Urban agriculture

Urban agriculture refers to various practices of cultivating, processing, and distributing food in urban areas.^[1][2] The term also applies to the area activities of animal husbandry, aquaculture, beekeeping, and horticulture in an urban context. Urban agriculture is distinguished from peri-urban agriculture, which takes place in rural areas at the edge of suburbs.^[3]

An urban farm in Chicago.

Urban agriculture can appear at varying levels of economic and social development. It can involve a movement of organic growers, "foodies" and "locavores", who seek to form social networks founded on a shared ethos of nature and community holism.^[4] These networks can develop by way of formal institutional support, becoming integrated into local town planning as a "transition town" movement for sustainable urban development. For others, food security, nutrition, and income generation are key motivations for the practice. In either case, the more direct access to fresh vegetable, fruit, and meat products that may be realised through urban agriculture can improve food security and food safety while decreasing food miles, leading to lower greenhouse gas emissions,^[5] thereby contributing to climate change mitigation.

History

Some of the first evidence of urban agriculture comes from Mesopotamia. Farmers would set aside small plots of land for farming within the city's walls. (3500BC) In Persia's semi-desert towns, oases were fed through aqueducts carrying mountain water to support intensive food production, nurtured by wastes from the communities.^[6] In Machu Picchu, water was conserved and reused as part of the stepped architecture of the city, and vegetable beds were designed to gather sun in order to prolong the growing season.^[6]

 

A gardening demonstration in New York City, 1922

The idea of supplemental food production beyond rural farming operations and distant imports is not new. It was used during war and depression times when food shortage issues arose, as well as during times of relative abundance. Allotment gardens emerged in Germany in the early 19th century as a response to poverty and food insecurity.^[7]

In the context of the USA, urban agriculture as a widely recognized practice took root in response of the 1893-1897 economic depression in Detroit.^[8] In 1894, Mayor Hazen S. Pingree called on outlying citizens of a depression-struck Detroit to lend their properties to the city government ahead of the winter season.^[9][10] The Detroit government would in turn develop these lots as makeshift potato gardens - nicknamed Pingree's Potato Patches after the mayor - as potatoes were weather resistant and easy to grow. He intended for these gardens to produce income, food supply, and boost independence during times of hardship.^[11] The Detroit project was successful enough that other US cities adopted similar urban agriculture practices. By 1906, the United States Department of Agriculture estimated that over 75,000 schools alone managed urban agriculture programs ^[12] to provide children and their families with fresh produce. However, it would not be until the First World War that US urban agriculture spread widely.^[8]

During World War One, food production became a major national security concern for several countries, including the US.^[8] President Woodrow Wilson called upon all American citizens to utilize any available open food growth, seeing this as a way to pull them out of a potentially damaging situation of food insecurity.^[13] The National War Garden Committee under the American Forestry Association organized campaigns with patriotic messages such as "Sow the Seeds of Victory", with the aim of reducing domestic pressure on food production. In so doing, primary agricultural industries could focus on shipping rations to troops in Europe.^[9] So called victory gardens sprouted during World War One (emulated later during World War Two) in the US, as well as Canada & the United Kingdom. By 1919, American victory gardens numbered 5 million plots country-wide, and over 500 million pounds of produce was harvested. So efficient were the American urban agriculture programs that surplus foodstuffs were shipped to war-ravaged European nations, in addition to American military forces.

 

Peaches in Montreuil, Seine-Saint-Denis, France

A very similar practice came into use during the Great Depression that provided a purpose, job and food to those who would otherwise be without anything during such harsh times. These efforts helped raise spirits and boost economic growth. Over 2.8 million dollars worth of food was produced from the subsistence gardens during the Depression. Public and government support for Victory Gardens waned during the Interwar Period, with most American sites becoming repurposed for various economic development initiatives.^[10]

By World War II, the War/Food Administration set up a National Victory Garden Program that set out to systematically establish functioning agriculture within cities. Indeed, these new victory gardens became the "first line of defense for the country".^[14] Once more, the government supported and encouraged Victory Gardens as a means of national security: domestic pressure on major agricultural industries would be relieved to further augment the war economy. With this new plan in action, as many as 5.5 million Americans took part in the victory garden movement and over nine million pounds of fruit and vegetables were grown a year, accounting for 44% of US-grown produce throughout that time.^[15] In the post-war period, the US government gradually stopped assisting urban agriculture programs, partially due to the lack of need of war supplies and partially due to the US fully embracing industrialized food systems.^[14]

By the 1950s and 1960s, urban agriculture was more focused on grassroots initiatives spearheaded by politicized social movements, including the African-American Civil Rights. These groups benefited from a great number of vacant lots, left behind during a period of post-war urban to suburban migration. Despite these efforts, vacant lots as a whole became seen as blighted, decaying areas. Some American cities, such as Syracuse, NY once more supported urban agriculture programs, not for food security but to make these vacant lots more appealing. Social and environmental justice groups, such as New York City based Green Guerillas, Seattle-based P-Patch, Boston-based Urban Gardeners,^[16] and Philadelphia-based Philadelphia Green, continued to shape American urban agricultural practices during the 1970s. These groups - and many others - reinvigorated interest in urban agriculture, aimed not only at community development but also combating environmental crises.^[8]

American urban agriculture initiatives during the 1980s built upon the previous decade's focus on community engagement. A natural evolution was sites of urban agriculture entering everyday community roles and consequently requiring more funding than grassroots movements could muster. The US government created an Urban Garden Program, which funded programs in twenty-eight cities who in turn produced roughly twenty-one million dollars of produce. Though some sites of urban agriculture were repurposed for other economic development, the overall trend of the 1980s was an expansion of the practice.^[8] The 1990s continued this growth of urban agriculture sites in the US, while also expanding their purposes. A result of this broadening was the division of urban agriculture practitioners based on motivations, organizational structure, and a host of other operational concerns.^[10]

Throughout the 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s, urban agriculture sites and usages of these sites have continued to grow. Groups managing some sites focus on the economic security and cultural preservation of immigrants, such as the Hmong American communities in various US states.^{[17][18][19][20]} Other groups incorporate urban agriculture programs as part of wider social justice missions, such as those in the city of Wilmington, Delaware.^[8] Still others seek to use urban agriculture as a means of combating community-scale food insecurity,^[21] as part of wider goals of rewilding cities^[22] and human diets,^[23] among a multitude of other uses.^[24] Much attention has been placed on the practice of urban agriculture in connection to food movements such as alternative food networks, sustainable food networks, and local food movements. Alternative food networks seek to redefine food production, distribution, and consumption by considering the sociocultural elements of local communities and economies.^[25] Sustainable food networks are a related concept, but focus more on ecological concerns. Local food networks focus more on the political responses to globalization ^[26] or concerns with the environmental impacts of industrialized food transportation.^[27]

Main types

 

A cow at Mudchute Park and Farm, Tower Hamlets, London. Note Canary Wharf in the background.

There is no overarching term for agricultural plots in urban areas. Gardens and farms, while not easy to define, are the two main types.^[28] According to the USDA, a farm is "any place from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were produced and sold."^[29] In Europe, the term "city farm" is used to include gardens and farms.^[30] Any plot with produce being grown in it can be considered an urban farm. Size does not matter, it is more about growing produce on your own in your personal plot or garden.

Gardens

Many communities make community gardening accessible to the public, providing space for citizens to cultivate plants for food, recreation and education. In many cities, small plots of land and also rooftops are used for community members to garden. Community gardens give citizens the opportunity to learn about horticulture through trial and error and get a better understanding of the process of producing food and other plants. All while still being able to feed those people in need from the community. It holds as both a learning experience as well as a means of help for those people in need. A community gardening program that is well-established is Seattle's P-Patch.^[31] The grassroots permaculture movement has been hugely influential in the renaissance of urban agriculture throughout the world. During the 1960s a number of community gardens were established in the United Kingdom, influenced by the community garden movement in the United States.^[32] Bristol's Severn Project was established in 2010 for £2500 and provides 34 tons of produce per year, employing people from disadvantaged backgrounds.^[33]

Farms

 

The Project Eats Rooftop Farm in New York City

The first urban agriculture method of growing occurs when family farms maintain their land as the city grows around it. City farms/Urban farms are agricultural plots in urban areas, that have people working with animals and plants to produce food. They are usually community-run gardens seeking to improve community relationships and offer an awareness of agriculture and farming to people who live in urbanized areas.^[34] Although the name says urban, urban farming does not have to be in the urban area, it can be in the backyard of a house, or the rooftop of an apartment building. They are important sources of food security for many communities around the globe. City farms vary in size from small plots in private yards to larger farms that occupy a number of acres. In 1996, a United Nations report estimated there are over 800 million people worldwide who grow food and raise livestock in cities.^[35] Although some city farms have paid employees, most rely heavily on volunteer labour, and some are run by volunteers alone. Other city farms operate as partnerships with local authorities.

An early city farm was set up in 1972 in Kentish Town, London. It combines farm animals with gardening space, an addition inspired by children's farms in the Netherlands. Other city farms followed across London and the United Kingdom. In Australia, several city farms exist in various capital cities. In Melbourne, the Collingwood Children's Farm was established in 1979 on the Abbotsford Precinct Heritage Farmlands (the APHF),^[36] the oldest continually farmed land in Victoria, farmed since 1838.

In 2010, New York City saw the building and opening of the world's largest privately owned and operated rooftop farm, followed by an even larger location in 2012.^[37] Both were a result of municipal programs such as The Green Roof Tax Abatement Program^[38] and Green Infrastructure Grant Program.^[39]

In Singapore, hydroponic rooftop farms (which also rely on vertical farming) are appearing.^[40] The goal behind these is to rejuvenate areas and workforces that have thus far been marginalized. Simultaneously top level pesticide-free produce will be grown and harvested.^[41]

 

A tidy front yard flower and vegetable garden in Aretxabaleta, Spain

Aquaponics systems

Aquaponics is a closed-loop farming technique that ingeniously combines aquaculture and hydroponics to create a self-sustaining ecosystem. In this mutually beneficial relationship, fish waste serves as a natural fertilizer for the plants, while the plants filter and purify the water for the fish. This ingenious system not only minimizes water usage but also eliminates the need for chemical fertilizers, making it an eco-friendly and resource-efficient method of food production.^[42]

The origins of aquaponics can be traced back to the ancient Aztecs in Mexico, who practiced a form of this method by cultivating crops on floating rafts in nutrient-rich waters. In modern times, researchers like Dr. Mark McMurtry and Dr. James Rakocy further developed and popularized aquaponics during the 1970s and 1980s.^[43]

In practice, fish are raised in a tank, and their waste releases ammonia. Beneficial bacteria then convert the ammonia into nitrites and nitrates, which serve as essential nutrients for the plants. As the plants take up these nutrients, they cleanse the water, which is recirculated back to the fish tank, completing the sustainable loop.

Vertical farming

Vertical farming has emerged as a solution for sustainable urban agriculture, enabling crops to be cultivated in vertically stacked layers or inclined surfaces, within controlled indoor environments. This approach maximizes space utilization and facilitates year-round cultivation, making it an ideal choice for densely populated urban areas with limited land availability.

The concept of vertical farming dates back to the early 20th century, but its recent popularity has surged due to the challenges posed by urbanization and the growing demand for sustainable food production. Vertical farms have gained significant traction globally as they offer solutions to overcome the limitations associated with traditional agriculture.^[44]

In practice, vertical farms employ advanced techniques such as hydroponics or aeroponics, allowing plants to grow without soil by using nutrient-rich water or air instead. By utilizing vertical space, these farms achieve higher crop yields per square foot compared to conventional farming methods. The integration of artificial lighting and sophisticated climate control systems ensures optimal conditions for crop growth throughout the year.

Singapore stands at the forefront of the vertical farming movement, embracing this technology-driven agriculture to address its limited land availability and secure food sustainability. As a densely populated city-state, Singapore's adoption of vertical farming showcases how innovative approaches to agriculture can effectively tackle the challenges of urban living while promoting sustainable food production.^[45] The obstacles that vertical farming must overcome include; training/indoor farming expertise, commercial feasability and resistance from city people/politicians.^[46]

Indoor farms

Indoor farming is a method involves cultivating plants indoors, free from the constraints of traditional agriculture such as weather fluctuations and limited land availability.

The concept of indoor farming emerged as a solution to the challenges faced by conventional farming methods. With unpredictable weather patterns and urbanization taking up valuable arable land, indoor farming offers a sustainable alternative.

In practice, indoor farms utilize advanced techniques like hydroponics, aeroponics, or aquaponics to cultivate plants. These systems provide a soil-less environment, ensuring efficient use of resources and optimal plant growth. Climate control systems play a crucial role in maintaining the perfect conditions for crops, regulating temperature, humidity, and lighting. Artificial lighting, often powered by energy-efficient LED technology, ensures that plants receive the right light spectrum for photosynthesis, resulting in healthy and abundant harvests.^[47] The ultimate goal of developments includes providing superior agricultural products that meet urban consumers' safety requirements.^[48]

Perspectives

Resource and economic

The Urban Agriculture Network has defined urban agriculture as:^[49]

An industry that produces, processes, and markets food, fuel, and other outputs, largely in response to the daily demand of consumers within a town, city, or metropolis, many types of privately and publicly held land and water bodies were found throughout intra-urban and peri-urban areas. Typically urban agriculture applies intensive production methods, frequently using and reusing natural resources and urban wastes, to yield a diverse array of land-, water-, and air-based fauna and flora contributing to food security, health, livelihood, and environment of the individual, household, and community.

With rising urbanization, food resources in urban areas are less accessible than in rural areas.^[50] This disproportionately affects the poorest communities, and the lack of food access and increased risk of malnutrition has been linked to socioeconomic inequities.^[50] Economic barriers to food access are linked to capitalist market structures and lead to "socioeconomic inequities in food choices", "less... healthful foods", and phenomena such as food deserts.^[50] Additionally, racialized systems of governance of urban poor communities facilitates the increasing prominence of issues such as unemployment, poverty, access to health, educational and social resources, including a community's access to healthy food.

Today, some cities have much vacant land due to urban sprawl and home foreclosures. This land could be used to address food insecurity. One study of Cleveland shows that the city could actually meet up to 100% of its fresh produce need. This would prevent up to $115 million in annual economic leakage. Using the rooftop space of New York City would also be able to provide roughly twice the amount of space necessary to supply New York City with its green vegetable yields. Space could be even better optimized through the usage of hydroponic or indoor factory production of food. Growing gardens within cities would also cut down on the amount of food waste. In order to fund these projects, it would require financial capital in the form of private enterprises or government funding.^[51]

Environmental

 

A mixed garden bed of plants for food and for bees and insects in a community based urban farm in New Zealand

 

Tomato plant at Roof garden in Mymensingh, Bangladesh

The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) defines urban agriculture to include aspects of environmental health, remediation, and recreation:^[52]

Urban agriculture is a complex system encompassing a spectrum of interests, from a traditional core of activities associated with the production, processing, marketing, distribution, and consumption, to a multiplicity of other benefits and services that are less widely acknowledged and documented. These include recreation and leisure; economic vitality and business entrepreneurship, individual health and well-being; community health and well being; landscape beautification; and environmental restoration and remediation.

Modern planning and design initiatives are often more responsive to this model of urban agriculture because it fits within the current scope of sustainable design. The definition allows for a multitude of interpretations across cultures and time. Frequently it is tied to policy decisions to build sustainable cities.^[53]

Urban farms also provide unique opportunities for individuals, especially those living in cities, to get actively involved with ecological citizenship. By reconnecting with food production and nature, urban community gardening teaches individuals the skills necessary to participate in a democratic society. Decisions must be made on a group-level basis in order to run the farm. Most effective results are achieved when residents of a community are asked to take on more active roles in the farm.^[54]

Urban farming is not as regulated as commercial farming. So chemicals can be applied and not regulated like a commercial grower would. There is nothing in place that will tell anyone what was applied. It is not regulated as strict so a lot can happen without being known, as far as what is applied.

Food security

Main article: Food security

Access to nutritious food, both economically and geographically, is another perspective in the effort to locate food and livestock production in cities. The tremendous influx of the world population to urban areas has increased the need for fresh and safe food. The Community Food Security Coalition (CFSC) defines food security as:

All persons in a community having access to culturally acceptable, nutritionally adequate food through local, non-emergency sources at all times.

Areas faced with food security issues have limited choices, often relying on highly processed fast food or convenience store foods that are high in calories and low in nutrients, which may lead to elevated rates of diet-related illnesses such as diabetes. These problems have brought about the concept of food justice which Alkon and Norgaard (2009; 289) explain that, "places access to healthy, affordable, culturally appropriate food in the contexts of institutional racism, racial formation, and racialized geographies... Food justice serves as a theoretical and political bridge between scholarship and activism on sustainable agriculture, food insecurity, and environmental justice."^[55]

Some systematic reviews have already explored urban agriculture contribution to food security and other determinants of health outcomes (see ^[56])

Urban agriculture is part of a larger discussion of the need for alternative agricultural paradigms to address food insecurity, inaccessibility of fresh foods, and unjust practices on multiple levels of the food system; and this discussion has been led by different actors, including food-insecure individuals, farm workers, educators and academics, policymakers, social movements, organizations, and marginalized people globally.^[57]

The issue of food security is accompanied by the related movements of food justice and food sovereignty. These movements incorporate urban agriculture in how they address food-resources of a community.^[58] Food sovereignty, in addition to promoting food access, also seeks to address the power dynamics and political economy of food; it accounts for the embedded power structures of the food system, ownership of production, and decision-making on multiple levels (i.e. growing, processing, and distribution): Under this framework, representative decision-making and responsiveness to the community are core features.^[59][60][61]

Agroecological

Main article: Agroecology

Agroecology is a scientific framework, movement, and applied practice of agricultural management systems that seeks to achieve food sovereignty within food systems and prioritizes sustainability, farmer and consumer well-being, traditional knowledge revival, and democratized learning systems.^[62][60] Transdisciplinarity and diversity of knowledge is a central theme to agroecology, so many urban agroecology initiatives address topics of social justice, gender empowerment, ecological sustainability, indigenous sovereignty, and participation in addition to promoting food access.^[63]

Under an agroecological framework, urban agriculture has the potential to play a role as a "public space, as an economic development strategy, and as a community-organizing tool" while alleviating food insecurity.^[64]

Impact

 

A sprouting glass jar with mung beans in it

In general, Urban and peri urban agriculture (UPA) contributes to food availability, particularly of fresh produce, provides employment and income and can contribute to the food security and nutrition of urban dwellers.^[2]

Economic

Urban and Peri-urban agriculture (UPA) expands the economic base of the city through production, processing, packaging, and marketing of consumable products. This results in an increase in entrepreneurial activities and the creation of jobs, as well as reducing food costs and improving quality.^[65] UPA provides employment, income, and access to food for urban populations, which helps to relieve chronic and emergency food insecurity. Chronic food insecurity refers to less affordable food and growing urban poverty, while emergency food insecurity relates to breakdowns in the chain of food distribution. UPA plays an important role in making food more affordable and in providing emergency supplies of food.^[66] Research into market values for produce grown in urban gardens has been attributed to a community garden plot a median yield value of between approximately $200 and $500 (US, adjusted for inflation).^[67]

Social

 

The needs of urban landscaping can be combined with those of suburban livestock farmers. (Kstovo, Russia)

Urban agriculture can have a large impact on the social and emotional well-being of individuals.^[68] UA can have an overall positive impact on community health, which directly impacts individuals social and emotional well-being.^[68] Urban gardens are often places that facilitate positive social interaction, which also contributes to overall social and emotional well-being. Urban agriculture sites have been noted as lowering crime rates generally in local neighborhoods.^[69] Many gardens facilitate the improvement of social networks within the communities that they are located. For many neighborhoods, gardens provide a "symbolic focus", which leads to increased neighborhood pride.^[70] Urban agriculture increases community participation through diagnostic workshops or different commissions in the area of vegetable gardens. Activities which involve hundreds of people.^[71]

When individuals come together around UA, physical activity levels are often increased. This can also raise serotonin levels akin to working out at a gym.^[72] There is the added element of walking/biking to the gardens, further increasing physical activity and the benefits of being outdoors.^[73]

UPA can be seen as a means of improving the livelihood of people living in and around cities. Taking part in such practices is seen mostly as an informal activity, but in many cities where inadequate, unreliable, and irregular access to food is a recurring problem, urban agriculture has been a positive response to tackling food concerns. Due to the food security that comes with UA, feelings of independence and empowerment often arise. The ability to produce and grow food for oneself has also been reported to improve levels of self-esteem or of self-efficacy.^[68] Households and small communities take advantage of vacant land and contribute not only to their household food needs but also the needs of their resident city.^[74] The CFSC states that:

Community and residential gardening, as well as small-scale farming, save household food dollars. They promote nutrition and free cash for non-garden foods and other items. As an example, you can raise your own chickens on an urban farm and have fresh eggs for only $0.44 per dozen.^[75]

This allows families to generate larger incomes selling to local grocers or to local outdoor markets while supplying their household with the proper nutrition of fresh and nutritional products. With the popularity of farmers markets recently, this has allowed an even larger income.

 

A vegetable garden in the square in front of the train station in Ezhou, China

Some community urban farms can be quite efficient and help women find work, who in some cases are marginalized from finding employment in the formal economy.^[76] Studies have shown that participation from women have a higher production rate, therefore producing the adequate amount for household consumption while supplying more for market sale.^[77]

As most UA activities are conducted on vacant municipal land, there have been raising concerns about the allocation of land and property rights. The IDRC and the FAO have published the Guidelines for Municipal Policymaking on Urban Agriculture, and are working with municipal governments to create successful policy measures that can be incorporated in urban planning.^[78]

Over a third of US households, roughly 42 million, participate in food gardening. There has also been an increase of 63% participation in farming by millennials from 2008 to 2013. US households participating in community gardening has also tripled from 1 to 3 million in that time frame. Urban agriculture provides unique opportunities to bridge diverse communities together. In addition, it provides opportunities for health care providers to interact with their patients. Thus, making each community garden a hub that is reflective of the community.^[79]

Energy efficiency

 

Edible oyster mushrooms growing on used coffee grounds

The current industrial agriculture system is accountable for high energy costs for the transportation of foodstuffs. According to a study by Rich Pirog, associate director of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University, the average conventional produce item travels 1,500 miles (2,400 km),^[80] using, if shipped by tractor-trailer, 1 US gallon (3.8 L; 0.83 imp gal) of fossil fuel per 100 pounds (45 kg).^[81] The energy used to transport food is decreased when urban agriculture can provide cities with locally grown food. Pirog found that traditional, non-local, food distribution system used 4 to 17 times more fuel and emitted 5 to 17 times more CO₂ than the local and regional transport.^[82]

Similarly, in a study by Marc Xuereb and Region of Waterloo Public Health, it was estimated that switching to locally-grown food could save transport-related emissions equivalent to nearly 50,000 metric tons of CO₂, or the equivalent of taking 16,191 cars off the road.^[83]

In theory one would save money, but everything is being run on the house's power grid most of the time. So prices can vary according to when you water, or how you water, etc.

 

A windowfarm, incorporating discarded plastic bottles into pots for hydroponic agriculture in urban windows

See also: Energy efficiency in agriculture and Efficient energy use

Carbon footprint

As mentioned above, the energy-efficient nature of urban agriculture can reduce each city's carbon footprint by reducing the amount of transport that occurs to deliver goods to the consumer.^[84] Such areas can act as carbon sinks^[85] offsetting some of the carbon accumulation that is innate to urban areas, where pavement and buildings outnumber plants. Plants absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) and release breathable oxygen (O₂) through photosynthesis. The process of Carbon Sequestration can be further improved by combining other agriculture techniques to increase removal from the atmosphere and prevent the release of CO₂ during harvest time. However, this process relies heavily on the types of plants selected and the methodology of farming.^[83] Specifically, choosing plants that do not lose their leaves and remain green all year can increase the farm's ability to sequester carbon.^[83]

Reduction in ozone and particulate matter

The reduction in ozone and other particulate matter can benefit human health.^[86] Reducing these particulates and ozone gases could reduce mortality rates in urban areas along with increase the health of those living in cities. A 2011 article found that a rooftop containing 2000 m² of uncut grass has the potential to remove up to 4000 kg of particulate matter and that one square meter of green roof is sufficient to offset the annual particulate matter emissions of a car.^[87][88]

Soil decontamination

Vacant urban lots are often victims to illegal dumping of hazardous chemicals and other wastes. They are also liable to accumulate standing water and "grey water", which can be dangerous to public health, especially left stagnant for long periods. The implementation of urban agriculture in these vacant lots can be a cost-effective method for removing these chemicals. In the process known as Phytoremediation, plants and the associated microorganisms are selected for their chemical ability to degrade, absorb, convert to an inert form, and remove toxins from the soil.^[89] Several chemicals can be targeted for removal, including heavy metals (e.g. Mercury and lead), inorganic compounds (e.g. Arsenic and Uranium), and organic compounds (e.g. petroleum and chlorinated compounds like PBCs).^[90]

Phytoremeditation is both an environmentally-friendly, cost-effective and energy-efficient measure to reduce pollution. Phytoremediation only costs about $5–$40 per ton of soil being decontaminated.^[91][92] Implementation of this process also reduces the amount of soil that must be disposed of in a hazardous waste landfill.^[93]

Urban agriculture as a method to mediate chemical pollution can be effective in preventing the spread of these chemicals into the surrounding environment. Other methods of remediation often disturb the soil and force the chemicals contained within it into the air or water. Plants can be used as a method to remove chemicals and also to hold the soil and prevent erosion of contaminated soil decreasing the spread of pollutants and the hazard presented by these lots.^[93][94]

One way of identifying soil contamination is through using already well-established plants as bioindicators of soil health. Using well-studied plants is important because there has already been substantial bodies of work to test them in various conditions, so responses can be verified with certainty. Such plants are also valuable because they are genetically identical as crops as opposed to natural variants of the same species. Typically urban soil has had the topsoil stripped away and has led to soil with low aeration, porosity, and drainage. Typical measures of soil health are microbial biomass and activity, enzymes, soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen, available nutrients, porosity, aggregate stability, and compaction. A new measurement is active carbon (AC), which is the most usable portion of the total organic carbon (TOC) in the soil. This contributes greatly to the functionality of the soil food web. Using common crops, which are generally well-studied, as bioindicators can be used to effectively test the quality of an urban farming plot before beginning planting.^[95]

Noise pollution

Large amounts of noise pollution not only lead to lower property values and high frustration, they can be damaging to human hearing and health.^[96] The study "Noise exposure and public health" found that exposure to continual noise is a public health problem. Examples of the detriment of continual noise on humans to include: "hearing impairment, hypertension and ischemic heart disease, annoyance, sleep disturbance, and decreased school performance." Since most roofs or vacant lots consist of hard flat surfaces that reflect sound waves instead of absorbing them, adding plants that can absorb these waves has the potential to lead to a vast reduction in noise pollution.^[96]

Nutrition and quality of food

Daily intake of a variety of fruits and vegetables is linked to a decreased risk of chronic diseases including diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Urban agriculture is associated with increased consumption of fruits and vegetables^[97] which decreases risk for disease and can be a cost-effective way to provide citizens with quality, fresh produce in urban settings.^[98]

Produce from urban gardens can be perceived to be more flavorful and desirable than store bought produce^[99] which may also lead to a wider acceptance and higher intake. A Flint, Michigan study found that those participating in community gardens consumed fruits and vegetables 1.4 times more per day and were 3.5 times more likely to consume fruits or vegetables at least 5 times daily (p. 1).^[97] Garden-based education can also yield nutritional benefits in children. An Idaho study reported a positive association between school gardens and increased intake of fruit, vegetables, vitamin A, vitamin C and fiber among sixth graders.^[100] Harvesting fruits and vegetables initiates the enzymatic process of nutrient degradation which is especially detrimental to water soluble vitamins such as ascorbic acid and thiamin.^[101] The process of blanching produce in order to freeze or can reduce nutrient content slightly, but not nearly as much as the amount of time spent in storage.^[101] Harvesting produce from one's own community garden cuts back on storage times significantly.

Urban agriculture also provides quality nutrition for low-income households. Studies show that every $1 invested in a community garden yields $6 worth of vegetables if labor is not considered a factor in investment.^[98] Many urban gardens reduce the strain on food banks and other emergency food providers by donating shares of their harvest and providing fresh produce in areas that otherwise might be food deserts. The supplemental nutrition program Women, Infants and Children (WIC) as well as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) have partnered with several urban gardens nationwide to improve the accessibility to produce in exchange for a few hours of volunteer gardening work.^[102]

Urban farming has been shown to increase health outcomes. Gardeners consume twice as much fruit and vegetables than non-gardeners. Levels of physical activity are also positively associated with urban farming. These results are seen indirectly and can be supported by the social involvement in an individual's community as a member of the community farm. This social involvement helped raise the aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, boosting the motivation or efficacy of the community as a whole. This increased efficacy was shown to increase neighborhood attachment. Therefore, the positive health outcomes of urban farming can be explained in part by interpersonal and social factors that boost health. Focusing on improving the aesthetics and community relationships and not only on the plant yield, is the best way to maximize the positive effect of urban farms on a neighborhood.^[103]

Economy of scale

Using high-density urban farming with vertical farms or stacked greenhouses, many environmental benefits can be achieved on a citywide scale that would be impossible otherwise. These systems do not only provide food, but also produce potable water from waste water, and can recycle organic waste back to energy and nutrients.^[104] At the same time, they can reduce food-related transportation to a minimum while providing fresh food for large communities in almost any climate.

Health inequalities and food justice

A 2009 report by the USDA determined that "evidence is both abundant and robust enough for us to conclude that Americans living in low-income and minority areas tend to have poor access to healthy food", and that the "structural inequalities" in these neighborhoods "contribute to inequalities in diet and diet-related outcomes".^[105] These diet-related outcomes, including obesity and diabetes, have become epidemic in low-income urban environments in the United States.^[106] Although the definition and methods for determining "food deserts" have varied, studies indicate that, at least in the United States, there are racial disparities in the food environment.^[107] Thus using the definition of environment as the place where people live, work, play and pray, food disparities become an issue of environmental justice.^[108] This is especially true in American inner-cities where a history of racist practices have contributed to the development of food deserts in the low-income, minority areas of the urban core.^[109] The issue of inequality is so integral to the issues of food access and health that the Growing Food & Justice for All Initiative was founded with the mission of "dismantling racism" as an integral part of creating food security.^[110]

Not only can urban agriculture provide healthy, fresh food options, but also can contribute to a sense of community, aesthetic improvement, crime reduction, minority empowerment and autonomy, and even preserve culture through the use of farming methods and heirloom seeds preserved from areas of origin.^[111]

Environmental justice

Urban agriculture may advance environmental justice and food justice for communities living in food deserts. First, urban agriculture may reduce racial and class disparities in access to healthy food. When urban agriculture leads to locally grown fresh produce sold at affordable prices in food deserts, access to healthy food is not just available for those who live in wealthy areas, thereby leading to greater equity in rich and poor neighborhoods.^[112]

Improved access to food through urban agriculture can also help alleviate psychosocial stresses in poor communities. Community members engaged in urban agriculture improve local knowledge about healthy ways to fulfill dietary needs. Urban agriculture can also better the mental health of community members. Buying and selling quality products to local producers and consumers allows community members to support one another, which may reduce stress. Thus, urban agriculture can help improve conditions in poor communities, where residents experience higher levels of stress due to a perceived lack of control over the quality of their lives.^[113]

Urban agriculture may improve the livability and built environment in communities that lack supermarkets and other infrastructure due to the presence of high unemployment caused by deindustrialization. Urban farmers who follow sustainable agricultural methods can not only help to build local food system infrastructure, but can also contribute to improving local air, and water and soil quality.^[114] Urban farming serves as one type of green space in urban areas, it has a positive impact on the air quality in the surrounding area. A case study conducted on a rooftop farm shows the PM2.5 concentration in the urban farming area is 7-33% lower than the surrounding parts without green spaces in a city.^[115] When agricultural products are produced locally within the community, they do not need to be transported, which reduces CO₂ emission rates and other pollutants that contribute to high rates of asthma in lower socioeconomic areas. Sustainable urban agriculture can also promote worker protection and consumer rights.^[114] For example, communities in New York City, Illinois, and Richmond, Virginia, have demonstrated improvements to their local environments through urban agricultural practices.^[116]

However, urban agriculture can also present urban growers with health risks if the soil used for urban farming is contaminated. Lead contamination is particularly common, with hazardous levels of lead found in soil in many United States cities.^[117] High lead levels in soil originate from sources including flaking lead paint which was widely used before being banned in the 1970s, vehicle exhaust, and atmospheric deposition. Without proper education on the risks of urban farming and safe practices, urban consumers of urban agricultural produce may face additional health-related issues.^[112]

Implementation

Further information: Urban agriculture by region

 

A small urban farm in Amsterdam

 

Rooftop urban farming at the Food Roof Farm in downtown St. Louis, Missouri

Creating a community-based infrastructure for urban agriculture means establishing local systems to grow and process food and transfer it from farmer to consumer.

To facilitate food production, cities have established community-based farming projects. Some projects have collectively tended community farms on common land, much like that of the eighteenth-century Boston Common. One such community farm is the Collingwood Children's Farm in Melbourne, Australia. Other community garden projects use the allotment garden model, in which gardeners care for individual plots in a larger gardening area, often sharing a tool shed and other amenities. Seattle's P-Patch Gardens use this model, as did the South Central Farm in Los Angeles and the Food Roof Farm in St. Louis. Independent urban gardeners also grow food in individual yards and on roofs. Garden sharing projects seek to pair producers with the land, typically, residential yard space. Roof gardens allow for urban dwellers to maintain green spaces in the city without having to set aside a tract of undeveloped land. Rooftop farms allow otherwise unused industrial roofspace to be used productively, creating work and profit.^[118] Projects around the world seek to enable cities to become 'continuous productive landscapes' by cultivating vacant urban land and temporary or permanent kitchen gardens.^[119]

 

Urban agriculture project in the La Romita section of Colonia Roma, Mexico City

 

Tomato plants growing in a pot farming alongside a small house in New Jersey in fifteen garbage cans filled with soil grew over 700 tomatoes during the summer of 2013.

Food processing on a community level has been accommodated by centralizing resources in community tool sheds and processing facilities for farmers to share. The Garden Resource Program Collaborative based in Detroit has cluster tool banks. Different areas of the city have tool banks where resources like tools, compost, mulch, tomato stakes, seeds, and education can be shared and distributed with the gardeners in that cluster. Detroit's Garden Resource Program Collaborative also strengthens their gardening community by providing access to their member's transplants; education on gardening, policy, and food issues; and by building connectivity between gardeners through workgroups, potlucks, tours, field trips, and cluster workdays. In Brazil, "Cities Without Hunger" has generated a public policy for the reconstruction of abandoned areas with food production and has improved the green areas of the community.

Farmers' markets, such as the farmers' market in Los Angeles, provide a common land where farmers can sell their product to consumers. Large cities tend to open their farmer's markets on the weekends and one day in the middle of the week. For example, the farmers' market of Boulevard Richard-Lenoir in Paris, France, is open on Sundays and Thursdays. However, to create a consumer dependency on urban agriculture and to introduce local food production as a sustainable career for farmers, markets would have to be open regularly. For example, the Los Angeles Farmers' Market is open seven days a week and has linked several local grocers together to provide different food products. The market's central location in downtown Los Angeles provides the perfect interaction for a diverse group of sellers to access their consumers.

Benefits

The benefits that UPA brings along to cities that implement this practice are numerous. The transformation of cities from only consumers of food to generators of agricultural products contributes to sustainability, improved health, and poverty alleviation.

• UPA assists to close the open-loop system in urban areas characterized by the importation of food from rural zones and the exportation of waste to regions outside the city or town.
• Wastewater and organic solid waste can be transformed into resources for growing agriculture products: the former can be used for irrigation, the latter as fertilizer.
• Vacant urban areas can be used for agriculture production.
• Other natural resources can be conserved. The use of wastewater for irrigation improves water management and increases the availability of fresh water for drinking and household consumption.
• UPA can help to preserve bioregional ecologies from being transformed into cropland.
• Urban agriculture saves energy (e.g. energy consumed in transporting food from rural to urban areas).
• Local production of food also allows savings in transportation costs, storage, and in product loss, what results in food cost reduction.
• UPA improves the quality of the urban environment through greening and thus, a reduction in pollution.
• Urban agriculture also makes the city a healthier place to live by improving the quality of the environment.
• UPA is a very effective tool to fight against hunger and malnutrition since it facilitates the access to food by an impoverished sector of the urban population.

Poverty alleviation: It is known that a large part of the people involved in urban agriculture is the urban poor. In developing countries, the majority of urban agricultural production is for self-consumption, with surpluses being sold in the market. According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), urban poor consumers spend 60–80% of their income on food, making them very vulnerable to higher food prices.

• UPA provides food and creates savings in household expenditure on consumables, thus increasing the amount of income allocated to other uses.
• UPA surpluses can be sold in local markets, generating more income for the urban poor.^[65]

Community centers and gardens educate the community to see agriculture as an integral part of urban life. The Florida House Institute for Sustainable Development in Sarasota, Florida, serves as a public community and education center in which innovators with sustainable, energy-saving ideas can implement and test them. Community centers like Florida House provide urban areas with a central location to learn about urban agriculture and to begin to integrate agriculture with the urban lifestyle.^[120]

Urban farms also are a proven effective educational tool to teach kids about healthy eating and meaningful physical activity.^[121]

Trade-offs

• Space is at a premium in cities and is accordingly expensive and difficult to secure.
• The utilization of untreated wastewater for urban agricultural irrigation can facilitate the spread of waterborne diseases among the human population.^[122]
• Although studies have demonstrated improved air quality in urban areas related to the proliferation of urban gardens, it has also been shown that increasing urban pollution (related specifically to a sharp rise in the number of automobiles on the road), has led to an increase in insect pests, which consume plants produced by urban agriculture. It is believed that changes to the physical structure of the plants themselves, which have been correlated to increased levels of air pollution, increase plants' palatability to insect pests. Reduced yields within urban gardens decreases the amount of food available for human consumption.^[123]
• Studies indicate that the nutritional quality of wheat suffers when urban wheat plants are exposed to high nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide concentrations. This problem is particularly acute in the developing world, where outdoor concentrations of sulfur dioxide are high and large percentages of the population rely upon urban agriculture as a primary source of food. These studies have implications for the nutritional quality of other staple crops that are grown in urban settings.^[123]
• Agricultural activities on land that is contaminated (with such metals as lead) pose potential risks to human health. These risks are associated both with working directly on contaminated land and with consuming food that was grown in contaminated soil.^[124]

Municipal greening policy goals can pose conflicts. For example, policies promoting urban tree canopy are not sympathetic to vegetable gardening because of the deep shade cast by trees. However, some municipalities like Portland, Oregon, and Davenport, Iowa are encouraging the implementation of fruit-bearing trees (as street trees or as park orchards) to meet both greening and food production goals.^[125]

See also

•  Agriculture and Agronomy portal
•  Gardening portal

• Allotment (gardening)
• Asset-based community development
• Building-integrated agriculture
• Ecological sanitation
• Foodscaping
• Forest gardening
• Green wall
• Growbag
• Growroom
• Guerrilla gardening
• Market garden
• Metropolitan agriculture
• Permaculture
• Rooftop gardens
• Satoyama
• Sheet mulching
• Smallholding
• Subsistence agriculture
• Terraces (agriculture)
• Underground farming
• Urban horticulture
• Urban forestry
• Vertical farming
• Windowfarm

References

1. Bailkey, M., and J. Nasr. 2000. "From Brownfields to Greenfields: Producing Food in North American Cities", Community Food Security News. Fall 1999/Winter 2000:6
2. "Food for the Cities: Production systems (UPA)". FAO. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
3. Hampwaye, G.; Nel, E. & Ingombe, L. (September 2009). . FANRPAN. Global Development Network. Archived from the original on 14 April 2018. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
4. Thornton, Alan (9 December 2013). "Chapter 13: Food for thought? The potential of urban agriculture in local food production for food security in the South Pacific". In Rosin, Christopher; Stock, Paul; Campbell, Hugh (eds.). Food Systems Failure: The Global Food Crisis and the Future of Agriculture. Routledge. pp. 203–218. ISBN 9780415712606. Archived from the original on 1 April 2024 – via ResearchGate.
5. Smith, Loren (21 June 2022). "Fifth of global food-related emissions due to transport". University of Sidney. Retrieved 8 October 2023.
6. André., Viljoen (2005). Continuous productive urban landscapes: designing urban agriculture for sustainable cities. Bohn, Katrin., Howe, J. (Joe). Oxford: Architectural Press. ISBN 9780750655439. OCLC 60533269.
7. (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2009.
8. Sundberg, Todd (Spring 2018). At the Intersection of Urban Agriculture and Social Justice Activism: Practices and Perceptions in Wilmington, DE. University of Delaware.
9. Warner, Bass, and Durlach (1987). To dwell is to garden: a history of Boston's community gardens. Northeastern University Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
10. Lawson, Laura (2005). . City bountiful: a century of community gardening in America. University of California Press.
11. "Hazen S. Pingree Monument". historicdetroit.org/. Dan Austin.
12. USDA. "The School Garden | National Agricultural Library". USDA National Agricultural Library. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
13. "Gardening for the Common Good". library.si.edu. 2018. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
14. Naylor, Lindsay (1 October 2012). ""Hired Gardens and the Question of Transgression: Lawns, Food Gardens and the Business of 'alternative' Food Practice."". Cultural Geographies. 19 (4): 483–504. Bibcode:2012CuGeo..19..483N. doi:10.1177/1474474012451543.
15. Steinhauer, Jennifer (15 July 2020). "Victory Gardens Were More About Solidarity Than Survival". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 6 December 2020.
16. . Boston Parks and Recreation Department https://www.cityofboston.gov/parks/pdfs/os4b.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
17. Bays, Sharon (1998). "What's Culture Got to Do With It? "Cultural Preservation" and Hmong Women's Activism In Central California". Transforming Anthropology. 7 (2): 35–45. doi:10.1525/tran.1998.7.2.35.
18. Kerr, Laura (30 April 2007). "Resisting Agricultural Assimilation: The Political Ecology of Hmong Growers in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Region". Geography Honors Projects. Macalester College. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
19. L'Annunziata, Elena (2010). "FOLLOWING THE PLANT: THE POLITICAL ECOLOGY OF A HMONG COMMUNITY GARDEN". Humboldt Journal of Social Relations. 33 (1/2).
20. Lipman and Campbell (20 March 2024). Planning for Equitable Urban Agriculture in the United States. Springer.
21. Meenar and Hoover (2012). "Community Food Security Via Urban Agriculture: Understanding People, Place, Economy, And Accessibility From A Food Justice Perspective". Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. 3 (1): 143–160. doi:10.5304/jafscd.2012.031.013. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
22. Egerer and Buchholz (2021). "Reframing urban "wildlife" to promote inclusive conservation science and practice". Biodiversity and Conservation. 30 (7): 2255–2266. Bibcode:2021BiCon..30.2255E. doi:10.1007/s10531-021-02182-y. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
23. Leiper, Chelsea (October 2019). "The Paleo paradox: Re-wilding as a health strategy across scales in the anthropocene". Geoforum. 105: 122–130. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.015. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
24. "Urban Agriculture". www.usepa.gov. USEPA. 4 December 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2024.
25. Kontothanasis, Georgios (2017). "Social Practices of Urban Agriculture in the Metropolitan Region of Thessaloniki". Procedia Environmental Sciences, Sustainable Synergies from Buildings to the Urban Scale. 38.
26. Feagan, Robert (2007). "The Place of Food: Mapping out the 'local' in Local Food Systems". Progress in Human Geography. 31 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1177/0309132507073527.
27. Meryment, Elizabeth. "Emerging Food Movements". Body and Soul Australia.
28. Crawford, Andrea (12 February 2014). "What's the Difference Between a Garden and a Farm?". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 5 December 2020.
29. "USDA ERS - Glossary". www.ers.usda.gov. Retrieved 5 December 2020.
30. "European Federation of City Farms". cityfarms.org. Retrieved 5 December 2020.
31. "P-Patch Community Gardening". seattle.gov. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
32. Patman, Suzanne (Winter 2015). "A New Direction in Garden History". Garden History. 43 (2): 273–283. JSTOR 24636254.
33. . thesevernproject.org. Archived from the original on 16 May 2018. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
34. "Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens". NICVA. 4 July 2014. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
35. Lawson, Laura (22 December 2016). "Agriculture: Sowing the city". Nature. 540 (7634): 522–524. Bibcode:2016Natur.540..522L. doi:10.1038/540522a. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 30905945.
36. "Collingwood Children's Farm in Melbourne, Australia, established in 1979 — City Farmer News". cityfarmer.info. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
37. "History, Travel, Arts, Science, People, Places - Smithsonian". smithsonianmag.com.
38. . nyc.gov. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
39. . Archived from the original on 15 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
40. Swartz, Joe (2 February 2018). "New Rooftop Farms to Sprout in Singapore!". Medium. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
41. "ComCrop - Singapore's first and only commercial rooftop farming company". Comcrop. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
42. "Fisheries and Aquaculture". food and africulture organization of the united nations.
43. Bradley, Kirsten (19 January 2014). "Aquaponics: A Brief History of This Integrated Fish & Veggies System". Milkwood. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
44. Piechowiak, Mateusz. "The Full History of Vertical Farming: When Did It All Start?". vertical farming planet.
45. Klein-Hessling, Dr. Hermann (11 March 2021). "A LITTLE HISTORY ON THE MOST RECENT EVOLUTION OF VERTICAL, URBAN FARMING IN SINGAPORE". Association for Vertical Farming (AVF). Retrieved 11 March 2021.
46. Despommier, Dickson (24 September 2019). "Vertical farms, building a viable indoor farming model for cities". Field Actions Science Reports. The journal of field actions (Special Issue 20): 68–73. ISSN 1867-139X.
47. Lutkin, Aimee (7 March 2018). "The future of farming is moving indoors". world economic forum. Retrieved 7 March 2018.
48. Ning Yuan, Grace; B-Marquez, Gian Powell; Deng, Haoran; Iu, Anastasiia; Fabella, Melisa; B. Salonga, Reginald; Ashardiono, Fitrio; A. Cartagena, Joyce (November 2022). "A review on urban agriculture: technology, socio-economy and policy". Cellpress. 8 (11).
49. Urban agriculture: food, jobs, and sustainable cities. Cheema, G. Shabbir., Smit, Jac., Ratta, Annu., Nasr, Joe., United Nations Development Programme., Urban Agriculture Network. New York, N.Y.: United Nations Development Programme. 1996. ISBN 9789211260472. OCLC 34575217.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
50. Vilar-Compte, Mireya; Burrola-Méndez, Soraya; Lozano-Marrufo, Annel; Ferré-Eguiluz, Isabel; Flores, Diana; Gaitán-Rossi, Pablo; Teruel, Graciela; Pérez-Escamilla, Rafael (20 January 2021). "Urban poverty and nutrition challenges associated with accessibility to a healthy diet: a global systematic literature review". International Journal for Equity in Health. 20 (1): 40. doi:10.1186/s12939-020-01330-0. ISSN 1475-9276. PMC 7816472. PMID 33472636.
51. Grewal, Sharanbir S.; Grewal, Parwinder S. (2012). "Can cities become self-reliant in food?". Cities. 29 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.003.
52. Butler, L.; Moronek, D.M., eds. (May 2002). "Urban and Agriculture Communities: Opportunities for Common Ground". Ames, Iowa: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
53. Fraser, Evan D.G. (2002). "Urban Ecology in Bangkok Thailand: Community Participation, Urban Agriculture and Forestry". Environments. 30: 1.
54. Katharine Travaline & Christian Hunold (2010) Urban agriculture and ecological citizenship in Philadelphia, Local Environment, 15:6, 581-590, doi:10.1080/13549839.2010.487529
55. Alkon, Alison Hope; Norgaard, Kari Marie (2009). "Breaking the Food Chains: An Investigation of Food Justice Activism". Sociological Inquiry. 79 (3): 289–305. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.2009.00291.x. S2CID 17487322.
56. Audate, PP; Fernandez, MA; Cloutier, G; Lebel, A (2018). "Impacts of Urban Agriculture on the Determinants of Health: Scoping Review Protocol". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 7 (3): e89. doi:10.2196/resprot.9427. PMC 5893886. PMID 29588270. http://www.researchprotocols.org/2018/3/e89
57. Giraldo, Omar Felipe; Rosset, Peter M. (19 March 2018). "Agroecology as a territory in dispute: between institutionality and social movements". The Journal of Peasant Studies. 45 (3): 545–564. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1353496. ISSN 0306-6150. S2CID 149061121.
58. Katz, Michael (2015). What Kind of Problem Is Poverty? The Archeology of an Idea. University of Georgia Press. pp. 39–78. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
59. Borras, Saturnino M.; Franco, Jennifer C.; Suárez, Sofía Monsalve (4 March 2015). "Land and food sovereignty". Third World Quarterly. 36 (3): 600–617. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1029225. ISSN 0143-6597. S2CID 153660813.
60. Rosset, Peter (July 2013). "Re-thinking agrarian reform, land and territory in La Via Campesina". Journal of Peasant Studies. 40 (4): 721–775. doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.826654. ISSN 0306-6150. S2CID 56037661.
61. Rosset, Peter (28 February 2011). "Food Sovereignty and Alternative Paradigms to Confront Land Grabbing and the Food and Climate Crises". Development. 54 (1): 21–30. doi:10.1057/dev.2010.102. ISSN 1011-6370. S2CID 54895180.
62. Nicholls, Clara I.; Altieri, Miguel A. (9 August 2018). "Pathways for the amplification of agroecology". Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 42 (10): 1170–1193. Bibcode:2018AgSFS..42.1170N. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1499578. ISSN 2168-3565. S2CID 158771961.
63. Méndez, V; Bacon, Christopher; Cohen, Roseann (18 November 2015), Introduction: Agroecology as a Transdisciplinary, Participatory, and Action-oriented Approach, Advances in Agroecology, CRC Press, pp. 1–22, doi:10.1201/b19500-2, ISBN 978-1-4822-4176-1, retrieved 4 December 2021
64. Weissman, Evan (25 March 2013). "No Buts About It…The Value of Urban Food Production". Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development: 23–24. doi:10.5304/jafscd.2013.032.014. ISSN 2152-0801.
65. Smit, Jac; Nasr, Joe (1992). "Urban agriculture for sustainable cities: Using wastes and idle land and water bodies as resources". Environment and Urbanization. 4 (2): 141–152. Bibcode:1992EnUrb...4..141S. doi:10.1177/095624789200400214. S2CID 153447663.
66. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. "Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture, Household Food Security and Nutrition". FAO. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
67. Sommers, L., and B. Butterfield, as cited in: Blair, D., C. Giesecke, and S. Sherman. (1991). "A Dietary, Social and Economic Evaluation of the Philadelphia Urban Gardening Project," Journal of Nutrition Education. 16 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine
68. Wakefield, S.; Yeudall, F.; Taron, C.; Reynolds, J.; Skinner, A. (2007). "Growing urban health: Community gardening in South-East Toronto". Health Promotion International. 22 (2): 92–101. doi:10.1093/heapro/dam001. PMID 17324956.
69. "The Greening of Wilmington". Out & About Greater Wilmington. Retrieved 6 April 2017.
70. Armstrong, Donna (2000). "A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: Implications for health promotion and community development". Health & Place. 6 (4): 319–27. doi:10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00013-7. PMID 11027957.
71. . SIOR, Social Impact Open Repository. Archived from the original on 5 September 2017.
72. Young, Simon N. (November 2007). "How to increase serotonin in the human brain without drugs". Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience. 32 (6): 394–399. ISSN 1180-4882. PMC 2077351. PMID 18043762.
73. Kingsley, Jonathan 'Yotti'; Townsend, Mardie; Henderson-Wilson, Claire (2009). "Cultivating health and wellbeing: Members' perceptions of the health benefits of a Port Melbourne community garden". Leisure Studies. 28 (2): 207–19. doi:10.1080/02614360902769894. S2CID 145574324.
74. Hales, Steve (26 July 2016). . My Green Hobby. Archived from the original on 29 December 2019.
75. . UrbanFarmingHQ. 29 March 2015. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 2 April 2015.
76. FAO. (1999). "Issues in Urban Agriculture", FAO Spotlight Magazine, January.
77. . Archived from the original on 18 December 2007.
78. IDRC/ UN-HABITAT".Guidelines for Municipal Policymaking on Urban Agriculture" Urban Agriculture: Land Management and Physical Planning (2003) PDF 14 April 2018 at the Wayback Machine 1.3
79. Alaimo, K., Beavers, A.W., Crawford, C. et al. Curr Envir Health Rpt (2016) 3: 302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-016-0105-0
80. (PDF). Leopold.iastate.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2012. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
81. "Eat Locally, Ease Climate Change Globally". The Washington Post. 9 March 2008. Retrieved 27 May 2010.
82. Pirog, Rich S.; Van Pelt, Timothy; Enshayan, Kamyar; and Cook, Ellen, "Food, Fuel, and Freeways: An Iowa perspective on how far food travels, fuel usage, and greenhouse gas emissions" (2001). Leopold Center Pubs and Papers. 3. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/leopold_pubspapers/3
83. Xuereb, Marc. (2005). "Food Miles: Environmental Implications of Food Imports to Waterloo Region." Public Health Planner Region of Waterloo Public Health. November.
84. . Delta Institute. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013.
85. Rowe, D. Bradley (2011). "Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement". Environmental Pollution. 159 (8–9): 2100–2110. Bibcode:2011EPoll.159.2100R. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.029. PMID 21074914.
86. Mayer, Helmut (1999). "Air pollution in cities". Atmospheric Environment. 33 (24–25): 4029–37. Bibcode:1999AtmEn..33.4029M. doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00144-2.
87. Environmental Affairs Department, City of Los Angeles. 2006. "Green Roofs - Cooling Los Angeles: A Resource Guide". http://environmentla.org/pdf/EnvironmentalBusinessProgs/Green%20Roofs%20Resource%20Guide%202007.pdf 12 February 2017 at the Wayback Machine
88. Rowe, D. Bradley (2011). "Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement". Environmental Pollution. 159 (8–9): 2100–10. Bibcode:2011EPoll.159.2100R. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.029. PMID 21074914.
89. Black, H. "Absorbing Possibilities: Phytoremediation." Environ Health Perspectives 103.12 (1995): 1106-108.
90. Comis, Don. (2000). "Phytoremediation: Using Plants To Clean Up Soils." Agricultural Research: n. pag. Phytoremediation: Using Plants To Clean Up Soils. USDA-ARS, 13 August 2004. Web. 25 March 2013.
91. Lasat, M. M. (2000). "Phytoextraction of metals from contaminated soil: a review of plant /soil/metal interaction and assessment of pertinent agronomic issues". Journal of Hazardous Substance Research. 2: 1–25.
92. Cluis, C. (Fall 2004). "Junk-greedy Greens: phytoremediation as a new option for soil decontamination", BioTech J. 2: 61-67.
93. Black, H (1995). "Absorbing possibilities: Phytoremediation". Environmental Health Perspectives. 103 (12): 1106–8. doi:10.2307/3432605. JSTOR 3432605. PMC 1519251. PMID 8747015.
94. "Managing Urban Runoff | Polluted Runoff". Water.epa.gov. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
95. Alaimo K, Beavers AW, Crawford C, et al. (2016) Amplifying Health Through Community Gardens: A Framework for Advancing Multicomponent, Behaviorally Based Neighborhood Interventions. Current Environmental Health Reports 3:302–312. doi:10.1007/s40572-016-0105-0
96. Passchier-Vermeer, W.; Passchier, W.F. (2000). "Noise exposure and public health". Environmental Health Perspectives. 108 (1): 123–131. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s1123. PMC 1637786. PMID 10698728.
97. Alaimo, K., Packnett, E., Miles, R., Kruger, D. (2008). "Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Urban Community Gardeners". Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. (1499-4046),40 (2), p. 94.
98. Bellows, Anne C., Katherine Brown, Jac Smit. ""Health Benefits of Urban Agriculture" (paper and research conducted by members of the Community Food Security Coalition's North American Initiative on Urban Agriculture)". Foodsecurity.org. Retrieved 1 April 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
99. Hale, James; Knapp, Corrine; Bardwell, Lisa; Buchenau, Michael; Marshall, Julie; Sancar, Fahriye; Litt, Jill S. (2011). "Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience". Social Science & Medicine. 72 (11): 1853–63. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044. PMC 3114166. PMID 21596466.
100. McAleese, Jessica D.; Rankin, Linda L. (2007). "Garden-Based Nutrition Education Affects Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Sixth-Grade Adolescents". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 107 (4): 662–5. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.015. PMID 17383272.
101. Rickman, Joy C; Barrett, Diane M; Bruhn, Christine M (2007). "Nutritional comparison of fresh, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables. Part 1. Vitamins C and B and phenolic compounds". Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 87 (6): 930–44. Bibcode:2007JSFA...87..930R. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2825. S2CID 4676055.
102. Swartz, S.H.; Ranum, O.J.; Phillips, O.K.; Cavanaugh, J.J.; Bennett, A.E. (2003). "Urban Gardening Yields Benefits for Low Income Families". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 103: 94–5. doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(08)70150-0.
103. Litt, J.s., et al. “Exploring Ecological, Emotional, and Social Levers of Self-Rated Health for Urban Gardeners and Non-Gardeners: A Path Analysis.” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 144, 2015, pp. 1–8., doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.004
104. Tom Bosschaert (15 December 2007). "Bosschaert, T "Large Scale Urban agriculture Essay", Except Consultancy, 2007". Except.nl. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
105. USDA; Economic Research Service (June 2009). . Administrative Publication No. (AP-036): 160. Archived from the original on 6 April 2013. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
106. Designed for Disease: The Link Between Local Food Environments and Obesity and Diabetes. California Center for Public Health Advocacy, PolicyLink, and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. April 2008.
107. Raja, S.; Changxing Ma; Yadav, P. (2008). "Beyond Food Deserts: Measuring and Mapping Racial Disparities in Neighborhood Food Environments". Journal of Planning Education and Research. 27 (4): 469–82. doi:10.1177/0739456X08317461. S2CID 40262352.
108. Morales, Alfonso (2011). "Growing Food and Justice: Dismantling Racism through Sustainable Food Systems". In Alison Hope Alkon; Julian Agyeman (eds.). Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability. MIT Press. pp. 149–177. ISBN 9780262300223.
109. Nathan McClintock (2011). "From Industrial Garden to Food Desert: Demarcated Devaluation in the Flatlands of Oakland, California". In Alison Hope Alkon; Julian Agyeman (eds.). Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability. MIT Press. pp. 89–121. ISBN 9780262300223.
110. . Archived from the original on 15 March 2013. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
111. Teresa M. Mares, Devon G. Pena (2011). "Environmental and Food Justice: Toward Local, Slow, and Deep Food Systems". In Alison Hope Alkon, Julian Agyeman (ed.). Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability. MIT Press. pp. 197–221.
112. McClintock, Nathan. (2008). From Industrial Garden to Food Desert: Unearthing the Root Structure of urban agriculture in Oakland, California. UC Berkeley: Institute for the Study of Societal Issues.
113. Sapolsky, Robert, "Sick of Poverty," Scientific American, Dec. 2005, pp: 93-99.
114. Gottlieb, Robert (2009). "Where We Live, Work, Play . . . And Eat: Expanding the Environmental Justice Agenda". Environmental Justice. 2: 7–8. doi:10.1089/env.2009.0001.
115. Tong, Zheming; Whitlow, Thomas H.; Landers, Andrew; Flanner, Benjamin (1 January 2016). "A case study of air quality above an urban roof top vegetable farm". Environmental Pollution. Special Issue: Urban Health and Wellbeing. 208 (Pt A): 256–260. Bibcode:2016EPoll.208..256T. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.006. ISSN 0269-7491. PMID 26272830.
116. Alternatives for Community & Environment. Environmental Justice and the Green Economy. A Vision Statement and Case Studies for Just and Sustainable Solutions. Rep. Roxbury, MA: Alternatives for Community & Environment, 2010. Print.
117. Murphy, Kate. "For Urban Gardeners, Lead Is a Concern". The New York Times. 13 May 2009.
118. Schultz, Colin (13 February 2014). "New York Could Grow All Its Own Food. Theoretically, New York City could become largely self-sufficient". Smithsonian. Retrieved 16 February 2014.
119. André Viljoen, Katrin Bohn and Joe Howe, 2005, Continuous Productive Urban Landscapes: Designing Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Cities, Oxford: Architectural Press
120. Smit, Jack, et al. "Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Cities: Using Wastes and Idle Land and Water Bodies as Resources"
121. Can a hands-on teaching tool affect students' attitudes and behavior regarding fruit and vegetables? by Lineberger Sarah E. and J. M. Zajicek, HortTechnology 10 (3) 593-596 -2000
122. Rojas-Valencia, M.N.; Velásquez, M.T. Orta de; Franco, Víctor (2011). "Urban agriculture, using sustainable practices that involve the reuse of wastewater and solid waste". Agricultural Water Management. 98 (9): 1388–94. Bibcode:2011AgWM...98.1388R. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.005.
123. Bell, J. N.B.; Power, S. A.; Jarraud, N.; Agrawal, M.; Davies, C. (2011). "The effects of air pollution on urban ecosystems and agriculture". International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 18 (3): 226–35. Bibcode:2011IJSDW..18..226B. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.570803. S2CID 154867736.
124. McClintock, Nathan (2012). "Assessing soil lead contamination at multiple scales in Oakland, California: Implications for urban agriculture and environmental justice". Applied Geography. 35 (1–2): 460–73. Bibcode:2012AppGe..35..460M. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.10.001.
125. Nordahl, Darrin (2009). Public Produce: The New Urban Agriculture. Washington DC: Island Press. ISBN 978-1-59726-588-1.^{[page needed]}

Notes

• Wayland, Michael (29 August 2013). "GM expanding urban gardening program in Detroit". MLive. Retrieved 7 November 2013.
• Farming Goes Vertical
• Skyfarming (2 April 2007). New York Magazine.
• , article about Chicago's City Farm

Further reading

• "URBACT - Sustainable food in urban communities".
• Pinderhughes, Raquel (2004). Alternative Urban Futures: Planning for sustainable development in cities throughout the world. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 185–217. ISBN 9780742523678. Retrieved 15 January 2012. ISBN 0-7425-2366-7

External links

 

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Urban agriculture.

• Federation of City Farms & Community Gardens
• FAO programs
• Water, Land, and Health of Urban and Peri-Urban food production
• Built-Up Encroachment and the Urban Field: A Comparison of Forty European Cities.