Silica cycle

The silica cycle is the biogeochemical cycle in which biogenic silica is transported between the Earth's systems. Silicon is considered a bioessential element and is one of the most abundant elements on Earth.^[2][3] The silica cycle has significant overlap with the carbon cycle (see carbonate–silicate cycle) and plays an important role in the sequestration of carbon through continental weathering, biogenic export and burial as oozes on geologic timescales.^[4]

Silicon cycle and balance in the modern world ocean ^[1]

Input, output, and biological silicon fluxes, with possible balance. Total silicon inputs = total silicon outputs = 15.6 Tmol Si yr⁻¹ in reasonable agreement with the individual range of each flux. White arrows represent fluxes of net sources of dissolved silicic acid and/or of dissolvable amorphous silica and of dissolved silicic acid recycled fluxes. Orange arrows represent sink fluxes of silicon, either as biogenic silica or as authigenic silica. Green arrows correspond to biological (pelagic) fluxes. Values of flux as published by Tréguer & De La Rocha.^[1]

Fluxes in teramoles of silicon per year (Tmol Si yr⁻¹).

Overview

Silicon is the seventh most abundant element in the universe and the second most abundant element in the Earth's crust (the most abundant is oxygen). The weathering of the Earth's crust by rainwater rich in carbon dioxide is a key process in the control of atmospheric carbon dioxide.^[5][6] It results in the generation of silicic acid in aqueous environments. Silicic acid, Si(OH)₄, is a hydrated form of silica found only as an unstable solution in water, yet it plays a central role in the silica cycle.^[1]

Silicifiers are organisms that use silicic acid to precipitate biogenic silica, SiO₂. Biogenic silica, also referred to as opal, is precipitated by silicifiers as internal structures^[7] and/or external structures.^[8] Silicifiers are among the most important aquatic organisms. They include micro-organisms such as diatoms, rhizarians, silicoflagellates and several species of choanoflagellates, as well as macro-organisms such as siliceous sponges. Phototrophic silicifiers, such as diatoms, globally consume vast amounts of silicon along with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and inorganic carbon (C), connecting the biogeochemistry of these elements and contributing to the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the ocean.^[9] Heterotrophic organisms like rhizarians, choanoflagellates, and sponges produce biogenic silica independently of the photoautotrophic processing of C and N.^{[10][8][11][1]}

The diatoms dominate the fixation and export of particulate matter in the contemporary marine silica cycle. This includes the export of organic carbon from the euphotic zone to the deep ocean via the biological carbon pump. As a result, diatoms, and other silica-secreting organisms play crucial roles in the global carbon cycle by sequestering carbon in the ocean. The connection between biogenic silica and organic carbon, together with the significantly higher preservation potential of biogenic siliceous compounds compared to organic carbon makes opal accumulation records of interest in paleoceanography and paleoclimatology.

Understanding the silica cycle is important for understanding the functioning of marine food webs, biogeochemical cycles, and the biological pump. Silicic acid is delivered to the ocean through six pathways as illustrated in the diagram above, which all ultimately derive from the weathering of the Earth's crust.^[12][1]

Terrestrial silica cycling

Silica is an important nutrient utilized by plants, trees, and grasses in the terrestrial biosphere. Silicate is transported by rivers and can be deposited in soils in the form of various siliceous polymorphs. Plants can readily uptake silicate in the form of H₄SiO₄ for the formation of phytoliths. Phytoliths are tiny rigid structures found within plant cells that aid in the structural integrity of the plant.^[2] Phytoliths also serve to protect the plants from consumption by herbivores who are unable to consume and digest silica-rich plants efficiently.^[2] Silica release from phytolith degradation or dissolution is estimated to occur at a rate double that of global silicate mineral weathering.^[3] Considering biogeochemical cycling within ecosystems, the import and export of silica to and from terrestrial ecosystems is small.

Weathering

Silicate minerals are abundant in rock formations all over the planet, comprising approximately 90% of the Earth's crust.^[4] The primary source of silicate to the terrestrial biosphere is weathering. The process and rate of weathering is variable, depending on rainfall, runoff, vegetation, lithology, and topography.

Given sufficient time, rainwater can dissolve even a highly resistant silicate-based mineral such as quartz.^[13] Water breaks the bonds between atoms in the crystal:^[14] 

The overall reaction for the dissolution of quartz results in silicic acid

SiO₂ + 2H₂O → H₄SiO₄

Another example of a silicate-based mineral is enstatite (MgSiO₃). Rainwater weathers this to silicic acid as follows:^[15]

${\displaystyle {\ce {MgSiO3(s) + 2CO2(g) + H2O(l) = Mg2+(aq) + 2HCO3- (aq) + SiO2(aq)}}}$ 

Reverse weathering

See also: Reverse weathering

In recent years, the effect of reverse weathering on biogenic silica has been of interest in quantifying the silica cycle. During weathering, dissolved silica is delivered to oceans through glacial runoff and riverine inputs.^[16] This dissolved silica is taken up by a multitude of marine organisms, such as diatoms, and is used to create protective shells.^[16] When these organisms die, they sink through the water column.^[16] Without active production of biogenic SiO₂, the mineral begins diagenesis.^[16] Conversion of this dissolved silica into authigenic silicate clays through the process of reverse weathering constitutes a removal of 20-25% of silicon input.^[17]

Reverse weathering is often found in river deltas as these systems have high sediment accumulation rates and are observed to undergo rapid diagenesis.^[18] The formation of silicate clays removes reactive silica from the pore waters of sediment, increasing the concentration of silica found in the rocks that form in these locations.^[18]

Silicate weathering also appears to be a dominant process in deeper methanogenic sediments, whereas reverse weathering is more common in surface sediments, but still occurs at a lower rate.^[19]

Sinks

The major sink of the terrestrial silica cycle is export to the ocean by rivers. Silica that is stored in plant matter or dissolved can be exported to the ocean by rivers. The rate of this transport is approximately 6 Tmol Si yr⁻¹.^[20][3] This is the major sink of the terrestrial silica cycle, as well as the largest source of the marine silica cycle.^[20] A minor sink for terrestrial silica is silicate that is deposited in terrestrial sediments and eventually exported to the Earth's crust.

Marine inputs

•  

  Inputs to the marine silica cycle
  adapted from Treguer et al., 1995^[21]

Riverine

As of 2021, the best estimate of the total riverine input of silicic acid is 6.2 (±1.8) Tmol Si yr⁻¹.^[12] This is based on data representing 60% of the world river discharge and a discharge-weighted average silicic acid riverine concentration of 158 µM−Si.^[22][12] However, silicic acid is not the only way silicon can be transferred from terrestrial to riverine systems, since particulate silicon can also be mobilised in crystallised or amorphous forms.^[22] According to Saccone and others in 2007,^[23] the term "amorphous silica" includes biogenic silica (from phytoliths, freshwater diatoms, sponge spicules), altered biogenic silica, and pedogenic silicates, the three of which can have similar high solubilities and reactivities. Delivery of amorphous silica to the fluvial system has been reviewed by Frings and others in 2016,^[24] who suggested a value of 1.9(±1.0) Tmol Si yr⁻¹. Therefore, the total riverine input is 8.1(±2.0) Tmol Si yr⁻¹.^[1]

Aeolian

No progress has been made regarding aeolian dust deposition into the ocean ^[25] and subsequent release of silicic acid via dust dissolution in seawater since 2013, when Tréguer and De La Rocha summed the flux of particulate dissolvable silica and wet deposition of silicic acid through precipitation.^[12] Thus, the best estimate for the aeolian flux of silicic acid, FA, remains 0.5(±0.5) Tmol Si yr⁻¹.^[1]

Sandy beaches

A 2019 study has proposed that, in the surf zone of beaches, wave action disturbed abiotic sand grains and dissolved them over time.^[26] To test this, the researchers placed sand samples in closed containers with different kinds of water and rotated the containers to simulate wave action. They discovered that the higher the rock/water ratio within the container, and the faster the container spun, the more silica dissolved into solution. After analyzing and upscaling their results, they estimated that anywhere from 3.2 ± 1.0 – 5.0 ± 2.0 Tmol Si yr⁻¹ of lithogenic DSi could enter the ocean from sandy beaches, a massive increase from a previous estimate of 0.3 Tmol Si yr⁻¹.^[27] If confirmed, this represents a significant input of dissolved LSi that was previously ignored.^[26][1]

Marine silica cycling

 

Marine^[28] and terrestrial^{[3][29][30][31][18]} contributions to the silica cycle are shown, with the relative movement (flux) provided in units of Tmol Si/yr.^[20] Marine biological production primarily comes from diatoms.^[32] Estuary biological production is due to sponges.^[33] Values of flux as published by Tréguer & De La Rocha.^[20] Reservoir size of silicate rocks, as discussed in the sources section, is 1.5x10²¹ Tmol.^[34]

 

Low-temperature processes controlling silicon dissolution in seawater ^[1]

Siliceous organisms in the ocean, such as diatoms and radiolaria, are the primary sink of dissolved silicic acid into opal silica.^[32] Only 3% of the Si molecules dissolved in the ocean are exported and permanently deposited in marine sediments on the seafloor each year, demonstrating that silicon recycling is a dominant process in the oceans.^[3] This rapid recycling is dependent on the dissolution of silica in organic matter in the water column, followed by biological uptake in the photic zone. The estimated residence time of the silica biological reservoir is about 400 years.^[3] Opal silica is predominately undersaturated in the world's oceans. This undersaturation promotes rapid dissolution as a result of constant recycling and long residence times. The estimated turnover time of Si is 1.5x10⁴ years.^[20] The total net inputs and outputs of silica in the ocean are 9.4 ± 4.7 Tmol Si yr⁻¹ and 9.9 ± 7.3 Tmol Si yr⁻¹, respectively.^[20]

Biogenic silica production in the photic zone is estimated to be 240 ± 40 Tmol Si year ⁻¹.^[20] Dissolution in the surface removes roughly 135 Tmol Si year⁻¹, while the remaining Si is exported to the deep ocean within sinking particles.^[3] In the deep ocean, another 26.2 Tmol Si Year⁻¹ is dissolved before being deposited to the sediments as opal rain.^[3]  Over 90% of the silica here is dissolved, recycled and eventually upwelled for use again in the euphotic zone.^[3]

Sources

The major sources of marine silica include rivers, groundwater flux, seafloor weathering inputs, hydrothermal vents, and atmospheric deposition (aeolian flux).^[15]  Rivers are by far the largest source of silica to the marine environment, accounting for up to 90% of all the silica delivered to the ocean.^[15][20][35] A source of silica to the marine biological silica cycle is silica that has been recycled by upwelling from the deep ocean and seafloor.

The diagram on low-temperature processes shows how these can control the dissolution of (either amorphous or crystallized) siliceous minerals in seawater in and to the coastal zone and in the deep ocean, feeding submarine groundwater (F_GW) and dissolved silicon in seawater and sediments (F_W).^[1] These processes correspond to both low and medium energy flux dissipated per volume of a given siliceous particle in the coastal zone, in the continental margins, and in the abysses and to high-energy flux dissipated in the surf zone.^[1]

Sinks

Rapid dissolution in the surface removes roughly 135 Tmol opal Si year⁻¹, converting it back to soluble silicic acid that can be used again for biomineralization.^[20] The remaining opal silica is exported to the deep ocean in sinking particles.^[20] In the deep ocean, another 26.2 Tmol Si Year⁻¹ is dissolved before being deposited to the sediments as opal silica.^[20]  At the sediment water interface, over 90% of the silica is recycled and upwelled for use again in the photic zone.^[20] Biogenic silica production in the photic zone is estimated to be 240 ± 40 Tmol si year ⁻¹.^[36] The residence time on a biological timescale is estimated to be about 400 years, with each molecule of silica recycled 25 times before sediment burial.^[20]

Deep seafloor deposition is the largest long-term sink of the marine silica cycle (6.3 ± 3.6 Tmol Si year⁻¹), and is roughly balanced by the sources of silica to the ocean.^[15] The silica deposited in the deep ocean is primarily in the form of siliceous ooze. When opal silica accumulates faster than it dissolves, it is buried and can provide a diagenetic environment for marine chert formation.^[37]  The processes leading to chert formation have been observed in the Southern Ocean, where siliceous ooze accumulation is the fastest.^[37]  Chert formation however can take tens of millions of years.^[38] Skeleton fragments from siliceous organisms are subject to recrystallization and cementation.^[37] Chert is the main fate of buried siliceous ooze and permanently removes silica from the oceanic silica cycle.

The siliceous ooze is eventually subducted under the crust and metamorphosed in the upper mantle.^[39] Under the mantle, silicate minerals are formed in oozes and eventually uplifted to the surface. At the surface, silica can enter the cycle again through weathering.^[39] This process can take tens of millions of years.^[39] The only other major sink of silica in the ocean is burial along continental margins (3.6 ± 3.7 Tmol Si year ⁻¹), primarily in the form of siliceous sponges.^[15] Due to the high degrees of uncertainty in source and sink estimations, it's difficult to conclude if the marine silica cycle is in equilibrium. The residence time of silica in the oceans is estimated to be about 10,000 years.^[15] Silica can also be removed from the cycle by becoming chert and being permanently buried.

Anthropogenic influences

The rise in agriculture of the past 400 years has increased the exposure rocks and soils, which has resulted in increased rates of silicate weathering. In turn, the leaching of amorphous silica stocks from soils has also increased, delivering higher concentrations of dissolved silica in rivers.^[15] Conversely, increased damming has led to a reduction in silica supply to the ocean due to uptake by freshwater diatoms behind dams. The dominance of non-siliceous phytoplankton due to anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus loading and enhanced silica dissolution in warmer waters has the potential to limit silicon ocean sediment export in the future.^[15]

In 2019 a group of scientists suggested acidification is reducing diatom silica production in the Southern Ocean.^[40][41]

 

Diatom

 

Radiolarian

Changes in ocean silicic acid can make it difficult for the marine microorganisms that construct silica shells

•  

  Concentration of silicic acid in the upper pelagic zone,^[42] showing high levels in the Southern Ocean

Role in climate regulation

The silica cycle plays an important role in long term global climate regulation. The global silica cycle also has large effects on the global carbon cycle through the carbonate-silicate cycle.^[43] The process of silicate mineral weathering transfers atmospheric CO₂ to the hydrologic cycle through the chemical reaction displayed above.^[4] Over geologic timescales, the rates of weathering change due to tectonic activity. During a time of high uplift rate, silicate weathering increases which results in high CO₂ uptake rates, offsetting increased volcanic CO₂ emissions associated with the geologic activity. This balance of weathering and volcanoes is part of what controls the greenhouse effect and ocean pH over geologic time scales.

Biogenic silica accumulation on the sea floor contains lot of information about where in the ocean export production has occurred on time scales ranging from hundreds to millions of years. For this reason, opal deposition records provide valuable information regarding large-scale oceanographic reorganizations in the geological past, as well as paleoproductivity. The mean oceanic residence time for silicate is approximately 10,000–15,000 yr. This relative short residence time, makes oceanic silicate concentrations and fluxes sensitive to glacial/interglacial perturbations, and thus an excellent proxy for evaluating climate changes.^[44][45]

Isotope ratios of oxygen (O¹⁸:O¹⁶) and silicon (Si³⁰:Si²⁸) are analysed from biogenic silica preserved in lake and marine sediments to derive records of past climate change and nutrient cycling (De La Rocha, 2006; Leng and Barker, 2006). This is a particularly valuable approach considering the role of diatoms in global carbon cycling. In addition, isotope analyses from BSi are useful for tracing past climate changes in regions such as in the Southern Ocean, where few biogenic carbonates are preserved.

The silicon isotope compositions in fossil sponge spicules (δ30Si) are being increasingly often used to estimate the level of silicic acid in marine settings throughout the geological history, which enables the reconstruction of past silica cycles.^[46]

See also

• Carbon cycle
• Lithogenic silica
• Oxygen cycle
• Silicification
• Silicon isotope biogeochemistry

References

1. Tréguer, Paul J.; Sutton, Jill N.; Brzezinski, Mark; Charette, Matthew A.; et al. (2021). "Reviews and syntheses: The biogeochemical cycle of silicon in the modern ocean". Biogeosciences. 18 (4): 1269–1289. Bibcode:2021BGeo...18.1269T. doi:10.5194/bg-18-1269-2021. S2CID 233993801.  Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2. Hunt, J. W.; Dean, A. P.; Webster, R. E.; Johnson, G. N.; Ennos, A. R. (2008). "A Novel Mechanism by which Silica Defends Grasses Against Herbivory". Annals of Botany. 102 (4): 653–656. doi:10.1093/aob/mcn130. ISSN 1095-8290. PMC 2701777. PMID 18697757.
3. Conley, Daniel J. (December 2002). "Terrestrial ecosystems and the global biogeochemical silica cycle". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 16 (4): 68–1–68–8. Bibcode:2002GBioC..16.1121C. doi:10.1029/2002gb001894. ISSN 0886-6236. S2CID 128672790.
4. Defant, Marc J.; Drummond, Mark S. (October 1990). "Derivation of some modern arc magmas by melting of young subducted lithosphere". Nature. 347 (6294): 662–665. Bibcode:1990Natur.347..662D. doi:10.1038/347662a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4267494.
5. Garrels, R.M. (1983) "The carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 100 million years". American Journal of Science, 283: 641-683.
6. Wollast, R.; MacKenzie, F. T. (1989). "Global Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate". Climate and Geo-Sciences. pp. 453–473. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2446-8_26. ISBN 978-0-7923-0412-8.
7. Moriceau, Brivaëla; Gehlen, Marion; Tréguer, Paul; Baines, Stephen; Livage, Jacques; André, Luc (2019). "Editorial: Biogeochemistry and Genomics of Silicification and Silicifiers". Frontiers in Marine Science. 6. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00057.
8. Maldonado, Manuel; López-Acosta, María; Sitjà, Cèlia; García-Puig, Marta; Galobart, Cristina; Ercilla, Gemma; Leynaert, Aude (2019). "Sponge skeletons as an important sink of silicon in the global oceans" (PDF). Nature Geoscience. 12 (10): 815–822. Bibcode:2019NatGe..12..815M. doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0430-7. S2CID 201692454.
9. Tréguer, Paul; Pondaven, Philippe (2000). "Silica control of carbon dioxide". Nature. 406 (6794): 358–359. doi:10.1038/35019236. PMID 10935620. S2CID 205007880.
10. Maldonado, Manuel; Ribes, Marta; Van Duyl, Fleur C. (2012). "Nutrient Fluxes Through Sponges". Advances in Sponge Science: Physiology, Chemical and Microbial Diversity, Biotechnology. Advances in Marine Biology. Vol. 62. pp. 113–182. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394283-8.00003-5. ISBN 9780123942838. PMID 22664122.
11. Llopis Monferrer, Natalia; Boltovskoy, Demetrio; Tréguer, Paul; Sandin, Miguel Méndez; Not, Fabrice; Leynaert, Aude (2020). "Estimating Biogenic Silica Production of Rhizaria in the Global Ocean". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 34 (3). Bibcode:2020GBioC..3406286L. doi:10.1029/2019GB006286. S2CID 213858837.
12. Tréguer, Paul J.; de la Rocha, Christina L. (2013). "The World Ocean Silica Cycle". Annual Review of Marine Science. 5: 477–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172346. PMID 22809182.
13. Boggs, Sam (2006). Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall. p. 7. ISBN 0131547283.
14. Nicholls, G. D. (1963). "Environmental Studies in Sedimentary Geochemistry". Science Progress (1933- ). 51 (201): 12–31. JSTOR 43418626.
15. Gaillardet, J.; Dupré, B.; Louvat, P.; Allègre, C.J. (July 1999). "Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers". Chemical Geology. 159 (1–4): 3–30. Bibcode:1999ChGeo.159....3G. doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00031-5. ISSN 0009-2541.
16. Loucaides, Socratis; Michalopoulos, Panagiotis; Presti, Massimo; Koning, Erica; Behrends, Thilo; Van Cappellen, Philippe (2010-02-15). "Seawater-mediated interactions between diatomaceous silica and terrigenous sediments: Results from long-term incubation experiments". Chemical Geology. 270 (1–4): 68–79. Bibcode:2010ChGeo.270...68L. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.11.006.
17. Tréguer, Paul J.; Rocha, Christina L. De La (2013-01-02). "The World Ocean Silica Cycle". Annual Review of Marine Science. 5 (1): 477–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172346. PMID 22809182.
18. Aller, R. C. (2014-01-01). "Sedimentary Diagenesis, Depositional Environments, and Benthic Fluxes". In Holland, Heinrich D.; Turekian, Karl K. (eds.). Treatise on Geochemistry (Second ed.). Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 293–334. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00611-2. ISBN 9780080983004.
19. Michalopoulos, Panagiotis; Aller, Robert C (2004-03-01). "Early diagenesis of biogenic silica in the Amazon delta: alteration, authigenic clay formation, and storage". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 68 (5): 1061–1085. Bibcode:2004GeCoA..68.1061M. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.018.
20. Tréguer, Paul J.; De La Rocha, Christina L. (2013-01-03). "The World Ocean Silica Cycle". Annual Review of Marine Science. 5 (1): 477–501. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172346. ISSN 1941-1405. PMID 22809182.
21. Tréguer, Paul; Nelson, David M.; Bennekom, Aleido J. Van; DeMaster, David J.; Leynaert, Aude; Quéguiner, Bernard (1995-04-21). "The Silica Balance in the World Ocean: A Reestimate". Science. 268 (5209): 375–379. Bibcode:1995Sci...268..375T. doi:10.1126/science.268.5209.375. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17746543. S2CID 5672525.
22. Dürr, H. H.; Meybeck, M.; Hartmann, J.; Laruelle, G. G.; Roubeix, V. (2011). "Global spatial distribution of natural riverine silica inputs to the coastal zone". Biogeosciences. 8 (3): 597–620. Bibcode:2011BGeo....8..597D. doi:10.5194/bg-8-597-2011.
23. Saccone, L.; Conley, D. J.; Koning, E.; Sauer, D.; Sommer, M.; Kaczorek, D.; Blecker, S. W.; Kelly, E. F. (2007). "Assessing the extraction and quantification of amorphous silica in soils of forest and grassland ecosystems". European Journal of Soil Science. 58 (6): 1446–1459. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00949.x.
24. Frings, Patrick J.; Clymans, Wim; Fontorbe, Guillaume; de la Rocha, Christina L.; Conley, Daniel J. (2016). "The continental Si cycle and its impact on the ocean Si isotope budget". Chemical Geology. 425: 12–36. Bibcode:2016ChGeo.425...12F. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.020. S2CID 52043719.
25. Tegen, I. and Kohfeld, K. E. (2006) "Atmospheric Transport of Silicon". In: The Silicon Cycle: Human Perturbations and Impacts on Aquatic Systems, edited by: Ittekot, V., Unger, D., Humborg, C., and Tac An, N. T., 7: 81–91, Island Press.
26. Fabre, Sébastien; Jeandel, Catherine; Zambardi, Thomas; Roustan, Michel; Almar, Rafaël (2019-09-11). "An Overlooked Silica Source of the Modern Oceans: Are Sandy Beaches the Key?". Frontiers in Earth Science. Frontiers Media SA. 7: 231. Bibcode:2019FrEaS...7..231F. doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00231. ISSN 2296-6463.
27. Wollast, R., & Mackenzie, F.T. (1983). "Global Cycle of Silica". In S.R. Aston (Ed.), Silicon Geochemistry and Biogeochemistry, Academic Press, pages 39–76.
28. Sarmiento, Jorge Louis (2006). Ocean biogeochemical dynamics. Gruber, Nicolas. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691017075. OCLC 60651167.
29. Drever, James I. (1993). "The effect of land plants on weathering rates of silicate minerals". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 58 (10): 2325–2332. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(94)90013-2.
30. De La Rocha, Christina; Conley, Daniel J. (2017), "The Venerable Silica Cycle", Silica Stories, Springer International Publishing, pp. 157–176, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54054-2_9, ISBN 9783319540542
31. Chadwick, Oliver A.; Ziegler, Karen; Kurtz, Andrew C.; Derry, Louis A. (2005). "Biological control of terrestrial silica cycling and export fluxes to watersheds". Nature. 433 (7027): 728–731. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..728D. doi:10.1038/nature03299. PMID 15716949. S2CID 4421477.
32. Yool, Andrew; Tyrrell, Toby (2003). "Role of diatoms in regulating the ocean's silicon cycle". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 17 (4): 14.1–14.22. Bibcode:2003GBioC..17.1103Y. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.394.3912. doi:10.1029/2002GB002018. S2CID 16849373.
33. DeMaster, David (2002). "The accumulation and cycling of biogenic silica in the Southern Ocean: revisiting the marine silica budget". Deep Sea Research Part II. 49 (16): 3155–3167. Bibcode:2002DSRII..49.3155D. doi:10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00076-0.
34. Sutton, Jill N.; Andre, Luc; Cardinal, Damien; Conley, Daniel J.; de Souza, Gregory F.; Dean, Jonathan; Dodd, Justin; Ehlert, Claudia; Ellwood, Michael J. (2018). "A Review of the Stable Isotope Bio-geochemistry of the Global Silicon Cycle and Its Associated Trace Elements". Frontiers in Earth Science. 5: 112. Bibcode:2018FrEaS...5..112S. doi:10.3389/feart.2017.00112. ISSN 2296-6463.
35. Huebner, J. Stephen (November 1982). "Rock-Forming Minerals. Volume 2A: Single-Chain Silicates. W. A. Deer , R. A. Howie , J. Zussman". The Journal of Geology. 90 (6): 748–749. doi:10.1086/628736. ISSN 0022-1376. S2CID 131566270.
36. Van Cappellen, P. (January 2003). "Biomineralization and Global Biogeochemical Cycles". Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. 54 (1): 357–381. Bibcode:2003RvMG...54..357V. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.499.4327. doi:10.2113/0540357.
37. Marshall, John; Plumb, R. Alan (2013). Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics : an Introductory Text. Burlington: Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-08-095987-0. OCLC 911000821.
38. Burckle, Lloyd H.; Cirilli, Jerome (1987). "Origin of Diatom Ooze Belt in the Southern Ocean: Implications for Late Quaternary Paleoceanography". Micropaleontology. 33 (1): 82. doi:10.2307/1485529. JSTOR 1485529.
39. Gaillardet, J.; Dupré, B.; Allègre, C.J. (December 1999). "Geochemistry of large river suspended sediments: silicate weathering or recycling tracer?". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 63 (23–24): 4037–4051. doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00307-5. ISSN 0016-7037.
40. New threat from ocean acidification emerges in the Southern Ocean, Phys.org, 26 August 2019.
41. Petrou, K., Baker, K.G., Nielsen, D.A. et al. (2019) "Acidification diminishes diatom silica production in the Southern Ocean". Nature: Climate Change, 9: 781–786. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0557-y
42. Information, US Department of Commerce, NOAA National Centers for Environmental. "World Ocean Atlas 2009". www.nodc.noaa.gov. Retrieved 17 April 2018.
43. Berner, Robert (August 1992). "Weathering, plants, and the long-term carbon cycle". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 56 (8): 3225–3231. Bibcode:1992GeCoA..56.3225B. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(92)90300-8.
44. DeMaster, D.J. (1981)."The supply and accumulation of silica in the marine environment". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 45: 1715-1732.
45. Cortese, G., Gersonde, R. (2004). "Opal sedimentation shifts in the World Ocean over the last 15 Myr". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 224: 509-527.
46. Łukowiak, Magdalena (2020). "Utilizing sponge spicules in taxonomic, ecological and environmental reconstructions: A review". PeerJ. 8: e10601. doi:10.7717/peerj.10601. PMC 7751429. PMID 33384908.   Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.