fbpx
Wikipedia

Byronosaurus

Byronosaurus is a genus of troodontid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous Period of Mongolia.

Byronosaurus
Temporal range: Late Cretaceous, 80–75 Ma
Diagram showing known remains
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Family: Troodontidae
Subfamily: Troodontinae
Genus: Byronosaurus
Norell, Makovicky & Clark, 2000
Species:
B. jaffei
Binomial name
Byronosaurus jaffei
Norell, Makovicky & Clark, 2000

Discovery and naming Edit

In 1993, Michael Novacek, a member of an American Museum of Natural History expedition to the Gobi Desert, discovered the skeleton of a small theropod at Ukhaa Tolgod. This was further excavated in 1994 and 1995. The find was illustrated in a publication in 1994.[1] On 15 July 1996, at the Bolor's Hill site, about eight kilometers (five miles) away from the original location, a second specimen was discovered, a skull.

In 2000, Mark Norell, Peter Makovicky and James Clark named and described the type species Byronosaurus jaffei. The species name as a whole honoured Byron Jaffe, "in recognition of his family's support for the Mongolian Academy of Sciences-American Museum of Natural History Paleontological Expeditions".[2]

The holotype, IGM 100/983, was found in a layer of the Djadochta Formation dating from the late Campanian. It consists of a partial skeleton with skull. It contains a partial skull with lower jaws, three neck vertebrae, three back vertebrae, a piece of a sacral vertebra, four partial tail vertebrae, ribs, the lower end of a thighbone, the upper ends of a shinbone and calf bone, a second metatarsal and three toe phalanges. The paratype, specimen IGM 100/984, is the skull found in 1996, of which only the snout has been preserved. Both specimens are of adult individuals.[2]

In 2003, the type specimen of Byronosaurus was described in detail. Makovicky and his colleagues found that Byronosaurus had a pneumatised snout with a sinus in each maxilla.[3]

In 2009, two front skulls and lower jaws of very young, perhaps newly hatched, individuals, specimens IGM 100/972 and IGM 100/974, were referred to Byronosaurus, after originally having been identified as Velociraptor exemplars. Bever and Norell estimated that the skull length of IGM 100/972 and IGM 100/974 were about 22.6 cm (8.9 in) and 25.4 cm (10.0 in), respectively.[4]

In 2017, the researchers who described a troodontid Almas ukhaa suggested that the specimens described by Bever and Norell (2009) don't belong to Byronosaurus based on different features found in the skull such as the number of maxillary teeth in both specimens being significantly fewer than this genus. They argued that these specimens are more closely related to A. ukhaa than to B. jaffei.[5]

Description Edit

 
Life restoration

Byronosaurus was a small dinosaur, measuring about 1.5–2 m (4.9–6.6 ft) long and 50 cm (20 in) tall; it weighed only about 4–20 kg (8.8–44.1 lb).[6][7] Unlike most other troodontids, its teeth seem to lack serrations just like its closest relative Xixiasaurus, probably a plesiomorphic trait among troodontids.[4][8] The Ukhaa perinates show that Byronosaurus had a buccal maxillary groove and a recessed interfenestral bar.[4]

Classification Edit

 
Maxillae of Byronosaurus compared with relatives

The following cladogram shows the position of Byronosaurus within Troodontidae according to a 2017 analysis by the palaeontologist Caizhi Shen and colleagues:[9]

Palaeobiology Edit

Troodontids had some of the highest encephalization quotients (a measure of the ratio between actual brain size and the brain size predicted from body size) among non-avian dinosaurs. As suggested by their large eye-sockets and well-developed middle-ears, they appear to have had keen senses. They also had proportionately long legs, which indicates they were agile.[10][8]

Diet Edit

 
Comparison of troodontid teeth; L is Byronosaurus

Due to their large brains, possible stereoscopic vision, grasping hands, and enlarged sickle-claws, troodontids were generally assumed to have been predatory. In 1998, the palaeontologist Thomas R. Holtz and colleagues pointed out that the serrations on the teeth of troodontids were different from those of typical, carnivorous theropods in their large size and wide spacing, which is similar to the condition in herbivorous dinosaurs (including therizinosaurid theropods) and lizards rather than carnivorous dinosaurs. They suggested that this difference in coarseness may be related to the size and resistance of plant and meat fibres, and that troodontids may have been herbivorous or omnivorous. They also pointed out that some features that had been interpreted as predatory adaptations in troodontids were also found in herbivorous and omnivorous animals, such as primates and raccoons.[11][8]

In 2001, the palaeontologists Philip J. Currie and Dong Zhiming rejected the idea that troodontids could have been herbivorous. They stated that troodontid anatomy was consistent with a carnivorous lifestyle, and pointed out that the structure of their serrations was not much different from those of other theropods. They noted that troodontid features such as sharply pointed serrations that curved up towards the tip of the teeth, razor sharp enamel between the serrations, and blood grooves at the bases, were not seen in herbivorous dinosaurs, which had simpler, cone shaped serrations.[12] Lü and colleagues discussed the previous studies of troodontid diet, and suggested that the loss of serrations in the teeth of Byronosaurus and some other troodontids was related to a change in their diet. Since the teeth would appear to have lost their typical ability to slice meat, at least these troodontids may therefore have been either herbivorous or omnivorous.[8] In 2015, the palaeontologist Christophe Hendrickx and colleagues suggested that basal (or "primitive") troodontids with unserrated teeth were herbivorous, whereas more derived troodontids with serrated teeth were carnivorous or omnivorous.[13]

Reproduction Edit

 
Hatchling specimen IGM 100/972 at the AMNH

Mark Norell and colleagues described two "perinate" (hatchlings or embryos close to hatching) specimens of Byronosaurus (specimens IGM 100/972 and IGM 100/974) in 1994. The two specimens were found in a nest of oviraptorid eggs in the Late Cretaceous "Flaming Cliffs" of the Djadochta Formation of Mongolia. The nest is quite certainly that of an oviraptorosaur, since an oviraptorid embryo is still preserved inside one of the eggs. The two partial skulls were first described by Norell et al. (1994) as dromaeosaurids, but reassigned to Byronosaurus after further study.[4][14][15] The juvenile skulls were either from hatchlings or embryos, and fragments of eggshell are adhered to them although it seems to be oviraptorid eggshell. The presence of tiny Byronosaurus skulls in an oviraptorid nest was considered an enigma. Hypotheses explaining how they came to be there included that they were the prey of the adult oviraptorid, that they were there to prey on oviraptorid hatchlings, or that an adult Byronosaurus may have laid eggs in a Citipati nest (see nest parasite).[14] However, these interpretations have all been shown to not be the case. In 2011, Norell stated that the Byronosaurus nest was found two metres uphill from the oviraptorid nest, with the oviraptorid nest at the end of a drainage course from the Byronosaurus nest, suggesting that the baby Byronosaurus skulls must have been washed from one nest to the other.[16] This claim has been already confirmed in 2005 by Gerald Grellet-Tinner who noted the presence of a troodontid nest (IGM 100/1003x) close to the Citipati nest containing the juvenile troodontid skulls.[17] Norell is officially preparing to publish this information with more important details.[16] Not only is the claim regarding nest parasitism considered dubious, but other researchers have pointed out the differences in skull morphology, suggesting that these specimens do not belong to this genus.[5] The eggs of Byronosaurus and other troodontids are not paired unlike oviraptorids like Citipati, but are "nearly vertically embedded with their round poles" up and are exposed barely above the sediment.[18]

See also Edit

References Edit

  1. ^ Novacek, M.J.; Norell, M.A; McKenna, M.C.; Clark, J.M. (1994). "Fossils of the Flaming Cliffs". Scientific American. 271 (6): 60–69. Bibcode:1994SciAm.271f..60N. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1294-60. JSTOR 24942946.
  2. ^ a b Norell, M.A.; Makovicky, P.J.; Clark, J.M. (2000). "A new troodontid theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod, Mongolia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 20 (1): 7–11. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2000)020[0007:ANTTFU]2.0.CO;2. S2CID 51833414.
  3. ^ Makovicky, P.J.; Norell, M.A.; Clark, J.M.; Rowe, T.E. (2003). (PDF). American Museum Novitates (3402): 1–32. doi:10.1206/0003-0082(2003)402<0001:oarobj>2.0.co;2. S2CID 51824767. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-03-16. Retrieved 2007-02-04.
  4. ^ a b c d Bever, G.S.; Norell, M.A. (2009). "The perinate skull of Byronosaurus (Troodontidae) with observations on the cranial ontogeny of paravian theropods". American Museum Novitates (3657): 1–51. doi:10.1206/650.1. ISSN 0003-0082.
  5. ^ a b Pei, R.; Norell, M.A.; Barta, D.E.; Bever, G.S.; Pittman, M.; Xu, Xing (2017). "Osteology of a New Late Cretaceous Troodontid Specimen from Ukhaa Tolgod, Ömnögovi Aimag, Mongolia". American Museum Novitates (3889): 1–47. doi:10.1206/3889.1. S2CID 90883541.
  6. ^ Long, J.A.; Schouten, P. (2008). Feathered Dinosaurs: The Origin of Birds. p. 155. ISBN 978-0195372663.
  7. ^ Paul, Gregory S. (2016). The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. p. 158. ISBN 978-1-78684-190-2. OCLC 985402380.
  8. ^ a b c d Junchang Lü; Li Xu; Yongqing Liu; Xingliao Zhang; Songhai Jia & Qiang Ji (2010). "A new troodontid (Theropoda: Troodontidae) from the Late Cretaceous of central China, and the radiation of Asian troodontids" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 55 (3): 381–388. doi:10.4202/app.2009.0047.
  9. ^ Shen, C.; Lü, J.; Liu, S.; Kundrát, M.; Brusatte, S.L.; Gao, H. (2017). "A new troodontid dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning Province, China" (PDF). Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition. 91 (3): 763–780. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.13307. hdl:20.500.11820/dc010682-fce0-4db4-bef6-7b2b29f5be8a. S2CID 129939153.
  10. ^ Makovicky, P.J.; Norell, M.A. (2004). "Troodontidae". In Weishampel, D.B.; Dodson, P.; Osmolska, H. (eds.). The Dinosauria (2 ed.). University of California Press. pp. 184–195. ISBN 978-0-520-24209-8.
  11. ^ Holtz, T.R.; Brinkman, D.L.; Chandler, C.L. (1998). "Denticle morphometrics and a possibly omnivorous feeding habit for the theropod dinosaur Troodon". GAIA. 15: 159–166. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.211.684. ISSN 0871-5424.
  12. ^ Currie, P.J.; Zhiming, D. (2001). "New information on Cretaceous troodontids (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the People's Republic of China" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 38 (12): 1753–1766. Bibcode:2001CaJES..38.1753C. doi:10.1139/cjes-38-12-1753.
  13. ^ Hendrickx, C.; Hartman, S.A.; Mateus, O. (2015). "An overview on non-avian theropod discoveries and classification". PalArch's Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology (1): 1–73. ISSN 1567-2158. from the original on 2018-06-22. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
  14. ^ a b Norell, Mark A.; Clark, James M.; Dashzeveg, Demberelyin; Barsbold, Rhinchen; Chiappe, Luis M.; Davidson, Amy R.; McKenna, Malcolm C.; Perle, Altangerel; Novacek, Michael J. (November 4, 1994). "A theropod dinosaur embryo and the affinities of the Flaming Cliffs dinosaur eggs". Science. 266 (5186): 779–782. Bibcode:1994Sci...266..779N. doi:10.1126/science.266.5186.779. PMID 17730398. S2CID 22333224.
  15. ^ Mackovicky, Peter J.; Norell, Mark A. (2004). "Troodontidae". In Weishampel, David B.; Dodson, Peter; Osmólska, Halszka (eds.). The Dinosauria (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 184–195. ISBN 0-520-24209-2.
  16. ^ a b Brougham, J. (July 8, 2011). . Dinosaur Mail. Archived from the original on November 17, 2011.
  17. ^ Grellet-Tinner, G. (2005). "Chapter VII – An Egg Clutch of the Troodontid Byronosaurus jaffei from the Gobi Desert: Novel Perspectives on the Origin of the Avian Reproductive Physiology". A Phylogenetic Analysis of Oological Characters: A Case Study of Saurischian Dinosaur Relationships and Avian Evolution. pp. 105–117.
  18. ^ Grellet-Tinner, G. (2006). "Oology and the evolution of thermophysiology in saurischian dinosaurs: homeotherm and endotherm deinonychosaurians?". Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia. 46 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1590/S0031-10492006000100001. S2CID 162574571.

    byronosaurus, genus, troodontid, dinosaur, from, late, cretaceous, period, mongolia, temporal, range, late, cretaceous, preꞒ, diagram, showing, known, remainsscientific, classificationdomain, eukaryotakingdom, animaliaphylum, chordataclade, dinosauriaclade, sa. Byronosaurus is a genus of troodontid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous Period of Mongolia ByronosaurusTemporal range Late Cretaceous 80 75 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N Diagram showing known remainsScientific classificationDomain EukaryotaKingdom AnimaliaPhylum ChordataClade DinosauriaClade SaurischiaClade TheropodaFamily TroodontidaeSubfamily TroodontinaeGenus ByronosaurusNorell Makovicky amp Clark 2000Species B jaffeiBinomial name Byronosaurus jaffeiNorell Makovicky amp Clark 2000 Contents 1 Discovery and naming 2 Description 3 Classification 4 Palaeobiology 4 1 Diet 4 2 Reproduction 5 See also 6 ReferencesDiscovery and naming EditIn 1993 Michael Novacek a member of an American Museum of Natural History expedition to the Gobi Desert discovered the skeleton of a small theropod at Ukhaa Tolgod This was further excavated in 1994 and 1995 The find was illustrated in a publication in 1994 1 On 15 July 1996 at the Bolor s Hill site about eight kilometers five miles away from the original location a second specimen was discovered a skull In 2000 Mark Norell Peter Makovicky and James Clark named and described the type species Byronosaurus jaffei The species name as a whole honoured Byron Jaffe in recognition of his family s support for the Mongolian Academy of Sciences American Museum of Natural History Paleontological Expeditions 2 The holotype IGM 100 983 was found in a layer of the Djadochta Formation dating from the late Campanian It consists of a partial skeleton with skull It contains a partial skull with lower jaws three neck vertebrae three back vertebrae a piece of a sacral vertebra four partial tail vertebrae ribs the lower end of a thighbone the upper ends of a shinbone and calf bone a second metatarsal and three toe phalanges The paratype specimen IGM 100 984 is the skull found in 1996 of which only the snout has been preserved Both specimens are of adult individuals 2 In 2003 the type specimen of Byronosaurus was described in detail Makovicky and his colleagues found that Byronosaurus had a pneumatised snout with a sinus in each maxilla 3 In 2009 two front skulls and lower jaws of very young perhaps newly hatched individuals specimens IGM 100 972 and IGM 100 974 were referred to Byronosaurus after originally having been identified as Velociraptor exemplars Bever and Norell estimated that the skull length of IGM 100 972 and IGM 100 974 were about 22 6 cm 8 9 in and 25 4 cm 10 0 in respectively 4 In 2017 the researchers who described a troodontid Almas ukhaa suggested that the specimens described by Bever and Norell 2009 don t belong to Byronosaurus based on different features found in the skull such as the number of maxillary teeth in both specimens being significantly fewer than this genus They argued that these specimens are more closely related to A ukhaa than to B jaffei 5 Description Edit nbsp Life restorationByronosaurus was a small dinosaur measuring about 1 5 2 m 4 9 6 6 ft long and 50 cm 20 in tall it weighed only about 4 20 kg 8 8 44 1 lb 6 7 Unlike most other troodontids its teeth seem to lack serrations just like its closest relative Xixiasaurus probably a plesiomorphic trait among troodontids 4 8 The Ukhaa perinates show that Byronosaurus had a buccal maxillary groove and a recessed interfenestral bar 4 Classification Edit nbsp Maxillae of Byronosaurus compared with relativesThe following cladogram shows the position of Byronosaurus within Troodontidae according to a 2017 analysis by the palaeontologist Caizhi Shen and colleagues 9 MPC D 100 44Byronosaurus jaffeiXixiasaurus henanensisGM 100 1323 now Almas ukhaa GM 100 1126Jinfengopteryx elegansMei longSinovenator changiiDaliansaurus liaoningensisSinusonasus magnodensSinornithoides youngiTroodon formosusZanabazar juniorSaurornithoides mongoliensisPalaeobiology EditTroodontids had some of the highest encephalization quotients a measure of the ratio between actual brain size and the brain size predicted from body size among non avian dinosaurs As suggested by their large eye sockets and well developed middle ears they appear to have had keen senses They also had proportionately long legs which indicates they were agile 10 8 Diet Edit nbsp Comparison of troodontid teeth L is ByronosaurusDue to their large brains possible stereoscopic vision grasping hands and enlarged sickle claws troodontids were generally assumed to have been predatory In 1998 the palaeontologist Thomas R Holtz and colleagues pointed out that the serrations on the teeth of troodontids were different from those of typical carnivorous theropods in their large size and wide spacing which is similar to the condition in herbivorous dinosaurs including therizinosaurid theropods and lizards rather than carnivorous dinosaurs They suggested that this difference in coarseness may be related to the size and resistance of plant and meat fibres and that troodontids may have been herbivorous or omnivorous They also pointed out that some features that had been interpreted as predatory adaptations in troodontids were also found in herbivorous and omnivorous animals such as primates and raccoons 11 8 In 2001 the palaeontologists Philip J Currie and Dong Zhiming rejected the idea that troodontids could have been herbivorous They stated that troodontid anatomy was consistent with a carnivorous lifestyle and pointed out that the structure of their serrations was not much different from those of other theropods They noted that troodontid features such as sharply pointed serrations that curved up towards the tip of the teeth razor sharp enamel between the serrations and blood grooves at the bases were not seen in herbivorous dinosaurs which had simpler cone shaped serrations 12 Lu and colleagues discussed the previous studies of troodontid diet and suggested that the loss of serrations in the teeth of Byronosaurus and some other troodontids was related to a change in their diet Since the teeth would appear to have lost their typical ability to slice meat at least these troodontids may therefore have been either herbivorous or omnivorous 8 In 2015 the palaeontologist Christophe Hendrickx and colleagues suggested that basal or primitive troodontids with unserrated teeth were herbivorous whereas more derived troodontids with serrated teeth were carnivorous or omnivorous 13 Reproduction Edit nbsp Hatchling specimen IGM 100 972 at the AMNHMark Norell and colleagues described two perinate hatchlings or embryos close to hatching specimens of Byronosaurus specimens IGM 100 972 and IGM 100 974 in 1994 The two specimens were found in a nest of oviraptorid eggs in the Late Cretaceous Flaming Cliffs of the Djadochta Formation of Mongolia The nest is quite certainly that of an oviraptorosaur since an oviraptorid embryo is still preserved inside one of the eggs The two partial skulls were first described by Norell et al 1994 as dromaeosaurids but reassigned to Byronosaurus after further study 4 14 15 The juvenile skulls were either from hatchlings or embryos and fragments of eggshell are adhered to them although it seems to be oviraptorid eggshell The presence of tiny Byronosaurus skulls in an oviraptorid nest was considered an enigma Hypotheses explaining how they came to be there included that they were the prey of the adult oviraptorid that they were there to prey on oviraptorid hatchlings or that an adult Byronosaurus may have laid eggs in a Citipati nest see nest parasite 14 However these interpretations have all been shown to not be the case In 2011 Norell stated that the Byronosaurus nest was found two metres uphill from the oviraptorid nest with the oviraptorid nest at the end of a drainage course from the Byronosaurus nest suggesting that the baby Byronosaurus skulls must have been washed from one nest to the other 16 This claim has been already confirmed in 2005 by Gerald Grellet Tinner who noted the presence of a troodontid nest IGM 100 1003x close to the Citipati nest containing the juvenile troodontid skulls 17 Norell is officially preparing to publish this information with more important details 16 Not only is the claim regarding nest parasitism considered dubious but other researchers have pointed out the differences in skull morphology suggesting that these specimens do not belong to this genus 5 The eggs of Byronosaurus and other troodontids are not paired unlike oviraptorids like Citipati but are nearly vertically embedded with their round poles up and are exposed barely above the sediment 18 See also Edit nbsp Dinosaurs portalTimeline of troodontid researchReferences Edit Novacek M J Norell M A McKenna M C Clark J M 1994 Fossils of the Flaming Cliffs Scientific American 271 6 60 69 Bibcode 1994SciAm 271f 60N doi 10 1038 scientificamerican1294 60 JSTOR 24942946 a b Norell M A Makovicky P J Clark J M 2000 A new troodontid theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod Mongolia Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20 1 7 11 doi 10 1671 0272 4634 2000 020 0007 ANTTFU 2 0 CO 2 S2CID 51833414 Makovicky P J Norell M A Clark J M Rowe T E 2003 Osteology and relationships of Byronosaurus jaffei Theropoda Troodontidae PDF American Museum Novitates 3402 1 32 doi 10 1206 0003 0082 2003 402 lt 0001 oarobj gt 2 0 co 2 S2CID 51824767 Archived from the original PDF on 2007 03 16 Retrieved 2007 02 04 a b c d Bever G S Norell M A 2009 The perinate skull of Byronosaurus Troodontidae with observations on the cranial ontogeny of paravian theropods American Museum Novitates 3657 1 51 doi 10 1206 650 1 ISSN 0003 0082 a b Pei R Norell M A Barta D E Bever G S Pittman M Xu Xing 2017 Osteology of a New Late Cretaceous Troodontid Specimen from Ukhaa Tolgod Omnogovi Aimag Mongolia American Museum Novitates 3889 1 47 doi 10 1206 3889 1 S2CID 90883541 Long J A Schouten P 2008 Feathered Dinosaurs The Origin of Birds p 155 ISBN 978 0195372663 Paul Gregory S 2016 The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs Princeton University Press p 158 ISBN 978 1 78684 190 2 OCLC 985402380 a b c d Junchang Lu Li Xu Yongqing Liu Xingliao Zhang Songhai Jia amp Qiang Ji 2010 A new troodontid Theropoda Troodontidae from the Late Cretaceous of central China and the radiation of Asian troodontids PDF Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55 3 381 388 doi 10 4202 app 2009 0047 Shen C Lu J Liu S Kundrat M Brusatte S L Gao H 2017 A new troodontid dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation of Liaoning Province China PDF Acta Geologica Sinica English Edition 91 3 763 780 doi 10 1111 1755 6724 13307 hdl 20 500 11820 dc010682 fce0 4db4 bef6 7b2b29f5be8a S2CID 129939153 Makovicky P J Norell M A 2004 Troodontidae In Weishampel D B Dodson P Osmolska H eds The Dinosauria 2 ed University of California Press pp 184 195 ISBN 978 0 520 24209 8 Holtz T R Brinkman D L Chandler C L 1998 Denticle morphometrics and a possibly omnivorous feeding habit for the theropod dinosaur Troodon GAIA 15 159 166 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 211 684 ISSN 0871 5424 Currie P J Zhiming D 2001 New information on Cretaceous troodontids Dinosauria Theropoda from the People s Republic of China PDF Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38 12 1753 1766 Bibcode 2001CaJES 38 1753C doi 10 1139 cjes 38 12 1753 Hendrickx C Hartman S A Mateus O 2015 An overview on non avian theropod discoveries and classification PalArch s Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology 1 1 73 ISSN 1567 2158 Archived from the original on 2018 06 22 Retrieved 2018 12 04 a b Norell Mark A Clark James M Dashzeveg Demberelyin Barsbold Rhinchen Chiappe Luis M Davidson Amy R McKenna Malcolm C Perle Altangerel Novacek Michael J November 4 1994 A theropod dinosaur embryo and the affinities of the Flaming Cliffs dinosaur eggs Science 266 5186 779 782 Bibcode 1994Sci 266 779N doi 10 1126 science 266 5186 779 PMID 17730398 S2CID 22333224 Mackovicky Peter J Norell Mark A 2004 Troodontidae In Weishampel David B Dodson Peter Osmolska Halszka eds The Dinosauria 2nd ed Berkeley University of California Press pp 184 195 ISBN 0 520 24209 2 a b Brougham J July 8 2011 Troodontid skulls in other nests the answer Dinosaur Mail Archived from the original on November 17 2011 Grellet Tinner G 2005 Chapter VII An Egg Clutch of the Troodontid Byronosaurus jaffei from the Gobi Desert Novel Perspectives on the Origin of the Avian Reproductive Physiology A Phylogenetic Analysis of Oological Characters A Case Study of Saurischian Dinosaur Relationships and Avian Evolution pp 105 117 Grellet Tinner G 2006 Oology and the evolution of thermophysiology in saurischian dinosaurs homeotherm and endotherm deinonychosaurians Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 46 1 1 10 doi 10 1590 S0031 10492006000100001 S2CID 162574571 Dinosauria com Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Byronosaurus amp oldid 1166495940, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

    article

    , read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.