fbpx
Wikipedia

Enterprise resource planning

March 29, 2023

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) is the integrated management of main business processes, often in real time and mediated by software and technology. ERP is usually referred to as a category of business management software—typically a suite of integrated applications—that an organization can use to collect, store, manage and interpret data from many business activities. ERP systems can be local based or cloud-based. Cloud-based applications have grown in recent years due to information being readily available from any location with Internet access. Traditional on-premises ERP systems are now considered legacy technology.[1][2][3][4]

Diagram showing some typical ERP modules

ERP provides an integrated and continuously updated view of core business processes using common databases maintained by a database management system. ERP systems track business resources—cash, raw materials, production capacity—and the status of business commitments: orders, purchase orders, and payroll. The applications that make up the system share data across various departments (manufacturing, purchasing, sales, accounting, etc.) that provide the data.[5] ERP facilitates information flow between all business functions and manages connections to outside stakeholders.[6]

According to Gartner, the global ERP market size is estimated at $35 billion in 2021.[7][8] Though early ERP systems focused on large enterprises, smaller enterprises increasingly use ERP systems.[9]

The ERP system integrates varied organizational systems and facilitates error-free transactions and production, thereby enhancing the organization's efficiency. However, developing an ERP system differs from traditional system development.[10] ERP systems run on a variety of computer hardware and network configurations, typically using a database as an information repository.[11]

Origin

The Gartner Group first used the acronym ERP in the 1990s[12][13] to include the capabilities of material requirements planning (MRP), and the later manufacturing resource planning (MRP II),[14][15] as well as computer-integrated manufacturing. Without replacing these terms, ERP came to represent a larger whole that reflected the evolution of application integration beyond manufacturing.[16]

Not all ERP packages are developed from a manufacturing core; ERP vendors variously began assembling their packages with finance-and-accounting, maintenance, and human-resource components. By the mid-1990s ERP systems addressed all core enterprise functions. Governments and non–profit organizations also began to use ERP systems.[17] An "ERP system selection methodology" is a formal process for selecting an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Existing methodologies include: Kuiper’s funnel method, Dobrin’s three-dimensional (3D) web-based decision support tool, and the Clarkston Potomac methodology.[18]

Expansion

ERP systems experienced rapid growth in the 1990s. Because of the year 2000 problem many companies took the opportunity to replace their old systems with ERP.[19]

ERP systems initially focused on automating back office functions that did not directly affect customers and the public. Front office functions, such as customer relationship management (CRM), dealt directly with customers, or e-business systems such as e-commerce and e-government—or supplier relationship management (SRM) became integrated later, when the internet simplified communicating with external parties.[20]

"ERP II" was coined in 2000 in an article by Gartner Publications entitled ERP Is Dead—Long Live ERP II.[21][22] It describes web–based software that provides real–time access to ERP systems to employees and partners (such as suppliers and customers). The ERP II role expands traditional ERP resource optimization and transaction processing. Rather than just manage buying, selling, etc.—ERP II leverages information in the resources under its management to help the enterprise collaborate with other enterprises.[23] ERP II is more flexible than the first generation ERP. Rather than confine ERP system capabilities within the organization, it goes beyond the corporate walls to interact with other systems. Enterprise application suite is an alternate name for such systems. ERP II systems are typically used to enable collaborative initiatives such as supply chain management (SCM), customer relationship management (CRM) and business intelligence (BI) among business partner organizations through the use of various electronic business technologies.[24][25] The large proportion of companies are pursuing a strong managerial targets in ERP system instead of acquire a ERP company.[26]

Developers now make more effort to integrate mobile devices with the ERP system. ERP vendors are extending ERP to these devices, along with other business applications, so that businesses don’t have to rely on third-party applications.[27] As an example, the e-commerce platform Shopify was able to make ERP tools from Microsoft and Oracle available on its app in October 2021.[27]

Technical stakes of modern ERP concern integration—hardware, applications, networking, supply chains. ERP now covers more functions and roles—including decision making, stakeholders' relationships, standardization, transparency, globalization, etc.[28]

Characteristics

ERP systems typically include the following characteristics:

  • An integrated system
  • Operates in (or near) real time
  • A common database that supports all the applications
  • A consistent look and feel across modules
  • Installation of the system with elaborate application/data integration by the Information Technology (IT) department, provided the implementation is not done in small steps[29]
  • Deployment options include: on-premises, cloud hosted, or SaaS

Functional areas

An ERP system covers the following common functional areas. In many ERP systems, these are called and grouped together as ERP modules:

GRP - ERP use in government

Government resource planning (GRP) is the equivalent of an ERP for the public sector and an integrated office automation system for government bodies.[30] The software structure, modularization, core algorithms and main interfaces do not differ from other ERPs, and ERP software suppliers manage to adapt their systems to government agencies.[31][32][33]

Both system implementations, in private and public organizations, are adopted to improve productivity and overall business performance in organizations, but comparisons (private vs. public) of implementations shows that the main factors influencing ERP implementation success in the public sector are cultural.[34][35][36]

Best practices

Most ERP systems incorporate best practices. This means the software reflects the vendor's interpretation of the most effective way to perform each business process. Systems vary in how conveniently the customer can modify these practices.[37]

Use of best practices eases compliance with requirements such as IFRS, Sarbanes-Oxley, or Basel II. They can also help comply with de facto industry standards, such as electronic funds transfer. This is because the procedure can be readily codified within the ERP software and replicated with confidence across multiple businesses that share that business requirement.[38][39]

Connectivity to plant floor information

ERP systems connect to real–time data and transaction data in a variety of ways. These systems are typically configured by systems integrators, who bring unique knowledge on process, equipment, and vendor solutions.

Direct integration—ERP systems have connectivity (communications to plant floor equipment) as part of their product offering. This requires that the vendors offer specific support for the plant floor equipment their customers operate.

Database integration—ERP systems connect to plant floor data sources through staging tables in a database. Plant floor systems deposit the necessary information into the database. The ERP system reads the information in the table. The benefit of staging is that ERP vendors do not need to master the complexities of equipment integration. Connectivity becomes the responsibility of the systems integrator.

Enterprise appliance transaction modules (EATM)—These devices communicate directly with plant floor equipment and with the ERP system via methods supported by the ERP system. EATM can employ a staging table, web services, or system–specific program interfaces (APIs). An EATM offers the benefit of being an off–the–shelf solution.

Custom–integration solutions—Many system integrators offer custom solutions. These systems tend to have the highest level of initial integration cost, and can have a higher long term maintenance and reliability costs. Long term costs can be minimized through careful system testing and thorough documentation. Custom–integrated solutions typically run on workstation or server-class computers.

Implementation

ERP's scope usually implies significant changes to staff work processes and practices.[40] Generally, three types of services are available to help implement such changes: consulting, customization, and support.[40] Implementation time depends on business size, number of modules, customization, the scope of process changes, and the readiness of the customer to take ownership for the project. Modular ERP systems can be implemented in stages. The typical project for a large enterprise takes about 14 months and requires around 150 consultants.[41] Small projects can require months; multinational and other large implementations can take years.[42][43] Customization can substantially increase implementation times.[41]

Besides that, information processing influences various business functions e.g. some large corporations like Walmart use a just in time inventory system. This reduces inventory storage and increases delivery efficiency, and requires up-to-date data. Before 2014, Walmart used a system called Inforem developed by IBM to manage replenishment.[44]

Process preparation

Implementing ERP typically requires changes in existing business processes.[45] Poor understanding of needed process changes prior to starting implementation is a main reason for project failure.[46] The difficulties could be related to the system, business process, infrastructure, training, or lack of motivation.

It is therefore crucial that organizations thoroughly analyze processes before they deploy an ERP software. Analysis can identify opportunities for process modernization. It also enables an assessment of the alignment of current processes with those provided by the ERP system. Research indicates that risk of business process mismatch is decreased by:

  • Linking current processes to the organization's strategy
  • Analyzing the effectiveness of each process
  • Understanding existing automated solutions[47][48]

ERP implementation is considerably more difficult (and politically charged) in decentralized organizations, because they often have different processes, business rules, data semantics, authorization hierarchies, and decision centers.[49] This may require migrating some business units before others, delaying implementation to work through the necessary changes for each unit, possibly reducing integration (e.g., linking via master data management) or customizing the system to meet specific needs.[50]

A potential disadvantage is that adopting "standard" processes can lead to a loss of competitive advantage. While this has happened, losses in one area are often offset by gains in other areas, increasing overall competitive advantage.[51][52]

Configuration

Configuring an ERP system is largely a matter of balancing the way the organization wants the system to work with the way it was designed to work. ERP systems typically include many settings that modify system operations. For example, an organization can select the type of inventory accounting—FIFO or LIFO—to use; whether to recognize revenue by geographical unit, product line, or distribution channel; and whether to pay for shipping costs on customer returns.[50]

Two-tier enterprise resource planning

Two-tier ERP software and hardware lets companies run the equivalent of two ERP systems at once: one at the corporate level and one at the division or subsidiary level. For example, a manufacturing company could use an ERP system to manage across the organization using independent global or regional distribution, production or sales centers, and service providers to support the main company's customers. Each independent center (or) subsidiary may have its own business operations cycles, workflows, and business processes.

Given the realities of globalization, enterprises continuously evaluate how to optimize their regional, divisional, and product or manufacturing strategies to support strategic goals and reduce time-to-market while increasing profitability and delivering value.[53] With two-tier ERP, the regional distribution, production, or sales centers and service providers continue operating under their own business model—separate from the main company, using their own ERP systems. Since these smaller companies' processes and workflows are not tied to main company's processes and workflows, they can respond to local business requirements in multiple locations.[54]

Factors that affect enterprises' adoption of two-tier ERP systems include:

  • Manufacturing globalization, the economics of sourcing in emerging economies
  • Potential for quicker, less costly ERP implementations at subsidiaries, based on selecting software more suited to smaller companies
  • Extra effort, (often involving the use of enterprise application integration) is required where data must pass between two ERP systems[55] Two-tier ERP strategies give enterprises agility in responding to market demands and in aligning IT systems at a corporate level while inevitably resulting in more systems as compared to one ERP system used throughout the organization.[56]

Customization

ERP systems are theoretically based on industry best practices, and their makers intend that organizations deploy them "as is".[57][58] ERP vendors do offer customers configuration options that let organizations incorporate their own business rules, but gaps in features often remain even after configuration is complete.

ERP customers have several options to reconcile feature gaps, each with their own pros/cons. Technical solutions include rewriting part of the delivered software, writing a homegrown module to work within the ERP system, or interfacing to an external system. These three options constitute varying degrees of system customization—with the first being the most invasive and costly to maintain.[59] Alternatively, there are non-technical options such as changing business practices or organizational policies to better match the delivered ERP feature set. Key differences between customization and configuration include:

  • Customization is always optional, whereas the software must always be configured before use (e.g., setting up cost/profit center structures, organizational trees, purchase approval rules, etc.).
  • The software is designed to handle various configurations and behaves predictably in any allowed configuration.
  • The effect of configuration changes on system behavior and performance is predictable and is the responsibility of the ERP vendor. The effect of customization is less predictable. It is the customer's responsibility, and increases testing requirements.
  • Configuration changes survive upgrades to new software versions. Some customizations (e.g., code that uses pre–defined "hooks" that are called before/after displaying data screens) survive upgrades, though they require retesting. Other customizations (e.g., those involving changes to fundamental data structures) are overwritten during upgrades and must be re-implemented.[60]

Advantages of customization include:

  • Improving user acceptance[61]
  • Potential to obtain competitive advantage vis-à-vis companies using only standard features.

Customization's disadvantages include that it may:

  • Increase time and resources required to implement and maintain[59][62]
  • Hinder seamless interfacing/integration between suppliers and customers due to the differences between systems[62]
  • Limit the company's ability to upgrade the ERP software in the future[62]
  • Create overreliance on customization, undermining the principles of ERP as a standardizing software platform

Extensions

ERP systems can be extended with third–party software, often via vendor-supplied interfaces.[63][64] Extensions offer features such as:[64]

Data migration

Data migration is the process of moving, copying, and restructuring data from an existing system to the ERP system. Migration is critical to implementation success and requires significant planning. Unfortunately, since migration is one of the final activities before the production phase, it often receives insufficient attention. The following steps can structure migration planning:[65]

  • Identify the data to be migrated.
  • Determine the migration timing.
  • Generate data migration templates for key data components
  • Freeze the toolset.
  • Decide on the migration-related setup of key business accounts.
  • Define data archiving policies and procedures.

Often, data migration is incomplete because some of the data in the existing system is either incompatible or not needed in the new system. As such, the existing system may need to be kept as an archived database to refer back to once the new ERP system is in place.[65]

Advantages

The most fundamental advantage of ERP is that the integration of a myriad of business processes saves time and expense. Management can make decisions faster and with fewer errors. Data becomes visible across the organization. Tasks that benefit from this integration include:[66]

  • Sales forecasting, which allows inventory optimization.
  • Chronological history of every transaction through relevant data compilation in every area of operation.
  • Order tracking, from acceptance through fulfillment
  • Revenue tracking, from invoice through cash receipt
  • Matching purchase orders (what was ordered), inventory receipts (what arrived), and costing (what the vendor invoiced)

ERP systems centralize business data, which:

  • Eliminates the need to synchronize changes between multiple systems—consolidation of finance, marketing, sales, human resource, and manufacturing applications[citation needed]
  • Brings legitimacy and transparency to each bit of statistical data
  • Facilitates standard product naming/coding
  • Provides a comprehensive enterprise view (no "islands of information"), making real–time information available to management anywhere, anytime to make proper decisions
  • Protects sensitive data by consolidating multiple security systems into a single structure[67]

Benefits

  • ERP creates a more agile company that adapts better to change. It also makes a company more flexible and less rigidly structured so organization components operate more cohesively, enhancing the business—internally and externally.[68]
  • ERP can improve data security in a closed environment. A common control system, such as the kind offered by ERP systems, allows organizations the ability to more easily ensure key company data is not compromised. This changes, however, with a more open environment, requiring further scrutiny of ERP security features and internal company policies regarding security.[69]
  • ERP provides increased opportunities for collaboration. Data takes many forms in the modern enterprise, including documents, files, forms, audio and video, and emails. Often, each data medium has its own mechanism for allowing collaboration. ERP provides a collaborative platform that lets employees spend more time collaborating on content rather than mastering the learning curve of communicating in various formats across distributed systems.[64]
  • ERP offers many benefits such as standardization of common processes, one integrated system, standardized reporting, improved key performance indicators (KPI), and access to common data. One of the key benefits of ERP; the concept of integrated system, is often misinterpreted by the business. ERP is a centralized system that provides tight integration with all major enterprise functions be it HR, planning, procurement, sales, customer relations, finance or analytics, as well to other connected application functions. In that sense ERP could be described as a centralized integrated enterprise system (CIES)[70]

Disadvantages

  • Customization can be problematic. Compared to the best-of-breed approach, ERP can be seen as meeting an organization's lowest common denominator needs, forcing the organization to find workarounds to meet unique demands.[71]
  • Re-engineering business processes to fit the ERP system may damage competitiveness or divert focus from other critical activities.
  • ERP can cost more than less integrated or less comprehensive solutions.
  • High ERP switching costs can increase the ERP vendor's negotiating power, which can increase support, maintenance, and upgrade expenses.
  • Overcoming resistance to sharing sensitive information between departments can divert management attention.
  • Integration of truly independent businesses can create unnecessary dependencies.
  • Extensive training requirements take resources from daily operations.
  • Harmonization of ERP systems can be a mammoth task (especially for big companies) and requires a lot of time, planning, and money.[72]
  • Critical challenges include disbanding the project team very quickly after implementation, interface issues, lack of proper testing, time zone limitations, stress, offshoring, people's resistance to change, a short hyper-care period, and data cleansing.[73]

Critical success factors

Critical success factors are limited number of areas in which results, if satisfactory, will ensure the organization’s successful competitive performance. The CSF method has helped organizations specify their own critical information needs. Achieving satisfactory results in the key areas of critical success factors can ensure competitive advantage leading to improved organizational performance and overcome the challenges faced by organizations. Critical success factors theoretical foundation was improved upon, verified, and validated by several researchers, which underscored the importance of CSFs and its application to ERP project implementations.[74]

The application of critical success factors can prevent organizations from making costly mistakes, and the effective usage of CSFs can ensure project success and reduce failures during project implementations. Some of the important critical success factors related to ERP projects are: Know your data, longer and more integrated testing, utilization of the right people, longer stabilization period (hyper-care), clear communication, early buy-in from business, have a Lean Agile program, less customization, ERP projects must be business-driven and not IT-driven.[74]

Adoption rates

Research published in 2011 based on a survey of 225 manufacturers, retailers and distributors found "high" rates of interest and adoption of ERP systems and that very few businesses were "completely untouched" by the concept of an ERP system. 27% of the companies survey had a fully operational system, 12% were at that time rolling out a system and 26% had an existing ERP system which they were extending or upgrading.[75]

Postmodern ERP

The term "postmodern ERP" was coined by Gartner in 2013, when it first appeared in the paper series "Predicts 2014".[76] According to Gartner's definition of the postmodern ERP strategy, legacy, monolithic and highly customized ERP suites, in which all parts are heavily reliant on each other, should sooner or later be replaced by a mixture of both cloud-based and on-premises applications, which are more loosely coupled and can be easily exchanged if needed.[76]

The basic idea is that there should still be a core ERP solution that would cover most important business functions, while other functions will be covered by specialist software solutions that merely extend the core ERP. This concept is similar to the so-called best-of-breed approach[77] to software execution, but it shouldn't be confused with it. While in both cases, applications that make up the whole are relatively loosely connected and quite easily interchangeable, in the case of the latter there is no ERP solution whatsoever. Instead, every business function is covered by a separate software solution.[78]

There is, however, no golden rule as to what business functions should be part of the core ERP, and what should be covered by supplementary solutions. According to Gartner, every company must define their own postmodern ERP strategy, based on company's internal and external needs, operations and processes.[76] For example, a company may define that the core ERP solution should cover those business processes that must stay behind the firewall, and therefore, choose to leave their core ERP on-premises. At the same time, another company may decide to host the core ERP solution in the cloud and move only a few ERP modules as supplementary solutions to on-premises.[citation needed]

The main benefits that companies will gain from implementing postmodern ERP strategy are speed and flexibility when reacting to unexpected changes in business processes or on the organizational level.[79] With the majority of applications having a relatively loose connection, it is fairly easy to replace or upgrade them whenever necessary. In addition to that, following the examples above, companies can select and combine cloud-based and on-premises solutions that are most suited for their ERP needs. The downside of postmodern ERP is that it will most likely lead to an increased number of software vendors that companies will have to manage, as well as pose additional integration challenges for the central IT.[80]

See also

References

  1. ^ "RISE with SAP for Modular Cloud ERP: A New Way of Working". 2 June 2021.
  2. ^ "SAP Buries the Past: Calls Out Legacy ERP, Welcomes Modular Cloud ERP". 9 June 2021.
  3. ^ "Time for an ERP upgrade? Replacing your legacy ERP system | SAP Insights".
  4. ^ . Archived from the original on 28 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  5. ^ Almajali, Dmaithan (2016). "Antecedents of ERP systems implementation success: a study on Jordanian healthcare sector". Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 29 (4): 549–565. doi:10.1108/JEIM-03-2015-0024.
  6. ^ Radovilsky, Zinovy (2004). Bidgoli, Hossein (ed.). The Internet Encyclopedia, Volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 707. ISBN 9780471222026.
  7. ^ Wilson, Deborah (19 April 2019). ""The ERP Software Market: $35 billion+, 40 years in the making, but still growing nicely!" by Chris Pang". Blogs.gartner.com. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
  8. ^ Louis Columbus. "Predicting The Future Of Services-Centric ERP". Forbes.com. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
  9. ^ Rubina Adam, Paula Kotze, Alta van der Merwe. 2011. Acceptance of enterprise resource planning systems by small manufacturing Enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, edited by Runtong Zhang, José Cordeiro, Xuewei Li, Zhenji Zhang and Juliang Zhang, SciTePress, p. 229 - 238
  10. ^ Shaul, L.; Tauber, D. (2012). "CSFs along ERP life-cycle in SMEs: a field study". Industrial Management & Data Systems. 112 (3): 360–384. doi:10.1108/02635571211210031.
  11. ^ Khosrow–Puor, Mehdi. (2006). Emerging Trends and Challenges in Information Technology Management. Idea Group, Inc. p. 865.
  12. ^ InfoWorld, Heather Harreld (27 August 2001). "Extended ERP technology reborn in B2B". Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  13. ^ "A Vision of Next Generation MRP II", Scenario S-300-339, Gartner Group, April 12, 1990[third-party source needed]
  14. ^ Anderegg, Travis. "MRP/MRPII/ERP/ERM — Confusing Terms and Definitions for a Murkey Alphabet Soup". Retrieved 23 September 2013.
  15. ^ . Archived from the original on 10 July 2011. Retrieved 7 October 2009.
  16. ^ Sheilds, Mureell G. (2005). E-Business and ERP: Rapid Implementation and Project Planning. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. p. 9.
  17. ^ Chang, SI; Guy Gable; Errol Smythe; Greg Timbrell (2000). A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues. International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems. pp. 494–500. Retrieved 9 September 2008.
  18. ^ Frédéric Adam, David Sammon (2004), The enterprise resource planning decade, p. 94, ISBN 978-1-59140-262-6
  19. ^ Bret Wagner; Ellen Monk (4 February 2008). Enterprise Resource Planning. Cengage Learning EMEA. ISBN 978-1-4239-0179-2.
  20. ^ Hayman, L. (2000). "ERP in the Internet Economy". Information Systems Frontiers. 2000 (2): 137–139. doi:10.1023/A:1026595923192. S2CID 207642319.
  21. ^ "B. Bond, Y. Genovese, D. Miklovic, N. Wood, B. Zrimsek, N. Rayner, ERP Is Dead — Long Live ERP II; GartnerGroup RAS Services, SPA-12-0420 4 October 2000". Retrieved 23 October 2020.
  22. ^ "ERP: What you need to ask before you buy". projectauditors.com. Retrieved 23 April 2014.
  23. ^ (PDF). Uncg.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 September 2012. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  24. ^ Charles Møller (1 August 2005). "ERP II: a conceptual framework for next‐generation enterprise systems?". Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 18 (4): 483–497. doi:10.1108/17410390510609626. ISSN 1741-0398.
  25. ^ Ruhi, Umar (1 July 2016). "An experiential learning pedagogical framework for enterprise systems education in business schools". The International Journal of Management Education. 14 (2): 198–211. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2016.04.006.
  26. ^ Adam, Frédéric; O'Doherty, Peter (December 2000). "Lessons from enterprise resource planning implementations in Ireland – towards smaller and shorter ERP projects". Journal of Information Technology. 15 (4): 305–316. doi:10.1080/02683960010008953. ISSN 0268-3962.
  27. ^ a b "Shopify enlists Microsoft, Oracle for business tools on app". Reuters. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  28. ^ Shaul, L.; Tauber, D. (2013). "Critical Success Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Review of the Last Decade". ACM Computing Surveys. 45 (4): 1–39. doi:10.1145/2501654.2501669. S2CID 3657624.
  29. ^ Sheilds, Mureell G., E-Business and ERP: Rapid Implementation and Project Planning. (2001) John Wiley and Sons, Inc. p. 9-10.
  30. ^ Yunliang, Xiongtao, Qing, Jing and Ning (2010) "Design of E-Government Information Management Platform Based on SOA Framework", 2010 First International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing, Hangzhou, doi:10.1109/ICNDC.2010.42.
  31. ^ Allen, Kern and Havenhand (2000) "ERP Critical Success Factors: an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector institutions", Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  32. ^ Chang, Gable, Smythe and Timbrell (2000) "A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues" Proceedings of ICIS.
  33. ^ Ebrahim, Zakareya; Irani, Zahir (2005). "E‐government adoption: architecture and barriers". Business Process Management Journal. 11 (5): 589–611. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.453.87. doi:10.1108/14637150510619902.
  34. ^ Wingreen, Maryam and Hritik (2014) "An Investigation into Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Success: Evidence from Private and Public Sector Organizations", PACIS 2014/339.
  35. ^ Shafqat, Enhong and Faisal (2012), "Enterprise Resource Planning - 'real blessing' or 'a blessing in disguise': an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector"
  36. ^ Coelho, Cunha; Meirelles (2015). The client-consultant relationship in the implementation of ERP in government: exploring the dynamic between power and knowledge. DGO. p. 140. doi:10.1145/2757401.2757405. ISBN 9781450336000. S2CID 13941079.
  37. ^ Monk, Ellen and Wagner, Brett."Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning" 3rd ed. Course Technology Cengage Learning. Boston, Massachusetts.2009
  38. ^ Ingolfo, S.; Siena, A.; Mylopoulos, J. (2011). Establishing Regulatory Compliance for Software Requirements. Conceptual Modeling - ER 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6998. pp. 47–61. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_5. ISBN 978-3-642-24605-0.
  39. ^ "IT Systems Validation for SOx and Regulatory Compliance". Insights. MetricStream, Inc. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  40. ^ a b "ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning)". Tech-faq.com. 5 March 2014. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  41. ^ a b . Information Systems Management. Auerbach Publications. 1999. p. 7. Archived from the original on January 3, 2013. Retrieved January 10, 2013.
  42. ^ Sankar, C.; Rau, K.-H. (2006). Implementation Strategies for SAP R/3 in a Multinational Organization: Lessons from a Real-World Case Study. Cybertech Publishing. p. 8. ISBN 9781591407782. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  43. ^ Pelphrey, M.W. (2015). Directing the ERP Implementation: A Best Practice Guide to Avoiding Program Failure Traps While Tuning System Performance. CRC Press. pp. 92–111. ISBN 9781482248425.
  44. ^ "Wal-Mart slow to roll out new replenishment system". Arkansas: Thecitywire.com. 8 January 2014. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  45. ^ Turban et al. (2008). Information Technology for Management, Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy. Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 300–343. ISBN 978-0-471-78712-9
  46. ^ Brown, C.; Vessey, I. (2003). "Managing the Next Wave of Enterprise Systems: Leveraging Lessons from ERP". MIS Quarterly Executive. 2 (1).
  47. ^ King. W., "Ensuring ERP implementation success," Information Systems Management, Summer 2005.
  48. ^ Yusuf, Y., A. Gunasekaran, and M. Abthorpe, "Enterprise Information Systems Project Implementation: A Case Study of ERP in Rolls-Royce," International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), February 2004.
  49. ^ Daneva, Maya; Roel Wieringa. (PDF). University of Twente. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 July 2010. Retrieved 12 July 2008.
  50. ^ a b Thomas H. Davenport, "Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System", Harvard Business Review, July–August 1998.
  51. ^ Turban et al. (2008). Information Technology for Management, Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy. Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 320. ISBN 978-0-471-78712-9
  52. ^ Dehning, B. and T.Stratopoulos, 'Determinants of a Sustainable Competitive Advantage Due to an IT-enabled Strategy,' Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 12, 2003
  53. ^ Ferdows, K (1997). "Making the most of foreign factories". Harvard Business Review. 75 (2): 73–88.
  54. ^ Gill, R. (2011). "The rise of two-tier ERP." Strategic Finance, 93(5), 35-40, 1.
  55. ^ Montgomery, Nigel (2010)."Two-Tier ERP Suite Strategy: Considering Your Options." Gartner Group. July 28, 2010. Retrieved September 20, 2012.
  56. ^ Kovacs, G. L.; Paganelli, P. (2003). "A planning and management infrastructure for large, complex, distributed projects — beyond ERP and SCM" (PDF). Computers in Industry. 51 (2): 165. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.474.6993. doi:10.1016/s0166-3615(03)00034-4.
  57. ^ Kraemmerand, P.; et al. (2003). "ERP implementation: an integrated process of radical change and continuous learning". Production Planning & Control. 14 (4): 228–248. doi:10.1080/0953728031000117959. S2CID 108921043.
  58. ^ Vilpola, Inka Heidi (2008). "A method for improving ERP implementation success by the principles and process of user-centred design". Enterprise Information Systems. 2 (1): 47–76. doi:10.1080/17517570701793848. S2CID 3032440.
  59. ^ a b Fryling, Meg (2010). "Estimating the impact of enterprise resource planning project management decisions on post-implementation maintenance costs: a case study using simulation modelling". Enterprise Information Systems. 4 (4): 391–421. Bibcode:2010EntIS...4..391F. doi:10.1080/17517575.2010.519785. S2CID 34298012.
  60. ^ Yakovlev, I.V. (2002). "An ERP implementation and business process reengineering at a Small University". Educause Quarterly. 2: 52–57.
  61. ^ Fryling, Meg (2010). Total Cost of Ownership, System Acceptance and Perceived Success of Enterprise Resource Planning Software: Simulating a Dynamic Feedback Perspective of ERP in the Higher Education Environment. p. 403. ISBN 978-1-109-74428-6.
  62. ^ a b c Bradford, M. (2015). Modern ERP: Select, Implement, & Use Today's Advanced Business Systems. pp. 107–108. ISBN 9781312665989. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  63. ^ Bendoly, E.; Jacobs, F.R. (2005). Strategic ERP Extension and Use. Stanford University Press. p. 95. ISBN 9780804750981. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  64. ^ a b c Leon, A. (2008). ERP Demystified. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. pp. 170–171. ISBN 9780070656642.
  65. ^ a b Ramaswamy, V.K. (27 September 2007). . Information Technology Toolbox, Inc. Archived from the original on 30 October 2007. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  66. ^ Meer, K.H. (2005). Best Practices in ERP Software Applications. p. 59. ISBN 978-0595345137. Retrieved 9 May 2018.
  67. ^ Walsh, Katherine (January 2009). "The ERP Security Challenge". CSOonline. CXO Media, Inc. Retrieved 17 January 2008.
  68. ^ O'Brien, James (2011). Management Information Systems(MIS). New York: McGraw-Hill, Irwin. p. 324.
  69. ^ She, W.; Thuraisingham, B. (2007). "Security for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems". Information Systems Security. 16 (3): 152–163. doi:10.1080/10658980701401959. S2CID 16472963.
  70. ^ Menon, Sreekumar (July 2019). "Benefits and Process Improvements for ERP Implementation: Results from an Exploratory Case Study". International Business Research. 12 (8): 124–132. doi:10.5539/ibr.v12n8p124 – via Canadian Center of Science and Education.
  71. ^ Young, Joanna (16 May 2014). "AUDIO | Best-of-Breed vs. ERP: What's Best for Higher Ed Today?". The EvoLLLution. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  72. ^ . Cfo-insight.com. 23 July 2012. Archived from the original on 27 July 2012.
  73. ^ Menon, S.A.; Muchnick, M.; Butler, C.; Pizur, T. (June 2019). "Critical Challenges in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation". International Journal of Business and Management. 14 (7): 54–69. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v14n7p54 – via Canadian Center of Science and Education.
  74. ^ a b Menon, Sreekumar (13 January 2020). "Critical Success Factors for ERP Projects: Recommendations from a Canadian Exploratory Study". International Journal of Business and Management. 15 (2): 80–91. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v15n2p80.
  75. ^ McCrea, B., Supply Chain Technology: Putting the spotlight on ERP, Logistics Management, June 2011, accessed 22 April 2022
  76. ^ a b c "Predicts 2014: The Rise of the Postmodern ERP and Enterprise Applications World". Gartner Group. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  77. ^ "Postmodern ERP Strategy Is Not a Best-of-Breed Approach". Gartner Group. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  78. ^ ""ERP, the Future of Applications, and the Composable Enterprise" by Mike Guay". Debbie Wilson. 27 January 2020. Retrieved 12 December 2022.
  79. ^ "5 Factors Facilitating the Transition to the Postmodern ERP Era". CIOReview. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
  80. ^ "The end of enterprise resource planning". Chemical & Engineering News. Retrieved 2 June 2020.

Bibliography

  • Clemons, Eric. K. (1986). "IS for Sustainable Competitive Advantage". Information & Management. 11 (3): 131–136. doi:10.1016/0378-7206(86)90010-8.
  • Grant, David; Richard Hall; Nick Wailes; Christopher Wright (March 2006). "The false promise of technological determinism: the case of enterprise resource planning systems". New Technology, Work and Employment. 21 (1): 2–15. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2006.00159.x. S2CID 6532611.
  • Head, Simon (2005). The New Ruthless Economy. Work and Power in the Digital Age. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-517983-5.
  • Henderson, Ian ERP from the Frontline MBE ISBN 978-1-898822-05-9 Making ERP Work
  • Lequeux, Jean-Louis (2008). Manager avec les ERP, Architecture Orientée Services (SOA) (in French). Paris: Ed. d'Organisation. ISBN 978-2-212-54094-9.
  • Loh, Tee Chiat; Lenny Koh Siau Ching (September 2004). "Critical elements for a successful ERP implementation in SMEs". International Journal of Production Research. 42 (17): 3433–3455. doi:10.1080/00207540410001671679. S2CID 108834696.
  • Shaul, Levi; Tauber Doron (September 2010). "Hierarchical examination of success factors across ERP life cycle". MCIS 2010 Proceedings.: 79.
  • Waldner, Jean-Baptiste (1990). Les nouvelles perspectives de la production (in French). Paris: Dunod. ISBN 978-2-04-019820-6.
  • Waldner, Jean-Baptiste (1992). Principles of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. ISBN 978-0-471-93450-9.
  • O'Leary, Daniel E (31 July 2000). Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Systems, Life Cycle, Electronic Commerce, and Risk. Cambridge University Press. p. 232. ISBN 978-0-52-179152-6.
  • Kurbel, Karl E. (23 August 2013). Enterprise Resource Planning and Supply Chain Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 359. ISBN 978-3-64-231573-2.
  • Shanks, Graeme; Willcocks, Leslie P. (11 September 2003). Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Cambridge University Press. p. 449. ISBN 978-0-521-81902-2.
  • Langenwalter, Gary A (17 July 2019). Enterprise Resources Planning and Beyond Integrating Your Entire Organization. Taylor & Francis. p. 424. ISBN 978-1-42-004906-0.
  • Odell, Laura A.; Farrar-Foley, Brendan T.; Kinkel, John R.; Moorthy, Rama S. (1 February 2012). "Beyond Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP):: The Next Generation Enterprise Resource Planning Environment". Institute for Defense Analyses: 124. JSTOR resrep26969. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Umble, Elisabeth J; Haft, Ronald R; Umblea, M.Michael (16 April 2003). "Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors". European Journal of Operational Research. Elsevier. 146 (2): 241–257. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00547-7.
  • Hitt, Lorin M.; Wu, D.J.; Zhou, Xiaoge (23 December 2014). "Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures". Journal of Management Information Systems. 19: 71–98. doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716. S2CID 18977742.
  • Jacobs, F.Robert; WestonJr.b, F.C.‘Ted (2007). "Enterprise resource planning (ERP)—A brief history". Journal of Operations Management. Elsevier. 25 (2): 357–363. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.11.005.
  • A., Momoh; R., Roy; E., Shehab (2010). "Challenges in enterprise resource planning implementation: state‐of‐the‐art". Business Process Management Journal. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 16 (4): 537–565. doi:10.1108/14637151011065919.
  • Chou, Shih-Wei; Chang, Yu-Chieh (2008). "The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits". Decision Support Systems. 46 (1): 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003.
  • Holland, C.P.; Light, B. (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. Vol. 16. Hawaii, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. pp. 30–36. doi:10.1109/HICSS.1999.772762. ISBN 0-7695-0001-3. S2CID 206700140.
  • Ram, Jiwat, and David Corkindale. “Developing a Framework for the Management of Critical Success Factors in Organisational Innovation Projects: A Case of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems.” Integrating Innovation: South Australian Entrepreneurship Systems and Strategies, edited by Göran Roos and Allan O’Connor, University of Adelaide Press, 2015, pp. 327–54, JSTOR 10.20851/j.ctt1sq5xd5.16.
  • Riposo, Jessie, Guy Weichenberg, Chelsea Kaihoi Duran, Bernard Fox, William Shelton, and Andreas Thorsen. “Organizational Change Management.” In Improving Air Force Enterprise Resource Planning-Enabled Business Transformation, 23–28. RAND Corporation, 2013. JSTOR 10.7249/j.ctt5hhvgh.13.
  • Aronin, B. S., Bailey, J. W., Byun, J. S., Davis, G. A., Wolfe, C. L., Frazier, T. P., & Bronson, P. F. (2018). ERP Systems in the DoD. In Global Combat Support System – Marine Corps: Root Cause Analysis (pp. 7–18). Institute for Defense Analyses. JSTOR resrep22788.5.
  • Ragowsky, Arik, and Toni M. Somers. “Special Section: Enterprise Resource Planning.” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, Taylor & Francis, Ltd., 2002, pp. 11–15, JSTOR 40398564.
  • LIEDTKA, JEANNE, ANDREW KING, and KEVIN BENNETT. “Rethinking Strategic Planning at SAP.” In Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works, 74–91. Columbia University Press, 2013. JSTOR 10.7312/lied16356.9.
  • Morris, Michael G., and Viswanath Venkatesh. “Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction: Understanding the Role of Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation.” MIS Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 1, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 2010, pp. 143–61, doi:10.2307/20721418.
  • Tsai, Bi-Huei, and Shin-Bin Chou. “APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE OUTPUT DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN INTERPRETING EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT OF ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING IN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FIRMS.” The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 49, no. 1, College of Business, Tennessee State University, 2015, pp. 285–304, JSTOR 24241295.
  • van Merode GG, Groothuis S, Hasman A. Enterprise resource planning for hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2004 Jun 30;73(6):493-501. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.02.007. PMID 15171978.
  • Zerbino P, Aloini D, Dulmin R, Mininno V. Why enterprise resource planning initiatives do succeed in the long run: A case-based causal network. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0260798. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260798. PMID 34914739; PMC 8675769.
  • Lee CW, Kwak NK. Strategic enterprise resource planning in a health-care system using a multicriteria decision-making model. J Med Syst. 2011 Apr;35(2):265-75. doi:10.1007/s10916-009-9362-x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. PMID 20703564.
  • Grove S. Enterprise resource planning: case history. Optimizing the supply chain. Health Manag Technol. 2004 Jan;25(1):24-7. PMID 14727396.
  • Schuerenberg BK. Making connections across an enterprise. Enterprise resource planning systems are tough to implement, but can provide a big payback. Health Data Manag. 2003 Jun;11(6):72-4, 76, 78. PMID 12825443.
  • Tian, Feng, and Sean Xin Xu. “How Do Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Affect Firm Risk? Post-Implementation Impact.” MIS Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1, Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota, 2015, pp. 39–60, JSTOR 26628340.
  • Ferratt, Thomas W., et al. “Achieving Success in Large Projects: Implications from a Study of ERP Implementations.” Interfaces, vol. 36, no. 5, INFORMS, 2006, pp. 458–69, JSTOR 20141427.
  • Karimi, Jahangir, Toni M. Somers, and Anol Bhattacherjee. “The Impact of ERP Implementation on Business Process Outcomes: A Factor-Based Study.” Journal of Management Information Systems 24, no. 1 (2007): 101–34. JSTOR 40398884.
  • Ranganathan, C., and Carol V. Brown. “ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables.” Information Systems Research, vol. 17, no. 2, INFORMS, 2006, pp. 145–61, JSTOR 23015772.
  • Benco, Daniel C., and Larry Prather. “Market Reaction to Announcements to Invest in ERP Systems.” Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, vol. 47, no. 4, University of Nebraska-Lincoln College of Business Administration, 2008, pp. 145–69, JSTOR 40473472.
  • Stephenson, Stephen V., and Andrew P. Sage. "Information and knowledge perspectives in systems engineering and management for innovation and productivity through enterprise resource planning." Information Resources Management Journal 20, no. 2 (2007): 44+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A164424350.
  • McGaughey, Ronald E., and Angappa Gunasekaran. "Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): past, present and future." International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 3, no. 3 (2007): 23+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A172292333.
  • Cordova, Ronald S., Rolou Lyn R. Maata, Ferdinand J. Epoc, and Marwan Alshar'e. "Challenges and Opportunities of Using Blockchain in Supply Chain Management." Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal 13, no. 3 (2021): 204+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A686969056.
  • Muscatello, Joseph R., and Injazz J. Chen. "Enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations: theory and practice." International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 4, no. 1 (2008): 63+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A193886705.
  • Muscatello, Joseph R., and Diane H. Parente. "Enterprise resource planning (ERP): a postimplementation cross-case analysis." Information Resources Management Journal 19, no. 3 (2006): 61+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A164420768.
  • Farzaneh, Mandana, Iman Raeesi Vanani, and Babak Sohrabi. "A survey study of influential factors in the implementation of enterprise resource planning systems." International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 9, no. 1 (2013): 76+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A339733802.
  • AlMuhayfith, Sara, and Hani Shaiti. "The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning on Business Performance: With the Discussion on Its Relationship with Open Innovation." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6, no. 3 (2020). Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A640009499.
  • Madjid Tavana and Vahid Hajipour and Shahrzad Oveisi (2020). "IoT-based enterprise resource planning: Challenges, open issues, applications, architecture, and future research directions". Internet of Things. 11: 100262. doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100262. ISSN 2542-6605. S2CID 222006095.
  • Rocío Rodríguez and Francisco-Jose Molina-Castillo and Göran Svensson (2020). "The mediating role of organizational complexity between enterprise resource planning and business model innovation". Industrial Marketing Management. 84: 328–341. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.007. ISSN 0019-8501. S2CID 204496134.
  • Nebojša Denić and Dalibor Petković and Boban Spasić (2020). Saleem Hashmi and Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury (ed.). Global Economy Increasing by Enterprise Resource Planning. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 331–337. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11590-5. ISBN 978-0-12-813196-1. S2CID 169934398.
  • Wu, Shi Liang and He, Wu (2012). Sambath, Sabo and Zhu, Egui (ed.). From Enterprise Resource Planning, Industry-Oriented Enterprise Resource Planning to Entire Resource Planning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1141–1148. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27552-4_147. ISBN 978-3-642-27552-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Oliver George Kayas and Rachel McLean and Tony Hines and Gillian H. Wright (2008). "The panoptic gaze: Analysing the interaction between enterprise resource planning technology and organisational culture". International Journal of Information Management. 28 (6): 446–452. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.08.005. ISSN 0268-4012.
  • Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh and Feybi Ariani Goni and Jiří Jaromír Klemeš (2018). "Evaluation of a framework for sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning systems implementation". Journal of Cleaner Production. 190: 778–786. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.182. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 158751005.
  • Swamidass, P. M., ed. (2000). "Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)ERP". ERP Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)ERP. Boston, MA: Springer US. p. 197. doi:10.1007/1-4020-0612-8_302. ISBN 978-1-4020-0612-8.
  • Lin, Kun (2012). Tan, Honghua (ed.). The Implement of Enterprise Resource Planning Based on the Enterprise Information Integration. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 631–634. ISBN 978-3-642-27711-5.
  • Bahrami, Bahram and Jordan, Ernest (2013). Piazolo, Felix and Felderer, Michael (ed.). Utilizing Enterprise Resource Planning in Decision-Making Processes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 153–168. ISBN 978-3-642-37021-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Wenrich, Kristi I., and Norita Ahmad. "Lessons learned during a decade of ERP experience: a case study." International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 5, no. 1 (2009): 55+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A197233836.
  • Subramanian, Girish H., and Christopher S. Hoffer. "An exploratory case study of enterprise resource planning implementation." International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 1, no. 1 (2005): 23+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A163154291.
  • W. Yang, H. Liu and J. Shi, "The design of printing enterprise resources planning (ERP) software," 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 2010, pp. 151–154, doi:10.1109/ICIME.2010.5478168.
  • Cronan, Timothy Paul, and David E. Douglas. "Assessing ERP learning (management, business process, and skills) and attitudes." Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, April–June 2013, 59+. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A339733778.
  • Hayes, David C., James E. Hunton, and Jacqueline L. Reck. "Market Reaction to ERP Implementation Announcements." Journal of Information Systems 15, no. 1 (2001): 3. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A77711885.
  • Alves, Maria do Ceu, and Sergio Ivo Amaral Matos. "ERP adoption by public and private organizations--a comparative analysis of successful implementations." Journal of Business Economics and Management 14, no. 3 (2013): 500. Gale Academic OneFile (accessed January 26, 2022). Gale A338324526.
  • Elsayed, N., Ammar, S., and Mardini, G. H., “The impact of ERP utilisation experience and segmental reporting on corporate performance in the UK context”, Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61–86, 2021. doi:10.1080/17517575.2019.1706192. Bibcode:2021EntIS..15...61E.
  • Sutduean, J., Singsa, A., Sriyakul, T., and Jermsittiparsert, K., “Supply Chain Integration, Enterprise Resource Planning, and Organizational Performance: The Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Approach”, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2975–2981, 2019. doi:10.1166/jctn.2019.8204. Bibcode:2019JCTN...16.2975S.
  • Alfaris, M. F., Edikuncoro, G. Y., Savitri, A. L., Yogiari, D., and Sulistio, J., “A Literature Review of Sustain Enterprise Resource Planning”, in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series, 2019, vol. 598, no. 1, p. 012128. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012128. Bibcode:2019MS&E..598a2128A.
  • G. Chattopadhyay, "Development of a learning package for interactive learning in enterprise resources planning (ERP)," 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574), 2004, pp. 848–850 Vol.2, doi:10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407501.
  • D. Reuther and G. Chattopadhyay, "Critical factors for enterprise resources planning system selection and implementation projects within small to medium enterprises," 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574), 2004, pp. 851–855 Vol.2, doi:10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407502.
  • Lv, T., Zhang, J., and Chen, Y., “Research of ERP Platform based on Cloud Computing”, in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series, 2018, vol. 394, no. 4, p. 042004. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/394/4/042004. Bibcode:2018MS&E..394d2004L.
  • Hasan, N., Miah, S. J., Bao, Y., and Hoque, M. R., “Factors affecting post-implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems: a perspective of business process performance”, Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1217–1244, 2019. doi:10.1080/17517575.2019.1612099. Bibcode:/abstract 2019EntIS..13.1217H .
  • Xinyu Zhang (2019). "Drivers affecting cloud ERP deployment decisions: an Australian study". arXiv:1911.11309. Bibcode:2019arXiv191111309Z. S2CID 208291311. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Lucas Gren and Alexander Wong and Erik Kristoffersson (2019). "Choosing agile or plan-driven enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations -- A study on 21 implementations from 20 companies". arXiv:1906.05220. Bibcode:2019arXiv190605220G. S2CID 49291109. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Emre Erturk and Jitesh Kumar Arora (2017). "An Exploratory Study on the Implementation and Adoption of ERP Solutions for Businesses". arXiv:1701.08329. Bibcode:2017arXiv170108329E. S2CID 858850. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Quang V Nguyen and Mary Tate and Philip Calvert and Benoit Aubert (2016). "Leveraging ERP Implementation to Create Intellectual Capital: the Role of Organizational Learning Capability". arXiv:1606.01431. Bibcode:2016arXiv160601431N. S2CID 14172135. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Sergey V. Zykov (2006). "Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: the Integrated Approach". arXiv:cs/0607129. Bibcode:2006cs........7129Z. S2CID 1653. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • Sardjono, W., Sudirwan, J., Priatna, W., and Putra, G. R., “Application of factor analysis method to support the users acceptance model of ERP systems implementation”, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1836, no. 1. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012032. Bibcode:2021JPhCS1836a2032S.
  • Meiryani, Erick Fernando, Setiani Putri Hendratno, Kriswanto, and Septi Wifasari. 2021. Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: The Business Backbone. 2021 The 5th International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-Government. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–48. doi:10.1145/3466029.3466049
  • T. Yang, J. Choi, Z. Xi, Y. Sun, C. Ouyang and Y. Huang, "Research of Enterprise Resource Planning in a Specific Enterprise," 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2006, pp. 418–422, doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2006.384418.
  • Komala, A. R. and Gunanda, I., “Development of Enterprise Resource Planning using Blockchain”, in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series, 2020, vol. 879, no. 1, p. 012141. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012141. Bibcode:2020MS&E..879a2141K.
  • Tsai, W.-H., Lee, K.-C., Liu, J.-Y., Lin, S.-J., and Chou, Y.-W., “The influence of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems' performance on earnings management”, Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 491–517, 2012. doi:10.1080/17517575.2011.622414. Bibcode:2012EntIS...6..491T.
  • Kapulin, D. V., Russkikh, P. A., and Moor, I. A., “Integration capabilities of business process models and ERP-systems”, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1333, no. 7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1333/7/072009. Bibcode:2019JPhCS1333g2009K.
  • Sebayang, P., Tarigan, Z. J. H., and Panjaitan, T. W. S., “ERP compatibility on business performance through the inventory system and internal integration”, in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series, 2021, vol. 1010, no. 1, p. 012008. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1010/1/012008. Bibcode:2021MS&E.1010a2008S.
  • August-Wilhelm Scheer and Frank Habermann. 2000. Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success. Communications of the ACM 43, 4 (April 2000), 57–61. doi:10.1145/332051.332073
  • Kuldeep Kumar and Jos van Hillegersberg. 2000. Enterprise resource planning: introduction. Communications of the ACM 43, 4 (April 2000), 22–26. doi:10.1145/332051.332063

External links

  •   Media related to Enterprise resource planning at Wikimedia Commons

March 29, 2023
enterprise, resource, planning, integrated, management, main, business, processes, often, real, time, mediated, software, technology, usually, referred, category, business, management, software, typically, suite, integrated, applications, that, organization, c. Enterprise resource planning ERP is the integrated management of main business processes often in real time and mediated by software and technology ERP is usually referred to as a category of business management software typically a suite of integrated applications that an organization can use to collect store manage and interpret data from many business activities ERP systems can be local based or cloud based Cloud based applications have grown in recent years due to information being readily available from any location with Internet access Traditional on premises ERP systems are now considered legacy technology 1 2 3 4 Diagram showing some typical ERP modules ERP provides an integrated and continuously updated view of core business processes using common databases maintained by a database management system ERP systems track business resources cash raw materials production capacity and the status of business commitments orders purchase orders and payroll The applications that make up the system share data across various departments manufacturing purchasing sales accounting etc that provide the data 5 ERP facilitates information flow between all business functions and manages connections to outside stakeholders 6 According to Gartner the global ERP market size is estimated at 35 billion in 2021 7 8 Though early ERP systems focused on large enterprises smaller enterprises increasingly use ERP systems 9 The ERP system integrates varied organizational systems and facilitates error free transactions and production thereby enhancing the organization s efficiency However developing an ERP system differs from traditional system development 10 ERP systems run on a variety of computer hardware and network configurations typically using a database as an information repository 11 Contents 1 Origin 2 Expansion 3 Characteristics 4 Functional areas 4 1 GRP ERP use in government 5 Best practices 6 Connectivity to plant floor information 7 Implementation 7 1 Process preparation 7 2 Configuration 7 3 Two tier enterprise resource planning 7 4 Customization 7 5 Extensions 7 6 Data migration 7 7 Advantages 7 8 Benefits 7 9 Disadvantages 7 10 Critical success factors 7 11 Adoption rates 8 Postmodern ERP 9 See also 10 References 11 Bibliography 12 External linksOrigin EditThe Gartner Group first used the acronym ERP in the 1990s 12 13 to include the capabilities of material requirements planning MRP and the later manufacturing resource planning MRP II 14 15 as well as computer integrated manufacturing Without replacing these terms ERP came to represent a larger whole that reflected the evolution of application integration beyond manufacturing 16 Not all ERP packages are developed from a manufacturing core ERP vendors variously began assembling their packages with finance and accounting maintenance and human resource components By the mid 1990s ERP systems addressed all core enterprise functions Governments and non profit organizations also began to use ERP systems 17 An ERP system selection methodology is a formal process for selecting an enterprise resource planning ERP system Existing methodologies include Kuiper s funnel method Dobrin s three dimensional 3D web based decision support tool and the Clarkston Potomac methodology 18 Expansion EditERP systems experienced rapid growth in the 1990s Because of the year 2000 problem many companies took the opportunity to replace their old systems with ERP 19 ERP systems initially focused on automating back office functions that did not directly affect customers and the public Front office functions such as customer relationship management CRM dealt directly with customers or e business systems such as e commerce and e government or supplier relationship management SRM became integrated later when the internet simplified communicating with external parties 20 ERP II was coined in 2000 in an article by Gartner Publications entitled ERP Is Dead Long Live ERP II 21 22 It describes web based software that provides real time access to ERP systems to employees and partners such as suppliers and customers The ERP II role expands traditional ERP resource optimization and transaction processing Rather than just manage buying selling etc ERP II leverages information in the resources under its management to help the enterprise collaborate with other enterprises 23 ERP II is more flexible than the first generation ERP Rather than confine ERP system capabilities within the organization it goes beyond the corporate walls to interact with other systems Enterprise application suite is an alternate name for such systems ERP II systems are typically used to enable collaborative initiatives such as supply chain management SCM customer relationship management CRM and business intelligence BI among business partner organizations through the use of various electronic business technologies 24 25 The large proportion of companies are pursuing a strong managerial targets in ERP system instead of acquire a ERP company 26 Developers now make more effort to integrate mobile devices with the ERP system ERP vendors are extending ERP to these devices along with other business applications so that businesses don t have to rely on third party applications 27 As an example the e commerce platform Shopify was able to make ERP tools from Microsoft and Oracle available on its app in October 2021 27 Technical stakes of modern ERP concern integration hardware applications networking supply chains ERP now covers more functions and roles including decision making stakeholders relationships standardization transparency globalization etc 28 Characteristics EditERP systems typically include the following characteristics An integrated system Operates in or near real time A common database that supports all the applications A consistent look and feel across modules Installation of the system with elaborate application data integration by the Information Technology IT department provided the implementation is not done in small steps 29 Deployment options include on premises cloud hosted or SaaSFunctional areas EditAn ERP system covers the following common functional areas In many ERP systems these are called and grouped together as ERP modules Financial accounting general ledger fixed assets payables including vouchering matching and payment receivables and collections cash management financial consolidation Management accounting budgeting costing cost management activity based costing Human resources recruiting training rostering payroll benefits retirement and pension plans diversity management retirement separation Manufacturing engineering bill of materials work orders scheduling capacity workflow management quality control manufacturing process manufacturing projects manufacturing flow product life cycle management Order processing order to cash order entry credit checking pricing available to promise inventory shipping sales analysis and reporting sales commissioning Supply chain management supply chain planning supplier scheduling product configurator order to cash purchasing inventory claim processing warehousing receiving putaway picking and packing Project management project planning resource planning project costing work breakdown structure billing time and expense performance units activity management Customer relationship management CRM sales and marketing commissions service customer contact call center support CRM systems are not always considered part of ERP systems but rather business support systems BSS Supplier relationship management SRM suppliers orders payments Data services various self service interfaces for customers suppliers and or employees Management of school and educational institutes GRP ERP use in government Edit Government resource planning GRP is the equivalent of an ERP for the public sector and an integrated office automation system for government bodies 30 The software structure modularization core algorithms and main interfaces do not differ from other ERPs and ERP software suppliers manage to adapt their systems to government agencies 31 32 33 Both system implementations in private and public organizations are adopted to improve productivity and overall business performance in organizations but comparisons private vs public of implementations shows that the main factors influencing ERP implementation success in the public sector are cultural 34 35 36 Best practices EditMost ERP systems incorporate best practices This means the software reflects the vendor s interpretation of the most effective way to perform each business process Systems vary in how conveniently the customer can modify these practices 37 Use of best practices eases compliance with requirements such as IFRS Sarbanes Oxley or Basel II They can also help comply with de facto industry standards such as electronic funds transfer This is because the procedure can be readily codified within the ERP software and replicated with confidence across multiple businesses that share that business requirement 38 39 Connectivity to plant floor information EditERP systems connect to real time data and transaction data in a variety of ways These systems are typically configured by systems integrators who bring unique knowledge on process equipment and vendor solutions Direct integration ERP systems have connectivity communications to plant floor equipment as part of their product offering This requires that the vendors offer specific support for the plant floor equipment their customers operate Database integration ERP systems connect to plant floor data sources through staging tables in a database Plant floor systems deposit the necessary information into the database The ERP system reads the information in the table The benefit of staging is that ERP vendors do not need to master the complexities of equipment integration Connectivity becomes the responsibility of the systems integrator Enterprise appliance transaction modules EATM These devices communicate directly with plant floor equipment and with the ERP system via methods supported by the ERP system EATM can employ a staging table web services or system specific program interfaces APIs An EATM offers the benefit of being an off the shelf solution Custom integration solutions Many system integrators offer custom solutions These systems tend to have the highest level of initial integration cost and can have a higher long term maintenance and reliability costs Long term costs can be minimized through careful system testing and thorough documentation Custom integrated solutions typically run on workstation or server class computers Implementation EditERP s scope usually implies significant changes to staff work processes and practices 40 Generally three types of services are available to help implement such changes consulting customization and support 40 Implementation time depends on business size number of modules customization the scope of process changes and the readiness of the customer to take ownership for the project Modular ERP systems can be implemented in stages The typical project for a large enterprise takes about 14 months and requires around 150 consultants 41 Small projects can require months multinational and other large implementations can take years 42 43 Customization can substantially increase implementation times 41 Besides that information processing influences various business functions e g some large corporations like Walmart use a just in time inventory system This reduces inventory storage and increases delivery efficiency and requires up to date data Before 2014 Walmart used a system called Inforem developed by IBM to manage replenishment 44 Process preparation Edit Implementing ERP typically requires changes in existing business processes 45 Poor understanding of needed process changes prior to starting implementation is a main reason for project failure 46 The difficulties could be related to the system business process infrastructure training or lack of motivation It is therefore crucial that organizations thoroughly analyze processes before they deploy an ERP software Analysis can identify opportunities for process modernization It also enables an assessment of the alignment of current processes with those provided by the ERP system Research indicates that risk of business process mismatch is decreased by Linking current processes to the organization s strategy Analyzing the effectiveness of each process Understanding existing automated solutions 47 48 ERP implementation is considerably more difficult and politically charged in decentralized organizations because they often have different processes business rules data semantics authorization hierarchies and decision centers 49 This may require migrating some business units before others delaying implementation to work through the necessary changes for each unit possibly reducing integration e g linking via master data management or customizing the system to meet specific needs 50 A potential disadvantage is that adopting standard processes can lead to a loss of competitive advantage While this has happened losses in one area are often offset by gains in other areas increasing overall competitive advantage 51 52 Configuration Edit Configuring an ERP system is largely a matter of balancing the way the organization wants the system to work with the way it was designed to work ERP systems typically include many settings that modify system operations For example an organization can select the type of inventory accounting FIFO or LIFO to use whether to recognize revenue by geographical unit product line or distribution channel and whether to pay for shipping costs on customer returns 50 Two tier enterprise resource planning Edit Two tier ERP software and hardware lets companies run the equivalent of two ERP systems at once one at the corporate level and one at the division or subsidiary level For example a manufacturing company could use an ERP system to manage across the organization using independent global or regional distribution production or sales centers and service providers to support the main company s customers Each independent center or subsidiary may have its own business operations cycles workflows and business processes Given the realities of globalization enterprises continuously evaluate how to optimize their regional divisional and product or manufacturing strategies to support strategic goals and reduce time to market while increasing profitability and delivering value 53 With two tier ERP the regional distribution production or sales centers and service providers continue operating under their own business model separate from the main company using their own ERP systems Since these smaller companies processes and workflows are not tied to main company s processes and workflows they can respond to local business requirements in multiple locations 54 Factors that affect enterprises adoption of two tier ERP systems include Manufacturing globalization the economics of sourcing in emerging economies Potential for quicker less costly ERP implementations at subsidiaries based on selecting software more suited to smaller companies Extra effort often involving the use of enterprise application integration is required where data must pass between two ERP systems 55 Two tier ERP strategies give enterprises agility in responding to market demands and in aligning IT systems at a corporate level while inevitably resulting in more systems as compared to one ERP system used throughout the organization 56 Customization Edit ERP systems are theoretically based on industry best practices and their makers intend that organizations deploy them as is 57 58 ERP vendors do offer customers configuration options that let organizations incorporate their own business rules but gaps in features often remain even after configuration is complete ERP customers have several options to reconcile feature gaps each with their own pros cons Technical solutions include rewriting part of the delivered software writing a homegrown module to work within the ERP system or interfacing to an external system These three options constitute varying degrees of system customization with the first being the most invasive and costly to maintain 59 Alternatively there are non technical options such as changing business practices or organizational policies to better match the delivered ERP feature set Key differences between customization and configuration include Customization is always optional whereas the software must always be configured before use e g setting up cost profit center structures organizational trees purchase approval rules etc The software is designed to handle various configurations and behaves predictably in any allowed configuration The effect of configuration changes on system behavior and performance is predictable and is the responsibility of the ERP vendor The effect of customization is less predictable It is the customer s responsibility and increases testing requirements Configuration changes survive upgrades to new software versions Some customizations e g code that uses pre defined hooks that are called before after displaying data screens survive upgrades though they require retesting Other customizations e g those involving changes to fundamental data structures are overwritten during upgrades and must be re implemented 60 Advantages of customization include Improving user acceptance 61 Potential to obtain competitive advantage vis a vis companies using only standard features Customization s disadvantages include that it may Increase time and resources required to implement and maintain 59 62 Hinder seamless interfacing integration between suppliers and customers due to the differences between systems 62 Limit the company s ability to upgrade the ERP software in the future 62 Create overreliance on customization undermining the principles of ERP as a standardizing software platformExtensions Edit ERP systems can be extended with third party software often via vendor supplied interfaces 63 64 Extensions offer features such as 64 product data management product life cycle management customer relations management data mining e procurementData migration Edit Data migration is the process of moving copying and restructuring data from an existing system to the ERP system Migration is critical to implementation success and requires significant planning Unfortunately since migration is one of the final activities before the production phase it often receives insufficient attention The following steps can structure migration planning 65 Identify the data to be migrated Determine the migration timing Generate data migration templates for key data components Freeze the toolset Decide on the migration related setup of key business accounts Define data archiving policies and procedures Often data migration is incomplete because some of the data in the existing system is either incompatible or not needed in the new system As such the existing system may need to be kept as an archived database to refer back to once the new ERP system is in place 65 Advantages Edit The most fundamental advantage of ERP is that the integration of a myriad of business processes saves time and expense Management can make decisions faster and with fewer errors Data becomes visible across the organization Tasks that benefit from this integration include 66 Sales forecasting which allows inventory optimization Chronological history of every transaction through relevant data compilation in every area of operation Order tracking from acceptance through fulfillment Revenue tracking from invoice through cash receipt Matching purchase orders what was ordered inventory receipts what arrived and costing what the vendor invoiced ERP systems centralize business data which Eliminates the need to synchronize changes between multiple systems consolidation of finance marketing sales human resource and manufacturing applications citation needed Brings legitimacy and transparency to each bit of statistical data Facilitates standard product naming coding Provides a comprehensive enterprise view no islands of information making real time information available to management anywhere anytime to make proper decisions Protects sensitive data by consolidating multiple security systems into a single structure 67 Benefits Edit ERP creates a more agile company that adapts better to change It also makes a company more flexible and less rigidly structured so organization components operate more cohesively enhancing the business internally and externally 68 ERP can improve data security in a closed environment A common control system such as the kind offered by ERP systems allows organizations the ability to more easily ensure key company data is not compromised This changes however with a more open environment requiring further scrutiny of ERP security features and internal company policies regarding security 69 ERP provides increased opportunities for collaboration Data takes many forms in the modern enterprise including documents files forms audio and video and emails Often each data medium has its own mechanism for allowing collaboration ERP provides a collaborative platform that lets employees spend more time collaborating on content rather than mastering the learning curve of communicating in various formats across distributed systems 64 ERP offers many benefits such as standardization of common processes one integrated system standardized reporting improved key performance indicators KPI and access to common data One of the key benefits of ERP the concept of integrated system is often misinterpreted by the business ERP is a centralized system that provides tight integration with all major enterprise functions be it HR planning procurement sales customer relations finance or analytics as well to other connected application functions In that sense ERP could be described as a centralized integrated enterprise system CIES 70 Disadvantages Edit Customization can be problematic Compared to the best of breed approach ERP can be seen as meeting an organization s lowest common denominator needs forcing the organization to find workarounds to meet unique demands 71 Re engineering business processes to fit the ERP system may damage competitiveness or divert focus from other critical activities ERP can cost more than less integrated or less comprehensive solutions High ERP switching costs can increase the ERP vendor s negotiating power which can increase support maintenance and upgrade expenses Overcoming resistance to sharing sensitive information between departments can divert management attention Integration of truly independent businesses can create unnecessary dependencies Extensive training requirements take resources from daily operations Harmonization of ERP systems can be a mammoth task especially for big companies and requires a lot of time planning and money 72 Critical challenges include disbanding the project team very quickly after implementation interface issues lack of proper testing time zone limitations stress offshoring people s resistance to change a short hyper care period and data cleansing 73 Critical success factors Edit Critical success factors are limited number of areas in which results if satisfactory will ensure the organization s successful competitive performance The CSF method has helped organizations specify their own critical information needs Achieving satisfactory results in the key areas of critical success factors can ensure competitive advantage leading to improved organizational performance and overcome the challenges faced by organizations Critical success factors theoretical foundation was improved upon verified and validated by several researchers which underscored the importance of CSFs and its application to ERP project implementations 74 The application of critical success factors can prevent organizations from making costly mistakes and the effective usage of CSFs can ensure project success and reduce failures during project implementations Some of the important critical success factors related to ERP projects are Know your data longer and more integrated testing utilization of the right people longer stabilization period hyper care clear communication early buy in from business have a Lean Agile program less customization ERP projects must be business driven and not IT driven 74 Adoption rates Edit Research published in 2011 based on a survey of 225 manufacturers retailers and distributors found high rates of interest and adoption of ERP systems and that very few businesses were completely untouched by the concept of an ERP system 27 of the companies survey had a fully operational system 12 were at that time rolling out a system and 26 had an existing ERP system which they were extending or upgrading 75 Postmodern ERP EditThe term postmodern ERP was coined by Gartner in 2013 when it first appeared in the paper series Predicts 2014 76 According to Gartner s definition of the postmodern ERP strategy legacy monolithic and highly customized ERP suites in which all parts are heavily reliant on each other should sooner or later be replaced by a mixture of both cloud based and on premises applications which are more loosely coupled and can be easily exchanged if needed 76 The basic idea is that there should still be a core ERP solution that would cover most important business functions while other functions will be covered by specialist software solutions that merely extend the core ERP This concept is similar to the so called best of breed approach 77 to software execution but it shouldn t be confused with it While in both cases applications that make up the whole are relatively loosely connected and quite easily interchangeable in the case of the latter there is no ERP solution whatsoever Instead every business function is covered by a separate software solution 78 There is however no golden rule as to what business functions should be part of the core ERP and what should be covered by supplementary solutions According to Gartner every company must define their own postmodern ERP strategy based on company s internal and external needs operations and processes 76 For example a company may define that the core ERP solution should cover those business processes that must stay behind the firewall and therefore choose to leave their core ERP on premises At the same time another company may decide to host the core ERP solution in the cloud and move only a few ERP modules as supplementary solutions to on premises citation needed The main benefits that companies will gain from implementing postmodern ERP strategy are speed and flexibility when reacting to unexpected changes in business processes or on the organizational level 79 With the majority of applications having a relatively loose connection it is fairly easy to replace or upgrade them whenever necessary In addition to that following the examples above companies can select and combine cloud based and on premises solutions that are most suited for their ERP needs The downside of postmodern ERP is that it will most likely lead to an increased number of software vendors that companies will have to manage as well as pose additional integration challenges for the central IT 80 See also EditList of ERP software packages Business process management Comparison of project management softwareReferences Edit RISE with SAP for Modular Cloud ERP A New Way of Working 2 June 2021 SAP Buries the Past Calls Out Legacy ERP Welcomes Modular Cloud ERP 9 June 2021 Time for an ERP upgrade Replacing your legacy ERP system SAP Insights What is ERP Oracle India Archived from the original on 28 July 2022 Retrieved 28 July 2022 Almajali Dmaithan 2016 Antecedents of ERP systems implementation success a study on Jordanian healthcare sector Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29 4 549 565 doi 10 1108 JEIM 03 2015 0024 Radovilsky Zinovy 2004 Bidgoli Hossein ed The Internet Encyclopedia Volume 1 John Wiley amp Sons Inc p 707 ISBN 9780471222026 Wilson Deborah 19 April 2019 The ERP Software Market 35 billion 40 years in the making but still growing nicely by Chris Pang Blogs gartner com Retrieved 24 July 2022 Louis Columbus Predicting The Future Of Services Centric ERP Forbes com Retrieved 24 July 2022 Rubina Adam Paula Kotze Alta van der Merwe 2011 Acceptance of enterprise resource planning systems by small manufacturing Enterprises In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems edited by Runtong Zhang Jose Cordeiro Xuewei Li Zhenji Zhang and Juliang Zhang SciTePress p 229 238 Shaul L Tauber D 2012 CSFs along ERP life cycle in SMEs a field study Industrial Management amp Data Systems 112 3 360 384 doi 10 1108 02635571211210031 Khosrow Puor Mehdi 2006 Emerging Trends and Challenges in Information Technology Management Idea Group Inc p 865 InfoWorld Heather Harreld 27 August 2001 Extended ERP technology reborn in B2B Retrieved 20 July 2016 A Vision of Next Generation MRP II Scenario S 300 339 Gartner Group April 12 1990 third party source needed Anderegg Travis MRP MRPII ERP ERM Confusing Terms and Definitions for a Murkey Alphabet Soup Retrieved 23 September 2013 ERP Archived from the original on 10 July 2011 Retrieved 7 October 2009 Sheilds Mureell G 2005 E Business and ERP Rapid Implementation and Project Planning John Wiley and Sons Inc p 9 Chang SI Guy Gable Errol Smythe Greg Timbrell 2000 A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues International Conference on Information Systems Atlanta Association for Information Systems pp 494 500 Retrieved 9 September 2008 Frederic Adam David Sammon 2004 The enterprise resource planning decade p 94 ISBN 978 1 59140 262 6 Bret Wagner Ellen Monk 4 February 2008 Enterprise Resource Planning Cengage Learning EMEA ISBN 978 1 4239 0179 2 Hayman L 2000 ERP in the Internet Economy Information Systems Frontiers 2000 2 137 139 doi 10 1023 A 1026595923192 S2CID 207642319 B Bond Y Genovese D Miklovic N Wood B Zrimsek N Rayner ERP Is Dead Long Live ERP II GartnerGroup RAS Services SPA 12 0420 4 October 2000 Retrieved 23 October 2020 ERP What you need to ask before you buy projectauditors com Retrieved 23 April 2014 The Bryan School of Business and Economics at UNCG Exceptional Problem Solvers PDF Uncg edu Archived from the original PDF on 12 September 2012 Retrieved 8 November 2012 Charles Moller 1 August 2005 ERP II a conceptual framework for next generation enterprise systems Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18 4 483 497 doi 10 1108 17410390510609626 ISSN 1741 0398 Ruhi Umar 1 July 2016 An experiential learning pedagogical framework for enterprise systems education in business schools The International Journal of Management Education 14 2 198 211 doi 10 1016 j ijme 2016 04 006 Adam Frederic O Doherty Peter December 2000 Lessons from enterprise resource planning implementations in Ireland towards smaller and shorter ERP projects Journal of Information Technology 15 4 305 316 doi 10 1080 02683960010008953 ISSN 0268 3962 a b Shopify enlists Microsoft Oracle for business tools on app Reuters 14 October 2021 Retrieved 8 December 2021 Shaul L Tauber D 2013 Critical Success Factors in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Review of the Last Decade ACM Computing Surveys 45 4 1 39 doi 10 1145 2501654 2501669 S2CID 3657624 Sheilds Mureell G E Business and ERP Rapid Implementation and Project Planning 2001 John Wiley and Sons Inc p 9 10 Yunliang Xiongtao Qing Jing and Ning 2010 Design of E Government Information Management Platform Based on SOA Framework 2010 First International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing Hangzhou doi 10 1109 ICNDC 2010 42 Allen Kern and Havenhand 2000 ERP Critical Success Factors an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector institutions Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Chang Gable Smythe and Timbrell 2000 A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues Proceedings of ICIS Ebrahim Zakareya Irani Zahir 2005 E government adoption architecture and barriers Business Process Management Journal 11 5 589 611 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 453 87 doi 10 1108 14637150510619902 Wingreen Maryam and Hritik 2014 An Investigation into Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Success Evidence from Private and Public Sector Organizations PACIS 2014 339 Shafqat Enhong and Faisal 2012 Enterprise Resource Planning real blessing or a blessing in disguise an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector Coelho Cunha Meirelles 2015 The client consultant relationship in the implementation of ERP in government exploring the dynamic between power and knowledge DGO p 140 doi 10 1145 2757401 2757405 ISBN 9781450336000 S2CID 13941079 Monk Ellen and Wagner Brett Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning 3rd ed Course Technology Cengage Learning Boston Massachusetts 2009 Ingolfo S Siena A Mylopoulos J 2011 Establishing Regulatory Compliance for Software Requirements Conceptual Modeling ER 2011 Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol 6998 pp 47 61 doi 10 1007 978 3 642 24606 7 5 ISBN 978 3 642 24605 0 IT Systems Validation for SOx and Regulatory Compliance Insights MetricStream Inc Retrieved 9 May 2018 a b ERP Enterprise Resource Planning Tech faq com 5 March 2014 Retrieved 14 July 2015 a b Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation Information Systems Management Auerbach Publications 1999 p 7 Archived from the original on January 3 2013 Retrieved January 10 2013 Sankar C Rau K H 2006 Implementation Strategies for SAP R 3 in a Multinational Organization Lessons from a Real World Case Study Cybertech Publishing p 8 ISBN 9781591407782 Retrieved 9 May 2018 Pelphrey M W 2015 Directing the ERP Implementation A Best Practice Guide to Avoiding Program Failure Traps While Tuning System Performance CRC Press pp 92 111 ISBN 9781482248425 Wal Mart slow to roll out new replenishment system Arkansas Thecitywire com 8 January 2014 Retrieved 14 July 2015 Turban et al 2008 Information Technology for Management Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy Massachusetts John Wiley amp Sons Inc pp 300 343 ISBN 978 0 471 78712 9 Brown C Vessey I 2003 Managing the Next Wave of Enterprise Systems Leveraging Lessons from ERP MIS Quarterly Executive 2 1 King W Ensuring ERP implementation success Information Systems Management Summer 2005 Yusuf Y A Gunasekaran and M Abthorpe Enterprise Information Systems Project Implementation A Case Study of ERP in Rolls Royce International Journal of Production Economics 87 3 February 2004 Daneva Maya Roel Wieringa Requirements Engineering for Cross organizational ERP Implementation Undocumented Assumptions and Potential Mismatches PDF University of Twente Archived from the original PDF on 5 July 2010 Retrieved 12 July 2008 a b Thomas H Davenport Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System Harvard Business Review July August 1998 Turban et al 2008 Information Technology for Management Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy Massachusetts John Wiley amp Sons Inc p 320 ISBN 978 0 471 78712 9 Dehning B and T Stratopoulos Determinants of a Sustainable Competitive Advantage Due to an IT enabled Strategy Journal of Strategic Information Systems Vol 12 2003 Ferdows K 1997 Making the most of foreign factories Harvard Business Review 75 2 73 88 Gill R 2011 The rise of two tier ERP Strategic Finance 93 5 35 40 1 Montgomery Nigel 2010 Two Tier ERP Suite Strategy Considering Your Options Gartner Group July 28 2010 Retrieved September 20 2012 Kovacs G L Paganelli P 2003 A planning and management infrastructure for large complex distributed projects beyond ERP and SCM PDF Computers in Industry 51 2 165 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 474 6993 doi 10 1016 s0166 3615 03 00034 4 Kraemmerand P et al 2003 ERP implementation an integrated process of radical change and continuous learning Production Planning amp Control 14 4 228 248 doi 10 1080 0953728031000117959 S2CID 108921043 Vilpola Inka Heidi 2008 A method for improving ERP implementation success by the principles and process of user centred design Enterprise Information Systems 2 1 47 76 doi 10 1080 17517570701793848 S2CID 3032440 a b Fryling Meg 2010 Estimating the impact of enterprise resource planning project management decisions on post implementation maintenance costs a case study using simulation modelling Enterprise Information Systems 4 4 391 421 Bibcode 2010EntIS 4 391F doi 10 1080 17517575 2010 519785 S2CID 34298012 Yakovlev I V 2002 An ERP implementation and business process reengineering at a Small University Educause Quarterly 2 52 57 Fryling Meg 2010 Total Cost of Ownership System Acceptance and Perceived Success of Enterprise Resource Planning Software Simulating a Dynamic Feedback Perspective of ERP in the Higher Education Environment p 403 ISBN 978 1 109 74428 6 a b c Bradford M 2015 Modern ERP Select Implement amp Use Today s Advanced Business Systems pp 107 108 ISBN 9781312665989 Retrieved 9 May 2018 Bendoly E Jacobs F R 2005 Strategic ERP Extension and Use Stanford University Press p 95 ISBN 9780804750981 Retrieved 9 May 2018 a b c Leon A 2008 ERP Demystified Tata McGraw Hill Education pp 170 171 ISBN 9780070656642 a b Ramaswamy V K 27 September 2007 Data Migration Strategy in ERP Information Technology Toolbox Inc Archived from the original on 30 October 2007 Retrieved 9 May 2018 Meer K H 2005 Best Practices in ERP Software Applications p 59 ISBN 978 0595345137 Retrieved 9 May 2018 Walsh Katherine January 2009 The ERP Security Challenge CSOonline CXO Media Inc Retrieved 17 January 2008 O Brien James 2011 Management Information Systems MIS New York McGraw Hill Irwin p 324 She W Thuraisingham B 2007 Security for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Information Systems Security 16 3 152 163 doi 10 1080 10658980701401959 S2CID 16472963 Menon Sreekumar July 2019 Benefits and Process Improvements for ERP Implementation Results from an Exploratory Case Study International Business Research 12 8 124 132 doi 10 5539 ibr v12n8p124 via Canadian Center of Science and Education Young Joanna 16 May 2014 AUDIO Best of Breed vs ERP What s Best for Higher Ed Today The EvoLLLution Retrieved 14 July 2015 The Minefied of Harmonising ERP Cfo insight com 23 July 2012 Archived from the original on 27 July 2012 Menon S A Muchnick M Butler C Pizur T June 2019 Critical Challenges in Enterprise Resource Planning ERP Implementation International Journal of Business and Management 14 7 54 69 doi 10 5539 ijbm v14n7p54 via Canadian Center of Science and Education a b Menon Sreekumar 13 January 2020 Critical Success Factors for ERP Projects Recommendations from a Canadian Exploratory Study International Journal of Business and Management 15 2 80 91 doi 10 5539 ijbm v15n2p80 McCrea B Supply Chain Technology Putting the spotlight on ERP Logistics Management June 2011 accessed 22 April 2022 a b c Predicts 2014 The Rise of the Postmodern ERP and Enterprise Applications World Gartner Group Retrieved 31 October 2016 Postmodern ERP Strategy Is Not a Best of Breed Approach Gartner Group Retrieved 31 October 2016 ERP the Future of Applications and the Composable Enterprise by Mike Guay Debbie Wilson 27 January 2020 Retrieved 12 December 2022 5 Factors Facilitating the Transition to the Postmodern ERP Era CIOReview Retrieved 31 October 2016 The end of enterprise resource planning Chemical amp Engineering News Retrieved 2 June 2020 Bibliography EditClemons Eric K 1986 IS for Sustainable Competitive Advantage Information amp Management 11 3 131 136 doi 10 1016 0378 7206 86 90010 8 Grant David Richard Hall Nick Wailes Christopher Wright March 2006 The false promise of technological determinism the case of enterprise resource planning systems New Technology Work and Employment 21 1 2 15 doi 10 1111 j 1468 005X 2006 00159 x S2CID 6532611 Head Simon 2005 The New Ruthless Economy Work and Power in the Digital Age Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 517983 5 Henderson Ian ERP from the Frontline MBE ISBN 978 1 898822 05 9 Making ERP Work Lequeux Jean Louis 2008 Manager avec les ERP Architecture Orientee Services SOA in French Paris Ed d Organisation ISBN 978 2 212 54094 9 Loh Tee Chiat Lenny Koh Siau Ching September 2004 Critical elements for a successful ERP implementation in SMEs International Journal of Production Research 42 17 3433 3455 doi 10 1080 00207540410001671679 S2CID 108834696 Shaul Levi Tauber Doron September 2010 Hierarchical examination of success factors across ERP life cycle MCIS 2010 Proceedings 79 Waldner Jean Baptiste 1990 Les nouvelles perspectives de la production in French Paris Dunod ISBN 978 2 04 019820 6 Waldner Jean Baptiste 1992 Principles of Computer Integrated Manufacturing Chichester John Wiley amp Sons Ltd ISBN 978 0 471 93450 9 O Leary Daniel E 31 July 2000 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Systems Life Cycle Electronic Commerce and Risk Cambridge University Press p 232 ISBN 978 0 52 179152 6 Kurbel Karl E 23 August 2013 Enterprise Resource Planning and Supply Chain Management Springer Berlin Heidelberg p 359 ISBN 978 3 64 231573 2 Shanks Graeme Willcocks Leslie P 11 September 2003 Second Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cambridge University Press p 449 ISBN 978 0 521 81902 2 Langenwalter Gary A 17 July 2019 Enterprise Resources Planning and Beyond Integrating Your Entire Organization Taylor amp Francis p 424 ISBN 978 1 42 004906 0 Odell Laura A Farrar Foley Brendan T Kinkel John R Moorthy Rama S 1 February 2012 Beyond Enterprise Resource Planning ERP The Next Generation Enterprise Resource Planning Environment Institute for Defense Analyses 124 JSTOR resrep26969 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Umble Elisabeth J Haft Ronald R Umblea M Michael 16 April 2003 Enterprise resource planning Implementation procedures and critical success factors European Journal of Operational Research Elsevier 146 2 241 257 doi 10 1016 S0377 2217 02 00547 7 Hitt Lorin M Wu D J Zhou Xiaoge 23 December 2014 Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning Business Impact and Productivity Measures Journal of Management Information Systems 19 71 98 doi 10 1080 07421222 2002 11045716 S2CID 18977742 Jacobs F Robert WestonJr b F C Ted 2007 Enterprise resource planning ERP A brief history Journal of Operations Management Elsevier 25 2 357 363 doi 10 1016 j jom 2006 11 005 A Momoh R Roy E Shehab 2010 Challenges in enterprise resource planning implementation state of the art Business Process Management Journal Emerald Group Publishing Limited 16 4 537 565 doi 10 1108 14637151011065919 Chou Shih Wei Chang Yu Chieh 2008 The implementation factors that influence the ERP enterprise resource planning benefits Decision Support Systems 46 1 149 157 doi 10 1016 j dss 2008 06 003 Holland C P Light B 1999 A critical success factors model for ERP implementation Vol 16 Hawaii USA Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers pp 30 36 doi 10 1109 HICSS 1999 772762 ISBN 0 7695 0001 3 S2CID 206700140 Ram Jiwat and David Corkindale Developing a Framework for the Management of Critical Success Factors in Organisational Innovation Projects A Case of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Integrating Innovation South Australian Entrepreneurship Systems and Strategies edited by Goran Roos and Allan O Connor University of Adelaide Press 2015 pp 327 54 JSTOR 10 20851 j ctt1sq5xd5 16 Riposo Jessie Guy Weichenberg Chelsea Kaihoi Duran Bernard Fox William Shelton and Andreas Thorsen Organizational Change Management In Improving Air Force Enterprise Resource Planning Enabled Business Transformation 23 28 RAND Corporation 2013 JSTOR 10 7249 j ctt5hhvgh 13 Aronin B S Bailey J W Byun J S Davis G A Wolfe C L Frazier T P amp Bronson P F 2018 ERP Systems in the DoD In Global Combat Support System Marine Corps Root Cause Analysis pp 7 18 Institute for Defense Analyses JSTOR resrep22788 5 Ragowsky Arik and Toni M Somers Special Section Enterprise Resource Planning Journal of Management Information Systems vol 19 no 1 Taylor amp Francis Ltd 2002 pp 11 15 JSTOR 40398564 LIEDTKA JEANNE ANDREW KING and KEVIN BENNETT Rethinking Strategic Planning at SAP In Solving Problems with Design Thinking Ten Stories of What Works 74 91 Columbia University Press 2013 JSTOR 10 7312 lied16356 9 Morris Michael G and Viswanath Venkatesh Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction Understanding the Role of Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation MIS Quarterly vol 34 no 1 Management Information Systems Research Center University of Minnesota 2010 pp 143 61 doi 10 2307 20721418 Tsai Bi Huei and Shin Bin Chou APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE OUTPUT DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN INTERPRETING EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT OF ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING IN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FIRMS The Journal of Developing Areas vol 49 no 1 College of Business Tennessee State University 2015 pp 285 304 JSTOR 24241295 van Merode GG Groothuis S Hasman A Enterprise resource planning for hospitals Int J Med Inform 2004 Jun 30 73 6 493 501 doi 10 1016 j ijmedinf 2004 02 007 PMID 15171978 Zerbino P Aloini D Dulmin R Mininno V Why enterprise resource planning initiatives do succeed in the long run A case based causal network PLoS One 2021 Dec 16 16 12 e0260798 doi 10 1371 journal pone 0260798 PMID 34914739 PMC 8675769 Lee CW Kwak NK Strategic enterprise resource planning in a health care system using a multicriteria decision making model J Med Syst 2011 Apr 35 2 265 75 doi 10 1007 s10916 009 9362 x Epub 2009 Sep 10 PMID 20703564 Grove S Enterprise resource planning case history Optimizing the supply chain Health Manag Technol 2004 Jan 25 1 24 7 PMID 14727396 Schuerenberg BK Making connections across an enterprise Enterprise resource planning systems are tough to implement but can provide a big payback Health Data Manag 2003 Jun 11 6 72 4 76 78 PMID 12825443 Tian Feng and Sean Xin Xu How Do Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Affect Firm Risk Post Implementation Impact MIS Quarterly vol 39 no 1 Management Information Systems Research Center University of Minnesota 2015 pp 39 60 JSTOR 26628340 Ferratt Thomas W et al Achieving Success in Large Projects Implications from a Study of ERP Implementations Interfaces vol 36 no 5 INFORMS 2006 pp 458 69 JSTOR 20141427 Karimi Jahangir Toni M Somers and Anol Bhattacherjee The Impact of ERP Implementation on Business Process Outcomes A Factor Based Study Journal of Management Information Systems 24 no 1 2007 101 34 JSTOR 40398884 Ranganathan C and Carol V Brown ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables Information Systems Research vol 17 no 2 INFORMS 2006 pp 145 61 JSTOR 23015772 Benco Daniel C and Larry Prather Market Reaction to Announcements to Invest in ERP Systems Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting vol 47 no 4 University of Nebraska Lincoln College of Business Administration 2008 pp 145 69 JSTOR 40473472 Stephenson Stephen V and Andrew P Sage Information and knowledge perspectives in systems engineering and management for innovation and productivity through enterprise resource planning Information Resources Management Journal 20 no 2 2007 44 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A164424350 McGaughey Ronald E and Angappa Gunasekaran Enterprise Resource Planning ERP past present and future International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 3 no 3 2007 23 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A172292333 Cordova Ronald S Rolou Lyn R Maata Ferdinand J Epoc and Marwan Alshar e Challenges and Opportunities of Using Blockchain in Supply Chain Management Global Business and Management Research An International Journal 13 no 3 2021 204 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A686969056 Muscatello Joseph R and Injazz J Chen Enterprise resource planning ERP implementations theory and practice International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 4 no 1 2008 63 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A193886705 Muscatello Joseph R and Diane H Parente Enterprise resource planning ERP a postimplementation cross case analysis Information Resources Management Journal 19 no 3 2006 61 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A164420768 Farzaneh Mandana Iman Raeesi Vanani and Babak Sohrabi A survey study of influential factors in the implementation of enterprise resource planning systems International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 9 no 1 2013 76 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A339733802 AlMuhayfith Sara and Hani Shaiti The Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning on Business Performance With the Discussion on Its Relationship with Open Innovation Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity 6 no 3 2020 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A640009499 Madjid Tavana and Vahid Hajipour and Shahrzad Oveisi 2020 IoT based enterprise resource planning Challenges open issues applications architecture and future research directions Internet of Things 11 100262 doi 10 1016 j iot 2020 100262 ISSN 2542 6605 S2CID 222006095 Rocio Rodriguez and Francisco Jose Molina Castillo and Goran Svensson 2020 The mediating role of organizational complexity between enterprise resource planning and business model innovation Industrial Marketing Management 84 328 341 doi 10 1016 j indmarman 2019 09 007 ISSN 0019 8501 S2CID 204496134 Nebojsa Denic and Dalibor Petkovic and Boban Spasic 2020 Saleem Hashmi and Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury ed Global Economy Increasing by Enterprise Resource Planning Oxford Elsevier pp 331 337 doi 10 1016 B978 0 12 803581 8 11590 5 ISBN 978 0 12 813196 1 S2CID 169934398 Wu Shi Liang and He Wu 2012 Sambath Sabo and Zhu Egui ed From Enterprise Resource Planning Industry Oriented Enterprise Resource Planning to Entire Resource Planning Berlin Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp 1141 1148 doi 10 1007 978 3 642 27552 4 147 ISBN 978 3 642 27552 4 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Oliver George Kayas and Rachel McLean and Tony Hines and Gillian H Wright 2008 The panoptic gaze Analysing the interaction between enterprise resource planning technology and organisational culture International Journal of Information Management 28 6 446 452 doi 10 1016 j ijinfomgt 2008 08 005 ISSN 0268 4012 Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh and Feybi Ariani Goni and Jiri Jaromir Klemes 2018 Evaluation of a framework for sustainable Enterprise Resource Planning systems implementation Journal of Cleaner Production 190 778 786 doi 10 1016 j jclepro 2018 04 182 ISSN 0959 6526 S2CID 158751005 Swamidass P M ed 2000 Enterprise Resource Planning ERP ERP ERP Enterprise Resource Planning ERP ERP Boston MA Springer US p 197 doi 10 1007 1 4020 0612 8 302 ISBN 978 1 4020 0612 8 Lin Kun 2012 Tan Honghua ed The Implement of Enterprise Resource Planning Based on the Enterprise Information Integration Berlin Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp 631 634 ISBN 978 3 642 27711 5 Bahrami Bahram and Jordan Ernest 2013 Piazolo Felix and Felderer Michael ed Utilizing Enterprise Resource Planning in Decision Making Processes Berlin Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp 153 168 ISBN 978 3 642 37021 2 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Wenrich Kristi I and Norita Ahmad Lessons learned during a decade of ERP experience a case study International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 5 no 1 2009 55 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A197233836 Subramanian Girish H and Christopher S Hoffer An exploratory case study of enterprise resource planning implementation International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 1 no 1 2005 23 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A163154291 W Yang H Liu and J Shi The design of printing enterprise resources planning ERP software 2010 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering 2010 pp 151 154 doi 10 1109 ICIME 2010 5478168 Cronan Timothy Paul and David E Douglas Assessing ERP learning management business process and skills and attitudes Journal of Organizational and End User Computing April June 2013 59 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A339733778 Hayes David C James E Hunton and Jacqueline L Reck Market Reaction to ERP Implementation Announcements Journal of Information Systems 15 no 1 2001 3 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A77711885 Alves Maria do Ceu and Sergio Ivo Amaral Matos ERP adoption by public and private organizations a comparative analysis of successful implementations Journal of Business Economics and Management 14 no 3 2013 500 Gale Academic OneFile accessed January 26 2022 Gale A338324526 Elsayed N Ammar S and Mardini G H The impact of ERP utilisation experience and segmental reporting on corporate performance in the UK context Enterprise Information Systems vol 15 no 1 pp 61 86 2021 doi 10 1080 17517575 2019 1706192 Bibcode 2021EntIS 15 61E Sutduean J Singsa A Sriyakul T and Jermsittiparsert K Supply Chain Integration Enterprise Resource Planning and Organizational Performance The Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation Approach Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience vol 16 no 7 pp 2975 2981 2019 doi 10 1166 jctn 2019 8204 Bibcode 2019JCTN 16 2975S Alfaris M F Edikuncoro G Y Savitri A L Yogiari D and Sulistio J A Literature Review of Sustain Enterprise Resource Planning in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series 2019 vol 598 no 1 p 012128 doi 10 1088 1757 899X 598 1 012128 Bibcode 2019MS amp E 598a2128A G Chattopadhyay Development of a learning package for interactive learning in enterprise resources planning ERP 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference IEEE Cat No 04CH37574 2004 pp 848 850 Vol 2 doi 10 1109 IEMC 2004 1407501 D Reuther and G Chattopadhyay Critical factors for enterprise resources planning system selection and implementation projects within small to medium enterprises 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference IEEE Cat No 04CH37574 2004 pp 851 855 Vol 2 doi 10 1109 IEMC 2004 1407502 Lv T Zhang J and Chen Y Research of ERP Platform based on Cloud Computing in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series 2018 vol 394 no 4 p 042004 doi 10 1088 1757 899X 394 4 042004 Bibcode 2018MS amp E 394d2004L Hasan N Miah S J Bao Y and Hoque M R Factors affecting post implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems a perspective of business process performance Enterprise Information Systems vol 13 no 9 pp 1217 1244 2019 doi 10 1080 17517575 2019 1612099 Bibcode abstract 2019EntIS 13 1217H Xinyu Zhang 2019 Drivers affecting cloud ERP deployment decisions an Australian study arXiv 1911 11309 Bibcode 2019arXiv191111309Z S2CID 208291311 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Lucas Gren and Alexander Wong and Erik Kristoffersson 2019 Choosing agile or plan driven enterprise resource planning ERP implementations A study on 21 implementations from 20 companies arXiv 1906 05220 Bibcode 2019arXiv190605220G S2CID 49291109 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Emre Erturk and Jitesh Kumar Arora 2017 An Exploratory Study on the Implementation and Adoption of ERP Solutions for Businesses arXiv 1701 08329 Bibcode 2017arXiv170108329E S2CID 858850 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Quang V Nguyen and Mary Tate and Philip Calvert and Benoit Aubert 2016 Leveraging ERP Implementation to Create Intellectual Capital the Role of Organizational Learning Capability arXiv 1606 01431 Bibcode 2016arXiv160601431N S2CID 14172135 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Sergey V Zykov 2006 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems the Integrated Approach arXiv cs 0607129 Bibcode 2006cs 7129Z S2CID 1653 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Sardjono W Sudirwan J Priatna W and Putra G R Application of factor analysis method to support the users acceptance model of ERP systems implementation in Journal of Physics Conference Series 2021 vol 1836 no 1 doi 10 1088 1742 6596 1836 1 012032 Bibcode 2021JPhCS1836a2032S Meiryani Erick Fernando Setiani Putri Hendratno Kriswanto and Septi Wifasari 2021 Enterprise Resource Planning Systems The Business Backbone 2021 The 5th International Conference on E Commerce E Business and E Government Association for Computing Machinery New York NY USA 43 48 doi 10 1145 3466029 3466049 T Yang J Choi Z Xi Y Sun C Ouyang and Y Huang Research of Enterprise Resource Planning in a Specific Enterprise 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics 2006 pp 418 422 doi 10 1109 ICSMC 2006 384418 Komala A R and Gunanda I Development of Enterprise Resource Planning using Blockchain in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series 2020 vol 879 no 1 p 012141 doi 10 1088 1757 899X 879 1 012141 Bibcode 2020MS amp E 879a2141K Tsai W H Lee K C Liu J Y Lin S J and Chou Y W The influence of enterprise resource planning ERP systems performance on earnings management Enterprise Information Systems vol 6 no 4 pp 491 517 2012 doi 10 1080 17517575 2011 622414 Bibcode 2012EntIS 6 491T Kapulin D V Russkikh P A and Moor I A Integration capabilities of business process models and ERP systems in Journal of Physics Conference Series 2019 vol 1333 no 7 doi 10 1088 1742 6596 1333 7 072009 Bibcode 2019JPhCS1333g2009K Sebayang P Tarigan Z J H and Panjaitan T W S ERP compatibility on business performance through the inventory system and internal integration in Materials Science and Engineering Conference Series 2021 vol 1010 no 1 p 012008 doi 10 1088 1757 899X 1010 1 012008 Bibcode 2021MS amp E 1010a2008S August Wilhelm Scheer and Frank Habermann 2000 Enterprise resource planning making ERP a success Communications of the ACM 43 4 April 2000 57 61 doi 10 1145 332051 332073 Kuldeep Kumar and Jos van Hillegersberg 2000 Enterprise resource planning introduction Communications of the ACM 43 4 April 2000 22 26 doi 10 1145 332051 332063External links Edit Media related to Enterprise resource planning at Wikimedia Commons Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Enterprise resource planning amp oldid 1144983607, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.