fbpx
Wikipedia

Flightless bird

Flightless birds are birds that, through evolution, lost the ability to fly.[1] There are over 60 extant species,[2] including the well-known ratites (ostriches, emu, cassowaries, rheas, and kiwi) and penguins. The smallest flightless bird is the Inaccessible Island rail (length 12.5 cm, weight 34.7 g). The largest (both heaviest and tallest) flightless bird, which is also the largest living bird in general, is the ostrich (2.7 m, 156 kg).

Penguins are a well-known example of flightless birds.
An Okarito kiwi (Apteryx rowi), also known as the rowi
Ostriches are the largest extant flightless birds as well as the largest extant birds in general.
An extinct moa. Until the arrival of humans, New Zealand's only mammals were bats and seals, resulting in many bird species evolving to fill the open niches. While many of New Zealand's flightless birds are now extinct, some, such as the kiwi, kākāpō, weka, and takahē have survived to the present day.

Many domesticated birds, such as the domestic chicken and domestic duck, have lost the ability to fly for extended periods, although their ancestral species, the red junglefowl and mallard, respectively, are capable of extended flight. A few particularly bred birds, such as the Broad Breasted White turkey, have become totally flightless as a result of selective breeding; the birds were bred to grow massive breast meat that weighs too much for the bird's wings to support in flight.

Flightlessness has evolved in many different birds independently, demonstrating repeated convergent evolution.[3] There were families of flightless birds, such as the now-extinct Phorusrhacidae, that evolved to be powerful terrestrial predators. Taking this to a greater extreme, the terror birds (and their relatives the bathornithids), eogruids, geranoidids, gastornithiforms, and dromornithids (all extinct) all evolved similar body shapes – long legs, long necks and big heads – but none of them were closely related. Furthermore, they also share traits of being giant, flightless birds with vestigial wings, long legs, and long necks with some of the ratites, although they are not related.[4][5]

History Edit

Origins of flightlessness Edit

Divergences and losses of flight within ratite lineage occurred right after the K-Pg extinction event wiped out all non-avian dinosaurs and large vertebrates 66 million years ago.[6] The immediate evacuation of niches following the mass extinction provided opportunities for Palaeognathes to distribute and occupy novel environments. New ecological influences selectively pressured different taxa to converge on flightless modes of existence by altering them morphologically and behaviorally. The successful acquisition and protection of a claimed territory selected for large size and cursoriality in Tertiary ancestors of ratites.[7] Temperate rainforests dried out throughout the Miocene and transformed into semiarid deserts, causing habitats to be widely spread across the growingly disparate landmasses. Cursoriality was an economic means of traveling long distances to acquire food that was usually low-lying vegetation, more easily accessed by walking.[7] Traces of these events are reflected in ratite distribution throughout semiarid grasslands and deserts today.[8]

Gigantism and flightlessness in birds are almost exclusively correlated due to islands lacking mammalian or reptilian predators and competition.[9] However, ratites occupy environments that are mostly occupied by a diverse number of mammals.[10] It is thought that they first originated through allopatric speciation caused by breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana.[11] However, later evidence suggests this hypothesis first proposed by Joel Cracraft in 1974 is incorrect.[12] Rather ratites arrived in their respective locations via a flighted ancestor and lost the ability to fly multiple times within the lineage.

Gigantism is not a requirement for flightlessness. The kiwi do not exhibit gigantism, along with tinamous, even though they coexisted with the moa and rheas that both exhibit gigantism. This could be the result of different ancestral flighted birds arrival or because of competitive exclusion.[11] The first flightless bird to arrive in each environment utilized the large flightless herbivore or omnivore niche, forcing the later arrivals to remain smaller. In environments where flightless birds are not present, it is possible that after the K/T Boundary there were no niches for them to fill. They were pushed out by other herbivorous mammals.[10]

New Zealand had more species of flightless birds (including the kiwi, several species of penguins, the takahē, the weka, the moa, and several other extinct species) than any other such location. One reason is that until the arrival of humans roughly a thousand years ago, there were no large land predators in New Zealand; the main predators of flightless birds were larger birds.[13]

Independent evolution of flightlessness in Palaeognathes Edit

Ratites belong to the superorder Palaeognathae, which include the volant tinamou, and are believed to have evolved flightlessness independently multiple times within their own group.[4][6][7][10] Some birds evolved flightlessness in response to the absence of predators, for example on oceanic islands. Incongruences between ratite phylogeny and Gondwana geological history indicate the presence of ratites in their current locations is the result of a secondary invasion by flying birds.[14] It remains possible that the most recent common ancestor of ratites was flightless and the tinamou regained the ability to fly.[15] However, it is believed that the loss of flight is an easier transition for birds than the loss and regain of flight, which has never been documented in avian history.[7] Moreover, tinamou nesting within flightless ratites indicates ancestral ratites were volant and multiple losses of flight occurred independently throughout the lineage. This indicates that the distinctive flightless nature of ratites is the result of convergent evolution.[16]

Morphological changes and energy conservation Edit

Two key differences between flying and flightless birds are the smaller wing bones of flightless birds[17] and the absent (or greatly reduced) keel on their breastbone. (The keel anchors muscles needed for wing movement.)[18]

Adapting to a cursorial lifestyle causes two inverse morphological changes to occur in the skeleto-muscular system: the pectoral apparatus used to power flight is paedorphically reduced while peramorphosis leads to enlargement of the pelvic girdle for running.[11] Repeated selection for cursorial traits across ratites suggests these adaptions comprise a more efficient use of energy in adulthood.[7] The name "ratite" comes from the Latin ratis, raft, a vessel with no keel. Their flat sternum is distinct from the typical sternum of flighted birds because it lacks a keel, like a raft. This structure is the place where flight muscles attach and thus allow for powered flight.[16] However, ratite anatomy presents other primitive characters meant for flight, such as the fusion of wing elements, a cerebellar structure, the presence of a pygostyle for tail feathers, and an alula on the wing.[12] These morphological traits suggest some affinities to volant groups. Palaeognathes were one of the first colonizers of novel niches and were free to increase in abundance until the population was limited by food and territory. A study looking at energy conservation and the evolution of flightlessness hypothesized intraspecific competition selected for a reduced individual energy expenditure, which is achieved by the loss of flight.[19]

Some flightless varieties of island birds are closely related to flying varieties, implying flight is a significant biological cost.[19] Flight is the most costly type of locomotion exemplified in the natural world. The energy expenditure required for flight increases proportionally with body size, which is often why flightlessness coincides with body mass.[8] By reducing large pectoral muscles that require a significant amount of overall metabolic energy, ratites decrease their basal metabolic rate and conserve energy.[19][20] A study looking at the basal rates of birds found a significant correlation between low basal rate and pectoral muscle mass in kiwis. On the contrary, flightless penguins exhibit an intermediate basal rate. This is likely because penguins have well-developed pectoral muscles for hunting and diving in the water.[19] For ground-feeding birds, a cursorial lifestyle is more economical and allows for easier access to dietary requirements.[7] Flying birds have different wing and feather structures that make flying easier, while flightless birds' wing structures are well adapted to their environment and activities, such as diving in the ocean.[21]

Species with certain characteristics are more likely to evolve flightlessness. For example, species that already have shorter wings are more likely to lose flight ability.[22] Additionally, birds that undergo simultaneous wing molt, in which they replace all of the feathers in their wings at once during the year, are more likely to evolve flight loss.[23]

A number of bird species appear to be in the process of losing their powers of flight to various extents. These include the Zapata rail of Cuba, the Okinawa rail of Japan, and the Laysan duck of Hawaii. All of these birds show adaptations common to flightlessness, and evolved recently from fully flighted ancestors, but have not yet completely given up the ability to fly. They are, however, weak fliers and are incapable of traveling long distances by air.[24]

Continued presence of wings in flightless birds Edit

Although selection pressure for flight was largely absent, the wing structure has not been lost except in the New Zealand moas.[11] Ostriches are the fastest running birds in the world and emus have been documented running 50 km/h.[8] At these high speeds, wings are necessary for balance and serving as a parachute apparatus to help the bird slow down. Wings are hypothesized to have played a role in sexual selection in early ancestral ratites and were thus maintained. This can be seen today in both the rheas and ostriches. These ratites utilize their wings extensively for courtship and displays to other males.[12] Sexual selection also influences the maintenance of large body size, which discourages flight. The large size of ratites leads to greater access to mates and higher reproductive success. Ratites and tinamous are monogamous and mate only a limited number of times per year.[25] High parental involvement denotes the necessity for choosing a reliable mate. In a climatically stable habitat providing year-round food supply, a male's claimed territory signals to females the abundance of resources readily available to her and her offspring.[20] Male size also indicates his protective abilities. Similar to the emperor penguin, male ratites incubate and protect their offspring anywhere between 85 and 92 days while females feed. They can go up to a week without eating and survive only off fat stores. The emu has been documented fasting for as long as 56 days.[8] If no continued pressures warrant the energy expenditure to maintain the structures of flight, selection will tend towards these other traits.

The only known species of flightless bird in which wings completely disappeared was the gigantic, herbivorous moa of New Zealand, hunted to extinction by humans by the 15th century. In moa, the entire pectoral girdle is reduced to a paired scapulocoracoid, which is the size of a finger.[26]

List of flightless birds Edit

Many flightless birds are extinct; this list shows species that are either still extant or became extinct in the Holocene (no more than 11,000 years ago). Extinct species are indicated with a cross (†). A number of species suspected, but not confirmed to be flightless, are also included here.

Longer-extinct groups of flightless birds include the Cretaceous patagopterygiformes, hesperornithids, the Cenozoic phorusrhacids ("terror birds") and related bathornithids, the unrelated eogruids, geranoidids, gastornithiforms, and dromornithids (mihirungs or "demon ducks"), and the plotopterids.

Palaeognathae (ratites) Edit

Struthioniformes (ostriches) Edit

 
Common ostrich
 
North Island brown kiwi

Casuariiformes (cassowaries and emus) Edit

Dinornithiformes (moa) Edit

Aepyornithiformes (elephant birds) Edit

Apterygiformes (kiwis) Edit

Rheiformes (rheas) Edit

Neognathae Edit

Galliformes (landfowl) Edit

Anseriformes (waterfowl) Edit

 
Campbell teal

Aegotheliformes (owlet-nightjars) Edit

Mesitornithiformes (mesites) Edit

  • Brown mesite Mesitornis unicolor (possibly flightless, has not been seen flying)[27]

Columbiformes (pigeons, doves) Edit

 
Dodo

Gruiformes (cranes, rails, and coots) Edit

 
Weka
 
Takahē stride

Podicipediformes (grebes) Edit

 
Great auk

Charadriiformes (shorebirds and allies) Edit

Sphenisciformes (penguins) Edit

 
Emperor penguin

Suliformes (boobies, cormorants and allies) Edit

 
Flightless cormorant

Pelecaniformes (pelicans, herons, ibises and allies) Edit

Strigiformes (owls) Edit

Coraciiformes (kingfishers and allies) Edit

Falconiformes (falcons and caracaras) Edit

Psittaciformes (parrots) Edit

 
Kākāpō

Passeriformes (perching birds) Edit

References Edit

  1. ^ "New Zealand Ecology – Moa". TerraNature. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  2. ^ Roots C. (2006). Flightless Birds. Westport: Greenwood Press. pp. XIV. ISBN 978-0-313-33545-7.
  3. ^ Sayol, F.; Steinbauer, M. J.; Blackburn, T. M.; Antonelli, A.; Faurby, S. (2020). "Anthropogenic extinctions conceal widespread evolution of flightlessness in birds". Science Advances. 6 (49). Bibcode:2020SciA....6.6095S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb6095. PMID 33268368. S2CID 227261010.
  4. ^ a b Harshman, J.; Braun, E. L.; Braun, M. J.; Huddleston, C. J.; Bowie, R. C.; Chojnowski, J. L.; Hackett, S. J.; Han, K. L.; Kimball, R. T.; Marks, B. D.; Miglia, K. J.; Moore, W. S.; Reddy, S.; Sheldon, F. H.; Steadman, D. W.; Steppan, S. J.; Witt, C. C.; Yuri, T. (2 September 2008). "Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (36): 13462–13467. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10513462H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803242105. PMC 2533212. PMID 18765814.
  5. ^ Holmes, Bob (2008-06-26). "Bird evolutionary tree given a shake by DNA study". New Scientist.
  6. ^ a b Smith, J. V.; Braun, E. L.; Kimball, R. T. (2013). "Ratite nonmonophyly: Independent evidence from 40 novel Loci". Systematic Biology. 62 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys067. PMID 22831877.
  7. ^ a b c d e f Phillips, M. J.; Gibb, G. C.; Crimp, E. A.; Penny, D. (2010). "Tinamous and moa flock together: Mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites". Systematic Biology. 59 (1): 90–107. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp079. PMID 20525622.
  8. ^ a b c d Noble, J. C. (1991). "On ratites and their interactions with plants" (PDF). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 64: 85–118.
  9. ^ "Flightlessness - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics".
  10. ^ a b c Mitchell, K. J.; Llamas, B.; Soubrier, J.; Rawlence, N. J.; Worthy, T. H.; Wood, J.; Lee, M. S.; Cooper, A. (2014). "Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution". Science. 344 (6186): 898–900. Bibcode:2014Sci...344..898M. doi:10.1126/science.1251981. hdl:2328/35953. PMID 24855267. S2CID 206555952.
  11. ^ a b c d Baker, A. J.; Haddrath, O.; McPherson, J. D.; Cloutier, A. (2014). "Genomic support for a moa-tinamou clade and adaptive morphological convergence in flightless ratites". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 31 (7): 1686–96. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu153. PMID 24825849.
  12. ^ a b c Cracraft, Joel (2008). "Phylogeny and Evolution of the Ratite Birds". Ibis. 116 (4): 494–521. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1974.tb07648.x.
  13. ^ . Archived from the original on 2007-08-18. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  14. ^ Haddrath, O.; Baker, A. J. (2012). "Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths, and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 279 (1747): 4617–25. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1630. PMC 3479725. PMID 22977150.
  15. ^ Harshman, J.; Braun, E. L.; Braun, M. J.; Huddleston, C. J.; Bowie, R. C.; Chojnowski, J. L.; Hackett, S. J.; Han, K. L.; Kimball, R. T.; Marks, B. D.; Miglia, K. J.; Moore, W. S.; Reddy, S.; Sheldon, F. H.; Steadman, D. W.; Steppan, S. J.; Witt, C. C.; Yuri, T. (2008). "Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (36): 13462–7. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10513462H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803242105. PMC 2533212. PMID 18765814.
  16. ^ a b Smith, J. V.; Braun, E. L.; Kimball, R. T. (2013). "Ratite nonmonophyly: Independent evidence from 40 novel Loci". Systematic Biology. 62 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys067. PMID 22831877.
  17. ^ Nudds, R. L.; Davidson, J. Slove (2010). "A shortening of the manus precedes the attenuation of other wing-bone elements in the evolution of flightlessness in birds". Acta Zoologica. 91: 115–122. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00391.x.
  18. ^ . Archived from the original on 2007-07-13. Retrieved 2007-08-27.
  19. ^ a b c d McNab, Brian K. (1994). "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist. 144 (4): 628–642. doi:10.1086/285697. JSTOR 2462941. S2CID 86511951.
  20. ^ a b Cubo, Jorge; Arthur, Wallace (2000). "Patterns of correlated character evolution in flightless birds: A phylogenetic approach". Evolutionary Ecology. 14 (8): 693–702. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.115.1294. doi:10.1023/A:1011695406277. S2CID 951896.
  21. ^ Elliott, Kyle H.; Ricklefs, Robert E.; Gaston, Anthony J.; Hatch, Scott A.; Speakman, John R.; Davoren, Gail K. (2013). "High flight costs, but low dive costs, in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (23): 9380–9384. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.9380E. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304838110. PMC 3677478. PMID 23690614.
  22. ^ McCall, Robert a.; Nee, Sean; Harvey, Paul H. (1998-07-01). "The role of wing length in the evolution of avian flightlessness". Evolutionary Ecology. 12 (5): 569–580. doi:10.1023/A:1006508826501. ISSN 1573-8477. S2CID 37855732.
  23. ^ Terrill, Ryan S. (2020-12-01). "Simultaneous Wing Molt as a Catalyst for the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist. 196 (6): 775–784. doi:10.1086/711416. ISSN 0003-0147. PMID 33211563. S2CID 225249314.
  24. ^ Roots, Clive (2006). Flightless Birds. Westport, CT: Greenwood. pp. 136–37. ISBN 9780313335457.
  25. ^ Handford, Paul; Mares, Michael A. (1985). "The mating systems of ratites and tinamous: An evolutionary perspective". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 25: 77–104. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00387.x.
  26. ^ "Moa forelimb structure and forelimb initiation gene network. A. The moa..." ResearchGate. Retrieved 2020-08-25.
  27. ^ Roots, Clive. Flightless Birds. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2006. 136-37. Print.
  28. ^ Diamond, Jared (1991). "A new species of rail from the Solomon Islands and convergent evolution of insular flightlessness" (PDF). The Auk. 108 (3): 461–470. doi:10.2307/4088088. JSTOR 4088088.
  29. ^ Hunter, Laurie A. (1988). "Status of the Endemic Atitlan Grebe of Guatemala: Is it Extinct?" (PDF). Condor. 90 (4): 906–912. doi:10.2307/1368847. JSTOR 1368847.

External links Edit

  • TerraNature pages on New Zealand flightless birds
  • in Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand

flightless, bird, flightless, redirects, here, record, label, flightless, record, label, birds, that, through, evolution, lost, ability, there, over, extant, species, including, well, known, ratites, ostriches, cassowaries, rheas, kiwi, penguins, smallest, fli. Flightless redirects here For the record label see Flightless record label Flightless birds are birds that through evolution lost the ability to fly 1 There are over 60 extant species 2 including the well known ratites ostriches emu cassowaries rheas and kiwi and penguins The smallest flightless bird is the Inaccessible Island rail length 12 5 cm weight 34 7 g The largest both heaviest and tallest flightless bird which is also the largest living bird in general is the ostrich 2 7 m 156 kg Penguins are a well known example of flightless birds An Okarito kiwi Apteryx rowi also known as the rowiOstriches are the largest extant flightless birds as well as the largest extant birds in general An extinct moa Until the arrival of humans New Zealand s only mammals were bats and seals resulting in many bird species evolving to fill the open niches While many of New Zealand s flightless birds are now extinct some such as the kiwi kakapō weka and takahe have survived to the present day Many domesticated birds such as the domestic chicken and domestic duck have lost the ability to fly for extended periods although their ancestral species the red junglefowl and mallard respectively are capable of extended flight A few particularly bred birds such as the Broad Breasted White turkey have become totally flightless as a result of selective breeding the birds were bred to grow massive breast meat that weighs too much for the bird s wings to support in flight Flightlessness has evolved in many different birds independently demonstrating repeated convergent evolution 3 There were families of flightless birds such as the now extinct Phorusrhacidae that evolved to be powerful terrestrial predators Taking this to a greater extreme the terror birds and their relatives the bathornithids eogruids geranoidids gastornithiforms and dromornithids all extinct all evolved similar body shapes long legs long necks and big heads but none of them were closely related Furthermore they also share traits of being giant flightless birds with vestigial wings long legs and long necks with some of the ratites although they are not related 4 5 Contents 1 History 1 1 Origins of flightlessness 1 1 1 Independent evolution of flightlessness in Palaeognathes 2 Morphological changes and energy conservation 2 1 Continued presence of wings in flightless birds 3 List of flightless birds 3 1 Palaeognathae ratites 3 1 1 Struthioniformes ostriches 3 1 2 Casuariiformes cassowaries and emus 3 1 3 Dinornithiformes moa 3 1 4 Aepyornithiformes elephant birds 3 1 5 Apterygiformes kiwis 3 1 6 Rheiformes rheas 3 2 Neognathae 3 2 1 Galliformes landfowl 3 2 2 Anseriformes waterfowl 3 2 3 Aegotheliformes owlet nightjars 3 2 4 Mesitornithiformes mesites 3 2 5 Columbiformes pigeons doves 3 2 6 Gruiformes cranes rails and coots 3 2 7 Podicipediformes grebes 3 2 8 Charadriiformes shorebirds and allies 3 2 9 Sphenisciformes penguins 3 2 10 Suliformes boobies cormorants and allies 3 2 11 Pelecaniformes pelicans herons ibises and allies 3 2 12 Strigiformes owls 3 2 13 Coraciiformes kingfishers and allies 3 2 14 Falconiformes falcons and caracaras 3 2 15 Psittaciformes parrots 3 2 16 Passeriformes perching birds 4 References 5 External linksHistory EditOrigins of flightlessness Edit Divergences and losses of flight within ratite lineage occurred right after the K Pg extinction event wiped out all non avian dinosaurs and large vertebrates 66 million years ago 6 The immediate evacuation of niches following the mass extinction provided opportunities for Palaeognathes to distribute and occupy novel environments New ecological influences selectively pressured different taxa to converge on flightless modes of existence by altering them morphologically and behaviorally The successful acquisition and protection of a claimed territory selected for large size and cursoriality in Tertiary ancestors of ratites 7 Temperate rainforests dried out throughout the Miocene and transformed into semiarid deserts causing habitats to be widely spread across the growingly disparate landmasses Cursoriality was an economic means of traveling long distances to acquire food that was usually low lying vegetation more easily accessed by walking 7 Traces of these events are reflected in ratite distribution throughout semiarid grasslands and deserts today 8 Gigantism and flightlessness in birds are almost exclusively correlated due to islands lacking mammalian or reptilian predators and competition 9 However ratites occupy environments that are mostly occupied by a diverse number of mammals 10 It is thought that they first originated through allopatric speciation caused by breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana 11 However later evidence suggests this hypothesis first proposed by Joel Cracraft in 1974 is incorrect 12 Rather ratites arrived in their respective locations via a flighted ancestor and lost the ability to fly multiple times within the lineage Gigantism is not a requirement for flightlessness The kiwi do not exhibit gigantism along with tinamous even though they coexisted with the moa and rheas that both exhibit gigantism This could be the result of different ancestral flighted birds arrival or because of competitive exclusion 11 The first flightless bird to arrive in each environment utilized the large flightless herbivore or omnivore niche forcing the later arrivals to remain smaller In environments where flightless birds are not present it is possible that after the K T Boundary there were no niches for them to fill They were pushed out by other herbivorous mammals 10 New Zealand had more species of flightless birds including the kiwi several species of penguins the takahe the weka the moa and several other extinct species than any other such location One reason is that until the arrival of humans roughly a thousand years ago there were no large land predators in New Zealand the main predators of flightless birds were larger birds 13 Independent evolution of flightlessness in Palaeognathes Edit Ratites belong to the superorder Palaeognathae which include the volant tinamou and are believed to have evolved flightlessness independently multiple times within their own group 4 6 7 10 Some birds evolved flightlessness in response to the absence of predators for example on oceanic islands Incongruences between ratite phylogeny and Gondwana geological history indicate the presence of ratites in their current locations is the result of a secondary invasion by flying birds 14 It remains possible that the most recent common ancestor of ratites was flightless and the tinamou regained the ability to fly 15 However it is believed that the loss of flight is an easier transition for birds than the loss and regain of flight which has never been documented in avian history 7 Moreover tinamou nesting within flightless ratites indicates ancestral ratites were volant and multiple losses of flight occurred independently throughout the lineage This indicates that the distinctive flightless nature of ratites is the result of convergent evolution 16 Morphological changes and energy conservation EditTwo key differences between flying and flightless birds are the smaller wing bones of flightless birds 17 and the absent or greatly reduced keel on their breastbone The keel anchors muscles needed for wing movement 18 Adapting to a cursorial lifestyle causes two inverse morphological changes to occur in the skeleto muscular system the pectoral apparatus used to power flight is paedorphically reduced while peramorphosis leads to enlargement of the pelvic girdle for running 11 Repeated selection for cursorial traits across ratites suggests these adaptions comprise a more efficient use of energy in adulthood 7 The name ratite comes from the Latin ratis raft a vessel with no keel Their flat sternum is distinct from the typical sternum of flighted birds because it lacks a keel like a raft This structure is the place where flight muscles attach and thus allow for powered flight 16 However ratite anatomy presents other primitive characters meant for flight such as the fusion of wing elements a cerebellar structure the presence of a pygostyle for tail feathers and an alula on the wing 12 These morphological traits suggest some affinities to volant groups Palaeognathes were one of the first colonizers of novel niches and were free to increase in abundance until the population was limited by food and territory A study looking at energy conservation and the evolution of flightlessness hypothesized intraspecific competition selected for a reduced individual energy expenditure which is achieved by the loss of flight 19 Some flightless varieties of island birds are closely related to flying varieties implying flight is a significant biological cost 19 Flight is the most costly type of locomotion exemplified in the natural world The energy expenditure required for flight increases proportionally with body size which is often why flightlessness coincides with body mass 8 By reducing large pectoral muscles that require a significant amount of overall metabolic energy ratites decrease their basal metabolic rate and conserve energy 19 20 A study looking at the basal rates of birds found a significant correlation between low basal rate and pectoral muscle mass in kiwis On the contrary flightless penguins exhibit an intermediate basal rate This is likely because penguins have well developed pectoral muscles for hunting and diving in the water 19 For ground feeding birds a cursorial lifestyle is more economical and allows for easier access to dietary requirements 7 Flying birds have different wing and feather structures that make flying easier while flightless birds wing structures are well adapted to their environment and activities such as diving in the ocean 21 Species with certain characteristics are more likely to evolve flightlessness For example species that already have shorter wings are more likely to lose flight ability 22 Additionally birds that undergo simultaneous wing molt in which they replace all of the feathers in their wings at once during the year are more likely to evolve flight loss 23 A number of bird species appear to be in the process of losing their powers of flight to various extents These include the Zapata rail of Cuba the Okinawa rail of Japan and the Laysan duck of Hawaii All of these birds show adaptations common to flightlessness and evolved recently from fully flighted ancestors but have not yet completely given up the ability to fly They are however weak fliers and are incapable of traveling long distances by air 24 Continued presence of wings in flightless birds Edit Although selection pressure for flight was largely absent the wing structure has not been lost except in the New Zealand moas 11 Ostriches are the fastest running birds in the world and emus have been documented running 50 km h 8 At these high speeds wings are necessary for balance and serving as a parachute apparatus to help the bird slow down Wings are hypothesized to have played a role in sexual selection in early ancestral ratites and were thus maintained This can be seen today in both the rheas and ostriches These ratites utilize their wings extensively for courtship and displays to other males 12 Sexual selection also influences the maintenance of large body size which discourages flight The large size of ratites leads to greater access to mates and higher reproductive success Ratites and tinamous are monogamous and mate only a limited number of times per year 25 High parental involvement denotes the necessity for choosing a reliable mate In a climatically stable habitat providing year round food supply a male s claimed territory signals to females the abundance of resources readily available to her and her offspring 20 Male size also indicates his protective abilities Similar to the emperor penguin male ratites incubate and protect their offspring anywhere between 85 and 92 days while females feed They can go up to a week without eating and survive only off fat stores The emu has been documented fasting for as long as 56 days 8 If no continued pressures warrant the energy expenditure to maintain the structures of flight selection will tend towards these other traits The only known species of flightless bird in which wings completely disappeared was the gigantic herbivorous moa of New Zealand hunted to extinction by humans by the 15th century In moa the entire pectoral girdle is reduced to a paired scapulocoracoid which is the size of a finger 26 List of flightless birds EditMany flightless birds are extinct this list shows species that are either still extant or became extinct in the Holocene no more than 11 000 years ago Extinct species are indicated with a cross A number of species suspected but not confirmed to be flightless are also included here Longer extinct groups of flightless birds include the Cretaceous patagopterygiformes hesperornithids the Cenozoic phorusrhacids terror birds and related bathornithids the unrelated eogruids geranoidids gastornithiforms and dromornithids mihirungs or demon ducks and the plotopterids Palaeognathae ratites Edit Struthioniformes ostriches Edit nbsp Common ostrich nbsp North Island brown kiwiCommon ostrich Struthio camelus North African ostrich Struthio camelus camelus South African ostrich Struthio camelus australis Masai ostrich Struthio camelus massaicus Arabian ostrich Struthio camelus syriacus Somali ostrich Struthio molybdophanes Asian ostrich Struthio asiaticus East Asian ostrich Struthio anderssoni Casuariiformes cassowaries and emus Edit Common emu Dromaius novaehollandiae Mainland emu Dromaius novaehollandiae novaehollandiae King Island emu Dromaius novaehollandiae minor Kangaroo Island emu Dromaius novaehollandiae baudinianus Tasmanian emu Dromaius novaehollandiae diemenensis Dwarf cassowary Casuarius bennetti Bennett s cassowary Casuarius bennetti bennetti Papuan dwarf cassowary Casuarius bennetti westermanni Southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius Northern cassowary Casuarius unappendiculatusDinornithiformes moa Edit North Island giant moa Dinornis novaezealandiae South Island giant moa Dinornis robustus Bush moa Anomalopteryx didiformis Eastern moa Emeus crassus Broad billed moa Euryapteryx curtus Heavy footed moa Pachyornis elephantopus Mantell s moa Pachyornis geranoides Crested moa Pachyornis australis Upland moa Megalapteryx didinus Aepyornithiformes elephant birds Edit Hildebrandt s elephant bird Aepyornis hildebrandti Giant elephant bird Aepyornis maximus Lesser elephant bird Mullerornis modestus Apterygiformes kiwis Edit Southern brown kiwi Apteryx australis Stewart Island tokoeka Apteryx australis lawryi Fiordland tokoeka Apteryx australis australis Great spotted kiwi Apteryx haastii North Island brown kiwi Apteryx mantelli Little spotted kiwi Apteryx owenii North Island little spotted kiwi Apteryx owenii iredalei South Island little spotted kiwi Apteryx owenii owenii Okarito kiwi Apteryx rowiRheiformes rheas Edit Greater rhea Rhea americana American rhea Rhea americana americana Intermediate rhea Rhea americana intermedia Argentine rhea Rhea americana albescens Paraguayan rhea Rhea americana nobilis Brodkorb s rhea Rhea americana araneipes Lesser rhea Rhea pennata Darwin s lesser rhea Rhea pennata pennata Garlepp s rhea Rhea pennata garleppi Puna Rhea Rhea pennata tarapacensisNeognathae Edit Galliformes landfowl Edit New Caledonian giant scrubfowl Sylviornis neocaledoniae Noble megapode Megavitornis altirostris Viti Levu scrubfowl Megapodius amissus Anseriformes waterfowl Edit Mihirung Genyornis newtoni nbsp Campbell tealAmsterdam wigeon Anas marecula Bermuda flightless duck Anas pachyscelus Auckland Island teal Anas aucklandica Campbell teal Anas nesiotis Eaton s pintail Anas eatoni Finsch s duck Chenonetta finschi Steamer ducks Fuegian steamer duck Tachyeres pteneres Falkland steamer duck Tachyeres brachypterus Chubut steamer duck Tachyeres leucocephalus Moa nalo Turtle jawed moa nalo Chelychelynechen quassus Small billed moa nalo Ptaiochen pau O ahu moa nalo Thambetochen xanion Maui Nui large billed moa nalo Thambetochen chauliodous Nene nui Branta hylobadistes possibly flightless or very weak flier Giant Hawaiʻi goose Branta rhuax California flightless sea duck or Law s diving goose Chendytes lawi Kaua i mole duck Talpanas lippa New Zealand geese Cnemiornis gracilis and C calcitrans Aegotheliformes owlet nightjars Edit New Zealand owlet nightjar Aegotheles novaezealandiae Mesitornithiformes mesites Edit Brown mesite Mesitornis unicolor possibly flightless has not been seen flying 27 Columbiformes pigeons doves Edit nbsp DodoDodo Raphus cucullatus Rodrigues solitaire Pezophaps solitaria Viti Levu giant pigeon Natunaornis gigoura Saint Helena dove Dysmoropelia dekarchiskos Henderson ground dove Gallicolumba leonpascoi Gruiformes cranes rails and coots Edit nbsp Weka nbsp Takahe strideCuban flightless crane Grus cubensis Red rail Aphanapteryx bonasia Rodrigues rail Erythromachus leguati Woodford s rail Nesoclopeus woodfordi most likely flightless Bar winged rail Nesoclopeus poecilopterus probably flightless Weka Gallirallus australis New Caledonian rail Gallirallus lafresnayanus likely Lord Howe woodhen Gallirallus sylvestris Calayan rail Gallirallus calayanensis Pink legged rail Gallirallus insignis Guam rail Gallirallus owstoni Roviana rail Gallirallus rovianae flightless or almost so 28 Tahiti rail Gallirallus pacificus Dieffenbach s rail Gallirallus dieffenbachii Wake Island rail Gallirallus wakensis numerous other unnamed Gallirallus rails from various Pacific islands Chatham rail Cabalus modestus Snoring rail Aramidopsis plateni Invisible rail Habroptila wallacii New Guinea flightless rail Megacrex inepta Aldabra white throated rail Dryolimnas cuvieri aldabranus Reunion rail Dryolimnas augusti Sauzier s wood rail or Cheke s wood rail Dryolimnas chekei Inaccessible Island rail Atlantisia rogersi Saint Helena rail Aphanocrex podarces Ascension crake Mundia elpenor Saint Helena crake Porzana astrictocarpus Laysan rail Porzana palmeri Hawaiian rail Porzana sandwichensis Small Maui crake Porzana keplerorum Liliput crake Porzana menehune Great Oʻahu crake Porzana ralphorum Great Maui crake Porzana severnsi Small Oʻahu crake Porzana ziegleri Kosrae crake Porzana monasa Henderson crake Porzana atra Mangaia crake Porzana rua Tahiti crake Porzana nigra numerous other unnamed Porzana crakes from various Pacific islands Lord Howe swamphen Porphyrio albus North Island takahe Porphyrio mantelli Takahe Porphyrio hochstetteri Samoan woodhen Gallinula pacifica Makira woodhen Gallinula silvestris Tristan moorhen Gallinula nesiotis Gough Island moorhen Gallinula comeri Tasmanian native hen Tribonyx mortierii Giant coot Fulica gigantea adults only immature birds can fly Hawkins rail Diaphorapteryx hawkinsi Snipe rail Capellirallus karamu Antillean cave rail Nesotrochis debooyi Hispaniolan cave rail Nesotrochis steganinos Cuban cave rail Nesotrochis picapicensis Adzebills Aptornis otidiformis and A defossor Podicipediformes grebes Edit nbsp Great auk Junin grebe Podiceps taczanowskii Titicaca grebe Rollandia microptera Atitlan grebe Podilymbus gigas reportedly flightless 29 Charadriiformes shorebirds and allies Edit Great auk Pinguinus impennis Sphenisciformes penguins Edit nbsp Emperor penguinEmperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri King penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae Chinstrap penguin Pygoscelis antarctica Gentoo penguin Pygoscelis papua Little blue penguin Eudyptula minor Magellanic penguin Spheniscus magellanicus Humboldt penguin Spheniscus humboldti Galapagos penguin Spheniscus mendiculus African penguin Spheniscus demersus Yellow eyed penguin Megadyptes antipodes Waitaha penguin Megadyptes waitaha Fiordland penguin Eudyptes pachyrhynchus Snares penguin Eudyptes robustus Erect crested penguin Eudyptes sclateri Northern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes moseleyi Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome Royal penguin Eudyptes schlegeli Macaroni penguin Eudyptes chrysolophus Chatham penguin Eudyptes warhami Suliformes boobies cormorants and allies Edit nbsp Flightless cormorantFlightless cormorant Nannopterum harrisiPelecaniformes pelicans herons ibises and allies Edit Ascension night heron Nycticorax olsoni Jamaican ibis Xenicibis xymphithecus Hawaiian flightless ibises Apteribis glenos and A brevis Strigiformes owls Edit Cuban giant owl Ornimegalonyx spp possibly flightless Cretan owl Athene cretensis possibly flightless Andros Island barn owl Tyto pollens possibly flightless Coraciiformes kingfishers and allies Edit Saint Helena hoopoe Upupa antaios Falconiformes falcons and caracaras Edit Jamaican caracara Caracara tellustris Psittaciformes parrots Edit nbsp KakapōKakapo Strigops habroptilusPasseriformes perching birds Edit Lyall s wren Xenicus lyalli Long billed wren Dendroscansor decurvirostris North Island stout legged wren Pachyplichas jagmi South Island stout legged wren Pachyplichas yaldwyni some Scytalopus tapaculos possibly flightless never seen flying Long legged bunting Emberiza alcoveri References Edit New Zealand Ecology Moa TerraNature Retrieved 2007 08 27 Roots C 2006 Flightless Birds Westport Greenwood Press pp XIV ISBN 978 0 313 33545 7 Sayol F Steinbauer M J Blackburn T M Antonelli A Faurby S 2020 Anthropogenic extinctions conceal widespread evolution of flightlessness in birds Science Advances 6 49 Bibcode 2020SciA 6 6095S doi 10 1126 sciadv abb6095 PMID 33268368 S2CID 227261010 a b Harshman J Braun E L Braun M J Huddleston C J Bowie R C Chojnowski J L Hackett S J Han K L Kimball R T Marks B D Miglia K J Moore W S Reddy S Sheldon F H Steadman D W Steppan S J Witt C C Yuri T 2 September 2008 Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 36 13462 13467 Bibcode 2008PNAS 10513462H doi 10 1073 pnas 0803242105 PMC 2533212 PMID 18765814 Holmes Bob 2008 06 26 Bird evolutionary tree given a shake by DNA study New Scientist a b Smith J V Braun E L Kimball R T 2013 Ratite nonmonophyly Independent evidence from 40 novel Loci Systematic Biology 62 1 35 49 doi 10 1093 sysbio sys067 PMID 22831877 a b c d e f Phillips M J Gibb G C Crimp E A Penny D 2010 Tinamous and moa flock together Mitochondrial genome sequence analysis reveals independent losses of flight among ratites Systematic Biology 59 1 90 107 doi 10 1093 sysbio syp079 PMID 20525622 a b c d Noble J C 1991 On ratites and their interactions with plants PDF Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 64 85 118 Flightlessness an overview ScienceDirect Topics a b c Mitchell K J Llamas B Soubrier J Rawlence N J Worthy T H Wood J Lee M S Cooper A 2014 Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution Science 344 6186 898 900 Bibcode 2014Sci 344 898M doi 10 1126 science 1251981 hdl 2328 35953 PMID 24855267 S2CID 206555952 a b c d Baker A J Haddrath O McPherson J D Cloutier A 2014 Genomic support for a moa tinamou clade and adaptive morphological convergence in flightless ratites Molecular Biology and Evolution 31 7 1686 96 doi 10 1093 molbev msu153 PMID 24825849 a b c Cracraft Joel 2008 Phylogeny and Evolution of the Ratite Birds Ibis 116 4 494 521 doi 10 1111 j 1474 919X 1974 tb07648 x New Zealand s Icon Flightless Archived from the original on 2007 08 18 Retrieved 2007 08 27 Haddrath O Baker A J 2012 Multiple nuclear genes and retroposons support vicariance and dispersal of the palaeognaths and an Early Cretaceous origin of modern birds Proceedings Biological Sciences 279 1747 4617 25 doi 10 1098 rspb 2012 1630 PMC 3479725 PMID 22977150 Harshman J Braun E L Braun M J Huddleston C J Bowie R C Chojnowski J L Hackett S J Han K L Kimball R T Marks B D Miglia K J Moore W S Reddy S Sheldon F H Steadman D W Steppan S J Witt C C Yuri T 2008 Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 36 13462 7 Bibcode 2008PNAS 10513462H doi 10 1073 pnas 0803242105 PMC 2533212 PMID 18765814 a b Smith J V Braun E L Kimball R T 2013 Ratite nonmonophyly Independent evidence from 40 novel Loci Systematic Biology 62 1 35 49 doi 10 1093 sysbio sys067 PMID 22831877 Nudds R L Davidson J Slove 2010 A shortening of the manus precedes the attenuation of other wing bone elements in the evolution of flightlessness in birds Acta Zoologica 91 115 122 doi 10 1111 j 1463 6395 2009 00391 x The Bird Site Flightless Birds Archived from the original on 2007 07 13 Retrieved 2007 08 27 a b c d McNab Brian K 1994 Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds The American Naturalist 144 4 628 642 doi 10 1086 285697 JSTOR 2462941 S2CID 86511951 a b Cubo Jorge Arthur Wallace 2000 Patterns of correlated character evolution in flightless birds A phylogenetic approach Evolutionary Ecology 14 8 693 702 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 115 1294 doi 10 1023 A 1011695406277 S2CID 951896 Elliott Kyle H Ricklefs Robert E Gaston Anthony J Hatch Scott A Speakman John R Davoren Gail K 2013 High flight costs but low dive costs in auks support the biomechanical hypothesis for flightlessness in penguins Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 23 9380 9384 Bibcode 2013PNAS 110 9380E doi 10 1073 pnas 1304838110 PMC 3677478 PMID 23690614 McCall Robert a Nee Sean Harvey Paul H 1998 07 01 The role of wing length in the evolution of avian flightlessness Evolutionary Ecology 12 5 569 580 doi 10 1023 A 1006508826501 ISSN 1573 8477 S2CID 37855732 Terrill Ryan S 2020 12 01 Simultaneous Wing Molt as a Catalyst for the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds The American Naturalist 196 6 775 784 doi 10 1086 711416 ISSN 0003 0147 PMID 33211563 S2CID 225249314 Roots Clive 2006 Flightless Birds Westport CT Greenwood pp 136 37 ISBN 9780313335457 Handford Paul Mares Michael A 1985 The mating systems of ratites and tinamous An evolutionary perspective Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 25 77 104 doi 10 1111 j 1095 8312 1985 tb00387 x Moa forelimb structure and forelimb initiation gene network A The moa ResearchGate Retrieved 2020 08 25 Roots Clive Flightless Birds Westport CT Greenwood 2006 136 37 Print Diamond Jared 1991 A new species of rail from the Solomon Islands and convergent evolution of insular flightlessness PDF The Auk 108 3 461 470 doi 10 2307 4088088 JSTOR 4088088 Hunter Laurie A 1988 Status of the Endemic Atitlan Grebe of Guatemala Is it Extinct PDF Condor 90 4 906 912 doi 10 2307 1368847 JSTOR 1368847 External links EditTerraNature pages on New Zealand flightless birds Kiwi in Te Ara the Encyclopedia of New Zealand Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Flightless bird amp oldid 1176254665, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.