fbpx
Wikipedia

Dravida Nadu

January 18, 2023

Dravida Nadu was also the name of a Tamil language publication started by C. N. Annadurai.

Dravida Nadu was the name of a proposed sovereign state demanded by the Justice Party led by the founder of the self-respect movement, E.V. Ramasamy Periyar, and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) led by C. N. Annadurai for the speakers of the Dravidian languages in South India.

Initially, the demand of Dravida Nadu proponents was limited to Tamil-speaking regions, but it was later expanded to include other Indian states with a majority of Dravidian-speakers (Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Kerala and Karnataka).[1] Some of the proponents also included parts of Ceylon (Sri Lanka),[2] Orissa and Maharashtra.[3] Other names for the proposed sovereign state included "South India", "Deccan Federation" and "Dakshinapath".[4][5]

The movement for Dravida Nadu was at its height from the 1940s to 1960s, but due to fears of Tamil hegemony, it failed to find any support outside Tamil Nadu. The States Reorganisation Act 1956, which created linguistic States, weakened the demand further.[6][7] In 1960, the DMK leaders decided to withdraw their demand for a Dravida Nadu from the party programme at a meeting held in the absence of Annadurai. In 1963, the Government of India led by Jawaharlal Nehru, declared secessionism as an illegal act. As a consequence, Annadurai abandoned the "claim" for Dravida Nadu – now geographically limited to modern Tamil Nadu – completely in 1963.

Background

 
Southern portion of the Madras Presidency in 1909

The concept of Dravida Nadu had its root in the anti-Brahminism movement in Tamil Nadu, whose aim was to end the Brahmin dominance in the Tamil society and government. The early demands of this movement were social equality, and greater power, and control.[8] However, over the time, it came to include a separatist movement, demanding a sovereign state for the Tamil people. The major political party backing this movement was the Justice Party, which came to power in the Madras Presidency in 1921.

Since the late 19th century, the anti-Brahmin Tamil leaders had stated that the non-Brahmin Tamils were the original inhabitants of the Tamil-speaking region.[9] The Brahmins, on the other hand, were described not only as oppressors, but even as a foreign power, on par with the British colonial rulers.[10]

The prominent Tamil leader, E. V. Ramasamy (popularly known as "Periyar") stated that the Tamil society was free of any societal divisions before the arrival of Brahmins, whom he described as "Aryan invaders". Ramasamy was an atheist, and considered the Indian nationalism as "an atavistic desire to endow the Hindu past on a more durable and contemporary basis".[11] Ramasamy notably remarked that upon seeing a Brahmin and a snake, he would encourage people to attack the Brahmin.[12]

The proponents of Dravida Nadu fabricated elaborate historical anthropologies to support their theory that the Dravidian-speaking areas once had a great non-Brahmin polity and civilisation, which had been destroyed by the Aryan conquest and Brahmin hegemony.[10] This led to an idealisation of the ancient Tamil society before its contact with the "Aryan race", and led to a surge in the Tamil nationalism.[9] Ramasamy expounded the Hindu epic Ramayana as a disguised historical account of how the Aryans subjugated the Tamils ruled by Ravana.[13] Some of the Dravidians also posed Saivism as an indigenous, even non-Hindu religion.

The Indian National Congress, a majority of whose leaders were Brahmins, came to be identified as a Brahmin party.[8] Ramasamy, who had joined Congress in 1919, became disillusioned with what he considered as the Brahminic leadership of the party.[9] The link between Brahmins and Congress became a target of the growing Tamil nationalism.

In 1925, E.V. Ramasamy launched the Self-respect movement, and by 1930, he was formulating the most radical "anti-Aryanism".[10] The rapport between the Justice Party and the Self-Respect movement of E.V. Ramasamy (who joined the party in 1935) strengthened the anti-Brahmin sentiment. In 1937–38, Hindi and Hindustani were introduced as new subjects in the schools, when C. Rajagopalachari of Congress became the Chief Minister of Madras Presidency. This led to widespread protests in the Tamil-speaking region, which had a strong independent linguistic identity. Ramasamy saw the Congress imposition of Hindi in government schools as further proof of an Aryan conspiracy.[11]

Characteristics and precursors

At the 14th Confederation of the Justice Party held in Madras in 1938, rules and regulations, or precursors of a Dravida Nadu were adopted. The objectives were defined as: to attain Purna Swaraj and complete control for Dravida Nadu in social, economic and industrial, and commercial fields; to liberate Dravida Nadu and Dravidians from exploitation and domination by aryan foreigners; to acquire for the citizens of Dravida Nadu without discrimination on account of caste and class and inequalities arising there from, in law and society, equal rights and equal opportunities; to remove from the Dravidian people the sense of difference and superstitious beliefs existing in the name of religion, customs, and traditions and unite them as a society of people with a liberal outlook and intellectual development, and to get proportionate representation in all fields till the achievement of these objectives and until the people who have a sense of caste, religious and class differences cooperate with the party in full confidence and goodwill.[14][15] Thus, Ramasamy also stated that "Self Respect should come before self-rule".[16]

The characteristics of the separate Dravida Nadu was described by E.V. Ramasamy as: the area then comprising Madras Presidency; passport system to enter the state; duty on goods from other provinces and entry with permit; demarcation of boundaries according to the needs and convenience of Dravida Nadu; and continuing an existing system of defence till grant of full independence. He also assured religious freedom to Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and others within this area.[17] On the same accord, the separation of religion and politics was a part of this leaving religion as a matter of individual belief. It was made clear that the political movement should not be used for religious propaganda.[18]

Justice Party

 
E.V.Ramasamy with Jinnah and Ambedkar. Mumbai, 6 January 1940

In December 1938, the Justice Party Convention passed a resolution stressing Tamil people's right to a separate sovereign state, under the direct control of the Secretary of State for India in London.[19]

In 1939, E.V.Ramasamy organised the Dravida Nadu Conference for the advocacy of a separate, sovereign and federal republic of Dravida Nadu.[20] In a speech on 17 December 1939, he raised the slogan "Dravida Nadu for Dravidians", which replaced the earlier slogan "Tamil Nadu for Tamils".[21] In 1940, the South Indian Liberal Federation (Justice Party) passed a resolution demanding a sovereign state of Dravida Nadu.[22]

E.V.Ramasamy was clear about the concept of a separate multi-linguistic nation, comprising Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam and Kannada areas, that is roughly corresponding to the then existing Madras Presidency with adjoining areas into a federation guaranteeing protection of minorities, including religious, linguistic, and cultural freedom of the people. The proposition was made with a view to safeguarding the national self-respect of Dravidians threatened by Indo-Aryan culture, language, political leadership, and business interests. A separatist conference was held in June 1940 at Kanchipuram when Ramasamy released the map of the proposed Dravida Nadu. With the promised grant of full self-government after World War II, and posed another threat to the Indian Freedom Movement However, it failed to get British approval. On the contrary, Ramasamy received sympathy and support from people such as Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar and Muhammad Ali Jinnah for his views on the Congress, and for his opposition to Hindi. They then decided to convene a movement to resist the Congress.[23][24] By the 1940s, E.V.Ramasamy supported Muslim League's claim for a separate Pakistan, and expected its support in return.[25] In an interview with the Governor of Madras, Jinnah, the main leader of Muslim League, said that India should be divided into four regions: Dravidistan, Hindustan, Bangalistan and Pakistan; Dravidistan would approximately consist of the area under the Madras Presidency.[26] Jinnah stated "I have every sympathy and shall do all to help, and you establish Dravidistan where the 7 per cent Muslim population will stretch its hands of friendship and live with you on lines of security, justice and fairplay."[27]

In July 1940, a secession committee was formed at the Dravida Nadu Secession Conference held in Kanchipuram. On 24 August 1940, the Tiruvarur Provincial Conference resolved that Dravida Nadu should be an independent state (thani-naadu).[28] The proponents of Dravida Nadu also sought to associate and amalgamate Tamil Islam within a supposedly more ancient Dravidian religion, which threatened the Islamic identity of Tamil Muslims, some of whom had earlier supported the demand for a sovereign Dravida Nadu movement.[29]

 
Dravida Nadu – Tamil magazine founded in 1942 by C. N. Annadurai

In August 1941, E.V. Ramasamy declared that the agitation for Dravida Nadu was being temporarily stopped. The reason cited was that it was necessary to help the government in its war efforts. The agitation would be renewed after the conclusion of the war. Even though the agitation for Dravida Nadu was being stopped, the demand was very much intact. When the Cripps Mission visited India, a delegation of the Justice Party, comprising E.V.Ramasamy, W. P. A. Soundarapandian Nadar, Samiappa Mudaliar and Muthiah Chettiar, met the members of the Cripps Mission on 30 March 1942, and placed before them the demand for a separate Dravidian nation.[30] The demand was rebuffed by Cripps, who told them that such a demand would be possible only through a resolution in the Madras legislature or through a general referendum.[31][32]

In August 1944, E.V. Ramasamy created a new party called Dravidar Kazhagam out of the Justice Party, at the Salem Provincial Conference. The creation of a separate non-Brahmin Dravidian nation was a central aim of the party.[11] In 1944, when E.V.Ramasamy met the Dalit leader B. R. Ambedkar to discuss join initiatives, Ambedkar stated that the idea of Dravidistan was applicable to entire India, since "Brahminism" was "a problem for the entire subcontinent".[11]

At the Dravidar Kazhagam State Conference in Tiruchi in the 1940s, prominent Tamil leader C. N. Annadurai stated that it was necessary to divide India racially to prevent "violent revolutions" in future, that according to him, had been prevented due to the British occupation of India.[33]

On 1 July 1947, the separatist Tamil leaders celebrated the "Dravida Nadu Secession Day".[28] On 13 July 1947, they passed a resolution in Tiruchirapalli demanding an independent Dravida Nadu. On 16 July, Mahatma Gandhi expressed his opposition to the demand.[34] Also in 1947, Jinnah refused to help E.V.Ramasamy to help create a Dravidastan.[35]

When India achieved Independence in August 1947, Ramasamy saw it as a sad event that marked the transfer of power to "Aryans", while Annadurai considered as a step towards an independent Dravida Nadu, and celebrated it. Over the time, disputes arose between the two leaders. They fell out after Ramasamy anointed his young wife as his successor to lead the party, superseding senior party leaders.

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam

 
Front page of the Dravida Nadu magazine dated 29 September 1946. It depicts Ramasamy E. V. Ramasamy and his speech in the court during the Anti-Hindi Agitations of 1937–40

In 1949, Annadurai and other leaders split up and established Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. Annadurai was initially more radical than Ramasamy in his demand for a separate Dravida Nadu.[36] In highlighting the demand for Dravida Nadu, the economics of exploitation by the Hindi-speaking, Aryan, Brahminical North was elaborated upon. It was contended that Dravida Nadu had been transformed into a virtual marketplace for north Indian products. And, thus, Annadurai explained that to change this situation, a separate Dravida Nadu must be demanded. Throughout the 1940s, E.V.Ramasamy spoke along the lines of a trifurcation of India, that is dividing the existing geographical region into Dravida Nadu, Muslim India (Pakistan), and Aryan Land (Hindustan). In public meetings that he addressed between March and June 1940, he projected the three-nation doctrine as the only solution which could end the political impasse in the country.[37]

In 1950, E.V.Ramasamy stated that Dravida Nadu, if it comes into being, will be a friendly and helpful state to India.[38] When the political power in Tamil Nadu shifted to the non-Brahmin K. Kamaraj in the 1950s, EVR's DK supported the Congress ministry.[39] In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Dravida Nadu proponents changed their demand for an independent Dravida Nadu to an independent Tamil Nadu, as they did not receive any support from the non-Tamil Dravidian-speaking states.[40] Ramasamy changed the banner in his magazine Viduthalai from "Dravida Nadu for Dravidians" to "Tamil Nadu for Tamils".

The reorganisation of the Indian states along linguistic lines through the States Reorganisation Act of 1956 weakened the separatist movement.[6][41] In June–July 1956, the founder of Kazhagam, E. V. Ramaswamy, declared that he had given up the goal of Dravidistan.[42]

However, by this time, DMK had taken over from DK as the main bearer of the separatist theme.[43] Unlike Khalistan and other separatist movements in Republic of India, DMK never considered violence as a serious option to achieve a separate Dravida Nadu.[10]

DMK's slogan of Dravida Nadu found no support in any state of India other than Tamil Nadu.[6][7] The non-Tamil Dravidian speakers perceived the ambitions of the Tamil politicians as hegemonic, ultimately leading to the failure of the Dravida Nadu concept.[44] C. Rajagopalachari, the former Chief Minister of Madras State and a Tamil Brahmin, stated that the DMK plea for Dravida Nadu should not be taken seriously.[45]

Decline

The decline in support for the Dravida Nadu within the DMK can be traced back to as early as the Tiruchi party conference in 1956, when the party decided to compete in the Tamil Nadu state assembly elections of 1957.[10] E.V.K. Sampath, who was leading a faction within DMK, argued that Dravida Nadu was "not feasible".[10] However, the party did state Dravida Nadu as a "long-range goal" during the elections.[46] The political observers doubted the seriousness of their demand for a sovereign state, and stated that the demand for a separate Dravida Nadu was just a side issue, and a slogan to catch the imagination of an emotional public.[10][47] In the 1957 elections, DMK managed to win only 15 of the 205 seats in the state assembly.[43]

In 1958, V. P. Raman, a Brahmin leader, joined the party and became a strong opponent of the Dravida Nadu concept. In November 1960, the DMK leaders, including Raman, decided to delete the demand of Dravida Nadu from the party programme at a meeting held in absence of Annadurai. Political scientist Sten Widmalm writes, "It seems that the more the party distanced itself from the demand for Dravida Nadu, the more it was supported."[10] In the 1962 election, DMK more than tripled its seats, winning 50 seats to the State Legislative Assembly, but still could not displace the Congress from power.

On 17 September 1960, a "Dravida Nadu Separation Day" was observed, which resulted in arrests of Annadurai and his associates.[48] The demand for a sovereign Tamil state was considered as a threat of Balkanization to India,[49] and also raised concerns among the Sinhalese politicians in Sri Lanka. In 1962, a Sinhalese M.P. stated in the Parliament: "The Sinhalese are the minority in Dravidistan. We are carrying on a struggle for our national existence against the Dravidistan majority."[50]

Annadurai, who had been elected to the upper house of Indian parliament (Rajya Sabha) in 1962, reiterated DMK's demand for independence for Dravida Nadu in his maiden speech on 1 May 1962. However, at the time of Sino-Indian War of 1962, he proclaimed that his party would stand up for the integrity and unity of India. A faction of DMK contended that the party should publicly abandon the demand for Dravida Nadu.[51]

In 1963, on the recommendation of the Committee on National Integration and Regionalism of the National Integration Council, the Indian parliament unanimously passed the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which sought to "prevent the fissiparous, secessionist tendency in the country engendered by regional and linguistic loyalties and to preserve the unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity" of India. This was essentially in response to the separatist movement demanding a sovereign Dravidistan.[39][52]

At a party conference in 1963, DMK formally dropped the secessionist demand,[53] but also asserted that it would continue to address the issues that led it to frame its demand for separation earlier.[54] The Sino-Indian war does not seem to be a decisive factor in dropping the demand for Dravida Nadu; prominent DMK leaders Era Sezhiyan and Murasoli Maran have stated that the demand for Dravida Nadu had been dropped in practice before 1962.[10] Maran explained that there was not really enough support for Dravida Nadu in Tamil Nadu at the time, and it was concluded that there was no use pursuing the demand.[10] He declared "I am Tamil first but I am also an Indian. Both can exist together provided there is space for cultural nationalism."[10] Era Sezhiyan declared that it was impossible to continue to demand Dravida Nadu when the policy lacked support even in the Tamil-speaking areas, let alone Kannada, Telugu and Malayalam-speaking areas.[10] Sezhiyan was a member of the committee that wrote the new party programme, which omitted the demand for Dravida Nadu. Sezhiyan stated that it was more practical to demand a higher degree of autonomy for Tamil Nadu instead.

After DMK decided to relinquish its demand for Dravida Nadu, it devoted more attention to the language issue (anti-Hindi agitations), and the 1962 election figures were almost exactly reversed in the subsequent 1967 elections.[10] In 1962, the Congress had won the majority of seats, while DMK managed to win only 50 seats. In 1967, DMK won a clear majority of 138 seats, while Congress won only 50 seats. DMK came to power with Annadurai as the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.

Resurgence

In the 1980s, a minor militant organisation called Tamil Nadu Liberation Army revived the demand for Dravida Nadu, when the Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) was sent to Sri Lanka.

In 2017, when the Indian Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change issued a notification banning the sale of cattle for slaughter, Twitter users from the Kerala state (where beef dishes are popular) protested by trending the hashtag #DravidaNadu. The hashtag also received support from Twitter users in Tamil Nadu.[55] The major national political parties refused to support secessionist sentiments.[56] Several heads of South Indian states and politicians expressed dismay over the Union Government's arrangements of tax revenue distribution to various states.[57][58] Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader and current Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin expressed his support for a sovereign Dravida Nadu state, should all the other South Indian states ever share the same notion.[59]

References

  1. ^ Taylor, Richard Warren (1982). Religion and Society: The First Twenty-five Years, 1953–1978. Christian Literature Society (for the Christian Institute for the Study of Religion and Society, Bangalore). p. 242. OCLC 9007066.
  2. ^ Welch, Claude Emerson (1967). Political Modernization: A Reader in Comparative Political Change. Wadsworth Pub. Co. p. 173. OCLC 941238.
  3. ^ James H. Mills, Satadru Sen, ed. (2004). Confronting the Body: The Politics of Physicality in Colonial and Post-Colonial India. Anthem Press. p. 145. ISBN 978-1-84331-032-7.
  4. ^ Afzal, M. Rafique (1979). The Case for Pakistan. Islamabad: National Commission on Historical and Cultural Research. xxv. OCLC 8165052.
  5. ^ Tirtha, Ranjit (1980). Society and Development in Contemporary India: Geographical Perspectives. Harlo. p. 161. ISBN 0-8187-0040-8. OCLC 6930110.
  6. ^ a b c Thapar, Romesh (1978). Change and Conflict in India. Macmillan. p. 75. ISBN 0-8364-0222-7.
  7. ^ a b Rao, C Rajeswara (1973). Defeat Separatist Conspiracy in Andhra. Communist Party of India. p. 28. OCLC 814926.
  8. ^ a b Amoretti, Ugo M.; Nancy Bermeo (2004). Federalism and Territorial Cleavages. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 286. ISBN 978-0-8018-7408-6.
  9. ^ a b c Omvedt, Gail (2006). Dalit Visions: The Anti-caste Movement and the Construction on an Indian Identity. Orient Longman. pp. 54–55. ISBN 81-250-2895-1.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Widmalm, Sten (2002). Kashmir in Comparative Perspective: Democracy and Violent Separatism in India. Routledge. pp. 101–107. ISBN 978-0-7007-1578-7.
  11. ^ a b c d Dirks, Nicholas B. (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press. p. 263. ISBN 978-0-691-08895-2.
  12. ^ Pandian, Jacob (1987). Caste, nationalism, and ethnicity : an interpretation of Tamil cultural history and social order. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. ISBN 0-86132-136-7. OCLC 17899446.
  13. ^ Paula, Richman (1991). "E. V. Ramasami's Reading of the Ramayana". Many Ramayanas: The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia. University of California Press. pp. 175–188. ISBN 978-0-520-07589-4.
  14. ^ Arooran, K. Nambi (1980). "Tamil Renaissance and Dravidian Nationalism – The Demand for Dravida Nadu". TamilNation.org. Retrieved 20 December 2008.[dead link]
  15. ^ Saraswathi. Towards Self-Respect, p. 87.
  16. ^ Diehl, E.V. Ramasamy Naiker-Periyar, p. 27.
  17. ^ Saraswathi. Towards Self-Respect, p. 93.
  18. ^ Saraswathi. Towards Self-Respect, p. 98.
  19. ^ More, J B P (1997). The Political Evolution of Muslims in Tamilnadu and Madras, 1930–1947. Orient Longman. p. 163. ISBN 978-81-250-1011-1. OCLC 37770527.
  20. ^ Gopal, Balakrishnan Raja; Teralundur Venkatarama Mahalingam; Harogadde Manappa Nayaka (1990). South Indian Studies. Geetha Book House. p. 177. OCLC 24325282.
  21. ^ Kannan, R (2010). Anna: The Life and Times of C. N. Annadurai. Penguin Books. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-670-08328-2.
  22. ^ Patwardhan, Achyut; Asoka Mehta (1942). The Communal Triangle in India. Allahabad: Kitabistan. p. 172. OCLC 4449727.
  23. ^ Saraswathi. Towards Self-Respect, pp. 89 & 90.
  24. ^ Dirks, Nicholas B. (2001). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press. p. 263. ISBN 0691088950.
  25. ^ Ram, Mohan (1968). Hindi Against India: The Meaning of DMK. Rachna Prakashan. pp. 79–80. OCLC 35586.
  26. ^ Menon, V. P. (1998). Transfer of Power in India. Orient Longman. p. 106. ISBN 81-250-0884-5.
  27. ^ Jinnah, Muhammad Ali (1993). "A Time-Bound Plan for Muslim India". In J. C. Johari (ed.). Voices of Indian Freedom Movement. Anmol Publications. p. 198. ISBN 81-7158-225-7.
  28. ^ a b Rajagopalan, Swarna (2001). State and Nation in South Asia. Lynne Rienner. p. 139. ISBN 978-1-55587-967-9.
  29. ^ More, J B P (2004). Muslim Identity, Print Culture, and the Dravidian Factor in Tamil Nadu. Orient Longman. pp. 166–170. OCLC 59991703.
  30. ^ Chatterjee, Up Against Caste: Comparative study of Ambedkar and Periyar, p. 43.
  31. ^ Kannan 2010, pp. 60
  32. ^ Chatterjee, Debi (2004). Up against caste: comparative study of Ambedkar and Periyar. Rawat Publications. p. 43. ISBN 978-81-7033-860-4.
  33. ^ "C.N.Annadurai". 28 August 2007. Retrieved 5 September 2007.[dead link]
  34. ^ "The 60 days to Aug 15, 1947". Indo-Asian News Service. 15 August 2007. Retrieved 5 September 2007.[dead link]
  35. ^ C. Wijeyawickrema. "War and Peace in Sri Lanka: the other battle – Part I: South Indian backyard". Retrieved 5 September 2007.
  36. ^ Jaffrelot, Christophe (2003). India's silent revolution: the rise of the low castes in North Indian politics. C. Hurst & Co. p. 244. ISBN 1-85065-398-4.
  37. ^ Chatterjee, Debi, [January 1981](2004) Up Against Caste: Comparative study of Ambedkar and Periyar. Rawat Publications: Chennai, p. 42.
  38. ^ E. V. Ramaswami. Republic Supplement, 26 January 1950. Quoted in "Reconstruction of society". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 15 August 2007. Retrieved 5 September 2007.[dead link]
  39. ^ a b Kothari, Rajni (1994). Politics in India. Orient Longman. pp. 333–343. ISBN 81-250-0072-0.
  40. ^ Ghurye, Govind Sadashiv (1961). Caste, Class, and Occupation. Popular Book Depot. p. 318. OCLC 175030.
  41. ^ Danspeckgruber, Wolfgang F (2002). The Self-Determination of Peoples: Community, Nation, and State in an Interdependent World. Lynne Rienner Publishers. p. 300. ISBN 1-55587-793-1.
  42. ^ Srinivas, Mysore Narasimhachar (1962). Caste in Modern India, and other essays. Asia Publishing House. p. 31. OCLC 5206379.
  43. ^ a b Manor, James (2001). "Center-state relations". In Atul Kohli (ed.). The Success of India's Democracy. Cambridge University Press. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-521-80530-8.
  44. ^ Stein, Burton (1998). A History of India. Blackwell Publishing. p. 402. ISBN 0-631-20546-2.
  45. ^ Erdman, Howard Loyd (1967). The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism. Cambridge University Press. p. 216. OCLC 301813.
  46. ^ Ghurye, G. S. (1976). S Devadas Pillai (ed.). Aspects of changing India : studies in honour of Prof. G. S. Ghurye. Popular Prakashan. p. 108. ISBN 81-7154-157-7. OCLC 4497385.
  47. ^ Pande, Ram (1985). Congress 100 Years. Jaipur Pub. House. p. 253. OCLC 12978554.
  48. ^ Bhaskaran, Ramaswami (1967). Sociology of Politics: Tradition and Politics in India. Asia Pub. House. p. 48. OCLC 342442.
  49. ^ Iyengar, K R Srinivasa (1970). Two cheers for the Commonwealth; talks on literature and education. Asia Publishing House. p. 65. ISBN 978-0-210-22307-9. OCLC 95129.
  50. ^ Sri Lanka, House of Representatives, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), vol. 48, col. 1313, 3 September 1962. Quoted in Bookman, Milica Zarkovic (1997). The Demographic Struggle for Power. Routledge. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-7146-4732-6.
  51. ^ Barnett, Marguerite Ross (1975). Electoral Politics in the Indian States: Party Systems and Cleavages. Manohar Book Service. p. 85. OCLC 2197571.
  52. ^ Connor, Walker (1993). Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton University Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-691-02563-6.
  53. ^ Ramachandra Guha (16 January 2005). . The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 25 February 2005. Retrieved 5 September 2007.
  54. ^ Sharma, Phool Kumar (1972). India, Pakistan, China, and the Contemporary World. National. p. 51. OCLC 693687.
  55. ^ Twitterati in Kerala rakes up #DravidaNadu over 'beef ban'
  56. ^ South India’s mini rebellion over Modi’s new cattle law kindles an old secessionist spark
  57. ^ Sharma, Mihir (24 April 2018). "For rich South India, the rest of the country is a tax burden". ThePrint. Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  58. ^ T. S. Sudhir (14 March 2018). "South India's politicos echoing public anger with leadership in north, conciliatory leadership needed at Centre". Firstpost.
  59. ^ Mathi (16 March 2018). "தென்மாநிலங்கள் முன்வைக்கும் திராவிட நாடு கோரிக்கைக்கு ஆதரவு: ஸ்டாலின்" [DMK Working President MK Stalin said that his party will support "Dravida Nadu"]. OneIndia Tamil (in Tamil).

External links

January 18, 2023
dravida, nadu, also, name, tamil, language, publication, started, annadurai, name, proposed, sovereign, state, demanded, justice, party, founder, self, respect, movement, ramasamy, periyar, dravida, munnetra, kazhagam, annadurai, speakers, dravidian, languages. Dravida Nadu was also the name of a Tamil language publication started by C N Annadurai Dravida Nadu was the name of a proposed sovereign state demanded by the Justice Party led by the founder of the self respect movement E V Ramasamy Periyar and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam DMK led by C N Annadurai for the speakers of the Dravidian languages in South India Initially the demand of Dravida Nadu proponents was limited to Tamil speaking regions but it was later expanded to include other Indian states with a majority of Dravidian speakers Andhra Pradesh Telangana Kerala and Karnataka 1 Some of the proponents also included parts of Ceylon Sri Lanka 2 Orissa and Maharashtra 3 Other names for the proposed sovereign state included South India Deccan Federation and Dakshinapath 4 5 The movement for Dravida Nadu was at its height from the 1940s to 1960s but due to fears of Tamil hegemony it failed to find any support outside Tamil Nadu The States Reorganisation Act 1956 which created linguistic States weakened the demand further 6 7 In 1960 the DMK leaders decided to withdraw their demand for a Dravida Nadu from the party programme at a meeting held in the absence of Annadurai In 1963 the Government of India led by Jawaharlal Nehru declared secessionism as an illegal act As a consequence Annadurai abandoned the claim for Dravida Nadu now geographically limited to modern Tamil Nadu completely in 1963 Contents 1 Background 1 1 Characteristics and precursors 2 Justice Party 3 Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam 4 Decline 5 Resurgence 6 References 7 External linksBackground Edit Southern portion of the Madras Presidency in 1909 The concept of Dravida Nadu had its root in the anti Brahminism movement in Tamil Nadu whose aim was to end the Brahmin dominance in the Tamil society and government The early demands of this movement were social equality and greater power and control 8 However over the time it came to include a separatist movement demanding a sovereign state for the Tamil people The major political party backing this movement was the Justice Party which came to power in the Madras Presidency in 1921 Since the late 19th century the anti Brahmin Tamil leaders had stated that the non Brahmin Tamils were the original inhabitants of the Tamil speaking region 9 The Brahmins on the other hand were described not only as oppressors but even as a foreign power on par with the British colonial rulers 10 The prominent Tamil leader E V Ramasamy popularly known as Periyar stated that the Tamil society was free of any societal divisions before the arrival of Brahmins whom he described as Aryan invaders Ramasamy was an atheist and considered the Indian nationalism as an atavistic desire to endow the Hindu past on a more durable and contemporary basis 11 Ramasamy notably remarked that upon seeing a Brahmin and a snake he would encourage people to attack the Brahmin 12 The proponents of Dravida Nadu fabricated elaborate historical anthropologies to support their theory that the Dravidian speaking areas once had a great non Brahmin polity and civilisation which had been destroyed by the Aryan conquest and Brahmin hegemony 10 This led to an idealisation of the ancient Tamil society before its contact with the Aryan race and led to a surge in the Tamil nationalism 9 Ramasamy expounded the Hindu epic Ramayana as a disguised historical account of how the Aryans subjugated the Tamils ruled by Ravana 13 Some of the Dravidians also posed Saivism as an indigenous even non Hindu religion The Indian National Congress a majority of whose leaders were Brahmins came to be identified as a Brahmin party 8 Ramasamy who had joined Congress in 1919 became disillusioned with what he considered as the Brahminic leadership of the party 9 The link between Brahmins and Congress became a target of the growing Tamil nationalism In 1925 E V Ramasamy launched the Self respect movement and by 1930 he was formulating the most radical anti Aryanism 10 The rapport between the Justice Party and the Self Respect movement of E V Ramasamy who joined the party in 1935 strengthened the anti Brahmin sentiment In 1937 38 Hindi and Hindustani were introduced as new subjects in the schools when C Rajagopalachari of Congress became the Chief Minister of Madras Presidency This led to widespread protests in the Tamil speaking region which had a strong independent linguistic identity Ramasamy saw the Congress imposition of Hindi in government schools as further proof of an Aryan conspiracy 11 Characteristics and precursors Edit At the 14th Confederation of the Justice Party held in Madras in 1938 rules and regulations or precursors of a Dravida Nadu were adopted The objectives were defined as to attain Purna Swaraj and complete control for Dravida Nadu in social economic and industrial and commercial fields to liberate Dravida Nadu and Dravidians from exploitation and domination by aryan foreigners to acquire for the citizens of Dravida Nadu without discrimination on account of caste and class and inequalities arising there from in law and society equal rights and equal opportunities to remove from the Dravidian people the sense of difference and superstitious beliefs existing in the name of religion customs and traditions and unite them as a society of people with a liberal outlook and intellectual development and to get proportionate representation in all fields till the achievement of these objectives and until the people who have a sense of caste religious and class differences cooperate with the party in full confidence and goodwill 14 15 Thus Ramasamy also stated that Self Respect should come before self rule 16 The characteristics of the separate Dravida Nadu was described by E V Ramasamy as the area then comprising Madras Presidency passport system to enter the state duty on goods from other provinces and entry with permit demarcation of boundaries according to the needs and convenience of Dravida Nadu and continuing an existing system of defence till grant of full independence He also assured religious freedom to Muslims Christians Buddhists and others within this area 17 On the same accord the separation of religion and politics was a part of this leaving religion as a matter of individual belief It was made clear that the political movement should not be used for religious propaganda 18 Justice Party Edit E V Ramasamy with Jinnah and Ambedkar Mumbai 6 January 1940 In December 1938 the Justice Party Convention passed a resolution stressing Tamil people s right to a separate sovereign state under the direct control of the Secretary of State for India in London 19 In 1939 E V Ramasamy organised the Dravida Nadu Conference for the advocacy of a separate sovereign and federal republic of Dravida Nadu 20 In a speech on 17 December 1939 he raised the slogan Dravida Nadu for Dravidians which replaced the earlier slogan Tamil Nadu for Tamils 21 In 1940 the South Indian Liberal Federation Justice Party passed a resolution demanding a sovereign state of Dravida Nadu 22 E V Ramasamy was clear about the concept of a separate multi linguistic nation comprising Tamil Telugu Malayalam and Kannada areas that is roughly corresponding to the then existing Madras Presidency with adjoining areas into a federation guaranteeing protection of minorities including religious linguistic and cultural freedom of the people The proposition was made with a view to safeguarding the national self respect of Dravidians threatened by Indo Aryan culture language political leadership and business interests A separatist conference was held in June 1940 at Kanchipuram when Ramasamy released the map of the proposed Dravida Nadu With the promised grant of full self government after World War II and posed another threat to the Indian Freedom Movement However it failed to get British approval On the contrary Ramasamy received sympathy and support from people such as Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar and Muhammad Ali Jinnah for his views on the Congress and for his opposition to Hindi They then decided to convene a movement to resist the Congress 23 24 By the 1940s E V Ramasamy supported Muslim League s claim for a separate Pakistan and expected its support in return 25 In an interview with the Governor of Madras Jinnah the main leader of Muslim League said that India should be divided into four regions Dravidistan Hindustan Bangalistan and Pakistan Dravidistan would approximately consist of the area under the Madras Presidency 26 Jinnah stated I have every sympathy and shall do all to help and you establish Dravidistan where the 7 per cent Muslim population will stretch its hands of friendship and live with you on lines of security justice and fairplay 27 In July 1940 a secession committee was formed at the Dravida Nadu Secession Conference held in Kanchipuram On 24 August 1940 the Tiruvarur Provincial Conference resolved that Dravida Nadu should be an independent state thani naadu 28 The proponents of Dravida Nadu also sought to associate and amalgamate Tamil Islam within a supposedly more ancient Dravidian religion which threatened the Islamic identity of Tamil Muslims some of whom had earlier supported the demand for a sovereign Dravida Nadu movement 29 Dravida Nadu Tamil magazine founded in 1942 by C N Annadurai In August 1941 E V Ramasamy declared that the agitation for Dravida Nadu was being temporarily stopped The reason cited was that it was necessary to help the government in its war efforts The agitation would be renewed after the conclusion of the war Even though the agitation for Dravida Nadu was being stopped the demand was very much intact When the Cripps Mission visited India a delegation of the Justice Party comprising E V Ramasamy W P A Soundarapandian Nadar Samiappa Mudaliar and Muthiah Chettiar met the members of the Cripps Mission on 30 March 1942 and placed before them the demand for a separate Dravidian nation 30 The demand was rebuffed by Cripps who told them that such a demand would be possible only through a resolution in the Madras legislature or through a general referendum 31 32 In August 1944 E V Ramasamy created a new party called Dravidar Kazhagam out of the Justice Party at the Salem Provincial Conference The creation of a separate non Brahmin Dravidian nation was a central aim of the party 11 In 1944 when E V Ramasamy met the Dalit leader B R Ambedkar to discuss join initiatives Ambedkar stated that the idea of Dravidistan was applicable to entire India since Brahminism was a problem for the entire subcontinent 11 At the Dravidar Kazhagam State Conference in Tiruchi in the 1940s prominent Tamil leader C N Annadurai stated that it was necessary to divide India racially to prevent violent revolutions in future that according to him had been prevented due to the British occupation of India 33 On 1 July 1947 the separatist Tamil leaders celebrated the Dravida Nadu Secession Day 28 On 13 July 1947 they passed a resolution in Tiruchirapalli demanding an independent Dravida Nadu On 16 July Mahatma Gandhi expressed his opposition to the demand 34 Also in 1947 Jinnah refused to help E V Ramasamy to help create a Dravidastan 35 When India achieved Independence in August 1947 Ramasamy saw it as a sad event that marked the transfer of power to Aryans while Annadurai considered as a step towards an independent Dravida Nadu and celebrated it Over the time disputes arose between the two leaders They fell out after Ramasamy anointed his young wife as his successor to lead the party superseding senior party leaders Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Edit Front page of the Dravida Nadu magazine dated 29 September 1946 It depicts Ramasamy E V Ramasamy and his speech in the court during the Anti Hindi Agitations of 1937 40 In 1949 Annadurai and other leaders split up and established Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Annadurai was initially more radical than Ramasamy in his demand for a separate Dravida Nadu 36 In highlighting the demand for Dravida Nadu the economics of exploitation by the Hindi speaking Aryan Brahminical North was elaborated upon It was contended that Dravida Nadu had been transformed into a virtual marketplace for north Indian products And thus Annadurai explained that to change this situation a separate Dravida Nadu must be demanded Throughout the 1940s E V Ramasamy spoke along the lines of a trifurcation of India that is dividing the existing geographical region into Dravida Nadu Muslim India Pakistan and Aryan Land Hindustan In public meetings that he addressed between March and June 1940 he projected the three nation doctrine as the only solution which could end the political impasse in the country 37 In 1950 E V Ramasamy stated that Dravida Nadu if it comes into being will be a friendly and helpful state to India 38 When the political power in Tamil Nadu shifted to the non Brahmin K Kamaraj in the 1950s EVR s DK supported the Congress ministry 39 In the late 1950s and early 1960s the Dravida Nadu proponents changed their demand for an independent Dravida Nadu to an independent Tamil Nadu as they did not receive any support from the non Tamil Dravidian speaking states 40 Ramasamy changed the banner in his magazine Viduthalai from Dravida Nadu for Dravidians to Tamil Nadu for Tamils The reorganisation of the Indian states along linguistic lines through the States Reorganisation Act of 1956 weakened the separatist movement 6 41 In June July 1956 the founder of Kazhagam E V Ramaswamy declared that he had given up the goal of Dravidistan 42 However by this time DMK had taken over from DK as the main bearer of the separatist theme 43 Unlike Khalistan and other separatist movements in Republic of India DMK never considered violence as a serious option to achieve a separate Dravida Nadu 10 DMK s slogan of Dravida Nadu found no support in any state of India other than Tamil Nadu 6 7 The non Tamil Dravidian speakers perceived the ambitions of the Tamil politicians as hegemonic ultimately leading to the failure of the Dravida Nadu concept 44 C Rajagopalachari the former Chief Minister of Madras State and a Tamil Brahmin stated that the DMK plea for Dravida Nadu should not be taken seriously 45 Decline Edit DMK leaders K A Mathialagan V P Raman C N Annadurai and M Karunanidhi with Rajaji The decline in support for the Dravida Nadu within the DMK can be traced back to as early as the Tiruchi party conference in 1956 when the party decided to compete in the Tamil Nadu state assembly elections of 1957 10 E V K Sampath who was leading a faction within DMK argued that Dravida Nadu was not feasible 10 However the party did state Dravida Nadu as a long range goal during the elections 46 The political observers doubted the seriousness of their demand for a sovereign state and stated that the demand for a separate Dravida Nadu was just a side issue and a slogan to catch the imagination of an emotional public 10 47 In the 1957 elections DMK managed to win only 15 of the 205 seats in the state assembly 43 In 1958 V P Raman a Brahmin leader joined the party and became a strong opponent of the Dravida Nadu concept In November 1960 the DMK leaders including Raman decided to delete the demand of Dravida Nadu from the party programme at a meeting held in absence of Annadurai Political scientist Sten Widmalm writes It seems that the more the party distanced itself from the demand for Dravida Nadu the more it was supported 10 In the 1962 election DMK more than tripled its seats winning 50 seats to the State Legislative Assembly but still could not displace the Congress from power On 17 September 1960 a Dravida Nadu Separation Day was observed which resulted in arrests of Annadurai and his associates 48 The demand for a sovereign Tamil state was considered as a threat of Balkanization to India 49 and also raised concerns among the Sinhalese politicians in Sri Lanka In 1962 a Sinhalese M P stated in the Parliament The Sinhalese are the minority in Dravidistan We are carrying on a struggle for our national existence against the Dravidistan majority 50 Annadurai who had been elected to the upper house of Indian parliament Rajya Sabha in 1962 reiterated DMK s demand for independence for Dravida Nadu in his maiden speech on 1 May 1962 However at the time of Sino Indian War of 1962 he proclaimed that his party would stand up for the integrity and unity of India A faction of DMK contended that the party should publicly abandon the demand for Dravida Nadu 51 In 1963 on the recommendation of the Committee on National Integration and Regionalism of the National Integration Council the Indian parliament unanimously passed the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution which sought to prevent the fissiparous secessionist tendency in the country engendered by regional and linguistic loyalties and to preserve the unity sovereignty and territorial integrity of India This was essentially in response to the separatist movement demanding a sovereign Dravidistan 39 52 At a party conference in 1963 DMK formally dropped the secessionist demand 53 but also asserted that it would continue to address the issues that led it to frame its demand for separation earlier 54 The Sino Indian war does not seem to be a decisive factor in dropping the demand for Dravida Nadu prominent DMK leaders Era Sezhiyan and Murasoli Maran have stated that the demand for Dravida Nadu had been dropped in practice before 1962 10 Maran explained that there was not really enough support for Dravida Nadu in Tamil Nadu at the time and it was concluded that there was no use pursuing the demand 10 He declared I am Tamil first but I am also an Indian Both can exist together provided there is space for cultural nationalism 10 Era Sezhiyan declared that it was impossible to continue to demand Dravida Nadu when the policy lacked support even in the Tamil speaking areas let alone Kannada Telugu and Malayalam speaking areas 10 Sezhiyan was a member of the committee that wrote the new party programme which omitted the demand for Dravida Nadu Sezhiyan stated that it was more practical to demand a higher degree of autonomy for Tamil Nadu instead After DMK decided to relinquish its demand for Dravida Nadu it devoted more attention to the language issue anti Hindi agitations and the 1962 election figures were almost exactly reversed in the subsequent 1967 elections 10 In 1962 the Congress had won the majority of seats while DMK managed to win only 50 seats In 1967 DMK won a clear majority of 138 seats while Congress won only 50 seats DMK came to power with Annadurai as the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Resurgence EditIn the 1980s a minor militant organisation called Tamil Nadu Liberation Army revived the demand for Dravida Nadu when the Indian Peacekeeping Force IPKF was sent to Sri Lanka In 2017 when the Indian Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change issued a notification banning the sale of cattle for slaughter Twitter users from the Kerala state where beef dishes are popular protested by trending the hashtag DravidaNadu The hashtag also received support from Twitter users in Tamil Nadu 55 The major national political parties refused to support secessionist sentiments 56 Several heads of South Indian states and politicians expressed dismay over the Union Government s arrangements of tax revenue distribution to various states 57 58 Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader and current Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin expressed his support for a sovereign Dravida Nadu state should all the other South Indian states ever share the same notion 59 References Edit Taylor Richard Warren 1982 Religion and Society The First Twenty five Years 1953 1978 Christian Literature Society for the Christian Institute for the Study of Religion and Society Bangalore p 242 OCLC 9007066 Welch Claude Emerson 1967 Political Modernization A Reader in Comparative Political Change Wadsworth Pub Co p 173 OCLC 941238 James H Mills Satadru Sen ed 2004 Confronting the Body The Politics of Physicality in Colonial and Post Colonial India Anthem Press p 145 ISBN 978 1 84331 032 7 Afzal M Rafique 1979 The Case for Pakistan Islamabad National Commission on Historical and Cultural Research xxv OCLC 8165052 Tirtha Ranjit 1980 Society and Development in Contemporary India Geographical Perspectives Harlo p 161 ISBN 0 8187 0040 8 OCLC 6930110 a b c Thapar Romesh 1978 Change and Conflict in India Macmillan p 75 ISBN 0 8364 0222 7 a b Rao C Rajeswara 1973 Defeat Separatist Conspiracy in Andhra Communist Party of India p 28 OCLC 814926 a b Amoretti Ugo M Nancy Bermeo 2004 Federalism and Territorial Cleavages Johns Hopkins University Press p 286 ISBN 978 0 8018 7408 6 a b c Omvedt Gail 2006 Dalit Visions The Anti caste Movement and the Construction on an Indian Identity Orient Longman pp 54 55 ISBN 81 250 2895 1 a b c d e f g h i j k l m Widmalm Sten 2002 Kashmir in Comparative Perspective Democracy and Violent Separatism in India Routledge pp 101 107 ISBN 978 0 7007 1578 7 a b c d Dirks Nicholas B 2001 Castes of Mind Colonialism and the Making of Modern India Princeton University Press p 263 ISBN 978 0 691 08895 2 Pandian Jacob 1987 Caste nationalism and ethnicity an interpretation of Tamil cultural history and social order Bombay Popular Prakashan ISBN 0 86132 136 7 OCLC 17899446 Paula Richman 1991 E V Ramasami s Reading of the Ramayana Many Ramayanas The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia University of California Press pp 175 188 ISBN 978 0 520 07589 4 Arooran K Nambi 1980 Tamil Renaissance and Dravidian Nationalism The Demand for Dravida Nadu TamilNation org Retrieved 20 December 2008 dead link Saraswathi Towards Self Respect p 87 Diehl E V Ramasamy Naiker Periyar p 27 Saraswathi Towards Self Respect p 93 Saraswathi Towards Self Respect p 98 More J B P 1997 The Political Evolution of Muslims in Tamilnadu and Madras 1930 1947 Orient Longman p 163 ISBN 978 81 250 1011 1 OCLC 37770527 Gopal Balakrishnan Raja Teralundur Venkatarama Mahalingam Harogadde Manappa Nayaka 1990 South Indian Studies Geetha Book House p 177 OCLC 24325282 Kannan R 2010 Anna The Life and Times of C N Annadurai Penguin Books p 56 ISBN 978 0 670 08328 2 Patwardhan Achyut Asoka Mehta 1942 The Communal Triangle in India Allahabad Kitabistan p 172 OCLC 4449727 Saraswathi Towards Self Respect pp 89 amp 90 Dirks Nicholas B 2001 Castes of Mind Colonialism and the Making of Modern India Princeton University Press p 263 ISBN 0691088950 Ram Mohan 1968 Hindi Against India The Meaning of DMK Rachna Prakashan pp 79 80 OCLC 35586 Menon V P 1998 Transfer of Power in India Orient Longman p 106 ISBN 81 250 0884 5 Jinnah Muhammad Ali 1993 A Time Bound Plan for Muslim India In J C Johari ed Voices of Indian Freedom Movement Anmol Publications p 198 ISBN 81 7158 225 7 a b Rajagopalan Swarna 2001 State and Nation in South Asia Lynne Rienner p 139 ISBN 978 1 55587 967 9 More J B P 2004 Muslim Identity Print Culture and the Dravidian Factor in Tamil Nadu Orient Longman pp 166 170 OCLC 59991703 Chatterjee Up Against Caste Comparative study of Ambedkar and Periyar p 43 Kannan 2010 pp 60 Chatterjee Debi 2004 Up against caste comparative study of Ambedkar and Periyar Rawat Publications p 43 ISBN 978 81 7033 860 4 C N Annadurai 28 August 2007 Retrieved 5 September 2007 dead link The 60 days to Aug 15 1947 Indo Asian News Service 15 August 2007 Retrieved 5 September 2007 dead link C Wijeyawickrema War and Peace in Sri Lanka the other battle Part I South Indian backyard Retrieved 5 September 2007 Jaffrelot Christophe 2003 India s silent revolution the rise of the low castes in North Indian politics C Hurst amp Co p 244 ISBN 1 85065 398 4 Chatterjee Debi January 1981 2004 Up Against Caste Comparative study of Ambedkar and Periyar Rawat Publications Chennai p 42 E V Ramaswami Republic Supplement 26 January 1950 Quoted in Reconstruction of society The Hindu Chennai India 15 August 2007 Retrieved 5 September 2007 dead link a b Kothari Rajni 1994 Politics in India Orient Longman pp 333 343 ISBN 81 250 0072 0 Ghurye Govind Sadashiv 1961 Caste Class and Occupation Popular Book Depot p 318 OCLC 175030 Danspeckgruber Wolfgang F 2002 The Self Determination of Peoples Community Nation and State in an Interdependent World Lynne Rienner Publishers p 300 ISBN 1 55587 793 1 Srinivas Mysore Narasimhachar 1962 Caste in Modern India and other essays Asia Publishing House p 31 OCLC 5206379 a b Manor James 2001 Center state relations In Atul Kohli ed The Success of India s Democracy Cambridge University Press p 89 ISBN 978 0 521 80530 8 Stein Burton 1998 A History of India Blackwell Publishing p 402 ISBN 0 631 20546 2 Erdman Howard Loyd 1967 The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism Cambridge University Press p 216 OCLC 301813 Ghurye G S 1976 S Devadas Pillai ed Aspects of changing India studies in honour of Prof G S Ghurye Popular Prakashan p 108 ISBN 81 7154 157 7 OCLC 4497385 Pande Ram 1985 Congress 100 Years Jaipur Pub House p 253 OCLC 12978554 Bhaskaran Ramaswami 1967 Sociology of Politics Tradition and Politics in India Asia Pub House p 48 OCLC 342442 Iyengar K R Srinivasa 1970 Two cheers for the Commonwealth talks on literature and education Asia Publishing House p 65 ISBN 978 0 210 22307 9 OCLC 95129 Sri Lanka House of Representatives Parliamentary Debates Hansard vol 48 col 1313 3 September 1962 Quoted in Bookman Milica Zarkovic 1997 The Demographic Struggle for Power Routledge p 15 ISBN 978 0 7146 4732 6 Barnett Marguerite Ross 1975 Electoral Politics in the Indian States Party Systems and Cleavages Manohar Book Service p 85 OCLC 2197571 Connor Walker 1993 Ethnonationalism The Quest for Understanding Princeton University Press p 27 ISBN 978 0 691 02563 6 Ramachandra Guha 16 January 2005 Hindi against India The Hindu Chennai India Archived from the original on 25 February 2005 Retrieved 5 September 2007 Sharma Phool Kumar 1972 India Pakistan China and the Contemporary World National p 51 OCLC 693687 Twitterati in Kerala rakes up DravidaNadu over beef ban South India s mini rebellion over Modi s new cattle law kindles an old secessionist spark Sharma Mihir 24 April 2018 For rich South India the rest of the country is a tax burden ThePrint Retrieved 23 July 2020 T S Sudhir 14 March 2018 South India s politicos echoing public anger with leadership in north conciliatory leadership needed at Centre Firstpost Mathi 16 March 2018 த ன ம ந லங கள ம ன வ க க ம த ர வ ட ந ட க ர க க க க ஆதரவ ஸ ட ல ன DMK Working President MK Stalin said that his party will support Dravida Nadu OneIndia Tamil in Tamil External links EditThe Demand for Dravida Nadu permanent dead link Portal India Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Dravida Nadu amp oldid 1132794629, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.