabilist's Hermite polynomials are solutions of the differential equation

 
where λ is a constant. Imposing the boundary condition that u should be polynomially bounded at infinity, the equation has solutions only if λ is a non-negative integer, and the solution is uniquely given by  , where   denotes a constant.

Rewriting the differential equation as an eigenvalue problem

 
the Hermite polynomials   may be understood as eigenfunctions of the differential operator   . This eigenvalue problem is called the Hermite equation, although the term is also used for the closely related equation
 
whose solution is uniquely given in terms of physicist's Hermite polynomials in the form  , where   denotes a constant, after imposing the boundary condition that u should be polynomially bounded at infinity.

The general solutions to the above second-order differential equations are in fact linear combinations of both Hermite polynomials and confluent hypergeometric functions of the first kind. For example, for the physicist's Hermite equation

 
the general solution takes the form
 
where   and   are constants,   are physicist's Hermite polynomials (of the first kind), and   are physicist's Hermite functions (of the second kind). The latter functions are compactly represented as   where   are Confluent hypergeometric functions of the first kind. The conventional Hermite polynomials may also be expressed in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions, see below.

With more general boundary conditions, the Hermite polynomials can be generalized to obtain more general analytic functions for complex-valued λ. An explicit formula of Hermite polynomials in terms of contour integrals (Courant & Hilbert 1989) is also possible.

Recurrence relation edit

The sequence of probabilist's Hermite polynomials also satisfies the recurrence relation

 
Individual coefficients are related by the following recursion formula:
 
and a0,0 = 1, a1,0 = 0, a1,1 = 1.

For the physicist's polynomials, assuming

 
we have
 
Individual coefficients are related by the following recursion formula:
 
and a0,0 = 1, a1,0 = 0, a1,1 = 2.

The Hermite polynomials constitute an Appell sequence, i.e., they are a polynomial sequence satisfying the identity

 

An integral recurrence that is deduced and demonstrated in [6] is as follows:

 
 

Equivalently, by Taylor-expanding,

 
These umbral identities are self-evident and included in the differential operator representation detailed below,
 

In consequence, for the mth derivatives the following relations hold:

 

It follows that the Hermite polynomials also satisfy the recurrence relation

 

These last relations, together with the initial polynomials H0(x) and H1(x), can be used in practice to compute the polynomials quickly.

Turán's inequalities are

 

Moreover, the following multiplication theorem holds:

 

Explicit expression edit

The physicist's Hermite polynomials can be written explicitly as

 

These two equations may be combined into one using the floor function:

 

The probabilist's Hermite polynomials He have similar formulas, which may be obtained from these by replacing the power of 2x with the corresponding power of 2x and multiplying the entire sum by 2n/2:

 

Inverse explicit expression edit

The inverse of the above explicit expressions, that is, those for monomials in terms of probabilist's Hermite polynomials He are

 

The corresponding expressions for the physicist's Hermite polynomials H follow directly by properly scaling this:[7]

 

Generating function edit

The Hermite polynomials are given by the exponential generating function

 

This equality is valid for all complex values of x and t, and can be obtained by writing the Taylor expansion at x of the entire function zez2 (in the physicist's case). One can also derive the (physicist's) generating function by using Cauchy's integral formula to write the Hermite polynomials as

 

Using this in the sum

 
one can evaluate the remaining integral using the calculus of residues and arrive at the desired generating function.

Expected values edit

If X is a random variable with a normal distribution with standard deviation 1 and expected value μ, then

 

The moments of the standard normal (with expected value zero) may be read off directly from the relation for even indices:

 
where (2n − 1)!! is the double factorial. Note that the above expression is a special case of the representation of the probabilist's Hermite polynomials as moments:
 

Asymptotic expansion edit

Asymptotically, as n → ∞, the expansion[8]

 
holds true. For certain cases concerning a wider range of evaluation, it is necessary to include a factor for changing amplitude:
 
which, using Stirling's approximation, can be further simplified, in the limit, to
 

This expansion is needed to resolve the wavefunction of a quantum harmonic oscillator such that it agrees with the classical approximation in the limit of the correspondence principle.

A better approximation, which accounts for the variation in frequency, is given by

 

A finer approximation,[9] which takes into account the uneven spacing of the zeros near the edges, makes use of the substitution

 
with which one has the uniform approximation
 

Similar approximations hold for the monotonic and transition regions. Specifically, if

 
then
 
while for
 
with t complex and bounded, the approximation is
 
where Ai is the Airy function of the first kind.

Special values edit

The physicist's Hermite polynomials evaluated at zero argument Hn(0) are called Hermite numbers.

 
which satisfy the recursion relation Hn(0) = −2(n − 1)Hn − 2(0).

In terms of the probabilist's polynomials this translates to

 

Relations to other functions edit

Laguerre polynomials edit

The Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the Laguerre polynomials:

 

Relation to confluent hypergeometric functions edit

The physicist's Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the parabolic cylinder functions:

 
in the right half-plane, where U(a, b, z) is Tricomi's confluent hypergeometric function. Similarly,
 
where 1F1(a, b; z) = M(a, b; z) is Kummer's confluent hypergeometric function.

Hermite polynomial expansion edit

Similar to Taylor expansion, some functions are expressible as an infinite sum of Hermite polynomials. Specifically, if  , then it has an expansion in the physicist's Hermite polynomials.[10]

Given such  , the partial sums of the Hermite expansion of   converges to in the   norm if and only if  .[11]

 
 
 
 
 
 

Differential-operator representation edit

The probabilist's Hermite polynomials satisfy the identity

 
where D represents differentiation with respect to x, and the exponential is interpreted by expanding it as a power series. There are no delicate questions of convergence of this series when it operates on polynomials, since all but finitely many terms vanish.

Since the power-series coefficients of the exponential are well known, and higher-order derivatives of the monomial xn can be written down explicitly, this differential-operator representation gives rise to a concrete formula for the coefficients of Hn that can be used to quickly compute these polynomials.

Since the formal expression for the Weierstrass transform W is eD2, we see that the Weierstrass transform of (2)nHen(x/2) is xn. Essentially the Weierstrass transform thus turns a series of Hermite polynomials into a corresponding Maclaurin series.

The existence of some formal power series g(D) with nonzero constant coefficient, such that Hen(x) = g(D)xn, is another equivalent to the statement that these polynomials form an Appell sequence. Since they are an Appell sequence, they are a fortiori a Sheffer sequence.

Contour-integral representation edit

From the generating-function representation above, we see that the Hermite polynomials have a representation in terms of a contour integral, as

 
with the contour encircling the origin.

Generalizations edit

The probabilist's Hermite polynomials defined above are orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability distribution, whose density function is

 
which has expected value 0 and variance 1.

Scaling, one may analogously speak of generalized Hermite polynomials[12]

 
of variance α, where α is any positive number. These are then orthogonal with respect to the normal probability distribution whose density function is
 
They are given by
 

Now, if

 
then the polynomial sequence whose nth term is
 
is called the umbral composition of the two polynomial sequences. It can be shown to satisfy the identities
 
and
 
The last identity is expressed by saying that this parameterized family of polynomial sequences is known as a cross-sequence. (See the above section on Appell sequences and on the differential-operator representation, which leads to a ready derivation of it. This binomial type identity, for α = β = 1/2, has already been encountered in the above section on #Recursion relations.)

"Negative variance" edit

Since polynomial sequences form a group under the operation of umbral composition, one may denote by

 
the sequence that is inverse to the one similarly denoted, but without the minus sign, and thus speak of Hermite polynomials of negative variance. For α > 0, the coefficients of   are just the absolute values of the corresponding coefficients of  .

These arise as moments of normal probability distributions: The nth moment of the normal distribution with expected value μ and variance σ2 is

 
where X is a random variable with the specified normal distribution. A special case of the cross-sequence identity then says that
 

Hermite functions edit

Definition edit

One can define the Hermite functions (often called Hermite-Gaussian functions) from the physicist's polynomials:

 
Thus,
 

Since these functions contain the square root of the weight function and have been scaled appropriately, they are orthonormal:

 
and they form an orthonormal basis of L2(R). This fact is equivalent to the corresponding statement for Hermite polynomials (see above).

The Hermite functions are closely related to the Whittaker function (Whittaker & Watson 1996) Dn(z):

 
and thereby to other parabolic cylinder functions.

The Hermite functions satisfy the differential equation

 
This equation is equivalent to the Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics, so these functions are the eigenfunctions.
 
Hermite functions: 0 (blue, solid), 1 (orange, dashed), 2 (green, dot-dashed), 3 (red, dotted), 4 (purple, solid), and 5 (brown, dashed)
 
 
Hermite functions: 0 (blue, solid), 2 (orange, dashed), 4 (green, dot-dashed), and 50 (red, solid)

Recursion relation edit

Following recursion relations of Hermite polynomials, the Hermite functions obey

 
and
 

Extending the first relation to the arbitrary mth derivatives for any positive integer m leads to

 

This formula can be used in connection with the recurrence relations for Hen and ψn to calculate any derivative of the Hermite functions efficiently.

Cramér's inequality edit

For real x, the Hermite functions satisfy the following bound due to Harald Cramér[13][14] and Jack Indritz:[15]

 

Hermite functions as eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform edit

The Hermite functions ψn(x) are a set of eigenfunctions of the continuous Fourier transform F. To see this, take the physicist's version of the generating function and multiply by e1/2x2. This gives

 

The Fourier transform of the left side is given by

 

The Fourier transform of the right side is given by

 

Equating like powers of t in the transformed versions of the left and right sides finally yields

 

The Hermite functions ψn(x) are thus an orthonormal basis of L2(R), which diagonalizes the Fourier transform operator.[16]

Wigner distributions of Hermite functions edit

The Wigner distribution function of the nth-order Hermite function is related to the nth-order Laguerre polynomial. The Laguerre polynomials are

 
leading to the oscillator Laguerre functions
 
For all natural integers n, it is straightforward to see[17] that
 
where the Wigner distribution of a function xL2(R, C) is defined as
 
This is a fundamental result for the quantum harmonic oscillator discovered by Hip Groenewold in 1946 in his PhD thesis.[18] It is the standard paradigm of quantum mechanics in phase space.

There are further relations between the two families of polynomials.

Combinatorial interpretation of coefficients edit

In the Hermite polynomial Hen(x) of variance 1, the absolute value of the coefficient of xk is the number of (unordered) partitions of an n-element set into k singletons and nk/2 (unordered) pairs. Equivalently, it is the number of involutions of an n-element set with precisely k fixed points, or in other words, the number of matchings in the complete graph on n vertices that leave k vertices uncovered (indeed, the Hermite polynomials are the matching polynomials of these graphs). The sum of the absolute values of the coefficients gives the total number of partitions into singletons and pairs, the so-called telephone numbers

1, 1, 2, 4, 10, 26, 76, 232, 764, 2620, 9496,... (sequence A000085 in the OEIS).

This combinatorial interpretation can be related to complete exponential Bell polynomials as

 
where xi = 0 for all i > 2.

These numbers may also be expressed as a special value of the Hermite polynomials:[19]

 

Completeness relation edit

The Christoffel–Darboux formula for Hermite polynomials reads

 

Moreover, the following completeness identity for the above Hermite functions holds in the sense of distributions:

 
where δ is the Dirac delta function, ψn the Hermite functions, and δ(xy) represents the Lebesgue measure on the line y = x in R2, normalized so that its projection on the horizontal axis is the usual Lebesgue measure.

This distributional identity follows Wiener (1958) by taking u → 1 in Mehler's formula, valid when −1 < u < 1:

 
which is often stated equivalently as a separable kernel,[20][21]
 

The function (x, y) → E(x, y; u) is the bivariate Gaussian probability density on R2, which is, when u is close to 1, very concentrated around the line y = x, and very spread out on that line. It follows that

 
when f and g are continuous and compactly supported.

This yields that f can be expressed in Hermite functions as the sum of a series of vectors in L2(R), namely,

 

In order to prove the above equality for E(x,y;u), the Fourier transform of Gaussian functions is used repeatedly:

 

The Hermite polynomial is then represented as

 

With this representation for Hn(x) and Hn(y), it is evident that

hermite, polynomials, this, article, about, family, orthogonal, polynomials, real, line, polynomial, interpolation, segment, using, derivatives, hermite, interpolation, integral, transform, hermite, transform, mathematics, classical, orthogonal, polynomial, se. This article is about the family of orthogonal polynomials on the real line For polynomial interpolation on a segment using derivatives see Hermite interpolation For integral transform of Hermite polynomials see Hermite transform In mathematics the Hermite polynomials are a classical orthogonal polynomial sequence The polynomials arise in signal processing as Hermitian wavelets for wavelet transform analysis probability such as the Edgeworth series as well as in connection with Brownian motion combinatorics as an example of an Appell sequence obeying the umbral calculus numerical analysis as Gaussian quadrature physics where they give rise to the eigenstates of the quantum harmonic oscillator and they also occur in some cases of the heat equation when the term x u x displaystyle begin aligned xu x end aligned is present systems theory in connection with nonlinear operations on Gaussian noise random matrix theory in Gaussian ensembles Hermite polynomials were defined by Pierre Simon Laplace in 1810 1 2 though in scarcely recognizable form and studied in detail by Pafnuty Chebyshev in 1859 3 Chebyshev s work was overlooked and they were named later after Charles Hermite who wrote on the polynomials in 1864 describing them as new 4 They were consequently not new although Hermite was the first to define the multidimensional polynomials Contents 1 Definition 2 Properties 2 1 Symmetry 2 2 Orthogonality 2 3 Completeness 2 4 Hermite s differential equation 2 5 Recurrence relation 2 6 Explicit expression 2 7 Inverse explicit expression 2 8 Generating function 2 9 Expected values 2 10 Asymptotic expansion 2 11 Special values 3 Relations to other functions 3 1 Laguerre polynomials 3 2 Relation to confluent hypergeometric functions 4 Hermite polynomial expansion 5 Differential operator representation 6 Contour integral representation 7 Generalizations 7 1 Negative variance 8 Hermite functions 8 1 Definition 8 2 Recursion relation 8 3 Cramer s inequality 8 4 Hermite functions as eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform 8 5 Wigner distributions of Hermite functions 8 6 Combinatorial interpretation of coefficients 8 7 Completeness relation 9 See also 10 Notes 11 References 12 External linksDefinition editLike the other classical orthogonal polynomials the Hermite polynomials can be defined from several different starting points Noting from the outset that there are two different standardizations in common use one convenient method is as follows The probabilist s Hermite polynomials are given by H e n x 1 n e x 2 2 d n d x n e x 2 2 displaystyle mathit He n x 1 n e frac x 2 2 frac d n dx n e frac x 2 2 nbsp while the physicist s Hermite polynomials are given by H n x 1 n e x 2 d n d x n e x 2 displaystyle H n x 1 n e x 2 frac d n dx n e x 2 nbsp These equations have the form of a Rodrigues formula and can also be written as H e n x x d d x n 1 H n x 2 x d d x n 1 displaystyle mathit He n x left x frac d dx right n cdot 1 quad H n x left 2x frac d dx right n cdot 1 nbsp The two definitions are not exactly identical each is a rescaling of the other H n x 2 n 2 H e n 2 x H e n x 2 n 2 H n x 2 displaystyle H n x 2 frac n 2 mathit He n left sqrt 2 x right quad mathit He n x 2 frac n 2 H n left frac x sqrt 2 right nbsp These are Hermite polynomial sequences of different variances see the material on variances below The notation He and H is that used in the standard references 5 The polynomials Hen are sometimes denoted by Hn especially in probability theory because1 2 p e x 2 2 displaystyle frac 1 sqrt 2 pi e frac x 2 2 nbsp is the probability density function for the normal distribution with expected value 0 and standard deviation 1 nbsp The first six probabilist s Hermite polynomials Hen x nbsp The first six physicist s Hermite polynomials Hn x The first eleven probabilist s Hermite polynomials are H e 0 x 1 H e 1 x x H e 2 x x 2 1 H e 3 x x 3 3 x H e 4 x x 4 6 x 2 3 H e 5 x x 5 10 x 3 15 x H e 6 x x 6 15 x 4 45 x 2 15 H e 7 x x 7 21 x 5 105 x 3 105 x H e 8 x x 8 28 x 6 210 x 4 420 x 2 105 H e 9 x x 9 36 x 7 378 x 5 1260 x 3 945 x H e 10 x x 10 45 x 8 630 x 6 3150 x 4 4725 x 2 945 displaystyle begin aligned mathit He 0 x amp 1 mathit He 1 x amp x mathit He 2 x amp x 2 1 mathit He 3 x amp x 3 3x mathit He 4 x amp x 4 6x 2 3 mathit He 5 x amp x 5 10x 3 15x mathit He 6 x amp x 6 15x 4 45x 2 15 mathit He 7 x amp x 7 21x 5 105x 3 105x mathit He 8 x amp x 8 28x 6 210x 4 420x 2 105 mathit He 9 x amp x 9 36x 7 378x 5 1260x 3 945x mathit He 10 x amp x 10 45x 8 630x 6 3150x 4 4725x 2 945 end aligned nbsp The first eleven physicist s Hermite polynomials are H 0 x 1 H 1 x 2 x H 2 x 4 x 2 2 H 3 x 8 x 3 12 x H 4 x 16 x 4 48 x 2 12 H 5 x 32 x 5 160 x 3 120 x H 6 x 64 x 6 480 x 4 720 x 2 120 H 7 x 128 x 7 1344 x 5 3360 x 3 1680 x H 8 x 256 x 8 3584 x 6 13440 x 4 13440 x 2 1680 H 9 x 512 x 9 9216 x 7 48384 x 5 80640 x 3 30240 x H 10 x 1024 x 10 23040 x 8 161280 x 6 403200 x 4 302400 x 2 30240 displaystyle begin aligned H 0 x amp 1 H 1 x amp 2x H 2 x amp 4x 2 2 H 3 x amp 8x 3 12x H 4 x amp 16x 4 48x 2 12 H 5 x amp 32x 5 160x 3 120x H 6 x amp 64x 6 480x 4 720x 2 120 H 7 x amp 128x 7 1344x 5 3360x 3 1680x H 8 x amp 256x 8 3584x 6 13440x 4 13440x 2 1680 H 9 x amp 512x 9 9216x 7 48384x 5 80640x 3 30240x H 10 x amp 1024x 10 23040x 8 161280x 6 403200x 4 302400x 2 30240 end aligned nbsp Properties editThe n th order Hermite polynomial is a polynomial of degree n The probabilist s version Hen has leading coefficient 1 while the physicist s version Hn has leading coefficient 2n Symmetry edit From the Rodrigues formulae given above we can see that Hn x and Hen x are even or odd functions depending on n H n x 1 n H n x H e n x 1 n H e n x displaystyle H n x 1 n H n x quad mathit He n x 1 n mathit He n x nbsp Orthogonality edit Hn x and Hen x are n th degree polynomials for n 0 1 2 3 These polynomials are orthogonal with respect to the weight function measure w x e x 2 2 for H e displaystyle w x e frac x 2 2 quad text for mathit He nbsp or w x e x 2 for H displaystyle w x e x 2 quad text for H nbsp i e we have H m x H n x w x d x 0 for all m n displaystyle int infty infty H m x H n x w x dx 0 quad text for all m neq n nbsp Furthermore H m x H n x e x 2 d x p 2 n n d n m displaystyle int infty infty H m x H n x e x 2 dx sqrt pi 2 n n delta nm nbsp and H e m x H e n x e x 2 2 d x 2 p n d n m displaystyle int infty infty mathit He m x mathit He n x e frac x 2 2 dx sqrt 2 pi n delta nm nbsp where d n m displaystyle delta nm nbsp is the Kronecker delta The probabilist polynomials are thus orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability density function Completeness edit The Hermite polynomials probabilist s or physicist s form an orthogonal basis of the Hilbert space of functions satisfying f x 2 w x d x lt displaystyle int infty infty bigl f x bigr 2 w x dx lt infty nbsp in which the inner product is given by the integral f g f x g x w x d x displaystyle langle f g rangle int infty infty f x overline g x w x dx nbsp including the Gaussian weight function w x defined in the preceding section An orthogonal basis for L2 R w x dx is a complete orthogonal system For an orthogonal system completeness is equivalent to the fact that the 0 function is the only function f L2 R w x dx orthogonal to all functions in the system Since the linear span of Hermite polynomials is the space of all polynomials one has to show in physicist case that if f satisfies f x x n e x 2 d x 0 displaystyle int infty infty f x x n e x 2 dx 0 nbsp for every n 0 then f 0 One possible way to do this is to appreciate that the entire functionF z f x e z x x 2 d x n 0 z n n f x x n e x 2 d x 0 displaystyle F z int infty infty f x e zx x 2 dx sum n 0 infty frac z n n int f x x n e x 2 dx 0 nbsp vanishes identically The fact then that F it 0 for every real t means that the Fourier transform of f x e x2 is 0 hence f is 0 almost everywhere Variants of the above completeness proof apply to other weights with exponential decay In the Hermite case it is also possible to prove an explicit identity that implies completeness see section on the Completeness relation below An equivalent formulation of the fact that Hermite polynomials are an orthogonal basis for L2 R w x dx consists in introducing Hermite functions see below and in saying that the Hermite functions are an orthonormal basis for L2 R Hermite s differential equation edit The probabilist s Hermite polynomials are solutions of the differential equation e 1 2 x 2 u l e 1 2 x 2 u 0 displaystyle left e frac 1 2 x 2 u right lambda e frac 1 2 x 2 u 0 nbsp where l is a constant Imposing the boundary condition that u should be polynomially bounded at infinity the equation has solutions only if l is a non negative integer and the solution is uniquely given by u x C 1 H e l x displaystyle u x C 1 He lambda x nbsp where C 1 displaystyle C 1 nbsp denotes a constant Rewriting the differential equation as an eigenvalue problemL u u x u l u displaystyle L u u xu lambda u nbsp the Hermite polynomials H e l x displaystyle He lambda x nbsp may be understood as eigenfunctions of the differential operator L u displaystyle L u nbsp This eigenvalue problem is called the Hermite equation although the term is also used for the closely related equation u 2 x u 2 l u displaystyle u 2xu 2 lambda u nbsp whose solution is uniquely given in terms of physicist s Hermite polynomials in the form u x C 1 H l x displaystyle u x C 1 H lambda x nbsp where C 1 displaystyle C 1 nbsp denotes a constant after imposing the boundary condition that u should be polynomially bounded at infinity The general solutions to the above second order differential equations are in fact linear combinations of both Hermite polynomials and confluent hypergeometric functions of the first kind For example for the physicist s Hermite equationu 2 x u 2 l u 0 displaystyle u 2xu 2 lambda u 0 nbsp the general solution takes the form u x C 1 H l x C 2 h l x displaystyle u x C 1 H lambda x C 2 h lambda x nbsp where C 1 displaystyle C 1 nbsp and C 2 displaystyle C 2 nbsp are constants H l x displaystyle H lambda x nbsp are physicist s Hermite polynomials of the first kind and h l x displaystyle h lambda x nbsp are physicist s Hermite functions of the second kind The latter functions are compactly represented as h l x 1 F 1 l 2 1 2 x 2 displaystyle h lambda x 1 F 1 tfrac lambda 2 tfrac 1 2 x 2 nbsp where 1 F 1 a b z displaystyle 1 F 1 a b z nbsp are Confluent hypergeometric functions of the first kind The conventional Hermite polynomials may also be expressed in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions see below With more general boundary conditions the Hermite polynomials can be generalized to obtain more general analytic functions for complex valued l An explicit formula of Hermite polynomials in terms of contour integrals Courant amp Hilbert 1989 is also possible Recurrence relation edit The sequence of probabilist s Hermite polynomials also satisfies the recurrence relationH e n 1 x x H e n x H e n x displaystyle mathit He n 1 x x mathit He n x mathit He n x nbsp Individual coefficients are related by the following recursion formula a n 1 k k 1 a n k 1 k 0 a n k 1 k 1 a n k 1 k gt 0 displaystyle a n 1 k begin cases k 1 a n k 1 amp k 0 a n k 1 k 1 a n k 1 amp k gt 0 end cases nbsp and a0 0 1 a1 0 0 a1 1 1 For the physicist s polynomials assumingH n x k 0 n a n k x k displaystyle H n x sum k 0 n a n k x k nbsp we have H n 1 x 2 x H n x H n x displaystyle H n 1 x 2xH n x H n x nbsp Individual coefficients are related by the following recursion formula a n 1 k a n k 1 k 0 2 a n k 1 k 1 a n k 1 k gt 0 displaystyle a n 1 k begin cases a n k 1 amp k 0 2a n k 1 k 1 a n k 1 amp k gt 0 end cases nbsp and a0 0 1 a1 0 0 a1 1 2 The Hermite polynomials constitute an Appell sequence i e they are a polynomial sequence satisfying the identityH e n x n H e n 1 x H n x 2 n H n 1 x displaystyle begin aligned mathit He n x amp n mathit He n 1 x H n x amp 2nH n 1 x end aligned nbsp An integral recurrence that is deduced and demonstrated in 6 is as follows H e n 1 x n 1 0 x H e n t d t H e n 0 displaystyle He n 1 x n 1 int 0 x He n t dt He n 0 nbsp H n 1 x 2 n 1 0 x H n t d t H n 0 displaystyle H n 1 x 2 n 1 int 0 x H n t dt H n 0 nbsp Equivalently by Taylor expanding H e n x y k 0 n n k x n k H e k y 2 n 2 k 0 n n k H e n k x 2 H e k y 2 H n x y k 0 n n k H k x 2 y n k 2 n 2 k 0 n n k H n k x 2 H k y 2 displaystyle begin aligned mathit He n x y amp sum k 0 n binom n k x n k mathit He k y amp amp 2 frac n 2 sum k 0 n binom n k mathit He n k left x sqrt 2 right mathit He k left y sqrt 2 right H n x y amp sum k 0 n binom n k H k x 2y n k amp amp 2 frac n 2 cdot sum k 0 n binom n k H n k left x sqrt 2 right H k left y sqrt 2 right end aligned nbsp These umbral identities are self evident and included in the differential operator representation detailed below H e n x e D 2 2 x n H n x 2 n e D 2 4 x n displaystyle begin aligned mathit He n x amp e frac D 2 2 x n H n x amp 2 n e frac D 2 4 x n end aligned nbsp In consequence for the m th derivatives the following relations hold H e n m x n n m H e n m x m n m H e n m x H n m x 2 m n n m H n m x 2 m m n m H n m x displaystyle begin aligned mathit He n m x amp frac n n m mathit He n m x amp amp m binom n m mathit He n m x H n m x amp 2 m frac n n m H n m x amp amp 2 m m binom n m H n m x end aligned nbsp It follows that the Hermite polynomials also satisfy the recurrence relationH e n 1 x x H e n x n H e n 1 x H n 1 x 2 x H n x 2 n H n 1 x displaystyle begin aligned mathit He n 1 x amp x mathit He n x n mathit He n 1 x H n 1 x amp 2xH n x 2nH n 1 x end aligned nbsp These last relations together with the initial polynomials H0 x and H1 x can be used in practice to compute the polynomials quickly Turan s inequalities areH n x 2 H n 1 x H n 1 x n 1 i 0 n 1 2 n i i H i x 2 gt 0 displaystyle mathit H n x 2 mathit H n 1 x mathit H n 1 x n 1 sum i 0 n 1 frac 2 n i i mathit H i x 2 gt 0 nbsp Moreover the following multiplication theorem holds H n g x i 0 n 2 g n 2 i g 2 1 i n 2 i 2 i i H n 2 i x H e n g x i 0 n 2 g n 2 i g 2 1 i n 2 i 2 i i 2 i H e n 2 i x displaystyle begin aligned H n gamma x amp sum i 0 left lfloor tfrac n 2 right rfloor gamma n 2i gamma 2 1 i binom n 2i frac 2i i H n 2i x mathit He n gamma x amp sum i 0 left lfloor tfrac n 2 right rfloor gamma n 2i gamma 2 1 i binom n 2i frac 2i i 2 i mathit He n 2i x end aligned nbsp Explicit expression edit The physicist s Hermite polynomials can be written explicitly asH n x n l 0 n 2 1 n 2 l 2 l n 2 l 2 x 2 l for even n n l 0 n 1 2 1 n 1 2 l 2 l 1 n 1 2 l 2 x 2 l 1 for odd n displaystyle H n x begin cases displaystyle n sum l 0 frac n 2 frac 1 tfrac n 2 l 2l left tfrac n 2 l right 2x 2l amp text for even n displaystyle n sum l 0 frac n 1 2 frac 1 frac n 1 2 l 2l 1 left frac n 1 2 l right 2x 2l 1 amp text for odd n end cases nbsp These two equations may be combined into one using the floor function H n x n m 0 n 2 1 m m n 2 m 2 x n 2 m displaystyle H n x n sum m 0 left lfloor tfrac n 2 right rfloor frac 1 m m n 2m 2x n 2m nbsp The probabilist s Hermite polynomials He have similar formulas which may be obtained from these by replacing the power of 2x with the corresponding power of 2 x and multiplying the entire sum by 2 n 2 H e n x n m 0 n 2 1 m m n 2 m x n 2 m 2 m displaystyle He n x n sum m 0 left lfloor tfrac n 2 right rfloor frac 1 m m n 2m frac x n 2m 2 m nbsp Inverse explicit expression edit The inverse of the above explicit expressions that is those for monomials in terms of probabilist s Hermite polynomials He arex n n m 0 n 2 1 2 m m n 2 m H e n 2 m x displaystyle x n n sum m 0 left lfloor tfrac n 2 right rfloor frac 1 2 m m n 2m He n 2m x nbsp The corresponding expressions for the physicist s Hermite polynomials H follow directly by properly scaling this 7 x n n 2 n m 0 n 2 1 m n 2 m H n 2 m x displaystyle x n frac n 2 n sum m 0 left lfloor tfrac n 2 right rfloor frac 1 m n 2m H n 2m x nbsp Generating function edit The Hermite polynomials are given by the exponential generating functione x t 1 2 t 2 n 0 H e n x t n n e 2 x t t 2 n 0 H n x t n n displaystyle begin aligned e xt frac 1 2 t 2 amp sum n 0 infty mathit He n x frac t n n e 2xt t 2 amp sum n 0 infty H n x frac t n n end aligned nbsp This equality is valid for all complex values of x and t and can be obtained by writing the Taylor expansion at x of the entire function z e z2 in the physicist s case One can also derive the physicist s generating function by using Cauchy s integral formula to write the Hermite polynomials asH n x 1 n e x 2 d n d x n e x 2 1 n e x 2 n 2 p i g e z 2 z x n 1 d z displaystyle H n x 1 n e x 2 frac d n dx n e x 2 1 n e x 2 frac n 2 pi i oint gamma frac e z 2 z x n 1 dz nbsp Using this in the sum n 0 H n x t n n displaystyle sum n 0 infty H n x frac t n n nbsp one can evaluate the remaining integral using the calculus of residues and arrive at the desired generating function Expected values edit If X is a random variable with a normal distribution with standard deviation 1 and expected value m thenE H e n X m n displaystyle operatorname mathbb E left mathit He n X right mu n nbsp The moments of the standard normal with expected value zero may be read off directly from the relation for even indices E X 2 n 1 n H e 2 n 0 2 n 1 displaystyle operatorname mathbb E left X 2n right 1 n mathit He 2n 0 2n 1 nbsp where 2n 1 is the double factorial Note that the above expression is a special case of the representation of the probabilist s Hermite polynomials as moments H e n x 1 2 p x i y n e y 2 2 d y displaystyle mathit He n x frac 1 sqrt 2 pi int infty infty x iy n e frac y 2 2 dy nbsp Asymptotic expansion edit Asymptotically as n the expansion 8 e x 2 2 H n x 2 n p G n 1 2 cos x 2 n n p 2 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x sim frac 2 n sqrt pi Gamma left frac n 1 2 right cos left x sqrt 2n frac n pi 2 right nbsp holds true For certain cases concerning a wider range of evaluation it is necessary to include a factor for changing amplitude e x 2 2 H n x 2 n p G n 1 2 cos x 2 n n p 2 1 x 2 2 n 1 1 4 2 G n G n 2 cos x 2 n n p 2 1 x 2 2 n 1 1 4 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x sim frac 2 n sqrt pi Gamma left frac n 1 2 right cos left x sqrt 2n frac n pi 2 right left 1 frac x 2 2n 1 right frac 1 4 frac 2 Gamma n Gamma left frac n 2 right cos left x sqrt 2n frac n pi 2 right left 1 frac x 2 2n 1 right frac 1 4 nbsp which using Stirling s approximation can be further simplified in the limit to e x 2 2 H n x 2 n e n 2 2 cos x 2 n n p 2 1 x 2 2 n 1 1 4 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x sim left frac 2n e right frac n 2 sqrt 2 cos left x sqrt 2n frac n pi 2 right left 1 frac x 2 2n 1 right frac 1 4 nbsp This expansion is needed to resolve the wavefunction of a quantum harmonic oscillator such that it agrees with the classical approximation in the limit of the correspondence principle A better approximation which accounts for the variation in frequency is given bye x 2 2 H n x 2 n e n 2 2 cos x 2 n 1 x 2 3 n p 2 1 x 2 2 n 1 1 4 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x sim left frac 2n e right frac n 2 sqrt 2 cos left x sqrt 2n 1 frac x 2 3 frac n pi 2 right left 1 frac x 2 2n 1 right frac 1 4 nbsp A finer approximation 9 which takes into account the uneven spacing of the zeros near the edges makes use of the substitutionx 2 n 1 cos f 0 lt e f p e displaystyle x sqrt 2n 1 cos varphi quad 0 lt varepsilon leq varphi leq pi varepsilon nbsp with which one has the uniform approximation e x 2 2 H n x 2 n 2 1 4 n p n 1 4 sin f 1 2 sin 3 p 4 n 2 1 4 sin 2 f 2 f O n 1 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x 2 frac n 2 frac 1 4 sqrt n pi n frac 1 4 sin varphi frac 1 2 cdot left sin left frac 3 pi 4 left frac n 2 frac 1 4 right left sin 2 varphi 2 varphi right right O left n 1 right right nbsp Similar approximations hold for the monotonic and transition regions Specifically ifx 2 n 1 cosh f 0 lt e f w lt displaystyle x sqrt 2n 1 cosh varphi quad 0 lt varepsilon leq varphi leq omega lt infty nbsp then e x 2 2 H n x 2 n 2 3 4 n p n 1 4 sinh f 1 2 e n 2 1 4 2 f sinh 2 f 1 O n 1 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x 2 frac n 2 frac 3 4 sqrt n pi n frac 1 4 sinh varphi frac 1 2 cdot e left frac n 2 frac 1 4 right left 2 varphi sinh 2 varphi right left 1 O left n 1 right right nbsp while for x 2 n 1 t displaystyle x sqrt 2n 1 t nbsp with t complex and bounded the approximation is e x 2 2 H n x p 1 4 2 n 2 1 4 n n 1 12 Ai 2 1 2 n 1 6 t O n 2 3 displaystyle e frac x 2 2 cdot H n x pi frac 1 4 2 frac n 2 frac 1 4 sqrt n n frac 1 12 left operatorname Ai left 2 frac 1 2 n frac 1 6 t right O left n frac 2 3 right right nbsp where Ai is the Airy function of the first kind Special values edit The physicist s Hermite polynomials evaluated at zero argument Hn 0 are called Hermite numbers H n 0 0 for odd n 2 n 2 n 1 for even n displaystyle H n 0 begin cases 0 amp text for odd n 2 frac n 2 n 1 amp text for even n end cases nbsp which satisfy the recursion relation Hn 0 2 n 1 Hn 2 0 In terms of the probabilist s polynomials this translates toH e n 0 0 for odd n 1 n 2 n 1 for even n displaystyle He n 0 begin cases 0 amp text for odd n 1 frac n 2 n 1 amp text for even n end cases nbsp Relations to other functions editLaguerre polynomials edit The Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the Laguerre polynomials H 2 n x 4 n n L n 1 2 x 2 4 n n k 0 n 1 n k n 1 2 n k x 2 k k H 2 n 1 x 2 4 n n x L n 1 2 x 2 2 4 n n k 0 n 1 n k n 1 2 n k x 2 k 1 k displaystyle begin aligned H 2n x amp 4 n n L n left frac 1 2 right x 2 amp amp 4 n n sum k 0 n 1 n k binom n frac 1 2 n k frac x 2k k H 2n 1 x amp 2 4 n n xL n left frac 1 2 right x 2 amp amp 2 cdot 4 n n sum k 0 n 1 n k binom n frac 1 2 n k frac x 2k 1 k end aligned nbsp Relation to confluent hypergeometric functions edit The physicist s Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the parabolic cylinder functions H n x 2 n U 1 2 n 1 2 x 2 displaystyle H n x 2 n U left tfrac 1 2 n tfrac 1 2 x 2 right nbsp in the right half plane where U a b z is Tricomi s confluent hypergeometric function Similarly H 2 n x 1 n 2 n n 1 F 1 n 1 2 x 2 H 2 n 1 x 1 n 2 n 1 n 2 x 1 F 1 n 3 2 x 2 displaystyle begin aligned H 2n x amp 1 n frac 2n n 1 F 1 big n tfrac 1 2 x 2 big H 2n 1 x amp 1 n frac 2n 1 n 2x 1 F 1 big n tfrac 3 2 x 2 big end aligned nbsp where 1F1 a b z M a b z is Kummer s confluent hypergeometric function Hermite polynomial expansion editSimilar to Taylor expansion some functions are expressible as an infinite sum of Hermite polynomials Specifically if e x 2 f x 2 d x lt displaystyle int e x 2 f x 2 dx lt infty nbsp then it has an expansion in the physicist s Hermite polynomials 10 Given such f displaystyle f nbsp the partial sums of the Hermite expansion of f displaystyle f nbsp converges to in the L p displaystyle L p nbsp norm if and only if 4 3 lt p lt 4 displaystyle 4 3 lt p lt 4 nbsp 11 x n n 2 n k 0 n 2 1 k n 2 k H n 2 k x n k 0 n 2 1 k 2 k n 2 k H e n 2 k x n Z displaystyle x n frac n 2 n sum k 0 left lfloor n 2 right rfloor frac 1 k n 2k H n 2k x n sum k 0 left lfloor n 2 right rfloor frac 1 k 2 k n 2k He n 2k x qquad n in mathbb Z nbsp e a x e a 2 4 n 0 a n n 2 n H n x a C x R displaystyle e ax e a 2 4 sum n geq 0 frac a n n 2 n H n x qquad a in mathbb C quad x in mathbb R nbsp e a 2 x 2 n 0 1 n a 2 n n 1 a 2 n 1 2 2 2 n H 2 n x displaystyle e a 2 x 2 sum n geq 0 frac 1 n a 2n n left 1 a 2 right n 1 2 2 2n H 2n x nbsp erf x 2 p 0 x e t 2 d t 1 2 p k 0 1 k k 2 k 1 2 3 k H 2 k x displaystyle operatorname erf x frac 2 sqrt pi int 0 x e t 2 mathrm d t frac 1 sqrt 2 pi sum k geq 0 frac 1 k k 2k 1 2 3k H 2k x nbsp cosh 2 x e k 0 1 2 k H 2 k x sinh 2 x e k 0 1 2 k 1 H 2 k 1 x displaystyle cosh 2x e sum k geq 0 frac 1 2k H 2k x qquad sinh 2x e sum k geq 0 frac 1 2k 1 H 2k 1 x nbsp cos x e 1 4 k 0 1 k 2 2 k 2 k H 2 k x sin x e 1 4 k 0 1 k 2 2 k 1 2 k 1 H 2 k 1 x displaystyle cos x e 1 4 sum k geq 0 frac 1 k 2 2k 2k H 2k x quad sin x e 1 4 sum k geq 0 frac 1 k 2 2k 1 2k 1 H 2k 1 x nbsp Differential operator representation editThe probabilist s Hermite polynomials satisfy the identityH e n x e D 2 2 x n displaystyle mathit He n x e frac D 2 2 x n nbsp where D represents differentiation with respect to x and the exponential is interpreted by expanding it as a power series There are no delicate questions of convergence of this series when it operates on polynomials since all but finitely many terms vanish Since the power series coefficients of the exponential are well known and higher order derivatives of the monomial xn can be written down explicitly this differential operator representation gives rise to a concrete formula for the coefficients of Hn that can be used to quickly compute these polynomials Since the formal expression for the Weierstrass transform W is eD2 we see that the Weierstrass transform of 2 nHen x 2 is xn Essentially the Weierstrass transform thus turns a series of Hermite polynomials into a corresponding Maclaurin series The existence of some formal power series g D with nonzero constant coefficient such that Hen x g D xn is another equivalent to the statement that these polynomials form an Appell sequence Since they are an Appell sequence they are a fortiori a Sheffer sequence Further information Weierstrass transform The inverse transformContour integral representation editFrom the generating function representation above we see that the Hermite polynomials have a representation in terms of a contour integral asH e n x n 2 p i C e t x t 2 2 t n 1 d t H n x n 2 p i C e 2 t x t 2 t n 1 d t displaystyle begin aligned mathit He n x amp frac n 2 pi i oint C frac e tx frac t 2 2 t n 1 dt H n x amp frac n 2 pi i oint C frac e 2tx t 2 t n 1 dt end aligned nbsp with the contour encircling the origin Generalizations editThe probabilist s Hermite polynomials defined above are orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability distribution whose density function is1 2 p e x 2 2 displaystyle frac 1 sqrt 2 pi e frac x 2 2 nbsp which has expected value 0 and variance 1 Scaling one may analogously speak of generalized Hermite polynomials 12 H e n a x displaystyle mathit He n alpha x nbsp of variance a where a is any positive number These are then orthogonal with respect to the normal probability distribution whose density function is 2 p a 1 2 e x 2 2 a displaystyle 2 pi alpha frac 1 2 e frac x 2 2 alpha nbsp They are given by H e n a x a n 2 H e n x a a 2 n 2 H n x 2 a e a D 2 2 x n displaystyle mathit He n alpha x alpha frac n 2 mathit He n left frac x sqrt alpha right left frac alpha 2 right frac n 2 H n left frac x sqrt 2 alpha right e frac alpha D 2 2 left x n right nbsp Now ifH e n a x k 0 n h n k a x k displaystyle mathit He n alpha x sum k 0 n h n k alpha x k nbsp then the polynomial sequence whose n th term is H e n a H e b x k 0 n h n k a H e k b x displaystyle left mathit He n alpha circ mathit He beta right x equiv sum k 0 n h n k alpha mathit He k beta x nbsp is called the umbral composition of the two polynomial sequences It can be shown to satisfy the identities H e n a H e b x H e n a b x displaystyle left mathit He n alpha circ mathit He beta right x mathit He n alpha beta x nbsp and H e n a b x y k 0 n n k H e k a x H e n k b y displaystyle mathit He n alpha beta x y sum k 0 n binom n k mathit He k alpha x mathit He n k beta y nbsp The last identity is expressed by saying that this parameterized family of polynomial sequences is known as a cross sequence See the above section on Appell sequences and on the differential operator representation which leads to a ready derivation of it This binomial type identity for a b 1 2 has already been encountered in the above section on Recursion relations Negative variance edit Since polynomial sequences form a group under the operation of umbral composition one may denote byH e n a x displaystyle mathit He n alpha x nbsp the sequence that is inverse to the one similarly denoted but without the minus sign and thus speak of Hermite polynomials of negative variance For a gt 0 the coefficients of H e n a x displaystyle mathit He n alpha x nbsp are just the absolute values of the corresponding coefficients of H e n a x displaystyle mathit He n alpha x nbsp These arise as moments of normal probability distributions The n th moment of the normal distribution with expected value m and variance s2 isE X n H e n s 2 m displaystyle E X n mathit He n sigma 2 mu nbsp where X is a random variable with the specified normal distribution A special case of the cross sequence identity then says that k 0 n n k H e k a x H e n k a y H e n 0 x y x y n displaystyle sum k 0 n binom n k mathit He k alpha x mathit He n k alpha y mathit He n 0 x y x y n nbsp Hermite functions editDefinition edit One can define the Hermite functions often called Hermite Gaussian functions from the physicist s polynomials ps n x 2 n n p 1 2 e x 2 2 H n x 1 n 2 n n p 1 2 e x 2 2 d n d x n e x 2 displaystyle psi n x left 2 n n sqrt pi right frac 1 2 e frac x 2 2 H n x 1 n left 2 n n sqrt pi right frac 1 2 e frac x 2 2 frac d n dx n e x 2 nbsp Thus 2 n 1 ps n 1 x x d d x ps n x displaystyle sqrt 2 n 1 psi n 1 x left x d over dx right psi n x nbsp Since these functions contain the square root of the weight function and have been scaled appropriately they are orthonormal ps n x ps m x d x d n m displaystyle int infty infty psi n x psi m x dx delta nm nbsp and they form an orthonormal basis of L2 R This fact is equivalent to the corresponding statement for Hermite polynomials see above The Hermite functions are closely related to the Whittaker function Whittaker amp Watson 1996 Dn z D n z n p 1 2 ps n z 2 1 n e z 2 4 d n d z n e z 2 2 displaystyle D n z left n sqrt pi right frac 1 2 psi n left frac z sqrt 2 right 1 n e frac z 2 4 frac d n dz n e frac z 2 2 nbsp and thereby to other parabolic cylinder functions The Hermite functions satisfy the differential equationps n x 2 n 1 x 2 ps n x 0 displaystyle psi n x left 2n 1 x 2 right psi n x 0 nbsp This equation is equivalent to the Schrodinger equation for a harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics so these functions are the eigenfunctions nbsp Hermite functions 0 blue solid 1 orange dashed 2 green dot dashed 3 red dotted 4 purple solid and 5 brown dashed ps 0 x p 1 4 e 1 2 x 2 ps 1 x 2 p 1 4 x e 1 2 x 2 ps 2 x 2 p 1 4 1 2 x 2 1 e 1 2 x 2 ps 3 x 3 p 1 4 1 2 x 3 3 x e 1 2 x 2 ps 4 x 2 6 p 1 4 1 4 x 4 12 x 2 3 e 1 2 x 2 ps 5 x 2 15 p 1 4 1 4 x 5 20 x 3 15 x e 1 2 x 2 displaystyle begin aligned psi 0 x amp pi frac 1 4 e frac 1 2 x 2 psi 1 x amp sqrt 2 pi frac 1 4 x e frac 1 2 x 2 psi 2 x amp left sqrt 2 pi frac 1 4 right 1 left 2x 2 1 right e frac 1 2 x 2 psi 3 x amp left sqrt 3 pi frac 1 4 right 1 left 2x 3 3x right e frac 1 2 x 2 psi 4 x amp left 2 sqrt 6 pi frac 1 4 right 1 left 4x 4 12x 2 3 right e frac 1 2 x 2 psi 5 x amp left 2 sqrt 15 pi frac 1 4 right 1 left 4x 5 20x 3 15x right e frac 1 2 x 2 end aligned nbsp nbsp Hermite functions 0 blue solid 2 orange dashed 4 green dot dashed and 50 red solid Recursion relation edit Following recursion relations of Hermite polynomials the Hermite functions obeyps n x n 2 ps n 1 x n 1 2 ps n 1 x displaystyle psi n x sqrt frac n 2 psi n 1 x sqrt frac n 1 2 psi n 1 x nbsp and x ps n x n 2 ps n 1 x n 1 2 ps n 1 x displaystyle x psi n x sqrt frac n 2 psi n 1 x sqrt frac n 1 2 psi n 1 x nbsp Extending the first relation to the arbitrary m th derivatives for any positive integer m leads tops n m x k 0 m m k 1 k 2 m k 2 n n m k ps n m k x H e k x displaystyle psi n m x sum k 0 m binom m k 1 k 2 frac m k 2 sqrt frac n n m k psi n m k x mathit He k x nbsp This formula can be used in connection with the recurrence relations for Hen and psn to calculate any derivative of the Hermite functions efficiently Cramer s inequality edit For real x the Hermite functions satisfy the following bound due to Harald Cramer 13 14 and Jack Indritz 15 ps n x p 1 4 displaystyle bigl psi n x bigr leq pi frac 1 4 nbsp Hermite functions as eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform edit The Hermite functions psn x are a set of eigenfunctions of the continuous Fourier transform F To see this take the physicist s version of the generating function and multiply by e 1 2 x2 This givese 1 2 x 2 2 x t t 2 n 0 e 1 2 x 2 H n x t n n displaystyle e frac 1 2 x 2 2xt t 2 sum n 0 infty e frac 1 2 x 2 H n x frac t n n nbsp The Fourier transform of the left side is given byF e 1 2 x 2 2 x t t 2 k 1 2 p e i x k e 1 2 x 2 2 x t t 2 d x e 1 2 k 2 2 k i t t 2 n 0 e 1 2 k 2 H n k i t n n displaystyle begin aligned mathcal F left e frac 1 2 x 2 2xt t 2 right k amp frac 1 sqrt 2 pi int infty infty e ixk e frac 1 2 x 2 2xt t 2 dx amp e frac 1 2 k 2 2kit t 2 amp sum n 0 infty e frac 1 2 k 2 H n k frac it n n end aligned nbsp The Fourier transform of the right side is given byF n 0 e 1 2 x 2 H n x t n n n 0 F e 1 2 x 2 H n x t n n displaystyle mathcal F left sum n 0 infty e frac 1 2 x 2 H n x frac t n n right sum n 0 infty mathcal F left e frac 1 2 x 2 H n x right frac t n n nbsp Equating like powers of t in the transformed versions of the left and right sides finally yieldsF e 1 2 x 2 H n x i n e 1 2 k 2 H n k displaystyle mathcal F left e frac 1 2 x 2 H n x right i n e frac 1 2 k 2 H n k nbsp The Hermite functions psn x are thus an orthonormal basis of L2 R which diagonalizes the Fourier transform operator 16 Wigner distributions of Hermite functions edit The Wigner distribution function of the n th order Hermite function is related to the n th order Laguerre polynomial The Laguerre polynomials areL n x k 0 n n k 1 k k x k displaystyle L n x sum k 0 n binom n k frac 1 k k x k nbsp leading to the oscillator Laguerre functions l n x e x 2 L n x displaystyle l n x e frac x 2 L n x nbsp For all natural integers n it is straightforward to see 17 that W ps n t f 1 n l n 4 p t 2 f 2 displaystyle W psi n t f 1 n l n big 4 pi t 2 f 2 big nbsp where the Wigner distribution of a function x L2 R C is defined as W x t f x t t 2 x t t 2 e 2 p i t f d t displaystyle W x t f int infty infty x left t frac tau 2 right x left t frac tau 2 right e 2 pi i tau f d tau nbsp This is a fundamental result for the quantum harmonic oscillator discovered by Hip Groenewold in 1946 in his PhD thesis 18 It is the standard paradigm of quantum mechanics in phase space There are further relations between the two families of polynomials Combinatorial interpretation of coefficients edit In the Hermite polynomial Hen x of variance 1 the absolute value of the coefficient of xk is the number of unordered partitions of an n element set into k singletons and n k 2 unordered pairs Equivalently it is the number of involutions of an n element set with precisely k fixed points or in other words the number of matchings in the complete graph on n vertices that leave k vertices uncovered indeed the Hermite polynomials are the matching polynomials of these graphs The sum of the absolute values of the coefficients gives the total number of partitions into singletons and pairs the so called telephone numbers 1 1 2 4 10 26 76 232 764 2620 9496 sequence A000085 in the OEIS This combinatorial interpretation can be related to complete exponential Bell polynomials asH e n x B n x 1 0 0 displaystyle mathit He n x B n x 1 0 ldots 0 nbsp where xi 0 for all i gt 2 These numbers may also be expressed as a special value of the Hermite polynomials 19 T n H e n i i n displaystyle T n frac mathit He n i i n nbsp Completeness relation edit The Christoffel Darboux formula for Hermite polynomials reads k 0 n H k x H k y k 2 k 1 n 2 n 1 H n y H n 1 x H n x H n 1 y x y displaystyle sum k 0 n frac H k x H k y k 2 k frac 1 n 2 n 1 frac H n y H n 1 x H n x H n 1 y x y nbsp Moreover the following completeness identity for the above Hermite functions holds in the sense of distributions n 0 ps n x ps n y d x y displaystyle sum n 0 infty psi n x psi n y delta x y nbsp where d is the Dirac delta function psn the Hermite functions and d x y represents the Lebesgue measure on the line y x in R2 normalized so that its projection on the horizontal axis is the usual Lebesgue measure This distributional identity follows Wiener 1958 by taking u 1 in Mehler s formula valid when 1 lt u lt 1 E x y u n 0 u n ps n x ps n y 1 p 1 u 2 exp 1 u 1 u x y 2 4 1 u 1 u x y 2 4 displaystyle E x y u sum n 0 infty u n psi n x psi n y frac 1 sqrt pi 1 u 2 exp left frac 1 u 1 u frac x y 2 4 frac 1 u 1 u frac x y 2 4 right nbsp which is often stated equivalently as a separable kernel 20 21 n 0 H n x H n y n u 2 n 1 1 u 2 e 2 u 1 u x y u 2 1 u 2 x y 2 displaystyle sum n 0 infty frac H n x H n y n left frac u 2 right n frac 1 sqrt 1 u 2 e frac 2u 1 u xy frac u 2 1 u 2 x y 2 nbsp The function x y E x y u is the bivariate Gaussian probability density on R2 which is when u is close to 1 very concentrated around the line y x and very spread out on that line It follows that n 0 u n f ps n ps n g E x y u f x g y d x d y f x g x d x f g displaystyle sum n 0 infty u n langle f psi n rangle langle psi n g rangle iint E x y u f x overline g y dx dy to int f x overline g x dx langle f g rangle nbsp when f and g are continuous and compactly supported This yields that f can be expressed in Hermite functions as the sum of a series of vectors in L2 R namely f n 0 f ps n ps n displaystyle f sum n 0 infty langle f psi n rangle psi n nbsp In order to prove the above equality for E x y u the Fourier transform of Gaussian functions is used repeatedly r p e r 2 x 2 4 e i s x s 2 r 2 d s for r gt 0 displaystyle rho sqrt pi e frac rho 2 x 2 4 int e isx frac s 2 rho 2 ds quad text for rho gt 0 nbsp The Hermite polynomial is then represented asH n x 1 n e x 2 d n d x n 1 2 p e i s x s 2 4 d s 1 n e x 2 1 2 p i s n e i s x s 2 4 d s displaystyle H n x 1 n e x 2 frac d n dx n left frac 1 2 sqrt pi int e isx frac s 2 4 ds right 1 n e x 2 frac 1 2 sqrt pi int is n e isx frac s 2 4 ds nbsp With this representation for Hn x and Hn y it is evident thatE x y u n 0 u n 2, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.