fbpx
Wikipedia

Essential infimum and essential supremum

In mathematics, the concepts of essential infimum and essential supremum are related to the notions of infimum and supremum, but adapted to measure theory and functional analysis, where one often deals with statements that are not valid for all elements in a set, but rather almost everywhere, that is, except on a set of measure zero.

While the exact definition is not immediately straightforward, intuitively the essential supremum of a function is the smallest value that is greater than or equal to the function values everywhere while ignoring what the function does at a set of points of measure zero. For example, if one takes the function that is equal to zero everywhere except at where then the supremum of the function equals one. However, its essential supremum is zero because we are allowed to ignore what the function does at the single point where is peculiar. The essential infimum is defined in a similar way.

Definition edit

As is often the case in measure-theoretic questions, the definition of essential supremum and infimum does not start by asking what a function   does at points   (that is, the image of  ), but rather by asking for the set of points   where   equals a specific value   (that is, the preimage of   under  ).

Let   be a real valued function defined on a set   The supremum of a function   is characterized by the following property:   for all   and if for some   we have   for all   then   More concretely, a real number   is called an upper bound for   if   for all   that is, if the set

 
is empty. Let
 
be the set of upper bounds of   and define the infimum of the empty set by   Then the supremum of   is
 
if the set of upper bounds   is nonempty, and   otherwise.

Now assume in addition that   is a measure space and, for simplicity, assume that the function   is measurable. Similar to the supremum, the essential supremum of a function is characterised by the following property:   for  -almost all   and if for some   we have   for  -almost all   then   More concretely, a number   is called an essential upper bound of   if the measurable set   is a set of  -measure zero,[a] That is, if   for  -almost all   in   Let

 
be the set of essential upper bounds. Then the essential supremum is defined similarly as
 
if   and   otherwise.

Exactly in the same way one defines the essential infimum as the supremum of the essential lower bounds, that is,

 
if the set of essential lower bounds is nonempty, and as   otherwise; again there is an alternative expression as   (with this being   if the set is empty).

Examples edit

On the real line consider the Lebesgue measure and its corresponding 𝜎-algebra   Define a function   by the formula

 

The supremum of this function (largest value) is 5, and the infimum (smallest value) is −4. However, the function takes these values only on the sets   and   respectively, which are of measure zero. Everywhere else, the function takes the value 2. Thus, the essential supremum and the essential infimum of this function are both 2.

As another example, consider the function

 
where   denotes the rational numbers. This function is unbounded both from above and from below, so its supremum and infimum are   and   respectively. However, from the point of view of the Lebesgue measure, the set of rational numbers is of measure zero; thus, what really matters is what happens in the complement of this set, where the function is given as   It follows that the essential supremum is   while the essential infimum is  

On the other hand, consider the function   defined for all real   Its essential supremum is   and its essential infimum is  

Lastly, consider the function

 
Then for any     and so   and  

Properties edit

If   then

 
and otherwise, if   has measure zero then [1]
 

If the essential supremums of two functions   and   are both nonnegative, then  

Given a measure space   the space   consisting of all of measurable functions that are bounded almost everywhere is a seminormed space whose seminorm

 
is the essential supremum of a function's absolute value when  [nb 1]

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ For nonmeasurable functions the definition has to be modified by assuming that   is contained in a set of measure zero. Alternatively, one can assume that the measure is complete.
  1. ^ If   then  

References edit

  1. ^ Dieudonné J.: Treatise On Analysis, Vol. II. Associated Press, New York 1976. p 172f.

This article incorporates material from Essential supremum on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

essential, infimum, essential, supremum, mathematics, concepts, essential, infimum, essential, supremum, related, notions, infimum, supremum, adapted, measure, theory, functional, analysis, where, often, deals, with, statements, that, valid, elements, rather, . In mathematics the concepts of essential infimum and essential supremum are related to the notions of infimum and supremum but adapted to measure theory and functional analysis where one often deals with statements that are not valid for all elements in a set but rather almost everywhere that is except on a set of measure zero While the exact definition is not immediately straightforward intuitively the essential supremum of a function is the smallest value that is greater than or equal to the function values everywhere while ignoring what the function does at a set of points of measure zero For example if one takes the function f x displaystyle f x that is equal to zero everywhere except at x 0 displaystyle x 0 where f 0 1 displaystyle f 0 1 then the supremum of the function equals one However its essential supremum is zero because we are allowed to ignore what the function does at the single point where f displaystyle f is peculiar The essential infimum is defined in a similar way Contents 1 Definition 2 Examples 3 Properties 4 See also 5 Notes 6 ReferencesDefinition editAs is often the case in measure theoretic questions the definition of essential supremum and infimum does not start by asking what a function f displaystyle f nbsp does at points x displaystyle x nbsp that is the image of f displaystyle f nbsp but rather by asking for the set of points x displaystyle x nbsp where f displaystyle f nbsp equals a specific value y displaystyle y nbsp that is the preimage of y displaystyle y nbsp under f displaystyle f nbsp Let f X R displaystyle f X to mathbb R nbsp be a real valued function defined on a set X displaystyle X nbsp The supremum of a function f displaystyle f nbsp is characterized by the following property f x sup f displaystyle f x leq sup f leq infty nbsp for all x X displaystyle x in X nbsp and if for some a R displaystyle a in mathbb R cup infty nbsp we have f x a displaystyle f x leq a nbsp for all x X displaystyle x in X nbsp then sup f a displaystyle sup f leq a nbsp More concretely a real number a displaystyle a nbsp is called an upper bound for f displaystyle f nbsp if f x a displaystyle f x leq a nbsp for all x X displaystyle x in X nbsp that is if the setf 1 a x X f x gt a displaystyle f 1 a infty x in X f x gt a nbsp is empty Let U f a R f 1 a displaystyle U f a in mathbb R f 1 a infty varnothing nbsp be the set of upper bounds of f displaystyle f nbsp and define the infimum of the empty set by inf displaystyle inf varnothing infty nbsp Then the supremum of f displaystyle f nbsp is sup f inf U f displaystyle sup f inf U f nbsp if the set of upper bounds U f displaystyle U f nbsp is nonempty and sup f displaystyle sup f infty nbsp otherwise Now assume in addition that X S m displaystyle X Sigma mu nbsp is a measure space and for simplicity assume that the function f displaystyle f nbsp is measurable Similar to the supremum the essential supremum of a function is characterised by the following property f x ess sup f displaystyle f x leq operatorname ess sup f leq infty nbsp for m displaystyle mu nbsp almost all x X displaystyle x in X nbsp and if for some a R displaystyle a in mathbb R cup infty nbsp we have f x a displaystyle f x leq a nbsp for m displaystyle mu nbsp almost all x X displaystyle x in X nbsp then ess sup f a displaystyle operatorname ess sup f leq a nbsp More concretely a number a displaystyle a nbsp is called an essential upper bound of f displaystyle f nbsp if the measurable set f 1 a displaystyle f 1 a infty nbsp is a set of m displaystyle mu nbsp measure zero a That is if f x a displaystyle f x leq a nbsp for m displaystyle mu nbsp almost all x displaystyle x nbsp in X displaystyle X nbsp LetU f ess a R m f 1 a 0 displaystyle U f operatorname ess a in mathbb R mu f 1 a infty 0 nbsp be the set of essential upper bounds Then the essential supremum is defined similarly as ess sup f inf U f e s s displaystyle operatorname ess sup f inf U f mathrm ess nbsp if U f ess displaystyle U f operatorname ess neq varnothing nbsp and ess sup f displaystyle operatorname ess sup f infty nbsp otherwise Exactly in the same way one defines the essential infimum as the supremum of the essential lower bound s that is ess inf f sup b R m x f x lt b 0 displaystyle operatorname ess inf f sup b in mathbb R mu x f x lt b 0 nbsp if the set of essential lower bounds is nonempty and as displaystyle infty nbsp otherwise again there is an alternative expression as ess inf f sup a R f x a for almost all x X displaystyle operatorname ess inf f sup a in mathbb R f x geq a text for almost all x in X nbsp with this being displaystyle infty nbsp if the set is empty Examples editOn the real line consider the Lebesgue measure and its corresponding 𝜎 algebra S displaystyle Sigma nbsp Define a function f displaystyle f nbsp by the formulaf x 5 if x 1 4 if x 1 2 otherwise displaystyle f x begin cases 5 amp text if x 1 4 amp text if x 1 2 amp text otherwise end cases nbsp The supremum of this function largest value is 5 and the infimum smallest value is 4 However the function takes these values only on the sets 1 displaystyle 1 nbsp and 1 displaystyle 1 nbsp respectively which are of measure zero Everywhere else the function takes the value 2 Thus the essential supremum and the essential infimum of this function are both 2 As another example consider the functionf x x 3 if x Q arctan x if x R Q displaystyle f x begin cases x 3 amp text if x in mathbb Q arctan x amp text if x in mathbb R smallsetminus mathbb Q end cases nbsp where Q displaystyle mathbb Q nbsp denotes the rational numbers This function is unbounded both from above and from below so its supremum and infimum are displaystyle infty nbsp and displaystyle infty nbsp respectively However from the point of view of the Lebesgue measure the set of rational numbers is of measure zero thus what really matters is what happens in the complement of this set where the function is given as arctan x displaystyle arctan x nbsp It follows that the essential supremum is p 2 displaystyle pi 2 nbsp while the essential infimum is p 2 displaystyle pi 2 nbsp On the other hand consider the function f x x 3 displaystyle f x x 3 nbsp defined for all real x displaystyle x nbsp Its essential supremum is displaystyle infty nbsp and its essential infimum is displaystyle infty nbsp Lastly consider the functionf x 1 x if x 0 0 if x 0 displaystyle f x begin cases 1 x amp text if x neq 0 0 amp text if x 0 end cases nbsp Then for any a R displaystyle a in mathbb R nbsp m x R 1 x gt a 1 a displaystyle mu x in mathbb R 1 x gt a geq tfrac 1 a nbsp and so U f ess displaystyle U f operatorname ess varnothing nbsp and ess sup f displaystyle operatorname ess sup f infty nbsp Properties editIf m X gt 0 displaystyle mu X gt 0 nbsp theninf f ess inf f ess sup f sup f displaystyle inf f leq operatorname ess inf f leq operatorname ess sup f leq sup f nbsp and otherwise if X displaystyle X nbsp has measure zero then 1 ess inf f ess sup f displaystyle infty operatorname ess inf f geq operatorname ess sup f infty nbsp If the essential supremums of two functions f displaystyle f nbsp and g displaystyle g nbsp are both nonnegative then ess sup f g ess sup f ess sup g displaystyle operatorname ess sup fg leq operatorname ess sup f operatorname ess sup g nbsp Given a measure space S S m displaystyle S Sigma mu nbsp the space L S m displaystyle mathcal L infty S mu nbsp consisting of all of measurable functions that are bounded almost everywhere is a seminormed space whose seminorm f inf C R 0 f x C for almost every x ess sup f if 0 lt m S 0 if 0 m S displaystyle f infty inf C in mathbb R geq 0 f x leq C text for almost every x begin cases operatorname ess sup f amp text if 0 lt mu S 0 amp text if 0 mu S end cases nbsp is the essential supremum of a function s absolute value when m S 0 displaystyle mu S neq 0 nbsp nb 1 See also editL p displaystyle L p nbsp space Function spaces generalizing finite dimensional p norm spacesNotes edit For nonmeasurable functions the definition has to be modified by assuming that f 1 a displaystyle f 1 a infty nbsp is contained in a set of measure zero Alternatively one can assume that the measure is complete If m S 0 displaystyle mu S 0 nbsp then ess sup f displaystyle operatorname ess sup f infty nbsp References edit Dieudonne J Treatise On Analysis Vol II Associated Press New York 1976 p 172f This article incorporates material from Essential supremum on PlanetMath which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike License Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Essential infimum and essential supremum amp oldid 1166344256, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.