Procurement

For other uses, see Procurement (disambiguation).

Procurement is the method of discovering and agreeing to terms and purchasing goods, services, or other works from an external source, often with the use of a tendering or competitive bidding process.^[1] The term may also refer to a contractual obligation to "procure", i.e. to "ensure" that something is done. When a government agency buys goods or services through this practice, it is referred to as government procurement or public procurement.^[2]

Procurement as an organizational process is intended to ensure that the buyer receives goods, services, or works at the best possible price when aspects such as quality, quantity, time, and location are compared.^[3] Corporations and public bodies often define processes intended to promote fair and open competition for their business while minimizing risks such as exposure to fraud and collusion.

Almost all purchasing decisions include factors such as delivery and handling, marginal benefit, and fluctuations in the prices of goods. Organisations which have adopted a corporate social responsibility perspective are also likely to require their purchasing activity to take wider societal and ethical considerations into account.^[4] On the other hand, the introduction of external regulations concerning accounting practices can affect ongoing buyer-supplier relations in unforeseen manners.^[5]

History

Formalized acquisition of goods and services has its roots in military logistics,^{[citation needed]} but the first written records of what would be recognized now as the purchasing department of an industrial operation relate to the railway companies of the 19th century:

"The intelligence and fidelity exercised in the purchase, care and use of railway supplies influences directly the cost of construction and operating and affect the reputations of officers and the profits of owners."^[6]

An early reference book from 1922 explains that

"The modern purchasing agent is a more important man by far than he was in older days when purchasing agents were likely to be rubber stamps or bargainers for an extra penny. A Purchasing agent of the modern breed is a creative thinker and planner and now regards his work as a profession."^[7]

Overview

An important distinction should be made between analyses without risk and those with risk. Where risk is involved, either in the costs or the benefits, the concept of best value should be employed.

Procurement activities are also often split into two distinct categories, direct and indirect spend. Direct spend refers to the production-related procurement that encompasses all items that are part of finished products, such as raw materials, components and parts. Direct procurement, which is the focus in supply chain management, directly affects the production process of manufacturing firms. In contrast, indirect procurement concerns non-production-related acquisition: obtaining "operating resources" which a company purchases to enable its operations. Indirect procurement comprises a wide variety of goods and services, from standardized items like office supplies and machine lubricants to complex and costly products and services like heavy equipment, consulting services, and outsourcing services.^[8][9]

Direct procurement and indirect procurement
		Types
		Direct procurement	Indirect procurement
		Raw material and production goods	Maintenance, repair, and operating supplies, outsourcing	Capital goods and services
F E A T U R E S	Quantity	Large	Low	Low
	Frequency	High	Relatively high	Low
	Value	Industry-specific	Low	High
	Nature	Operational	Tactical	Strategic
	Examples	Crude oil in petroleum industry	Lubricants, spare parts	Crude oil storage facilities

Topics

Procurement vs. sourcing vs. acquisition

Procurement is one component of the broader concept of sourcing and acquisition. Typically procurement is viewed as more tactical in nature (the process of physically buying a product or service) and sourcing and acquisition are viewed as more strategic and encompassing.

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM)^[10] defines strategic sourcing as the process of identifying sources that could provide needed products or services for the acquiring organization. The term procurement is used to reflect the entire purchasing process or cycle, and not just the tactical components. ISM defines procurement as an organizational function that includes specification development, value analysis, supplier market research, negotiation, buying activities, contract administration, inventory control, traffic, receiving and stores. Purchasing refers to the major function of an organization that is responsible for acquisition of required materials, services and equipment.

The United States Defense Acquisition University (DAU) defines procurement as the act of buying goods and services for the government.^[11] DAU defines acquisition as the conceptualization, initiation, design, development, test, contracting, production, deployment, Logistics Support (LS), modification, and disposal of weapons and other systems, supplies, or services (including construction) to satisfy Department of Defense needs, intended for use in or in support of military missions.^[11]

There is also an important distinction between the terms "procurement" and "purchasing"; the clear distinction between the two is often lost amidst the ambiguities of international English. As a broad definition,^[12] "procurement" is the overarching function that describes the activities and processes to acquire goods and services. Importantly, and distinct from "purchasing", it involves the activities involved in establishing fundamental requirements, sourcing activities such as market research and vendor evaluation and negotiation of contracts. It can also include the purchasing activities required to order and receive goods.

Acquisition and sourcing are therefore much wider concepts than procurement.

Multiple sourcing business models and acquisition models exist.

Acquisition processes

A linear acquisition process used in industry and defense is shown in the next figure, in this case relating to acquisition in the technology field. The process is defined by a series of phases during which technology is defined and matured into viable concepts, which are subsequently developed and readied for production, after which the systems produced are supported in the field.^[13]

 

Model of the acquisition process^[13]

The process allows for a given system to enter the process at any of the development phases. For example, a system using unproven technology would enter at the beginning stages of the process and would proceed through a lengthy period of technology maturation, while a system based on mature and proven technologies might enter directly into engineering development or, conceivably, even production. The process itself includes four phases of development:^[13]

• Concept and technology development is intended to explore alternative concepts based on assessments of operational needs, technology readiness, risk, and affordability.
• The concept and technology development phase begins with concept exploration. During this stage, concept studies are undertaken to define alternative concepts and to provide information about capability and risk that would permit an objective comparison of competing concepts.
• The system development and demonstration phase could be entered directly as a result of a technological opportunity and urgent user need, as well as having come through concept and technology development.
• The last, and longest phase is the sustainable and disposal phase of the program. During this phase all necessary activities are accomplished to maintain and sustain the system in the field in the most cost-effective manner possible.

Some aspects of a procurement process may need to be initiated ahead of the majority of the project, for example where there are extensive lead times. Such cases may be referred to as "advance procurement".^[14][15]

Many writers also refer to procurement as a cyclical process, which commences with a definition of business needs and develops a specification, identifies suppliers and adopted appropriate methods for consulting with them, inviting and evaluating proposals, secures on contract and takes delivery of a new asset or accepts performance of a service, manages the ownership of the asset or the delivery of the service and reaches an end-of-life point where the asset becomes due for replacement or the service contract terminates. At this point the cycle would recommence.^[16][17]

Sourcing business model

Procurement officials increasingly realize that their make-buy supplier decisions fall along a continuum from simple buying transactions to more complex, strategic buyer-supplier collaborations. It is important for procurement officials to use the right sourcing business model that fits each buyer-seller situation. There are seven models along the sourcing continuum: basic provider, approved provider, preferred provider, performance-based/managed services model, vested business model, shared services model and equity partnerships.

• A basic provider model is transaction-based; it usually has a set price for individual products and services for which there are a wide range of standard market options. Typically these products or services are readily available, with little differentiation in what is offered.
• An approved provider model uses a transaction-based approach where goods and services are purchased from prequalified suppliers that meet certain performance or other selection criteria.
• The preferred provider model also uses a transaction-based economic model, but a key difference between the preferred provider and the other transaction-based models is that the buyer has chosen to move to a supplier relationship where there is an opportunity for the supplier to add incremental value to the buyer's business to meet strategic objectives.
• A performance-based (or managed services model) is generally a formal, longer-term supplier agreement that combines a relational contracting model with an output-based economic model. It seeks to drive supplier accountability for output-based service-level agreements (SLAs) and/or cost reduction targets.
• A vested sourcing business model is a hybrid relationship that combines an outcome-based economic model with a relational contracting model. Companies enter into highly collaborative arrangements designed to create and share value for buyers and suppliers above and beyond.
• A shared services model is typically an internal organization based on an arms-length outsourcing arrangement. Using this approach, processes are often centralized into an SSO that charges business units or users for the services they use.
• An equity partnership creates a legally binding entity; it can take different legal forms, from buying a supplier (an acquisition), to creating a subsidiary, to equity-sharing joint ventures or entering into cooperative (co-op) arrangements.

Procurement software

Main article: Procurement software

Procurement software (often labeled as e-procurement software) manages purchasing processes electronically or via cloud computing.

Procurement performance

The Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS) promotes a model of "five rights", which it suggests are "a traditional formula expressing the basic objectives of procurement and the general criteria by which procurement performance is measured", namely that goods and services purchased should be of the right quality, in the right quantity, delivered to the right place at the right time and obtained at the right price.^[18] CIPS has in the past also offered an alternative listing of the five rights as "buy[ing] goods or services of the right quality, in the right quantity, from the right source, at the right time and at the right price.^[19] Right source is added as a sixth right in CIPS' 2018 publication, Contract Administration.^[20]

Delivery on savings goals is an important part of the procurement function, but this objective is generally seen as value generation rather than cost reduction.^[21] CIPS also notes that securing savings is "one measure of purchasing performance", but argues that savings should only be used as a measure of performance where they are "a reflection of the [organisation]'s ... expectations of the purchasing and supply management function". CIPS distinguishes between "savings", which can reduce budgets, and "cost avoidance", which "attempts to thwart price increases and to keep within budget".^[22] Examples of savings as a beneficial outcome include:

• agreeing a reduction in price, obtaining the same item for less cost
• sourcing, or developing a supply of, a lower quality item at a reduced cost, where the item is still fit for purpose
• obtaining added value for the same cost, e.g. negotiating extended warranties, additional spare parts etc.^[22]

Ardent Partners published a report in 2011 which presented a comprehensive, industry-wide view into what was happening in the world of procurement at that time by drawing on the experience, performance, and perspective of nearly 250 chief procurement officers and other procurement executives. The report included the main procurement performance and operational benchmarks that procurement leaders use to gauge the success of their organizations. This report found that the average procurement department manages 60.6% of total enterprise spend. This measure, commonly called "spend under management" or "managed spend", refers to the percentage of total enterprise spend (which includes all direct and indirect spend) that a procurement organization manages or influences. Alternatively, the term may refer to the percentage of addressable spend which is influenced by procurement, "addressable spend" being the expenditure which could potentially be influenced.^[23] The average procurement department also achieved an annual saving of 6.7% in the last reporting cycle, sourced 52.6% of its addressable spend, and has a contract compliance rate of 62.6%.^[24]

Consultants A.T. Kearney have developed a model for assessing the performance of a procurement organisation or the procurement function within a wider organisation, known as ROSMA^SM (Return on Supply Management Assets).^[25] According to the 2016 ROSMA Performance Check Report, What Good Looks Like,

the procurement profession has a top-tier group of standout performers, a middle-tier that is delivering value, but performing well below the top tier, and a large group of bottom-quartile performers that add limited value to their organizations.^[26][27]

CIPS promotes organisational self-assessment using the ROSMA Performance Check, arguing that it enables a procurement department to "measure and explain procurement and supply's value in terms your CFO and CEO will understand, using a common financial standard".^[26] Findings in 2020 suggested that "top quartile procurement performers have ROSMA scores two to three times higher than those in the middle two quartiles".^[28] A.T. Kearney's report suggests a close match between the self-reported performance of CPOs in the best performing departments and the view of procurement held by the CFO and the organisation more widely, and also notes that weaker performers or "inconsequentials" share a distinct profile marked by lack of "identifiable leadership accountable for procurement's performance.^{[27]: page 5}

Spend under management also contributes to an additional measure of procurement performance or procurement efficiency: procurement operating expense as a percentage of managed spend.^[29]

Joint procurement

Joint procurement takes place when two or more organisations share purchasing activities, and therefore has a more specifically buyer-side focus than many examples of collaborative buyer-seller relationships. Kamann, van der Vaart and de Vries propose a "theoretical frame of reference" to explain various approaches to understanding "why would companies work together in the first place?"

• a transaction cost economics approach, where the total transaction costs of the actors involved are lower when they work together
• a resource dependence approach, and the resource based view, where the group of actors is able to create a resource, market power, which they would be unable to exercise independently
• neo-classical economics' case, arguing that certain functions become separate, specialised units in order to obtain scale effects
• neo-institutionalism - the argument that actors work together because it is the thing to do these days.^[30]

They note also that many large and powerful companies "do not have - nor feel - the need to go together".^[30]

Joint or collaborative procurement is a common practice within public sector procurement. There are central purchasing bodies in many countries which coordinate joint purchasing activities for public sector organisations. A report commissioned by the European Parliament's Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) has recommended that EU Member States "should consider creating Central Purchasing Bodies (CPBs)" in order to secure "coherent and coordinated procurement".^[31]

Relationship with Finance

Procurement and Finance have, as functions within the corporate structure, been at odds. The contentious nature of their relationship can perhaps be attributed to the history of procurement itself. Historically, Procurement has been considered Finance's underling. One reason behind this perception can be ascribed to semantics. When Procurement was in its infancy, it was referred to as a "commercial" operation. And so the procurement department was referred to as the commercial department rather than the procurement department: the word "commercial" was understood to be associated with money. And so it was obvious that Procurement would become directly answerable to Finance. Another factor, equally grounded in semantics, was that procurement departments (or rather, commercial departments) were always seen as "spending the money". This impression was enough to situate Procurement within the Finance function.

Procurement and Finance are functions with interests that are mutually irreconcilable. Whereas Procurement is fundamentally concerned with the spending or disbursal of money, Finance, by its very nature, performs a cost-cutting role. That is fundamentally the reason why Procurement's aspirations have been constantly checked by Finance's cost-cutting imperatives. This notion, however, has been changing as more chief procurement officers have begun to argue for more autonomy and less interference from Finance departments.

Electronic procurement

Electronic procurement is the purchasing of goods by businesses through the internet or other networked computer connection.^[32] Electronic data interchange (EDI) was a forerunner to electronic procurement, this consisted of standardized transmission of data such as inventories and good required electronically. Schoenherr argues that EDI developed from standardized manifests for deliveries to Berlin during the Berlin Airlift which were applied by DuPont in the 1960s and argues that Material requirements planning and Enterprise resource planning were both forerunners to electronic procurement.^[33]: 35

Alternative competitive bidding procedures

There are several alternatives to traditional competitive bid tendering that are available in formal procurement. One approach that has gained increasing momentum in the construction industry and among developing economies is the selection in planning (SIP) process, which enables project developers and equipment purchasers to make significant changes to their requirements with relative ease. The SIP process also enables vendors and contractors to respond with greater accuracy and competitiveness as a result of the generally longer lead times they are afforded.

University of Tennessee research shows that request for solution and request for association (also known as request for partner or request for partnership) methods are also gaining traction as viable alternatives and more collaborative methods for selecting strategic suppliers – especially for outsourcing.^[34]

Public procurement

Main article: Government procurement

Public procurement, also known as government procurement, is when a governing body purchases goods, works, and services from an organization for themselves or the taxpayers.^[2][35][36] In 2019, public procurement accounted for approximately 12% of GDP in OECD countries^[37] and in 2021 the World Bank Group estimated that public procurement made up about 15% of global GDP.^[38]

Benefits of public procurement

Public procurement is based on the idea that governments should direct their society while giving the private sector the freedom to decide the best practices to produce the desired goods and services.^{[39]: Chapter 1} One benefit of public procurement is its ability to cultivate innovation and economic growth.^[40][41][42] The public sector picks the most capable nonprofit or for-profit organizations available to issue the desired good or service to the taxpayers. This produces competition within the private sector to gain these contracts that then reward the organizations that can supply more cost-effective and quality goods and services. Some contracts also have specific clauses to promote working with minority-led, women-owned businesses and/or state-owned enterprises.^[43] Competition is a key component of public procurement which affects the outcomes of the whole process.^[44] There is a great amount of competition over public procurements because of the massive amount of money that flows through these systems; It is estimated that approximately one trillion USD is spent on public procurement worldwide every year.^[45]

Green public procurement

In public procurement, contracting authorities and entities take environmental issues into account when tendering for goods or services. The goal is to reduce the impact of the procurement on human health and the environment.^[46]

In the European Union, the Commission has adopted its communication on public procurement for a better environment, where proposes a political target of 50% Green public procurement to be reached by the Member States by 2010.^[47] The European Commission has recommended GPP criteria for 21 product/service groups which may be used by any public authority in Europe.^[48]

The EU has also launched the GPP 2020, which aims to implement 100 low-carbon tenders.^[49][50]

Social and environmental considerations can be applied to contracts both above and below the threshold for application of the EU Procurement Directives. The 2014 Procurement Directives enable public authorities to take environmental considerations into account. This applies during pre-procurement, as part of the procurement process itself, and in the performance of the contract. Rules regarding exclusion and selection aim to ensure a minimum level of compliance with environmental law by contractors and sub-contractors. Techniques such as life-cycle costing, specification of sustainable production processes, and use of environmental award criteria are available to help contracting authorities identify environmentally preferable bids.^[51]

Accessible procurement

The United States Section 508^[52] and European Commission standard EN 301 549^[53] require public procurement to promote accessibility. This means buying products and technology that have accessibility features built in to promote access for the around 1 billion people worldwide who have disabilities.^[54]

Challenges for public procurement

One issue of public procurement is the inability of governments to measure economic productivity, because as the size of public procurement systems substantially grows, so do their complexity and influence.^[55][56] Public procurement is heavily embedded in all forms of public sector goods and services, from health care to road maintenance,^[55] thus making it difficult for the government to monitor the impacts, positive or negative.^[37] Monitoring public spending and its impact is important to reform public procurement, especially when pending economic instability calls for proactive responses.^[55]

In some cases, if a nation is extremely impoverished, it may not have the necessary funds or a large enough private sector to even procure companies to issue the goods or services to the people.^[39] Thus, omitting public procurement as a potential governing practice.

Another concern with public procurement is corruption; companies have much to gain from bribing public officials to obtain these procurements. In societies where corruption is endemic and enforcement is low, public officials are incentivized to accept bribes due to either necessity or greed.^[57] Academic research shows that discretion in procurement decisions is beneficial in countries with a high level of human capital, but is detrimental in low-human capital jurisdictions.^[58]

Fraud

The OECD has published guidelines on how to detect and combat bid rigging.^[59]

Procurement fraud can be defined as dishonestly obtaining an advantage, avoiding an obligation or causing a loss to public property or various means during procurement process by public servants, contractors or any other person involved in the procurement.^[60] An example is a kickback, whereby a dishonest agent of the supplier pays a dishonest agent of the purchaser to select the supplier's bid, often at an inflated price. Other frauds in procurement include:

• Collusion among bidders to reduce competition.
• Providing bidders with advance "inside" information.
• Submission of false or inflated invoices for services and products that are not delivered or work that is never done. "Shadow vendors", shell companies that are set up and used for billing, may be used in such schemes.
• Intentional substitution of substandard materials without the customer's agreement.
• Use of "sole source" contracts without proper justification.
• Use of prequalification standards in specifications to unnecessarily exclude otherwise qualified contractors.
• Dividing requirements to qualify for small-purchase procedures to avoid scrutiny for contract review procedures of larger purchases.

Integrity Pacts are one tool to prevent fraud and other irregular practices in procurement projects. The G20 has recommended their use in their 2019 Compendium of Good Practices for Promoting Integrity and Transparency in Infrastructure Development.^[61] A major European Commission pilot project entitled Integrity Pacts - Civil Control Mechanism for Safeguarding EU Funds is seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of Integrity Pacts in reducing corruption in 17 EU-funded projects in 11 Member States with a total value of over EUR 920 million.^[62]

Roles in procurement

"Buyer" redirects here. For other uses, see Buyer (disambiguation).

"Buyers" redirects here. For other uses, see Buyers (disambiguation).

See also: Fashion buyer, Construction buyer, and Broker

Personnel who undertake procurement on behalf of an organization may be referred to as procurement officers, professionals or specialists, buyers or supply managers.^[63] The US Federal Acquisition Regulation refers to Contracting Officers.^[64] Staff in managerial positions may be referred to as Purchasing Managers or Procurement Managers.

A Purchasing or Procurement Manager's responsibilities may include:

• approving orders
• seeking reliable vendors or suppliers to provide quality goods at reasonable prices
• negotiating prices and contracts
• reviewing technical specifications for raw materials, components, equipment or buildings
• determining and monitoring quantity and timing of deliveries (more commonly in small companies)
• forecasting upcoming demand
• supervision of other procurement staff and agents.

Category management represents a system of organising the roles of staff within a procurement team "in such a way as to focus ... on the [external] supply markets of an organisation", rather than being organised according to the organisation's internal departmental structure.^[65]

In many larger organizations the procurement and supply function is led by a board-level or other senior position such as a Director of Supply Chain ^[66] or a Chief Procurement Officer.

Independent or third party personnel who undertake procurement or negotiate purchases on behalf of an organization may be called purchasing agents or buying agents. A commercial agent may both purchase and sell on behalf of a third party.^[67]

US Bureau of Labor Statistics research found that there were 526,200 purchasing manager, buyer and purchasing agent positions in the United States in 2019.^[68] Various writers have noted that businesses may reduce the numbers of purchasing staff during a recession along with staff in other business areas, despite a tendency to become more dependent on bought-in goods and services as operations contract. For example, US business executive Steve Collins observed that in one major company the purchasing staffbase "was downsized some 30% during the [2010] recession, 'but the expectations for the remaining employees remained unchanged ... The additional workload placed on the remaining employees following the downsizing created a much more challenging environment'".^[69] In 2021 the Australasian Procurement and Construction Council (APCC) put forward an appeal asking everyone working in the procurement profession in Australia to include the term in their occupational title when completing their August 2021 census return.^[70]

The European Commission issued a recommendation in October 2017 directed towards the "professionalisation of public procurement" so that Member States could "attract, develop and retain" staff in public purchasing roles, focus on performance and "make the most of the available tools and techniques".^[71] Research undertaken in 2020 highlighted the importance of social or "soft" skills within the skill sets of professional procurement staff.^[72]

Gender: women in procurement

Procurement and purchasing roles are generally open to both men and women, but leaders of the profession recognise that women face "the same challeges as men, [including] the need for recognition, and [the need] to influence the organisations they work for", but with additional challenges such as the need to be "twice as good" to prove their capability in order to gain the appreciation of their peers and their senior colleagues.^[73] Some writers have observed that there is limited opportunity for women to enter procurement because of stereotypes vewing some roles as not appropriate for women.^[74]

A "Women in Procurement" event held at Khobar in Saudi Arabia in 2016 identified networking among women working in the profession as a valuable tool for supporting women in the profession.^[73]

Obligation to procure

A contractual obligation to "procure" that something happens refers to an absolute obligation to ensure that the action is done or the condition is met,^[75] for example a contract with a principal supplier may include a clause requiring the company to "procure" that its subsidiaries, holding companies and other associated businesses undertake the same commitments as those contractually imposed on the principal.^[76] The use of the word "procure" in a joint venture agreement between Nearfield Ltd., Lincoln Nominees Ltd., and other partners, in relation to the utilisation of a bank loan, gave rise to a dispute between the parties regarding the meaning of the word "procure", which was resolved in 2006 by the judge, Peter Smith, confirming that the "normal meaning of the word" is clear and well understood:

I do not see that procure means anything other than as Nearfield [the claimant] puts it "see to it".^[77]

In this case the obligation to "procure the payment" of the loan amounted to a guarantee of that loan.^[78]

See also

• Agreement on Government Procurement
• Bidder conferences
• Contract management
• E-procurement
• Expediting
• Global sourcing
• Group purchasing organization
• MESC
• Procurement outsourcing
• Performance Based Contracting
• Selection in planning
• Strategic sourcing
• Syndicated procurement
• Tender notification

References

1. Laffont, Jean-Jacques; Tirole, Jean (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. MIT Press. p. 1. ISBN 9780262121743.
2. "Public procurement - OECD". www.oecd.org. Retrieved 22 April 2022.
3. Weele, Arjan J. van (2010). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice (5th ed.). Andover: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-4080-1896-5.
4. Salam, M. A. (2007), Social responsibility in purchasing: the case of Thailand, International Journal of Procurement Management, vol. 1, issue 1/2, 97-116, accessed 27 January 2021. Salam refers to CSR in a purchasing context as "purchasing social responsibility" (PSR).
5. Gu, Tiantian; Sanders, Nada R.; Venkateswaran, Anand (2017). "CEO Incentives and Customer-Supplier Relations". Production and Operations Management. 26 (9): 1705–1727. doi:10.1111/poms.12715. ISSN 1937-5956.
6. Kirkman, Marshall Monroe (1887). The Handling of Railway Supplies: Their Purchase and Disposition. Chicago.
7. Hysell, Helen (1922). The Science of Purchasing. New York: Appleton.
8. Lewis, M.A. and Roehrich, J.K. (2009), Contracts, relationships and integration: Towards a model of the procurement of complex performance. International Journal of Procurement Management, 2(2):125–142.
9. Caldwell, N.D. Roehrich, J.K. and Davies, A.C. (2009)
10. "ISM - Supply Management Defined". from the original on 13 December 2016. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
11. . Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
12. As a broad definition Definition of Procurement - Procurement vs Purchasing
13. Systems Engineering Fundamentals. Defense Acquisition University Press, 2001 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
14. Law Insider, Advance procurement definition, accessed 24 November 2022
15. United States Coast Guard, RFP released for Coast Guard's heavy polar icebreaker, published 5 March 2018, accessed 24 November 2022
16. Delta eSourcing, What is the Procurement Cycle?, accessed 21 January 2021
17. Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, Procurement and Supply Cycle, accessed 21 January 2021
18. CIPS in partnership with Profex Publishing, Procurement and Supply Operations, 2012, revised 2016, pp. 1-2
19. CIPS, Procurement Glossary - F 14 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 14 March 2017
20. Mason, L. (2018), Contract Administration, Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, p. 114
21. GEP, The Next Frontier in Procurement Transformation, accessed 7 December 2022
22. CIPS, Positions on Practice: Savings, accessed 21 August 2020
23. Jaggaer, How do you optimize addressable spend?, published 24 May 2016, accessed 16 January 2018
24. "Ardent Partners Research - CPO 2011: Innovative Ideas for the Decade Ahead". from the original on 24 September 2011.
25. A T Kearney, What good looks like, summary published 2016, accessed 10 July 2021
26. CIPS (2016), ROSMA^SM Performance Check, accessed 10 July 2021
27. A T Kearney (2016), What Good Looks Like, accessed 10 July 2021
28. Supply Chain Digest, Supply Chain News: Annual Research from AT Kearney as Usual Finds Outsized Benefits for Procurement Leaders, published 10 February 2020, accessed 10 July 2021
29. OpsDog, Inc., Procurement Operating Expense as a Percentage of Managed Spend, accessed 2 February 2021
30. Kamann D. J. F., van der Vaart T., and de Vries, J. (2004) Joint purchasing: theory and practice, International IPSERA Conference, 4–7 April 2004, Catania, Italy
31. European Parliament, The EU’s Public Procurement Framework, briefing requested by the IMCO committee, published April 2020, accessed 1 March 2023
32. Schoenherr, Tobias (2019), Schoenherr, Tobias (ed.), "The Advent of the Internet and Online Reverse Auctions", The Evolution of Electronic Procurement: Transforming Business as Usual, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 47–63, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93985-8_4, ISBN 978-3-319-93985-8, retrieved 4 September 2021
33. Schoenherr, Tobias (2019), Schoenherr, Tobias (ed.), "The Evolution of Electronic Procurement", The Evolution of Electronic Procurement: Transforming Business as Usual, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 33–46, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93985-8_3, ISBN 978-3-319-93985-8, retrieved 4 September 2021
34. Vitasek, Kate; Kling, Jeanne; Keith, Bonnie; Handley, David (2016). (PDF). Knoxville, Tennessee: Haslam College of Business. p. 9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 April 2017. Retrieved 27 April 2017.
35. Khan, Naushad (11 January 2018). Public Procurement Fundamentals. Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/9781787546059. ISBN 978-1-78754-608-0. S2CID 115362081.
36. Georghiou, Luke; Edler, Jakob; Uyarra, Elvira; Yeow, Jillian (2014). "Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment". Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 86: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018. ISSN 0040-1625.
37. "Home". www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
38. Mihály, Fazekas; Rene, Blum, Jurgen (2021). "Improving Public Procurement Outcomes". World Bank Group.
39. Peters, B. Guy (2018). The politics of bureaucracy: an introduction to comparative public administration (7 ed.). New York, NY. ISBN 978-0-415-74339-6. OCLC 1002302064.
40. "Productivity in Public Procurement - A Case Study of Finland: Measuring the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public Procurement" (PDF). OECD. 2019. Retrieved 7 October 2022. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
41. Edler, Jakob; Yeow, Jillian (1 March 2016). "Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation". Research Policy. 45 (2): 414–426. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010. ISSN 0048-7333.
42. Edler, Jakob; Georghiou, Luke (1 September 2007). "Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side". Research Policy. 36 (7): 949–963. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003. ISSN 0048-7333.
43. "The Office of Federal Procurement Policy". The White House. Retrieved 13 April 2022.
44. Pliatsidis, Andreas Christos (1 January 2022). "Impact of the time limits for the receipt of tenders on the number of bidders: evidence from public procurement in Greece". Journal of Public Procurement. 22 (4): 314–335. doi:10.1108/JOPP-05-2022-0025. ISSN 2150-6930. S2CID 253312170.
45. Mihály, Fazekas; Blum, Jurgen. Improving Public Procurement Outcomes Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base. OCLC 1289178042.
46. "EC.Europa.eu". EC.Europa.eu. from the original on 25 April 2013. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
47. "EC.europa.eu". EC.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 28 September 2011. Retrieved 16 June 2013.
48. "European Commission - PP Criteria".
49. Low-carbon tenders under the GPP 2020
50. Promoting green public procurement (GPP) in support of the 2020 goals (GPP 2020)
51. Buying Green - A Handbook on green public procurement. European Commission. 2016. p. 4.
52. "Section508.gov - GSA Government-wide Section 508 Accessibility Program". www.section508.gov. from the original on 23 March 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
53. "Standard - EN 301 549 - Mandate 376". mandate376.standards.eu. from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
54. "World report on disability". World Health Organization. from the original on 16 March 2018. Retrieved 8 May 2018.
55. "Productivity in Public Procurement" (PDF). OECD.
56. De Simone, Francesco; Shah, Shruti (1 January 2012). "Civil Society Procurement Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities". A New Role for Citizens in public Procurement.
57. Søreide, Tina (2002). Corruption in public procurement : causes, consequences and cures. CMI. ISBN 82-8062-007-9. OCLC 474869271.
58. Bosio, Erica; Djankov, Simeon; Glaeser, Edward; Shleifer, Andrei (2022). "Public Procurement in Law and Practice". American Economic Review. AEA. 112 (4): 1091–1117. doi:10.1257/aer.20200738.
59. networkthoughts (6 July 2016). "Detecting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement – OECD Guidelines". from the original on 12 October 2016. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
60. Combating Procurement Frauds Author Dr Irfan Ahmad. Tender Service. 2005.
61. "G20 Compendium of Good Practices for Promoting Integrity and Transparency in Infrastructure Development" (PDF). OECD. OECD. 2019.
62. "Improving how funds are invested and managed: Integrity Pacts". European Commission. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
63. CIPS, Find the latest supply chain and procurement vacancies in buying, category management, planning and logistics, accessed 1 December 2020
64. FAR, 1.603-1 General, accessed 1 December 2020
65. CIPS Knowledge Works: Category Management, July 2007, page 2
66. NHS Supply Chain, Interview with Chris Holmes, Director of Supply Chain, published 26 April 2019. accessed 3 December 2020
67. O'Donovan, D., Commercial Agents Directive - Termination of Commercial Agency, Orpen Franks Solicitors, accessed 2 December 2020
68. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook: Purchasing Managers, Buyers and Purchasing Agents, published 21 September 2020, accessed 28 December 2020
69. Supply Chain Digest, Supply Chain News: In times of Reduce Staff in Procurement, New Tool to Help Prioritize the Work, published 16 May 2010, accessed 29 December 2020
70. Australasian Procurement and Construction Council, Promoting procurement in the census, accessed 29 July 2021
71. Publications Office of the EU, Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/1805 of 3 October 2017 on the professionalisation of public procurement — Building an architecture for the professionalisation of public procurement (Text with EEA relevance), accessed 28 April 2021
72. Harper, M., Closing the Skills Gap in Procurement Part 2: The Solution, American Productivity & Quality Center (APQC), published 2 April 2020, accessed 6 January 2022
73. Women in procurement professional roles network and hear from business leaders on the future of the profession, Eye of Dubai, published 19 June 2016, accessed 28 September 2022
74. Phillips, W., Lack of opportunities' for women to enter procurement, Supply Management, published 9 March 2022, accessed 4 October 2022
75. LexisNexis, What is the legal effect of a contractual obligation to ‘procure’ that something happens? How is this affected by adding the qualification ‘reasonable endeavours’?, updated 10 November 2022, accessed 26 February 2023
76. Law Insider, Inc., Obligation to Procure Sample Clauses, Law Insider, accessed 26 February 2023
77. England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division), Nearfield Ltd v Lincoln Nominees Ltd & Anor [2006] EWHC 2421 (Ch), delivered 9 October 2006, accessed 26 February 2023
78. Coulter, C. and Swinson, M., European Union: Beware The Promise "To Procure": The Risk Of Giving An Inadvertent Guarantee In English Law Contracts, Morrison & Foerster LLP, published 11 June 2009, accessed 26 February 2023

Bibliography

• N., Shaw, Felecia (1 October 2010). "The Power to Procure: A Look inside the City of Austin Procurement Program". An Applied Research Project Submitted to the Department of Political Science, Texas State University-San Marcos, in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Public Administration, Fall 2010. Retrieved 26 October 2016.
• Benslimane, Y.; Plaisent, M.; Bernard, P.: Investigating Search Costs and Coordination Costs in Electronic Markets: A Transaction Costs Economics Perspective, in: Electronic Markets, 15, 3, 2005, pp. 213–224.
• Hodges Silverstein, S.; Sager, T.: 2015. Legal Procurement Handbook (New York: Buying Legal Council).
• Hammami, Farouk; Rekik, Monia; Coelho, Leandro C. (2019). "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the bid construction problem in transportation procurement auctions with a heterogeneous fleet". Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 127: 150–177. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.009. S2CID 182223089. Transportation services procurement.
• Keith, B.; Vitasek, K.; Manrodt, K.; Kling, J.: 2016. Strategic Sourcing in the New Economy: Harnessing the Potential of Sourcing Business Models for Modern Procurement (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

Attribution

•   This article incorporates public domain material from the (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2011.

External links

 

Look up procurement in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

• Federal Procurement Data System (United States)
• Green public procurement (European Commission)
• Defense Acquisition University Press, 2001
• Disability:INclusive Workplaces – Accessible Technology Procurement Toolkit