fbpx
Wikipedia

Walter Bauer

Walter Bauer (German: [ˈbaʊɐ]; 8 August 1877 – 17 November 1960) was a German theologian, lexicographer of New Testament Greek, and scholar of the development of Early Christianity.

Walter Bauer

Life

Bauer was born in Königsberg, East Prussia, and raised in Marburg,[1] where his father was a professor. He studied theology at the universities of Marburg, Strassburg, and Berlin. Bauer taught at Breslau and Göttingen, where he later died.

Work

Bauer's most famous and influential work is his 1934 book Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum (Tübingen; a second edition in 1964, edited by Georg Strecker, was translated as Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity in a 1971 English edition). In it, Bauer developed his thesis that in earliest Christianity, orthodoxy and heresy do not stand in relation to one another as primary to secondary. In many regions, beliefs that would be considered "heresy" centuries later were the original and accepted form of Christianity.[2] Bauer pushed against the overwhelmingly dominant view that for the period of Christian origins, ecclesiastical doctrine already represented what is primary, while heresies, on the other hand somehow are a deviation from the genuine.[3] This was the view from the major Church historians of the era such as Eusebius, whose book Church History portrayed orthodox Christianity as descending from Jesus's clear teachings, and heresies as unusual offshoots by people who are evil, misled by the devil, and so on.

Through studies of historical records, Bauer concluded that what came to be known as orthodoxy was just one of numerous forms of Christianity in the early centuries. It was the eventual form of Christianity practiced in the 4th century that influenced the development of orthodoxy[4] and acquired the majority of converts over time. This was largely due to the conversion to Christianity of the Roman Emperor Constantine I and consequently the greater resources available to the Christians in the eastern Roman empire capital he established (Constantinople). Practitioners of what became orthodoxy then rewrote the history of the conflict making it appear that this view had always been the majority one. Writings in support of other views were systematically destroyed.

Bauer's conclusions contradicted nearly 1,600 years of writing on church history and thus were met with much skepticism among Christian academics such as Walther Völker.[5]

The cultural isolation of Nazi Germany precluded a wider dissemination of Bauer's ideas until after World War II; in the international field of biblical scholarship, Bauer continued to be known solely as the compiler of the monumental Wörterbuch zu den Schriften des Neuen Testaments (in its English translation A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature or the Bauer Lexicon), which has become standard. Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei was finally translated into English in 1970 and published in 1971.[6] Since then, Bauer's view has gained prominence and grudging acceptance; events since the original 1934 publication date, such as the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945, have generally supported Bauer's thesis by showing a much broader and diverse range of Christianities than the classical view would have expected.

Reception

Bauer's translator, Robert A. Kraft, praised his sophisticated, nuanced writing style, which:

[...] presents a complex and frustrating problem for the translator who hopes to capture something of the "tone" or "flavor" of the original as well as representing accurately its content. Bauer writes in a dynamic and highly sophisticated manner, mixing precision with irony and even insinuation, pictorial language with careful presentation of the historical evidence, hypotheses and caveats with the subtle use of overstatement and understatement in cleverly nuanced expressions. His German is literary but not necessarily formal. Long sentences with closely interrelated parts appear alongside brief, sometimes cryptic or oblique comments couched in clever, often scholarly German idiom. Frequently the presentation flows along rapidly in an exciting manner, despite the difficulties of the subject matter— but its flow is such that the motion is difficult to capture in translation, and is sometimes even difficult to follow in the original.

An early critic of the Bauer thesis, Anglican theologian H. E. W. Turner in his Bampton Lectures, delivered at Oxford in 1954, said of Bauer, "His fatal weakness appears to be a persistent tendency to over-simplify problems, combined with the ruthless treatment of such evidence as fails to support his case. [...] Perhaps the root difficulty is that Bauer fails to attain an adequate view of the nature of orthodoxy. [...] For the nature of orthodoxy is richer and more varied than Bauer himself allows."[7]

A later book critiquing Bauer's thesis and the subsequent work Bart Erhman did espousing and expanding Bauer's thesis is The Heresy of Orthodoxy by Andreas J. Kostenberger and Michael Kruger, published in 2010, which addresses the thesis on the basis of historical, philosophical and theological argument.[8]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Boring, M. Eugene (2007). "Bauer, Walter". In McKim, Donald K. (ed.). Dictionary of major biblical interpreters (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic. p. 172. ISBN 978-0-8308-2927-9.
  2. ^ Behr, John (2013). Irenaeus of Lyons: Identifying Christianity. OUP Oxford. pp. 5–6. ISBN 978-0-19-166781-7. [Walter Bauer claimed] that Christianity was a diverse phenomenon from the beginning, that 'varieties of Christianity' arose around the Mediterranean, and that in some places what would later be called 'heretical' was initially normative. [...] Although some of Bauer's reconstructions are inaccurate and have been dropped, the idea that Christianity was originally a diverse phenomenon has now been generally accepted.
  3. ^ Bauer (1964:3f) instanced Origen, Commentarius II in Cant., and Sel. in Proverb. and Tertullian, De praescript. haer. 36 as espousing the traditional theory of the relation of heresy.
  4. ^ See Bauer's concise epitome of Rechtgläubigkeit in Bauer, Aufsätze und Kleine Schriften, Georg Strecker, ed. Tübingen, 1967, pp 229-33.
  5. ^ Reviews and responses to Bauer are cited in Georg Strecker, "Die Aufnahme des Buches" in Rechtgläubigkeit, 1964, pp 288-306; a "completely revised and expanded version of Strecker's essay by Robert A. Kraft appears in the English translation, 1971, pp 286-316; see also Daniel J. Harrington, "The Reception of Walter Bauer's "Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity" during the Last Decade", The Harvard Theological Review 73.1/2 (January - April 1980), pp. 289–298.
  6. ^ Helmut Koester, "Häretiker im Urchristentum" RGG, 3rd ed. III pp 17-21, gives a bibliography of works influenced by Bauer.
  7. ^ Turner, H. E. W. (1954). The Pattern of Christian Truth: A Study of the Relations between Orthodoxy and Heresy in the Early Church. London: A. R. Mowbray. Reprint: Eugene, Ore.: Wipf & Stock, 2004. pp. 78, 80. ISBN 978-1-59244-982-8
  8. ^ Köstenberger, Andreas J.; Kruger, Michael J. (2010). The Heresy of Orthodoxy: How Contemporary Culture's Fascination with Diversity Has Reshaped Our Understanding of Early Christianity. ISBN 978-1433501432.

References

  • Walter, Bauer (2000). Danker, Frederick W. (ed.). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (Third ed.). Chicago. ISBN 9780226039336. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  • Walter Bauer, 1971. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity (Philadelphia: Fortress) ISBN 0-8006-1363-5 (on-line: Updated Electronic English Edition by Robert A. Kraft, 1993).
  • Bart D Ehrman, 2002. Lost Christianities: Christian Scriptures and the Battles over Authentication (Chantilly VA: The Teaching Company), Lesson 19, pg 28.
Early criticism
  • David L Hawkin, "Thirty Years Later: a retrospective on the significance of H. E. W. Turner's The Pattern of Christian Truth," in Churchman 99.1 (1985): 51-56.
  • Walther Völker, "Walter Bauer's Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum", translated by Thomas P. Scheck in Journal of Early Christian Studies 14.4 (2006): 399-405. Originally published in Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 54 (1935): 628–31.

walter, bauer, biographer, novelist, poet, writer, german, ˈbaʊɐ, august, 1877, november, 1960, german, theologian, lexicographer, testament, greek, scholar, development, early, christianity, contents, life, work, reception, also, notes, referenceslife, editba. For the biographer novelist and poet see Walter Bauer writer Walter Bauer German ˈbaʊɐ 8 August 1877 17 November 1960 was a German theologian lexicographer of New Testament Greek and scholar of the development of Early Christianity Walter Bauer Contents 1 Life 2 Work 3 Reception 4 See also 5 Notes 6 ReferencesLife EditBauer was born in Konigsberg East Prussia and raised in Marburg 1 where his father was a professor He studied theology at the universities of Marburg Strassburg and Berlin Bauer taught at Breslau and Gottingen where he later died Work EditBauer s most famous and influential work is his 1934 book Rechtglaubigkeit und Ketzerei im altesten Christentum Tubingen a second edition in 1964 edited by Georg Strecker was translated as Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity in a 1971 English edition In it Bauer developed his thesis that in earliest Christianity orthodoxy and heresy do not stand in relation to one another as primary to secondary In many regions beliefs that would be considered heresy centuries later were the original and accepted form of Christianity 2 Bauer pushed against the overwhelmingly dominant view that for the period of Christian origins ecclesiastical doctrine already represented what is primary while heresies on the other hand somehow are a deviation from the genuine 3 This was the view from the major Church historians of the era such as Eusebius whose book Church History portrayed orthodox Christianity as descending from Jesus s clear teachings and heresies as unusual offshoots by people who are evil misled by the devil and so on Through studies of historical records Bauer concluded that what came to be known as orthodoxy was just one of numerous forms of Christianity in the early centuries It was the eventual form of Christianity practiced in the 4th century that influenced the development of orthodoxy 4 and acquired the majority of converts over time This was largely due to the conversion to Christianity of the Roman Emperor Constantine I and consequently the greater resources available to the Christians in the eastern Roman empire capital he established Constantinople Practitioners of what became orthodoxy then rewrote the history of the conflict making it appear that this view had always been the majority one Writings in support of other views were systematically destroyed Bauer s conclusions contradicted nearly 1 600 years of writing on church history and thus were met with much skepticism among Christian academics such as Walther Volker 5 The cultural isolation of Nazi Germany precluded a wider dissemination of Bauer s ideas until after World War II in the international field of biblical scholarship Bauer continued to be known solely as the compiler of the monumental Worterbuch zu den Schriften des Neuen Testaments in its English translation A Greek English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature or the Bauer Lexicon which has become standard Rechtglaubigkeit und Ketzerei was finally translated into English in 1970 and published in 1971 6 Since then Bauer s view has gained prominence and grudging acceptance events since the original 1934 publication date such as the discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945 have generally supported Bauer s thesis by showing a much broader and diverse range of Christianities than the classical view would have expected Reception EditBauer s translator Robert A Kraft praised his sophisticated nuanced writing style which presents a complex and frustrating problem for the translator who hopes to capture something of the tone or flavor of the original as well as representing accurately its content Bauer writes in a dynamic and highly sophisticated manner mixing precision with irony and even insinuation pictorial language with careful presentation of the historical evidence hypotheses and caveats with the subtle use of overstatement and understatement in cleverly nuanced expressions His German is literary but not necessarily formal Long sentences with closely interrelated parts appear alongside brief sometimes cryptic or oblique comments couched in clever often scholarly German idiom Frequently the presentation flows along rapidly in an exciting manner despite the difficulties of the subject matter but its flow is such that the motion is difficult to capture in translation and is sometimes even difficult to follow in the original An early critic of the Bauer thesis Anglican theologian H E W Turner in his Bampton Lectures delivered at Oxford in 1954 said of Bauer His fatal weakness appears to be a persistent tendency to over simplify problems combined with the ruthless treatment of such evidence as fails to support his case Perhaps the root difficulty is that Bauer fails to attain an adequate view of the nature of orthodoxy For the nature of orthodoxy is richer and more varied than Bauer himself allows 7 A later book critiquing Bauer s thesis and the subsequent work Bart Erhman did espousing and expanding Bauer s thesis is The Heresy of Orthodoxy by Andreas J Kostenberger and Michael Kruger published in 2010 which addresses the thesis on the basis of historical philosophical and theological argument 8 See also EditChristian heresy F Wilbur Gingrich Bauer s Lexicon Proto orthodox ChristianityNotes Edit Boring M Eugene 2007 Bauer Walter In McKim Donald K ed Dictionary of major biblical interpreters 2nd ed Downers Grove Ill IVP Academic p 172 ISBN 978 0 8308 2927 9 Behr John 2013 Irenaeus of Lyons Identifying Christianity OUP Oxford pp 5 6 ISBN 978 0 19 166781 7 Walter Bauer claimed that Christianity was a diverse phenomenon from the beginning that varieties of Christianity arose around the Mediterranean and that in some places what would later be called heretical was initially normative Although some of Bauer s reconstructions are inaccurate and have been dropped the idea that Christianity was originally a diverse phenomenon has now been generally accepted Bauer 1964 3f instanced Origen Commentarius II in Cant and Sel in Proverb and Tertullian De praescript haer 36 as espousing the traditional theory of the relation of heresy See Bauer s concise epitome of Rechtglaubigkeit in Bauer Aufsatze und Kleine Schriften Georg Strecker ed Tubingen 1967 pp 229 33 Reviews and responses to Bauer are cited in Georg Strecker Die Aufnahme des Buches in Rechtglaubigkeit 1964 pp 288 306 a completely revised and expanded version of Strecker s essay by Robert A Kraft appears in the English translation 1971 pp 286 316 see also Daniel J Harrington The Reception of Walter Bauer s Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity during the Last Decade The Harvard Theological Review 73 1 2 January April 1980 pp 289 298 Helmut Koester Haretiker im Urchristentum RGG 3rd ed III pp 17 21 gives a bibliography of works influenced by Bauer Turner H E W 1954 The Pattern of Christian Truth A Study of the Relations between Orthodoxy and Heresy in the Early Church London A R Mowbray Reprint Eugene Ore Wipf amp Stock 2004 pp 78 80 ISBN 978 1 59244 982 8 Kostenberger Andreas J Kruger Michael J 2010 The Heresy of Orthodoxy How Contemporary Culture s Fascination with Diversity Has Reshaped Our Understanding of Early Christianity ISBN 978 1433501432 References EditWalter Bauer 2000 Danker Frederick W ed A Greek English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature Third ed Chicago ISBN 9780226039336 Retrieved 16 December 2021 Walter Bauer 1971 Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity Philadelphia Fortress ISBN 0 8006 1363 5 on line Updated Electronic English Edition by Robert A Kraft 1993 Bart D Ehrman 2002 Lost Christianities Christian Scriptures and the Battles over Authentication Chantilly VA The Teaching Company Lesson 19 pg 28 Early criticismDavid L Hawkin Thirty Years Later a retrospective on the significance of H E W Turner s The Pattern of Christian Truth in Churchman 99 1 1985 51 56 Walther Volker Walter Bauer s Rechtglaubigkeit und Ketzerei im altesten Christentum translated by Thomas P Scheck in Journal of Early Christian Studies 14 4 2006 399 405 Originally published in Zeitschrift fur Kirchengeschichte 54 1935 628 31 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Walter Bauer amp oldid 1142121414, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.