fbpx
Wikipedia

Hard disk drive

April 02, 2023

"Hard drive" redirects here. For other uses, see Hard Drive (disambiguation).

A hard disk drive (HDD), hard disk, hard drive, or fixed disk,[b] is an electro-mechanical data storage device that stores and retrieves digital data using magnetic storage with one or more rigid rapidly rotating platters coated with magnetic material. The platters are paired with magnetic heads, usually arranged on a moving actuator arm, which read and write data to the platter surfaces.[2] Data is accessed in a random-access manner, meaning that individual blocks of data can be stored and retrieved in any order. HDDs are a type of non-volatile storage, retaining stored data when powered off.[3][4][5] Modern HDDs are typically in the form of a small rectangular box.

Hard disk drive
Partially disassembled IBM 350 (RAMAC)
Date inventedDecember 24, 1954; 68 years ago (1954-12-24)[a]
Invented byIBM team led by Rey Johnson
Internals of a 2.5-inch laptop hard disk drive
A disassembled and labeled 1997 HDD lying atop a mirror
An overview of how HDDs work

Introduced by IBM in 1956,[6] HDDs were the dominant secondary storage device for general-purpose computers beginning in the early 1960s. HDDs maintained this position into the modern era of servers and personal computers, though personal computing devices produced in large volume, like cell phones and tablets, rely on flash memory storage devices. More than 224 companies have produced HDDs historically, though after extensive industry consolidation most units are manufactured by Seagate, Toshiba, and Western Digital. HDDs dominate the volume of storage produced (exabytes per year) for servers. Though production is growing slowly (by exabytes shipped[7]), sales revenues and unit shipments are declining because solid-state drives (SSDs) have higher data-transfer rates, higher areal storage density, somewhat better reliability,[8][9] and much lower latency and access times.[10][11][12][13]

The revenues for SSDs, most of which use NAND flash memory, slightly exceeded those for HDDs in 2018.[14] Flash storage products had more than twice the revenue of hard disk drives as of 2017.[15] Though SSDs have four to nine times higher cost per bit,[16][17] they are replacing HDDs in applications where speed, power consumption, small size, high capacity and durability are important.[12][13] As of 2019, the cost per bit of SSDs is falling, and the price premium over HDDs has narrowed.[17]

The primary characteristics of an HDD are its capacity and performance. Capacity is specified in unit prefixes corresponding to powers of 1000: a 1-terabyte (TB) drive has a capacity of 1,000 gigabytes (GB; where 1 gigabyte = 1 billion (109) bytes). Typically, some of an HDD's capacity is unavailable to the user because it is used by the file system and the computer operating system, and possibly inbuilt redundancy for error correction and recovery. There can be confusion regarding storage capacity, since capacities are stated in decimal gigabytes (powers of 1000) by HDD manufacturers, whereas the most commonly used operating systems report capacities in powers of 1024, which results in a smaller number than advertised. Performance is specified as the time required to move the heads to a track or cylinder (average access time), the time it takes for the desired sector to move under the head (average latency, which is a function of the physical rotational speed in revolutions per minute), and finally the speed at which the data is transmitted (data rate).

The two most common form factors for modern HDDs are 3.5-inch, for desktop computers, and 2.5-inch, primarily for laptops. HDDs are connected to systems by standard interface cables such as PATA (Parallel ATA), SATA (Serial ATA), USB or SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) cables.

History

Main article: History of hard disk drives
Video of modern HDD operation (cover removed)
Improvement of HDD characteristics over time
Parameter Started with (1957) Improved to Improvement
Capacity
(formatted)		 3.75 megabytes[18] 22 terabytes (as of 2023)[19] 5.86-million-to-one[c]
Physical volume 68 cubic feet (1.9 m3)[d][6] 2.1 cubic inches (34 cm3)[20][e] 56,000-to-one[f]
Weight 2,000 pounds
(910 kg)[6]		 2.2 ounces
(62 g)[20]		 15,000-to-one[g]
Average access time approx. 600 milliseconds[6] 2.5 ms to 10 ms; RW RAM dependent about
200-to-one[h]
Price US$9,200 per megabyte (1961; US$83,107 in 2021)[21] US$0.024 per gigabyte by 2020[22][i][23] 3.46-billion-to-one[j]
Data density 2,000 bits per square inch[24] 1.3 terabits per square inch in 2015[25] 650-million-to-one[k]
Average lifespan c. 2000 hrs MTBF[citation needed] c. 2,500,000 hrs (~285 years) MTBF[26] 1250-to-one[l]

The first production IBM hard disk drive, the 350 disk storage, shipped in 1957 as a component of the IBM 305 RAMAC system. It was approximately the size of two medium-sized refrigerators and stored five million six-bit characters (3.75 megabytes)[18] on a stack of 52 disks (100 surfaces used).[27] The 350 had a single arm with two read/write heads, one facing up and the other down, that moved both horizontally between a pair of adjacent platters and vertically from one pair of platters to a second set.[28][29][30] Variants of the IBM 350 were the IBM 355, IBM 7300 and IBM 1405.

In 1961 IBM announced, and in 1962 shipped, the IBM 1301 disk storage unit,[31] which superseded the IBM 350 and similar drives. The 1301 consisted of one (for Model 1) or two (for model 2) modules, each containing 25 platters, each platter about 1⁄8-inch (3.2 mm) thick and 24 inches (610 mm) in diameter.[32] While the earlier IBM disk drives used only two read/write heads per arm, the 1301 used an array of 48[m] heads (comb), each array moving horizontally as a single unit, one head per surface used. Cylinder-mode read/write operations were supported, and the heads flew about 250 micro-inches (about 6 µm) above the platter surface. Motion of the head array depended upon a binary adder system of hydraulic actuators which assured repeatable positioning. The 1301 cabinet was about the size of three home refrigerators placed side by side, storing the equivalent of about 21 million eight-bit bytes per module. Access time was about a quarter of a second.

Also in 1962, IBM introduced the model 1311 disk drive, which was about the size of a washing machine and stored two million characters on a removable disk pack. Users could buy additional packs and interchange them as needed, much like reels of magnetic tape. Later models of removable pack drives, from IBM and others, became the norm in most computer installations and reached capacities of 300 megabytes by the early 1980s. Non-removable HDDs were called "fixed disk" drives.

In 1963 IBM introduced the 1302,[33] with twice the track capacity and twice as many tracks per cylinder as the 1301. The 1302 had one (for Model 1) or two (for Model 2) modules, each containing a separate comb for the first 250 tracks and the last 250 tracks.

Some high-performance HDDs were manufactured with one head per track, e.g., Burroughs B-475 in 1964, IBM 2305 in 1970, so that no time was lost physically moving the heads to a track and the only latency was the time for the desired block of data to rotate into position under the head.[34] Known as fixed-head or head-per-track disk drives, they were very expensive and are no longer in production.[35]

In 1973, IBM introduced a new type of HDD code-named "Winchester". Its primary distinguishing feature was that the disk heads were not withdrawn completely from the stack of disk platters when the drive was powered down. Instead, the heads were allowed to "land" on a special area of the disk surface upon spin-down, "taking off" again when the disk was later powered on. This greatly reduced the cost of the head actuator mechanism, but precluded removing just the disks from the drive as was done with the disk packs of the day. Instead, the first models of "Winchester technology" drives featured a removable disk module, which included both the disk pack and the head assembly, leaving the actuator motor in the drive upon removal. Later "Winchester" drives abandoned the removable media concept and returned to non-removable platters.

In 1974 IBM introduced the swinging arm actuator, made feasible because the Winchester recording heads function well when skewed to the recorded tracks. The simple design of the IBM GV (Gulliver) drive,[36] invented at IBM's UK Hursley Labs, became IBM's most licensed electro-mechanical invention[37] of all time, the actuator and filtration system being adopted in the 1980s eventually for all HDDs, and still universal nearly 40 years and 10 Billion arms later.

Like the first removable pack drive, the first "Winchester" drives used platters 14 inches (360 mm) in diameter. In 1978 IBM introduced a swing arm drive, the IBM 0680 (Piccolo), with eight inch platters, exploring the possibility that smaller platters might offer advantages. Other eight inch drives followed, then 5+1⁄4 in (130 mm) drives, sized to replace the contemporary floppy disk drives. The latter were primarily intended for the then fledgling personal computer (PC) market.

Over time, as recording densities were greatly increased, further reductions in disk diameter to 3.5" and 2.5" were found to be optimum. Powerful rare earth magnet materials became affordable during this period, and were complementary to the swing arm actuator design to make possible the compact form factors of modern HDDs.

As the 1980s began, HDDs were a rare and very expensive additional feature in PCs, but by the late 1980s their cost had been reduced to the point where they were standard on all but the cheapest computers.

Most HDDs in the early 1980s were sold to PC end users as an external, add-on subsystem. The subsystem was not sold under the drive manufacturer's name but under the subsystem manufacturer's name such as Corvus Systems and Tallgrass Technologies, or under the PC system manufacturer's name such as the Apple ProFile. The IBM PC/XT in 1983 included an internal 10 MB HDD, and soon thereafter internal HDDs proliferated on personal computers.

External HDDs remained popular for much longer on the Apple Macintosh. Many Macintosh computers made between 1986 and 1998 featured a SCSI port on the back, making external expansion simple. Older compact Macintosh computers did not have user-accessible hard drive bays (indeed, the Macintosh 128K, Macintosh 512K, and Macintosh Plus did not feature a hard drive bay at all), so on those models external SCSI disks were the only reasonable option for expanding upon any internal storage.

HDD improvements have been driven by increasing areal density, listed in the table above. Applications expanded through the 2000s, from the mainframe computers of the late 1950s to most mass storage applications including computers and consumer applications such as storage of entertainment content.

In the 2000s and 2010s, NAND began supplanting HDDs in applications requiring portability or high performance. NAND performance is improving faster than HDDs, and applications for HDDs are eroding. In 2018, the largest hard drive had a capacity of 15 TB, while the largest capacity SSD had a capacity of 100 TB.[38] As of 2018, HDDs were forecast to reach 100 TB capacities around 2025,[39] but as of 2019 the expected pace of improvement was pared back to 50 TB by 2026.[40] Smaller form factors, 1.8-inches and below, were discontinued around 2010. The cost of solid-state storage (NAND), represented by Moore's law, is improving faster than HDDs. NAND has a higher price elasticity of demand than HDDs, and this drives market growth.[41] During the late 2000s and 2010s, the product life cycle of HDDs entered a mature phase, and slowing sales may indicate the onset of the declining phase.[42]

The 2011 Thailand floods damaged the manufacturing plants and impacted hard disk drive cost adversely between 2011 and 2013.[43]

In 2019, Western Digital closed its last Malaysian HDD factory due to decreasing demand, to focus on SSD production.[44] All three remaining HDD manufacturers have had decreasing demand for their HDDs since 2014.[45]

Technology

 
Magnetic cross section & frequency modulation encoded binary data

Magnetic recording

See also: Magnetic storage

A modern HDD records data by magnetizing a thin film of ferromagnetic material[n] on both sides of a disk. Sequential changes in the direction of magnetization represent binary data bits. The data is read from the disk by detecting the transitions in magnetization. User data is encoded using an encoding scheme, such as run-length limited encoding,[o] which determines how the data is represented by the magnetic transitions.

A typical HDD design consists of a spindle that holds flat circular disks, called platters, which hold the recorded data. The platters are made from a non-magnetic material, usually aluminum alloy, glass, or ceramic. They are coated with a shallow layer of magnetic material typically 10–20 nm in depth, with an outer layer of carbon for protection.[47][48][49] For reference, a standard piece of copy paper is 0.07–0.18 mm (70,000–180,000 nm)[50] thick.

 
Destroyed hard disk, glass platter visible
 
Diagram labeling the major components of a computer HDD
 
Recording of single magnetisations of bits on a 200 MB HDD-platter (recording made visible using CMOS-MagView).[51]
 
Longitudinal recording (standard) & perpendicular recording diagram

The platters in contemporary HDDs are spun at speeds varying from 4,200 RPM in energy-efficient portable devices, to 15,000 rpm for high-performance servers.[52] The first HDDs spun at 1,200 rpm[6] and, for many years, 3,600 rpm was the norm.[53] As of November 2019, the platters in most consumer-grade HDDs spin at 5,400 or 7,200 RPM.

Information is written to and read from a platter as it rotates past devices called read-and-write heads that are positioned to operate very close to the magnetic surface, with their flying height often in the range of tens of nanometers. The read-and-write head is used to detect and modify the magnetization of the material passing immediately under it.

In modern drives, there is one head for each magnetic platter surface on the spindle, mounted on a common arm. An actuator arm (or access arm) moves the heads on an arc (roughly radially) across the platters as they spin, allowing each head to access almost the entire surface of the platter as it spins. The arm is moved using a voice coil actuator or in some older designs a stepper motor. Early hard disk drives wrote data at some constant bits per second, resulting in all tracks having the same amount of data per track but modern drives (since the 1990s) use zone bit recording – increasing the write speed from inner to outer zone and thereby storing more data per track in the outer zones.

In modern drives, the small size of the magnetic regions creates the danger that their magnetic state might be lost because of thermal effects⁠ ⁠— thermally induced magnetic instability which is commonly known as the "superparamagnetic limit". To counter this, the platters are coated with two parallel magnetic layers, separated by a three-atom layer of the non-magnetic element ruthenium, and the two layers are magnetized in opposite orientation, thus reinforcing each other.[54] Another technology used to overcome thermal effects to allow greater recording densities is perpendicular recording, first shipped in 2005,[55] and as of 2007 used in certain HDDs.[56][57][58]

In 2004, a higher-density recording media was introduced, consisting of coupled soft and hard magnetic layers. So-called exchange spring media magnetic storage technology, also known as exchange coupled composite media, allows good writability due to the write-assist nature of the soft layer. However, the thermal stability is determined only by the hardest layer and not influenced by the soft layer.[59][60]

Components

 
An HDD with disks and motor hub removed, exposing copper-colored stator coils surrounding a bearing in the center of the spindle motor. The orange stripe along the side of the arm is a thin printed-circuit cable, the spindle bearing is in the center and the actuator is in the upper left.

A typical HDD has two electric motors: a spindle motor that spins the disks and an actuator (motor) that positions the read/write head assembly across the spinning disks. The disk motor has an external rotor attached to the disks; the stator windings are fixed in place. Opposite the actuator at the end of the head support arm is the read-write head; thin printed-circuit cables connect the read-write heads to amplifier electronics mounted at the pivot of the actuator. The head support arm is very light, but also stiff; in modern drives, acceleration at the head reaches 550 g.

 
Head stack with an actuator coil on the left and read/write heads on the right
 
Close-up of a single read-write head, showing the side facing the platter

The actuator is a permanent magnet and moving coil motor that swings the heads to the desired position. A metal plate supports a squat neodymium-iron-boron (NIB) high-flux magnet. Beneath this plate is the moving coil, often referred to as the voice coil by analogy to the coil in loudspeakers, which is attached to the actuator hub, and beneath that is a second NIB magnet, mounted on the bottom plate of the motor (some drives have only one magnet).

The voice coil itself is shaped rather like an arrowhead and is made of doubly coated copper magnet wire. The inner layer is insulation, and the outer is thermoplastic, which bonds the coil together after it is wound on a form, making it self-supporting. The portions of the coil along the two sides of the arrowhead (which point to the center of the actuator bearing) then interact with the magnetic field of the fixed magnet. Current flowing radially outward along one side of the arrowhead and radially inward on the other produces the tangential force. If the magnetic field were uniform, each side would generate opposing forces that would cancel each other out. Therefore, the surface of the magnet is half north pole and half south pole, with the radial dividing line in the middle, causing the two sides of the coil to see opposite magnetic fields and produce forces that add instead of canceling. Currents along the top and bottom of the coil produce radial forces that do not rotate the head.

The HDD's electronics control the movement of the actuator and the rotation of the disk and perform reads and writes on demand from the disk controller. Feedback of the drive electronics is accomplished by means of special segments of the disk dedicated to servo feedback. These are either complete concentric circles (in the case of dedicated servo technology) or segments interspersed with real data (in the case of embedded servo, otherwise known as sector servo technology). The servo feedback optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio of the GMR sensors by adjusting the voice coil motor to rotate the arm. A more modern servo system also employs milli and/or micro actuators to more accurately position the read/write heads.[61] The spinning of the disks uses fluid-bearing spindle motors. Modern disk firmware is capable of scheduling reads and writes efficiently on the platter surfaces and remapping sectors of the media that have failed.

Error rates and handling

Modern drives make extensive use of error correction codes (ECCs), particularly Reed–Solomon error correction. These techniques store extra bits, determined by mathematical formulas, for each block of data; the extra bits allow many errors to be corrected invisibly. The extra bits themselves take up space on the HDD, but allow higher recording densities to be employed without causing uncorrectable errors, resulting in much larger storage capacity.[62] For example, a typical 1 TB hard disk with 512-byte sectors provides additional capacity of about 93 GB for the ECC data.[63]

In the newest drives, as of 2009,[64] low-density parity-check codes (LDPC) were supplanting Reed–Solomon; LDPC codes enable performance close to the Shannon Limit and thus provide the highest storage density available.[64][65]

Typical hard disk drives attempt to "remap" the data in a physical sector that is failing to a spare physical sector provided by the drive's "spare sector pool" (also called "reserve pool"),[66] while relying on the ECC to recover stored data while the number of errors in a bad sector is still low enough. The S.M.A.R.T (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) feature counts the total number of errors in the entire HDD fixed by ECC (although not on all hard drives as the related S.M.A.R.T attributes "Hardware ECC Recovered" and "Soft ECC Correction" are not consistently supported), and the total number of performed sector remappings, as the occurrence of many such errors may predict an HDD failure.

The "No-ID Format", developed by IBM in the mid-1990s, contains information about which sectors are bad and where remapped sectors have been located.[67]

Only a tiny fraction of the detected errors end up as not correctable. Examples of specified uncorrected bit read error rates include:

  • 2013 specifications for enterprise SAS disk drives state the error rate to be one uncorrected bit read error in every 1016 bits read,[68][69]
  • 2018 specifications for consumer SATA hard drives state the error rate to be one uncorrected bit read error in every 1014 bits.[70][71]

Within a given manufacturers model the uncorrected bit error rate is typically the same regardless of capacity of the drive.[68][69][70][71]

The worst type of errors are silent data corruptions which are errors undetected by the disk firmware or the host operating system; some of these errors may be caused by hard disk drive malfunctions while others originate elsewhere in the connection between the drive and the host.[72]

Development

 
Leading-edge hard disk drive areal densities from 1956 through 2009 compared to Moore's law. By 2016, progress had slowed significantly below the extrapolated density trend.[73]

The rate of areal density advancement was similar to Moore's law (doubling every two years) through 2010: 60% per year during 1988–1996, 100% during 1996–2003 and 30% during 2003–2010.[74] Speaking in 1997, Gordon Moore called the increase "flabbergasting",[75] while observing later that growth cannot continue forever.[76] Price improvement decelerated to −12% per year during 2010–2017,[77] as the growth of areal density slowed. The rate of advancement for areal density slowed to 10% per year during 2010–2016,[78] and there was difficulty in migrating from perpendicular recording to newer technologies.[79]

As bit cell size decreases, more data can be put onto a single drive platter. In 2013, a production desktop 3 TB HDD (with four platters) would have had an areal density of about 500 Gbit/in2 which would have amounted to a bit cell comprising about 18 magnetic grains (11 by 1.6 grains).[80] Since the mid-2000s areal density progress has been challenged by a superparamagnetic trilemma involving grain size, grain magnetic strength and ability of the head to write.[81] In order to maintain acceptable signal to noise smaller grains are required; smaller grains may self-reverse (electrothermal instability) unless their magnetic strength is increased, but known write head materials are unable to generate a strong enough magnetic field sufficient to write the medium in the increasingly smaller space taken by grains.

Magnetic storage technologies are being developed to address this trilemma, and compete with flash memory–based solid-state drives (SSDs). In 2013, Seagate introduced shingled magnetic recording (SMR),[82] intended as something of a "stopgap" technology between PMR and Seagate's intended successor heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), SMR utilises overlapping tracks for increased data density, at the cost of design complexity and lower data access speeds (particularly write speeds and random access 4k speeds).[83][84]

By contrast, HGST (now part of Western Digital) focused on developing ways to seal helium-filled drives instead of the usual filtered air. Since turbulence and friction are reduced, higher areal densities can be achieved due to using a smaller track width, and the energy dissipated due to friction is lower as well, resulting in a lower power draw. Furthermore, more platters can be fit into the same enclosure space, although helium gas is notoriously difficult to prevent escaping.[85] Thus, helium drives are completely sealed and do not have a breather port, unlike their air-filled counterparts.

Other recording technologies are either under research or have been commercially implemented to increase areal density, including Seagate's heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). HAMR requires a different architecture with redesigned media and read/write heads, new lasers, and new near-field optical transducers.[86] HAMR is expected to ship commercially in late 2020 or 2021.[87][88] Technical issues delayed the introduction of HAMR by a decade, from earlier projections of 2009,[89] 2015,[90] 2016,[91] and the first half of 2019. Some drives have adopted dual independent actuator arms to increase read/write speeds and compete with SSDs.[92] HAMR's planned successor, bit-patterned recording (BPR),[93] has been removed from the roadmaps of Western Digital and Seagate.[94] Western Digital's microwave-assisted magnetic recording (MAMR),[95][96] also referred to as energy-assisted magnetic recording (EAMR), was sampled in 2020, with the first EAMR drive, the Ultrastar HC550, shipping in late 2020.[97][98][99] Two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR)[80][100] and "current perpendicular to plane" giant magnetoresistance (CPP/GMR) heads have appeared in research papers.[101][102][103] A 3D-actuated vacuum drive (3DHD) concept has been proposed.[104]

Depending upon assumptions on feasibility and timing of these technologies, Seagate forecasts that areal density will grow 20% per year during 2020–2034.[40]

Capacity

 
Two Seagate Barracuda drives from 2003 and 2009, respectively 160 GB and 1 TB. As of 2022, Seagate offers capacities up to 20TB.

The highest-capacity HDDs shipping commercially in 2022 are 20 TB.[105][106] The capacity of a hard disk drive, as reported by an operating system to the end user, is smaller than the amount stated by the manufacturer for several reasons, e.g., the operating system using some space, use of some space for data redundancy, space use for file system structures. Confusion of decimal prefixes and binary prefixes can also lead to errors.

Calculation

Modern hard disk drives appear to their host controller as a contiguous set of logical blocks, and the gross drive capacity is calculated by multiplying the number of blocks by the block size. This information is available from the manufacturer's product specification, and from the drive itself through use of operating system functions that invoke low-level drive commands.[107][108] Older IBM and compatible drives, e.g., IBM 3390, using the CKD record format have variable length records; such drive capacity calculations must take into account the characteristics of the records. Some newer DASD simulate CKD, and the same capacity formulae apply.

The gross capacity of older sector-oriented HDDs is calculated as the product of the number of cylinders per recording zone, the number of bytes per sector (most commonly 512), and the count of zones of the drive.[citation needed] Some modern SATA drives also report cylinder-head-sector (CHS) capacities, but these are not physical parameters because the reported values are constrained by historic operating system interfaces. The C/H/S scheme has been replaced by logical block addressing (LBA), a simple linear addressing scheme that locates blocks by an integer index, which starts at LBA 0 for the first block and increments thereafter.[109] When using the C/H/S method to describe modern large drives, the number of heads is often set to 64, although a typical modern hard disk drive has between one and four platters. In modern HDDs, spare capacity for defect management is not included in the published capacity; however, in many early HDDs a certain number of sectors were reserved as spares, thereby reducing the capacity available to the operating system. Furthermore, many HDDs store their firmware in a reserved service zone, which is typically not accessible by the user, and is not included in the capacity calculation.

For RAID subsystems, data integrity and fault-tolerance requirements also reduce the realized capacity. For example, a RAID 1 array has about half the total capacity as a result of data mirroring, while a RAID 5 array with n drives loses 1/n of capacity (which equals to the capacity of a single drive) due to storing parity information. RAID subsystems are multiple drives that appear to be one drive or more drives to the user, but provide fault tolerance. Most RAID vendors use checksums to improve data integrity at the block level. Some vendors design systems using HDDs with sectors of 520 bytes to contain 512 bytes of user data and eight checksum bytes, or by using separate 512-byte sectors for the checksum data.[110]

Some systems may use hidden partitions for system recovery, reducing the capacity available to the end user without knowledge of special disk partitioning utilities like diskpart in Windows.[citation needed]

Formatting

Main article: Disk formatting

Data is stored on a hard drive in a series of logical blocks. Each block is delimited by markers identifying its start and end, error detecting and correcting information, and space between blocks to allow for minor timing variations. These blocks often contained 512 bytes of usable data, but other sizes have been used. As drive density increased, an initiative known as Advanced Format extended the block size to 4096 bytes of usable data, with a resulting significant reduction in the amount of disk space used for block headers, error checking data, and spacing.

The process of initializing these logical blocks on the physical disk platters is called low-level formatting, which is usually performed at the factory and is not normally changed in the field.[111] High-level formatting writes data structures used by the operating system to organize data files on the disk. This includes writing partition and file system structures into selected logical blocks. For example, some of the disk space will be used to hold a directory of disk file names and a list of logical blocks associated with a particular file.

Examples of partition mapping scheme include Master boot record (MBR) and GUID Partition Table (GPT). Examples of data structures stored on disk to retrieve files include the File Allocation Table (FAT) in the DOS file system and inodes in many UNIX file systems, as well as other operating system data structures (also known as metadata). As a consequence, not all the space on an HDD is available for user files, but this system overhead is usually small compared with user data.

Units

See also: Binary prefix § disk drives
Decimal and binary unit prefixes interpretation[112][113]
Capacity advertised by manufacturers[p] Capacity expected by some consumers[q] Reported capacity
Windows[q] macOS ver 10.6+[p]
With prefix Bytes Bytes Diff.
100 GB 100,000,000,000 107,374,182,400 7.37% 93.1 GB 100 GB
1 TB 1,000,000,000,000 1,099,511,627,776 9.95% 931 GB 1,000 GB, 1,000,000 MB

In the early days of computing the total capacity of HDDs was specified in 7 to 9 decimal digits frequently truncated with the idiom millions.[114][33] By the 1970s, the total capacity of HDDs was given by manufacturers using SI decimal prefixes such as megabytes (1 MB = 1,000,000 bytes), gigabytes (1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes) and terabytes (1 TB = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes).[112][115][116][117] However, capacities of memory are usually quoted using a binary interpretation of the prefixes, i.e. using powers of 1024 instead of 1000.

Software reports hard disk drive or memory capacity in different forms using either decimal or binary prefixes. The Microsoft Windows family of operating systems uses the binary convention when reporting storage capacity, so an HDD offered by its manufacturer as a 1 TB drive is reported by these operating systems as a 931 GB HDD. Mac OS X 10.6 ("Snow Leopard") uses decimal convention when reporting HDD capacity.[118] The default behavior of the df command-line utility on Linux is to report the HDD capacity as a number of 1024-byte units.[119]

The difference between the decimal and binary prefix interpretation caused some consumer confusion and led to class action suits against HDD manufacturers. The plaintiffs argued that the use of decimal prefixes effectively misled consumers while the defendants denied any wrongdoing or liability, asserting that their marketing and advertising complied in all respects with the law and that no class member sustained any damages or injuries.[120][121][122] In 2020, a California court ruled that use of the decimal prefixes with a decimal meaning was not misleading.[123]

Form factors

Main article: List of disk drive form factors
 
8-, 5.25-, 3.5-, 2.5-, 1.8- and 1-inch HDDs, together with a ruler to show the size of platters and read-write heads
 
A newer 2.5-inch (63.5 mm) 6,495 MB HDD compared to an older 5.25-inch full-height 110 MB HDD

IBM's first hard disk drive, the IBM 350, used a stack of fifty 24-inch platters, stored 3.75 MB of data (approximately the size of one modern digital picture), and was of a size comparable to two large refrigerators. In 1962, IBM introduced its model 1311 disk, which used six 14-inch (nominal size) platters in a removable pack and was roughly the size of a washing machine. This became a standard platter size for many years, used also by other manufacturers.[124] The IBM 2314 used platters of the same size in an eleven-high pack and introduced the "drive in a drawer" layout. sometimes called the"pizza oven", although the "drawer" was not the complete drive. Into the 1970s HDDs were offered in standalone cabinets of varying dimensions containing from one to four HDDs.

Beginning in the late 1960s drives were offered that fit entirely into a chassis that would mount in a 19-inch rack. Digital's RK05 and RL01 were early examples using single 14-inch platters in removable packs, the entire drive fitting in a 10.5-inch-high rack space (six rack units). In the mid-to-late 1980s the similarly sized Fujitsu Eagle, which used (coincidentally) 10.5-inch platters, was a popular product.

With increasing sales of microcomputers having built in floppy-disk drives (FDDs), HDDs that would fit to the FDD mountings became desirable. Starting with the Shugart Associates SA1000, HDD form factors initially followed those of 8-inch, 5¼-inch, and 3½-inch floppy disk drives. Although referred to by these nominal sizes, the actual sizes for those three drives respectively are 9.5", 5.75" and 4" wide. Because there were no smaller floppy disk drives, smaller HDD form factors such as 2½-inch drives (actually 2.75" wide) developed from product offerings or industry standards.

As of 2019, 2½-inch and 3½-inch hard disks are the most popular sizes. By 2009, all manufacturers had discontinued the development of new products for the 1.3-inch, 1-inch and 0.85-inch form factors due to falling prices of flash memory,[125][126] which has no moving parts. While nominal sizes are in inches, actual dimensions are specified in millimeters.

Performance characteristics

Main article: Hard disk drive performance characteristics

The factors that limit the time to access the data on an HDD are mostly related to the mechanical nature of the rotating disks and moving heads, including:

  • Seek time is a measure of how long it takes the head assembly to travel to the track of the disk that contains data.
  • Rotational latency is incurred because the desired disk sector may not be directly under the head when data transfer is requested. Average rotational latency is shown in the table, based on the statistical relation that the average latency is one-half the rotational period.
  • The bit rate or data transfer rate (once the head is in the right position) creates delay which is a function of the number of blocks transferred; typically relatively small, but can be quite long with the transfer of large contiguous files.

Delay may also occur if the drive disks are stopped to save energy.

Defragmentation is a procedure used to minimize delay in retrieving data by moving related items to physically proximate areas on the disk.[127] Some computer operating systems perform defragmentation automatically. Although automatic defragmentation is intended to reduce access delays, performance will be temporarily reduced while the procedure is in progress.[128]

Time to access data can be improved by increasing rotational speed (thus reducing latency) or by reducing the time spent seeking. Increasing areal density increases throughput by increasing data rate and by increasing the amount of data under a set of heads, thereby potentially reducing seek activity for a given amount of data. The time to access data has not kept up with throughput increases, which themselves have not kept up with growth in bit density and storage capacity.

Latency

Latency characteristics typical of HDDs
Rotational speed
[rpm] 		Average rotational latency
[ms]
15,000 2
10,000 3
7,200 4.16
5,400 5.55
4,800 6.25

Data transfer rate

As of 2010, a typical 7,200-rpm desktop HDD has a sustained "disk-to-buffer" data transfer rate up to 1,030 Mbit/s.[129] This rate depends on the track location; the rate is higher for data on the outer tracks (where there are more data sectors per rotation) and lower toward the inner tracks (where there are fewer data sectors per rotation); and is generally somewhat higher for 10,000-rpm drives. A current widely used standard for the "buffer-to-computer" interface is 3.0 Gbit/s SATA, which can send about 300 megabyte/s (10-bit encoding) from the buffer to the computer, and thus is still comfortably ahead of today's disk-to-buffer transfer rates. Data transfer rate (read/write) can be measured by writing a large file to disk using special file generator tools, then reading back the file. Transfer rate can be influenced by file system fragmentation and the layout of the files.[127]

HDD data transfer rate depends upon the rotational speed of the platters and the data recording density. Because heat and vibration limit rotational speed, advancing density becomes the main method to improve sequential transfer rates. Higher speeds require a more powerful spindle motor, which creates more heat. While areal density advances by increasing both the number of tracks across the disk and the number of sectors per track,[130] only the latter increases the data transfer rate for a given rpm. Since data transfer rate performance tracks only one of the two components of areal density, its performance improves at a lower rate.[131]

Other considerations

Other performance considerations include quality-adjusted price, power consumption, audible noise, and both operating and non-operating shock resistance.

Access and interfaces

Main article: Hard disk drive interface
 
Inner view of a 1998 Seagate HDD that used the Parallel ATA interface
 
2.5-inch SATA drive on top of 3.5-inch SATA drive, showing close-up of (7-pin) data and (15-pin) power connectors

Current hard drives connect to a computer over one of several bus types, including parallel ATA, Serial ATA, SCSI, Serial Attached SCSI (SAS), and Fibre Channel. Some drives, especially external portable drives, use IEEE 1394, or USB. All of these interfaces are digital; electronics on the drive process the analog signals from the read/write heads. Current drives present a consistent interface to the rest of the computer, independent of the data encoding scheme used internally, and independent of the physical number of disks and heads within the drive.

Typically a DSP in the electronics inside the drive takes the raw analog voltages from the read head and uses PRML and Reed–Solomon error correction[132] to decode the data, then sends that data out the standard interface. That DSP also watches the error rate detected by error detection and correction, and performs bad sector remapping, data collection for Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology, and other internal tasks.

Modern interfaces connect the drive to the host interface with a single data/control cable. Each drive also has an additional power cable, usually direct to the power supply unit. Older interfaces had separate cables for data signals and for drive control signals.

  • Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), originally named SASI for Shugart Associates System Interface, was standard on servers, workstations, Commodore Amiga, Atari ST and Apple Macintosh computers through the mid-1990s, by which time most models had been transitioned to newer interfaces. The length limit of the data cable allows for external SCSI devices. The SCSI command set is still used in the more modern SAS interface.
  • Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE), later standardized under the name AT Attachment (ATA, with the alias PATA (Parallel ATA) retroactively added upon introduction of SATA) moved the HDD controller from the interface card to the disk drive. This helped to standardize the host/controller interface, reduce the programming complexity in the host device driver, and reduced system cost and complexity. The 40-pin IDE/ATA connection transfers 16 bits of data at a time on the data cable. The data cable was originally 40-conductor, but later higher speed requirements led to an "ultra DMA" (UDMA) mode using an 80-conductor cable with additional wires to reduce crosstalk at high speed.
  • EIDE was an unofficial update (by Western Digital) to the original IDE standard, with the key improvement being the use of direct memory access (DMA) to transfer data between the disk and the computer without the involvement of the CPU, an improvement later adopted by the official ATA standards. By directly transferring data between memory and disk, DMA eliminates the need for the CPU to copy byte per byte, therefore allowing it to process other tasks while the data transfer occurs.
  • Fibre Channel (FC) is a successor to parallel SCSI interface on enterprise market. It is a serial protocol. In disk drives usually the Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL) connection topology is used. FC has much broader usage than mere disk interfaces, and it is the cornerstone of storage area networks (SANs). Recently other protocols for this field, like iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet have been developed as well. Confusingly, drives usually use copper twisted-pair cables for Fibre Channel, not fibre optics. The latter are traditionally reserved for larger devices, such as servers or disk array controllers.
  • Serial Attached SCSI (SAS). The SAS is a new generation serial communication protocol for devices designed to allow for much higher speed data transfers and is compatible with SATA. SAS uses a mechanically compatible data and power connector to standard 3.5-inch SATA1/SATA2 HDDs, and many server-oriented SAS RAID controllers are also capable of addressing SATA HDDs. SAS uses serial communication instead of the parallel method found in traditional SCSI devices but still uses SCSI commands.
  • Serial ATA (SATA). The SATA data cable has one data pair for differential transmission of data to the device, and one pair for differential receiving from the device, just like EIA-422. That requires that data be transmitted serially. A similar differential signaling system is used in RS485, LocalTalk, USB, FireWire, and differential SCSI. SATA I to III are designed to be compatible with, and use, a subset of SAS commands, and compatible interfaces. Therefore, a SATA hard drive can be connected to and controlled by a SAS hard drive controller (with some minor exceptions such as drives/controllers with limited compatibility). However they cannot be connected the other way round—a SATA controller cannot be connected to a SAS drive.

Integrity and failure

 
Close-up of an HDD head resting on a disk platter; its mirror reflection is visible on the platter surface. Unless the head is on a landing zone, the heads touching the platters while in operation can be catastrophic.
Main articles: Hard disk drive failure, Head crash, and Data recovery
See also: Solid-state drive § SSD reliability and failure modes, and RAID § Unrecoverable read errors during rebuild

Due to the extremely close spacing between the heads and the disk surface, HDDs are vulnerable to being damaged by a head crash – a failure of the disk in which the head scrapes across the platter surface, often grinding away the thin magnetic film and causing data loss. Head crashes can be caused by electronic failure, a sudden power failure, physical shock, contamination of the drive's internal enclosure, wear and tear, corrosion, or poorly manufactured platters and heads.

The HDD's spindle system relies on air density inside the disk enclosure to support the heads at their proper flying height while the disk rotates. HDDs require a certain range of air densities to operate properly. The connection to the external environment and density occurs through a small hole in the enclosure (about 0.5 mm in breadth), usually with a filter on the inside (the breather filter).[133] If the air density is too low, then there is not enough lift for the flying head, so the head gets too close to the disk, and there is a risk of head crashes and data loss. Specially manufactured sealed and pressurized disks are needed for reliable high-altitude operation, above about 3,000 m (9,800 ft).[134] Modern disks include temperature sensors and adjust their operation to the operating environment. Breather holes can be seen on all disk drives – they usually have a sticker next to them, warning the user not to cover the holes. The air inside the operating drive is constantly moving too, being swept in motion by friction with the spinning platters. This air passes through an internal recirculation (or "recirc") filter to remove any leftover contaminants from manufacture, any particles or chemicals that may have somehow entered the enclosure, and any particles or outgassing generated internally in normal operation. Very high humidity present for extended periods of time can corrode the heads and platters. An exception to this are hermetically sealed, helium filled HDDs that largely eliminate environmental issues that can arise due to humidity or atmospheric pressure changes. Such HDDs were introduced by HGST in their first successful high volume implementation in 2013.

For giant magnetoresistive (GMR) heads in particular, a minor head crash from contamination (that does not remove the magnetic surface of the disk) still results in the head temporarily overheating, due to friction with the disk surface, and can render the data unreadable for a short period until the head temperature stabilizes (so called "thermal asperity", a problem which can partially be dealt with by proper electronic filtering of the read signal).

When the logic board of a hard disk fails, the drive can often be restored to functioning order and the data recovered by replacing the circuit board with one of an identical hard disk. In the case of read-write head faults, they can be replaced using specialized tools in a dust-free environment. If the disk platters are undamaged, they can be transferred into an identical enclosure and the data can be copied or cloned onto a new drive. In the event of disk-platter failures, disassembly and imaging of the disk platters may be required.[135] For logical damage to file systems, a variety of tools, including fsck on UNIX-like systems and CHKDSK on Windows, can be used for data recovery. Recovery from logical damage can require file carving.

A common expectation is that hard disk drives designed and marketed for server use will fail less frequently than consumer-grade drives usually used in desktop computers. However, two independent studies by Carnegie Mellon University[136] and Google[137] found that the "grade" of a drive does not relate to the drive's failure rate.

A 2011 summary of research, into SSD and magnetic disk failure patterns by Tom's Hardware summarized research findings as follows:[138]

  • Mean time between failures (MTBF) does not indicate reliability; the annualized failure rate is higher and usually more relevant.
  • HDDs do not tend to fail during early use, and temperature has only a minor effect; instead, failure rates steadily increase with age.
  • S.M.A.R.T. warns of mechanical issues but not other issues affecting reliability, and is therefore not a reliable indicator of condition.[139]
  • Failure rates of drives sold as "enterprise" and "consumer" are "very much similar", although these drive types are customized for their different operating environments.[140][141]
  • In drive arrays, one drive's failure significantly increases the short-term risk of a second drive failing.

As of 2019, Backblaze, a storage provider reported an annualized failure rate of two percent per year for a storage farm with 110,000 off-the-shelf HDDs with the reliability varying widely between models and manufacturers.[142] Backblaze subsequently reported that the failure rate for HDDs and SSD of equivalent age was similar.[8]

To minimize cost and overcome failures of individual HDDs, storage systems providers rely on redundant HDD arrays. HDDs that fail are replaced on an ongoing basis.[142][89]

Market segments

Consumer segment

 
Two high-end consumer SATA 2.5-inch 10,000 rpm HDDs, factory-mounted in 3.5-inch adapter frames
Desktop HDDs
Desktop HDDs typically have two to five internal platters, rotate at 5,400 to 10,000 rpm, and have a media transfer rate of 0.5 Gbit/s or higher (1 GB = 109 bytes; 1 Gbit/s = 109 bit/s). Earlier (1980–1990s) drives tend to be slower in rotation speed. As of May 2019, the highest-capacity desktop HDDs stored 16 TB,[143][144] with plans to release 18 TB drives later in 2019.[145] 18 TB HDDs were released in 2020. As of 2016, the typical speed of a hard drive in an average desktop computer is 7,200 RPM, whereas low-cost desktop computers may use 5,900 RPM or 5,400 RPM drives. For some time in the 2000s and early 2010s some desktop users and data centers also used 10,000 RPM drives such as Western Digital Raptor but such drives have become much rarer as of 2016 and are not commonly used now, having been replaced by NAND flash-based SSDs.
Mobile (laptop) HDDs
Smaller than their desktop and enterprise counterparts, they tend to be slower and have lower capacity, because typically has one internal platter and were 2.5" or 1.8" physical size instead of more common for desktops 3.5" form-factor. Mobile HDDs spin at 4,200 rpm, 5,200 rpm, 5,400 rpm, or 7,200 rpm, with 5,400 rpm being the most common. 7,200 rpm drives tend to be more expensive and have smaller capacities, while 4,200 rpm models usually have very high storage capacities. Because of smaller platter(s), mobile HDDs generally have lower capacity than their desktop counterparts.
Consumer electronics HDDs
They include drives embedded into digital video recorders and automotive vehicles. The former are configured to provide a guaranteed streaming capacity, even in the face of read and write errors, while the latter are built to resist larger amounts of shock. They usually spin at a speed of 5400 RPM.
External and portable HDDs
 
Two 2.5" external USB hard drives
See also: USB mass storage device class and Disk enclosure
Current external hard disk drives typically connect via USB-C; earlier models use an regular USB (sometimes with using of a pair of ports for better bandwidth) or (rarely), e.g., eSATA connection. Variants using USB 2.0 interface generally have slower data transfer rates when compared to internally mounted hard drives connected through SATA. Plug and play drive functionality offers system compatibility and features large storage options and portable design. As of March 2015, available capacities for external hard disk drives ranged from 500 GB to 10 TB.[146] External hard disk drives are usually available as assembled integrated products but may be also assembled by combining an external enclosure (with USB or other interface) with a separately purchased drive. They are available in 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch sizes; 2.5-inch variants are typically called portable external drives, while 3.5-inch variants are referred to as desktop external drives. "Portable" drives are packaged in smaller and lighter enclosures than the "desktop" drives; additionally, "portable" drives use power provided by the USB connection, while "desktop" drives require external power bricks. Features such as encryption, Wi-Fi connectivity,[147] biometric security or multiple interfaces (for example, FireWire) are available at a higher cost.[148] There are pre-assembled external hard disk drives that, when taken out from their enclosures, cannot be used internally in a laptop or desktop computer due to embedded USB interface on their printed circuit boards, and lack of SATA (or Parallel ATA) interfaces.[149][150]

Enterprise and business segment

Server and workstation HDDs
 
Hot-swappable HDD enclosure
Typically used with multiple-user computers running enterprise software. Examples are: transaction processing databases, internet infrastructure (email, webserver, e-commerce), scientific computing software, and nearline storage management software. Enterprise drives commonly operate continuously ("24/7") in demanding environments while delivering the highest possible performance without sacrificing reliability. Maximum capacity is not the primary goal, and as a result the drives are often offered in capacities that are relatively low in relation to their cost.[151]
The fastest enterprise HDDs spin at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm, and can achieve sequential media transfer speeds above 1.6 Gbit/s[152] and a sustained transfer rate up to 1 Gbit/s.[152] Drives running at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm use smaller platters to mitigate increased power requirements (as they have less air drag) and therefore generally have lower capacity than the highest capacity desktop drives. Enterprise HDDs are commonly connected through Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) or Fibre Channel (FC). Some support multiple ports, so they can be connected to a redundant host bus adapter.
Enterprise HDDs can have sector sizes larger than 512 bytes (often 520, 524, 528 or 536 bytes). The additional per-sector space can be used by hardware RAID controllers or applications for storing Data Integrity Field (DIF) or Data Integrity Extensions (DIX) data, resulting in higher reliability and prevention of silent data corruption.[153]
Video recording HDDs
This line were similar to consumer video recording HDDs with stream stability requirements and similar to server HDDs with requirements to expandability support, but also they strongly oriented for growing of internal capacity. The main sacrifice for this segment is a writing and reading speed.[154]

Economy

Price evolution

HDD price per byte decreased at the rate of 40% per year during 1988–1996, 51% per year during 1996–2003 and 34% per year during 2003–2010.[23][74] The price decrease slowed down to 13% per year during 2011–2014, as areal density increase slowed and the 2011 Thailand floods damaged manufacturing facilities[79] and have held at 11% per year during 2010–2017.[155]

The Federal Reserve Board has published a quality-adjusted price index for large-scale enterprise storage systems including three or more enterprise HDDs and associated controllers, racks and cables. Prices for these large-scale storage systems decreased at the rate of 30% per year during 2004–2009 and 22% per year during 2009–2014.[74]

Manufacturers and sales

 
Diagram of HDD manufacturer consolidation
See also: History of hard disk drives and List of defunct hard disk manufacturers

More than 200 companies have manufactured HDDs over time, but consolidations have concentrated production to just three manufacturers today: Western Digital, Seagate, and Toshiba. Production is mainly in the Pacific rim.

Worldwide revenue for disk storage declined eight percent per year, from a peak of $38 billion in 2012 to $22 billion (estimated) in 2019.[40] Production of HDD storage grew 15% per year during 2011–2017, from 335 to 780 exabytes per year.[156] HDD shipments declined seven percent per year during this time period, from 620 to 406 million units.[156][78] HDD shipments were projected to drop by 18% during 2018–2019, from 375 million to 309 million units.[157] In 2018, Seagate has 40% of unit shipments, Western Digital has 37% of unit shipments, while Toshiba has 23% of unit shipments.[158] The average sales price for the two largest manufacturers was $60 per unit in 2015.[159]

Competition from SSDs

HDDs are being superseded by solid-state drives (SSDs) in markets where their higher speed (up to 7 gigabytes) per second for M.2 (NGFF) NVMe SSDs,[160] or 2.5 gigabytes per second for PCIe expansion card drives[161]), ruggedness, and lower power are more important than price, since the bit cost of SSDs is four to nine times higher than HDDs.[17][16] As of 2016, HDDs are reported to have a failure rate of 2–9% per year, while SSDs have fewer failures: 1–3% per year.[162] However, SSDs have more un-correctable data errors than HDDs.[162]

SSDs offer larger capacities (up to 100 TB)[38] than the largest HDD and/or higher storage densities (100 TB and 30 TB SSDs are housed in 2.5 inch HDD cases but with the same height as a 3.5-inch HDD),[163][164][165][166][167] although their cost remains prohibitive.

A laboratory demonstration of a 1.33-Tb 3D NAND chip with 96 layers (NAND commonly used in solid state drives (SSDs)) had 5.5 Tbit/in2 as of 2019,[168] while the maximum areal density for HDDs is 1.5 Tbit/in2. The areal density of flash memory is doubling every two years, similar to Moore's law (40% per year) and faster than the 10–20% per year for HDDs. As of 2018, the maximum capacity was 16 terabytes for an HDD,[169] and 100 terabytes for an SSD.[25] HDDs were used in 70% of the desktop and notebook computers produced in 2016, and SSDs were used in 30%. The usage share of HDDs is declining and could drop below 50% in 2018–2019 according to one forecast, because SSDs are replacing smaller-capacity (less than one-terabyte) HDDs in desktop and notebook computers and MP3 players.[170]

The market for silicon-based flash memory (NAND) chips, used in SSDs and other applications, is growing faster than for HDDs. Worldwide NAND revenue grew 16% per year from $22 billion to $57 billion during 2011–2017, while production grew 45% per year from 19 exabytes to 175 exabytes.[156]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ This is the original filing date of the application which led to US Patent 3,503,060, generally accepted as the definitive hard disk drive patent.[1]
  2. ^ Further inequivalent terms used to describe various hard disk drives include disk drive, disk file, direct access storage device (DASD), CKD disk, and Winchester disk drive (after the IBM 3340). The term "DASD" includes other devices beside disks.
  3. ^ 22,000,000,000,000 divided by 3,750,000
  4. ^ Comparable in size to a large side-by-side refrigerator.
  5. ^ The 1.8-inch form factor is obsolete; sizes smaller than 2.5 inches have been replaced by flash memory.
  6. ^ 68 x 12 x 12 x 12 divided by 2.1
  7. ^ 910,000 divided by 62
  8. ^ 600 divided by 2.5
  9. ^ $387.55÷16,000 GB.
  10. ^ 83,107,180 divided by 0.024.
  11. ^ 1,300,000,000,000 divided by 2,000.
  12. ^ 2,500,000 divided by 2,000.
  13. ^ 40 for user data, one for format tracks, 6 for alternate surfaces and one for maintenance.
  14. ^ Initially gamma iron oxide particles in an epoxy binder, the recording layer in a modern HDD typically is domains of a granular Cobalt-Chrome-Platinum-based alloy physically isolated by an oxide to enable perpendicular recording.[46]
  15. ^ Historically a variety of run-length limited codes have been used in magnetic recording including for example, codes named FM, MFM and GCR which are no longer used in modern HDDs.
  16. ^ a b Expressed using decimal multiples.
  17. ^ a b Expressed using binary multiples.

References

  1. ^ Kean, David W., "IBM San Jose, A quarter century of innovation", 1977.
  2. ^ Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H.; Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea C. (2014). "Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces, Chapter: Hard Disk Drives" (PDF). Arpaci-Dusseau Books. (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2014.
  3. ^ Patterson, David; Hennessy, John (1971). Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Interface. Elsevier. p. 23. ISBN 9780080502571.
  4. ^ Domingo, Joel. "SSD vs. HDD: What's the Difference?". PC Magazine UK. from the original on March 28, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  5. ^ Mustafa, Naveed Ul; Armejach, Adria; Ozturk, Ozcan; Cristal, Adrian; Unsal, Osman S. (2016). "Implications of non-volatile memory as primary storage for database management systems". 2016 International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling and Simulation (SAMOS). IEEE. pp. 164–171. doi:10.1109/SAMOS.2016.7818344. hdl:11693/37609. ISBN 978-1-5090-3076-7. S2CID 17794134.
  6. ^ a b c d e "IBM Archives: IBM 350 disk storage unit". January 23, 2003. from the original on May 31, 2008. Retrieved October 19, 2012.
  7. ^ Shilov, Anton. "Demand for HDD Storage Booming: 240 EB Shipped in Q3 2019". www.anandtech.com.
  8. ^ a b Klein, Andy (September 30, 2021). "Are SSDs Really More Reliable Than Hard Drives?". Backblaze. Retrieved September 30, 2021. Once we controlled for age and drive days, the two drive types were similar and the difference was certainly not enough by itself to justify the extra cost of purchasing a SSD versus a HDD.
  9. ^ "Validating the Reliability of Intel Solid-State Drives" (PDF). Intel. July 2011. (PDF) from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  10. ^ Fullerton, Eric (March 2014). (PDF). IEEE. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 28, 2018. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
  11. ^ Handy, James (July 31, 2012). Objective Analysis. Archived from the original on January 1, 2013. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
  12. ^ a b Hutchinson, Lee. (June 25, 2012) How SSDs conquered mobile devices and modern OSes July 7, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. Ars Technica. Retrieved January 7, 2013.
  13. ^ a b Santo Domingo, Joel (May 10, 2012). "SSD vs HDD: What's the Difference?". PC Magazine. from the original on March 19, 2017. Retrieved November 24, 2012.
  14. ^ Hough, Jack (May 14, 2018). "Why Western Digital Can Gain 45% Despite Declining HDD Business". Barron’s. from the original on May 15, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  15. ^ Mellor, Chris (July 31, 2017). "NAND that's that... Flash chip industry worth twice disk drive biz". The Register. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
  16. ^ a b McCallum, John C. (November 2019). "Disk Drive Storage Price Decreasing with Time (1955-2019)". jcmit.com. Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  17. ^ a b c Mellor, Chris (August 28, 2019). "How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives?". Retrieved November 15, 2019.
  18. ^ a b "Time Capsule, 1956 Hard Disk". Oracle Magazine. Oracle. July 2014. from the original on August 11, 2014. Retrieved September 19, 2014. IBM 350 disk drive held 3.75 MB
  19. ^ "Western Digital 22TB WD Gold, Red, Pro, and Purple HDDs Hit Retail". AnandTech. from the original on July 19, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
  20. ^ a b "Toshiba Storage Solutions – MK3233GSG". from the original on July 24, 2012. Retrieved November 7, 2009.
  21. ^ Ballistic Research Laboratories "A THIRD SURVEY OF DOMESTIC ELECTRONIC DIGITAL COMPUTING SYSTEMS," March 1961, section on IBM 305 RAMAC March 2, 2015, at the Wayback Machine (p. 314-331) states a $34,500 purchase price which calculates to $9,200/MB.
  22. ^ Athow, Desire (May 2020). "The largest available hard disk is still a 16TB drive". techradar.com.
  23. ^ a b McCallum, John C. (May 16, 2015). . jcmit.com. Archived from the original on July 14, 2015. Retrieved July 25, 2015.
  24. ^ "Magnetic head development". IBM Archives. from the original on March 21, 2015. Retrieved August 11, 2014.
  25. ^ a b Shilov, Anton (March 19, 2018). "Unlimited 5 Year Endurance: The 100TB SSD from Nimbus Data". AnandTech. from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2018.
  26. ^ "Ultrastar DC HC500 Series HDD". Hgst.com. from the original on August 29, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  27. ^ "IBM Archives: IBM 350 disk storage unit". IBM. January 23, 2003. from the original on June 17, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  28. ^ "355 DISK STORAGE", IBM 650 RAMAC Manual of Operations (4th ed.), June 1, 1957, p. 17, 22-6270-3, Three mechanically independent access arms are provided for each file unit, and each arm can be independently directed to any track in the file.
  29. ^ "Disk Storage" (PDF), IBM Reference Manual 7070 Data Processing System (2nd ed.), January 1960, A22-7003-1, Each disk-storage unit has three mechanically independent access arms, all of which can be seeking at the same time.
  30. ^ "IBM RAMAC 1401 System" (PDF), Reference Manual IBM 1401 Data Processing System (6th ed.), April 1962, p. 63, A24-1403-5, The disk storage unit can have two access arms. One is standard and the other is available as a special feature.
  31. ^ "IBM Archives: IBM 1301 disk storage unit". ibm.com. January 23, 2003. from the original on December 19, 2014. Retrieved June 25, 2015.
  32. ^ . computermuseum.li. Archived from the original on March 28, 2015.
  33. ^ a b IBM 1301, Models 1 and 2, Disk Storage and IBM 1302, Models 1 and 2, Disk Storage with IBM 7090, 7094 and 7094 II Data Processing Systems (PDF). IBM. A22-6785.
  34. ^ Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4.0 Resource Guide 1995, Chapter 17 – Disk and File System Basics
  35. ^ Chaudhuri, P. Pal (April 15, 2008). Computer Organization and Design (3rd ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 568. ISBN 978-81-203-3511-0.
  36. ^ "Design of a Swinging Arm Actuator for a disk file" J. S. HEATH IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. July 1976
  37. ^ US 3,849,800 Magnetic disk apparatus. Cuzner, Dodman, Heath, & Rigbey
  38. ^ a b Alcorn, Paul (March 19, 2018). "Need A 100TB SSD? Nimbus Data Has You Covered With The ExaDrive DC100". Tomshardware.com. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  39. ^ Mott, Nathaniel (November 7, 2018). "Seagate Wants to Ship 100TB HDDs by 2025". Tomshardware.com. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  40. ^ a b c Mellor, Chris (September 23, 2019). "How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives?". Retrieved November 15, 2019. the total addressable market for disk drives will grow from $21.8bn in 2019
  41. ^ Kanellos, Michael (January 17, 2006). "Flash goes the notebook". CNET. from the original on May 19, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  42. ^ "Industry Life Cycle - Encyclopedia - Business Terms". Inc. from the original on July 8, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  43. ^ "Farming hard drives: how Backblaze weathered the Thailand drive crisis". blaze.com. 2013. from the original on June 25, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2014.
  44. ^ Mellor, Chris (July 17, 2018). "Western Digital formats hard disk drive factory as demand spins down". The Register. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  45. ^ Hruska, Joel (July 20, 2018). "Western Digital to Close HDD Plant, Increase SSD Production". extremetech.com. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  46. ^ Plumer, M. L.; van Ek, J.; Cain, W. C. (2012). "New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording". arXiv:1201.5543 [physics.pop-ph].
  47. ^ "Hard Drives". escotal.com. from the original on September 3, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
  48. ^ "What is a "head-crash" & how can it result in permanent loss of my hard drive data?". data-master.com. from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
  49. ^ . hardrivehelp.com. Archived from the original on September 3, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
  50. ^ Sherlis, Juliya (2001). Elert, Glenn (ed.). "Thickness of a piece of paper". The Physics Factbook. from the original on June 8, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2011.
  51. ^ CMOS-MagView January 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine is an instrument that visualizes magnetic field structures and strengths.
  52. ^ Blount, Walker C. (November 2007). (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 19, 2012. Retrieved July 17, 2011.
  53. ^ Kozierok, Charles (October 20, 2018). "Hard Drive Spindle Speed". The PC Guide. from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  54. ^ Hayes, Brian. "Terabyte Territory". American Scientist. p. 212. from the original on July 8, 2014. Retrieved September 20, 2014.
  55. ^ "Press Releases December 14, 2004". Toshiba. from the original on April 14, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  56. ^ "Seagate Momentus 2½" HDDs per webpage January 2008". Seagate.com. October 24, 2008. from the original on March 11, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  57. ^ "Seagate Barracuda 3½" HDDs per webpage January 2008". Seagate.com. from the original on March 14, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  58. ^ . Wdc.com. Archived from the original on March 16, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  59. ^ D. Suess; et al. (2004). "Exchange spring recording media for areal densities up to 10Tbit/in2". J. Magn. Mag. Mat.
  60. ^ R. Victora; et al. (2005). "Composite media for perpendicular magnetic recording". IEEE Trans. Mag. Mat. 41 (2): 537–542. Bibcode:2005ITM....41..537V. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.838075. S2CID 29531529.
  61. ^ A. Al-Mamun, G. Guo, C. Bi, Hard Disk Drive: Mechatronics and Control, 2006, Taylor & Francis.
  62. ^ Kozierok, Charles (November 25, 2018). "Hard Drive Error Correcting Code (ECC)". The PC Guide. from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  63. ^ Stevens, Curtis E. (2011). (PDF). idema.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 5, 2013. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  64. ^ a b , Hitachi
  65. ^ "2.5-inch Hard Disk Drive with High Recording Density and High Shock Resistance May 26, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Toshiba, 2011
  66. ^ MjM Data Recovery Ltd. . Datarecovery.mjm.co.uk. Archived from the original on February 1, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  67. ^ Kozierok, Charles (December 23, 2018). "Hard Drive Sector Format and Structure". The PC Guide. from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  68. ^ a b "Enterprise Performance 15K HDD: Data Sheet" (PDF). Seagate. 2013. (PDF) from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
  69. ^ a b "WD Xe: Datacenter hard drives" (PDF). Western Digital. 2013. (PDF) from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
  70. ^ a b "3.5" BarraCuda data sheet" (PDF). Seagate. June 2018. (PDF) from the original on July 28, 2018. Retrieved July 28, 2018.
  71. ^ a b "WD Red Desktop/Mobile Series Spec Sheet" (PDF). Western Digital. April 2018. (PDF) from the original on July 28, 2018. Retrieved July 28, 2018.
  72. ^ David S. H. Rosenthal (October 1, 2010). "Keeping Bits Safe: How Hard Can It Be?". ACM Queue. from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved January 2, 2014.
  73. ^ Hayes, Brian (March 27, 2016). "Where's My Petabyte Disk Drive?". p. chart of historical data courtesy of Edward Grochowski. Retrieved December 1, 2019.
  74. ^ a b c Byrne, David (July 1, 2015). "Prices for Data Storage Equipment and the State of IT Innovation". The Federal Reserve Board FEDS Notes. p. Table 2. from the original on July 8, 2015. Retrieved July 5, 2015.
  75. ^ "Gallium Arsenide". PC Magazine. March 25, 1997. from the original on August 21, 2014. Retrieved August 16, 2014. Gordon Moore: ... the ability of the magnetic disk people to continue to increase the density is flabbergasting--that has moved at least as fast as the semiconductor complexity.
  76. ^ Dubash, Manek (April 13, 2005). . techworld.com. Archived from the original on July 6, 2014. Retrieved March 18, 2022. It can't continue forever. The nature of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster happens.
  77. ^ McCallum, John C. (2017). "Disk Drive Prices (1955–2017)". from the original on July 11, 2017. Retrieved July 15, 2017.
  78. ^ a b Decad, Gary M.; Robert E. Fontana Jr. (July 6, 2017). . ibmsystemsmag.com. p. Table 1. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
  79. ^ a b Mellor, Chris (November 10, 2014). "Kryder's law craps out: Race to UBER-CHEAP STORAGE is OVER". theregister.co.uk. UK: The Register. from the original on November 12, 2014. Retrieved November 12, 2014. The 2011 Thai floods almost doubled disk capacity cost/GB for a while. Rosenthal writes: 'The technical difficulties of migrating from PMR to HAMR, meant that already in 2010 the Kryder rate had slowed significantly and was not expected to return to its trend in the near future. The floods reinforced this.'
  80. ^ a b Anderson, Dave (2013). "HDD Opportunities & Challenges, Now to 2020" (PDF). Seagate. (PDF) from the original on May 25, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2014. 'PMR CAGR slowing from historical 40+% down to ~8-12%' and 'HAMR CAGR = 20-40% for 2015–2020'
  81. ^ Plumer, Martin L.; et al. (March 2011). "New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording". Physics in Canada. 67 (1): 25–29. arXiv:1201.5543. Bibcode:2012arXiv1201.5543P.
  82. ^ (Press release). New York: Seagate Technology plc. September 9, 2013. Archived from the original on October 9, 2014. Retrieved July 5, 2014. Shingled Magnetic Technology is the First Step to Reaching a 20 Terabyte Hard Drive by 2020
  83. ^ Edge, Jake (March 26, 2014). "Support for shingled magnetic recording devices". LWN.net. from the original on February 2, 2015. Retrieved January 7, 2015.
  84. ^ Corbet, Jonathan (April 23, 2013). "LSFMM: A storage technology update". LWN.net. from the original on January 7, 2015. Retrieved January 7, 2015. A 'shingled magnetic recording' (SMR) drive is a rotating drive that packs its tracks so closely that one track cannot be overwritten without destroying the neighboring tracks as well. The result is that overwriting data requires rewriting the entire set of closely-spaced tracks; that is an expensive tradeoff, but the benefit—much higher storage density—is deemed to be worth the cost in some situations.
  85. ^ "Brochure: HelioSeal Technology: Beyond Air. Helium Takes You Higher" (PDF). Western Digital. 2020.
  86. ^ Shilov, Anton (December 18, 2015). "Hard Disk Drives with HAMR Technology Set to Arrive in 2018". from the original on January 2, 2016. Retrieved January 2, 2016. Unfortunately, mass production of actual hard drives featuring HAMR has been delayed for a number of times already and now it turns out that the first HAMR-based HDDs are due in 2018. ... HAMR HDDs will feature a new architecture, require new media, completely redesigned read/write heads with a laser as well as a special near-field optical transducer (NFT) and a number of other components not used or mass produced today.
  87. ^ Shilov, Anton (November 5, 2019). "Seagate: 18 TB HDD Due in First Half 2020, 20 TB Drive to Ship in Late 2020". Retrieved November 22, 2019.
  88. ^ Mellor, Chris (August 28, 2019). "How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives?". Retrieved November 15, 2019. Seagate CTO Dr John Morris told analysts that Seagate has built 55,000 HAMR drives and aims to get disks ready for customer sampling by the end of 2020.
  89. ^ a b Rosenthal, David (May 16, 2018). "Longer talk at MSST2018". Retrieved November 22, 2019.
  90. ^ Shilov, Anton (October 15, 2014). "TDK: HAMR technology could enable 15TB HDDs already in 2015". Retrieved November 15, 2019.
  91. ^ Oliver, Bill (November 18, 2013). . Archived from the original on November 21, 2013. Retrieved November 15, 2019. …Seagate expects to start selling HAMR drives in 2016.
  92. ^ "State of the Union: Seagate's HAMR Hard Drives, Dual-Actuator Mach2, and 24 TB HDDs on Track". Anandtech.com. from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  93. ^ "Will Toshiba's Bit-Patterned Drives Change the HDD Landscape?". PC Magazine. August 19, 2010. from the original on August 22, 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
  94. ^ Rosenthal, David (May 16, 2018). "Longer talk at MSST2018". Retrieved November 22, 2019. The most recent Seagate roadmap pushes HAMR shipments into 2020, so they are now slipping faster than real-time. Western Digital has given up on HAMR and is promising that Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording (MAMR) is only a year out. BPM has dropped off both companies' roadmaps.
  95. ^ Mallary, Mike; et al. (July 2014). "Head and Media Challenges for 3 Tb/in2 Microwave-Assisted Magnetic Recording". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 50 (7): 1–8. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2014.2305693. S2CID 22858444.
  96. ^ Li, Shaojing; Livshitz, Boris; Bertram, H. Neal; Schabes, Manfred; Schrefl, Thomas; Fullerton, Eric E.; Lomakin, Vitaliy (2009). "Microwave assisted magnetization reversal in composite media" (PDF). Applied Physics Letters. 94 (20): 202509. Bibcode:2009ApPhL..94t2509L. doi:10.1063/1.3133354. (PDF) from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  97. ^ Shilov, Anton. "Western Digital Reveals 18 TB DC HC550 'EAMR' Hard Drive". www.anandtech.com. Retrieved October 11, 2021.
  98. ^ Mellor, Chris (September 3, 2019). "Western Digital debuts 18TB and 20TB MAMR disk drives". Retrieved November 23, 2019. …microwave-assisted magnetic (MAMR) recording technology…sample shipments are due by the end of the year.
  99. ^ Discuss, Raevenlord. "Western Digital Finally Launches Ultrastar DC HC550 18 TB Drives With EAMR for Enterprise". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 11, 2021.
  100. ^ Wood, Roger (October 19, 2010). "Shingled Magnetic Recording and Two-Dimensional Magnetic Recording" (PDF). ewh.ieee.org. Hitachi GST. (PDF) from the original on October 4, 2014. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  101. ^ Coughlin, Thomas; Grochowski, Edward (June 19, 2012). "Years of Destiny: HDD Capital Spending and Technology Developments from 2012–2016" (PDF). IEEE Santa Clara Valley Magnetics Society. (PDF) from the original on March 2, 2013. Retrieved October 9, 2012.
  102. ^ Bai, Zhaoqiang; Cai, Yongqing; Shen, Lei; Han, Guchang; Feng, Yuanping (2013). "All-Heusler giant-magnetoresistance junctions with matched energy bands and Fermi surfaces". arXiv:1301.6106 [cond-mat.mes-hall].
  103. ^ "Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Explained - Animation". from the original on October 6, 2018. Retrieved July 27, 2014.
  104. ^ "Promising New Hard Disk Technology". Retrieved December 1, 2019.
  105. ^ "Seagate Ships 20TB HAMR HDDs Commercially, ..." Tom's Hardware. January 23, 2021. Retrieved June 2, 2021. Seagate said this week that it had begun commercial shipments of its hard drives featuring heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) technology back in November
  106. ^ "Product Manual: Ultrastar DC HC650 SATA OEM Specification" (PDF). Western Digital.
  107. ^ Information technology – Serial Attached SCSI – 2 (SAS-2), INCITS 457 Draft 2, May 8, 2009, chapter 4.1 Direct-access block device type model overview, The LBAs on a logical unit shall begin with zero and shall be contiguous up to the last logical block on the logical unit.
  108. ^ ISO/IEC 791D:1994, AT Attachment Interface for Disk Drives (ATA-1), section 7.1.2
  109. ^ "LBA Count for Disk Drives Standard (Document LBA1-03)" (PDF). IDEMA. June 15, 2009. from the original on February 22, 2016. Retrieved February 14, 2016.
  110. ^ . Blogs.netapp.com. August 14, 2009. Archived from the original on July 20, 2011. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  111. ^ . Archived from the original on June 4, 2017. Retrieved June 28, 2010.
  112. ^ a b (PDF). Seagate. October 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 20, 2013. Retrieved June 8, 2013.
  113. ^ (PDF). Toshiba. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 22, 2009. Retrieved January 7, 2013.
  114. ^ "650 RAMAC announcement". January 23, 2003. from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved May 23, 2011.
  115. ^ Mulvany, R.B., "Engineering Design of a Disk Storage Facility with Data Modules". IBM JRD, November 1974
  116. ^ Introduction to IBM Direct Access Storage Devices, M. Bohl, IBM publication SR20-4738. 1981.
  117. ^ CDC Product Line Card June 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, October 1974.
  118. ^ Apple Support Team. "How OS X and iOS report storage capacity". Apple, Inc. from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 15, 2015.
  119. ^ "df(1) – Linux man page". linux.die.net. from the original on July 18, 2015. Retrieved July 18, 2015.
  120. ^ "Western Digital Settles Hard-Drive Capacity Lawsuit, Associated Press June 28, 2006". Fox News. March 22, 2001. from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  121. ^ Cogar, Phil (October 26, 2007). "Seagate lawsuit concludes, settlement announced". Bit-tech.net. from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  122. ^ "Western Digital – Notice of Class Action Settlement email". Xtremesystems.org. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  123. ^ "Order granted motion to dismiss amended complaint without leave to amend, 22 January 2020" (PDF).
  124. ^ Emerson W. Pugh, Lyle R. Johnson, John H. Palmer IBM's 360 and early 370 systems MIT Press, 1991 ISBN 0-262-16123-0, page 266.
  125. ^ Flash price fall shakes HDD market, EETimes Asia, August 1, 2007. February 1, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  126. ^ In 2008 Samsung June 16, 2011, at the Wayback Machine introduced the 1.3-inch SpinPoint A1 HDD but by March 2009 the family was listed as End Of Life Products and new 1.3-inch models were not available in this size. February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  127. ^ a b Kearns, Dave (April 18, 2001). "How to defrag". ITWorld. from the original on February 20, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
  128. ^ Broida, Rick (April 10, 2009). "Turning Off Disk Defragmenter May Solve a Sluggish PC". PCWorld. from the original on November 8, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
  129. ^ . Seagate. Archived from the original on February 10, 2011. Retrieved January 22, 2011.
  130. ^ "GLOSSARY of DRIVE and COMPUTER TERMS". Seagate. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
  131. ^ Albrecht, Thomas R.; Arora, Hitesh; Ayanoor-Vitikkate, Vipin; Beaujour, Jean-Marc; Bedau, Daniel; Berman, David; Bogdanov, Alexei L.; Chapuis, Yves-Andre; Cushen, Julia; Dobisz, Elizabeth E.; Doerk, Gregory; He Gao; Grobis, Michael; Gurney, Bruce; Hanson, Weldon; Hellwig, Olav; Hirano, Toshiki; Jubert, Pierre-Olivier; Kercher, Dan; Lille, Jeffrey; Zuwei Liu; Mate, C. Mathew; Obukhov, Yuri; Patel, Kanaiyalal C.; Rubin, Kurt; Ruiz, Ricardo; Schabes, Manfred; Lei Wan; Weller, Dieter; et al. (2015). "Bit Patterned Magnetic Recording: Theory, Media Fabrication, and Recording Performance". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. HGST, a Western Digital Company. 51 (5): 1–42. arXiv:1503.06664. Bibcode:2015ITM....5197880A. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2015.2397880. S2CID 33974771.
  132. ^ . Archived from the original on July 8, 2011.
  133. ^ Mueler, Scott (February 24, 2019). "Micro House PC Hardware Library Volume I: Hard Drives". Macmillan Computer Publishing. from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  134. ^ (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 4, 2012.
  135. ^ Grabianowski, Ed (May 29, 2009). "How To Recover Lost Data from Your Hard Drive". HowStuffWorks. pp. 5–6. from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  136. ^ "Everything You Know About Disks Is Wrong". Storagemojo.com. February 22, 2007. from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  137. ^ Pinheiro, Eduardo; Wolf-Dietrich Weber; Luiz André Barroso (February 2007). "Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population" (PDF). Google Inc. (PDF) from the original on January 5, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2011.
  138. ^ Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive? – Tom's Hardware long term SSD reliability review, 2011, "final words"
  139. ^ Anthony, Sebastian. "Using SMART to accurately predict when a hard drive is about to die". ExtremeTech. from the original on August 31, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  140. ^ "Consumer hard drives as reliable as enterprise hardware". Alphr. from the original on September 11, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  141. ^ Beach, Brian (December 4, 2013). "Enterprise Drives: Fact or Fiction?". Backblaze. from the original on August 18, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  142. ^ a b "Hard Drive Data and Stats". Backblaze. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
  143. ^ Donnell, Deirdre O. "Seagate introduces world-first 16TB Exos HDD and IronWolf NAS drives". Notebookcheck.
  144. ^ "BarraCuda en BarraCuda Pro interne harde schijven | Seagate Nederland". from the original on May 6, 2019. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
  145. ^ "16 TB MAMR Hard Drives in 2019: Western Digital". from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  146. ^ "Seagate Backup Plus External Hard Drive Review (8TB)". storagereview.com. March 22, 2015. from the original on July 25, 2015. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
  147. ^ Smith, Lyle (September 3, 2014). "WD My Passport Wireless Review". storagereview.com. Retrieved July 21, 2021.
  148. ^ . Biometricsecurityproducts.org. July 26, 2011. Archived from the original on May 25, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  149. ^ . hwigroup.net. Archived from the original on October 5, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2014. Example of a pre-assembled external hard disk drive without its enclosure that cannot be used internally on a laptop or desktop due to the embedded interface on its printed circuit board
  150. ^ Hsiung, Sebean (May 5, 2010). "How to bypass USB controller and use as a SATA drive". datarecoverytools.co.uk. from the original on September 15, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.
  151. ^ "Enterprise-class versus Desktop class Hard Drives" (PDF). Intel. (PDF) from the original on August 3, 2016. Retrieved September 25, 2013.
  152. ^ a b "Seagate Cheetah 15K.5 Data Sheet" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on December 28, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
  153. ^ Petersen, Martin K. (August 30, 2008). (PDF). Oracle Corporation. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 9, 2015. Retrieved January 23, 2015. Most disk drives use 512-byte sectors. [...] Enterprise drives (Parallel SCSI/SAS/FC) support 520/528 byte 'fat' sectors.
  154. ^ Mr.Dr. (February 23, 2021). "WD Red vs WD Purple: Which Hard Drives are Better?". Dr. Comparison. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  155. ^ "Hard Drive Cost Per Gigabyte". Backblaze. July 11, 2017. from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  156. ^ a b c Decad, Gary M.; Robert E. Fontana Jr. (May 15, 2018). "A Ten Year (2008-2017) Storage Landscape LTO Tape Media, HDD, NAND" (PDF). Retrieved November 23, 2019.
  157. ^ Shilov, Anton (May 3, 2019). "Shipments of PC Hard Drives Predicted to Drop By Nearly 50% in 2019". Retrieved November 22, 2019. According to Nidec's data, unit sales of hard drives declined by around 43% from 2010 to 2018, going from around 650 million units in 2010 to 375 million units in 2018. And it looks like sales will continue to drop in the coming years. Recently Nidec revised its HDD shipment forecast downwards from 356 million drives to 309 million drives in 2019, which will further drop to 290 million units in 2020.
  158. ^ "2018 Hard Disk Drive Results". Forbes. from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  159. ^ Shilov, Anton (March 2, 2016). "Hard Drive Shipments Drop by Nearly 17% in 2015". from the original on July 7, 2016. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
  160. ^ "Force Series Gen.4 PCIe MP600 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD". www.corsair.com. Retrieved March 6, 2020.
  161. ^ "Intel Optane SSD 900P Series Review". StorageReview.com. March 16, 2018. from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  162. ^ a b Schroeder, Bianca; Lagisetty, Raghav; Merchant, Arif (February 22, 2016). "Flash Reliability in Production: The Expected and the Unexpected" (PDF). Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  163. ^ "You won't be able to afford Samsung's record-setting 30TB SSD". Bgr.com. February 20, 2018. from the original on April 10, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  164. ^ Circuit Breaker (February 20, 2018). "Samsung unveils world's largest SSD with whopping 30TB of storage". The Verge. from the original on January 27, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  165. ^ "Advantages". Nimbus Data. from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  166. ^ "Scalable SSDs". Nimbus Data. from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  167. ^ "Samsung's massive 15TB SSD can be yours - for about $10K". Computerworld. July 27, 2016. from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  168. ^ McGrath, Dylan (February 20, 2019). "Toshiba Claims Highest-Capacity NAND". Retrieved November 24, 2019.
  169. ^ Bedford, Tom (December 4, 2018). "Seagate reveals world's largest, and most ludicrous 16TB HDD". Alphr. from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2018.
  170. ^ Coughlin, Tom (June 7, 2016). "3D NAND Enables Larger Consumer SSDs". forbes.com. from the original on June 16, 2016. Retrieved July 4, 2016.

Further reading

  • Mueller, Scott (2011). Upgrading and Repairing PCs (20th ed.). Que. ISBN 978-0-7897-4710-5.
  • Messmer, Hans-Peter (2001). The Indispensable PC Hardware Book (4th ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-201-59616-8.
  • Kheong Chn, Sann (2005). "An Introduction to the HDD, modelling, detection and decoding for magnetic recording channels" (PDF). The Eleventh Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications. Retrieved January 10, 2020.

External links

  • Hard Disk Drives Encyclopedia
  • Video showing an opened HD working
  • Timeline: 50 Years of Hard Drives October 6, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  • HDD from inside: Tracks and Zones. How hard it can be?
  • Hard disk hacking – firmware modifications, in eight parts, going as far as booting a Linux kernel on an ordinary HDD controller board
  • , February 14, 2013, by Ariel Berkman
  • Rotary Acceleration Feed Forward (RAFF) Information Sheet, Western Digital, January 2013
  • PowerChoice Technology for Hard Disk Drive Power Savings and Flexibility, Seagate Technology, March 2010
  • Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR), HGST, Inc., 2015
  • The Road to Helium, HGST, Inc., 2015
  • Research paper about perspective usage of magnetic photoconductors in magneto-optical data storage.

April 02, 2023
hard, disk, drive, hard, drive, redirects, here, other, uses, hard, drive, disambiguation, hard, disk, drive, hard, disk, hard, drive, fixed, disk, electro, mechanical, data, storage, device, that, stores, retrieves, digital, data, using, magnetic, storage, wi. Hard drive redirects here For other uses see Hard Drive disambiguation A hard disk drive HDD hard disk hard drive or fixed disk b is an electro mechanical data storage device that stores and retrieves digital data using magnetic storage with one or more rigid rapidly rotating platters coated with magnetic material The platters are paired with magnetic heads usually arranged on a moving actuator arm which read and write data to the platter surfaces 2 Data is accessed in a random access manner meaning that individual blocks of data can be stored and retrieved in any order HDDs are a type of non volatile storage retaining stored data when powered off 3 4 5 Modern HDDs are typically in the form of a small rectangular box Hard disk drivePartially disassembled IBM 350 RAMAC Date inventedDecember 24 1954 68 years ago 1954 12 24 a Invented byIBM team led by Rey JohnsonInternals of a 2 5 inch laptop hard disk drive A disassembled and labeled 1997 HDD lying atop a mirror source source source source source source track track track track track track track track track track track track track track track track track An overview of how HDDs work Introduced by IBM in 1956 6 HDDs were the dominant secondary storage device for general purpose computers beginning in the early 1960s HDDs maintained this position into the modern era of servers and personal computers though personal computing devices produced in large volume like cell phones and tablets rely on flash memory storage devices More than 224 companies have produced HDDs historically though after extensive industry consolidation most units are manufactured by Seagate Toshiba and Western Digital HDDs dominate the volume of storage produced exabytes per year for servers Though production is growing slowly by exabytes shipped 7 sales revenues and unit shipments are declining because solid state drives SSDs have higher data transfer rates higher areal storage density somewhat better reliability 8 9 and much lower latency and access times 10 11 12 13 The revenues for SSDs most of which use NAND flash memory slightly exceeded those for HDDs in 2018 14 Flash storage products had more than twice the revenue of hard disk drives as of 2017 update 15 Though SSDs have four to nine times higher cost per bit 16 17 they are replacing HDDs in applications where speed power consumption small size high capacity and durability are important 12 13 As of 2019 update the cost per bit of SSDs is falling and the price premium over HDDs has narrowed 17 The primary characteristics of an HDD are its capacity and performance Capacity is specified in unit prefixes corresponding to powers of 1000 a 1 terabyte TB drive has a capacity of 1 000 gigabytes GB where 1 gigabyte 1 billion 109 bytes Typically some of an HDD s capacity is unavailable to the user because it is used by the file system and the computer operating system and possibly inbuilt redundancy for error correction and recovery There can be confusion regarding storage capacity since capacities are stated in decimal gigabytes powers of 1000 by HDD manufacturers whereas the most commonly used operating systems report capacities in powers of 1024 which results in a smaller number than advertised Performance is specified as the time required to move the heads to a track or cylinder average access time the time it takes for the desired sector to move under the head average latency which is a function of the physical rotational speed in revolutions per minute and finally the speed at which the data is transmitted data rate The two most common form factors for modern HDDs are 3 5 inch for desktop computers and 2 5 inch primarily for laptops HDDs are connected to systems by standard interface cables such as PATA Parallel ATA SATA Serial ATA USB or SAS Serial Attached SCSI cables Contents 1 History 2 Technology 2 1 Magnetic recording 2 2 Components 2 3 Error rates and handling 2 4 Development 3 Capacity 3 1 Calculation 3 2 Formatting 3 3 Units 4 Form factors 5 Performance characteristics 5 1 Latency 5 2 Data transfer rate 5 3 Other considerations 6 Access and interfaces 7 Integrity and failure 8 Market segments 8 1 Consumer segment 8 2 Enterprise and business segment 9 Economy 9 1 Price evolution 9 2 Manufacturers and sales 10 Competition from SSDs 11 See also 12 Notes 13 References 14 Further reading 15 External linksHistory EditMain article History of hard disk drives source source source source source source source source source source Video of modern HDD operation cover removed Improvement of HDD characteristics over time Parameter Started with 1957 Improved to ImprovementCapacity formatted 3 75 megabytes 18 22 terabytes as of 2023 update 19 5 86 million to one c Physical volume 68 cubic feet 1 9 m3 d 6 2 1 cubic inches 34 cm3 20 e 56 000 to one f Weight 2 000 pounds 910 kg 6 2 2 ounces 62 g 20 15 000 to one g Average access time approx 600 milliseconds 6 2 5 ms to 10 ms RW RAM dependent about200 to one h Price US 9 200 per megabyte 1961 US 83 107 in 2021 21 US 0 024 per gigabyte by 2020 22 i 23 3 46 billion to one j Data density 2 000 bits per square inch 24 1 3 terabits per square inch in 2015 25 650 million to one k Average lifespan c 2000 hrs MTBF citation needed c 2 500 000 hrs 285 years MTBF 26 1250 to one l The first production IBM hard disk drive the 350 disk storage shipped in 1957 as a component of the IBM 305 RAMAC system It was approximately the size of two medium sized refrigerators and stored five million six bit characters 3 75 megabytes 18 on a stack of 52 disks 100 surfaces used 27 The 350 had a single arm with two read write heads one facing up and the other down that moved both horizontally between a pair of adjacent platters and vertically from one pair of platters to a second set 28 29 30 Variants of the IBM 350 were the IBM 355 IBM 7300 and IBM 1405 In 1961 IBM announced and in 1962 shipped the IBM 1301 disk storage unit 31 which superseded the IBM 350 and similar drives The 1301 consisted of one for Model 1 or two for model 2 modules each containing 25 platters each platter about 1 8 inch 3 2 mm thick and 24 inches 610 mm in diameter 32 While the earlier IBM disk drives used only two read write heads per arm the 1301 used an array of 48 m heads comb each array moving horizontally as a single unit one head per surface used Cylinder mode read write operations were supported and the heads flew about 250 micro inches about 6 µm above the platter surface Motion of the head array depended upon a binary adder system of hydraulic actuators which assured repeatable positioning The 1301 cabinet was about the size of three home refrigerators placed side by side storing the equivalent of about 21 million eight bit bytes per module Access time was about a quarter of a second Also in 1962 IBM introduced the model 1311 disk drive which was about the size of a washing machine and stored two million characters on a removable disk pack Users could buy additional packs and interchange them as needed much like reels of magnetic tape Later models of removable pack drives from IBM and others became the norm in most computer installations and reached capacities of 300 megabytes by the early 1980s Non removable HDDs were called fixed disk drives In 1963 IBM introduced the 1302 33 with twice the track capacity and twice as many tracks per cylinder as the 1301 The 1302 had one for Model 1 or two for Model 2 modules each containing a separate comb for the first 250 tracks and the last 250 tracks Some high performance HDDs were manufactured with one head per track e g Burroughs B 475 in 1964 IBM 2305 in 1970 so that no time was lost physically moving the heads to a track and the only latency was the time for the desired block of data to rotate into position under the head 34 Known as fixed head or head per track disk drives they were very expensive and are no longer in production 35 In 1973 IBM introduced a new type of HDD code named Winchester Its primary distinguishing feature was that the disk heads were not withdrawn completely from the stack of disk platters when the drive was powered down Instead the heads were allowed to land on a special area of the disk surface upon spin down taking off again when the disk was later powered on This greatly reduced the cost of the head actuator mechanism but precluded removing just the disks from the drive as was done with the disk packs of the day Instead the first models of Winchester technology drives featured a removable disk module which included both the disk pack and the head assembly leaving the actuator motor in the drive upon removal Later Winchester drives abandoned the removable media concept and returned to non removable platters In 1974 IBM introduced the swinging arm actuator made feasible because the Winchester recording heads function well when skewed to the recorded tracks The simple design of the IBM GV Gulliver drive 36 invented at IBM s UK Hursley Labs became IBM s most licensed electro mechanical invention 37 of all time the actuator and filtration system being adopted in the 1980s eventually for all HDDs and still universal nearly 40 years and 10 Billion arms later Like the first removable pack drive the first Winchester drives used platters 14 inches 360 mm in diameter In 1978 IBM introduced a swing arm drive the IBM 0680 Piccolo with eight inch platters exploring the possibility that smaller platters might offer advantages Other eight inch drives followed then 5 1 4 in 130 mm drives sized to replace the contemporary floppy disk drives The latter were primarily intended for the then fledgling personal computer PC market Over time as recording densities were greatly increased further reductions in disk diameter to 3 5 and 2 5 were found to be optimum Powerful rare earth magnet materials became affordable during this period and were complementary to the swing arm actuator design to make possible the compact form factors of modern HDDs As the 1980s began HDDs were a rare and very expensive additional feature in PCs but by the late 1980s their cost had been reduced to the point where they were standard on all but the cheapest computers Most HDDs in the early 1980s were sold to PC end users as an external add on subsystem The subsystem was not sold under the drive manufacturer s name but under the subsystem manufacturer s name such as Corvus Systems and Tallgrass Technologies or under the PC system manufacturer s name such as the Apple ProFile The IBM PC XT in 1983 included an internal 10 MB HDD and soon thereafter internal HDDs proliferated on personal computers External HDDs remained popular for much longer on the Apple Macintosh Many Macintosh computers made between 1986 and 1998 featured a SCSI port on the back making external expansion simple Older compact Macintosh computers did not have user accessible hard drive bays indeed the Macintosh 128K Macintosh 512K and Macintosh Plus did not feature a hard drive bay at all so on those models external SCSI disks were the only reasonable option for expanding upon any internal storage HDD improvements have been driven by increasing areal density listed in the table above Applications expanded through the 2000s from the mainframe computers of the late 1950s to most mass storage applications including computers and consumer applications such as storage of entertainment content In the 2000s and 2010s NAND began supplanting HDDs in applications requiring portability or high performance NAND performance is improving faster than HDDs and applications for HDDs are eroding In 2018 the largest hard drive had a capacity of 15 TB while the largest capacity SSD had a capacity of 100 TB 38 As of 2018 update HDDs were forecast to reach 100 TB capacities around 2025 39 but as of 2019 update the expected pace of improvement was pared back to 50 TB by 2026 40 Smaller form factors 1 8 inches and below were discontinued around 2010 The cost of solid state storage NAND represented by Moore s law is improving faster than HDDs NAND has a higher price elasticity of demand than HDDs and this drives market growth 41 During the late 2000s and 2010s the product life cycle of HDDs entered a mature phase and slowing sales may indicate the onset of the declining phase 42 The 2011 Thailand floods damaged the manufacturing plants and impacted hard disk drive cost adversely between 2011 and 2013 43 In 2019 Western Digital closed its last Malaysian HDD factory due to decreasing demand to focus on SSD production 44 All three remaining HDD manufacturers have had decreasing demand for their HDDs since 2014 45 Technology Edit Magnetic cross section amp frequency modulation encoded binary data Magnetic recording Edit See also Magnetic storage A modern HDD records data by magnetizing a thin film of ferromagnetic material n on both sides of a disk Sequential changes in the direction of magnetization represent binary data bits The data is read from the disk by detecting the transitions in magnetization User data is encoded using an encoding scheme such as run length limited encoding o which determines how the data is represented by the magnetic transitions A typical HDD design consists of a spindle that holds flat circular disks called platters which hold the recorded data The platters are made from a non magnetic material usually aluminum alloy glass or ceramic They are coated with a shallow layer of magnetic material typically 10 20 nm in depth with an outer layer of carbon for protection 47 48 49 For reference a standard piece of copy paper is 0 07 0 18 mm 70 000 180 000 nm 50 thick Destroyed hard disk glass platter visible Diagram labeling the major components of a computer HDD Recording of single magnetisations of bits on a 200 MB HDD platter recording made visible using CMOS MagView 51 Longitudinal recording standard amp perpendicular recording diagram The platters in contemporary HDDs are spun at speeds varying from 4 200 RPM in energy efficient portable devices to 15 000 rpm for high performance servers 52 The first HDDs spun at 1 200 rpm 6 and for many years 3 600 rpm was the norm 53 As of November 2019 update the platters in most consumer grade HDDs spin at 5 400 or 7 200 RPM Information is written to and read from a platter as it rotates past devices called read and write heads that are positioned to operate very close to the magnetic surface with their flying height often in the range of tens of nanometers The read and write head is used to detect and modify the magnetization of the material passing immediately under it In modern drives there is one head for each magnetic platter surface on the spindle mounted on a common arm An actuator arm or access arm moves the heads on an arc roughly radially across the platters as they spin allowing each head to access almost the entire surface of the platter as it spins The arm is moved using a voice coil actuator or in some older designs a stepper motor Early hard disk drives wrote data at some constant bits per second resulting in all tracks having the same amount of data per track but modern drives since the 1990s use zone bit recording increasing the write speed from inner to outer zone and thereby storing more data per track in the outer zones In modern drives the small size of the magnetic regions creates the danger that their magnetic state might be lost because of thermal effects thermally induced magnetic instability which is commonly known as the superparamagnetic limit To counter this the platters are coated with two parallel magnetic layers separated by a three atom layer of the non magnetic element ruthenium and the two layers are magnetized in opposite orientation thus reinforcing each other 54 Another technology used to overcome thermal effects to allow greater recording densities is perpendicular recording first shipped in 2005 55 and as of 2007 update used in certain HDDs 56 57 58 In 2004 a higher density recording media was introduced consisting of coupled soft and hard magnetic layers So called exchange spring media magnetic storage technology also known as exchange coupled composite media allows good writability due to the write assist nature of the soft layer However the thermal stability is determined only by the hardest layer and not influenced by the soft layer 59 60 Components Edit An HDD with disks and motor hub removed exposing copper colored stator coils surrounding a bearing in the center of the spindle motor The orange stripe along the side of the arm is a thin printed circuit cable the spindle bearing is in the center and the actuator is in the upper left A typical HDD has two electric motors a spindle motor that spins the disks and an actuator motor that positions the read write head assembly across the spinning disks The disk motor has an external rotor attached to the disks the stator windings are fixed in place Opposite the actuator at the end of the head support arm is the read write head thin printed circuit cables connect the read write heads to amplifier electronics mounted at the pivot of the actuator The head support arm is very light but also stiff in modern drives acceleration at the head reaches 550 g Head stack with an actuator coil on the left and read write heads on the right Close up of a single read write head showing the side facing the platter The actuator is a permanent magnet and moving coil motor that swings the heads to the desired position A metal plate supports a squat neodymium iron boron NIB high flux magnet Beneath this plate is the moving coil often referred to as the voice coil by analogy to the coil in loudspeakers which is attached to the actuator hub and beneath that is a second NIB magnet mounted on the bottom plate of the motor some drives have only one magnet The voice coil itself is shaped rather like an arrowhead and is made of doubly coated copper magnet wire The inner layer is insulation and the outer is thermoplastic which bonds the coil together after it is wound on a form making it self supporting The portions of the coil along the two sides of the arrowhead which point to the center of the actuator bearing then interact with the magnetic field of the fixed magnet Current flowing radially outward along one side of the arrowhead and radially inward on the other produces the tangential force If the magnetic field were uniform each side would generate opposing forces that would cancel each other out Therefore the surface of the magnet is half north pole and half south pole with the radial dividing line in the middle causing the two sides of the coil to see opposite magnetic fields and produce forces that add instead of canceling Currents along the top and bottom of the coil produce radial forces that do not rotate the head The HDD s electronics control the movement of the actuator and the rotation of the disk and perform reads and writes on demand from the disk controller Feedback of the drive electronics is accomplished by means of special segments of the disk dedicated to servo feedback These are either complete concentric circles in the case of dedicated servo technology or segments interspersed with real data in the case of embedded servo otherwise known as sector servo technology The servo feedback optimizes the signal to noise ratio of the GMR sensors by adjusting the voice coil motor to rotate the arm A more modern servo system also employs milli and or micro actuators to more accurately position the read write heads 61 The spinning of the disks uses fluid bearing spindle motors Modern disk firmware is capable of scheduling reads and writes efficiently on the platter surfaces and remapping sectors of the media that have failed Error rates and handling Edit Modern drives make extensive use of error correction codes ECCs particularly Reed Solomon error correction These techniques store extra bits determined by mathematical formulas for each block of data the extra bits allow many errors to be corrected invisibly The extra bits themselves take up space on the HDD but allow higher recording densities to be employed without causing uncorrectable errors resulting in much larger storage capacity 62 For example a typical 1 TB hard disk with 512 byte sectors provides additional capacity of about 93 GB for the ECC data 63 In the newest drives as of 2009 update 64 low density parity check codes LDPC were supplanting Reed Solomon LDPC codes enable performance close to the Shannon Limit and thus provide the highest storage density available 64 65 Typical hard disk drives attempt to remap the data in a physical sector that is failing to a spare physical sector provided by the drive s spare sector pool also called reserve pool 66 while relying on the ECC to recover stored data while the number of errors in a bad sector is still low enough The S M A R T Self Monitoring Analysis and Reporting Technology feature counts the total number of errors in the entire HDD fixed by ECC although not on all hard drives as the related S M A R T attributes Hardware ECC Recovered and Soft ECC Correction are not consistently supported and the total number of performed sector remappings as the occurrence of many such errors may predict an HDD failure The No ID Format developed by IBM in the mid 1990s contains information about which sectors are bad and where remapped sectors have been located 67 Only a tiny fraction of the detected errors end up as not correctable Examples of specified uncorrected bit read error rates include 2013 specifications for enterprise SAS disk drives state the error rate to be one uncorrected bit read error in every 1016 bits read 68 69 2018 specifications for consumer SATA hard drives state the error rate to be one uncorrected bit read error in every 1014 bits 70 71 Within a given manufacturers model the uncorrected bit error rate is typically the same regardless of capacity of the drive 68 69 70 71 The worst type of errors are silent data corruptions which are errors undetected by the disk firmware or the host operating system some of these errors may be caused by hard disk drive malfunctions while others originate elsewhere in the connection between the drive and the host 72 Development Edit Leading edge hard disk drive areal densities from 1956 through 2009 compared to Moore s law By 2016 progress had slowed significantly below the extrapolated density trend 73 The rate of areal density advancement was similar to Moore s law doubling every two years through 2010 60 per year during 1988 1996 100 during 1996 2003 and 30 during 2003 2010 74 Speaking in 1997 Gordon Moore called the increase flabbergasting 75 while observing later that growth cannot continue forever 76 Price improvement decelerated to 12 per year during 2010 2017 77 as the growth of areal density slowed The rate of advancement for areal density slowed to 10 per year during 2010 2016 78 and there was difficulty in migrating from perpendicular recording to newer technologies 79 As bit cell size decreases more data can be put onto a single drive platter In 2013 a production desktop 3 TB HDD with four platters would have had an areal density of about 500 Gbit in2 which would have amounted to a bit cell comprising about 18 magnetic grains 11 by 1 6 grains 80 Since the mid 2000s areal density progress has been challenged by a superparamagnetic trilemma involving grain size grain magnetic strength and ability of the head to write 81 In order to maintain acceptable signal to noise smaller grains are required smaller grains may self reverse electrothermal instability unless their magnetic strength is increased but known write head materials are unable to generate a strong enough magnetic field sufficient to write the medium in the increasingly smaller space taken by grains Magnetic storage technologies are being developed to address this trilemma and compete with flash memory based solid state drives SSDs In 2013 Seagate introduced shingled magnetic recording SMR 82 intended as something of a stopgap technology between PMR and Seagate s intended successor heat assisted magnetic recording HAMR SMR utilises overlapping tracks for increased data density at the cost of design complexity and lower data access speeds particularly write speeds and random access 4k speeds 83 84 By contrast HGST now part of Western Digital focused on developing ways to seal helium filled drives instead of the usual filtered air Since turbulence and friction are reduced higher areal densities can be achieved due to using a smaller track width and the energy dissipated due to friction is lower as well resulting in a lower power draw Furthermore more platters can be fit into the same enclosure space although helium gas is notoriously difficult to prevent escaping 85 Thus helium drives are completely sealed and do not have a breather port unlike their air filled counterparts Other recording technologies are either under research or have been commercially implemented to increase areal density including Seagate s heat assisted magnetic recording HAMR HAMR requires a different architecture with redesigned media and read write heads new lasers and new near field optical transducers 86 HAMR is expected to ship commercially in late 2020 or 2021 87 88 Technical issues delayed the introduction of HAMR by a decade from earlier projections of 2009 89 2015 90 2016 91 and the first half of 2019 Some drives have adopted dual independent actuator arms to increase read write speeds and compete with SSDs 92 HAMR s planned successor bit patterned recording BPR 93 has been removed from the roadmaps of Western Digital and Seagate 94 Western Digital s microwave assisted magnetic recording MAMR 95 96 also referred to as energy assisted magnetic recording EAMR was sampled in 2020 with the first EAMR drive the Ultrastar HC550 shipping in late 2020 97 98 99 Two dimensional magnetic recording TDMR 80 100 and current perpendicular to plane giant magnetoresistance CPP GMR heads have appeared in research papers 101 102 103 A 3D actuated vacuum drive 3DHD concept has been proposed 104 Depending upon assumptions on feasibility and timing of these technologies Seagate forecasts that areal density will grow 20 per year during 2020 2034 40 Capacity Edit Two Seagate Barracuda drives from 2003 and 2009 respectively 160 GB and 1 TB As of 2022 update Seagate offers capacities up to 20TB The highest capacity HDDs shipping commercially in 2022 are 20 TB 105 106 The capacity of a hard disk drive as reported by an operating system to the end user is smaller than the amount stated by the manufacturer for several reasons e g the operating system using some space use of some space for data redundancy space use for file system structures Confusion of decimal prefixes and binary prefixes can also lead to errors Calculation Edit Modern hard disk drives appear to their host controller as a contiguous set of logical blocks and the gross drive capacity is calculated by multiplying the number of blocks by the block size This information is available from the manufacturer s product specification and from the drive itself through use of operating system functions that invoke low level drive commands 107 108 Older IBM and compatible drives e g IBM 3390 using the CKD record format have variable length records such drive capacity calculations must take into account the characteristics of the records Some newer DASD simulate CKD and the same capacity formulae apply The gross capacity of older sector oriented HDDs is calculated as the product of the number of cylinders per recording zone the number of bytes per sector most commonly 512 and the count of zones of the drive citation needed Some modern SATA drives also report cylinder head sector CHS capacities but these are not physical parameters because the reported values are constrained by historic operating system interfaces The C H S scheme has been replaced by logical block addressing LBA a simple linear addressing scheme that locates blocks by an integer index which starts at LBA 0 for the first block and increments thereafter 109 When using the C H S method to describe modern large drives the number of heads is often set to 64 although a typical modern hard disk drive has between one and four platters In modern HDDs spare capacity for defect management is not included in the published capacity however in many early HDDs a certain number of sectors were reserved as spares thereby reducing the capacity available to the operating system Furthermore many HDDs store their firmware in a reserved service zone which is typically not accessible by the user and is not included in the capacity calculation For RAID subsystems data integrity and fault tolerance requirements also reduce the realized capacity For example a RAID 1 array has about half the total capacity as a result of data mirroring while a RAID 5 array with n drives loses 1 n of capacity which equals to the capacity of a single drive due to storing parity information RAID subsystems are multiple drives that appear to be one drive or more drives to the user but provide fault tolerance Most RAID vendors use checksums to improve data integrity at the block level Some vendors design systems using HDDs with sectors of 520 bytes to contain 512 bytes of user data and eight checksum bytes or by using separate 512 byte sectors for the checksum data 110 Some systems may use hidden partitions for system recovery reducing the capacity available to the end user without knowledge of special disk partitioning utilities like diskpart in Windows citation needed Formatting Edit Main article Disk formatting Data is stored on a hard drive in a series of logical blocks Each block is delimited by markers identifying its start and end error detecting and correcting information and space between blocks to allow for minor timing variations These blocks often contained 512 bytes of usable data but other sizes have been used As drive density increased an initiative known as Advanced Format extended the block size to 4096 bytes of usable data with a resulting significant reduction in the amount of disk space used for block headers error checking data and spacing The process of initializing these logical blocks on the physical disk platters is called low level formatting which is usually performed at the factory and is not normally changed in the field 111 High level formatting writes data structures used by the operating system to organize data files on the disk This includes writing partition and file system structures into selected logical blocks For example some of the disk space will be used to hold a directory of disk file names and a list of logical blocks associated with a particular file Examples of partition mapping scheme include Master boot record MBR and GUID Partition Table GPT Examples of data structures stored on disk to retrieve files include the File Allocation Table FAT in the DOS file system and inodes in many UNIX file systems as well as other operating system data structures also known as metadata As a consequence not all the space on an HDD is available for user files but this system overhead is usually small compared with user data Units Edit See also Binary prefix disk drives Decimal and binary unit prefixes interpretation 112 113 Capacity advertised by manufacturers p Capacity expected by some consumers q Reported capacityWindows q macOS ver 10 6 p With prefix Bytes Bytes Diff 100 GB 100 000 000 000 107 374 182 400 7 37 93 1 GB 100 GB1 TB 1 000 000 000 000 1 099 511 627 776 9 95 931 GB 1 000 GB 1 000 000 MBIn the early days of computing the total capacity of HDDs was specified in 7 to 9 decimal digits frequently truncated with the idiom millions 114 33 By the 1970s the total capacity of HDDs was given by manufacturers using SI decimal prefixes such as megabytes 1 MB 1 000 000 bytes gigabytes 1 GB 1 000 000 000 bytes and terabytes 1 TB 1 000 000 000 000 bytes 112 115 116 117 However capacities of memory are usually quoted using a binary interpretation of the prefixes i e using powers of 1024 instead of 1000 Software reports hard disk drive or memory capacity in different forms using either decimal or binary prefixes The Microsoft Windows family of operating systems uses the binary convention when reporting storage capacity so an HDD offered by its manufacturer as a 1 TB drive is reported by these operating systems as a 931 GB HDD Mac OS X 10 6 Snow Leopard uses decimal convention when reporting HDD capacity 118 The default behavior of the df command line utility on Linux is to report the HDD capacity as a number of 1024 byte units 119 The difference between the decimal and binary prefix interpretation caused some consumer confusion and led to class action suits against HDD manufacturers The plaintiffs argued that the use of decimal prefixes effectively misled consumers while the defendants denied any wrongdoing or liability asserting that their marketing and advertising complied in all respects with the law and that no class member sustained any damages or injuries 120 121 122 In 2020 a California court ruled that use of the decimal prefixes with a decimal meaning was not misleading 123 Form factors EditMain article List of disk drive form factors 8 5 25 3 5 2 5 1 8 and 1 inch HDDs together with a ruler to show the size of platters and read write heads A newer 2 5 inch 63 5 mm 6 495 MB HDD compared to an older 5 25 inch full height 110 MB HDD IBM s first hard disk drive the IBM 350 used a stack of fifty 24 inch platters stored 3 75 MB of data approximately the size of one modern digital picture and was of a size comparable to two large refrigerators In 1962 IBM introduced its model 1311 disk which used six 14 inch nominal size platters in a removable pack and was roughly the size of a washing machine This became a standard platter size for many years used also by other manufacturers 124 The IBM 2314 used platters of the same size in an eleven high pack and introduced the drive in a drawer layout sometimes called the pizza oven although the drawer was not the complete drive Into the 1970s HDDs were offered in standalone cabinets of varying dimensions containing from one to four HDDs Beginning in the late 1960s drives were offered that fit entirely into a chassis that would mount in a 19 inch rack Digital s RK05 and RL01 were early examples using single 14 inch platters in removable packs the entire drive fitting in a 10 5 inch high rack space six rack units In the mid to late 1980s the similarly sized Fujitsu Eagle which used coincidentally 10 5 inch platters was a popular product With increasing sales of microcomputers having built in floppy disk drives FDDs HDDs that would fit to the FDD mountings became desirable Starting with the Shugart Associates SA1000 HDD form factors initially followed those of 8 inch 5 inch and 3 inch floppy disk drives Although referred to by these nominal sizes the actual sizes for those three drives respectively are 9 5 5 75 and 4 wide Because there were no smaller floppy disk drives smaller HDD form factors such as 2 inch drives actually 2 75 wide developed from product offerings or industry standards As of 2019 update 2 inch and 3 inch hard disks are the most popular sizes By 2009 all manufacturers had discontinued the development of new products for the 1 3 inch 1 inch and 0 85 inch form factors due to falling prices of flash memory 125 126 which has no moving parts While nominal sizes are in inches actual dimensions are specified in millimeters Performance characteristics EditMain article Hard disk drive performance characteristics The factors that limit the time to access the data on an HDD are mostly related to the mechanical nature of the rotating disks and moving heads including Seek time is a measure of how long it takes the head assembly to travel to the track of the disk that contains data Rotational latency is incurred because the desired disk sector may not be directly under the head when data transfer is requested Average rotational latency is shown in the table based on the statistical relation that the average latency is one half the rotational period The bit rate or data transfer rate once the head is in the right position creates delay which is a function of the number of blocks transferred typically relatively small but can be quite long with the transfer of large contiguous files Delay may also occur if the drive disks are stopped to save energy Defragmentation is a procedure used to minimize delay in retrieving data by moving related items to physically proximate areas on the disk 127 Some computer operating systems perform defragmentation automatically Although automatic defragmentation is intended to reduce access delays performance will be temporarily reduced while the procedure is in progress 128 Time to access data can be improved by increasing rotational speed thus reducing latency or by reducing the time spent seeking Increasing areal density increases throughput by increasing data rate and by increasing the amount of data under a set of heads thereby potentially reducing seek activity for a given amount of data The time to access data has not kept up with throughput increases which themselves have not kept up with growth in bit density and storage capacity Latency Edit Latency characteristics typical of HDDs Rotational speed rpm Average rotational latency ms 15 000 210 000 37 200 4 165 400 5 554 800 6 25Data transfer rate Edit As of 2010 update a typical 7 200 rpm desktop HDD has a sustained disk to buffer data transfer rate up to 1 030 Mbit s 129 This rate depends on the track location the rate is higher for data on the outer tracks where there are more data sectors per rotation and lower toward the inner tracks where there are fewer data sectors per rotation and is generally somewhat higher for 10 000 rpm drives A current widely used standard for the buffer to computer interface is 3 0 Gbit s SATA which can send about 300 megabyte s 10 bit encoding from the buffer to the computer and thus is still comfortably ahead of today s disk to buffer transfer rates Data transfer rate read write can be measured by writing a large file to disk using special file generator tools then reading back the file Transfer rate can be influenced by file system fragmentation and the layout of the files 127 HDD data transfer rate depends upon the rotational speed of the platters and the data recording density Because heat and vibration limit rotational speed advancing density becomes the main method to improve sequential transfer rates Higher speeds require a more powerful spindle motor which creates more heat While areal density advances by increasing both the number of tracks across the disk and the number of sectors per track 130 only the latter increases the data transfer rate for a given rpm Since data transfer rate performance tracks only one of the two components of areal density its performance improves at a lower rate 131 Other considerations Edit Other performance considerations include quality adjusted price power consumption audible noise and both operating and non operating shock resistance Access and interfaces EditMain article Hard disk drive interface Inner view of a 1998 Seagate HDD that used the Parallel ATA interface 2 5 inch SATA drive on top of 3 5 inch SATA drive showing close up of 7 pin data and 15 pin power connectors Current hard drives connect to a computer over one of several bus types including parallel ATA Serial ATA SCSI Serial Attached SCSI SAS and Fibre Channel Some drives especially external portable drives use IEEE 1394 or USB All of these interfaces are digital electronics on the drive process the analog signals from the read write heads Current drives present a consistent interface to the rest of the computer independent of the data encoding scheme used internally and independent of the physical number of disks and heads within the drive Typically a DSP in the electronics inside the drive takes the raw analog voltages from the read head and uses PRML and Reed Solomon error correction 132 to decode the data then sends that data out the standard interface That DSP also watches the error rate detected by error detection and correction and performs bad sector remapping data collection for Self Monitoring Analysis and Reporting Technology and other internal tasks Modern interfaces connect the drive to the host interface with a single data control cable Each drive also has an additional power cable usually direct to the power supply unit Older interfaces had separate cables for data signals and for drive control signals Small Computer System Interface SCSI originally named SASI for Shugart Associates System Interface was standard on servers workstations Commodore Amiga Atari ST and Apple Macintosh computers through the mid 1990s by which time most models had been transitioned to newer interfaces The length limit of the data cable allows for external SCSI devices The SCSI command set is still used in the more modern SAS interface Integrated Drive Electronics IDE later standardized under the name AT Attachment ATA with the alias PATA Parallel ATA retroactively added upon introduction of SATA moved the HDD controller from the interface card to the disk drive This helped to standardize the host controller interface reduce the programming complexity in the host device driver and reduced system cost and complexity The 40 pin IDE ATA connection transfers 16 bits of data at a time on the data cable The data cable was originally 40 conductor but later higher speed requirements led to an ultra DMA UDMA mode using an 80 conductor cable with additional wires to reduce crosstalk at high speed EIDE was an unofficial update by Western Digital to the original IDE standard with the key improvement being the use of direct memory access DMA to transfer data between the disk and the computer without the involvement of the CPU an improvement later adopted by the official ATA standards By directly transferring data between memory and disk DMA eliminates the need for the CPU to copy byte per byte therefore allowing it to process other tasks while the data transfer occurs Fibre Channel FC is a successor to parallel SCSI interface on enterprise market It is a serial protocol In disk drives usually the Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop FC AL connection topology is used FC has much broader usage than mere disk interfaces and it is the cornerstone of storage area networks SANs Recently other protocols for this field like iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet have been developed as well Confusingly drives usually use copper twisted pair cables for Fibre Channel not fibre optics The latter are traditionally reserved for larger devices such as servers or disk array controllers Serial Attached SCSI SAS The SAS is a new generation serial communication protocol for devices designed to allow for much higher speed data transfers and is compatible with SATA SAS uses a mechanically compatible data and power connector to standard 3 5 inch SATA1 SATA2 HDDs and many server oriented SAS RAID controllers are also capable of addressing SATA HDDs SAS uses serial communication instead of the parallel method found in traditional SCSI devices but still uses SCSI commands Serial ATA SATA The SATA data cable has one data pair for differential transmission of data to the device and one pair for differential receiving from the device just like EIA 422 That requires that data be transmitted serially A similar differential signaling system is used in RS485 LocalTalk USB FireWire and differential SCSI SATA I to III are designed to be compatible with and use a subset of SAS commands and compatible interfaces Therefore a SATA hard drive can be connected to and controlled by a SAS hard drive controller with some minor exceptions such as drives controllers with limited compatibility However they cannot be connected the other way round a SATA controller cannot be connected to a SAS drive Integrity and failure Edit Close up of an HDD head resting on a disk platter its mirror reflection is visible on the platter surface Unless the head is on a landing zone the heads touching the platters while in operation can be catastrophic Main articles Hard disk drive failure Head crash and Data recovery See also Solid state drive SSD reliability and failure modes and RAID Unrecoverable read errors during rebuild Due to the extremely close spacing between the heads and the disk surface HDDs are vulnerable to being damaged by a head crash a failure of the disk in which the head scrapes across the platter surface often grinding away the thin magnetic film and causing data loss Head crashes can be caused by electronic failure a sudden power failure physical shock contamination of the drive s internal enclosure wear and tear corrosion or poorly manufactured platters and heads The HDD s spindle system relies on air density inside the disk enclosure to support the heads at their proper flying height while the disk rotates HDDs require a certain range of air densities to operate properly The connection to the external environment and density occurs through a small hole in the enclosure about 0 5 mm in breadth usually with a filter on the inside the breather filter 133 If the air density is too low then there is not enough lift for the flying head so the head gets too close to the disk and there is a risk of head crashes and data loss Specially manufactured sealed and pressurized disks are needed for reliable high altitude operation above about 3 000 m 9 800 ft 134 Modern disks include temperature sensors and adjust their operation to the operating environment Breather holes can be seen on all disk drives they usually have a sticker next to them warning the user not to cover the holes The air inside the operating drive is constantly moving too being swept in motion by friction with the spinning platters This air passes through an internal recirculation or recirc filter to remove any leftover contaminants from manufacture any particles or chemicals that may have somehow entered the enclosure and any particles or outgassing generated internally in normal operation Very high humidity present for extended periods of time can corrode the heads and platters An exception to this are hermetically sealed helium filled HDDs that largely eliminate environmental issues that can arise due to humidity or atmospheric pressure changes Such HDDs were introduced by HGST in their first successful high volume implementation in 2013 For giant magnetoresistive GMR heads in particular a minor head crash from contamination that does not remove the magnetic surface of the disk still results in the head temporarily overheating due to friction with the disk surface and can render the data unreadable for a short period until the head temperature stabilizes so called thermal asperity a problem which can partially be dealt with by proper electronic filtering of the read signal When the logic board of a hard disk fails the drive can often be restored to functioning order and the data recovered by replacing the circuit board with one of an identical hard disk In the case of read write head faults they can be replaced using specialized tools in a dust free environment If the disk platters are undamaged they can be transferred into an identical enclosure and the data can be copied or cloned onto a new drive In the event of disk platter failures disassembly and imaging of the disk platters may be required 135 For logical damage to file systems a variety of tools including fsck on UNIX like systems and CHKDSK on Windows can be used for data recovery Recovery from logical damage can require file carving A common expectation is that hard disk drives designed and marketed for server use will fail less frequently than consumer grade drives usually used in desktop computers However two independent studies by Carnegie Mellon University 136 and Google 137 found that the grade of a drive does not relate to the drive s failure rate A 2011 summary of research into SSD and magnetic disk failure patterns by Tom s Hardware summarized research findings as follows 138 Mean time between failures MTBF does not indicate reliability the annualized failure rate is higher and usually more relevant HDDs do not tend to fail during early use and temperature has only a minor effect instead failure rates steadily increase with age S M A R T warns of mechanical issues but not other issues affecting reliability and is therefore not a reliable indicator of condition 139 Failure rates of drives sold as enterprise and consumer are very much similar although these drive types are customized for their different operating environments 140 141 In drive arrays one drive s failure significantly increases the short term risk of a second drive failing As of 2019 update Backblaze a storage provider reported an annualized failure rate of two percent per year for a storage farm with 110 000 off the shelf HDDs with the reliability varying widely between models and manufacturers 142 Backblaze subsequently reported that the failure rate for HDDs and SSD of equivalent age was similar 8 To minimize cost and overcome failures of individual HDDs storage systems providers rely on redundant HDD arrays HDDs that fail are replaced on an ongoing basis 142 89 Market segments EditConsumer segment Edit Two high end consumer SATA 2 5 inch 10 000 rpm HDDs factory mounted in 3 5 inch adapter frames Desktop HDDs Desktop HDDs typically have two to five internal platters rotate at 5 400 to 10 000 rpm and have a media transfer rate of 0 5 Gbit s or higher 1 GB 109 bytes 1 Gbit s 109 bit s Earlier 1980 1990s drives tend to be slower in rotation speed As of May 2019 update the highest capacity desktop HDDs stored 16 TB 143 144 with plans to release 18 TB drives later in 2019 145 18 TB HDDs were released in 2020 As of 2016 update the typical speed of a hard drive in an average desktop computer is 7 200 RPM whereas low cost desktop computers may use 5 900 RPM or 5 400 RPM drives For some time in the 2000s and early 2010s some desktop users and data centers also used 10 000 RPM drives such as Western Digital Raptor but such drives have become much rarer as of 2016 update and are not commonly used now having been replaced by NAND flash based SSDs Mobile laptop HDDs Smaller than their desktop and enterprise counterparts they tend to be slower and have lower capacity because typically has one internal platter and were 2 5 or 1 8 physical size instead of more common for desktops 3 5 form factor Mobile HDDs spin at 4 200 rpm 5 200 rpm 5 400 rpm or 7 200 rpm with 5 400 rpm being the most common 7 200 rpm drives tend to be more expensive and have smaller capacities while 4 200 rpm models usually have very high storage capacities Because of smaller platter s mobile HDDs generally have lower capacity than their desktop counterparts Consumer electronics HDDs They include drives embedded into digital video recorders and automotive vehicles The former are configured to provide a guaranteed streaming capacity even in the face of read and write errors while the latter are built to resist larger amounts of shock They usually spin at a speed of 5400 RPM External and portable HDDs Two 2 5 external USB hard drives See also USB mass storage device class and Disk enclosure Current external hard disk drives typically connect via USB C earlier models use an regular USB sometimes with using of a pair of ports for better bandwidth or rarely e g eSATA connection Variants using USB 2 0 interface generally have slower data transfer rates when compared to internally mounted hard drives connected through SATA Plug and play drive functionality offers system compatibility and features large storage options and portable design As of March 2015 update available capacities for external hard disk drives ranged from 500 GB to 10 TB 146 External hard disk drives are usually available as assembled integrated products but may be also assembled by combining an external enclosure with USB or other interface with a separately purchased drive They are available in 2 5 inch and 3 5 inch sizes 2 5 inch variants are typically called portable external drives while 3 5 inch variants are referred to as desktop external drives Portable drives are packaged in smaller and lighter enclosures than the desktop drives additionally portable drives use power provided by the USB connection while desktop drives require external power bricks Features such as encryption Wi Fi connectivity 147 biometric security or multiple interfaces for example FireWire are available at a higher cost 148 There are pre assembled external hard disk drives that when taken out from their enclosures cannot be used internally in a laptop or desktop computer due to embedded USB interface on their printed circuit boards and lack of SATA or Parallel ATA interfaces 149 150 Enterprise and business segment Edit Server and workstation HDDs Hot swappable HDD enclosure Typically used with multiple user computers running enterprise software Examples are transaction processing databases internet infrastructure email webserver e commerce scientific computing software and nearline storage management software Enterprise drives commonly operate continuously 24 7 in demanding environments while delivering the highest possible performance without sacrificing reliability Maximum capacity is not the primary goal and as a result the drives are often offered in capacities that are relatively low in relation to their cost 151 The fastest enterprise HDDs spin at 10 000 or 15 000 rpm and can achieve sequential media transfer speeds above 1 6 Gbit s 152 and a sustained transfer rate up to 1 Gbit s 152 Drives running at 10 000 or 15 000 rpm use smaller platters to mitigate increased power requirements as they have less air drag and therefore generally have lower capacity than the highest capacity desktop drives Enterprise HDDs are commonly connected through Serial Attached SCSI SAS or Fibre Channel FC Some support multiple ports so they can be connected to a redundant host bus adapter Enterprise HDDs can have sector sizes larger than 512 bytes often 520 524 528 or 536 bytes The additional per sector space can be used by hardware RAID controllers or applications for storing Data Integrity Field DIF or Data Integrity Extensions DIX data resulting in higher reliability and prevention of silent data corruption 153 Video recording HDDs This line were similar to consumer video recording HDDs with stream stability requirements and similar to server HDDs with requirements to expandability support but also they strongly oriented for growing of internal capacity The main sacrifice for this segment is a writing and reading speed 154 Economy EditPrice evolution Edit HDD price per byte decreased at the rate of 40 per year during 1988 1996 51 per year during 1996 2003 and 34 per year during 2003 2010 23 74 The price decrease slowed down to 13 per year during 2011 2014 as areal density increase slowed and the 2011 Thailand floods damaged manufacturing facilities 79 and have held at 11 per year during 2010 2017 155 The Federal Reserve Board has published a quality adjusted price index for large scale enterprise storage systems including three or more enterprise HDDs and associated controllers racks and cables Prices for these large scale storage systems decreased at the rate of 30 per year during 2004 2009 and 22 per year during 2009 2014 74 Manufacturers and sales Edit Diagram of HDD manufacturer consolidation See also History of hard disk drives and List of defunct hard disk manufacturers More than 200 companies have manufactured HDDs over time but consolidations have concentrated production to just three manufacturers today Western Digital Seagate and Toshiba Production is mainly in the Pacific rim Worldwide revenue for disk storage declined eight percent per year from a peak of 38 billion in 2012 to 22 billion estimated in 2019 40 Production of HDD storage grew 15 per year during 2011 2017 from 335 to 780 exabytes per year 156 HDD shipments declined seven percent per year during this time period from 620 to 406 million units 156 78 HDD shipments were projected to drop by 18 during 2018 2019 from 375 million to 309 million units 157 In 2018 Seagate has 40 of unit shipments Western Digital has 37 of unit shipments while Toshiba has 23 of unit shipments 158 The average sales price for the two largest manufacturers was 60 per unit in 2015 159 Competition from SSDs EditHDDs are being superseded by solid state drives SSDs in markets where their higher speed up to 7 gigabytes per second for M 2 NGFF NVMe SSDs 160 or 2 5 gigabytes per second for PCIe expansion card drives 161 ruggedness and lower power are more important than price since the bit cost of SSDs is four to nine times higher than HDDs 17 16 As of 2016 update HDDs are reported to have a failure rate of 2 9 per year while SSDs have fewer failures 1 3 per year 162 However SSDs have more un correctable data errors than HDDs 162 SSDs offer larger capacities up to 100 TB 38 than the largest HDD and or higher storage densities 100 TB and 30 TB SSDs are housed in 2 5 inch HDD cases but with the same height as a 3 5 inch HDD 163 164 165 166 167 although their cost remains prohibitive A laboratory demonstration of a 1 33 Tb 3D NAND chip with 96 layers NAND commonly used in solid state drives SSDs had 5 5 Tbit in2 as of 2019 update 168 while the maximum areal density for HDDs is 1 5 Tbit in2 The areal density of flash memory is doubling every two years similar to Moore s law 40 per year and faster than the 10 20 per year for HDDs As of 2018 update the maximum capacity was 16 terabytes for an HDD 169 and 100 terabytes for an SSD 25 HDDs were used in 70 of the desktop and notebook computers produced in 2016 and SSDs were used in 30 The usage share of HDDs is declining and could drop below 50 in 2018 2019 according to one forecast because SSDs are replacing smaller capacity less than one terabyte HDDs in desktop and notebook computers and MP3 players 170 The market for silicon based flash memory NAND chips used in SSDs and other applications is growing faster than for HDDs Worldwide NAND revenue grew 16 per year from 22 billion to 57 billion during 2011 2017 while production grew 45 per year from 19 exabytes to 175 exabytes 156 See also Edit Electronics portalAutomatic acoustic management Cleanroom Click of death Comparison of disk encryption software Data erasure Drive mapping Error recovery control Hard disk drive performance characteristics Hybrid drive Microdrive Network drive file server shared resource Object storage Write precompensationNotes Edit This is the original filing date of the application which led to US Patent 3 503 060 generally accepted as the definitive hard disk drive patent 1 Further inequivalent terms used to describe various hard disk drives include disk drive disk file direct access storage device DASD CKD disk and Winchester disk drive after the IBM 3340 The term DASD includes other devices beside disks 22 000 000 000 000 divided by 3 750 000 Comparable in size to a large side by side refrigerator The 1 8 inch form factor is obsolete sizes smaller than 2 5 inches have been replaced by flash memory 68 x 12 x 12 x 12 divided by 2 1 910 000 divided by 62 600 divided by 2 5 387 55 16 000 GB 83 107 180 divided by 0 024 1 300 000 000 000 divided by 2 000 2 500 000 divided by 2 000 40 for user data one for format tracks 6 for alternate surfaces and one for maintenance Initially gamma iron oxide particles in an epoxy binder the recording layer in a modern HDD typically is domains of a granular Cobalt Chrome Platinum based alloy physically isolated by an oxide to enable perpendicular recording 46 Historically a variety of run length limited codes have been used in magnetic recording including for example codes named FM MFM and GCR which are no longer used in modern HDDs a b Expressed using decimal multiples a b Expressed using binary multiples References Edit Kean David W IBM San Jose A quarter century of innovation 1977 Arpaci Dusseau Remzi H Arpaci Dusseau Andrea C 2014 Operating Systems Three Easy Pieces Chapter Hard Disk Drives PDF Arpaci Dusseau Books Archived PDF from the original on February 16 2015 Retrieved March 7 2014 Patterson David Hennessy John 1971 Computer Organization and Design The Hardware Software Interface Elsevier p 23 ISBN 9780080502571 Domingo Joel SSD vs HDD What s the Difference PC Magazine UK Archived from the original on March 28 2018 Retrieved March 21 2018 Mustafa Naveed Ul Armejach Adria Ozturk Ozcan Cristal Adrian Unsal Osman S 2016 Implications of non volatile memory as primary storage for database management systems 2016 International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems Architectures Modeling and Simulation SAMOS IEEE pp 164 171 doi 10 1109 SAMOS 2016 7818344 hdl 11693 37609 ISBN 978 1 5090 3076 7 S2CID 17794134 a b c d e IBM Archives IBM 350 disk storage unit January 23 2003 Archived from the original on May 31 2008 Retrieved October 19 2012 Shilov Anton Demand for HDD Storage Booming 240 EB Shipped in Q3 2019 www anandtech com a b Klein Andy September 30 2021 Are SSDs Really More Reliable Than Hard Drives Backblaze Retrieved September 30 2021 Once we controlled for age and drive days the two drive types were similar and the difference was certainly not enough by itself to justify the extra cost of purchasing a SSD versus a HDD Validating the Reliability of Intel Solid State Drives PDF Intel July 2011 Archived PDF from the original on October 19 2016 Retrieved February 10 2012 Fullerton Eric March 2014 5th Non Volatile Memories Workshop NVMW 2014 PDF IEEE Archived from the original PDF on September 28 2018 Retrieved February 21 2023 Handy James July 31 2012 For the Lack of a Fab Objective Analysis Archived from the original on January 1 2013 Retrieved November 25 2012 a b Hutchinson Lee June 25 2012 How SSDs conquered mobile devices and modern OSes Archived July 7 2017 at the Wayback Machine Ars Technica Retrieved January 7 2013 a b Santo Domingo Joel May 10 2012 SSD vs HDD What s the Difference PC Magazine Archived from the original on March 19 2017 Retrieved November 24 2012 Hough Jack May 14 2018 Why Western Digital Can Gain 45 Despite Declining HDD Business Barron s Archived from the original on May 15 2018 Retrieved May 15 2018 Mellor Chris July 31 2017 NAND that s that Flash chip industry worth twice disk drive biz The Register Retrieved November 21 2019 a b McCallum John C November 2019 Disk Drive Storage Price Decreasing with Time 1955 2019 jcmit com Retrieved November 25 2019 a b c Mellor Chris August 28 2019 How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives Retrieved November 15 2019 a b Time Capsule 1956 Hard Disk Oracle Magazine Oracle July 2014 Archived from the original on August 11 2014 Retrieved September 19 2014 IBM 350 disk drive held 3 75 MB Western Digital 22TB WD Gold Red Pro and Purple HDDs Hit Retail AnandTech Archived from the original on July 19 2022 Retrieved July 19 2022 a b Toshiba Storage Solutions MK3233GSG Archived from the original on July 24 2012 Retrieved November 7 2009 Ballistic Research Laboratories A THIRD SURVEY OF DOMESTIC ELECTRONIC DIGITAL COMPUTING SYSTEMS March 1961 section on IBM 305 RAMAC Archived March 2 2015 at the Wayback Machine p 314 331 states a 34 500 purchase price which calculates to 9 200 MB Athow Desire May 2020 The largest available hard disk is still a 16TB drive techradar com a b McCallum John C May 16 2015 Disk Drive Prices 1955 2015 jcmit com Archived from the original on July 14 2015 Retrieved July 25 2015 Magnetic head development IBM Archives Archived from the original on March 21 2015 Retrieved August 11 2014 a b Shilov Anton March 19 2018 Unlimited 5 Year Endurance The 100TB SSD from Nimbus Data AnandTech Archived from the original on December 24 2018 Retrieved December 24 2018 Ultrastar DC HC500 Series HDD Hgst com Archived from the original on August 29 2018 Retrieved February 20 2019 IBM Archives IBM 350 disk storage unit IBM January 23 2003 Archived from the original on June 17 2015 Retrieved July 26 2015 355 DISK STORAGE IBM 650 RAMAC Manual of Operations 4th ed June 1 1957 p 17 22 6270 3 Three mechanically independent access arms are provided for each file unit and each arm can be independently directed to any track in the file Disk Storage PDF IBM Reference Manual 7070 Data Processing System 2nd ed January 1960 A22 7003 1 Each disk storage unit has three mechanically independent access arms all of which can be seeking at the same time IBM RAMAC 1401 System PDF Reference Manual IBM 1401 Data Processing System 6th ed April 1962 p 63 A24 1403 5 The disk storage unit can have two access arms One is standard and the other is available as a special feature IBM Archives IBM 1301 disk storage unit ibm com January 23 2003 Archived from the original on December 19 2014 Retrieved June 25 2015 DiskPlatter 1301 computermuseum li Archived from the original on March 28 2015 a b IBM 1301 Models 1 and 2 Disk Storage and IBM 1302 Models 1 and 2 Disk Storage with IBM 7090 7094 and 7094 II Data Processing Systems PDF IBM A22 6785 Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4 0 Resource Guide 1995 Chapter 17 Disk and File System Basics Chaudhuri P Pal April 15 2008 Computer Organization and Design 3rd ed PHI Learning Pvt Ltd p 568 ISBN 978 81 203 3511 0 Design of a Swinging Arm Actuator for a disk file J S HEATH IBM J RES DEVELOP July 1976 US 3 849 800 Magnetic disk apparatus Cuzner Dodman Heath amp Rigbey a b Alcorn Paul March 19 2018 Need A 100TB SSD Nimbus Data Has You Covered With The ExaDrive DC100 Tomshardware com Retrieved February 20 2019 Mott Nathaniel November 7 2018 Seagate Wants to Ship 100TB HDDs by 2025 Tomshardware com Retrieved February 20 2019 a b c Mellor Chris September 23 2019 How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives Retrieved November 15 2019 the total addressable market for disk drives will grow from 21 8bn in 2019 Kanellos Michael January 17 2006 Flash goes the notebook CNET Archived from the original on May 19 2018 Retrieved May 15 2018 Industry Life Cycle Encyclopedia Business Terms Inc Archived from the original on July 8 2018 Retrieved May 15 2018 Farming hard drives how Backblaze weathered the Thailand drive crisis blaze com 2013 Archived from the original on June 25 2014 Retrieved May 23 2014 Mellor Chris July 17 2018 Western Digital formats hard disk drive factory as demand spins down The Register Retrieved July 21 2021 Hruska Joel July 20 2018 Western Digital to Close HDD Plant Increase SSD Production extremetech com Retrieved July 21 2021 Plumer M L van Ek J Cain W C 2012 New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording arXiv 1201 5543 physics pop ph Hard Drives escotal com Archived from the original on September 3 2011 Retrieved July 16 2011 What is a head crash amp how can it result in permanent loss of my hard drive data data master com Archived from the original on July 8 2011 Retrieved July 16 2011 Hard Drive Help hardrivehelp com Archived from the original on September 3 2011 Retrieved July 16 2011 Sherlis Juliya 2001 Elert Glenn ed Thickness of a piece of paper The Physics Factbook Archived from the original on June 8 2017 Retrieved July 9 2011 CMOS MagView Archived January 13 2012 at the Wayback Machine is an instrument that visualizes magnetic field structures and strengths Blount Walker C November 2007 Why 7 200 RPM Mobile Hard Disk Drives PDF Archived from the original PDF on April 19 2012 Retrieved July 17 2011 Kozierok Charles October 20 2018 Hard Drive Spindle Speed The PC Guide Archived from the original on May 26 2019 Retrieved May 26 2019 Hayes Brian Terabyte Territory American Scientist p 212 Archived from the original on July 8 2014 Retrieved September 20 2014 Press Releases December 14 2004 Toshiba Archived from the original on April 14 2009 Retrieved March 13 2009 Seagate Momentus 2 HDDs per webpage January 2008 Seagate com October 24 2008 Archived from the original on March 11 2009 Retrieved March 13 2009 Seagate Barracuda 3 HDDs per webpage January 2008 Seagate com Archived from the original on March 14 2009 Retrieved March 13 2009 Western Digital Scorpio 2 and Greenpower 3 HDDs per quarterly conference July 2007 Wdc com Archived from the original on March 16 2009 Retrieved March 13 2009 D Suess et al 2004 Exchange spring recording media for areal densities up to 10Tbit in2 J Magn Mag Mat R Victora et al 2005 Composite media for perpendicular magnetic recording IEEE Trans Mag Mat 41 2 537 542 Bibcode 2005ITM 41 537V doi 10 1109 TMAG 2004 838075 S2CID 29531529 A Al Mamun G Guo C Bi Hard Disk Drive Mechatronics and Control 2006 Taylor amp Francis Kozierok Charles November 25 2018 Hard Drive Error Correcting Code ECC The PC Guide Archived from the original on May 26 2019 Retrieved May 26 2019 Stevens Curtis E 2011 Advanced Format in Legacy Infrastructures More Transparent than Disruptive PDF idema org Archived from the original PDF on November 5 2013 Retrieved November 5 2013 a b Iterative Detection Read Channel Technology in Hard Disk Drives Hitachi 2 5 inch Hard Disk Drive with High Recording Density and High Shock Resistance Archived May 26 2019 at the Wayback Machine Toshiba 2011 MjM Data Recovery Ltd MJM Data Recovery Ltd Hard Disk Bad Sector Mapping Techniques Datarecovery mjm co uk Archived from the original on February 1 2014 Retrieved January 21 2014 Kozierok Charles December 23 2018 Hard Drive Sector Format and Structure The PC Guide Archived from the original on May 26 2019 Retrieved May 26 2019 a b Enterprise Performance 15K HDD Data Sheet PDF Seagate 2013 Archived PDF from the original on October 29 2013 Retrieved October 24 2013 a b WD Xe Datacenter hard drives PDF Western Digital 2013 Archived PDF from the original on October 29 2013 Retrieved October 24 2013 a b 3 5 BarraCuda data sheet PDF Seagate June 2018 Archived PDF from the original on July 28 2018 Retrieved July 28 2018 a b WD Red Desktop Mobile Series Spec Sheet PDF Western Digital April 2018 Archived PDF from the original on July 28 2018 Retrieved July 28 2018 David S H Rosenthal October 1 2010 Keeping Bits Safe How Hard Can It Be ACM Queue Archived from the original on December 17 2013 Retrieved January 2 2014 Hayes Brian March 27 2016 Where s My Petabyte Disk Drive p chart of historical data courtesy of Edward Grochowski Retrieved December 1 2019 a b c Byrne David July 1 2015 Prices for Data Storage Equipment and the State of IT Innovation The Federal Reserve Board FEDS Notes p Table 2 Archived from the original on July 8 2015 Retrieved July 5 2015 Gallium Arsenide PC Magazine March 25 1997 Archived from the original on August 21 2014 Retrieved August 16 2014 Gordon Moore the ability of the magnetic disk people to continue to increase the density is flabbergasting that has moved at least as fast as the semiconductor complexity Dubash Manek April 13 2005 Moore s Law is dead says Gordon Moore techworld com Archived from the original on July 6 2014 Retrieved March 18 2022 It can t continue forever The nature of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster happens McCallum John C 2017 Disk Drive Prices 1955 2017 Archived from the original on July 11 2017 Retrieved July 15 2017 a b Decad Gary M Robert E Fontana Jr July 6 2017 A Look at Cloud Storage Component Technologies Trends and Future Projections ibmsystemsmag com p Table 1 Archived from the original on July 29 2017 Retrieved July 21 2014 a b Mellor Chris November 10 2014 Kryder s law craps out Race to UBER CHEAP STORAGE is OVER theregister co uk UK The Register Archived from the original on November 12 2014 Retrieved November 12 2014 The 2011 Thai floods almost doubled disk capacity cost GB for a while Rosenthal writes The technical difficulties of migrating from PMR to HAMR meant that already in 2010 the Kryder rate had slowed significantly and was not expected to return to its trend in the near future The floods reinforced this a b Anderson Dave 2013 HDD Opportunities amp Challenges Now to 2020 PDF Seagate Archived PDF from the original on May 25 2014 Retrieved May 23 2014 PMR CAGR slowing from historical 40 down to 8 12 and HAMR CAGR 20 40 for 2015 2020 Plumer Martin L et al March 2011 New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording Physics in Canada 67 1 25 29 arXiv 1201 5543 Bibcode 2012arXiv1201 5543P Seagate Delivers On Technology Milestone First to Ship Hard Drives Using Next Generation Shingled Magnetic Recording Press release New York Seagate Technology plc September 9 2013 Archived from the original on October 9 2014 Retrieved July 5 2014 Shingled Magnetic Technology is the First Step to Reaching a 20 Terabyte Hard Drive by 2020 Edge Jake March 26 2014 Support for shingled magnetic recording devices LWN net Archived from the original on February 2 2015 Retrieved January 7 2015 Corbet Jonathan April 23 2013 LSFMM A storage technology update LWN net Archived from the original on January 7 2015 Retrieved January 7 2015 A shingled magnetic recording SMR drive is a rotating drive that packs its tracks so closely that one track cannot be overwritten without destroying the neighboring tracks as well The result is that overwriting data requires rewriting the entire set of closely spaced tracks that is an expensive tradeoff but the benefit much higher storage density is deemed to be worth the cost in some situations Brochure HelioSeal Technology Beyond Air Helium Takes You Higher PDF Western Digital 2020 Shilov Anton December 18 2015 Hard Disk Drives with HAMR Technology Set to Arrive in 2018 Archived from the original on January 2 2016 Retrieved January 2 2016 Unfortunately mass production of actual hard drives featuring HAMR has been delayed for a number of times already and now it turns out that the first HAMR based HDDs are due in 2018 HAMR HDDs will feature a new architecture require new media completely redesigned read write heads with a laser as well as a special near field optical transducer NFT and a number of other components not used or mass produced today Shilov Anton November 5 2019 Seagate 18 TB HDD Due in First Half 2020 20 TB Drive to Ship in Late 2020 Retrieved November 22 2019 Mellor Chris August 28 2019 How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives Retrieved November 15 2019 Seagate CTO Dr John Morris told analysts that Seagate has built 55 000 HAMR drives and aims to get disks ready for customer sampling by the end of 2020 a b Rosenthal David May 16 2018 Longer talk at MSST2018 Retrieved November 22 2019 Shilov Anton October 15 2014 TDK HAMR technology could enable 15TB HDDs already in 2015 Retrieved November 15 2019 Oliver Bill November 18 2013 WD Demos Future HDD Storage Tech 60TB Hard Drives Archived from the original on November 21 2013 Retrieved November 15 2019 Seagate expects to start selling HAMR drives in 2016 State of the Union Seagate s HAMR Hard Drives Dual Actuator Mach2 and 24 TB HDDs on Track Anandtech com Archived from the original on February 20 2019 Retrieved February 20 2019 Will Toshiba s Bit Patterned Drives Change the HDD Landscape PC Magazine August 19 2010 Archived from the original on August 22 2010 Retrieved August 21 2010 Rosenthal David May 16 2018 Longer talk at MSST2018 Retrieved November 22 2019 The most recent Seagate roadmap pushes HAMR shipments into 2020 so they are now slipping faster than real time Western Digital has given up on HAMR and is promising that Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording MAMR is only a year out BPM has dropped off both companies roadmaps Mallary Mike et al July 2014 Head and Media Challenges for 3 Tb in2 Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 50 7 1 8 doi 10 1109 TMAG 2014 2305693 S2CID 22858444 Li Shaojing Livshitz Boris Bertram H Neal Schabes Manfred Schrefl Thomas Fullerton Eric E Lomakin Vitaliy 2009 Microwave assisted magnetization reversal in composite media PDF Applied Physics Letters 94 20 202509 Bibcode 2009ApPhL 94t2509L doi 10 1063 1 3133354 Archived PDF from the original on May 24 2019 Retrieved May 24 2019 Shilov Anton Western Digital Reveals 18 TB DC HC550 EAMR Hard Drive www anandtech com Retrieved October 11 2021 Mellor Chris September 3 2019 Western Digital debuts 18TB and 20TB MAMR disk drives Retrieved November 23 2019 microwave assisted magnetic MAMR recording technology sample shipments are due by the end of the year Discuss Raevenlord Western Digital Finally Launches Ultrastar DC HC550 18 TB Drives With EAMR for Enterprise TechPowerUp Retrieved October 11 2021 Wood Roger October 19 2010 Shingled Magnetic Recording and Two Dimensional Magnetic Recording PDF ewh ieee org Hitachi GST Archived PDF from the original on October 4 2014 Retrieved August 4 2014 Coughlin Thomas Grochowski Edward June 19 2012 Years of Destiny HDD Capital Spending and Technology Developments from 2012 2016 PDF IEEE Santa Clara Valley Magnetics Society Archived PDF from the original on March 2 2013 Retrieved October 9 2012 Bai Zhaoqiang Cai Yongqing Shen Lei Han Guchang Feng Yuanping 2013 All Heusler giant magnetoresistance junctions with matched energy bands and Fermi surfaces arXiv 1301 6106 cond mat mes hall Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Explained Animation Archived from the original on October 6 2018 Retrieved July 27 2014 Promising New Hard Disk Technology Retrieved December 1 2019 Seagate Ships 20TB HAMR HDDs Commercially Tom s Hardware January 23 2021 Retrieved June 2 2021 Seagate said this week that it had begun commercial shipments of its hard drives featuring heat assisted magnetic recording HAMR technology back in November Product Manual Ultrastar DC HC650 SATA OEM Specification PDF Western Digital Information technology Serial Attached SCSI 2 SAS 2 INCITS 457 Draft 2 May 8 2009 chapter 4 1 Direct access block device type model overview The LBAs on a logical unit shall begin with zero and shall be contiguous up to the last logical block on the logical unit ISO IEC 791D 1994 AT Attachment Interface for Disk Drives ATA 1 section 7 1 2 LBA Count for Disk Drives Standard Document LBA1 03 PDF IDEMA June 15 2009 Archived from the original on February 22 2016 Retrieved February 14 2016 How to Measure Storage Efficiency Part II Taxes Blogs netapp com August 14 2009 Archived from the original on July 20 2011 Retrieved April 26 2012 Low Level Formatting Archived from the original on June 4 2017 Retrieved June 28 2010 a b Storage Solutions Guide PDF Seagate October 2012 Archived from the original PDF on June 20 2013 Retrieved June 8 2013 MKxx33GSG MK1235GSL r1 PDF Toshiba Archived from the original PDF on November 22 2009 Retrieved January 7 2013 650 RAMAC announcement January 23 2003 Archived from the original on June 5 2011 Retrieved May 23 2011 Mulvany R B Engineering Design of a Disk Storage Facility with Data Modules IBM JRD November 1974 Introduction to IBM Direct Access Storage Devices M Bohl IBM publication SR20 4738 1981 CDC Product Line Card Archived June 5 2011 at the Wayback Machine October 1974 Apple Support Team How OS X and iOS report storage capacity Apple Inc Archived from the original on April 2 2015 Retrieved March 15 2015 df 1 Linux man page linux die net Archived from the original on July 18 2015 Retrieved July 18 2015 Western Digital Settles Hard Drive Capacity Lawsuit Associated Press June 28 2006 Fox News March 22 2001 Archived from the original on May 24 2019 Retrieved May 24 2019 Cogar Phil October 26 2007 Seagate lawsuit concludes settlement announced Bit tech net Archived from the original on March 20 2012 Retrieved April 26 2012 Western Digital Notice of Class Action Settlement email Xtremesystems org Retrieved April 26 2012 Order granted motion to dismiss amended complaint without leave to amend 22 January 2020 PDF Emerson W Pugh Lyle R Johnson John H Palmer IBM s 360 and early 370 systems MIT Press 1991 ISBN 0 262 16123 0 page 266 Flash price fall shakes HDD market EETimes Asia August 1 2007 Archived February 1 2008 at the Wayback Machine In 2008 Samsung Archived June 16 2011 at the Wayback Machine introduced the 1 3 inch SpinPoint A1 HDD but by March 2009 the family was listed as End Of Life Products and new 1 3 inch models were not available in this size Archived February 11 2009 at the Wayback Machine a b Kearns Dave April 18 2001 How to defrag ITWorld Archived from the original on February 20 2010 Retrieved November 26 2010 Broida Rick April 10 2009 Turning Off Disk Defragmenter May Solve a Sluggish PC PCWorld Archived from the original on November 8 2010 Retrieved November 26 2010 Speed Considerations Seagate Archived from the original on February 10 2011 Retrieved January 22 2011 GLOSSARY of DRIVE and COMPUTER TERMS Seagate Retrieved August 4 2018 Albrecht Thomas R Arora Hitesh Ayanoor Vitikkate Vipin Beaujour Jean Marc Bedau Daniel Berman David Bogdanov Alexei L Chapuis Yves Andre Cushen Julia Dobisz Elizabeth E Doerk Gregory He Gao Grobis Michael Gurney Bruce Hanson Weldon Hellwig Olav Hirano Toshiki Jubert Pierre Olivier Kercher Dan Lille Jeffrey Zuwei Liu Mate C Mathew Obukhov Yuri Patel Kanaiyalal C Rubin Kurt Ruiz Ricardo Schabes Manfred Lei Wan Weller Dieter et al 2015 Bit Patterned Magnetic Recording Theory Media Fabrication and Recording Performance IEEE Transactions on Magnetics HGST a Western Digital Company 51 5 1 42 arXiv 1503 06664 Bibcode 2015ITM 5197880A doi 10 1109 TMAG 2015 2397880 S2CID 33974771 Reed Solomon Codes Introduction Archived from the original on July 8 2011 Mueler Scott February 24 2019 Micro House PC Hardware Library Volume I Hard Drives Macmillan Computer Publishing Archived from the original on May 24 2019 Retrieved May 24 2019 Ruggedized Disk Drives for Commercial Airborne Computer Systems PDF Archived from the original PDF on May 4 2012 Grabianowski Ed May 29 2009 How To Recover Lost Data from Your Hard Drive HowStuffWorks pp 5 6 Archived from the original on November 5 2012 Retrieved October 24 2012 Everything You Know About Disks Is Wrong Storagemojo com February 22 2007 Archived from the original on May 24 2019 Retrieved May 24 2019 Pinheiro Eduardo Wolf Dietrich Weber Luiz Andre Barroso February 2007 Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population PDF Google Inc Archived PDF from the original on January 5 2010 Retrieved December 26 2011 Investigation Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive Tom s Hardware long term SSD reliability review 2011 final words Anthony Sebastian Using SMART to accurately predict when a hard drive is about to die ExtremeTech Archived from the original on August 31 2015 Retrieved August 25 2015 Consumer hard drives as reliable as enterprise hardware Alphr Archived from the original on September 11 2015 Retrieved August 25 2015 Beach Brian December 4 2013 Enterprise Drives Fact or Fiction Backblaze Archived from the original on August 18 2015 Retrieved August 25 2015 a b Hard Drive Data and Stats Backblaze Retrieved November 24 2019 Donnell Deirdre O Seagate introduces world first 16TB Exos HDD and IronWolf NAS drives Notebookcheck BarraCuda en BarraCuda Pro interne harde schijven Seagate Nederland Archived from the original on May 6 2019 Retrieved November 9 2019 16 TB MAMR Hard Drives in 2019 Western Digital Archived from the original on May 24 2019 Retrieved May 24 2019 Seagate Backup Plus External Hard Drive Review 8TB storagereview com March 22 2015 Archived from the original on July 25 2015 Retrieved July 20 2015 Smith Lyle September 3 2014 WD My Passport Wireless Review storagereview com Retrieved July 21 2021 Back Up Your Important Data to External Hard disk drive Biometric Safe Info and Products Reviews about Biometric Security Device Biometricsecurityproducts org July 26 2011 Archived from the original on May 25 2012 Retrieved April 26 2012 Western Digital My Passport 2 TB hwigroup net Archived from the original on October 5 2013 Retrieved January 11 2014 Example of a pre assembled external hard disk drive without its enclosure that cannot be used internally on a laptop or desktop due to the embedded interface on its printed circuit board Hsiung Sebean May 5 2010 How to bypass USB controller and use as a SATA drive datarecoverytools co uk Archived from the original on September 15 2014 Retrieved January 11 2014 Enterprise class versus Desktop class Hard Drives PDF Intel Archived PDF from the original on August 3 2016 Retrieved September 25 2013 a b Seagate Cheetah 15K 5 Data Sheet PDF Archived PDF from the original on December 28 2013 Retrieved December 19 2013 Petersen Martin K August 30 2008 Linux Data Integrity PDF Oracle Corporation Archived from the original PDF on January 9 2015 Retrieved January 23 2015 Most disk drives use 512 byte sectors Enterprise drives Parallel SCSI SAS FC support 520 528 byte fat sectors Mr Dr February 23 2021 WD Red vs WD Purple Which Hard Drives are Better Dr Comparison Retrieved May 28 2021 Hard Drive Cost Per Gigabyte Backblaze July 11 2017 Archived from the original on May 26 2019 Retrieved May 26 2019 a b c Decad Gary M Robert E Fontana Jr May 15 2018 A Ten Year 2008 2017 Storage Landscape LTO Tape Media HDD NAND PDF Retrieved November 23 2019 Shilov Anton May 3 2019 Shipments of PC Hard Drives Predicted to Drop By Nearly 50 in 2019 Retrieved November 22 2019 According to Nidec s data unit sales of hard drives declined by around 43 from 2010 to 2018 going from around 650 million units in 2010 to 375 million units in 2018 And it looks like sales will continue to drop in the coming years Recently Nidec revised its HDD shipment forecast downwards from 356 million drives to 309 million drives in 2019 which will further drop to 290 million units in 2020 2018 Hard Disk Drive Results Forbes Archived from the original on May 26 2019 Retrieved May 26 2019 Shilov Anton March 2 2016 Hard Drive Shipments Drop by Nearly 17 in 2015 Archived from the original on July 7 2016 Retrieved July 5 2016 Force Series Gen 4 PCIe MP600 2TB NVMe M 2 SSD www corsair com Retrieved March 6 2020 Intel Optane SSD 900P Series Review StorageReview com March 16 2018 Archived from the original on December 31 2018 Retrieved February 20 2019 a b Schroeder Bianca Lagisetty Raghav Merchant Arif February 22 2016 Flash Reliability in Production The Expected and the Unexpected PDF Retrieved November 25 2019 You won t be able to afford Samsung s record setting 30TB SSD Bgr com February 20 2018 Archived from the original on April 10 2019 Retrieved February 20 2019 Circuit Breaker February 20 2018 Samsung unveils world s largest SSD with whopping 30TB of storage The Verge Archived from the original on January 27 2019 Retrieved February 20 2019 Advantages Nimbus Data Archived from the original on December 31 2018 Retrieved February 20 2019 Scalable SSDs Nimbus Data Archived from the original on December 31 2018 Retrieved February 20 2019 Samsung s massive 15TB SSD can be yours for about 10K Computerworld July 27 2016 Archived from the original on December 31 2018 Retrieved February 20 2019 McGrath Dylan February 20 2019 Toshiba Claims Highest Capacity NAND Retrieved November 24 2019 Bedford Tom December 4 2018 Seagate reveals world s largest and most ludicrous 16TB HDD Alphr Archived from the original on December 24 2018 Retrieved December 24 2018 Coughlin Tom June 7 2016 3D NAND Enables Larger Consumer SSDs forbes com Archived from the original on June 16 2016 Retrieved July 4 2016 Further reading EditMueller Scott 2011 Upgrading and Repairing PCs 20th ed Que ISBN 978 0 7897 4710 5 Messmer Hans Peter 2001 The Indispensable PC Hardware Book 4th ed Addison Wesley ISBN 978 0 201 59616 8 Kheong Chn Sann 2005 An Introduction to the HDD modelling detection and decoding for magnetic recording channels PDF The Eleventh Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications Retrieved January 10 2020 External links EditHard disk drive at Wikipedia s sister projects Definitions from Wiktionary Media from Commons News from Wikinews Textbooks from Wikibooks Resources from Wikiversity This article s use of external links may not follow Wikipedia s policies or guidelines Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references July 2020 Learn how and when to remove this template message Hard Disk Drives Encyclopedia Video showing an opened HD working Average seek time of a computer disk Timeline 50 Years of Hard Drives Archived October 6 2013 at the Wayback Machine HDD from inside Tracks and Zones How hard it can be Hard disk hacking firmware modifications in eight parts going as far as booting a Linux kernel on an ordinary HDD controller board Hiding Data in Hard Drive s Service Areas February 14 2013 by Ariel Berkman Rotary Acceleration Feed Forward RAFF Information Sheet Western Digital January 2013 PowerChoice Technology for Hard Disk Drive Power Savings and Flexibility Seagate Technology March 2010 Shingled Magnetic Recording SMR HGST Inc 2015 The Road to Helium HGST Inc 2015 Research paper about perspective usage of magnetic photoconductors in magneto optical data storage Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Hard disk drive amp oldid 1146816503, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.