fbpx
Wikipedia

Operation Whirlwind

Operation Whirlwind (Croatian: Operacija Vihor)[1] was a failed Croatian Army (HV) offensive in the Banovina region of Croatia, fought from 11–13 December 1991, during the early stages of the Croatian War of Independence. The offensive employed a single infantry brigade as the main attacking force, supported by a bridging unit and a handful of tanks and armoured personnel carriers. Although the offensive met hardly any resistance in its initial stage, achieving tactical surprise, the operation was poorly planned, supported and executed as a result of limited training and combat experience. The offensive established a short-lived bridgehead, evacuated in panic two days after the operation commenced, under tank and mortar fire from the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) deployed north of Glina.

Operation Whirlwind
Part of the Croatian War of Independence
Operation Whirlwind bridgehead

Operation Whirlwind bridgehead on the map of Croatia. JNA-held area in late December 1991 are highlighted red.
Date11–13 December 1991
Location
Banovina, Croatia
Result Serbian victory
Belligerents
 Croatia Yugoslavia
SAO Krajina
Commanders and leaders
Božo Budimir
Franc Ferenčak
Boško Džombić
Strength
~2,100 ~1,500
Casualties and losses
18 killed
18 wounded
20 killed
3 POW
1 missing

The operation was criticised for its poor planning and execution, insufficient preparation, reconnaissance and training, and inappropriate command and control methods applied by the Sisak Operational Group in charge of the offensive. It also lacked clear objectives. Afterwards, Croatian military authorities investigated the offensive, but found that there was very little written documentation, including written unit-level orders, pertaining to the operation. That led Admiral Davor Domazet-Lošo to conclude that the offensive was not formally authorised. The formal investigation did not specifically charge anyone with the failures, simply specifying the problems observed instead.

Background edit

In 1990, following the electoral defeat of the government of the Socialist Republic of Croatia, ethnic tensions worsened. The Yugoslav People's Army (Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija – JNA) confiscated Croatia's Territorial Defence (Teritorijalna obrana - TO) weapons to minimize resistance.[2] On 17 August, the tensions escalated into an open revolt by Croatian Serbs,[3] centred on the predominantly Serb-populated areas of the Dalmatian hinterland around Knin,[4] parts of the Lika, Kordun, Banovina and eastern Croatia.[5] This was followed by two unsuccessful attempts by Serbia, supported by Montenegro and Serbia's provinces of Vojvodina and Kosovo to obtain the Yugoslav Presidency's approval for a JNA operation to disarm Croatian security forces in January 1991.[6]

After a bloodless skirmish between Serb insurgents and Croatian special police in March,[7] the JNA itself, supported by Serbia and its allies, asked the Federal Presidency to give it wartime authorities and declare a state of emergency. The request was denied on 15 March, and the JNA came under the control of Serbian President Slobodan Milošević. Milošević, preferring a campaign to expand Serbia rather than to preserve Yugoslavia, publicly threatened to replace the JNA with a Serbian army and declared that he no longer recognized the authority of the Federal Presidency.[8] By the end of the month, the conflict had escalated into the Croatian War of Independence.[9] The JNA stepped in, increasingly supporting the Croatian Serb insurgents, and preventing Croatian police from intervening.[8] In early April, the leaders of the Croatian Serb revolt declared their intention to integrate the area under their control, known as SAO Krajina, with Serbia. The Government of Croatia viewed this declaration as an attempt to secede.[10]

In May, the Croatian government responded by forming the Croatian National Guard (Zbor narodne garde - ZNG),[11] but its development was hampered by a United Nations (UN) arms embargo introduced in September.[12] On 8 October, Croatia declared independence from Yugoslavia,[13] and a month later the ZNG was renamed the Croatian Army (Hrvatska vojska - HV).[11] Late 1991 saw the fiercest fighting of the war, as the 1991 Yugoslav campaign in Croatia culminated in the Siege of Dubrovnik,[14] and the Battle of Vukovar.[15] In western Slavonia, the HV managed to push back the JNA at several points, and secure Papuk Mountain in early December in Operation Otkos 10.[16]

Order of battle edit

The principal force committed to the offensive, planned by the HV Sisak Operational Group (OG), was the 102nd Infantry Brigade,[17] attached to the Sisak OG by the Zagreb Operational Zone command, as the single combat unit deployed as a reserve in the Sisak OG area of responsibility (AOR).[18]

Besides the 102nd Brigade, commanded by Captain Franc Ferenčak,[19] the Zagreb Operational Zone deployed an armoured-mechanised unit, attached directly to the Zagreb Operational Zone, into the Sisak OG AOR.[20] The unit consisted of eight tanks and two armoured personnel carriers.[21]

The Sisak OG assigned the 10th Brigade of the Croatian TO to support the right flank of the 102nd Infantry Brigade.[22] Protection of the left flank was assigned to the 2nd Battalion of the 2nd Guards Brigade,[23] supported by the 2nd Battalion of the 144th Infantry Brigade.[22]

To reinforce the 102nd Infantry Bridade and the independent armoured-mechanised unit, ten soldiers from the Glina Battalion were attached to each battalion of the 10th and 102nd brigades; two soldiers were assigned to serve as guides for each tank. In addition, the Glina Battalion was tasked with reconnaissance, harassment of JNA's rear and securing captured infrastructure.[22]

Sisak special police were assigned to support the Glina Battalion, and indirectly the main offensive force. The 36th Engineering-Pontoon Battalion was tasked with the Kupa River crossing by the 102nd Infantry Brigade.[24] The Sisak OG was commanded by Major General Božo Budimir.[25]

The Croatian Serb TO and JNA defences immediately west of the city of Sisak and north of Glina were positioned along the right (southern) bank of the Kupa River, largely consisting of the JNA 592nd and the 622nd Mechanised Brigades. On the opposite bank, the HV 100th Infantry Brigade held positions west of Sisak, flanked by the 145th Infantry Brigade to its right, and the 10th brigade of the Croatian TO further to the west.[18] The planned main axis of the Operation Whirlwind extended across the 592nd Mechanised Brigade AOR, commanded by Colonel Boško Džombić.[26]

Timeline edit

 
A map of Operation Whirlwind
  Frontline in December 1991
  HV advance 11–12 December 1991
  HV bridgehead 11–13 December 1991

The HV 102nd Infantry Brigade arrived at the Sisak OG AOR on 11 December 1992, and was ordered to undertake the offensive on the same evening, at about 20:00, leaving no time for any preparation or reconnaissance. A reconnaissance–sabotage detachment of the HV Glina Battalion and the special police force were ferried across the Kupa River on the night of 11/12 December, capturing the village of Stankovac and preparing to support the 102nd Infantry Brigade at the river crossing. The 36th Engineering-Pontoon Battalion completed a crossing point in the village of Šišinec by 4:00 and the lead elements of the 102nd Infantry Brigade crossed the Kupa River a half-hour later.[27]

The river crossing was unopposed until 08:00, when the defending force launched a mortar attack against the crossing point. Nonetheless, the 1st Battalion of the 102nd Infantry Brigade cleared the river by 09:00 that morning and reached Stankovac.[21]

After spending three hours crossing the Kupa River, by 13:00 the independent armoured-mechanised unit was headed for Mala Solina, 6 kilometres (3.7 miles) to the south. However, the unit was intercepted by JNA armour and forced to turn back to Stankovac. To further complicate the situation for the HV, the 10th Brigade did not even start to move south, while the 2nd Battalion of the 102nd Independent Brigade would not cross Kupa before its commander joined the unit at 16:00.[21]

The 3rd Battalion of the 102nd Infantry Brigade reached the village of Vratečko on the right (southern) bank of the Kupa River, but was unable to join the force south of Kupa. A bridge separating the battalion from the rest of the brigade remained out of HV's control.[21]

By the evening, the 2nd Battalion was ordered to separate from the main axis of the offensive and protect the right flank of the 1st Battalion of the 102nd Brigade—performing the task originally assigned to the 10th Brigade of the Croatian TO. At the same time, the 10th Brigade commanding officer was relieved of duty for failure to advance. Regardless, the unit remained inactive. The HV units that managed to cross the river on 12 December surprised the JNA and reported inflicting considerable casualties.[21]

On the night of 12/13 December, the air temperature dropped to −15 °C (5 °F), and HV troops sought shelter in Stankovac until the morning—shrinking the bridgehead held by the 102nd Infantry Brigade. In addition, the 36th Engineering-Platoon Battalion removed engineering equipment from the Kupa crossing, leaving behind only four to six boats. The command post of the 102nd Infantry Brigade remained in Farkašić, detached from the main offensive force in Stankovac.[28]

On 13 December, at approximately 07:00, the independent HV armoured-mechanised unit advanced northwest along the Kupa, towards Gračanica. During the advance, one of the tanks was captured and its crew killed after the capture. Nearly simultaneously, the JNA commenced a tank and mortar attack against Stankovac and the river crossing at Šišinec. The HV armoured-mechanised unit and the 1st Battalion of the 102nd Infantry Brigade panicked, believing the crossing point was lost, and started to fall back to Šišinec in disarray, sustaining considerable casualties. Since there was no way to transport the remaining HV armour across the Kupa River, the tanks were destroyed by one of the force's own tanks. That tank was then destroyed with explosives to prevent its capture. As there were too few boats at the river crossing to allow a quick retreat, some of the troops swam across the river, causing several to drown in very cold water. The command post of the brigade fell back to Galdovo, while the troops started to retreat to Zagreb. The entire brigade was back in Zagreb by 15 December.[29]

Aftermath edit

While the JNA's casualties are not known, the HV sustained a loss of 18 killed and 18 wounded,[30] as well as a loss of eight tanks, two armoured personnel carriers and seven boats.[31] The 2,011-strong 102nd Infantry Brigade alone suffered 13 dead. Their names were later inscribed on a memorial plaque in Šišinec, at the Kupa River crossing point. In the aftermath of the offensive, there were speculations in Croatia that the casualties were much higher,[30] possibly as many as 60 killed and 200 wounded.[32]

A Croatian Serb paramilitary unit, "Šiltovi", based in Glina, is suspected of killing HV troops taken as prisoners of war during the retreat.[33] In addition, Croatian Serb forces killed 21 civilians in the Joševica massacre as retribution for the HV offensive.[34] The killing was investigated by SAO Krajina authorities, which concluded that the killings were in revenge for the deaths of 21 Serb paramilitaries in the village of Gračenica in Operation Whirlwind.[35] In 2010, Croatian authorities charged six individuals with war crimes committed in the village of Joševica.[34]

The failed offensive was investigated by the HV in 1991 and researched later by retired HV Brigadier Vlado Hodalj.[30] He concluded that the offensive failed because of overall poor planning and preparation, specifically citing the lack of reconnaissance and reserves.[36] Furthermore, Hodalj cited inadequate leadership by the Sisak OG as a cause of the failure, pointing to inaction in respect of the 10th Brigade's failure to advance and improper employment of the 2nd Guards Brigade in an auxiliary role,[37] protecting the flank of an inexperienced brigade that was committed to the offensive with little, if any, training.[38] Finally, the offensive itself had no clear goal.[39] Croatian Admiral Davor Domazet-Lošo also criticised the offensive as an unnecessary, purely tactical and politically counterproductive move, likely unauthorised by appropriate authorities.[40]

Hodalj praised the Sisak OG command for managing to keep the operation a secret until it was launched, making sure it would surprise the JNA. The secrecy was reflected in the apparent last-minute rerouting of the 102nd Infantry Brigade to the offensive, although the Zagreb Operational Zone deployed it to Sunja, to the east of Sisak. Still, the Sisak OG failed to prepare detailed river crossing plans, or even issue maps and written brigade-level commands for the crossings—relying on oral commands instead.[41] Likewise, the troops were not equipped to endure the cold weather in the open, limiting their effectiveness.[42] Hodalj concluded that the offensive exceeded needs and capabilities of the Sisak OG. Even though the 1991 HV investigation concluded that the offensive was prepared for ten days and was approved by Zagreb Operational Zone command, there are no documents pertaining to the preparations other than those issued by the Sisak OG itself.[43] Regardless of the poor preparation of the offensive, the 102nd Infantry Brigade was subject to public criticism in Croatia for fleeing the battlefield in the aftermath of Operation Whirlwind.[44]

Footnotes edit

References edit

Books
  • Bjelajac, Mile; Žunec, Ozren (2009). "The War in Croatia, 1991–1995". In Charles W. Ingrao; Thomas Allan Emmert (eds.). Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies: A Scholars' Initiative. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press. pp. 230–271. ISBN 978-1-55753-533-7. from the original on 2023-12-13. Retrieved 2016-10-19.
  • Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Russian and European Analysis (2002). Balkan Battlegrounds: A Military History of the Yugoslav Conflict, 1990–1995, Volume 2. Washington, D.C.: Central Intelligence Agency. ISBN 9780160664724. OCLC 50396958. from the original on 2023-02-08. Retrieved 2017-09-07.
  • Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. London, England: Routledge. 1999. ISBN 978-1-85743-058-5. from the original on 2023-01-10. Retrieved 2016-10-19.
  • Hoare, Marko Attila (2010). "The War of Yugoslav Succession". In Ramet, Sabrina P. (ed.). Central and Southeast European Politics Since 1989. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 111–136. ISBN 978-1-139-48750-4. from the original on 2023-02-08. Retrieved 2023-12-13.
  • Ramet, Sabrina P. (2006). The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building And Legitimation, 1918–2006. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-34656-8. from the original on 2023-01-12. Retrieved 2016-10-19.
Scientific journal articles
  • Hodalj, Vlado (December 1999). "102. brigada Hrvatske vojske u operaciji Vihor 1991. godine" [The 102nd brigade of the Croatian Army in the Operation Whirlwind in 1991]. Polemos: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research on War and Peace. 2 (3–4). Croatian Sociological Association and Jesenski & Turk Publishing House: 11–41. ISSN 1331-5595. from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2013-05-26.
  • Marijan, Davor (May 2012). "The Sarajevo Ceasefire – Realism or strategic error by the Croatian leadership?". Review of Croatian History. 7 (1). Croatian Institute of History: 103–123. ISSN 1845-4380. from the original on 2020-11-09. Retrieved 2013-05-26.
News reports
  • Bellamy, Christopher (10 October 1992). "Croatia built 'web of contacts' to evade weapons embargo". The Independent. from the original on 10 November 2012.
  • Bobinac, Vedrana; Garmaz, Željko (12 February 2000). "Tko je odgovoran za propast operacije "Vihor" i tragediju 102. zagrebaèke brigade na Kupi" [Who is responsible for the failure of the Operation Whirlwind and the tragedy of the 102nd Zagreb Brigade at Kupa] (PDF). Vjesnik (in Croatian). p. 3. (PDF) from the original on 30 November 2013.
  • Engelberg, Stephen (3 March 1991). "Belgrade Sends Troops to Croatia Town". The New York Times. from the original on 2 October 2013.
  • "Optužnica za zločine na Banovini" [Indictment for crimes in Banovina] (in Croatian). Croatian Radiotelevision. 9 November 2010. from the original on 12 June 2022. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  • Piškor, Mate (31 May 2008). "Grčka ga izručila, a Hrvatska oslobodila" [Greece extradited him, Croatia set him free]. Slobodna Dalmacija (in Croatian). from the original on 9 June 2008.
  • "Roads Sealed as Yugoslav Unrest Mounts". The New York Times. Reuters. 19 August 1990. from the original on 21 September 2013.
  • "Sisak: Prisjećanje na prvu vojno-oslobodilačku akciju u Domovinskom ratu" [Sisak: Remembrance of the first military-liberation operation in the Croatian War of Independence] (in Croatian). Index.hr. 18 October 2003. from the original on 30 November 2013.
  • Špeletić, Tomo Krešo (19 February 2000). "Istina o poginulim, nestalim i ranjenim pripadnicima 102. brigade u akciji "Vihor" na Kupi u prosincu '91" [Truth about killed, missing and wounded members of the 102nd Brigade in the Operation Whirlwind on Kupa in December 1991] (PDF). Vjesnik (in Croatian). p. 7. (PDF) from the original on 30 November 2013.
  • Sudetic, Chuck (18 November 1991). "Croats Concede Danube Town's Loss". The New York Times. from the original on 14 November 2013.
  • Sudetic, Chuck (2 April 1991). "Rebel Serbs Complicate Rift on Yugoslav Unity". The New York Times. from the original on 2 October 2013.
Other sources
  • Domazet-Lošo, Davor (27 June 2011). "Markov trg" [Mark's Square]. Jabuka TV (Television interview) (in Croatian). Interviewed by Marko Jurič. Zagreb, Croatia. from the original on 4 June 2016. Retrieved 1 December 2016.
  • Mihović, Domagoj (8 March 2008). "O brigadi" [About the brigade] (in Croatian). 102nd Infantry Brigade Veterans Club. from the original on 26 July 2013.
  • "Odluka" [Decision]. Narodne novine (in Croatian) (53). Narodne novine d.d. 8 October 1991. ISSN 1333-9273. from the original on 23 September 2009. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  • Vrcelj, Marko (2009). "Dopis Vojne pošte T-7917 Ministarstvu odbrane Srbije o ratnom putu 592. mtbr., kako bi jedan njezin pripadnik, koji je ranjen na području Gline, mogao ostvariti svoja prava" [A letter from the Military post T-7919 to the Ministry of defence of Serbia about the war history of the 592nd Mechanised Brigade, to allow one of its members, wounded in Glina area, to achieve his rights of 31 August 1992]. In Rupić, Marko (ed.). [The Republic of Croatia and the Croatian War of Independence 1990-1995 - Documents, volume 3] (PDF) (in Croatian). Zagreb, Croatia: Hrvatski memorijalno-dokumentacijski centar Domovinskog rata – Zagreb. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 June 2015. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  • "The Prosecutor vs. Milan Martic – Judgement" (PDF). International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. 12 June 2007. (PDF) from the original on 26 August 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  • "Yugoslavia: further reports of torture and deliberate and arbitrary killings in war zones". Amnesty International. March 1992. (PDF) from the original on 18 October 2011.

45°26′47″N 16°04′12″E / 45.44639°N 16.07000°E / 45.44639; 16.07000

operation, whirlwind, this, article, about, 1991, croatian, military, operation, soviet, intervention, hungary, hungarian, revolution, 1956, croatian, operacija, vihor, failed, croatian, army, offensive, banovina, region, croatia, fought, from, december, 1991,. This article is about the 1991 Croatian military operation For the Soviet intervention in Hungary see Hungarian Revolution of 1956 Operation Whirlwind Croatian Operacija Vihor 1 was a failed Croatian Army HV offensive in the Banovina region of Croatia fought from 11 13 December 1991 during the early stages of the Croatian War of Independence The offensive employed a single infantry brigade as the main attacking force supported by a bridging unit and a handful of tanks and armoured personnel carriers Although the offensive met hardly any resistance in its initial stage achieving tactical surprise the operation was poorly planned supported and executed as a result of limited training and combat experience The offensive established a short lived bridgehead evacuated in panic two days after the operation commenced under tank and mortar fire from the Yugoslav People s Army JNA deployed north of Glina Operation WhirlwindPart of the Croatian War of IndependenceOperation Whirlwind bridgeheadOperation Whirlwind bridgehead on the map of Croatia JNA held area in late December 1991 are highlighted red Date11 13 December 1991LocationBanovina CroatiaResultSerbian victoryBelligerents CroatiaYugoslavia SAO KrajinaCommanders and leadersBozo Budimir Franc FerencakBosko DzombicStrength 2 100 1 500Casualties and losses18 killed 18 wounded20 killed 3 POW 1 missing The operation was criticised for its poor planning and execution insufficient preparation reconnaissance and training and inappropriate command and control methods applied by the Sisak Operational Group in charge of the offensive It also lacked clear objectives Afterwards Croatian military authorities investigated the offensive but found that there was very little written documentation including written unit level orders pertaining to the operation That led Admiral Davor Domazet Loso to conclude that the offensive was not formally authorised The formal investigation did not specifically charge anyone with the failures simply specifying the problems observed instead Contents 1 Background 2 Order of battle 3 Timeline 4 Aftermath 5 Footnotes 6 ReferencesBackground editMain article Croatian War of Independence In 1990 following the electoral defeat of the government of the Socialist Republic of Croatia ethnic tensions worsened The Yugoslav People s Army Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija JNA confiscated Croatia s Territorial Defence Teritorijalna obrana TO weapons to minimize resistance 2 On 17 August the tensions escalated into an open revolt by Croatian Serbs 3 centred on the predominantly Serb populated areas of the Dalmatian hinterland around Knin 4 parts of the Lika Kordun Banovina and eastern Croatia 5 This was followed by two unsuccessful attempts by Serbia supported by Montenegro and Serbia s provinces of Vojvodina and Kosovo to obtain the Yugoslav Presidency s approval for a JNA operation to disarm Croatian security forces in January 1991 6 After a bloodless skirmish between Serb insurgents and Croatian special police in March 7 the JNA itself supported by Serbia and its allies asked the Federal Presidency to give it wartime authorities and declare a state of emergency The request was denied on 15 March and the JNA came under the control of Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic Milosevic preferring a campaign to expand Serbia rather than to preserve Yugoslavia publicly threatened to replace the JNA with a Serbian army and declared that he no longer recognized the authority of the Federal Presidency 8 By the end of the month the conflict had escalated into the Croatian War of Independence 9 The JNA stepped in increasingly supporting the Croatian Serb insurgents and preventing Croatian police from intervening 8 In early April the leaders of the Croatian Serb revolt declared their intention to integrate the area under their control known as SAO Krajina with Serbia The Government of Croatia viewed this declaration as an attempt to secede 10 In May the Croatian government responded by forming the Croatian National Guard Zbor narodne garde ZNG 11 but its development was hampered by a United Nations UN arms embargo introduced in September 12 On 8 October Croatia declared independence from Yugoslavia 13 and a month later the ZNG was renamed the Croatian Army Hrvatska vojska HV 11 Late 1991 saw the fiercest fighting of the war as the 1991 Yugoslav campaign in Croatia culminated in the Siege of Dubrovnik 14 and the Battle of Vukovar 15 In western Slavonia the HV managed to push back the JNA at several points and secure Papuk Mountain in early December in Operation Otkos 10 16 Order of battle editThe principal force committed to the offensive planned by the HV Sisak Operational Group OG was the 102nd Infantry Brigade 17 attached to the Sisak OG by the Zagreb Operational Zone command as the single combat unit deployed as a reserve in the Sisak OG area of responsibility AOR 18 Besides the 102nd Brigade commanded by Captain Franc Ferencak 19 the Zagreb Operational Zone deployed an armoured mechanised unit attached directly to the Zagreb Operational Zone into the Sisak OG AOR 20 The unit consisted of eight tanks and two armoured personnel carriers 21 The Sisak OG assigned the 10th Brigade of the Croatian TO to support the right flank of the 102nd Infantry Brigade 22 Protection of the left flank was assigned to the 2nd Battalion of the 2nd Guards Brigade 23 supported by the 2nd Battalion of the 144th Infantry Brigade 22 To reinforce the 102nd Infantry Bridade and the independent armoured mechanised unit ten soldiers from the Glina Battalion were attached to each battalion of the 10th and 102nd brigades two soldiers were assigned to serve as guides for each tank In addition the Glina Battalion was tasked with reconnaissance harassment of JNA s rear and securing captured infrastructure 22 Sisak special police were assigned to support the Glina Battalion and indirectly the main offensive force The 36th Engineering Pontoon Battalion was tasked with the Kupa River crossing by the 102nd Infantry Brigade 24 The Sisak OG was commanded by Major General Bozo Budimir 25 The Croatian Serb TO and JNA defences immediately west of the city of Sisak and north of Glina were positioned along the right southern bank of the Kupa River largely consisting of the JNA 592nd and the 622nd Mechanised Brigades On the opposite bank the HV 100th Infantry Brigade held positions west of Sisak flanked by the 145th Infantry Brigade to its right and the 10th brigade of the Croatian TO further to the west 18 The planned main axis of the Operation Whirlwind extended across the 592nd Mechanised Brigade AOR commanded by Colonel Bosko Dzombic 26 Timeline edit nbsp A map of Operation Whirlwind Frontline in December 1991 HV advance 11 12 December 1991 HV bridgehead 11 13 December 1991The HV 102nd Infantry Brigade arrived at the Sisak OG AOR on 11 December 1992 and was ordered to undertake the offensive on the same evening at about 20 00 leaving no time for any preparation or reconnaissance A reconnaissance sabotage detachment of the HV Glina Battalion and the special police force were ferried across the Kupa River on the night of 11 12 December capturing the village of Stankovac and preparing to support the 102nd Infantry Brigade at the river crossing The 36th Engineering Pontoon Battalion completed a crossing point in the village of Sisinec by 4 00 and the lead elements of the 102nd Infantry Brigade crossed the Kupa River a half hour later 27 The river crossing was unopposed until 08 00 when the defending force launched a mortar attack against the crossing point Nonetheless the 1st Battalion of the 102nd Infantry Brigade cleared the river by 09 00 that morning and reached Stankovac 21 After spending three hours crossing the Kupa River by 13 00 the independent armoured mechanised unit was headed for Mala Solina 6 kilometres 3 7 miles to the south However the unit was intercepted by JNA armour and forced to turn back to Stankovac To further complicate the situation for the HV the 10th Brigade did not even start to move south while the 2nd Battalion of the 102nd Independent Brigade would not cross Kupa before its commander joined the unit at 16 00 21 The 3rd Battalion of the 102nd Infantry Brigade reached the village of Vratecko on the right southern bank of the Kupa River but was unable to join the force south of Kupa A bridge separating the battalion from the rest of the brigade remained out of HV s control 21 By the evening the 2nd Battalion was ordered to separate from the main axis of the offensive and protect the right flank of the 1st Battalion of the 102nd Brigade performing the task originally assigned to the 10th Brigade of the Croatian TO At the same time the 10th Brigade commanding officer was relieved of duty for failure to advance Regardless the unit remained inactive The HV units that managed to cross the river on 12 December surprised the JNA and reported inflicting considerable casualties 21 On the night of 12 13 December the air temperature dropped to 15 C 5 F and HV troops sought shelter in Stankovac until the morning shrinking the bridgehead held by the 102nd Infantry Brigade In addition the 36th Engineering Platoon Battalion removed engineering equipment from the Kupa crossing leaving behind only four to six boats The command post of the 102nd Infantry Brigade remained in Farkasic detached from the main offensive force in Stankovac 28 On 13 December at approximately 07 00 the independent HV armoured mechanised unit advanced northwest along the Kupa towards Gracanica During the advance one of the tanks was captured and its crew killed after the capture Nearly simultaneously the JNA commenced a tank and mortar attack against Stankovac and the river crossing at Sisinec The HV armoured mechanised unit and the 1st Battalion of the 102nd Infantry Brigade panicked believing the crossing point was lost and started to fall back to Sisinec in disarray sustaining considerable casualties Since there was no way to transport the remaining HV armour across the Kupa River the tanks were destroyed by one of the force s own tanks That tank was then destroyed with explosives to prevent its capture As there were too few boats at the river crossing to allow a quick retreat some of the troops swam across the river causing several to drown in very cold water The command post of the brigade fell back to Galdovo while the troops started to retreat to Zagreb The entire brigade was back in Zagreb by 15 December 29 Aftermath editWhile the JNA s casualties are not known the HV sustained a loss of 18 killed and 18 wounded 30 as well as a loss of eight tanks two armoured personnel carriers and seven boats 31 The 2 011 strong 102nd Infantry Brigade alone suffered 13 dead Their names were later inscribed on a memorial plaque in Sisinec at the Kupa River crossing point In the aftermath of the offensive there were speculations in Croatia that the casualties were much higher 30 possibly as many as 60 killed and 200 wounded 32 A Croatian Serb paramilitary unit Siltovi based in Glina is suspected of killing HV troops taken as prisoners of war during the retreat 33 In addition Croatian Serb forces killed 21 civilians in the Josevica massacre as retribution for the HV offensive 34 The killing was investigated by SAO Krajina authorities which concluded that the killings were in revenge for the deaths of 21 Serb paramilitaries in the village of Gracenica in Operation Whirlwind 35 In 2010 Croatian authorities charged six individuals with war crimes committed in the village of Josevica 34 The failed offensive was investigated by the HV in 1991 and researched later by retired HV Brigadier Vlado Hodalj 30 He concluded that the offensive failed because of overall poor planning and preparation specifically citing the lack of reconnaissance and reserves 36 Furthermore Hodalj cited inadequate leadership by the Sisak OG as a cause of the failure pointing to inaction in respect of the 10th Brigade s failure to advance and improper employment of the 2nd Guards Brigade in an auxiliary role 37 protecting the flank of an inexperienced brigade that was committed to the offensive with little if any training 38 Finally the offensive itself had no clear goal 39 Croatian Admiral Davor Domazet Loso also criticised the offensive as an unnecessary purely tactical and politically counterproductive move likely unauthorised by appropriate authorities 40 Hodalj praised the Sisak OG command for managing to keep the operation a secret until it was launched making sure it would surprise the JNA The secrecy was reflected in the apparent last minute rerouting of the 102nd Infantry Brigade to the offensive although the Zagreb Operational Zone deployed it to Sunja to the east of Sisak Still the Sisak OG failed to prepare detailed river crossing plans or even issue maps and written brigade level commands for the crossings relying on oral commands instead 41 Likewise the troops were not equipped to endure the cold weather in the open limiting their effectiveness 42 Hodalj concluded that the offensive exceeded needs and capabilities of the Sisak OG Even though the 1991 HV investigation concluded that the offensive was prepared for ten days and was approved by Zagreb Operational Zone command there are no documents pertaining to the preparations other than those issued by the Sisak OG itself 43 Regardless of the poor preparation of the offensive the 102nd Infantry Brigade was subject to public criticism in Croatia for fleeing the battlefield in the aftermath of Operation Whirlwind 44 Footnotes edit CIA 2002 p 225 Hoare 2010 p 117 Hoare 2010 p 118 The New York Times amp 19 August 1990 ICTY amp 12 June 2007 Hoare 2010 pp 118 119 Ramet 2006 pp 384 385 a b Hoare 2010 p 119 The New York Times amp 3 March 1991 The New York Times amp 2 April 1991 a b EECIS 1999 pp 272 278 The Independent amp 10 October 1992 Narodne novine amp 8 October 1991 Bjelajac amp Zunec 2009 pp 249 250 The New York Times amp 18 November 1991 Marijan 2012 pp 110 111 Hodalj 1999 pp 22 23 a b Hodalj 1999 p 16 102 InfBde Hodalj 1999 p 27 a b c d e Hodalj 1999 p 28 a b c Hodalj 1999 p 25 Hodalj 1999 p 22 Hodalj 1999 pp 25 27 Index hr amp 18 October 2003 HMDCDR 2009 p 228 Hodalj 1999 pp 27 28 Hodalj 1999 pp 28 30 Hodalj 1999 p 30 a b c Vjesnik amp 19 February 2000 Hodalj 1999 p 31 Vjesnik amp 12 February 2000 Slobodna Dalmacija amp 31 May 2008 a b HRT amp 9 November 2010 Amnesty International 1992 p 8 Hodalj 1999 pp 39 40 Hodalj 1999 pp 38 39 Hodalj 1999 pp 35 36 Hodalj 1999 p 33 Domazet amp 27 June 2011 Hodalj 1999 pp 34 35 Hodalj 1999 p 36 Hodalj 1999 pp 32 33 Hodalj 1999 p 41References editBooksBjelajac Mile Zunec Ozren 2009 The War in Croatia 1991 1995 In Charles W Ingrao Thomas Allan Emmert eds Confronting the Yugoslav Controversies A Scholars Initiative West Lafayette Indiana Purdue University Press pp 230 271 ISBN 978 1 55753 533 7 Archived from the original on 2023 12 13 Retrieved 2016 10 19 Central Intelligence Agency Office of Russian and European Analysis 2002 Balkan Battlegrounds A Military History of the Yugoslav Conflict 1990 1995 Volume 2 Washington D C Central Intelligence Agency ISBN 9780160664724 OCLC 50396958 Archived from the original on 2023 02 08 Retrieved 2017 09 07 Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States London England Routledge 1999 ISBN 978 1 85743 058 5 Archived from the original on 2023 01 10 Retrieved 2016 10 19 Hoare Marko Attila 2010 The War of Yugoslav Succession In Ramet Sabrina P ed Central and Southeast European Politics Since 1989 Cambridge England Cambridge University Press pp 111 136 ISBN 978 1 139 48750 4 Archived from the original on 2023 02 08 Retrieved 2023 12 13 Ramet Sabrina P 2006 The Three Yugoslavias State Building And Legitimation 1918 2006 Bloomington Indiana Indiana University Press ISBN 978 0 253 34656 8 Archived from the original on 2023 01 12 Retrieved 2016 10 19 Scientific journal articlesHodalj Vlado December 1999 102 brigada Hrvatske vojske u operaciji Vihor 1991 godine The 102nd brigade of the Croatian Army in the Operation Whirlwind in 1991 Polemos Journal of Interdisciplinary Research on War and Peace 2 3 4 Croatian Sociological Association and Jesenski amp Turk Publishing House 11 41 ISSN 1331 5595 Archived from the original on 2016 03 03 Retrieved 2013 05 26 Marijan Davor May 2012 The Sarajevo Ceasefire Realism or strategic error by the Croatian leadership Review of Croatian History 7 1 Croatian Institute of History 103 123 ISSN 1845 4380 Archived from the original on 2020 11 09 Retrieved 2013 05 26 News reportsBellamy Christopher 10 October 1992 Croatia built web of contacts to evade weapons embargo The Independent Archived from the original on 10 November 2012 Bobinac Vedrana Garmaz Zeljko 12 February 2000 Tko je odgovoran za propast operacije Vihor i tragediju 102 zagrebaeke brigade na Kupi Who is responsible for the failure of the Operation Whirlwind and the tragedy of the 102nd Zagreb Brigade at Kupa PDF Vjesnik in Croatian p 3 Archived PDF from the original on 30 November 2013 Engelberg Stephen 3 March 1991 Belgrade Sends Troops to Croatia Town The New York Times Archived from the original on 2 October 2013 Optuznica za zlocine na Banovini Indictment for crimes in Banovina in Croatian Croatian Radiotelevision 9 November 2010 Archived from the original on 12 June 2022 Retrieved 26 May 2013 Piskor Mate 31 May 2008 Grcka ga izrucila a Hrvatska oslobodila Greece extradited him Croatia set him free Slobodna Dalmacija in Croatian Archived from the original on 9 June 2008 Roads Sealed as Yugoslav Unrest Mounts The New York Times Reuters 19 August 1990 Archived from the original on 21 September 2013 Sisak Prisjecanje na prvu vojno oslobodilacku akciju u Domovinskom ratu Sisak Remembrance of the first military liberation operation in the Croatian War of Independence in Croatian Index hr 18 October 2003 Archived from the original on 30 November 2013 Speletic Tomo Kreso 19 February 2000 Istina o poginulim nestalim i ranjenim pripadnicima 102 brigade u akciji Vihor na Kupi u prosincu 91 Truth about killed missing and wounded members of the 102nd Brigade in the Operation Whirlwind on Kupa in December 1991 PDF Vjesnik in Croatian p 7 Archived PDF from the original on 30 November 2013 Sudetic Chuck 18 November 1991 Croats Concede Danube Town s Loss The New York Times Archived from the original on 14 November 2013 Sudetic Chuck 2 April 1991 Rebel Serbs Complicate Rift on Yugoslav Unity The New York Times Archived from the original on 2 October 2013 Other sourcesDomazet Loso Davor 27 June 2011 Markov trg Mark s Square Jabuka TV Television interview in Croatian Interviewed by Marko Juric Zagreb Croatia Archived from the original on 4 June 2016 Retrieved 1 December 2016 Mihovic Domagoj 8 March 2008 O brigadi About the brigade in Croatian 102nd Infantry Brigade Veterans Club Archived from the original on 26 July 2013 Odluka Decision Narodne novine in Croatian 53 Narodne novine d d 8 October 1991 ISSN 1333 9273 Archived from the original on 23 September 2009 Retrieved 26 May 2013 Vrcelj Marko 2009 Dopis Vojne poste T 7917 Ministarstvu odbrane Srbije o ratnom putu 592 mtbr kako bi jedan njezin pripadnik koji je ranjen na podrucju Gline mogao ostvariti svoja prava A letter from the Military post T 7919 to the Ministry of defence of Serbia about the war history of the 592nd Mechanised Brigade to allow one of its members wounded in Glina area to achieve his rights of 31 August 1992 In Rupic Marko ed Republika Hrvatska i Domovinski rat 1990 1995 Dokumenti Knjiga 3 The Republic of Croatia and the Croatian War of Independence 1990 1995 Documents volume 3 PDF in Croatian Zagreb Croatia Hrvatski memorijalno dokumentacijski centar Domovinskog rata Zagreb Archived from the original PDF on 10 June 2015 Retrieved 26 May 2013 The Prosecutor vs Milan Martic Judgement PDF International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia 12 June 2007 Archived PDF from the original on 26 August 2018 Retrieved 26 May 2013 Yugoslavia further reports of torture and deliberate and arbitrary killings in war zones Amnesty International March 1992 Archived PDF from the original on 18 October 2011 45 26 47 N 16 04 12 E 45 44639 N 16 07000 E 45 44639 16 07000 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Operation Whirlwind amp oldid 1189646809, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.