fbpx
Wikipedia

KIC 9832227

KIC 9832227 is a contact binary star system in the constellation Cygnus, located about 2,060 light-years away. It is also identified as an eclipsing binary with an orbital period of almost 11 hours.[4]

KIC 9832227

KIC 9832227 (circled)
Observation data
Epoch J2000      Equinox J2000
Constellation Cygnus
Right ascension 19h 29m 15.950s[1]
Declination +46° 37′ 19.86″[1]
Apparent magnitude (V) 12.27 – 12.46[2]
Characteristics
Spectral type K2III/IV[3]
Variable type Eclipsing[4]
Astrometry
Proper motion (μ) RA: −9.505[1] mas/yr
Dec.: −5.718[1] mas/yr
Parallax (π)1.5798 ± 0.0134 mas[1]
Distance2,060 ± 20 ly
(633 ± 5 pc)
Orbit[5]
Period (P)0.4282579 days
Semi-major axis (a)2.992 R
Inclination (i)53.2°
Periastron epoch (T)2455688.49913
Details[5]
A
Mass1.395 M
Radius1.581 R
Luminosity2.609 L
Surface gravity (log g)4.19 cgs
Temperature5800 K
Rotational velocity (v sin i)149.7 km/s
B
Mass0.318 M
Radius0.830 R
Luminosity0.789 L
Surface gravity (log g)4.10 cgs
Temperature5920 K
Rotational velocity (v sin i)84.7 km/s
Other designations
2MASS J19291594+4637198, KIC 9832227, ASAS J192916+4637.3, GSC 03543-01211
Database references
SIMBADdata
KICdata

Incorrect 2022 merger prediction edit

 
A light curve for KIC 9832227, plotted from TESS data[6]

In 2017, the system was predicted to result in a merger in 2022.2 (± 0.6 years), producing a luminous red nova (LRN) reaching an apparent magnitude of 2,[7] or about the brightness of Polaris, the North Star. The LRN would remain visible to the naked eye for roughly a month. The merger of the two stellar cores was predicted to give birth to a new, hotter, more massive main-sequence star. However, a reanalysis of the data in September 2018 revealed that the prediction had been based on a wrongly timed observation, negating the predicted merger.[8][9][10]

The period of the variations in KIC 9832227 has been observed to be growing shorter since 2013, leading to the prediction of the merger in or around 2022.[11] In September 2018, it was announced that the original prediction was based on a dataset which timing had been erroneously offset by 12 hours—an error which appeared to exaggerate the decay rate of the orbital period. Correcting for the error shows that the period had actually been increasing up to about 2008. The cause for the period variation is still unknown, but it was determined the system would not be merging at the predicted time.[8][9][12]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b c d e Vallenari, A.; et al. (Gaia collaboration) (2023). "Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 674: A1. arXiv:2208.00211. Bibcode:2023A&A...674A...1G. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940. S2CID 244398875. Gaia DR3 record for this source at VizieR.
  2. ^ "ASAS J192916+4637.3". AAVSO. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  3. ^ Frasca, A.; Molenda-Żakowicz, J.; De Cat, P.; Catanzaro, G.; Fu, J. N.; Ren, A. B.; Luo, A. L.; Shi, J. R.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, H. T. (2016). "Activity indicators and stellar parameters of the Kepler targets. An application of the ROTFIT pipeline to LAMOST-Kepler stellar spectra". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 594. arXiv:1606.09149. Bibcode:2016A&A...594A..39F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628337. S2CID 119283349.
  4. ^ a b Kinemuchi, Karen (2013-10-01). "To Pulsate or to Eclipse? Status of KIC 9832227 Variable Star". arXiv:1310.0544 [astro-ph.SR].
  5. ^ a b Molnar, Lawrence A.; Van Noord, Daniel M.; Steenwyk, Steven D.; Spedden, Chris J.; Kinemuchi, Karen (2015). (PDF). American Astronomical Society. 225 (225): 415.05. Bibcode:2015AAS...22541505M. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 January 2017.
  6. ^ "MAST: Barbara A. Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes". Space Telescope Science Institute. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  7. ^ Molnar, Lawrence A.; Van Noord, Daniel; Kinemuchi, Karen; Smolinski, Jason P.; Alexander, Cara E.; Kobulnicky, Henry A.; Cook, Evan M.; Jang, Byoungchan; Steenwyk, Steven D. (2017). "KIC 9832227: A red nova precursor". American Astronomical Society. 229: 417.04. Bibcode:2017AAS...22941704M.
  8. ^ a b Molnar, Lawrence A. (7 September 2018). . calvin.edu. Archived from the original on 16 December 2018. Retrieved 8 September 2018.
  9. ^ a b Kucinski, Matt (7 September 2018). "Team of researchers challenge bold astronomical prediction". calvin.edu. Retrieved 8 September 2018.
  10. ^ Parks, Jake (7 September 2018). "Two stars will NOT merge and explode into red fury in 2022". astronomy.com.
  11. ^ Carlisle, Camille (6 January 2017). "Paired Stars in Cygnus En Route to Merger". Sky and Telescope. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
  12. ^ Socia, Quentin J.; Welsh, William F.; Short, Donald R.; Orosz, Jerome A.; Angione, Ronald J.; Windmiller, Gur; Caldwell, Douglas A.; Batalha, Natalie M. (11 September 2018). "KIC 9832227: Using Vulcan Data to Negate the 2022 Red Nova Merger Prediction". Astrophysical Journal Letters. 864 (2): L32. arXiv:1809.02771. Bibcode:2018ApJ...864L..32S. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aadc0d. S2CID 56134618.

External links edit

  • Molnar, Lawrence; et al. (4 January 2017). (PDF). Calvin College (draft ed.). Calvin College Group. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 January 2017. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
  • Knapton, Sarah (6 January 2017). "Spectacular collision of suns will create new star in night sky in 2022". The Telegraph. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  • Byrd, Deborah (6 January 2017). "Star predicted to explode in 2022". EarthSky. EarthSky Communications. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  • Masi, Gianluca (11 January 2017). "Star merging in KIC 9832227: a possible once-in-a-lifetime event". Virtual Telescope Project. Retrieved 11 January 2017.


9832227, contact, binary, star, system, constellation, cygnus, located, about, light, years, away, also, identified, eclipsing, binary, with, orbital, period, almost, hours, circled, observation, dataepoch, j2000, equinox, j2000, constellation, cygnus, right, . KIC 9832227 is a contact binary star system in the constellation Cygnus located about 2 060 light years away It is also identified as an eclipsing binary with an orbital period of almost 11 hours 4 KIC 9832227KIC 9832227 circled Observation dataEpoch J2000 Equinox J2000 Constellation Cygnus Right ascension 19h 29m 15 950s 1 Declination 46 37 19 86 1 Apparent magnitude V 12 27 12 46 2 Characteristics Spectral type K2III IV 3 Variable type Eclipsing 4 AstrometryProper motion m RA 9 505 1 mas yr Dec 5 718 1 mas yrParallax p 1 5798 0 0134 mas 1 Distance2 060 20 ly 633 5 pc Orbit 5 Period P 0 4282579 daysSemi major axis a 2 992 R Inclination i 53 2 Periastron epoch T 2455688 49913 Details 5 AMass1 395 M Radius1 581 R Luminosity2 609 L Surface gravity log g 4 19 cgsTemperature5800 KRotational velocity v sin i 149 7 km sBMass0 318 M Radius0 830 R Luminosity0 789 L Surface gravity log g 4 10 cgsTemperature5920 KRotational velocity v sin i 84 7 km s Other designations2MASS J19291594 4637198 KIC 9832227 ASAS J192916 4637 3 GSC 03543 01211 Database referencesSIMBADdataKICdata Contents 1 Incorrect 2022 merger prediction 2 See also 3 References 4 External linksIncorrect 2022 merger prediction edit nbsp A light curve for KIC 9832227 plotted from TESS data 6 In 2017 the system was predicted to result in a merger in 2022 2 0 6 years producing a luminous red nova LRN reaching an apparent magnitude of 2 7 or about the brightness of Polaris the North Star The LRN would remain visible to the naked eye for roughly a month The merger of the two stellar cores was predicted to give birth to a new hotter more massive main sequence star However a reanalysis of the data in September 2018 revealed that the prediction had been based on a wrongly timed observation negating the predicted merger 8 9 10 The period of the variations in KIC 9832227 has been observed to be growing shorter since 2013 leading to the prediction of the merger in or around 2022 11 In September 2018 it was announced that the original prediction was based on a dataset which timing had been erroneously offset by 12 hours an error which appeared to exaggerate the decay rate of the orbital period Correcting for the error shows that the period had actually been increasing up to about 2008 The cause for the period variation is still unknown but it was determined the system would not be merging at the predicted time 8 9 12 See also editStellar collisionReferences edit a b c d e Vallenari A et al Gaia collaboration 2023 Gaia Data Release 3 Summary of the content and survey properties Astronomy and Astrophysics 674 A1 arXiv 2208 00211 Bibcode 2023A amp A 674A 1G doi 10 1051 0004 6361 202243940 S2CID 244398875 Gaia DR3 record for this source at VizieR ASAS J192916 4637 3 AAVSO Retrieved 7 January 2017 Frasca A Molenda Zakowicz J De Cat P Catanzaro G Fu J N Ren A B Luo A L Shi J R Wu Y Zhang H T 2016 Activity indicators and stellar parameters of the Kepler targets An application of the ROTFIT pipeline to LAMOST Kepler stellar spectra Astronomy and Astrophysics 594 arXiv 1606 09149 Bibcode 2016A amp A 594A 39F doi 10 1051 0004 6361 201628337 S2CID 119283349 a b Kinemuchi Karen 2013 10 01 To Pulsate or to Eclipse Status of KIC 9832227 Variable Star arXiv 1310 0544 astro ph SR a b Molnar Lawrence A Van Noord Daniel M Steenwyk Steven D Spedden Chris J Kinemuchi Karen 2015 A prediction of a luminous red nova eruption PDF American Astronomical Society 225 225 415 05 Bibcode 2015AAS 22541505M Archived from the original PDF on 7 January 2017 MAST Barbara A Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes Space Telescope Science Institute Retrieved 8 December 2021 Molnar Lawrence A Van Noord Daniel Kinemuchi Karen Smolinski Jason P Alexander Cara E Kobulnicky Henry A Cook Evan M Jang Byoungchan Steenwyk Steven D 2017 KIC 9832227 A red nova precursor American Astronomical Society 229 417 04 Bibcode 2017AAS 22941704M a b Molnar Lawrence A 7 September 2018 Supplementary material to Calvin College press release Team of researchers challenge bold astronomical prediction September 7 2018 calvin edu Archived from the original on 16 December 2018 Retrieved 8 September 2018 a b Kucinski Matt 7 September 2018 Team of researchers challenge bold astronomical prediction calvin edu Retrieved 8 September 2018 Parks Jake 7 September 2018 Two stars will NOT merge and explode into red fury in 2022 astronomy com Carlisle Camille 6 January 2017 Paired Stars in Cygnus En Route to Merger Sky and Telescope Retrieved 12 January 2017 Socia Quentin J Welsh William F Short Donald R Orosz Jerome A Angione Ronald J Windmiller Gur Caldwell Douglas A Batalha Natalie M 11 September 2018 KIC 9832227 Using Vulcan Data to Negate the 2022 Red Nova Merger Prediction Astrophysical Journal Letters 864 2 L32 arXiv 1809 02771 Bibcode 2018ApJ 864L 32S doi 10 3847 2041 8213 aadc0d S2CID 56134618 External links editMolnar Lawrence et al 4 January 2017 Prediction of a Red Nova Outburst in KIC 9832227 PDF Calvin College draft ed Calvin College Group Archived from the original PDF on 7 January 2017 Retrieved 8 January 2017 Knapton Sarah 6 January 2017 Spectacular collision of suns will create new star in night sky in 2022 The Telegraph Retrieved 7 January 2017 Byrd Deborah 6 January 2017 Star predicted to explode in 2022 EarthSky EarthSky Communications Retrieved 7 January 2017 Masi Gianluca 11 January 2017 Star merging in KIC 9832227 a possible once in a lifetime event Virtual Telescope Project Retrieved 11 January 2017 Portals nbsp Astronomy nbsp Stars nbsp Spaceflight nbsp Outer space nbsp Solar System nbsp This binary or multiple star system related article is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte nbsp This variable star related article is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title KIC 9832227 amp oldid 1194466947, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.