fbpx
Wikipedia

Impala

The impala or rooibok (Aepyceros melampus) is a medium-sized antelope found in eastern and southern Africa. The only extant member of the genus Aepyceros, and tribe Aepycerotini, it was first described to Europeans by German zoologist Hinrich Lichtenstein in 1812. Two subspecies are recognised—the grassland-dwelling common impala (sometimes referred to as the Kenyan impala), and the larger and darker black-faced impala, which lives in slightly more arid, scrubland environments. The impala reaches 70–92 cm (28–36 in) at the shoulder and weighs 40–76 kg (88–168 lb). It features a glossy, reddish brown coat. The male's slender, lyre-shaped horns are 45–92 cm (18–36 in) long.

Impala
An impala ram in northern Botswana
A ewe with calf at the Kruger National Park, South Africa
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Family: Bovidae
Tribe: Aepycerotini
Genus: Aepyceros
Species:
A. melampus
Binomial name
Aepyceros melampus
(Lichtenstein, 1812)
Subspecies
  • A. m. melampus Lichtenstein, 1812
  • A. m. petersi Bocage, 1879
Distribution:
  Black-faced impala
  Common impala
Synonyms[2]
List
  • A. holubi Lorenz, 1894
  • A. johnstoni Thomas, 1893
  • A. katangae Lönnberg, 1914
  • A. pallah (Gervais, 1841)
  • A. rendilis Lönnberg, 1912
  • A. typicus Thomas, 1893

Active mainly during the day, the impala may be gregarious or territorial depending upon the climate and geography. Three distinct social groups can be observed: the territorial males, bachelor herds and female herds. The impala is known for two characteristic leaps that constitute an anti-predator strategy. Browsers as well as grazers, impala feed on monocots, dicots, forbs, fruits and acacia pods (whenever available). An annual, three-week-long rut takes place toward the end of the wet season, typically in May. Rutting males fight over dominance, and the victorious male courts females in oestrus. Gestation lasts six to seven months, following which a single calf is born and immediately concealed in cover. Calves are suckled for four to six months; young males—forced out of the all-female groups—join bachelor herds, while females may stay back.

The impala is found in woodlands and sometimes on the interface (ecotone) between woodlands and savannahs; it inhabits places near water. While the black-faced impala is confined to southwestern Angola and Kaokoland in northwestern Namibia, the common impala is widespread across its range and has been reintroduced in Gabon and southern Africa. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) classifies the impala as a species of least concern; the black-faced subspecies has been classified as a vulnerable species, with fewer than 1,000 individuals remaining in the wild as of 2008.

Etymology

The first attested English name, in 1802, was palla or pallah, from the Tswana phala 'red antelope';[3] the name impala, also spelled impalla or mpala, is first attested in 1875, and is directly from Zulu.[4] Its Afrikaans name, rooibok 'red buck', is also sometimes used in English.[5]

The scientific generic name Aepyceros (lit. ‘high-horned’) comes from Ancient Greek αἰπύς (aipus, 'high, steep') + κέρας (keras, 'horn');[6][7] the specific name melampus (lit. ‘black-foot’) from μελάς (melas, 'black') + πούς (pous, 'foot').[8]

Taxonomy and evolution

The impala is the sole member of the genus Aepyceros and belongs to the family Bovidae. It was first described by German zoologist Martin Hinrich Carl Lichtenstein in 1812.[2] In 1984, palaeontologist Elisabeth Vrba opined that the impala is a sister taxon to the alcelaphines, given its resemblance to the hartebeest.[9] A 1999 phylogenetic study by Alexandre Hassanin (of the National Centre for Scientific Research, Paris) and colleagues, based on mitochondrial and nuclear analyses, showed that the impala forms a clade with the suni (Neotragus moschatus). This clade is sister to another formed by the bay duiker (Cephalophus dorsalis) and the klipspringer (Oreotragus oreotragus).[10] An rRNA and β-spectrin nuclear sequence analysis in 2003 also supported an association between Aepyceros and Neotragus.[11] The following cladogram is based on the 1999 study:[10]

Sheep (Ovis aries)

Bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus)

Sable antelope (Hippotragus niger)

Klipspringer (Oreotragus oreotragus)

Bay duiker (Cephalophus dorsalis)

Impala (Aepyceros melampus)

Suni (Neotragus moschatus)

Grant's gazelle (Nanger granti)

Mountain reedbuck (Redunca fulvorufula)

Up to six subspecies have been described, although only two are generally recognised on the basis of mitochondrial data.[12] Though morphologically similar,[13] the subspecies show a significant genetic distance between them, and no hybrids between them have been reported.[13][14]

  • A. m. melampus Lichtenstein, 1812: Known as the common impala, it occurs across eastern and southern Africa. The range extends from central Kenya to South Africa and westward into southeastern Angola.
  • A. m. petersi Bocage, 1879: Known as the black-faced impala, it is restricted to southwestern Africa, occurring in northwestern Namibia and southwestern Angola.

According to Vrba, the impala evolved from an alcelaphine ancestor. She noted that while this ancestor has diverged at least 18 times into various morphologically different forms, the impala has continued in its basic form for at least five million years.[9][15] Several fossil species have been discovered, including A. datoadeni from the Pliocene of Ethiopia.[16] The oldest fossil discovered suggests its ancient ancestors were slightly smaller than the modern form, but otherwise very similar in all aspects to the latter. This implies that the impala has efficiently adapted to its environment since prehistoric times. Its gregarious nature, variety in diet, positive population trend, defence against ticks and symbiotic relationship with the tick-feeding oxpeckers could have played a role in preventing major changes in morphology and behaviour.[9]

Description

 
Close view of a male, with characteristic lyre-shaped horns, white tail and several black markings

The impala is a medium-sized, slender-bodied antelope, comparable to the kob, puku and Grant's gazelle in size and built.[17] The head-and-body length is around 130 centimetres (51 in).[18] Males reach approximately 75–92 cm (30–36 in) at the shoulder, while females are 70–85 cm (28–33 in) tall. Males typically weigh 53–76 kilograms (117–168 lb) and females 40–53 kg (88–117 lb). Sexually dimorphic, females are hornless and smaller than males. Males grow slender, lyre-shaped horns 45–92 cm (18–36 in) long.[17] The horns, strongly ridged and divergent, are circular in section and hollow at the base. Their arch-like structure allows interlocking of horns, which helps a male throw off his opponent during fights; horns also protect the skull from damage.[13][17]

The glossy coat of the impala shows two-tone colouration – the reddish brown back and the tan flanks; these are in sharp contrast to the white underbelly. Facial features include white rings around the eyes and a light chin and snout. The ears, 17 cm (6.7 in) long, are tipped with black.[13][19] Black streaks run from the buttocks to the upper hindlegs. The bushy white tail, 30 cm (12 in) long, features a solid black stripe along the midline.[19] The impala's colouration bears a strong resemblance to the gerenuk, which has shorter horns and lacks the black thigh stripes of the impala.[13] The impala has scent glands covered by a black tuft of hair on the hindlegs. Sebaceous glands concentrated on the forehead and dispersed on the torso of dominant males[17][20] are most active during the mating season, while those of females are only partially developed and do not undergo seasonal changes.[21] There are four nipples.[17]

Of the subspecies, the black-faced impala is significantly larger and darker than the common impala; melanism is responsible for the black colouration.[22] Distinctive of the black-faced impala is a dark stripe, on either side of the nose, that runs upward to the eyes and thins as it reaches the forehead.[18][19] Other differences include the larger black tip on the ear, and a bushier and nearly 30% longer tail in the black-faced impala.[13]

The impala has a special dental arrangement on the front lower jaw similar to the toothcomb seen in strepsirrhine primates,[23] which is used during allogrooming to comb the fur on the head and the neck and remove ectoparasites.[13][24]

Ecology and behaviour

 
Impala can leap up to 3 m (9.8 ft).

The impala is diurnal (active mainly during the day), though activity tends to cease during the hot midday hours; they feed and rest at night.[17] Three distinct social groups can be observed – the territorial males, bachelor herds and female herds.[25] The territorial males hold territories where they may form harems of females; territories are demarcated with urine and faeces and defended against juvenile or male intruders.[17] Bachelor herds tend to be small, with less than 30 members. Individuals maintain distances of 2.5–3 m (8.2–9.8 ft) from one another; while young and old males may interact, middle-aged males generally avoid one another except to spar. Female herds vary in size from 6 to 100; herds occupy home ranges of 80–180 ha (200–440 acres; 0.31–0.69 sq mi). The mother–calf bond is weak, and breaks soon after weaning; juveniles leave the herds of their mothers to join other herds. Female herds tend to be loose and have no obvious leadership.[17][26] Allogrooming is an important means of social interaction in bachelor and female herds; in fact, the impala appears to be the only ungulate to display self-grooming as well as allogrooming. In allogrooming, females typically groom related impalas, while males associate with unrelated ones. Each partner grooms the other six to twelve times.[27]

 
An impala stotting

Social behaviour is influenced by the climate and geography; as such, the impala are territorial at certain times of the year and gregarious at other times, and the length of these periods can vary broadly among populations. For instance, populations in southern Africa display territorial behaviour only during the few months of the rut, whereas in eastern African populations, territoriality is relatively minimal despite a protracted mating season. Moreover, territorial males often tolerate bachelors, and may even alternate between bachelorhood and territoriality at different times of the year. A study of impala in the Serengeti National Park showed that in 94% of the males, territoriality was observed for less than four months.[17]

The impala is an important prey species for Africa's large carnivores, such as cheetahs, leopards, wild dogs, lions, hyenas, crocodiles and pythons. The antelope displays two characteristic leaps – it can jump up to 3 m (9.8 ft), over vegetation and even other impala, covering distances of up to 10 m (33 ft); the other type of leap involves a series of jumps in which the animal lands on its forelegs, moves its hindlegs mid-air in a kicking fashion, lands on all fours (stotting) and then rebounds. It leaps in either manner in different directions, probably to confuse predators.[13][28] At times, the impala may also conceal itself in vegetation to escape the eye of the predator.[29] The most prominent vocalisation is the loud roar, delivered through one to three loud snorts with the mouth closed, followed by two to ten deep grunts with the mouth open and the chin and tail raised; a typical roar can be heard up to 2 km (1.2 mi) away.[17] Scent gland secretions identify a territorial male.[30] Impalas are sedentary; adult and middle-aged males, in particular, can hold their territories for years.[17]

Parasites

 
Impala have a symbiotic relationship with oxpeckers.

Common ixodid ticks collected from impala include Amblyomma hebraeum, Boophilus decoloratus, Hyalomma marginatum, Ixodes cavipalpus, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and R. evertsi.[31][32][33] In Zimbabwe, heavy infestation by ticks such as R. appendiculatus has proved to be a major cause behind the high mortality of ungulates, as they can lead to tick paralysis. Impala have special adaptations for grooming, such as their characteristic dental arrangement, to manage ticks before they engorge; however, the extensive grooming needed to keep the tick load under control involves the risk of dehydration during summer, lower vigilance against predators and gradual wearing out of the teeth. A study showed that impala adjust the time devoted to grooming and the number of grooming bouts according to the seasonal prevalence of ticks.[31]

Impala are symbiotically related to oxpeckers,[34] which feed on ticks from those parts of the antelope's body which the animal cannot access by itself (such as the ears, neck, eyelids, forehead and underbelly). The impala is the smallest ungulate with which oxpeckers are associated. In a study it was observed that oxpeckers selectively attended to impala despite the presence of other animals such as Coke's hartebeest, Grant's gazelle, Thomson's gazelle and topi. A possible explanation for this could be that because the impala inhabits woodlands (which can have a high density of ticks), the impala could have greater mass of ticks per unit area of the body surface.[35] Another study showed that the oxpeckers prefer the ears over other parts of the body, probably because these parts show maximum tick infestation.[36] The bird has also been observed to perch on the udders of a female and pilfer its milk.[37]

Lice recorded from impala include Damalinia aepycerus, D. elongata, Linognathus aepycerus and L. nevilli; in a study, ivermectin (a medication against parasites) was found to have an effect on Boophilus decoloratus and Linognathus species, though not on Damalinia species.[38] In a study of impala in South Africa, the number of worms in juveniles showed an increase with age, reaching a peak when impala turned a year old. This study recorded worms of genera such as Cooperia, Cooperoides, Fasciola, Gongylonema. Haemonchus, Impalaia, Longistrongylus and Trichostrongylus; some of these showed seasonal variations in density.[39]

Impala show high frequency of defensive behaviours towards flying insects.[40] This is probably the reason for Vale 1977 and Clausen et al 1998 only finding trace levels of feeding by Glossina (tsetse fly) upon impala.[40]

Theileria of impala in Kenya are not cross infectious to cattle: Grootenhuis et al 1975 were not able to induce cattle infection and Fawcett et al 1987 did not find it naturally occurring.[41]

Diet

 
A herd grazing in Maasai Mara

Impala browse as well as graze; either may predominate, depending upon the availability of resources.[42] The diet comprises monocots, dicots, forbs, fruits and acacia pods (whenever available). Impala prefer places close to water sources, and resort to succulent vegetation if water is scarce.[17] An analysis showed that the diet of impala is composed of 45% monocots, 45% dicots and 10% fruits; the proportion of grasses in the diet increases significantly (to as high as 90%) after the first rains, but declines in the dry season.[43] Browsing predominates in the late wet and dry season, and diets are nutritionally poor in the mid-dry season, when impala feed mostly on woody dicots.[13][44] Another study showed that the dicot proportion in the diet is much higher in bachelors and females than in territorial males.[45]

Impala feed on soft and nutritious grasses such as Digitaria macroblephara; tough, tall grasses, such as Heteropogon contortus and Themeda triandra, are typically avoided.[46] Impala on the periphery of the herds are generally more vigilant against predators than those feeding in the centre; a foraging individual will try to defend the patch it is feeding on by lowering its head.[47] A study revealed that time spent in foraging reaches a maximum of 75.5% of the day in the late dry season, decreases through the rainy season, and is minimal in the early dry season (57.8%).[48]

Reproduction

 
Two males fighting for dominance

Males are sexually mature by the time they are a year old, though successful mating generally occurs only after four years. Mature males start establishing territories and try to gain access to females. Females can conceive after they are a year and a half old; oestrus lasts for 24 to 48 hours, and occurs every 12–29 days in non-pregnant females.[29] The annual three-week-long rut (breeding season) begins toward the end of the wet season, typically in May. Gonadal growth and hormone production in males begin a few months before the breeding season, resulting in greater aggressiveness and territoriality.[17] The bulbourethral glands are heavier, testosterone levels are nearly twice as high in territorial males as in bachelors,[49] and the neck of a territorial male tends to be thicker than that of a bachelor during the rut. Mating tends to take place between full moons.[17]

Sounds of rutting male

Rutting males fight over dominance, often giving out noisy roars and chasing one another; they walk stiffly and display their neck and horns. Males desist from feeding and allogrooming during the rut, probably to devote more time to garnering females in oestrus;[50] the male checks the female's urine to ensure that she is in oestrus.[51][50] On coming across such a female, the excited male begins the courtship by pursuing her, keeping a distance of 3–5 metres (9.8–16.4 ft) from her. The male flicks his tongue and may nod vigorously; the female allows him to lick her vulva, and holds her tail to one side. The male tries mounting the female, holding his head high and clasping her sides with his forelegs. Mounting attempts may be repeated every few seconds to every minute or two. The male loses interest in the female after the first copulation, though she is still active and can mate with other males.[17][25]

Gestation lasts six to seven months. Births generally occur in the midday; the female will isolate herself from the herd when labour pain begins.[52] The perception that females can delay giving birth for an additional month if conditions are harsh may however not be realistic.[53] A single calf is born, and is immediately concealed in cover for the first few weeks of its birth. The fawn then joins a nursery group within its mother's herd. Calves are suckled for four to six months; young males, forced out of the group, join bachelor herds, while females may stay back.[17]

Distribution and habitat

 
Impala inhabit woodlands.

The impala inhabits woodlands due to its preference for shade; it can also be found on the interface (ecotone) between woodlands and savannahs. Places near water sources are preferred. In southern Africa, populations tend to be associated with Colophospermum mopane and Acacia woodlands.[17][42] Habitat choices differ seasonally – Acacia senegal woodlands are preferred in the wet season, and A. drepanolobium savannahs in the dry season. Another factor that could influence habitat choice is vulnerability to predators; impala tend to keep away from areas with tall grasses as predators could be concealed there.[46] A study found that the reduction of woodland cover and creation of shrublands by the African bush elephants has favoured impala population by increasing the availability of more dry season browse. Earlier, the Baikiaea woodland, which has now declined due to elephants, provided minimum browsing for impala. The newly formed Capparis shrubland, on the other hand, could be a key browsing habitat.[54] Impala are generally not associated with montane habitats;[13] however, in KwaZulu-Natal, impala have been recorded at altitudes of up to 1,400 metres (4,600 ft) above sea level.[42]

The historical range of the impala – spanning across southern and eastern Africa – has remained intact to a great extent, although it has disappeared from a few places, such as Burundi. The range extends from central and southern Kenya and northeastern Uganda in the east to northern KwaZulu-Natal in the south, and westward up to Namibia and southern Angola. The black-faced impala is confined to southwestern Angola and Kaokoland in northwestern Namibia; the status of this subspecies has not been monitored since the 2000s. The common impala has a wider distribution, and has been introduced in protected areas in Gabon and across southern Africa.[1]

Threats and conservation

 
Impalas of Kruger National Park, RSA
 
Impala tracks

The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) classifies the impala as a species of least concern overall.[1] The black-faced impala, however, is classified as a vulnerable species; as of 2008, fewer than 1,000 were estimated in the wild.[55] Though there are no major threats to the survival of the common impala, poaching and natural calamities have significantly contributed to the decline of the black-faced impala. As of 2008, the population of the common impala has been estimated at around two million.[1] According to some studies, translocation of the black-faced impala can be highly beneficial in its conservation.[56][57]

Around a quarter of the common impala populations occur in protected areas, such as the Okavango Delta (Botswana); Masai Mara and Kajiado (Kenya); Kruger National Park (South Africa); the Ruaha and Serengeti National Parks and Selous Game Reserve (Tanzania); Luangwa Valley (Zambia); Hwange, Sebungwe and Zambezi Valley (Zimbabwe). The rare black-faced impala has been introduced into private farms in Namibia and the Etosha National Park. Population densities vary largely from place to place; from less than one impala per square kilometre in Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania) to as high as 135 per square kilometre near Lake Kariba (Zimbabwe).[1][58]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2016). "Aepyceros melampus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016: e.T550A50180828. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T550A50180828.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
  2. ^ a b Grubb, P. (2005). "Order Artiodactyla". In Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 673. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0. OCLC 62265494.
  3. ^ Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edition, March 2005, s.v. pallah
  4. ^ Oxford English Dictionary Supp., 1933, s.v.
  5. ^ Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edition, November 2010, s.v.
  6. ^ "Aepyceros". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  7. ^ Briggs, M.; Briggs, P. (2006). The Encyclopedia of World Wildlife. Somerset, UK: Parragon Publishers. p. 114. ISBN 978-1-4054-8292-9.
  8. ^ Huffman, B. "Impala (Aepyceros melampus)". Ultimate Ungulate. Ultimate Ungulate. Retrieved 10 April 2016.
  9. ^ a b c Vrba, E.S. (1984). "Evolutionary pattern and process in the sister-group Alcelaphini-Aepycerotini (Mammalia: Bovidae)". In Eldredge, N.; Stanley, S.M. (eds.). Living Fossils. New York, USA: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4613-8271-3. OCLC 10403493.
  10. ^ a b Hassanin, A.; Douzery, E.J.P. (1999). "Evolutionary affinities of the enigmatic saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) in the context of the molecular phylogeny of Bovidae". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 266 (1422): 893–900. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0720. PMC 1689916. PMID 10380679.  
  11. ^ Kuznetsova, M.V.; Kholodova, M.V. (2003). "Revision of phylogenetic relationships in the Antilopinae subfamily on the basis of the mitochondrial rRNA and β-spectrin nuclear gene sequences". Doklady Biological Sciences. 391 (1–6): 333–6. doi:10.1023/A:1025102617714. ISSN 1608-3105. PMID 14556525. S2CID 30920084.
  12. ^ Nersting, L.G.; Arctander, P. (2001). "Phylogeography and conservation of impala and greater kudu". Molecular Ecology. 10 (3): 711–9. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01205.x. PMID 11298982. S2CID 23102044.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Kingdon, J.; Happold, D.; Butynski, T.; Happold, M.; Hoffmann, M.; Kalina, J. (2013). Mammals of Africa. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. pp. 479–84. ISBN 978-1-4081-8996-2. OCLC 854973585.
  14. ^ Lorenzen, E.D.; Arctander, P.; Siegismund, H.R. (2006). "Regional genetic structuring and evolutionary history of the impala (Aepyceros melampus)". Journal of Heredity. 97 (2): 119–32. doi:10.1093/jhered/esj012. PMID 16407525.  
  15. ^ Arctander, P.; Kat, P.W.; Simonsen, B.T.; Siegismund, H.R. (1996). "Population genetics of Kenyan impalas – consequences for conservation". In Smith, T.B.; Wayne, R.K. (eds.). Molecular Genetic Approaches in Conservation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 399–412. ISBN 978-0-19-534466-0. OCLC 666957480.
  16. ^ Geraads, D.; Bobe, R.; Reed, K. (2012). "Pliocene Bovidae (Mammalia) from the Hadar Formation of Hadar and Ledi-Geraru, Lower Awash, Ethiopia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 32 (1): 180–97. doi:10.1080/02724634.2012.632046. S2CID 86230742.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Estes, R.D. (2004). The Behavior Guide to African Mammals: Including Hoofed Mammals, Carnivores, Primates (4th ed.). Berkeley, US: University of California Press. pp. 158–66. ISBN 978-0-520-08085-0. OCLC 19554262.
  18. ^ a b Liebenberg, L. (1990). A Field Guide to the Animal Tracks of Southern Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: D. Philip. pp. 275–6. ISBN 978-0-86486-132-0. OCLC 24702472.
  19. ^ a b c Stuart, C.; Stuart, T. (2001). Field Guide to Mammals of Southern Africa (3rd ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Struik Publishers. p. 210. ISBN 978-1-86872-537-3. OCLC 46643659.
  20. ^ Armstrong, M. (2007). Wildlife and Plants. Vol. 9 (3rd ed.). New York, US: Marshall Cavendish. pp. 538–9. ISBN 978-0-7614-7693-1. OCLC 229311414.
  21. ^ Welsch, U.; van Dyk, G.; Moss, D.; Feuerhake, F. (1998). "Cutaneous glands of male and female impalas (Aepyceros melampus): seasonal activity changes and secretory mechanisms". Cell and Tissue Research. 292 (2): 377–94. doi:10.1007/s004410051068. PMID 9560480. S2CID 3127722.
  22. ^ Hoven, W. (2015). "Private game reserves in southern Africa". In van der Duim, R.; Lamers, M.; van Wijk, J. (eds.). Institutional Arrangements for Conservation, Development and Tourism in Eastern and Southern Africa. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 101–18. ISBN 978-94-017-9528-9. OCLC 895661132.
  23. ^ McKenzie, A.A. (1990). "The ruminant dental grooming apparatus". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 99 (2): 117–28. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1990.tb00564.x.
  24. ^ Mills, G.; Hes, L. (1997). The Complete Book of Southern African Mammals (1st ed.). Cape Town, South Africa: Struik Publishers. p. 271. ISBN 978-0-947430-55-9. OCLC 37480533.
  25. ^ a b Schenkel, R. (1966). "On sociology and behaviour in impala (Aepyceros melampus) Lichtenstein". African Journal of Ecology. 4 (1): 99–114. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1966.tb00887.x.
  26. ^ Murray, M.G. (1981). "Structure of association in impala, Aepyceros melampus". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 9 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1007/BF00299849. S2CID 24117010.
  27. ^ Hart, B.L.; Hart, L.A. (1992). "Reciprocal allogrooming in impala, Aepyceros melampus". Animal Behaviour. 44 (6): 1073–1083. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80319-7. S2CID 53165208.
  28. ^ "Impala: Aepyceros melampus". National Geographic. 11 April 2010. Retrieved 6 May 2014.
  29. ^ a b Nowak, R.M. (1999). Walker's Mammals of the World. Vol. 2 (6th ed.). Baltimore, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1194–6. ISBN 978-0-8018-5789-8. OCLC 39045218.
  30. ^ Kingdon, J. (1989). East African Mammals: An Atlas of Evolution in Africa. Vol. 3. London, UK: Academic Press. pp. 462–74. ISBN 978-0-226-43725-5. OCLC 48864096.
  31. ^ a b Mooring, M.S. (1995). (PDF). Animal Behaviour. 50 (2): 377–92. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0253. S2CID 53185353. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 October 2016.
  32. ^ Gallivan, G.J.; Culverwell, J.; Girdwood, R.; Surgeoner, G.A. (1995). "Ixodid ticks of impala (Aepyceros melampus) in Swaziland: effect of age class, sex, body condition and management". South African Journal of Zoology. 30 (4): 178–86. doi:10.1080/02541858.1995.11448385.  
  33. ^ Horak, I.G. (1982). "Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. XV. The seasonal prevalence of ectoparasites on impala and cattle in the Northern Transvaal". The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research. 49 (2): 85–93. PMID 7177586.
  34. ^ Mikula P, Hadrava J, Albrecht T, Tryjanowski P. (2018) Large-scale assessment of commensalistic–mutualistic associations between African birds and herbivorous mammals using internet photos. PeerJ 6:e4520 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4520
  35. ^ Hart, B.L.; Hart, L.A.; Mooring, M.S. (1990). "Differential foraging of oxpeckers on impala in comparison with sympatric antelope species". African Journal of Ecology. 28 (3): 240–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1990.tb01157.x.  
  36. ^ Mooring, M.S.; Mundy, P.J. (1996). "Interactions between impala and oxpeckers at Matobo National Park, Zimbabwe". African Journal of Ecology. 34 (1): 54–65. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2028.1996.tb00594.x.  
  37. ^ Hussain Kanchwala (2022). "How Did We Start Drinking Milk Of The Ruminants? Are We The Only Species To Drink Milk Of Other Species?". ScienceABC.
  38. ^ Horak, I.G.; Boomker, J.; Kingsley, S.A.; De Vos, V. (1983). "The efficacy of ivermectin against helminth and arthropod parasites of impala". Journal of the South African Veterinary Association. 54 (4): 251–3. PMID 6689430.
  39. ^ Horak, I.G. (1978). "Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa. X. Helminths in impala". The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research. 45 (4): 221–8. PMID 572950.
  40. ^ a b Auty, Harriet; Morrison, Liam J.; Torr, Stephen J.; Lord, Jennifer (2016). "Transmission Dynamics of Rhodesian Sleeping Sickness at the Interface of Wildlife and Livestock Areas" (PDF). Trends in Parasitology. Cell Press. 32 (8): 608–621. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2016.05.003. ISSN 1471-4922. PMID 27262917.
  41. ^ Grootenhuis, J.G.; Olubayo, R.O. (1993). "Disease research in the wildlife‐livestock interface in Kenya". Veterinary Quarterly. Royal Netherlands Veterinary Association+Flemish Veterinary Association (T&F). 15 (2): 55–59. doi:10.1080/01652176.1993.9694372. ISSN 0165-2176. PMID 8372423.
  42. ^ a b c Skinner, J.D.; Chimimba, C.T. (2005). The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 703–8. ISBN 978-0-521-84418-5. OCLC 62703884.
  43. ^ Meissner, H.H.; Pieterse, E.; Potgieter, J.H.J. (1996). "Seasonal food selection and intake by male impala Aepyceros melampus in two habitats". South African Journal of Wildlife Research. 26 (2): 56–63. ISSN 0379-4369.
  44. ^ Dunham, K. M. (2009). "The diet of impala (Aepyceros melampus) in the Sengwa Wildlife Research Area, Rhodesia". Journal of Zoology. 192 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1980.tb04218.x.
  45. ^ van Rooyen, A.F.; Skinner, J.D. (1989). "Dietary differences between the sexes in impala". Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa. 47 (2): 181–5. doi:10.1080/00359198909520161.
  46. ^ a b Jarman, P.J.; Sinclair, A.R.E. (1984). "Feeding strategy and the pattern of resource partitioning in ungulates". In Sinclair, A.R.E.; Norton-Griffths, M. (eds.). Serengeti, Dynamics of an Ecosystem. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press. pp. 130–63. ISBN 978-0-226-76029-2. OCLC 29118101.
  47. ^ Blanchard, P.; Sabatier, R.; Fritz, H. (2008). "Within-group spatial position and vigilance: a role also for competition? The case of impalas (Aepyceros melampus) with a controlled food supply". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 62 (12): 1863–8. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0615-3. S2CID 11796268.
  48. ^ Wronski, T. (September 2002). "Feeding ecology and foraging behaviour of impala Aepyceros melampus in Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda". African Journal of Ecology. 40 (3): 205–11. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2028.2002.00348.x.
  49. ^ Bramley, P.S.; Neaves, W.B. (1972). "The relationship between social status and reproductive activity in male impala, Aepyceros melampus" (PDF). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 31 (1): 77–81. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0310077. PMID 5078117.
  50. ^ a b Mooring, M. S.; Hart, B. L. (1995). "Differential grooming rate and tick load of territorial male and female impala". Behavioral Ecology. 6 (1): 94–101. doi:10.1093/beheco/6.1.94.
  51. ^ Hart, Lynette A., and Benjamin L. Hart. "Species-specific patterns of urine investigation and flehmen in Grant's gazelle (Gazella granti), Thomson's gazelle (G. thomsoni), impala (Aepyceros melampus), and eland (Taurotragus oryx)." Journal of Comparative Psychology 101.4 (1987): 299.
  52. ^ Jarman, M.V. (1979). Impala Social Behaviour: Territory, Hierarchy, Mating, and the Use of Space. Berlin, Germany: Parey. pp. 1–92. ISBN 978-3-489-60936-0. OCLC 5638565.
  53. ^ D'Araujo, Shaun (20 November 2016). "Can Impala Really Delay Their Births?". Londolozi Blog.
  54. ^ Rutina, L.P.; Moe, S.R.; Swenson, J.E. (2005). "Elephant Loxodonta africana driven woodland conversion to shrubland improves dry-season browse availability for impalas Aepyceros melampus". Wildlife Biology. 11 (3): 207–13. doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[207:ELADWC]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 84372708.
  55. ^ IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2017). "Aepyceros melampus ssp. petersi". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017: e.T549A50180804. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-2.RLTS.T549A50180804.en. Retrieved 12 November 2021.
  56. ^ Green, W.C.H.; Rothstein, A. (2008). "Translocation, hybridisation, and the endangered black-faced impala". Conservation Biology. 12 (2): 475–80. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96424.x. S2CID 85717262.
  57. ^ Matson, T.; Goldizen, A.W.; Jarman, P.J. (2004). "Factors affecting the success of translocations of the black-faced impala in Namibia". Biological Conservation. 116 (3): 359–65. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00229-5.
  58. ^ East, R. (1999). African Antelope Database 1998. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Species Survival Commission. pp. 238–41. ISBN 978-2-8317-0477-7. OCLC 44634423.

External links

  • Impala: Summary from the African Wildlife Foundation
  • ITIS Standard Report Page

impala, other, uses, disambiguation, impala, rooibok, aepyceros, melampus, medium, sized, antelope, found, eastern, southern, africa, only, extant, member, genus, aepyceros, tribe, aepycerotini, first, described, europeans, german, zoologist, hinrich, lichtens. For other uses see Impala disambiguation The impala or rooibok Aepyceros melampus is a medium sized antelope found in eastern and southern Africa The only extant member of the genus Aepyceros and tribe Aepycerotini it was first described to Europeans by German zoologist Hinrich Lichtenstein in 1812 Two subspecies are recognised the grassland dwelling common impala sometimes referred to as the Kenyan impala and the larger and darker black faced impala which lives in slightly more arid scrubland environments The impala reaches 70 92 cm 28 36 in at the shoulder and weighs 40 76 kg 88 168 lb It features a glossy reddish brown coat The male s slender lyre shaped horns are 45 92 cm 18 36 in long ImpalaAn impala ram in northern BotswanaA ewe with calf at the Kruger National Park South AfricaConservation statusLeast Concern IUCN 3 1 1 Scientific classificationKingdom AnimaliaPhylum ChordataClass MammaliaOrder ArtiodactylaFamily BovidaeTribe AepycerotiniGenus AepycerosSpecies A melampusBinomial nameAepyceros melampus Lichtenstein 1812 SubspeciesA m melampus Lichtenstein 1812 A m petersi Bocage 1879Distribution Black faced impala Common impalaSynonyms 2 List A holubi Lorenz 1894A johnstoni Thomas 1893A katangae Lonnberg 1914A pallah Gervais 1841 A rendilis Lonnberg 1912A typicus Thomas 1893Active mainly during the day the impala may be gregarious or territorial depending upon the climate and geography Three distinct social groups can be observed the territorial males bachelor herds and female herds The impala is known for two characteristic leaps that constitute an anti predator strategy Browsers as well as grazers impala feed on monocots dicots forbs fruits and acacia pods whenever available An annual three week long rut takes place toward the end of the wet season typically in May Rutting males fight over dominance and the victorious male courts females in oestrus Gestation lasts six to seven months following which a single calf is born and immediately concealed in cover Calves are suckled for four to six months young males forced out of the all female groups join bachelor herds while females may stay back The impala is found in woodlands and sometimes on the interface ecotone between woodlands and savannahs it inhabits places near water While the black faced impala is confined to southwestern Angola and Kaokoland in northwestern Namibia the common impala is widespread across its range and has been reintroduced in Gabon and southern Africa The International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN classifies the impala as a species of least concern the black faced subspecies has been classified as a vulnerable species with fewer than 1 000 individuals remaining in the wild as of 2008 Contents 1 Etymology 2 Taxonomy and evolution 3 Description 4 Ecology and behaviour 4 1 Parasites 4 2 Diet 4 3 Reproduction 5 Distribution and habitat 6 Threats and conservation 7 References 8 External linksEtymology EditThe first attested English name in 1802 was palla or pallah from the Tswana phala red antelope 3 the name impala also spelled impalla or mpala is first attested in 1875 and is directly from Zulu 4 Its Afrikaans name rooibok red buck is also sometimes used in English 5 The scientific generic name Aepyceros lit high horned comes from Ancient Greek aἰpys aipus high steep keras keras horn 6 7 the specific name melampus lit black foot from melas melas black poys pous foot 8 Taxonomy and evolution EditSee also List of bovids The impala is the sole member of the genus Aepyceros and belongs to the family Bovidae It was first described by German zoologist Martin Hinrich Carl Lichtenstein in 1812 2 In 1984 palaeontologist Elisabeth Vrba opined that the impala is a sister taxon to the alcelaphines given its resemblance to the hartebeest 9 A 1999 phylogenetic study by Alexandre Hassanin of the National Centre for Scientific Research Paris and colleagues based on mitochondrial and nuclear analyses showed that the impala forms a clade with the suni Neotragus moschatus This clade is sister to another formed by the bay duiker Cephalophus dorsalis and the klipspringer Oreotragus oreotragus 10 An rRNA and b spectrin nuclear sequence analysis in 2003 also supported an association between Aepyceros and Neotragus 11 The following cladogram is based on the 1999 study 10 Sheep Ovis aries Bontebok Damaliscus pygargus Sable antelope Hippotragus niger Klipspringer Oreotragus oreotragus Bay duiker Cephalophus dorsalis Impala Aepyceros melampus Suni Neotragus moschatus Grant s gazelle Nanger granti Mountain reedbuck Redunca fulvorufula Up to six subspecies have been described although only two are generally recognised on the basis of mitochondrial data 12 Though morphologically similar 13 the subspecies show a significant genetic distance between them and no hybrids between them have been reported 13 14 A m melampus Lichtenstein 1812 Known as the common impala it occurs across eastern and southern Africa The range extends from central Kenya to South Africa and westward into southeastern Angola A m petersi Bocage 1879 Known as the black faced impala it is restricted to southwestern Africa occurring in northwestern Namibia and southwestern Angola According to Vrba the impala evolved from an alcelaphine ancestor She noted that while this ancestor has diverged at least 18 times into various morphologically different forms the impala has continued in its basic form for at least five million years 9 15 Several fossil species have been discovered including A datoadeni from the Pliocene of Ethiopia 16 The oldest fossil discovered suggests its ancient ancestors were slightly smaller than the modern form but otherwise very similar in all aspects to the latter This implies that the impala has efficiently adapted to its environment since prehistoric times Its gregarious nature variety in diet positive population trend defence against ticks and symbiotic relationship with the tick feeding oxpeckers could have played a role in preventing major changes in morphology and behaviour 9 Description Edit Close view of a male with characteristic lyre shaped horns white tail and several black markings The impala is a medium sized slender bodied antelope comparable to the kob puku and Grant s gazelle in size and built 17 The head and body length is around 130 centimetres 51 in 18 Males reach approximately 75 92 cm 30 36 in at the shoulder while females are 70 85 cm 28 33 in tall Males typically weigh 53 76 kilograms 117 168 lb and females 40 53 kg 88 117 lb Sexually dimorphic females are hornless and smaller than males Males grow slender lyre shaped horns 45 92 cm 18 36 in long 17 The horns strongly ridged and divergent are circular in section and hollow at the base Their arch like structure allows interlocking of horns which helps a male throw off his opponent during fights horns also protect the skull from damage 13 17 The glossy coat of the impala shows two tone colouration the reddish brown back and the tan flanks these are in sharp contrast to the white underbelly Facial features include white rings around the eyes and a light chin and snout The ears 17 cm 6 7 in long are tipped with black 13 19 Black streaks run from the buttocks to the upper hindlegs The bushy white tail 30 cm 12 in long features a solid black stripe along the midline 19 The impala s colouration bears a strong resemblance to the gerenuk which has shorter horns and lacks the black thigh stripes of the impala 13 The impala has scent glands covered by a black tuft of hair on the hindlegs Sebaceous glands concentrated on the forehead and dispersed on the torso of dominant males 17 20 are most active during the mating season while those of females are only partially developed and do not undergo seasonal changes 21 There are four nipples 17 Of the subspecies the black faced impala is significantly larger and darker than the common impala melanism is responsible for the black colouration 22 Distinctive of the black faced impala is a dark stripe on either side of the nose that runs upward to the eyes and thins as it reaches the forehead 18 19 Other differences include the larger black tip on the ear and a bushier and nearly 30 longer tail in the black faced impala 13 The impala has a special dental arrangement on the front lower jaw similar to the toothcomb seen in strepsirrhine primates 23 which is used during allogrooming to comb the fur on the head and the neck and remove ectoparasites 13 24 Ecology and behaviour Edit Impala can leap up to 3 m 9 8 ft The impala is diurnal active mainly during the day though activity tends to cease during the hot midday hours they feed and rest at night 17 Three distinct social groups can be observed the territorial males bachelor herds and female herds 25 The territorial males hold territories where they may form harems of females territories are demarcated with urine and faeces and defended against juvenile or male intruders 17 Bachelor herds tend to be small with less than 30 members Individuals maintain distances of 2 5 3 m 8 2 9 8 ft from one another while young and old males may interact middle aged males generally avoid one another except to spar Female herds vary in size from 6 to 100 herds occupy home ranges of 80 180 ha 200 440 acres 0 31 0 69 sq mi The mother calf bond is weak and breaks soon after weaning juveniles leave the herds of their mothers to join other herds Female herds tend to be loose and have no obvious leadership 17 26 Allogrooming is an important means of social interaction in bachelor and female herds in fact the impala appears to be the only ungulate to display self grooming as well as allogrooming In allogrooming females typically groom related impalas while males associate with unrelated ones Each partner grooms the other six to twelve times 27 An impala stotting Social behaviour is influenced by the climate and geography as such the impala are territorial at certain times of the year and gregarious at other times and the length of these periods can vary broadly among populations For instance populations in southern Africa display territorial behaviour only during the few months of the rut whereas in eastern African populations territoriality is relatively minimal despite a protracted mating season Moreover territorial males often tolerate bachelors and may even alternate between bachelorhood and territoriality at different times of the year A study of impala in the Serengeti National Park showed that in 94 of the males territoriality was observed for less than four months 17 The impala is an important prey species for Africa s large carnivores such as cheetahs leopards wild dogs lions hyenas crocodiles and pythons The antelope displays two characteristic leaps it can jump up to 3 m 9 8 ft over vegetation and even other impala covering distances of up to 10 m 33 ft the other type of leap involves a series of jumps in which the animal lands on its forelegs moves its hindlegs mid air in a kicking fashion lands on all fours stotting and then rebounds It leaps in either manner in different directions probably to confuse predators 13 28 At times the impala may also conceal itself in vegetation to escape the eye of the predator 29 The most prominent vocalisation is the loud roar delivered through one to three loud snorts with the mouth closed followed by two to ten deep grunts with the mouth open and the chin and tail raised a typical roar can be heard up to 2 km 1 2 mi away 17 Scent gland secretions identify a territorial male 30 Impalas are sedentary adult and middle aged males in particular can hold their territories for years 17 Parasites Edit Impala have a symbiotic relationship with oxpeckers Common ixodid ticks collected from impala include Amblyomma hebraeum Boophilus decoloratus Hyalomma marginatum Ixodes cavipalpus Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and R evertsi 31 32 33 In Zimbabwe heavy infestation by ticks such as R appendiculatus has proved to be a major cause behind the high mortality of ungulates as they can lead to tick paralysis Impala have special adaptations for grooming such as their characteristic dental arrangement to manage ticks before they engorge however the extensive grooming needed to keep the tick load under control involves the risk of dehydration during summer lower vigilance against predators and gradual wearing out of the teeth A study showed that impala adjust the time devoted to grooming and the number of grooming bouts according to the seasonal prevalence of ticks 31 Impala are symbiotically related to oxpeckers 34 which feed on ticks from those parts of the antelope s body which the animal cannot access by itself such as the ears neck eyelids forehead and underbelly The impala is the smallest ungulate with which oxpeckers are associated In a study it was observed that oxpeckers selectively attended to impala despite the presence of other animals such as Coke s hartebeest Grant s gazelle Thomson s gazelle and topi A possible explanation for this could be that because the impala inhabits woodlands which can have a high density of ticks the impala could have greater mass of ticks per unit area of the body surface 35 Another study showed that the oxpeckers prefer the ears over other parts of the body probably because these parts show maximum tick infestation 36 The bird has also been observed to perch on the udders of a female and pilfer its milk 37 Lice recorded from impala include Damalinia aepycerus D elongata Linognathus aepycerus and L nevilli in a study ivermectin a medication against parasites was found to have an effect on Boophilus decoloratus and Linognathus species though not on Damalinia species 38 In a study of impala in South Africa the number of worms in juveniles showed an increase with age reaching a peak when impala turned a year old This study recorded worms of genera such as Cooperia Cooperoides Fasciola Gongylonema Haemonchus Impalaia Longistrongylus and Trichostrongylus some of these showed seasonal variations in density 39 Impala show high frequency of defensive behaviours towards flying insects 40 This is probably the reason for Vale 1977 and Clausen et al 1998 only finding trace levels of feeding by Glossina tsetse fly upon impala 40 Theileria of impala in Kenya are not cross infectious to cattle Grootenhuis et al 1975 were not able to induce cattle infection and Fawcett et al 1987 did not find it naturally occurring 41 Diet Edit A herd grazing in Maasai Mara Impala browse as well as graze either may predominate depending upon the availability of resources 42 The diet comprises monocots dicots forbs fruits and acacia pods whenever available Impala prefer places close to water sources and resort to succulent vegetation if water is scarce 17 An analysis showed that the diet of impala is composed of 45 monocots 45 dicots and 10 fruits the proportion of grasses in the diet increases significantly to as high as 90 after the first rains but declines in the dry season 43 Browsing predominates in the late wet and dry season and diets are nutritionally poor in the mid dry season when impala feed mostly on woody dicots 13 44 Another study showed that the dicot proportion in the diet is much higher in bachelors and females than in territorial males 45 Impala feed on soft and nutritious grasses such as Digitaria macroblephara tough tall grasses such as Heteropogon contortus and Themeda triandra are typically avoided 46 Impala on the periphery of the herds are generally more vigilant against predators than those feeding in the centre a foraging individual will try to defend the patch it is feeding on by lowering its head 47 A study revealed that time spent in foraging reaches a maximum of 75 5 of the day in the late dry season decreases through the rainy season and is minimal in the early dry season 57 8 48 Reproduction Edit Two males fighting for dominance Males are sexually mature by the time they are a year old though successful mating generally occurs only after four years Mature males start establishing territories and try to gain access to females Females can conceive after they are a year and a half old oestrus lasts for 24 to 48 hours and occurs every 12 29 days in non pregnant females 29 The annual three week long rut breeding season begins toward the end of the wet season typically in May Gonadal growth and hormone production in males begin a few months before the breeding season resulting in greater aggressiveness and territoriality 17 The bulbourethral glands are heavier testosterone levels are nearly twice as high in territorial males as in bachelors 49 and the neck of a territorial male tends to be thicker than that of a bachelor during the rut Mating tends to take place between full moons 17 source source Sounds of rutting male Rutting males fight over dominance often giving out noisy roars and chasing one another they walk stiffly and display their neck and horns Males desist from feeding and allogrooming during the rut probably to devote more time to garnering females in oestrus 50 the male checks the female s urine to ensure that she is in oestrus 51 50 On coming across such a female the excited male begins the courtship by pursuing her keeping a distance of 3 5 metres 9 8 16 4 ft from her The male flicks his tongue and may nod vigorously the female allows him to lick her vulva and holds her tail to one side The male tries mounting the female holding his head high and clasping her sides with his forelegs Mounting attempts may be repeated every few seconds to every minute or two The male loses interest in the female after the first copulation though she is still active and can mate with other males 17 25 Gestation lasts six to seven months Births generally occur in the midday the female will isolate herself from the herd when labour pain begins 52 The perception that females can delay giving birth for an additional month if conditions are harsh may however not be realistic 53 A single calf is born and is immediately concealed in cover for the first few weeks of its birth The fawn then joins a nursery group within its mother s herd Calves are suckled for four to six months young males forced out of the group join bachelor herds while females may stay back 17 Distribution and habitat Edit Impala inhabit woodlands The impala inhabits woodlands due to its preference for shade it can also be found on the interface ecotone between woodlands and savannahs Places near water sources are preferred In southern Africa populations tend to be associated with Colophospermum mopane and Acacia woodlands 17 42 Habitat choices differ seasonally Acacia senegal woodlands are preferred in the wet season and A drepanolobium savannahs in the dry season Another factor that could influence habitat choice is vulnerability to predators impala tend to keep away from areas with tall grasses as predators could be concealed there 46 A study found that the reduction of woodland cover and creation of shrublands by the African bush elephants has favoured impala population by increasing the availability of more dry season browse Earlier the Baikiaea woodland which has now declined due to elephants provided minimum browsing for impala The newly formed Capparis shrubland on the other hand could be a key browsing habitat 54 Impala are generally not associated with montane habitats 13 however in KwaZulu Natal impala have been recorded at altitudes of up to 1 400 metres 4 600 ft above sea level 42 The historical range of the impala spanning across southern and eastern Africa has remained intact to a great extent although it has disappeared from a few places such as Burundi The range extends from central and southern Kenya and northeastern Uganda in the east to northern KwaZulu Natal in the south and westward up to Namibia and southern Angola The black faced impala is confined to southwestern Angola and Kaokoland in northwestern Namibia the status of this subspecies has not been monitored since the 2000s The common impala has a wider distribution and has been introduced in protected areas in Gabon and across southern Africa 1 Threats and conservation Edit Impalas of Kruger National Park RSA Impala tracks The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources IUCN classifies the impala as a species of least concern overall 1 The black faced impala however is classified as a vulnerable species as of 2008 fewer than 1 000 were estimated in the wild 55 Though there are no major threats to the survival of the common impala poaching and natural calamities have significantly contributed to the decline of the black faced impala As of 2008 the population of the common impala has been estimated at around two million 1 According to some studies translocation of the black faced impala can be highly beneficial in its conservation 56 57 Around a quarter of the common impala populations occur in protected areas such as the Okavango Delta Botswana Masai Mara and Kajiado Kenya Kruger National Park South Africa the Ruaha and Serengeti National Parks and Selous Game Reserve Tanzania Luangwa Valley Zambia Hwange Sebungwe and Zambezi Valley Zimbabwe The rare black faced impala has been introduced into private farms in Namibia and the Etosha National Park Population densities vary largely from place to place from less than one impala per square kilometre in Mkomazi National Park Tanzania to as high as 135 per square kilometre near Lake Kariba Zimbabwe 1 58 References Edit a b c d e IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2016 Aepyceros melampus IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016 e T550A50180828 doi 10 2305 IUCN UK 2016 2 RLTS T550A50180828 en Retrieved 12 November 2021 a b Grubb P 2005 Order Artiodactyla In Wilson D E Reeder D M eds Mammal Species of the World A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference 3rd ed Johns Hopkins University Press p 673 ISBN 978 0 8018 8221 0 OCLC 62265494 Oxford English Dictionary 3rd edition March 2005 s v pallah Oxford English Dictionary Supp 1933 s v Oxford English Dictionary 3rd edition November 2010 s v Aepyceros Merriam Webster Dictionary Retrieved 10 April 2016 Briggs M Briggs P 2006 The Encyclopedia of World Wildlife Somerset UK Parragon Publishers p 114 ISBN 978 1 4054 8292 9 Huffman B Impala Aepyceros melampus Ultimate Ungulate Ultimate Ungulate Retrieved 10 April 2016 a b c Vrba E S 1984 Evolutionary pattern and process in the sister group Alcelaphini Aepycerotini Mammalia Bovidae In Eldredge N Stanley S M eds Living Fossils New York USA Springer ISBN 978 1 4613 8271 3 OCLC 10403493 a b Hassanin A Douzery E J P 1999 Evolutionary affinities of the enigmatic saola Pseudoryx nghetinhensis in the context of the molecular phylogeny of Bovidae Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 266 1422 893 900 doi 10 1098 rspb 1999 0720 PMC 1689916 PMID 10380679 Kuznetsova M V Kholodova M V 2003 Revision of phylogenetic relationships in the Antilopinae subfamily on the basis of the mitochondrial rRNA and b spectrin nuclear gene sequences Doklady Biological Sciences 391 1 6 333 6 doi 10 1023 A 1025102617714 ISSN 1608 3105 PMID 14556525 S2CID 30920084 Nersting L G Arctander P 2001 Phylogeography and conservation of impala and greater kudu Molecular Ecology 10 3 711 9 doi 10 1046 j 1365 294x 2001 01205 x PMID 11298982 S2CID 23102044 a b c d e f g h i j Kingdon J Happold D Butynski T Happold M Hoffmann M Kalina J 2013 Mammals of Africa London UK Bloomsbury Publishing Plc pp 479 84 ISBN 978 1 4081 8996 2 OCLC 854973585 Lorenzen E D Arctander P Siegismund H R 2006 Regional genetic structuring and evolutionary history of the impala Aepyceros melampus Journal of Heredity 97 2 119 32 doi 10 1093 jhered esj012 PMID 16407525 Arctander P Kat P W Simonsen B T Siegismund H R 1996 Population genetics of Kenyan impalas consequences for conservation In Smith T B Wayne R K eds Molecular Genetic Approaches in Conservation Oxford UK Oxford University Press pp 399 412 ISBN 978 0 19 534466 0 OCLC 666957480 Geraads D Bobe R Reed K 2012 Pliocene Bovidae Mammalia from the Hadar Formation of Hadar and Ledi Geraru Lower Awash Ethiopia Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32 1 180 97 doi 10 1080 02724634 2012 632046 S2CID 86230742 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Estes R D 2004 The Behavior Guide to African Mammals Including Hoofed Mammals Carnivores Primates 4th ed Berkeley US University of California Press pp 158 66 ISBN 978 0 520 08085 0 OCLC 19554262 a b Liebenberg L 1990 A Field Guide to the Animal Tracks of Southern Africa Cape Town South Africa D Philip pp 275 6 ISBN 978 0 86486 132 0 OCLC 24702472 a b c Stuart C Stuart T 2001 Field Guide to Mammals of Southern Africa 3rd ed Cape Town South Africa Struik Publishers p 210 ISBN 978 1 86872 537 3 OCLC 46643659 Armstrong M 2007 Wildlife and Plants Vol 9 3rd ed New York US Marshall Cavendish pp 538 9 ISBN 978 0 7614 7693 1 OCLC 229311414 Welsch U van Dyk G Moss D Feuerhake F 1998 Cutaneous glands of male and female impalas Aepyceros melampus seasonal activity changes and secretory mechanisms Cell and Tissue Research 292 2 377 94 doi 10 1007 s004410051068 PMID 9560480 S2CID 3127722 Hoven W 2015 Private game reserves in southern Africa In van der Duim R Lamers M van Wijk J eds Institutional Arrangements for Conservation Development and Tourism in Eastern and Southern Africa Dordrecht Netherlands Springer pp 101 18 ISBN 978 94 017 9528 9 OCLC 895661132 McKenzie A A 1990 The ruminant dental grooming apparatus Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 99 2 117 28 doi 10 1111 j 1096 3642 1990 tb00564 x Mills G Hes L 1997 The Complete Book of Southern African Mammals 1st ed Cape Town South Africa Struik Publishers p 271 ISBN 978 0 947430 55 9 OCLC 37480533 a b Schenkel R 1966 On sociology and behaviour in impala Aepyceros melampus Lichtenstein African Journal of Ecology 4 1 99 114 doi 10 1111 j 1365 2028 1966 tb00887 x Murray M G 1981 Structure of association in impala Aepyceros melampus Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9 1 23 33 doi 10 1007 BF00299849 S2CID 24117010 Hart B L Hart L A 1992 Reciprocal allogrooming in impala Aepyceros melampus Animal Behaviour 44 6 1073 1083 doi 10 1016 S0003 3472 05 80319 7 S2CID 53165208 Impala Aepyceros melampus National Geographic 11 April 2010 Retrieved 6 May 2014 a b Nowak R M 1999 Walker s Mammals of the World Vol 2 6th ed Baltimore USA Johns Hopkins University Press pp 1194 6 ISBN 978 0 8018 5789 8 OCLC 39045218 Kingdon J 1989 East African Mammals An Atlas of Evolution in Africa Vol 3 London UK Academic Press pp 462 74 ISBN 978 0 226 43725 5 OCLC 48864096 a b Mooring M S 1995 The effect of tick challenge on grooming rate by impala PDF Animal Behaviour 50 2 377 92 doi 10 1006 anbe 1995 0253 S2CID 53185353 Archived from the original PDF on 12 October 2016 Gallivan G J Culverwell J Girdwood R Surgeoner G A 1995 Ixodid ticks of impala Aepyceros melampus in Swaziland effect of age class sex body condition and management South African Journal of Zoology 30 4 178 86 doi 10 1080 02541858 1995 11448385 Horak I G 1982 Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa XV The seasonal prevalence of ectoparasites on impala and cattle in the Northern Transvaal The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 49 2 85 93 PMID 7177586 Mikula P Hadrava J Albrecht T Tryjanowski P 2018 Large scale assessment of commensalistic mutualistic associations between African birds and herbivorous mammals using internet photos PeerJ 6 e4520 https doi org 10 7717 peerj 4520 Hart B L Hart L A Mooring M S 1990 Differential foraging of oxpeckers on impala in comparison with sympatric antelope species African Journal of Ecology 28 3 240 9 doi 10 1111 j 1365 2028 1990 tb01157 x Mooring M S Mundy P J 1996 Interactions between impala and oxpeckers at Matobo National Park Zimbabwe African Journal of Ecology 34 1 54 65 doi 10 1111 j 1365 2028 1996 tb00594 x Hussain Kanchwala 2022 How Did We Start Drinking Milk Of The Ruminants Are We The Only Species To Drink Milk Of Other Species ScienceABC Horak I G Boomker J Kingsley S A De Vos V 1983 The efficacy of ivermectin against helminth and arthropod parasites of impala Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 54 4 251 3 PMID 6689430 Horak I G 1978 Parasites of domestic and wild animals in South Africa X Helminths in impala The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 45 4 221 8 PMID 572950 a b Auty Harriet Morrison Liam J Torr Stephen J Lord Jennifer 2016 Transmission Dynamics of Rhodesian Sleeping Sickness at the Interface of Wildlife and Livestock Areas PDF Trends in Parasitology Cell Press 32 8 608 621 doi 10 1016 j pt 2016 05 003 ISSN 1471 4922 PMID 27262917 Grootenhuis J G Olubayo R O 1993 Disease research in the wildlife livestock interface in Kenya Veterinary Quarterly Royal Netherlands Veterinary Association Flemish Veterinary Association T amp F 15 2 55 59 doi 10 1080 01652176 1993 9694372 ISSN 0165 2176 PMID 8372423 a b c Skinner J D Chimimba C T 2005 The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion 3rd ed Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press pp 703 8 ISBN 978 0 521 84418 5 OCLC 62703884 Meissner H H Pieterse E Potgieter J H J 1996 Seasonal food selection and intake by male impala Aepyceros melampus in two habitats South African Journal of Wildlife Research 26 2 56 63 ISSN 0379 4369 Dunham K M 2009 The diet of impala Aepyceros melampus in the Sengwa Wildlife Research Area Rhodesia Journal of Zoology 192 1 41 57 doi 10 1111 j 1469 7998 1980 tb04218 x van Rooyen A F Skinner J D 1989 Dietary differences between the sexes in impala Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 47 2 181 5 doi 10 1080 00359198909520161 a b Jarman P J Sinclair A R E 1984 Feeding strategy and the pattern of resource partitioning in ungulates In Sinclair A R E Norton Griffths M eds Serengeti Dynamics of an Ecosystem Chicago US University of Chicago Press pp 130 63 ISBN 978 0 226 76029 2 OCLC 29118101 Blanchard P Sabatier R Fritz H 2008 Within group spatial position and vigilance a role also for competition The case of impalas Aepyceros melampus with a controlled food supply Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62 12 1863 8 doi 10 1007 s00265 008 0615 3 S2CID 11796268 Wronski T September 2002 Feeding ecology and foraging behaviour of impala Aepyceros melampus in Lake Mburo National Park Uganda African Journal of Ecology 40 3 205 11 doi 10 1046 j 1365 2028 2002 00348 x Bramley P S Neaves W B 1972 The relationship between social status and reproductive activity in male impala Aepyceros melampus PDF Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 31 1 77 81 doi 10 1530 jrf 0 0310077 PMID 5078117 a b Mooring M S Hart B L 1995 Differential grooming rate and tick load of territorial male and female impala Behavioral Ecology 6 1 94 101 doi 10 1093 beheco 6 1 94 Hart Lynette A and Benjamin L Hart Species specific patterns of urine investigation and flehmen in Grant s gazelle Gazella granti Thomson s gazelle G thomsoni impala Aepyceros melampus and eland Taurotragus oryx Journal of Comparative Psychology 101 4 1987 299 Jarman M V 1979 Impala Social Behaviour Territory Hierarchy Mating and the Use of Space Berlin Germany Parey pp 1 92 ISBN 978 3 489 60936 0 OCLC 5638565 D Araujo Shaun 20 November 2016 Can Impala Really Delay Their Births Londolozi Blog Rutina L P Moe S R Swenson J E 2005 Elephant Loxodonta africana driven woodland conversion to shrubland improves dry season browse availability for impalas Aepyceros melampus Wildlife Biology 11 3 207 13 doi 10 2981 0909 6396 2005 11 207 ELADWC 2 0 CO 2 S2CID 84372708 IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group 2017 Aepyceros melampus ssp petersi IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017 e T549A50180804 doi 10 2305 IUCN UK 2017 2 RLTS T549A50180804 en Retrieved 12 November 2021 Green W C H Rothstein A 2008 Translocation hybridisation and the endangered black faced impala Conservation Biology 12 2 475 80 doi 10 1111 j 1523 1739 1998 96424 x S2CID 85717262 Matson T Goldizen A W Jarman P J 2004 Factors affecting the success of translocations of the black faced impala in Namibia Biological Conservation 116 3 359 65 doi 10 1016 S0006 3207 03 00229 5 East R 1999 African Antelope Database 1998 Gland Switzerland IUCN Species Survival Commission pp 238 41 ISBN 978 2 8317 0477 7 OCLC 44634423 External links Edit Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica article Palla Wikimedia Commons has media related to Aepyceros melampus Wikispecies has information related to Aepyceros melampus Look up impala in Wiktionary the free dictionary Impala Summary from the African Wildlife Foundation ITIS Standard Report Page Portals Africa Animals Mammals Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Impala amp oldid 1146972613, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.