fbpx
Wikipedia

Microswimmer

A microswimmer is a microscopic object with the ability to move in a fluid environment.[1] Natural microswimmers are found everywhere in the natural world as biological microorganisms, such as bacteria, archaea, protists, sperm and microanimals. Since the turn of the millennium there has been increasing interest in manufacturing synthetic and biohybrid microswimmers. Although only two decades have passed since their emergence, they have already shown promise for various biomedical and environmental applications.[1]

Given the recent nature of the field, there is yet no consensus in the literature for the nomenclature of the microscopic objects this article refers to as "microswimmers". Among the many alternative names such objects are given in the literature, microswimmers, micro/nanorobots and micro/nanomotors are likely the most frequently encountered. Other common terms may be more descriptive, including information about the object shape, e.g., microtube or microhelix, its components, e.g., biohybrid, spermbot,[2] bacteriabot,[3] or micro-bio-robot,[4] or behavior, e.g., microrocket, microbullet, microtool or microroller. Researchers have also named their specific microswimmers e.g., medibots,[5] hairbots,[6] iMushbots,[7] IRONSperm,[8] teabots,[9] biobots,[10] T-budbots,[11] or MOFBOTS.[12][1]

Background edit

In 1828, the British biologist Robert Brown discovered the incessant jiggling motion of pollen in water and described his finding in his article "A Brief Account of Microscopical Observations…",[13] leading to extended scientific discussion about the origin of this motion. This enigma was resolved only in 1905, when Albert Einstein published his celebrated essay Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen.[14] Einstein not only deduced the diffusion of suspended particles in quiescent liquids, but also suggested these findings could be used to determine particle size — in a sense, he was the world's first microrheologist.[15]

Ever since Newton established his equations of motion, the mystery of motion on the microscale has emerged frequently in scientific history, as famously demonstrated by a couple of articles that should be discussed briefly. First, an essential concept, popularized by Osborne Reynolds, is that the relative importance of inertia and viscosity for the motion of a fluid depends on certain details of the system under consideration.[15] The Reynolds number Re, named in his honor, quantifies this comparison as a dimensionless ratio of characteristic inertial and viscous forces:

 
E. M. Purcell
 
Purcell’s swimming scallop
"Fast or slow, it exactly retraces its trajectory and it's back where it started".[16]
 

Here, ρ represents the density of the fluid; u is a characteristic velocity of the system (for instance, the velocity of a swimming particle); l is a characteristic length scale (e.g., the swimmer size); and μ is the viscosity of the fluid. Taking the suspending fluid to be water, and using experimentally observed values for u, one can determine that inertia is important for macroscopic swimmers like fish (Re = 100), while viscosity dominates the motion of microscale swimmers like bacteria (Re = 10−4).[15]

The overwhelming importance of viscosity for swimming at the micrometer scale has profound implications for swimming strategy. This has been discussed memorably by E. M. Purcell, who invited the reader into the world of microorganisms and theoretically studied the conditions of their motion.[16] In the first place, propulsion strategies of large scale swimmers often involve imparting momentum to the surrounding fluid in periodic discrete events, such as vortex shedding, and coasting between these events through inertia. This cannot be effective for microscale swimmers like bacteria: due to the large viscous damping, the inertial coasting time of a micron-sized object is on the order of 1 μs. The coasting distance of a microorganism moving at a typical speed is about 0.1 angstroms (Å). Purcell concluded that only forces that are exerted in the present moment on a microscale body contribute to its propulsion, so a constant energy conversion method is essential.[16][15]

Microorganisms have optimized their metabolism for continuous energy production, while purely artificial microswimmers (microrobots) must obtain energy from the environment, since their on-board-storage-capacity is very limited. As a further consequence of the continuous dissipation of energy, biological and artificial microswimmers do not obey the laws of equilibrium statistical physics, and need to be described by non-equilibrium dynamics.[15] Mathematically, Purcell explored the implications of low Reynolds number by taking the Navier-Stokes equation and eliminating the inertial terms:

 

where   is the velocity of the fluid and   is the gradient of the pressure. As Purcell noted, the resulting equation — the Stokes equation — contains no explicit time dependence.[16] This has some important consequences for how a suspended body (e.g., a bacterium) can swim through periodic mechanical motions or deformations (e.g., of a flagellum). First, the rate of motion is practically irrelevant for the motion of the microswimmer and of the surrounding fluid: changing the rate of motion will change the scale of the velocities of the fluid and of the microswimmer, but it will not change the pattern of fluid flow. Secondly, reversing the direction of mechanical motion will simply reverse all velocities in the system. These properties of the Stokes equation severely restrict the range of feasible swimming strategies.[16][15]

As a concrete illustration, consider a mathematical scallop that consists of two rigid pieces connected by a hinge. Can the "scallop" swim by periodically opening and closing the hinge? No: regardless of how the cycle of opening and closing depends on time, the scallop will always return to its starting point at the end of the cycle. Here originated the striking quote: "Fast or slow, it exactly retraces its trajectory and it's back where it started".[16] In light of this scallop theorem, Purcell developed approaches concerning how artificial motion at the micro scale can be generated.[15] This paper continues to inspire ongoing scientific discussion; for example, recent work by the Fischer group from the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems experimentally confirmed that the scallop principle is only valid for Newtonian fluids.[17][15]

Types edit

Different types of microswimmers are powered and actuated in different ways. Swimming strategies for individual microswimmers [3][18][19][20][21][22] as well as swarms of microswimmers [23][24][25][26][27][28] have been examined down through the years. Typically, microswimmers rely either on external power sources, as it is the case for magnetic,[29] optic,[10] or acoustic control,[30] or employ the fuel available in their surroundings, as is the case with biohybrid or catalytic microswimmers. Magnetic and acoustic actuation are typically compatible with in vivo microswimmer manipulation and catalytic microswimmers can be specifically engineered to employ in vivo fuels. The use of optical forces in biological fluids or in vivo is more challenging, but interesting examples have nevertheless been demonstrated.[10]

Often, researchers choose to take inspiration from nature, either for the entire microswimmer design, or for achieving a desired propulsion type. For example, one of the first bioinspired microswimmers consisted of human red blood cells modified with a flagellum-like artificial component made of filaments of magnetic particles bonded via biotinstreptavidin interactions.[31] More recently, biomimetic swimming inspired by worm-like travelling wave features,[32] shrimp locomotion,[33] and bacterial run-and-tumble motion,[34] was demonstrated by using shaped light.[10]

A different nature-inspired approach is the use of biohybrid microswimmers. These comprise a living component and a synthetic one. Biohybrids most often take advantage of the microscale motion of various biological systems and can also make use of other behaviours characterising the living component.[35] For magnetic bioinspired and biohybrid microswimmers, typical model organisms are bacteria, sperm cells and magnetotactic cells.[36] In addition to the use of magnetic forces, actuation of bioinspired microswimmers was also demonstrated using e.g., acoustic excitation [37] or optical forces.[38] Another nature-inspired behavior related to optical forces is that of phototaxis, which can be exploited by e.g., cargo-carrying microorganisms,[39] synthetic microswimmers [40][41][42] or biohybrid microswimmers.[43] A number of recent review papers are focused on explaining or comparing existing propulsion and control strategies used in microswimmer actuation.[44][45][46][47][48] Magnetic actuation is most often included for controlled in vivo guiding, even for microswimmers which rely on a different type of propulsion. In 2020, Koleoso et al. reviewed the use of magnetic small scale robots for biomedical applications and provide details about the various magnetic fields and actuation systems developed for such purposes.[29][1]

Strategies for the fabrication of microswimmers include two-photon polymerisation 3D printing, photolithography, template-assisted electrodeposition, or bonding of a living component to an inanimate one by exploiting different strategies. More recent approaches exploit 4D printing, which is the 3D printing of stimuli-responsive materials.[49][50][51][52] Further functionalization is often required, either to enable a certain type of actuation, e.g., metal coating for magnetic control or thermoplasmonic responses, or as part of the application, if certain characteristics are required for e.g., sensing, cargo transport, controlled interactions with the environment, or biodegradation.[53][54][55][56][1]

Natural microswimmers edit

 
Changes in speed and Reynolds number with length of swimmer [15]
 
Natural microswimmers
Drawing of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii alga in a co-culture with Escherichia coli bacteria [57]

Motile systems have developed in the natural world over time and length scales spanning several orders of magnitude, and have evolved anatomically and physiologically to attain optimal strategies for self-propulsion and overcome the implications of high viscosity forces and Brownian motion, as shown in the diagram on the right.[58][15]

Some of the smallest known natural motile systems are motor proteins, i.e., proteins and protein complexes present in cells that carry out a variety of physiological functions by transducing chemical energy into mechanical energy. These motor proteins are classified as myosins, kinesins, or dyneins. Myosin motors are responsible for muscle contractions and the transport of cargousing actin filaments as tracks. Dynein motors and kinesin motors, on the other hand, use microtubules to transport vesicles across the cell.[59][60] The mechanism these protein motors use to convert chemical energy into movement depends on ATP hydrolysis, which leads to a conformation modification in the globular motor domain, leading to directed motion.[61][62][15]

Apart from motor proteins, enzymes, traditionally recognized for their catalytic functions in biochemical processes, can function as nanoscale machines that convert chemical energy into mechanical action at the molecular dimension. Diffusion of various enzymes (e.g. urease, and catalase), measured by fluorescent correlated spectroscopy (FCS), increases in a substrate-dependent manner.[63][64] Moreover, when enzymes are membrane-bound, their catalytic actions can drive lipid vesicle movement. For instance, lipid vesicles integrated with enzymes such as transmembrane adenosine 5’-triphosphatase, membrane-bound acid phosphatase, or urease exhibit enhanced mobility correlating with the enzymatic turnover rate.[65]

Bacteria can be roughly divided into two fundamentally different groups, gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, distinguished by the architecture of their cell envelope. In each case the cell envelope is a complex multi-layered structure that protects the cell from its environment. In gram-positive bacteria, the cytoplasmic membrane is only surrounded by a thick cell wall of peptidoglycan. By contrast, the envelope of gram-negative bacteria is more complex and consists (from inside to outside) of the cytoplasmic membrane, a thin layer of peptidoglycan, and an additional outer membrane, also called the lipopolysaccharide layer. Other bacterial cell surface structures range from disorganised slime layers to highly structured capsules. These are made from secreted slimy or sticky polysaccharides or proteins that provide protection for the cells and are in direct contact with the environment. They have other functions, including attachment to solid surfaces. Additionally, protein appendages can be present on the surface: fimbriae and pili can have different lengths and diameters and their functions include adhesion and twitching motility.[66][67][15]

Specifically, for microorganisms that live in aqueous environments, locomotion refers to swimming, and hence the world is full of different classes of swimming microorganisms, such as bacteria, spermatozoa, protozoa, and algae. Bacteria move due to rotation of hair-like filaments called flagella, which are anchored to a protein motor complex on the bacteria cell wall.[15]

The following table, based on Schwarz et al., 2017,[68] lists some examples of natural or biological microswimmers.

Motile microorganisms
Name Image Size (μm2)a Speed (μm/s)b Propulsion mechanism Natural swimming habitat Sources
bacterial
swimmers


(prokaryotes)
Escherichia coli   0.5 × 2 30 Peritrichous bundles Intestinal flora [69]
Serratia marcescens 1 × 2 50 Peritrichous bundles Respiratory and urinary tracts (parasitic) [70]
Salmonella typhimurium   0.5 × 2 30 Peritrichous bundles Intestines (parasitic) [71]
Bacillus subtilis   1 × 3 20 Peritrichous bundles Intestinal flora [72]
Aliivibrio fischeri   1 × 2 50 Lophotrichous flagella Mucus (symbiotic) [73]
Vibrio alginolyticus   2 × 3 40 Monotrichous flagellum Blood (parasitic) [74][75]
Listeria monocytogenes   0.5 × 1.5 <1 Peritrichous or amphitrichous bundles Inter- and intracellular (parasitic) [76][77]
Magnetococcus marinus   2 × 2 200 Two lophotrichous bundles Marine water [78][79]
Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense   0.5 × 2 60 Two amphitrichous flagella Freshwater sediments [80]
Mycoplasma mobile 0.5 × 0.5 5 Gliding via protrusions Fish gills (parasitic) [81]
protist
swimmers


(unicellular)
eukaryotes)
Chlamydomonas   10 × 10 150 Two lophotrichous flagella Freshwater, soil [82]
Tetrahymena   25 × 50 >500 Holotrichous cilia Freshwater [83]
Trypanosome   3 × 20 30 Monotrichous flagellum Blood (parasitic) [84][85]
sperm
cells
Human   3 × 5 50 Monotrichous flagellum Reproductive tract [86][87]
Bovine 5 × 10 100 Monotrichous flagellum Reproductive tract [87][88][89]
Murine 3 × 8 120 Monotrichous flagellum Reproductive tract [86][88]

Synthetic microswimmers edit

"An artificial microswimmer is a cutting-edge technology with engineering and medical applications. A natural microswimmer, such as bacteria and sperm cells, also play important roles in wide varieties of engineering, medical and biological phenomena. Due to the small size of the microswimmer, the inertial effect of the surrounding flow field may be negligible. In such a case, reciprocal body deformation cannot induce migration of a swimmer, which is known as the scallop theorem. To overcome the implications of the scallop theorem, the microswimmer needs to undergo a nonreciprocal body deformation to achieve migration. The swimming strategy is thus completely different from macro-scale swimmers...".[90]

 
Under light fields, polystyrene/gold Janus particles are set to swim and rotate alternatively such that they follow a predefined path [91]

One of the current engineering challenges is to create miniaturized functional vehicles that can carry out complex tasks at a small scale that would be otherwise impractical, inefficient, or outright impossible by conventional means. These vehicles are termed nano/micromotors or nano/microrobots, and should be distinguished from even smaller molecular machines for energy, computing, or other applications on the one side and static microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) on the other side of this size scale. Rather than being electronic devices on a chip, micromotors are able to move freely through a liquid medium while being steered or directed externally or by intrinsic design, which can be achieved by various mechanisms, most importantly catalytic reactions,[92][93][94][95] magnetic fields,[96] or ultrasonic waves.[97][98][99][100][101]

There are a variety of sensing, actuating, or pickup-and-delivery applications that scientists are currently aiming for, with local drug targeting for cancer treatment being one of the more prominent examples.[102][5] For applications like this, a micromotor needs to be able to move, i.e., to swim, freely in three dimensions efficiently controlled and directed with a reliable mechanism.[68]

It is a direct consequence of the small size scale of microswimmers that they have a low Reynolds number. This means the physics of how microswimmers swim is dominated by viscous drag forces, a problem which has been discussed extensively by physicists in the field.[99][103][58] This kind of swimming has challenged engineers as it is not commonly experienced in everyday life, but can nonetheless be observed in nature for motile microorganisms like sperm or certain bacteria. Naturally, these microorganisms served as inspiration from the very beginning to create artificial micromotors, as they were able to tackle the challenges that an active, self-sufficient microswimmer vehicle has to face.[104] With biomimetic approaches, researchers were able to imitate the flagella-based motion strategy of sperm and Escherichia coli bacteria by reproducing their respective flagellum shape and actuating it with magnetic fields.[31][105][68][15]

Microorganisms have adapted their locomotion to the harsh environment of low Reynolds number regime by invoking different swimming strategy.[106] For example, the E. coli moves by rotating its helical flagellum,[107][108] Chlamydomonas flagella have a breaststroke kind of motion.[109] African trypanosome has a helical flagellum attached to the cell body with a planar wave passing through it.[110][111] Swimming of these kind of natural swimmers have been investigated for the last half-century.[112] As a result of these studies, artificial swimmers have also been proposed, like Taylor sheet,[113] Purcell's two-hinge swimmer,[16][114] three-linked spheres swimmer,[115][116][117] elastic two-sphere swimmer [118] and three-sphere with a passive elastic arm,[119] which have further enhanced understanding about low Reynolds number swimmers. One of the challenges in proposing an artificial swimmer lies in the fact that the proposed movement stroke should not be reciprocal otherwise it cannot propel itself due to the Scallop theorem. In Scallop theorem, Purcell had argued that a swimmer with one-hinge or one degree of freedom is bound to perform reciprocal motion and thus will not be able to swim in the Stokes regime.[106][16][112]

Purcell proposed two possible ways to elude from Scallop theorem, one is 'corkscrew' motion [107][104] and the other is 'flexible oar' motion.[120][121] Using the concept of flexible oar, Dreyfus et al reported a micro swimmer that exploit elastic property of a slender filament made up of paramagnetic beads.[31] To break the time inversion symmetry, a passive head was attached to the flexible arm. The passive head reduces the velocity of the flexible swimmer, bigger the head, higher is the drag force experienced by the swimmer. The head is essential for swimming because without it the tail performs a reciprocal motion and the velocity of the swimmer reduces to zero.[122][112]

Another way microswimmers can propel is through catalytic reactions. Taking inspiration from Whitesides, who used the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to propel cm/mm-scale objects on a water surface,[123] Sen et al. (2004) fabricated catalytic motors in the micrometer range.[92] These microswimmers were rod-shaped particles 370 nm in diameter and consisted of 1 µm long Pt and Au segments. They propelled via the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in solution which would be catalyzed into water and oxygen. The Pt/Au rods were able to consistently reach speeds of up to 8 µm/s in a solution of 3.3% hydrogen peroxide. The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in the Pt side produces oxygen, two protons and two electrons. The two protons and electrons will travel towards the Au, where they will be used to react with another hydrogen peroxide molecule, to produce two water molecules. The movements of the two protons and the two electrons through the rod drag the fluid towards the Au side, thus this fluid flow will propel the rod in the opposite direction. This self-electrophoresis mechanism is what powers the motion of these rods.[93] Further analysis of the Pt/Au rods showed that they were capable of performing chemotaxis towards higher hydrogen peroxide concentrations,[94] transport cargo,[95] and exhibited steerable motion in an external magnetic field when inner Ni segments were added.[95]

Responding to stimuli edit

 
Symmetric self-thermophoretic active particle[124]
scale bar has a length of 1 μm

Reconfigurable synthetic or artificial microswimmers need internal feedback[125] Self-propelling microparticles are often proposed as synthetic models for biological microswimmers, yet they lack the internally regulated adaptation of their biological counterparts. Conversely, adaptation can be encoded in larger-scale soft-robotic devices but remains elusive to transfer to the colloidal scale.[125]

The ubiquity and success of motile bacteria are strongly coupled to their ability to autonomously adapt to different environments as they can reconfigure their shape, metabolism, and motility via internal feedback mechanisms.[126][127] Realizing artificial microswimmers with similar adaptation capabilities and autonomous behavior might substantially impact technologies ranging from optimal transport to sensing and microrobotics.[128] Focusing on adaptation, existing approaches at the colloidal scale mostly rely on external feedback, either to regulate motility via the spatiotemporal modulation of the propulsion velocity and direction [129][124][130][131] or to induce shape changes via the same magnetic or electric fields,[132][133][134] which are also driving the particles. On the contrary, endowing artificial microswimmers with an internal feedback mechanism, which regulates motility in response to stimuli that are decoupled from the source of propulsion, remains an elusive task.[125]

A promising route to achieve this goal is to exploit the coupling between particle shape and motility. Efficient switching between different propulsion states can, for instance, be reached by the spontaneous aggregation of symmetry-breaking active clusters of varying geometry,[135][136][137][138] albeit this process does not have the desired deterministic control. Conversely, designing colloidal clusters with fixed shapes and compositions offers fine control on motility [139][140][141] but lacks adaptation. Although progress on reconfigurable robots at the sub-millimeter scale has been made,[142][143][144][145][146] downscaling these concepts to the colloidal level demands alternative fabrication and design. Shape-shifting colloidal clusters reconfiguring along a predefined pathway in response to local stimuli [147] would combine both characteristics, with high potential toward the vision of realising adaptive artificial microswimmers.[125]

Biohybrid microswimmers edit

 
Types of bacterial biohybrid microswimmers [148]
 
Bacterial biohybrid microswimmers development[149]
capture, delivery, sensing, and release

The so-called biohybrid microswimmer can be defined as a microswimmer that consist of both biological and artificial parts, for instance, one or several living microorganisms attached to one or various synthetic parts. The biohybrid approach directly employs living microorganisms to be a main component or modified base of a functional microswimmer.[150][151] Initially microorganisms were used as the motor units for artificial devices, but in recent years this role has been extended and modified toward other functionalities that take advantage of the biological capabilities of these organisms considering their means of interacting with other cells and living matter, specifically for applications inside the human body like drug delivery or fertilisation.[152][153][68]

A distinct advantage of microorganisms is that they naturally integrate motility and various biological functions in a conveniently miniaturised package, coupled with autonomous sensing and decision-making capabilities. They are able to adapt and thrive in complex in vivo environments and are capable of self-repair and self-assembly upon interaction with their surroundings. In that sense, self-sufficient microorganisms naturally function very similar to what we envision for artificially created microrobots: They harvest chemical energy from their surroundings to power molecular motor proteins that serve as actuators, they employ ion channels and microtubular networks to act as intracellular wiring, they rely on RNA or DNA as memory for control algorithms, and they feature an array of various membrane proteins to sense and evaluate their surroundings. All these abilities act together to allow microbes to thrive and pursue their goal and function. In principle, these abilities also qualify them as biological microrobots for novel operations like theranostics, the combination of diagnosis and therapy, if we are able to impose such functions artificially, for example, by functionalisation with therapeutics. Further, artificial extensions may be used as handles for external control and supervision mechanisms or to enhance the microbe's performance to guide and tailor its functions for specific applications.[68]

In fact, the biohybrid approach can be conceived in a dualistic way, with respect to the three basic ingredients of an in vivo microrobot, which are motility, control, and functionality. Figure 1 illustrates how these three ingredients can be either realized biologically, i.e., by the microorganism, or artificially, i.e., by the synthetic component. For example, a hybrid biomicromotor based on a sperm cell can be driven by the flagellum of the sperm or by an attached artificial helical flagellum.[154][155] It can orient itself autonomously via biological interactions with its surroundings and other cells, or be controlled and supervised externally via artificial sensors and actuators. Finally, it can carry out a biological function, like its inherent ability to fertilize an egg cell, or an artificially imposed function, like the delivery of synthetic drugs or DNA vectors. A biohybrid device may deploy any feasible combination of such biological and artificial components in order to carry out a specific application.[68]

Navigation edit

Hydrodynamics can determine the optimal route for microswimmer navigation[156] Compared to the well explored problem of how to steer a macroscopic agent, like an airplane or a moon lander, to optimally reach a target, optimal navigation strategies for microswimmers experiencing hydrodynamic interactions with walls and obstacles are far-less understood.[156] Furthermore, hydrodynamic interactions in suspensions of microswimmers produce complex behavior.[157][158] The quest on how to navigate or steer to optimally reach a target is important, e.g., for airplanes to save fuel while facing complex wind patterns on their way to a remote destination, or for the coordination of the motion of the parts of a space-agent to safely land on the moon. These classical problems are well-explored and are usually solved using optimal control theory.[159] Likewise, navigation and search strategies are frequently encountered in a plethora of biological systems, including the foraging of animals for food,[160] or of T cells searching for targets to mount an immune response.[161]

There is growing interest in optimal navigation problems and search strategies [162][163][164][165][166][167] of microswimmers [58][103][168][169] and "dry" active Brownian particles,[170][99][171][172][156] The general problem regarding the optimal trajectory of a microswimmer which can freely steer but cannot control its speed toward a predefined target (point-to-point navigation) can be referred to as "the optimal microswimmer navigation problem". The characteristic differences between the optimal microswimmer navigation problem and conventional optimal control problems for macroagents like airplanes, cruise-ships, or moon-landers root in the presence of a low-Reynolds-number solvent in the former problem only. They comprise (i) overdamped dynamics, (ii) thermal fluctuations, and (iii) long-ranged fluid-mediated hydrodynamic interactions with interfaces, walls, and obstacles, all of which are characteristic for microswimmers.[99] In particular, the non-conservative hydrodynamic forces which microswimmers experience call for a distinct navigation strategy than the conservative gravitational forces acting, e.g. on space vehicles. Recent work has explored optimal navigation problems of dry active particles (and particles in external flow fields) accounting for (i) and partly also for (ii). Specifically recent research has pioneered the use of reinforcement learning [173][174][175] such as determining optimal steering strategies of active particles to optimally navigate toward a target position [162][163][166][167] or to exploit external flow fields to avoid getting trapped in certain flow structures by learning smart gravitaxis.[176] Deep reinforcement learning has been used to explore microswimmer navigation problems in mazes and obstacle arrays [177] assuming global [163] or only local [164] knowledge of the environment. Analytical approaches to optimal active particle navigation [165][166] complement these works and allow testing machine-learned results.[166][167][156]

Applications edit

As is the case for microtechnology and nanotechnology in general, the history of microswimmer applications arguably starts with Richard Feynman’s famous lecture There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom.[178] In the visionary speech, among other topics, Feynman addressed the idea of microscopic surgeons, saying: "...it would be interesting in surgery if you could swallow the surgeon. You put the mechanical surgeon inside the blood vessel and it goes into the heart and <<looks>> around (of course the information has to be fed out). It finds out which valve is the faulty one and takes a little knife and slices it out. Other small machines might be permanently incorporated in the body to assist some inadequately-functioning organ." The concept of the surgeon one could swallow was soon after presented in the science-fiction movie Fantastic Voyage and in Isaac Asimov’s writings.[1]

 
Magnetotactic bacteria, such as Magnetococcus marinus, as potential drug-carriers capable of penetrating a tumour [179]

Only a few decades later, microswimmers aiming to become true microscale surgeons evolved from an intriguing science-fiction concept to a reality explored in many research laboratories around the world, as already highlighted by Metin Sitti in 2009.[180][1] These active agents that can self-propel in a low Reynolds number environment might play a key role in the future of nanomedicine, as popularised in 2016 by Yuval Noah Harari in Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow.[181] In particular, they might become useful for the targeted delivery of genes [182] or drugs [183][184] and other cargo [185][186] to a certain target (e.g. a cancer cell) through our blood vessels, requiring them to find a good, or ideally optimal, path toward the target avoiding, e.g., obstacles and unfortunate flow field regions.[156]

Already in 2010, Nelson et al. reviewed the existing and envisioned applications of microrobots in minimally invasive medicine.[187] Since then, the field has grown, and it has become clear that microswimmers have much potential for biomedical applications.[1] Already, many interesting tasks can be performed in vitro using tailored microswimmers. Still, as of 2020, a number of challenges regarding in vivo control, biocompatibility and long-term biosafety need to be overcome before microswimmers can become a viable option for many clinical applications.[188][1]

A schematic representation of the classification of biomedical applications is shown in the diagram on the left below. This includes the use of microswimmers for cargo transport in drug delivery and other biomedical applications, as well as assisted fertilisation, sensing, micromanipulation and imaging. Some of the more complex microswimmers fit into multiple categories, as they are applied simultaneously for e.g., sensing and drug delivery.[1]

 
Biomedical applications of microswimmers [1]
 
Essentials for a microswimmer to function
with medical interventional capabilities [189]

The design of an untethered microscopic mobile machine or microrobot to function in vivo with medical interventional capabilities should assume an integrated approach where design 3D body shape, material composition, manufacturing technique, deployment strategy, actuation and control methods, imaging modality, permeation of biological barriers, and the execution of the prescribed medical tasks need to be considered altogether, as illustrated in the diagram on the right above. Each of these essential aspects contains a special design consideration, which must be reflected at the physical design of the microrobot.[189]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Bunea, Ada-Ioana; Taboryski, Rafael (2020). "Recent Advances in Microswimmers for Biomedical Applications". Micromachines. 11 (12): 1048. doi:10.3390/mi11121048. PMC 7760273. PMID 33261101.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  2. ^ Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schwarz, Lukas; Meyer, Anne K.; Hebenstreit, Franziska; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2016). "Cellular Cargo Delivery: Toward Assisted Fertilization by Sperm-Carrying Micromotors". Nano Letters. 16 (1): 555–561. Bibcode:2016NanoL..16..555M. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04221. PMID 26699202.
  3. ^ a b Schauer, Oliver; Mostaghaci, Babak; Colin, Remy; Hürtgen, Daniel; Kraus, David; Sitti, Metin; Sourjik, Victor (2018). "Motility and chemotaxis of bacteria-driven microswimmers fabricated using antigen 43-mediated biotin display". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 9801. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.9801S. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28102-9. PMC 6023875. PMID 29955099.
  4. ^ Magdanz, Veronika; Sanchez, Samuel; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2013). "Development of a Sperm-Flagella Driven Micro-Bio-Robot". Advanced Materials. 25 (45): 6581–6588. Bibcode:2013AdM....25.6581M. doi:10.1002/adma.201302544. PMID 23996782. S2CID 5125033.
  5. ^ a b Srivastava, Sarvesh Kumar; Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Koch, Britta; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2016). "Medibots: Dual-Action Biogenic Microdaggers for Single-Cell Surgery and Drug Release". Advanced Materials. 28 (5): 832–837. Bibcode:2016AdM....28..832S. doi:10.1002/adma.201504327. PMID 26619085. S2CID 40955542.
  6. ^ Singh, Ajay Vikram; Dad Ansari, Mohammad Hasan; Dayan, Cem Balda; Giltinan, Joshua; Wang, Shuo; Yu, Yan; Kishore, Vimal; Laux, Peter; Luch, Andreas; Sitti, Metin (2019). "Multifunctional magnetic hairbot for untethered osteogenesis, ultrasound contrast imaging and drug delivery". Biomaterials. 219: 119394. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119394. PMID 31382208. S2CID 199451792.
  7. ^ Bhuyan, Tamanna; Singh, Amit Kumar; Dutta, Deepanjalee; Unal, Aynur; Ghosh, Siddhartha Sankar; Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar (2017). "Magnetic Field Guided Chemotaxis of i Mushbots for Targeted Anticancer Therapeutics". ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 3 (8): 1627–1640. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00086. PMID 33429648.
  8. ^ Magdanz, Veronika; Khalil, Islam S. M.; Simmchen, Juliane; Furtado, Guilherme P.; Mohanty, Sumit; Gebauer, Johannes; Xu, Haifeng; Klingner, Anke; Aziz, Azaam; Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schmidt, Oliver G.; Misra, Sarthak (2020). "IRONSperm: Sperm-templated soft magnetic microrobots". Science Advances. 6 (28): eaba5855. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.5855M. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba5855. PMC 7450605. PMID 32923590.
  9. ^ Bhuyan, Tamanna; Dutta, Deepanjalee; Bhattacharjee, Mitradip; Singh, Amit Kumar; Ghosh, Siddhartha Sankar; Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar (2019). "Acoustic Propulsion of Vitamin C Loaded Teabots for Targeted Oxidative Stress and Amyloid Therapeutics". ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2 (10): 4571–4582. doi:10.1021/acsabm.9b00677. PMID 35021416. S2CID 203945671.
  10. ^ a b c d Bunea, Ada-Ioana; Glückstad, Jesper (2019). "Strategies for Optical Trapping in Biological Samples: Aiming at Microrobotic Surgeons" (PDF). Laser & Photonics Reviews. 13 (4). Bibcode:2019LPRv...1300227B. doi:10.1002/lpor.201800227. S2CID 128326068.
  11. ^ Bhuyan, Tamanna; Simon, Anitha T.; Maity, Surjendu; Singh, Amit Kumar; Ghosh, Siddhartha Sankar; Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar (2020). "Magnetotactic T-Budbots to Kill-n-Clean Biofilms". ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 12 (39): 43352–43364. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c08444. PMID 32864951. S2CID 221383266.
  12. ^ Wang, Xiaopu; Chen, Xiang-Zhong; Alcântara, Carlos C. J.; Sevim, Semih; Hoop, Marcus; Terzopoulou, Anastasia; De Marco, Carmela; Hu, Chengzhi; De Mello, Andrew J.; Falcaro, Paolo; Furukawa, Shuhei; Nelson, Bradley J.; Puigmartí-Luis, Josep; Pané, Salvador (2019). "MOF-Based Microrobots: MOFBOTS: Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Biomedical Microrobots (Adv. Mater. 27/2019)". Advanced Materials. 31 (27). Bibcode:2019AdM....3170192W. doi:10.1002/adma.201970192. S2CID 198797318.
  13. ^ Brown, James F. (1852). "XXIV. On some salts and products of decomposition of pyromeconic acid". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 4 (24): 161–168. doi:10.1080/14786445208647098.
  14. ^ Einstein, A. (1905). "Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen". Annalen der Physik. 322 (8): 549–560. Bibcode:1905AnP...322..549E. doi:10.1002/andp.19053220806.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Bastos-Arrieta, Julio; Revilla-Guarinos, Ainhoa; Uspal, William E.; Simmchen, Juliane (2018). "Bacterial Biohybrid Microswimmers". Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 5: 97. doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00097. PMC 7805739. PMID 33500976.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h Purcell, E. M. (1977). "Life at low Reynolds number". American Journal of Physics. 45 (1): 3–11. Bibcode:1977AmJPh..45....3P. doi:10.1119/1.10903.
  17. ^ Qiu, Tian; Lee, Tung-Chun; Mark, Andrew G.; Morozov, Konstantin I.; Münster, Raphael; Mierka, Otto; Turek, Stefan; Leshansky, Alexander M.; Fischer, Peer (2014). "Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number". Nature Communications. 5: 5119. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.5119Q. doi:10.1038/ncomms6119. PMC 4241991. PMID 25369018.
  18. ^ Zhang, Li; Abbott, Jake J.; Dong, Lixin; Kratochvil, Bradley E.; Bell, Dominik; Nelson, Bradley J. (2009). "Artificial bacterial flagella: Fabrication and magnetic control". Applied Physics Letters. 94 (6): 064107. Bibcode:2009ApPhL..94f4107Z. doi:10.1063/1.3079655.
  19. ^ Abbott, Jake J.; Peyer, Kathrin E.; Lagomarsino, Marco Cosentino; Zhang, Li; Dong, Lixin; Kaliakatsos, Ioannis K.; Nelson, Bradley J. (2009). "How Should Microrobots Swim?". The International Journal of Robotics Research. 28 (11–12): 1434–1447. doi:10.1177/0278364909341658. S2CID 62330062.
  20. ^ Schamel, Debora; Mark, Andrew G.; Gibbs, John G.; Miksch, Cornelia; Morozov, Konstantin I.; Leshansky, Alexander M.; Fischer, Peer (2014). "Nanopropellers and Their Actuation in Complex Viscoelastic Media". ACS Nano. 8 (9): 8794–8801. doi:10.1021/nn502360t. PMID 24911046.
  21. ^ Rogowski, Louis William; Oxner, Micah; Tang, Jiannan; Kim, Min Jun (2020). "Heterogeneously flagellated microswimmer behavior in viscous fluids". Biomicrofluidics. 14 (2): 024112. doi:10.1063/1.5137743. PMC 7173976. PMID 32341723.
  22. ^ Ceylan, Hakan; Yasa, Immihan Ceren; Yasa, Oncay; Tabak, Ahmet Fatih; Giltinan, Joshua; Sitti, Metin (2019). "3D-Printed Biodegradable Microswimmer for Theranostic Cargo Delivery and Release". ACS Nano. 13 (3): 3353–3362. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b09233. PMC 6728090. PMID 30742410.
  23. ^ Peyer, Kathrin E.; Zhang, Li; Nelson, Bradley J. (2013). "Bio-inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications". Nanoscale. 5 (4): 1259–1272. Bibcode:2013Nanos...5.1259P. doi:10.1039/C2NR32554C. PMID 23165991.
  24. ^ Chowdhury, Sagar; Jing, Wuming; Cappelleri, David J. (2015). "Controlling multiple microrobots: Recent progress and future challenges". Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics. 10 (1–4): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s12213-015-0083-6. S2CID 53644820.
  25. ^ Servant, Ania; Qiu, Famin; Mazza, Mariarosa; Kostarelos, Kostas; Nelson, Bradley J. (2015). "Controlled in Vivo Swimming of a Swarm of Bacteria-Like Microrobotic Flagella". Advanced Materials. 27 (19): 2981–2988. Bibcode:2015AdM....27.2981S. doi:10.1002/adma.201404444. PMID 25850420. S2CID 22780031.
  26. ^ Dong, Xiaoguang; Sitti, Metin (2020). "Controlling two-dimensional collective formation and cooperative behavior of magnetic microrobot swarms". The International Journal of Robotics Research. 39 (5): 617–638. doi:10.1177/0278364920903107. S2CID 213942288.
  27. ^ Liang, Xiong; Mou, Fangzhi; Huang, Zhen; Zhang, Jianhua; You, Ming; Xu, Leilei; Luo, Ming; Guan, Jianguo (2020). "Hierarchical Microswarms with Leader–Follower-Like Structures: Electrohydrodynamic Self-Organization and Multimode Collective Photoresponses". Advanced Functional Materials. 30 (16). doi:10.1002/adfm.201908602. S2CID 214408287.
  28. ^ Zheng, Jing; Dai, Baohu; Wang, Jizhuang; Xiong, Ze; Yang, Ya; Liu, Jun; Zhan, Xiaojun; Wan, Zhihan; Tang, Jinyao (2017). "Orthogonal navigation of multiple visible-light-driven artificial microswimmers". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 1438. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8.1438Z. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01778-9. PMC 5681650. PMID 29127414.
  29. ^ a b Koleoso, M.; Feng, X.; Xue, Y.; Li, Q.; Munshi, T.; Chen, X. (2020). "Micro/Nanoscale magnetic robots for biomedical applications". Materials Today Bio. 8: 100085. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100085. PMC 7702192. PMID 33299981.
  30. ^ Rao, K. Jagajjanani; Li, Fei; Meng, Long; Zheng, Hairong; Cai, Feiyan; Wang, Wei (2015). "A Force to be Reckoned with: A Review of Synthetic Microswimmers Powered by Ultrasound". Small. 11 (24): 2836–2846. doi:10.1002/smll.201403621. PMID 25851515.
  31. ^ a b c Dreyfus, Rémi; Baudry, Jean; Roper, Marcus L.; Fermigier, Marc; Stone, Howard A.; Bibette, Jérôme (2005). "Microscopic artificial swimmers". Nature. 437 (7060): 862–865. Bibcode:2005Natur.437..862D. doi:10.1038/nature04090. PMID 16208366. S2CID 3025635.
  32. ^ Palagi, Stefano; Mark, Andrew G.; Reigh, Shang Yik; Melde, Kai; Qiu, Tian; Zeng, Hao; Parmeggiani, Camilla; Martella, Daniele; Sanchez-Castillo, Alberto; Kapernaum, Nadia; Giesselmann, Frank; Wiersma, Diederik S.; Lauga, Eric; Fischer, Peer (2016). "Structured light enables biomimetic swimming and versatile locomotion of photoresponsive soft microrobots". Nature Materials. 15 (6): 647–653. Bibcode:2016NatMa..15..647P. doi:10.1038/nmat4569. hdl:2158/1105540. PMID 26878315.
  33. ^ Kim, Min-Soo; Lee, Hyun-Taek; Ahn, Sung-Hoon (2019). "Laser Controlled 65 Micrometer Long Microrobot Made of Ni-Ti Shape Memory Alloy". Advanced Materials Technologies. 4 (12). doi:10.1002/admt.201900583. S2CID 210801365.
  34. ^ Peng, Xiaolei; Chen, Zhihan; Kollipara, Pavana Siddhartha; Liu, Yaoran; Fang, Jie; Lin, Linhan; Zheng, Yuebing (2020). "Opto-thermoelectric microswimmers". Light: Science & Applications. 9 (1): 141. Bibcode:2020LSA.....9..141P. doi:10.1038/s41377-020-00378-5. PMC 7429954. PMID 32864116.
  35. ^ Bastos-Arrieta, Julio; Revilla-Guarinos, Ainhoa; Uspal, William E.; Simmchen, Juliane (2018). "Bacterial Biohybrid Microswimmers". Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 5: 97. doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00097. PMC 7805739. PMID 33500976.
  36. ^ Bente, Klaas; Codutti, Agnese; Bachmann, Felix; Faivre, Damien (2018). "Biohybrid and Bioinspired Magnetic Microswimmers". Small. 14 (29): e1704374. doi:10.1002/smll.201704374. PMID 29855143. S2CID 46918320.
  37. ^ Kaynak, Murat; Ozcelik, Adem; Nourhani, Amir; Lammert, Paul E.; Crespi, Vincent H.; Huang, Tony Jun (2017). "Acoustic actuation of bioinspired microswimmers". Lab on a Chip. 17 (3): 395–400. doi:10.1039/C6LC01272H. PMC 5465869. PMID 27991641.
  38. ^ Xin, Hongbao; Zhao, Nan; Wang, Yunuo; Zhao, Xiaoting; Pan, Ting; Shi, Yang; Li, Baojun (2020). "Optically Controlled Living Micromotors for the Manipulation and Disruption of Biological Targets". Nano Letters. 20 (10): 7177–7185. Bibcode:2020NanoL..20.7177X. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02501. PMID 32935992. S2CID 221747106.
  39. ^ Nagai, Moeto; Hirano, Takahiro; Shibata, Takayuki (2019). "Phototactic Algae-Driven Unidirectional Transport of Submillimeter-Sized Cargo in a Microchannel". Micromachines. 10 (2): 130. doi:10.3390/mi10020130. PMC 6412834. PMID 30781488.
  40. ^ Lozano, Celia; Ten Hagen, Borge; Löwen, Hartmut; Bechinger, Clemens (2016). "Phototaxis of synthetic microswimmers in optical landscapes". Nature Communications. 7: 12828. arXiv:1609.09814. Bibcode:2016NatCo...712828L. doi:10.1038/ncomms12828. PMC 5056439. PMID 27687580. S2CID 7924312.
  41. ^ Singh, Dhruv P.; Uspal, William E.; Popescu, Mihail N.; Wilson, Laurence G.; Fischer, Peer (2018). "Photogravitactic Microswimmers" (PDF). Advanced Functional Materials. 28 (25). doi:10.1002/adfm.201706660. S2CID 247697846.
  42. ^ Dai, Baohu; Wang, Jizhuang; Xiong, Ze; Zhan, Xiaojun; Dai, Wei; Li, Chien-Cheng; Feng, Shien-Ping; Tang, Jinyao (2016). "Programmable artificial phototactic microswimmer". Nature Nanotechnology. 11 (12): 1087–1092. Bibcode:2016NatNa..11.1087D. doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.187. PMID 27749832.
  43. ^ Akolpoglu, Mukrime Birgul; Dogan, Nihal Olcay; Bozuyuk, Ugur; Ceylan, Hakan; Kizilel, Seda; Sitti, Metin (2020). "High-Yield Production of Biohybrid Microalgae for On-Demand Cargo Delivery". Advanced Science. 7 (16). doi:10.1002/advs.202001256. PMC 7435244. PMID 32832367.
  44. ^ Tu, Yingfeng; Peng, Fei; Wilson, Daniela A. (2017). "Motion Manipulation of Micro- and Nanomotors". Advanced Materials. 29 (39). Bibcode:2017AdM....2901970T. doi:10.1002/adma.201701970. hdl:2066/181774. PMID 28841755. S2CID 205280841.
  45. ^ Luo, Ming; Feng, Youzeng; Wang, Tingwei; Guan, Jianguo (2018). "Micro-/Nanorobots at Work in Active Drug Delivery". Advanced Functional Materials. 28 (25). doi:10.1002/adfm.201706100. S2CID 104145610.
  46. ^ Srivastava, Sarvesh Kumar; Clergeaud, Gael; Andresen, Thomas L.; Boisen, Anja (2019). "Micromotors for drug delivery in vivo: The road ahead" (PDF). Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 138: 41–55. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.005. PMID 30236447. S2CID 52310451.
  47. ^ Plutnar, Jan; Pumera, Martin (2019). "Chemotactic Micro- and Nanodevices". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 58 (8): 2190–2196. doi:10.1002/anie.201809101. PMID 30216620. S2CID 52278805.
  48. ^ Yang, Qingliang; Xu, Lei; Zhong, Weizhen; Yan, Qinying; Gao, Ying; Hong, Weiyong; She, Yuanbin; Yang, Gensheng (2020). "Recent Advances in Motion Control of Micro/Nanomotors". Advanced Intelligent Systems. 2 (8). doi:10.1002/aisy.202000049. S2CID 221418150.
  49. ^ Kanu, Nand Jee; Gupta, Eva; Vates, Umesh Kumar; Singh, Gyanendra Kumar (2019). "An insight into biomimetic 4D printing". RSC Advances. 9 (65): 38209–38226. Bibcode:2019RSCAd...938209K. doi:10.1039/C9RA07342F. PMC 9075844. PMID 35541793. S2CID 214386444.
  50. ^ Lui, Yuan Siang; Sow, Wan Ting; Tan, Lay Poh; Wu, Yunlong; Lai, Yuekun; Li, Huaqiong (2019). "4D printing and stimuli-responsive materials in biomedical aspects". Acta Biomaterialia. 92: 19–36. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.005. hdl:10356/143207. PMID 31071476. S2CID 149445838.
  51. ^ Spiegel, Christoph A.; Hippler, Marc; Münchinger, Alexander; Bastmeyer, Martin; Barner-Kowollik, Christopher; Wegener, Martin; Blasco, Eva (2020). "4D Printing at the Microscale". Advanced Functional Materials. 30 (26). doi:10.1002/adfm.201907615. S2CID 210959593.
  52. ^ Yang, Qingzhen; Gao, Bin; Xu, Feng (2020). "Recent Advances in 4D Bioprinting". Biotechnology Journal. 15 (1): e1900086. doi:10.1002/biot.201900086. PMID 31486199. S2CID 201837838.
  53. ^ Zhang, Yabin; Yuan, Ke; Zhang, Li (16 January 2019). "Micro/Nanomachines: from Functionalization to Sensing and Removal". Advanced Materials Technologies. 4 (4). Wiley: 1800636. doi:10.1002/admt.201800636. ISSN 2365-709X. S2CID 139612870.
  54. ^ Bunea, Ada-Ioana; Jakobsen, Mogens Havsteen; Engay, Einstom; Bañas, Andrew R.; Glückstad, Jesper (2019). "Optimization of 3D-printed microstructures for investigating the properties of the mucus biobarrier". Micro and Nano Engineering. 2. Elsevier BV: 41–47. doi:10.1016/j.mne.2018.12.004. ISSN 2590-0072. S2CID 215751974.
  55. ^ Zhang, Yabin; Yuan, Ke; Zhang, Li (2019). "Micro/Nanomachines: From Functionalization to Sensing and Removal". Advanced Materials Technologies. 4 (4). doi:10.1002/admt.201800636. S2CID 139612870.
  56. ^ Bunea, Ada-Ioana; Jakobsen, Mogens Havsteen; Engay, Einstom; Bañas, Andrew R.; Glückstad, Jesper (2019). "Optimization of 3D-printed microstructures for investigating the properties of the mucus biobarrier". Micro and Nano Engineering. 2: 41–47. doi:10.1016/j.mne.2018.12.004. S2CID 215751974.
  57. ^ Singh, Ajay Vikram; Kishore, Vimal; Santomauro, Giulia; Yasa, Oncay; Bill, Joachim; Sitti, Metin (28 April 2020). "Mechanical Coupling of Puller and Pusher Active Microswimmers Influences Motility". Langmuir. 36 (19). American Chemical Society (ACS): 5435–5443. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03665. ISSN 0743-7463. PMC 7304893. PMID 32343587.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  58. ^ a b c Lauga, Eric; Powers, Thomas R. (2009). "The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms". Reports on Progress in Physics. 72 (9): 096601. arXiv:0812.2887. Bibcode:2009RPPh...72i6601L. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/9/096601. S2CID 3932471.
  59. ^ Vogel, Pia D. (2005). "Nature's design of nanomotors". European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 60 (2): 267–277. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.10.007. PMID 15939237.
  60. ^ Patra, Debabrata; Sengupta, Samudra; Duan, Wentao; Zhang, Hua; Pavlick, Ryan; Sen, Ayusman (2013). "Intelligent, self-powered, drug delivery systems". Nanoscale. 5 (4): 1273–1283. Bibcode:2013Nanos...5.1273P. doi:10.1039/C2NR32600K. PMID 23166050.
  61. ^ Feringa, Ben L. (2001). "In Control of Motion: From Molecular Switches to Molecular Motors". Accounts of Chemical Research. 34 (6): 504–513. doi:10.1021/ar0001721. hdl:11370/a0b20090-34b9-4e2d-8450-bc2afbea2fcf. PMID 11412087.
  62. ^ Sokolov, A.; Apodaca, M. M.; Grzybowski, B. A.; Aranson, I. S. (2010). "Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (3): 969–974. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107..969S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913015107. PMC 2824308. PMID 20080560.
  63. ^ Zhao, Xi; Gentile, Kayla; Mohajerani, Farzad; Sen, Ayusman (2018-10-16). "Powering Motion with Enzymes". Accounts of Chemical Research. 51 (10): 2373–2381. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00286. ISSN 0001-4842. PMID 30256612. S2CID 52845451.
  64. ^ Muddana, Hari S.; Sengupta, Samudra; Mallouk, Thomas E.; Sen, Ayusman; Butler, Peter J. (2010-02-24). "Substrate Catalysis Enhances Single-Enzyme Diffusion". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 132 (7): 2110–2111. doi:10.1021/ja908773a. ISSN 0002-7863. PMC 2832858. PMID 20108965.
  65. ^ Ghosh, Subhadip; Mohajerani, Farzad; Son, Seoyoung; Velegol, Darrell; Butler, Peter J.; Sen, Ayusman (2019-09-11). "Motility of Enzyme-Powered Vesicles". Nano Letters. 19 (9): 6019–6026. Bibcode:2019NanoL..19.6019G. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01830. ISSN 1530-6984. PMID 31429577.
  66. ^ Madigan, Michael T.; Bender, Kelly S.; Buckley, Daniel H.; Brock, Thomas D.; Matthew Sattley, W.; Stahl, David Allan (29 January 2018). Brock Biology of Microorganisms. Pearson. ISBN 9781292235103.
  67. ^ Dufrêne, Yves F. (2015). "Sticky microbes: Forces in microbial cell adhesion". Trends in Microbiology. 23 (6): 376–382. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.011. PMID 25684261.
  68. ^ a b c d e f Schwarz, Lukas; Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2017). "Hybrid Bio Micromotors". Applied Physics Reviews. 4 (3): 031301. Bibcode:2017ApPRv...4c1301S. doi:10.1063/1.4993441.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  69. ^ Darnton, Nicholas C.; Turner, Linda; Rojevsky, Svetlana; Berg, Howard C. (2007). "On Torque and Tumbling in Swimming Escherichia coli". Journal of Bacteriology. 189 (5): 1756–1764. doi:10.1128/JB.01501-06. PMC 1855780. PMID 17189361.
  70. ^ Edwards, Matthew R.; Carlsen, Rika Wright; Zhuang, Jiang; Sitti, Metin (2014). "Swimming characterization of Serratia marcescens for bio-hybrid micro-robotics". Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics. 9 (3–4): 47–60. doi:10.1007/s12213-014-0072-1. S2CID 84413776.
  71. ^ Magariyama, Yukio; Sugiyama, Shigeru; Kudo, Seishi (2001). "Bacterial swimming speed and rotation rate of bundled flagella". FEMS Microbiology Letters. 199 (1): 125–129. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10662.x. PMID 11356579.
  72. ^ Ito, Masahiro; Terahara, Naoya; Fujinami, Shun; Krulwich, Terry Ann (2005). "Properties of Motility in Bacillus subtilis Powered by the H+-coupled MotAB Flagellar Stator, Na+-coupled MotPS or Hybrid Stators MotAS or MotPB". Journal of Molecular Biology. 352 (2): 396–408. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.07.030. PMC 2578835. PMID 16095621.
  73. ^ Higashi, Kazuhiko; Miki, Norihisa (2014). "A self-swimming microbial robot using microfabricated nanofibrous hydrogel". Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 202: 301–306. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2014.05.068.
  74. ^ Kawagishi, I.; Maekawa, Y.; Atsumi, T.; Homma, M.; Imae, Y. (1995). "Isolation of the polar and lateral flagellum-defective mutants in Vibrio alginolyticus and identification of their flagellar driving energy sources". Journal of Bacteriology. 177 (17): 5158–5160. doi:10.1128/jb.177.17.5158-5160.1995. PMC 177299. PMID 7665498.
  75. ^ Xie, L.; Altindal, T.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Wu, X.-L. (2011). "Bacterial flagellum as a propeller and as a rudder for efficient chemotaxis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108 (6): 2246–2251. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011953108. PMC 3038696. PMID 21205908.
  76. ^ Lacayo, Catherine I.; Theriot, Julie A. (2004). "Listeria monocytogenes Actin-based Motility Varies Depending on Subcellular Location: A Kinematic Probe for Cytoarchitecture". Molecular Biology of the Cell. 15 (5): 2164–2175. doi:10.1091/mbc.E03-10-0747. PMC 404013. PMID 15004231.
  77. ^ McGrath, James L.; Eungdamrong, Narat J.; Fisher, Charles I.; Peng, Fay; Mahadevan, Lakshminarayanan; Mitchison, Timothy J.; Kuo, Scot C. (2003). "The Force-Velocity Relationship for the Actin-Based Motility of Listeria monocytogenes". Current Biology. 13 (4): 329–332. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00051-4. PMID 12593799. S2CID 6459972.
  78. ^ Chen, Yifan; Kosmas, Panagiotis; Martel, Sylvain (2013). "A Feasibility Study for Microwave Breast Cancer Detection Using Contrast-Agent-Loaded Bacterial Microbots". International Journal of Antennas and Propagation. 2013: 1–11. doi:10.1155/2013/309703.
  79. ^ Ruan, J.; Kato, T.; Santini, C.-L.; Miyata, T.; Kawamoto, A.; Zhang, W.-J.; Bernadac, A.; Wu, L.-F.; Namba, K. (2012). "Architecture of a flagellar apparatus in the fast-swimming magnetotactic bacterium MO-1". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (50): 20643–20648. Bibcode:2012PNAS..10920643R. doi:10.1073/pnas.1215274109. PMC 3528567. PMID 23184985.
  80. ^ Martel, Sylvain; Tremblay, Charles C.; Ngakeng, Serge; Langlois, Guillaume (2006). "Controlled manipulation and actuation of micro-objects with magnetotactic bacteria". Applied Physics Letters. 89 (23): 233904. Bibcode:2006ApPhL..89w3904M. doi:10.1063/1.2402221.
  81. ^ Miyata, Makoto; Ryu, William S.; Berg, Howard C. (2002). "Force and Velocity of Mycoplasma mobile Gliding". Journal of Bacteriology. 184 (7): 1827–1831. doi:10.1128/JB.184.7.1827-1831.2002. PMC 134919. PMID 11889087.
  82. ^ Weibel, D. B.; Garstecki, P.; Ryan, D.; Diluzio, W. R.; Mayer, M.; Seto, J. E.; Whitesides, G. M. (2005). "Microoxen: Microorganisms to move microscale loads". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (34): 11963–11967. Bibcode:2005PNAS..10211963W. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505481102. PMC 1189341. PMID 16103369.
  83. ^ Kim, Dal Hyung; Cheang, U. Kei; Kőhidai, László; Byun, Doyoung; Kim, Min Jun (2010). "Artificial magnetotactic motion control of Tetrahymena pyriformis using ferromagnetic nanoparticles: A tool for fabrication of microbiorobots". Applied Physics Letters. 97 (17): 173702. Bibcode:2010ApPhL..97q3702K. doi:10.1063/1.3497275.
  84. ^ Hill, Kent L. (2003). "Biology and Mechanism of Trypanosome Cell Motility". Eukaryotic Cell. 2 (2): 200–208. doi:10.1128/EC.2.2.200-208.2003. PMC 154846. PMID 12684369.
  85. ^ Krüger, Timothy; Engstler, Markus (2016). "Trypanosomes – versatile microswimmers". The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 225 (11–12): 2157–2172. Bibcode:2016EPJST.225.2157K. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2016-60063-5. S2CID 125623927.
  86. ^ a b Maree, L.; Van Der Horst, G. (2013). "Quantification and identification of sperm subpopulations using computer-aided sperm analysis and species-specific cut-off values for swimming speed". Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 88 (3–4): 181–193. doi:10.3109/10520295.2012.757366. hdl:10566/3120. PMID 23331185. S2CID 19603301.
  87. ^ a b Eamer, Lise; Nosrati, Reza; Vollmer, Marion; Zini, Armand; Sinton, David (2015). "Microfluidic assessment of swimming media for motility-based sperm selection". Biomicrofluidics. 9 (4): 044113. doi:10.1063/1.4928129. PMC 4529441. PMID 26339314.
  88. ^ a b Gomendio, Montserrat; Roldan, Eduardo R.S. (2008). "Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility". The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 52 (5–6): 439–447. doi:10.1387/ijdb.082595mg. PMID 18649256.
  89. ^ Tung, Chih-Kuan; Ardon, Florencia; Fiore, Alyssa G.; Suarez, Susan S.; Wu, Mingming (2014). "Cooperative roles of biological flow and surface topography in guiding sperm migration revealed by a microfluidic model". Lab Chip. 14 (7): 1348–1356. doi:10.1039/C3LC51297E. PMC 4497544. PMID 24535032.
  90. ^ Ishikawa, Takuji (2019) Special Issue "Microswimmer" Micromachines, ISSN 2072-666X.
  91. ^ Dumé, Isabelle (2020) Microswimmers benefit from thermoelectric guidance Physics World.
  92. ^ a b Paxton, Walter F.; Kistler, Kevin C.; Olmeda, Christine C.; Sen, Ayusman; St. Angelo, Sarah K.; Cao, Yanyan; Mallouk, Thomas E.; Lammert, Paul E.; Crespi, Vincent H. (2004-10-01). "Catalytic Nanomotors: Autonomous Movement of Striped Nanorods". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 126 (41): 13424–13431. doi:10.1021/ja047697z. ISSN 0002-7863. PMID 15479099.
  93. ^ a b Paxton, Walter F.; Baker, Paul T.; Kline, Timothy R.; Wang, Yang; Mallouk, Thomas E.; Sen, Ayusman (2006-11-01). "Catalytically Induced Electrokinetics for Motors and Micropumps". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 128 (46): 14881–14888. doi:10.1021/ja0643164. ISSN 0002-7863. PMID 17105298.
  94. ^ a b Hong, Yiying; Blackman, Nicole M. K.; Kopp, Nathaniel D.; Sen, Ayusman; Velegol, Darrell (2007-10-26). "Chemotaxis of Nonbiological Colloidal Rods". Physical Review Letters. 99 (17): 178103. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..99q8103H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.178103. PMID 17995374.
  95. ^ a b c Sundararajan, Shakuntala; Lammert, Paul E.; Zudans, Andrew W.; Crespi, Vincent H.; Sen, Ayusman (2008-05-01). "Catalytic Motors for Transport of Colloidal Cargo". Nano Letters. 8 (5): 1271–1276. Bibcode:2008NanoL...8.1271S. doi:10.1021/nl072275j. ISSN 1530-6984. PMID 18416540.
  96. ^ Zhou, Dekai; Ren, Liqiang; Li, Yuguang C.; Xu, Pengtao; Gao, Yuan; Zhang, Guangyu; Wang, Wei; Mallouk, Thomas E.; Li, Longqiu (2017). "Visible light-driven, magnetically steerable gold/iron oxide nanomotors". Chem. Commun. 53 (83): 11465–11468. doi:10.1039/C7CC06327J. ISSN 1359-7345. PMID 28983536.
  97. ^ Wang, Wei; Castro, Luz Angelica; Hoyos, Mauricio; Mallouk, Thomas (2012). "Autonomous motion of metallic microrods propelled by ultrasound". ACS Nano. 6 (7): 6122–6132. doi:10.1021/nn301312z. PMID 22631222.
  98. ^ Guix, Maria; Mayorga-Martinez, Carmen C.; Merkoçi, Arben (2014). "Nano/Micromotors in (Bio)chemical Science Applications". Chemical Reviews. 114 (12): 6285–6322. doi:10.1021/cr400273r. PMID 24827167.
  99. ^ a b c d Bechinger, Clemens; Di Leonardo, Roberto; Löwen, Hartmut; Reichhardt, Charles; Volpe, Giorgio; Volpe, Giovanni (2016). "Active Particles in Complex and Crowded Environments". Reviews of Modern Physics. 88 (4): 045006. arXiv:1602.00081. Bibcode:2016RvMP...88d5006B. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.045006. S2CID 14940249.
  100. ^ Magdanz, Veronika; Guix, Maria; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2014). "Tubular micromotors: From microjets to spermbots". Robotics and Biomimetics. 1. doi:10.1186/s40638-014-0011-6. S2CID 55870000.
  101. ^ McNeill, Jeffrey M.; Mallouk, Thomas E. (2023-10-14). "Acoustically Powered Nano- and Microswimmers: From Individual to Collective Behavior". ACS Nanoscience Au. 3 (6): 424–440. doi:10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.3c00038. ISSN 2694-2496. PMC 10740144. PMID 38144701.
  102. ^ Ricotti, Leonardo; Cafarelli, Andrea; Iacovacci, Veronica; Vannozzi, Lorenzo; Menciassi, Arianna (2015). "Advanced Micro-Nano-Bio Systems for Future Targeted Therapies". Current Nanoscience. 11 (2): 144–160. Bibcode:2015CNan...11..144R. doi:10.2174/1573413710666141114221246.
  103. ^ a b Elgeti, J.; Winkler, R. G.; Gompper, G. (2015). "Physics of microswimmers—single particle motion and collective behavior: A review". Reports on Progress in Physics. 78 (5): 056601. arXiv:1412.2692. Bibcode:2015RPPh...78e6601E. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/5/056601. PMID 25919479. S2CID 3909877.
  104. ^ a b Purcell, E. M. (1997). "The efficiency of propulsion by a rotating flagellum". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 94 (21): 11307–11311. Bibcode:1997PNAS...9411307P. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.21.11307. PMC 23452. PMID 9326605.
  105. ^ Morozov, Konstantin I.; Leshansky, Alexander M. (2014). "The chiral magnetic nanomotors". Nanoscale. 6 (3): 1580–1588. arXiv:1308.6115. Bibcode:2014Nanos...6.1580M. doi:10.1039/C3NR04853E. PMID 24336860. S2CID 15834620.
  106. ^ a b Lauga, Eric; Powers, Thomas R (25 August 2009). "The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms". Reports on Progress in Physics. 72 (9). IOP Publishing: 096601. arXiv:0812.2887. Bibcode:2009RPPh...72i6601L. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/9/096601. ISSN 0034-4885. S2CID 3932471.
  107. ^ a b Berg, Howard C.; Anderson, Robert A. (1973). "Bacteria Swim by Rotating their Flagellar Filaments". Nature. 245 (5425): 380–382. Bibcode:1973Natur.245..380B. doi:10.1038/245380a0. PMID 4593496. S2CID 4173914.
  108. ^ Berg, Howard (2004). E. coli in motion (in Italian). New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-21638-6. OCLC 56124142.
  109. ^ Mitchell, David R. (2001). "Chlamydomonas flagella". Journal of Phycology. 36 (2): 261–273. doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.99218.x. S2CID 221921243.
  110. ^ Oberholzer, Michael; Lopez, Miguel A.; McLelland, Bryce T.; Hill, Kent L. (2010). "Social Motility in African Trypanosomes". PLOS Pathogens. 6 (1): e1000739. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000739. PMC 2813273. PMID 20126443.
  111. ^ Babu, Sujin B.; Stark, Holger (2012). "Modeling the locomotion of the African trypanosome using multi-particle collision dynamics". New Journal of Physics. 14 (8): 085012. Bibcode:2012NJPh...14h5012B. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/085012.
  112. ^ a b c Choudhary, Priyanka; Mandal, Subhayan; Babu, Sujin B. (2018). "Locomotion of a flexible one-hinge swimmer in Stokes regime". Journal of Physics Communications. 2 (2): 025009. arXiv:1707.07451. Bibcode:2018JPhCo...2b5009C. doi:10.1088/2399-6528/aaa856. S2CID 119229534.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License.
  113. ^ Taylor, Geoffrey (1951). "Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 209 (1099): 447–461. Bibcode:1951RSPSA.209..447T. doi:10.1098/rspa.1951.0218. S2CID 120382159.
  114. ^ Avron, J. E.; Raz, O. (2008). "A geometric theory of swimming: Purcell's swimmer and its symmetrized cousin". New Journal of Physics. 10 (6): 063016. arXiv:0712.2047. Bibcode:2008NJPh...10f3016A. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/6/063016. S2CID 14646885.
  115. ^ Najafi, Ali; Golestanian, Ramin (2004). "Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number: Three linked spheres". Physical Review E. 69 (6): 062901. arXiv:cond-mat/0402070. Bibcode:2004PhRvE..69f2901N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.69.062901. PMID 15244646. S2CID 27500334.
  116. ^ Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Abdallah; Lisicki, Maciej; Mathijssen, Arnold J. T. M. (2020). "Tuning the upstream swimming of microrobots by shape and cargo size". Physical Review Applied. 14 (2): 024071. arXiv:2004.05694. Bibcode:2020PhRvP..14b4071D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024071. S2CID 229547570.
  117. ^ Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Abdallah; Lisicki, Maciej; Hoell, Christian; Löwen, Hartmut (2018). "Swimming trajectories of a three-sphere microswimmer near a wall". Journal of Chemical Physics. 148 (13): 134904. arXiv:1801.01162. Bibcode:2018JChPh.148m4904D. doi:10.1063/1.5021027. PMID 29626882. S2CID 4718416.
  118. ^ Nasouri, Babak; Khot, Aditi; Elfring, Gwynn J. (2017). "Elastic two-sphere swimmer in Stokes flow". Physical Review Fluids. 2 (4): 043101. arXiv:1611.05847. Bibcode:2017PhRvF...2d3101N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.043101. S2CID 119474335.
  119. ^ Montino, Alessandro; Desimone, Antonio (2015). "Three-sphere low-Reynolds-number swimmer with a passive elastic arm". The European Physical Journal E. 38 (5): 127. doi:10.1140/epje/i2015-15042-3. PMID 25990633. S2CID 45431975.
  120. ^ Wiggins, Chris H.; Goldstein, Raymond E. (1998). "Flexive and Propulsive Dynamics of Elastica at Low Reynolds Number". Physical Review Letters. 80 (17): 3879–3882. arXiv:cond-mat/9707346. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..80.3879W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3879. S2CID 10335181.
  121. ^ Lagomarsino, M.C.; Capuani, F.; Lowe, C.P. (2003). "A simulation study of the dynamics of a driven filament in an Aristotelian fluid". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 224 (2): 215–224. Bibcode:2003JThBi.224..215L. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00159-0. hdl:2434/802791. PMID 12927528. S2CID 3200289.
  122. ^ Lauga, Eric (2007). "Floppy swimming: Viscous locomotion of actuated elastica". Physical Review E. 75 (4): 041916. arXiv:cond-mat/0610154. Bibcode:2007PhRvE..75d1916L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.041916. PMID 17500930. S2CID 13651250.
  123. ^ Ismagilov, Rustem F.; Schwartz, Alexander; Bowden, Ned; Whitesides, George M. (2002-02-15). "Autonomous Movement and Self-Assembly". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 41 (4): 652–654. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020215)41:4<652::AID-ANIE652>3.0.CO;2-U. ISSN 1433-7851.
  124. ^ a b Khadka, Utsab; Holubec, Viktor; Yang, Haw; Cichos, Frank (2018). "Active particles bound by information flows". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 3864. arXiv:1803.03053. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.3864K. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06445-1. PMC 6154969. PMID 30242284.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  125. ^ a b c d Alvarez, L.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, M. A.; Alegria, A.; Arrese-Igor, S.; Zhao, K.; Kröger, M.; Isa, Lucio (2021). "Reconfigurable artificial microswimmers with internal feedback". Nature Communications. 12 (1): 4762. arXiv:2009.08382. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.4762A. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25108-2. PMC 8346629. PMID 34362934.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  126. ^ Hamadeh, Abdullah; Roberts, Mark A. J.; August, Elias; McSharry, Patrick E.; Maini, Philip K.; Armitage, Judith P.; Papachristodoulou, Antonis (2011). "Feedback Control Architecture and the Bacterial Chemotaxis Network". PLOS Computational Biology. 7 (5): e1001130. Bibcode:2011PLSCB...7E1130H. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001130. PMC 3088647. PMID 21573199.
  127. ^ Baker, Melinda D.; Wolanin, Peter M.; Stock, Jeffry B. (2006). "Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis". BioEssays. 28 (1): 9–22. doi:10.1002/bies.20343. PMID 16369945. S2CID 189870.
  128. ^ Ebbens, S.J. (2016). "Active colloids: Progress and challenges towards realising autonomous applications". Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 21: 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2015.10.003.
  129. ^ Lozano, Celia; Ten Hagen, Borge; Löwen, Hartmut; Bechinger, Clemens (2016). "Phototaxis of synthetic microswimmers in optical landscapes". Nature Communications. 7: 12828. arXiv:1609.09814. Bibcode:2016NatCo...712828L. doi:10.1038/ncomms12828. PMC 5056439. PMID 27687580.
  130. ^ Sprenger, Alexander R.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, Miguel Angel; Alvarez, Laura; Isa, Lucio; Wittkowski, Raphael; Löwen, Hartmut (2020). "Active Brownian Motion with Orientation-Dependent Motility: Theory and Experiments". Langmuir. 36 (25): 7066–7073. arXiv:1911.09524. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03617. PMID 31975603. S2CID 208201932.
  131. ^ Fernandez-Rodriguez, Miguel Angel; Grillo, Fabio; Alvarez, Laura; Rathlef, Marco; Buttinoni, Ivo; Volpe, Giovanni; Isa, Lucio (2020). "Feedback-controlled active brownian colloids with space-dependent rotational dynamics". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 4223. arXiv:1911.02291. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.4223F. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17864-4. PMC 7445303. PMID 32839447.
  132. ^ Han, Koohee; Shields, C. Wyatt; Diwakar, Nidhi M.; Bharti, Bhuvnesh; López, Gabriel P.; Velev, Orlin D. (2017). "Sequence-encoded colloidal origami and microbot assemblies from patchy magnetic cubes". Science Advances. 3 (8): e1701108. Bibcode:2017SciA....3E1108H. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701108. PMC 5544397. PMID 28798960.
  133. ^ Shields, C. Wyatt; Velev, Orlin D. (2017). "The Evolution of Active Particles: Toward Externally Powered Self-Propelling and Self-Reconfiguring Particle Systems". Chem. 3 (4): 539–559. doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.006.
  134. ^ Yang, Tao; Sprinkle, Brennan; Guo, Yang; Qian, Jun; Hua, Daoben; Donev, Aleksandar; Marr, David W. M.; Wu, Ning (2020). "Reconfigurable microbots folded from simple colloidal chains". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (31): 18186–18193. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11718186Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.2007255117. PMC 7414297. PMID 32680965.
  135. ^ Soto, Rodrigo; Golestanian, Ramin (2014). "Self-Assembly of Catalytically Active Colloidal Molecules: Tailoring Activity Through Surface Chemistry". Physical Review Letters. 112 (6): 068301. arXiv:1306.6596. Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112f8301S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.068301. PMID 24580712. S2CID 37057964.
  136. ^ Niu, Ran; Fischer, Andreas; Palberg, Thomas; Speck, Thomas (2018). "Dynamics of Binary Active Clusters Driven by Ion-Exchange Particles". ACS Nano. 12 (11): 10932–10938. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b04221. PMID 30346687. S2CID 206722021.
  137. ^ Ma, Fuduo; Wang, Sijia; Wu, David T.; Wu, Ning (2015). "Electric-field–induced assembly and propulsion of chiral colloidal clusters". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (20): 6307–6312. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.6307M. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502141112. PMC 4443365. PMID 25941383.
  138. ^ Wang, Zuochen; Wang, Zhisheng; Li, Jiahui; Tian, Changhao; Wang, Yufeng (2020). "Active colloidal molecules assembled via selective and directional bonds". Nature Communications. 11 (1): 2670. Bibcode:2020NatCo..11.2670W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16506-z. PMC 7260206. PMID 32471993.
  139. ^ Ebbens, Stephen; Jones, Richard A. L.; Ryan, Anthony J.; Golestanian, Ramin; Howse, Jonathan R. (2010). "Self-assembled autonomous runners and tumblers". Physical Review E. 82 (1 Pt 2): 015304. Bibcode:2010PhRvE..82a5304E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.015304. PMID 20866681.
  140. ^ Ni, Songbo; Marini, Emanuele; Buttinoni, Ivo; Wolf, Heiko; Isa, Lucio (2017). "Hybrid colloidal microswimmers through sequential capillary assembly". Soft Matter. 13 (23): 4252–4259. doi:10.1039/c7sm00443e. PMID 28573270.
  141. ^ Wang, Zuochen; Wang, Zhisheng; Li, Jiahui; Cheung, Simon Tsz Hang; Tian, Changhao; Kim, Shin-Hyun; Yi, Gi-Ra; Ducrot, Etienne; Wang, Yufeng (2019). "Active Patchy Colloids with Shape-Tunable Dynamics". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 141 (37): 14853–14863. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b07785. PMID 31448592. S2CID 201748635.
  142. ^ Hu, Chengzhi; Pané, Salvador; Nelson, Bradley J. (2018). "Soft Micro- and Nanorobotics". Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems. 1: 53–75. doi:10.1146/annurev-control-060117-104947. hdl:20.500.11850/316345. S2CID 139844553.
  143. ^ Palagi, Stefano; Fischer, Peer (2018). "Bioinspired microrobots". Nature Reviews Materials. 3 (6): 113–124. Bibcode:2018NatRM...3..113P. doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0016-9. S2CID 189929035.
  144. ^ Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Magdanz, Veronika; Guix, Maria; Fomin, Vladimir M.; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2018). "Swimming Microrobots: Soft, Reconfigurable, and Smart". Advanced Functional Materials. 28 (25). doi:10.1002/adfm.201707228. S2CID 103866599.
  145. ^ Hu, Wenqi; Lum, Guo Zhan; Mastrangeli, Massimo; Sitti, Metin (2018). "Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion". Nature. 554 (7690): 81–85. Bibcode:2018Natur.554...81H. doi:10.1038/nature25443. PMID 29364873. S2CID 4461200.
  146. ^ Huang, H.-W.; Uslu, F. E.; Katsamba, P.; Lauga, E.; Sakar, M. S.; Nelson, B. J.; Nelson, Bradley J. (2019). "Adaptive locomotion of artificial microswimmers". Science Advances. 5 (1): eaau1532. arXiv:1902.09000. Bibcode:2019SciA....5.1532H. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau1532. PMC 6357760. PMID 30746446.
  147. ^ Dou, Yong; Bishop, Kyle J. M. (2019). "Autonomous navigation of shape-shifting microswimmers". Physical Review Research. 1 (3): 032030. arXiv:1908.05808. Bibcode:2019PhRvR...1c2030D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.032030. S2CID 201058417.
  148. ^ Zhuang, Jiang; Park, Byung-Wook; Sitti, Metin (2017). "Propulsion and Chemotaxis in Bacteria-Driven Microswimmers". Advanced Science. 4 (9). doi:10.1002/advs.201700109. PMC 5604384. PMID 28932674.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  149. ^ Sun, Zhiyong; Popp, Philipp; Loderer, Christoph; Revilla-Guarinos, Ainhoa (28 December 2019). "Genetically Engineered Bacterial Biohybrid Microswimmers for Sensing Applications". Sensors. 20 (1). MDPI AG: 180. Bibcode:2019Senso..20..180S. doi:10.3390/s20010180. ISSN 1424-8220. PMC 6982730. PMID 31905650.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  150. ^ Carlsen, Rika Wright; Sitti, Metin (2014). "Bio-Hybrid Cell-Based Actuators for Microsystems". Small. 10 (19): 3831–3851. doi:10.1002/smll.201400384. PMID 24895215.
  151. ^ Hosseinidoust, Zeinab; Mostaghaci, Babak; Yasa, Oncay; Park, Byung-Wook; Singh, Ajay Vikram; Sitti, Metin (2016). "Bioengineered and biohybrid bacteria-based systems for drug delivery". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 106 (Pt A): 27–44. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.09.007. PMID 27641944.
  152. ^ Magdanz, Veronika; Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schwarz, Lukas; Xu, Haifeng; Elgeti, Jens; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2017). "Spermatozoa as Functional Components of Robotic Microswimmers". Advanced Materials. 29 (24). Bibcode:2017AdM....2906301M. doi:10.1002/adma.201606301. PMID 28323360. S2CID 26622101.
  153. ^ Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2017). "Medical microbots need better imaging and control". Nature. 545 (7655): 406–408. Bibcode:2017Natur.545..406M. doi:10.1038/545406a. PMID 28541344. S2CID 4388403.
  154. ^ Magdanz, Veronika; Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schwarz, Lukas; Xu, Haifeng; Elgeti, Jens; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2017). "Spermatozoa as Functional Components of Robotic Microswimmers". Advanced Materials. 29 (24). Bibcode:2017AdM....2906301M. doi:10.1002/adma.201606301. PMID 28323360. S2CID 26622101.
  155. ^ Medina-Sánchez, Mariana; Schmidt, Oliver G. (2017). "Medical microbots need better imaging and control". Nature. 545 (7655): 406–408. Bibcode:2017Natur.545..406M. doi:10.1038/545406a. PMID 28541344. S2CID 4388403.
  156. ^ a b c d e Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Abdallah; Löwen, Hartmut; Liebchen, Benno (2021). "Hydrodynamics can determine the optimal route for microswimmer navigation". Communications Physics. 4 (1): 15. arXiv:2008.11064. Bibcode:2021CmPhy...4...15D. doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00522-6. S2CID 234012727.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  157. ^ Schwarzendahl, Fabian Jan; Mazza, Marco G. (2018). "Maximum in density heterogeneities of active swimmers". Soft Matter. 14 (23): 4666–4678. arXiv:1711.08689. Bibcode:2018SMat...14.4666S. doi:10.1039/C7SM02301D. PMID 29717736.
  158. ^ Theers, Mario; Westphal, Elmar; Qi, Kai; Winkler, Roland G.; Gompper, Gerhard (31 October 2018). "Clustering of microswimmers: interplay of shape and hydrodynamics". Soft Matter. 14 (42): 8590–8603. arXiv:1807.01211. Bibcode:2018SMat...14.8590T. doi:10.1039/C8SM01390J. PMID 30339172.
  159. ^ Kirk, Donald (2004). Optimal control theory : an introduction. Mineola, N.Y. ISBN 978-0-486-13507-6.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  160. ^ Viswanathan, Gandhimohan. M.; Da Luz, Marcos G. E.; Raposo, Ernesto P.; Stanley, H. Eugene (2011). The Physics of Foraging. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511902680. ISBN 9780511902680.
  161. ^ Fricke, G. Matthew; Letendre, Kenneth A.; Moses, Melanie E.; Cannon, Judy L. (2016). "Persistence and Adaptation in Immunity: T Cells Balance the Extent and Thoroughness of Search". PLOS Computational Biology. 12 (3): e1004818. Bibcode:2016PLSCB..12E4818F. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004818. PMC 4798282. PMID 26990103.
  162. ^ a b Muiños-Landin, S.; Fischer, A.; Holubec, V.; Cichos, F. (2021). "Reinforcement learning with artificial microswimmers". Science Robotics. 6 (52). arXiv:1803.06425. doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abd9285. PMID 34043550. S2CID 4938282.
  163. ^ a b c Yang, Yuguang; Bevan, Michael A. (2018). "Optimal Navigation of Self-Propelled Colloids". ACS Nano. 12 (11): 10712–10724. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b05371. PMID 30252442. S2CID 52824752.
  164. ^ a b Yang, Yuguang; Bevan, Michael A.; Li, Bo (2020). "Efficient Navigation of Colloidal Robots in an Unknown Environment via Deep Reinforcement Learning". Advanced Intelligent Systems. 2. arXiv:1906.10844. doi:10.1002/aisy.201900106. S2CID 199000857.
  165. ^ a b Liebchen, Benno; Löwen, Hartmut (2019). "Optimal navigation strategies for active particles". EPL (Europhysics Letters). 127 (3): 34003. Bibcode:2019EL....12734003L. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/127/34003. S2CID 203038971.
  166. ^ a b c d Schneider, E.; Stark, H. (2019). "Optimal steering of a smart active particle". EPL (Europhysics Letters). 127 (6): 64003. arXiv:1909.03243. Bibcode:2019EL....12764003S. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/127/64003. S2CID 202540395.
  167. ^ a b c Biferale, L.; Bonaccorso, F.; Buzzicotti, M.; Clark Di Leoni, P.; Gustavsson, K. (2019). "Zermelo's problem: Optimal point-to-point navigation in 2D turbulent flows using reinforcement learning". Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 29 (10): 103138. arXiv:1907.08591. Bibcode:2019Chaos..29j3138B. doi:10.1063/1.5120370. PMID 31675828. S2CID 197935446.
  168. ^ Lauga, Eric (2016). "Bacterial Hydrodynamics". Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 48 (1): 105–130. arXiv:1509.02184. Bibcode:2016AnRFM..48..105L. doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034606. S2CID 13849152.
  169. ^ Lauga, Eric (2020). The fluid dynamics of cell motility. Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, NY. ISBN 978-1-107-17465-8.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  170. ^ Romanczuk, P.; Bär, M.; Ebeling, W.; Lindner, B.; Schimansky-Geier, L. (2012). "Active Brownian particles". The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 202: 1–162. arXiv:1202.2442. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01529-y. S2CID 119100040.
  171. ^ Cates, Michael E.; Tailleur, Julien (2015). "Motility-Induced Phase Separation". Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics. 6: 219–244. arXiv:1406.3533. Bibcode:2015ARCMP...6..219C. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014710. S2CID 15672131.
  172. ^ Zöttl, Andreas; Stark, Holger (11 May 2016). "Emergent behavior in active colloids". Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 28 (25). IOP Publishing: 253001. arXiv:1601.06643. Bibcode:2016JPCM...28y3001Z. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/25/253001. ISSN 0953-8984. S2CID 3948148.
  173. ^ Sutton, Richard (2018). Reinforcement learning : an introduction. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-35270-3.
  174. ^ Cichos, Frank; Gustavsson, Kristian; Mehlig, Bernhard; Volpe, Giovanni (2020). "Machine learning for active matter". Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (2): 94–103. doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0146-9. S2CID 214355969.
  175. ^ Garnier, Paul; Viquerat, Jonathan; Rabault, Jean; Larcher, Aurélien; Kuhnle, Alexander; Hachem, Elie (2021). "A review on deep reinforcement learning for fluid mechanics". Computers & Fluids. 225: 104973. arXiv:1908.04127. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104973. S2CID 199543817.
  176. ^ Colabrese, Simona; Gustavsson, Kristian; Celani, Antonio; Biferale, Luca (2017). "Flow Navigation by Smart Microswimmers via Reinforcement Learning". Physical Review Letters. 118 (15): 158004. arXiv:1701.08848. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118o8004C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.158004. PMID 28452499. S2CID 13695532.
  177. ^ Yang, Yuguang; Bevan, Michael A.; Li, Bo (2020). "Micro/Nano Motor Navigation and Localization via Deep Reinforcement Learning". Advanced Theory and Simulations. 3 (6). arXiv:2002.06775. doi:10.1002/adts.202000034. S2CID 211133324.
  178. ^ Feynman, R. (2018). "There’s plenty of room at the bottom". In: Hey, Anthony (2018). Feynman and computation : exploring the limits of computers. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 63–76. ISBN 978-0-429-50045-9.
  179. ^ Kuzajewska, Danuta; Wszołek, Agata; Żwierełło, Wojciech; Kirczuk, Lucyna; Maruszewska, Agnieszka (19 May 2020). "Magnetotactic Bacteria and Magnetosomes as Smart Drug Delivery Systems: A New Weapon on the Battlefield with Cancer?". Biology. 9 (5). MDPI AG: 102. doi:10.3390/biology9050102. ISSN 2079-7737. PMC 7284773. PMID 32438567.
  180. ^ Sitti, Metin (2009). "Voyage of the microrobots". Nature. 458 (7242): 1121–1122. doi:10.1038/4581121a. PMID 19407789. S2CID 205044764.
  181. ^ Harari, Yuval (2016). Homo deus : a brief history of tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker. ISBN 978-1-4735-4537-3.
  182. ^ Qiu, Famin; Fujita, Satoshi; Mhanna, Rami; Zhang, Li; Simona, Benjamin R.; Nelson, Bradley J. (2015). "Magnetic Helical Microswimmers Functionalized with Lipoplexes for Targeted Gene Delivery". Advanced Functional Materials. 25 (11): 1666–1671. doi:10.1002/adfm.201403891. S2CID 95812709.
  183. ^ Park, Byung-Wook; Zhuang, Jiang; Yasa, Oncay; Sitti, Metin (2017). "Multifunctional Bacteria-Driven Microswimmers for Targeted Active Drug Delivery". ACS Nano. 11 (9): 8910–8923. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b03207. PMID 28873304.
  184. ^ Wang, Joseph; Gao, Wei (2012). "Nano/Microscale Motors: Biomedical Opportunities and Challenges". ACS Nano. 6 (7): 5745–5751. doi:10.1021/nn3028997. PMID 22770233.
  185. ^ Ma, Xing; Hahn, Kersten; Sanchez, Samuel (2015). "Catalytic Mesoporous Janus Nanomotors for Active Cargo Delivery". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 137 (15): 4976–4979. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b02700. PMC 4440854. PMID 25844893.
  186. ^ Demirörs, Ahmet F.; Akan, Mehmet Tolga; Poloni, Erik; Studart, André R. (2018). "Active cargo transport with Janus colloidal shuttles using electric and magnetic fields". Soft Matter. 14 (23): 4741–4749. Bibcode:2018SMat...14.4741D. doi:10.1039/C8SM00513C. PMID 29799053.
  187. ^ Nelson, Bradley J.; Kaliakatsos, Ioannis K.; Abbott, Jake J. (2010). "Microrobots for Minimally Invasive Medicine". Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 12: 55–85. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-010510-103409. PMID 20415589.
  188. ^ Soto, Fernando; Wang, Jie; Ahmed, Rajib; Demirci, Utkan (2020). "Medical Micro/Nanorobots in Precision Medicine". Advanced Science. 7 (21). doi:10.1002/advs.202002203. PMC 7610261. PMID 33173743.
  189. ^ a b Ceylan, Hakan; Yasa, Immihan C; Kilic, Ugur; Hu, Wenqi; Sitti, Metin (16 July 2019). "Translational prospects of untethered medical microrobots". Progress in Biomedical Engineering. 1 (1). IOP Publishing: 012002. doi:10.1088/2516-1091/ab22d5. ISSN 2516-1091. S2CID 199341199.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License.

microswimmer, microswimmer, microscopic, object, with, ability, move, fluid, environment, natural, microswimmers, found, everywhere, natural, world, biological, microorganisms, such, bacteria, archaea, protists, sperm, microanimals, since, turn, millennium, th. A microswimmer is a microscopic object with the ability to move in a fluid environment 1 Natural microswimmers are found everywhere in the natural world as biological microorganisms such as bacteria archaea protists sperm and microanimals Since the turn of the millennium there has been increasing interest in manufacturing synthetic and biohybrid microswimmers Although only two decades have passed since their emergence they have already shown promise for various biomedical and environmental applications 1 Given the recent nature of the field there is yet no consensus in the literature for the nomenclature of the microscopic objects this article refers to as microswimmers Among the many alternative names such objects are given in the literature microswimmers micro nanorobots and micro nanomotors are likely the most frequently encountered Other common terms may be more descriptive including information about the object shape e g microtube or microhelix its components e g biohybrid spermbot 2 bacteriabot 3 or micro bio robot 4 or behavior e g microrocket microbullet microtool or microroller Researchers have also named their specific microswimmers e g medibots 5 hairbots 6 iMushbots 7 IRONSperm 8 teabots 9 biobots 10 T budbots 11 or MOFBOTS 12 1 Contents 1 Background 2 Types 3 Natural microswimmers 4 Synthetic microswimmers 4 1 Responding to stimuli 5 Biohybrid microswimmers 6 Navigation 7 Applications 8 See also 9 ReferencesBackground editIn 1828 the British biologist Robert Brown discovered the incessant jiggling motion of pollen in water and described his finding in his article A Brief Account of Microscopical Observations 13 leading to extended scientific discussion about the origin of this motion This enigma was resolved only in 1905 when Albert Einstein published his celebrated essay Uber die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Warme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flussigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen 14 Einstein not only deduced the diffusion of suspended particles in quiescent liquids but also suggested these findings could be used to determine particle size in a sense he was the world s first microrheologist 15 Ever since Newton established his equations of motion the mystery of motion on the microscale has emerged frequently in scientific history as famously demonstrated by a couple of articles that should be discussed briefly First an essential concept popularized by Osborne Reynolds is that the relative importance of inertia and viscosity for the motion of a fluid depends on certain details of the system under consideration 15 The Reynolds number Re named in his honor quantifies this comparison as a dimensionless ratio of characteristic inertial and viscous forces nbsp E M Purcell nbsp Purcell s swimming scallop Fast or slow it exactly retraces its trajectory and it s back where it started 16 R e r u l m displaystyle mathrm Re frac rho ul mu nbsp Here r represents the density of the fluid u is a characteristic velocity of the system for instance the velocity of a swimming particle l is a characteristic length scale e g the swimmer size and m is the viscosity of the fluid Taking the suspending fluid to be water and using experimentally observed values for u one can determine that inertia is important for macroscopic swimmers like fish Re 100 while viscosity dominates the motion of microscale swimmers like bacteria Re 10 4 15 The overwhelming importance of viscosity for swimming at the micrometer scale has profound implications for swimming strategy This has been discussed memorably by E M Purcell who invited the reader into the world of microorganisms and theoretically studied the conditions of their motion 16 In the first place propulsion strategies of large scale swimmers often involve imparting momentum to the surrounding fluid in periodic discrete events such as vortex shedding and coasting between these events through inertia This cannot be effective for microscale swimmers like bacteria due to the large viscous damping the inertial coasting time of a micron sized object is on the order of 1 ms The coasting distance of a microorganism moving at a typical speed is about 0 1 angstroms A Purcell concluded that only forces that are exerted in the present moment on a microscale body contribute to its propulsion so a constant energy conversion method is essential 16 15 Microorganisms have optimized their metabolism for continuous energy production while purely artificial microswimmers microrobots must obtain energy from the environment since their on board storage capacity is very limited As a further consequence of the continuous dissipation of energy biological and artificial microswimmers do not obey the laws of equilibrium statistical physics and need to be described by non equilibrium dynamics 15 Mathematically Purcell explored the implications of low Reynolds number by taking the Navier Stokes equation and eliminating the inertial terms m 2 u p 0 displaystyle begin aligned mu nabla 2 mathbf u boldsymbol nabla p amp boldsymbol 0 end aligned nbsp where u displaystyle mathbf u nbsp is the velocity of the fluid and p displaystyle boldsymbol nabla p nbsp is the gradient of the pressure As Purcell noted the resulting equation the Stokes equation contains no explicit time dependence 16 This has some important consequences for how a suspended body e g a bacterium can swim through periodic mechanical motions or deformations e g of a flagellum First the rate of motion is practically irrelevant for the motion of the microswimmer and of the surrounding fluid changing the rate of motion will change the scale of the velocities of the fluid and of the microswimmer but it will not change the pattern of fluid flow Secondly reversing the direction of mechanical motion will simply reverse all velocities in the system These properties of the Stokes equation severely restrict the range of feasible swimming strategies 16 15 As a concrete illustration consider a mathematical scallop that consists of two rigid pieces connected by a hinge Can the scallop swim by periodically opening and closing the hinge No regardless of how the cycle of opening and closing depends on time the scallop will always return to its starting point at the end of the cycle Here originated the striking quote Fast or slow it exactly retraces its trajectory and it s back where it started 16 In light of this scallop theorem Purcell developed approaches concerning how artificial motion at the micro scale can be generated 15 This paper continues to inspire ongoing scientific discussion for example recent work by the Fischer group from the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems experimentally confirmed that the scallop principle is only valid for Newtonian fluids 17 15 Types editDifferent types of microswimmers are powered and actuated in different ways Swimming strategies for individual microswimmers 3 18 19 20 21 22 as well as swarms of microswimmers 23 24 25 26 27 28 have been examined down through the years Typically microswimmers rely either on external power sources as it is the case for magnetic 29 optic 10 or acoustic control 30 or employ the fuel available in their surroundings as is the case with biohybrid or catalytic microswimmers Magnetic and acoustic actuation are typically compatible with in vivo microswimmer manipulation and catalytic microswimmers can be specifically engineered to employ in vivo fuels The use of optical forces in biological fluids or in vivo is more challenging but interesting examples have nevertheless been demonstrated 10 Often researchers choose to take inspiration from nature either for the entire microswimmer design or for achieving a desired propulsion type For example one of the first bioinspired microswimmers consisted of human red blood cells modified with a flagellum like artificial component made of filaments of magnetic particles bonded via biotin streptavidin interactions 31 More recently biomimetic swimming inspired by worm like travelling wave features 32 shrimp locomotion 33 and bacterial run and tumble motion 34 was demonstrated by using shaped light 10 A different nature inspired approach is the use of biohybrid microswimmers These comprise a living component and a synthetic one Biohybrids most often take advantage of the microscale motion of various biological systems and can also make use of other behaviours characterising the living component 35 For magnetic bioinspired and biohybrid microswimmers typical model organisms are bacteria sperm cells and magnetotactic cells 36 In addition to the use of magnetic forces actuation of bioinspired microswimmers was also demonstrated using e g acoustic excitation 37 or optical forces 38 Another nature inspired behavior related to optical forces is that of phototaxis which can be exploited by e g cargo carrying microorganisms 39 synthetic microswimmers 40 41 42 or biohybrid microswimmers 43 A number of recent review papers are focused on explaining or comparing existing propulsion and control strategies used in microswimmer actuation 44 45 46 47 48 Magnetic actuation is most often included for controlled in vivo guiding even for microswimmers which rely on a different type of propulsion In 2020 Koleoso et al reviewed the use of magnetic small scale robots for biomedical applications and provide details about the various magnetic fields and actuation systems developed for such purposes 29 1 Strategies for the fabrication of microswimmers include two photon polymerisation 3D printing photolithography template assisted electrodeposition or bonding of a living component to an inanimate one by exploiting different strategies More recent approaches exploit 4D printing which is the 3D printing of stimuli responsive materials 49 50 51 52 Further functionalization is often required either to enable a certain type of actuation e g metal coating for magnetic control or thermoplasmonic responses or as part of the application if certain characteristics are required for e g sensing cargo transport controlled interactions with the environment or biodegradation 53 54 55 56 1 Natural microswimmers editFurther information Bacterial motility and Protist locomotion nbsp Changes in speed and Reynolds number with length of swimmer 15 nbsp Natural microswimmersDrawing of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii alga in a co culture with Escherichia coli bacteria 57 Motile systems have developed in the natural world over time and length scales spanning several orders of magnitude and have evolved anatomically and physiologically to attain optimal strategies for self propulsion and overcome the implications of high viscosity forces and Brownian motion as shown in the diagram on the right 58 15 Some of the smallest known natural motile systems are motor proteins i e proteins and protein complexes present in cells that carry out a variety of physiological functions by transducing chemical energy into mechanical energy These motor proteins are classified as myosins kinesins or dyneins Myosin motors are responsible for muscle contractions and the transport of cargousing actin filaments as tracks Dynein motors and kinesin motors on the other hand use microtubules to transport vesicles across the cell 59 60 The mechanism these protein motors use to convert chemical energy into movement depends on ATP hydrolysis which leads to a conformation modification in the globular motor domain leading to directed motion 61 62 15 Apart from motor proteins enzymes traditionally recognized for their catalytic functions in biochemical processes can function as nanoscale machines that convert chemical energy into mechanical action at the molecular dimension Diffusion of various enzymes e g urease and catalase measured by fluorescent correlated spectroscopy FCS increases in a substrate dependent manner 63 64 Moreover when enzymes are membrane bound their catalytic actions can drive lipid vesicle movement For instance lipid vesicles integrated with enzymes such as transmembrane adenosine 5 triphosphatase membrane bound acid phosphatase or urease exhibit enhanced mobility correlating with the enzymatic turnover rate 65 Bacteria can be roughly divided into two fundamentally different groups gram positive and gram negative bacteria distinguished by the architecture of their cell envelope In each case the cell envelope is a complex multi layered structure that protects the cell from its environment In gram positive bacteria the cytoplasmic membrane is only surrounded by a thick cell wall of peptidoglycan By contrast the envelope of gram negative bacteria is more complex and consists from inside to outside of the cytoplasmic membrane a thin layer of peptidoglycan and an additional outer membrane also called the lipopolysaccharide layer Other bacterial cell surface structures range from disorganised slime layers to highly structured capsules These are made from secreted slimy or sticky polysaccharides or proteins that provide protection for the cells and are in direct contact with the environment They have other functions including attachment to solid surfaces Additionally protein appendages can be present on the surface fimbriae and pili can have different lengths and diameters and their functions include adhesion and twitching motility 66 67 15 Specifically for microorganisms that live in aqueous environments locomotion refers to swimming and hence the world is full of different classes of swimming microorganisms such as bacteria spermatozoa protozoa and algae Bacteria move due to rotation of hair like filaments called flagella which are anchored to a protein motor complex on the bacteria cell wall 15 The following table based on Schwarz et al 2017 68 lists some examples of natural or biological microswimmers Motile microorganisms Name Image Size mm2 a Speed mm s b Propulsion mechanism Natural swimming habitat Sources bacterialswimmers prokaryotes Escherichia coli nbsp 0 5 2 30 Peritrichous bundles Intestinal flora 69 Serratia marcescens 1 2 50 Peritrichous bundles Respiratory and urinary tracts parasitic 70 Salmonella typhimurium nbsp 0 5 2 30 Peritrichous bundles Intestines parasitic 71 Bacillus subtilis nbsp 1 3 20 Peritrichous bundles Intestinal flora 72 Aliivibrio fischeri nbsp 1 2 50 Lophotrichous flagella Mucus symbiotic 73 Vibrio alginolyticus nbsp 2 3 40 Monotrichous flagellum Blood parasitic 74 75 Listeria monocytogenes nbsp 0 5 1 5 lt 1 Peritrichous or amphitrichous bundles Inter and intracellular parasitic 76 77 Magnetococcus marinus nbsp 2 2 200 Two lophotrichous bundles Marine water 78 79 Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense nbsp 0 5 2 60 Two amphitrichous flagella Freshwater sediments 80 Mycoplasma mobile 0 5 0 5 5 Gliding via protrusions Fish gills parasitic 81 protistswimmers unicellular eukaryotes Chlamydomonas nbsp 10 10 150 Two lophotrichous flagella Freshwater soil 82 Tetrahymena nbsp 25 50 gt 500 Holotrichous cilia Freshwater 83 Trypanosome nbsp 3 20 30 Monotrichous flagellum Blood parasitic 84 85 spermcells Human nbsp 3 5 50 Monotrichous flagellum Reproductive tract 86 87 Bovine 5 10 100 Monotrichous flagellum Reproductive tract 87 88 89 Murine 3 8 120 Monotrichous flagellum Reproductive tract 86 88 Synthetic microswimmers edit An artificial microswimmer is a cutting edge technology with engineering and medical applications A natural microswimmer such as bacteria and sperm cells also play important roles in wide varieties of engineering medical and biological phenomena Due to the small size of the microswimmer the inertial effect of the surrounding flow field may be negligible In such a case reciprocal body deformation cannot induce migration of a swimmer which is known as the scallop theorem To overcome the implications of the scallop theorem the microswimmer needs to undergo a nonreciprocal body deformation to achieve migration The swimming strategy is thus completely different from macro scale swimmers 90 nbsp Under light fields polystyrene gold Janus particles are set to swim and rotate alternatively such that they follow a predefined path 91 One of the current engineering challenges is to create miniaturized functional vehicles that can carry out complex tasks at a small scale that would be otherwise impractical inefficient or outright impossible by conventional means These vehicles are termed nano micromotors or nano microrobots and should be distinguished from even smaller molecular machines for energy computing or other applications on the one side and static microelectromechanical systems MEMS on the other side of this size scale Rather than being electronic devices on a chip micromotors are able to move freely through a liquid medium while being steered or directed externally or by intrinsic design which can be achieved by various mechanisms most importantly catalytic reactions 92 93 94 95 magnetic fields 96 or ultrasonic waves 97 98 99 100 101 There are a variety of sensing actuating or pickup and delivery applications that scientists are currently aiming for with local drug targeting for cancer treatment being one of the more prominent examples 102 5 For applications like this a micromotor needs to be able to move i e to swim freely in three dimensions efficiently controlled and directed with a reliable mechanism 68 It is a direct consequence of the small size scale of microswimmers that they have a low Reynolds number This means the physics of how microswimmers swim is dominated by viscous drag forces a problem which has been discussed extensively by physicists in the field 99 103 58 This kind of swimming has challenged engineers as it is not commonly experienced in everyday life but can nonetheless be observed in nature for motile microorganisms like sperm or certain bacteria Naturally these microorganisms served as inspiration from the very beginning to create artificial micromotors as they were able to tackle the challenges that an active self sufficient microswimmer vehicle has to face 104 With biomimetic approaches researchers were able to imitate the flagella based motion strategy of sperm and Escherichia coli bacteria by reproducing their respective flagellum shape and actuating it with magnetic fields 31 105 68 15 Microorganisms have adapted their locomotion to the harsh environment of low Reynolds number regime by invoking different swimming strategy 106 For example the E coli moves by rotating its helical flagellum 107 108 Chlamydomonas flagella have a breaststroke kind of motion 109 African trypanosome has a helical flagellum attached to the cell body with a planar wave passing through it 110 111 Swimming of these kind of natural swimmers have been investigated for the last half century 112 As a result of these studies artificial swimmers have also been proposed like Taylor sheet 113 Purcell s two hinge swimmer 16 114 three linked spheres swimmer 115 116 117 elastic two sphere swimmer 118 and three sphere with a passive elastic arm 119 which have further enhanced understanding about low Reynolds number swimmers One of the challenges in proposing an artificial swimmer lies in the fact that the proposed movement stroke should not be reciprocal otherwise it cannot propel itself due to the Scallop theorem In Scallop theorem Purcell had argued that a swimmer with one hinge or one degree of freedom is bound to perform reciprocal motion and thus will not be able to swim in the Stokes regime 106 16 112 Purcell proposed two possible ways to elude from Scallop theorem one is corkscrew motion 107 104 and the other is flexible oar motion 120 121 Using the concept of flexible oar Dreyfus et al reported a micro swimmer that exploit elastic property of a slender filament made up of paramagnetic beads 31 To break the time inversion symmetry a passive head was attached to the flexible arm The passive head reduces the velocity of the flexible swimmer bigger the head higher is the drag force experienced by the swimmer The head is essential for swimming because without it the tail performs a reciprocal motion and the velocity of the swimmer reduces to zero 122 112 Another way microswimmers can propel is through catalytic reactions Taking inspiration from Whitesides who used the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide H2O2 to propel cm mm scale objects on a water surface 123 Sen et al 2004 fabricated catalytic motors in the micrometer range 92 These microswimmers were rod shaped particles 370 nm in diameter and consisted of 1 µm long Pt and Au segments They propelled via the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in solution which would be catalyzed into water and oxygen The Pt Au rods were able to consistently reach speeds of up to 8 µm s in a solution of 3 3 hydrogen peroxide The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in the Pt side produces oxygen two protons and two electrons The two protons and electrons will travel towards the Au where they will be used to react with another hydrogen peroxide molecule to produce two water molecules The movements of the two protons and the two electrons through the rod drag the fluid towards the Au side thus this fluid flow will propel the rod in the opposite direction This self electrophoresis mechanism is what powers the motion of these rods 93 Further analysis of the Pt Au rods showed that they were capable of performing chemotaxis towards higher hydrogen peroxide concentrations 94 transport cargo 95 and exhibited steerable motion in an external magnetic field when inner Ni segments were added 95 Responding to stimuli edit nbsp Symmetric self thermophoretic active particle 124 scale bar has a length of 1 mm Reconfigurable synthetic or artificial microswimmers need internal feedback 125 Self propelling microparticles are often proposed as synthetic models for biological microswimmers yet they lack the internally regulated adaptation of their biological counterparts Conversely adaptation can be encoded in larger scale soft robotic devices but remains elusive to transfer to the colloidal scale 125 The ubiquity and success of motile bacteria are strongly coupled to their ability to autonomously adapt to different environments as they can reconfigure their shape metabolism and motility via internal feedback mechanisms 126 127 Realizing artificial microswimmers with similar adaptation capabilities and autonomous behavior might substantially impact technologies ranging from optimal transport to sensing and microrobotics 128 Focusing on adaptation existing approaches at the colloidal scale mostly rely on external feedback either to regulate motility via the spatiotemporal modulation of the propulsion velocity and direction 129 124 130 131 or to induce shape changes via the same magnetic or electric fields 132 133 134 which are also driving the particles On the contrary endowing artificial microswimmers with an internal feedback mechanism which regulates motility in response to stimuli that are decoupled from the source of propulsion remains an elusive task 125 A promising route to achieve this goal is to exploit the coupling between particle shape and motility Efficient switching between different propulsion states can for instance be reached by the spontaneous aggregation of symmetry breaking active clusters of varying geometry 135 136 137 138 albeit this process does not have the desired deterministic control Conversely designing colloidal clusters with fixed shapes and compositions offers fine control on motility 139 140 141 but lacks adaptation Although progress on reconfigurable robots at the sub millimeter scale has been made 142 143 144 145 146 downscaling these concepts to the colloidal level demands alternative fabrication and design Shape shifting colloidal clusters reconfiguring along a predefined pathway in response to local stimuli 147 would combine both characteristics with high potential toward the vision of realising adaptive artificial microswimmers 125 Biohybrid microswimmers editMain article Biohybrid microswimmer nbsp Types of bacterial biohybrid microswimmers 148 nbsp Bacterial biohybrid microswimmers development 149 capture delivery sensing and release The so called biohybrid microswimmer can be defined as a microswimmer that consist of both biological and artificial parts for instance one or several living microorganisms attached to one or various synthetic parts The biohybrid approach directly employs living microorganisms to be a main component or modified base of a functional microswimmer 150 151 Initially microorganisms were used as the motor units for artificial devices but in recent years this role has been extended and modified toward other functionalities that take advantage of the biological capabilities of these organisms considering their means of interacting with other cells and living matter specifically for applications inside the human body like drug delivery or fertilisation 152 153 68 A distinct advantage of microorganisms is that they naturally integrate motility and various biological functions in a conveniently miniaturised package coupled with autonomous sensing and decision making capabilities They are able to adapt and thrive in complex in vivo environments and are capable of self repair and self assembly upon interaction with their surroundings In that sense self sufficient microorganisms naturally function very similar to what we envision for artificially created microrobots They harvest chemical energy from their surroundings to power molecular motor proteins that serve as actuators they employ ion channels and microtubular networks to act as intracellular wiring they rely on RNA or DNA as memory for control algorithms and they feature an array of various membrane proteins to sense and evaluate their surroundings All these abilities act together to allow microbes to thrive and pursue their goal and function In principle these abilities also qualify them as biological microrobots for novel operations like theranostics the combination of diagnosis and therapy if we are able to impose such functions artificially for example by functionalisation with therapeutics Further artificial extensions may be used as handles for external control and supervision mechanisms or to enhance the microbe s performance to guide and tailor its functions for specific applications 68 In fact the biohybrid approach can be conceived in a dualistic way with respect to the three basic ingredients of an in vivo microrobot which are motility control and functionality Figure 1 illustrates how these three ingredients can be either realized biologically i e by the microorganism or artificially i e by the synthetic component For example a hybrid biomicromotor based on a sperm cell can be driven by the flagellum of the sperm or by an attached artificial helical flagellum 154 155 It can orient itself autonomously via biological interactions with its surroundings and other cells or be controlled and supervised externally via artificial sensors and actuators Finally it can carry out a biological function like its inherent ability to fertilize an egg cell or an artificially imposed function like the delivery of synthetic drugs or DNA vectors A biohybrid device may deploy any feasible combination of such biological and artificial components in order to carry out a specific application 68 Navigation editHydrodynamics can determine the optimal route for microswimmer navigation 156 Compared to the well explored problem of how to steer a macroscopic agent like an airplane or a moon lander to optimally reach a target optimal navigation strategies for microswimmers experiencing hydrodynamic interactions with walls and obstacles are far less understood 156 Furthermore hydrodynamic interactions in suspensions of microswimmers produce complex behavior 157 158 The quest on how to navigate or steer to optimally reach a target is important e g for airplanes to save fuel while facing complex wind patterns on their way to a remote destination or for the coordination of the motion of the parts of a space agent to safely land on the moon These classical problems are well explored and are usually solved using optimal control theory 159 Likewise navigation and search strategies are frequently encountered in a plethora of biological systems including the foraging of animals for food 160 or of T cells searching for targets to mount an immune response 161 There is growing interest in optimal navigation problems and search strategies 162 163 164 165 166 167 of microswimmers 58 103 168 169 and dry active Brownian particles 170 99 171 172 156 The general problem regarding the optimal trajectory of a microswimmer which can freely steer but cannot control its speed toward a predefined target point to point navigation can be referred to as the optimal microswimmer navigation problem The characteristic differences between the optimal microswimmer navigation problem and conventional optimal control problems for macroagents like airplanes cruise ships or moon landers root in the presence of a low Reynolds number solvent in the former problem only They comprise i overdamped dynamics ii thermal fluctuations and iii long ranged fluid mediated hydrodynamic interactions with interfaces walls and obstacles all of which are characteristic for microswimmers 99 In particular the non conservative hydrodynamic forces which microswimmers experience call for a distinct navigation strategy than the conservative gravitational forces acting e g on space vehicles Recent work has explored optimal navigation problems of dry active particles and particles in external flow fields accounting for i and partly also for ii Specifically recent research has pioneered the use of reinforcement learning 173 174 175 such as determining optimal steering strategies of active particles to optimally navigate toward a target position 162 163 166 167 or to exploit external flow fields to avoid getting trapped in certain flow structures by learning smart gravitaxis 176 Deep reinforcement learning has been used to explore microswimmer navigation problems in mazes and obstacle arrays 177 assuming global 163 or only local 164 knowledge of the environment Analytical approaches to optimal active particle navigation 165 166 complement these works and allow testing machine learned results 166 167 156 Applications editAs is the case for microtechnology and nanotechnology in general the history of microswimmer applications arguably starts with Richard Feynman s famous lecture There s Plenty of Room at the Bottom 178 In the visionary speech among other topics Feynman addressed the idea of microscopic surgeons saying it would be interesting in surgery if you could swallow the surgeon You put the mechanical surgeon inside the blood vessel and it goes into the heart and lt lt looks gt gt around of course the information has to be fed out It finds out which valve is the faulty one and takes a little knife and slices it out Other small machines might be permanently incorporated in the body to assist some inadequately functioning organ The concept of the surgeon one could swallow was soon after presented in the science fiction movie Fantastic Voyage and in Isaac Asimov s writings 1 nbsp Magnetotactic bacteria such as Magnetococcus marinus as potential drug carriers capable of penetrating a tumour 179 Only a few decades later microswimmers aiming to become true microscale surgeons evolved from an intriguing science fiction concept to a reality explored in many research laboratories around the world as already highlighted by Metin Sitti in 2009 180 1 These active agents that can self propel in a low Reynolds number environment might play a key role in the future of nanomedicine as popularised in 2016 by Yuval Noah Harari in Homo Deus A Brief History of Tomorrow 181 In particular they might become useful for the targeted delivery of genes 182 or drugs 183 184 and other cargo 185 186 to a certain target e g a cancer cell through our blood vessels requiring them to find a good or ideally optimal path toward the target avoiding e g obstacles and unfortunate flow field regions 156 Already in 2010 Nelson et al reviewed the existing and envisioned applications of microrobots in minimally invasive medicine 187 Since then the field has grown and it has become clear that microswimmers have much potential for biomedical applications 1 Already many interesting tasks can be performed in vitro using tailored microswimmers Still as of 2020 a number of challenges regarding in vivo control biocompatibility and long term biosafety need to be overcome before microswimmers can become a viable option for many clinical applications 188 1 A schematic representation of the classification of biomedical applications is shown in the diagram on the left below This includes the use of microswimmers for cargo transport in drug delivery and other biomedical applications as well as assisted fertilisation sensing micromanipulation and imaging Some of the more complex microswimmers fit into multiple categories as they are applied simultaneously for e g sensing and drug delivery 1 nbsp Biomedical applications of microswimmers 1 nbsp Essentials for a microswimmer to functionwith medical interventional capabilities 189 The design of an untethered microscopic mobile machine or microrobot to function in vivo with medical interventional capabilities should assume an integrated approach where design 3D body shape material composition manufacturing technique deployment strategy actuation and control methods imaging modality permeation of biological barriers and the execution of the prescribed medical tasks need to be considered altogether as illustrated in the diagram on the right above Each of these essential aspects contains a special design consideration which must be reflected at the physical design of the microrobot 189 See also editBioinspiration Bio inspired robotics Bio inspired engineering Gray goo Robotic sperm Soft robotics SquirmerReferences edit a b c d e f g h i j k Bunea Ada Ioana Taboryski Rafael 2020 Recent Advances in Microswimmers for Biomedical Applications Micromachines 11 12 1048 doi 10 3390 mi11121048 PMC 7760273 PMID 33261101 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License Medina Sanchez Mariana Schwarz Lukas Meyer Anne K Hebenstreit Franziska Schmidt Oliver G 2016 Cellular Cargo Delivery Toward Assisted Fertilization by Sperm Carrying Micromotors Nano Letters 16 1 555 561 Bibcode 2016NanoL 16 555M doi 10 1021 acs nanolett 5b04221 PMID 26699202 a b Schauer Oliver Mostaghaci Babak Colin Remy Hurtgen Daniel Kraus David Sitti Metin Sourjik Victor 2018 Motility and chemotaxis of bacteria driven microswimmers fabricated using antigen 43 mediated biotin display Scientific Reports 8 1 9801 Bibcode 2018NatSR 8 9801S doi 10 1038 s41598 018 28102 9 PMC 6023875 PMID 29955099 Magdanz Veronika Sanchez Samuel Schmidt Oliver G 2013 Development of a Sperm Flagella Driven Micro Bio Robot Advanced Materials 25 45 6581 6588 Bibcode 2013AdM 25 6581M doi 10 1002 adma 201302544 PMID 23996782 S2CID 5125033 a b Srivastava Sarvesh Kumar Medina Sanchez Mariana Koch Britta Schmidt Oliver G 2016 Medibots Dual Action Biogenic Microdaggers for Single Cell Surgery and Drug Release Advanced Materials 28 5 832 837 Bibcode 2016AdM 28 832S doi 10 1002 adma 201504327 PMID 26619085 S2CID 40955542 Singh Ajay Vikram Dad Ansari Mohammad Hasan Dayan Cem Balda Giltinan Joshua Wang Shuo Yu Yan Kishore Vimal Laux Peter Luch Andreas Sitti Metin 2019 Multifunctional magnetic hairbot for untethered osteogenesis ultrasound contrast imaging and drug delivery Biomaterials 219 119394 doi 10 1016 j biomaterials 2019 119394 PMID 31382208 S2CID 199451792 Bhuyan Tamanna Singh Amit Kumar Dutta Deepanjalee Unal Aynur Ghosh Siddhartha Sankar Bandyopadhyay Dipankar 2017 Magnetic Field Guided Chemotaxis of i Mushbots for Targeted Anticancer Therapeutics ACS Biomaterials Science amp Engineering 3 8 1627 1640 doi 10 1021 acsbiomaterials 7b00086 PMID 33429648 Magdanz Veronika Khalil Islam S M Simmchen Juliane Furtado Guilherme P Mohanty Sumit Gebauer Johannes Xu Haifeng Klingner Anke Aziz Azaam Medina Sanchez Mariana Schmidt Oliver G Misra Sarthak 2020 IRONSperm Sperm templated soft magnetic microrobots Science Advances 6 28 eaba5855 Bibcode 2020SciA 6 5855M doi 10 1126 sciadv aba5855 PMC 7450605 PMID 32923590 Bhuyan Tamanna Dutta Deepanjalee Bhattacharjee Mitradip Singh Amit Kumar Ghosh Siddhartha Sankar Bandyopadhyay Dipankar 2019 Acoustic Propulsion of Vitamin C Loaded Teabots for Targeted Oxidative Stress and Amyloid Therapeutics ACS Applied Bio Materials 2 10 4571 4582 doi 10 1021 acsabm 9b00677 PMID 35021416 S2CID 203945671 a b c d Bunea Ada Ioana Gluckstad Jesper 2019 Strategies for Optical Trapping in Biological Samples Aiming at Microrobotic Surgeons PDF Laser amp Photonics Reviews 13 4 Bibcode 2019LPRv 1300227B doi 10 1002 lpor 201800227 S2CID 128326068 Bhuyan Tamanna Simon Anitha T Maity Surjendu Singh Amit Kumar Ghosh Siddhartha Sankar Bandyopadhyay Dipankar 2020 Magnetotactic T Budbots to Kill n Clean Biofilms ACS Applied Materials amp Interfaces 12 39 43352 43364 doi 10 1021 acsami 0c08444 PMID 32864951 S2CID 221383266 Wang Xiaopu Chen Xiang Zhong Alcantara Carlos C J Sevim Semih Hoop Marcus Terzopoulou Anastasia De Marco Carmela Hu Chengzhi De Mello Andrew J Falcaro Paolo Furukawa Shuhei Nelson Bradley J Puigmarti Luis Josep Pane Salvador 2019 MOF Based Microrobots MOFBOTS Metal Organic Framework Based Biomedical Microrobots Adv Mater 27 2019 Advanced Materials 31 27 Bibcode 2019AdM 3170192W doi 10 1002 adma 201970192 S2CID 198797318 Brown James F 1852 XXIV On some salts and products of decomposition of pyromeconic acid The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4 24 161 168 doi 10 1080 14786445208647098 Einstein A 1905 Uber die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Warme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flussigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen Annalen der Physik 322 8 549 560 Bibcode 1905AnP 322 549E doi 10 1002 andp 19053220806 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Bastos Arrieta Julio Revilla Guarinos Ainhoa Uspal William E Simmchen Juliane 2018 Bacterial Biohybrid Microswimmers Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 97 doi 10 3389 frobt 2018 00097 PMC 7805739 PMID 33500976 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License a b c d e f g h Purcell E M 1977 Life at low Reynolds number American Journal of Physics 45 1 3 11 Bibcode 1977AmJPh 45 3P doi 10 1119 1 10903 Qiu Tian Lee Tung Chun Mark Andrew G Morozov Konstantin I Munster Raphael Mierka Otto Turek Stefan Leshansky Alexander M Fischer Peer 2014 Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number Nature Communications 5 5119 Bibcode 2014NatCo 5 5119Q doi 10 1038 ncomms6119 PMC 4241991 PMID 25369018 Zhang Li Abbott Jake J Dong Lixin Kratochvil Bradley E Bell Dominik Nelson Bradley J 2009 Artificial bacterial flagella Fabrication and magnetic control Applied Physics Letters 94 6 064107 Bibcode 2009ApPhL 94f4107Z doi 10 1063 1 3079655 Abbott Jake J Peyer Kathrin E Lagomarsino Marco Cosentino Zhang Li Dong Lixin Kaliakatsos Ioannis K Nelson Bradley J 2009 How Should Microrobots Swim The International Journal of Robotics Research 28 11 12 1434 1447 doi 10 1177 0278364909341658 S2CID 62330062 Schamel Debora Mark Andrew G Gibbs John G Miksch Cornelia Morozov Konstantin I Leshansky Alexander M Fischer Peer 2014 Nanopropellers and Their Actuation in Complex Viscoelastic Media ACS Nano 8 9 8794 8801 doi 10 1021 nn502360t PMID 24911046 Rogowski Louis William Oxner Micah Tang Jiannan Kim Min Jun 2020 Heterogeneously flagellated microswimmer behavior in viscous fluids Biomicrofluidics 14 2 024112 doi 10 1063 1 5137743 PMC 7173976 PMID 32341723 Ceylan Hakan Yasa Immihan Ceren Yasa Oncay Tabak Ahmet Fatih Giltinan Joshua Sitti Metin 2019 3D Printed Biodegradable Microswimmer for Theranostic Cargo Delivery and Release ACS Nano 13 3 3353 3362 doi 10 1021 acsnano 8b09233 PMC 6728090 PMID 30742410 Peyer Kathrin E Zhang Li Nelson Bradley J 2013 Bio inspired magnetic swimming microrobots for biomedical applications Nanoscale 5 4 1259 1272 Bibcode 2013Nanos 5 1259P doi 10 1039 C2NR32554C PMID 23165991 Chowdhury Sagar Jing Wuming Cappelleri David J 2015 Controlling multiple microrobots Recent progress and future challenges Journal of Micro Bio Robotics 10 1 4 1 11 doi 10 1007 s12213 015 0083 6 S2CID 53644820 Servant Ania Qiu Famin Mazza Mariarosa Kostarelos Kostas Nelson Bradley J 2015 Controlled in Vivo Swimming of a Swarm of Bacteria Like Microrobotic Flagella Advanced Materials 27 19 2981 2988 Bibcode 2015AdM 27 2981S doi 10 1002 adma 201404444 PMID 25850420 S2CID 22780031 Dong Xiaoguang Sitti Metin 2020 Controlling two dimensional collective formation and cooperative behavior of magnetic microrobot swarms The International Journal of Robotics Research 39 5 617 638 doi 10 1177 0278364920903107 S2CID 213942288 Liang Xiong Mou Fangzhi Huang Zhen Zhang Jianhua You Ming Xu Leilei Luo Ming Guan Jianguo 2020 Hierarchical Microswarms with Leader Follower Like Structures Electrohydrodynamic Self Organization and Multimode Collective Photoresponses Advanced Functional Materials 30 16 doi 10 1002 adfm 201908602 S2CID 214408287 Zheng Jing Dai Baohu Wang Jizhuang Xiong Ze Yang Ya Liu Jun Zhan Xiaojun Wan Zhihan Tang Jinyao 2017 Orthogonal navigation of multiple visible light driven artificial microswimmers Nature Communications 8 1 1438 Bibcode 2017NatCo 8 1438Z doi 10 1038 s41467 017 01778 9 PMC 5681650 PMID 29127414 a b Koleoso M Feng X Xue Y Li Q Munshi T Chen X 2020 Micro Nanoscale magnetic robots for biomedical applications Materials Today Bio 8 100085 doi 10 1016 j mtbio 2020 100085 PMC 7702192 PMID 33299981 Rao K Jagajjanani Li Fei Meng Long Zheng Hairong Cai Feiyan Wang Wei 2015 A Force to be Reckoned with A Review of Synthetic Microswimmers Powered by Ultrasound Small 11 24 2836 2846 doi 10 1002 smll 201403621 PMID 25851515 a b c Dreyfus Remi Baudry Jean Roper Marcus L Fermigier Marc Stone Howard A Bibette Jerome 2005 Microscopic artificial swimmers Nature 437 7060 862 865 Bibcode 2005Natur 437 862D doi 10 1038 nature04090 PMID 16208366 S2CID 3025635 Palagi Stefano Mark Andrew G Reigh Shang Yik Melde Kai Qiu Tian Zeng Hao Parmeggiani Camilla Martella Daniele Sanchez Castillo Alberto Kapernaum Nadia Giesselmann Frank Wiersma Diederik S Lauga Eric Fischer Peer 2016 Structured light enables biomimetic swimming and versatile locomotion of photoresponsive soft microrobots Nature Materials 15 6 647 653 Bibcode 2016NatMa 15 647P doi 10 1038 nmat4569 hdl 2158 1105540 PMID 26878315 Kim Min Soo Lee Hyun Taek Ahn Sung Hoon 2019 Laser Controlled 65 Micrometer Long Microrobot Made of Ni Ti Shape Memory Alloy Advanced Materials Technologies 4 12 doi 10 1002 admt 201900583 S2CID 210801365 Peng Xiaolei Chen Zhihan Kollipara Pavana Siddhartha Liu Yaoran Fang Jie Lin Linhan Zheng Yuebing 2020 Opto thermoelectric microswimmers Light Science amp Applications 9 1 141 Bibcode 2020LSA 9 141P doi 10 1038 s41377 020 00378 5 PMC 7429954 PMID 32864116 Bastos Arrieta Julio Revilla Guarinos Ainhoa Uspal William E Simmchen Juliane 2018 Bacterial Biohybrid Microswimmers Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 97 doi 10 3389 frobt 2018 00097 PMC 7805739 PMID 33500976 Bente Klaas Codutti Agnese Bachmann Felix Faivre Damien 2018 Biohybrid and Bioinspired Magnetic Microswimmers Small 14 29 e1704374 doi 10 1002 smll 201704374 PMID 29855143 S2CID 46918320 Kaynak Murat Ozcelik Adem Nourhani Amir Lammert Paul E Crespi Vincent H Huang Tony Jun 2017 Acoustic actuation of bioinspired microswimmers Lab on a Chip 17 3 395 400 doi 10 1039 C6LC01272H PMC 5465869 PMID 27991641 Xin Hongbao Zhao Nan Wang Yunuo Zhao Xiaoting Pan Ting Shi Yang Li Baojun 2020 Optically Controlled Living Micromotors for the Manipulation and Disruption of Biological Targets Nano Letters 20 10 7177 7185 Bibcode 2020NanoL 20 7177X doi 10 1021 acs nanolett 0c02501 PMID 32935992 S2CID 221747106 Nagai Moeto Hirano Takahiro Shibata Takayuki 2019 Phototactic Algae Driven Unidirectional Transport of Submillimeter Sized Cargo in a Microchannel Micromachines 10 2 130 doi 10 3390 mi10020130 PMC 6412834 PMID 30781488 Lozano Celia Ten Hagen Borge Lowen Hartmut Bechinger Clemens 2016 Phototaxis of synthetic microswimmers in optical landscapes Nature Communications 7 12828 arXiv 1609 09814 Bibcode 2016NatCo 712828L doi 10 1038 ncomms12828 PMC 5056439 PMID 27687580 S2CID 7924312 Singh Dhruv P Uspal William E Popescu Mihail N Wilson Laurence G Fischer Peer 2018 Photogravitactic Microswimmers PDF Advanced Functional Materials 28 25 doi 10 1002 adfm 201706660 S2CID 247697846 Dai Baohu Wang Jizhuang Xiong Ze Zhan Xiaojun Dai Wei Li Chien Cheng Feng Shien Ping Tang Jinyao 2016 Programmable artificial phototactic microswimmer Nature Nanotechnology 11 12 1087 1092 Bibcode 2016NatNa 11 1087D doi 10 1038 nnano 2016 187 PMID 27749832 Akolpoglu Mukrime Birgul Dogan Nihal Olcay Bozuyuk Ugur Ceylan Hakan Kizilel Seda Sitti Metin 2020 High Yield Production of Biohybrid Microalgae for On Demand Cargo Delivery Advanced Science 7 16 doi 10 1002 advs 202001256 PMC 7435244 PMID 32832367 Tu Yingfeng Peng Fei Wilson Daniela A 2017 Motion Manipulation of Micro and Nanomotors Advanced Materials 29 39 Bibcode 2017AdM 2901970T doi 10 1002 adma 201701970 hdl 2066 181774 PMID 28841755 S2CID 205280841 Luo Ming Feng Youzeng Wang Tingwei Guan Jianguo 2018 Micro Nanorobots at Work in Active Drug Delivery Advanced Functional Materials 28 25 doi 10 1002 adfm 201706100 S2CID 104145610 Srivastava Sarvesh Kumar Clergeaud Gael Andresen Thomas L Boisen Anja 2019 Micromotors for drug delivery in vivo The road ahead PDF Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 138 41 55 doi 10 1016 j addr 2018 09 005 PMID 30236447 S2CID 52310451 Plutnar Jan Pumera Martin 2019 Chemotactic Micro and Nanodevices Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58 8 2190 2196 doi 10 1002 anie 201809101 PMID 30216620 S2CID 52278805 Yang Qingliang Xu Lei Zhong Weizhen Yan Qinying Gao Ying Hong Weiyong She Yuanbin Yang Gensheng 2020 Recent Advances in Motion Control of Micro Nanomotors Advanced Intelligent Systems 2 8 doi 10 1002 aisy 202000049 S2CID 221418150 Kanu Nand Jee Gupta Eva Vates Umesh Kumar Singh Gyanendra Kumar 2019 An insight into biomimetic 4D printing RSC Advances 9 65 38209 38226 Bibcode 2019RSCAd 938209K doi 10 1039 C9RA07342F PMC 9075844 PMID 35541793 S2CID 214386444 Lui Yuan Siang Sow Wan Ting Tan Lay Poh Wu Yunlong Lai Yuekun Li Huaqiong 2019 4D printing and stimuli responsive materials in biomedical aspects Acta Biomaterialia 92 19 36 doi 10 1016 j actbio 2019 05 005 hdl 10356 143207 PMID 31071476 S2CID 149445838 Spiegel Christoph A Hippler Marc Munchinger Alexander Bastmeyer Martin Barner Kowollik Christopher Wegener Martin Blasco Eva 2020 4D Printing at the Microscale Advanced Functional Materials 30 26 doi 10 1002 adfm 201907615 S2CID 210959593 Yang Qingzhen Gao Bin Xu Feng 2020 Recent Advances in 4D Bioprinting Biotechnology Journal 15 1 e1900086 doi 10 1002 biot 201900086 PMID 31486199 S2CID 201837838 Zhang Yabin Yuan Ke Zhang Li 16 January 2019 Micro Nanomachines from Functionalization to Sensing and Removal Advanced Materials Technologies 4 4 Wiley 1800636 doi 10 1002 admt 201800636 ISSN 2365 709X S2CID 139612870 Bunea Ada Ioana Jakobsen Mogens Havsteen Engay Einstom Banas Andrew R Gluckstad Jesper 2019 Optimization of 3D printed microstructures for investigating the properties of the mucus biobarrier Micro and Nano Engineering 2 Elsevier BV 41 47 doi 10 1016 j mne 2018 12 004 ISSN 2590 0072 S2CID 215751974 Zhang Yabin Yuan Ke Zhang Li 2019 Micro Nanomachines From Functionalization to Sensing and Removal Advanced Materials Technologies 4 4 doi 10 1002 admt 201800636 S2CID 139612870 Bunea Ada Ioana Jakobsen Mogens Havsteen Engay Einstom Banas Andrew R Gluckstad Jesper 2019 Optimization of 3D printed microstructures for investigating the properties of the mucus biobarrier Micro and Nano Engineering 2 41 47 doi 10 1016 j mne 2018 12 004 S2CID 215751974 Singh Ajay Vikram Kishore Vimal Santomauro Giulia Yasa Oncay Bill Joachim Sitti Metin 28 April 2020 Mechanical Coupling of Puller and Pusher Active Microswimmers Influences Motility Langmuir 36 19 American Chemical Society ACS 5435 5443 doi 10 1021 acs langmuir 9b03665 ISSN 0743 7463 PMC 7304893 PMID 32343587 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License a b c Lauga Eric Powers Thomas R 2009 The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms Reports on Progress in Physics 72 9 096601 arXiv 0812 2887 Bibcode 2009RPPh 72i6601L doi 10 1088 0034 4885 72 9 096601 S2CID 3932471 Vogel Pia D 2005 Nature s design of nanomotors European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 60 2 267 277 doi 10 1016 j ejpb 2004 10 007 PMID 15939237 Patra Debabrata Sengupta Samudra Duan Wentao Zhang Hua Pavlick Ryan Sen Ayusman 2013 Intelligent self powered drug delivery systems Nanoscale 5 4 1273 1283 Bibcode 2013Nanos 5 1273P doi 10 1039 C2NR32600K PMID 23166050 Feringa Ben L 2001 In Control of Motion From Molecular Switches to Molecular Motors Accounts of Chemical Research 34 6 504 513 doi 10 1021 ar0001721 hdl 11370 a0b20090 34b9 4e2d 8450 bc2afbea2fcf PMID 11412087 Sokolov A Apodaca M M Grzybowski B A Aranson I S 2010 Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 3 969 974 Bibcode 2010PNAS 107 969S doi 10 1073 pnas 0913015107 PMC 2824308 PMID 20080560 Zhao Xi Gentile Kayla Mohajerani Farzad Sen Ayusman 2018 10 16 Powering Motion with Enzymes Accounts of Chemical Research 51 10 2373 2381 doi 10 1021 acs accounts 8b00286 ISSN 0001 4842 PMID 30256612 S2CID 52845451 Muddana Hari S Sengupta Samudra Mallouk Thomas E Sen Ayusman Butler Peter J 2010 02 24 Substrate Catalysis Enhances Single Enzyme Diffusion Journal of the American Chemical Society 132 7 2110 2111 doi 10 1021 ja908773a ISSN 0002 7863 PMC 2832858 PMID 20108965 Ghosh Subhadip Mohajerani Farzad Son Seoyoung Velegol Darrell Butler Peter J Sen Ayusman 2019 09 11 Motility of Enzyme Powered Vesicles Nano Letters 19 9 6019 6026 Bibcode 2019NanoL 19 6019G doi 10 1021 acs nanolett 9b01830 ISSN 1530 6984 PMID 31429577 Madigan Michael T Bender Kelly S Buckley Daniel H Brock Thomas D Matthew Sattley W Stahl David Allan 29 January 2018 Brock Biology of Microorganisms Pearson ISBN 9781292235103 Dufrene Yves F 2015 Sticky microbes Forces in microbial cell adhesion Trends in Microbiology 23 6 376 382 doi 10 1016 j tim 2015 01 011 PMID 25684261 a b c d e f Schwarz Lukas Medina Sanchez Mariana Schmidt Oliver G 2017 Hybrid Bio Micromotors Applied Physics Reviews 4 3 031301 Bibcode 2017ApPRv 4c1301S doi 10 1063 1 4993441 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License Darnton Nicholas C Turner Linda Rojevsky Svetlana Berg Howard C 2007 On Torque and Tumbling in Swimming Escherichia coli Journal of Bacteriology 189 5 1756 1764 doi 10 1128 JB 01501 06 PMC 1855780 PMID 17189361 Edwards Matthew R Carlsen Rika Wright Zhuang Jiang Sitti Metin 2014 Swimming characterization of Serratia marcescens for bio hybrid micro robotics Journal of Micro Bio Robotics 9 3 4 47 60 doi 10 1007 s12213 014 0072 1 S2CID 84413776 Magariyama Yukio Sugiyama Shigeru Kudo Seishi 2001 Bacterial swimming speed and rotation rate of bundled flagella FEMS Microbiology Letters 199 1 125 129 doi 10 1111 j 1574 6968 2001 tb10662 x PMID 11356579 Ito Masahiro Terahara Naoya Fujinami Shun Krulwich Terry Ann 2005 Properties of Motility in Bacillus subtilis Powered by the H coupled MotAB Flagellar Stator Na coupled MotPS or Hybrid Stators MotAS or MotPB Journal of Molecular Biology 352 2 396 408 doi 10 1016 j jmb 2005 07 030 PMC 2578835 PMID 16095621 Higashi Kazuhiko Miki Norihisa 2014 A self swimming microbial robot using microfabricated nanofibrous hydrogel Sensors and Actuators B Chemical 202 301 306 doi 10 1016 j snb 2014 05 068 Kawagishi I Maekawa Y Atsumi T Homma M Imae Y 1995 Isolation of the polar and lateral flagellum defective mutants in Vibrio alginolyticus and identification of their flagellar driving energy sources Journal of Bacteriology 177 17 5158 5160 doi 10 1128 jb 177 17 5158 5160 1995 PMC 177299 PMID 7665498 Xie L Altindal T Chattopadhyay S Wu X L 2011 Bacterial flagellum as a propeller and as a rudder for efficient chemotaxis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 6 2246 2251 doi 10 1073 pnas 1011953108 PMC 3038696 PMID 21205908 Lacayo Catherine I Theriot Julie A 2004 Listeria monocytogenes Actin based Motility Varies Depending on Subcellular Location A Kinematic Probe for Cytoarchitecture Molecular Biology of the Cell 15 5 2164 2175 doi 10 1091 mbc E03 10 0747 PMC 404013 PMID 15004231 McGrath James L Eungdamrong Narat J Fisher Charles I Peng Fay Mahadevan Lakshminarayanan Mitchison Timothy J Kuo Scot C 2003 The Force Velocity Relationship for the Actin Based Motility of Listeria monocytogenes Current Biology 13 4 329 332 doi 10 1016 S0960 9822 03 00051 4 PMID 12593799 S2CID 6459972 Chen Yifan Kosmas Panagiotis Martel Sylvain 2013 A Feasibility Study for Microwave Breast Cancer Detection Using Contrast Agent Loaded Bacterial Microbots International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 2013 1 11 doi 10 1155 2013 309703 Ruan J Kato T Santini C L Miyata T Kawamoto A Zhang W J Bernadac A Wu L F Namba K 2012 Architecture of a flagellar apparatus in the fast swimming magnetotactic bacterium MO 1 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 50 20643 20648 Bibcode 2012PNAS 10920643R doi 10 1073 pnas 1215274109 PMC 3528567 PMID 23184985 Martel Sylvain Tremblay Charles C Ngakeng Serge Langlois Guillaume 2006 Controlled manipulation and actuation of micro objects with magnetotactic bacteria Applied Physics Letters 89 23 233904 Bibcode 2006ApPhL 89w3904M doi 10 1063 1 2402221 Miyata Makoto Ryu William S Berg Howard C 2002 Force and Velocity of Mycoplasma mobile Gliding Journal of Bacteriology 184 7 1827 1831 doi 10 1128 JB 184 7 1827 1831 2002 PMC 134919 PMID 11889087 Weibel D B Garstecki P Ryan D Diluzio W R Mayer M Seto J E Whitesides G M 2005 Microoxen Microorganisms to move microscale loads Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 34 11963 11967 Bibcode 2005PNAS 10211963W doi 10 1073 pnas 0505481102 PMC 1189341 PMID 16103369 Kim Dal Hyung Cheang U Kei Kohidai Laszlo Byun Doyoung Kim Min Jun 2010 Artificial magnetotactic motion control of Tetrahymena pyriformis using ferromagnetic nanoparticles A tool for fabrication of microbiorobots Applied Physics Letters 97 17 173702 Bibcode 2010ApPhL 97q3702K doi 10 1063 1 3497275 Hill Kent L 2003 Biology and Mechanism of Trypanosome Cell Motility Eukaryotic Cell 2 2 200 208 doi 10 1128 EC 2 2 200 208 2003 PMC 154846 PMID 12684369 Kruger Timothy Engstler Markus 2016 Trypanosomes versatile microswimmers The European Physical Journal Special Topics 225 11 12 2157 2172 Bibcode 2016EPJST 225 2157K doi 10 1140 epjst e2016 60063 5 S2CID 125623927 a b Maree L Van Der Horst G 2013 Quantification and identification of sperm subpopulations using computer aided sperm analysis and species specific cut off values for swimming speed Biotechnic amp Histochemistry 88 3 4 181 193 doi 10 3109 10520295 2012 757366 hdl 10566 3120 PMID 23331185 S2CID 19603301 a b Eamer Lise Nosrati Reza Vollmer Marion Zini Armand Sinton David 2015 Microfluidic assessment of swimming media for motility based sperm selection Biomicrofluidics 9 4 044113 doi 10 1063 1 4928129 PMC 4529441 PMID 26339314 a b Gomendio Montserrat Roldan Eduardo R S 2008 Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility The International Journal of Developmental Biology 52 5 6 439 447 doi 10 1387 ijdb 082595mg PMID 18649256 Tung Chih Kuan Ardon Florencia Fiore Alyssa G Suarez Susan S Wu Mingming 2014 Cooperative roles of biological flow and surface topography in guiding sperm migration revealed by a microfluidic model Lab Chip 14 7 1348 1356 doi 10 1039 C3LC51297E PMC 4497544 PMID 24535032 Ishikawa Takuji 2019 Special Issue Microswimmer Micromachines ISSN 2072 666X Dume Isabelle 2020 Microswimmers benefit from thermoelectric guidance Physics World a b Paxton Walter F Kistler Kevin C Olmeda Christine C Sen Ayusman St Angelo Sarah K Cao Yanyan Mallouk Thomas E Lammert Paul E Crespi Vincent H 2004 10 01 Catalytic Nanomotors Autonomous Movement of Striped Nanorods Journal of the American Chemical Society 126 41 13424 13431 doi 10 1021 ja047697z ISSN 0002 7863 PMID 15479099 a b Paxton Walter F Baker Paul T Kline Timothy R Wang Yang Mallouk Thomas E Sen Ayusman 2006 11 01 Catalytically Induced Electrokinetics for Motors and Micropumps Journal of the American Chemical Society 128 46 14881 14888 doi 10 1021 ja0643164 ISSN 0002 7863 PMID 17105298 a b Hong Yiying Blackman Nicole M K Kopp Nathaniel D Sen Ayusman Velegol Darrell 2007 10 26 Chemotaxis of Nonbiological Colloidal Rods Physical Review Letters 99 17 178103 Bibcode 2007PhRvL 99q8103H doi 10 1103 PhysRevLett 99 178103 PMID 17995374 a b c Sundararajan Shakuntala Lammert Paul E Zudans Andrew W Crespi Vincent H Sen Ayusman 2008 05 01 Catalytic Motors for Transport of Colloidal Cargo Nano Letters 8 5 1271 1276 Bibcode 2008NanoL 8 1271S doi 10 1021 nl072275j ISSN 1530 6984 PMID 18416540 Zhou Dekai Ren Liqiang Li Yuguang C Xu Pengtao Gao Yuan Zhang Guangyu Wang Wei Mallouk Thomas E Li Longqiu 2017 Visible light driven magnetically steerable gold iron oxide nanomotors Chem Commun 53 83 11465 11468 doi 10 1039 C7CC06327J ISSN 1359 7345 PMID 28983536 Wang Wei Castro Luz Angelica Hoyos Mauricio Mallouk Thomas 2012 Autonomous motion of metallic microrods propelled by ultrasound ACS Nano 6 7 6122 6132 doi 10 1021 nn301312z PMID 22631222 Guix Maria Mayorga Martinez Carmen C Merkoci Arben 2014 Nano Micromotors in Bio chemical Science Applications Chemical Reviews 114 12 6285 6322 doi 10 1021 cr400273r PMID 24827167 a b c d Bechinger Clemens Di Leonardo Roberto Lowen Hartmut Reichhardt Charles Volpe Giorgio Volpe Giovanni 2016 Active Particles in Complex and Crowded Environments Reviews of Modern Physics 88 4 045006 arXiv 1602 00081 Bibcode 2016RvMP 88d5006B doi 10 1103 RevModPhys 88 045006 S2CID 14940249 Magdanz Veronika Guix Maria Schmidt Oliver G 2014 Tubular micromotors From microjets to spermbots Robotics and Biomimetics 1 doi 10 1186 s40638 014 0011 6 S2CID 55870000 McNeill Jeffrey M Mallouk Thomas E 2023 10 14 Acoustically Powered Nano and Microswimmers From Individual to Collective Behavior ACS Nanoscience Au 3 6 424 440 doi 10 1021 acsnanoscienceau 3c00038 ISSN 2694 2496 PMC 10740144 PMID 38144701 Ricotti Leonardo Cafarelli Andrea Iacovacci Veronica Vannozzi Lorenzo Menciassi Arianna 2015 Advanced Micro Nano Bio Systems for Future Targeted Therapies Current Nanoscience 11 2 144 160 Bibcode 2015CNan 11 144R doi 10 2174 1573413710666141114221246 a b Elgeti J Winkler R G Gompper G 2015 Physics of microswimmers single particle motion and collective behavior A review Reports on Progress in Physics 78 5 056601 arXiv 1412 2692 Bibcode 2015RPPh 78e6601E doi 10 1088 0034 4885 78 5 056601 PMID 25919479 S2CID 3909877 a b Purcell E M 1997 The efficiency of propulsion by a rotating flagellum Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94 21 11307 11311 Bibcode 1997PNAS 9411307P doi 10 1073 pnas 94 21 11307 PMC 23452 PMID 9326605 Morozov Konstantin I Leshansky Alexander M 2014 The chiral magnetic nanomotors Nanoscale 6 3 1580 1588 arXiv 1308 6115 Bibcode 2014Nanos 6 1580M doi 10 1039 C3NR04853E PMID 24336860 S2CID 15834620 a b Lauga Eric Powers Thomas R 25 August 2009 The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms Reports on Progress in Physics 72 9 IOP Publishing 096601 arXiv 0812 2887 Bibcode 2009RPPh 72i6601L doi 10 1088 0034 4885 72 9 096601 ISSN 0034 4885 S2CID 3932471 a b Berg Howard C Anderson Robert A 1973 Bacteria Swim by Rotating their Flagellar Filaments Nature 245 5425 380 382 Bibcode 1973Natur 245 380B doi 10 1038 245380a0 PMID 4593496 S2CID 4173914 Berg Howard 2004 E coli in motion in Italian New York Springer ISBN 978 0 387 21638 6 OCLC 56124142 Mitchell David R 2001 Chlamydomonas flagella Journal of Phycology 36 2 261 273 doi 10 1046 j 1529 8817 2000 99218 x S2CID 221921243 Oberholzer Michael Lopez Miguel A McLelland Bryce T Hill Kent L 2010 Social Motility in African Trypanosomes PLOS Pathogens 6 1 e1000739 doi 10 1371 journal ppat 1000739 PMC 2813273 PMID 20126443 Babu Sujin B Stark Holger 2012 Modeling the locomotion of the African trypanosome using multi particle collision dynamics New Journal of Physics 14 8 085012 Bibcode 2012NJPh 14h5012B doi 10 1088 1367 2630 14 8 085012 a b c Choudhary Priyanka Mandal Subhayan Babu Sujin B 2018 Locomotion of a flexible one hinge swimmer in Stokes regime Journal of Physics Communications 2 2 025009 arXiv 1707 07451 Bibcode 2018JPhCo 2b5009C doi 10 1088 2399 6528 aaa856 S2CID 119229534 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3 0 International License Taylor Geoffrey 1951 Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences 209 1099 447 461 Bibcode 1951RSPSA 209 447T doi 10 1098 rspa 1951 0218 S2CID 120382159 Avron J E Raz O 2008 A geometric theory of swimming Purcell s swimmer and its symmetrized cousin New Journal of Physics 10 6 063016 arXiv 0712 2047 Bibcode 2008NJPh 10f3016A doi 10 1088 1367 2630 10 6 063016 S2CID 14646885 Najafi Ali Golestanian Ramin 2004 Simple swimmer at low Reynolds number Three linked spheres Physical Review E 69 6 062901 arXiv cond mat 0402070 Bibcode 2004PhRvE 69f2901N doi 10 1103 PhysRevE 69 062901 PMID 15244646 S2CID 27500334 Daddi Moussa Ider Abdallah Lisicki Maciej Mathijssen Arnold J T M 2020 Tuning the upstream swimming of microrobots by shape and cargo size Physical Review Applied 14 2 024071 arXiv 2004 05694 Bibcode 2020PhRvP 14b4071D doi 10 1103 PhysRevApplied 14 024071 S2CID 229547570 Daddi Moussa Ider Abdallah Lisicki Maciej Hoell Christian Lowen Hartmut 2018 Swimming trajectories of a three sphere microswimmer near a wall Journal of Chemical Physics 148 13 134904 arXiv 1801 01162 Bibcode 2018JChPh 148m4904D doi 10 1063 1 5021027 PMID 29626882 S2CID 4718416 Nasouri Babak Khot Aditi Elfring Gwynn J 2017 Elastic two sphere swimmer in Stokes flow Physical Review Fluids 2 4 043101 arXiv 1611 05847 Bibcode 2017PhRvF 2d3101N doi 10 1103 PhysRevFluids 2 043101 S2CID 119474335 Montino Alessandro Desimone Antonio 2015 Three sphere low Reynolds number swimmer with a passive elastic arm The European Physical Journal E 38 5 127 doi 10 1140 epje i2015 15042 3 PMID 25990633 S2CID 45431975 Wiggins Chris H Goldstein Raymond E 1998 Flexive and Propulsive Dynamics of Elastica at Low Reynolds Number Physical Review Letters 80 17 3879 3882 arXiv cond mat 9707346 Bibcode 1998PhRvL 80 3879W doi 10 1103 PhysRevLett 80 3879 S2CID 10335181 Lagomarsino M C Capuani F Lowe C P 2003 A simulation study of the dynamics of a driven filament in an Aristotelian fluid Journal of Theoretical Biology 224 2 215 224 Bibcode 2003JThBi 224 215L doi 10 1016 S0022 5193 03 00159 0 hdl 2434 802791 PMID 12927528 S2CID 3200289 Lauga Eric 2007 Floppy swimming Viscous locomotion of actuated elastica Physical Review E 75 4 041916 arXiv cond mat 0610154 Bibcode 2007PhRvE 75d1916L doi 10 1103 PhysRevE 75 041916 PMID 17500930 S2CID 13651250 Ismagilov Rustem F Schwartz Alexander Bowden Ned Whitesides George M 2002 02 15 Autonomous Movement and Self Assembly Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 4 652 654 doi 10 1002 1521 3773 20020215 41 4 lt 652 AID ANIE652 gt 3 0 CO 2 U ISSN 1433 7851 a b Khadka Utsab Holubec Viktor Yang Haw Cichos Frank 2018 Active particles bound by information flows Nature Communications 9 1 3864 arXiv 1803 03053 Bibcode 2018NatCo 9 3864K doi 10 1038 s41467 018 06445 1 PMC 6154969 PMID 30242284 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License a b c d Alvarez L Fernandez Rodriguez M A Alegria A Arrese Igor S Zhao K Kroger M Isa Lucio 2021 Reconfigurable artificial microswimmers with internal feedback Nature Communications 12 1 4762 arXiv 2009 08382 Bibcode 2021NatCo 12 4762A doi 10 1038 s41467 021 25108 2 PMC 8346629 PMID 34362934 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License Hamadeh Abdullah Roberts Mark A J August Elias McSharry Patrick E Maini Philip K Armitage Judith P Papachristodoulou Antonis 2011 Feedback Control Architecture and the Bacterial Chemotaxis Network PLOS Computational Biology 7 5 e1001130 Bibcode 2011PLSCB 7E1130H doi 10 1371 journal pcbi 1001130 PMC 3088647 PMID 21573199 Baker Melinda D Wolanin Peter M Stock Jeffry B 2006 Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis BioEssays 28 1 9 22 doi 10 1002 bies 20343 PMID 16369945 S2CID 189870 Ebbens S J 2016 Active colloids Progress and challenges towards realising autonomous applications Current Opinion in Colloid amp Interface Science 21 14 23 doi 10 1016 j cocis 2015 10 003 Lozano Celia Ten Hagen Borge Lowen Hartmut Bechinger Clemens 2016 Phototaxis of synthetic microswimmers in optical landscapes Nature Communications 7 12828 arXiv 1609 09814 Bibcode 2016NatCo 712828L doi 10 1038 ncomms12828 PMC 5056439 PMID 27687580 Sprenger Alexander R Fernandez Rodriguez Miguel Angel Alvarez Laura Isa Lucio Wittkowski Raphael Lowen Hartmut 2020 Active Brownian Motion with Orientation Dependent Motility Theory and Experiments Langmuir 36 25 7066 7073 arXiv 1911 09524 doi 10 1021 acs langmuir 9b03617 PMID 31975603 S2CID 208201932 Fernandez Rodriguez Miguel Angel Grillo Fabio Alvarez Laura Rathlef Marco Buttinoni Ivo Volpe Giovanni Isa Lucio 2020 Feedback controlled active brownian colloids with space dependent rotational dynamics Nature Communications 11 1 4223 arXiv 1911 02291 Bibcode 2020NatCo 11 4223F doi 10 1038 s41467 020 17864 4 PMC 7445303 PMID 32839447 Han Koohee Shields C Wyatt Diwakar Nidhi M Bharti Bhuvnesh Lopez Gabriel P Velev Orlin D 2017 Sequence encoded colloidal origami and microbot assemblies from patchy magnetic cubes Science Advances 3 8 e1701108 Bibcode 2017SciA 3E1108H doi 10 1126 sciadv 1701108 PMC 5544397 PMID 28798960 Shields C Wyatt Velev Orlin D 2017 The Evolution of Active Particles Toward Externally Powered Self Propelling and Self Reconfiguring Particle Systems Chem 3 4 539 559 doi 10 1016 j chempr 2017 09 006 Yang Tao Sprinkle Brennan Guo Yang Qian Jun Hua Daoben Donev Aleksandar Marr David W M Wu Ning 2020 Reconfigurable microbots folded from simple colloidal chains Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 31 18186 18193 Bibcode 2020PNAS 11718186Y doi 10 1073 pnas 2007255117 PMC 7414297 PMID 32680965 Soto Rodrigo Golestanian Ramin 2014 Self Assembly of Catalytically Active Colloidal Molecules Tailoring Activity Through Surface Chemistry Physical Review Letters 112 6 068301 arXiv 1306 6596 Bibcode 2014PhRvL 112f8301S doi 10 1103 PhysRevLett 112 068301 PMID 24580712 S2CID 37057964 Niu Ran Fischer Andreas Palberg Thomas Speck Thomas 2018 Dynamics of Binary Active Clusters Driven by Ion Exchange Particles ACS Nano 12 11 10932 10938 doi 10 1021 acsnano 8b04221 PMID 30346687 S2CID 206722021 Ma Fuduo Wang Sijia Wu David T Wu Ning 2015 Electric field induced assembly and propulsion of chiral colloidal clusters Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 20 6307 6312 Bibcode 2015PNAS 112 6307M doi 10 1073 pnas 1502141112 PMC 4443365 PMID 25941383 Wang Zuochen Wang Zhisheng Li Jiahui Tian Changhao Wang Yufeng 2020 Active colloidal molecules assembled via selective and directional bonds Nature Communications 11 1 2670 Bibcode 2020NatCo 11 2670W doi 10 1038 s41467 020 16506 z PMC 7260206 PMID 32471993 Ebbens Stephen Jones Richard A L Ryan Anthony J Golestanian Ramin Howse Jonathan R 2010 Self assembled autonomous runners and tumblers Physical Review E 82 1 Pt 2 015304 Bibcode 2010PhRvE 82a5304E doi 10 1103 PhysRevE 82 015304 PMID 20866681 Ni Songbo Marini Emanuele Buttinoni Ivo Wolf Heiko Isa Lucio 2017 Hybrid colloidal microswimmers through sequential capillary assembly Soft Matter 13 23 4252 4259 doi 10 1039 c7sm00443e PMID 28573270 Wang Zuochen Wang Zhisheng Li Jiahui Cheung Simon Tsz Hang Tian Changhao Kim Shin Hyun Yi Gi Ra Ducrot Etienne Wang Yufeng 2019 Active Patchy Colloids with Shape Tunable Dynamics Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 37 14853 14863 doi 10 1021 jacs 9b07785 PMID 31448592 S2CID 201748635 Hu Chengzhi Pane Salvador Nelson Bradley J 2018 Soft Micro and Nanorobotics Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems 1 53 75 doi 10 1146 annurev control 060117 104947 hdl 20 500 11850 316345 S2CID 139844553 Palagi Stefano Fischer Peer 2018 Bioinspired microrobots Nature Reviews Materials 3 6 113 124 Bibcode 2018NatRM 3 113P doi 10 1038 s41578 018 0016 9 S2CID 189929035 Medina Sanchez Mariana Magdanz Veronika Guix Maria Fomin Vladimir M Schmidt Oliver G 2018 Swimming Microrobots Soft Reconfigurable and Smart Advanced Functional Materials 28 25 doi 10 1002 adfm 201707228 S2CID 103866599 Hu Wenqi Lum Guo Zhan Mastrangeli Massimo Sitti Metin 2018 Small scale soft bodied robot with multimodal locomotion Nature 554 7690 81 85 Bibcode 2018Natur 554 81H doi 10 1038 nature25443 PMID 29364873 S2CID 4461200 Huang H W Uslu F E Katsamba P Lauga E Sakar M S Nelson B J Nelson Bradley J 2019 Adaptive locomotion of artificial microswimmers Science Advances 5 1 eaau1532 arXiv 1902 09000 Bibcode 2019SciA 5 1532H doi 10 1126 sciadv aau1532 PMC 6357760 PMID 30746446 Dou Yong Bishop Kyle J M 2019 Autonomous navigation of shape shifting microswimmers Physical Review Research 1 3 032030 arXiv 1908 05808 Bibcode 2019PhRvR 1c2030D doi 10 1103 PhysRevResearch 1 032030 S2CID 201058417 Zhuang Jiang Park Byung Wook Sitti Metin 2017 Propulsion and Chemotaxis in Bacteria Driven Microswimmers Advanced Science 4 9 doi 10 1002 advs 201700109 PMC 5604384 PMID 28932674 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License Sun Zhiyong Popp Philipp Loderer Christoph Revilla Guarinos Ainhoa 28 December 2019 Genetically Engineered Bacterial Biohybrid Microswimmers for Sensing Applications Sensors 20 1 MDPI AG 180 Bibcode 2019Senso 20 180S doi 10 3390 s20010180 ISSN 1424 8220 PMC 6982730 PMID 31905650 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License Carlsen Rika Wright Sitti Metin 2014 Bio Hybrid Cell Based Actuators for Microsystems Small 10 19 3831 3851 doi 10 1002 smll 201400384 PMID 24895215 Hosseinidoust Zeinab Mostaghaci Babak Yasa Oncay Park Byung Wook Singh Ajay Vikram Sitti Metin 2016 Bioengineered and biohybrid bacteria based systems for drug delivery Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 106 Pt A 27 44 doi 10 1016 j addr 2016 09 007 PMID 27641944 Magdanz Veronika Medina Sanchez Mariana Schwarz Lukas Xu Haifeng Elgeti Jens Schmidt Oliver G 2017 Spermatozoa as Functional Components of Robotic Microswimmers Advanced Materials 29 24 Bibcode 2017AdM 2906301M doi 10 1002 adma 201606301 PMID 28323360 S2CID 26622101 Medina Sanchez Mariana Schmidt Oliver G 2017 Medical microbots need better imaging and control Nature 545 7655 406 408 Bibcode 2017Natur 545 406M doi 10 1038 545406a PMID 28541344 S2CID 4388403 Magdanz Veronika Medina Sanchez Mariana Schwarz Lukas Xu Haifeng Elgeti Jens Schmidt Oliver G 2017 Spermatozoa as Functional Components of Robotic Microswimmers Advanced Materials 29 24 Bibcode 2017AdM 2906301M doi 10 1002 adma 201606301 PMID 28323360 S2CID 26622101 Medina Sanchez Mariana Schmidt Oliver G 2017 Medical microbots need better imaging and control Nature 545 7655 406 408 Bibcode 2017Natur 545 406M doi 10 1038 545406a PMID 28541344 S2CID 4388403 a b c d e Daddi Moussa Ider Abdallah Lowen Hartmut Liebchen Benno 2021 Hydrodynamics can determine the optimal route for microswimmer navigation Communications Physics 4 1 15 arXiv 2008 11064 Bibcode 2021CmPhy 4 15D doi 10 1038 s42005 021 00522 6 S2CID 234012727 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4 0 International License Schwarzendahl Fabian Jan Mazza Marco G 2018 Maximum in density heterogeneities of active swimmers Soft Matter 14 23 4666 4678 arXiv 1711 08689 Bibcode 2018SMat 14 4666S doi 10 1039 C7SM02301D PMID 29717736 Theers Mario Westphal Elmar Qi Kai Winkler Roland G Gompper Gerhard 31 October 2018 Clustering of microswimmers interplay of shape and hydrodynamics Soft Matter 14 42 8590 8603 arXiv 1807 01211 Bibcode 2018SMat 14 8590T doi 10 1039 C8SM01390J PMID 30339172 Kirk Donald 2004 Optimal control theory an introduction Mineola N Y ISBN 978 0 486 13507 6 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Viswanathan Gandhimohan M Da Luz Marcos G E Raposo Ernesto P Stanley H Eugene 2011 The Physics of Foraging doi 10 1017 CBO9780511902680 ISBN 9780511902680 Fricke G Matthew Letendre Kenneth A Moses Melanie E Cannon Judy L 2016 Persistence and Adaptation in Immunity T Cells Balance the Extent and Thoroughness of Search PLOS Computational Biology 12 3 e1004818 Bibcode 2016PLSCB 12E4818F doi 10 1371 journal pcbi 1004818 PMC 4798282 PMID 26990103 a b Muinos Landin S Fischer A Holubec V Cichos F 2021 Reinforcement learning with artificial microswimmers Science Robotics 6 52 arXiv 1803 06425 doi 10 1126 scirobotics abd9285 PMID 34043550 S2CID 4938282 a b c Yang Yuguang Bevan Michael A 2018 Optimal Navigation of Self Propelled Colloids ACS Nano 12 11 10712 10724 doi 10 1021 acsnano 8b05371 PMID 30252442 S2CID 52824752 a b Yang Yuguang Bevan Michael A Li Bo 2020 Efficient Navigation of Colloidal Robots in an Unknown Environment via Deep Reinforcement Learning Advanced Intelligent Systems 2 arXiv 1906 10844 doi 10 1002 aisy 201900106 S2CID 199000857 a b Liebchen Benno Lowen Hartmut 2019 Optimal navigation strategies for active particles EPL Europhysics Letters 127 3 34003 Bibcode 2019EL 12734003L doi 10 1209 0295 5075 127 34003 S2CID 203038971 a b c d Schneider E Stark H 2019 Optimal steering of a smart active particle EPL Europhysics Letters 127 6 64003 arXiv 1909 03243 Bibcode 2019EL 12764003S doi 10 1209 0295 5075 127 64003 S2CID 202540395 a b c Biferale L Bonaccorso F Buzzicotti M Clark Di Leoni P Gustavsson K 2019 Zermelo s problem Optimal point to point navigation in 2D turbulent flows using reinforcement learning Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 29 10 103138 arXiv 1907 08591 Bibcode 2019Chaos 29j3138B doi 10 1063 1 5120370 PMID 31675828 S2CID 197935446 Lauga Eric 2016 Bacterial Hydrodynamics Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 48 1 105 130 arXiv 1509 02184 Bibcode 2016AnRFM 48 105L doi 10 1146 annurev fluid 122414 034606 S2CID 13849152 Lauga Eric 2020 The fluid dynamics of cell motility Cambridge United Kingdom New York NY ISBN 978 1 107 17465 8 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint location missing publisher link Romanczuk P Bar M Ebeling W Lindner B Schimansky Geier L 2012 Active Brownian particles The European Physical Journal Special Topics 202 1 162 arXiv 1202 2442 doi 10 1140 epjst e2012 01529 y S2CID 119100040 Cates Michael E Tailleur Julien 2015 Motility Induced Phase Separation Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6 219 244 arXiv 1406 3533 Bibcode 2015ARCMP 6 219C doi 10 1146 annurev conmatphys 031214 014710 S2CID 15672131 Zottl Andreas Stark Holger 11 May 2016 Emergent behavior in active colloids Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 28 25 IOP Publishing 253001 arXiv 1601 06643 Bibcode 2016JPCM 28y3001Z doi 10 1088 0953 8984 28 25 253001 ISSN 0953 8984 S2CID 3948148 Sutton Richard 2018 Reinforcement learning an introduction Cambridge Massachusetts The MIT Press ISBN 978 0 262 35270 3 Cichos Frank Gustavsson Kristian Mehlig Bernhard Volpe Giovanni 2020 Machine learning for active matter Nature Machine Intelligence 2 2 94 103 doi 10 1038 s42256 020 0146 9 S2CID 214355969 Garnier Paul Viquerat Jonathan Rabault Jean Larcher Aurelien Kuhnle Alexander Hachem Elie 2021 A review on deep reinforcement learning for fluid mechanics Computers amp Fluids 225 104973 arXiv 1908 04127 doi 10 1016 j compfluid 2021 104973 S2CID 199543817 Colabrese Simona Gustavsson Kristian Celani Antonio Biferale Luca 2017 Flow Navigation by Smart Microswimmers via Reinforcement Learning Physical Review Letters 118 15 158004 arXiv 1701 08848 Bibcode 2017PhRvL 118o8004C doi 10 1103 PhysRevLett 118 158004 PMID 28452499 S2CID 13695532 Yang Yuguang Bevan Michael A Li Bo 2020 Micro Nano Motor Navigation and Localization via Deep Reinforcement Learning Advanced Theory and Simulations 3 6 arXiv 2002 06775 doi 10 1002 adts 202000034 S2CID 211133324 Feynman R 2018 There s plenty of room at the bottom In Hey Anthony 2018 Feynman and computation exploring the limits of computers Boca Raton CRC Press pp 63 76 ISBN 978 0 429 50045 9 Kuzajewska Danuta Wszolek Agata Zwierello Wojciech Kirczuk Lucyna Maruszewska Agnieszka 19 May 2020 Magnetotactic Bacteria and Magnetosomes as Smart Drug Delivery Systems A New Weapon on the Battlefield with Cancer Biology 9 5 MDPI AG 102 doi 10 3390 biology9050102 ISSN 2079 7737 PMC 7284773 PMID 32438567 Sitti Metin 2009 Voyage of the microrobots Nature 458 7242 1121 1122 doi 10 1038 4581121a PMID 19407789 S2CID 205044764 Harari Yuval 2016 Homo deus a brief history of tomorrow London Harvill Secker ISBN 978 1 4735 4537 3 Qiu Famin Fujita Satoshi Mhanna Rami Zhang Li Simona Benjamin R Nelson Bradley J 2015 Magnetic Helical Microswimmers Functionalized with Lipoplexes for Targeted Gene Delivery Advanced Functional Materials 25 11 1666 1671 doi 10 1002 adfm 201403891 S2CID 95812709 Park Byung Wook Zhuang Jiang Yasa Oncay Sitti Metin 2017 Multifunctional Bacteria Driven Microswimmers for Targeted Active Drug Delivery ACS Nano 11 9 8910 8923 doi 10 1021 acsnano 7b03207 PMID 28873304 Wang Joseph Gao Wei 2012 Nano Microscale Motors Biomedical Opportunities and Challenges ACS Nano 6 7 5745 5751 doi 10 1021 nn3028997 PMID 22770233 Ma Xing Hahn Kersten Sanchez Samuel 2015 Catalytic Mesoporous Janus Nanomotors for Active Cargo Delivery Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 15 4976 4979 doi 10 1021 jacs 5b02700 PMC 4440854 PMID 25844893 Demirors Ahmet F Akan Mehmet Tolga Poloni Erik Studart Andre R 2018 Active cargo transport with Janus colloidal shuttles using electric and magnetic fields Soft Matter 14 23 4741 4749 Bibcode 2018SMat 14 4741D doi 10 1039 C8SM00513C PMID 29799053 Nelson Bradley J Kaliakatsos Ioannis K Abbott Jake J 2010 Microrobots for Minimally Invasive Medicine Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 12 55 85 doi 10 1146 annurev bioeng 010510 103409 PMID 20415589 Soto Fernando Wang Jie Ahmed Rajib Demirci Utkan 2020 Medical Micro Nanorobots in Precision Medicine Advanced Science 7 21 doi 10 1002 advs 202002203 PMC 7610261 PMID 33173743 a b Ceylan Hakan Yasa Immihan C Kilic Ugur Hu Wenqi Sitti Metin 16 July 2019 Translational prospects of untethered medical microrobots Progress in Biomedical Engineering 1 1 IOP Publishing 012002 doi 10 1088 2516 1091 ab22d5 ISSN 2516 1091 S2CID 199341199 nbsp Material was copied from this source which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3 0 International License Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Microswimmer amp oldid 1208842055, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.